台湾省苗栗县初中生休闲行为研究
|
摘要
本研究的主要目的在于了解处于21世纪观光休闲活动欣欣向荣和“新故乡”小区营造计划下,台湾省苗栗县初中生的休闲无聊感、休闲内在动机、同侪关系、休闲参与、朋友非行以及偏差行为等影响休闲行为的变项的现况、不同社会经济背景的中学生在这些变项上的表现情况以及苗栗县初中生的休闲无聊感、休闲内在动机、同侪关系、休闲参与以及朋友非行等影响休闲行为的变项对于其偏差行为之预测,以便提供苗栗县主管单位对于当地初中生休闲教育和休闲活动规划的相关建议。
本研究采用问卷调查法,研究样本为台湾省的苗栗县初中生,共计发出问卷1800份,回收有效问卷1603份,有效问卷率达89.1%。本研究使用《休闲无聊感量表》、《休闲内在动机量表》、《同侪关系量表》、《休闲参与量表》以及《偏差行为量表》等工具进行数据搜集,随后以描述性统计、t检验、单因子变异数分析、积差相关及逐步回归分析等SPSS For Windows 10软件包来进行资料分析,获得的研究结果如下:
1、苗栗县初中生的休闲无聊感、偏差行为以及朋友非行的发展现状属于中等偏低的程度,休闲内在动机的发展现状属于中等偏高的程度,同侪关系和休闲参与的发展现状属于中等的程度。
2、苗栗县初中生的性别在休闲内在动机、同侪关系、休闲参与、偏差行为以及朋友非行等方面呈现差异性,但在休闲无聊感方面并无差异存在。
3、苗栗县中学生的年龄在休闲参与、偏差行为以及朋友非行等方面呈现差异性,但在休闲无聊感、休闲内在动机、同侪关系等方面并无差异存在。
4、苗栗县初中生的教育程度在休闲参与、偏差行为以及朋友非行等方面呈现差异性,但在休闲无聊感、休闲内在动机、同侪关系等方面并无差异存在。
5、苗栗县初中生的零用钱使用情况在休闲无聊感、偏差行为以及朋友非行等方面呈现差异性,但在休闲内在动机、同侪关系、休闲参与等方面并无差异存在。
6、苗栗县初中生参与当地休闲景点不同程度的情况在休闲无聊感、休闲内在动机等方面呈现差异性,可是,在同侪关系、休闲参与、偏差行为、朋友非行等方面并无差异存在。
7、以苗栗县初中生的休闲无聊感、休闲内在动机、同侪关系、休闲参与、朋友非行等五个预测变项来预测偏差行为时,进入回归方程式的显著变项共有4个,分别是休闲无聊感、同侪关系、休闲参与以及朋友非行,此四个变项能预测偏差行为达30.7%的变异量。
The aim of the research is to investigate and understand the present conditions of the variables impacting on leisure of the junior high school students in Miaoli County, such as leisure boredom, intrinsic leisure motivation, peer relationship, leisure participation, friend deviation and deviant behavior, the present conditions of these variables with the influence of different social and economic background of these students and the forecast of deviant behavior by means of the variables impacting on leisure of these students, such as leisure boredom, intrinsic leisure motivation, peer relationship, leisure participation and friend deviation, while putting ourselves in the 21th century’s prosperous sightseeing-leisure activities and the“New Homeland: Building Communities”project. And we hope to offer some relative suggestions to Miaoli County government while planning the leisure education of local junior high school students and their leisure activities.
1. The measurement of the subjects’leisure boredom, deviant behavior and friend deviation is in the middle-to-low range. Of the subjects’intrinsic leisure motivation is in the middle-to-high range. Of the subjects’peer relationship and leisure participation is in the middle range.Questionnaire method is used throughout the study with sampling from junior high school students in Miaoli County, Taiwan. The data are generated from 1603 questionnaires retrieved from totally 1800 questionnaires investigated. The efficient questionnaire is up to 89.1%. The study uses the Leisure Boredom Scale, the Intrinsic Leisure Motivation Scale, the Peer relationship Scale, the Leisure Participation Scale and the Deviant Behavior Scale for gathering data, and then uses descriptive statistics, T-test, one way- ANOVA, Pearson product- moment correlation and stepwise regression 10.0 analysis for analyzing data. The major findings are as follows:
2. There are significant gender differences in the subjects’intrinsic leisure motivation, peer relationship, leisure participation, deviant behavior and friend deviation, but there are no significant gender differences in the subjects’leisure boredom.
3. There are significant age differences in the subjects’leisure participation, deviant behavior and friend deviation, but there are no significant age differences in the subjects’leisure boredom, intrinsic leisure motivation and peer relationship.
4. There are significant education differences in the subjects’leisure participation, deviant behavior and friend deviation, but there are no significant education differences in the subjects’leisure boredom, intrinsic leisure motivation and peer relationship.
5. There are significant spending money differences in the subjects’leisure boredom, deviant behavior and friend deviation, but there are no significant spending money differences in the subjects’intrinsic leisure motivation, peer relationship and leisure participation.
6. There are significant participating local leisure spots differences in the subjects’leisure boredom and intrinsic leisure motivation, but there are no significant participating local leisure spots differences in the subjects’peer relationship, leisure participation, deviant behavior and friend deviation.
7. While forecasting the deviant behavior of the junior high school students in Miaoli County by means of such five variables as leisure boredom, intrinsic leisure motivation, peer relationship, leisure participation and friend deviation, there are four obvious variables in the stepwise regression analysis, including leisure boredom, peer relationship, leisure participation and friend deviation. The variable measurement of jointly forecasting the deviant behavior by means of these four variables is up to 30.7%.
