用户名: 密码: 验证码:
长期定位施肥土壤酶活性及其肥力变化研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
长期肥料定位试验是目前研究施肥对土壤肥力影响最常用的方法。本文以布设在黄土高原不同地域的三个长期肥料定位试验为基础,研究了长期不同施肥土壤酶活性及其肥力的变化,皆在揭示长期不同施肥条件下土壤肥力的变化规律,以期在获得农作物优质高产的前提下更好的培育土壤肥力,主要结论如下:
     1.经过多年定位施肥,土壤有机质含量呈持续增加趋势。
     黑垆土2007年的土壤有机质含量较1984年增加11.54%-60.58%。化肥有机肥配施的土壤有机质含量明显高于单施化肥;氮肥有机肥配施增加有机质含量的效果最显著,较对照增加20.75%,氮磷有机肥配施和磷肥有机肥配施的分别增加16.38%和11.50%。
     黄绵土化肥有机肥配施的土壤有机质含量明显高于单施化肥;氮磷钾有机肥配施增加土壤有机质含量的效果最明显,较对照增加34.04%,氮磷有机肥配施和氮肥有机肥配施的土壤有机质分别增加33.30%和32.66%。
     沙质黄绵土氮肥有机肥配施和氮磷有机肥配施增加土壤有机质含量的效果明显,分别较对照增加43.31%和22.09%,明显高于单施化肥。
     2.多年定位施肥的土壤氮素含量呈现明显的增加趋势。以有机肥和氮素化肥的施入增加效果显著。
     黑垆土2007年的土壤全氮含量与1984年相比增加0.88%-91.67%,碱解氮含量增加13.41%-102.89%。氮磷有机肥配施和氮肥有机肥配施增加土壤全氮含量效果明显,分别较对照增加41.98%和39.51%,明显高于单施化肥。施肥对土壤碱解氮含量的影响与全氮相似,氮磷有机肥配施和氮肥有机肥配施的土壤碱解氮含量分别较对照增加78.65%和71.39%。
     黄绵土氮磷有机肥配施和氮肥有机肥配施增加土壤全氮含量的效果明显,分别较对照增加21.74%和22.61%,明显高于单施化肥。氮磷钾有机肥配施和氮磷有机肥配施增加土壤碱解氮含量的效果明显,分别较对照增加39.44%和36.87%。
     沙质黄绵土2006年的土壤全氮含量较1992年增加5.13%-15.38%。施用有机肥的土壤全氮含量明显高于单施化肥,氮肥有机肥配施提高土壤全氮含量的效果最显著。
     3.长期施肥对土壤磷素含量的影响显著,尤其是施用磷肥,土壤全磷、速效磷含量增加显著。
     黑垆土2007年的土壤全磷含量与1984年相比增加4.55%-37.88%,速效磷含量增加0.08-14.53倍。氮磷有机肥配施和氮肥有机肥配施增加土壤全磷含量的效果明显,分别较对照增加33.33%和30.43%,且明显高于单施化肥。磷肥配施有机肥增加土壤速效磷含量的效果明显,较对照增加15.87倍,氮磷有机肥配施的土壤速效磷含量较对照增加13.33倍。
     黄绵土氮磷配施的土壤全磷含量增加效果显著,较对照增加27.69%,氮磷钾有机肥配施和氮磷有机肥配施的效果次之,分别较对照增加24.62%和20%,明显高于其它施肥。氮磷钾有机肥配施和氮磷有机肥配施增加土壤速效磷含量效果显著,明显高于单施化肥。
     沙质黄绵土2006年的土壤全磷含量比1992年增加5.08%-23.73%,速效磷含量增加0.9-3.27倍。单施磷肥的土壤全磷含量增幅最明显,较对照增加17.74%,其它施肥的土壤全磷含量差异不显著。
     4.长期施肥对土壤速效钾含量有较为明显的影响。
     黑垆土2007年的土壤速效钾含量较1984年增加0.08-3.36倍。单施有机肥的土壤速效钾含量增加效果明显,较对照增加2.5倍。施用有机肥和施用化肥的土壤速效钾含量差异显著。
     黄绵土氮磷钾有机肥配施增加土壤速效钾含量的效果明显,较对照增加33.87%,明显高于其它施肥。
     5.施肥对土壤酶活性有不同方向的显著性影响。单施磷肥降低了耕层土壤的脲酶活性,与对照相比,黑垆土脲酶活性降低0.5%,沙质黄绵土脲酶活性降低77.78%,其它施肥均显著增加了脲酶活性。单施氮肥降低了土壤转化酶活性,施用有机肥可显著增加土壤转化酶活性,黑垆土的转化酶活性较对照增加1.56%-15.63% ,黄绵土的增加10.13%-30.38% ,沙质黄绵土的增加1.43%-35.71%。施肥对过氧化氢酶活性影响不明显,但增加了耕层碱性磷酸酶活性,有机肥增加效果更显著。长期施肥,不同土类的土壤酶活性剖面分布趋势相似:随土层深度的加深,酶活性逐渐降低。
     6.酶活性与肥力间的关系非常密切。相关分析和通径分析表明:碱性磷酸酶与土壤C、N、P状况有密切关系,均达显著相关,脲酶与土壤N含量显著相关,转化酶与土壤P含量显著相关,因此土壤酶活性可以用来综合评价黄土区的土壤肥力水平。
Long-term fertilization experiment is the most common method which is used to study the impact of fertilization on soil fertility. This article studied the change of enzyme activity and soil fertility based on three long-term fertilization experiments in the Loess Plateau, in order to reveal the impacts of long-term fertilization on soil fertility and improve the soil fertility under the premise of obtaining high-quality and high-yield. The results are as follows:
     1 After long-term fertilization, the organic matter content increased compared to the beginning of the experiment. The organic matter content increased significantly in the treatment applying with manure.
     The organic matter content of dark loessial soil was increased by 11.54%-60.58% compared to 1984. The organic matter content in the combined chemical fertilizer and organic manure treatment of the dark loessial soil was significantly higher than that of in the single chemical fertilizer treatment. Soil organic matter content in the NM treatment increased by 20.75% compared to CK, NPM and PM increased by 16.38% and 11.50% respectively.
