用户名: 密码: 验证码:
深基坑边坡抗滑桩加固的最小势能分析方法研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
目前深基坑工程中应用较多的边坡稳定分析方法仍然是极限平衡方法,该方法应用较广,但也存在不足之处。因此,边坡的稳定性分析方法仍在发展中,最小势能分析方法是一种最近发展起来的边坡的边坡稳定性分析方法。依据稳定平衡体系势能最小的原理,从整个边坡的势能变化求得一个满足势能最小的位移,据此可直接求出滑面上的法向应力分布,再利用平衡条件和摩尔-库仑强度准则便可直接得到安全系数。此方法概念简单明了,与传统极限平衡法的误差在允许范围内,结果可信。本文在前人研究工作的基础上,进一步考虑了抗滑桩加固边坡时的最小势能分析方法。
     论文简单介绍了Mauldon和Ureta提出的岩石棱柱体模型、李小强提出的二维圆柱体模型及其计算方法,并介绍了考虑剪切势能锚杆加固措施的边坡稳定分析的方法。在此基础上,本文做了以下工作:
     1、进一步考虑了滑移面为任意形状时的最小势能分析方法,建立了相关安全系数的计算公式。
     2、分析了深层搅拌桩(抗滑桩)基坑工程常见加固措施对滑移体势能的影响,建立了抗滑桩最小势能分析方法的模型,推导了计算理论公式。
     3、通过对典型工程算例的计算,得出该方法的计算结果与其他常用方法计算结果比较接近,以此拓展了最小势能法的运用范围。
     本文在进行实际工程验算时,将未考虑加固措施的最小势能方法和常见的极限平衡法做了详细的对比,显示了该法的可行性。
     最后把最小势能方法应用到上海市新天地广场基坑边坡工程的治理加固分析中,展现了最小势能方法的工程应用前景。
At present, the more application of slope stability analysis method in deep foundation pit is still the limit equilibrium method. This method applies widely, but there are also inadequate. Therefore, slope stability analysis methods are still developing, the minimum potential energy analysis is a recent development of the slope stability analysis. And then based on the principle that potential is the minimum of the balance and stability system, it obtains a displacement whose potential is the minimum from potential changes of whole slope, which makes a normal stress distribution of slip surface obtained directly. Finally, using the balance conditions and Moore-Coulomb strength criterion, it can get the safety factor directly. The concept of this method is simple and clear, and error compared to the traditional limit equilibrium method is in the accepted range, which makes the results credible. Based on the previous research work, it further considers minimum potential method of reinforcement of slope with anti-slide pile.
     First of all, this paper presents a simple introduction of the rock prism model proposed by Mauldon and Ureta and the two-dimensional model of a cylinder proposed by Li Xiaoqiang. Moreover, it proposes a slope stability analysis method considering shear potential bolt reinforcement measures. On the basis, this paper does the following work:
     1、Further considering minimum potential method of slide plane for any shape, it constructs the calculation formula of related safety factor.
     2、It analyses impact which common reinforcement measures of deep mixing pile (anti-slide pile) of foundation pit engineering on potential of slip mass, and constructs improved model of minimum potential method. Then, it deduces the calculation theoretical formulas.
     3、Numerical construction examples show that results of the method are rather close to the calculation results with other commonly used method, which expands the application scope of traditional minimum potential method.
     Checking the actual construction in this paper, it provides a detailed comparison to the minimum potential method without consideration of reinforcement measures and limit equilibrium method, which shows the feasibility of the method.
     Finally the minimum potential energy methods applied to the analysis of governance reinforcement of Shanghai Xintiandi Square's foundation pit slope project shows engineering applications of minimum potential method.
引文
[1]刘立平,姜德义,郑硕才等.边坡稳定性分析方法的最新进展.重庆大学学报(自然科学版),2000,23(3):115
    [2]陈祖煜.土质边坡稳定分析:原理·方法·程序.北京:中国水利水电出版社,2003
    [3]陈祖煜.土力学经典问题的极限分析上下限解.岩土工程学报,2002,24(1):1-11
    [4]王年香.码头桩基与岸坡相互作用的数值模拟和简化计算方法研究:[博士学位论文].南京水利科学研究院,1998
    [5]TIMOTHY D S,HISHAM T.Performance of three-dimensional slope stability methods in practice.Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironrnental engineering,1998,124(I11):1049-1060
    [6]Burland,J.B.Simpson,John,H.D.ST.,Movements around Excavations in London Clay,Design Parameters in Geotechnical Engineering.BGS,London,Vol.1,1979,pp.13-29
    [7]Simpson,B.,O,riordan,N.J.,Croft,D.D.,A Computer Model for the Analysis of Ground Movements in London Clay,Geotechnique 29,No.2,1979,pp.149-175
    [8]Potts,D.M.,Fourie,A.B.,The Behavior of a Propped Retaining Wall:Results of a Numerical Experiment.Geoteclinique.Vol 34,No.3,1984,pp.383-404
    [9]朱大勇.边坡临界滑动场及数值模拟.岩土工程学报,1997,19(1):63-68
    [10]Chowdhury R.N.Seismic response of coastal cscarpments,Proc.(CDRom)6th US Nat.Conf.On Earthquake Engineering.Scattle,May 31-June 4
    [11]杨光华.深基坑支护结构的实用计算方法及其应用.北京:地质出版社,2004
    [12]陈忠汉,黄书秋,程丽萍.深基坑工程.北京:机械工程出版社,1999
    [13]Su.Base Stability of Deep Excavation In Anisotropic Soft Clay.Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenviromental Engineering,Vol.124,NO.9,1998
    [14]龚晓南.土塑性力学.杭州:浙江大学出版杜,1999
    [15]JOHN T C,ALFREDO U.Probabilistic evaluation of earthquake—induced slope failure.Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental engineering,1998,124(11):1140-1143
    [16]李广信.基坑支护结构上水土压力的分算与合算.岩土工程学报,2000,22 (3):348-352
    [17]王广国,杜明芳,侯学渊.深基坑的大变形分析.岩石力学与工程学报,2000,19(4):509-512
    [18]应宏伟.软土地基深基坑工程性状的研究:[博士学位论文].杭州:浙江大学,1997
    [19]谢宁,孙钧.土体非线性流变的有限元解析及其工程应用.岩土工程学报,1995,17(4):95-99
    [20]徐日庆,龚晓南,杨林德.深基坑开挖的安全性预报与工程决策.土木工程学报,1998,31(5):33-38
    [21]曾庆义,杨晓阳.基坑抗隆起稳定问题的应力强度计算方法.岩土工程学报,1996,18(2):17-22
    [22]俞建霖,龚晓南.深基坑工程的空间性状分析.岩土工程学报,1999,21(1):21-25
    [23]李庆来.深基开挖变形预测及信息施工:[博士学位论文].杭州:浙江大学,1997
    [24]朱合华,杨林德,桥本正.深基坑工程动态施工反演分析与变形预报.岩土工程学报,1998,20(4):30-35
    [25]谢宁,孙钧.土体非线性流变的有限元解析及其工程应用.岩土工程学报,1995,17(4):95-99
    [26]夏明耀.饱和软粘土固结、蠕变变形和应力松弛规律.同济大学学报,1989,25(9):44-46
    [27]杨光华.深基坑开挖中几个问题的实用计算方法.第五届全国地基处理学术讨论会论文集,1997
    [28]杨雪强,刘祖德.论深基坑支护的空间效应.岩土工程学报,1998,20(2):74-78
    [29]刘国彬,沈建明,侯学渊.深基坑支护结构的可靠度分析.同济大学学报,1998,26(3):260-264
    [30]钱家欢,殷宗泽.土工原理与计算(第二版).北京:中国水利水电出版社,1995
    [31]Mauldon.M.and Ureta,J.(1994)Stability of rock wedges with multiple sliding surfaces,Association of Geologists Annual Meeting,Williamsburg
    [32]李小强,白世伟,李铀.最小势能方法在二维边坡稳定分析中的应用.岩土力学,2004,2(6):909-912
    [33][美]YANG H.HUANG.土坡稳定分析.北京:清华大学出版社,1998
    [34]李小强.最小势能原理在边坡稳定性分析中的应用:[博士学位论文].武汉:中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所,2004
    [35]李仁平.软土地基中被动桩与土体的相互作用及其工程应用:[博士学位论文].浙江:浙江大学,2001
    [36]蒋良潍.松散斜坡体锚-桩加固作用机理与工程应用研究:[博士学位论文].成都:成都理工大学,2006
    [37]陆洋.考虑加固措施特点的边坡稳定最小势能分析方法研究:[硕士学位论文].长沙:中南大学,2006
    [38]李梅.边坡案例推理稳定性评价系统及治理措施优化研究:[博士学位论文].武汉:武汉理工大学,2006
    [39]胡晓军.边坡加固工程支挡结构研究:[博士学位论文].合肥:合肥工业大学,2007
    [40]Bolton.Behavior of Diaphragm Walls In Clay Prior To Collapse.Geotechnique,Vol.38,No.2,1988
    [41]Kishnani,SeePage And Soil-structure Interaction Effects In Braced Excavations.Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,VOl.119,No.5,1993
    [42]Zheng H,Ge X R.Improved preconditioned conjugatemethod and its applications in F.E.A.for engineering[J].Applied Mathematics & Mechanics,1993,14(4):371-380
    [43]Lechman J B,Griffiths D V.Analysis of the progression of failure of earth slopes by finite elements[A].In:Geotechnical Special Publication:Slope Stability 2000[C].U.S.A:ASCE,2000.250-265
    [44]李铀,陆洋,彭意.锚杆(索)加固边坡的最小势能稳定分析方法研究[J].岩土力学(录用待刊)
    [45]邹广电,魏汝龙.土坡稳定分析普遍极限平衡数值解的理论及方法研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2006,25(2):363-370
    [46]Zheng H,Liu D F,Lee C F,et al.A new formulation ofSignorini's type for seepage problems with free surfaces[J].International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering,2005,64(1):1-16
    [47]Cai F,Ugai K.Numerical analysis of the stability of a slope reinforced with piles[J].Soils and Foundations,2000,40(1):73-8
    [48]徐邦栋.滑坡分析与防治.北京:中国铁道出版社,2001
    [49]朱大勇,钱七勇,周早生等.岩体边坡临界滑动场计算方法及其在露天矿边坡设计中的应用.岩石力学与工程学报,1999,18(5):567-572
    [50]陆培毅,刘畅,顾晓鲁.深基坑支护结构支撑系统简化空间分析方法的研究.岩土工程学报,2002,24(4):471-474
    [51]沈爱超,李铀.单一地层任意滑移面的最小势能边坡稳定性分析方法.岩土力学(录用待刊)
    [52]沈爱超,吴丽君.深基坑支护体系与计算理论的有关问题.土工基础,2008,74(1):48-51
    [53]杨迎晓,朱向荣.深基坑支护系统优化的价值工程应用研究.建筑技术开发,2002,29(6):22-24
    [54]Brown P T.Booker J R.Finite element analysis of excavation.Computer and Geotechnique,1985,1(3)
    [55]张强勇.岩土工程强度与稳定性计算.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2005
    [56]Terzaghi K,Peck.R.B,Soil mechanics in Engineering Practice.1967
    [57]Yuet T.Performance of tied back wall in clay.Journal of the Geotechique Div,ASCE,Vol.100,No.12,1976
    [58]Abdulaziz I,Mana G,Wayne Clough.Prediction of Movement for Braced Cuts in Clay.ASCE,Vol.107,No.6,1981
    [59]黄志全,王思敬,李华晔等.岩体力学参数取值的置信度及其可靠性.岩石力学与工程学报,1999,18(1):33-35
    [60]Puller M.Deep excavation,a practical manual.London:Thomas Telford Publishing,1996.121-125
    [61]Desai C.S.,Zaman M.M.,Lighnter LG,et al.Thin-layer element for interfaces and joints.International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geotechnics,1984,8(1):19-43
    [62]王化卿,李传珠,刘励忠等.预应力锚索抗滑桩设计与施工.滑坡文集,北京:中国铁道出版社,1990年第7集,34-41
    [63]王曙光.深基坑支护事故处理经验录.北京:机械工程出版社,2005
    [64]李相然 赵春富,张绍河.地下与基础工程防渗加固技术.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2005
    [65]Oden,J.T.and Pires,E.B.Nonlocal and Nonlinear Friction Laws and Variational Principles for Contact Problems in Elasticity.Journal of Applied Mechanics,Vol.50,1983
    [66]吴恒,周东,李陶深等.深基坑桩锚支护协同演化优化设计.岩土工程学报,2002,24(4):465-470
    [67]赵志缙,应惠清.简明深基坑设计施工手册.北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2001.3-10
    [68]唐业清.高层建筑深基坑的开挖与支护.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1994.33-37
    [69]汪小刚,陈祖煜,刘文松.应用蒙特卡洛法确定节理岩体的连通率和综合抗剪强度指标.岩石力学与工程学报,1992,11(4):345-355
    [70]Ng.Numerical Analysis of A Multipropped Excavation In Stiff Clay.Can Geotech,J.35,1998
    [71]Ng.Effect of Modeling Soil Nonlinearity And Wall Installation on Back-Analysis of Deep Excavation In Stiff Clay.Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,Vol.121,No.10,1995
    [72]孙广忠.岩体力学基础.北京:科学出版社,1983
    [73]深圳市勘察测绘院,深圳市岩土工程公司主编.深圳地区建筑深基坑支护技术规范(SJG 05-96).深圳市勘察测绘院出版,1996,6-7
    [74]蒋洪胜,刘国彬.软土深基坑支撑轴力的时空效应变化规律研究.岩土工程学报,1998,20(6):105-107
    [75]Kondner,R.L.Hyperbolic Stress-strain Response:Cohesive Soils.ASCE J.Soil Mech.andFound.Div.,No.SM1,1963,pp.115-143
    [76]郑宏,葛修润,谷先荣等.关于岩土工程有限元分析中的若干问题.岩土力学,1995,16(3):7-12
    [77]周建民,丰定祥,郑宏.深层搅拌桩复合地基的有限元分析.岩土力学,1997,18(2):44-50
    [78]Dawson E,You K,Park Y.Strength-reduction stability analysis ofrockslopes using the Hoek-Brown failure criterion[A].In:Labuz J F,Glaser S D,Dawson E,ed.Trends in Rock Mechanics[C].New York:Geotechnical Special Publication,ASCE,2000,65-77
    [79]沈珠江.理论土力学[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2000
    [80]年廷凯,杨庆等.阻滑桩加固土坡稳定性分析与桩基的简化设计[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2005,19(10):3427-3433
    [81]许锡昌,葛修润.基于最小势能原理的桩锚支护结构空间变形分析[J].岩土力学,2006,27(5):705-710
    [82]杨涛,周德培,张俊云等.抗滑桩滑坡推力分布形式的计算确定[J].岩土工程学报,2006,28(3):322-326
    [83]许锡昌,陈善雄,徐海滨.悬臂排桩支护结构空间变形分析[J].岩土力学,2006,27(2):184-188

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700