本研究采用问卷调查法,研究样本为台湾省的苗栗县初中生,共计发出问卷1800份,回收有效问卷1603份,有效问卷率达89.1%。本研究使用《休闲无聊感量表》、《休闲内在动机量表》、《同侪关系量表》、《休闲参与量表》以及《偏差行为量表》等工具进行数据搜集,随后以描述性统计、t检验、单因子变异数分析、积差相关及逐步回归分析等SPSS For Windows 10软件包来进行资料分析,获得的研究结果如下:
1、苗栗县初中生的休闲无聊感、偏差行为以及朋友非行的发展现状属于中等偏低的程度,休闲内在动机的发展现状属于中等偏高的程度,同侪关系和休闲参与的发展现状属于中等的程度。
2、苗栗县初中生的性别在休闲内在动机、同侪关系、休闲参与、偏差行为以及朋友非行等方面呈现差异性,但在休闲无聊感方面并无差异存在。
3、苗栗县中学生的年龄在休闲参与、偏差行为以及朋友非行等方面呈现差异性,但在休闲无聊感、休闲内在动机、同侪关系等方面并无差异存在。
4、苗栗县初中生的教育程度在休闲参与、偏差行为以及朋友非行等方面呈现差异性,但在休闲无聊感、休闲内在动机、同侪关系等方面并无差异存在。
5、苗栗县初中生的零用钱使用情况在休闲无聊感、偏差行为以及朋友非行等方面呈现差异性,但在休闲内在动机、同侪关系、休闲参与等方面并无差异存在。
6、苗栗县初中生参与当地休闲景点不同程度的情况在休闲无聊感、休闲内在动机等方面呈现差异性,可是,在同侪关系、休闲参与、偏差行为、朋友非行等方面并无差异存在。
7、以苗栗县初中生的休闲无聊感、休闲内在动机、同侪关系、休闲参与、朋友非行等五个预测变项来预测偏差行为时,进入回归方程式的显著变项共有4个,分别是休闲无聊感、同侪关系、休闲参与以及朋友非行,此四个变项能预测偏差行为达30.7%的变异量。
The aim of the research is to investigate and understand the present conditions of the variables impacting on leisure of the junior high school students in Miaoli County, such as leisure boredom, intrinsic leisure motivation, peer relationship, leisure participation, friend deviation and deviant behavior, the present conditions of these variables with the influence of different social and economic background of these students and the forecast of deviant behavior by means of the variables impacting on leisure of these students, such as leisure boredom, intrinsic leisure motivation, peer relationship, leisure participation and friend deviation, while putting ourselves in the 21th century’s prosperous sightseeing-leisure activities and the“New Homeland: Building Communities”project. And we hope to offer some relative suggestions to Miaoli County government while planning the leisure education of local junior high school students and their leisure activities.
1. The measurement of the subjects’leisure boredom, deviant behavior and friend deviation is in the middle-to-low range. Of the subjects’intrinsic leisure motivation is in the middle-to-high range. Of the subjects’peer relationship and leisure participation is in the middle range.Questionnaire method is used throughout the study with sampling from junior high school students in Miaoli County, Taiwan. The data are generated from 1603 questionnaires retrieved from totally 1800 questionnaires investigated. The efficient questionnaire is up to 89.1%. The study uses the Leisure Boredom Scale, the Intrinsic Leisure Motivation Scale, the Peer relationship Scale, the Leisure Participation Scale and the Deviant Behavior Scale for gathering data, and then uses descriptive statistics, T-test, one way- ANOVA, Pearson product- moment correlation and stepwise regression 10.0 analysis for analyzing data. The major findings are as follows:
2. There are significant gender differences in the subjects’intrinsic leisure motivation, peer relationship, leisure participation, deviant behavior and friend deviation, but there are no significant gender differences in the subjects’leisure boredom.
3. There are significant age differences in the subjects’leisure participation, deviant behavior and friend deviation, but there are no significant age differences in the subjects’leisure boredom, intrinsic leisure motivation and peer relationship.
4. There are significant education differences in the subjects’leisure participation, deviant behavior and friend deviation, but there are no significant education differences in the subjects’leisure boredom, intrinsic leisure motivation and peer relationship.
5. There are significant spending money differences in the subjects’leisure boredom, deviant behavior and friend deviation, but there are no significant spending money differences in the subjects’intrinsic leisure motivation, peer relationship and leisure participation.
6. There are significant participating local leisure spots differences in the subjects’leisure boredom and intrinsic leisure motivation, but there are no significant participating local leisure spots differences in the subjects’peer relationship, leisure participation, deviant behavior and friend deviation.
7. While forecasting the deviant behavior of the junior high school students in Miaoli County by means of such five variables as leisure boredom, intrinsic leisure motivation, peer relationship, leisure participation and friend deviation, there are four obvious variables in the stepwise regression analysis, including leisure boredom, peer relationship, leisure participation and friend deviation. The variable measurement of jointly forecasting the deviant behavior by means of these four variables is up to 30.7%.
引文
[1] Iso-Ahola, S. E., & Weissinger, E Leisure and Boredom. Journal of Social and Clinic Psychology[J]1992 5(3), 356-364.
[2] Weissinger, E., & Bandalos D. L Development, reliability and validity of a scale to measuring intrinsic motivation in leisure Journal of Leisure Research[J] 1995 27, 379-400.
[3] 陈婉容 青少年休闲行为对偏差行为影响之研究[D] 国立体育学院体育研究所硕士论文 2002 年
[4] Raghed, M. G., & Beard, J. G Measuring leisure attitude. Journal of Leisure Research[J] 1982 14(2), 155-164.
[5]吴武典 青少年问题与对策[M] 台北:张老师出版社 1985
[6] 林朝夫 偏差行为辅导与个案研究[M] 台北:心理出版社 1991
[1] 黄越钦 劳动法新论[M] 台北市:翰芦图书总经销 2002
[1] 叶智魁 工作与休闲-提升生活素质的反省[J] 户外游憩研究,1995 8(2),31-46 页
[1] Bammel, G. & Burrus Bammel, L. L 休闲与人类行为[M] 涂淑芳译 台北市:桂冠图书股份有限公司(原著于 1996 年出版)
[1] Bammel, G. & Burrus Bammel, L. L 休闲与人类行为[M] 涂淑芳译 台北市:桂冠图书股份有限公司(原著于 1996 年出版)
[1] 黄煜峰、雷雳 国中生心理学[M] 台北市:五南图书出版有限公司 1995
[1] Neulunger, John(1981). To Leisure: An Introduction. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
[2] Weissinger, E., & Bandalos D. L. (1995). Development, reliability and validity of a scale to measuring intrinsic motivation in leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 27, pp.379-400.
[1] 陈淑湘 青少年休闲生活与偏差行为之相关研究-休闲同侪关系、休闲活动选择与休闲无聊感之型态分析[D] 静宜大学青少年儿童福利研究所硕士论文 1999
[1] Weissinger, E., & Iso-Ahola, S. E. (1992). Use of recreation majors as research subject: differences between majors on leisure-related variables. Leisure Siences, 14, pp.327-335.
