东秦岭—大别造山带北侧构造变形研究
|
摘要
秦岭--大别造山带是中国扬子、华北两大板块的构造拼合带。东秦岭-大别造山带北侧是该区域的重要组成部分。研究该区域的构造特点,解析不同时期构造作用,重塑东秦岭-大别造山带北侧现今结构,确立纵向和横向构造变形的差异性,对于推动该地区盆山关系和地质找矿有着重要意义。
本文在了解秦岭大别造山带及邻区最新研究进展的基础上,以活动论构造历史观为指导,综合应用构造学、岩石学和地球物理的方法,通过野外地质调查和室内综合地球物理资料的解释,得出如下结论。
(1)根据主要构造界线和演化过程,以商南-信阳-舒城断裂和襄樊—广济断裂为界,将研究区划分为三个地块：华北地块、秦岭地块和扬子地块。其中,以灵宝-鲁山-确山-固始—肥东断裂带为界,将华北地块分为华北地块南部和华北地块本部,且在华北地块南部,栾川—方城—明港—肥西断裂再次将其分为北秦岭构造带和华北地块南缘构造带。
(2)根据地层接触关系,以印支期界面为主要分界面,东秦岭—大别造山带北缘地区可分为三大构造层：盆地基底、盆地盖层和上覆层。其盆地基底为前印支构造层,盆地盖层可再分为印支期亚构造层、早燕山亚构造层、中燕山亚构造层、晚燕山—早喜马拉雅亚构造层、晚喜马拉雅亚构造层,上覆层为第四纪沉积物。作为研究主体的盆地盖层各亚构造层还可细分出系列次一级构造层。
(3)通过确立研究区四条主干地质剖面：西峡—伊川剖面、桐柏—舞阳剖面、新县—光山剖面和六安—岳西剖面构造形变特征,搭建了区域地质格架
(4)建立了研究区现今各结构单元的差异构造变形、变形样式和变形量的分析,明确了各构造单元的差异变形。
Qinling-Dabie orogenic belt is the tectonic amalgamation belt of Yangtze plate and North China plate, of which the East Qinling-the northern margin of Dabie organic belt is the main component part. This paper studied the tectonic characteristics, analysed tectonic actions during different periods, remolded the current structure of the East Qinling-the northern margin of Dabie orogenic belt and established the differences between the vertical and horizontal tectonic deformation.It is of great value in making clear the relationship between the basin and the mountion in this region and geological prospecting.
On the basis of systematically summing up the results of the previous research, under the guide of mobilism and tectonic history view, through the methods of tectonics,petrology and geophysics, field research and laboratory analysis, the Qinling-the north Dabie orogenic belt structural characteristics and tectonic evolution come to the following conclusions and awareness.
(1) Compromise based on the regional geophysical characteristics in the study area, the important tectonic boundary is established by the Shangnan-Xinyang-Shucheng fracture, Luanchuan-Fangcheng-Minggnag-feixi fracture and Lingbao-Lushan queshan-Gushi-feidong crack band.According to the main tectonic boundaries and evolutionary processes to shangnan-Xinyang-Shucheng fault and Xiangfan-Guang Ji fault bounded, the study area are divided into three blocks:the North China block, Qinling block and Yangtze block, Among them, Lingbao-Lushan-queshan-Gushi-feidong fault zone is bounded, by which the North China block is divided into the southern North China Block and North China block headquarters, and in the southern of North China block, Luanchuan-Fangcheng-Minggang-feixi fault again divided into the North Qinling tectonic belt and the southern margin of North China block tectonic belt.
(2) According to research stratigraphic contact, Indo-China as the main interface, the East Qinling-the northern margin of Dabie orogenic belt can be divided into three tectonic regions:the basement, basin cap rock and overlying layers, the basin basement shall be pre-Indo-China structural layer, while the basin cap rock can be further divided into sub-structural layer Indosinian early Yanshan tectonic sub-layer, in the Yanshan tectonic sub-late Yanshan-Early Himalayan sub-structural layer, late Himalayan sub-structural layer, Quaternary sediments overlying layer. As a research subject in the study area the sub-basin tectonic cap rock can be further divided into a series of less-grand structural layer.
(3) The tectonic deformation features of four main geological sections are established in the study area:Xixia-Yichuan profile, Tongbai-Wuyang profile, Xinxian-Guangshan profiles and Liuan-Yuexi profile.
(4) Through analysis the remnants stratigraphic distribution, tectonic chronology and rock fabric, balanced cross-section analysis, and paleo-stress analysis, established the research of differences in tectonic deformation, deformation styles and deformation analysis in the present-day structural unit, the differences in deformation of the various tectonic units are made clear.
本文在了解秦岭大别造山带及邻区最新研究进展的基础上,以活动论构造历史观为指导,综合应用构造学、岩石学和地球物理的方法,通过野外地质调查和室内综合地球物理资料的解释,得出如下结论。
(1)根据主要构造界线和演化过程,以商南-信阳-舒城断裂和襄樊—广济断裂为界,将研究区划分为三个地块：华北地块、秦岭地块和扬子地块。其中,以灵宝-鲁山-确山-固始—肥东断裂带为界,将华北地块分为华北地块南部和华北地块本部,且在华北地块南部,栾川—方城—明港—肥西断裂再次将其分为北秦岭构造带和华北地块南缘构造带。
(2)根据地层接触关系,以印支期界面为主要分界面,东秦岭—大别造山带北缘地区可分为三大构造层：盆地基底、盆地盖层和上覆层。其盆地基底为前印支构造层,盆地盖层可再分为印支期亚构造层、早燕山亚构造层、中燕山亚构造层、晚燕山—早喜马拉雅亚构造层、晚喜马拉雅亚构造层,上覆层为第四纪沉积物。作为研究主体的盆地盖层各亚构造层还可细分出系列次一级构造层。
(3)通过确立研究区四条主干地质剖面：西峡—伊川剖面、桐柏—舞阳剖面、新县—光山剖面和六安—岳西剖面构造形变特征,搭建了区域地质格架
(4)建立了研究区现今各结构单元的差异构造变形、变形样式和变形量的分析,明确了各构造单元的差异变形。
Qinling-Dabie orogenic belt is the tectonic amalgamation belt of Yangtze plate and North China plate, of which the East Qinling-the northern margin of Dabie organic belt is the main component part. This paper studied the tectonic characteristics, analysed tectonic actions during different periods, remolded the current structure of the East Qinling-the northern margin of Dabie orogenic belt and established the differences between the vertical and horizontal tectonic deformation.It is of great value in making clear the relationship between the basin and the mountion in this region and geological prospecting.
On the basis of systematically summing up the results of the previous research, under the guide of mobilism and tectonic history view, through the methods of tectonics,petrology and geophysics, field research and laboratory analysis, the Qinling-the north Dabie orogenic belt structural characteristics and tectonic evolution come to the following conclusions and awareness.
(1) Compromise based on the regional geophysical characteristics in the study area, the important tectonic boundary is established by the Shangnan-Xinyang-Shucheng fracture, Luanchuan-Fangcheng-Minggnag-feixi fracture and Lingbao-Lushan queshan-Gushi-feidong crack band.According to the main tectonic boundaries and evolutionary processes to shangnan-Xinyang-Shucheng fault and Xiangfan-Guang Ji fault bounded, the study area are divided into three blocks:the North China block, Qinling block and Yangtze block, Among them, Lingbao-Lushan-queshan-Gushi-feidong fault zone is bounded, by which the North China block is divided into the southern North China Block and North China block headquarters, and in the southern of North China block, Luanchuan-Fangcheng-Minggang-feixi fault again divided into the North Qinling tectonic belt and the southern margin of North China block tectonic belt.
(2) According to research stratigraphic contact, Indo-China as the main interface, the East Qinling-the northern margin of Dabie orogenic belt can be divided into three tectonic regions:the basement, basin cap rock and overlying layers, the basin basement shall be pre-Indo-China structural layer, while the basin cap rock can be further divided into sub-structural layer Indosinian early Yanshan tectonic sub-layer, in the Yanshan tectonic sub-late Yanshan-Early Himalayan sub-structural layer, late Himalayan sub-structural layer, Quaternary sediments overlying layer. As a research subject in the study area the sub-basin tectonic cap rock can be further divided into a series of less-grand structural layer.
(3) The tectonic deformation features of four main geological sections are established in the study area:Xixia-Yichuan profile, Tongbai-Wuyang profile, Xinxian-Guangshan profiles and Liuan-Yuexi profile.
(4) Through analysis the remnants stratigraphic distribution, tectonic chronology and rock fabric, balanced cross-section analysis, and paleo-stress analysis, established the research of differences in tectonic deformation, deformation styles and deformation analysis in the present-day structural unit, the differences in deformation of the various tectonic units are made clear.
引文
[1]Isacks,B., L. Oliver, J., Sykes, L.R.., Seismology and the new global tectonics[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,1968,73:5855-5900
[2]Isacks,B., Molnar,P., Mantel earthquake mechanisms and sinking of the lithosphere[J].Nature 1969, 223:1121-1124
[3]Minear, J.W., Toksoz, M.N., Thermal regime of a down going and new global tectonics, [J].Joural of Geophysical Research,1970,1397-1419
[4]Bird, P., Toksoz, M.N., SleeP, N.H., Thermal and mechanical models of continent-continent convergent zones[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,1975,80:4405-4416
[5]Wiekham, S.M., Oxburgh, E.R., Continental rifts as a setting for regional metamorphism, [J].Nature, 1985,318:330-333
[6]Whitehead, Jr., J.A., Dick, H.J.B., Schouten, H., A mechanism for magmatic accretion under spreading centers[J].Nature,1984,312:146-147
[7]Sack, P.E., Secor Jr, S.T., Delamination in collisional orogens[J].Geology,1990,18:999-1002
[8]Buck, W. R, Modes of continental lithospheric extension[J].Journal Geophysics Research,1991, 96:20161-20178
[9]Bonini, M., Sokoutis, D., Mulugeta, G, et al, Dynamics of magma emplacement in centrifuge models of continental extension with implications for flnak volcanism[J].Tectonics,2001,20(6):1053-65
[10]Allerton, S., Escartin, J.R., Searle, C., Extremely asymmetric magmatic accretion of oceanic crust at the ends of slow-spreading ridge segments[J].Geology,2000,28(2):179-182
[11]毛建仁,陶奎元,杨祝良,等Geodynamic Background of the Mesozoic Intracontinental Magmatism in Southeast China[J]. Chinese Journal of Geochemistry 1997,16(3):230-239
[12]刘凤山,石准立,太行山---燕山地区中生代花岗岩生成动力学机制与陆内造山作用[J].地球学报,1998,191：13-18
[13]郭正府,邓晋福,许志琴,等.青藏东昆仑晚古生代末--中生代中酸性火成岩与陆内造山过程[J].现代地质,1998,12(3)：344-352
[14]Huismans R.S., Podladchikov, Y.Y, Cloetingh, S., Dynamic modeling of the transition from passive to active rifting, application to the Pannonian basin[J].Tectonics.2001,20(6):1021-1039
[15]Lewis, J.C.,Byrne, T.B., Fault kinematics and past plate motions at a convergent plate boundary: Tertlary Shimanto Belt, southwest Japan[J].Tectonics,2001,20(4),548-565
[16]Wessel, P., Global distribution of seamounts inferred from gridded Geosat/ERS-1 aitmetry, [J]. GeoPhys. Res.2001.106(B9):19,431-19,442
[17]Hofmann, A., Dirks, H.G., Paul., M H., et al, Horizontal tectonic deformation geometries in a late Archaean sedimentary sequence, Belingwe greenstone belt, Zimbabwe[J].Tectonics 2001,20(6):909-932
[18]李勇,孙爱珍.龙门山造山带构造地层学研究[J].地层学杂志,2000,(03)：201-206
[1 9]杨文采,余长青.根据地球物理资料分析大别--苏鲁超高压变质带演化的运动学与动力学[J].地球物理学报,2001,44(3)：346-359
[20]Hodges, K.V, Hurtado, J.M., Whipple, K., Southward extrusion of Tibetan crust and its effect on Himalayan tectonics[J].Tectonics,2001,20(6):799-809
[21]刘和甫,盆山耦合类型[J].地学前缘,2000,7(4)：469-475
[22]郭锋,吴有林,范蔚茗,等.湖南省宁远--道县中生代玄武岩中辉长岩包体的岩石学初步研究[J].大地构造与成矿学,1996,(1)：38-45
[23]王国灿,杨巍然.大别造山带中新生代隆升作用的时空格局---构造年代学证据[J].地球科学,1998,23(5)：461-466
[24]王光杰,滕吉文,张中杰.中国华南大陆及陆缘地带的大地构造基本格局[J].地球物理学进展,2000,15(03)：25-44
[25]徐树桐,董树文,周海渊,等.大别山东段(安徽)大别杂岩中的断层构造岩和推复构造[J].科学通报,1984,(5)：298-30]
[26]徐树桐,江来利,刘贻灿,等.大别山区(安徽部分)的构造格局和演化过程[J].地质学报,1992,66(1)1-13
[27]徐树桐,刘贻灿,吴维平,江来利,大别山造山带研究的主要进展及存在问题[J].自然科学进展2001,(8)：796-803
[28]郭华,吴正文,柴育成,等.大别山造山带中生代逆冲推覆构造系统[J].现代地质,2002,16(2)： 121-129
[29]游振东,索书田,钟增球,等.大别山超高压变质岩的退变质显微构造：折返过程的启示[J].地质学报,2000,74(3)：224-233
[30]徐树桐,袁学诚,吴维平,等.大别山黄石-六安反射地震剖面新的地质解释[J].地质通报,2008,27(1)：19-26
[31]刘贻灿,徐树桐,李曙光,等.大别山北部榴辉岩的大地构造属性及冷却史[J].地球科学——中国地质大学学报,2003,28(1)：11-16
[32]徐树桐,刘贻灿,陈冠宝,等.中国中东部大别山的几何结构和运动学[J].地质学报,2005,(6)：330
[33]徐树桐,刘贻灿,陈冠宝,等.大别山及苏鲁地区微粒金刚石分类及其大地构造意义[J].地质通报,2005,24(12)：1081-1088
[34]徐树桐,刘贻灿,苏文,等.大别山超高压变质带面理化榴辉岩中变形石榴石的几何学和运动学特征及其大地构造意义[J].岩石学报,1999,15(3)：321-337
[35]江来利,徐树桐,刘贻灿,等.大别山超高压变质带的构造背景[J]地质论评,1995,41(3)：229-237
[36]刘贻灿,徐树桐,江来利,等.大别山造山带北部麻粒岩相岩石的若干特征[J].安徽地质,1997,7(2)： 7-14
[37]张本仁,欧阳建平,韩吟文,等.北秦岭古聚会带壳幔再循环[J].地球科学——中国地质大学学报,1996,21(5)：469-475
[38]许继锋,张本仁,韩吟文.秦岭造山带两类元古宙地壳基底及其地壳增生[J].地球科学——中国地质大学学报,1996,21(5)：476-480
[39]张本仁,韩吟文,许继锋.北秦岭新元古代前属于扬子板块的地球化学证据[J].高校地质学报,1998,4(4)：369-381
[40]张宗清,张国伟,付国民,等.秦岭变质地层年龄及其构造意义[J].中国科学(D辑),1996,26(3)：216-222
[41]高山,张本仁.扬子地台北部太古宙TTG片麻岩的发现及其意义[J].地球科学---中国地质大学学报,1990,15(6)：675-679
[42]李曙光,聂永红,S.R.Hart,俯冲陆壳与上地幔的相互作用-Ⅱ.大别山同碰撞镁铁-超镁铁岩的Sr,Nd同位素地球化学[J].中国科学(D辑),1998,28(1)：18-22
[43]王勇生,江来利,朱光,等.大别造山带现今构造格局的形成—来自石英C轴组构的证据[J].岩石学报,2009,25(1)：219-231
[44]王人镜,杨巍然.大别造山带核部花岗岩岩体的热演化及其隆升历史[J].地学前缘,1999,6(4)：201-202
[45]杨坤光,马昌前,许长海,等.东大别山北缘姚河岩体与边部糜棱岩带的研究及其地质意义[J].地震地质,1998,20(4)：305-311
[46]杨坤光,姚淑梅,马昌前.大别地区花岗岩体石英轴组构分析及其意义[J].地质科技情报,1999,18(1)：29-32
[47]杨坤光,马昌前,简平,等.大别山北缘两次俯冲(碰撞)的岩石学和构造学证据[J].中国科学(D辑),2000,30(4)：364-372
[48]欧阳建平,张本仁.北秦岭微古陆形成与演化的地球化学证据[J].中国科学(D辑),1996,(Z)：42-48
[49]薛爱民,金维浚,袁学诚.大别山北缘合肥盆地中、新生代构造演化[J].高校地质学报,1999,5(2)： 157-163
[50]杨坤光,马昌前,许长海,等.北淮阳构造带与大别造山带的差异性隆升[J].中国科学(D辑),1999,29(2)：97-103
[51]张鹏.北淮阳东段变花岗岩中错石U--Pb年龄及其地质意义[J].安徽地质,1999,9(2)：90-93
[52]杨巍然,杨坤光,刘忠明,等.桐柏-大别造山带加里东期构造热事件及其意义[J].地学前缘(中国地质大学,北京),1999,6(4)：247-253
[53]许长海,周祖翼,马昌前,等.大别造山带140-85Ma热窿伸展作用---年代学约束[J].中国科学(D辑)：2001,31(11)：925-937
[54]徐贵忠,王艺芬,张稳胜.桐柏--大别山碰撞造山带的大地构造演化[J].西安地质学院学报,1993,15(1)：35-44
[55]侯广顺.秦岭-大别造山带地壳化学结构地球化学分区及编图[硕士论文].中国地质大学,2003：4-68
[56]吴正文,张长厚.关于创建中国造山带理论的思考[J].地学前缘(中国地质大学,北京),1999,6(3)： 21-29
[57]李明立.河南省大别山地区中生代中酸性小岩体特征及钼多金属成矿系统[博士论文].中国地质大学(北京),
[58]解东宁,何明喜,周立发,等.东秦岭—大别造山带北缘逆冲推覆构造特征及油气前景[J].石油与天然气地质,2006,27(1)：48-55
[59]何治亮,程喆,徐旭辉,等.东秦岭—大别及两侧的大地构造旋回与油气勘探领域[J].石油实验地质2009,31(2)：109-118
[60]赵宗举,杨树锋,周进高等,合肥盆地逆掩冲断带地质—地球物理综合解释及其大地构造属性.成都理工学院学报,2000,27(2)：151-157
[61]张国伟,张本仁,袁学诚,肖庆辉,2001.秦岭造山带与大陆动力学.科学出版社,1-885
[62]欧阳建平,张本仁,北秦岭微古陆形成与演化的地球化学证据.中国科学(D辑),1996,26(增刊)：42-48
[63]李丕隆等,2003.合肥盆地石油地质与地球物理特征研究及进展,北京：地质出版社
[64]杨巍然等,1991.造山带结构与演化的现代理论和研究方法.武汉：中国地质大学出版社
[65]张国伟等著,1988.秦岭造山带形成及其演化.西安：西北大学出版社
[66]河南省地质矿产局,1989.河南省区域地质志.北京：地质出版社,104-111
[67]薛爱民,杨小毛.利用磷灰石裂变径迹资料反演合肥盆地古地温和估计沉降率与剥蚀率.地球物理学报.1994,37(6)：787-794
[68]张国伟,孟庆任,刘少峰等,华北南部盆地巨型陆内俯冲带与秦岭造山带岩石圈现今三维结构.高校地质学报,1997,3(2)：129-143
[69]陈刚,李丕龙,李学田等.合肥盆地原型恢复与油气评价的研究方法思考.石油实验地质,2002,24(3)：201-203
[2]Isacks,B., Molnar,P., Mantel earthquake mechanisms and sinking of the lithosphere[J].Nature 1969, 223:1121-1124
[3]Minear, J.W., Toksoz, M.N., Thermal regime of a down going and new global tectonics, [J].Joural of Geophysical Research,1970,1397-1419
[4]Bird, P., Toksoz, M.N., SleeP, N.H., Thermal and mechanical models of continent-continent convergent zones[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,1975,80:4405-4416
[5]Wiekham, S.M., Oxburgh, E.R., Continental rifts as a setting for regional metamorphism, [J].Nature, 1985,318:330-333
[6]Whitehead, Jr., J.A., Dick, H.J.B., Schouten, H., A mechanism for magmatic accretion under spreading centers[J].Nature,1984,312:146-147
[7]Sack, P.E., Secor Jr, S.T., Delamination in collisional orogens[J].Geology,1990,18:999-1002
[8]Buck, W. R, Modes of continental lithospheric extension[J].Journal Geophysics Research,1991, 96:20161-20178
[9]Bonini, M., Sokoutis, D., Mulugeta, G, et al, Dynamics of magma emplacement in centrifuge models of continental extension with implications for flnak volcanism[J].Tectonics,2001,20(6):1053-65
[10]Allerton, S., Escartin, J.R., Searle, C., Extremely asymmetric magmatic accretion of oceanic crust at the ends of slow-spreading ridge segments[J].Geology,2000,28(2):179-182
[11]毛建仁,陶奎元,杨祝良,等Geodynamic Background of the Mesozoic Intracontinental Magmatism in Southeast China[J]. Chinese Journal of Geochemistry 1997,16(3):230-239
[12]刘凤山,石准立,太行山---燕山地区中生代花岗岩生成动力学机制与陆内造山作用[J].地球学报,1998,191：13-18
[13]郭正府,邓晋福,许志琴,等.青藏东昆仑晚古生代末--中生代中酸性火成岩与陆内造山过程[J].现代地质,1998,12(3)：344-352
[14]Huismans R.S., Podladchikov, Y.Y, Cloetingh, S., Dynamic modeling of the transition from passive to active rifting, application to the Pannonian basin[J].Tectonics.2001,20(6):1021-1039
[15]Lewis, J.C.,Byrne, T.B., Fault kinematics and past plate motions at a convergent plate boundary: Tertlary Shimanto Belt, southwest Japan[J].Tectonics,2001,20(4),548-565
[16]Wessel, P., Global distribution of seamounts inferred from gridded Geosat/ERS-1 aitmetry, [J]. GeoPhys. Res.2001.106(B9):19,431-19,442
[17]Hofmann, A., Dirks, H.G., Paul., M H., et al, Horizontal tectonic deformation geometries in a late Archaean sedimentary sequence, Belingwe greenstone belt, Zimbabwe[J].Tectonics 2001,20(6):909-932
[18]李勇,孙爱珍.龙门山造山带构造地层学研究[J].地层学杂志,2000,(03)：201-206
[1 9]杨文采,余长青.根据地球物理资料分析大别--苏鲁超高压变质带演化的运动学与动力学[J].地球物理学报,2001,44(3)：346-359
[20]Hodges, K.V, Hurtado, J.M., Whipple, K., Southward extrusion of Tibetan crust and its effect on Himalayan tectonics[J].Tectonics,2001,20(6):799-809
[21]刘和甫,盆山耦合类型[J].地学前缘,2000,7(4)：469-475
[22]郭锋,吴有林,范蔚茗,等.湖南省宁远--道县中生代玄武岩中辉长岩包体的岩石学初步研究[J].大地构造与成矿学,1996,(1)：38-45
[23]王国灿,杨巍然.大别造山带中新生代隆升作用的时空格局---构造年代学证据[J].地球科学,1998,23(5)：461-466
[24]王光杰,滕吉文,张中杰.中国华南大陆及陆缘地带的大地构造基本格局[J].地球物理学进展,2000,15(03)：25-44
[25]徐树桐,董树文,周海渊,等.大别山东段(安徽)大别杂岩中的断层构造岩和推复构造[J].科学通报,1984,(5)：298-30]
[26]徐树桐,江来利,刘贻灿,等.大别山区(安徽部分)的构造格局和演化过程[J].地质学报,1992,66(1)1-13
[27]徐树桐,刘贻灿,吴维平,江来利,大别山造山带研究的主要进展及存在问题[J].自然科学进展2001,(8)：796-803
[28]郭华,吴正文,柴育成,等.大别山造山带中生代逆冲推覆构造系统[J].现代地质,2002,16(2)： 121-129
[29]游振东,索书田,钟增球,等.大别山超高压变质岩的退变质显微构造：折返过程的启示[J].地质学报,2000,74(3)：224-233
[30]徐树桐,袁学诚,吴维平,等.大别山黄石-六安反射地震剖面新的地质解释[J].地质通报,2008,27(1)：19-26
[31]刘贻灿,徐树桐,李曙光,等.大别山北部榴辉岩的大地构造属性及冷却史[J].地球科学——中国地质大学学报,2003,28(1)：11-16
[32]徐树桐,刘贻灿,陈冠宝,等.中国中东部大别山的几何结构和运动学[J].地质学报,2005,(6)：330
[33]徐树桐,刘贻灿,陈冠宝,等.大别山及苏鲁地区微粒金刚石分类及其大地构造意义[J].地质通报,2005,24(12)：1081-1088
[34]徐树桐,刘贻灿,苏文,等.大别山超高压变质带面理化榴辉岩中变形石榴石的几何学和运动学特征及其大地构造意义[J].岩石学报,1999,15(3)：321-337
[35]江来利,徐树桐,刘贻灿,等.大别山超高压变质带的构造背景[J]地质论评,1995,41(3)：229-237
[36]刘贻灿,徐树桐,江来利,等.大别山造山带北部麻粒岩相岩石的若干特征[J].安徽地质,1997,7(2)： 7-14
[37]张本仁,欧阳建平,韩吟文,等.北秦岭古聚会带壳幔再循环[J].地球科学——中国地质大学学报,1996,21(5)：469-475
[38]许继锋,张本仁,韩吟文.秦岭造山带两类元古宙地壳基底及其地壳增生[J].地球科学——中国地质大学学报,1996,21(5)：476-480
[39]张本仁,韩吟文,许继锋.北秦岭新元古代前属于扬子板块的地球化学证据[J].高校地质学报,1998,4(4)：369-381
[40]张宗清,张国伟,付国民,等.秦岭变质地层年龄及其构造意义[J].中国科学(D辑),1996,26(3)：216-222
[41]高山,张本仁.扬子地台北部太古宙TTG片麻岩的发现及其意义[J].地球科学---中国地质大学学报,1990,15(6)：675-679
[42]李曙光,聂永红,S.R.Hart,俯冲陆壳与上地幔的相互作用-Ⅱ.大别山同碰撞镁铁-超镁铁岩的Sr,Nd同位素地球化学[J].中国科学(D辑),1998,28(1)：18-22
[43]王勇生,江来利,朱光,等.大别造山带现今构造格局的形成—来自石英C轴组构的证据[J].岩石学报,2009,25(1)：219-231
[44]王人镜,杨巍然.大别造山带核部花岗岩岩体的热演化及其隆升历史[J].地学前缘,1999,6(4)：201-202
[45]杨坤光,马昌前,许长海,等.东大别山北缘姚河岩体与边部糜棱岩带的研究及其地质意义[J].地震地质,1998,20(4)：305-311
[46]杨坤光,姚淑梅,马昌前.大别地区花岗岩体石英轴组构分析及其意义[J].地质科技情报,1999,18(1)：29-32
[47]杨坤光,马昌前,简平,等.大别山北缘两次俯冲(碰撞)的岩石学和构造学证据[J].中国科学(D辑),2000,30(4)：364-372
[48]欧阳建平,张本仁.北秦岭微古陆形成与演化的地球化学证据[J].中国科学(D辑),1996,(Z)：42-48
[49]薛爱民,金维浚,袁学诚.大别山北缘合肥盆地中、新生代构造演化[J].高校地质学报,1999,5(2)： 157-163
[50]杨坤光,马昌前,许长海,等.北淮阳构造带与大别造山带的差异性隆升[J].中国科学(D辑),1999,29(2)：97-103
[51]张鹏.北淮阳东段变花岗岩中错石U--Pb年龄及其地质意义[J].安徽地质,1999,9(2)：90-93
[52]杨巍然,杨坤光,刘忠明,等.桐柏-大别造山带加里东期构造热事件及其意义[J].地学前缘(中国地质大学,北京),1999,6(4)：247-253
[53]许长海,周祖翼,马昌前,等.大别造山带140-85Ma热窿伸展作用---年代学约束[J].中国科学(D辑)：2001,31(11)：925-937
[54]徐贵忠,王艺芬,张稳胜.桐柏--大别山碰撞造山带的大地构造演化[J].西安地质学院学报,1993,15(1)：35-44
[55]侯广顺.秦岭-大别造山带地壳化学结构地球化学分区及编图[硕士论文].中国地质大学,2003：4-68
[56]吴正文,张长厚.关于创建中国造山带理论的思考[J].地学前缘(中国地质大学,北京),1999,6(3)： 21-29
[57]李明立.河南省大别山地区中生代中酸性小岩体特征及钼多金属成矿系统[博士论文].中国地质大学(北京),
[58]解东宁,何明喜,周立发,等.东秦岭—大别造山带北缘逆冲推覆构造特征及油气前景[J].石油与天然气地质,2006,27(1)：48-55
[59]何治亮,程喆,徐旭辉,等.东秦岭—大别及两侧的大地构造旋回与油气勘探领域[J].石油实验地质2009,31(2)：109-118
[60]赵宗举,杨树锋,周进高等,合肥盆地逆掩冲断带地质—地球物理综合解释及其大地构造属性.成都理工学院学报,2000,27(2)：151-157
[61]张国伟,张本仁,袁学诚,肖庆辉,2001.秦岭造山带与大陆动力学.科学出版社,1-885
[62]欧阳建平,张本仁,北秦岭微古陆形成与演化的地球化学证据.中国科学(D辑),1996,26(增刊)：42-48
[63]李丕隆等,2003.合肥盆地石油地质与地球物理特征研究及进展,北京：地质出版社
[64]杨巍然等,1991.造山带结构与演化的现代理论和研究方法.武汉：中国地质大学出版社
[65]张国伟等著,1988.秦岭造山带形成及其演化.西安：西北大学出版社
[66]河南省地质矿产局,1989.河南省区域地质志.北京：地质出版社,104-111
[67]薛爱民,杨小毛.利用磷灰石裂变径迹资料反演合肥盆地古地温和估计沉降率与剥蚀率.地球物理学报.1994,37(6)：787-794
[68]张国伟,孟庆任,刘少峰等,华北南部盆地巨型陆内俯冲带与秦岭造山带岩石圈现今三维结构.高校地质学报,1997,3(2)：129-143
[69]陈刚,李丕龙,李学田等.合肥盆地原型恢复与油气评价的研究方法思考.石油实验地质,2002,24(3)：201-203