     The organic matter content of the loessial soil in the combined of chemical fertilizer with organic manure treatment was significantly higher than that of in the single chemical fertilizer treatment. In compared with CK, soil organic matter content increased by 34.04% in the NPKM treatment, and increased by 33.30% and 32.66% in the treatment of NPM and NM.
     Soil organic matter increased by 43.31% and 22.09% in the NM and NPM treatments of the sandy loess, which was higher than that of single chemical fertilizer treatment markedly.
     2 After years of fertilization, the nitrogen content was increased.
     Compared with 1984, total N content of the dark loessial soil increased by 0.88%-91.67%, and the content of the available N increased by 13.41%-102.89%. Compared with CK, total N increased by 41.98% and 39.51% both of NPM and NM in the dark loessial soil, which was markedly higher than that of in the single chemical fertilizer treatment. Available N increased by 78.65% and 71.39% respectively in the NPM and NM treatment.
     Compared with CK, total N increased by 21.74% and 22.61% in the NPM and NM treatments of the loess soil, which was markedly higher than that of in the single chemical fertilizer treatment. Available N increased by 39.44% and 36.87% in the NPKM and NPM treatments of the loess soil.
     Compared with 1992, the total N content increased by 5.13%-15.38% of the sandy loess soil. Single manure Application can increased total N of the sandy loess soil, which was markedly higher than that of in the chemical fertilizer treatment. The total N of NM treatment was higher.
     3 the effect of Longer-term fertilization on soil phosphorus was significantly and the soil total P and available P increased significantly in the application of phosphorus fertilizer treatment.
     In comparisons with 1984, the total P content increased by 4.55%-37.88% of the dark loessial soil. The available P increased by 0.08-14.53-fold. Total P increased by 33.33% and 30.43% in the NPM and NM treatment respectively, which was markedly higher than that of in the chemical fertilizer treatment. The available P increased by 15.87-fold in the PM treatment, and increased by 13.33-fold in the NPM treatment.
     In comparison with CK, total P content increased by 27.09% in the NP treatment of the loess soil, and increased by 24.62% and 20% in the treatment of NPKM and NPM respectively, which was markedly higher than that of in other treatments. Available P content increased obviously in the NPKM and NM treatments, which was markedly higher than that of in the single chemical fertilizer treatment.
     In comparison with 1992, total P increased by 5.085-23.73% of the sandy loess soil, and the available P content increased by 0.9-3.27-fold.
