输穴结合夹脊穴治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床研究
|
摘要
颈椎病(cervical spondylosis)是颈椎间盘组织退行性变继发病理改变累及周围组织结构并出现相应临床症状。近年来由于生活方式的改变使本病的发病年龄有年轻化趋势,形成了与现代社会劳动群体相伴随的现代病。其中尤其以神经根型颈椎病(Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy CSR)最多见,约占颈椎病发病率50%-60%,对人体健康造成严重影响。针刺治疗CSR可消除水肿,消炎止痛,改善局部血液循环供应,解除肌肉痉挛,减轻对神经的刺激和压迫,对改善疼痛、麻木、头晕等症状可有立竿见影的效果,且副作用小、疗效好、费用低,有着明显的优势,为目前CSR的主要治疗方法之一。
目的：
本课题采用随机对照研究,运用输穴结合夹脊穴治疗神经根型颈椎病患者,并通过与单纯使用夹脊穴和常规针灸取穴疗法对比,观察本疗法的临床疗效,为针灸疗法治疗神经根型颈椎病提供选穴组方依据。
方法：
研究对象选取2011年3月至2012年3月期间在台湾新北市天泽中医诊所的患者为研究的目标人群,将其中符合病例筛选标准的90例神经根型颈椎病患者,按1：1：1的比例随机分配至综合疗法A组(输穴结合夹脊穴组)、B组(夹脊穴组),C组(普通针刺组)每组各30例。各组均每周连续治疗5次,休息两天,10次为一个疗程,共治疗2个疗程。通过记录两组患者临床症状体征评分,简化McGill量表评分,观察本疗法对神经根型颈椎病患者的临床疗效。
结果：
本研究采用随机对照试验方法进行临床试验,共有合格受试者90例。随机分为三组,每组各30例患者。三组患者治疗前一般资料比较,三组患者在性别、年龄、病程分布上差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),具有可比性。治疗前三组患者临床症状体征积分、PRI积分、VAS评分、PPI积分经统计学分析,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),具有可比性。
1.三组患者临床症状体征评分比较
治疗前三组神经根型颈椎病患者的20分法量表比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),具有可比性。经不同针刺疗法治疗后,三组患者临床症状体征评分较治疗前均有明显提高,三组20分法量表评分差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。进一步进行两两比较,A组与B组评分差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)；A组与C组评分差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)；B组与C组评分差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。上述结果提示,经不同方案治疗后,输穴结合夹脊穴治疗神经根型颈椎病对患者的临床症状和体征具有明显改善作用,其疗效优于单纯使用夹脊穴,或者常规针刺方法。
2.三组患者PRI评分比较
治疗前三组患者PRI评分比较,差异无统计学意义,具有可比性(P>0.05)。经不同疗法治疗后,三组PRI评分均有明显下降,经统计学分析,差异具有统计学以(P<0.01)。进一步进行两两比较,A组与B组、A组与C组PRI评分比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)；B组与C组评分差异不具有统计学意义(P>0.05)。提示输穴结合夹脊穴治疗神经根型颈椎病,可以明显改善患者改良疼痛量表PRI评分,其疗效优于单纯夹脊穴疗法及常规针刺疗法,而进一步组间比较,单纯选用夹脊穴疗法和常规针刺疗法对于降低患者PRI评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
3.三组患者VAS评分值比较
治疗前三组患者VAS评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),具有可比性。经不同疗法治疗后,三组患者VAS评分较治疗前均有明显下降,三组差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。进一步进行两两比较,A组与B组差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)；A组与C组评分差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)；B组与C组评分差异不具有统计学意义(P>0.05)。上述结果提示,输穴结合夹脊穴治疗神经根型颈椎病,可以明显改善患者视觉模拟评分,其疗效优于单纯夹脊穴疗法及常规针刺疗法,而进一步组间比较,单纯选用夹脊穴疗法和常规针刺疗法对于降低患者视觉模拟评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
4.三组患者PPI评分比较
治疗前,三组患者PPI评分比较,差异无统计学意义,具有可比性(P>0.05)。三组患者经不同治疗方法后,PPI评分值均有下降,组间比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。进一步两两比较,A组与B组差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)；A组与C组评分差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)；B组与C组评分差异不具有统计学意义(P>0.05)。上述结果提示,输穴结合夹脊穴治疗神经根型颈椎病,可以明显改善患者现时疼痛强度PPI评分,其疗效优于单纯夹脊穴疗法及常规针刺疗法,而进一步组间比较,单纯选用夹脊穴疗法和常规针刺疗法对于降低患者现时疼痛强度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
5.三组患者临床疗效比较
三组患者临床疗效比较,A组显效18例、有效10例、无效2例；B组显效10例、有效12例、无效8例；C组显效13例、有效11例、无效6例；A组总有效率93.3%,B组总有效率73.3%,C组总有效率80.0%,经Ridit分析,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。
结论：
本研究数据结果提示输穴结合夹脊穴治疗神经根型颈椎病对于改善患者临床症状、体征具有良好疗效,同时,可以显著降低患者SF-MPQ量表中各项疼痛指数评分。本疗法采用输穴结合夹脊穴,针刺颈夹脊穴气至病所,具有直接激发经气,疏通经络的作用。并根据循经取穴的原则,以“输主体重节痛”的经典理论为依据,选取五输穴之输穴配合治疗本病,既体现了针灸疗法选穴组方原则中近治与远治相结合的原则,又充分利用了特定穴的功效,进行辨经选穴治疗,分经论治,条理分明,规律性强,疗效高。本疗法选穴组方简洁明了,疗效肯定,值得临床推广。
Cervial sppondylosis is due to cervical intervertebral disc degenerative changes and subsequent pathological process. Because of the rapid change in lifestyle in china, there is concern that cervical spondylosis may become epidemic, And the type of cervical spondylotic radiculopaty is the most common, its incidence is50%-60%. It dose harm to our health and also bings some negative influences on our daily life and work.
