崩岗侵蚀治理的综合效益评价
|
摘要
本文以福建省安溪县恒美生态茶园为研究对象,在综合调查和野外实地勘查、取样分析的基础上,依据生态经济学原理,利用统计分析和评价方法,通过对这种强度开发治理模式——变崩岗侵蚀区为生态茶园的研究,采用层次分析法与专家打分法相结合从基础效益、生态效益、社会效益和经济效益等四方面选择11个指标构建指标体系,利用多层次模糊评价法对恒美小流域治理的综合效益进行了评价,揭示该措施的可行性以及取得的成效,以期为崩岗侵蚀的治理提供理论依据和指导作用。
研究结果表明:构建的评价指标体系和采用的评价方法能较为全面地反映水土保持的综合效益,具有一定的区域适宜性。对指导今后的崩岗侵蚀治理工作具有重要的现实意义。
(1)经过治理,土壤侵蚀模数和地表径流模数都降低了,取得了显著的成效,大大地改善了水土流失的状况;
(2)生态效益有了显著提高,土壤肥力指数由原来的0.2301提高到0.7210,土壤理化性质各指标都不同程度地提高,其中有机质提高最大;项目区植被覆盖度和生物量都明显增加,改善了当地的生态环境;
(3)茶园产生的经济效益是显著的,虽然投入比较大,但是在国家和政府的支持下,只需要五年就可以完全收回投资成本,同时农民的收入从此增加,大大改善的农民的生活条件;
(4)崩岗侵蚀治理综合治理效益值为0.7231,该项目区崩岗侵蚀治理的综合效益良好,相对于治理前的0.1594提高了354%。治理后基础效益、生态效益、经济效益和社会效益的评价值分别为0.0943、0.2744、0.2205、0.1339,针对于崩岗侵蚀治理成生态茶园的综合效益,其贡献率分别达到13.04%、37.33%、30.49%、18.52%,由此可知,各效益中生态效益和经济效益治理效果明显,并在综合效益中具有很重要的作用。综合治理相对于治理前差异极显著,因此安溪恒美小流域治理崩岗的这一强度开发治理模式----变崩岗侵蚀区为生态茶园的实施是可行的和必要的,也是值得借鉴和推广的模式。
Based on the comprehensive research, site exploration and sampling and analysis, this thesis mainly talks about the comprehensive benefits of managing of Hengmei Watershed, Hengmei Ecology Tea Garden of Anxi Town, Fujian Province. It’s according to the Ecological Economics Principle and by the methods of the Statistical Analysis and Evaluation, through the research of strength development and management of changing collapse gully erosion area to ecological tea garden. It chooses 11 indexes as the Index system to make the analysis from four aspects of Basic Benefits, Ecological Benefits, Social Benefits and Economic Benefits by the analytic hierarchy process and expert scoring. The method of multi-level fuzzy evaluation shows the feasibility and results of the measures to provide theoretical foundation and direction for the management of collapse gully.
The result shows: the Index system of evaluation and evaluation method can comprehensively show the benefits of Water and soil keeping relatively. It is suitable for some region and very important for the management of collapse gully in the future.
(1)After management, the soil erosion modulus and runoff modulus have been reduced. It achieved remarkable results and improved the situation the water and soil loss a lot.
(2)The ecological benefit has been improved more while the soil fertility index raised from 0.2301 to 0.7210, every index of soil properties improved relatively with organic matter improved the largest, also the plant coverage and biodiversity are significantly increased which improves the local ecological environment.
(3) The economic benefit of tea garden is remarkable. Though the invest was large, the investor can get back the invest in five years at the support of country and government. Meanwhile, it will increase the farmer’s income and improve the living condition a lot.
