用户名: 密码: 验证码:
吉林省生态资产遥感定量评估
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
随着社会经济的发展和资源环境问题的日益突出,生态环境和资源逐渐被人们认为是一种国家资产,即生态资产。生态资产包括有形的自然资源价值和隐形的生态系统服务功能价值。生态系统除了给人类提供实物型生态产品(食物、原材料、药品等)外,同时还以其巨大的生物多样性向人类提供更多类型的非实物型生态服务(净化空气、水土保持、涵养水源等)。
     本文将在对国内外生态资产价值评估理论方法进行梳理总结的基础上,将生态学模型与遥感信息模型相结合,对生态系统类型、植被净初级生产力和植被覆盖度、调整系数进行遥感测量,建立生态资产评估的定量遥感模型,综合考虑生态系统类型、质量、空间分布差异。通过计算得到2000年和2008年吉林省生态资产总价值,并进行了动态变化分析,结果表明:
     1)2000年吉林省生态资产总价值为4385.61亿元,单位面积价值为230.18万元(km~2·a),而2008年吉林省生态资产总价值为6751.31亿元,单位面积价值为354.35万元(km~2·a)。
     2)在生态资产总价值构成中,水土保持价值>维持大气平衡价值>生产有机质价值>涵养水源价值>营养物质循环价值,其中2000年和2008年水土保持总价值为2368.83、2921.54亿元,而最低的营养物质循环价值2000年和2008年分别为25.87、51.70亿元。
     3)从不同土地利用类型上看,2000年中林地的生态资产价值最高,为2955.25亿元,而2008年林地生态资产价值为4148.85亿元。其次为耕地,草地和未利用地价值相对较低,都只有100多亿元,而灌木林地总价值最低,2000年为68.03亿元,2008年为113.35亿元。各土地利用类型的单位价值中,两年中的耕地的价值均最高,未利用地的单位价值最低。
     4)从东中西地区来看, 2000年、2008年的吉林省的生态资产总价值分布都呈现由东向西逐渐降低的趋势,其中东部地区最高,西部地区最少,2000年的吉林省西部生态资产总价值为282.83亿元,2008年的总价值达到520.28亿元。吉林省不同地区的生态资产差异明显。从总生态资产价值来看,2000-2008年吉林省生态资产总价值升高了2365.70亿元,单位面积价值增加了124.17万元(km~2·a)。从平均生态资产价值看,2000年中,白山地区>通化地区>延边地区>吉林地区>辽源地区>长春地区>四平地区>松原地区>白城地区,而2008年则是白山地区>通化地区>延边地区>吉林地区>长春地区>松原地区>辽源地区>四平地区>白城地区。
     本文的研究成果将有助于推动我国生态资产遥感定量测量研究方法的进展,为国内相关研究提供技术和方法借鉴;可以为区域自然资源利用、吉林省生态省建设、政府宏观决策提供数据支撑与科学依据,具有重要的科学意义和应用价值。
With the socio-economic development and resource and environment problems have become more prominent, and the ecological environment and resources have gradually been considered a national asset, that is, ecological assets. Ecological assets include tangible value of natural resources and the hidden value of ecosystem services. Ecosystems in addition to human-kind eco-products (food, raw materials, medicines, etc), but also for its great biological diversity to provide more types of non-human kind-based ecological services (clean air, soil and water conservation, water conservation, etc.) .
     This paper will assess the domestic and international ecological value of the assets to sort out theoretical methods based on the summary will be ecology model and remote sensing information model combining ecosystem types, vegetation net primary productivity and vegetation cover, the adjustment factor for remote sensing measurements, the establishment of quantitative remote sensing of ecological assets assessment model, considering the ecosystem type, quality, spatial distribution of differences. By calculation of Jilin Province in 2000 and 2008, the total value of ecological assets, and the dynamic change analysis shows that:
     1) In 2000 the total value of ecological capital of Jilin Province 438.561 billion yuan, per unit area value of 2.3018 million yuan (km~2·a), Jilin Province, in 2008 the total value of ecological assets 675.131 billion yuan, per unit area value of 3.5435 million yuan (km~2·a).
     2) The composition of the total value of ecological assets, water and soil conservation> maintain the atmospheric balance of the value of> production of organic matter value> Water Conservation value> value of nutrient cycling, including soil and water conservation in 2000 and 2008, the total value of 2368.83, 2921.54 billion, the lowest value of nutrient cycling in 2000 and 2008, respectively 25.87, 51.70 billion.
