川中地区上三叠统须家河组层序格架内储层特征
|
摘要
在前人勘探研究的基础上,本论文以川中地区须家河组为研究对象,根据沉积学、层序地层学以及储层沉积学理论为指导,结合野外剖面、岩心观察、铸体薄片分析、扫描电镜分析、孔渗物性分析等资料,对川中古隆起北东侧的广安-合川-安岳地区须二、须四、须六段开展层序地层学特征和地层格架中的储层分布规律研究,取得的主要成果有如下几点:
1.根据前人研究资料,结合野外剖面、测井资料分析,开展了川中古隆起层序地层学研究,提出了适合研究区的地层划分方案,分析了层序发育特征、层序界面类型及成因特征,并将须二段的“腰带子”及须五段的煤层分别作为界面,将广安-合川-安岳地区的须家河组二段-六段划分了6个三级层序(SQ1～SQ6),并对每个层序进行了对比分析,认为在须二段、须四段、须六段中SQ1、SQ2、SQ3、SQ6层序发育比较完全,砂体展布较好,砂体有大面积稳定分布的特点。
2.根据沉积特征分析,将川中地区沉积体系划分为辫状河三角洲-浅湖体系,由须二-须六的岩相古地理编图结果,表明辫状河三角洲体系的分流河道主要来自于川东北的米仓山-大巴山、渝东江南古陆及川南的峨眉瓦山地区,沉积相展布主要受川中古隆起北东侧古地形控制的特点。
3.根据层序格架内的孔渗物性资料、铸体薄片分析,认为广安-合川-安岳地区中-低丰度的岩性油气藏有效孔隙度下限为6%,各个层序中储层在纵向上的分布,主要出现在须二段、须四段、须六段的SQ1、SQ2、SQ3、SQ6层序中,储层的物性较好,并且显示在靠近层序界面的中下部砂体物性更好;在平面上,将须家河组各层序的储层孔隙度等厚线投到沉积相分布图上,显示须二、四段的储层主要分布在合川、潼南地区,物性以分流河道砂体为较好,而须六段的储层主要分布在广安地区,也以分流河道微相的砂体储层物性为较好。
4.通过分析层序格架内的沉积作用、成岩作用,划分出5种对孔隙发育有重要的影响成岩相,确定在影响储层物性的众多因素中,沉积作用是储层发育的基础,在宏观上控制了储层的区域分布规律,成岩作用是储层发育的关键,它决定了储层物性的好坏,构造作用是形成天然气藏和储层高产的重要条件。
Based on the previous research of exploration, this paper studies the Xujiahe formation in central Sichuan. Accordding to sedimentology, sequence stratigraphy, sedimentology of reservoir theory, and combined with the field profile, analyses of cores, cast thin-sections, SEM, and analyses of porosity and permeability properties, it researches the characteristics of sequence stratigraphy and the reserve layer distribution of stratigraphic framework of Xujiahe Formation T3X2、T3X4、T3X6 in Guangan-Hechuan-Anyue areas of northeast of the medieval SiChuan uplift, the main achieved results include the following:
1. According to the previous studies, combined with the field profile, and analysis of the log data, it carried out the sequence stratigraphy research in the medieval SiChuan, proposed the division program of the stratigraphic in the study area, analysed the characteristics of the types and the causes of the sequence boundary, took "sub-belt" in T3X2 and the coal seam in T3X5 as a flood plain face. It is divided into six third-order sequences from T3X2 to T3X6 in Xujiahe formation of Guangan - Hechuan - Anyue region (SQ1 ~ SQ6). By comparing each sequence, it has a result that sequence comparison completely in T3X2、T3X4、T3X6 (SQ1, SQ2, SQ3, SQ6 ), the sandbody cloth well and has the characteristics of stable distribution.
2. According to the analysis of sedimentary features, it is divided into braided river delta-shallow lake depositional system in medieval Sichuan region. By the results of lithofacies palaeogeography map from T3X2 to T3X6, it shows the main distributary channel of braided river delta system comes from the northeastern Sichuan MiCangshan-DaBashan, Chongqing and oldland in Sichuan Jiangnan and Washan of Emei Mountain region. The distribution of sedimentary facies is mainly affected by the north eastern side of the ancient topography characteristics in medieval Sichuan uplift.
3. According to the analyses of porosity, permeability and cast sheet of sequence stratigraphic framework, it concludes that the minimum effective porosity is 6% in middle-lower abundance of oil and gas reservoir lithology of Guangan- Hechuan- Anyue regions. The reservoir in the vertical distribution of the various sequences is mainly in the sequence of T3X2、T3X4、T3X6 (SQ1, SQ2, SQ3, SQ6 ), and the physical properties of reservoir is good, and shows the physical properties is better in the bottom of sequence boundary of the sandbody; In the plane, the isopach map of each sequence of reservoir porosity is Superimposed into sedimentary facies, and it shows that the reservoirs of T3X2, T3X4 fomation are mainly distributed in Hechuan, Tongnan areas, and the distribution of properties is better in sandbody of channel. The reservoir of T3X6 fomation is mainly distributed in Guangan areas, and the distribution of properties is better in sandbody of micro channel.
4. By analyzing the sedimentation, diagenesis of the sequence stratigraphic framework, it is divided into five kinds of diagenetic phases, which play important implications in porosity development. From the many impact factors of reservoir properties, sedimentation is the basis of reservoir development, which control the macro distribution of reservoir; The diagenesis is the key to reservoir development, which determines the quality of reservoir properties. And the structure is an important condition for the formation of natural gas and the high yield of reservoir.
1.根据前人研究资料,结合野外剖面、测井资料分析,开展了川中古隆起层序地层学研究,提出了适合研究区的地层划分方案,分析了层序发育特征、层序界面类型及成因特征,并将须二段的“腰带子”及须五段的煤层分别作为界面,将广安-合川-安岳地区的须家河组二段-六段划分了6个三级层序(SQ1～SQ6),并对每个层序进行了对比分析,认为在须二段、须四段、须六段中SQ1、SQ2、SQ3、SQ6层序发育比较完全,砂体展布较好,砂体有大面积稳定分布的特点。
2.根据沉积特征分析,将川中地区沉积体系划分为辫状河三角洲-浅湖体系,由须二-须六的岩相古地理编图结果,表明辫状河三角洲体系的分流河道主要来自于川东北的米仓山-大巴山、渝东江南古陆及川南的峨眉瓦山地区,沉积相展布主要受川中古隆起北东侧古地形控制的特点。
3.根据层序格架内的孔渗物性资料、铸体薄片分析,认为广安-合川-安岳地区中-低丰度的岩性油气藏有效孔隙度下限为6%,各个层序中储层在纵向上的分布,主要出现在须二段、须四段、须六段的SQ1、SQ2、SQ3、SQ6层序中,储层的物性较好,并且显示在靠近层序界面的中下部砂体物性更好;在平面上,将须家河组各层序的储层孔隙度等厚线投到沉积相分布图上,显示须二、四段的储层主要分布在合川、潼南地区,物性以分流河道砂体为较好,而须六段的储层主要分布在广安地区,也以分流河道微相的砂体储层物性为较好。
4.通过分析层序格架内的沉积作用、成岩作用,划分出5种对孔隙发育有重要的影响成岩相,确定在影响储层物性的众多因素中,沉积作用是储层发育的基础,在宏观上控制了储层的区域分布规律,成岩作用是储层发育的关键,它决定了储层物性的好坏,构造作用是形成天然气藏和储层高产的重要条件。
Based on the previous research of exploration, this paper studies the Xujiahe formation in central Sichuan. Accordding to sedimentology, sequence stratigraphy, sedimentology of reservoir theory, and combined with the field profile, analyses of cores, cast thin-sections, SEM, and analyses of porosity and permeability properties, it researches the characteristics of sequence stratigraphy and the reserve layer distribution of stratigraphic framework of Xujiahe Formation T3X2、T3X4、T3X6 in Guangan-Hechuan-Anyue areas of northeast of the medieval SiChuan uplift, the main achieved results include the following:
1. According to the previous studies, combined with the field profile, and analysis of the log data, it carried out the sequence stratigraphy research in the medieval SiChuan, proposed the division program of the stratigraphic in the study area, analysed the characteristics of the types and the causes of the sequence boundary, took "sub-belt" in T3X2 and the coal seam in T3X5 as a flood plain face. It is divided into six third-order sequences from T3X2 to T3X6 in Xujiahe formation of Guangan - Hechuan - Anyue region (SQ1 ~ SQ6). By comparing each sequence, it has a result that sequence comparison completely in T3X2、T3X4、T3X6 (SQ1, SQ2, SQ3, SQ6 ), the sandbody cloth well and has the characteristics of stable distribution.