Objective
This study adapted randomly researching menthod, and we adopted the treatment of Shu acupoints combined Jiaji points for the CSR patients, meanwhile, compared with merely Jiaji acupoints and common acupoints therapy, to observe the clinical effect on CSR patients, and provide the basis for clinical application.
Methods
duiring the period of2011/3to2012/3. we selected90simple CSR patients who accepted treatment in Tai Wan Mingshi hospital, randomly divided the cases into three groups, each group30cases. The A group adapted the menthod of Shu acupoints combined with Jiaji acupoints; the B group treated with merely Jiaji acupoints; and the C group used commin method alone. Each group accepted5times therapy every week, and then there was2days for rest,10times for a course of treatment, and2threapeutic courses, then for every paatient, the clinical symptoms, signs scores and the SF-MPQ scale were recored, SPSS sotrware was used for statistical analysis.
Results
1according to the clinical symptoms and signs scores:the three groups before treatmen was no significant difference (P>0.05). After the treatment, the scores of the three groups were increased. And the difference was significant (P<0.01). the multiple comparisons showed that, there was significant difference between A and B group, A and C groups, B and C groups (P<0.01). therefore the intergration therapeutics group was more effective than the other two groups in increasing the symptoms and signs scores.
2according to the PRI scores:after treament, there was remarkable dicerase of the PRI scores, and the difference was significant (P<0.01). and the multiple comparisons showed that there was significant difference between A and B group, A and C groups (P<0.01). But B and C groups had no statistical significance (P>0.05). The result pointed out that the intergration therapeutics group was more effective than the other two groups indecreasing the PRI scores.
3according to the VAS scores:after treament, there was remarkable dicerase of the VAS scores, and the difference was significant (P<0.01). and the multiple comparisons showed that there was significant difference between A and B group, A and C groups (P<0.01). But B and C groups had no statistical significance (P>0.05). The result pointed out that the intergration therapeutics group was more effective than the other two groups indecreasing the VAS scores.
4according to the PPI scores:after treament, there was remarkable dicerase of the PRI scores, and the difference was significant (P<0.01). and the multiple comparisons showed that there was significant difference between A and B group, A and C groups (P<0.01). But B and C groups had no statistical significance (P>0.05). The result pointed out that the intergration therapeutics group was more effective than the other two groups indecreasing the PPI scores.
5the clinical efficacy of the effect, in treatment group, the clinical markedly effective18cases, effective10cases, inefficacy2cases, the effective rate was93.3%, while in Jiaji group, markedly effective10cases, effective12cases, inefficacy8cases, the effective rate was73.3%, the common acupoints group, markedly effective13cases, effective11cases, inefficacy6cases, the effective rate was80.0%, the curative effect of the treatment group was better than others (P<0.05)
Conclusion
In the study the rusult showed that, the therapy of Shu acupoints combined with Jiaji acupoints has better clinical efficacy in ameliorate patients' clinical symptoms, sings, and relieve pain. Needling cervical Jiaji points can promot the movement of the channel-qi and dredging meridians, and combine with the Shu acupoints along channel, that not only illustrate the nearby and remote therapeutic effect, but also take advantage of the specific acupoints. The concisely point prescriptions is worth spreading and exercising widely.
