全球化背景下的地域分工与城市化空间格局研究
|
摘要
20世纪中末期以来,技术进步与制度创新扫除了生产要素和产品跨国流动的障碍,推动了经济全球化不断向前发展,最终形成了规模宏大的全球生产网络。全球生产网络的形成,使产品价值链在全球范围内实现重构,对国际劳动地域分工的格局、形态以及分工关系均产生重大影响,对中国城市化的影响既有机遇,又存在挑战。一方面,参与外部分工的过程在使城市化过程获得重要动力源的同时,也使中国的城市化过程对发达经济体产生越来越明显的依附性,由此带来城市化过程的脆弱性。另一方面,内部分工的整合性和调控过程对城市化的空间格局施加重要作用,并影响其可持续发展。因此,有必要进一步探讨当前地域分工演进的基本特征、对城市化空间格局的影响效应及其作用机理。
本文综合运用地理学、经济学和管理学的相关理论与方法,初步构建了“经济全球化——新的地域分工——新的城市化空间格局”的分析框架；在其基础上,以长江三角洲地区为例,对全球化背景下新地域分工的格局特征及其空间过程、新的城市化空间格局及其演化脉络进行定性和定量的研究,并进一步探讨地域分工演进对城市化空间格局演变的影响机制,总结了一般机理和相关模式。全文共分三个部分。
第一部分是研究绪论、国内外研究进展和论文的研究框架。第一章绪论部分对研究范畴和相关概念进行界定,论述了本文的研究背景与意义,提出了研究的主要内容、基本的研究视角和技术路线。第二章对国内外研究进展进行综述,主要从全球化研究、新地域分工研究、新城市化空间格局、城市与区域研究框架以及主要的研究方法等方面把握了国内外的进展概况。在前两章的基础上,第三章提出了本文的基本研究框架。首先,描述了全球化背景下地域分工演进的主要维度,即从尺度、形态和关系三方面掌握地域分工演进的动态；其次,从宏观、中观、微观三个不同尺度水平概览了当前出现的新的城市化空间形式,包括巨型区域、多中心都市区和边缘城市等,并介绍了其相关研究进展；第三,在新地域分工与新的城市化空间格局间建立因果联系,初步探讨了地域分工演进对城市化空间格局形成的影响与机制,以构成本文的研究基础。
第二部分是以长江三角洲地区为案例,探讨新地域分工、新城市化空间格局以及二者间的作用机制与模式。第四章对全球化背景下长江三角洲地区地域分工在三个维度上的格局特征与空间演化过程进行研究。首先,确定了长江三角洲地区的地域范围,即江苏、浙江和上海两省一市的行政地域范围。其次,利用对外出口数据表征了长江三角洲参与全球分工的态势,利用区域产品盈余指数表达长江三角洲内部地域间分工的变动过程。总体上看,长江三角洲“去地域化”的尺度重组战略非常明显。地域化的程度在苏南、浙东北和上海等区域变得越来越低,使这种尺度结构并不稳定。另一方面,研究区域内部去地域化程度的趋向于均衡和地域化程度的差异性表现使长江三角洲地区呈现出尺度重组的独特过程。第三,以汽车产业为例对产品内地域分工进行实证研究。先是把汽车产业链划分为研发设计、一般零部件制造、总成与分总成、整车制造与改装、品牌营销与管理等5个生产区段；然后,将各生产区段在各地区的生产产值汇入地图,据此概括研究区域产品内地域分工的特点。长江三角洲的实证表明,从对20世纪末期到现在,地域分工的形态和内容已经表现出一定的新变化,低区段生产单元的空间布局更加分散,且扩散的方向主要表现为近域扩散,温台地区和杭绍地区的体现较为明显。第四,采用协整性检验、Grange因果检验等计量经济方法,对发展中地区与发达地区间的不平等分工产生的后果进行定量分析,主要验证了不平等分工中形成的区域发展脆弱性后果、结构锁定后果和生产环境后果。计量结果显示,经济增长和第二产业发展对对外出口已经产生一定的依赖性,且表现为长期均衡和单向的因果关系；区域在低区段的分工通过不同的传导路径导致了其进入“比较优势陷阱”；研究区域的对外出口增长在一定程度上会带来污染物排放的增加。第五章在不同尺度上探讨了长江三角洲地区新的城市化空间格局。首先,借鉴国外Mega-Region的基本思路和理念,对长江三角洲地区进行实证研究。基于生产性服务业在中心城市集聚、制造业向外围扩散、并因此而产生地域间密切的相互联系和彼此依赖关系的理论框架下,探讨了Mega-Region的边界界定方法。在此基础上,研究了边界的变化过程和各个时期的格局特征。其次,以上海都市区为例,构造了都市区发展的多中心指数,综合运用统计指标对上海都市区的人口和就业的多中心程度进行刻画。研究认为,上海都市区的多中心程度不断提高,归因于浦东新区、闵行、宝山、嘉定等地的迅速发展。而后,以上海市中心城区和边缘城市为例,研究了长江三角洲地区城市化微观格局的发展特征。辨别了上海市周边的边缘城市,而后以上海市嘉定区为例,梳理了其发展和成长的脉络,描述了这一边缘城市规模性、独立性和专业性的基本特点。针对地域分工和城市化空间格局的机理与模式,第六章进行了总结。本文认为,新的地域分工形态使大城市周边的新城获得发展机会,得到快速成长；地域分工的多尺度叠加则使多中心的都市区成为一个稳定的空间结构,也使巨型城市通过中心城市的多中心化得到实现；而在区域尺度分工、区域之间密集联系和区域关系演变的基础上,大尺度的城市化空间形态最终形成。这一过程的发展依赖于外围驱动要素和核心驱动要素对城市化空间格局演变一般过程的影响。最后,总结提出了长江三角洲地区城市化空间格局形成过程的一般模式。
第三部分是结论部分,对全文进行总结,提炼出本文的主要结论和创新点,对今后研究做出展望。
本文的创新点在于：(1)构建了“经济全球化——新地域分工——新城市化空间格局”的分析框架,提供一个当代中国城市化空间格局研究的可行思路：(2)对全球化背景下地域分工的产品内形式进行了实证研究,且得到了较为理想的结论；(3)对Mega-Region进行了实证研究,探讨了其界定方法和发展特征。
Since the late20th century, technological progress and institutional innovation eliminate the obstacles to cross-border flows of productive factors and the products, and promote the continuous development of economic globalization, and ultimately a large-scale global production network is formed. Further, the formation of global production networks achieves a global reconfiguration of the product value chains, which has a major impact on the structure, form and relation of the international division of labor. For China, the model of new international division of spatial labor at least has three characteristics. First, the transition of territorial division of labor is from the domestic division at regional scale to the territorial division of labor at the global-scale. Second, the territorial specialization of inter-industry and intra-industry are shifted into intra-product specialization, which highlights the division and cooperation in accordance with the value chains in the same product. Third, the evolution of international and domestic division results in new spatial relationships. In the context of globalization, the evolution of the spatial division presents opportunities and challenges to the long-term development of China's urbanization. On the one hand, foreign investment and exports have become important power sources of the rapid expansion of the city size, and correspondingly, the transformation of urban functions is also advanced rapidly. On the other hand, it has become increasingly obvious that China's urbanization dependents on the developed economies, which in turn cause the urbanization process frailly and unsustainably. Consequently, it is necessary to further explore the basic characteristics of the evolution of current spatial division of labor and its influence on the spatial pattern of urbanization and the mechanisms of how it works.