2. According to the analysis of sedimentary features, it is divided into braided river delta-shallow lake depositional system in medieval Sichuan region. By the results of lithofacies palaeogeography map from T3X2 to T3X6, it shows the main distributary channel of braided river delta system comes from the northeastern Sichuan MiCangshan-DaBashan, Chongqing and oldland in Sichuan Jiangnan and Washan of Emei Mountain region. The distribution of sedimentary facies is mainly affected by the north eastern side of the ancient topography characteristics in medieval Sichuan uplift.
3. According to the analyses of porosity, permeability and cast sheet of sequence stratigraphic framework, it concludes that the minimum effective porosity is 6% in middle-lower abundance of oil and gas reservoir lithology of Guangan- Hechuan- Anyue regions. The reservoir in the vertical distribution of the various sequences is mainly in the sequence of T3X2、T3X4、T3X6 (SQ1, SQ2, SQ3, SQ6 ), and the physical properties of reservoir is good, and shows the physical properties is better in the bottom of sequence boundary of the sandbody; In the plane, the isopach map of each sequence of reservoir porosity is Superimposed into sedimentary facies, and it shows that the reservoirs of T3X2, T3X4 fomation are mainly distributed in Hechuan, Tongnan areas, and the distribution of properties is better in sandbody of channel. The reservoir of T3X6 fomation is mainly distributed in Guangan areas, and the distribution of properties is better in sandbody of micro channel.
4. By analyzing the sedimentation, diagenesis of the sequence stratigraphic framework, it is divided into five kinds of diagenetic phases, which play important implications in porosity development. From the many impact factors of reservoir properties, sedimentation is the basis of reservoir development, which control the macro distribution of reservoir; The diagenesis is the key to reservoir development, which determines the quality of reservoir properties. And the structure is an important condition for the formation of natural gas and the high yield of reservoir.
引文
[1]四川省地质矿产局.中华人民共和国地质矿产部地质专报.一区域地质第23号四川省区域地质志[M].北京:地质出版社, 1991.206～241
[2]车国琼,翟中华等.川中地区上三叠统天然气有利勘探区带与目标优选评价研究.中石油勘探院内部资料.2006.6