(4) The comprehensive management benefits value of collapse gully is 0.7231. which has been improved 354% than 0.1594 before management. The comprehensive benefits of the collapse gully in the project area is very favorable and the evaluation value of the Basic Benefits, Ecology Benefits, Social Benefits and Economic Benefits are respectively 0.0943, 0.2744, 0.2205 and 0.1339, with contribution rate 13.04%, 37.33%, 30.49%, 18.52%. It can conclude that the ecological benefits and economic benefits are the most important ones in comprehensive benefits. The remarkable benefits of comprehensive management has shown that the strength development and management of changing collapse gully area to ecological tea garden in Hengmei Watershed of Anxi is not only feasible and necessary but also worthing learning and promotion.
研究结果表明:构建的评价指标体系和采用的评价方法能较为全面地反映水土保持的综合效益,具有一定的区域适宜性。对指导今后的崩岗侵蚀治理工作具有重要的现实意义。
(1)经过治理,土壤侵蚀模数和地表径流模数都降低了,取得了显著的成效,大大地改善了水土流失的状况;
(2)生态效益有了显著提高,土壤肥力指数由原来的0.2301提高到0.7210,土壤理化性质各指标都不同程度地提高,其中有机质提高最大;项目区植被覆盖度和生物量都明显增加,改善了当地的生态环境;
(3)茶园产生的经济效益是显著的,虽然投入比较大,但是在国家和政府的支持下,只需要五年就可以完全收回投资成本,同时农民的收入从此增加,大大改善的农民的生活条件;
(4)崩岗侵蚀治理综合治理效益值为0.7231,该项目区崩岗侵蚀治理的综合效益良好,相对于治理前的0.1594提高了354%。治理后基础效益、生态效益、经济效益和社会效益的评价值分别为0.0943、0.2744、0.2205、0.1339,针对于崩岗侵蚀治理成生态茶园的综合效益,其贡献率分别达到13.04%、37.33%、30.49%、18.52%,由此可知,各效益中生态效益和经济效益治理效果明显,并在综合效益中具有很重要的作用。综合治理相对于治理前差异极显著,因此安溪恒美小流域治理崩岗的这一强度开发治理模式----变崩岗侵蚀区为生态茶园的实施是可行的和必要的,也是值得借鉴和推广的模式。
Based on the comprehensive research, site exploration and sampling and analysis, this thesis mainly talks about the comprehensive benefits of managing of Hengmei Watershed, Hengmei Ecology Tea Garden of Anxi Town, Fujian Province. It’s according to the Ecological Economics Principle and by the methods of the Statistical Analysis and Evaluation, through the research of strength development and management of changing collapse gully erosion area to ecological tea garden. It chooses 11 indexes as the Index system to make the analysis from four aspects of Basic Benefits, Ecological Benefits, Social Benefits and Economic Benefits by the analytic hierarchy process and expert scoring. The method of multi-level fuzzy evaluation shows the feasibility and results of the measures to provide theoretical foundation and direction for the management of collapse gully.
The result shows: the Index system of evaluation and evaluation method can comprehensively show the benefits of Water and soil keeping relatively. It is suitable for some region and very important for the management of collapse gully in the future.
(1)After management, the soil erosion modulus and runoff modulus have been reduced. It achieved remarkable results and improved the situation the water and soil loss a lot.
(2)The ecological benefit has been improved more while the soil fertility index raised from 0.2301 to 0.7210, every index of soil properties improved relatively with organic matter improved the largest, also the plant coverage and biodiversity are significantly increased which improves the local ecological environment.
(3) The economic benefit of tea garden is remarkable. Though the invest was large, the investor can get back the invest in five years at the support of country and government. Meanwhile, it will increase the farmer’s income and improve the living condition a lot.
(4) The comprehensive management benefits value of collapse gully is 0.7231. which has been improved 354% than 0.1594 before management. The comprehensive benefits of the collapse gully in the project area is very favorable and the evaluation value of the Basic Benefits, Ecology Benefits, Social Benefits and Economic Benefits are respectively 0.0943, 0.2744, 0.2205 and 0.1339, with contribution rate 13.04%, 37.33%, 30.49%, 18.52%. It can conclude that the ecological benefits and economic benefits are the most important ones in comprehensive benefits. The remarkable benefits of comprehensive management has shown that the strength development and management of changing collapse gully area to ecological tea garden in Hengmei Watershed of Anxi is not only feasible and necessary but also worthing learning and promotion.