[1] Weissinger, E., & Iso-Ahola, S. E. (1992). Use of recreation majors as research subject: differences between majors on leisure-related variables. Leisure Siences, 14, pp.327-335
[2] 黄郁宜 国中学生在学期间校外生活之研究[D] 国立台湾师范大学教育研究所硕士论文 1984
[1]翁玉珠青少年休闲活动倾向、凝聚力与情绪调适之相关研究「D]中国文化大学家政研究所硕士论文1995
[2]彭怀恩社会学概论「M]台北市:风云论坛1996
[3]林青莹青少年偏差行为的家庭因素之分析研究[D]台湾师范大学公民训育所硕士论文1 998「月1〔皿子卜曲二过多.l、才j，六二1月弓f七二诀十趋自二「、，1之矢」卜百11二月淤tl不】」Jp病通本1 no‘
[1] 陈淑湘 青少年休闲生活与偏差行为之相关研究-休闲同侪关系、休闲活动选择与休闲无聊感之型态分析[D] 静宜大学青少年儿童福利研究所硕士论文 1999
[1] 詹志禹,林邦杰,谢高桥:我国(岛内)青少年犯罪研究之整合分析[M] 台北:“行政院”青年辅导委员会 1995
[1] 丁 瑜 家庭因素对学生学习和品德的影响[J] 南京师大学报(社科版),1985 (4)。
[2] 王美芬 单亲青少年休闲状况之调查研究[D] 公立彰化师范大学辅导研究所硕士论文 1993
[3] 王淑女 青少年的休闲活动与偏差行为[J] 社区发展季刊 1995 (27),105-23 页
[4] 王淑女 青少年偏差行为研究[M] 辅仁大学社会学系印行 1995
[5] 王淑女 电动玩具对青少年偏差犯罪行为的影响[C] 台湾少年犯罪与矫治问题研讨会 1996 年
[6] 王淑女 都市化与青少年偏差行为[J] 辅仁学志 1998 (28),55-85 页。
[7] 少年事件处理法(2000)2000 年“华总一义”字第 8900028400 号修正。
[8] 文崇一 休闲生活问题[J] 台湾的社会问题 台北:巨流出版社 1984 年
[9] “行政院主计处”台湾地区国民休闲生活调查报告[C] 台北:“行政院主计处” 1992
[10] “行政院文化建设委员会” 2004 年文化白皮书 台北市:“文建会” 2004 年
[11] “交通部观光局”2001 年岛内旅游状况调查 台北:http://www.tbroc.gov.tw 2002
[12] 吕民璇:青少年价值观念与青少年辅导工作之研究[C] 在学青少年休闲观念及其休闲偏好之探讨 台中市:社会工作服务研究中心。1989
[13] 吕建政 休闲教育的发展[M] 台湾教育,523,18-20 页 1994
[14] 吴武典 青少年问题与对策[M] 台北:张老师出版社 1985
[15] 吴宝贵 个人的人格取向与休闲活动的意义及偏好[D] 台湾大学心理学研究所硕士论文 1979
[16] 何福田,蔡培村 青少年休闲辅导理念的建立与实务之规划。台北:“行政院青年辅导委员会”1989
[17] 李开泰 家庭环境因素与青少年犯罪问题研究[J] 青年研究,第六期 1990
[18] 林世欣 国中学生自我概念与同侪关系之研究[D] 公立屏东师范大学教育心理与辅导研究所硕士论文 2000
[19] 林东泰 青少年休闲价值观之研究[M] 台北:“行政院青年辅导委员会” 1997
[20] 林青莹 青少年偏差行为的家庭因素之分析研究[D] 台湾师范大学公民训育所硕士论文 1998
[21] 林朝夫 偏差行为辅导与个案研究[M] 台北:心理出版社 1991
[22] 汪若兰,地方魅力焦点:“文建会”地方文化馆导览手册:苗栗县[M] 台北市:“文建会” 2000
[23] 侯崇文,周愫娴 少年出入不宜进入场所问题之探讨及防范策略[M]台北:“行政院青年辅导委员会”1997
[24] 施清发 老人参与程度与休闲体验中自由感、无聊感及休闲需要间之关系[D] 高雄医学院行为科学研究所硕士论文 1999
[25] 孙淑文 同侪关系与少年犯罪[D] 台湾大学社会学研究所硕士论文。1990
[26] 殷国宝,翁小英 违法犯罪青少年致力特点的研究[J] 青少年犯罪研究 1987(3)
[27] 翁玉珠 青少年休闲活动倾向、凝聚力与情绪调适之相关研究[D] 中国文化大学家政研究所硕士论文 1995
[28] 春金,侯崇文 儿童、少年犯罪成因及处遇方式之比较研究[M] 台北:“行政院青年辅导委员会” 1995
[29] 黄立贤: 专科学生休闲兴趣相关因素之研究[D]公立高雄师范大学辅导研究所硕士论文 1996
[30] 张少熙 青少年自我概念与休闲活动倾向及其阻碍因素之研究[D] 公立台湾师范大学体育研究所硕士论文 1994
[31] 张古秀云 社区居民对旅游冲击认知与发展态度之研究-以新竹县横山乡内湾村为例[C] 明新科技大学休闲事业管理系专题研究。2004
[32] 张玉玲 大学生休闲内在动机、休闲阻碍与其休闲无聊感及其自我统合之关系研究[D] 公立高雄师范大学辅导研究所硕士论文 1998
[33] 张玉玲 无聊啊!谈休闲无聊感对青少年自我统合发展之影响[J]学生辅导 1999 (60) 68-79 页。
[34] 张平吾 青少年犯罪成因之探讨与防制之道[J] 警学丛刊 198010(4),85-97 页。
[35] 张孝铭 休闲胜任感、掌控感与休闲参与流畅体验之相关研究[J] 大专体育学刊,2000(1) 47-56 页
[36] 张启瑞 台北市初中学生休闲生活之调查[M] 测验与辅导,1982 845-847 页
[37] 张春兴 成长中自我的探索[M] 台北:东华书局 1983
[38] 涂淑芬译 休闲与人类行为[M] 台北市:桂冠图书股份有限公司 1996
[39] 彭怀恩 社会学概论[M] 台北市:风云论坛 1996
[40] 黄文真 台北市初中学生休闲生活之研究[D] 公立高雄师范大学辅导研究所硕士论文 1986
[41] 黄中科 都市在学少年休闲活动之研究-以台中市在学少年为例[D]东海大学社会研究所硕士论文1990
[42] 黄牧仁译 儿童到青少年期的友谊发展[M] 台北市:五南出版社 1999
[43] 黄郁宜 初中学生在学期间校外生活之研究[D] 公立台湾师范大学教育研究所硕士论文 1984
[44] 黄煜峰,雷雳初中生心理学[M] 台北市:五南图书出版有限公司 1995
[45] 黄嘉宗 高职学生休闲活动调查研究[D] 公立高雄师范大学教育研究所硕士论文 1986
[46] 黄慧真译 发展心理学[M] 台北:桂冠图书股份有限公司 1994
[47] 黄越钦 劳动法新论[M] 台北市:翰芦图书总经销 2002
[48] 黄德祥 青少年发展与辅导[M] 台北:五南图书出版有限公司 1994
[49] 詹志禹,林邦杰,谢高桥:我国青少年犯罪研究之整合分析[M] 台北:“行政院青年辅导委员会” 1995
[50] 杨秀芝 一般少年与非行少年休闲生活之比较-以西门町休闲活动为主的少年研究[D] 私立东吴大学社会学研究所硕士论文 1988
[51] 杨敏玲 休闲与预防青少年犯罪[J] 台湾教育 21-23 页 1994
[52] 杨敏玲 无聊与青少年偏差行为[M] 测验与辅导,1996(137) 28、30-33 页。
[53] 刘素秋 青少年休闲活动与犯罪相关性之研究[D] 公立政治大学社会研究所硕士论文 1997
[54] 叶智魁 工作与休闲-提升生活素质的反省[J] 户外游憩研 19958(2),31-46 页。
[55] ﹝英﹞赖特,周振材等译 行为?性格?犯罪[M] 黑龙江人民出版社 1998
[56] 陈南绮 青少年休闲无聊感与休闲阻碍休闲参与及休闲满意度之相关研究[D] 公立体育学院体育研究所硕士论文 2000
[57] 陈婉容 青少年休闲行为对偏差行为影响之研究[D] 公立体育学院体育研究所硕士论文 2002
[58] 陈淑湘 青少年休闲生活与偏差行为之相关研究-休闲同侪关系、休闲活动选择与休闲无聊感之型态分析[D] 静宜大学青少年儿童福利研究所硕士论文 1999 [59[ 陈丽欣 少年犯罪种类与其个人家庭学校社会生活之比较分析[M] 台北:“法务部”1983
[60] 远流出版公司编辑制作 文化台湾:新世纪 新容颜[M] 台北市:“文建会”2004
[61] 苏建文等 发展心理学[M] 台北市:心理出版社 1998
[62] Agnew, R., & Petersen, E. (1989). Social control theory and delinquency. Criminology, 23, pp.47-61.
