用户名: 密码: 验证码:
基于突发事件风险的供应链利益分配与行为决策研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
供应链打破了企业的界限,是一条联结企业之间物流、信息流、资金流的功能网链,供应链管理已经成为企业的“第三利润源”。为了提高供应链的效率,很多企业采用了新战略,比如外包、单一供应源、集中分销等等,这都使得供应链变得更加复杂,更加脆弱,因而极易受到来自外部环境和供应链上各参与主体的突发事件的影响。近年来,频发的突发事件对企业间的供应链造成严重影响,它可能造成供应链中交通设施不可用或延迟使用、原材料供应的暂时中断,还可能造成信息通道的堵塞、需求的巨大波动等从而导致巨大的经济损失。突发事件改变了供应链企业传统的思维模型。面对多变的供应链内外部环境,针对目前在供应链突发事件研究的空白,本文以供应链管理理论为基础,结合应急管理对供应链突发事件应急决策进行了深入的研究,具体包括以下内容:
     (1)针对定价推动型和需求拉动型两种典型的供应链分别探讨了突发事件成本风险和需求风险的传递机制。借助博弈论的思想分析了生产商和零售商双方的决策思维和定价策略,分别计算了其利润对成本以及利润对需求的风险弹性,并通过MATLAB对具体的算例进行了模拟,分析了随着原材料成本、需求总量以及需求弹性系数的变化,如何引起供应链利润发生风险波动,阐述了突发事件所引起的风险在供应链中传递的机制。
     (2)以资源投入和资源贡献率为基准,将突发事件作为供应链管理中影响供应链节点企业利益分配问题的一个重要因素,提出考虑突发事件风险的供应链利益分配机制,提供了协调供应链的利益分配方法。阐述了影响供应链利益分配的主要因素的,比较了正常情况和考虑突发事件情况下利益分配的不同之处,研究了在正常情况、考虑外部突发事件及考虑内部突发事件情况下,1对1供应链和1对多供应链各自的利益分配类型、方法及模式。
     (3)运用博弈论理论深入研究了考虑突发事件风险情况下供应链企业的决策模式和思维方式,进一步考察了供应链企业群体之间的利益分配规律。运用群体博弈理论和方法,按照供应链内各企业主体地位的不同和突发事件来源不同,并通过组合建立了四种考虑突发事件风险的供应链企业博弈模型。将突发事件发生的概率作为变量,研究了不同情况下基于突发事件的供应链群体博弈结果及博弈主体各自的效益分配方案。
     (4)针对考虑突发事件风险情况下供应链成员企业间存在矛盾问题,提出以物理-事理-人理(WSR)方法为指导,运用应急管理等管理理论对供应链突成员企业行为进行协调。首先对供应链突发事件“物理”因素进行分析,提出了一系列的针对性措施以减少供应链系统的不稳定性,然后运用供应链应急协调的“事理”对“物理”进行统筹规划,构建供应链突发事件应急协调的机制,以指导供应链系统应急协调的流程。最后,兼顾“人理”因素,通过各种措施加强供应链系统中企业的合作意识,实现“人理”协同。
     (5)针对我国造船供应链突发风险问题,分析了造船供应链突发风险的特点及利益分配的机制。并通过对RSZG造船供应链协作商CAD/CAM工作网络系统突发事件,实证分析了突发事件对该供应链的影响。运用内部突发事件1对多供应链群体博弈模型仿真了突发事件发生的概率对供应链中不同地位的企业效益分配的影响,并根据突发事件发生的概率分析了各企业采取的行动。
     在经济社会日益复杂的今天,考虑突发事件风险情况下的供应链企业利益分配与行为决策,无论在理论上,还是实践中都具有重要的理论意义和参考价值。
Supply chain has broken the boundaries between enterprises, it is a function link of network chain among logistics, information flow and capital flow, and has become "the third profit source". Many enterprises adopt new strategy, such as outsourcing, singleness supplier, concentration distribution and so on, to improve the efficiency of the supply chain, which makes the supply chain more complex and vulnerable to the impact of unexpected events from internal and external. Recently, the frequent occurrence of emergencies has played a serious impact on the inter-enterprise supply chain. It may result in transportation facilities are not available or delay the use of a temporary interruption of supply of raw materials of the supply chain, but also may result in blockage of information channel, demand fluctuations resulting in huge economic losses to the supply chain. Emergencies change the supply chain business model of traditional thinking. At present, as a hot area of research, most of the supply chain research focuses on under normal supply chain management. Facing of changing external environment within the supply chain, and under the current environment, based on supply chain management theory, with emergency management of the supply chain of emergency decision-making this thesis conducts in-depth study of specific include the following:
     Firstly, two kind supply chain risk transmission model are constructed which are price pusher and demand puller. Each was discussed under the situations with inventory and without inventory. The transmission effect of supply chain risk mainly reflected on the risk of fluctuations in manufacture's and retailer's profits. To watch the risk transmission effects intuitively, this dissertation did example analyses for each model above with MATLAB, and gave corresponding conclusions. According to the previous studies, some tactics for supply chain risk management are presented.
