黑龙江省东部早白垩世沉积特征与原型盆地恢复
|
摘要
本文通过对黑龙江省早白垩世盆地的地层学、沉积学、层序地层学、构造地质学、地震相特征和物源特征等方面进行综合,提出黑龙江省东部早白垩世原型盆地为一大型近海湖泊盆地,在滴道组(裴德组)时期为孤立的断陷盆地;在城子河组和穆棱组时期属于统一的拗陷盆地。原型盆地滴道组时期,物源具有近源、多源的特征。城子河组和穆棱组时期存在三大稳定物源区:西部小兴安岭-张广才岭区、东南部那丹哈达地区、东部富锦隆起以东地区。
前白垩纪西伯利亚板块和华北板块的碰撞,佳木斯地体和那丹哈达地体向欧亚板块的拼贴,使东北地区岩石圈增厚。增厚的岩石圈在早白垩世发生拆沉作用,并在泛太平洋板块向欧亚大陆俯冲联合作用下导致岩石圈的伸展作用和热沉降作用是该区盆地形成的主要动力学机制。
The basins include Sanjiang basin, Boli basin, Jixi basin, Hulin basin, Ning'anbasin, Hegang basin and Tangyuan fault basin in eastern Heilongjiang Province. It havebeen proved to have practical hydrocarbon prospects according a long-term explorationin the basins refered above. Though each of these basins are isolated nowadays and havebeen reformed consumingly, they were coexist and have the close connection with othersin the same system in early Cretaceous. But these Cretaceous basins rarely have beenstudied as a unite in the east of Heilongjiang province. This paper discusses theformation mechanisms and retoration of prototype basins using stratigraphy,sedimentology, sequence stratigraphy and provenance analysis.
Jixi Group and Longzhaogou Group are developed in the early Cretaceous basins inthe east of Heilongjiang Province. Jixi group includes Didao formation, Chengziheformation and Muleng formation, and Longzhuagou group includes Peide formation,Qihulin formation, Yunshan formation and Zhushan formation.Using biolo-stratigraphy,petrology stratigraphy, isotope geochronometry and other methods, this paper point outthat Jixi group and Longzhaogou Group were developed in the same time but in differentplaces. In the two groups, Didao formation is correspond with Peide formation, andChengzihe formation is correspond with Qihulin and Yunshan formation , and Mulengformation is correspond with Zhushan formation respectively.The sedimentary facies in the east of Heilongjiang province is mainly composed ofcontinental facies, and still including marine event sediments in the background ofcontinent, which form the rich and colorful sedimentary systems of the area. Theintegrative analysis of the Sanjing area utilizing cores, field sections, well log, seismicand palaeontologic datas indicates that, the sedimentary assemblages in this area aremostly made up of the continental facies, and others are marine-continental transitional
and marine facies. The continental facies can father be divided into alluvial fan facies,(fan)delta, lacustrine, volcanic-pyroclastic — lacustrine bottom fan facies;themarine-continental transitional facies is devided into delta facies;the marinesedimentary environment can be divided into offshore and shallow marine facies. Thesedimentary features and spread rules of the Early Cretaceous indicate: during thesedimentary periods of Didao (Peide) Formation, the basins are isolated fault basins,which mainly develop alluvial fan-(fan)delta-lacustrine sedimentary systems. during thesedimentary periods of Chengzihe Formation (Qihulin Formation+Yunshan Formation)and Muling Formation (Zhushan formation), the basins are uniform depression basins,which develop fluvial-(fan)delta-shallow lake-semi-lake sedimentary systems,Meanwhile, there exist marine events. The integrative analysis utilizing palaeontologicfossils, geochemistry element ratios and Sr isotope ratio indicates that, there are twoperiods of marine events in Chengzihe Formation and one period of marine event inMuling Formation, the direction of marine transgressions are all from the east of thebasins. The distributions of marine transgressions at the early period of ChengziheFormation are limit, but the ranges of marine transgressions at the late period ofChengzihe Formation and MulingFormation are the whole areas.According to recognize and identify the sedimentary features , sequence boundariesof the Early Cretaceous basins and classify the inner unites of sequence (systems tract) ,the article establishes the sequence stratigraphic framework .One second order sequence(supersequence) and nine third order sequences are distinguished in it. Among them, twothird order sequences are distinguished in Didao Formation, four third order sequencesare distinguished in Chengzihe Formation, and Muling Formation develops threesequences. Among them, the second order sequence is the result of tectonic movements,and the third order sequence is the result of base-level change caused by many kinds offactors, thereby, which can explain the cause of formation of different order sequences.Palaeocurrent analysis in Early Cretaceous in the eastern Hei Longjiang shows thatthe palaeocurrents were dispersed during the Didao Formation, and there was notuniform catchment center, characterized by nearby provenance and multiple supplysources. During the Chengzihe Formation and Muleng Formation, basins which isisolated nowadays had a united catchment center and were characterized by "overflowbasin".The palaeocurrents were primarily come form the western, eastern orsoutheastern basins , which suggests that the provenance maybe was both the Xiao
Hinggan Mountain-Zhangguangcai Mountain and the region in the east of FujinUpheaval.By the analysis of the composition of sandstone,the heavy mineral assemblageand geochemistry of detrital rocks, it is revealed that during the Didao Formation thesource of sediments was predominantly low grade metamorphic rocks, sharing similarchemical component constitution with the Jiamusi Terrane;during the ChengziheFormation and Muleng Formation there were three large and stable provenancesincluding the western Xiao Hinggan Mountain-Zhangguangcai Mountain, thesoutheastern Nadanhadab Terrane , the east of Fujin Upheaval. The tectonic settings ofprovenances for the Didao Formation, Chengzihe Formation and Muleng Formation isdetermined as the active continental margine.The early Cretaceous prototype basin in the eastern area of Heilongjiang Provinceis considered to be a large submaritime basin according to studying stratigraphy,edimentology, sequence stratigraphy,tectonics, seisemic facies characteristics andprovenance characteristics based on the field geological investigation and officeanalysis.It consists of the isolated fault basins when Didao Formation and it is a largeunited depression basin of Chengzihe and MuLeng Formation. The evidences are: It hassimilar sedimentary filled characteristics in early Cretaceous.The sediments are mainlyclastic rocks with coal bed, volcanic rocks and marine bed;The marine bed can betracked and contrasted;It has similar second order sequences;Nowdays,the isolatedbasins have no border facies and the boundaries are a series of reversed faults, Archaeanstratum thrust on younger stratum after Muleng Formation;Palaeogeographiccharacteristics and provenance analysis also show that it was a sag-basin.Before Cretaceous, The northeasten crust of China became thicking for SiberianPlate and Huabei Plate collision, as well as Jiamusi Terrane and Nadanhada Terraneamalgamation to Eurasia Plate. In the early Cretaceous the thicker crust occured todelamination,later which led to the crust extension ,and the crust heat-subdidence. Itdeveloped a series basins with the Pacific Ocean Plates subduction to the Eurasia Plate,which possessed the abortive continental rift, which interpretes the mechanism of thebasins developed as well. It is a fault stage in Didao Formation , and it is a sag stage inChengzihe Formation and Muleng Formation. Strong movements of Yilan-Yitong Faultand Dunmi Fault reformed the prototype basin, and make a sorts of EW thrust faultsdeveloped. Nowadays there are a relic basins in the eastern area of HeilongjiangProvince.