[63] Aristotle. (1941). The Nichomachean Ethics. In R. McKeon (Ed.), Basic Works of Aristotle. New York: Random House.
[64] Atwater, E. (1996(1992)). Adolescence. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.
[65] Bammel, G. & Burrus Bammel, L. L. (1996). 休闲与人类行为(涂淑芳) 台北市:桂冠图书股份有限公司(原著于 1996 年出版)
[66] Bishop, D. W. (1970). Stability of the factor structure of leisure behavior: Analysis of four communities. Journal of Leisure Research, 2, pp. 160-170.
[67] Burch, W. (1969). The Social Circles of Leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 1(2), pp.143.
[68] Bloland, P. A. (1987). Leisure as a campus resource for fostering student development. Journal of Counseling and Development, 65, pp.291-294.
[69] Caldwell, L. L., & Smith, E. A. (1994). Leisure and mental health of high risk adolescents. In D. M. Compton and S. E. Iso-Ahola(Eds.). Leisure and Mental Health, 1(1), pp.330-345.
[70] Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodger, W. L. (1976). The Quality of American Life: Perceptions, Evaluation and Satisfactions. New York: Sage.
[71] Cohen, A. (1955). Delinquent Boys: The Culture of the Gang. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
[72] Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social changes and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, pp.588-608.
[73] Cole, M., & Cole, S. (1989). The Development of Children. New York: Freeman and Company.
[74] Cloward, R., & Ohlin, L. (1960). Delinquency and Opportunity. New York: Free Press.
[75] Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond Boredom and Anxiety. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
[76] Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (1984). Being Adolescent. New York: Basic Books.
[77] Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum Publishing Co. Japanese Edition, Tokyo: Seishin Shobo, 1980.
[78] Deci, E. L. (1980). The psychology of self-determination. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath (Lexington Books). Japanese Edition, Tokyo: Seishin Shobo, 1985.
[79] Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1980). The empirical exploration of intrinsic motivational processes. In L.
[80]Berkowitz(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, pp.150-156. New York: Academic Press.
[81] Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
[82] Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). The Support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, pp.1024-1037.
[83] Dowd, E. T. (1982). Leisure Counseling: Summary of an emerging field. The Counseling Psychologist, 9, pp.81-82.
[84] Dacey, J. S. (1986). Adolescents today(3rd ed.). Glenview: Scatt Foresman and Company.
[85] Dasen, P. R. (1977a). Are Cognitive Processes Universal? A contribution to cross- cultural Piagetian psychology. In N. Warren(Ed.), Studies in cross- cultural sychology , 1. London: New York: Gardner.
[86] Dasen, P. R. (1977b). Piagetian psychology: Cross cultural contributions. New York: Gardner.
[87] Dumazedier, Joffre (1967). Toward a Society of Leisure. New York: Free Press.
[88] Dumazedier, Joffre (1974). Sociology of Leisure. New York: Elsevier
[89] Engels, F. (1892). The Condition of the Working Class in England in 1844. London: Allen and Unwin
[90] Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and Crisis. New York: Norton.
[91] Friedman, M., & Roseman, R. (1976). Type A Behavior and Your Health. New York: Knopf.
[92] Garton, A. F., & Pratt, C. (1991). Leisure activities of adolescent school students: Predictors of participation and interest. Journal of Adolescence, 14, pp.305-321.
