河长制在促进完善流域生态补偿机制中的作用研究
|
摘要
河长制平台在促进完善流域生态补偿机制方面具有非常重要的作用,是实现流域水环境可持续管理的关键突破口。本研究梳理了完善流域生态补偿机制的必要性,分析了利用河长制平台完善流域生态补偿机制的可行性,并以跨界断面监测为技术衔接点,以完善跨界断面的设置、考核指标和考核目标作为突破点,利用河长制的高位推动、组织体系和部门联动,从技术方法、监测体系和补偿方式三个方面提出了完善流域生态补偿机制的建议:一是发挥河长制科技支撑作用,完善流域生态补偿技术方法;二是发挥河长制部门协同作用,完善流域生态补偿监测体系;三是发挥河长制统筹兼顾作用,完善流域生态补偿方式。
The river chief system plays a very important role in promoting the basin eco-compensation mechanism, and is the key breakthrough to realize the sustainable management of basin water environment. This study combs the necessity of the improvement of basin eco-compensation mechanism, and analyzes the feasibility of its improvement by using the river chief system. This study takes the transboundary cross-section monitoring as the technical point, and the improvement of transboundary cross-section monitoring station setting, assessment indices and targets as breakthrough point. Relying on the high position promotion, organization system and department linkage of the river chief system, suggestions are put forward to improve the basin eco-compensation mechanism from three aspects including technical method, monitoring system and compensation mode. One is to bring into play the scientific and technological supporting role of the river chief system, improve the technology and method for basin eco-compensation. Second is to bring into play the department linkage of the river chief system, improve the monitoring system for basin eco-compensation. Third is to bring into play the overall planning and all-round consideration of the river chief system, improve the compensation mode for basin eco-compensation.
The river chief system plays a very important role in promoting the basin eco-compensation mechanism, and is the key breakthrough to realize the sustainable management of basin water environment. This study combs the necessity of the improvement of basin eco-compensation mechanism, and analyzes the feasibility of its improvement by using the river chief system. This study takes the transboundary cross-section monitoring as the technical point, and the improvement of transboundary cross-section monitoring station setting, assessment indices and targets as breakthrough point. Relying on the high position promotion, organization system and department linkage of the river chief system, suggestions are put forward to improve the basin eco-compensation mechanism from three aspects including technical method, monitoring system and compensation mode. One is to bring into play the scientific and technological supporting role of the river chief system, improve the technology and method for basin eco-compensation. Second is to bring into play the department linkage of the river chief system, improve the monitoring system for basin eco-compensation. Third is to bring into play the overall planning and all-round consideration of the river chief system, improve the compensation mode for basin eco-compensation.
引文
[1]张军.流域水环境生态补偿实践与进展[J].中国环境监测, 2014, 30(1):191-195.
[2]SHANG W X, GONG Y C, WANG Z J, et al. Eco-compensation inChina:Theory, practices and suggestions for the future[J]. Journal ofenvironmental management, 2018, 210:162-170.
[3]李干杰.“生态保护红线”——确保国家生态安全的生命线[J].求是,2014(2):44-46.
[4]ZHANG L Y. Distributed leadership in drainage basin management:a critical analysis of ‘river chief policy’ from a distributed leadershipperspective[C]//IOPConferenceSeries:EarthandEnvironmentalScience. IOP Publishing, 2018, 113:012123.
[5]左其亭,韩春华,韩春辉,等.河长制理论基础及支撑体系研究[J].人民黄河, 2017, 39(6):1-6.
[6]张捷,谌莹.河长制再设计:行政问责与横向生态补偿[J].财经智库,2018, 3(2):67-83, 141-142.
[7]刘聚涛,万怡国,许小华,等.江西省河长制实施现状及其建议[J].中国水利, 2016(18):51-53.
[8]阮本清,许凤冉,张春玲.流域生态补偿研究进展与实践[J].水利学报,2008, 39(10):1220-1225.
[9]王军锋,吴雅晴,姜银萍,等.基于补偿标准设计的流域生态补偿制度运行机制和补偿模式研究[J].环境保护, 2017, 45(7):38-43.
[10]孙晓莉.完善地表水跨界断面水质生态补偿考核机制的建议[J].能源与节能, 2011(7):57-58.
[11]王晓,逄勇,沈春其,等.太湖流域跨界水环境动态监测点位优化布局[J].水资源保护, 2017, 33(5):130-137.
[12]贾纪立.赤水河流域生态补偿机制的实践[J].法制与社会, 2016(12):178-179.
[13]黎元生,胡熠.流域生态环境整体性治理的路径探析——基于河长制改革的视角[J].中国特色社会主义研究, 2017, 1(4):73-77.
[14]CHIEN S S, HONG D L. River leaders in China:party-state hierarchyand transboundary governance[J]. Political geography, 2018, 62:58-67.
[15]张丛林,张爽,杨威杉,等.福建生态文明试验区全面推行河长制评估研究[J].中国环境管理, 2018, 10(3):59-64.
[16]姜斌.对河长制管理制度问题的思考[J].中国水利, 2016(21):6-7.
[17]任敏.“河长制”:一个中国政府流域治理跨部门协同的样本研究[J].北京行政学院学报, 2015(3):25-31.
[18]邝俊侠,黄祖照,陈彦宁,等.在线声学多普勒流量仪对天然河流污染物通量监测研究[J].现代科学仪器, 2017(2):72-77.
[19]胡旭珺,周翟尤佳,张惠远,等.国际生态补偿实践经验及对我国的启示[J].环境保护, 2018, 46(2):76-79.
[2]SHANG W X, GONG Y C, WANG Z J, et al. Eco-compensation inChina:Theory, practices and suggestions for the future[J]. Journal ofenvironmental management, 2018, 210:162-170.
[3]李干杰.“生态保护红线”——确保国家生态安全的生命线[J].求是,2014(2):44-46.
[4]ZHANG L Y. Distributed leadership in drainage basin management:a critical analysis of ‘river chief policy’ from a distributed leadershipperspective[C]//IOPConferenceSeries:EarthandEnvironmentalScience. IOP Publishing, 2018, 113:012123.
[5]左其亭,韩春华,韩春辉,等.河长制理论基础及支撑体系研究[J].人民黄河, 2017, 39(6):1-6.
[6]张捷,谌莹.河长制再设计:行政问责与横向生态补偿[J].财经智库,2018, 3(2):67-83, 141-142.
[7]刘聚涛,万怡国,许小华,等.江西省河长制实施现状及其建议[J].中国水利, 2016(18):51-53.
[8]阮本清,许凤冉,张春玲.流域生态补偿研究进展与实践[J].水利学报,2008, 39(10):1220-1225.
[9]王军锋,吴雅晴,姜银萍,等.基于补偿标准设计的流域生态补偿制度运行机制和补偿模式研究[J].环境保护, 2017, 45(7):38-43.
[10]孙晓莉.完善地表水跨界断面水质生态补偿考核机制的建议[J].能源与节能, 2011(7):57-58.
[11]王晓,逄勇,沈春其,等.太湖流域跨界水环境动态监测点位优化布局[J].水资源保护, 2017, 33(5):130-137.
[12]贾纪立.赤水河流域生态补偿机制的实践[J].法制与社会, 2016(12):178-179.
[13]黎元生,胡熠.流域生态环境整体性治理的路径探析——基于河长制改革的视角[J].中国特色社会主义研究, 2017, 1(4):73-77.
[14]CHIEN S S, HONG D L. River leaders in China:party-state hierarchyand transboundary governance[J]. Political geography, 2018, 62:58-67.
[15]张丛林,张爽,杨威杉,等.福建生态文明试验区全面推行河长制评估研究[J].中国环境管理, 2018, 10(3):59-64.
[16]姜斌.对河长制管理制度问题的思考[J].中国水利, 2016(21):6-7.
[17]任敏.“河长制”:一个中国政府流域治理跨部门协同的样本研究[J].北京行政学院学报, 2015(3):25-31.
[18]邝俊侠,黄祖照,陈彦宁,等.在线声学多普勒流量仪对天然河流污染物通量监测研究[J].现代科学仪器, 2017(2):72-77.
[19]胡旭珺,周翟尤佳,张惠远,等.国际生态补偿实践经验及对我国的启示[J].环境保护, 2018, 46(2):76-79.