引文
[1]曾昭璇,黄少敏.红层地貌与花岗岩地貌[A].中国自然地理(地貌)[M].北京:科学出版社,1980.139-150
[2]唐克丽等.中国水土保持.北京:科学出版社[M],2004,80-82
[3]阮伏水.福建省崩岗侵蚀与治理模式探讨[J].山地学报,2003,21(6):675-680
[4]Dus Zanchar, Soil Erosion. New York. Elesrier Scientific Publishing Company, 1982: 281~287
[5]王礼先,孙保平,余新晓等.中国水利百科全书——水土保持分册[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2004,48-49
[6]吴志峰,钟伟青.崩岗灾害地貌及其环境效应[J].生态科学,1997,16(2):91-96.
[7] A.C.Imeson, F.J.P.M.Kwaad, 1980, Gullu types and Gully Priduction, Geografisch Tijdschrift 14:430-441
[8]牛德奎,郭晓敏,等.我国南方红壤丘陵区崩岗侵蚀的分布及其环境背景分析[J].江西农业大学学报,2000,22(2):204-208
[9]吴志峰,王继增.华南花岗岩风化壳岩土特性与崩岗侵蚀关系[J].水土保持学报,2000,14(2):31-35
[10]鲁胜力.加快花岗岩区崩岗治理的措施建议[J].中国水利,2005,(10):44-46
[11]史德明.中国红壤[M].北京:科学出版社,1983: 237-253
[12]张淑光,钟朝章.广东省崩岗形成机理与类型.水土保持通报,1990,10(3):8-16
[13]丁光敏.福建省崩岗侵蚀成因及治理模式研究[J].水土保持通报,2001,21(5):10-15
[14]江金波.再论崩岗侵蚀的成因与防治———以德庆、五华两地为例[J].中国水土保持,1995,(1):19-22
[15]阮伏水,周伏建等.花岗岩风化壳抗侵蚀特征研究[J].福建水土保持,1995(4):37-42
[16]陈金华.安溪县崩岗侵蚀现状与防治对策[J].福建水土保持,1999,11(4):21-43
[17]吴海彪.种植麻竹治理崩岗侵蚀的主要技术措施[J].福建水土保持,2001,13(3):24-26
[18]丘世均,红土坡地崩岗侵蚀过程与机理[J].水土保持通报,1994,14(1):31-41
[19]张淑光,姚少雄等.崩岗和人工土质陡壁快速绿化的研究[J].土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1999,5(5):67-71
[20]牛德奎.崩岗侵蚀调查方法的探讨[J].江西水利科技,1994,20(1):42-47
[21]许金城,施悦忠,等.安溪县崩岗侵蚀的调查与对策[J].福建水土保持,1997,(4):28-30
[22]S.H.Luk, 1987, Soil Erosion(China)project, progress Report, University of Toronto Press-3
[23]张胜龙.梅县崩岗侵蚀与防治工程[J].中国水土保持,1991,4:21-25
[24]殷柞云,陈建兴等.花岗岩风华壳的崩岗侵蚀整治方案及效益[J].水土保持通报,1999, 19(4): 12-17
[25]郑昭堑,施悦忠.泉州市几种崩岗治理模式的探讨[J].福建水土保持,2004,16(3):27-28,34
[26]张学俭,沈雪建.治理与开发相结合实现生态与经济效益双赢[J].中国水土保持,2004(9):1-2
[27]刘瑞华.华南地区崩岗侵蚀灾害及其防治[J].水文地质工程地质,2004(4):54-57
[28]钟继洪,唐淑英.南方山区花岗岩区化壳崩岗侵蚀及其防治对策[J].水土保持通报,1991,11(4):25-28
[29]谢建辉.德庆县崩岗治理及其防治对策[J].亚热带水土保持,2006,18(2):52-54
[30]袁本华,周春苗.新邵县崩岗现状与防治对策[J].亚热带水土保持,2006,18(3):52-53,56
[31]吴海彪.种植麻竹治理崩岗侵蚀的主要技术措施[J].福建水土保持,2001,13(3):24-26
[32]Hatton,Tom.1999.A natural model-Learning form natural ecosystems in saline environments. Natural Resource Mamagement.2(1):9-13