     4 Soil available K increased obviously under Long-term fertilization experiment.
     In comparison with 1984, the available K content increased by 0.08-3.36-fold of the dark loessial soil in 2007. Available K increased by 33.87% in the treatment combined with NPK and manure of the loess soil, which was higher than that of in other treatments markedly.
     5 single P Application can reduce the activity of soil urease. Compared with CK, the dark loessial soil urease activity reduced by 0.5%, the sandy loess soil urease activity reduced by 77.78%, other fertilization treatment increased soil urease activity significantly. soil invertase activity reduced in different soil types under the Single N fertilizer treatment, and were increased in other fertilization treatments.Long-term organic manure application can increase the soil invertase activity significantly. Compared with the CK treatment, soil invertase activity increased by 1.56%-15.63% of the dark loessial soil, increased by 10.13% -30.38% of the loessial soil, and increased by 1.43% -35.71% of the sandy loess soil. Long-term fertilization had little effect on soil catalase activity. The alkaline phosphatase activity in the different fertilization treatments under different types of soil are all increased, the increase was even more evident in the organic fertilizer treatment. After years of fertilization, the activity of soil enzyme was lowering gradually with the deepening of soil depth.
     6 According to correlation and path analysis, soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, and soil P were related to alkaline phosphatase, calatase activities; urease activity was inversely related to soil N content, and invertase activity was inversely related to soil P content, so it can be used to estimate the level of soil fertility.
引文
[1]孙瑞莲,赵秉强,朱鲁生,徐晶,张夫道.长期定位施肥对土壤酶活性的影响及其调控土壤肥力的作用[J].植物营养与肥力学报,2003,(04).406-410.
    [2]徐明刚,于荣,孙小凤,等.长期施肥对我国典型土壤活性有机质及碳库管理指数的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报.006,12(4):459-465.
    [3]李文祥.长期不同施肥对土娄土肥力及作物产量的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料.2007,2:23-25.
    [4]翁定河.沿海旱地玉米施用有机肥对土壤肥力的影响[J].2007,19(5):66-69.
    [5]沈善敏.国外的长期肥料试验[J].土壤通报,1984,(2-4):85-91,134-138,184-185.
    [6]赵秉强.我国的长期肥料定位试验研究[J].植物营养与肥料学报.(增)2002 :3-8.
    [7]周礼恺.土壤酶活性的总体在土壤肥力水平中的作用[J].土壤学报.1983,20(4):413-417.
    [8]曹承绵,李荣华,张志明等.红壤的酶活性与土壤肥力.土壤通报,1986,17(7):15-19.
    [9] SrivastavaS.C.,SinghJ.S.,MierobialC,N and P in dry tropieal forest soils:Effeets of alternate land一uses and nutrient flux[J].Solis Biol Bioehem,1991,23(2):117一124.
    [10]Klemedtsson, L., Berg, P, and Clarholm, M, Mierobial nitrogen transformation In the root environment of barley. Soils Biol.Bioehem, 1987, 19:551一558.
    [11]Singh, J, S, Raghubanshi, A, S, and Srivastava, S.C.Mierobial biomass Aet as a souree of Plant nutrients in dry troPieal forest and savanna.Nature, 1989, 338:499一500.
    [12]Neff, J.C., Townsend, A.R., Gleixner,g., lehman,S.J., Turnbull, J.,Bowman, W.D., Variable effects of nitrogen additions on the stability and turnover of soil carbon. Nature . 2002,419,915-917.
    [13]Six,J.,Conant,R.T.,Paul,E.A.,Paustian,K.,Stabilization mechanisms of soil organic matter: implications for C-saturatoion of soil. Plant and Soil.2002,241,155-176.
    [14]Slobodian,N.,Van Rees,K.,Pennock,D.,Cultivation-induced effects on belowground bipmass and organic carbon.Soil Sciety of America Journal. 2002,66,924-930.
    [15]Smith,P.,An overview of the permanence of soil organic carbon stocks:infiuence of direct human-induced ,indirect and natural effect[J]. European Journal of Soil Science. 2005 ,56 ,673-680.
    [16]姚源喜,杨延蕃,刘树堂,等.长期定位施肥对作物产量和土壤肥力的影响[J].莱阳农学院学报.1991,8(4):245-251.