     Secondly, resource inputs and the contribution rate as the benchmark, the emergency incidents as a supply chain management, supply chain nodes that affect the distribution of business interests is an important factor in the risk of unexpected events that it will consider the interests of the supply chain, distribution mechanism, providing the coordination of the supply chain method of distribution of benefits. Described the distribution of benefits that affect the supply chain, the main factors, and compared to normal circumstances and take into account emergency situations the difference between the distribution of benefits was studied in normal circumstances, to consider the external unexpected events and unexpected events to consider the internal situation,1 to a supply chain, and 1 for n supply chain, distribution of interests of their respective types, methods and models.
     Thirdly, the supply chain business decision-making patterns and ways of thinking are studied using game theory and considering emergency risk. And further examine the supply chain, distribution of benefits among business groups, law. In accordance with the supply chain the dominant position of enterprises of different and unexpected events from different sources, and through the establishment of the four kinds of combinations to consider the risk of unexpected events game model of supply chain enterprises. The probability of unexpected events will occur as a variable to study the different cases of supply chain based on emergencies game results and game groups, the main benefits of their distribution program.
     Fourthly, this thesis has a research on the emergency coordination mechanism in supply chain under disruption by the method of WSR and a series of emergency management theory. Firstly, this thesis analyses the“Wuli”factor of the emergency coordination mechanism in supply chain under disruption, and proposes a series of pointed measures to reduce the instability of supply chain system. Secondly, this thesis makes use of the“Shili”to make overall plans of "Wuli", which is helpful to establishing the emergency coordination mechanism in supply chain under disruption and conducting the flow of emergency coordination. Finally, takes the factor of "Renli" into account, this thesis enhances the awareness of cooperation among enterprises in supply chain by all kind measures and realizes the coordination of the three factors.
     Fifthly, using the Shipbuilding Supply Chain of RSZG for example, empirical analysis of the probability of unexpected events in different positions in the supply chain, the impact of the distribution of enterprise efficiency, and the face of unexpected events throughout the supply chain than the non-cooperative inter-firm cooperation beneficial to the conclusion. Through practice, the emergence of new problems, new research could be inspired by the phenomenon of workers in a more realistic theory of the coordination mechanism, which could further guide practice.
     In today's increasingly complex of economy and society, it has important significant to consider the risk of emergency in case of corporate decision-making and coordination of the supply chain, whether in theory or in practice.