前白垩纪西伯利亚板块和华北板块的碰撞,佳木斯地体和那丹哈达地体向欧亚板块的拼贴,使东北地区岩石圈增厚。增厚的岩石圈在早白垩世发生拆沉作用,并在泛太平洋板块向欧亚大陆俯冲联合作用下导致岩石圈的伸展作用和热沉降作用是该区盆地形成的主要动力学机制。
The basins include Sanjiang basin, Boli basin, Jixi basin, Hulin basin, Ning'anbasin, Hegang basin and Tangyuan fault basin in eastern Heilongjiang Province. It havebeen proved to have practical hydrocarbon prospects according a long-term explorationin the basins refered above. Though each of these basins are isolated nowadays and havebeen reformed consumingly, they were coexist and have the close connection with othersin the same system in early Cretaceous. But these Cretaceous basins rarely have beenstudied as a unite in the east of Heilongjiang province. This paper discusses theformation mechanisms and retoration of prototype basins using stratigraphy,sedimentology, sequence stratigraphy and provenance analysis.
Jixi Group and Longzhaogou Group are developed in the early Cretaceous basins inthe east of Heilongjiang Province. Jixi group includes Didao formation, Chengziheformation and Muleng formation, and Longzhuagou group includes Peide formation,Qihulin formation, Yunshan formation and Zhushan formation.Using biolo-stratigraphy,petrology stratigraphy, isotope geochronometry and other methods, this paper point outthat Jixi group and Longzhaogou Group were developed in the same time but in differentplaces. In the two groups, Didao formation is correspond with Peide formation, andChengzihe formation is correspond with Qihulin and Yunshan formation , and Mulengformation is correspond with Zhushan formation respectively.The sedimentary facies in the east of Heilongjiang province is mainly composed ofcontinental facies, and still including marine event sediments in the background ofcontinent, which form the rich and colorful sedimentary systems of the area. Theintegrative analysis of the Sanjing area utilizing cores, field sections, well log, seismicand palaeontologic datas indicates that, the sedimentary assemblages in this area aremostly made up of the continental facies, and others are marine-continental transitional
and marine facies. The continental facies can father be divided into alluvial fan facies,(fan)delta, lacustrine, volcanic-pyroclastic — lacustrine bottom fan facies;themarine-continental transitional facies is devided into delta facies;the marinesedimentary environment can be divided into offshore and shallow marine facies. Thesedimentary features and spread rules of the Early Cretaceous indicate: during thesedimentary periods of Didao (Peide) Formation, the basins are isolated fault basins,which mainly develop alluvial fan-(fan)delta-lacustrine sedimentary systems. during thesedimentary periods of Chengzihe Formation (Qihulin Formation+Yunshan Formation)and Muling Formation (Zhushan formation), the basins are uniform depression basins,which develop fluvial-(fan)delta-shallow lake-semi-lake sedimentary systems,Meanwhile, there exist marine events. The integrative analysis utilizing palaeontologicfossils, geochemistry element ratios and Sr isotope ratio indicates that, there are twoperiods of marine events in Chengzihe Formation and one period of marine event inMuling Formation, the direction of marine transgressions are all from the east of thebasins. The distributions of marine transgressions at the early period of ChengziheFormation are limit, but the ranges of marine transgressions at the late period ofChengzihe Formation and MulingFormation are the whole areas.According to recognize and identify the sedimentary features , sequence boundariesof the Early Cretaceous basins and classify the inner unites of sequence (systems tract) ,the article establishes the sequence stratigraphic framework .One second order sequence(supersequence) and nine third order sequences are distinguished in it. Among them, twothird order sequences are distinguished in Didao Formation, four third order sequencesare distinguished in Chengzihe Formation, and Muling Formation develops threesequences. Among them, the second order sequence is the result of tectonic movements,and the third order sequence is the result of base-level change caused by many kinds offactors, thereby, which can explain the cause of formation of different order sequences.Palaeocurrent analysis in Early Cretaceous in the eastern Hei Longjiang shows thatthe palaeocurrents were dispersed during the Didao Formation, and there was notuniform catchment center, characterized by nearby provenance and multiple supplysources. During the Chengzihe Formation and Muleng Formation, basins which isisolated nowadays had a united catchment center and were characterized by "overflowbasin".The palaeocurrents were primarily come form the western, eastern orsoutheastern basins , which suggests that the provenance maybe was both the Xiao
Hinggan Mountain-Zhangguangcai Mountain and the region in the east of FujinUpheaval.By the analysis of the composition of sandstone,the heavy mineral assemblageand geochemistry of detrital rocks, it is revealed that during the Didao Formation thesource of sediments was predominantly low grade metamorphic rocks, sharing similarchemical component constitution with the Jiamusi Terrane;during the ChengziheFormation and Muleng Formation there were three large and stable provenancesincluding the western Xiao Hinggan Mountain-Zhangguangcai Mountain, thesoutheastern Nadanhadab Terrane , the east of Fujin Upheaval. The tectonic settings ofprovenances for the Didao Formation, Chengzihe Formation and Muleng Formation isdetermined as the active continental margine.The early Cretaceous prototype basin in the eastern area of Heilongjiang Provinceis considered to be a large submaritime basin according to studying stratigraphy,edimentology, sequence stratigraphy,tectonics, seisemic facies characteristics andprovenance characteristics based on the field geological investigation and officeanalysis.It consists of the isolated fault basins when Didao Formation and it is a largeunited depression basin of Chengzihe and MuLeng Formation. The evidences are: It hassimilar sedimentary filled characteristics in early Cretaceous.The sediments are mainlyclastic rocks with coal bed, volcanic rocks and marine bed;The marine bed can betracked and contrasted;It has similar second order sequences;Nowdays,the isolatedbasins have no border facies and the boundaries are a series of reversed faults, Archaeanstratum thrust on younger stratum after Muleng Formation;Palaeogeographiccharacteristics and provenance analysis also show that it was a sag-basin.Before Cretaceous, The northeasten crust of China became thicking for SiberianPlate and Huabei Plate collision, as well as Jiamusi Terrane and Nadanhada Terraneamalgamation to Eurasia Plate. In the early Cretaceous the thicker crust occured todelamination,later which led to the crust extension ,and the crust heat-subdidence. Itdeveloped a series basins with the Pacific Ocean Plates subduction to the Eurasia Plate,which possessed the abortive continental rift, which interpretes the mechanism of thebasins developed as well. It is a fault stage in Didao Formation , and it is a sag stage inChengzihe Formation and Muleng Formation. Strong movements of Yilan-Yitong Faultand Dunmi Fault reformed the prototype basin, and make a sorts of EW thrust faultsdeveloped. Nowadays there are a relic basins in the eastern area of HeilongjiangProvince.
引文
1.谯汉生,方朝亮,牛嘉玉等. 2003. 东北地区深层石油地质(M).北京:石油工业出版社,5-11
2.曹熹,党增欣,张兴洲等. 1992. 佳木斯复合地体(M). 吉林:吉林科学技术出版社,1-15
3.Chris P, Jim M, Chris E, et al. 2001, Experimental straligraphy. GSA Today, 11(7): 4-9
4.Whittaker A, Cope L C, Cowie J W, et al. 1991, A guide to stratigraphical procedure. Journal of the geological society, London, 148:813-824
5.宋彪,李锦轶,牛宝贵,等.1997,黑龙江省东部麻山群黑云斜长片麻岩中锆石的年龄及其地质意义(J). 地球学报,18:306-312
6.黑龙江省地质矿产局,黑龙江省区域地质志(M).1993.北京:地质出版社,8-43
7.Dorsett-Bain H L, Wilde S A, Liu J L. 1996.A Pan-African granulite facies event in northeastern China:SHRIMP U-Pb zircon dating of the Mashan Group at Liu Mao, Heilongjiang Province [A].30th IGC, Abstracts 2[C], 552.