[33]Herron, N.F. and Hairsine, P.B. 1998.A scheme for evaluating the effectiveness of riparian zones in reducing overland flow to streams. Australian Journal of Soil Reserch.36:683-698
[34]陈国良.微机应用与农业系统模型[M].西安:陕西科学技术出版社,1986
[35]李怀甫.小流域综合治理理论与方法[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,1989:1-50
[36]日本林野厅.森林公益效能计量调查——绿色效益调查[M].杨惠民译.北京:中国林业出版社,1982
[37]Stones J R,Giliam J W,Cassel D K. Effects of erosion and landscape position on the productivity of piedmont soils[J].Journal Sci.Soc.Am.J.1985,49:987-991
[38]Pimentel D. Environmental and economic costs of soil erosion and conservation benefits. Science,1995,267:1117-1123
[39]Glenn W H. Valuing Public Goods With the Contingent Valuation Method: A Critique ofKanhneman and Knetsch. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,1992,23:248-257
[40]Richard C. Existence Values in Benefit-cost Analysis and Damage Assessment. Land Economics,1992,68(4):405-417
[41]Smith V K. Nonmarket Valuation of Environmental Resources: An Interpretive Appraisal. Land Economics,1993,69(1):1-26
[42]Daily Ged Nature’s Service. Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington D C: Island Press,1997
[43]Ted C.Sheng. Watershed Project Monitoring and Evaluation. Watershed Conservation , The Chinese Soil and Water Conservation Society and Colorade University
[44]王维明.草仔坝小流域综合治理经济效益的灰色关联分析[J].福建水土保持,2003,15 (2):49-52
[45]李智广,李锐.小流域综合治理效益评价方法评议[J].水土保持通报,1998,18(7):71-75
[46]李中魁,杨茂瑞.黄土高原小流域治理效益评价与系统评估研究[J].生态学报,1998,18(3):241-247
[47]王礼先.小流域综合治理效益评价方法与指标[J].北京林业大学学报,1991,13(3):50-51
[48]黎锁平.水土保持综合治理效益的灰色系统评价[J].水土保持通报,1994,14(5):13-18
[49]李中魁.小流域综合治理监测和评估[M].西安:西安地图出版社,1996
[50]李忠锋,裴新富.皇甫川流域水土保持生态工程建设体系及效益评价[J].水土保持通报,2002,22(1):22-25
[51]王军强.陕北黄土高原小流域治理及其效益评价[D].西北农林科技大学硕士学位毕业论文.2001.5
[52]王佑民.黄土高塬沟壑区综合治理及其效益研究[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1990
[53]杨文治,余存祖.黄土高原区域治理与评价[M].北京:中国科学出版社,1992
[54]常茂德,赵诚信.黄土高原地区不同类型区水土保持综合治理模式研究与评价[M].西安:陕西科学技术出版社,1995
[55]陈彰岑,于德广.黄河中游多沙粗沙区快速治理模式的实践与理论[M].郑州:黄河水利出版社,1998
[56]孟庆枚.黄土高原水土保持[M].郑州:黄河水利出版社,1996
[57]孙德祥,钱拴提,周广阔等.宁夏盐池半荒漠区沙漠化土地综合治理生态工程效益评价[J].2003,17(1):14-17