目的：
本课题采用随机对照研究,运用输穴结合夹脊穴治疗神经根型颈椎病患者,并通过与单纯使用夹脊穴和常规针灸取穴疗法对比,观察本疗法的临床疗效,为针灸疗法治疗神经根型颈椎病提供选穴组方依据。
方法：
研究对象选取2011年3月至2012年3月期间在台湾新北市天泽中医诊所的患者为研究的目标人群,将其中符合病例筛选标准的90例神经根型颈椎病患者,按1：1：1的比例随机分配至综合疗法A组(输穴结合夹脊穴组)、B组(夹脊穴组),C组(普通针刺组)每组各30例。各组均每周连续治疗5次,休息两天,10次为一个疗程,共治疗2个疗程。通过记录两组患者临床症状体征评分,简化McGill量表评分,观察本疗法对神经根型颈椎病患者的临床疗效。
结果：
本研究采用随机对照试验方法进行临床试验,共有合格受试者90例。随机分为三组,每组各30例患者。三组患者治疗前一般资料比较,三组患者在性别、年龄、病程分布上差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),具有可比性。治疗前三组患者临床症状体征积分、PRI积分、VAS评分、PPI积分经统计学分析,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),具有可比性。
1.三组患者临床症状体征评分比较
治疗前三组神经根型颈椎病患者的20分法量表比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),具有可比性。经不同针刺疗法治疗后,三组患者临床症状体征评分较治疗前均有明显提高,三组20分法量表评分差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。进一步进行两两比较,A组与B组评分差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)；A组与C组评分差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)；B组与C组评分差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。上述结果提示,经不同方案治疗后,输穴结合夹脊穴治疗神经根型颈椎病对患者的临床症状和体征具有明显改善作用,其疗效优于单纯使用夹脊穴,或者常规针刺方法。
2.三组患者PRI评分比较
治疗前三组患者PRI评分比较,差异无统计学意义,具有可比性(P>0.05)。经不同疗法治疗后,三组PRI评分均有明显下降,经统计学分析,差异具有统计学以(P<0.01)。进一步进行两两比较,A组与B组、A组与C组PRI评分比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)；B组与C组评分差异不具有统计学意义(P>0.05)。提示输穴结合夹脊穴治疗神经根型颈椎病,可以明显改善患者改良疼痛量表PRI评分,其疗效优于单纯夹脊穴疗法及常规针刺疗法,而进一步组间比较,单纯选用夹脊穴疗法和常规针刺疗法对于降低患者PRI评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
3.三组患者VAS评分值比较
治疗前三组患者VAS评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),具有可比性。经不同疗法治疗后,三组患者VAS评分较治疗前均有明显下降,三组差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。进一步进行两两比较,A组与B组差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)；A组与C组评分差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)；B组与C组评分差异不具有统计学意义(P>0.05)。上述结果提示,输穴结合夹脊穴治疗神经根型颈椎病,可以明显改善患者视觉模拟评分,其疗效优于单纯夹脊穴疗法及常规针刺疗法,而进一步组间比较,单纯选用夹脊穴疗法和常规针刺疗法对于降低患者视觉模拟评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
4.三组患者PPI评分比较
治疗前,三组患者PPI评分比较,差异无统计学意义,具有可比性(P>0.05)。三组患者经不同治疗方法后,PPI评分值均有下降,组间比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。进一步两两比较,A组与B组差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)；A组与C组评分差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)；B组与C组评分差异不具有统计学意义(P>0.05)。上述结果提示,输穴结合夹脊穴治疗神经根型颈椎病,可以明显改善患者现时疼痛强度PPI评分,其疗效优于单纯夹脊穴疗法及常规针刺疗法,而进一步组间比较,单纯选用夹脊穴疗法和常规针刺疗法对于降低患者现时疼痛强度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
5.三组患者临床疗效比较
三组患者临床疗效比较,A组显效18例、有效10例、无效2例；B组显效10例、有效12例、无效8例；C组显效13例、有效11例、无效6例；A组总有效率93.3%,B组总有效率73.3%,C组总有效率80.0%,经Ridit分析,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。
结论：
本研究数据结果提示输穴结合夹脊穴治疗神经根型颈椎病对于改善患者临床症状、体征具有良好疗效,同时,可以显著降低患者SF-MPQ量表中各项疼痛指数评分。本疗法采用输穴结合夹脊穴,针刺颈夹脊穴气至病所,具有直接激发经气,疏通经络的作用。并根据循经取穴的原则,以“输主体重节痛”的经典理论为依据,选取五输穴之输穴配合治疗本病,既体现了针灸疗法选穴组方原则中近治与远治相结合的原则,又充分利用了特定穴的功效,进行辨经选穴治疗,分经论治,条理分明,规律性强,疗效高。本疗法选穴组方简洁明了,疗效肯定,值得临床推广。
Cervial sppondylosis is due to cervical intervertebral disc degenerative changes and subsequent pathological process. Because of the rapid change in lifestyle in china, there is concern that cervical spondylosis may become epidemic, And the type of cervical spondylotic radiculopaty is the most common, its incidence is50%-60%. It dose harm to our health and also bings some negative influences on our daily life and work.
Objective
This study adapted randomly researching menthod, and we adopted the treatment of Shu acupoints combined Jiaji points for the CSR patients, meanwhile, compared with merely Jiaji acupoints and common acupoints therapy, to observe the clinical effect on CSR patients, and provide the basis for clinical application.
Methods
duiring the period of2011/3to2012/3. we selected90simple CSR patients who accepted treatment in Tai Wan Mingshi hospital, randomly divided the cases into three groups, each group30cases. The A group adapted the menthod of Shu acupoints combined with Jiaji acupoints; the B group treated with merely Jiaji acupoints; and the C group used commin method alone. Each group accepted5times therapy every week, and then there was2days for rest,10times for a course of treatment, and2threapeutic courses, then for every paatient, the clinical symptoms, signs scores and the SF-MPQ scale were recored, SPSS sotrware was used for statistical analysis.
Results
1according to the clinical symptoms and signs scores:the three groups before treatmen was no significant difference (P>0.05). After the treatment, the scores of the three groups were increased. And the difference was significant (P<0.01). the multiple comparisons showed that, there was significant difference between A and B group, A and C groups, B and C groups (P<0.01). therefore the intergration therapeutics group was more effective than the other two groups in increasing the symptoms and signs scores.
2according to the PRI scores:after treament, there was remarkable dicerase of the PRI scores, and the difference was significant (P<0.01). and the multiple comparisons showed that there was significant difference between A and B group, A and C groups (P<0.01). But B and C groups had no statistical significance (P>0.05). The result pointed out that the intergration therapeutics group was more effective than the other two groups indecreasing the PRI scores.
3according to the VAS scores:after treament, there was remarkable dicerase of the VAS scores, and the difference was significant (P<0.01). and the multiple comparisons showed that there was significant difference between A and B group, A and C groups (P<0.01). But B and C groups had no statistical significance (P>0.05). The result pointed out that the intergration therapeutics group was more effective than the other two groups indecreasing the VAS scores.