[3]蒋裕强等,川中地区须家河组天然气成藏机制研究,天然气工业,2006年,11(1)
[4]蒋裕强等,川中地区上三叠须家河组须二和须四段砂岩优质储层成因探讨[J],油气地质与采收率,2007,14(1):18～21
[5]汪泽成,赵文智,张林,等.四川盆地构造层序与天然气勘探[M].北京:地质出版社, 2002
[6]赵文智,胡素云,董大忠,蔚远江.“十五”期间中国油气勘探进展及未来重点勘探领域[J].石油勘探与开发, 2007,(05)
[7]Vail P R , Mitchum R M J r , Thompsons S. Global2cycles of relative changes of sea level[A]. AAPG Memoir,1977,26:83-97
[8]Vail P R. Sequence stratigraphy workbook, fundamentals of sequence stratigraphy[A]. AAPG annual convention short course: sequence stratigraphy interpretation of seismic stratigraphy interpretation procedure[C]. Houston: AAPG, 1988
[9]Vail P R, Audemard F, Bowman S A, et al. The stratigraphic signatures of tectonics, eustasy and sedimentology: an overview[A]. Cycles and event s in st ratigraphy[C]. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1991,617-659
[10]陈洪德,刘文均,郑荣才等.层序地层学理论和研究方法[M].成都科技出版社.1995
[11]陈洪德,田海芹,田景春.中国南方中-新生代构造-层序岩相古地理研究及编图[R].成都理工大学沉积地质研究院.2006
[12]郑荣才.四川盆地下侏罗统大安寨段高分辨率层序地层学[J].沉积学报.1998,16(2):42-49
[13]郑荣才,尹世民,彭军.基准面旋回结构与叠加样式的沉积动力学分析[J].沉积学报, 2000,18(3):369～375
[14]郑荣才,彭军,吴朝容.陆相盆地基准面旋回的级次划分和研究意义[J].沉积学报, 2001,19(2):249～255
[15]郑荣才,吴朝容.西部凹陷深层沙河街组生储盖组合的层序分析[J].成都理工学院学报, 1999,26(4)348-356
[16]郑荣才,彭军.陕北志丹三角洲长6油层组高分辨率层序分析与等时对比[J].沉积学报, 2002,20(1):92-100
[17]徐怀大等译.层序地层学原理[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1993
[18]王鸿祯,翟裕生,游振东等.中国地质科学50年的简要回顾[J],地质论评,2000(1)
[19]Cross T A. Controls on coal distribution in transgressive-regressive cycles, Upper Cretaceous, Western Interior, U. S. A. In: Wilgaus C K et al. Sea-level changes: An integrarl approach. SEPM Special Publication,1988,42:371～380
[20]邓宏文.美国层序地层研究中的新学派─高分辨率层序地层学[J].石油与天然气地质,1995,16(2):89～97
[21]邓宏文,王红亮,祝永军,等.高分辨率层序地层学-原理及应用[M].北京:地质出版社, 2002.3-24
[22]魏国齐,宋华清等,四川盆地川中-川南过渡带上三叠统油气成藏主控因素及富集规律研究,中国石油勘探开发研究院,内部报告,2006
[23]郭正吾,邓康龄,韩永辉,等.四川盆地形成与演化[M].北京:地质出版社,1996
[24]刘和甫,汪泽成.中国中西部中,新生代前陆盆地与挤压造山带耦合分析[J].地学前缘, 2000, 7(3): 55-72
[25]冯增昭.单因素分析综合作图法—岩相古地理学方法论[J].沉积学报.1992,10(3):70-77.
[26]罗志立.四川盆地基底结构的新认识[J].成都理工学院学报, 1998,(02)
[27]刘树根,罗志立,戴苏兰.龙门山冲断带的隆升和川西前陆盆地的沉降[J].地质学报,1995,69(3):205-213
[28]郑荣才,朱如凯,翟文亮等.川西类前陆盆地晚三叠世须家河期构造演化及层序充填样式[J].中国地质.2008.35(2):246～254
[29]刘和甫.前陆盆地类型及褶皱-冲断层样式[J].地学前缘, 1995,2(3-4):59-68
[30]刘和甫,李晓清,刘立群,等.盆山耦合与前陆盆地成藏区带分析[J].现代地质,2004,18(4): 389-403
[31]罗志立.试论中国型(C-型)冲断带及其油气勘探问题[J].石油与天然气地质, 1984,5(4):315-323
[32]刘树根,徐国盛,李巨初,等.龙门山造山带-川西前陆盆地系统的成山成盆成藏动力学[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2003,30(6): 559-566
[33]刘树根,罗志立,赵锡奎,等.试论中国西部陆内俯冲型前陆盆地的基本特征[J].石油与天然气地质,2005,26(1): 37-48
[34]邹才能,李明,吴亚东等,川中地区香溪群层序地层研究及气藏目标评价,中国石油勘探开发研究院内部资料,2005.10
[35]四川盆地陆相中生代地层古生物编写组.四川盆地陆相中生代地层古生物[M].成都:四川人民出版社, 1984.5-56
[36]罗启后,王世谦.四川盆地中西部三叠系重点含气层系天然气富集条件研究[J].天然气工业,1996,(S1):40-54
[37]何鲤.四川盆地上三叠统地震地层划分与对比方案[J].石油与天然气地质, 1989,10(4):439～446
[38]张健、李国辉等,四川盆地上三叠统划分对比研究,天然气工业,2006,26(1):12～15
[39]高红灿.四川盆地上三叠统须家河组层序—岩相古地理及砂体分布研究[D].成都理工大学, 2007
[40]王鸿祯(主编).中国古地理图集[M].北京:地图出版社,1985
[41]曾允孚,李勇.龙门山前陆盆地形成与演化[J].矿物岩石,1995,15(1):40～49
[42]罗志立,龙学明.龙门山造山带的崛起和川西前陆盆地的沉降[J].四川地质学报,1992,12(1):204～218
[43]刘树根.龙门山冲断带与川西前陆盆地的形成演化[M].成都:成都科技大学出版社,1993,1～119
[44]刘树根,赵锡奎,罗志立,等.龙门山造山带一川西前陆盆地系统构造事件研究[J].成都理工学院学报, 2001,28(3): 221～230
[45]李勇.论龙门山前陆盆地与龙门山造山带的耦合关系[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报,1998,17(2):77～81
[46]李勇,孙爱珍.龙门山造山带构造地层学研究[J].地层学杂志,2000,24(3): 201-206
[47]刘树根,罗志立,赵锡奎,等.中国西部盆山系统的耦合关系及其动力学模式——以龙门山造山带一川西前陆盆地系统为例[J].地质学报, 2003,77(2): 177～186
[48]罗志立,刘树根,雍自权,等.中国陆内俯冲(C-俯冲)观的形成和发展[J].新疆石油地质, 2003,24(1):1～7
[49]罗志立.试评A-俯冲带术语在中国大地构造学中的应用[J].石油实验地质,1994,16(4):317～323
[50]罗志立,刘树根.评述“前陆盆地”名词在中国中西部含油气盆地中的引用[J].地质论评,2002,48(4):398-406
[51]罗志立,李景明,李小军,等.中国前陆盆地特征及含油气远景分析[J].中国石油勘探,2004,9(2):1～11
[52]陈智梁,陈世瑜.扬子地块西缘地质构造演化[M].重庆:重庆出版社,1987
[53]何登发,吕修祥,林永汉等.前陆盆地分析[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1996
[54]蒋裕强,陶艳忠等,川中地区上三叠统储层评价及控制因素研究,中石油勘探院,内部资料,2007
[55]王金琪.安县构造运动[J].石油与天然气地质,1990,11(3):223～234
[56] Dickinson W R. Plate tectonics and sedimentation. In Dickinson W R. et al., Tectonics and Sedimentation: Society of Economic Paleontoloists and Minlogists, Special Publication, 1974,22:1～27
[57]顾家裕.陆相盆地层序地层学格架概念及模式[J].石油勘探与开发,1995,22 (4):6-10.
[57]纪友亮,张世奇等.陆相断陷湖盆层序地层学[M]北京石油工业出版社,1996
[58]田景春,陈洪德,覃建雄,等.层序-岩相古地理图及其编制.地球科学与环境学报,2004,26(1):6～12
[59]高红灿,郑荣才,柯光明,等.川东北前陆盆地须家河组层序-岩相古地理特征[J].沉积与特提斯地质,2005,25(3):38～45
[60]高志勇,罗平,郑荣才等,四川磨溪-龙女寺构造香溪群高分辨率层序地层分析,成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2005.
[61]冯增昭主编,沉积岩石学,石油工业出版社,1994.
[62]姜在兴等.沉积学,北京石油工业出版社, 2003. [63)张金亮,王宝清等.四川盆地中西部上三叠统沉积相[J].西安石油学院学报(自然科学版),2000,15(2):1-6.
[64]侯方浩,蒋裕强,方少仙,等.四川盆地上三叠统香溪组二段和四段砂岩沉积模式[J].石油学报.2005,26(2):30-37.
[65]朱仕军,黄继详.川中-川南过渡带香溪群地层划分与对比[J].西南石油学院学报,1996,18(2)
[65]林良彪,陈洪德,姜平等.川西前陆盆地须家河组沉积相及岩相古地理演化[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2006,(04)
[66]赵强,赵路子,田景春等.川中、川南过渡带须家河组储集砂体成因类型及特征[J].沉积与特提斯地质, 2007,(02)
[67]谢继容,李国辉,唐大海.四川盆地上三叠统须家河组物源供给体系分析[J].天然气勘探与开发, 2006,(04)
[68]罗启后,王世谦.四川盆地中西部三叠系重点含气层系天然气富集条件研究[J].天然气工业,1996,(S1):40-54
[69]梁西文,何文斌,盛贤才.四川盆地东缘上三叠统须家河组沉积特征[J].华南地质与矿产, 2006(1):59-65
[70]宋岩,赵孟军,柳少波等.中国3类前陆盆地油气成藏特征[J].石油勘探与开发,2005,32(3):1-6
[71]顾家裕,宁从前.塔里木盆地碎屑岩优质储层特征及成因分析〔J}.地质论评,1998, 14(1):8389
[72]应凤祥,罗平,何东博等,中国含油气盆地碎屑岩储集层成岩作用与成岩数值模拟[M],北京石油工业出版社,2004
[73]应凤祥,杨式升,张敏等.激光扫描共聚焦显微镜研究储层孔隙结构[J].沉积学报, 2002,(01)
[74]刘宝珺,张锦泉主编,沉积成岩作用[M],北京:科学出版社,1992,6-22,68-92
[75]罗平,杨式升,马龙等.酒西盆地青西坳陷湖相纹层状泥质白云岩中泥级斜长石成因、特征与油气勘探意义[J].石油勘探与开发,2001,(06)
[2]车国琼,翟中华等.川中地区上三叠统天然气有利勘探区带与目标优选评价研究.中石油勘探院内部资料.2006.6
[3]蒋裕强等,川中地区须家河组天然气成藏机制研究,天然气工业,2006年,11(1)
[4]蒋裕强等,川中地区上三叠须家河组须二和须四段砂岩优质储层成因探讨[J],油气地质与采收率,2007,14(1):18～21
[5]汪泽成,赵文智,张林,等.四川盆地构造层序与天然气勘探[M].北京:地质出版社, 2002
[6]赵文智,胡素云,董大忠,蔚远江.“十五”期间中国油气勘探进展及未来重点勘探领域[J].石油勘探与开发, 2007,(05)
[7]Vail P R , Mitchum R M J r , Thompsons S. Global2cycles of relative changes of sea level[A]. AAPG Memoir,1977,26:83-97
[8]Vail P R. Sequence stratigraphy workbook, fundamentals of sequence stratigraphy[A]. AAPG annual convention short course: sequence stratigraphy interpretation of seismic stratigraphy interpretation procedure[C]. Houston: AAPG, 1988
[9]Vail P R, Audemard F, Bowman S A, et al. The stratigraphic signatures of tectonics, eustasy and sedimentology: an overview[A]. Cycles and event s in st ratigraphy[C]. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1991,617-659
[10]陈洪德,刘文均,郑荣才等.层序地层学理论和研究方法[M].成都科技出版社.1995
[11]陈洪德,田海芹,田景春.中国南方中-新生代构造-层序岩相古地理研究及编图[R].成都理工大学沉积地质研究院.2006
[12]郑荣才.四川盆地下侏罗统大安寨段高分辨率层序地层学[J].沉积学报.1998,16(2):42-49
[13]郑荣才,尹世民,彭军.基准面旋回结构与叠加样式的沉积动力学分析[J].沉积学报, 2000,18(3):369～375
[14]郑荣才,彭军,吴朝容.陆相盆地基准面旋回的级次划分和研究意义[J].沉积学报, 2001,19(2):249～255
[15]郑荣才,吴朝容.西部凹陷深层沙河街组生储盖组合的层序分析[J].成都理工学院学报, 1999,26(4)348-356
[16]郑荣才,彭军.陕北志丹三角洲长6油层组高分辨率层序分析与等时对比[J].沉积学报, 2002,20(1):92-100
[17]徐怀大等译.层序地层学原理[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1993
[18]王鸿祯,翟裕生,游振东等.中国地质科学50年的简要回顾[J],地质论评,2000(1)
[19]Cross T A. Controls on coal distribution in transgressive-regressive cycles, Upper Cretaceous, Western Interior, U. S. A. In: Wilgaus C K et al. Sea-level changes: An integrarl approach. SEPM Special Publication,1988,42:371～380
[20]邓宏文.美国层序地层研究中的新学派─高分辨率层序地层学[J].石油与天然气地质,1995,16(2):89～97
[21]邓宏文,王红亮,祝永军,等.高分辨率层序地层学-原理及应用[M].北京:地质出版社, 2002.3-24
[22]魏国齐,宋华清等,四川盆地川中-川南过渡带上三叠统油气成藏主控因素及富集规律研究,中国石油勘探开发研究院,内部报告,2006
[23]郭正吾,邓康龄,韩永辉,等.四川盆地形成与演化[M].北京:地质出版社,1996
[24]刘和甫,汪泽成.中国中西部中,新生代前陆盆地与挤压造山带耦合分析[J].地学前缘, 2000, 7(3): 55-72
[25]冯增昭.单因素分析综合作图法—岩相古地理学方法论[J].沉积学报.1992,10(3):70-77.
[26]罗志立.四川盆地基底结构的新认识[J].成都理工学院学报, 1998,(02)
[27]刘树根,罗志立,戴苏兰.龙门山冲断带的隆升和川西前陆盆地的沉降[J].地质学报,1995,69(3):205-213
[28]郑荣才,朱如凯,翟文亮等.川西类前陆盆地晚三叠世须家河期构造演化及层序充填样式[J].中国地质.2008.35(2):246～254
[29]刘和甫.前陆盆地类型及褶皱-冲断层样式[J].地学前缘, 1995,2(3-4):59-68
[30]刘和甫,李晓清,刘立群,等.盆山耦合与前陆盆地成藏区带分析[J].现代地质,2004,18(4): 389-403
[31]罗志立.试论中国型(C-型)冲断带及其油气勘探问题[J].石油与天然气地质, 1984,5(4):315-323
[32]刘树根,徐国盛,李巨初,等.龙门山造山带-川西前陆盆地系统的成山成盆成藏动力学[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2003,30(6): 559-566
[33]刘树根,罗志立,赵锡奎,等.试论中国西部陆内俯冲型前陆盆地的基本特征[J].石油与天然气地质,2005,26(1): 37-48
[34]邹才能,李明,吴亚东等,川中地区香溪群层序地层研究及气藏目标评价,中国石油勘探开发研究院内部资料,2005.10
[35]四川盆地陆相中生代地层古生物编写组.四川盆地陆相中生代地层古生物[M].成都:四川人民出版社, 1984.5-56
[36]罗启后,王世谦.四川盆地中西部三叠系重点含气层系天然气富集条件研究[J].天然气工业,1996,(S1):40-54
[37]何鲤.四川盆地上三叠统地震地层划分与对比方案[J].石油与天然气地质, 1989,10(4):439～446
[38]张健、李国辉等,四川盆地上三叠统划分对比研究,天然气工业,2006,26(1):12～15
[39]高红灿.四川盆地上三叠统须家河组层序—岩相古地理及砂体分布研究[D].成都理工大学, 2007
[40]王鸿祯(主编).中国古地理图集[M].北京:地图出版社,1985
[41]曾允孚,李勇.龙门山前陆盆地形成与演化[J].矿物岩石,1995,15(1):40～49
[42]罗志立,龙学明.龙门山造山带的崛起和川西前陆盆地的沉降[J].四川地质学报,1992,12(1):204～218
[43]刘树根.龙门山冲断带与川西前陆盆地的形成演化[M].成都:成都科技大学出版社,1993,1～119
[44]刘树根,赵锡奎,罗志立,等.龙门山造山带一川西前陆盆地系统构造事件研究[J].成都理工学院学报, 2001,28(3): 221～230
[45]李勇.论龙门山前陆盆地与龙门山造山带的耦合关系[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报,1998,17(2):77～81
[46]李勇,孙爱珍.龙门山造山带构造地层学研究[J].地层学杂志,2000,24(3): 201-206
[47]刘树根,罗志立,赵锡奎,等.中国西部盆山系统的耦合关系及其动力学模式——以龙门山造山带一川西前陆盆地系统为例[J].地质学报, 2003,77(2): 177～186
[48]罗志立,刘树根,雍自权,等.中国陆内俯冲(C-俯冲)观的形成和发展[J].新疆石油地质, 2003,24(1):1～7
[49]罗志立.试评A-俯冲带术语在中国大地构造学中的应用[J].石油实验地质,1994,16(4):317～323
[50]罗志立,刘树根.评述“前陆盆地”名词在中国中西部含油气盆地中的引用[J].地质论评,2002,48(4):398-406
[51]罗志立,李景明,李小军,等.中国前陆盆地特征及含油气远景分析[J].中国石油勘探,2004,9(2):1～11
[52]陈智梁,陈世瑜.扬子地块西缘地质构造演化[M].重庆:重庆出版社,1987
[53]何登发,吕修祥,林永汉等.前陆盆地分析[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1996
[54]蒋裕强,陶艳忠等,川中地区上三叠统储层评价及控制因素研究,中石油勘探院,内部资料,2007
[55]王金琪.安县构造运动[J].石油与天然气地质,1990,11(3):223～234
[56] Dickinson W R. Plate tectonics and sedimentation. In Dickinson W R. et al., Tectonics and Sedimentation: Society of Economic Paleontoloists and Minlogists, Special Publication, 1974,22:1～27
[57]顾家裕.陆相盆地层序地层学格架概念及模式[J].石油勘探与开发,1995,22 (4):6-10.
[57]纪友亮,张世奇等.陆相断陷湖盆层序地层学[M]北京石油工业出版社,1996
[58]田景春,陈洪德,覃建雄,等.层序-岩相古地理图及其编制.地球科学与环境学报,2004,26(1):6～12
[59]高红灿,郑荣才,柯光明,等.川东北前陆盆地须家河组层序-岩相古地理特征[J].沉积与特提斯地质,2005,25(3):38～45
[60]高志勇,罗平,郑荣才等,四川磨溪-龙女寺构造香溪群高分辨率层序地层分析,成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2005.
[61]冯增昭主编,沉积岩石学,石油工业出版社,1994.
[62]姜在兴等.沉积学,北京石油工业出版社, 2003. [63)张金亮,王宝清等.四川盆地中西部上三叠统沉积相[J].西安石油学院学报(自然科学版),2000,15(2):1-6.
[64]侯方浩,蒋裕强,方少仙,等.四川盆地上三叠统香溪组二段和四段砂岩沉积模式[J].石油学报.2005,26(2):30-37.
[65]朱仕军,黄继详.川中-川南过渡带香溪群地层划分与对比[J].西南石油学院学报,1996,18(2)
[65]林良彪,陈洪德,姜平等.川西前陆盆地须家河组沉积相及岩相古地理演化[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2006,(04)
[66]赵强,赵路子,田景春等.川中、川南过渡带须家河组储集砂体成因类型及特征[J].沉积与特提斯地质, 2007,(02)
[67]谢继容,李国辉,唐大海.四川盆地上三叠统须家河组物源供给体系分析[J].天然气勘探与开发, 2006,(04)
[68]罗启后,王世谦.四川盆地中西部三叠系重点含气层系天然气富集条件研究[J].天然气工业,1996,(S1):40-54
[69]梁西文,何文斌,盛贤才.四川盆地东缘上三叠统须家河组沉积特征[J].华南地质与矿产, 2006(1):59-65
[70]宋岩,赵孟军,柳少波等.中国3类前陆盆地油气成藏特征[J].石油勘探与开发,2005,32(3):1-6
[71]顾家裕,宁从前.塔里木盆地碎屑岩优质储层特征及成因分析〔J}.地质论评,1998, 14(1):8389
[72]应凤祥,罗平,何东博等,中国含油气盆地碎屑岩储集层成岩作用与成岩数值模拟[M],北京石油工业出版社,2004
[73]应凤祥,杨式升,张敏等.激光扫描共聚焦显微镜研究储层孔隙结构[J].沉积学报, 2002,(01)
[74]刘宝珺,张锦泉主编,沉积成岩作用[M],北京:科学出版社,1992,6-22,68-92
[75]罗平,杨式升,马龙等.酒西盆地青西坳陷湖相纹层状泥质白云岩中泥级斜长石成因、特征与油气勘探意义[J].石油勘探与开发,2001,(06)