[58]徐勇.黄土丘陵区生态农业建设效益评价指标体系初步研究[J].水土保持研究,2002,9(4):139-146
[59]时光新,尹成信.基于熵的小流域治理效益评价模型及其应用[J].水土保持通报,1999,19(5):38-39
[60]李智广,李锐,杨勤科等.小流域治理综合效益评价指标体系研究[J].水土保持通报, 1998,18(7):71-75
[61]梁会民.小流域综合治理的生态经济效益评估研究[J].生态经济,2001,8:12-14
[62]丁立仲等.浙西山区上梧溪小流域生态恢复工程效益评价研究[J].中国生态农业学报.2006,14(3):202-203
[63]康玲玲,王云璋,王霞.小流域水土保持综合治理效益指标体系及其应用[J].土壤与环境,2002,11(3):274-278
[64]金瑾.水土保持综合治理效益评价研究[J].山西建筑.2008,1(34):349-350
[65]王宏兴.多目标决策灰色关联投影法在小流域水土保持生态工程综合效益评价中的应用[J].水土保持研究,2003,10(4):43-45
[66]蒋定生.黄土高原坡耕地水土保持措施效益评价试验研究[J].水土保持学报,1990,4(3):1-6
[67]车克钧.祁连山水源涵养林综合效能的计量研究[J].林业科学,1992,28(4):291-296
[68]黎锁平.水源保持综合治理效益的灰色系统评价方法[J].水土保持科技情报.1995,4:23-26
[69]孙立达,孙保平,齐实.小流域综合治理理论与实践[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,1992:244-299.
[70]Chambers,Rober. Participatory Rural Appraisal(PAR):Challenges,Potentials,and Paradigm. World Development, 1994,22(10):1437-1454.
[71]张于心,智明光.综合评价指标体系和评价方法[J].北方交通大学学报,1995,19 (3):393-400.
[72]王刚.黄土高原水土保持社会经济效益评价[D].陕西师范大学博士学位论文.2007.05
[73]Pimentel D. Environmental and economic costs of soil erosion and conservation benefits. Science,1995,267:1117-1123
[74]吴发启主编.水土保持概论[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2003:194-197
[75]崔文秀.层次分析法在小流域规划中的应用[J].水土保持通报,1989,9(5):45-51
[76]许树柏编著.层次分析法原理[M].天津:天津大学出版社,1988:1-25
[77]陈维杰等.浑春河小流域综合治理效益分析[J].水土保持通报,1999,(6):44-47
[78]杨小青等.喀斯特山区石漠化生态治理效益模糊综合评价--以广西都安瑶族自治县为例[J] .生态与农村环境学报.2008,24(2):22–26
[79]赵晓光,吴发启,贾锐鱼.流域管理效益评价指标体系的建立[J].中国西部生态重建与经济协调发展学术研讨会论文集.1999:326-333.
[80]王晓慧,孙保平.北京市大兴永定河沙地综合效益评价[J].水土保持通报,1998,18(6):34-38.
[81]宋广顺.大庆外围深部砂岩气层损害机理及模拟评价研究[D].中国石油勘探开发科学研究院硕士学位论文,2001.6.
[82]刘创民,李昌哲,张理宏等.北京九龙山森林植被涵养水源效能多层次模糊综合评判[J].1995,11(1):48-52.
[83]杨艳生.多层次、二次模糊综合评判在土壤侵蚀中的应用[J].土壤,1986,2:10-15.
[84]葛苏林.模糊子集、模糊映射[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1995.
[85]冯德益,楼世博.模糊数学方法及应用[M].北京:地震出版社,1983.
[86]李文龙,王刚,李自珍.人工固沙林生态系统健康的模糊综合评价及实例分析[J].西北植物学报,2004,24(3):443-448.
[87]袁嘉祖,冯晋臣.模糊数学及其在林业中的应用[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1998.
[88]范建容,周万村,高世忠.云南松林火灾后生态变化模糊评价[J].西南林学院学报,1995,15(2):1-6.