Comprehensively using related theories and methods of geography, economics and management science, this thesis constructs a consecution of "economic globalization——new territorial division of labor——new spatial pattern of urbanization". Basing on the above and taking the Yangtze River Delta for example, the thesis exerts qualitative and quantitative researches analyzing the pattern characteristics and the spatial process of new territorial division of labor and the new spatial pattern of urbanization and its evolution, and further studies the influential mechanisms how the evolution of territorial division of labor works on the transformation of spatial pattern of China's urbanization, and then concludes several general mechanisms and related models. This thesis consists of three sections.
Section I includes introduction and the research progress at home and abroad and the research framework of the thesis. The introduction of chapter1defines the research objects and relevant concepts, and presents the research background and its significance and puts forwards the main contents of the study, basic research perspective and technological route. Chapter2overviews and grasps the main research progress at home and abroad, including the research on globalization, the research on new spatial division of labor, the study framework of cities and regions and related research methods, etc. Basing on the above, chapter3proposes a fundamental research framework for this thesis. It is firstly describing the main dimensions of the evolution of territorial division in the context of globalization, that is, from the scale, form and relationships to master the dynamics of evolution of the territorial division. Second, from the macro, medium and micro levels of the three different scales, the thesis overviews and introduces the current emergence of new forms of urban space, such as Mega-City Region, Mega-Region and multi-centered Metropolitan area, Edge city. At the end of the chapter establishes a causal link between new territorial division of labor and new spatial patterns of urbanization, and probes into the influences and mechanisms how the evolution of territorial division of labor works on the transformation of spatial pattern of urbanization, which constitute a basis for further study in this thesis.
Section II studies the new territorial division of labor and the new spatial pattern of urbanization and the mechanisms and models between them, taking the Yangtze River Delta as the example. Chapter4observes the pattern characteristics of the territorial division of labor and the spatial process evolution in three aspects in the Yangtze River Delta region. First, the geographical scope of the controversial Yangtze River Delta area is identified to be composed of two provinces of Jiangsu and Zhejiang and one municipality of Shanghai. Second, export data is selected to measure the extent of Yangtze River Delta taking part in the international division of labor, and the regional product surplus index is constituted to reflect the internal changes of territorial division of labor in Yangtze River Delta area. It is found that within the Yangtze River Delta area all regions are actively promoting the scale-oriented restructuring so as to be fused into globalization, but also there are obvious geographical differences.
Overall, the strategic scale-oriented restructuring of "deterritorialisation" is evident in Yangtze River Delta area in which exports size and the degree of dependence on foreign trade develop promptly. But the development is not based on the geographical response of the adjustment policy. Instead, the extent of regionalization in the south of Jiangsu, northeast of Zhejiang and Shanghai has become increasingly low, which may affect the future development of globalization in the region and make the structure of this scale is unstable. And there is a unique process of scale-reorganization in the Yangtze River Delta motivated by the geographical balance of deterritorialisation and the diversity of territorialisation. Third, owing to its organizational structure and the circuitous industry chain, the automobile industry is chosen as the empirical research to study the territorial intra-product specialization. At first, the automobile industry chain is divided into5production sectors:R&D design, general parts and components manufacturing, assembly and sub-assembly, vehicle manufacturing and conversion, brand marketing and management. Then it is analyzing the spatial structure and evolution of the trend and sum up the characteristics of territorial intra-product specialization by horizontal and vertical contrasts of the total production values of every production sector linked into the map. The study of Yangtze River Delta area indicates that from the late20th century to the present, the forms and contents of territorial division of labor have shown some new changes. The spatial distribution of low-sector production units become more dispersed and spread into the surrounding areas mostly. Simultaneously, there are two main geographical relations between low-sector and high-sector. One is geographical superposition with local combination of different sectors, and the other is a combination of proximity, the representative of Wenzhou-Taizhou area and Hangzhou-Shaoxing area. In addition, the trend of territorial intra-product specialization is not very clear based on the county-level units. Using econometric methods such as cointegration analysis and Grange causality test, the fourth quantitatively analyzes the outcome caused by uneven division of labor between developing regions and developed regions and validates the consequences of vulnerability of regional development and structure-locked and production environment. The results show that economic growth and the development of secondary industry dependent on exports, exhibiting a long-run equilibrium and one-way causal relationship, and the influential coefficient reaches0.72and0.71separately that fluctuation of regional exports impacts the GDP and the added value of the secondary industry. Territorial division of labor in low-sector production in a region leads it into the "trap of comparative advantage" through different transmit route. To a certain extent, the study area's export growth brings about the increase of pollutant emissions. Chapter5argues the new spatial pattern of urbanization at varied scales. After discriminating the main concepts and considering the development characteristics of the Yangtze River Delta area, it is firstly determining the key applicable concepts for the study area. Then the thesis discerns the edge cities neighboring Shanghai, and taking Jiading district of Shanghai as a case, depicts the history of the city's growth and transformation and the characteristics of its development. Third, the multi-center index of metropolitan development is constructed and used to portray the extent of population and employment multi-center in Metropolitan Shanghai. It shows that metropolitan Shanghai, has a growing degree of multi-center, especially in the Pudong New Area, Minhang, Baoshan, Jiading. It is finally empirical research on Yangtze River Delta area making use of the idea and concept of Mega-Region from abroad. The methods of how to define the borders of Mega-Region are from the theoretical framework that produce services concentrate in urban centers and manufacturing spread to the periphery and thus result in inter-regional linkages and close relations with each other. Subsequently, the thesis studies the transformation process of the borders and the spatial structures in different periods. Chapter6draws conclusion that new form of territorial division of labor gives the new cities surrounding big cities opportunities to develop fast, and the superposition of multi-scale of territorial division of labor benefits the stability of spatial structure of the metropolitan city with multi-center, large-scale spatial patterns of urbanization is ultimately formed on the foundation of territorial division of labor, intensive contact of inter-regions and the evolution of regional relations. All of these rely on the external and core drive factors acting on the general process of the spatial pattern of urbanization. The end of the chapter summarizes the general pattern of spatial structure formation of urbanization in Yangtze River Delta.