    [17]E.G.GregorichB.H.Ellert, C.F. Drury and B.C.Liang ,Fertilization effects on soil organicmatter turnover and corn residue C storage, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1996, 60:472-476.
    [18]Gregorich, M.H.Beare, U.Stocklas and P.St-Georges.Biodegradability of soluble organicmatter in maize cropped soils, Geoderma. 2003, 113: 237-252.
    [19]B.Ludwing, B.John, R .Ellerbrock, M.Kaiser and H.Flessa.Stabilization of carbon from maize in a sandy soil in a long-term experiment[J]. Eur. J.Soil Sci. 2003, 54: 117-126.
    [20]P.Sollins, P.HomannandB.A.Caldwell.Stabilization and destabilizationof soil organic matter: mechanisms and controls, Geoderma. 1996, 74: 65-105.
    [21]周广业,阎龙翔.长期施用不同肥料对土壤磷素形态转化的影响[J].土壤学报,1993,30(4):443-446.
    [22]杨学云等.黄土施肥效应与肥力演变的长期定位监测研究.Ⅱ长期施肥对土壤理化性质的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2002, 8(增刊):71-74.
    [23]刘恩科.长期施氮磷钾化肥对玉米产量及土壤肥力的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2007,13(5):789-794.
    [24]Debosz,K., Rasmussen, P.H., Pedersen,A. R.,Temporal variations in microbial biomass C and cellulolytic enzyme activity in arable soils: effects of organic matter input. Applied Soil Ecology 1999, 13, 209-218.
    [25]Fang, C.,Smith, P., Smith, J. U., Moncrieff, J.B., Incorporating microorganisms as decomposers into models to simulate soil organic matter decomposition. Geoderma. 2005, 129, 139-146.
    [26]Fontaine, S., M ariotti, A., Abbadie, L., The peiming effect of organic matter: a question of microbial competition? Soil Biology & Biochemistry 2003, 35, 837-843.
    [27]Fontaine, S., Bardoux, G., ,Abbadie, L., M ariotti, A., Carbon input to soil may decrease carbon content. Ecology letters 2004,7 314-320.
    [28]Freibauer, A., Rounsevell, M. D. A.,Smith, P., Verhagen, J., Carbon sequestration in the agricultural soils Europe. Geoderma. 2004 ,122, 1-23.
    [29]王斯佳.长期施用化肥对黑土氮、磷及酶活性的影响[D].东北农业大学,2008.
    [30]张夫道.长期施肥条件下土壤养分的动态和平衡:Ⅱ对土壤氮的有效性和腐殖质氮组成的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 1996,2(1):39一48.
    [31]邹小明.植物与磷的生物地球化学循环[J」.张福锁:土壤与植物研究新动态[C].北京:中国农业出版社,1995. 171-184.
    [32]张福锁.植物磷营养基因型差异的机理[M].张福锁主编,土壤与植物营养研究新动态,第一卷.北京:农业大学出版社. 1992.23-30.
    [33]宋春,韩晓增.不同土地利用下黑土磷素肥力特征研究[J].土壤通报,2007.38 (5):928-932.
    [34]樊军.旱地长期轮作施肥对土壤肥力影响的定位研究[J].水土保持究,2003,10(1):31-36.
    [35]杨彬.河西走廊灌漠土定位施肥对土壤肥力及春小麦产量的影响[J].中国水土保持,2005,6:35-36.
    [36]林继雄,林葆,艾卫.磷肥后效与利用率的定位试验[J].土壤肥料,1995 ,(6):1-5.
    [37]Bolland M D A,Weatherley A J,Gilkes R J. The long-term residual value of rock phosphate and super phosphate fertilizers for various plant species under field conditions[J]. Fert.Res..1989,20(2):89-100.
    [38]杨瑞吉,杨祁峰,牛俊义.表征土壤肥力主要指标的研究进展[J],甘肃农业大学学报,2004,39(l):86-91.
    [39]Swarup, A., Chhllar, R.K. Build up and depletion of soil phosphorus and potassium and their uptake by rice and wheat in a long-term field experiment[J] . Plant and soil. 1986, 91 (2):161-170.
    [40]Mercik, S., Nemeth, K.Effects of 60-year N、P、K and Ca fertilization on EU F-nutrient fraction in the soil and on yields of rye and potato crops[J] . Plant and soil. 1985, 83(1) : 151-159.
    [41]刘杏兰,高宗,刘存寿等.有机-无机肥配施的增产效应及对土壤肥力影响的定位研究[J].土壤学报, 1996,(2):138-147.
    [42]WoodsL F.Active organic matter distribution in the surface 15cm of undisturbed and cultivated soils Biol Fertil Soils, 1989, 8:271-278.
    [43]Hofmann, E, Enzymreaktion en and ihre Bedeutung fur die Bestirmaung der Bidenfruehtbarkeit. Z. Pflanzenernahr, Dung, Bodenk, 1952, 56(101): 68.
    [44]俞静文,彭静霜.红壤酶活性与土壤肥力[J].土壤肥料,1985,(3):16一19.
    [45]MonrealC.M., BergstromD.W., Soil enzymatic factors expressing the influence of land use tillage system and texture on soi1 bioehemieal qua1ity, CanJSoi1Sei. 2000, 80:419-428.
    [46]BergstromD.W.,MonrealC.M.,Inereased soil enzyme activities under two row crops,Soil Sci.Soe.Am J., 1998, 62: 1295一1301.
    [47]Powlson D S. Measurement of soil microbial biomass provides an early indication of changes in total organic matter due to straw incorporation[J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 1987, 19:159-164.
    [48]φ·Χ·哈兹耶夫.郑洪元,周礼恺,译.土壤酶活性[M].北京:科学出版社,1982,1-5.
    [49]Lalande R.,GagnonB.,SimardR.R.,Mierobial biomass and alkaline PhosPhatase Aetivity in two composted maended soils. Can[J].Soil Sci.,1998,78:581一587.
    [50]InsamH., Mitehell C.C., Dormaar J.F., Relationship of soil mierobial biomass and activity with fertilization Pratice and crop yield of three ultisols[J]. Soil Biol.Biochem., 1991, 23:459-464.
    [51]VekemansX.,GoddenB.,PenninekxJ.,Factor analysi of the relationships between Several Physieo-ehemical nadmierobiological characteristics of some Beigian Agrieultural solid[J].Soil Biol.Bioehem.,1989, (21):53-58.
    [52]邱凤琼,周礼凯,陈恩凤.东北黑土有机质和酶活性与土壤肥力的关系[J].土壤学报,1981,18(3):244一252.
    [53]袁玲,周礼凯,杨邦俊,邱凤琼等.土壤肥力实质的研究—棕壤[J].土壤学报,1985, 22 (2): 113一119. [ 54 ]李焕珍,张忠源,杨伟奇等.玉米秸秆直接还田培肥效果的研究[J].土壤通报,1996,27(5):213-215.
    [55]关松荫.土壤酶及其研究方法[M].农业出版社,1986,7.
    [56]和文祥,朱铭.陕西土壤脲酶活性与土壤肥力关系分析[J].土壤学报,1997,34(4):392-398.
    [57]邱丽萍.培肥土壤酶的空间变异规律[D].硕士学位论文.西北农林科技大学,2004.
    [58]林静.不同红壤生态区土壤酶活性与土壤肥力相关性的研究[J].福建农林科技,1999年增刊:23-24.
    [59]樊军.黄土高原旱地长期定位试验土壤酶活性研究[D].硕士学位论文.西北农林科技大学,2003.
    [60]王俊华,尹睿,张华勇,等.长期定位施肥对土壤酶活性及其相关因素的影响[J].生态环境,2007,16(1):191-196.
    [61]唐艳,杨林林,叶家颖.银杏园土壤酶活性与土壤肥力的关系研究[J].广西植物,1998,19(3): 277一281.
    [62]Bremner JM andMuIvaney RL Urease activity in soil .In :Burns RG ed Soil Enzymes London : Aeademic Press, 1978, 149一197.
    [63]ZhouL一Ket,al, Effeet of urease inhibitor hydroquinone on urea一N transformation In soil, Chin J Appl. Eeol., 1992, 3(l): 36一41.
    [64]Bergstrom D.W.,Monreal C.M.,Inereased soil enzyme activities under two row crops[J].Soil Sci.Soe. Am J.,1998,62:1295一1301.
    [65]Zantua M I, Dumenil L C, Bremner J M. Relationships between soil urease axtivity And other soil ProPerties[J]. Soil Sci . Soe .Am J.,1977,41: 350一352.
    [66]Zantua M I, Bermner J M. Persevration of soil samples of rassy of ureasea etivity[J]. Soil Biol.Bioehem., 1975, (7): 297一299.
    [67]卢善玲,蒋筱仙,阂三第.上海郊区水稻土脲酶活性的初步研究[A].全国土壤酶学研究文集,沈阳:辽宁科学技术出版社,1988,75一79.
    [68]周礼恺.土壤酶学[M].北京:科学出版社,1982.
    [69]Ross D J.Invertase and amylase activities as influeneed by clay minerals, soil一clay fractions and topsoils under grasslnad[J]. Soil Biol.Bioehem., 1983, (15):287-293.
    [70]李双霖,李友钦,果园土壤酶活性与土壤肥力关系的研究[J].福建农业科技,1990,(1):9一10.
    [71]沈桂琴,关松荫,阂九康.土壤中转化酶活性的研究[A].全国土壤酶学研究文集,沈阳:辽宁科学技术出版社,1988,309一314.
    [72]吴可红,李来荣.红壤柑橘园土壤熟化度与酶活性相关性的研究[J].生态学报,1989,9(2):167一173.
    [73]王冬梅,王春枝,韩晓日等.长期施肥对棕壤主要酶活性的影响[J].土壤通报.,2006,7(2):263一267.
    [74]何念祖.浙江省几种水稻土的酶活性及其与土壤肥力的关系[J].浙江农业大学学报, 1986,12(1):43-47.
    [75]郑郁善,黄宝龙.福建含笑杉木混交林生物量和土壤肥力的研究[J].南京林业大学学报,1998,22(2):49一52.
    [76]Tabatabai M. A., Soil enzymes, In: Weaver RW eds. Methods Soil Analisis, Mierobiological and Bioehmical ProPerties, Wiseonsin : Soil Seience Society of America, Madison. PP 1982, 903一947.
    [77]Juma N. G. and Tabatabai M , A. , Comparison of kinetic and thermodynamic Parmaeters of PhosPhomonoesterases of soils of corn and soybean roots . Soil Biol. Bioehem. , 1988 , (20) : 533一539.
    [78]周礼恺,张志明,曹承绵.黑土和棕壤的酶活性[A].全国土壤酶学研究文集,沈阳:辽宁科学技术出版社,1988,7-15.
    [79]Muleln M D著,陈洪松,等译.在不同作物覆盖条件下免耕玉米地土壤的生物生化特性[J].水土保持科技情报,1999,(3):21-24.
    [80]Hofmann F, Seegerer A.Uber das enzymsys fen unserer, Kulturbudenl saceharase Bioehem. 1951, 2(322) : 174一179.
    [81]肖玉珍,赵静珍,齐永安等.地膜覆盖栽培玉米土壤中微生物变化规律的研究[J].东北农学院学报,1988,(2):135一141.
    [82]金作兴,叶家颖.临夏州玉米地膜覆盖栽培增产技术[J].甘肃农业大学学报. 1987, (4):15一17.
    [83]叶家颖.土壤脲酶的活性研究[J].广西农业科学,1988,(3):29-31.
    [84]黄巧云.粘粒矿物有机质对酶活性的影响[J].土壤学进展,1995,23(4):12一18.
    [85]Insam H. , Mitehell C.C. , DormaarJ.F. , Relationship of soil mierobial biomass and Activity with fertilization Pratice and crop yield of three ultisols[J]. Soil Biol. Bioehem. , 1991 , 23 : 459一464.
    [86]Vekemans X. , Godden B. , Penninekx J. , Factor analysis of the relationships between Several physico一chemical and mierobiological charaeteristics of some Beigian Agrieultural solid[J]. Soil Biol. Bioehem. , 1989 , (21) : 53一58.
    [87]陈恩凤,周礼恺,邱凤琼等.土壤肥力实质的研究-棕壤[J].土壤学报,1985 ,22(2): 113-119.
    [88]刘恩科.不同施肥制度土壤团聚体微生物学特性及其与土壤肥力的关系[D].中国农业科学院学位论文,2007.
    [89]A. S. R.Juo,”Long-term soil fertility experiments”, in (Transation of 14th ICSS), vol. IV, 1990:4-8.
    [90]Glending,M. J. etal 130 years of inorganic nitrogen fertilizer applications to Broadbalk Weat experiment: The effect on soil organic nitrogen, Trans. 14th ICSS. VoLIV,1990:9-13.
    [91]沈善敏.长期土壤肥力试验的科学价值.植物营养与肥料学报, 1995, 1(1): 1-9.
    [92]Suzuki M, Kamekawa k. Effect of continuous application of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizer for sixty years on soil Fertility and rice yield in paddy Field[C]. translation of 14th Inter. Soil Sci. 1990, IV :14-19.
    [93]Yamada, Y. The effect of intensive use of chemical fertility in comparision with the use of organic manure. Fertilizer raw resources, needs and commerce in Asia and pacific. ,1980, 122.
    [94]Lefroy R D B , Blair G J.. Changes in soil organic matter with cropping as measured by organic carbon fractions and 13C natural isotope abundance plantSoil , 1993 , 155/156 : 399-402.
    [95]中国科学院南京土壤研究所.土壤理化分析[M].上海:上海科学技术出社, 1981.
    [96]严昶升主编.土壤肥力研究方法[M].北京:农业出版社,1988,243 - 279.
    [97]赵兰坡,姜岩.土壤磷酸酶的测定方法讨论[J].土壤通报, 1986, 17(3):138-141.
    [98]Campbell C A and Lafond G P, Harapiak J T, Relative cost to soilfertility of long-term crop Produetion without fertilization[J]. Canadian Journal of Plant Seienee, 1996, 76(3): 401一406.
    [99]Belay A, Claassens A S, Wehner F C.Effeet of direct nitrogen and Potassium and residual PhosPhorus fertilizers on soil chemical properties,microbial componenta and maize yield under long-term crop rotation[J]. Biology and Fertilizer of Soils, 2002, 35(6): 420一427.
    [100]Schwab A P ,Owensby C E , Kulyingyuong S , Changes in soil chemical properties due to 40 years of fertilization[J] . Soil Science , 1990 , (1): 35-43.
    [101]吕家珑,张一平,王旭东等.长期单施化肥对土壤性状及作物产量的影响[J].应用生态学报,2001,12(4):569-572.
    [102]张夫道.长期施肥条件下土壤养分的动态和平衡[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 1999,(3):10-21.
    [103]曹慧,孙辉,杨浩等.土壤酶活性及其对土壤质量的指示研究进展[J].应用与环境生物学报, 2003, 9(1): 105-109.
    [104]DickR P. A review: Long-term effects of agricultural systems on soil biochemical and microbial parameters[J]. Agric.Ecosys and Environ. 1992, 40(1-4): 25-36.
    [105]贾伟.长期有机无机肥配施对褐土微生物生物量碳、氮及酶活性的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2008, 14(4):700-705.
    [106]Lavahum, M.F.E., Joergensen, R.G.and Meyer, B.Activities and biomass of soil micriirganismsat different depth[J]. Biol. Fertil. Soils. 1996, 23: 38-42.
    [107]杨瑞吉,杨祁峰,牛俊义.表征土壤肥力主要指标的研究进展[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2004,39(l):86一91.
    [108]任祖淦,陈玉水,唐福钦.有机无机肥料对土壤微生物和酶活性的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,1996,2(6):179一283.
    [109]蒋和,翁文任,林增泉.施肥十年后的水稻土微生物学特征和酶活性的研究[J].土壤通报,1990,21(6):265一268.
    [110]赵之重.土壤酶与土壤肥力关系的研究[J].青海大学学报(自然科学版),1998,16(3):24一29.
    [111]陈大勋,陆集卿,李双霖.福建省几种土壤类型酶活性的研究[J].福建农林大学学报(自然科学版),1986,15(1):73-85.
    [112]张文霖.主成分分析在SPSS中的操作应用[J].市场研究.2005(12):33.
    [113]王娟,谷学景,赵吉.羊草草原土壤酶活性对土壤肥力的指示作用[J].农业环境科学学报,2006,25(4):936.
    [114]关松荫,沈桂琴,孟昭鹏等.我国主要土壤剖面酶活性状况[J].土壤学报,1984,21(4):368-381.
    [115]陆琴.太湖地区典型水稻土的酶学特征及水肥管理的酶学效应[M].南京:中国科学院南京土壤研究所,2002.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700