8.Simon A Wilder,吴福元, 张兴洲等.2001.中国东北麻山杂岩晚泛非期变质的锆石 SHRIMP 年龄据及全球大陆再造意义.30(1):35-50
9.Wilde SA, Zhang XZ and Wu FY. 2000.Extension of a newly identified 500Ma metamorphic rerrian in North East Chian: Further U-Pb SHRIMP dating of the Mashan Complex, Heilongjiang Province, China. Tectonophysica. 328:115-130
10.Wilde SA, Wu FY and Zhang XZ. 2000.The Mashan Complex: SHRIMP U-Pb zircon evidence for a Late Pan-African metamorphic event in NE China and its implication for global continental reconstructions. Geochimica,30:35-50
11.赵春荆,彭玉鲸、党增欣等.1996.吉黑东部构造格架及地壳演化.沈阳:辽宁大学出版社
12.赵春荆,朱群、李之彤.1997.佳木斯地块基底地质构造.中国地质.科学院沈阳地质矿产研究所集刊.(5—6):1-118
13.李锦铁,牛宝贵.宋彪,等.1999.长白山北段地壳的形成与演化.北京:地质出版社
14 . Ntatalin B A, Borukayev H B. 1991.esozoic sutures in the southern Far East of the USSR.Geotectonics, 25:64-74
15.李春昱,王荃,刘雪亚,等. 1982.亚洲大地构造图及说明书.北京:地质出版社
16.黄汲清,任纪舜,姜春发,等. 1980.中国大地构造及其演化.北京:科学出版社
17.王五力,郑少林,张立君,等. 1995.中国东北环太平洋带构造地层学.北京:地质出版社, 1-164
18.李春昱,王荃,刘雪亚,等. 1984.亚洲大地构造及其演化.中国地质科学院院报, (10):3-11
19.杨丙中,王东坡,李西建. 1989.松辽盆地东部地区逆冲推覆构造与油气勘探趋势.长春地质学院学报, 19(4):361-369
20.Ji X, Coney P J. Accreted terranes of China. In: Howell D C(ed). 1985.Tectono stratigraphic terranes of the Circum Pacific Region, Earth Science Series No.i. Houston: Circum Pacific Council for Energy and Mineral Resources, 349-361
21.Kojima S. 1989.Mesozoic terrane accretion in northeast China, Sikhote Alin and Japan regions. Paleogeog Paleoclim Paleoecol, 69:213-232
22.水谷伸治朗,邵济安,张庆龙. 1989.那丹哈达地体与东亚大陆边缘中生代构造关系.地质学报, 63(3):204-216
23.Yang Q, Mizutani S, Nagai H. 1993.Biostratigraphic correlation between the Nadanhada daterrane of N C China and the Minoterran of central Japan. The Journal of Earth Pianet Science, 40:27-43
24.邵济安,唐克东,王成源,等.那丹哈达地体的构造特征及演化.中国科学,1991,21(7):744-751
25.张庆龙,水谷伸治朗.2004.从板块构造到地体.江苏地质,28(1):1-6
26.张兴洲, Sklyarov E V. 1992.中国东北及邻区蓝片岩带的构造意义.长春地质学院地质研究所文集,北京:地震出版社
27.张梅生,彭向东,孙晓猛.1998.中国东北区古生代构造古地理格局.辽宁地质.2:91-96
28.王五力. 1992.环太平洋带中国大陆增生、构造演化和成矿作用基本特点的初步总结.中国科学院沈阳地质矿产研究所所刊,22
29.刘茂强,杨丙中,邓俊国,等. 1993.伊通-舒兰地堑地质构造特征及其演化.北京:地质出版社
30.王小凤,李中坚,陈柏林,等. 2000.郯庐断裂带.北京:地质出版社,226-237
31.万天丰.郯庐断裂带的演化和古应力场. 1995.地球科学-中国地质大学学报. 20(4):526-534
32.徐嘉伟,马国锋. 1992 郯庐断裂带研究的十年回顾.地质论评,.38(4):316-324
33.张理刚,王可法,陈振胜,等. 1993.中国东部中生代花岗岩长石铅同位素组成与铅同位素省划分.科学通报, 38(3)
34.孙革,郑少林,孙学坤等.黑龙江东部侏罗-白垩纪界限附近地层研究新进展.地层学杂志.1992,16(1):48-54
35.张世红,施央申,孙岩等. 1991.黑龙江完达山造山带及其与那丹哈达地体的关系.南京大学学报(地球科学),3:287-294
36.邵济安,唐克东,王成源. 1991.那丹哈达地体构造特征及演化.中国科学(B),7:744-751
37.邵济安,王成源,唐克东. 1992.乌苏里地区构造新探索.地质论评,38(1):34-39
38.刘海山,郝天珧. 1992.勃利盆地侏罗系、白垩系、第三系古地磁研究及其意义.见沈阳地质矿产所集刊.北京:地质出版社
39.赵海玲,邓晋福,陈发景,等. 1996.黑龙江完达山地区中侏罗世火山岩特征及其形成构造背景.地球科学,21(4):28-32
40.沙金庚,1991,对黑龙江省东部龙爪沟群和鸡西群时代的不同认识,地质学报,4:376-385
41.沙金庚,2002. 黑龙江东部早白垩世生物地层学研究的主要进展,地学前缘,9(3):95-101.
42.沙金庚,1990. 黑龙江省东部 Aucellina(双壳类)的发现. 地层学杂志,14(3):226-230.
43.沙金庚,1991. 对黑龙江东部龙爪沟群和鸡西群时代的不同认识. 地质学报,(4):376-383.
44.沙金庚,1992. 黑龙江东部的 Buchia 和 Aucellina 层. 地层学杂志,16(1):41-48.
45.沙金庚,1999. 一个值得注意的修订-评“中国黑龙江省东部早白垩世双壳类”. 古生物学报,38(3):403-406.
46.沙金庚,2002. 黑龙江东部早白垩世生物地层学研究的主要进展. 地学前缘,9(39):95-101.
47.沙金庚,蔡华伟,顾知微,等. 2000.龙爪沟群和鸡西群双壳类化石群的时代[A],第三届全国地层委员会,第三届全国地层会议论文集[G].北京:地质出版社.265-269
48.孙革,郑少林,姜剑红,等. 1999.黑龙江鸡西含煤盆地早白垩世生物地层研究新进展田.煤田地质与勘探,27(6):1-3.
49.孙 革,郑少林.2000.中国东北中生代地层划分对比之新见.地层学杂志,24(1):6—64.
50.杨建国,2000. 黑龙江东部三江盆地中侏罗世孢粉新发现. 中国含油气盆地孢粉学论文集,北京:石油工业出版社.
51.杨建国,赵传本,1998. 黑龙江省龙爪沟地区侏罗系研究新进展. 大庆石油地质与开发,17(6):16-18.
52.Kellys R A, Wang Yigang, Zheng lin. 1994.A revised Cretaceous age for ammonites,,originally indentified as Middle Jurassic,from eastern Heilongjiang, China[J],Acta Palaeontologica Sinaca,33(4):509-517
53.Futakami M, Matsukawa M,Chen Piji, et al. 1995.Barremian ammonite from the Longzhaogou Group in eastern Heilongjiang, northeast China[J],The Journal of the Geological Societh of Japan,101(1):79-85
54.Sha Jingeng, Fursich F T. 1994.Bivalve faunas of eastern Heilongjiang,northeastern China. The Late Jurrasic and Early Cretaceous bhchiid fauna(J), Beringeria, 12:3-93
55.何承全,黄冠军,1997. 黑龙江绥滨地区中侏罗世晚期绥滨组沟鞭藻类的发现. 微体古生物学报,14(1):21-40.