4according to the PPI scores:after treament, there was remarkable dicerase of the PRI scores, and the difference was significant (P<0.01). and the multiple comparisons showed that there was significant difference between A and B group, A and C groups (P<0.01). But B and C groups had no statistical significance (P>0.05). The result pointed out that the intergration therapeutics group was more effective than the other two groups indecreasing the PPI scores.
5the clinical efficacy of the effect, in treatment group, the clinical markedly effective18cases, effective10cases, inefficacy2cases, the effective rate was93.3%, while in Jiaji group, markedly effective10cases, effective12cases, inefficacy8cases, the effective rate was73.3%, the common acupoints group, markedly effective13cases, effective11cases, inefficacy6cases, the effective rate was80.0%, the curative effect of the treatment group was better than others (P<0.05)
Conclusion
In the study the rusult showed that, the therapy of Shu acupoints combined with Jiaji acupoints has better clinical efficacy in ameliorate patients' clinical symptoms, sings, and relieve pain. Needling cervical Jiaji points can promot the movement of the channel-qi and dredging meridians, and combine with the Shu acupoints along channel, that not only illustrate the nearby and remote therapeutic effect, but also take advantage of the specific acupoints. The concisely point prescriptions is worth spreading and exercising widely.
引文
[1]姜利国.自拟康颈通络汤治疗神经根型颈椎病70例[J].中国民间疗法,2011,19(12)：33
[2]钟冲,韩淑凯,曹文杰等.芪蛭通络方治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床观察[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2011,19(5)：54-55
[3]石真安.自拟颈舒通痹汤治疗神经根型颈椎病60例[J].中医正骨,2011,23(1)：66-67
[4]苗同贺,复康颗粒治疗神经根型颈椎病56例[J],湖南中医杂志,2011,27(5)：36-37
[5]郑昱新,石印玉,詹红生等芪葛颗粒治疗神经根型颈椎病356例[J].湖南中医杂志,2011,27(?)：64-65
[6]刘柏龄,马晓春,刘茜.刘柏龄治疗脊柱病经验撷要[M].北京：北京科学技术出版社,2003：71-72.
[7]施杞,王拥军.施杞谈颈椎病[M].上海：上海科技教育出版社,2000：94-30
[8]杨百明,李娟.神经根型颈椎病的中医辨证施治[J].新疆中医药,1997,17(3)：17-18.
[9]王锡三,水性伤痛贴治疗神经根型颈椎病84例疗效观察[J].医护论坛,2011,18(29)：175-176
[10]刘建卫,陈志华,黄培祥,等.萸乌散药熨法治疗颈型和神经根型颈椎病疗效观察[J].中医正骨,2008,20(2)：41-42.
[11]赵昌林,陈孝根.白芥子散外敷治疗神经根型颈椎病80例的临床观察[J].江苏中医药,2006,27(8)：34.
[12]高华.深刺颈夹脊穴治疗神经根型颈椎病151例分析[J].中国误诊学杂志,2010,10(5)：3674-3675
[13]王国明,李丽霞,宋永强,等.针刺治疗神经根型颈椎病212例临床观察[J].中国中医药信息杂志,2006,13(6)：6
[14]王凌力,杜宇征,郑健刚.通络法治疗神经根型颈椎病60例临床观察[J].云南中医中药杂志,2008,29(9)：37.
[15]刘公望,王秀云,孟向文,等.四天穴针刺法治疗神经根型颈椎病临床观察[J].上海针灸杂志,2009,28(1)：25-28
[16]李志宏,李冬梅.温针灸治疗顽固性神经根型颈椎病47例[J].云南中医中药杂志.2009,30(6)：46
[17]梁日楚.神经根型颈椎病不同针灸方法治疗效果分析[J].中外医学研究,2011,9(12)：52-53
[18]刘双岭,陈伊,姜海霞,等.夹脊电针治疗神经根型颈椎病30例[J].针灸临床杂志,2010：26(4)：39-4
[19]王艳锋.以颈臂穴为主施以电针治疗神经根型颈椎病临床研究[J].中医临床研究,2012,4(2)：3-5
[20]钟吉富.针刀治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床研究[J],科学之友,2007,1(4)：125-126
[21]彭建全,苏华新,徐原,等.针刀松解结合前屈位牵引治疗神经根型颈椎病的疗效观察[J].中医药导报,2010,16(5)：66-68
[22]吴峻,於芸.针刀治疗神经根型颈椎病30例临床观察[J].江苏中医药,2007,39(6)：51-52.
[23]刘悦平,胡晶晶,张红星等.穴位注射颈夹脊穴对神经根型颈椎病镇痛作用的研究[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志.2009,13(4)：28-29
[24]曾顺军,刘丽,关德斌.颈横突穴位注射治疗神经根型颈椎病疗效观察[J].上海针灸杂志.2010,29(8)：523-524
[25]梁来德.脊柱推拿治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床观察[J].中国医药指南,2009,18(7)：53-54,
[26]徐辉,楚少增,王春梅.活动牵引加推拿治疗神经根型颈椎病[J].医学信息,2007,20(8)：1467-1 469
[27]唐玉萍.牵引和手法推拿治疗神经根型颈椎病[J].华夏医学,2008,21(1)：176-177
[28]杜涛.牵引配合推拿治疗神经根型颈椎病60例[J].云南中医中药杂志,2009,30(7)：50.
[29]刘维,李洪久.综合疗法治疗神经根型颈椎病70例[J].实用中医内科杂志,2012,36(1)：82-83
[30]陈维清.综合疗法治疗神经根型颈椎病144例[J].中国医药科学.2011,4(23)：109-110
[31]王振华,刘鹰,梁东升.中医综合疗法治疗神经根型颈椎病临床观察[J].医药论坛杂志,2011,32(11)：80-81.
[32]薄智云,牛庆强,朱文罡,等.腹针治疗神经根型颈椎病多中心对照研究[J]中国针灸,2005,25(6)：387-389
[33]彭冬青,刘云霞,董玉喜,等.贺氏针灸三通法治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床研究[J].北京中医药,2009,28(1)：36-38.
[34]刘成峰,夏春发.腕踝针配合推拿正骨手法治疗神经根型颈椎病126例[J].现代中医药,2010,30(4)：44-45.
[35]李彬,谢新才,冯毅,等,火针治疗神经根型颈椎病疗效观察[J].北京中医药,2010,29(12)：920-922.
[36]季英莲,房静,张叔爱.浮针治疗神经根型颈椎病31例疗效观察与护理[J],2011.17(36)：34-35
[37]王晅.倒马针配合局部刺络治疗神经根型颈椎病24例临床疗效观察[J].2011,21(12)：56-57
[38]张志兰,侯宝国.傍针刺法为主治疗神经根型颈椎病[J].2011,4(33)：152-153
[39]朱东娇,曹云峰,赵玉祥.平衡针治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床对照分析[J].内蒙古中医药.2011,30(18)：40-41
[40]朱立国,于杰.关于神经根型颈椎病的临床治疗评述[J].医学信息,外科版,2009,,2(1)：3-6
[41]Bridge FM,Ball DJ,Mackinrom SE, et al. Nerve crush injuries-a mod-el for axanot mesis[J].Exp Neurol,1994,127(2):284
[42]Yoshizawa H,Kobayash S,Monta T. Chronic nerve root compression pathophysiologic mechanism of nerve root dysfunceio[J]. Spine,1995,20(4):397
[43]Olmarker K, RyderiKB, Prhophysiology of sciatica[J]. Orthop Clin Nor(Am),1991,22: 223
[44]王葵光,胡有谷.腰椎间盘突出症的自身免疫状态[J].中华骨科杂志,1994,14(5)：258
[45]于杰,朱立国,房敏等.神经根型颈椎病压痛部位分布及其与神经节段的关系[J].h环球中医药,2011,4(4)：250-252
[46]Yi S, Lim JH, Choi KS,et al. Comparison of anterior cervical foraminotomy vs arthroplasty for unilateral cervical radiculopathy [J]. SurgNeurol,2009,71 (6):677-680
[47]Nasca RJ. Cervical radiculopathy:current di -agnostic and treatment options [J]. J SurgOrthop Adv,2009,18(1):13-8.
[48]王刚,王军,翁长水.神经根型颈椎病病程与预后的关系[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2006,21(9)：69
[49]徐军.脊柱牵引治疗技术(续三).中国临床康复,2002,6(6)：778
[50]谢开字.牵引中药并用治疗神经根型颈椎病117例.实用中医内科杂志,2005：19(3)：290
[51]安雪,张红星,周利等.针刺配合中药离子导入对神经根型颈椎病IL-1的影响及疗效观察[J].2012,34(1)：4-7
[52]孙瑜,胡中.超短波对神经根型颈椎病治疗作用观察[J].昆明医学院学报,2010,31(9)：98-99
[53]赵强,肖少华,魏全等McKenzie方法配合微波和低周波治疗神经根型颈椎病的疗效观察[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2006.24(1)：53-54
[54]李艳.低频脉冲电治疗神经根型颈椎病疗效观察.中华现代临床医学杂志,2004,2(78)：1084
[55]张平建.超短波并低频脉冲电治疗神经根型颈椎病58例.中华实用中西医杂志,2004：4(17)：150
[56]贾连顺.颈椎病研究的现状和展望[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2001,8(8)：733-734[57]孙宇,刘忠军,党耕町.颈椎病外科治疗的回顾[J].北京大学学报(医学版),2002,34(5)：627-62
[58]陈鸿儒,董析.颈椎病微创手术研究进展[J].骨与关节损伤杂志,2003,16(9)：645-647
[59]吕平.前路减压融合内固定治疗神经根型颈椎病12例临床观察[J].中国社区医师,2011,2(35)：162
[60]辛陆军,吕宏乐,刘建设.Solis融合器在前路手术治疗神经根型颈椎病中的应用[J].医药论坛杂志.2011,32(18)：132-134
[61]钟跃,洪国良,杨新宇,等.经后路显微微创神经根减压手术治疗颈椎病[J].中国神经精神疾 病杂志,2003,23(5)：376-378
[62]Poynton AR,0 Farrell DA, Mulcahy D, et al. Chymopapain chemonucleolysis:a review of 105 cases[J]. J R Coll Surg Edinb,1998,43 (6):407-409
[63]K knel Talu G, Derby R. Chemonucleolysi sin low back pain [J]. Agri,2008,20(2):8-13.