[93] Hamilton, J. A. (1983). Development of interest and enjoyment in adolescence: Ⅱ. Boredom and psychopathology. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 12, pp.363-372. [94 ] Harrington, Michael (1963). The Other America: Poverty in the United States. Baltimore: Penguin.
[95] Hill, A. B., & Perkins, R.E. (1985). Towards a model of boredom. British Journal of Psychology, 76, pp.235-240.
[96] Hirschi, Travis (1969). Causes of Delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.
[97] Iso-Ahola, S. E., & Crowley, E.D. (1991). Adolescent substance abuse and leisure boredom. Journal of Leisure Research, 23(3), pp.206-271.
[98] Iso-Ahola, S. E., & Weissinger, E. (1987). Leisure and Boredom. Journal of Social and Clinic Psychology, 5(3), pp.356-364.
[99] Iso-Ahola, S. E., & Weissinger, E. (1990). Perceptions of boredom in leisure: Conceptualization, reliability, and validity of the leisure boredom scale. Journal of Leisure Research, 22(1), pp. 1-17.
[100] Jahoda, G. (1980). Theoretical and systematic approaches in mass-cultural psychology. In H. C. Triandis & W. W. Lambert(Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, 1. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
[101] Jarvinen, D. W., & Nichols, J. G. (1996). Adolescents’ social goals, beliefs about the causes of social success, and satisfaction in peer relations. Developmental Psychology, 32(3), 435-441.
[102] Kando, T. (1980). Leisure and the Popular Culture in Transition. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby.
[103] Kaplan, Max (1975). Leisure: Theory and Policy. New York: Wiley.
[104] Kelly, J. R., & Godbey, G. (1992). The Sociology of Leisure. State College, PA: Venture Publishing.
[105] Kleiber, D., & Rickards, W. (1985). Leisure and recreation in adolescence: Limitation and potential. In M. G. Wade(Ed.), Constants on Leisure, pp.289-318. Springfield: Thomas Book.
[106] Kraus, R. (1971). Recreation and leisure in modern society. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
[107] Larson, R. W., & Richards, M. B. (1989). The changing life space of early adolescent adjustment(Special Issue). Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 18, pp.501-626.
[108] Larson, R. W., & Richards, M. B. (1991). Boredom in the middle school years: Blaming schools years blaming students. American Journal of education, August, pp.418-443.
[109] Linder, Staff (1970). The Harried Leisure Class. New York: Columbia University Press
[110] Mannell,R. C., & Kleiber, D. A.(1997). A Social Psychology of Leisure. State College, Pa: Venture Publishing.
[111] Meddi, S., & Kobasa, S. (1981). Intrinsic motivation and health. In Day(Ed.), Advances in intrinsic motivation and aesthetics. New York: Plenum.
[112] Merton, R. K. (1957). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.
[113] Messner, S., & Blau, J. (1987). Routine leisure activities and rates of crime: Amacro-level analysis. Social Forces, 65, 1035-1051.
[114] Neulinger, John (1974). The Psychology of Leisure. Springfield, Ⅲ: Charles C. Thomas.
[115] Neulunger, John(1981). To Leisure: An Introduction. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
[116] Orcutt, J. J. (1984). Contrasting effects of two kinds of boredom on alcohol use. Journal of Drug Issues, 14, pp.161-173.
[117] Raghed, M. G., & Beard, J. G. (1982). Measuring leisure attitude. Journal of Leisure Research, 14(2), pp.155-164.
[118] Skogen, K., & Wichstrom, L. (1996). Delinquency in the wilderness: Patterns of outdoor recreation activities and conduct problems in the general adolescent population. Leisure Studies, 15, pp.15 1-169.
[119] Steinberg, L. (1989). Adolescence. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.
[120] Steinberg, L. (1993). Adolescence. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
[121] Sternberg, R. J. (1986).Intelligence applied. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
[122] Sternberg, R. J. (1988). The Triarchic Mind. New York: Viking Penguin.
[123] Sternberg, R. J. (1989). Introduction. In R. J. Sternberg(Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence, 5. Hillsdale. NJ: Erlbaum.
[124] Sutherland, Edwin H., & Cressey, Donald R. (1955). Principles of Criinology. 5th ed. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott.
[125] Veblen, T. (1899). Theory of the Leisure Class. New York: Macmillan.
[126] Weissinger, E. (1985). Development and validation of an intrinsic leisure motivation scale. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University on Maryland, college Park.
[127] Weissinger, E., & Bandalos D. L. (1995). Development, reliability and validity of a scale to measuring intrinsic motivation in leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 27, pp.379-400.
[128] Weissinger, E., Caldwell, L. L., & Bandalos, D. L. (1992).Relation between intrinsic motivation and boredom in leisure time. Leisure Sciences, 14, pp.317-325.
[129] Weissinger, E., & Iso-Ahola, S. E. (1992). Use of recreation majors as research subject: differences between majors on leisure-related variables. Leisure Siences, 14, pp.327-335.
[130] Williams, R. (1989). The Trusting Heart:Great News about Type A Behavior. New York: Times Books.
[131] Yang, Min-Lin (1999). A leisure-related multivariate model for adolescent delinquency. Department of leisure studies, University of Urbana-Champaign.
[132] Yeh, Chih-Kuei.(1988). The Influence of Peer Groups on Young Adolescents’ Leisure Involvement. Arizona State University
[2] Weissinger, E., & Bandalos D. L Development, reliability and validity of a scale to measuring intrinsic motivation in leisure Journal of Leisure Research[J] 1995 27, 379-400.
[3] 陈婉容 青少年休闲行为对偏差行为影响之研究[D] 国立体育学院体育研究所硕士论文 2002 年
[4] Raghed, M. G., & Beard, J. G Measuring leisure attitude. Journal of Leisure Research[J] 1982 14(2), 155-164.
[5]吴武典 青少年问题与对策[M] 台北:张老师出版社 1985
[6] 林朝夫 偏差行为辅导与个案研究[M] 台北:心理出版社 1991
[1] 黄越钦 劳动法新论[M] 台北市:翰芦图书总经销 2002
[1] 叶智魁 工作与休闲-提升生活素质的反省[J] 户外游憩研究,1995 8(2),31-46 页
[1] Bammel, G. & Burrus Bammel, L. L 休闲与人类行为[M] 涂淑芳译 台北市:桂冠图书股份有限公司(原著于 1996 年出版)
[1] Bammel, G. & Burrus Bammel, L. L 休闲与人类行为[M] 涂淑芳译 台北市:桂冠图书股份有限公司(原著于 1996 年出版)
[1] 黄煜峰、雷雳 国中生心理学[M] 台北市:五南图书出版有限公司 1995
[1] Neulunger, John(1981). To Leisure: An Introduction. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
[2] Weissinger, E., & Bandalos D. L. (1995). Development, reliability and validity of a scale to measuring intrinsic motivation in leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 27, pp.379-400.
[1] 陈淑湘 青少年休闲生活与偏差行为之相关研究-休闲同侪关系、休闲活动选择与休闲无聊感之型态分析[D] 静宜大学青少年儿童福利研究所硕士论文 1999
[1] Weissinger, E., & Iso-Ahola, S. E. (1992). Use of recreation majors as research subject: differences between majors on leisure-related variables. Leisure Siences, 14, pp.327-335.
[1] Weissinger, E., & Iso-Ahola, S. E. (1992). Use of recreation majors as research subject: differences between majors on leisure-related variables. Leisure Siences, 14, pp.327-335
[2] 黄郁宜 国中学生在学期间校外生活之研究[D] 国立台湾师范大学教育研究所硕士论文 1984
[1]翁玉珠青少年休闲活动倾向、凝聚力与情绪调适之相关研究「D]中国文化大学家政研究所硕士论文1995
[2]彭怀恩社会学概论「M]台北市:风云论坛1996
[3]林青莹青少年偏差行为的家庭因素之分析研究[D]台湾师范大学公民训育所硕士论文1 998「月1〔皿子卜曲二过多.l、才j，六二1月弓f七二诀十趋自二「、，1之矢」卜百11二月淤tl不】」Jp病通本1 no‘
[1] 陈淑湘 青少年休闲生活与偏差行为之相关研究-休闲同侪关系、休闲活动选择与休闲无聊感之型态分析[D] 静宜大学青少年儿童福利研究所硕士论文 1999
[1] 詹志禹,林邦杰,谢高桥:我国(岛内)青少年犯罪研究之整合分析[M] 台北:“行政院”青年辅导委员会 1995
[1] 丁 瑜 家庭因素对学生学习和品德的影响[J] 南京师大学报(社科版),1985 (4)。
[2] 王美芬 单亲青少年休闲状况之调查研究[D] 公立彰化师范大学辅导研究所硕士论文 1993
[3] 王淑女 青少年的休闲活动与偏差行为[J] 社区发展季刊 1995 (27),105-23 页
[4] 王淑女 青少年偏差行为研究[M] 辅仁大学社会学系印行 1995
[5] 王淑女 电动玩具对青少年偏差犯罪行为的影响[C] 台湾少年犯罪与矫治问题研讨会 1996 年
[6] 王淑女 都市化与青少年偏差行为[J] 辅仁学志 1998 (28),55-85 页。
[7] 少年事件处理法(2000)2000 年“华总一义”字第 8900028400 号修正。
[8] 文崇一 休闲生活问题[J] 台湾的社会问题 台北:巨流出版社 1984 年
[9] “行政院主计处”台湾地区国民休闲生活调查报告[C] 台北:“行政院主计处” 1992
[10] “行政院文化建设委员会” 2004 年文化白皮书 台北市:“文建会” 2004 年
[11] “交通部观光局”2001 年岛内旅游状况调查 台北:http://www.tbroc.gov.tw 2002
[12] 吕民璇:青少年价值观念与青少年辅导工作之研究[C] 在学青少年休闲观念及其休闲偏好之探讨 台中市:社会工作服务研究中心。1989
[13] 吕建政 休闲教育的发展[M] 台湾教育,523,18-20 页 1994
[14] 吴武典 青少年问题与对策[M] 台北:张老师出版社 1985
[15] 吴宝贵 个人的人格取向与休闲活动的意义及偏好[D] 台湾大学心理学研究所硕士论文 1979
[16] 何福田,蔡培村 青少年休闲辅导理念的建立与实务之规划。台北:“行政院青年辅导委员会”1989
[17] 李开泰 家庭环境因素与青少年犯罪问题研究[J] 青年研究,第六期 1990
[18] 林世欣 国中学生自我概念与同侪关系之研究[D] 公立屏东师范大学教育心理与辅导研究所硕士论文 2000
[19] 林东泰 青少年休闲价值观之研究[M] 台北:“行政院青年辅导委员会” 1997
[20] 林青莹 青少年偏差行为的家庭因素之分析研究[D] 台湾师范大学公民训育所硕士论文 1998
[21] 林朝夫 偏差行为辅导与个案研究[M] 台北:心理出版社 1991
[22] 汪若兰,地方魅力焦点:“文建会”地方文化馆导览手册:苗栗县[M] 台北市:“文建会” 2000
[23] 侯崇文,周愫娴 少年出入不宜进入场所问题之探讨及防范策略[M]台北:“行政院青年辅导委员会”1997
[24] 施清发 老人参与程度与休闲体验中自由感、无聊感及休闲需要间之关系[D] 高雄医学院行为科学研究所硕士论文 1999
[25] 孙淑文 同侪关系与少年犯罪[D] 台湾大学社会学研究所硕士论文。1990
[26] 殷国宝,翁小英 违法犯罪青少年致力特点的研究[J] 青少年犯罪研究 1987(3)
[27] 翁玉珠 青少年休闲活动倾向、凝聚力与情绪调适之相关研究[D] 中国文化大学家政研究所硕士论文 1995
[28] 春金,侯崇文 儿童、少年犯罪成因及处遇方式之比较研究[M] 台北:“行政院青年辅导委员会” 1995
[29] 黄立贤: 专科学生休闲兴趣相关因素之研究[D]公立高雄师范大学辅导研究所硕士论文 1996
[30] 张少熙 青少年自我概念与休闲活动倾向及其阻碍因素之研究[D] 公立台湾师范大学体育研究所硕士论文 1994
[31] 张古秀云 社区居民对旅游冲击认知与发展态度之研究-以新竹县横山乡内湾村为例[C] 明新科技大学休闲事业管理系专题研究。2004
[32] 张玉玲 大学生休闲内在动机、休闲阻碍与其休闲无聊感及其自我统合之关系研究[D] 公立高雄师范大学辅导研究所硕士论文 1998
[33] 张玉玲 无聊啊!谈休闲无聊感对青少年自我统合发展之影响[J]学生辅导 1999 (60) 68-79 页。
[34] 张平吾 青少年犯罪成因之探讨与防制之道[J] 警学丛刊 198010(4),85-97 页。
[35] 张孝铭 休闲胜任感、掌控感与休闲参与流畅体验之相关研究[J] 大专体育学刊,2000(1) 47-56 页
[36] 张启瑞 台北市初中学生休闲生活之调查[M] 测验与辅导,1982 845-847 页
[37] 张春兴 成长中自我的探索[M] 台北:东华书局 1983
[38] 涂淑芬译 休闲与人类行为[M] 台北市:桂冠图书股份有限公司 1996
[39] 彭怀恩 社会学概论[M] 台北市:风云论坛 1996
[40] 黄文真 台北市初中学生休闲生活之研究[D] 公立高雄师范大学辅导研究所硕士论文 1986
[41] 黄中科 都市在学少年休闲活动之研究-以台中市在学少年为例[D]东海大学社会研究所硕士论文1990
[42] 黄牧仁译 儿童到青少年期的友谊发展[M] 台北市:五南出版社 1999
[43] 黄郁宜 初中学生在学期间校外生活之研究[D] 公立台湾师范大学教育研究所硕士论文 1984
[44] 黄煜峰,雷雳初中生心理学[M] 台北市:五南图书出版有限公司 1995
[45] 黄嘉宗 高职学生休闲活动调查研究[D] 公立高雄师范大学教育研究所硕士论文 1986
[46] 黄慧真译 发展心理学[M] 台北:桂冠图书股份有限公司 1994
[47] 黄越钦 劳动法新论[M] 台北市:翰芦图书总经销 2002
[48] 黄德祥 青少年发展与辅导[M] 台北:五南图书出版有限公司 1994
[49] 詹志禹,林邦杰,谢高桥:我国青少年犯罪研究之整合分析[M] 台北:“行政院青年辅导委员会” 1995
[50] 杨秀芝 一般少年与非行少年休闲生活之比较-以西门町休闲活动为主的少年研究[D] 私立东吴大学社会学研究所硕士论文 1988
[51] 杨敏玲 休闲与预防青少年犯罪[J] 台湾教育 21-23 页 1994
[52] 杨敏玲 无聊与青少年偏差行为[M] 测验与辅导,1996(137) 28、30-33 页。
[53] 刘素秋 青少年休闲活动与犯罪相关性之研究[D] 公立政治大学社会研究所硕士论文 1997
[54] 叶智魁 工作与休闲-提升生活素质的反省[J] 户外游憩研 19958(2),31-46 页。
[55] ﹝英﹞赖特,周振材等译 行为?性格?犯罪[M] 黑龙江人民出版社 1998
[56] 陈南绮 青少年休闲无聊感与休闲阻碍休闲参与及休闲满意度之相关研究[D] 公立体育学院体育研究所硕士论文 2000
[57] 陈婉容 青少年休闲行为对偏差行为影响之研究[D] 公立体育学院体育研究所硕士论文 2002
[58] 陈淑湘 青少年休闲生活与偏差行为之相关研究-休闲同侪关系、休闲活动选择与休闲无聊感之型态分析[D] 静宜大学青少年儿童福利研究所硕士论文 1999 [59[ 陈丽欣 少年犯罪种类与其个人家庭学校社会生活之比较分析[M] 台北:“法务部”1983
[60] 远流出版公司编辑制作 文化台湾:新世纪 新容颜[M] 台北市:“文建会”2004
[61] 苏建文等 发展心理学[M] 台北市:心理出版社 1998
[62] Agnew, R., & Petersen, E. (1989). Social control theory and delinquency. Criminology, 23, pp.47-61.
[63] Aristotle. (1941). The Nichomachean Ethics. In R. McKeon (Ed.), Basic Works of Aristotle. New York: Random House.
[64] Atwater, E. (1996(1992)). Adolescence. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.
[65] Bammel, G. & Burrus Bammel, L. L. (1996). 休闲与人类行为(涂淑芳) 台北市:桂冠图书股份有限公司(原著于 1996 年出版)
[66] Bishop, D. W. (1970). Stability of the factor structure of leisure behavior: Analysis of four communities. Journal of Leisure Research, 2, pp. 160-170.
[67] Burch, W. (1969). The Social Circles of Leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 1(2), pp.143.
[68] Bloland, P. A. (1987). Leisure as a campus resource for fostering student development. Journal of Counseling and Development, 65, pp.291-294.
[69] Caldwell, L. L., & Smith, E. A. (1994). Leisure and mental health of high risk adolescents. In D. M. Compton and S. E. Iso-Ahola(Eds.). Leisure and Mental Health, 1(1), pp.330-345.
[70] Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodger, W. L. (1976). The Quality of American Life: Perceptions, Evaluation and Satisfactions. New York: Sage.
[71] Cohen, A. (1955). Delinquent Boys: The Culture of the Gang. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
[72] Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social changes and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, pp.588-608.
[73] Cole, M., & Cole, S. (1989). The Development of Children. New York: Freeman and Company.
[74] Cloward, R., & Ohlin, L. (1960). Delinquency and Opportunity. New York: Free Press.
[75] Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond Boredom and Anxiety. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
[76] Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (1984). Being Adolescent. New York: Basic Books.
[77] Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum Publishing Co. Japanese Edition, Tokyo: Seishin Shobo, 1980.
[78] Deci, E. L. (1980). The psychology of self-determination. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath (Lexington Books). Japanese Edition, Tokyo: Seishin Shobo, 1985.
[79] Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1980). The empirical exploration of intrinsic motivational processes. In L.
[80]Berkowitz(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, pp.150-156. New York: Academic Press.
[81] Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
[82] Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). The Support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, pp.1024-1037.
[83] Dowd, E. T. (1982). Leisure Counseling: Summary of an emerging field. The Counseling Psychologist, 9, pp.81-82.
[84] Dacey, J. S. (1986). Adolescents today(3rd ed.). Glenview: Scatt Foresman and Company.
[85] Dasen, P. R. (1977a). Are Cognitive Processes Universal? A contribution to cross- cultural Piagetian psychology. In N. Warren(Ed.), Studies in cross- cultural sychology , 1. London: New York: Gardner.
[86] Dasen, P. R. (1977b). Piagetian psychology: Cross cultural contributions. New York: Gardner.
[87] Dumazedier, Joffre (1967). Toward a Society of Leisure. New York: Free Press.
[88] Dumazedier, Joffre (1974). Sociology of Leisure. New York: Elsevier
[89] Engels, F. (1892). The Condition of the Working Class in England in 1844. London: Allen and Unwin
[90] Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and Crisis. New York: Norton.
[91] Friedman, M., & Roseman, R. (1976). Type A Behavior and Your Health. New York: Knopf.
[92] Garton, A. F., & Pratt, C. (1991). Leisure activities of adolescent school students: Predictors of participation and interest. Journal of Adolescence, 14, pp.305-321.
[93] Hamilton, J. A. (1983). Development of interest and enjoyment in adolescence: Ⅱ. Boredom and psychopathology. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 12, pp.363-372. [94 ] Harrington, Michael (1963). The Other America: Poverty in the United States. Baltimore: Penguin.
[95] Hill, A. B., & Perkins, R.E. (1985). Towards a model of boredom. British Journal of Psychology, 76, pp.235-240.
[96] Hirschi, Travis (1969). Causes of Delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.
[97] Iso-Ahola, S. E., & Crowley, E.D. (1991). Adolescent substance abuse and leisure boredom. Journal of Leisure Research, 23(3), pp.206-271.
[98] Iso-Ahola, S. E., & Weissinger, E. (1987). Leisure and Boredom. Journal of Social and Clinic Psychology, 5(3), pp.356-364.
[99] Iso-Ahola, S. E., & Weissinger, E. (1990). Perceptions of boredom in leisure: Conceptualization, reliability, and validity of the leisure boredom scale. Journal of Leisure Research, 22(1), pp. 1-17.
[100] Jahoda, G. (1980). Theoretical and systematic approaches in mass-cultural psychology. In H. C. Triandis & W. W. Lambert(Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, 1. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
[101] Jarvinen, D. W., & Nichols, J. G. (1996). Adolescents’ social goals, beliefs about the causes of social success, and satisfaction in peer relations. Developmental Psychology, 32(3), 435-441.
[102] Kando, T. (1980). Leisure and the Popular Culture in Transition. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby.
[103] Kaplan, Max (1975). Leisure: Theory and Policy. New York: Wiley.
[104] Kelly, J. R., & Godbey, G. (1992). The Sociology of Leisure. State College, PA: Venture Publishing.
[105] Kleiber, D., & Rickards, W. (1985). Leisure and recreation in adolescence: Limitation and potential. In M. G. Wade(Ed.), Constants on Leisure, pp.289-318. Springfield: Thomas Book.
[106] Kraus, R. (1971). Recreation and leisure in modern society. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
[107] Larson, R. W., & Richards, M. B. (1989). The changing life space of early adolescent adjustment(Special Issue). Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 18, pp.501-626.
[108] Larson, R. W., & Richards, M. B. (1991). Boredom in the middle school years: Blaming schools years blaming students. American Journal of education, August, pp.418-443.
[109] Linder, Staff (1970). The Harried Leisure Class. New York: Columbia University Press
[110] Mannell,R. C., & Kleiber, D. A.(1997). A Social Psychology of Leisure. State College, Pa: Venture Publishing.
[111] Meddi, S., & Kobasa, S. (1981). Intrinsic motivation and health. In Day(Ed.), Advances in intrinsic motivation and aesthetics. New York: Plenum.
[112] Merton, R. K. (1957). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.
[113] Messner, S., & Blau, J. (1987). Routine leisure activities and rates of crime: Amacro-level analysis. Social Forces, 65, 1035-1051.
[114] Neulinger, John (1974). The Psychology of Leisure. Springfield, Ⅲ: Charles C. Thomas.
[115] Neulunger, John(1981). To Leisure: An Introduction. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
[116] Orcutt, J. J. (1984). Contrasting effects of two kinds of boredom on alcohol use. Journal of Drug Issues, 14, pp.161-173.
[117] Raghed, M. G., & Beard, J. G. (1982). Measuring leisure attitude. Journal of Leisure Research, 14(2), pp.155-164.
[118] Skogen, K., & Wichstrom, L. (1996). Delinquency in the wilderness: Patterns of outdoor recreation activities and conduct problems in the general adolescent population. Leisure Studies, 15, pp.15 1-169.
[119] Steinberg, L. (1989). Adolescence. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.
[120] Steinberg, L. (1993). Adolescence. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
[121] Sternberg, R. J. (1986).Intelligence applied. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
[122] Sternberg, R. J. (1988). The Triarchic Mind. New York: Viking Penguin.
[123] Sternberg, R. J. (1989). Introduction. In R. J. Sternberg(Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence, 5. Hillsdale. NJ: Erlbaum.
[124] Sutherland, Edwin H., & Cressey, Donald R. (1955). Principles of Criinology. 5th ed. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott.
[125] Veblen, T. (1899). Theory of the Leisure Class. New York: Macmillan.
[126] Weissinger, E. (1985). Development and validation of an intrinsic leisure motivation scale. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University on Maryland, college Park.
[127] Weissinger, E., & Bandalos D. L. (1995). Development, reliability and validity of a scale to measuring intrinsic motivation in leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 27, pp.379-400.
[128] Weissinger, E., Caldwell, L. L., & Bandalos, D. L. (1992).Relation between intrinsic motivation and boredom in leisure time. Leisure Sciences, 14, pp.317-325.
[129] Weissinger, E., & Iso-Ahola, S. E. (1992). Use of recreation majors as research subject: differences between majors on leisure-related variables. Leisure Siences, 14, pp.327-335.
[130] Williams, R. (1989). The Trusting Heart:Great News about Type A Behavior. New York: Times Books.
[131] Yang, Min-Lin (1999). A leisure-related multivariate model for adolescent delinquency. Department of leisure studies, University of Urbana-Champaign.
[132] Yeh, Chih-Kuei.(1988). The Influence of Peer Groups on Young Adolescents’ Leisure Involvement. Arizona State University