国际规范影响下的国内制度改革
|
摘要
国际规范是国际社会中具有约束力的规则集合体。具有较高权威性的国际规范形成了规范团体,规范团体直接影响着国家的行动空间和行动效力。为了加入规范团体,获得成员资格,国家需要进行国内制度改革以达到规范团体的准入标准。面对国内利益集团等社会力量的各种利益诉求,政府需要为引入新的规范和理念、开展制度改革而进行国内动员。通过媒体的作用引导社会舆论,达成支持改革的共识。国家为了尽快加入规范团体,往往将成员资格本身作为外交目标,这样就导致了正式加入规范团体之后面对国内改革与正式成员标准的差距。面对这样的问题,以及国际规范中存在的一些不合理因素,国家试图对国际规范进行改造。
国际规范的权威性由两个指标来衡量:社会确认和制度化水平。社会确认是指接受和认可规范的个体数量和规模,以及规范是否具有公平性。接受规范的个体数量越多,规范的社会确认程度越高,也越容易对尚未接受规范的个体产生吸引力。制度化水平是指国际规范的规则内容是否明确严密,是否具有较为健全的组织结构和议事程序,以及是否拥有针对违规行为的严格惩罚机制。
以规范为基础并拥有集体互动和沟通的个体形成了规范团体,每个个体均将自身看作是归属团体的一份子,规范团体也因此具有内聚性。为了确保团体的存续,团体通过例行监督和评估维持成员对规范的遵守和对团体的忠诚。规范团体具有内部同化力,成员共享相同的准则和价值观念,具有统一一致的行为特征。同时,团体也具有外部扩张性,以规范权威性为基础,在团体正式成员的示范和推广下,团体吸引新成员加入,并影响着外部国家对国家利益的界定及其行动空间。规范的权威性越高,正式成员推广规范的行动遇到的障碍越少。
国际规范团体形成了庞大的规范网络,国家无法独立于这种网络之外。国家追求具有权威性的国际规范团体的成员资格,以扩大行动空间和提高行动效力。每个规范团体都有其成员资格的标准和准入门槛,权威性越高的规范团体,加入团体的门槛越高,对新成员履行规范的意愿和能力的审核越严格。为了获得成员资格,达到规范团体的要求,国家学习规范的具体内容并进行相关的制度改革。为了排除改革的阻力,国家需要进行社会动员,把获得规范团体成员资格的目标引入到国家重要议事日程之中,以积聚充足的对改革的支持。国家获得成员资格后,就会面对正式成员资格带来的对履行规范的要求。而国内改革往往无法在短时间完成,因此国家在国内以及在国际上面临诸多问题。国家试图使国际规范能够涵盖自身的利益诉求,更具代表性和普适性。越是具有高度权威性的规范,修订规则的条件越严格,往往只会在分支规则上进行一定的修改,而不会影响到核心规则。
中国、俄罗斯与FATF的案例表明,具有高度权威性的FATF《40+9项建议》直接影响着两国在国际金融领域的行动空间和效力,两国开始从游离于该规范团体之外转变为认可该规范的价值,两国对自身国家利益的界定发生了变化。通过金融领域的国际交往,两国开始意识到反洗钱的重要性,并将其作为重要的需要尽早与国际接轨的事务。通过国内动员和模仿学习《40+9项建议》的规则,两国进行了相关领域的大力改革并最终加入了FATF。俄罗斯虽然开始在FATF和美国压力之下进行国内改革,但经过一定时间的互动后,开始自愿主动地按照FATF的要求进行制度建设,并得到了FATF及其成员的认可。加入WTO是中国自20世纪80年代以来一直寻求实现的目标,为了获得WTO成员资格,中国进行了庞大的国内制度改革,其中知识产权制度改革是重要的组成部分。WTO在知识产权领域的协议——TRIPs是世界上最具权威性的知识产权规范。中国的国内改革基本是按照TRIPs的要求进行。印度和巴西作为WTO的成员,也为保持其成员资格,在TRIPs的内部监督下进行着国内制度改革。同时为了解决国内深入改革面临的问题以及正式成员资格带来的压力,印度和巴西等发展中国家寻求改造WTO的知识产权规则,TRIPs在公共健康领域的规则修改就说明了这一点。
International norms are the aggregation of rules that have binding power. When they are of quite enormous authoritativeness, international norms will form norm groups, which pose direct impact upon states' behavioral room and effects. In order to join norm groups and gain the membership, states have to make domestic institution reform, with the purpose of meeting the access requirements of norm groups. Facing the various interest appeals of social forces at home such as interest groups, governments need to launch social mobilization so as to introduce new norms and conceptions, and implement institutional reform. Utilizing the mass media, public opinion is molded to formulate the consensus of supporting the reform. To get into the norm groups as soon as possible, states usually take the membership as their diplomatic aims, leading to the fact that domestic reform pace falls far behind the standards of formal membership. Given this sort of problems, combining with the specific unreasonableness of international norms, states attempt to make modifications to international norms.
Two indications serve to measure the authoritativeness of international norms: social proof and institutionalization level. Social proof refers to the amount and scale of individuals accepting and recognizing the norms, and the fairness of the norms. The larger the amount of individuals embracing the norms, the higher their degree of social proof, and also, the easier to generate attraction towards individuals that still refuse the norms. Institutionalization level concerns the clearness and preciseness of the rule content, the robustness of organizational structure and procedures, and the strictness of punishment mechanism targeting deviation behaviors.
Individuals that have norm-based collective interactions and contacts constitute norm groups, with each one viewing itself as a part attributing to the group, which thereby accumulates Cohesiveness. To guarantee its continuity, groups deploy routine monitoring and assessment to maintain its members' compliance and attachment. Norm groups have internal homogenizing power, whose members share the same principles and values, and unitary behavioral features. Meanwhile, groups have the nature of outward expanding, which is grounded upon the authoritativeness of norms and the demonstration and promotion of formal members, and which influences the interest definition and behavioral room of outside states. The higher the authoritativeness, the less barriers formal members encounter when projecting norms.
International norm groups constitute a huge norm network, with states being unable to stand the exclusion from this network. States pursue the membership of highly authoritative international norm groups, in order to widen its behavioral room and enhance its behavioral effects. Each norm group has the standards of membership and access threshold. The more authoritative norm groups have higher thresholds and more stringent verification concerning the willingness and capacity of new members to comply with the norms. To acquire the membership and live up to the demand of norm groups, states learn from the specific norm content and implement relevant institutional reform. States need to deploy social mobilization to remove the stumbling block in the way of reform and to gather adequate support for reforms, by bringing the goal of attaining the membership of norm groups into the list of states' prior affairs. Once the membership is gained, states have to confront the demand of implementing norms accompanying the formal status. But internal reforms can not be accomplished in a short time, hence states would come across lots of problems. States attempt to make international norms cover their own appeal and be more representative and universal. The authoritative norms have rigorous conditions for rule modifications. Therefore, change would happen, if there is any, only on the minor branches rules, rather than the core rules.
The cases of China and Russia joining FATF show that the authoritative "40+9 Recommendations" of FATF has a direct influence upon the behavioral room and effects of both the states in the arena of international finance. China and Russia began to reverse their manner of behaving outside this norm group, and to recognize the value of the norms, with both of them changing the connotation of their national interests. Through international interchange in the field of finance, China and Russia started to give weight to anti-money laundering, and regard it as one of their urgent issues which should be dealt with in accordance with international trend. By mobilizing domestically and imitating and learning from the rules of "40+9 Recommendations", China and Russia launched enormous relevant reform and ultimately joined FATF. Although Russia implemented reform under the pressure of FATF and the United States, after a period of interaction, she tended to willingly make domestic institution reform according to FATF requirements, and obtained the acknowledgement of FATF and its members. Access into WTO had been the aim of China since the 1980s, and to gain the membership of WTO, China undertook tremendous reform at home, intellectual property rights being one of the components. The WTO agreement concerning intellectual property rights - TRIPs is the most authoritative intellectual property rights norms in the world. China's reform is basically developed in the light of TRIPs provisions. India and Brazil, as WTO members, are reforming internal institutions as well under the in-group supervision of TRIPs in order to maintain their membership. To deal with the problems of the deeper domestic reform and the pressure brought by the formal membership, developing states like India and Brazil seek to remold WTO intellectual property rights rules, which is well exemplified by the revision of TRIPs rules concerning public health.
国际规范的权威性由两个指标来衡量:社会确认和制度化水平。社会确认是指接受和认可规范的个体数量和规模,以及规范是否具有公平性。接受规范的个体数量越多,规范的社会确认程度越高,也越容易对尚未接受规范的个体产生吸引力。制度化水平是指国际规范的规则内容是否明确严密,是否具有较为健全的组织结构和议事程序,以及是否拥有针对违规行为的严格惩罚机制。
以规范为基础并拥有集体互动和沟通的个体形成了规范团体,每个个体均将自身看作是归属团体的一份子,规范团体也因此具有内聚性。为了确保团体的存续,团体通过例行监督和评估维持成员对规范的遵守和对团体的忠诚。规范团体具有内部同化力,成员共享相同的准则和价值观念,具有统一一致的行为特征。同时,团体也具有外部扩张性,以规范权威性为基础,在团体正式成员的示范和推广下,团体吸引新成员加入,并影响着外部国家对国家利益的界定及其行动空间。规范的权威性越高,正式成员推广规范的行动遇到的障碍越少。
国际规范团体形成了庞大的规范网络,国家无法独立于这种网络之外。国家追求具有权威性的国际规范团体的成员资格,以扩大行动空间和提高行动效力。每个规范团体都有其成员资格的标准和准入门槛,权威性越高的规范团体,加入团体的门槛越高,对新成员履行规范的意愿和能力的审核越严格。为了获得成员资格,达到规范团体的要求,国家学习规范的具体内容并进行相关的制度改革。为了排除改革的阻力,国家需要进行社会动员,把获得规范团体成员资格的目标引入到国家重要议事日程之中,以积聚充足的对改革的支持。国家获得成员资格后,就会面对正式成员资格带来的对履行规范的要求。而国内改革往往无法在短时间完成,因此国家在国内以及在国际上面临诸多问题。国家试图使国际规范能够涵盖自身的利益诉求,更具代表性和普适性。越是具有高度权威性的规范,修订规则的条件越严格,往往只会在分支规则上进行一定的修改,而不会影响到核心规则。
中国、俄罗斯与FATF的案例表明,具有高度权威性的FATF《40+9项建议》直接影响着两国在国际金融领域的行动空间和效力,两国开始从游离于该规范团体之外转变为认可该规范的价值,两国对自身国家利益的界定发生了变化。通过金融领域的国际交往,两国开始意识到反洗钱的重要性,并将其作为重要的需要尽早与国际接轨的事务。通过国内动员和模仿学习《40+9项建议》的规则,两国进行了相关领域的大力改革并最终加入了FATF。俄罗斯虽然开始在FATF和美国压力之下进行国内改革,但经过一定时间的互动后,开始自愿主动地按照FATF的要求进行制度建设,并得到了FATF及其成员的认可。加入WTO是中国自20世纪80年代以来一直寻求实现的目标,为了获得WTO成员资格,中国进行了庞大的国内制度改革,其中知识产权制度改革是重要的组成部分。WTO在知识产权领域的协议——TRIPs是世界上最具权威性的知识产权规范。中国的国内改革基本是按照TRIPs的要求进行。印度和巴西作为WTO的成员,也为保持其成员资格,在TRIPs的内部监督下进行着国内制度改革。同时为了解决国内深入改革面临的问题以及正式成员资格带来的压力,印度和巴西等发展中国家寻求改造WTO的知识产权规则,TRIPs在公共健康领域的规则修改就说明了这一点。
International norms are the aggregation of rules that have binding power. When they are of quite enormous authoritativeness, international norms will form norm groups, which pose direct impact upon states' behavioral room and effects. In order to join norm groups and gain the membership, states have to make domestic institution reform, with the purpose of meeting the access requirements of norm groups. Facing the various interest appeals of social forces at home such as interest groups, governments need to launch social mobilization so as to introduce new norms and conceptions, and implement institutional reform. Utilizing the mass media, public opinion is molded to formulate the consensus of supporting the reform. To get into the norm groups as soon as possible, states usually take the membership as their diplomatic aims, leading to the fact that domestic reform pace falls far behind the standards of formal membership. Given this sort of problems, combining with the specific unreasonableness of international norms, states attempt to make modifications to international norms.
Two indications serve to measure the authoritativeness of international norms: social proof and institutionalization level. Social proof refers to the amount and scale of individuals accepting and recognizing the norms, and the fairness of the norms. The larger the amount of individuals embracing the norms, the higher their degree of social proof, and also, the easier to generate attraction towards individuals that still refuse the norms. Institutionalization level concerns the clearness and preciseness of the rule content, the robustness of organizational structure and procedures, and the strictness of punishment mechanism targeting deviation behaviors.
Individuals that have norm-based collective interactions and contacts constitute norm groups, with each one viewing itself as a part attributing to the group, which thereby accumulates Cohesiveness. To guarantee its continuity, groups deploy routine monitoring and assessment to maintain its members' compliance and attachment. Norm groups have internal homogenizing power, whose members share the same principles and values, and unitary behavioral features. Meanwhile, groups have the nature of outward expanding, which is grounded upon the authoritativeness of norms and the demonstration and promotion of formal members, and which influences the interest definition and behavioral room of outside states. The higher the authoritativeness, the less barriers formal members encounter when projecting norms.
International norm groups constitute a huge norm network, with states being unable to stand the exclusion from this network. States pursue the membership of highly authoritative international norm groups, in order to widen its behavioral room and enhance its behavioral effects. Each norm group has the standards of membership and access threshold. The more authoritative norm groups have higher thresholds and more stringent verification concerning the willingness and capacity of new members to comply with the norms. To acquire the membership and live up to the demand of norm groups, states learn from the specific norm content and implement relevant institutional reform. States need to deploy social mobilization to remove the stumbling block in the way of reform and to gather adequate support for reforms, by bringing the goal of attaining the membership of norm groups into the list of states' prior affairs. Once the membership is gained, states have to confront the demand of implementing norms accompanying the formal status. But internal reforms can not be accomplished in a short time, hence states would come across lots of problems. States attempt to make international norms cover their own appeal and be more representative and universal. The authoritative norms have rigorous conditions for rule modifications. Therefore, change would happen, if there is any, only on the minor branches rules, rather than the core rules.