Section III is the conclusion of the thesis. It summarizes the full text and extracts the innovation points and make prospects for future research.
The thesis makes progress in the following three aspects:(1) A consecution of "economic globalization——new territorial division of labor——new spatial pattern of urbanization" is constructed, and then leads into a possible idea to study contemporary Chinese urbanization patterns;(2) It is creative to do a empirical research on the intra-product specialization in the context of globalization and receive satisfactory conclusions;(3) An empirical study is carried out on the concept of Mega-Region, probing into the methods of defining it and the its development characteristics.
本文综合运用地理学、经济学和管理学的相关理论与方法,初步构建了“经济全球化——新的地域分工——新的城市化空间格局”的分析框架；在其基础上,以长江三角洲地区为例,对全球化背景下新地域分工的格局特征及其空间过程、新的城市化空间格局及其演化脉络进行定性和定量的研究,并进一步探讨地域分工演进对城市化空间格局演变的影响机制,总结了一般机理和相关模式。全文共分三个部分。
第一部分是研究绪论、国内外研究进展和论文的研究框架。第一章绪论部分对研究范畴和相关概念进行界定,论述了本文的研究背景与意义,提出了研究的主要内容、基本的研究视角和技术路线。第二章对国内外研究进展进行综述,主要从全球化研究、新地域分工研究、新城市化空间格局、城市与区域研究框架以及主要的研究方法等方面把握了国内外的进展概况。在前两章的基础上,第三章提出了本文的基本研究框架。首先,描述了全球化背景下地域分工演进的主要维度,即从尺度、形态和关系三方面掌握地域分工演进的动态；其次,从宏观、中观、微观三个不同尺度水平概览了当前出现的新的城市化空间形式,包括巨型区域、多中心都市区和边缘城市等,并介绍了其相关研究进展；第三,在新地域分工与新的城市化空间格局间建立因果联系,初步探讨了地域分工演进对城市化空间格局形成的影响与机制,以构成本文的研究基础。
第二部分是以长江三角洲地区为案例,探讨新地域分工、新城市化空间格局以及二者间的作用机制与模式。第四章对全球化背景下长江三角洲地区地域分工在三个维度上的格局特征与空间演化过程进行研究。首先,确定了长江三角洲地区的地域范围,即江苏、浙江和上海两省一市的行政地域范围。其次,利用对外出口数据表征了长江三角洲参与全球分工的态势,利用区域产品盈余指数表达长江三角洲内部地域间分工的变动过程。总体上看,长江三角洲“去地域化”的尺度重组战略非常明显。地域化的程度在苏南、浙东北和上海等区域变得越来越低,使这种尺度结构并不稳定。另一方面,研究区域内部去地域化程度的趋向于均衡和地域化程度的差异性表现使长江三角洲地区呈现出尺度重组的独特过程。第三,以汽车产业为例对产品内地域分工进行实证研究。先是把汽车产业链划分为研发设计、一般零部件制造、总成与分总成、整车制造与改装、品牌营销与管理等5个生产区段；然后,将各生产区段在各地区的生产产值汇入地图,据此概括研究区域产品内地域分工的特点。长江三角洲的实证表明,从对20世纪末期到现在,地域分工的形态和内容已经表现出一定的新变化,低区段生产单元的空间布局更加分散,且扩散的方向主要表现为近域扩散,温台地区和杭绍地区的体现较为明显。第四,采用协整性检验、Grange因果检验等计量经济方法,对发展中地区与发达地区间的不平等分工产生的后果进行定量分析,主要验证了不平等分工中形成的区域发展脆弱性后果、结构锁定后果和生产环境后果。计量结果显示,经济增长和第二产业发展对对外出口已经产生一定的依赖性,且表现为长期均衡和单向的因果关系；区域在低区段的分工通过不同的传导路径导致了其进入“比较优势陷阱”；研究区域的对外出口增长在一定程度上会带来污染物排放的增加。第五章在不同尺度上探讨了长江三角洲地区新的城市化空间格局。首先,借鉴国外Mega-Region的基本思路和理念,对长江三角洲地区进行实证研究。基于生产性服务业在中心城市集聚、制造业向外围扩散、并因此而产生地域间密切的相互联系和彼此依赖关系的理论框架下,探讨了Mega-Region的边界界定方法。在此基础上,研究了边界的变化过程和各个时期的格局特征。其次,以上海都市区为例,构造了都市区发展的多中心指数,综合运用统计指标对上海都市区的人口和就业的多中心程度进行刻画。研究认为,上海都市区的多中心程度不断提高,归因于浦东新区、闵行、宝山、嘉定等地的迅速发展。而后,以上海市中心城区和边缘城市为例,研究了长江三角洲地区城市化微观格局的发展特征。辨别了上海市周边的边缘城市,而后以上海市嘉定区为例,梳理了其发展和成长的脉络,描述了这一边缘城市规模性、独立性和专业性的基本特点。针对地域分工和城市化空间格局的机理与模式,第六章进行了总结。本文认为,新的地域分工形态使大城市周边的新城获得发展机会,得到快速成长；地域分工的多尺度叠加则使多中心的都市区成为一个稳定的空间结构,也使巨型城市通过中心城市的多中心化得到实现；而在区域尺度分工、区域之间密集联系和区域关系演变的基础上,大尺度的城市化空间形态最终形成。这一过程的发展依赖于外围驱动要素和核心驱动要素对城市化空间格局演变一般过程的影响。最后,总结提出了长江三角洲地区城市化空间格局形成过程的一般模式。
第三部分是结论部分,对全文进行总结,提炼出本文的主要结论和创新点,对今后研究做出展望。
本文的创新点在于：(1)构建了“经济全球化——新地域分工——新城市化空间格局”的分析框架,提供一个当代中国城市化空间格局研究的可行思路：(2)对全球化背景下地域分工的产品内形式进行了实证研究,且得到了较为理想的结论；(3)对Mega-Region进行了实证研究,探讨了其界定方法和发展特征。
Since the late20th century, technological progress and institutional innovation eliminate the obstacles to cross-border flows of productive factors and the products, and promote the continuous development of economic globalization, and ultimately a large-scale global production network is formed. Further, the formation of global production networks achieves a global reconfiguration of the product value chains, which has a major impact on the structure, form and relation of the international division of labor. For China, the model of new international division of spatial labor at least has three characteristics. First, the transition of territorial division of labor is from the domestic division at regional scale to the territorial division of labor at the global-scale. Second, the territorial specialization of inter-industry and intra-industry are shifted into intra-product specialization, which highlights the division and cooperation in accordance with the value chains in the same product. Third, the evolution of international and domestic division results in new spatial relationships. In the context of globalization, the evolution of the spatial division presents opportunities and challenges to the long-term development of China's urbanization. On the one hand, foreign investment and exports have become important power sources of the rapid expansion of the city size, and correspondingly, the transformation of urban functions is also advanced rapidly. On the other hand, it has become increasingly obvious that China's urbanization dependents on the developed economies, which in turn cause the urbanization process frailly and unsustainably. Consequently, it is necessary to further explore the basic characteristics of the evolution of current spatial division of labor and its influence on the spatial pattern of urbanization and the mechanisms of how it works.