[89]森林土壤调查及土壤分析[M].福建林学院林学系土壤组编,1999.3
[90]郑添发,黄炎和.闽东南花岗岩侵蚀区土壤侵蚀规律与治理[J].福建农学院学报.1991,20(2):196一199
[91]陈志明,许永明,李翠玲.安溪县崩岗治理模式及实施效果[J].中国水土保持.2007, (3):15-16
[2]唐克丽等.中国水土保持.北京:科学出版社[M],2004,80-82
[3]阮伏水.福建省崩岗侵蚀与治理模式探讨[J].山地学报,2003,21(6):675-680
[4]Dus Zanchar, Soil Erosion. New York. Elesrier Scientific Publishing Company, 1982: 281~287
[5]王礼先,孙保平,余新晓等.中国水利百科全书——水土保持分册[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2004,48-49
[6]吴志峰,钟伟青.崩岗灾害地貌及其环境效应[J].生态科学,1997,16(2):91-96.
[7] A.C.Imeson, F.J.P.M.Kwaad, 1980, Gullu types and Gully Priduction, Geografisch Tijdschrift 14:430-441
[8]牛德奎,郭晓敏,等.我国南方红壤丘陵区崩岗侵蚀的分布及其环境背景分析[J].江西农业大学学报,2000,22(2):204-208
[9]吴志峰,王继增.华南花岗岩风化壳岩土特性与崩岗侵蚀关系[J].水土保持学报,2000,14(2):31-35
[10]鲁胜力.加快花岗岩区崩岗治理的措施建议[J].中国水利,2005,(10):44-46
[11]史德明.中国红壤[M].北京:科学出版社,1983: 237-253
[12]张淑光,钟朝章.广东省崩岗形成机理与类型.水土保持通报,1990,10(3):8-16
[13]丁光敏.福建省崩岗侵蚀成因及治理模式研究[J].水土保持通报,2001,21(5):10-15
[14]江金波.再论崩岗侵蚀的成因与防治———以德庆、五华两地为例[J].中国水土保持,1995,(1):19-22
[15]阮伏水,周伏建等.花岗岩风化壳抗侵蚀特征研究[J].福建水土保持,1995(4):37-42
[16]陈金华.安溪县崩岗侵蚀现状与防治对策[J].福建水土保持,1999,11(4):21-43
[17]吴海彪.种植麻竹治理崩岗侵蚀的主要技术措施[J].福建水土保持,2001,13(3):24-26
[18]丘世均,红土坡地崩岗侵蚀过程与机理[J].水土保持通报,1994,14(1):31-41
[19]张淑光,姚少雄等.崩岗和人工土质陡壁快速绿化的研究[J].土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1999,5(5):67-71
[20]牛德奎.崩岗侵蚀调查方法的探讨[J].江西水利科技,1994,20(1):42-47
[21]许金城,施悦忠,等.安溪县崩岗侵蚀的调查与对策[J].福建水土保持,1997,(4):28-30
[22]S.H.Luk, 1987, Soil Erosion(China)project, progress Report, University of Toronto Press-3
[23]张胜龙.梅县崩岗侵蚀与防治工程[J].中国水土保持,1991,4:21-25
[24]殷柞云,陈建兴等.花岗岩风华壳的崩岗侵蚀整治方案及效益[J].水土保持通报,1999, 19(4): 12-17
[25]郑昭堑,施悦忠.泉州市几种崩岗治理模式的探讨[J].福建水土保持,2004,16(3):27-28,34
[26]张学俭,沈雪建.治理与开发相结合实现生态与经济效益双赢[J].中国水土保持,2004(9):1-2
[27]刘瑞华.华南地区崩岗侵蚀灾害及其防治[J].水文地质工程地质,2004(4):54-57
[28]钟继洪,唐淑英.南方山区花岗岩区化壳崩岗侵蚀及其防治对策[J].水土保持通报,1991,11(4):25-28
[29]谢建辉.德庆县崩岗治理及其防治对策[J].亚热带水土保持,2006,18(2):52-54
[30]袁本华,周春苗.新邵县崩岗现状与防治对策[J].亚热带水土保持,2006,18(3):52-53,56
[31]吴海彪.种植麻竹治理崩岗侵蚀的主要技术措施[J].福建水土保持,2001,13(3):24-26
[32]Hatton,Tom.1999.A natural model-Learning form natural ecosystems in saline environments. Natural Resource Mamagement.2(1):9-13
[33]Herron, N.F. and Hairsine, P.B. 1998.A scheme for evaluating the effectiveness of riparian zones in reducing overland flow to streams. Australian Journal of Soil Reserch.36:683-698
[34]陈国良.微机应用与农业系统模型[M].西安:陕西科学技术出版社,1986
[35]李怀甫.小流域综合治理理论与方法[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,1989:1-50
[36]日本林野厅.森林公益效能计量调查——绿色效益调查[M].杨惠民译.北京:中国林业出版社,1982