The cases of China and Russia joining FATF show that the authoritative "40+9 Recommendations" of FATF has a direct influence upon the behavioral room and effects of both the states in the arena of international finance. China and Russia began to reverse their manner of behaving outside this norm group, and to recognize the value of the norms, with both of them changing the connotation of their national interests. Through international interchange in the field of finance, China and Russia started to give weight to anti-money laundering, and regard it as one of their urgent issues which should be dealt with in accordance with international trend. By mobilizing domestically and imitating and learning from the rules of "40+9 Recommendations", China and Russia launched enormous relevant reform and ultimately joined FATF. Although Russia implemented reform under the pressure of FATF and the United States, after a period of interaction, she tended to willingly make domestic institution reform according to FATF requirements, and obtained the acknowledgement of FATF and its members. Access into WTO had been the aim of China since the 1980s, and to gain the membership of WTO, China undertook tremendous reform at home, intellectual property rights being one of the components. The WTO agreement concerning intellectual property rights - TRIPs is the most authoritative intellectual property rights norms in the world. China's reform is basically developed in the light of TRIPs provisions. India and Brazil, as WTO members, are reforming internal institutions as well under the in-group supervision of TRIPs in order to maintain their membership. To deal with the problems of the deeper domestic reform and the pressure brought by the formal membership, developing states like India and Brazil seek to remold WTO intellectual property rights rules, which is well exemplified by the revision of TRIPs rules concerning public health.
引文
1 Robert Gilpin,Global Political Economy:Understanding the International Economic Order,Princeton:Princeton University Press,2001,p.71.
2 Helen V.Milner,"International Politcial Economy:Beyond Hegemonic Statbility",Foreign Policy,Spring 1998,p.118.
1 Jeffrey A.Frieden and Ronald Rogowski,"The Impact of the International Economy on National Policies:An Analytical Overview",in Robert O.Keohane and Helen Milner eds.,Internationalization and Domestic Politics,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1996,p.26.
2 Peter J.Katzenstein,Robert O.Keohane,and Stephen D.Krasner,"International Organization and the Study of World Politics",International Organization 52,4,Autumn 1998,p.669.
1 Geoffrey Garrett and Peter Lange,"Internationalization,Institutions,and Political Change",in Robert O.Keohane and Helen Milner eds.,Internationalization and Domestic Politics,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1996,p.54.
2 Robert D.Putnam,"Diplomacy and Domestic Politics:The Logic of Two-Level Games",International Organization 42,3,Summer 1988,p.430.帕特南等人还专门主编了一部关于双层博弈的书,也收录了这篇文章。Peter B.Evans,Harold K.Jacobson and Robert D.Putnam eds.,Double Edged Diplomacy:International Bargaining and Domestic Politics,Berkeley:University of California Press,1993.
1 Andrew Moravcsik,"Integrating International and Domestic Theories of International Bargaining",in Peter B.Evans,Harold K.Jacobson and Robert D.Putnam eds.,Double Edged Diplomacy:International Bargaining and Domestic Politics,Berkeley:University of California Press,1993,p.15.
2 Martha Finnemore,National Interests in International Society,Ithaca:Comell University Press,1996,pp.2-3.
1 Kathryn Sikkink,"Human Rights,Principled Issue-Networks,and Sovereignty in Latin America",International Organization 47,3,Summer 1993,pp.411-441.
Margaret E.Keck and Kathryn Sikkink,Activists Beyond Borders:Advocacy Networks in International Politics,Ithaca,NY:Comell University Press,1998.
Thomas Risse,Stephen C.Ropp,and Kathryn Sikkink eds.,The Power of Human Rights:International Norms and Domestic Change,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1999.
2 Jeffrey T.Checkel,"Norms,Institutions,and National Identity in Contemporary Europe",International Studies Quarterly 1999,43,pp.83-114.
Annika Bj(o|¨)rkdahl,"Norm-maker and Norm-taker:Exploring the Normative Influence of the EU in Macedonia",European Foreign Affairs Review,Summer 2005,Vol.10,Issue 2,pp.257-278.
Ronald H.Linden ed.,Norms and Nannies:The Impact of International Organizations on the Central and East European States,Lanbam:Rowman & Littlefield Publishers,Inc.,2002.
Emilian R.Kavalski,"The International Socialization of the Balkans",The Review of International Affairs,Vol.2,No.4(Summer 2003),pp.71-88.
Alexandra Gheciu,"Security Institutions as Agents of Socialization? NATO and the 'New Europe'",International Organization 59,Fall 2005,pp.973-1012.
Jeffrey T.Checkel ed.,International Institutions and Socialization in Europe,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2007.
3 John Meyer,John Boli,George M.Thomas,Francisco O.Ramirez,"World Soceity and the Nation-State",The American Journal of Sociology,Vol.103,No.1(July 1997),pp.144-181.
1 Audie Klotz,Norms in International Relations:The Struggle Against Apartheid,Ithaca:Cornell University Press,1995,p.173.
2 Alastair Iain Johnston,Social States:China in International Institutions,1980-2000,Princeton: Princeton University Press,2008.
1 Alastair Iain Johnston,Social States:China in International Institutions,1980-2000,Princeton:Princeton University Press,2008,pp.40-41.
2 David Zweig,Internationalizing China:Domestic Interests and Global Linkages,Ithaca:Cornell University Press,2002.
Ann Kent,"China's International Socialization:The Role of International Organizations",Global Governance g(2002),pp.343-364.
Hongying Wang,"Multilateralism in Chinese Foreign Policy:The Limits of Socialization",Asian Survey,Vol.40,No.3,May/June 2000,pp.475-491.
Elizabeth Economy and Michael Oksenberg,China Joins the World:Progress and Prospects,New York:Council on Foreign Relations Press,1999.
Joseph Fewsmith,"The Political and Social Implications of China's Accession to the WTO",The China Quarterly,Vol.167,September 2001,pp.573-591.
3 苏长和:“中国与国际制度——一项研究议程”,《世界经济与政治》,2002年第10期。
苏长和:“跨国关系与国内政治——比较政治与国际政治经济学视野下的国际关系研究”,《美国研究》,2003年第4期。
郭树勇:《大国成长的逻辑:西方大国崛起的国际政治社会学分析》,北京:北京大学出版社,2006年版。
于宏源:“国际制度与政府决策转型”,《国际政治科学》,2007年第1期。
田野:“国际制度与国家自主性——一项研究框架”,《国际观察》,2008年第2期。
任湘怡:“国际与国内:双向互动——析国际政治经济学的两种不同研究路径”,《世界经济研究》,2008年第1期。
吴其胜:“国际关系研究中的跨层次分析”,《外交评论》,2008年第1期。
1 Imre Lakatos,The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes,edited by John Worrall and Gregory Currie,New York:Columbia University Press,1978,p.70.
1 John Lewis Gaddis,"History,Science,and the Study of International Relations",in Ngaire Wood ed.,Explaining International Relations Since 1945,New York:Oxford University Press,1996,p.34.
1 Peter Gourevitch,"The Second Image Reversed:The International Sources of Domestic Politics",International Organization 32,4,Autumn 1978,pp.881-912.
1 Kenneth N.Waltz,Man,the State,and War:A Theoretical Arialysis,New York:Columbia University Press,1959.第二意象就是从国家的内部政治体制的不同来分析国家间关系。
2 Peter J.Katzenstein,ed.,Between Power and Plenty:Foreign Economic Policies of Advanced Industrial States,Madison:The University of Wisconsin Press,1984.
3 John W.Burton,Global Conflict:The Domestic Sources of International Crisis,Maryland:Wheatsheaf Books,1984.
4 Graham Allison,"Conceptual Models and the Cuban Missile Crisis",American Political Science Review 63,No.3(Sep.1969),pp.689-718.
Eugene R.Wittkopf and James M.McCormick eds.,The Domestic Sources of American Foreign Policy:Insights and Evidence,fourth edition,New York:Rowman & Littlefield Publishers,Inc.,2004.
1 Kenneth N.Waltz,Theory of International Politics,Reading,Mass.:Addison-Wesley,1979.
2 Robert O.Keohane,After Hegemony:Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy,Princeton:Princeton University Press,1984.
3 代表性著作有 Robert Keohane,"The Demand for International Regimes",International Organization 36,2,Spring 1982,pp.141-171.
Ernst Haas,"Words Can Hurt You;Or,Who Said What to Whom about Regimes",International Organization 36,2,Spring 1982,pp.207-243.
Robert Keohane,"Reciprocity in International Relations",International Organizations 40,1,Winter 1986,pp.1-27.
Robert Keohane,"International Institutions:Two Approaches",International Organization 32,4,December 1988,pp.379-396.
Stephen D.Krasner ed.,International Regimes,Ithaca:Cornell University Press,1983.
Robert O.Keohane,After Hegemony:Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy,Princeton:Princeton University Press,1984.
Oran Young,"International Regimes:Toward a Theory of Institutions",World Politics,Vol.39,No.1(Oct.1986),pp.104-122.
Stephan Haggard and Beth A.Simmons,"Theories of International Regimes",International Organization 41,3,Summer 1987,pp.491-517.
Robert Keohane,International Institutions and State Power:Essays in International Relations Theory,Boulder,Colo.:Westview Press,1989.Arthur Stein,"Coordination and Cooperation:Regimes in an Anarchic World",in David Baldwin ed.,Neorealism and Neoliberalism:The Contemporary Debate,New York:Columbia University Press,1993,pp.29-59.
Lisa Martin and Beth A.Simmons eds.,International Institutions:An International Organization Reader,Cambridge,MA:MIT Press,2001.
4 Peter Evans,Dietrich Rueschemayer and Theda Skocpol eds.,Bringing the State Back In,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1985.
5 Alexander Wendt,Social Theory of International Politics,Cambridge University Press,1999,p.314.
1 Alexander Wendt,Social Theory of International Politics,Cambridge University Press,1999,pp.246-312.
2 Alexander Wendt,Social Theory of International Politics,Cambridge University Press,1999,pp.313-378.
3 Robert O.Keohane and Joseph S.Nye eds.,Transnational Relations and World Politics,Cambridge,MA.:Harvard University Press,1970.
4 Robert O.Keohane and Joseph S.Nye,"Transnational Relations and Word Politics:An Introduction",International Organization 25,3,Summer 1971,p.332.
5 Robert O.Keohane and Joseph S.Nye,Power and Interdependence:World Politics in Transition,Boston:Little Brown,1977.
6 Robert O.Keohane,and Helen Milner eds.,Internationalization and Domestic Politics,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1996.Helen Milner,Interests,Institutions,and Information:Domestic Politics and International Relations,Princeton:Princeton University Press,1997.
1 John G.Ikenberry,"The Interwining of Domestic and International Politics",Polity,Vol.29,No.2(Winter 1996),p.297.
2 Helen V.Milner,Interests,Institutions,and Information:Domestic Politics and International Relations,Princeton:Princeton University Press,1997,p.11.
1 Linda Weiss,"Introduction:Bringing Domestic Institutions Back In",in Linda Weiss ed.,States in the Global Economy:Bringing Domestic Institutions Back In,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2003,p.2.
2 Linda Weiss,"Introduction:Bringing Domestic Institutions Back In",in Linda Weiss ed.,States in the Global Economy:Bringing Domestic Institutions Back In,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2003,pp.15-18.
3 John G.Ikenberry,"The Interwining of Domestic and International Politics",Polity,Vol.29,No.2(Winter 1996),p.295.
4 Robert Keohane and Helen Milner,"Internationalization and Domestic Politics:A Conclusion",in Robert O.Keohane,and Helen Milner eds.,Internationalization and Domestic Politics,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1996,p.251.
1 Lisa L.Martin and Beth A.Simmons,"Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions",International Organization 52,4,Autumn 1998,p.748.
1 Martha Finnemore and Kathryn Sikkink,"International Norms Dynamics and Political Change",International Organization 52,4,Autumn 1998,p.892.
2 Peter J.Katzenstein,Cultural Norms & National Security:Police and Military in Postwar Japan,Ithaca:Cornell University Press,1996,p.18.
3 Friedrich Kratochwil,"The Force of Prescriptions",International Organization 34,4,Autumn 1984,p.689.
1 Robert H.Gass and John S.Seiter,Persuasion,Social Influence,and Compliance Gaining,second edition,New York:Pearsong Education Inc.,2003,p.127.
2 Martha Finnemore and Kathryn Sikkink,"International Norm Dynamics and Political Change",International Organization 52,4,Autumn 1998,p.893.
3 Martha Finnemore and Kathryn Sikkink,"International Norm Dynamics and Political Change",International Organization 52,4,Autumn 1998,p.895.
4 Peter J.Katzenstein,Cultural Norms & National Security:Police and Military in Postwar Japan,Ithaca:Cornell University Press,1996,p.18.
5 Shah M.Tarzi,"International Norms,Trade and Human Rights:A Perspective on Norm Conformity",The Journal of Social,Political and Economic Studies,Vol.27,No.2,Summer 2002,p.189.
1 Martha Finnemore,National Interests in International Society,Ithaca:Comell University Press,1996,pp.22-23.
2 Robert O.Keohane,International Institutions and State Power,Boulder:Westview Press,1989,pp.3-4.
3 Stephen D.Krasner,Structural Conflict:The Third World Against Global Liberalism,Berkeley:University of California Press,1985,pp.4-5.
4 Friedrich Kratochwil,"The Force of Prescriptions",International Organization 34,4,Autumn 1984,p.687.
1 Kenneth W.Abbott and Duncan Snidal,"Hard and Soft Law in International Governance",International Organization 54,3,Summer 2000,p.456.
1 Thomas A.Loya and John Boli,"Standardization in the World Polity:Technical Rationality over Power",in John Boli and George M.Thomas eds.,Constructing World Culture:International Nongovernmental Organizations Since 1875,p.169.
2 Robert Axelrod,"An Evolutionary Approach to Norms",The American Political Science Review,Vol.80,No.4(December 1986),p.1105.
1 William McDougall,An Introduction to Social Psychology,21st edition,London:Methuen &Co.Ltd.,1928,Chapter 12.
2[德]盖奥尔格·西美尔著、林荣远译:《社会学——关于社会化形式的研究》,北京:华夏出版社,2002年版,第89页。
3 Mancur Olson,The Logic of Collective Action:Public Goods and the Theory of Groups,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1971,p.36.
1 Miles Kahler,"Multilateralism with Small and Large Numbers",in John Gerard Ruggie ed.,Multilateralism Matters:The Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form,New York:Columbia University Press,1993,p.298.
2[德]尼克拉斯·卢曼著,瞿铁鹏、李强译:《信任》,上海:上海世纪出版集团,2005年版,第65页。
3[德]尤尔根·哈贝马斯著、曹卫东译:《交往行为理论》(第一卷),上海:上海世纪出版集团,2004年版,第88页。
4 Robert Axelrod,"Argumentation in Foreign Policy Settings:Britain in 1918,Munich in 1938, and Japan in 1970",The Journal of Conflict Resolution,Vol.21,No.4,December 1977,p.729.
1 Robert Axelrod,"The Dissemination of Culture:A Model with Local Convergence and Global Polarization",The Journal of Conflict Resolution,Vol.41,No.2,April 1977,p.205.
2 Lisa L.Martin,"The Rational State Choice of Multilateralism",in John Gerard Ruggie ed.,Multilateralism Matters:The Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form,New York:Columbia University Press,1993,p.102.