     3) From the perspective of different land use types, forest ecology in 2000, the highest value of the assets, for 295.525 billion yuan, forest ecology in 2008 was 414.885 billion yuan worth of assets. Followed by arable land, grassland and unused land values are relatively low, are only 100 billion, while the minimum total value of shrub land in 2000, 6.803 billion yuan in 2008 to 11.335 billion yuan. The unit value of land use type, the two years were the highest value of cultivated land, unused land in the unit value of the minimum.
     4) From the Middle and regional perspective, 2000, 2008, the Jilin Province of the distribution of the total value of ecological assets showed decreased from east to west trend, in which the highest in eastern and western regions at least, western Jilin Province in 2000, eco- The total value of 28.283 billion yuan of assets, the total value in 2008 reached 52.028 billion yuan. Ecological assets in different regions of Jilin Province are different. From the perspective of total value of ecological assets of Jilin Province, 2000-2008 the total value of ecological assets increased by 236.57 billion yuan, an increase of per unit area value of 1.2417 million yuan (km~2·a). The average value of the assets from the ecological perspective, in 2000, the White Mountain region> Tonghua area> Yanbian> Jilin> Liaoyuan region> in Changchun> Siping area> Matsubara Area> White City area, while the 2008 is the White Mountain region> Tonghua area> Yanbian Area> Jilin> Changchun area> Matsubara area> Liaoyuan region> Siping Area> White City area.
     This study results will help promote Chinese ecological assets of remote sensing methods of quantitative measurement of progress, in order to provide technical and domestic research methods for reference; for regional natural resource use, building an ecological province of Jilin Province, the government's macroeconomic policy-making and provide data support scientific basis, with important scientific significance and application value.
引文
[1]陈志良,吴志峰,夏念和等.中国生态资产评估研究进展[J].生态环境, 2007, 16(2): 680- 685.
    [2] Daily G C , eds. Nature’s Services : Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems[J]. Island Press, Washington D. C. 1997.
    [3]欧阳志云,王如松.生态系统服务功能与可持续发展,社会-经济-自然复合生态系统可持续发展研究〔M〕.北京:中国环境科学出版社, 1999, 120~128.
    [4]张志强,徐中民,程国栋.生态系统服务与自然资本价值评估[J].生态学报, 2001 , 11 (21): 68~72.
    [5] Costanza R, d’Arge R, Groot R, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital [J]. Nature , 1997, 387: 253~260.
    [6]潘耀忠,史培军,朱文泉,等.中国陆地生态系统生态资产遥感测量[J].中国科学, 2004 , D, 34 (4): 374~384.
    [7] Gretchen C, Daily T, Soderqvist D, et al. The value of nature and nature of value. Science. 2000, 289: 395~396.
    [8]谢高地,鲁春霞,成升魁.全球生态系统服务价值评估研究进展.资源科学, 2001, 11(6): 5-9.
    [9] Vogt W. Road to Survival [M]. New York: William Sloan. 1948.
    [10] Study of Critical Environmental Problems. Man’s Impact on the Global Environment [M], Berlin: Springer - Verlzg1, 1970.
    [11] Holdren J P, Ehrlich P R. 1974. Human Population and the Global Environment[J]. American Scientist, 62: 282 - 292.
    [12] Ehrlich P R, Ehrlich A H[J]. 1981. Extinction. New York: Ballantine.
    [13] Ready R C, J C Whitehead, G C Blomquist. Contingent Valuation when Respondents are Ambivalent [J]. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 29 (September 1995): 181 - 96.
    [14] Loomis J, E Ekstrand. Alternative Approaches for Incorporating Respondent Uncertainty when Estimating Willingness to Pay: The Case of the Mexican Spotted Owl [J]. Ecolog. Ecom. 27 (October 1998): 29 - 41.
    [15] Li C-Z, L Mattsson. Discrete Choice under Preference Uncertainty: An Improved Structural Model for Contingent Valuation [J]. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 28 (March 1995): 256 - 69.
    [16] G. Cornelis Van Kooten et al. Preference Uncertainty in Non2market Valuation: A Fuzzy Approach [J]. Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 83 (3) (August 2001): 487 - 500.
    [17] David Pimentel et al.Environmental and Economic Costs of Soil Erosion and Conservation Benefits [J]. Science. 1995-1267.
    [18] Bjorklund, J., Limburg, K.E., Rydberg, T. 1999. Impact of production intensity on the ability ofthe agricultural landscape to generate ecosystem services: An example from Sweden [J]. Ecological Economics, 29:269-291.
    [19] Bolund, P., Hunhammar, S. 1999. Ecosystem services in urban areas [J]. Ecological Economics, 29:293-301.
    [20] Holmund, C., Hammer, M. 1999. Ecosystem services generated by fish populations [J]. Ecological Economics, 29: 253-268.
    [21] Kreuter, U.P., Harris, H.G., Matlock, M.D. et al 2001. Change in ecosystem service values in the San Antonio area, Texas[J]. Ecological Economics, 39: 333-346.
    [22] Yung, E.C. 2004. An ecological perspective on the valuation of ecosystem services[J]. Biological Conservation, 120(4): 549-565.
    [23] Milon, J.W., Scrogin, D. 2006. Latent preferences and valuation of wetland ecosystem restoration[J], 56(2): 162-175.
    [24] Amy, R., Robert, K.K., Ranga, B.M. 2007. Valuing ecosystem services: A shadow price for net primary production[J]. Ecological Economics, 64(2): 454-462.
    [25] Rattan, L. 2008. Black and buried carbon’s impacts on soil quality and ecosystem services[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 99(1): 1-3.
    [26] G. Cornelis Van Kooten et al. Preference Uncertainty in Non-maker Valuation: A Fuaay Approach [J]. Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 83(3) (August 2001):487-500
    [27]陈仲新,张新时.中国生态系统效益价值[J].科学通报, 2000, 45(1):17-22.
    [28]徐俏,何孟常,杨志峰,等.广州市生态系统服务功能价值评估[J].北京师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2003, 39(2): 268-272.
    [29]高旺盛,董孝斌.黄土高原丘陵沟壑区脆弱农业生态系统服务评价—以安塞县为例[J].自然资源学报, 2003, 18(2): 182-188.
    [30]高清竹,何立环,黄晓霞,江源.海河上游农牧交错地区生态系统服务价值的变化[J].自然资源学报, 2002, 17(6): 706-712.
    [31]许中旗,李文华,闵庆文,等.锡林流域生态系统服务价值变化研究[J].自然资源学报, 2005, 20(1): 99-104.
    [32]周可法,陈曦,周华荣,等基于遥感与GIS的干旱区生态资产评估研究[J].科学通报, 2006/S1,175-180.
    [33]侯元兆,张佩昌,王琦,等.中国森林资源核算[M].北京:中国林业出版社, 1995
    [34]余新晓,鲁绍伟,靳芳.中国森林生态系统服务功能价值评估[J].生态学报, 2005, 25(8): 2096-2102.
    [35]韩维栋,高秀梅,卢昌义,等.中国红树林生态系统生态价值评估[J].生态科学, 2000,19(1): 40-46.
    [36]肖寒,欧阳志云,赵景柱,等.海南岛生态系统土壤保持空间分布特征及生态经济价值评估[J].生态学报, 2000, 20(4): 552-558.
    [37]辛琨,肖笃宁.盘锦地区湿地生态系统服务功能价值估算[J].生态学报, 2002, 22(8): 1345-1349.
    [38]欧阳志云,赵同谦,王效科,等.水生态服务功能分析及其间接价值评价[J].生态学报, 2004, 24(10): 2091-2099.
    [39]李阳兵,王世杰,周德全.茂兰岩溶森林的生态服务研究[J].地球与环境, 2005, 33(2): 39-44.
    [40]王宗明,张柏,张树清.吉林省生态系统服务价值变化研究[J].自然资源学报, 2004, 19(1): 55-61
    [41]杨志新,郑大玮,文化.北京郊区农田生态系统服务功能价值的评估研究[J].自然资源学报, 2005, 20(4): 564-571.
    [42]喻建华,高中贵,张露,等.昆山市生态系统服务价值变化研究[J].长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(2): 213-217
    [43]刘全友,童依平.北方农牧交错带土地利用类型对土壤养分分布的影响[J].应用生态学报, 2005, 16(10): 1849-1852.
    [44]薛达元.长白山自然保护区生物多样性非使用价值评估[J].中国环境科学, 2000, 20(2): 141-145.
    [45]姜文来.森林涵养水源的价值核算研究[J].水土保持学报, 2003,17(2): 34-40.
    [46]李晶,任志远.秦巴山区植被涵养水源价值测评研究[J].水土保持学报, 2003, 17(4): 132-134.
    [47]徐中民,张志强,苏志勇,等.恢复额济纳旗生态系统的总经济价值-条件估值非参数估计方法的应用[J].冰川冻土, 2002, 24(2): 160-167.
    [48]张志强,徐中民,程国栋,等.黑河流域张掖地区生态系统服务恢复的条件价值评估[J].生态学报, 2002, 22(6): 885-893.
    [49]赵平,夏冬平,王天厚.上海市崇明东滩湿地生态恢复与重建工程中社会经济价值分析[J].生态学杂志, 2005, 24(1): 75-78.
    [50]高云峰,江文涛.北京市山区森林资源价值评价[J].中国农村经济, 2005, 7: 19-29, 80.
    [51]史培军,潘耀忠,陈云浩,等.多尺度生态资产遥感综合测量的技术体系[J].地球科学进展, 2002, 17(2): 171-173.
    [52]何浩,潘耀忠,朱文泉,等.中国陆地生态系统服务价值测量[J].应用生态学报, 2005, 16(6): 1122-1127.
    [53]于德永,潘耀忠,刘鑫等.湖州市生态资产遥感测量及其在社会经济中的应用[J].植物生态学报, 2006, 30(3) :404-413.
    [54]王宗明,张柏,宋开山等.松嫩平原土地利用变化对区域生态系统服务价值的影响研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 2008, 18(1): 149-154.
    [55]吴波,慈龙骏.毛乌素沙地景观格局变化研究[J].生态学报,2001,21(2):191一196.
    [56]李海毅,3S技术支持下的吉林省土地退化动态研究[D],吉林大学,2007.
    [57] Westman W E. How much are nature’services worth〔J〕.Science , 1977 , 197 :960~964.
    [58]周可法,陈曦,张海波,等.干旱区生态资产遥感定量评估模型研究.干旱区地理. 2004, 27(4):492-497
    [59]李京,陈云浩,潘耀忠,等。生态资产遥感定量测量技术体系研究-生态资产定量遥感评估模型[J].遥感信息,2003,3:8-11
    [60]张志强,徐中民,程国栋.生态系统服务与自然资本价值评估[J].生态学报,2001,11(21): 68-72
    [61]潘耀忠,史培军,朱文泉等,中国陆地生态系统生态资产遥感定量测量[J],中国科学D辑2004, 34(4):375-384
    [62] Adams J E, Arkin G F. A light interception method for measuring row crop ground cover [J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 1977, 41(4): 789-792.
    [63]潘耀忠,李晓兵,何春阳.中国土地覆盖综合分类研究:基于NOAA / AVHRR和Holdridge PE [J] .第四纪研究, 2000, 20: 270-281.
    [64]陈云浩,李晓兵,史培军.北京海淀区植被覆盖的遥感动态研究.植物生态学报, 2001, 25(5): 588-593..
    [65]章文波,符素华,刘宝元.目估法测量植被覆盖度的精度分析[J].北京师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2001, 37 (3): 402 - 408.
    [66] Frenette M, Julien, P .Y. Professor; et al. Computer modeling of soil erosion and sediment yield from large watersheds, International Journal of Sediment Research, 1987, 2(00):39-68.
    [67] Zhou Q. Robson M, Pilesjo P. On the ground estimation of vegetation cover in Australian Rangelands [J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1998 (9): 1815 - 1820.
    [68] Sellers P J, Tucker C J, Collatz, et al. A global 1°by 1°NDVI dataset for climate studies: The generation of global fields of terrestrial biophysical parameters form the NDVI [J]. International journal of Remote Sensing, 1994, 15 (17): 3519 - 3545.
    [69] Graetz R D, Pech R R, Davis A W. The assessment and monitoring of sparsely vegetated rangelands of Absorbed landsat data[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1988, 9 (7): 1201 -1222.
    [70] Gillies R R, Kustas W P, Humes K S. A verification of the‘Triangle’met.hod for obtaining surface soil water content and energy fluxes from remote measurements of the Normalized Difference vegetation index(NDVI) and surface[J]. International Journal of Romote Sensing, 1997, (18): 3145 - 3166.
    [71]吉林省地方志编簨委员会编簨,吉林省志一卷四\自然地理卷[M].长春:吉林人民出版社,1992
    [72] ZHAO Yingshi, The Principle and Method of Analysis of Remote Sensing Application [M]. Beijing: Sciences Press, 2003.[赵英时.遥感应用分析原理与方法[M].北京:科学出版社.2003]
    [73]李苗苗,吴炳方,颜长珍,等.密云水库上游植被覆盖的遥感估算[J].资源科学,2004, 26(4):153– 159.
    [74]顾祝军,曾志远.遥感植被盖度研究[J].水土保持研究,2005, 12 (2): 18– 21.
    [75]陈涛,李平湘,张良培.武汉地区1988~2002年植被覆盖度变化动态分析[J].遥感技术与应用.2008,5(23): 511-516.
    [76]孙红雨,王长耀,牛铮,等.中国地表植被覆盖变化及其与气候因子关系:基于NOAA时间序列数据分析.遥感学报, 1998, 3(2): 204-210.
    [77] Carlson T N, Ripley D A. On the Relation between NDVI, Fractional Vegetation Cover, and Leaf Area Index[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1997, 62 (3): 241-252.
    [78] Kaufman YJ, Tanre D. Atmospherically Resistant Vegetation Index (ARVI) for EOS2MODIS [J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1992, 30 (2): 261-270.
    [79] Zribi M, Le Hégarat Mascle. Derivation of Wild Vegetation Cover Density in Semarid Region: ERS2/ SAR Evaluation [J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2003, (24): 1335-1352.
    [80]乔峰,张克斌,张生英等,农牧交错区植被覆盖度动态变化遥感监测:以宁夏盐池为例[J].干旱区研究, 2006, 2(23): 283-288.
    [81] USGS. National land cover characterization[EB/OL]. http://edcimswww.cr.usgs.gov/pub/imswelcome.
    [82]国志兴,王宗明,张柏等. 2000年~2006年东北地区植被NPP的时空特征及影响因素分析[J].资源科学,2008,30 (8) : 1226- 1235.
    [83]于德永,潘耀忠,刘鑫等.湖州市生态资产遥感测量及其在社会经济中的应用[J].植物生态学报, 2006, 30(3) :404-413.
    [84]郭志华,彭少麟,王伯荪,等. GIS和RS支持下广东省植被吸收PAR的估算及其时空分布[J].生态学报, 1999, 19(4): 441–447.
    [85] JIAN NI. Net primary productivity in forests of China: Scaling up of national inventory data and comparison with model predictions[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2003, 176: 485-495.
    [86]李金昌,姜文来,靳乐山.生态价值[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,1999:117
    [87]刘淇.提高我国钢铁工业竞争力是跨世纪的战略任务[J].钢铁,1997, 32(2): 1–9.
    [88]王艳艳,杨明川,潘耀忠等,中国陆地植被生态系统生产有机物质价值遥感估算[J].生态环境2005, 14(4): 455-459
    [89]常学向,王金叶,张学龙,等.祁连山森林水源涵养效益初析[J] .西北林学院学报,2001 , 16 (增) : 51~54.
    [90]赵传燕,冯兆东,刘勇.干旱区森林水源涵养生态服务功能研究进展[J ] .山地学报, 2003 , 21 (2) :157~161.
    [91]常学向,王金叶,张学龙,等.祁连山森林水源涵养效益初析[J] .西北林学院学报,2001 , 16 (增) : 51~54.
    [92]孙平安,林年丰,李昭阳等,松嫩平原水土保持价值复合计算模型的建立及应用[J].吉林大学学报,2006,36(3).
    [93]王万茂,高波,夏太寿,等.土地生态经济学[M] .北京:科学技术文献出版社,1992.
    [94]焦居仁,宁堆虎,佟伟力,等.水利技术标准汇编(水土保持卷) [M] .北京:中国水利水电出版社,2002 :336-340
    [95]李绍阳,多源遥感数据支持下的松嫩平原生态环境变化研究D,吉林大学,2006-05-01
    [96]何勇,董文杰,季劲均,等. 2005.基于AVIM的中国陆地生态系统净初级生产力模拟.地球科学进展, 20(3): 345 -349.
    [97] Rasmus F, Inge S, Michael SR, et a1. 2006. Evaluation of satellite based primary production modeling in the semi-arid Sahel. Remote Sensing of Environment, 105: 173-188.
    [98]张晓浩,黎夏,施迅,等. 2007.广东省水稻生物质能的估算.遥感信息, (1): 26-29.
    [99]国志兴,王宗明,张柏,等. 2008. 2000—2006年东北地区植被NPP的时空特征及影响因素分析.资源科学, 30(8): 1226-1235.
    [100]国志兴,王宗明,刘殿伟,等. 2009.三江平原农田生产力时空特征分析.农业工程学报, 25(1): 248-254.
    [101]王宗明,国志兴,宋开山,等. 2009. 2000—2005年三江平原土地利用/覆被变化对植被净初级生产力的影响研究.自然资源学报, 24(1): 136-147.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700