[64]Yan D, Li J, Zhu H. Percutaneous cervicalnucleoplasty and percutaneous cervical dis —cectomy treatments of the contained cervical disc herniation [J]. Arch Orthop TraumaSurg,2010,130 (11):1371-1376
[65]Choy DS, Fejos AS. Cervical disc herniations and percutaneous laser disc decompression:a case report[J]. Photomed Laser Surg,2004,22 (5):423-425.
[66]Lee SH, Ahn Y, Choi WC, et al. Immediatepain improvement is a useful predictor of long-term favorable outcome after percuta-neous laser disc decompression for cervical disc herniation [J]. Photomed Laser Surg,2006,24 (4):508-513.
[67]Nardi PV, Cabezas D, Cesaroni A. Percuta-neous cervical nucleoplasty using coblation technology. Clinical results in fifty consecu-tive cases [J]. Acta Neurochir (Suppl), 2005,92:73-78
[68]an J, Zheng Y, Gong L, et al. Anterior cer-vical discectomy and interbody fusion by endoscopic approach:a preliminary report[J].J Neurosurg Spine,2008,8 (1):17-21.
[69]Fessler RG, Khoo LT. Minimally invasive cervical microendoscopic foraminotomy:aninitial clinical experience [J]. Neurosurgery,2002,51 (5 Suppl):37-45
[70]Holly LT,Moftakhar P,Khoo LT. Minimally Invasive 2 -Level Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy:Preliminary Clinical Results [J].J Spinal Disord Tech,2007,20 (1):20-24.
[71]安光辉,赵毅,孙鹏.夹脊穴治疗颈椎病的理论与应用[J].中国临床康复,2006,10(31)：129-131
[72]王玉明,李生棣,李勃.华佗夹脊穴与硬脊膜关系初探[J].甘肃中医,2001,14(5)：60-61
[73]王玉明,李勃,关钊玉.等.腰段华佗夹脊穴针刺深度的CT影像定位探析[J].中国针灸2005,25(3)：179-180
[74]陈毅名,熊锁,单永化.针刺夹脊穴治疗颈椎病疗效分析.上海针灸杂志,1988,17(1)：19.
[75]金国英.推拿与针刺治疗神经根型颈椎病123例[J].辽宁中医杂志,2003,30(4)：307.
[76]张吉,王振坤,白丽敏等.针灸镇痛机制与临床[M].北京：人民卫生出版社.2002：24
[77]王春琛,杨春艳,王麟鹏等.早起针刺夹脊穴对MCAO大鼠脊髓β-内啡肽和强啡肽水平的影响[J].中国中医急症,2012,13(2)：213-222
[78]党读华,夏冰.针刺输穴为主治疗偏瘫患者肩痛56例[J].上海针灸杂志,1997,16(6)：18.
[79]高树中,赵联和,谭奇文,等.“病时间时甚者取之输”的临床应用体会[J].中国针 灸,1998,18(7)：431-432.
[80]朱桂香,甄增国,董素静.针刺手三阳经输穴治疗颈肩综合征[J].河南中医,2002,22(2)：60.
[81]李莉,李国臣,黄银兰.以太渊穴为主治疗痹证76例[J].陕西中医,2003,24(5)：451.
[82]周勇,吴玮.中渚穴的临床应用[J].针灸临床杂志,2001,17(2)：46.
[83]李豪英.诸痛疮痒话后溪[J].中医药学刊,2006,24(9)：1756.
[84]解秸萍.“输主体重节痛”作用的研究[J].北京针灸骨伤学院学报,2001,8(2)：6-8.
[2]钟冲,韩淑凯,曹文杰等.芪蛭通络方治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床观察[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2011,19(5)：54-55
[3]石真安.自拟颈舒通痹汤治疗神经根型颈椎病60例[J].中医正骨,2011,23(1)：66-67
[4]苗同贺,复康颗粒治疗神经根型颈椎病56例[J],湖南中医杂志,2011,27(5)：36-37
[5]郑昱新,石印玉,詹红生等芪葛颗粒治疗神经根型颈椎病356例[J].湖南中医杂志,2011,27(?)：64-65
[6]刘柏龄,马晓春,刘茜.刘柏龄治疗脊柱病经验撷要[M].北京：北京科学技术出版社,2003：71-72.
[7]施杞,王拥军.施杞谈颈椎病[M].上海：上海科技教育出版社,2000：94-30
[8]杨百明,李娟.神经根型颈椎病的中医辨证施治[J].新疆中医药,1997,17(3)：17-18.
[9]王锡三,水性伤痛贴治疗神经根型颈椎病84例疗效观察[J].医护论坛,2011,18(29)：175-176
[10]刘建卫,陈志华,黄培祥,等.萸乌散药熨法治疗颈型和神经根型颈椎病疗效观察[J].中医正骨,2008,20(2)：41-42.
[11]赵昌林,陈孝根.白芥子散外敷治疗神经根型颈椎病80例的临床观察[J].江苏中医药,2006,27(8)：34.
[12]高华.深刺颈夹脊穴治疗神经根型颈椎病151例分析[J].中国误诊学杂志,2010,10(5)：3674-3675
[13]王国明,李丽霞,宋永强,等.针刺治疗神经根型颈椎病212例临床观察[J].中国中医药信息杂志,2006,13(6)：6
[14]王凌力,杜宇征,郑健刚.通络法治疗神经根型颈椎病60例临床观察[J].云南中医中药杂志,2008,29(9)：37.