3 G.John Ikenberry,"Institutions,Strategic Restraint,and the Persistence of American Postwar Order",International Security,Vol.23,No.3(Winter 1998/99),pp.61-62.
1 Emanuel Adler and Michael Barnett,"A Framework for the Study of Security Communities",in Emanuel Adler and Michael Barnett eds.,Security Communities,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1998,p.44.
2 Michael Barnett and Raymond Duvall eds.,Power in Global Governance,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2005,p.42.
3 Judith Goldstein,Miles Kahler,Robert O.Keohane,and Anne-Made Slaughter,"Introduction:Legalization and World Politics",International Organization 54,3,Summer 2000,p.399.
1 Robert O.Keohane and Joseph S.Nye,Jr.,"Introduction",in Joseph S.Nye and John D.Donahue eds.,Governance in a Globalizing World,Washington,D.C.:Brookings Institution Press,2000,p.34.
2 James A.Caporaso,"International Relations Theory and Multilateralism:The Search for Foundations",in John Gerard Ruggie ed.,Multilateralism Matters:The Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form,New York:Columbia University Press,1993,p.73.
3 Ernst Fehr,Urs Fischbacher,"Third-Party Punishiment and Social Norms",Evolution and Human Behavior,25(2004),p.64.
4 Jonathan Bendor and Piotr Swistak,"The Evolution of Norms",The American Journal of Sociology,Vol.106,No.6(May 2001),p.1494.
1 Kenneth W.Abbott,Robert O.Keohane,Andrew Moravcsik,Anne-Marie Slaughter,and Duncan Snidal,"The Concept of Legalization",International Organization 54,3,Summer 2000,p.330.
2 Karl W.Deutsch,The Analysis of International Relations,Englewood Cliffs:Prentice-Hall,Inc.,1968,p.43.
3[德]尼克拉斯·卢曼著,瞿铁鹏、李强译:《信任》,上海:上海世纪出版集团,2005年版,第118页。
1 Robert Axelrod,"An Evolutionary Approach to Norms",The American Political Science Review,Vol.80,No.4(December 1986),pp.1102-1107.
2[德]斐迪南·腾尼斯著、林荣远译:《共同体与社会》,北京:商务印书馆,1999年版,第65-72页。
1[德]斐迪南·腾尼斯著、林荣远译:《共同体与社会》,北京:商务印书馆,1999年版,第95页。
2 Barry Buzan,From International to World Society? English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalization,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2004,p.111.
1[意]安东尼奥·葛兰西著、葆煦译:《狱中札记》,北京:人民出版社,1983年版,第37页。
2[德]马克斯·韦伯著、胡景北译:《社会学的基本概念》,上海:上海世纪出版集团,第78页。
1 Deborah J.Terry,"Intergroup Relations and Organizational Mergers",in Michael A.Hogg and Deborah J.Terry eds.,Social Identity Processes in Organizational Contexts,Ann Arbor,MI:Sheridan Books,2001,pp.230-231.
2 S.Alexander Haslam and Michael J.Platow,"Your Wish Is Our Command:The Role of Shared Social Identity in Translating a Leader's Vision into Followers' Action",in Michael A.Hogg and Deborah J.Terry eds.,Social Identity Processes in Organizational Contexts,Ann Arbor,MI:Sheridan Books,2001,p.217.
3 Zygmunt Bauman,Community:Seeking Safety in an Insecure World,Cambridge:Polity Press,2001,pp.5-6.
1[德]马克斯·韦伯著、林荣远译:《经济与社会》(上卷),北京:商务印书馆,2006年版,第72页。
1 Michael Barnett and Martha Finnemore,Rules for the World:International Organizations in Global Politics,Ithaca:Cornell University Press,2004,p.33.
2 Zygmunt Bauman,Community:Seeking Safety in an Insecure World,Cambridge:Polity Press,2001,pp.96-97.
1 Brian Barry,"Can States Be Moral? International Morality and the Compliance Problem",in Anthony Ellis ed.,Ethnics and International Relations,Manchester:Manchester University Press,1986,p.80.
2 Engin F.Isin and Patrica K.Wood,Citizenship and Identity,London:SAGE Publications,1999,p.39.
1 Michael Hogg,"Social Identification,Group Prototypicality,and Emergent Leadership",in Michael A.Hogg and Deborah J.Terry eds.,Social Identity Processes in Organizational Contexts,Ann Arbor,MI:Sheridan Books,2001,p.204.
1 Engin F.Isin and Patrica K.Wood,Citizenship and Identity,London:SAGE Publications,1999,p.19.
2 World Society Research Group,"Introduction:World Society",in Mathias Albert,Lothar Brock,and Klaus Dieter Wolf eds.,Civilizing Worm Politics:Society and Community Beyond the State,Lanhanm,Maryland:Rowman & Little Pubulishers,Inc.,2000,p.11.
1 Robert H.Gass and John S.Seiter,Persuasion,Social Influence,and Compliance Gaining,second edition,New York:Pearsong Education Inc.,2003,p.127.
2[德]马克斯·韦伯著、林荣远译:《经济与社会》(上卷),北京:商务印书馆,2006年版,第79页。
1 So Alexander Haslam and Michael J.Platow,"Your Wish is Our Command:The Role of Shared Social Identity in Translating a Leader's Vision into Followers' Action",in Michael A.Hogg and Deborah J.Terry eds.,Social Identity Processes in Organizational Contexts,Ann Arbor,MI:Sheridan Books,2001,pp.218-225.
2 Michael Hogg,"Social Identification,Group Prototypicality,and Emergent Leadership",in Michael A.Hogg and Deborah J.Terry eds.,Social Identity Processes in Organizational Contexts,Ann Arbor,MI:Sheridan Books,2001,p.210.
1 Joseph S.Nye,Jr.,Soft Power:The Means to Success in World Politics,New York:Public Affair,2004,p.4.
1 Louis Henkin,How Nations Behave:Law and Foreign Policy,New York:Columbia University Press,pp.10-11.
2 Richard N.Rosecrance,The Rise of the Virtual State:Wealth and Power in the Coming Century,New York:Basic Books,1999,p.15.
1 Charles Gore,"The Rise and Fall of the Washington Consensus as a Paradigm for Developing Countries",World Development,Vol.28,No.5,pp.789-792.
1 Stephen D.Krasner,Structural Conflict:The Third World Against Global Liberalism,Berkeley:University of California Press,1985,p.5.
1 Michael Hogg,"Social Identification,Group Prototypicality,and Emergent Leadership",in Michael A.Hogg and Deborah J.Terry eds.,Social Identity Processes in Organizational Contexts,Ann Arbor,MI:Sheridan Books,2001,p.204.
1 Robert O.Keohane and Joseph S.Nye,Power and Interdependence:World Politics in Transition,3rd edition,Boston:Little Brown,2001,p.284.
1 Robert O.Keohane and Joseph S.Nye,Power and Interdependence:World Politics in Transition,3rd edition,Boston:Little Brown,2001,p.284.
2 Michael N.Barnett and Martha Finnemore,"The Politics,Power,and Pathologies of International Organizations",International Organization 53,4,Autumn 1999,p.719.
1 John W.Meyer,John Boli,George M.Thomas,Francisco O.Ramirez,"World Society and the Nation-State",The American Journal of Sociology,Vol.103,No.1(July 1997),p.161.
2 Ian Johnston,"The Power of Interpretive Communities",in Michael Barnett and Raymond Duvall eds.,Power in Global Governance,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2005,pp.187-188.
1 Alastair Iain Johnston,Social States:China in International Institutions,1980-2000,Princeton:Princeton University Press,2008,preface.
2[德]马克斯·韦伯著、林荣远译:《经济与社会》(上卷),北京:商务印书馆,2006年版,第76页。
1 Tom Tyler,"Cooperation in Organizations:A Social Identity Perspective",in Michael A.Hogg and Deborah J.Terry eds.,Social Identity Processes in Organizational Contexts,Ann Arbor,MI:Sheridan Books,2001,p.157.
1 Peter J.Katzenstein,"Introduction:Alternative Perspectives on National Security",in Peter J.Katzenstein ed.,The Culture of National Security:Norms and Identity in Worm Politics,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.5.
2 Ronald L.Jepperson,Alexander Wendt,and Peter J.Katzenstein,"Norms,Identity,and Culture in National Security",in Peter J.Katzenstein ed.,The Culture of National Security:Norms and Identity in World Politics,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.54.
3 Stephen D.Krasner,Structural Conflict:The Third World Against Global Liberalism,Berkeley:University of California Press,1985,p.259.
1 Frank Schimmelfennig,"Introduction:The Impact of International Organizations on the Central and Eastern European States-Conceptual and Theoretical Issues",in Ronald H.Linden ed.,Norms and Nannies:The Impact of International Organizations on the Central and East European States,Lanbam:Rowman & Littlefiled Publishers,Inc.,2002,p.6.
1 Benjamin E.Goldsmith,Imitation in International Relations:Observation Learning,Analogies,and Foreign Policy in Russia and Ukraine,New York:Palgrave Macmillian,2005,p.18.
1 G.John Ikenberry,"Conclusion:An Institutional Approach to American Foreign Economic Policy",International Organization 42,1,Winter 1988,p.220.
1 Christopher Hill,The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy,New York:Palgrave Macmillan,2003,p.269.
1 William G.Roy,Rachel Parker-Gwin,"How Many Logics of Collective Action",Theory and Society Vol.28,No.2(Apr.1999),p.207.
1 Jalal Alamgir,"Managing openness in India:the social construction of a globalist narrative",in Linda Weiss ed.,States in the Global Economy:Bringing Domestic Institutions Back In,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2003,p.225.
2 Helen V.Milner,Interests,Institutions,and Information:Domestic Politics and International Relations,Princeton:Princeton University Press,1997,p.19.
3 Robert Gilpin,Global Political Economy:Understanding the International Economic Order,Princeton:Princeton University Press,2001,p.129.
1 Christopher Hill,The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy,New York:Palgrave Macmillan,2003,pp.275-276.
2 Kathleen Hall Jamieson & Paul Waldman,The Press Effect:Politicians,Journalists,and the Stories That Shape the Political World,New York:Oxford University Press,2003,p.95.
3 Walter Lippman,Public Opinion,New York:The Macmillan Company,1922,p.248.
4 Emanuel Adler and Peter M.Haas,"Conclusion:Epistemic Communities,World Order,and the Creation of a Reflective Research Program",International Organization 46,1,Winter 1992,p.375.
5 Peter M.Haas,"Introduction:Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination",International Organization 46,1,Winter 1992,p.3.
1 E.H.Carr,The Twenty Years' Crisis 1919-1939:An Introduction to the Study of International Relations,New York:Palgrave,2001,pp.120-121.
2 E.H.Carr,The Twenty Years' Crisis 1919-1939:An Introduction to the Study of International Relations,New York:Palgrave,2001,p.129.
1 Walter Lippman,Public Opinion,New York:The Macmillan Company,1922,p.248.
2 Emanuel Adler and Peter M.Haas,"Conclusion:Epistemic Communities,World Order,and the Creation of a Reflective Research Program",International Organization 46,1,Winter 1992,p.384.
3 Andrew P.Cortell and James W.Davis,"Understanding the Domestic Impact of International Norms:A Research Agenda",International Studies Review,Vol.2,No.1(Spring 2000),pp.72-84.
4 Andrew P.Cortell and James W.Davis,"How Do International Institutions Matter? The Domestic Impact of International Rules and Norms",International Studies Quarterly(1996) 40,pp.451-478.
1 Ernst B.Haas,"Collective Learning:Some Theoretical Speculations",in Breslauer,George W.,and Philip E.Tetlock,eds.,Learning in U.S.and Soviet Foreign Policy,Boulder,Colo.:Westview,1991,p.63.
2 Robert Axelrod and Robert Keohane,"Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy:Strategies and Institutions",World Politics Vol.38,No.1(Oct.1985),p.241.
3 Hans J.Morgenthau,Politics Among Nations:The Struggle for Power and Peace,sixth edition,New York:Alfred A.Knopf,Inc.,1985,p.164.
1 Susan Strange,The Retreat of the State:The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1996,p.164.
2 Robert O.Keohane and Joseph S.Nye,Power and Interdependence:World Politics in Transition,3rd edition,Boston:Little Brown,2001,p.286.
3 Ernst B.Haas,"Collective Learning:Some Theoretical Speculations",in Breslauer,George W.,and Philip E.Tetlock,eds.,Learning in U.S.and Soviet Foreign Policy,Boulder,Colo.: Westview,1991,p.89.
1 Ernst B.Haas,"Collective Learning:Some Theoretical Speculations",in Breslauer,George W.,and Philip E.Tetlock,eds.,Learning in U.S.and Soviet Foreign Policy,Boulder,Colo.:Westview,1991,pp.89-90.
2 Emanuel Adler and Michael Barnett,"A Framework for the Study of Security Communities",in Emanuel Adler and Michael Barnett eds.,Security Communities,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1998,p.44.
1 Louis Henkin,How Nations Behave:Law and Foreign Policy,New York:Columbia University Press,p.20.
2 Stephen D.Krasner,Structural Conflict:The Third World Against Global Liberalism,Berkeley:University of California Press,1985,p.29.
1 Ernst Fehr and Urs Fischbacher,"Social Norms and Human Cooperation",Trends in Cognitive Sciences,Vol.8,No.4,April 2004,p.185.
1 Christopher Weller,"Collective Identities in World Society",in Mathias Albert,Lothar Brock,and Klaus Dieter Wolf eds.,Civilizing World Politics:Society and Community Beyond the State,Lanhanm,Maryland:Rowman & Little Pubulishers,Inc.,2000,p.51.
1 Louis Henkin,How Nations Behave:Law and Foreign Policy,New York:Columbia University Press,p.30.
2 Emanuel Richter,"'Community' in the Global Network:A Methodological Exploration,in Mathias Albert,Lothar Brock,and Klaus Dieter Wolf eds.,Civilizing World Politics:Society.and Community Beyond the State,Lanhanm,Maryland:Rowman & Little Pubulishers,Inc.,2000,pp.86-87.
1 《建议》英文全文可参见http://www.fatf-gan.org
2 FATF,FATF Revised Mandate 2008-2012,12 April 2008,p.2.
1 FATF,FATF Annual Report 2006-2007,29 June 2007,p.4.
2 FATF,FATF Annual Report 2006-2007,29 June 2007,p.4.
1 Alexander Wendt,Social Theory of International Politics,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1999,p.355.
1 FATF,FATF Revised Mandate 2008-2012,12 April 2008,p.5.
1 Andrew P.Cortell and James W.Davis,"Understanding the Domestic Impact of International Norms:A Research Agenda",International Studies Review,Vol.2,No.1(Spring 2000),p.70.
2 中国人民银行:《2005年中国反洗钱报告》。
3 中国人民银行:《2005年中国反洗钱报告》。
1 FATF,First Mutual Evaluation Report on Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism:People's Republic of China,29 June 2007,p.22.