56.何承全,孙学坤,2000. 黑龙江省东部鸡西盆地城子河组下部早白垩世欧特里夫晚期海相沟鞭藻类. 古生物学报,39(1):46-62.
57.何承全,万传彪,杨明杰,1999. 黑龙江省东部虎林盆地欧特里夫-巴列姆期沟鞭藻类. 古生物学报,38(2):183-202.
58.何承全,祝幼华,2003. 黑龙江省东北部绥滨地区东荣组最上部的沟鞭藻组合-兼论该地区侏罗-白垩系界线. 古生物学报,42(3):328-345.
59.郑少林,梁子华.1995.城子河组的新材料及其地层意义.地层学杂志,19(1):1-19
60.郑少林 张武 朱洪森,等. 2005.关于龙爪沟群地层单位名称问题的讨论.29(1):84-91
61 . Gu Zhiwei.1998. Evolutionary trends in non-marine Cretaceous bivalves of northeast China[A].JOHNSTON P A,HAGGART J W. Bivalves:An Eon of Evotion-Paleobiological Studies Honoring Norman D.Newell[M].Calgary:University of Calgary Press, 1998.367-276
62.Gu Zhiwei, Li Zishun, Yu Xihan. 1997.Lower Cretaceous Bivalves from eastern Heilongjiang Province of China [M].Beijing;Science Press,301
63.顾知微.1995.热河动物化石群地质时代的研究[A].见:王鸿桢主编.中国地质科学发展的回顾[C]. 武汉:中国地质大学出版社,93-99
64.万传彪,闫凤兰,尹楠.1995.黑龙江集贤地区早白垩世沟鞭藻类和其他藻类[J]微体古生物学报,12(1):51-52
65.万传彪,乔秀云,杨建国,等. 2000.黑龙江省鸡西盆地早白垩世孢粉组合.见:朱宗浩等主编.中国含油气盆地孢粉论文集.北京:石油工业出版社, 83-90
66.孙学坤,何承全.1992.黑龙江绥滨地区晚侏罗世东荣组的沟鞭藻[J].古生物学报,31(2):190-205
67.尚玉珂.1997.黑龙江省鸡西城子河组被子植物化石层的孢粉研究[J].微体古生物学报14(2):162-174
68.姜宝玉,冯金宝.2001.鸡西群城子河组时代的进一步探讨地层学杂志[J].25(3):217-221
69.杨小菊.2002.黑龙江鸡西早白垩世穆棱组真蕨类植物一新种[J]古生物学报,41(2):259-265
70.杨小菊.2003.黑龙江省鸡西盆地早白垩世穆棱组植物化石新材料[J]. 古生物学报, 42(4):561-584
71.杨小菊,何承全,黎文本,等.2003.鸡西盆地早白垄世穆棱组海相沟鞭藻的发现及其古环境意义.科学通报,48(14):1553-1556
72.任凤和,杨晓平,李仰春,汪岩,周兴福.2005. 黑龙江省东部鸡西群地层时代划分及地质意义.中国地质.32(1):48-54
73.张世红,张传恒,李红生.1999. 黑龙江省东部裴德组砾石中放射虫的发现及其意义. 地层学杂志,23(3):201-205
74.潘华璋,朱祥根.2004. 黑龙江省东部早白垩世的一些海相和半咸水相腹足类. 古生物学报,43(3):338—348
75.赵传本,杨建国,李强.2000.黑龙江东部鸡西群研究新进展.见:第三届全国地层会议论文集编委会编.第三届全国地层会议论文集.北京:地质出版社.3O4—3O7.
76.于兴河等.2002.碎屑岩系储层沉积学[A].北京:石油工业出版社,125-139
77.姜宝玉.2003. 黑龙江省东部七虎林组的一些双壳类化石.动物学杂志.38(4):85-100
78. Simon R. A. Kelly,王义刚,张静.1994. 黑龙江东部龙爪沟群七虎林组菊石之修定.古生 物学报.33(4):509-518
79.金秉福,林振宏,杨群慧,等.沉积矿物学在陆缘海环境分析中的应用.海洋地质与第四纪地质,2002,22(3):113～118
80.葛瑞全.济阳凹陷新生界海绿石的存在及其地质意义.沉积学报,2004,22(2):276-280
81.任来义,林桂芳,赵志清等. 东璞凹陷早第三纪的海侵(泛)事件.2000,39(4):553-557
82.任来义,林桂芳,谈玉明等. 2002,从古生物和地球化学标志看东璞凹陷第三纪的海侵事件. 西安石油学院学报(自然科学版),17(1):20-31
83.王冠民,钟建华,姜在兴,等.2005. 从济阳坳陷沙一段古盐度的横向变化看古近纪的海侵方向.世界地质.24(3):243-247
84.刘春莲,秦红,车平,等.2005. 广东三水盆地始新统布心组生油岩元素地球化学特征及沉积环境.古地理学报.7(1):125-136
85.刘招君,董清水,王嗣敏.等.2002.陆相层序地层学导论与应用.北京:石油工业出版社
86.刘招君、郭巍、方石等.2003.松辽盆地及其临区中新生代盆山动力学.内部资料
87.林畅松,刘景彦,张英志,等.2005. 构造活动盆地的层序地层与构造地层分析—以中国中、新生代构造活动湖盆分析为例.地学前缘.12(4):365-374
88.林畅松,张燕梅,李思田,等. 2004.中国中新生代断陷盆地幕式裂陷过程的动力学响应和模拟模型.地球科学—中国地质大学学报, 29(5):583-589
89.林畅松,郑和荣,任建业,等. 2003.渤海湾盆地东营、沾化凹陷早第三纪同沉积断裂作用对沉积充填的控制.中国科学(D辑), 33(11):1025-1036
90.任凤和,杨小平,李仰春,等.2005. 黑龙江省东部鸡西群地层时代划分及地质意义.中国地质,32(1):48-54
91.赵海玲, 邓晋福, 陈发景, 胡泉, 赵世柯. 1996. 黑龙江完达山地区中侏罗世火山岩特征及其形成构造背景. 地球科学-中国地质大学学报, 21(4): 428-432
92.李思田.盆地动力学与能源资源[J].地学前缘,2000,7(3):1-9.
93.刘池洋,杨兴科.改造盆地研究和油气评价的思路[J].石油与天然气地质,2000,21(1):12-14.
94.Dickinson W R, The dynamics of sedimentary basins(M). USGD,National Academy Press,1997
95.刘池洋. 1993盆地动态演化研究的基础:原始盆地恢复—以柴达木盆地为例[A].见:赵重远,刘池洋,姚远,编.含油气盆地地质学研究进展[C].西安:西北大学出版社,.26一31
96.李思田,路风香,林畅松,等. 1997.中国东部及邻区中新生代盆地演化及地球动力学背景[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,
97.黄清华,杨建国,孔惠. 2003.东北依兰一伊通地堑方正断陷方正组的建立及其意义.地层学杂志.27(2):138-145
99.童亨茂,2002. 伊通地堑边界断裂的性质与演化. 地质力学学报.8(1):35-42
100.王建国,王林凤.2001 鸡西含煤沉积盆地早期油气勘探. 中国海上油气(地质).15(2):120-126.