[37]Stones J R,Giliam J W,Cassel D K. Effects of erosion and landscape position on the productivity of piedmont soils[J].Journal Sci.Soc.Am.J.1985,49:987-991
[38]Pimentel D. Environmental and economic costs of soil erosion and conservation benefits. Science,1995,267:1117-1123
[39]Glenn W H. Valuing Public Goods With the Contingent Valuation Method: A Critique ofKanhneman and Knetsch. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,1992,23:248-257
[40]Richard C. Existence Values in Benefit-cost Analysis and Damage Assessment. Land Economics,1992,68(4):405-417
[41]Smith V K. Nonmarket Valuation of Environmental Resources: An Interpretive Appraisal. Land Economics,1993,69(1):1-26
[42]Daily Ged Nature’s Service. Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington D C: Island Press,1997
[43]Ted C.Sheng. Watershed Project Monitoring and Evaluation. Watershed Conservation , The Chinese Soil and Water Conservation Society and Colorade University
[44]王维明.草仔坝小流域综合治理经济效益的灰色关联分析[J].福建水土保持,2003,15 (2):49-52
[45]李智广,李锐.小流域综合治理效益评价方法评议[J].水土保持通报,1998,18(7):71-75
[46]李中魁,杨茂瑞.黄土高原小流域治理效益评价与系统评估研究[J].生态学报,1998,18(3):241-247
[47]王礼先.小流域综合治理效益评价方法与指标[J].北京林业大学学报,1991,13(3):50-51
[48]黎锁平.水土保持综合治理效益的灰色系统评价[J].水土保持通报,1994,14(5):13-18
[49]李中魁.小流域综合治理监测和评估[M].西安:西安地图出版社,1996
[50]李忠锋,裴新富.皇甫川流域水土保持生态工程建设体系及效益评价[J].水土保持通报,2002,22(1):22-25
[51]王军强.陕北黄土高原小流域治理及其效益评价[D].西北农林科技大学硕士学位毕业论文.2001.5
[52]王佑民.黄土高塬沟壑区综合治理及其效益研究[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1990
[53]杨文治,余存祖.黄土高原区域治理与评价[M].北京:中国科学出版社,1992
[54]常茂德,赵诚信.黄土高原地区不同类型区水土保持综合治理模式研究与评价[M].西安:陕西科学技术出版社,1995
[55]陈彰岑,于德广.黄河中游多沙粗沙区快速治理模式的实践与理论[M].郑州:黄河水利出版社,1998
[56]孟庆枚.黄土高原水土保持[M].郑州:黄河水利出版社,1996
[57]孙德祥,钱拴提,周广阔等.宁夏盐池半荒漠区沙漠化土地综合治理生态工程效益评价[J].2003,17(1):14-17
[58]徐勇.黄土丘陵区生态农业建设效益评价指标体系初步研究[J].水土保持研究,2002,9(4):139-146
[59]时光新,尹成信.基于熵的小流域治理效益评价模型及其应用[J].水土保持通报,1999,19(5):38-39
[60]李智广,李锐,杨勤科等.小流域治理综合效益评价指标体系研究[J].水土保持通报, 1998,18(7):71-75
[61]梁会民.小流域综合治理的生态经济效益评估研究[J].生态经济,2001,8:12-14
[62]丁立仲等.浙西山区上梧溪小流域生态恢复工程效益评价研究[J].中国生态农业学报.2006,14(3):202-203
[63]康玲玲,王云璋,王霞.小流域水土保持综合治理效益指标体系及其应用[J].土壤与环境,2002,11(3):274-278
[64]金瑾.水土保持综合治理效益评价研究[J].山西建筑.2008,1(34):349-350
[65]王宏兴.多目标决策灰色关联投影法在小流域水土保持生态工程综合效益评价中的应用[J].水土保持研究,2003,10(4):43-45
[66]蒋定生.黄土高原坡耕地水土保持措施效益评价试验研究[J].水土保持学报,1990,4(3):1-6
[67]车克钧.祁连山水源涵养林综合效能的计量研究[J].林业科学,1992,28(4):291-296
[68]黎锁平.水源保持综合治理效益的灰色系统评价方法[J].水土保持科技情报.1995,4:23-26
[69]孙立达,孙保平,齐实.小流域综合治理理论与实践[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,1992:244-299.
[70]Chambers,Rober. Participatory Rural Appraisal(PAR):Challenges,Potentials,and Paradigm. World Development, 1994,22(10):1437-1454.
[71]张于心,智明光.综合评价指标体系和评价方法[J].北方交通大学学报,1995,19 (3):393-400.
[72]王刚.黄土高原水土保持社会经济效益评价[D].陕西师范大学博士学位论文.2007.05
[73]Pimentel D. Environmental and economic costs of soil erosion and conservation benefits. Science,1995,267:1117-1123
[74]吴发启主编.水土保持概论[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2003:194-197
[75]崔文秀.层次分析法在小流域规划中的应用[J].水土保持通报,1989,9(5):45-51
[76]许树柏编著.层次分析法原理[M].天津:天津大学出版社,1988:1-25
[77]陈维杰等.浑春河小流域综合治理效益分析[J].水土保持通报,1999,(6):44-47
[78]杨小青等.喀斯特山区石漠化生态治理效益模糊综合评价--以广西都安瑶族自治县为例[J] .生态与农村环境学报.2008,24(2):22–26
[79]赵晓光,吴发启,贾锐鱼.流域管理效益评价指标体系的建立[J].中国西部生态重建与经济协调发展学术研讨会论文集.1999:326-333.
[80]王晓慧,孙保平.北京市大兴永定河沙地综合效益评价[J].水土保持通报,1998,18(6):34-38.
[81]宋广顺.大庆外围深部砂岩气层损害机理及模拟评价研究[D].中国石油勘探开发科学研究院硕士学位论文,2001.6.
[82]刘创民,李昌哲,张理宏等.北京九龙山森林植被涵养水源效能多层次模糊综合评判[J].1995,11(1):48-52.
[83]杨艳生.多层次、二次模糊综合评判在土壤侵蚀中的应用[J].土壤,1986,2:10-15.
[84]葛苏林.模糊子集、模糊映射[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1995.
[85]冯德益,楼世博.模糊数学方法及应用[M].北京:地震出版社,1983.
[86]李文龙,王刚,李自珍.人工固沙林生态系统健康的模糊综合评价及实例分析[J].西北植物学报,2004,24(3):443-448.
[87]袁嘉祖,冯晋臣.模糊数学及其在林业中的应用[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1998.
[88]范建容,周万村,高世忠.云南松林火灾后生态变化模糊评价[J].西南林学院学报,1995,15(2):1-6.
[89]森林土壤调查及土壤分析[M].福建林学院林学系土壤组编,1999.3
[90]郑添发,黄炎和.闽东南花岗岩侵蚀区土壤侵蚀规律与治理[J].福建农学院学报.1991,20(2):196一199
[91]陈志明,许永明,李翠玲.安溪县崩岗治理模式及实施效果[J].中国水土保持.2007, (3):15-16
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |