三峡水库蓄水后长江中游航道整治参数确定方法研究
|
摘要
长江是我国第一大河,贯通东、中、西部的水路交通运输大通道,通航里程与水运量分别占全国内河的53%和80%。长江中游起于宜昌,至于鄱阳湖湖口,长900km,水运条件十分优越,是连接我国东、中、西部地区的重要纽带,是实施西部大开发战略的重要依托,也是长江沿江经济持续、快速发展的重要支撑。保持长江航道畅通和安全直接关系到东西部物质交流和经济交往,对于我国经济、社会发展具有非常重要的促进作用。然而,长江中游浅滩众多,尚未经过大规模系统整治,通航能力差,成为严重制约长江干线航道畅通的“瓶颈”,必须对其开展系统治理。
要对长江中游主航道进行经济合理的整治开发,必须以确定合理的设计最低通航水位和航道整治参数为保证。设计水位、航道整治参数与河道变形、枯水流量等因素紧密相关,设计水位设定的高低涉及到船型、船舶航运效益、航道建设和维护投入等问题,航道整治参数的确定涉及到工程成本、效果等问题。
2003年以来,随着三峡水库的蓄水运用,长江中游水沙过程受到人为调节,流量调平,清水下泄,河床发生剧烈冲刷,由此引起同流量下枯水位变化以及滩槽格局的改变,设计水位及航道整治参数难以确定,严重影响到长江中游诸多浅滩治理工程的顺利开展,开展三峡水库蓄水后长江中游航道整治参数确定方法的研究是十分必要和紧迫的。
本文在系统总结三峡水库蓄水对水沙过程及浅滩河段演变影响的基础上,揭示了决定航道整治参数的影响因素的变化趋势,提出了水库水沙过程调节、河床冲刷双重作用下设计水位的推求方法；考虑枢纽下游河段非恒定输沙、河床单向下切两个主要特点,推导得出了航道整治线宽度计算公式,并对式中系数和指数的拟定进行了分析和讨论；结合长江中游的浅滩特点,得出适用于长江中游的航道整治线宽度计算公式,并提出整治断面的概念；分别将改进后的航道整治参数确定方法应用于三峡水库下游具体河段,首次对就沙量减少、退水加快等情况下整治参数的应用效果及适应性开展了深入分析,为长江中游航道整治参数选取提供了依据。
全文主要讨论了以下几个方面的问题：
(1)三峡水库蓄水对浅滩河段演变的影响。通过分析三峡水库蓄水后流量、含沙量的变化,揭示了三峡水库蓄水后10月份退水加快,含沙量锐减的特点,同时坝下游河床受到长距离、长时期的冲刷,引起枯水水位下降,冲积河床上航道水深有所提高,抗冲性强的河段可能出现坡陡流急问题,沙质河床洲滩萎缩河宽增大,主流摆动频繁等问题。
(2)设计水位确定方法。首先对蓄水前的设计水位确定方法进行总结,提出蓄水后整治流量与同流量下水位均变化情况下的计算方法。针对蓄水后年内出库流量过程被调节、坝下游河床持续冲刷等特点,采用由设计流量推求设计水位的方法确定三峡水库蓄水后15年内的中游各站设计水位,通过对不同方法确定的设计水位进行比较,确定各水文站具体的设计水位取值。最后,在受电站日调节影响明显的近坝段,考虑日调节非恒定流对设计水位的影响,给出了设计水位的修正值。
(3)整治线宽度确定问题。系统总结长江中游整治参数的确定方法,并提出优化思路,确定了整治水位的确定方法,此外提出的综合整治线型与整治断面进行航道整治,是按三维条件对河道进行调整和控制,可以综合的考虑洪、枯、中、枯水河道条件的协调,其内容较全面,可以确保河势稳定,体现了对浅滩河道进行全面治理的理念,并开展实体实验研究,对公式的适用性进行了验证。
(4)整治参数确定方法应用问题。将改进后的航道整治参数确定方法应用于三峡水库下游明显冲刷段(藕池口水道)和弱冲刷段(牯牛沙水道),就沙量减少、退水加快等情况下整治参数的应用效果及适应性开展了深入分析,证明本文所提航道整治参数确定方法对三峡水库蓄水后的长江中下游浅滩河道具有较好的适用性。
The Yangtze River is the longest river in our country, which is the significant channel through east to west, Navigable mileage is accounted for53%while the water volume is accounted for80%. The middle reaches of the Yangtze River is900km from Yichang to Poyang Lake, Hukou, the water transport condition is extremely advantageous, it is an important link making the East, middle, West of China together, it is the bases of the western development, it is also the important support for the sustainable, rapid development of economic. Keeping Yangtze waterway unimpeded and safe will increase the material exchange and economic exchanges between the East and West, which is benefit for the social and economic development of our country. However, the middle reaches of the Yangtze River have many shoal patch, this problem has not been solved, it is becoming the "bottleneck" for transportation on the yangze river, so we must take action to deal with it.
Before manage the Yangtze River comprehensive, we should determine the navigable water level and regulation parameters, Channel regulation parameters. Design water level, waterway regulation parameters are closely related to many factors such as the channel distortion, low water flow. The designing water level impacts the shipping benefits and the cost of Channel construction and Channel maintenance. The determination of waterway regulation parameters influence the engineering cost and effect.
Since2003, because of the three gorges reservoir's impoundment, the water and sediment process in the middle reaches of the Yangze river is determined by artificial regulating, Flow's leveling, clean water's washing, riverbed's changing. so the low water level and beach trough structure changed, then designing water level and the waterway regulation parameters are difficult to determine, which impedes the implementation of the project in the middle reaches in Yangze river. Above, the study of how to determine the waterway regulation parameter in the middle reaches of Yangze river is necessary.
This article explains the trends of the rectification parameters in yangze river through considering the changing of water and sediment process and the changing of the terrain by under Three Gorges reservoir. Then find the way to determine the designing water level under the Reservoir regulation and riverbed sedimentation condition. The downstream of the hydro-junction has two characteristics:unsteady sediment transport and unidirectional cutting bed. We has reduced the formulary of calculating the width of channel regulation line, and analysed the parameters in this formulary. To find out the formulary of calculating the width of channel regulation line in middle reach of yangze river, we have made the formulary combined with the feature of middle reach of yangze and put forward the concept of remediation cross-section, using the proved parameter in the downstream of three gorges reservoir. Provides the basis for determining the remediation parameters in the middle reach of yangze by considering the reduction of sand and the acceleration of withdrawal water.
This passage focuses on the following aspects:
(1) The differences of the river evolution under the three gorges reservoir operating. Because of the three gorges reservoir, the recession of water is expediting and the sands become less on October. The bed below is washing out for long distance and for long time. So low water level is drawdown, channel depth becomes deeper. The strong impact of the river may appears the steep slope and flow anxious problems, the dandy river's width becomes wider. All above will make the mainstream awe.
(2) Method for determining the designing water level. On the basis of summing the method for determining the design water level before impoundment, put forward a better method after impoundment:deducing design water level by the design flow. So we can determine the midstream hydrological station designing water level for15years after the Three Gorges reservoir completion. Determine the designing water level of the hydrological station comparing the different designing water level by different methods. At last, the Power stations also affect water levels, so make same amending is necessary.
(3) The determining of regulation line width. We have summarized the method of determining the regulation parameters. And put forwards some optimization ideas, determined the method for the regulation water level, put forward the idea of combining regulation line and rectification section in the Channel regulation. All above is according to the three-dimensional condition to adjust and control the river. We can consider the influence of the flood and the dry water which is overall for a river's development. To make the river steady and governance the river comprehensive, studies on physical experiment and verify the formula will make it more reasonable.
(4) The usage of method for determining regulation parameters. We can put this improved method in the significant erosion period (Lotus pond channel) and Weak erosion period (Guniu Sha channel) on the downstream of The Three Gorges reservoir. Then discuss how adaptable the regulation parameters it is when facing the lesser sand and the accelerated water Withdrawal. To prove the new method for determining regulation parameters mentioned above is better after running Three Gorges Reservoir.
要对长江中游主航道进行经济合理的整治开发,必须以确定合理的设计最低通航水位和航道整治参数为保证。设计水位、航道整治参数与河道变形、枯水流量等因素紧密相关,设计水位设定的高低涉及到船型、船舶航运效益、航道建设和维护投入等问题,航道整治参数的确定涉及到工程成本、效果等问题。
2003年以来,随着三峡水库的蓄水运用,长江中游水沙过程受到人为调节,流量调平,清水下泄,河床发生剧烈冲刷,由此引起同流量下枯水位变化以及滩槽格局的改变,设计水位及航道整治参数难以确定,严重影响到长江中游诸多浅滩治理工程的顺利开展,开展三峡水库蓄水后长江中游航道整治参数确定方法的研究是十分必要和紧迫的。
本文在系统总结三峡水库蓄水对水沙过程及浅滩河段演变影响的基础上,揭示了决定航道整治参数的影响因素的变化趋势,提出了水库水沙过程调节、河床冲刷双重作用下设计水位的推求方法；考虑枢纽下游河段非恒定输沙、河床单向下切两个主要特点,推导得出了航道整治线宽度计算公式,并对式中系数和指数的拟定进行了分析和讨论；结合长江中游的浅滩特点,得出适用于长江中游的航道整治线宽度计算公式,并提出整治断面的概念；分别将改进后的航道整治参数确定方法应用于三峡水库下游具体河段,首次对就沙量减少、退水加快等情况下整治参数的应用效果及适应性开展了深入分析,为长江中游航道整治参数选取提供了依据。
全文主要讨论了以下几个方面的问题：
(1)三峡水库蓄水对浅滩河段演变的影响。通过分析三峡水库蓄水后流量、含沙量的变化,揭示了三峡水库蓄水后10月份退水加快,含沙量锐减的特点,同时坝下游河床受到长距离、长时期的冲刷,引起枯水水位下降,冲积河床上航道水深有所提高,抗冲性强的河段可能出现坡陡流急问题,沙质河床洲滩萎缩河宽增大,主流摆动频繁等问题。
(2)设计水位确定方法。首先对蓄水前的设计水位确定方法进行总结,提出蓄水后整治流量与同流量下水位均变化情况下的计算方法。针对蓄水后年内出库流量过程被调节、坝下游河床持续冲刷等特点,采用由设计流量推求设计水位的方法确定三峡水库蓄水后15年内的中游各站设计水位,通过对不同方法确定的设计水位进行比较,确定各水文站具体的设计水位取值。最后,在受电站日调节影响明显的近坝段,考虑日调节非恒定流对设计水位的影响,给出了设计水位的修正值。
(3)整治线宽度确定问题。系统总结长江中游整治参数的确定方法,并提出优化思路,确定了整治水位的确定方法,此外提出的综合整治线型与整治断面进行航道整治,是按三维条件对河道进行调整和控制,可以综合的考虑洪、枯、中、枯水河道条件的协调,其内容较全面,可以确保河势稳定,体现了对浅滩河道进行全面治理的理念,并开展实体实验研究,对公式的适用性进行了验证。
(4)整治参数确定方法应用问题。将改进后的航道整治参数确定方法应用于三峡水库下游明显冲刷段(藕池口水道)和弱冲刷段(牯牛沙水道),就沙量减少、退水加快等情况下整治参数的应用效果及适应性开展了深入分析,证明本文所提航道整治参数确定方法对三峡水库蓄水后的长江中下游浅滩河道具有较好的适用性。
The Yangtze River is the longest river in our country, which is the significant channel through east to west, Navigable mileage is accounted for53%while the water volume is accounted for80%. The middle reaches of the Yangtze River is900km from Yichang to Poyang Lake, Hukou, the water transport condition is extremely advantageous, it is an important link making the East, middle, West of China together, it is the bases of the western development, it is also the important support for the sustainable, rapid development of economic. Keeping Yangtze waterway unimpeded and safe will increase the material exchange and economic exchanges between the East and West, which is benefit for the social and economic development of our country. However, the middle reaches of the Yangtze River have many shoal patch, this problem has not been solved, it is becoming the "bottleneck" for transportation on the yangze river, so we must take action to deal with it.
Before manage the Yangtze River comprehensive, we should determine the navigable water level and regulation parameters, Channel regulation parameters. Design water level, waterway regulation parameters are closely related to many factors such as the channel distortion, low water flow. The designing water level impacts the shipping benefits and the cost of Channel construction and Channel maintenance. The determination of waterway regulation parameters influence the engineering cost and effect.
Since2003, because of the three gorges reservoir's impoundment, the water and sediment process in the middle reaches of the Yangze river is determined by artificial regulating, Flow's leveling, clean water's washing, riverbed's changing. so the low water level and beach trough structure changed, then designing water level and the waterway regulation parameters are difficult to determine, which impedes the implementation of the project in the middle reaches in Yangze river. Above, the study of how to determine the waterway regulation parameter in the middle reaches of Yangze river is necessary.
This article explains the trends of the rectification parameters in yangze river through considering the changing of water and sediment process and the changing of the terrain by under Three Gorges reservoir. Then find the way to determine the designing water level under the Reservoir regulation and riverbed sedimentation condition. The downstream of the hydro-junction has two characteristics:unsteady sediment transport and unidirectional cutting bed. We has reduced the formulary of calculating the width of channel regulation line, and analysed the parameters in this formulary. To find out the formulary of calculating the width of channel regulation line in middle reach of yangze river, we have made the formulary combined with the feature of middle reach of yangze and put forward the concept of remediation cross-section, using the proved parameter in the downstream of three gorges reservoir. Provides the basis for determining the remediation parameters in the middle reach of yangze by considering the reduction of sand and the acceleration of withdrawal water.
This passage focuses on the following aspects:
(1) The differences of the river evolution under the three gorges reservoir operating. Because of the three gorges reservoir, the recession of water is expediting and the sands become less on October. The bed below is washing out for long distance and for long time. So low water level is drawdown, channel depth becomes deeper. The strong impact of the river may appears the steep slope and flow anxious problems, the dandy river's width becomes wider. All above will make the mainstream awe.
(2) Method for determining the designing water level. On the basis of summing the method for determining the design water level before impoundment, put forward a better method after impoundment:deducing design water level by the design flow. So we can determine the midstream hydrological station designing water level for15years after the Three Gorges reservoir completion. Determine the designing water level of the hydrological station comparing the different designing water level by different methods. At last, the Power stations also affect water levels, so make same amending is necessary.
(3) The determining of regulation line width. We have summarized the method of determining the regulation parameters. And put forwards some optimization ideas, determined the method for the regulation water level, put forward the idea of combining regulation line and rectification section in the Channel regulation. All above is according to the three-dimensional condition to adjust and control the river. We can consider the influence of the flood and the dry water which is overall for a river's development. To make the river steady and governance the river comprehensive, studies on physical experiment and verify the formula will make it more reasonable.
(4) The usage of method for determining regulation parameters. We can put this improved method in the significant erosion period (Lotus pond channel) and Weak erosion period (Guniu Sha channel) on the downstream of The Three Gorges reservoir. Then discuss how adaptable the regulation parameters it is when facing the lesser sand and the accelerated water Withdrawal. To prove the new method for determining regulation parameters mentioned above is better after running Three Gorges Reservoir.
引文
[1]潘庆桑,胡向阳.长江中下游分汊河段的整治.长江科学院院报.2005年6月：13-16.
[2]陆永军,刘建民.长江中游典型浅滩演变与整治研究,中国工程科学.2002(7)：40-45.
[3]师哲,等.葛洲坝枢纽下游河段河床演变分析.长江科学院院报.第17卷第1期2000.2：13-16.
[4]黄召彪.长江下游张家洲南港航道整治工程方案研究.水运工程.2002年3月：39-45.
[5]赵志舟,周华君,等.长江陆溪口水道航道整治方案研究.重庆建筑大学学报.2003年2月：49-53.
[6]姜加虎,黄群.三峡工程对其下游长江水位影响研究.水利学报.1997(8)：39-43.
[7]韩其为,何明民.三峡水库修建后下游长江冲刷及其对防洪的影响.水力发电学报.1995(3)：34-46.
[8]孙尔雨,舒茂修.三峡电站调峰期间下游河道通航条件研究.武汉水利电力大学(宜昌)学报1997：12.57-61.
[9]陆永军,刘建民.芦家河浅滩整治措施(现状)二维动床数学模型研究.长江三峡工程泥沙和航运问题研究成果汇编.交通部三峡办公室,1997.
[10]长江三峡工程航道泥沙原形观测2012年度分析报告.长江航道规划设计研究院,2013
[11]长江科学院.三峡水库枢纽下游河床冲刷对防洪航运影响研究.长江三峡工程泥沙与航运关键技
[12]韩其为.何明宪.从裁弯后荆江断面形态调整看三峡水库修建后横断面变化.三峡水利枢纽工程应用基础研究(第二卷).地质出版社.1997.
[13]梅森.三峡库区及长江干线船舶经济航行优化研究[D].大连海事大学,2009.
[14]付中敏,郑惊涛.弯曲分汉河段江心洲稳定性试验研究[J].水运工程,2010,(12)：109-114.
[15]王宝儒.汉江(襄樊至汉口)航道整治工程回顾.水运工程,1998(7)：27-30
[16]董松年.汉江丹江口水库坝下河床演变及其对航道的影响,见：汉江航道整治与泥沙问题研究论文.
[17]李万松.水库调流下游河段航道整治适用设计方法.交通科技.总第183期2000年第6期：29-32.
[18]刘建民.冲积性河流浅滩整治水位与整治线宽度确定.水道港口.2005年6月：83-86.
[19]张幸农,孙波.冲积河流航道整治线宽度研究评述.
[20]程昌华,等.航道工程学.北京人民交通出版社.2001.
[21]平原航道整治.北京：人民交通出版社.1977.
[22]Garde, R. J., and Ranga Raju, K. G. Mechanics of Sediment Transportation and Alluvial Stream Problems. New York, NY:Halsted Press, Second Edition,1985.618
[23]Lane E W. A study of the shape of channels formed by natural streams flowing in erodible material. MR D sediment series. No 9, U S Army Engineer Division, Missouri, Corps Engineers, Omaha, Nebraska,1957.
[24]Leopold L B, Wolman M G. River channel patterns:braided, meandering and straight. U S Geol Surv Prof Pap 282-B,1957.
[25]尤联元,金德生.水库下游再造床过程的若干问题,地理研究.1990(4)：38-48.
[26]龚国元.不同自然条件下水库下游的河床演变,地理科学.1984(2)：15-124.
[27]Garde, R. J., and Ranga Raju, K. G. Mechanics of Sediment Transportation and Alluvial Stream Problems. New York, NY:Halsted Press, Second Edition,1985.618
[28]Leopold L B, Wolman M G. River channel patterns:braided, meandering and straight. U S Geol Surv Prof Pap 282-B,1957.
[29]Kondolf, GM., Swanson, ML. Channel adjustments to reservoir construction and gravel extraction along Stony Creek, California, Environmental Geology. vol.21, no.4, pp.256-269,1993.
[30]Nicola Surian, Massimo Rinaldi. Morphological response to river engineering and management in alluvial channels in Italy, Geomorphology 50(2003):307-326.
[31]张敏,李勇.冲积性河流横断面形态调整研究方法及应用分析[J].水利与建筑工程学报,2006,4(2)：11-15.
[32]许炯心.汉江丹江口水库下游河床调整过程中的复杂响应,科学通报.1989(6)：450-452.
[33]蒋忠绥.湘江下游浅滩航道的整治.泥沙研究.1982(3)：13-23.
[34]洪毅.松花江白玉通浅滩航道整治工程措施探讨.水运工程.2000.2：30-33.
[35]陆永军,刘建民.长江中游典型浅滩演变与整治研究,中国工程科学.2002(7)：40-45.
[36]程昌华.河床形态与浅滩演变重庆交通学院学报1994,13(3)：66-74.
[37]胡旭跃.浅滩航道整治的几个基本问题.长沙交通学院学报,1994.10(4)：70-76.
[38]陆永军,刘建民.荆江重点浅滩整治的二维动床数学模型研究,泥沙研究.1998,(1)：37-51.
[39]Crowder D. W., Diplas. P. Using two-dimensional hydrodynamic models at scales of ecological importance. Journal of Hydrology,2000,230:172-191.
[40]Richards, K. S.,1985. Equilibrium. In:Goudie, A. Ed., The Encyclopaedic Dictionary of Physical Geography. Blackwell, Oxford, pp.163-164.
[41]Wargadalam. J.1993. Hydraulic Geometry Equations of Alluvial Channels. PH. D. Dissertation. Colorado State University. Fort Collins. CO.
[42]Gigi A. Richard. Quantification and Prediction of Lateral Channel Adjustments Downstream from COCHITI Dam RIO GRAND. NM. Dissertation of Colorado State Universtiy.2001.
[43]Knighton, D.1998. Fluvial Forms and Processes—A New Perspective, John Wiley&Sons, Inc., New York, NY.
[44]Schumm, S. A. River Metamorphosis. Journal of the Hydraulics Division 95.1969:255-273.
[45]Rrnwich, W. H. Equilibrium, disequilibrium, and non equilibrium landforms in the landscape. Geomorphology 5.1992:265-276.
[46]陈雄波,王国兵.高含沙河流河床形态的研究[J].水利水运科学研究,1998,(1)：82-89.
[47]Richards, K. S.,1985. Equilibrium. In:Goudie, A. Ed., The Encyclopaedic Dictionary of Physical Geography. Blackwell, Oxford, pp.163-164.
[48]Wargadalam. J.1993. Hydraulic Geometry Equations of Alluvial Channels. PH. D. Dissertation. Colorado State University. Fort Collins. CO.
[49]Gigi A. Richard. Quantification and Prediction of Lateral Channel Adjustments Downstream from COCHITI Dam RIO GRAND. NM. Dissertation of Colorado State Universtiy.2001.
[50]Knighton, D.1998. Fluvial Forms and Processes—A New Perspective, John Wiley&Sons, Inc., New York, NY.
[51]张尧淮.汉江中游河段河相关系的探讨[J].水运工程,1986,6：25-27.
[52]冉立山,王随继.黄河上游河道水力几何形态关系分析[J].人民黄河,2009,(6)：38-41.
[53]付春兰,董学阳.黄河下游河道横断面变化特点分析[J].水资源与水工程学报,2012,(3)：179-181.
[54]Garde, R. J., and Ranga Raju, K. G Mechanics of Sediment Transportation and Alluvial Stream Problems. New York, NY:Halsted Press, Second Edition,1985.618.
[55]Pinter N., Miller K., Wlosinski J. H. Recurrent shoaling and channel dredging, Middle and Upper Mississippi River, USA. Journal of Hydrology 2004 (290):275-296.
[56]张幸农,孙波.冲积河流航道整治线宽度研究述评.南京水利科学研究院.1997年6月.
[57]高凯春,李青云,黄颖等.长江干线航道重点碍航河段图集.长江航道局.2008年5月.
[58]马雪妍.渭河下游河道横断面调整特点及原因分析[J].水利与建筑工程学报,2006,(1)：32-36.
[59]长江航道规划设计研究院.长江中游沙市河段航道整治一期工程工程可行性研究报告.2008年4月.
[60]孙昭华,李义天.长江中游芦家河水道坡陡流急现象成因及治理对策研究.三峡工程运行与长江中游水道研究会论文汇编.武汉.2007年.
[61]Kondolf, GM., Swanson, ML. Channel adjustments to reservoir construction and gravel extraction along Stony Creek, California, Environmental Geology, vol.21, no.4, pp.256-269,1993.
[62]李万松.水库调流下游河段航道整治的设计方法.珠江水运.2001.8：26-28.
[63]余文畴.卢金友.长江河道演变与整治.北京：中国水利水电出版社.2005.8.
[64]华东水利学院.重庆交通学院.航道整治(港口与航道工程专业用).北京：人民交通出版社.1980
[65]卢汉才.刘建民.论冲积性河流航道整治线宽度及丁坝高程的确定.南京水利科学研究所河港研究报告汇编.1961.
[66]苏钰.整治水位与整治线宽度的最佳组合.水运工程.1999.
[67]刘丁生.航道整治工程整治水位的确定原则和计算方法.水运工程技术资料(14)平原航道整治论
[68]蒋忠绥.平原河流浅滩整治线宽度计算理论和方法.
[69]贡炳生.航道整治线宽度及整治水位的确定.
[70]Nicola Surian, Massimo Rinaldi. Morphological response to river engineering and management in alluvial channels in Italy, Geomorphology 50 (2003):307-326.
[71]Shields, FD Jr; Simon, A; Steffen, LJ, Reservoir effects on downstream river channel migration, Environmental Conservation. Vol.27, no.1, pp.54-66. Mar 2000.
[72]Crowder D. W., Diplas. P. Using two-dimensional hydrodynamic models at scales of ecological importance. Journal of Hydrology,2000,230:172-191.
[73]费祥俊,宋根培.多沙河流横断面调整及其对排洪和输沙能力的影响[J].人民黄河,1987,(8)：14-17.
[74]刘建民.整治水位与整治线宽度及其走向的研究.水道港口.1998(4)：1-13.
[75]李泗喜.松花江下游分汊河道航道整治水位和整治线宽度的计算与选定.水运工程.1995年12：20-25.
[76]胡春宏,张治昊.黄河口尾河道横断面形态调整及其与水沙关系的响应关系[J].应用基础与工程科学学报.2011,19(4)：25-29.
[77]Richards, K. S.,1985. Equilibrium. In:Goudie, A. Ed., The Encyclopaedic Dictionary of Physical Geography. Blackwell, Oxford, pp.163-164.
[78]黄莉.监利河段水沙变化及其对该河段河床横断面形态影响机理研究[D.长江科学院,2008.
[79]刘建民.冲积性河流浅滩整治水位与整治线宽度确定.水道港口,2005,26(2).83-86.
[80]李义天.长江中下游设计水位及航道整治参数研究.武汉大学.2005年.
[81]Rrnwich, W. H. Equilibrium, disequilibrium, and non equilibrium landforms in the landscape. Geomorphology 5.1992:265-2764.
[82].长江中下游浅滩航道整治水位和整治线宽度的确定.水道港口,1999：27-35.
[83]S. Anders Brandt, Classification of geomorphologic effects downstream of dams. Catena 40 (2000): 375-401.
[84]史传文,吴保生.冲积河流河型的成因及分类与判别计算方法研究[J].水利发电学报,2007,26(5)：107-111.
[85]许新庆,史传文.冲积河流河型分类的依据及数学方法分析[J].黄河水利职业技术学院学报,2009,(1)：1-3.
[86]周作付,谭观印,吴建成,何晓辉,陈洪艳.东江“博罗浅段”整治水位及整治线宽度的计算分析.水运工程,2004,361(2)：62-64.
[87]赵晓马.顺直冲积性河道河相关系和稳定指标研究[D].重庆交通大选,2009.
[88]周冠伦.航道工程手册.人民交通出版社.2004年1月.
[89]祁茂文,罗保平.长江中游碾子湾河段航道整治工程研究.水道港口.48-51.
[90]刘怀汉,李文全,等.长江中游周公堤-天星洲河段浅滩演变及整治工程初步研究.长江航道 规划设计研究院.2004年2月.
[91]Margareta B. Jansson and Ulf Erlingsson, Measurement and Quantification of a Sedimentation Budget for a Reservoir with Regular Flushing. Regulated Rivers:Research &Management 16: 279-306(2000).
[92]陶杰,史传文.冲积河流河型自然分类方法研究[J].人民黄河,2010,(8)：3-7.
[93]谢鉴衡.河床演变及整治.北京：水利电力出版社.1977.
[94]祁茂文,罗保平.长江中游碾子湾河段航道整治工程研究.水道港口.48-51.
[95]刘怀汉,李文全,等.长江中游周公堤-天星洲河段浅滩演变及整治工程初步研究.长江航道规划设计研究院.2004年2月.
[96]王随继,任明达.根据河道形态和沉积物特征的河流新分类[J].沉积学报,1999,17(2)：1-12.
[97]谢鉴衡,丁君松.河床演变及整治[M].北京：水利电力出版社,1987.
[98]M. M. Grasser and F. El-Gamal, Aswan High Dam:Lesson learnt and on-going research. Water Power & Dam Construction. Jun.1994:35-39.
[99]长江航道规划设计院.长江中游铁铺水道航道整治工程工程可行性研究报告[R],2010.
[100]张幸农,孙波.冲积河流航道整治线宽度的研究.泥沙研究.2002,(5).48-53.
[101]David J. Topping, David M. Rubin, L. E. Vierra Jr., Colorado River sediment transport 1. Nature sediment supply limitation and influence of Glen Canyon Dam, Water Resources Research, Vol36. No2. Pages515-542, Feb.2000.
[102]王秀英.冲积河流航道整治设计参数确定方法研究.武汉大学博士学位论文.2006年4月.
[103]Williams, G. P., Wolman, M. G.,1984. Downstream effects of dams on alluvial rivers. In: Geological Survey Professional Paper 1286 U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, v q 83 pp.
[104]乐培九,李旺生.冲积河流航道整治线宽度问题的研究.泥沙研究.1991,(2).
[105]黄文辉,左利钦.长江中游分汉型河道二维水沙数值模拟[J].水利水运工程学报,2010,(3)：27-31.
[106]肖立敏.顺直微弯河段整治水位与整治线宽度对航道整治效果影响研究.南京水利科学研究院硕士研究生论文.2007年07月.
[107]曹民雄,蔡国正,王秀红,等.长江中游弯道段浅滩整治参数及方法研究.南京水利科学研究院.2008年1月.
[108]韩其为.水库泥沙北京：科学出版社.2003.
[109]国务院三峡工程建设委员会办公室泥沙课题专家组,中国长江三峡工程开发总公司三峡工程泥沙专家组.长江三峡工程泥沙问题研究.1996-2000年(第七卷).知识产权出版社.2002年7月.
[110]陆永军,李国斌,左利钦,等.长江中游窑监河段航道整治工程二维数学模型研究.南京水利科学研究院.2008年4月.
[111]唐存本,李安中,张贤明.内河航道通航条件关键技术研究专题之三——内河航道设计通航水位计算方法研究..南京水利科学研究院研究报告.2006.3.
[112江陵,李义天.长江中游沙市河段演变趋势探析[J].泥沙研究,2006,(3)：76-81.
[113]长江航道规划设计研究院.长江中游沙市河段腊林洲守护工程工程可行性研究报告[R],2009.
[114]长江航道规划设计研究院.长江中游碾子湾水道航道整治工程初步设计.2002年9月.
[115]肖兰.长江窑监河段航道整治方案试验研究[J].中国水运,2010,10(6)：126-127.
[116]长江航道规划设计研究院.长江界牌河段综合治理工程航道整治初步设计.1994年4月.
[117]李青云.窑监河道航道治理方案研究[J].水运工程,2009,(3)：122-127.
[118]长江重庆航运工程勘察设计所.长江中游陆溪口水道航道整治工程初步设计.2003年9月
[119]左利钦.下荆江窑监河段河床演变及整治初步研究[J].水运工程,2011,(4)：39-45.
[120]Schumm, S. A. and Galay, V. J., The river Nile in Egypt. In:S. A. Schumm and B. R. Winkley (Editors), The Variablility of Large Alluvial Rivers, ASCE Press, New York,1994.
[121]长江航道规划设计研究院.长江中游嘉鱼-燕子窝河段航道整治工程初步设计.2005年9月.
[122]李红,王平义.长江中游典型弯曲分汊河道概化模型实验研究[J].中国水运,2010,(4)：135-136.
[123]长江航道规划设计研究院.长江中游罗湖洲水道航道整治初步设计.
[124]长江航道规划设计研究院.长江下游张家洲南港航道整治工程初步设计.2001年12月.
[125]David J. Gilvear. Patterns of channel adjustment to impoundment of the upper river Spey, Scotland (1942-2000), River Research and Application,20:151-165 (2004).
[126]长江航道规划设计研究院,长江重庆航运工程勘察设计院.长江三峡工程航道泥沙原型观测2006-2007年度分析报告.2007年.
[127]ASHMOREP. Intensity and characteristic length of braided channel patterns[J]. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering,2009,36(10):1656-1666.
[128]MAARTEN G, JAN H. River channel and bar patterns explained and predicted by an empirical and a physics-based method[J]. Earth Surface and Processes and Landforms[J],2011,36: 721-738.
[129]R. Luchia, J. M. Hookeb, G. Zolezzia. Width variations and mid-channel bar inception in meanders: River Bollin (UK)[J]. Geomorphology,2010(119):1-8.
[130]SCOTT N. WILKINSON, ROBERT J. KELLER AND IAN D. RUTHERFURD. PHASE-SHIFTS IN SHEAR STRESS AS AN EXPLANATION FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF POOL-RIFFLE SEQUENCES[J]. Earth Surface and Processes and Landforms[J],2004,29:737-753.
[131]Peter Ashmore, Walter Bertold and J. Tobias Gardner. Active width of gravel-bed braided rivers[J]. Earth Surface and Processes and Landforms[J],2011,36:1510-1521.
[132]张耀先,焦爱萍,弯曲型河道挟沙水流运动规律研究进展,泥沙研究,2002,2：53-58.
[133]郑惊涛.弯曲分汉河段泥沙运动规律研究[D].重庆交通大学,2008.
[134]赵志舟,向剑.长江陆溪口水航道整治的必要性[J].重庆交通学院学报,2003,22(1)：109-112.
[135]Nicola Surian. Channel changes due to river regulation:the case of the Plave River, Italy, Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,24,1135-1151 (1999).
[136]胡小庆.长江中游陆溪口水道航道整治目标调整分析[J].重庆交通学院学报,2011,30(6)：1388-1391.
[137]方春明,毛继新,鲁文.中游与洞庭湖泥沙问题研究.北京：中国水利水电出版社,2004.
[138]樊明.三峡枢纽电厂泥沙问题的分析.第八届全国海岸工程学术讨论会暨1997年海峡两岸港口及海岸开发研究会论文集.北京：海洋出版社.1997,199-208.
[139]戴会超,何文社,袁杰,曹叔尤.葛洲坝水利枢纽运行后泥沙冲淤变化分析.水科学进展.2005,16(5).691-695.
[140]李云中,黄光华.葛洲坝水库蓄水前后推移质泥沙变化分析.长江葛洲坝工程泥沙问题研讨会文集.三峡工程泥沙专家组、国际泥沙研究培训中心.1995.170-181.
[141]潘庆燊.长江水利枢纽工程泥沙研究.北京：中国水利水电出版社.2003.
[142]伍文俊.三峡工程蓄水前后上下游航道演变及治理措施研究.武汉大学硕士学位论文.2004年10月.
[143]Yang. C. T, Sediment Transport and River Engineering,河流泥沙国际学术讨论会论文集第1卷,光华出版社,1980年,349-386页.
[144]Andrew, E. D. Effective and Bankfull Discharges of Streams in the Yampa River Basin, Colorado and Wyoming, J. Hydro., Vol.46,1980:311-330.
[145]赵志舟,周君华.长江陆溪口水道航道整治方案研究[J].重庆建筑大学学报,2003,25(1)：49-53.
[146]黄颖.水库下游河床调整及防护措施研究[D].武汉大学,2005.
[147]张乐.三峡水库成库初期库尾洪水急流滩航道条件变化研究[D].重庆交通大学,2010.
[148]Jan H. wan den Berg. Prediction of alluvial channel pattern of perennial rivers. Geomorphology 12. 1995:259-279.
[149]鲍正风,胡晓勇.三峡水库汛前消落期优化调度方式研究.水电站机电技术,2010(6)：83-84,101.
[150]Scot E. Smith, General Impact of Aswan High Dam. Journal of Water Resource Planning and Management, Vol.112, No.4, Oct 1986.
[151]李义天,孙昭华等.三峡水库蓄水前后长江中游设计水位变化分析[R].武汉大学科研报告.2009.
[152]长江航道规划设计研究院,荆江河段航道整治工程设计水位专题研究[R].2011.
[153]W. Brian Dade, Peter F. Friend. Grain-Size, Sediment-Transport Regime, and Channel Slope in Alluvial Rivers, The Journal of Geology,1998, volume 106, p.661-675.
[154]Chien, N., Changes in river regime after the construction of upstream reservoirs. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,10,143-159.1985.
[155]Wargadalam. J.1993. Hydraulic Geometry Equations of Alluvial Channels. PH. D. Dissertation. Colorado 189 State University. Fort Collins. CO.
[156]Gigi A. Richard. Quantification and Prediction of Lateral Channel Adjustments Downstream from COCHITI Dam RIO GRAND. NM. Dissertation of Colorado State Universtiy.2001.
[157]Knighton, D.1998. Fluvial Forms and Processes— A New Perspective, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY.
[158]长江航道规划设计研究院,长江中游界牌河段平面二维水沙数学模型研究[R].2008.
[159]武汉大学,长江中游城陵矶-湖口河段航道整治工程技术后评估[R].2010.
[160]武汉大学,宜昌-城陵矶河段航道条件变化分析[R].2010.
[161]长江航道规划设计研究院,长江武汉～铜陵河段演变分析及航道治理对策研究[R].2006
[162]长江航道规划设计研究院,藕池口水道治理方案专题研究[R].2010.
[163]长江流域规划办公室水文局.长江中下游河道基本特征[R].武汉：长江流域规划办公室水文局.1983.
[164]张明进,张华庆.长江中游牯牛沙水道航道整理工程数学模型研究[R].天津：交通部天津水运工程科学研究所,2007.
[165]交通部三峡办公室编.长江三峡工程泥沙和航运问题研究成果汇编(Ⅱ)[R].北京：交通部,1997.
[2]陆永军,刘建民.长江中游典型浅滩演变与整治研究,中国工程科学.2002(7)：40-45.
[3]师哲,等.葛洲坝枢纽下游河段河床演变分析.长江科学院院报.第17卷第1期2000.2：13-16.
[4]黄召彪.长江下游张家洲南港航道整治工程方案研究.水运工程.2002年3月：39-45.
[5]赵志舟,周华君,等.长江陆溪口水道航道整治方案研究.重庆建筑大学学报.2003年2月：49-53.
[6]姜加虎,黄群.三峡工程对其下游长江水位影响研究.水利学报.1997(8)：39-43.
[7]韩其为,何明民.三峡水库修建后下游长江冲刷及其对防洪的影响.水力发电学报.1995(3)：34-46.
[8]孙尔雨,舒茂修.三峡电站调峰期间下游河道通航条件研究.武汉水利电力大学(宜昌)学报1997：12.57-61.
[9]陆永军,刘建民.芦家河浅滩整治措施(现状)二维动床数学模型研究.长江三峡工程泥沙和航运问题研究成果汇编.交通部三峡办公室,1997.
[10]长江三峡工程航道泥沙原形观测2012年度分析报告.长江航道规划设计研究院,2013
[11]长江科学院.三峡水库枢纽下游河床冲刷对防洪航运影响研究.长江三峡工程泥沙与航运关键技
[12]韩其为.何明宪.从裁弯后荆江断面形态调整看三峡水库修建后横断面变化.三峡水利枢纽工程应用基础研究(第二卷).地质出版社.1997.
[13]梅森.三峡库区及长江干线船舶经济航行优化研究[D].大连海事大学,2009.
[14]付中敏,郑惊涛.弯曲分汉河段江心洲稳定性试验研究[J].水运工程,2010,(12)：109-114.
[15]王宝儒.汉江(襄樊至汉口)航道整治工程回顾.水运工程,1998(7)：27-30
[16]董松年.汉江丹江口水库坝下河床演变及其对航道的影响,见：汉江航道整治与泥沙问题研究论文.
[17]李万松.水库调流下游河段航道整治适用设计方法.交通科技.总第183期2000年第6期：29-32.
[18]刘建民.冲积性河流浅滩整治水位与整治线宽度确定.水道港口.2005年6月：83-86.
[19]张幸农,孙波.冲积河流航道整治线宽度研究评述.
[20]程昌华,等.航道工程学.北京人民交通出版社.2001.
[21]平原航道整治.北京：人民交通出版社.1977.
[22]Garde, R. J., and Ranga Raju, K. G. Mechanics of Sediment Transportation and Alluvial Stream Problems. New York, NY:Halsted Press, Second Edition,1985.618
[23]Lane E W. A study of the shape of channels formed by natural streams flowing in erodible material. MR D sediment series. No 9, U S Army Engineer Division, Missouri, Corps Engineers, Omaha, Nebraska,1957.
[24]Leopold L B, Wolman M G. River channel patterns:braided, meandering and straight. U S Geol Surv Prof Pap 282-B,1957.
[25]尤联元,金德生.水库下游再造床过程的若干问题,地理研究.1990(4)：38-48.
[26]龚国元.不同自然条件下水库下游的河床演变,地理科学.1984(2)：15-124.
[27]Garde, R. J., and Ranga Raju, K. G. Mechanics of Sediment Transportation and Alluvial Stream Problems. New York, NY:Halsted Press, Second Edition,1985.618
[28]Leopold L B, Wolman M G. River channel patterns:braided, meandering and straight. U S Geol Surv Prof Pap 282-B,1957.
[29]Kondolf, GM., Swanson, ML. Channel adjustments to reservoir construction and gravel extraction along Stony Creek, California, Environmental Geology. vol.21, no.4, pp.256-269,1993.
[30]Nicola Surian, Massimo Rinaldi. Morphological response to river engineering and management in alluvial channels in Italy, Geomorphology 50(2003):307-326.
[31]张敏,李勇.冲积性河流横断面形态调整研究方法及应用分析[J].水利与建筑工程学报,2006,4(2)：11-15.
[32]许炯心.汉江丹江口水库下游河床调整过程中的复杂响应,科学通报.1989(6)：450-452.
[33]蒋忠绥.湘江下游浅滩航道的整治.泥沙研究.1982(3)：13-23.
[34]洪毅.松花江白玉通浅滩航道整治工程措施探讨.水运工程.2000.2：30-33.
[35]陆永军,刘建民.长江中游典型浅滩演变与整治研究,中国工程科学.2002(7)：40-45.
[36]程昌华.河床形态与浅滩演变重庆交通学院学报1994,13(3)：66-74.
[37]胡旭跃.浅滩航道整治的几个基本问题.长沙交通学院学报,1994.10(4)：70-76.
[38]陆永军,刘建民.荆江重点浅滩整治的二维动床数学模型研究,泥沙研究.1998,(1)：37-51.
[39]Crowder D. W., Diplas. P. Using two-dimensional hydrodynamic models at scales of ecological importance. Journal of Hydrology,2000,230:172-191.
[40]Richards, K. S.,1985. Equilibrium. In:Goudie, A. Ed., The Encyclopaedic Dictionary of Physical Geography. Blackwell, Oxford, pp.163-164.
[41]Wargadalam. J.1993. Hydraulic Geometry Equations of Alluvial Channels. PH. D. Dissertation. Colorado State University. Fort Collins. CO.
[42]Gigi A. Richard. Quantification and Prediction of Lateral Channel Adjustments Downstream from COCHITI Dam RIO GRAND. NM. Dissertation of Colorado State Universtiy.2001.
[43]Knighton, D.1998. Fluvial Forms and Processes—A New Perspective, John Wiley&Sons, Inc., New York, NY.
[44]Schumm, S. A. River Metamorphosis. Journal of the Hydraulics Division 95.1969:255-273.
[45]Rrnwich, W. H. Equilibrium, disequilibrium, and non equilibrium landforms in the landscape. Geomorphology 5.1992:265-276.
[46]陈雄波,王国兵.高含沙河流河床形态的研究[J].水利水运科学研究,1998,(1)：82-89.
[47]Richards, K. S.,1985. Equilibrium. In:Goudie, A. Ed., The Encyclopaedic Dictionary of Physical Geography. Blackwell, Oxford, pp.163-164.
[48]Wargadalam. J.1993. Hydraulic Geometry Equations of Alluvial Channels. PH. D. Dissertation. Colorado State University. Fort Collins. CO.
[49]Gigi A. Richard. Quantification and Prediction of Lateral Channel Adjustments Downstream from COCHITI Dam RIO GRAND. NM. Dissertation of Colorado State Universtiy.2001.
[50]Knighton, D.1998. Fluvial Forms and Processes—A New Perspective, John Wiley&Sons, Inc., New York, NY.
[51]张尧淮.汉江中游河段河相关系的探讨[J].水运工程,1986,6：25-27.
[52]冉立山,王随继.黄河上游河道水力几何形态关系分析[J].人民黄河,2009,(6)：38-41.
[53]付春兰,董学阳.黄河下游河道横断面变化特点分析[J].水资源与水工程学报,2012,(3)：179-181.
[54]Garde, R. J., and Ranga Raju, K. G Mechanics of Sediment Transportation and Alluvial Stream Problems. New York, NY:Halsted Press, Second Edition,1985.618.
[55]Pinter N., Miller K., Wlosinski J. H. Recurrent shoaling and channel dredging, Middle and Upper Mississippi River, USA. Journal of Hydrology 2004 (290):275-296.
[56]张幸农,孙波.冲积河流航道整治线宽度研究述评.南京水利科学研究院.1997年6月.
[57]高凯春,李青云,黄颖等.长江干线航道重点碍航河段图集.长江航道局.2008年5月.
[58]马雪妍.渭河下游河道横断面调整特点及原因分析[J].水利与建筑工程学报,2006,(1)：32-36.
[59]长江航道规划设计研究院.长江中游沙市河段航道整治一期工程工程可行性研究报告.2008年4月.
[60]孙昭华,李义天.长江中游芦家河水道坡陡流急现象成因及治理对策研究.三峡工程运行与长江中游水道研究会论文汇编.武汉.2007年.
[61]Kondolf, GM., Swanson, ML. Channel adjustments to reservoir construction and gravel extraction along Stony Creek, California, Environmental Geology, vol.21, no.4, pp.256-269,1993.
[62]李万松.水库调流下游河段航道整治的设计方法.珠江水运.2001.8：26-28.
[63]余文畴.卢金友.长江河道演变与整治.北京：中国水利水电出版社.2005.8.
[64]华东水利学院.重庆交通学院.航道整治(港口与航道工程专业用).北京：人民交通出版社.1980
[65]卢汉才.刘建民.论冲积性河流航道整治线宽度及丁坝高程的确定.南京水利科学研究所河港研究报告汇编.1961.
[66]苏钰.整治水位与整治线宽度的最佳组合.水运工程.1999.
[67]刘丁生.航道整治工程整治水位的确定原则和计算方法.水运工程技术资料(14)平原航道整治论
[68]蒋忠绥.平原河流浅滩整治线宽度计算理论和方法.
[69]贡炳生.航道整治线宽度及整治水位的确定.
[70]Nicola Surian, Massimo Rinaldi. Morphological response to river engineering and management in alluvial channels in Italy, Geomorphology 50 (2003):307-326.
[71]Shields, FD Jr; Simon, A; Steffen, LJ, Reservoir effects on downstream river channel migration, Environmental Conservation. Vol.27, no.1, pp.54-66. Mar 2000.
[72]Crowder D. W., Diplas. P. Using two-dimensional hydrodynamic models at scales of ecological importance. Journal of Hydrology,2000,230:172-191.
[73]费祥俊,宋根培.多沙河流横断面调整及其对排洪和输沙能力的影响[J].人民黄河,1987,(8)：14-17.
[74]刘建民.整治水位与整治线宽度及其走向的研究.水道港口.1998(4)：1-13.
[75]李泗喜.松花江下游分汊河道航道整治水位和整治线宽度的计算与选定.水运工程.1995年12：20-25.
[76]胡春宏,张治昊.黄河口尾河道横断面形态调整及其与水沙关系的响应关系[J].应用基础与工程科学学报.2011,19(4)：25-29.
[77]Richards, K. S.,1985. Equilibrium. In:Goudie, A. Ed., The Encyclopaedic Dictionary of Physical Geography. Blackwell, Oxford, pp.163-164.
[78]黄莉.监利河段水沙变化及其对该河段河床横断面形态影响机理研究[D.长江科学院,2008.
[79]刘建民.冲积性河流浅滩整治水位与整治线宽度确定.水道港口,2005,26(2).83-86.
[80]李义天.长江中下游设计水位及航道整治参数研究.武汉大学.2005年.
[81]Rrnwich, W. H. Equilibrium, disequilibrium, and non equilibrium landforms in the landscape. Geomorphology 5.1992:265-2764.
[82].长江中下游浅滩航道整治水位和整治线宽度的确定.水道港口,1999：27-35.
[83]S. Anders Brandt, Classification of geomorphologic effects downstream of dams. Catena 40 (2000): 375-401.
[84]史传文,吴保生.冲积河流河型的成因及分类与判别计算方法研究[J].水利发电学报,2007,26(5)：107-111.
[85]许新庆,史传文.冲积河流河型分类的依据及数学方法分析[J].黄河水利职业技术学院学报,2009,(1)：1-3.
[86]周作付,谭观印,吴建成,何晓辉,陈洪艳.东江“博罗浅段”整治水位及整治线宽度的计算分析.水运工程,2004,361(2)：62-64.
[87]赵晓马.顺直冲积性河道河相关系和稳定指标研究[D].重庆交通大选,2009.
[88]周冠伦.航道工程手册.人民交通出版社.2004年1月.
[89]祁茂文,罗保平.长江中游碾子湾河段航道整治工程研究.水道港口.48-51.
[90]刘怀汉,李文全,等.长江中游周公堤-天星洲河段浅滩演变及整治工程初步研究.长江航道 规划设计研究院.2004年2月.
[91]Margareta B. Jansson and Ulf Erlingsson, Measurement and Quantification of a Sedimentation Budget for a Reservoir with Regular Flushing. Regulated Rivers:Research &Management 16: 279-306(2000).
[92]陶杰,史传文.冲积河流河型自然分类方法研究[J].人民黄河,2010,(8)：3-7.
[93]谢鉴衡.河床演变及整治.北京：水利电力出版社.1977.
[94]祁茂文,罗保平.长江中游碾子湾河段航道整治工程研究.水道港口.48-51.
[95]刘怀汉,李文全,等.长江中游周公堤-天星洲河段浅滩演变及整治工程初步研究.长江航道规划设计研究院.2004年2月.
[96]王随继,任明达.根据河道形态和沉积物特征的河流新分类[J].沉积学报,1999,17(2)：1-12.
[97]谢鉴衡,丁君松.河床演变及整治[M].北京：水利电力出版社,1987.
[98]M. M. Grasser and F. El-Gamal, Aswan High Dam:Lesson learnt and on-going research. Water Power & Dam Construction. Jun.1994:35-39.
[99]长江航道规划设计院.长江中游铁铺水道航道整治工程工程可行性研究报告[R],2010.
[100]张幸农,孙波.冲积河流航道整治线宽度的研究.泥沙研究.2002,(5).48-53.
[101]David J. Topping, David M. Rubin, L. E. Vierra Jr., Colorado River sediment transport 1. Nature sediment supply limitation and influence of Glen Canyon Dam, Water Resources Research, Vol36. No2. Pages515-542, Feb.2000.
[102]王秀英.冲积河流航道整治设计参数确定方法研究.武汉大学博士学位论文.2006年4月.
[103]Williams, G. P., Wolman, M. G.,1984. Downstream effects of dams on alluvial rivers. In: Geological Survey Professional Paper 1286 U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, v q 83 pp.
[104]乐培九,李旺生.冲积河流航道整治线宽度问题的研究.泥沙研究.1991,(2).
[105]黄文辉,左利钦.长江中游分汉型河道二维水沙数值模拟[J].水利水运工程学报,2010,(3)：27-31.
[106]肖立敏.顺直微弯河段整治水位与整治线宽度对航道整治效果影响研究.南京水利科学研究院硕士研究生论文.2007年07月.
[107]曹民雄,蔡国正,王秀红,等.长江中游弯道段浅滩整治参数及方法研究.南京水利科学研究院.2008年1月.
[108]韩其为.水库泥沙北京：科学出版社.2003.
[109]国务院三峡工程建设委员会办公室泥沙课题专家组,中国长江三峡工程开发总公司三峡工程泥沙专家组.长江三峡工程泥沙问题研究.1996-2000年(第七卷).知识产权出版社.2002年7月.
[110]陆永军,李国斌,左利钦,等.长江中游窑监河段航道整治工程二维数学模型研究.南京水利科学研究院.2008年4月.
[111]唐存本,李安中,张贤明.内河航道通航条件关键技术研究专题之三——内河航道设计通航水位计算方法研究..南京水利科学研究院研究报告.2006.3.
[112江陵,李义天.长江中游沙市河段演变趋势探析[J].泥沙研究,2006,(3)：76-81.
[113]长江航道规划设计研究院.长江中游沙市河段腊林洲守护工程工程可行性研究报告[R],2009.
[114]长江航道规划设计研究院.长江中游碾子湾水道航道整治工程初步设计.2002年9月.
[115]肖兰.长江窑监河段航道整治方案试验研究[J].中国水运,2010,10(6)：126-127.
[116]长江航道规划设计研究院.长江界牌河段综合治理工程航道整治初步设计.1994年4月.
[117]李青云.窑监河道航道治理方案研究[J].水运工程,2009,(3)：122-127.
[118]长江重庆航运工程勘察设计所.长江中游陆溪口水道航道整治工程初步设计.2003年9月
[119]左利钦.下荆江窑监河段河床演变及整治初步研究[J].水运工程,2011,(4)：39-45.
[120]Schumm, S. A. and Galay, V. J., The river Nile in Egypt. In:S. A. Schumm and B. R. Winkley (Editors), The Variablility of Large Alluvial Rivers, ASCE Press, New York,1994.
[121]长江航道规划设计研究院.长江中游嘉鱼-燕子窝河段航道整治工程初步设计.2005年9月.
[122]李红,王平义.长江中游典型弯曲分汊河道概化模型实验研究[J].中国水运,2010,(4)：135-136.
[123]长江航道规划设计研究院.长江中游罗湖洲水道航道整治初步设计.
[124]长江航道规划设计研究院.长江下游张家洲南港航道整治工程初步设计.2001年12月.
[125]David J. Gilvear. Patterns of channel adjustment to impoundment of the upper river Spey, Scotland (1942-2000), River Research and Application,20:151-165 (2004).
[126]长江航道规划设计研究院,长江重庆航运工程勘察设计院.长江三峡工程航道泥沙原型观测2006-2007年度分析报告.2007年.
[127]ASHMOREP. Intensity and characteristic length of braided channel patterns[J]. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering,2009,36(10):1656-1666.
[128]MAARTEN G, JAN H. River channel and bar patterns explained and predicted by an empirical and a physics-based method[J]. Earth Surface and Processes and Landforms[J],2011,36: 721-738.
[129]R. Luchia, J. M. Hookeb, G. Zolezzia. Width variations and mid-channel bar inception in meanders: River Bollin (UK)[J]. Geomorphology,2010(119):1-8.
[130]SCOTT N. WILKINSON, ROBERT J. KELLER AND IAN D. RUTHERFURD. PHASE-SHIFTS IN SHEAR STRESS AS AN EXPLANATION FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF POOL-RIFFLE SEQUENCES[J]. Earth Surface and Processes and Landforms[J],2004,29:737-753.
[131]Peter Ashmore, Walter Bertold and J. Tobias Gardner. Active width of gravel-bed braided rivers[J]. Earth Surface and Processes and Landforms[J],2011,36:1510-1521.
[132]张耀先,焦爱萍,弯曲型河道挟沙水流运动规律研究进展,泥沙研究,2002,2：53-58.
[133]郑惊涛.弯曲分汉河段泥沙运动规律研究[D].重庆交通大学,2008.
[134]赵志舟,向剑.长江陆溪口水航道整治的必要性[J].重庆交通学院学报,2003,22(1)：109-112.
[135]Nicola Surian. Channel changes due to river regulation:the case of the Plave River, Italy, Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,24,1135-1151 (1999).
[136]胡小庆.长江中游陆溪口水道航道整治目标调整分析[J].重庆交通学院学报,2011,30(6)：1388-1391.
[137]方春明,毛继新,鲁文.中游与洞庭湖泥沙问题研究.北京：中国水利水电出版社,2004.
[138]樊明.三峡枢纽电厂泥沙问题的分析.第八届全国海岸工程学术讨论会暨1997年海峡两岸港口及海岸开发研究会论文集.北京：海洋出版社.1997,199-208.
[139]戴会超,何文社,袁杰,曹叔尤.葛洲坝水利枢纽运行后泥沙冲淤变化分析.水科学进展.2005,16(5).691-695.
[140]李云中,黄光华.葛洲坝水库蓄水前后推移质泥沙变化分析.长江葛洲坝工程泥沙问题研讨会文集.三峡工程泥沙专家组、国际泥沙研究培训中心.1995.170-181.
[141]潘庆燊.长江水利枢纽工程泥沙研究.北京：中国水利水电出版社.2003.
[142]伍文俊.三峡工程蓄水前后上下游航道演变及治理措施研究.武汉大学硕士学位论文.2004年10月.
[143]Yang. C. T, Sediment Transport and River Engineering,河流泥沙国际学术讨论会论文集第1卷,光华出版社,1980年,349-386页.
[144]Andrew, E. D. Effective and Bankfull Discharges of Streams in the Yampa River Basin, Colorado and Wyoming, J. Hydro., Vol.46,1980:311-330.
[145]赵志舟,周君华.长江陆溪口水道航道整治方案研究[J].重庆建筑大学学报,2003,25(1)：49-53.
[146]黄颖.水库下游河床调整及防护措施研究[D].武汉大学,2005.
[147]张乐.三峡水库成库初期库尾洪水急流滩航道条件变化研究[D].重庆交通大学,2010.
[148]Jan H. wan den Berg. Prediction of alluvial channel pattern of perennial rivers. Geomorphology 12. 1995:259-279.
[149]鲍正风,胡晓勇.三峡水库汛前消落期优化调度方式研究.水电站机电技术,2010(6)：83-84,101.
[150]Scot E. Smith, General Impact of Aswan High Dam. Journal of Water Resource Planning and Management, Vol.112, No.4, Oct 1986.
[151]李义天,孙昭华等.三峡水库蓄水前后长江中游设计水位变化分析[R].武汉大学科研报告.2009.
[152]长江航道规划设计研究院,荆江河段航道整治工程设计水位专题研究[R].2011.
[153]W. Brian Dade, Peter F. Friend. Grain-Size, Sediment-Transport Regime, and Channel Slope in Alluvial Rivers, The Journal of Geology,1998, volume 106, p.661-675.
[154]Chien, N., Changes in river regime after the construction of upstream reservoirs. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,10,143-159.1985.
[155]Wargadalam. J.1993. Hydraulic Geometry Equations of Alluvial Channels. PH. D. Dissertation. Colorado 189 State University. Fort Collins. CO.
[156]Gigi A. Richard. Quantification and Prediction of Lateral Channel Adjustments Downstream from COCHITI Dam RIO GRAND. NM. Dissertation of Colorado State Universtiy.2001.
[157]Knighton, D.1998. Fluvial Forms and Processes— A New Perspective, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY.
[158]长江航道规划设计研究院,长江中游界牌河段平面二维水沙数学模型研究[R].2008.
[159]武汉大学,长江中游城陵矶-湖口河段航道整治工程技术后评估[R].2010.
[160]武汉大学,宜昌-城陵矶河段航道条件变化分析[R].2010.
[161]长江航道规划设计研究院,长江武汉～铜陵河段演变分析及航道治理对策研究[R].2006
[162]长江航道规划设计研究院,藕池口水道治理方案专题研究[R].2010.
[163]长江流域规划办公室水文局.长江中下游河道基本特征[R].武汉：长江流域规划办公室水文局.1983.
[164]张明进,张华庆.长江中游牯牛沙水道航道整理工程数学模型研究[R].天津：交通部天津水运工程科学研究所,2007.
[165]交通部三峡办公室编.长江三峡工程泥沙和航运问题研究成果汇编(Ⅱ)[R].北京：交通部,1997.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |