用户名: 密码: 验证码:
预应力混凝土连续箱梁桥病害原因分析及防治
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
预应力混凝土连续箱梁桥在快速发展的近30多年来,特别是20世纪90年代,由于在设计、施工以及运营管理等方面存在不足和缺陷,导致了大量病害的产生,这影响了其在公路建设中的进一步推广和应用。故加深对预应力混凝土连续箱梁桥病害问题的研究,对今后的设计和施工提供有益的建议,以避免类似问题的出现,是十分必要的。有鉴于此,本文以深圳恩上立交桥主桥为工程背景,做了以下几个方面的工作:
     (1)在参阅大量文献的基础上,对预应力混凝土连续箱梁桥的病害发生位置、形态以及可能的原因进行了总结和初步分析,为此类桥梁的设计、施工和养护提供技术支持。
     (2)本文分别采用空间有限元和平面杆系有限元对恩上桥进行了分析计算,并对两者的计算结果进行了对比分析。分析结果表明,和空间有限元相比,对于截面的正应力,平面杆系有限元的计算结果稍偏于不安全,但已经可以满足桥梁设计时整体计算的工程要求;而对于截面的横向受力,带有弹性约束的平面框架模型的计算结果偏于安全,能够较好的对箱梁顶板的横向应力进行简化计算。
     (3)本文在理论计算的基础上,对恩上桥在施工过程中的应力状态进行了测试,并根据实测结果对桥梁应力的测试方法和测试数据的处理方法进行了研究。研究结果表明,和JTG62徐变模型、B3徐变模型相比,GL2000徐变模型更适用于节段施工桥梁结构施工阶段的徐变系数的计算。
     (4)在现行规范中还没有任何条文对沥青混凝土高温摊铺所引起的桥梁结构温度场的分布进行规定,所以本文在实测数据的基础上,通过ANSYS建模,对影响沥青混凝土摊铺所形成的温度梯度的各种参数进行了分析,在分析基础上提出了沥青混凝土摊铺所引起的截面上最不利温度梯度的简化模式,可以为沥青混凝土摊铺所引起的截面应力的计算提供参考。并且在对参数分析的基础上,对防止沥青混凝土摊铺引起截面拉应力过大的措施提出了一些建议。
     (5)本文在对跨中底板下缘纵向开裂的原因以及跨中底板下缘横向受力影响因素的分析基础上,分别从设计和施工角度提出了防治此类病害的建议,为以后的设计、施工提供参考。
The insufficiencies and defects in design, construction as well as operation management have caused a lot of diseases in prestressed concrete continuous box-girder bridge in the past 30 years, especially in the 1990s, which hampers the further application and popularization of this type of bridge in highway construction.
     Therefore, in order to provide useful suggestions for design and construction, and to avoid the similar questions, it is very essential to make further research on the diseases of prestressed concrete continue box-girder bridge. Taking this into consideration, following research work has been done with Shenzhen En-Shang Bridge as the project background in this paper:
     Firstly, based on many references, the cause of diseases was studied and diseases types, distributing pattern and shape feature have been summarized in this paper, which could be a technical support for the design, construction and maintenance of bridges of this type.
     Secondly, Models of spatial finite element method and plane finite element method have been established to analysis En-Shang Bridge in this paper, respectively. And the comparison of analysis results shows that, as for the longitudinal stresses, the results of plane finite element method are unsafe compared to the spatial finite element. However, the results of plane finite element model are accurate enough for project request on the whole bridge computation in bridge design;As for the transverse stresses, the results of the plan frame model with elastic constraints are safer than the finite element model, and the results of the plan frame model with elastic constraints is a properly simplified method for the computation of transverse stresses in the top of box girder.
     Thirdly, based on the theoretical calculation, the stress of the bridge has been tested during the construction of En-Shang Bridge, and according to the result of the tests, the test mothed of stress and test data-processing mothed are strudied in this paper.The study shows that the GL2000 creep model has better performance in the calculation of creep coefficient for the bridge built by segmental construction method, compared to the JTG62 creep model and B3 creep model.
     Fourthly, in the present, there is no regulation on the temperature gradient in the box-girder bridge caused by paving of high temperature bituminous concrete.
     Therefore, based on the test result of actual bridge, the parameters whichinfluence temperature gradient caused by paving of bituminous concrete are analyzedby ANSYS model in this paper.And according to the results of parameter analysis,some measures which can be used to prevent the excess tensile stress caused bypaving of bituminous concrete are proposed in this paper, and based on that, atemperature gradient model is also proposed in this paper, which can be a referencefor the stress calculation caused by paving of bituminous concrete in the box section.
     Lastly, based on the anlysis of the causes of crack and the parameter whichinfluence the stress on the bottom of the box girder at mid-span, some measures forpreventing such cracks are proposed in this paper, which could be a reference forlater bridge design and construction.
引文
[1]邵旭东.桥梁工程.北京:人民交通出版社,2004,1-50
    [2]王崇焕.中国古代交通.北京:商务印书馆,1996,15-20
    [3]朱汉华,陈孟冲,袁迎捷.预应力混凝土连续箱梁桥裂缝分析与防治.北京:人民交通出版社,2006,1-166
    [4]李国平.桥梁预应力混凝土技术及设计原理.北京:人民交通出版社,2003,1-20
    [5]周军生,楼庄鸿.大跨径预应力混凝土连续刚构桥的现状和发展趋势.中国公路学报,2000,13(1):31-37
    [6]楼庄鸿.大跨径梁式桥的主要病害.公路交通科技,2006,23(4):84-87
    [7]陈宇峰,徐君兰,余武军.大跨PC连续刚构桥跨中持续下挠成因及预防措施.重庆交通大学学报,2007,26(4):6-8
    [8]陈开利.帕劳共和国的桥梁倒塌事故.国外公路,1998,18(3):31-33
    [9]张俊成,赵国珠,付卯生等.风陵渡黄河公路大桥梁体裂缝修补及补强施工技术.山西交通科技,1999,(1):48-50
    [10]韩旭东.东明黄河公路大桥维修加固.华东公路,2005,(3):64-66
    [11]李文越.白岩沟大桥梁体裂缝原因分析及整治.铁道建筑,2000,(7):16-18
    [12]谢峻,王国亮,郑晓华.大跨径预应力混凝土箱梁桥长期下挠问题的研究现状.公路交通科技,2007,24(1):47-50
    [13]冯兆祥,赵启林,吉林.混凝土连续体系桥梁的病害现状.中国市政工程,2008,(3):29-31
    [14]马润平,卫军,高宗余.大跨预应力混凝土梁式桥后期下挠原因分析.铁道工程学报,2007,(5):51-54
    [15]李强,吕敬之,胡建勋.大跨径连续刚构桥主要病害分析防治.见:2008年度学术论文集.北京:北京建达路桥有限公司,2008,74-85
    [16]蔡慧悦,蔡镜清.洛溪大桥梁体裂缝的成因分析和探讨.工程技术,2006,(8):70-72
    [17]马竞,邵旭东,占雪芳.大跨径梁式桥的病害原因与对策.见:第五届全国FRP学术交流会论文汇编.广州:FRP及工程应用专业委员会,2007,465-468
    [18]王国亮,谢峻,傅宇方.在用大跨度预应力混凝土箱梁桥裂缝调查研究,公路交通科技,2008,25(8):52-56
    [19]湖南大学土木工程学院,中交公路规划设计院.混凝土桥梁裂缝成因分析研究报告,1998
    [20]孔海霞,张喜刚,袁洪等.苏通大桥副桥连续刚构桥设计.见:2004年全国桥梁学 术会议.昆明:中国公路学会,2004,62-70
    [21]韩大建,徐郁峰,苏成等.大跨度混凝土斜拉桥主梁应力监测中徐变应变的分离.工程力学,2001(增刊):766-771
    [22]项海帆.高等桥梁结构理论.北京:人民交通出版社,2002,15-72
    [23]王华.预应力混凝土薄壁箱梁桥空间分析及开裂原因分析:[硕士学位论文].湖南:湖南大学,2005,1-20
    [24]邵老师,程翔云,李立峰.桥梁设计与计算.北京:人民交通出版社,2007,327-357
    [25]郭金琼.箱形梁设计理论.北京:人民交通出版社,1991,1-144
    [26]王运涛,张雪松,顾安邦.大跨径预应力连续刚构桥常用分析方法的评述.重庆交通大学学报,2007,26(2):21-23
    [27]程翔云.梁桥理论与计算.北京:人民交通出版社,1990,2-95
    [28]张志田.钢筋混凝土箱梁横向受力有效分布宽度的理论及试验研究:[硕士学位论文].湖南:湖南大学,2001,1-50
    [29](捷)克里斯特克(Krstek,V)著,何福照,吴德心译.箱梁理论.北京:人民交通出版社,1988,68-118
    [30]王晖,项贻强.梯形多室箱横向内力计算方法研究.公路交通科技,2007.24(1):83-86
    [31]杨新廷,李捷,许家录.箱梁桥的横向计算.甘肃科技,2005,21(4):141-142
    [32]郑震,郭金琼.箱形梁桥横向内力计算的计算机方法.福州大学学报,1995,23(1):60-66
    [33]程翔云.双室箱梁顶板的横向计算研究.中国公路学报,1996,9(4):65-69
    [34]陈常松,颜东煌,陈政清等.混凝土振弦式应变计测试技术研究.中国公路学报,2004,17(1):29-33
    [35]杨转运,张亮亮,刘会.薄壁箱梁大吨位预压力锚固区局部承压.重庆大学学报,2007,30(6):114-120
    [36]许惟国,何广汉.连续刚构桥锚固区局部应力的研究.西南交通大学学报,2004,39(3):371-374
    [37]程俊瑞,卢文良,季文玉等.预应力混凝土箱梁水化热温度及应变的试验研究.公路,2004,(2):24-27
    [38]王卫锋,刘春燕,范学明.预应力混凝土连续刚构桥实测应变与应力的转换.郑州大学学报,2006,27(1):36-39
    [39]Zdenek P.Bazant and Sandeep Baweja.Creep and Shrinkage Prediction Model for Analysis and Design of Concrete Structures:Model B3.Materials and Structures,1995,(28):1-29
    [40]丁文胜,吕志涛,孟少平等.混凝土收缩徐变预测模型的分析和比较.桥梁建 设,2004,(6):13-16
    [41]Rajeev Goel,Ram Kumar,Suraj Parkash and D.K.Paul.Prediction of Creep and Shrinkage Strains in Prestressed Concrete Bridge.Advances in Bridge Engineering,2006,(24):543-554
    [42]汪剑,方志.大跨度预应力混凝土箱梁桥收缩徐变效应测试与分析.土木工程学报,2008,41(1):71-81
    [43]亢景付,彭小平.预应力施加过程中混凝土的徐变变化.天津大学学报,2003,36(2):210-214
    [44]王常峰,陈兴冲.预应力混凝土梁施工的应力监测与处理方法.兰州交通大学学报,2006,25(4):24-27
    [45]张开银,邹晓军,方晓睿等.预应力混凝土梁桥应力测试技术.武汉理工大学学报,2003,27(2):174-177
    [46]周履,陈永春.收缩徐变.中国铁道出版社,1994,北京.10-230
    [47]胡狄,陈政清.从短期试验结果预测新建预应力混凝土梁收缩和徐变的长期效应.中国铁道科学,2003,24(3):44-49
    [48]Christopher.J.Waldron.Investigation of Long-Time Prestress Losses in Pretensioned High Preformance Concrete Girders.Materials and Structures,2004,(11):28-56
    [49]余辉,杨转运,王羽.连续刚构特大桥施工温度及应力监测.山东交通学院学报,2005,13(4):52-56
    [50]江湧,荆秀芬,石雪飞.桥梁施工监控测试中混凝土实测徐变应变的计算方法.桥梁建设,2005,(增):145-147
    [51]杨雅勋,李子青,郝宪武等.预应力混凝土连续刚构桥主梁应力测试技术研究.铁道建筑,2007,(8):1-4
    [52]中华人民共和国交通部.公路钢筋混凝土及预应力混凝土桥涵设计规范(JTGD62-2004),北京:人民交通出版社,2004,10-200
    [53]N.J.Gardner M.J.Lockman.Design provisions for Drying Shrinkage and Creep of Normal-Strength Conctete.ACI Materials Journal,2001,(4):159-167
    [54]中华人民共和国交通部.公路沥青路面施工技术规范(JTG F40-2004).北京:人民交通出版社,2004,34-35
    [55]葛耀君.分段施工桥梁分析与控制.北京:人民交通出版社,2003,110-121
    [56](德)凯尔别克(Kehlbeck,F)著,刘兴法译.太阳辐射对桥梁结构的影响.北京:中国铁道出版社,1981,29-37
    [57]彦启森,赵庆珠.建筑热工程[Ⅱ].北京:建筑工业出版社,1986,50-55
    [58]逯颜秋,张肖宁,唐伟霞.桥面铺装层温度场ANSYS模拟.华南理工大学学 报,2007,35(2):59-63
    [59]杨学良,刘伯莹.沥青路面温度场与结构耦合的有限元分析.公路交通科技,2006,23(11):1-4
    [60]邓祖华.钢筋混凝土箱梁桥沥青摊铺温度场研究:[硕士学位论文],南京:东南大学,2008
    [61]张朝晖.ANSYS8.0热分析教程与实例解析.北京:中国铁道工业出版社,2005,1-100
    [62]罗文林,唐蓓华,邓飞宇等.连续箱梁(刚构)桥合拢段底板束张拉致底板破坏浅析.湖南交通科技,2006,32(4):120-123
    [63]严允中.连续刚构桥箱梁底板崩裂原因及预防措施.公路交通科技,2006,12(6):101-104
    [64]黎增丰,涂常卫,钟伟坚等.潭州大桥箱梁底板砼开裂事故处理.中南公路工程,1997,22(4):35-40
    [65]潘钻峰,吕志涛.大跨径连续刚构桥主跨底板合拢预应力束的空间效应研究.世界桥梁,2006,(4):36-39
    [66]包立新,杨广来,杨文军.对连续刚构桥底板开裂问题的探讨.公路,2004,(8):39-41
    [67]WALTER PODOLNY,JR.The cause of cracking in post-tensioned concrete box girder bridge and retrofit procedures.Washington,D.C:PCI Journal prestressed concrete instrutute.1985.1-60
    [68]虞建成,李旺丰.某连续刚构桥中跨跨中底板纵向裂缝成因分析.中外公路,2007,27(1):115-118
    [69]范立础.桥梁工程(上册).北京:人民交通出版社,1990,2-35
    [70]周明华.大跨度变截面预应力砼连续箱梁桥的裂缝病害与施工阶段底板水平撕裂的机理分析.见:第十三届全国混凝土及预应力混凝土学术会议论文.北京:中国土木工程学会混凝土及预应力混凝土分会,2005,513-520
    [71]李俊,李小珍,卫星等.连续刚构桥底板纵向裂纹原因分析.公路,2005,(9):1-5
    [72]Do-yong Moon,Jongsung Sim,Hongseob Oh.Practical crack control during the construction of precast segmental box girder bridges.computer and structures,2005,(83).2584-2593
    [73]Dean VanLanduyt and John E.Breen.Tendon Breakout Failures in bridges.ACI ,1997,(11):1-20
    [74]JIANG Haibo.The cause analysis cracks on key segment of box girder of full-taoyuan bridge.in:International Conference on Transportation Engineering.America:ASCE,2007,807-813
    [75]李健刚,张俊波.连续刚构桥底板防崩问题分析.城市道路与防洪,2008,9.(9):37-39
    [76]江克斌,郭永涛,赵启林等.PC连续箱梁悬臂段空间效应的影响参数研究,公路交通科技,2008,25(1):64-68
    [77]Park R,Paulay T.Reinforced Concrete Structures.Newyork:John Wiley and S ons,1975,41-47
    [78]詹建辉,陈卉.特大桥连续刚构主梁下挠及箱梁裂缝成因分析.中外公路.2005.25(1):56-58
    [79]Prasada Rao A S,Jayaraman J.Creep and Shrinkage Analysis of Partially Prestressed Concrete Members.Journal of Structure Engineering,1989,115(5):1169-1189.
    [80]Sergio Eduardo Gutierrez,Roberto Oscar Cudmani,Rodolfo Francisco Danesi.Time-dependent Analysis of Reinforced and Prestressed Concrete Memhers.ACI structural Journal,1996,93(4):420-427.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700