环境意识核心结构的理论探索
|
摘要
环境意识核心结构是研究环境意识最重要的切入点,因此探索环境意识的核心结构对于系统把握环境意识以及促进环境保护方面将发挥重大的作用。目前学界对于环境意识这个理论体系并没有规划出其明确的结构;而对于环境意识核心结构的各部分理论有分别论述,但缺乏系统地归纳和组织。
本文从实事求是的原则出发,在了解了众多的环境意识分支理论后,为努力构建系统的环境意识而做引路人,因此想在前辈学者的理论研究成果基础上进行概括分类,建立环境意识的主干体系——环境意识核心结构。本文将主要从环境意识核心结构的含义、结构划分、结构中各部分的相互关系,如何构建科学的环境核心结构,环境意识核心结构的理论探索有何作用,这几个部分着手来阐述关于环境意识核心结构的理论探索过程。
通过有关环境意识的学术理论争鸣来探索环境意识的核心结构,这是人类社会发展越来越重视环境保护的结果,也是理清人与自然的关系树立科学的环境意识必须的。把握住了环境意识的核心结构就能提纲挈领地深入环境意识,为社会发展建立良好的思想体系保障。
The environmental awareness and environmental awareness among the core structure of the most important starting point, therefore explore environmental awareness grasp the core structure of the system of environmental awareness and promoting environmental protection will play a significant role. For the current academic environmental awareness of this theory did not planning system and its clear structure and the core structure for the environmental awareness of the theoretical expositions there is a difference, but its lack of organization and into the system.
In this paper, proceeding from the principle of seeking truth from facts, in the many branches of theoretical awareness of the environment, and to strive to build a system of environmental awareness and guides do, to senior academics in the results of theoretical studies conducted on the basis of general classification, the backbone of the establishment of environmental awareness system - Environmental awareness of the core structure. This paper will focus on environmental awareness of the meaning of the core structure, composition, the structure of the relationship between the various parts, how to construct the core structure of the environmental science, environmental awareness of the core structure of theoretical exploration of the role will be, to proceed on several parts of environmental awareness of the core structure of the process.
Environmental awareness through the academic theory to explore the contention of environmental awareness in the core structure, which is the development of human society has attached increasing importance to environmental protection, and also sort out the relationship between man and nature foster a scientific awareness of the environment necessary. Adhere to the environmental awareness of the core structure will be able to outline in-depth awareness of the environment for social development, protection of a good ideology.
本文从实事求是的原则出发,在了解了众多的环境意识分支理论后,为努力构建系统的环境意识而做引路人,因此想在前辈学者的理论研究成果基础上进行概括分类,建立环境意识的主干体系——环境意识核心结构。本文将主要从环境意识核心结构的含义、结构划分、结构中各部分的相互关系,如何构建科学的环境核心结构,环境意识核心结构的理论探索有何作用,这几个部分着手来阐述关于环境意识核心结构的理论探索过程。
通过有关环境意识的学术理论争鸣来探索环境意识的核心结构,这是人类社会发展越来越重视环境保护的结果,也是理清人与自然的关系树立科学的环境意识必须的。把握住了环境意识的核心结构就能提纲挈领地深入环境意识,为社会发展建立良好的思想体系保障。
The environmental awareness and environmental awareness among the core structure of the most important starting point, therefore explore environmental awareness grasp the core structure of the system of environmental awareness and promoting environmental protection will play a significant role. For the current academic environmental awareness of this theory did not planning system and its clear structure and the core structure for the environmental awareness of the theoretical expositions there is a difference, but its lack of organization and into the system.
In this paper, proceeding from the principle of seeking truth from facts, in the many branches of theoretical awareness of the environment, and to strive to build a system of environmental awareness and guides do, to senior academics in the results of theoretical studies conducted on the basis of general classification, the backbone of the establishment of environmental awareness system - Environmental awareness of the core structure. This paper will focus on environmental awareness of the meaning of the core structure, composition, the structure of the relationship between the various parts, how to construct the core structure of the environmental science, environmental awareness of the core structure of theoretical exploration of the role will be, to proceed on several parts of environmental awareness of the core structure of the process.
Environmental awareness through the academic theory to explore the contention of environmental awareness in the core structure, which is the development of human society has attached increasing importance to environmental protection, and also sort out the relationship between man and nature foster a scientific awareness of the environment necessary. Adhere to the environmental awareness of the core structure will be able to outline in-depth awareness of the environment for social development, protection of a good ideology.
引文
[1] 彼得.辛格.实践伦理学[M].北京:东方出版社, 2005:12-14.
[2] 比.马林诺斯基.科学的文化理论[M].北京:中央民族大学出版社,1999:45-47.
[3] 陈昌曙.哲学视野中的可持续发展[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2000:97-101.
[4] 恩格斯.自然辩证法[M].北京:商务出版社,1982:22-30.
[5] 范跃进.生态文化研究[M].北京:文化艺术出版社,2004:30.
[6] 黄楠森.西方哲学家论人在宇宙中的地位[J].中共中央党校学报,2000,(4):2-5.
[7] 何庆芳.新经济时代与人文精神[J].光明日报,2001,(5):01-04.
[8] 侯文蕙.征服的挽歌[M].北京:东方出版社,1995:70-71.
[9] 利奥波德.沙乡的沉思[M].北京:经济科学出版社,1992:21-25.
[10]黎德化.文化冲突与社会矛盾[M].北京:北京出版社,2006:87-89.
[11]黎德化,刘霞.论生态环境的社会控制[J],北京林业大学学报(社会科学版),2004,(6):16-19.
[12]李德顺.从“人类中心”到“环境价值”——兼谈一种价值思维的角度和方法[J].哲学研究,1998,(2):6.
[13]李贵仓.科技伦理问题产生的利益根源[J].河南大学学报(社会科学版),2003,(6):12-14.
[14]李艳芳.讼公众参与环境影响评价中的信息公开制度[J].江海学刊,2004,(1):11-12.
[15]刘福森,曲红梅.“环境哲学”的五个问题[J].自然辩证法研究,2003,(11):4-6.
[16]刘湘溶.生态伦理学[M].长沙:湖南师范大学出版社,1992:25-29.
[17]卢风.论人类中心主义与非人类中心主义争论的实质[J].清华哲学年鉴,2000,(1):34-36.
[18]默迪.价值走向原野[J].哈尔滨师专学报,1996,(11):4-5.
[19]裴广川.环境伦理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社.2002:22-30.
[20]潘玉君,王丽华.走进人类中心主义[J].自然辩证法研究,1996,(4):55-59.
[21]任暟.“人类中心主义”辩证[J].哲学动态,2001,(1):30-33.
[22]特.雷根.关于动物权利的激进的平等主义观点[J].哲学译丛,1999,(4):23-31.
[23]陶宏义.人类中心主义是一个历史范畴[J].湖北师范学院学报,1999,(1):59-61.
[24]陶至元.环境伦理学的探讨[J].北京:高等教育出版社.1998:11-12.
[25]苏珊.朗格.情感与形式[J].北京:中国社会科学出版社.1980:5-8.
[26]王建明.“人类中心主义”之我见[J].哲学动态,1995,(1):74-79.
[27]解保军.马克思自然观的生态哲学意蕴[M].哈尔滨:黑龙江人民出版社,2002:27-29.
[28]徐篙龄.环境伦理学进展:评论与阐释[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,1999:21-25.
[29]肖中舟.“人类中心主义”辨义[J].人文杂志,1997,(3):19-23.
[30]詹献斌.对环境伦理学的反思[J].北京大学学报,1997,(6):24-29.
[31]岩佐茂.环境的思想[M].北京:中央编译出版社,1997:91-92.
[32]杨通进.大地伦理学及其哲学基础[J].玉溪师范学院学报,2003,(3):26-30.
[33]杨贤志.环境管理学[M].北京:科技图书股份有限公司,1983:25-40.
[34]杨志文.论价值的自然基础[J].自然辩证法通讯,2001,(4):36-42.
[35]余谋昌.生态哲学[M].西安:陕西人民教育出版社,2000:17-20.
[36]余谋昌.走出人类中心主义[J].自然辩证法研究,1994,(7):8-14.
[37]章建刚.“内在价值”的含义与环境伦理学[J].思想战线,2000,(5):3-4.
[38]Arne Naess, “The Third World, Wilderness, and Deep Ecology”George Sessions [J]. Deep Ecology For The 21st Century,1995,20(11):397-407.
[39]ArnoldBerleant.LivingintheLandscape—TowardanAesteticsofEnvironmen[J]t.Lawrence:Vnive-rsity Press of Kansas,1997:2-5.
[40]Bernard E. Rollin. Environmental Ethics and International Justice, in James P. Sterba,[J]. Earth Ethics. Prentice-Hall, 1995,11(2):114-128.
[41]Calill.IS The Human Development In Eastern Economic Jourranl[J].Winter.2005:10-12.
[42]Devall.B, Sessions.G.Deep Ecology:Living as if Nature Mattered[J],Salt Lake City,1985:20-25.
[43]Garrett Hardin, lifeboat ethics, in G. Lucas & T. Ogletree ed. Lifeboat Ethics: The Moral Dilemmas of world Hunger[J].Harper and Row, 1976, 2(5):134.
[44]H.Rolston.EnvironmentalEthics:Duties to and Values in Natural World[J].Philadelphia, 1998:5-9.
[45]Holmes Rolston. Environmental Protection and an Equitable International Order: Ethics after the Earth Summit [J].Business Ethics Quarterly,1995,12(4):11-13.
[46]Ramachandra Guha.A Third World Critique.in Donald VanDeVeer & Christine Pierce [A]. Environmental Ethics and Policy Book, 1994:548-556.
[47]Philadelphia. Environmental Ethics[M].Rolston,1988:52-58.
[2] 比.马林诺斯基.科学的文化理论[M].北京:中央民族大学出版社,1999:45-47.
[3] 陈昌曙.哲学视野中的可持续发展[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2000:97-101.
[4] 恩格斯.自然辩证法[M].北京:商务出版社,1982:22-30.
[5] 范跃进.生态文化研究[M].北京:文化艺术出版社,2004:30.
[6] 黄楠森.西方哲学家论人在宇宙中的地位[J].中共中央党校学报,2000,(4):2-5.
[7] 何庆芳.新经济时代与人文精神[J].光明日报,2001,(5):01-04.
[8] 侯文蕙.征服的挽歌[M].北京:东方出版社,1995:70-71.
[9] 利奥波德.沙乡的沉思[M].北京:经济科学出版社,1992:21-25.
[10]黎德化.文化冲突与社会矛盾[M].北京:北京出版社,2006:87-89.
[11]黎德化,刘霞.论生态环境的社会控制[J],北京林业大学学报(社会科学版),2004,(6):16-19.
[12]李德顺.从“人类中心”到“环境价值”——兼谈一种价值思维的角度和方法[J].哲学研究,1998,(2):6.
[13]李贵仓.科技伦理问题产生的利益根源[J].河南大学学报(社会科学版),2003,(6):12-14.
[14]李艳芳.讼公众参与环境影响评价中的信息公开制度[J].江海学刊,2004,(1):11-12.
[15]刘福森,曲红梅.“环境哲学”的五个问题[J].自然辩证法研究,2003,(11):4-6.
[16]刘湘溶.生态伦理学[M].长沙:湖南师范大学出版社,1992:25-29.
[17]卢风.论人类中心主义与非人类中心主义争论的实质[J].清华哲学年鉴,2000,(1):34-36.
[18]默迪.价值走向原野[J].哈尔滨师专学报,1996,(11):4-5.
[19]裴广川.环境伦理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社.2002:22-30.
[20]潘玉君,王丽华.走进人类中心主义[J].自然辩证法研究,1996,(4):55-59.
[21]任暟.“人类中心主义”辩证[J].哲学动态,2001,(1):30-33.
[22]特.雷根.关于动物权利的激进的平等主义观点[J].哲学译丛,1999,(4):23-31.
[23]陶宏义.人类中心主义是一个历史范畴[J].湖北师范学院学报,1999,(1):59-61.
[24]陶至元.环境伦理学的探讨[J].北京:高等教育出版社.1998:11-12.
[25]苏珊.朗格.情感与形式[J].北京:中国社会科学出版社.1980:5-8.
[26]王建明.“人类中心主义”之我见[J].哲学动态,1995,(1):74-79.
[27]解保军.马克思自然观的生态哲学意蕴[M].哈尔滨:黑龙江人民出版社,2002:27-29.
[28]徐篙龄.环境伦理学进展:评论与阐释[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,1999:21-25.
[29]肖中舟.“人类中心主义”辨义[J].人文杂志,1997,(3):19-23.
[30]詹献斌.对环境伦理学的反思[J].北京大学学报,1997,(6):24-29.
[31]岩佐茂.环境的思想[M].北京:中央编译出版社,1997:91-92.
[32]杨通进.大地伦理学及其哲学基础[J].玉溪师范学院学报,2003,(3):26-30.
[33]杨贤志.环境管理学[M].北京:科技图书股份有限公司,1983:25-40.
[34]杨志文.论价值的自然基础[J].自然辩证法通讯,2001,(4):36-42.
[35]余谋昌.生态哲学[M].西安:陕西人民教育出版社,2000:17-20.
[36]余谋昌.走出人类中心主义[J].自然辩证法研究,1994,(7):8-14.
[37]章建刚.“内在价值”的含义与环境伦理学[J].思想战线,2000,(5):3-4.
[38]Arne Naess, “The Third World, Wilderness, and Deep Ecology”George Sessions [J]. Deep Ecology For The 21st Century,1995,20(11):397-407.
[39]ArnoldBerleant.LivingintheLandscape—TowardanAesteticsofEnvironmen[J]t.Lawrence:Vnive-rsity Press of Kansas,1997:2-5.
[40]Bernard E. Rollin. Environmental Ethics and International Justice, in James P. Sterba,[J]. Earth Ethics. Prentice-Hall, 1995,11(2):114-128.
[41]Calill.IS The Human Development In Eastern Economic Jourranl[J].Winter.2005:10-12.
[42]Devall.B, Sessions.G.Deep Ecology:Living as if Nature Mattered[J],Salt Lake City,1985:20-25.
[43]Garrett Hardin, lifeboat ethics, in G. Lucas & T. Ogletree ed. Lifeboat Ethics: The Moral Dilemmas of world Hunger[J].Harper and Row, 1976, 2(5):134.
[44]H.Rolston.EnvironmentalEthics:Duties to and Values in Natural World[J].Philadelphia, 1998:5-9.
[45]Holmes Rolston. Environmental Protection and an Equitable International Order: Ethics after the Earth Summit [J].Business Ethics Quarterly,1995,12(4):11-13.
[46]Ramachandra Guha.A Third World Critique.in Donald VanDeVeer & Christine Pierce [A]. Environmental Ethics and Policy Book, 1994:548-556.
[47]Philadelphia. Environmental Ethics[M].Rolston,1988:52-58.