1 “中国反洗钱领域面临的四大挑战”,《每日经济信息》,2007年6月19日。
1 FATF,First Mutual Evaluation Report on Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism:People's Republic of China,29 June 2007,p.62.
1 中国人民银行:《2005年中国反洗钱报告》。
2 中国人民银行:《2006年中国反洗钱报告》。
3 中国人民银行:《2008年中国反洗钱报告》。
1 FATF/ME(2007)2/ADD,p.4.
2 蔡八弟:“《反洗钱法》渐行渐近 多部门合作成当务之急”,《中国经济周刊》,2005年第47期,第31页。
1 唐朱昌:“俄罗斯经济转型中的政府反洗钱措施评析”,《俄罗斯研究》,2007年第2期,第24页。
1 FATF,Second Mutual Evaluation Report - Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism:Russian Federation,20 June 2008,pp.145-146.
2 时映梅:“论俄罗斯的资本外逃与洗钱”,《当代世界社会主义问题》,2006年第4期,第94-95页。
1 FATF,Second Mutual Evaluation Report - Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism:Russian Federation,20 June 2008,pp.7-9.
1 “俄罗斯反洗钱成果显著”,《经济参考报》,2006年4月27日,第3版。
2 FATF,Second Mutual Evaluation Report - Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism:Russian Federation,20 June 2008,p.32.
1 Kenneth W.Abbott,Robert O.Keohane,Andrew Moravcsik,Anne-Marie Slaughter,and Duncan Snidal,"The Concept of Legalization",International Organization 54,3,Summer 2000,p.404.
1 Alastair Iain Johnston and Paul Evans,"China's Engagement with Multilateral Security Institutions",in Alastair Iain Johnston and Robert S.Ross eds.,Engaging China:The Management of an Emergent Power,New York:Routledge,1999,p.252.
1 WP/TPR/G/199.
2 Margaret M.Pearson,"China's Integration into the International Trade and Investment Regime",in Elizabeth Economy and Michael Oksenberg eds.,China Joins the World:Progress and Prospects,New York:Council on Foreign Relations Press,1999,p.188.
1 国务院新闻办公室:《1998年中国知识产权保护状况》。
2 国务院新闻办公室:《中国知识产权保护状况》白皮书。
1 “加入WTO后的中国知识产权保护”,《中国教育报》,2003年3月14日,第5版。
2 “保护知识产权入世 符合中国长远利益”,《第一财经日报》,2004年12月23日,第3版。
3 Commission on Intellectual Property Rights,Integrating Intellectual Property Rights and Development Policy:Report of the Commission on Intellectual Property Rights,London,September 2002,p.42.
1 国家知识产权局:《2007年度报告》。
2 国务院新闻办公室:“中国知识产权保护的新进展”,《光明日报》,2005年4月22日,第5版。
3 国务院新闻办公室:“中国知识产权保护的新进展”,《光明日报》,2005年4月22日,第5版。
1 R.A.Mashelkar,"Intellectual Property Rights and the Third World",Current Science,Vol.81,No.8,25 October 2005,p.956.
1 Jalai Alamgir,"Managing openness in India:the social construction of a globalist narrative",in Linda Weiss ed.,States in the Global Economy:Bringing Domestic Institutions Back In,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2003,p.226.
1 WT/TPR/S/75.
2 邓国庆:“创新型知识产权制度案例:巴西”,《科技日报》,2005年12月1日,第2版。
1 Commission on Intellectual Property Rights,Integrating Intellectual Property Rights and Development Policy:Report of the Commission on Intellectual Property Rights,London,September 2002,p.42.
1 Margaret M.Pearson,"China's Integration into the International Trade and Investment Regime",in Elizabeth Economy and Michael Oksenberg eds.,China Joins the World:Progress and Prospects,New York:Council on Foreign Relations Press,1999,pp.184-185.
1.程又中:“对‘中国加入国际社会'的阐释”,《教学与研究》,2004年第10期。
2.邓国庆:“创新型知识产权制度案例:巴西”,《科技日报》,2005年12月1日,第2版。
3.郭树勇:《大国成长的逻辑:西方大国崛起的国际政治社会学分析》,北京:北京大学出版社2006年版。
4.国务院新闻办公室:“中国知识产权保护的新进展”,《光明日报》,2005年4月22日,第5版。
5.何靖、杨胜刚、吴志明:“反洗钱的国际经验与中国的对策”,《财经理论与实践》,2004年第5期。
6.黄超:“建构主义视角下的国际规范扩散”,《外交评论》,2008年第4期。
7.刘鸣:“国际社会与国际体系概念的辨析及评价”,《现代国际关系》,2003年第12期。
8.刘贞晔:“国家的社会化、非政府组织及其理论解释范式”,《世界经济与政治》,2005年第1期。
9.刘贞晔:《国际政治领域中的非政府组织:一种互动关系的分析》,天津:天津人民出版社,2005年版。
10.潘亚玲:“安全化、国际合作与国际规范的动态发展”,《外交评论》,2008年第3期。
11.秦亚青:“国际关系理论的核心问题与中国学派的生成”,《中国社会科学》,2005年第3期。
12.秦亚青:“建构主义:思想渊源、理论流派与学术理念”,《国际政治研究》,2006年第3期。
13.时映梅:“论俄罗斯的资本外逃与洗钱”,《当代世界社会主义问题》,2006年第4期。
14.师永彦:“从FATF评估看全球反洗钱制度的现状与存在问题”,《中国金融》,2006年第24期。
15.宋才发:《WTO规则与中国法律制度改革》,北京:人民法院出版社,2005年版。
16.苏长和:《全球公共问题与国际合作:一种制度的分析》,上海:上海人民出版社,2000年版。
17.苏长和:“中国与国际制度——一项研究议程”,《世界经济与政治》,2002年第10期。
18.苏长和:“跨国关系与国内政治——比较政治与国际政治经济学视野下的国际关系研究”,《美国研究》,2003年第4期。
19.唐朱昌:“俄罗斯经济转型中的政府反洗钱措施评析”,《俄罗斯研究》,2007年第2期。
20.王逸舟:《西方国际政治学:历史与理论》,上海:上海人民出版社,1998年版。
21.邬为蕾:“全球视野下的反洗钱问题及对策分析”,《生产力研究》,2005年年第5期。
22.徐进:“国家何以建构国际规范:一项研究议程”,《国际论坛》,2007年第5期。
23.杨翰辉:《WTO与中国知识产权制度的冲突与规避》,北京:中国城市出版社,2001年版。
24.杨胜刚、何靖:“反洗钱的大额和可疑交易信息报告制度研究”,《求索》,2004年第10期。
25.袁正清:《国际政治理论的社会学转向:建构主义研究》,上海:上海人民出版社,2005年版。
26.张丽娜主编:《WTO与中国知识产权法律制度研究》,北京:中国民主法制出版社,2006年版。
27.张鹿:“中国加入FATF的历程及未来反洗钱和反恐融资面临的挑战”,《中国金融》,2007年第15期。
28.郑飞:“国际规范的价值与功能:个体理性视角”,《国际论坛》,2007年第6期。
29.朱立群、赵广成:“中国国际观念的变化与巩固:动力与趋势”,《外交评论》,2008年第1期。
30.[德]斐迪南·滕尼斯著、林荣远译:《共同体与社会》,北京:商务印书馆,1999年版。
31.[德]盖奥尔格·西美尔著、林荣远译:《社会学——关于社会化形式的研究》,北京:华夏出版社,2002年版。
32.[德]马克斯·韦伯著、胡景北译:《社会学的基本概念》,上海:上海世纪出版集团,2005年版。
33.[德]马克斯·韦伯著、林荣远译:《经济与社会》(上卷),北京:商务印书馆,2006年版。
34.[德]尼克拉斯·卢曼著、瞿铁鹏、李强译:《信任》,上海:上海世纪出版集团,2005年版。
35.[德]齐美尔著、林荣远译:《社会是如何可能的——齐美尔社会学文选》,桂林:广西师范大学出版社,200v2年版。
36.[挪威]托布约尔·克努成著,余万里、何宗强译:《国际关系理论史导论》,天津:天津人民出版社,2004年版。
37.[德]尤尔根·哈贝马斯著、曹卫东译:《交往行为理论》(第一卷),上海:上海世纪出版集团,2004年版。
1.Abbott,Kenneth W.and Duncan Snidal,"Hard and Soft Law in International Governance",International Organization 54,3,Summer 2000.
2.Adler,Emanuel and Peter M.Haas,"Conclusion:Epistemic Communities,World Order,and the Creation of a Reflective Research Program",International Organization 46,1,Winter 1992.
3.Albert,Mathias,Lothar Brock,and Klaus Dieter Wolf eds.,Givilizing World Politics:Society and Community Beyond the State,Lanham,Maryland:Rowman & Littlefield Publishers,Inc.,2000.
4.Allison,Graham,"Conceptual Models and the Cuban Missile Crisis",American Political Science Review 63,No.3(Sep.1969).
5.Anderson,Benedict,Imagined Communities:Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism,New York:Verso,2006.
6.Axelrod,Robert,The Evolution of Cooperation,revised edition,New York:Basic Books,2006.
7.Bandura,Albert,Social Learning Theory,Englewood Cliffs:Prentice-Hall,1977.
8.Bandura,Albert,"Social Cognitive Theory:An Agentic Perspective",Asian Journal of Social Psychology,(1999) 2.
9.Bandura,Albert,"Social Cognitive Theory in Cultural Context",Applied Psychology:An International Review,2002,51(2).
10.Barnett,Michael N.and Martha Finnemore,"The Politics,Power,and Pathologies of International Organizations",International Organization 53,4,Autumn 1999.
11.Barnett,Michael and Martha Finnemore,Rules for the World:International Organizations in Global Politics,Ithaca:Cornell University Press,2004.
12.Barnett,Michael and Raymond Duvall,Power in Global Governance,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2005.
13.Baron,Robert A.,and Donn Byrne,Social Psychology:Understanding Human Interaction,5th edition,Boston:Allyn and Bacon,1987.
14.Breslauer,George W.,and Philip E.Tetlock,eds.,Learning in U.S.and Soviet Foreign Policy,Boulder,Colo.:Westview,1991.
15.Bull,Hedley,The Anarchical Society:A Study of Order in World Politics,New York:Columbia University Press,1977.
16.Bull,Hedley,and Adam Watson,eds.,The Expansion of International Society,Oxford:Clarendon Press,1984.
17.Buzan,Barry,From International to Worm Society? English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2004.
18.Cardenas,Sonia,"Norm Collision:Explaining the Effects of International Human Rights Pressure on State Behavior",International Studies Review,(2004) 6.
19.Checkel,Jeffrey T.,"The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory",World Politics,Vol.50.No.2,1998.
20.Checkel,Jeffrey T.ed.,International Institutions and Socialization in Europe,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2007.
21.Commission on Intellectual Property Rights,Integrating Intellectual Property.Rights and Development Policy:Report of the Commission on Intellectual Property Rights,London,September 2002.
22.Cortell,Andrew P.and James W.Davis,"Understanding the Domestic Impact of International Norms:A Research Agenda",International Studies Review,Vol.2,No.1(Spring 2000).
23.Deutsch,Karl W.,The Nerves of Government:Models of Political Communication and Control,New York:The Free Press,1966.
24.Deutsch,Karl W.,The Analysis of International Relations,Englewood Cliffs:Prentice-Hall,Inc.,1968.
25.Daniel Drezner ed.,Locating the Proper Authorities:The Interaction of Domestic and International Institutions,Ann Arbor:The University of Michigan Press,2003.
26.Economy,Elizabeth and Michael Oksenberg,China Joins the World:Progress and Prospects,New York:Council on Foreign Relations Press,1999.
27.Eiser,J.Richard,Social Psychology:Attitudes,Cognition,and Social Behavior,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1986.
28.Ellis,Anthony ed.,Ethnics and International Relations,Manchester:Manchester University Press,1986.
29.Evans,Peter,Dietrich Rueschemayer and Theda Skocpol eds.,Bringing the State Back In,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1985.
30.Evans,Peter B.,Harold K.Jacobson and Robert D.Putnam eds.,Double Edged Diplomacy:International Bargaining and Domestic Politics,Berkeley:University of California Press,1993.
31.FATF,FATF Annual Report 2006-2007,29 June 2007.
32.FATF,FATF Revised Mandate 2008-2012,12 April 2008.
33.FATF,First Mutual Evaluation Report on Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism:People's Republic of China,29 June 2007.
34.FATF,Second Mutual Evaluation Report - Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism:Russian Federation,20 June 2008.
35.Fehr,Ernst,Urs Fischbacher,"Third-Party Punishiment and Social Norms",Evolution and Human Behavior,25(2004).
36.Fehr,Ernst and Urs Fischbacher,"Social Norms and Human Cooperation",Trends in Cognitive Sciences,Vol.8,No.4,April 2004.
37.Fewsmith,Joseph,"The Political and Social Implications of China's Accession to the WTO",The China Quarterly,Vol.167,September 2001.
38.Finnemore,Martha,National Interests in International Society,Ithaca:Comell University Press,1996.
39.Finnemore,Martha,and Kathryn Sikkink,"International Norm Dynamics and Political Change",International Organization 52,4,Autumn 1998.
40.Frieden,Jeffry A.,and Ronald Rogowski,"The Impact of the International Economy on National Policies:An Analytical Overview",in Keohane Robert O.,and Helen Milner eds.,Internationalization and Domestic Politics,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1996.
41.Gass,Robert H.and John S.Seiter,Persuasion,Social Influence,and Compliance Gaining,second edition,New York:Pearsong Education Inc.,2003.
42.Giddens,Anthony,Social Theory and Modern Sociology,Stanford:Stanford University Press, 1987.
43.Gilpin,Robert,Global Political Economy:Understanding the International Economic Order,Princeton:Princeton University Press,2001.
44.Goldsmith,Benjamin E.,"Imitation in International Relations:Analogies,Vicarious Learning,and Foreign Policy",International Interactions,29,2003.
45.Goldstein,Avery,"Great Expectations:Interpreting China's Arrival",International Security,Vol.22,No.3(Winter 1997198).
46.Goldstein,Judith,Miles Kahler,Robert O.Keohane,and Anne-Marie Slaughter,"Introduction:Legalization and World Politics",International Organization 54,3,Summer 2000.
47.Gourevitch,Peter,"The Second Image Reversed:The International Sources of Domestic Politics",International Organization 32,4,Autumn 1978.
48.Graham,Edward M.,Nina Oding and Paul J.Welfens eds.,Internationalization and Economic Policy Reforms in Transition Countries,Berlin:Springer,2005.
49.Gruber,Lloyd,Ruling the World:Power Politics and the Rise of Supranational Institutions,New Jersey:Princeton University Press,2000.
50.Haas,Peter M.,"International Institutions and Social Learning in the Management of Global Environmental Risks",Policy Studies Journal,Vol.28,No.3,2000.