101.张渝昌. 1997.中国含油气盆地原型分析,南京大学出版社(南京) .1-26
102.刘和甫,李小军,刘立群.2003.地球动力学与盆地层序及油气系统分析.现代地质.17(1):80-86
103.赵文智,靳久强,薛良清,等.2000. 中国西北地区诛罗纪原型盆地形成与演化[M],北京:地质出版社,5
104.杜旭东,漆家福,陆克政,张一伟.1999.大港探区中生代原型盆地恢复及成盆模式.应用基础与工程科学学报,7(3):230-239
105.杜旭东、漆家福、张一伟、陆克政.2000.中国东部晚侏罗—早白垩纪盆地火山岩系的确认及成盆构造背景分析.石油大学学报. 24(1):1-7
106.葛文春、林强、孙德有、吴福元、元忠宽、李文远、陈明植、尹成孝.1999.大兴安岭中生代玄武岩的地球化学特征:壳幔相互作用的证据.岩石学报.15(3):396-407
107.林强、葛文春、孙德有、吴福元、元忠宽、闵耿德、陈明植、李文远、权致纯、尹成孝.1998.中国东北地区中生代火山岩的大地构造意义.地质科学. 33(2):129-139
108.林强、葛文春等.2003.大兴安岭中生代双峰式火山岩地球化学特征.地球化学. 32(3)208-223
109.邵济安等.1999.大兴安岭中生代伸展过程中的岩浆作用.地学前缘, 6(4):399-346
110.邵济安等.2001.大兴安岭—燕山晚中生代岩浆活动与俯冲作用关系.地质学报.75(1):56-63
111.邵济安、张履桥等.2001.内蒙古喀喇沁变质核杂岩及其隆升机制探讨.岩石学报. 17(2):283-290
112.吴福元、孙德有、林强.1999.东北花岗岩成因与地壳增生.岩石学报. 15:181-191
113.张履桥、邵济安等.1998.内蒙古甘珠尔庙变质核杂岩.地质科学. 33(2):140~145
114.张晓东、余青等.2000.松辽盆地变质核杂岩和伸展断陷的构造特征及成因.地学前缘 7(4):411~419
115.Maruyama S. 1997. Pacific-type orogeny revisited: Miyashiro-type orogeny proposed. The Island Arc, 6: 91-120.
116.Maruyama S., Liou J G., Seno T., 1989. Mesozoic and Cenozoic evolution of Asia. In: Ben-Avraham, Z., ed.. The evolution of the Pacific Ocean margins. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press,75-79
117.Natalin, B. A. 1993. History and modes of Mesozoic accretion in southeastern Russia. Island Arc.2: 15～34.
118.Fukao Y, Maruyama S, Obayshi M, et al. 1994, Geologic implication of the whole mantle P-wave topography. Journal of the Geological Society of Japan, 100(1): 4～23.
119.Dickinson WR., et al. 1997.The dynamics of sedimentary basins, National Research Council. Washington, D.C
120.Ershov AV., Brunet MF, 1999. KorotaevM从Nikishin AM&Bolotov SN.and dynamics ofNorthern Caucasus molasse basin: implicationsTectonophysics. 313: 219-241.
121.Blanco ML, Maroo M, Burbank DW, Verg6s J, Roca E, Anad6n P, Pina 1. 2000,Tectonic and climaticcontrols on the development of foreland fan deltas: Montserrat and Sant Liorenc del Munt systems (middle Eocene, Ebro Basin, NE Spain). Sedimentary Geology, 138:17 39.
122.Cloke, 1. R., S. J. Moss, and J. C. Craig, 1997,The influence of basement reactivation on the extensionaland inversion history of the Kutai Basin, eastern Kalimantan: Journal of the GeologicalSociety, London, 154, 157-161
123.Estaun AP, Marron JA, Br6n D, Puchkov V. Gorozhanina Y, Baryshev V. 1997,Along-strike structuralvariations in the foreland thrust and fold belt of the southUralsTectonophysics, 276:265-280.
124.Galeazzi JS. 1998,Structural and stratigraphic evolution of the western Malvinas Basin. AAPG Bull,82(3):596 636
125.Lu H, Howell DG Jia D. Rejuvenation of the Kuqa foreland basin, northern flank of the Tarim basin, northwest China. International Goel. Rev.,1994, 36, 1151一1158
126.Lonergan L&Johnson C. Reconstructing orogenic exhumation histories using synorogenic detrital zirconcs and apatites: an example from the Betic Cordillera, (S. Spain). BasinResearch, 1998,10,353-364.
127.Klemme HD. Basin classification, in Geological Principals of World Oil Occurrence, Univ. of A Iberia,1974.
128.Schlunegger LW&Mater A. Sedimentary sequences, seismic facies, subsidence analysis andevolution of the Burdigalian Upper Marine Molasse Group, Central Switzerland_一AAPG Bulletin, 1997,81(7):1185-1207.
129.Dickinson W R. Plate tectonics and sedimentation [J]. Society of Ecomomic Paleontogogists and Mineralogists Special Publication, 1974b, 22:1-27
130.Dickinson. 1985.Interpretixg provenance relatiois from detrial modes of sandstones .Zaffa G G. Provenance of ArenitesDordrecht:D Reidel,MATO-ASI Series.148:333-361
131. Morton A C. Influences of provenance and diagenesis on detrtal garnet suites in the Forties Sandstone, Paleocene Centra North Sea[ J]. J .Sediment. Petrol,1987, 57: 1 027-1 032
132. Kazuo A, Asahilco T. Two-phase uplift of Higher H in a layssince 17 M a[ J]. Geology, 1992, 20: 391-394.
133. Dill H G. Can REE Patterns and U 一 Th variations be used as a tool to determ ine the origin of apatite in elastic rocks?[ J]. Sed-imentary Geology, 1994, 92(3 一 4):175-196.
134. Morton A C. Influences of provenance and diagenesis on detriatal garnet suites in the Forties Sandstone, Paleocene Central North Sea[ J]. J .Sediment. Petrol,1987, 57: 1 027-1 032
135. Morton A C, Hallsworth C R. Processes controlling the composition of heavy m ineral as semSlages in sandstones[ J]. Sedimentary Geology, 1999, 124: 3-29
136. Morton A and Hurst A. Correlation of sandstones using heavy mineral: an example from the Statfjord Formation of the Snorre Field,northern North Sea[A]. In: Dunay R E. Hailwood E A. eds. Nonbiostratigraphical Methods of Dating and Correlation[ C1. Geological Society special Publication. 1995. 89: 3-22
137. Roser B P. Korsch R J. Provenance signatures of sandstone-mudstone suites determined using discriminant function analysis of major element dataI J I . Chemical Geology. 1988. 67. 119-139
138. Emery D and Myers K. Sequence stratigraphy. Blackwell Science, 1996.
139. Shanley K W. Alluvial architecture in a sequence stratigraphic framework. Journal of Geology, 1994, 102 (2): 105-109.
140. Van Wagoner J C. Sequence stratigraphy and marine to nonmarine facies architecture of foreland basin strata, Book Cliffs, Utah, USA: Reply. AAPG Bull, 1998, 82 (8): 1607-1618.
2.曹熹,党增欣,张兴洲等. 1992. 佳木斯复合地体(M). 吉林:吉林科学技术出版社,1-15
3.Chris P, Jim M, Chris E, et al. 2001, Experimental straligraphy. GSA Today, 11(7): 4-9
4.Whittaker A, Cope L C, Cowie J W, et al. 1991, A guide to stratigraphical procedure. Journal of the geological society, London, 148:813-824
5.宋彪,李锦轶,牛宝贵,等.1997,黑龙江省东部麻山群黑云斜长片麻岩中锆石的年龄及其地质意义(J). 地球学报,18:306-312
6.黑龙江省地质矿产局,黑龙江省区域地质志(M).1993.北京:地质出版社,8-43
7.Dorsett-Bain H L, Wilde S A, Liu J L. 1996.A Pan-African granulite facies event in northeastern China:SHRIMP U-Pb zircon dating of the Mashan Group at Liu Mao, Heilongjiang Province [A].30th IGC, Abstracts 2[C], 552.
8.Simon A Wilder,吴福元, 张兴洲等.2001.中国东北麻山杂岩晚泛非期变质的锆石 SHRIMP 年龄据及全球大陆再造意义.30(1):35-50
9.Wilde SA, Zhang XZ and Wu FY. 2000.Extension of a newly identified 500Ma metamorphic rerrian in North East Chian: Further U-Pb SHRIMP dating of the Mashan Complex, Heilongjiang Province, China. Tectonophysica. 328:115-130
10.Wilde SA, Wu FY and Zhang XZ. 2000.The Mashan Complex: SHRIMP U-Pb zircon evidence for a Late Pan-African metamorphic event in NE China and its implication for global continental reconstructions. Geochimica,30:35-50
11.赵春荆,彭玉鲸、党增欣等.1996.吉黑东部构造格架及地壳演化.沈阳:辽宁大学出版社
12.赵春荆,朱群、李之彤.1997.佳木斯地块基底地质构造.中国地质.科学院沈阳地质矿产研究所集刊.(5—6):1-118
13.李锦铁,牛宝贵.宋彪,等.1999.长白山北段地壳的形成与演化.北京:地质出版社
14 . Ntatalin B A, Borukayev H B. 1991.esozoic sutures in the southern Far East of the USSR.Geotectonics, 25:64-74
15.李春昱,王荃,刘雪亚,等. 1982.亚洲大地构造图及说明书.北京:地质出版社
16.黄汲清,任纪舜,姜春发,等. 1980.中国大地构造及其演化.北京:科学出版社
17.王五力,郑少林,张立君,等. 1995.中国东北环太平洋带构造地层学.北京:地质出版社, 1-164
18.李春昱,王荃,刘雪亚,等. 1984.亚洲大地构造及其演化.中国地质科学院院报, (10):3-11
19.杨丙中,王东坡,李西建. 1989.松辽盆地东部地区逆冲推覆构造与油气勘探趋势.长春地质学院学报, 19(4):361-369
20.Ji X, Coney P J. Accreted terranes of China. In: Howell D C(ed). 1985.Tectono stratigraphic terranes of the Circum Pacific Region, Earth Science Series No.i. Houston: Circum Pacific Council for Energy and Mineral Resources, 349-361
21.Kojima S. 1989.Mesozoic terrane accretion in northeast China, Sikhote Alin and Japan regions. Paleogeog Paleoclim Paleoecol, 69:213-232
22.水谷伸治朗,邵济安,张庆龙. 1989.那丹哈达地体与东亚大陆边缘中生代构造关系.地质学报, 63(3):204-216
23.Yang Q, Mizutani S, Nagai H. 1993.Biostratigraphic correlation between the Nadanhada daterrane of N C China and the Minoterran of central Japan. The Journal of Earth Pianet Science, 40:27-43
24.邵济安,唐克东,王成源,等.那丹哈达地体的构造特征及演化.中国科学,1991,21(7):744-751
25.张庆龙,水谷伸治朗.2004.从板块构造到地体.江苏地质,28(1):1-6
26.张兴洲, Sklyarov E V. 1992.中国东北及邻区蓝片岩带的构造意义.长春地质学院地质研究所文集,北京:地震出版社
27.张梅生,彭向东,孙晓猛.1998.中国东北区古生代构造古地理格局.辽宁地质.2:91-96
28.王五力. 1992.环太平洋带中国大陆增生、构造演化和成矿作用基本特点的初步总结.中国科学院沈阳地质矿产研究所所刊,22
29.刘茂强,杨丙中,邓俊国,等. 1993.伊通-舒兰地堑地质构造特征及其演化.北京:地质出版社
30.王小凤,李中坚,陈柏林,等. 2000.郯庐断裂带.北京:地质出版社,226-237
31.万天丰.郯庐断裂带的演化和古应力场. 1995.地球科学-中国地质大学学报. 20(4):526-534
32.徐嘉伟,马国锋. 1992 郯庐断裂带研究的十年回顾.地质论评,.38(4):316-324
33.张理刚,王可法,陈振胜,等. 1993.中国东部中生代花岗岩长石铅同位素组成与铅同位素省划分.科学通报, 38(3)
34.孙革,郑少林,孙学坤等.黑龙江东部侏罗-白垩纪界限附近地层研究新进展.地层学杂志.1992,16(1):48-54
35.张世红,施央申,孙岩等. 1991.黑龙江完达山造山带及其与那丹哈达地体的关系.南京大学学报(地球科学),3:287-294
36.邵济安,唐克东,王成源. 1991.那丹哈达地体构造特征及演化.中国科学(B),7:744-751
37.邵济安,王成源,唐克东. 1992.乌苏里地区构造新探索.地质论评,38(1):34-39
38.刘海山,郝天珧. 1992.勃利盆地侏罗系、白垩系、第三系古地磁研究及其意义.见沈阳地质矿产所集刊.北京:地质出版社
39.赵海玲,邓晋福,陈发景,等. 1996.黑龙江完达山地区中侏罗世火山岩特征及其形成构造背景.地球科学,21(4):28-32
40.沙金庚,1991,对黑龙江省东部龙爪沟群和鸡西群时代的不同认识,地质学报,4:376-385
41.沙金庚,2002. 黑龙江东部早白垩世生物地层学研究的主要进展,地学前缘,9(3):95-101.
42.沙金庚,1990. 黑龙江省东部 Aucellina(双壳类)的发现. 地层学杂志,14(3):226-230.
43.沙金庚,1991. 对黑龙江东部龙爪沟群和鸡西群时代的不同认识. 地质学报,(4):376-383.
44.沙金庚,1992. 黑龙江东部的 Buchia 和 Aucellina 层. 地层学杂志,16(1):41-48.
45.沙金庚,1999. 一个值得注意的修订-评“中国黑龙江省东部早白垩世双壳类”. 古生物学报,38(3):403-406.
46.沙金庚,2002. 黑龙江东部早白垩世生物地层学研究的主要进展. 地学前缘,9(39):95-101.
47.沙金庚,蔡华伟,顾知微,等. 2000.龙爪沟群和鸡西群双壳类化石群的时代[A],第三届全国地层委员会,第三届全国地层会议论文集[G].北京:地质出版社.265-269
48.孙革,郑少林,姜剑红,等. 1999.黑龙江鸡西含煤盆地早白垩世生物地层研究新进展田.煤田地质与勘探,27(6):1-3.
49.孙 革,郑少林.2000.中国东北中生代地层划分对比之新见.地层学杂志,24(1):6—64.
50.杨建国,2000. 黑龙江东部三江盆地中侏罗世孢粉新发现. 中国含油气盆地孢粉学论文集,北京:石油工业出版社.
51.杨建国,赵传本,1998. 黑龙江省龙爪沟地区侏罗系研究新进展. 大庆石油地质与开发,17(6):16-18.
52.Kellys R A, Wang Yigang, Zheng lin. 1994.A revised Cretaceous age for ammonites,,originally indentified as Middle Jurassic,from eastern Heilongjiang, China[J],Acta Palaeontologica Sinaca,33(4):509-517
53.Futakami M, Matsukawa M,Chen Piji, et al. 1995.Barremian ammonite from the Longzhaogou Group in eastern Heilongjiang, northeast China[J],The Journal of the Geological Societh of Japan,101(1):79-85
54.Sha Jingeng, Fursich F T. 1994.Bivalve faunas of eastern Heilongjiang,northeastern China. The Late Jurrasic and Early Cretaceous bhchiid fauna(J), Beringeria, 12:3-93
55.何承全,黄冠军,1997. 黑龙江绥滨地区中侏罗世晚期绥滨组沟鞭藻类的发现. 微体古生物学报,14(1):21-40.
56.何承全,孙学坤,2000. 黑龙江省东部鸡西盆地城子河组下部早白垩世欧特里夫晚期海相沟鞭藻类. 古生物学报,39(1):46-62.
57.何承全,万传彪,杨明杰,1999. 黑龙江省东部虎林盆地欧特里夫-巴列姆期沟鞭藻类. 古生物学报,38(2):183-202.
58.何承全,祝幼华,2003. 黑龙江省东北部绥滨地区东荣组最上部的沟鞭藻组合-兼论该地区侏罗-白垩系界线. 古生物学报,42(3):328-345.
59.郑少林,梁子华.1995.城子河组的新材料及其地层意义.地层学杂志,19(1):1-19
60.郑少林 张武 朱洪森,等. 2005.关于龙爪沟群地层单位名称问题的讨论.29(1):84-91
61 . Gu Zhiwei.1998. Evolutionary trends in non-marine Cretaceous bivalves of northeast China[A].JOHNSTON P A,HAGGART J W. Bivalves:An Eon of Evotion-Paleobiological Studies Honoring Norman D.Newell[M].Calgary:University of Calgary Press, 1998.367-276
62.Gu Zhiwei, Li Zishun, Yu Xihan. 1997.Lower Cretaceous Bivalves from eastern Heilongjiang Province of China [M].Beijing;Science Press,301
63.顾知微.1995.热河动物化石群地质时代的研究[A].见:王鸿桢主编.中国地质科学发展的回顾[C]. 武汉:中国地质大学出版社,93-99
64.万传彪,闫凤兰,尹楠.1995.黑龙江集贤地区早白垩世沟鞭藻类和其他藻类[J]微体古生物学报,12(1):51-52
65.万传彪,乔秀云,杨建国,等. 2000.黑龙江省鸡西盆地早白垩世孢粉组合.见:朱宗浩等主编.中国含油气盆地孢粉论文集.北京:石油工业出版社, 83-90
66.孙学坤,何承全.1992.黑龙江绥滨地区晚侏罗世东荣组的沟鞭藻[J].古生物学报,31(2):190-205
67.尚玉珂.1997.黑龙江省鸡西城子河组被子植物化石层的孢粉研究[J].微体古生物学报14(2):162-174
68.姜宝玉,冯金宝.2001.鸡西群城子河组时代的进一步探讨地层学杂志[J].25(3):217-221
69.杨小菊.2002.黑龙江鸡西早白垩世穆棱组真蕨类植物一新种[J]古生物学报,41(2):259-265
70.杨小菊.2003.黑龙江省鸡西盆地早白垩世穆棱组植物化石新材料[J]. 古生物学报, 42(4):561-584
71.杨小菊,何承全,黎文本,等.2003.鸡西盆地早白垄世穆棱组海相沟鞭藻的发现及其古环境意义.科学通报,48(14):1553-1556
72.任凤和,杨晓平,李仰春,汪岩,周兴福.2005. 黑龙江省东部鸡西群地层时代划分及地质意义.中国地质.32(1):48-54
73.张世红,张传恒,李红生.1999. 黑龙江省东部裴德组砾石中放射虫的发现及其意义. 地层学杂志,23(3):201-205
74.潘华璋,朱祥根.2004. 黑龙江省东部早白垩世的一些海相和半咸水相腹足类. 古生物学报,43(3):338—348
75.赵传本,杨建国,李强.2000.黑龙江东部鸡西群研究新进展.见:第三届全国地层会议论文集编委会编.第三届全国地层会议论文集.北京:地质出版社.3O4—3O7.
76.于兴河等.2002.碎屑岩系储层沉积学[A].北京:石油工业出版社,125-139
77.姜宝玉.2003. 黑龙江省东部七虎林组的一些双壳类化石.动物学杂志.38(4):85-100
78. Simon R. A. Kelly,王义刚,张静.1994. 黑龙江东部龙爪沟群七虎林组菊石之修定.古生 物学报.33(4):509-518
79.金秉福,林振宏,杨群慧,等.沉积矿物学在陆缘海环境分析中的应用.海洋地质与第四纪地质,2002,22(3):113～118
80.葛瑞全.济阳凹陷新生界海绿石的存在及其地质意义.沉积学报,2004,22(2):276-280
81.任来义,林桂芳,赵志清等. 东璞凹陷早第三纪的海侵(泛)事件.2000,39(4):553-557
82.任来义,林桂芳,谈玉明等. 2002,从古生物和地球化学标志看东璞凹陷第三纪的海侵事件. 西安石油学院学报(自然科学版),17(1):20-31
83.王冠民,钟建华,姜在兴,等.2005. 从济阳坳陷沙一段古盐度的横向变化看古近纪的海侵方向.世界地质.24(3):243-247
84.刘春莲,秦红,车平,等.2005. 广东三水盆地始新统布心组生油岩元素地球化学特征及沉积环境.古地理学报.7(1):125-136
85.刘招君,董清水,王嗣敏.等.2002.陆相层序地层学导论与应用.北京:石油工业出版社
86.刘招君、郭巍、方石等.2003.松辽盆地及其临区中新生代盆山动力学.内部资料
87.林畅松,刘景彦,张英志,等.2005. 构造活动盆地的层序地层与构造地层分析—以中国中、新生代构造活动湖盆分析为例.地学前缘.12(4):365-374
88.林畅松,张燕梅,李思田,等. 2004.中国中新生代断陷盆地幕式裂陷过程的动力学响应和模拟模型.地球科学—中国地质大学学报, 29(5):583-589
89.林畅松,郑和荣,任建业,等. 2003.渤海湾盆地东营、沾化凹陷早第三纪同沉积断裂作用对沉积充填的控制.中国科学(D辑), 33(11):1025-1036
90.任凤和,杨小平,李仰春,等.2005. 黑龙江省东部鸡西群地层时代划分及地质意义.中国地质,32(1):48-54
91.赵海玲, 邓晋福, 陈发景, 胡泉, 赵世柯. 1996. 黑龙江完达山地区中侏罗世火山岩特征及其形成构造背景. 地球科学-中国地质大学学报, 21(4): 428-432
92.李思田.盆地动力学与能源资源[J].地学前缘,2000,7(3):1-9.
93.刘池洋,杨兴科.改造盆地研究和油气评价的思路[J].石油与天然气地质,2000,21(1):12-14.
94.Dickinson W R, The dynamics of sedimentary basins(M). USGD,National Academy Press,1997
95.刘池洋. 1993盆地动态演化研究的基础:原始盆地恢复—以柴达木盆地为例[A].见:赵重远,刘池洋,姚远,编.含油气盆地地质学研究进展[C].西安:西北大学出版社,.26一31
96.李思田,路风香,林畅松,等. 1997.中国东部及邻区中新生代盆地演化及地球动力学背景[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,
97.黄清华,杨建国,孔惠. 2003.东北依兰一伊通地堑方正断陷方正组的建立及其意义.地层学杂志.27(2):138-145
99.童亨茂,2002. 伊通地堑边界断裂的性质与演化. 地质力学学报.8(1):35-42
100.王建国,王林凤.2001 鸡西含煤沉积盆地早期油气勘探. 中国海上油气(地质).15(2):120-126.
101.张渝昌. 1997.中国含油气盆地原型分析,南京大学出版社(南京) .1-26
102.刘和甫,李小军,刘立群.2003.地球动力学与盆地层序及油气系统分析.现代地质.17(1):80-86
103.赵文智,靳久强,薛良清,等.2000. 中国西北地区诛罗纪原型盆地形成与演化[M],北京:地质出版社,5
104.杜旭东,漆家福,陆克政,张一伟.1999.大港探区中生代原型盆地恢复及成盆模式.应用基础与工程科学学报,7(3):230-239
105.杜旭东、漆家福、张一伟、陆克政.2000.中国东部晚侏罗—早白垩纪盆地火山岩系的确认及成盆构造背景分析.石油大学学报. 24(1):1-7
106.葛文春、林强、孙德有、吴福元、元忠宽、李文远、陈明植、尹成孝.1999.大兴安岭中生代玄武岩的地球化学特征:壳幔相互作用的证据.岩石学报.15(3):396-407
107.林强、葛文春、孙德有、吴福元、元忠宽、闵耿德、陈明植、李文远、权致纯、尹成孝.1998.中国东北地区中生代火山岩的大地构造意义.地质科学. 33(2):129-139
108.林强、葛文春等.2003.大兴安岭中生代双峰式火山岩地球化学特征.地球化学. 32(3)208-223
109.邵济安等.1999.大兴安岭中生代伸展过程中的岩浆作用.地学前缘, 6(4):399-346
110.邵济安等.2001.大兴安岭—燕山晚中生代岩浆活动与俯冲作用关系.地质学报.75(1):56-63
111.邵济安、张履桥等.2001.内蒙古喀喇沁变质核杂岩及其隆升机制探讨.岩石学报. 17(2):283-290
112.吴福元、孙德有、林强.1999.东北花岗岩成因与地壳增生.岩石学报. 15:181-191
113.张履桥、邵济安等.1998.内蒙古甘珠尔庙变质核杂岩.地质科学. 33(2):140~145
114.张晓东、余青等.2000.松辽盆地变质核杂岩和伸展断陷的构造特征及成因.地学前缘 7(4):411~419
115.Maruyama S. 1997. Pacific-type orogeny revisited: Miyashiro-type orogeny proposed. The Island Arc, 6: 91-120.
116.Maruyama S., Liou J G., Seno T., 1989. Mesozoic and Cenozoic evolution of Asia. In: Ben-Avraham, Z., ed.. The evolution of the Pacific Ocean margins. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press,75-79
117.Natalin, B. A. 1993. History and modes of Mesozoic accretion in southeastern Russia. Island Arc.2: 15～34.
118.Fukao Y, Maruyama S, Obayshi M, et al. 1994, Geologic implication of the whole mantle P-wave topography. Journal of the Geological Society of Japan, 100(1): 4～23.
119.Dickinson WR., et al. 1997.The dynamics of sedimentary basins, National Research Council. Washington, D.C
120.Ershov AV., Brunet MF, 1999. KorotaevM从Nikishin AM&Bolotov SN.and dynamics ofNorthern Caucasus molasse basin: implicationsTectonophysics. 313: 219-241.
121.Blanco ML, Maroo M, Burbank DW, Verg6s J, Roca E, Anad6n P, Pina 1. 2000,Tectonic and climaticcontrols on the development of foreland fan deltas: Montserrat and Sant Liorenc del Munt systems (middle Eocene, Ebro Basin, NE Spain). Sedimentary Geology, 138:17 39.
122.Cloke, 1. R., S. J. Moss, and J. C. Craig, 1997,The influence of basement reactivation on the extensionaland inversion history of the Kutai Basin, eastern Kalimantan: Journal of the GeologicalSociety, London, 154, 157-161
123.Estaun AP, Marron JA, Br6n D, Puchkov V. Gorozhanina Y, Baryshev V. 1997,Along-strike structuralvariations in the foreland thrust and fold belt of the southUralsTectonophysics, 276:265-280.
124.Galeazzi JS. 1998,Structural and stratigraphic evolution of the western Malvinas Basin. AAPG Bull,82(3):596 636
125.Lu H, Howell DG Jia D. Rejuvenation of the Kuqa foreland basin, northern flank of the Tarim basin, northwest China. International Goel. Rev.,1994, 36, 1151一1158
126.Lonergan L&Johnson C. Reconstructing orogenic exhumation histories using synorogenic detrital zirconcs and apatites: an example from the Betic Cordillera, (S. Spain). BasinResearch, 1998,10,353-364.
127.Klemme HD. Basin classification, in Geological Principals of World Oil Occurrence, Univ. of A Iberia,1974.
128.Schlunegger LW&Mater A. Sedimentary sequences, seismic facies, subsidence analysis andevolution of the Burdigalian Upper Marine Molasse Group, Central Switzerland_一AAPG Bulletin, 1997,81(7):1185-1207.
129.Dickinson W R. Plate tectonics and sedimentation [J]. Society of Ecomomic Paleontogogists and Mineralogists Special Publication, 1974b, 22:1-27
130.Dickinson. 1985.Interpretixg provenance relatiois from detrial modes of sandstones .Zaffa G G. Provenance of ArenitesDordrecht:D Reidel,MATO-ASI Series.148:333-361
131. Morton A C. Influences of provenance and diagenesis on detrtal garnet suites in the Forties Sandstone, Paleocene Centra North Sea[ J]. J .Sediment. Petrol,1987, 57: 1 027-1 032
132. Kazuo A, Asahilco T. Two-phase uplift of Higher H in a layssince 17 M a[ J]. Geology, 1992, 20: 391-394.
133. Dill H G. Can REE Patterns and U 一 Th variations be used as a tool to determ ine the origin of apatite in elastic rocks?[ J]. Sed-imentary Geology, 1994, 92(3 一 4):175-196.
134. Morton A C. Influences of provenance and diagenesis on detriatal garnet suites in the Forties Sandstone, Paleocene Central North Sea[ J]. J .Sediment. Petrol,1987, 57: 1 027-1 032
135. Morton A C, Hallsworth C R. Processes controlling the composition of heavy m ineral as semSlages in sandstones[ J]. Sedimentary Geology, 1999, 124: 3-29
136. Morton A and Hurst A. Correlation of sandstones using heavy mineral: an example from the Statfjord Formation of the Snorre Field,northern North Sea[A]. In: Dunay R E. Hailwood E A. eds. Nonbiostratigraphical Methods of Dating and Correlation[ C1. Geological Society special Publication. 1995. 89: 3-22
137. Roser B P. Korsch R J. Provenance signatures of sandstone-mudstone suites determined using discriminant function analysis of major element dataI J I . Chemical Geology. 1988. 67. 119-139
138. Emery D and Myers K. Sequence stratigraphy. Blackwell Science, 1996.
139. Shanley K W. Alluvial architecture in a sequence stratigraphic framework. Journal of Geology, 1994, 102 (2): 105-109.
140. Van Wagoner J C. Sequence stratigraphy and marine to nonmarine facies architecture of foreland basin strata, Book Cliffs, Utah, USA: Reply. AAPG Bull, 1998, 82 (8): 1607-1618.