[15]刘公望,王秀云,孟向文,等.四天穴针刺法治疗神经根型颈椎病临床观察[J].上海针灸杂志,2009,28(1)：25-28
[16]李志宏,李冬梅.温针灸治疗顽固性神经根型颈椎病47例[J].云南中医中药杂志.2009,30(6)：46
[17]梁日楚.神经根型颈椎病不同针灸方法治疗效果分析[J].中外医学研究,2011,9(12)：52-53
[18]刘双岭,陈伊,姜海霞,等.夹脊电针治疗神经根型颈椎病30例[J].针灸临床杂志,2010：26(4)：39-4
[19]王艳锋.以颈臂穴为主施以电针治疗神经根型颈椎病临床研究[J].中医临床研究,2012,4(2)：3-5
[20]钟吉富.针刀治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床研究[J],科学之友,2007,1(4)：125-126
[21]彭建全,苏华新,徐原,等.针刀松解结合前屈位牵引治疗神经根型颈椎病的疗效观察[J].中医药导报,2010,16(5)：66-68
[22]吴峻,於芸.针刀治疗神经根型颈椎病30例临床观察[J].江苏中医药,2007,39(6)：51-52.
[23]刘悦平,胡晶晶,张红星等.穴位注射颈夹脊穴对神经根型颈椎病镇痛作用的研究[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志.2009,13(4)：28-29
[24]曾顺军,刘丽,关德斌.颈横突穴位注射治疗神经根型颈椎病疗效观察[J].上海针灸杂志.2010,29(8)：523-524
[25]梁来德.脊柱推拿治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床观察[J].中国医药指南,2009,18(7)：53-54,
[26]徐辉,楚少增,王春梅.活动牵引加推拿治疗神经根型颈椎病[J].医学信息,2007,20(8)：1467-1 469
[27]唐玉萍.牵引和手法推拿治疗神经根型颈椎病[J].华夏医学,2008,21(1)：176-177
[28]杜涛.牵引配合推拿治疗神经根型颈椎病60例[J].云南中医中药杂志,2009,30(7)：50.
[29]刘维,李洪久.综合疗法治疗神经根型颈椎病70例[J].实用中医内科杂志,2012,36(1)：82-83
[30]陈维清.综合疗法治疗神经根型颈椎病144例[J].中国医药科学.2011,4(23)：109-110
[31]王振华,刘鹰,梁东升.中医综合疗法治疗神经根型颈椎病临床观察[J].医药论坛杂志,2011,32(11)：80-81.
[32]薄智云,牛庆强,朱文罡,等.腹针治疗神经根型颈椎病多中心对照研究[J]中国针灸,2005,25(6)：387-389
[33]彭冬青,刘云霞,董玉喜,等.贺氏针灸三通法治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床研究[J].北京中医药,2009,28(1)：36-38.
[34]刘成峰,夏春发.腕踝针配合推拿正骨手法治疗神经根型颈椎病126例[J].现代中医药,2010,30(4)：44-45.
[35]李彬,谢新才,冯毅,等,火针治疗神经根型颈椎病疗效观察[J].北京中医药,2010,29(12)：920-922.
[36]季英莲,房静,张叔爱.浮针治疗神经根型颈椎病31例疗效观察与护理[J],2011.17(36)：34-35
[37]王晅.倒马针配合局部刺络治疗神经根型颈椎病24例临床疗效观察[J].2011,21(12)：56-57
[38]张志兰,侯宝国.傍针刺法为主治疗神经根型颈椎病[J].2011,4(33)：152-153
[39]朱东娇,曹云峰,赵玉祥.平衡针治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床对照分析[J].内蒙古中医药.2011,30(18)：40-41
[40]朱立国,于杰.关于神经根型颈椎病的临床治疗评述[J].医学信息,外科版,2009,,2(1)：3-6
[41]Bridge FM,Ball DJ,Mackinrom SE, et al. Nerve crush injuries-a mod-el for axanot mesis[J].Exp Neurol,1994,127(2):284
[42]Yoshizawa H,Kobayash S,Monta T. Chronic nerve root compression pathophysiologic mechanism of nerve root dysfunceio[J]. Spine,1995,20(4):397
[43]Olmarker K, RyderiKB, Prhophysiology of sciatica[J]. Orthop Clin Nor(Am),1991,22: 223
[44]王葵光,胡有谷.腰椎间盘突出症的自身免疫状态[J].中华骨科杂志,1994,14(5)：258
[45]于杰,朱立国,房敏等.神经根型颈椎病压痛部位分布及其与神经节段的关系[J].h环球中医药,2011,4(4)：250-252
[46]Yi S, Lim JH, Choi KS,et al. Comparison of anterior cervical foraminotomy vs arthroplasty for unilateral cervical radiculopathy [J]. SurgNeurol,2009,71 (6):677-680
[47]Nasca RJ. Cervical radiculopathy:current di -agnostic and treatment options [J]. J SurgOrthop Adv,2009,18(1):13-8.
[48]王刚,王军,翁长水.神经根型颈椎病病程与预后的关系[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2006,21(9)：69
[49]徐军.脊柱牵引治疗技术(续三).中国临床康复,2002,6(6)：778
[50]谢开字.牵引中药并用治疗神经根型颈椎病117例.实用中医内科杂志,2005：19(3)：290
[51]安雪,张红星,周利等.针刺配合中药离子导入对神经根型颈椎病IL-1的影响及疗效观察[J].2012,34(1)：4-7
[52]孙瑜,胡中.超短波对神经根型颈椎病治疗作用观察[J].昆明医学院学报,2010,31(9)：98-99
[53]赵强,肖少华,魏全等McKenzie方法配合微波和低周波治疗神经根型颈椎病的疗效观察[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2006.24(1)：53-54
[54]李艳.低频脉冲电治疗神经根型颈椎病疗效观察.中华现代临床医学杂志,2004,2(78)：1084
[55]张平建.超短波并低频脉冲电治疗神经根型颈椎病58例.中华实用中西医杂志,2004：4(17)：150
[56]贾连顺.颈椎病研究的现状和展望[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2001,8(8)：733-734[57]孙宇,刘忠军,党耕町.颈椎病外科治疗的回顾[J].北京大学学报(医学版),2002,34(5)：627-62
[58]陈鸿儒,董析.颈椎病微创手术研究进展[J].骨与关节损伤杂志,2003,16(9)：645-647
[59]吕平.前路减压融合内固定治疗神经根型颈椎病12例临床观察[J].中国社区医师,2011,2(35)：162
[60]辛陆军,吕宏乐,刘建设.Solis融合器在前路手术治疗神经根型颈椎病中的应用[J].医药论坛杂志.2011,32(18)：132-134
[61]钟跃,洪国良,杨新宇,等.经后路显微微创神经根减压手术治疗颈椎病[J].中国神经精神疾 病杂志,2003,23(5)：376-378
[62]Poynton AR,0 Farrell DA, Mulcahy D, et al. Chymopapain chemonucleolysis:a review of 105 cases[J]. J R Coll Surg Edinb,1998,43 (6):407-409
[63]K knel Talu G, Derby R. Chemonucleolysi sin low back pain [J]. Agri,2008,20(2):8-13.
[64]Yan D, Li J, Zhu H. Percutaneous cervicalnucleoplasty and percutaneous cervical dis —cectomy treatments of the contained cervical disc herniation [J]. Arch Orthop TraumaSurg,2010,130 (11):1371-1376
[65]Choy DS, Fejos AS. Cervical disc herniations and percutaneous laser disc decompression:a case report[J]. Photomed Laser Surg,2004,22 (5):423-425.
[66]Lee SH, Ahn Y, Choi WC, et al. Immediatepain improvement is a useful predictor of long-term favorable outcome after percuta-neous laser disc decompression for cervical disc herniation [J]. Photomed Laser Surg,2006,24 (4):508-513.
[67]Nardi PV, Cabezas D, Cesaroni A. Percuta-neous cervical nucleoplasty using coblation technology. Clinical results in fifty consecu-tive cases [J]. Acta Neurochir (Suppl), 2005,92:73-78
[68]an J, Zheng Y, Gong L, et al. Anterior cer-vical discectomy and interbody fusion by endoscopic approach:a preliminary report[J].J Neurosurg Spine,2008,8 (1):17-21.
[69]Fessler RG, Khoo LT. Minimally invasive cervical microendoscopic foraminotomy:aninitial clinical experience [J]. Neurosurgery,2002,51 (5 Suppl):37-45
[70]Holly LT,Moftakhar P,Khoo LT. Minimally Invasive 2 -Level Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy:Preliminary Clinical Results [J].J Spinal Disord Tech,2007,20 (1):20-24.
[71]安光辉,赵毅,孙鹏.夹脊穴治疗颈椎病的理论与应用[J].中国临床康复,2006,10(31)：129-131
[72]王玉明,李生棣,李勃.华佗夹脊穴与硬脊膜关系初探[J].甘肃中医,2001,14(5)：60-61
[73]王玉明,李勃,关钊玉.等.腰段华佗夹脊穴针刺深度的CT影像定位探析[J].中国针灸2005,25(3)：179-180
[74]陈毅名,熊锁,单永化.针刺夹脊穴治疗颈椎病疗效分析.上海针灸杂志,1988,17(1)：19.
[75]金国英.推拿与针刺治疗神经根型颈椎病123例[J].辽宁中医杂志,2003,30(4)：307.
[76]张吉,王振坤,白丽敏等.针灸镇痛机制与临床[M].北京：人民卫生出版社.2002：24
[77]王春琛,杨春艳,王麟鹏等.早起针刺夹脊穴对MCAO大鼠脊髓β-内啡肽和强啡肽水平的影响[J].中国中医急症,2012,13(2)：213-222
[78]党读华,夏冰.针刺输穴为主治疗偏瘫患者肩痛56例[J].上海针灸杂志,1997,16(6)：18.
[79]高树中,赵联和,谭奇文,等.“病时间时甚者取之输”的临床应用体会[J].中国针 灸,1998,18(7)：431-432.
[80]朱桂香,甄增国,董素静.针刺手三阳经输穴治疗颈肩综合征[J].河南中医,2002,22(2)：60.
[81]李莉,李国臣,黄银兰.以太渊穴为主治疗痹证76例[J].陕西中医,2003,24(5)：451.
[82]周勇,吴玮.中渚穴的临床应用[J].针灸临床杂志,2001,17(2)：46.
[83]李豪英.诸痛疮痒话后溪[J].中医药学刊,2006,24(9)：1756.
[84]解秸萍.“输主体重节痛”作用的研究[J].北京针灸骨伤学院学报,2001,8(2)：6-8.