51.Halabi,Yakub,"The Expansion of Global Governance into the Third World:Altruism,Realism,or Constructivism?" International Studies Review,(2004) 6.
52.Hewitt,John P.,Self and Society:A Symbolic Interactionist Social Psychology,5th edition,Boston:Allyn and Bacon,1991.
53.Hill,Christopher,The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy,New York:Palgrave Macmillan,2003.
54.Hogg,Michael A.and Deborah J.Terry eds.,Social Identity Processes in Organizational Contexts,Ann Arbor,MI:Sheridan Books,2001.
55.Ikenberry,John G.,and Charles A.Kupchan,"Socialization and Hegemonic Power",International Organization 44,3,Summer 1990.
56.Ikenberry John G.,"Institutions,Strategic Restraint,and the Persistence of American Postwar Order",International Security,Vol.23,No.3(Winter 1998/99).
57.Isin,Engin F.and Patrica K.Wood,Citizenship and Identity,London:SAGE Publications,1999.
58.Jamieson,Kathleen Hall & Paul Waldman,The Press Effect:Politicians,Journalists,and the Stories That Shape the Political World,New York:Oxford University Press,2003.
59.Jepperson,Ronald L.,Alexander Wendt,and Peter J.Katzenstein,"Norms,Identity,and Culture in National Security",in Katzenstein,Peter J.,ed.,The Culture of National Security:Norms and Identity in World Politics,New York:Columbia University Press,1996.
60.Johnston,Alastair lain and Robert S.Ross eds.,Engaging China:The Management of an Emergent Power,New York:Routledge,1999.
61.Johnston,Alastair Iain,"Treating International Institutions as Social Environments", International Studies Quarterly,(2001) 45.
62.Johnston,Alastair Iain,"Is China a Status Quo Power?" International Security,Vol.27,No.4(Spring 2003).
63.Johnston,Alastair lain,Social States:China in International Institutions,1980-2000,Princeton:Princeton University Press,2008.
64.Karatnychy,Adrian,and Alexander Motyl,and Amanda Schnetzer eds.,Nations in Transit 2003,New York:Freedom House,2003.
65.Katzenstein,Peter J.ed.,Between Power and Plenty:Foreign Economic Policies of Advanced Industrial States,Madison:The University of Wisconsin Press,1984.
66.Katzenstein,Peter J.,ed.,The Culture of National Security:Norms and Identity in World Politics,New York:Columbia University Press,1996.
67.Katzenstein,Peter J.,Cultural Norms & National Security:Police and Military in Postwar Japan,Ithaca:Cornell University Press,1996.
68.Kent,Ann,"China's International Socialization:The Role of International Organizations",Global Governance 8(2002).
69.Keck,Margaret and Kathryn Sikkink,Activists Beyond Borders,Ithaca:Cornell University Press,1998.
70.Keohane,Robert O.and Joseph S.Nye eds.,Transnational Relations and World Politics,Cambridge,MA.:Harvard University Press,1970.
71.Keohane,Robert O.,After Hegemony:Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy,Princeton:Princeton University Press,1984.
72.Keohane,Robert O.,International Institutions and State Power,Boulder:Westview Press,1989.
73.Keohane Robert O.,and Helen Milner eds.,Internationalization and Domestic Politics,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1996.
74.Keohane,Robert O.and Joseph S.Nye,Power and Interdependence:World Politics in Transition,third edition,Boston:Harvard University Press,2001.
75.Khanna,Parag,The Second World:Empires and Influence in the New Global Order,New York:Random House,2008.
76.Kirst-Ashman,Karen K.,Human Behavior,Communities,Organizations,and Groups in the Macro Social Environment:An Empowerment Approach,Belmont,CA:Thomas Learning,2000.
77.Klotz,Audie,Norms in International Relations:The Struggle Against Apartheid,Ithaca:Cornell University Press,1995.
78.Kowert,Paul and Jeffrey Legro,"Norms,Identity,and Their Limits:A Theoretical Reprise",in Katzenstein,Peter J.,ed.,The Culture of National Security:Norms and Identity in World Politics,New York:Columbia University Press,1996.
79.Krasner,Stephen D.,ed.,International Regimes,Ithaca:Cornell University Press,1983.
80.Krasner,Stephen D.,Structural Conflict:The Third World Against Global Liberalism, Berkeley:University of California Press,1985.
81.Kratochwil,Friedrich,"The Force of Prescriptions",International Organization 34,4,Autumn 1984.
82.Kratochwil,Friedrich,and John G.Ruggie,"International Organization:A State of the Art on an Art of the State",International Organization 40,4,Autumn 1986.
83.Legro,Jeffrey W.,"Which Norms Matter? Revisiting the 'Failure' of Internationalism",International Organization 51,1,Winter 1997.
84.Levy,Jack S.,"Learning and Foreign Policy",International Organization 48,2,Spring 1994.
85.Linden,Ronald H.ed.,Norms and Nannies:The Impact of International Organizations on the Central and East European States,Lanbam:Rowman & Littlefield Publishers,Inc.,2002.
86.Albert,Mathias,Lothar Brock,and Klaus Dieter Wolf eds.,Civilizing World Politics:Society and Community Beyond the State,Lanhanm,Maryland:Rowman & Little Pubulishers,Inc.,2000.
87.Mashelkar,R.A.,"Intellectual Property Rights and the Third Word",Current Science,Vol.81,No.8,25 October 2005.
88.McDougall,William,An Introduction to Social Psychology,21st edition,London:Methuen &Co.Ltd.,1928.
89.Meyer,John W.,John Boli,George M.Thomas,Francisco O.Ramirez,"World Society and the Nation-State",The American Journal of Sociology,Vol.103,No.1(July 1997).
90.Milner,Helen V.,Interests,Institutions,and Information:Domestic Politics and International Relations,Princeton:Princeton University Press,1997.
91.Milner,Helen V.,"International Politcial Economy:Beyond Hegemonic Statbility",Foreign Policy,Spring 1998.
92.Moravcsik,Andrew,"Taking Preferences Seriously:A Liberal Theory of International Politics",International Organization 51,4,Autumn 1997.
93.Morgenthau,Hans J.,Politics Among Nations:The Struggle for Power and Peace,sixth edition,New York:Alfred A.Knopf,Inc.,1985.
94.Putnam,Robert D.,"Diplomacy and Domestic Politics:The Logic of Two-Level Games",International Organization 42,3,Summer 1988.
95.Rosecrance,Richard N.,The Rise of the Virtual State:Wealth and Power in the Coming Century,New York:Basic Books,1999.
96.Roy,William G.,Rachel Parker-Gwin,"How Many Logics of Collective Action",Theory and Society Vol.28,No.2(Apr.1999).
97.Ruggie,John G.ed.,Multilateralism Matters:The Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form,New York:Columbia University Press,1993.
98.Ruggie,John G.,"What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge",International Organization 52,4,Autumn 1998.
99.Sikkink,Kathryn,"Human Rights,Principled Issue-Networks,and Sovereignty in Latin America",International Organization 47,3,Summer 1993.
100.Waltz,Kenneth N.,Man,the State,and War:A Theoretical Analysis,New York:Columbia University Press,1959.
101.Waltz,Kenneth N.,Foreign Policy and Domestic Politics:The American and British Experience,Boston:Little,Brown and Company,1967.
102.Waltz,Kenneth N.,Theory of International Politics,Reading,Mass.:Addison-Wesley,1979.
103.Weiss,Linda,States in the Global Economy:Bringing Domestic Institutions Back In,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2006.
104.Wendt,Alexander,"Constructing International Politics",International Security,Vol.20,No.1,Summer 1995.
105.Wendt,Alexander,Social Theory of International Politics,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1999.
106.Ngaire Wood ed.,Explaining International Relations Since 1945,New York:Oxford University Press,1996.
107.Yongjin,Zhang,China Goes Global,London:The Foreign Policy Centre,2005.
108.Zweig,David,Internationalizing China:Domestic Interests and Global Linkages,Ithaca:Cornell University Press,2002.
2 Helen V.Milner,"International Politcial Economy:Beyond Hegemonic Statbility",Foreign Policy,Spring 1998,p.118.
1 Jeffrey A.Frieden and Ronald Rogowski,"The Impact of the International Economy on National Policies:An Analytical Overview",in Robert O.Keohane and Helen Milner eds.,Internationalization and Domestic Politics,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1996,p.26.
2 Peter J.Katzenstein,Robert O.Keohane,and Stephen D.Krasner,"International Organization and the Study of World Politics",International Organization 52,4,Autumn 1998,p.669.
1 Geoffrey Garrett and Peter Lange,"Internationalization,Institutions,and Political Change",in Robert O.Keohane and Helen Milner eds.,Internationalization and Domestic Politics,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1996,p.54.
2 Robert D.Putnam,"Diplomacy and Domestic Politics:The Logic of Two-Level Games",International Organization 42,3,Summer 1988,p.430.帕特南等人还专门主编了一部关于双层博弈的书,也收录了这篇文章。Peter B.Evans,Harold K.Jacobson and Robert D.Putnam eds.,Double Edged Diplomacy:International Bargaining and Domestic Politics,Berkeley:University of California Press,1993.
1 Andrew Moravcsik,"Integrating International and Domestic Theories of International Bargaining",in Peter B.Evans,Harold K.Jacobson and Robert D.Putnam eds.,Double Edged Diplomacy:International Bargaining and Domestic Politics,Berkeley:University of California Press,1993,p.15.
2 Martha Finnemore,National Interests in International Society,Ithaca:Comell University Press,1996,pp.2-3.
1 Kathryn Sikkink,"Human Rights,Principled Issue-Networks,and Sovereignty in Latin America",International Organization 47,3,Summer 1993,pp.411-441.
Margaret E.Keck and Kathryn Sikkink,Activists Beyond Borders:Advocacy Networks in International Politics,Ithaca,NY:Comell University Press,1998.
Thomas Risse,Stephen C.Ropp,and Kathryn Sikkink eds.,The Power of Human Rights:International Norms and Domestic Change,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1999.
2 Jeffrey T.Checkel,"Norms,Institutions,and National Identity in Contemporary Europe",International Studies Quarterly 1999,43,pp.83-114.
Annika Bj(o|¨)rkdahl,"Norm-maker and Norm-taker:Exploring the Normative Influence of the EU in Macedonia",European Foreign Affairs Review,Summer 2005,Vol.10,Issue 2,pp.257-278.
Ronald H.Linden ed.,Norms and Nannies:The Impact of International Organizations on the Central and East European States,Lanbam:Rowman & Littlefield Publishers,Inc.,2002.
Emilian R.Kavalski,"The International Socialization of the Balkans",The Review of International Affairs,Vol.2,No.4(Summer 2003),pp.71-88.
Alexandra Gheciu,"Security Institutions as Agents of Socialization? NATO and the 'New Europe'",International Organization 59,Fall 2005,pp.973-1012.
Jeffrey T.Checkel ed.,International Institutions and Socialization in Europe,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2007.
3 John Meyer,John Boli,George M.Thomas,Francisco O.Ramirez,"World Soceity and the Nation-State",The American Journal of Sociology,Vol.103,No.1(July 1997),pp.144-181.
1 Audie Klotz,Norms in International Relations:The Struggle Against Apartheid,Ithaca:Cornell University Press,1995,p.173.
2 Alastair Iain Johnston,Social States:China in International Institutions,1980-2000,Princeton: Princeton University Press,2008.
1 Alastair Iain Johnston,Social States:China in International Institutions,1980-2000,Princeton:Princeton University Press,2008,pp.40-41.
2 David Zweig,Internationalizing China:Domestic Interests and Global Linkages,Ithaca:Cornell University Press,2002.
Ann Kent,"China's International Socialization:The Role of International Organizations",Global Governance g(2002),pp.343-364.
Hongying Wang,"Multilateralism in Chinese Foreign Policy:The Limits of Socialization",Asian Survey,Vol.40,No.3,May/June 2000,pp.475-491.
Elizabeth Economy and Michael Oksenberg,China Joins the World:Progress and Prospects,New York:Council on Foreign Relations Press,1999.
Joseph Fewsmith,"The Political and Social Implications of China's Accession to the WTO",The China Quarterly,Vol.167,September 2001,pp.573-591.
3 苏长和:“中国与国际制度——一项研究议程”,《世界经济与政治》,2002年第10期。
苏长和:“跨国关系与国内政治——比较政治与国际政治经济学视野下的国际关系研究”,《美国研究》,2003年第4期。
郭树勇:《大国成长的逻辑:西方大国崛起的国际政治社会学分析》,北京:北京大学出版社,2006年版。
于宏源:“国际制度与政府决策转型”,《国际政治科学》,2007年第1期。
田野:“国际制度与国家自主性——一项研究框架”,《国际观察》,2008年第2期。
任湘怡:“国际与国内:双向互动——析国际政治经济学的两种不同研究路径”,《世界经济研究》,2008年第1期。
吴其胜:“国际关系研究中的跨层次分析”,《外交评论》,2008年第1期。
1 Imre Lakatos,The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes,edited by John Worrall and Gregory Currie,New York:Columbia University Press,1978,p.70.
1 John Lewis Gaddis,"History,Science,and the Study of International Relations",in Ngaire Wood ed.,Explaining International Relations Since 1945,New York:Oxford University Press,1996,p.34.
1 Peter Gourevitch,"The Second Image Reversed:The International Sources of Domestic Politics",International Organization 32,4,Autumn 1978,pp.881-912.
1 Kenneth N.Waltz,Man,the State,and War:A Theoretical Arialysis,New York:Columbia University Press,1959.第二意象就是从国家的内部政治体制的不同来分析国家间关系。
2 Peter J.Katzenstein,ed.,Between Power and Plenty:Foreign Economic Policies of Advanced Industrial States,Madison:The University of Wisconsin Press,1984.
3 John W.Burton,Global Conflict:The Domestic Sources of International Crisis,Maryland:Wheatsheaf Books,1984.
4 Graham Allison,"Conceptual Models and the Cuban Missile Crisis",American Political Science Review 63,No.3(Sep.1969),pp.689-718.
Eugene R.Wittkopf and James M.McCormick eds.,The Domestic Sources of American Foreign Policy:Insights and Evidence,fourth edition,New York:Rowman & Littlefield Publishers,Inc.,2004.
1 Kenneth N.Waltz,Theory of International Politics,Reading,Mass.:Addison-Wesley,1979.
2 Robert O.Keohane,After Hegemony:Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy,Princeton:Princeton University Press,1984.
3 代表性著作有 Robert Keohane,"The Demand for International Regimes",International Organization 36,2,Spring 1982,pp.141-171.
Ernst Haas,"Words Can Hurt You;Or,Who Said What to Whom about Regimes",International Organization 36,2,Spring 1982,pp.207-243.
Robert Keohane,"Reciprocity in International Relations",International Organizations 40,1,Winter 1986,pp.1-27.
Robert Keohane,"International Institutions:Two Approaches",International Organization 32,4,December 1988,pp.379-396.
Stephen D.Krasner ed.,International Regimes,Ithaca:Cornell University Press,1983.
Robert O.Keohane,After Hegemony:Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy,Princeton:Princeton University Press,1984.
Oran Young,"International Regimes:Toward a Theory of Institutions",World Politics,Vol.39,No.1(Oct.1986),pp.104-122.
Stephan Haggard and Beth A.Simmons,"Theories of International Regimes",International Organization 41,3,Summer 1987,pp.491-517.
Robert Keohane,International Institutions and State Power:Essays in International Relations Theory,Boulder,Colo.:Westview Press,1989.Arthur Stein,"Coordination and Cooperation:Regimes in an Anarchic World",in David Baldwin ed.,Neorealism and Neoliberalism:The Contemporary Debate,New York:Columbia University Press,1993,pp.29-59.
Lisa Martin and Beth A.Simmons eds.,International Institutions:An International Organization Reader,Cambridge,MA:MIT Press,2001.
4 Peter Evans,Dietrich Rueschemayer and Theda Skocpol eds.,Bringing the State Back In,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1985.
5 Alexander Wendt,Social Theory of International Politics,Cambridge University Press,1999,p.314.
1 Alexander Wendt,Social Theory of International Politics,Cambridge University Press,1999,pp.246-312.
2 Alexander Wendt,Social Theory of International Politics,Cambridge University Press,1999,pp.313-378.
3 Robert O.Keohane and Joseph S.Nye eds.,Transnational Relations and World Politics,Cambridge,MA.:Harvard University Press,1970.
4 Robert O.Keohane and Joseph S.Nye,"Transnational Relations and Word Politics:An Introduction",International Organization 25,3,Summer 1971,p.332.
5 Robert O.Keohane and Joseph S.Nye,Power and Interdependence:World Politics in Transition,Boston:Little Brown,1977.
6 Robert O.Keohane,and Helen Milner eds.,Internationalization and Domestic Politics,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1996.Helen Milner,Interests,Institutions,and Information:Domestic Politics and International Relations,Princeton:Princeton University Press,1997.
1 John G.Ikenberry,"The Interwining of Domestic and International Politics",Polity,Vol.29,No.2(Winter 1996),p.297.
2 Helen V.Milner,Interests,Institutions,and Information:Domestic Politics and International Relations,Princeton:Princeton University Press,1997,p.11.
1 Linda Weiss,"Introduction:Bringing Domestic Institutions Back In",in Linda Weiss ed.,States in the Global Economy:Bringing Domestic Institutions Back In,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2003,p.2.
2 Linda Weiss,"Introduction:Bringing Domestic Institutions Back In",in Linda Weiss ed.,States in the Global Economy:Bringing Domestic Institutions Back In,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2003,pp.15-18.
3 John G.Ikenberry,"The Interwining of Domestic and International Politics",Polity,Vol.29,No.2(Winter 1996),p.295.
4 Robert Keohane and Helen Milner,"Internationalization and Domestic Politics:A Conclusion",in Robert O.Keohane,and Helen Milner eds.,Internationalization and Domestic Politics,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1996,p.251.
1 Lisa L.Martin and Beth A.Simmons,"Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions",International Organization 52,4,Autumn 1998,p.748.
1 Martha Finnemore and Kathryn Sikkink,"International Norms Dynamics and Political Change",International Organization 52,4,Autumn 1998,p.892.
2 Peter J.Katzenstein,Cultural Norms & National Security:Police and Military in Postwar Japan,Ithaca:Cornell University Press,1996,p.18.
3 Friedrich Kratochwil,"The Force of Prescriptions",International Organization 34,4,Autumn 1984,p.689.
1 Robert H.Gass and John S.Seiter,Persuasion,Social Influence,and Compliance Gaining,second edition,New York:Pearsong Education Inc.,2003,p.127.
2 Martha Finnemore and Kathryn Sikkink,"International Norm Dynamics and Political Change",International Organization 52,4,Autumn 1998,p.893.
3 Martha Finnemore and Kathryn Sikkink,"International Norm Dynamics and Political Change",International Organization 52,4,Autumn 1998,p.895.
4 Peter J.Katzenstein,Cultural Norms & National Security:Police and Military in Postwar Japan,Ithaca:Cornell University Press,1996,p.18.
5 Shah M.Tarzi,"International Norms,Trade and Human Rights:A Perspective on Norm Conformity",The Journal of Social,Political and Economic Studies,Vol.27,No.2,Summer 2002,p.189.
1 Martha Finnemore,National Interests in International Society,Ithaca:Comell University Press,1996,pp.22-23.
2 Robert O.Keohane,International Institutions and State Power,Boulder:Westview Press,1989,pp.3-4.
3 Stephen D.Krasner,Structural Conflict:The Third World Against Global Liberalism,Berkeley:University of California Press,1985,pp.4-5.
4 Friedrich Kratochwil,"The Force of Prescriptions",International Organization 34,4,Autumn 1984,p.687.
1 Kenneth W.Abbott and Duncan Snidal,"Hard and Soft Law in International Governance",International Organization 54,3,Summer 2000,p.456.
1 Thomas A.Loya and John Boli,"Standardization in the World Polity:Technical Rationality over Power",in John Boli and George M.Thomas eds.,Constructing World Culture:International Nongovernmental Organizations Since 1875,p.169.
2 Robert Axelrod,"An Evolutionary Approach to Norms",The American Political Science Review,Vol.80,No.4(December 1986),p.1105.
1 William McDougall,An Introduction to Social Psychology,21st edition,London:Methuen &Co.Ltd.,1928,Chapter 12.
2[德]盖奥尔格·西美尔著、林荣远译:《社会学——关于社会化形式的研究》,北京:华夏出版社,2002年版,第89页。
3 Mancur Olson,The Logic of Collective Action:Public Goods and the Theory of Groups,Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,1971,p.36.
1 Miles Kahler,"Multilateralism with Small and Large Numbers",in John Gerard Ruggie ed.,Multilateralism Matters:The Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form,New York:Columbia University Press,1993,p.298.
2[德]尼克拉斯·卢曼著,瞿铁鹏、李强译:《信任》,上海:上海世纪出版集团,2005年版,第65页。
3[德]尤尔根·哈贝马斯著、曹卫东译:《交往行为理论》(第一卷),上海:上海世纪出版集团,2004年版,第88页。
4 Robert Axelrod,"Argumentation in Foreign Policy Settings:Britain in 1918,Munich in 1938, and Japan in 1970",The Journal of Conflict Resolution,Vol.21,No.4,December 1977,p.729.
1 Robert Axelrod,"The Dissemination of Culture:A Model with Local Convergence and Global Polarization",The Journal of Conflict Resolution,Vol.41,No.2,April 1977,p.205.
2 Lisa L.Martin,"The Rational State Choice of Multilateralism",in John Gerard Ruggie ed.,Multilateralism Matters:The Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form,New York:Columbia University Press,1993,p.102.
3 G.John Ikenberry,"Institutions,Strategic Restraint,and the Persistence of American Postwar Order",International Security,Vol.23,No.3(Winter 1998/99),pp.61-62.
1 Emanuel Adler and Michael Barnett,"A Framework for the Study of Security Communities",in Emanuel Adler and Michael Barnett eds.,Security Communities,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1998,p.44.
2 Michael Barnett and Raymond Duvall eds.,Power in Global Governance,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2005,p.42.
3 Judith Goldstein,Miles Kahler,Robert O.Keohane,and Anne-Made Slaughter,"Introduction:Legalization and World Politics",International Organization 54,3,Summer 2000,p.399.
1 Robert O.Keohane and Joseph S.Nye,Jr.,"Introduction",in Joseph S.Nye and John D.Donahue eds.,Governance in a Globalizing World,Washington,D.C.:Brookings Institution Press,2000,p.34.
2 James A.Caporaso,"International Relations Theory and Multilateralism:The Search for Foundations",in John Gerard Ruggie ed.,Multilateralism Matters:The Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form,New York:Columbia University Press,1993,p.73.
3 Ernst Fehr,Urs Fischbacher,"Third-Party Punishiment and Social Norms",Evolution and Human Behavior,25(2004),p.64.
4 Jonathan Bendor and Piotr Swistak,"The Evolution of Norms",The American Journal of Sociology,Vol.106,No.6(May 2001),p.1494.
1 Kenneth W.Abbott,Robert O.Keohane,Andrew Moravcsik,Anne-Marie Slaughter,and Duncan Snidal,"The Concept of Legalization",International Organization 54,3,Summer 2000,p.330.
2 Karl W.Deutsch,The Analysis of International Relations,Englewood Cliffs:Prentice-Hall,Inc.,1968,p.43.
3[德]尼克拉斯·卢曼著,瞿铁鹏、李强译:《信任》,上海:上海世纪出版集团,2005年版,第118页。
1 Robert Axelrod,"An Evolutionary Approach to Norms",The American Political Science Review,Vol.80,No.4(December 1986),pp.1102-1107.
2[德]斐迪南·腾尼斯著、林荣远译:《共同体与社会》,北京:商务印书馆,1999年版,第65-72页。
1[德]斐迪南·腾尼斯著、林荣远译:《共同体与社会》,北京:商务印书馆,1999年版,第95页。
2 Barry Buzan,From International to World Society? English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalization,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2004,p.111.
1[意]安东尼奥·葛兰西著、葆煦译:《狱中札记》,北京:人民出版社,1983年版,第37页。
2[德]马克斯·韦伯著、胡景北译:《社会学的基本概念》,上海:上海世纪出版集团,第78页。
1 Deborah J.Terry,"Intergroup Relations and Organizational Mergers",in Michael A.Hogg and Deborah J.Terry eds.,Social Identity Processes in Organizational Contexts,Ann Arbor,MI:Sheridan Books,2001,pp.230-231.
2 S.Alexander Haslam and Michael J.Platow,"Your Wish Is Our Command:The Role of Shared Social Identity in Translating a Leader's Vision into Followers' Action",in Michael A.Hogg and Deborah J.Terry eds.,Social Identity Processes in Organizational Contexts,Ann Arbor,MI:Sheridan Books,2001,p.217.
3 Zygmunt Bauman,Community:Seeking Safety in an Insecure World,Cambridge:Polity Press,2001,pp.5-6.
1[德]马克斯·韦伯著、林荣远译:《经济与社会》(上卷),北京:商务印书馆,2006年版,第72页。
1 Michael Barnett and Martha Finnemore,Rules for the World:International Organizations in Global Politics,Ithaca:Cornell University Press,2004,p.33.
2 Zygmunt Bauman,Community:Seeking Safety in an Insecure World,Cambridge:Polity Press,2001,pp.96-97.
1 Brian Barry,"Can States Be Moral? International Morality and the Compliance Problem",in Anthony Ellis ed.,Ethnics and International Relations,Manchester:Manchester University Press,1986,p.80.
2 Engin F.Isin and Patrica K.Wood,Citizenship and Identity,London:SAGE Publications,1999,p.39.
1 Michael Hogg,"Social Identification,Group Prototypicality,and Emergent Leadership",in Michael A.Hogg and Deborah J.Terry eds.,Social Identity Processes in Organizational Contexts,Ann Arbor,MI:Sheridan Books,2001,p.204.
1 Engin F.Isin and Patrica K.Wood,Citizenship and Identity,London:SAGE Publications,1999,p.19.
2 World Society Research Group,"Introduction:World Society",in Mathias Albert,Lothar Brock,and Klaus Dieter Wolf eds.,Civilizing Worm Politics:Society and Community Beyond the State,Lanhanm,Maryland:Rowman & Little Pubulishers,Inc.,2000,p.11.
1 Robert H.Gass and John S.Seiter,Persuasion,Social Influence,and Compliance Gaining,second edition,New York:Pearsong Education Inc.,2003,p.127.
2[德]马克斯·韦伯著、林荣远译:《经济与社会》(上卷),北京:商务印书馆,2006年版,第79页。
1 So Alexander Haslam and Michael J.Platow,"Your Wish is Our Command:The Role of Shared Social Identity in Translating a Leader's Vision into Followers' Action",in Michael A.Hogg and Deborah J.Terry eds.,Social Identity Processes in Organizational Contexts,Ann Arbor,MI:Sheridan Books,2001,pp.218-225.
2 Michael Hogg,"Social Identification,Group Prototypicality,and Emergent Leadership",in Michael A.Hogg and Deborah J.Terry eds.,Social Identity Processes in Organizational Contexts,Ann Arbor,MI:Sheridan Books,2001,p.210.
1 Joseph S.Nye,Jr.,Soft Power:The Means to Success in World Politics,New York:Public Affair,2004,p.4.
1 Louis Henkin,How Nations Behave:Law and Foreign Policy,New York:Columbia University Press,pp.10-11.
2 Richard N.Rosecrance,The Rise of the Virtual State:Wealth and Power in the Coming Century,New York:Basic Books,1999,p.15.
1 Charles Gore,"The Rise and Fall of the Washington Consensus as a Paradigm for Developing Countries",World Development,Vol.28,No.5,pp.789-792.
1 Stephen D.Krasner,Structural Conflict:The Third World Against Global Liberalism,Berkeley:University of California Press,1985,p.5.
1 Michael Hogg,"Social Identification,Group Prototypicality,and Emergent Leadership",in Michael A.Hogg and Deborah J.Terry eds.,Social Identity Processes in Organizational Contexts,Ann Arbor,MI:Sheridan Books,2001,p.204.
1 Robert O.Keohane and Joseph S.Nye,Power and Interdependence:World Politics in Transition,3rd edition,Boston:Little Brown,2001,p.284.
1 Robert O.Keohane and Joseph S.Nye,Power and Interdependence:World Politics in Transition,3rd edition,Boston:Little Brown,2001,p.284.
2 Michael N.Barnett and Martha Finnemore,"The Politics,Power,and Pathologies of International Organizations",International Organization 53,4,Autumn 1999,p.719.
1 John W.Meyer,John Boli,George M.Thomas,Francisco O.Ramirez,"World Society and the Nation-State",The American Journal of Sociology,Vol.103,No.1(July 1997),p.161.
2 Ian Johnston,"The Power of Interpretive Communities",in Michael Barnett and Raymond Duvall eds.,Power in Global Governance,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2005,pp.187-188.
1 Alastair Iain Johnston,Social States:China in International Institutions,1980-2000,Princeton:Princeton University Press,2008,preface.
2[德]马克斯·韦伯著、林荣远译:《经济与社会》(上卷),北京:商务印书馆,2006年版,第76页。
1 Tom Tyler,"Cooperation in Organizations:A Social Identity Perspective",in Michael A.Hogg and Deborah J.Terry eds.,Social Identity Processes in Organizational Contexts,Ann Arbor,MI:Sheridan Books,2001,p.157.
1 Peter J.Katzenstein,"Introduction:Alternative Perspectives on National Security",in Peter J.Katzenstein ed.,The Culture of National Security:Norms and Identity in Worm Politics,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.5.
2 Ronald L.Jepperson,Alexander Wendt,and Peter J.Katzenstein,"Norms,Identity,and Culture in National Security",in Peter J.Katzenstein ed.,The Culture of National Security:Norms and Identity in World Politics,New York:Columbia University Press,1996,p.54.
3 Stephen D.Krasner,Structural Conflict:The Third World Against Global Liberalism,Berkeley:University of California Press,1985,p.259.
1 Frank Schimmelfennig,"Introduction:The Impact of International Organizations on the Central and Eastern European States-Conceptual and Theoretical Issues",in Ronald H.Linden ed.,Norms and Nannies:The Impact of International Organizations on the Central and East European States,Lanbam:Rowman & Littlefiled Publishers,Inc.,2002,p.6.
1 Benjamin E.Goldsmith,Imitation in International Relations:Observation Learning,Analogies,and Foreign Policy in Russia and Ukraine,New York:Palgrave Macmillian,2005,p.18.
1 G.John Ikenberry,"Conclusion:An Institutional Approach to American Foreign Economic Policy",International Organization 42,1,Winter 1988,p.220.
1 Christopher Hill,The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy,New York:Palgrave Macmillan,2003,p.269.
1 William G.Roy,Rachel Parker-Gwin,"How Many Logics of Collective Action",Theory and Society Vol.28,No.2(Apr.1999),p.207.
1 Jalal Alamgir,"Managing openness in India:the social construction of a globalist narrative",in Linda Weiss ed.,States in the Global Economy:Bringing Domestic Institutions Back In,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2003,p.225.
2 Helen V.Milner,Interests,Institutions,and Information:Domestic Politics and International Relations,Princeton:Princeton University Press,1997,p.19.
3 Robert Gilpin,Global Political Economy:Understanding the International Economic Order,Princeton:Princeton University Press,2001,p.129.
1 Christopher Hill,The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy,New York:Palgrave Macmillan,2003,pp.275-276.
2 Kathleen Hall Jamieson & Paul Waldman,The Press Effect:Politicians,Journalists,and the Stories That Shape the Political World,New York:Oxford University Press,2003,p.95.
3 Walter Lippman,Public Opinion,New York:The Macmillan Company,1922,p.248.
4 Emanuel Adler and Peter M.Haas,"Conclusion:Epistemic Communities,World Order,and the Creation of a Reflective Research Program",International Organization 46,1,Winter 1992,p.375.
5 Peter M.Haas,"Introduction:Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination",International Organization 46,1,Winter 1992,p.3.
1 E.H.Carr,The Twenty Years' Crisis 1919-1939:An Introduction to the Study of International Relations,New York:Palgrave,2001,pp.120-121.
2 E.H.Carr,The Twenty Years' Crisis 1919-1939:An Introduction to the Study of International Relations,New York:Palgrave,2001,p.129.
1 Walter Lippman,Public Opinion,New York:The Macmillan Company,1922,p.248.
2 Emanuel Adler and Peter M.Haas,"Conclusion:Epistemic Communities,World Order,and the Creation of a Reflective Research Program",International Organization 46,1,Winter 1992,p.384.
3 Andrew P.Cortell and James W.Davis,"Understanding the Domestic Impact of International Norms:A Research Agenda",International Studies Review,Vol.2,No.1(Spring 2000),pp.72-84.
4 Andrew P.Cortell and James W.Davis,"How Do International Institutions Matter? The Domestic Impact of International Rules and Norms",International Studies Quarterly(1996) 40,pp.451-478.
1 Ernst B.Haas,"Collective Learning:Some Theoretical Speculations",in Breslauer,George W.,and Philip E.Tetlock,eds.,Learning in U.S.and Soviet Foreign Policy,Boulder,Colo.:Westview,1991,p.63.
2 Robert Axelrod and Robert Keohane,"Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy:Strategies and Institutions",World Politics Vol.38,No.1(Oct.1985),p.241.
3 Hans J.Morgenthau,Politics Among Nations:The Struggle for Power and Peace,sixth edition,New York:Alfred A.Knopf,Inc.,1985,p.164.
1 Susan Strange,The Retreat of the State:The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1996,p.164.
2 Robert O.Keohane and Joseph S.Nye,Power and Interdependence:World Politics in Transition,3rd edition,Boston:Little Brown,2001,p.286.
3 Ernst B.Haas,"Collective Learning:Some Theoretical Speculations",in Breslauer,George W.,and Philip E.Tetlock,eds.,Learning in U.S.and Soviet Foreign Policy,Boulder,Colo.: Westview,1991,p.89.
1 Ernst B.Haas,"Collective Learning:Some Theoretical Speculations",in Breslauer,George W.,and Philip E.Tetlock,eds.,Learning in U.S.and Soviet Foreign Policy,Boulder,Colo.:Westview,1991,pp.89-90.
2 Emanuel Adler and Michael Barnett,"A Framework for the Study of Security Communities",in Emanuel Adler and Michael Barnett eds.,Security Communities,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1998,p.44.
1 Louis Henkin,How Nations Behave:Law and Foreign Policy,New York:Columbia University Press,p.20.
2 Stephen D.Krasner,Structural Conflict:The Third World Against Global Liberalism,Berkeley:University of California Press,1985,p.29.
1 Ernst Fehr and Urs Fischbacher,"Social Norms and Human Cooperation",Trends in Cognitive Sciences,Vol.8,No.4,April 2004,p.185.
1 Christopher Weller,"Collective Identities in World Society",in Mathias Albert,Lothar Brock,and Klaus Dieter Wolf eds.,Civilizing World Politics:Society and Community Beyond the State,Lanhanm,Maryland:Rowman & Little Pubulishers,Inc.,2000,p.51.
1 Louis Henkin,How Nations Behave:Law and Foreign Policy,New York:Columbia University Press,p.30.
2 Emanuel Richter,"'Community' in the Global Network:A Methodological Exploration,in Mathias Albert,Lothar Brock,and Klaus Dieter Wolf eds.,Civilizing World Politics:Society.and Community Beyond the State,Lanhanm,Maryland:Rowman & Little Pubulishers,Inc.,2000,pp.86-87.
1 《建议》英文全文可参见http://www.fatf-gan.org
2 FATF,FATF Revised Mandate 2008-2012,12 April 2008,p.2.
1 FATF,FATF Annual Report 2006-2007,29 June 2007,p.4.
2 FATF,FATF Annual Report 2006-2007,29 June 2007,p.4.
1 Alexander Wendt,Social Theory of International Politics,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1999,p.355.
1 FATF,FATF Revised Mandate 2008-2012,12 April 2008,p.5.
1 Andrew P.Cortell and James W.Davis,"Understanding the Domestic Impact of International Norms:A Research Agenda",International Studies Review,Vol.2,No.1(Spring 2000),p.70.
2 中国人民银行:《2005年中国反洗钱报告》。
3 中国人民银行:《2005年中国反洗钱报告》。
1 FATF,First Mutual Evaluation Report on Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism:People's Republic of China,29 June 2007,p.22.
1 “中国反洗钱领域面临的四大挑战”,《每日经济信息》,2007年6月19日。
1 FATF,First Mutual Evaluation Report on Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism:People's Republic of China,29 June 2007,p.62.
1 中国人民银行:《2005年中国反洗钱报告》。
2 中国人民银行:《2006年中国反洗钱报告》。
3 中国人民银行:《2008年中国反洗钱报告》。
1 FATF/ME(2007)2/ADD,p.4.
2 蔡八弟:“《反洗钱法》渐行渐近 多部门合作成当务之急”,《中国经济周刊》,2005年第47期,第31页。
1 唐朱昌:“俄罗斯经济转型中的政府反洗钱措施评析”,《俄罗斯研究》,2007年第2期,第24页。
1 FATF,Second Mutual Evaluation Report - Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism:Russian Federation,20 June 2008,pp.145-146.
2 时映梅:“论俄罗斯的资本外逃与洗钱”,《当代世界社会主义问题》,2006年第4期,第94-95页。
1 FATF,Second Mutual Evaluation Report - Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism:Russian Federation,20 June 2008,pp.7-9.
1 “俄罗斯反洗钱成果显著”,《经济参考报》,2006年4月27日,第3版。
2 FATF,Second Mutual Evaluation Report - Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism:Russian Federation,20 June 2008,p.32.
1 Kenneth W.Abbott,Robert O.Keohane,Andrew Moravcsik,Anne-Marie Slaughter,and Duncan Snidal,"The Concept of Legalization",International Organization 54,3,Summer 2000,p.404.
1 Alastair Iain Johnston and Paul Evans,"China's Engagement with Multilateral Security Institutions",in Alastair Iain Johnston and Robert S.Ross eds.,Engaging China:The Management of an Emergent Power,New York:Routledge,1999,p.252.
1 WP/TPR/G/199.
2 Margaret M.Pearson,"China's Integration into the International Trade and Investment Regime",in Elizabeth Economy and Michael Oksenberg eds.,China Joins the World:Progress and Prospects,New York:Council on Foreign Relations Press,1999,p.188.
1 国务院新闻办公室:《1998年中国知识产权保护状况》。
2 国务院新闻办公室:《中国知识产权保护状况》白皮书。
1 “加入WTO后的中国知识产权保护”,《中国教育报》,2003年3月14日,第5版。
2 “保护知识产权入世 符合中国长远利益”,《第一财经日报》,2004年12月23日,第3版。
3 Commission on Intellectual Property Rights,Integrating Intellectual Property Rights and Development Policy:Report of the Commission on Intellectual Property Rights,London,September 2002,p.42.
1 国家知识产权局:《2007年度报告》。
2 国务院新闻办公室:“中国知识产权保护的新进展”,《光明日报》,2005年4月22日,第5版。
3 国务院新闻办公室:“中国知识产权保护的新进展”,《光明日报》,2005年4月22日,第5版。
1 R.A.Mashelkar,"Intellectual Property Rights and the Third World",Current Science,Vol.81,No.8,25 October 2005,p.956.
1 Jalai Alamgir,"Managing openness in India:the social construction of a globalist narrative",in Linda Weiss ed.,States in the Global Economy:Bringing Domestic Institutions Back In,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2003,p.226.
1 WT/TPR/S/75.
2 邓国庆:“创新型知识产权制度案例:巴西”,《科技日报》,2005年12月1日,第2版。
1 Commission on Intellectual Property Rights,Integrating Intellectual Property Rights and Development Policy:Report of the Commission on Intellectual Property Rights,London,September 2002,p.42.
1 Margaret M.Pearson,"China's Integration into the International Trade and Investment Regime",in Elizabeth Economy and Michael Oksenberg eds.,China Joins the World:Progress and Prospects,New York:Council on Foreign Relations Press,1999,pp.184-185.
1.程又中:“对‘中国加入国际社会'的阐释”,《教学与研究》,2004年第10期。
2.邓国庆:“创新型知识产权制度案例:巴西”,《科技日报》,2005年12月1日,第2版。
3.郭树勇:《大国成长的逻辑:西方大国崛起的国际政治社会学分析》,北京:北京大学出版社2006年版。
4.国务院新闻办公室:“中国知识产权保护的新进展”,《光明日报》,2005年4月22日,第5版。
5.何靖、杨胜刚、吴志明:“反洗钱的国际经验与中国的对策”,《财经理论与实践》,2004年第5期。
6.黄超:“建构主义视角下的国际规范扩散”,《外交评论》,2008年第4期。
7.刘鸣:“国际社会与国际体系概念的辨析及评价”,《现代国际关系》,2003年第12期。
8.刘贞晔:“国家的社会化、非政府组织及其理论解释范式”,《世界经济与政治》,2005年第1期。
9.刘贞晔:《国际政治领域中的非政府组织:一种互动关系的分析》,天津:天津人民出版社,2005年版。
10.潘亚玲:“安全化、国际合作与国际规范的动态发展”,《外交评论》,2008年第3期。
11.秦亚青:“国际关系理论的核心问题与中国学派的生成”,《中国社会科学》,2005年第3期。
12.秦亚青:“建构主义:思想渊源、理论流派与学术理念”,《国际政治研究》,2006年第3期。
13.时映梅:“论俄罗斯的资本外逃与洗钱”,《当代世界社会主义问题》,2006年第4期。
14.师永彦:“从FATF评估看全球反洗钱制度的现状与存在问题”,《中国金融》,2006年第24期。
15.宋才发:《WTO规则与中国法律制度改革》,北京:人民法院出版社,2005年版。
16.苏长和:《全球公共问题与国际合作:一种制度的分析》,上海:上海人民出版社,2000年版。
17.苏长和:“中国与国际制度——一项研究议程”,《世界经济与政治》,2002年第10期。
18.苏长和:“跨国关系与国内政治——比较政治与国际政治经济学视野下的国际关系研究”,《美国研究》,2003年第4期。
19.唐朱昌:“俄罗斯经济转型中的政府反洗钱措施评析”,《俄罗斯研究》,2007年第2期。
20.王逸舟:《西方国际政治学:历史与理论》,上海:上海人民出版社,1998年版。
21.邬为蕾:“全球视野下的反洗钱问题及对策分析”,《生产力研究》,2005年年第5期。
22.徐进:“国家何以建构国际规范:一项研究议程”,《国际论坛》,2007年第5期。
23.杨翰辉:《WTO与中国知识产权制度的冲突与规避》,北京:中国城市出版社,2001年版。
24.杨胜刚、何靖:“反洗钱的大额和可疑交易信息报告制度研究”,《求索》,2004年第10期。
25.袁正清:《国际政治理论的社会学转向:建构主义研究》,上海:上海人民出版社,2005年版。
26.张丽娜主编:《WTO与中国知识产权法律制度研究》,北京:中国民主法制出版社,2006年版。
27.张鹿:“中国加入FATF的历程及未来反洗钱和反恐融资面临的挑战”,《中国金融》,2007年第15期。
28.郑飞:“国际规范的价值与功能:个体理性视角”,《国际论坛》,2007年第6期。
29.朱立群、赵广成:“中国国际观念的变化与巩固:动力与趋势”,《外交评论》,2008年第1期。
30.[德]斐迪南·滕尼斯著、林荣远译:《共同体与社会》,北京:商务印书馆,1999年版。
31.[德]盖奥尔格·西美尔著、林荣远译:《社会学——关于社会化形式的研究》,北京:华夏出版社,2002年版。
32.[德]马克斯·韦伯著、胡景北译:《社会学的基本概念》,上海:上海世纪出版集团,2005年版。
33.[德]马克斯·韦伯著、林荣远译:《经济与社会》(上卷),北京:商务印书馆,2006年版。
34.[德]尼克拉斯·卢曼著、瞿铁鹏、李强译:《信任》,上海:上海世纪出版集团,2005年版。
35.[德]齐美尔著、林荣远译:《社会是如何可能的——齐美尔社会学文选》,桂林:广西师范大学出版社,200v2年版。
36.[挪威]托布约尔·克努成著,余万里、何宗强译:《国际关系理论史导论》,天津:天津人民出版社,2004年版。
37.[德]尤尔根·哈贝马斯著、曹卫东译:《交往行为理论》(第一卷),上海:上海世纪出版集团,2004年版。
1.Abbott,Kenneth W.and Duncan Snidal,"Hard and Soft Law in International Governance",International Organization 54,3,Summer 2000.