引文
[1]牛春阳.收益共享契约下供应链的应急管理研究[D].西安电子科技大学.2009
    [2]许明辉.供应链中的应急管理[D].武汉大学.2005
    [3]Xu M, Qi X, Yu G. The demand disruption management problem for a supply chain systemwith nonlinear demand functions[J]. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering.2003,12(1):1-16 P
    [4]雷臻,徐玖平.供应链中突发事件的应急管理探讨[J].项目管理技术.2004(5):26-29页
    [5]于辉,陈剑,于刚.回购契约下供应链对突发事件的协调应对[J].系统工程理论与实践.2005(8):38-43页
    [6]于辉,陈剑,于刚.协调供应链如何应对突发事件[J].系统工程理论与实践.2005(7):9-16页
    [7]Veronneau S., Roy J. Global service supply chains:An empirical study of current practices and challenges of a cruise line corporation[J]. Tourism Management.2009,30(1):128-139 P
    [8]刘家国,孔祥雨.供应链协调管理中存在的障碍分析[J].情报杂志.2007,26(9):71-73页
    [9]Sheffi Y. Supply chain management under the threat of international terrorism[J]. International Journal of Logistics Management.2001,12(2): 1-11P
    [10]Qi X.T., Bard J., Yu G. Supply chain coordination with demand disruptions[J]. Omega.2004,32(4):301-312 P
    [11]Yang J., Qi X., Yu G. Disruption management in production planning[J]. Naval Research Logistics.2005,52:420-443 P
    [12]Xia Y, Yang M, Golany B. Real time disruptionmanagement in a two-stage production and inventory system[J]. IIETransactions.2004,36:11-125 P
    [13]Xiao T, Yu G. Supply chain disruption management and evolutionarily stable strategies of retailers in the quantity-setting duopoly situation with homogeneous goods[J]. European Journal of Operational Research (forthcoming).2006,173(2):648-668 P
    [14]张松,佟仁城,汪寿阳,et al.地震对磷产品供应链的影响分析及应对策略[J].管理评论.2008,20(12):30-34页
    [15]Moinzadeh K, Aggarwal P. Analysis of a production/inventory system subject to random disruptions[J]. Management Science.1997,43: 1577-1588 P
    [16]Abboud N.E. A discrete-time Markov production-inventory model with machine breakdowns[J]. Computers&Industrial Engineering.2001,39: 95-107 P
    [17]鲁其辉,朱道立.含交付时间不确定性的供应链协调策略研究[J].管理科学学报.2008,11(2):50-60页
    [18]Parlar Mahmut. Continuous-review inventory problem with random supply interruptions [J]. European Journal of Operation Research.1997,99:366-385
    [19]Li Z.L., Xu S.H., Hayya J. A periodic-review inventory systemwith supply interruptions [J]. Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences. 2004,18:33-53 P
    [20]Anupindi R., Akella R. Diversification under supply uncertainty[J]. Management Science.1993,39(8):944-963 P
    [21]Gurler, ParlarM. An inventory problemwith two randomly available suppliers[J]. Operations Research.1997,45:904-918 P
    [22]Tomlin B., Wang Y. On the value of mix flexibility and dual sourcing in unreliable newsvendor networks[J]. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management.2005,7(1):37-57 P
    [23]NEUMANN V, MORGENSTERN O. Theory of games and economic behaviour[M], Princetion:Princeton University Press.1947
    [24]PAUL A SAMUELSON, WILLIAM D. Microeconomics[M], New York: McGraw Hill Companies, Inc. 1998, P
    [25]胡本勇,彭其渊.基于广告一研发的供应链合作博弈分析[J].管理科学学报.2008,11(2):61-70页
    [26]Reyniers Diane J, Tapiero Charles S. The delivery and control of quality in supplier-producercontracts[J]. Management Science.1995,41(10): 1581-1589 P
    [27]Lim Wei Shi. A lemons market?An incentive scheme to induce truth-telling in third party logistics providers[J]. European Journal of Operational Research.2000,125(3):519-525 P
    [28]Gupta U. Multi-Event Crisis Management using non-cooperative repeated games[D]. Tampa:Univ South Florida.2004
    [29]An Lianjun, Jeng J.J., Ettl Markus, et al. A system dynamics framework for Sense-and-Respond systems[C]. in IEEE International Conference on E-Commerce Technology for Dynamic E-Business[A].2004
    [30]姚杰,计雷,池宏.突发事件应急管理中的动态博弈分析[J].管理评论.2005,(3):44-50页
    [31]Luo S., Yu G."On the Airline Schedule Perturbation Problem Caused by the Ground Delay Program"[J].Transportation Science.1997,1.31(4):298-311
    [32]Wei G., Yu G., Song M. Optimization Model and Algorithm for Crew Management During Irregular Operations[J]. Journal of Combinatorial Optimization.19971.1(3):80-97 P
    [33]Yu G., Yang J. On the Robust Shortest Path Problem[J]. Computers and Operations Research.1998,1.25(6):457-468 P
    [34]Thengvall B., Bard J., Yu G. Balancing user preferences for aircraft schedule recovery during irregular operations[J]. IIE Transactions on Operations Engineering.2000,1.32(3):181-193 P
    [35]Bard J. F., Yu G., Arguello M.F."A Time-Band Optimization Model for the Irregular Operations Problem"[J]. IIE Transactions on Operations Engineering.2001 Vol.33(10):931-947 P
    [36]Xia Y, Qi X., Yu G. Real-time production and inventory disruption management under continuous rate EPQ model [J]. Naval research logistic. 2002 P
    [37]Xia Y, Yang J., Golany B., et al. Real-time disruption managemnet in a two stage production and inventory system[J]. IEE Transaction.2002(36):1-15 P
    [38]Qi X, Bard J, Yu G. Supply chain coordination with demand disruptions[J]. Omega.2004,32:301-312 P
    [39]徐家旺,黄小原.电子市场环境下需求不确定供应链多目标鲁棒运作模型[J].系统工程.2006,(5):65-69页
    [40]黄小原,晏妮娜.供应链鲁棒性问题的研究进展[J].管理学报.2007(4):521-528页
    [41]邱若臻,黄小原.电子市场环境下供应链运作的鲁棒优化模型[J].管理工程学报.2007(4):143-146页
    [42]徐家旺,黄小原,邱若臻.需求不确定环境下闭环供应链的鲁棒运作策略设计[J].中国管理科学.2007(6):111-117页
    [43]晏妮娜,黄小原.Internet下的双源渠道动态模型及鲁棒H_∞控制[J].控制工程.2007(5):555-559页
    [44]Swam inathan J M, Simith S F. Sadeh N M. Modelingsupplychain dynamics:Amulti-Agentapproach[J]. Decision Science.1998,29(3): 607-632 P
    [45]Kalakota R., Stallaert J., Whinstop A B. Implementing real-time supply chain optimization W. Paper, Editor.1997 P
    [46]Niasen M.E. Agent-Based Supply Chain Integration[J]. nformation Technology and Management.2001(2):289-312 P
    [47]邓宁,刘加顺,罗荣桂.基于Agent对供应链风险管理的研究[J].商业研究.2007,9:14-18页
    [48]Parunak Van, VanderBok Ray, Modeling the extended supply network, in Internal Report.1998
    [49]赵卫东,李旗号.基于案例推理的决策问题求解研究[J].管理科学学报.2000,3(004):29-36页
    [50]姜丽红,刘豹.案例推理在智能化预测支持系统中的应用研究[J].管理科学学报.1996(4):46-53页
    [51]付玉,张存禄,黄培清.基于案例推理的供应链风险估计方法[J].预测.2005,24(1):56-58页
    [52]Roshna R.Pai, Venkata R.KallePalli, Reggie J.Caudill, et al. Methods toward supply chain risk analysis[C]. in IEEE International Conefrenceon systems man and Cybemeties[A].2003
    [53]胡笑旋.贝叶斯网建模技术及其在决策中的应用[D].合肥工业大学.2006
    [54]Friedman N., Geiger D., Goldszm M. Bayesian Network C lassifiers[J]..Machine Learning.1997,29(2):131-163 P
    [55]蔡文.可拓学概述[J].系统工程理论与实践.1998,18(001):76-84页
    [56]蔡文,石勇.可拓学的科学意义与未来发展[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报.2006,38(007):1079-1086页
    [57]蔡文,杨春燕.可拓学基础理论研究的新进展[J].中国工程科学.2003,5(002):80-87页
    [58]周争鸣,杨益民.菱形思维的可拓神经网络实现[J].系统工程理论与实践.2000(6):123-125页
    [59]单伟,张庆普.基于可拓方法的企业隐性知识管理绩效评价研究..[J].中国管理科学.2006,(z1):126-129页
    [60]Carbonneau R., Laframboise K., Vahidov R. Application of machine learning techniques for supply chain demand forecasting[J]. European Journal of Operational Research.2008,184(3):1140-1154 P
    [61]Aburto L, Weber R. Improved supply chain management based on hybrid demand forecasts[J]. Applied Soft Computing Journal.2007,7(1):136-144P
    [62]Dekkers R, Verweij P E, Weemaes C M R. Gastrointestinal zygomycosis due to Rhizopus microsporus var rhizopodiformis as a manifestation of chronic granulomatous disease[J]. Medical Mycology.2008,46(5):491-494 P
    [63]吴冲,夏晗.基于五级分类支持向量机集成的商业银行信用风险评估模型研究[J].预测.2009,28(4):57-61页
    [64]吴冲,王萤,郭英见.基于支持向量机的个人信用评估模型研究[J].运筹与管理.2008,17(004):96-99页
    [65]Li R., Cui Y., He H., et al. Application of support vector machine combined with K-nearest neighbors in solar flare and solar proton events forecasting[J]. Advances in Space Research.2008,42(9):1469-1474 P
    [66]李辉,李向阳,王颜新.基于多支持向量机系统的供应链伙伴关系协同预警框架[J].计算机集成制造系统.2006(5):753-759页
    [67]Chao X, Chen J, Wang SY. Dynamic inventory management with financial constraints[C]. in Lecture Notes in Operations Research. Proceedings of the 5th Internatonal Symposium on Operations Research and its Applications [A]. 2005. Beijing:World Publishing Corporation
    [68]Baig T., Goldfajn I., Investimentos G. Financial market contagion in the Asian crisis[J]. October 1998, IMF Working Paper.98-155 P
    [69]Narasimhan R., Talluri S. Perspectives on risk management in supply chains[J]. Journal of Operations Management.2009,27(2):114-118 P
    [70]Sucky E. The bullwhip effect in supply chains-An overestimated problem?[J]. International Journal of Production economics.2009,118(1): 311-322 P
    [71]卜琳华,刘家国.牛鞭效应及其信息共享的价值[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报:社会科学版.2006,8(3):101-104页
    [72]Hendricks K. B., Singhal V. R. Demand-Supply Mismatches and Stock Market Reaction:Evidence from Excess Inventory Announcements[J]. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management.2009,11(3):509-524
    [73]Corbett C. J., DeCroix G. A., Ha A. Y. Optimal shared-savings contracts in supply chains:Linear contracts and double moral hazard[J]. European Journal of Operational Research.2005,163(3):653-667 P
    [74]Schneeweiss C., Zimmer K. Hierarchical coordination mechanisms within the supply chain[J]. European Journal of Operational Research.2004,153(3): 687-703 P
    [75]Guo Z., Fang F., Whinston A. B. Supply chain information sharing in a macro prediction market[J]. Decision Support Systems.2006,42(3): 1944-1958 P
    [76]Kaminsky G L., Reinhart C. M. On crises, contagion, and confusion[J]. Journal of International Economics.2000,51(1):145-168 P
    [77]Beretta S., Bozzolan S. A framework for the analysis of firm risk communication [J]. International Journal of Accounting.2004,39(3): 265-288 P
    [78]崔毅,杨卫,邵希娟.从亚洲金融风暴反观企业风险的传导机理[J].南方金融.2001,10:27-29页
    [79]魏遥,雷良海.美国次贷危机的传导机制[J].阜阳师范学院学报:社会科学版.2009(001):9-14页
    [80]叶厚元,邓明然.企业风险传导的六种方式及其特征[J].管理现代化. 2005(006):38-40页
    [81]叶厚元,邓明然.企业风险传导的介质研究[J].管理现代化.2007,11(1):38-41页
    [82]邓明然,夏喆.企业风险传导及其载体研究[J].财会通讯:学术版.2006,6(1):20-23页
    [83]叶建木,邓明然,王洪运.企业风险传导机理研究[J].企业改革与发展.2005,(3):156-158页
    [84]陈剑辉,徐丽群.弹性系数在供应链风险传导研究中的应用[J].安徽农业科学.2007,35(001):313-314页
    [85]卢雅琪,赵林度.供应链体系中VMI服务定价风险及其传导[J].东南大学学报.2007(37):426-429.页
    [86]王元明,赵道致,徐大海.基于风险传递的项目型供应链风险控制研究[J].软科学.2008,22(12):1-4页
    [87]西宝,李一军.工程项目风险链管理及鞭梢效应[J].哈尔滨建筑大学学报.2002,35(004):112-116页
    [88]Hallikas J., Karvonen I., Pulkkinen U., et al. Risk management processes in supplier networks[J]. International Journal of Production economics.2004, 90(1):47-58 P
    [89]王旭坪,傅克俊,胡祥培.应急物流系统及其快速反应机制研究[J].中国软科学.2005(006):127-131页
    [90]于璐,李颖,刘家国.基于CBR和GRA的供应链突发事件应急系统研究[J].情报杂志.2009(010):132-135页
    [91]赵秋红,汪寿阳,黎建强.综合物流系统:理论与方法[M],北京:科学出版社.2005,
    [92]X Gan, S Sethi, H Yan. Channel coordination with a risk-neutral supplier and a downside-risk-averse retailer[J]. Production and Operations Management.2005,14:80-89 P
    [93]Chen J., Li J., Wang S.Y. Risk management in supply chains:Literature review[C]. in International Workshop on Successful Strategies in Supply Chain Management[A].2006. Hong Kong
    [94]Tomlin B. On the value of mitigation and contingency strategies for managing supply-chain disruption risks[J]. Management Science.2006, 52(5):639-657 P
    [95]韩梅琳,樊瑞满,郑建国.供应链突发事件应急协调机制研究[J].统计与决策.2007(20):170-172页
    [96]张维迎.博弈论与信息经济学[M]:上海人民出版社.2004,
    [97]生延超.基于改进的Shapley值法的技术联盟企业利益分配[J].大连理工大学学报(社会科学版).2009,30(2):112.117页
    [98]魏修建.供应链利益分配研究-资源与贡献率的分配思路与框架[J].南开管理评论.2005,8(2):78-83页
    [99]王鹏.供应链收益分配模型及其比较研究[D].华中科技大学.2006
    [100]Cachon G. P., Lariviere M. A. Supply chain coordination with revenue-sharing contracts:strengths and limitations [J]. Management Science.2005,51(1):30-44 P
    [101]Simchi-Levi D., Wu S. D., Shen Z. J. Handbook of quantitative supply chain analysis:modeling in the e-business era[M]:Kluwer Academic Publishers. 2004
    [102]Lemaire J. Cooperative game theory and its insurance applications [J]. ASTIN. 2006,17(2):556-587 P
    [103]顾基发,高飞.从管理科学角度谈物理-事理-人理系统方法论[J].系统工程理论与实践.1998,18(8):1-5页
    [104]顾基发,唐锡晋,朱正祥.物理-事理-人理系统方法论综述[J].交通运输系统工程与信息.2007,17(16):51-60页
    [105]顾基发,唐锡晋,朱正祥.物理-事理-人理系统方法论综述[J].交通运输 系统工程与信息.2007,7(6):51-60页
    [106]余训.基于WSR方法论的高速公路全面造价管理研究[D].长沙理工大学.2008
    [107]崔业好.基于WSR的六西格玛系统工程研究[D].青岛大学.2006
    [108]牟小俐,熊忠发.实时响应的供应链中信息传递与管理模式探讨[J].科技进步与对策.2006,23(007):173-175页
    [109]Yang J., Yu G On the Robust Single Machine Scheduling Problem[J]. Journal of Combinatorial Optimization.2002,1.6(2):17-33 P
    [110]郭敏,王红卫.合作型供应链的协调和激励机制研究[J].系统工程.2002,20(004):49-53页
    [111]刘家国.我国船舶配套业发展现状及障碍分析[J].科技造步与对策.2009,26(17):58-61页
    [112]刘家国,吴冲,赵金楼.基于技术与成本曲面积分的船舶工业国际竞争力模型研究[J].哈尔滨工程大学学报.2009,30(5):592-596页
    [113]刘家国,赵金楼,赵忠伟.基于造船供应链的我国船舶配套业发展模式研究[J].船舶工程.2008,30(006):70-73页
    [114]张光明,宁宣熙.造船供应链的结构和特点研究[J].造船技术.2004(006):1-3页
    [115]李卉.造船市场需求影响因素研究[D].哈尔滨工程大学.2009
    [116]张光明.造船供应链合作关系的建立,运行和维护研究[D].南京航空航天大学.2006
    [117]陈剑辉.运用弹性系数研究供应链风险传导效应[D].上海交通大学.2007
    [118]杨俊.供应链风险管理理论与方法研究[D].武汉:武汉理工大学硕士毕业论文.2005
    [119]刘志华.供应链风险管理体系及风险处理方法[J].科技广场.2008(2):222-223页

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700