2.Adler,Emanuel and Peter M.Haas,"Conclusion:Epistemic Communities,World Order,and the Creation of a Reflective Research Program",International Organization 46,1,Winter 1992.
3.Albert,Mathias,Lothar Brock,and Klaus Dieter Wolf eds.,Givilizing World Politics:Society and Community Beyond the State,Lanham,Maryland:Rowman & Littlefield Publishers,Inc.,2000.
4.Allison,Graham,"Conceptual Models and the Cuban Missile Crisis",American Political Science Review 63,No.3(Sep.1969).
5.Anderson,Benedict,Imagined Communities:Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism,New York:Verso,2006.
6.Axelrod,Robert,The Evolution of Cooperation,revised edition,New York:Basic Books,2006.
7.Bandura,Albert,Social Learning Theory,Englewood Cliffs:Prentice-Hall,1977.
8.Bandura,Albert,"Social Cognitive Theory:An Agentic Perspective",Asian Journal of Social Psychology,(1999) 2.
9.Bandura,Albert,"Social Cognitive Theory in Cultural Context",Applied Psychology:An International Review,2002,51(2).
10.Barnett,Michael N.and Martha Finnemore,"The Politics,Power,and Pathologies of International Organizations",International Organization 53,4,Autumn 1999.
11.Barnett,Michael and Martha Finnemore,Rules for the World:International Organizations in Global Politics,Ithaca:Cornell University Press,2004.
12.Barnett,Michael and Raymond Duvall,Power in Global Governance,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2005.
13.Baron,Robert A.,and Donn Byrne,Social Psychology:Understanding Human Interaction,5th edition,Boston:Allyn and Bacon,1987.
14.Breslauer,George W.,and Philip E.Tetlock,eds.,Learning in U.S.and Soviet Foreign Policy,Boulder,Colo.:Westview,1991.
15.Bull,Hedley,The Anarchical Society:A Study of Order in World Politics,New York:Columbia University Press,1977.
16.Bull,Hedley,and Adam Watson,eds.,The Expansion of International Society,Oxford:Clarendon Press,1984.
17.Buzan,Barry,From International to Worm Society? English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2004.
18.Cardenas,Sonia,"Norm Collision:Explaining the Effects of International Human Rights Pressure on State Behavior",International Studies Review,(2004) 6.
19.Checkel,Jeffrey T.,"The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory",World Politics,Vol.50.No.2,1998.
20.Checkel,Jeffrey T.ed.,International Institutions and Socialization in Europe,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2007.
21.Commission on Intellectual Property Rights,Integrating Intellectual Property.Rights and Development Policy:Report of the Commission on Intellectual Property Rights,London,September 2002.
22.Cortell,Andrew P.and James W.Davis,"Understanding the Domestic Impact of International Norms:A Research Agenda",International Studies Review,Vol.2,No.1(Spring 2000).
23.Deutsch,Karl W.,The Nerves of Government:Models of Political Communication and Control,New York:The Free Press,1966.
24.Deutsch,Karl W.,The Analysis of International Relations,Englewood Cliffs:Prentice-Hall,Inc.,1968.
25.Daniel Drezner ed.,Locating the Proper Authorities:The Interaction of Domestic and International Institutions,Ann Arbor:The University of Michigan Press,2003.
26.Economy,Elizabeth and Michael Oksenberg,China Joins the World:Progress and Prospects,New York:Council on Foreign Relations Press,1999.
27.Eiser,J.Richard,Social Psychology:Attitudes,Cognition,and Social Behavior,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1986.
28.Ellis,Anthony ed.,Ethnics and International Relations,Manchester:Manchester University Press,1986.
29.Evans,Peter,Dietrich Rueschemayer and Theda Skocpol eds.,Bringing the State Back In,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1985.
30.Evans,Peter B.,Harold K.Jacobson and Robert D.Putnam eds.,Double Edged Diplomacy:International Bargaining and Domestic Politics,Berkeley:University of California Press,1993.
31.FATF,FATF Annual Report 2006-2007,29 June 2007.
32.FATF,FATF Revised Mandate 2008-2012,12 April 2008.
33.FATF,First Mutual Evaluation Report on Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism:People's Republic of China,29 June 2007.
34.FATF,Second Mutual Evaluation Report - Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism:Russian Federation,20 June 2008.
35.Fehr,Ernst,Urs Fischbacher,"Third-Party Punishiment and Social Norms",Evolution and Human Behavior,25(2004).
36.Fehr,Ernst and Urs Fischbacher,"Social Norms and Human Cooperation",Trends in Cognitive Sciences,Vol.8,No.4,April 2004.
37.Fewsmith,Joseph,"The Political and Social Implications of China's Accession to the WTO",The China Quarterly,Vol.167,September 2001.
38.Finnemore,Martha,National Interests in International Society,Ithaca:Comell University Press,1996.
39.Finnemore,Martha,and Kathryn Sikkink,"International Norm Dynamics and Political Change",International Organization 52,4,Autumn 1998.
40.Frieden,Jeffry A.,and Ronald Rogowski,"The Impact of the International Economy on National Policies:An Analytical Overview",in Keohane Robert O.,and Helen Milner eds.,Internationalization and Domestic Politics,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1996.
41.Gass,Robert H.and John S.Seiter,Persuasion,Social Influence,and Compliance Gaining,second edition,New York:Pearsong Education Inc.,2003.
42.Giddens,Anthony,Social Theory and Modern Sociology,Stanford:Stanford University Press, 1987.
43.Gilpin,Robert,Global Political Economy:Understanding the International Economic Order,Princeton:Princeton University Press,2001.
44.Goldsmith,Benjamin E.,"Imitation in International Relations:Analogies,Vicarious Learning,and Foreign Policy",International Interactions,29,2003.
45.Goldstein,Avery,"Great Expectations:Interpreting China's Arrival",International Security,Vol.22,No.3(Winter 1997198).
46.Goldstein,Judith,Miles Kahler,Robert O.Keohane,and Anne-Marie Slaughter,"Introduction:Legalization and World Politics",International Organization 54,3,Summer 2000.
47.Gourevitch,Peter,"The Second Image Reversed:The International Sources of Domestic Politics",International Organization 32,4,Autumn 1978.
48.Graham,Edward M.,Nina Oding and Paul J.Welfens eds.,Internationalization and Economic Policy Reforms in Transition Countries,Berlin:Springer,2005.
49.Gruber,Lloyd,Ruling the World:Power Politics and the Rise of Supranational Institutions,New Jersey:Princeton University Press,2000.
50.Haas,Peter M.,"International Institutions and Social Learning in the Management of Global Environmental Risks",Policy Studies Journal,Vol.28,No.3,2000.
51.Halabi,Yakub,"The Expansion of Global Governance into the Third World:Altruism,Realism,or Constructivism?" International Studies Review,(2004) 6.
52.Hewitt,John P.,Self and Society:A Symbolic Interactionist Social Psychology,5th edition,Boston:Allyn and Bacon,1991.
53.Hill,Christopher,The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy,New York:Palgrave Macmillan,2003.
54.Hogg,Michael A.and Deborah J.Terry eds.,Social Identity Processes in Organizational Contexts,Ann Arbor,MI:Sheridan Books,2001.
55.Ikenberry,John G.,and Charles A.Kupchan,"Socialization and Hegemonic Power",International Organization 44,3,Summer 1990.
56.Ikenberry John G.,"Institutions,Strategic Restraint,and the Persistence of American Postwar Order",International Security,Vol.23,No.3(Winter 1998/99).
57.Isin,Engin F.and Patrica K.Wood,Citizenship and Identity,London:SAGE Publications,1999.
58.Jamieson,Kathleen Hall & Paul Waldman,The Press Effect:Politicians,Journalists,and the Stories That Shape the Political World,New York:Oxford University Press,2003.
59.Jepperson,Ronald L.,Alexander Wendt,and Peter J.Katzenstein,"Norms,Identity,and Culture in National Security",in Katzenstein,Peter J.,ed.,The Culture of National Security:Norms and Identity in World Politics,New York:Columbia University Press,1996.
60.Johnston,Alastair lain and Robert S.Ross eds.,Engaging China:The Management of an Emergent Power,New York:Routledge,1999.
61.Johnston,Alastair Iain,"Treating International Institutions as Social Environments", International Studies Quarterly,(2001) 45.
62.Johnston,Alastair Iain,"Is China a Status Quo Power?" International Security,Vol.27,No.4(Spring 2003).
63.Johnston,Alastair lain,Social States:China in International Institutions,1980-2000,Princeton:Princeton University Press,2008.
64.Karatnychy,Adrian,and Alexander Motyl,and Amanda Schnetzer eds.,Nations in Transit 2003,New York:Freedom House,2003.
65.Katzenstein,Peter J.ed.,Between Power and Plenty:Foreign Economic Policies of Advanced Industrial States,Madison:The University of Wisconsin Press,1984.
66.Katzenstein,Peter J.,ed.,The Culture of National Security:Norms and Identity in World Politics,New York:Columbia University Press,1996.
67.Katzenstein,Peter J.,Cultural Norms & National Security:Police and Military in Postwar Japan,Ithaca:Cornell University Press,1996.
68.Kent,Ann,"China's International Socialization:The Role of International Organizations",Global Governance 8(2002).
69.Keck,Margaret and Kathryn Sikkink,Activists Beyond Borders,Ithaca:Cornell University Press,1998.
70.Keohane,Robert O.and Joseph S.Nye eds.,Transnational Relations and World Politics,Cambridge,MA.:Harvard University Press,1970.
71.Keohane,Robert O.,After Hegemony:Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy,Princeton:Princeton University Press,1984.
72.Keohane,Robert O.,International Institutions and State Power,Boulder:Westview Press,1989.
73.Keohane Robert O.,and Helen Milner eds.,Internationalization and Domestic Politics,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1996.
74.Keohane,Robert O.and Joseph S.Nye,Power and Interdependence:World Politics in Transition,third edition,Boston:Harvard University Press,2001.
75.Khanna,Parag,The Second World:Empires and Influence in the New Global Order,New York:Random House,2008.
76.Kirst-Ashman,Karen K.,Human Behavior,Communities,Organizations,and Groups in the Macro Social Environment:An Empowerment Approach,Belmont,CA:Thomas Learning,2000.
77.Klotz,Audie,Norms in International Relations:The Struggle Against Apartheid,Ithaca:Cornell University Press,1995.
78.Kowert,Paul and Jeffrey Legro,"Norms,Identity,and Their Limits:A Theoretical Reprise",in Katzenstein,Peter J.,ed.,The Culture of National Security:Norms and Identity in World Politics,New York:Columbia University Press,1996.
79.Krasner,Stephen D.,ed.,International Regimes,Ithaca:Cornell University Press,1983.
80.Krasner,Stephen D.,Structural Conflict:The Third World Against Global Liberalism, Berkeley:University of California Press,1985.
81.Kratochwil,Friedrich,"The Force of Prescriptions",International Organization 34,4,Autumn 1984.
82.Kratochwil,Friedrich,and John G.Ruggie,"International Organization:A State of the Art on an Art of the State",International Organization 40,4,Autumn 1986.
83.Legro,Jeffrey W.,"Which Norms Matter? Revisiting the 'Failure' of Internationalism",International Organization 51,1,Winter 1997.
84.Levy,Jack S.,"Learning and Foreign Policy",International Organization 48,2,Spring 1994.
85.Linden,Ronald H.ed.,Norms and Nannies:The Impact of International Organizations on the Central and East European States,Lanbam:Rowman & Littlefield Publishers,Inc.,2002.
86.Albert,Mathias,Lothar Brock,and Klaus Dieter Wolf eds.,Civilizing World Politics:Society and Community Beyond the State,Lanhanm,Maryland:Rowman & Little Pubulishers,Inc.,2000.
87.Mashelkar,R.A.,"Intellectual Property Rights and the Third Word",Current Science,Vol.81,No.8,25 October 2005.
88.McDougall,William,An Introduction to Social Psychology,21st edition,London:Methuen &Co.Ltd.,1928.
89.Meyer,John W.,John Boli,George M.Thomas,Francisco O.Ramirez,"World Society and the Nation-State",The American Journal of Sociology,Vol.103,No.1(July 1997).
90.Milner,Helen V.,Interests,Institutions,and Information:Domestic Politics and International Relations,Princeton:Princeton University Press,1997.
91.Milner,Helen V.,"International Politcial Economy:Beyond Hegemonic Statbility",Foreign Policy,Spring 1998.
92.Moravcsik,Andrew,"Taking Preferences Seriously:A Liberal Theory of International Politics",International Organization 51,4,Autumn 1997.
93.Morgenthau,Hans J.,Politics Among Nations:The Struggle for Power and Peace,sixth edition,New York:Alfred A.Knopf,Inc.,1985.
94.Putnam,Robert D.,"Diplomacy and Domestic Politics:The Logic of Two-Level Games",International Organization 42,3,Summer 1988.
95.Rosecrance,Richard N.,The Rise of the Virtual State:Wealth and Power in the Coming Century,New York:Basic Books,1999.
96.Roy,William G.,Rachel Parker-Gwin,"How Many Logics of Collective Action",Theory and Society Vol.28,No.2(Apr.1999).
97.Ruggie,John G.ed.,Multilateralism Matters:The Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form,New York:Columbia University Press,1993.
98.Ruggie,John G.,"What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge",International Organization 52,4,Autumn 1998.
99.Sikkink,Kathryn,"Human Rights,Principled Issue-Networks,and Sovereignty in Latin America",International Organization 47,3,Summer 1993.
100.Waltz,Kenneth N.,Man,the State,and War:A Theoretical Analysis,New York:Columbia University Press,1959.
101.Waltz,Kenneth N.,Foreign Policy and Domestic Politics:The American and British Experience,Boston:Little,Brown and Company,1967.
102.Waltz,Kenneth N.,Theory of International Politics,Reading,Mass.:Addison-Wesley,1979.
103.Weiss,Linda,States in the Global Economy:Bringing Domestic Institutions Back In,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2006.
104.Wendt,Alexander,"Constructing International Politics",International Security,Vol.20,No.1,Summer 1995.
105.Wendt,Alexander,Social Theory of International Politics,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1999.
106.Ngaire Wood ed.,Explaining International Relations Since 1945,New York:Oxford University Press,1996.
107.Yongjin,Zhang,China Goes Global,London:The Foreign Policy Centre,2005.
108.Zweig,David,Internationalizing China:Domestic Interests and Global Linkages,Ithaca:Cornell University Press,2002.