Comprehensively using related theories and methods of geography, economics and management science, this thesis constructs a consecution of "economic globalization——new territorial division of labor——new spatial pattern of urbanization". Basing on the above and taking the Yangtze River Delta for example, the thesis exerts qualitative and quantitative researches analyzing the pattern characteristics and the spatial process of new territorial division of labor and the new spatial pattern of urbanization and its evolution, and further studies the influential mechanisms how the evolution of territorial division of labor works on the transformation of spatial pattern of China's urbanization, and then concludes several general mechanisms and related models. This thesis consists of three sections.
Section I includes introduction and the research progress at home and abroad and the research framework of the thesis. The introduction of chapter1defines the research objects and relevant concepts, and presents the research background and its significance and puts forwards the main contents of the study, basic research perspective and technological route. Chapter2overviews and grasps the main research progress at home and abroad, including the research on globalization, the research on new spatial division of labor, the study framework of cities and regions and related research methods, etc. Basing on the above, chapter3proposes a fundamental research framework for this thesis. It is firstly describing the main dimensions of the evolution of territorial division in the context of globalization, that is, from the scale, form and relationships to master the dynamics of evolution of the territorial division. Second, from the macro, medium and micro levels of the three different scales, the thesis overviews and introduces the current emergence of new forms of urban space, such as Mega-City Region, Mega-Region and multi-centered Metropolitan area, Edge city. At the end of the chapter establishes a causal link between new territorial division of labor and new spatial patterns of urbanization, and probes into the influences and mechanisms how the evolution of territorial division of labor works on the transformation of spatial pattern of urbanization, which constitute a basis for further study in this thesis.
Section II studies the new territorial division of labor and the new spatial pattern of urbanization and the mechanisms and models between them, taking the Yangtze River Delta as the example. Chapter4observes the pattern characteristics of the territorial division of labor and the spatial process evolution in three aspects in the Yangtze River Delta region. First, the geographical scope of the controversial Yangtze River Delta area is identified to be composed of two provinces of Jiangsu and Zhejiang and one municipality of Shanghai. Second, export data is selected to measure the extent of Yangtze River Delta taking part in the international division of labor, and the regional product surplus index is constituted to reflect the internal changes of territorial division of labor in Yangtze River Delta area. It is found that within the Yangtze River Delta area all regions are actively promoting the scale-oriented restructuring so as to be fused into globalization, but also there are obvious geographical differences.
Overall, the strategic scale-oriented restructuring of "deterritorialisation" is evident in Yangtze River Delta area in which exports size and the degree of dependence on foreign trade develop promptly. But the development is not based on the geographical response of the adjustment policy. Instead, the extent of regionalization in the south of Jiangsu, northeast of Zhejiang and Shanghai has become increasingly low, which may affect the future development of globalization in the region and make the structure of this scale is unstable. And there is a unique process of scale-reorganization in the Yangtze River Delta motivated by the geographical balance of deterritorialisation and the diversity of territorialisation. Third, owing to its organizational structure and the circuitous industry chain, the automobile industry is chosen as the empirical research to study the territorial intra-product specialization. At first, the automobile industry chain is divided into5production sectors:R&D design, general parts and components manufacturing, assembly and sub-assembly, vehicle manufacturing and conversion, brand marketing and management. Then it is analyzing the spatial structure and evolution of the trend and sum up the characteristics of territorial intra-product specialization by horizontal and vertical contrasts of the total production values of every production sector linked into the map. The study of Yangtze River Delta area indicates that from the late20th century to the present, the forms and contents of territorial division of labor have shown some new changes. The spatial distribution of low-sector production units become more dispersed and spread into the surrounding areas mostly. Simultaneously, there are two main geographical relations between low-sector and high-sector. One is geographical superposition with local combination of different sectors, and the other is a combination of proximity, the representative of Wenzhou-Taizhou area and Hangzhou-Shaoxing area. In addition, the trend of territorial intra-product specialization is not very clear based on the county-level units. Using econometric methods such as cointegration analysis and Grange causality test, the fourth quantitatively analyzes the outcome caused by uneven division of labor between developing regions and developed regions and validates the consequences of vulnerability of regional development and structure-locked and production environment. The results show that economic growth and the development of secondary industry dependent on exports, exhibiting a long-run equilibrium and one-way causal relationship, and the influential coefficient reaches0.72and0.71separately that fluctuation of regional exports impacts the GDP and the added value of the secondary industry. Territorial division of labor in low-sector production in a region leads it into the "trap of comparative advantage" through different transmit route. To a certain extent, the study area's export growth brings about the increase of pollutant emissions. Chapter5argues the new spatial pattern of urbanization at varied scales. After discriminating the main concepts and considering the development characteristics of the Yangtze River Delta area, it is firstly determining the key applicable concepts for the study area. Then the thesis discerns the edge cities neighboring Shanghai, and taking Jiading district of Shanghai as a case, depicts the history of the city's growth and transformation and the characteristics of its development. Third, the multi-center index of metropolitan development is constructed and used to portray the extent of population and employment multi-center in Metropolitan Shanghai. It shows that metropolitan Shanghai, has a growing degree of multi-center, especially in the Pudong New Area, Minhang, Baoshan, Jiading. It is finally empirical research on Yangtze River Delta area making use of the idea and concept of Mega-Region from abroad. The methods of how to define the borders of Mega-Region are from the theoretical framework that produce services concentrate in urban centers and manufacturing spread to the periphery and thus result in inter-regional linkages and close relations with each other. Subsequently, the thesis studies the transformation process of the borders and the spatial structures in different periods. Chapter6draws conclusion that new form of territorial division of labor gives the new cities surrounding big cities opportunities to develop fast, and the superposition of multi-scale of territorial division of labor benefits the stability of spatial structure of the metropolitan city with multi-center, large-scale spatial patterns of urbanization is ultimately formed on the foundation of territorial division of labor, intensive contact of inter-regions and the evolution of regional relations. All of these rely on the external and core drive factors acting on the general process of the spatial pattern of urbanization. The end of the chapter summarizes the general pattern of spatial structure formation of urbanization in Yangtze River Delta.
Section III is the conclusion of the thesis. It summarizes the full text and extracts the innovation points and make prospects for future research.
The thesis makes progress in the following three aspects:(1) A consecution of "economic globalization——new territorial division of labor——new spatial pattern of urbanization" is constructed, and then leads into a possible idea to study contemporary Chinese urbanization patterns;(2) It is creative to do a empirical research on the intra-product specialization in the context of globalization and receive satisfactory conclusions;(3) An empirical study is carried out on the concept of Mega-Region, probing into the methods of defining it and the its development characteristics.
引文
[1]Amin A, Thrift N (eds.). Globalization, Institutions, and Regional Development in Europe [M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press,1994.
[2]Arndt S W. Globalization and the open economy [J]. North American Journal of Economics and Finance,1997,8(1):71-79.
[3]Auty. Natural Resources, Capital Accumulation and the Resource Curse [J]. Ecological Economics,2006:1-10.
[4]Battern. Network cities:creative urban agglomerations for the 21st century [J]. Urban Studies, 1995,32(2):313-327.
[5]Beaverstock J V, Smith R G, Taylor P J. Globalization and world cities:some measurement methodologies [J]. Applied Geography,2000, (20):43-63.
[6]Bell M, Albu. Knowledge systems and technological dynamism in industrial clusters in developing countries [J]. World Development,1999,27 (9):1715-1734.
[7]Berry B J, Kim H M. Challenges to the mono-centric model [J]. Geographical Analysis,1993, 25:1-41.
[8]Brenner N. The urban question as a scale question:reflections on Henri Lefebvre, urban theory and the politics of scale [J]. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,2000, 24(2):361-378.
[9]Clark C. Urban population densities [J]. Journal of Royal Statistical Society,1951,114: 490-496.
[10]Castells M. The Information Age:Economy, Society and Culture. Vol.Ⅰ:The Rise of the Network Society [M]. Oxford:Blackwell,1996.
[11]Castells M. The Informational City [M]. Oxford:Blackwell,1989.
[12]Champion A. Urbanization, suburbanization, counter-urbanization and re-urbanization [A]. In: Paddison R, Lever W (eds.), Handbook of urban studies. Beverly Hills:Sage,2000.
[13]Cohen R. The New International Division of Labor, Multinational Corporations and urban hierarchy [A]. In:Dear M, Scott A J (eds.), Urbanization and urban planning in capitalist society. London:Methuen,1981.
[14]Corden, Neary. Booming Sector and De-industrialization in a Small Open Economy [J]. Economic Journal,1982,92:825-848.
[15]Coxhead Ian国际贸易和自然资源“诅咒”：中国的增长威胁到东南亚地区的发展子吗[J].经济学,2006,5(2)：609-634.
[16]Daniels P W. Producer services research in the United Kingdom [J]. Professional Geographer, 1995,47(1):82-87.
[17]Dematteis, Guiseppe. Globalisation and regional integration:the case of the Italian urban system [J]. GeoJournal,1997,43(4):331-338.
[18]Dewar M, Epstein D. Planning for "Mega-regions" in the United States [J]. Journal of Planning Literature,2007,22(2):108-124.
[19]Dicken P, Lloyd P E. Location in space:theoretical perspective in economic geography [M]. New York:Harper & Row,1990.
[20]Dicken P. Global Shift:Reshaping the Global Economic Map in the 21st Century [M]. London:Sage,2003.
[21]Dixit A K, Grossman G M. Trade and protection with multistage production [J]. The Review of Economic Studies,1982,49(4):583-594.
[22]Douglass M. Mega-urban regions and world city formation:globalization, the economic crisis and urban policy issues in Pacific Asia [J]. Urban Studies,2000,37(12):2315-2335.
[23]Doxiadis C A. Man's movement and his settlements [M]. Ekistrics,1970,29(1):173-175.
[24]Emrys J. Metropolis:The World's Great Cities [M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press,1990.
[25]Finger J M. Tariff provisions for offshore assembly and the exports of developing countries [J]. The Economic Journal,1975,85(338):365-371.
[1]Florida R. The rise of the mega-region [J]. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society,2008, (1):459-476.
[26]Frieldmann J. The world city hypothesis [J]. Development and Change,1986,17(1):69-83.
[27]Frisken F, Norris D F. Regionalism reconsidered [J]. Journal of Urban Affairs, 2002,23(5):467-478.
[28]Frobel F, Heinrichs J, Kreye O. The New International Division of Labor [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1980.
[29]Fujita M, Krugman P, Venables A J. The Spatial Economy:Cities, Regions and International Trade[M]. Cambridge:MIT Press,1999.
[30]Garreau J. Edge City:Life on the New Frontier [M].New York:Doubleday.1991.
[31]Garza G. Global economy, metropolitan dynamics and urban policies in Mexico [J]. Cities, 1999,16(3):149-170.
[32]Ginsburg N. Extended metropolitan region in Asia:a new spatial paradigm [A]. In:Ginsburg N,Koppel B, McGee T G (eds.), The Extended Metropolis:Settlement Transition in Asia. Honolulu:University of Hawaii,1991.
[33]Glaeser E. Do regional economies need regional coordination [A]. In:Goldfeld K S (eds.), The Economic Geography of Mega-regions. NJ:Princeton University,2007.
[34]Gottman N J. Megalopolis, or the urbanization of the Northeastern Seaboard [J]. Economic Geography,1957,33(3).
[35]Hall P. Global city-regions in the twenty-first century [A]. In Scott (ed.) Global City-Regions. New York:Oxford University Press,2001.
[36]Hall P. Planning the mega-city:a new eastern Asian urban form [A]. In:Brotchie J, Newton P, Hall P (eds.). East west perspective on 21st century urban development:sustainable eastern and western cities in the new millennium. Aldershot:Ashgate,1999.
[37]Hall P. The global city [J]. International Social Science Journal,1996,48(1):15-23.
[38]Hall P. The world cities,2nd edition [M]. London:Weidenfeld and Nicolson,1977.
[39]Hall P. World cities, mega-cities and global mega-city region [R]. GaWC Annual Lecture, 2004.
[40]Hare P. Institutional change and economic performance in the transitional economies [J]. UNECE Economic Survey of Europe in 2001,2001, (2):77-99.
[41]Harvey D. The Limits to Capital [M]. Oxford:Blackwell,1982.
[42]Hayter R. The Dynamics of Industrial Location [M]. Chichester:John Wiley & Sons,1997.
[43]Helleiner G K. Manufactured exports from less developed countries and multinational firms [J]. The Economic Journal,1973,83(329):21-47.
[44]Herod A. Notes on a spatialized labor politics:scale and the political geography of daul unionism in the US longshore industry [A]. In:R Lee, J Wills (eds.), Geographies of Economics. London:Arnold,1997.186-196.
[45]IMF. IMF survey [M]. Washington, DC.1996,1 July:214.
[46]Jarillo J C. On strategic networks [J]. Strategic Management Journal,1988,9(1):31-41.
[47]Jones R W, Kierzkowski H. The role of services in production and international trade:a theoretical framework [A]. In:Jones R W, Krueger A O (eds.), The Political Economy of International Trade:Essays in Honor of Robert E B. Basil Blackwell,1990.
[48]Knox Paul L, McCarthy Linda. Urbanization:An Introduction to Urban Geography [M]. Second Edition. New Jersey:Prentice Hall,2005.9-14.
[49]Kontuly T, Wiard S and Vogelsang R. Counter-urbanization in the Federal Republic of Germany [J]. Professional Geographer,1986,38(2):170-181.
[50]Krugman P. Growing world trade:causes and consequences [J]. Brooking Papers on Economic Activity,1995(1):327-362.
[51]Lang R E. Edgeless cities:exploring the elusive metropolis [M]. Washington:Washington brooking institution press,2003.
[52]Lefevre H. The production of space [M]. Oxford:Blackwell,1991.
[53]Lin G C S, Wei Y H D. China's restless urban landscapes 1:New Challenges for Theoretical Reconstruction [J]. Environment and Planning A,2002,34(9):1535-1544.
[54]Liu X H. Estimation of the spatial distribution of urban population using high spatial resolution satellite imagery [M]. Santa Barbara:University of California,2003.
[55]Logan J R. The New Chinese City [M]. Oxford:Blackwell,2002.
[56]Ma L J C. Urban transformation in China,1949-2000:a review and research agenda [J]. Environment and planning A,2002,34:1545-1569.
[57]Marcotullio P J. Asian urban sustainability in the era of globalization [J]. Habitat International,2001, (25):577-598.
[58]Massey D. Power-geometry and a progressive sense of place [M]. In:Bird J, et al (eds.). Mapping the Future:Local Cultures, Global Change. London:Routledge,1993.
[59]Mcgee, T G. The Emergence of Desakota Regions in Asia:Expanding a Hypothesis [A]. In: Ginsburg N,Koppel B, McGee T G (eds.), The Extended Metropolis:Settlement Transition in Asia. Honolulu:University of Hawaii,1991.
[60]Mercer J. North American cities:the micro-geography [A]. In:Boal F, Royle S (eds.), North America:a geographical mosaic. London:Arnold,1999.
[61]Naroll R S, Bertalanffy Lvon. The principle of allometry in biology and the social sciences [R]. General Systems Yearbook,1956,1:76-89.
[62]Newling B E. The spatial variation of urban population densities [J]. Geographical Review, 1969,59:242-252.
[63]Northam R M. Urban Geography [M]. New York:John Wiley & Sons,1975.
[64]Nucci A, Long L. Spatial and demographic dynamics of metropolitan and non-metropolitan territory in the United States [J]. International Journal of Population Geography,1996,1(2): 165-181.
[65]Pacione M. Urban Geography:a global perspective [M].2nd Edition. New York:Routledge, 2005.
[66]Peet R. Global capitalism:theories of societal development [M]. London:Routledge,1991.
[67]Porter M E. Comparative advantage:creating and sustaining superior performance [M]. The Free Press,1985.
[68]RPA. America 2050:towards a national strategy for prosperity, equity and sustainability [R]. New York:The Second Annual Policy Roundtable on Mega-Regional Development,2006.
[69]Sachs, Warner. The curse of natural resources [J]. European Economic Review,2001,45: 827-838.
[70]Sassen S. Mega-regions:benefits beyond sharing trains and parking lots [A].In:Goldfeld K S (eds.), The Economic Geography of Mega-regions. NJ:Princeton University,2007.
[71]Sassen S. The Global City:New York, London, Tokyo [M]. NJ:Princeton University Press, 1991.
[72]Schmitz H. Small shoemakers and Fordist giants:tale of a super-cluster [J]. World Development,1995,23(1):9-28.
[73]Scott A J, Agnew J, Soja E W, et al. Global city-region [A].In:Scott A J, et al. Global city-regions:trends, theory, policy. Oxford:Oxford University Press,2001.
[74]Scott A J. Regional motors of the global economy [J]. Futures,1996,28(5):391-411.
[75]Scott A J. Regions and the world economy:the coming shape of Global Product, competition, and political order [M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press,1998.
[76]Sherrantt G G. A model for general urban growth [A]. In:Churchman C W, Verhulst M (eds.), Management Sciences, Model and Techniques:Proceedings of the Sixth International Meeting of Institute of Management Sciences. Elmsford, N.Y:Pergamon Press,1960.
[77]Smeed R J. The traffic problem in towns [R]. Manchester Statistical Society Papers, Manchester:Norbury Lockwood,1961.
[78]Smith D A, Timberlake M. Conceptualizing and mapping the structure of the world system's city system [J]. Urban Studies,1995,32(2):287-302.
[79]Stewart J Q, Warntz W. Physics of population distribution [J]. Journal of Regional Science, 1958,1:99-123.
[80]Storper M. Globalization, localization and trade [A]. In:Clark G, Feldman M, Gertler M (Eds), A Handbook Of Economic Geography, Oxford:Oxford University Press:146-165.
[81]Storper M. The Regional World:Territorial Development in a Global Economy [M]. New York:Guilford,1997.
[82]Sturgeon T J. Modular production networks:a new American model of industrial organization [J]. Industrial and Corporate Change,2002,11(3):451-496.
[83]Swyngedoiuw E. Excluding the other:the production of scale and scaled politics [A]. In:R Lee, J Wills(eds.), Geographies of Economics. London:Arnold,1997.167-176.
[84]Tanner J C. Factors affecting the amount travel [R]. Road Research Technical Paper No.51, HMSO (Department of Scientific and Industrial Research). London,1961.
[85]Taylor P J, Hierarchical tendencies amongst world cities:a global research proposal [J]. Cities, 1997,14(6):323-332.
[86]Thrift N, Amin A. Globalization, socio-economics, territoriality [A].In:R Lee, J Wills (eds.), Geographies of Economics. London:Arnold,1997.147-157.
[87]Todorovich P. Introduction [A]. In:Goldfeld K S (eds.), The Economic Geography of Mega-regions. NJ:Princeton University,2007.
[88]UNCTAD. Informational encounter on international governance:trade in a globalization world economy [M] Jakarta, Indonesia.1991, June.pp 19-20.
[89]UNCTAD. Trade and development report [R]. United Nations, New York and Geneva,2002.
[90]United Nations. World urbanization prospects:the 1994 revision [M]. New York:United Nations,1995.
[91]Ward S V (eds.). Planning and Urban Change [M].Sage Publications,2004.
[92]Wei Y H D. Regional development in China [M]. New York:Routledge,2000.
[93]Wu F L. China's recent urban development in the process of land and housing marketisation and economic globalization [J]. Habitat International,2001, (25):273-289.
[94]Wu F. Commentary:Transitional cities [J]. Environment and Planning A,2003,35: 1331-1338.
[95]Yi K M. Can vertical specialization explain the growth of world trade [J]. Journal of Political Economy,2003,111(1):52-102.
[96]Yue T X, Wang Y A, Liu J Y, et al. Surface modeling of human population distribution in China [J]. Ecological Modeling,2005,181:461-478.
[97]Zou D. The open door policy and urban development in China [J]. Habitat International,1996, 20(4):525-529.
[98][英]A.J.约翰斯顿(主编).柴彦威等译.人文地理学词典[M].北京：商务印书馆,2004.
[99]阿兰·鲁格曼.全球化的终结[M].北京：中央编译出版社,2000.1-9.
[100]蔡来兴等.国际经济中心城市的崛起[M].上海：上海人民出版社,1995.
[101]陈波翀,郝寿义,杨兴宪.中国城市化快速发展的动力机制[J].地理学报,2004,59(6)：1068-1075.
[102]陈波翀,郝寿义.自然资源对中国城市化水平的影响研究[J].自然资源学报,2005,20(3)：394-399.
[103]陈才.区域经济地理学[M].北京：科学出版社,2001.
[104]崔功豪,魏清泉,陈宗兴.区域分析与规划[M].北京：高等教育出版社,1999：10-14.
[105]崔功豪.长江三角洲城市发展的新趋势[J].城市规划,2006,30,增刊：41-43.
[106]崔功豪等.城市地理学[M].南京：江苏教育出版社,1992.
[107]邓悦,王铮.上海的边缘城市[J].人文地理,2001,16(5)：34-39.
[108]杜国明,张树文.基于遥感的城乡人口分布模拟[J].遥感学报,2007,11(2)：252-256.
[109]方创琳,刘海燕.快速城市化进程中的区域剥夺行为与调控路径[J].地理学报,2007,62(8)：849-860.
[110]方创琳等.中国城市群结构体系的组成与空间分异格局[J].地理学报,2005,60(5)：827-840.
[111]冯健,周一星.近20年来北京都市区人口增长与分布[J].地理学报,2003,58(6)：903-916.
[112]冯健.杭州市人口密度空间分布及其演化的模型研究[J].地理研究,2002,21(5)：635-646.
[113]高云虹,曾菊新.西部地区城市化进程及其动力机制[J].经济地理,2006,26(6)：965-968.
[114]辜胜阻.非农化与城镇化研究[M].杭州：浙江人民出版社,1991.
[115]顾朝林,庞海峰.中国城市集聚区的演化过程[J].城市问题,2007,(9)：2-6.
[116]顾朝林,石爱华,王恩儒.“新经济地理学”与“地理经济学”——兼论西方经济学与地理学融合的新趋向[J].地理科学,2002,22(2)：30-36.
[117]顾朝林,袁家冬,杜国庆.全球化与日本城市化的新动向[J].国际城市规划,2007,22,(1)：14.
[118]顾朝林.城市化的国际研究[J].城市规划,2003,29(6)：19-24.
[119]顾朝林.大都市伸展区：全球化时代中国大都市地区发展新特征[J].规划师,2002,36(2)：16-21.
[120]顾朝林.经济全球化与中国城市发展[M].北京：商务印书馆,1999.
[121]顾朝林.中国城市发展的新趋势[J].城市规划,2004,30(3)：26-31.
[122]顾朝林等.长江三角洲城市群发展展望[J].地理科学,2007,27(1)：1-8.
[123]顾朝林等.经济全球化与中国城市发展[M].北京：商务印书馆,1999.
[124]何深静,刘玉亭.中国城市贫困问题的国际研究新进展[J].国际城市规划,2008,23(4)：7-11.
[125]洪银兴.从比较优势到竞争优势——兼论国际贸易的比较利益理论的缺陷[J].经济研究,1997,(6)：20-26.
[126]洪银兴.经济转型和转型经济理论[J].学术月刊,2004,(6)：92-102.
[127]胡序威,周一星,顾朝林.中国沿海城镇密集地区空间集聚与扩散研究[M].北京：科学出版社,2000.
[128]胡序威.经济全球化与中国城市化[J].城市规划学刊,2007,(4)：53-55.
[129]黄亚平.城市空间理论与空间分析[M].南京：东南大学出版社,2002.
[130]简博秀.全球化观点的中国都市与区域研究[J].地理学报,2004,59(增刊)：93-100.
[131]金东海,秦文利.论城市化发展的自然资源基础[J].人文地理,2004,19(4)：64-67.
[132]景普秋,张复明.资源型地区工业化与城市化的偏差与整合[J].人文地理,2005,20(6)：38-41.
[133]景普秋.中国工业化与城镇化互动发展研究[M].北京：经济科学出版社,2003.
[134]敬东,谢杰雄.交易成本理论对城市及区域规划的影响——评艾伦-斯科特的“新工业区位论”[J].现代城市研究,1999,(3)：33-36.
[135]黎云,李郇.我国城市用地规模的影响因素分析[J].城市规划,2006,30(10)：14-18.
[136]李诚固,郑文升,李培祥.中国城市化的区域经济支撑模型分析[J].地理科学,2004,24(1)：1-6.
[137]李加林,许继琴,李伟芳等.长江三角洲地区城市用地增长的时空特征分析[J].地理学报,2007,62(4)：437-447.
[138]李若建.我国城市人口空间特征变化分析[J].人口研究,1991,(5)：34-37.
[139]李小建.公司地理论[M]一北京：科学出版社,1999.
[140]李小建.经济地理学[M].北京：高等教育出版社,1999：197.
[141]里斯本小组.竞争的极限：经济全球化与人类未来[M].北京：中央编译出版社,2000.50-51.
[142]梁志坚.交易成本理论在城市与区域研究中的应用[J].城市问题,1994,(6)：7-9.
[143]林毅夫,刘培林.自身能力和国企改革[R].北京大学中国经济研究中心讨论稿系列,2001,2001005.
[144]刘春生.全球生产网络的构建与中国的战略选择[M].北京：中国人民大学出版社,2008.
[145]刘纪远,王新生,庄大方等.凸壳原理用于城市用地空间扩展类型识别[J].地理学报,2003,59(6)：885-892.
[146]刘耀彬,李仁东.转型时期中国城市化水平变动及动力分析[J].长江流域资源与环境,2003,12(1)：8-12.
[147]卢锋.产品内分工[J].经济学(季刊),2004,2004,4(1)：55-82.
[148]吕安民,李成名,林宗坚等.基于遥感影像的城市人口密度模型[J].地理学报,2004,59(6)：158-164.
[149]吕拉昌,魏也华,林初升.中国城市地理研究的若干问题：海外学者的观点[J].人文地理,2006,(2)：67-71.
[150]孟庆民,李国平,杨开忠.新国际分工的动态：概念与机制[J].中国软科学,2000,(9)：112-116.
[151]孟庆民,李国平.新国际劳动分工研究动态[J].世界地理研究,2000,(2)：31-37.
[152]宁越敏,刘涛.上海CBD的发展及趋势展望[J].现代城市研究,2006,(2)：67-72.
[153]宁越敏.从劳动分工到城市形态——评艾伦-斯科特的区位论(二)[J].城市问题,1995,(3)：14-16.
[154]宁越敏.从劳动分工到城市形态——评艾伦-斯科特的区位论(一)[J].城市问题,1995,(2)：18-21.
[155]宁越敏.上海大都市区空间结构的重构[J].城市规划,2006,30(增刊)：44-45.
[156]宁越敏.新的国际劳动分工、世界城市和我国中心城市的发展[J].城市问题,1991,(3)：2-7.
[157]庞海峰,樊烨,丁睿.中国城市人口增长过程及差异研究[J].地理与地理信息科学,2006,22(2)：69-72.
[158]乔继明,宁越敏.试论西方国家劳动空间分工理论的发展[J].世界地理研究,1992,1(1)：38-44.
[159]上海市城市规划设计院,嘉定县建设局规划室.上海的“科学城”——_嘉定城总体规划[J].城市规划,1985,(2)：57-60.
[160]盛洪.分工与交易——一个一般理论及其对中国非专业化问题的应用分析[M].上海：上海三联书店,1992.
[161]田文.产品内贸易的定义、计量及比较分析[J].财贸经济,2005,(5)：77-79.
[162]田永中,陈述彭,岳天祥等.基于土地利用的中国人口密度模拟[J].地理学报,2004,59(2)：283-292.
[163]王缉慈,童昕.地方竞争优势的源泉——论全球化背景下的地方产业群[J].战略与管理,2002,(49)：28—-36.
[164]王闰平,陈凯.资源富集地区经济贫困的成因与对策研究[J].资源科学,2006,7：158-165.
[165]韦亚平.大都市区化的空间分工机制[J].城市发展研究,2003,13(4)：1-6.
[166]魏后凯.大都市区新型产业分工与冲突管理[J].中国工业经济,2007,(2)：28-34.
[167]吴敬琏.当代中国经济改革[M].上海：上海远东出版社,2003.
[168]吴晓,马红杰.“边缘城市”的形成和形态初探[J].华中建筑,2000,(4)：85-86.
[169]吴志强Global region:an alternative strategy for Canton[R]广州都市区发展国际研讨会论文集,2002.
[170]夏丽萍,刘惟华.建设以科研和高科技产业为主体的科技城——嘉定新城总体规划简介(上)[J].上海建设科技,2000,(2)：18-20.
[171]徐康宁,王剑.自然资源丰裕程度与经济发展水平关系的研究[J].经济研究,2006,(1)：78-89.
[172]徐康宁.国际生产网络与新国际分工[J].国际经济评论,2007,(6)：38-41.
[173]徐永健,许学强,阎小培.中国典型都市连绵区形成机制初探——以珠江三角洲和长江三角洲为例[J].人文地理,2000,15(2)：19-23.
[174]许学强,周春山.论珠江三角洲大都会区的形成[J].城市问题,1993,(3)：3-6.
[175]许学强,周一星,宁越敏.城市地理学[M].北京：高等教育出版社,1997.
[176]闫小培,林彰平.20世纪90年代中国城市发展空间差异变动分析[J].地理学报,2004,59(3)：437-445.
[177]闫小培,周素红.信息技术对城市职能的影响——兼论信息化下广州城市职能转变与城 市发展政策应对[J].城市规划,2003,27(8)：15-18.
[178]阎小培,郭建国,胡宇冰.穗港澳都市连绵区的形成机制研究[J].地理研究,1997,16(2)：31-38.
[179]杨青山,李红英,梅林.改革开放以来东北区城市化与产业结构变动关系研究[J].地理科学,2004,24(3)：314-319.
[180]杨小唤,江东,王乃斌等.人口统计数据空间化的处理方法[J].地理学报,2002,57(7)：70-75.
[181]杨小凯,张永生.新兴古典经济学和超边际分析[M].北京：中国人民大学出版社,2000.
[182]姚士谋等.中国城市群(第二版)[M].合肥：中国科学技术大学出版社,2001.
[183]叶嘉安,徐江,易虹.中国城市化的第四波[J].城市规划,2006,30(增刊)：13-18.
[184]叶舜赞.大城市和国际城市集聚和扩散机制的探讨[J].城市问题,1994,(4)：6-10.
[185]于尔根·弗里德里希斯.全球化：概念与基本设想[N].联邦德国议会周报副刊：政治与现代史,1997.33-34期合刊.
[186]俞卫平编译.全球化时代的资本主义[M].北京：中央编译山版社,1999.66-89.
[187]虞孝感,吴楚材.长江三角洲地区国土与区域规划研究[M].北京：科学出版社,1993.
[188]曾刚.上海汽车产业集群建设初探www.sass.org.cn/eWebEditor/UploadFile/OOn/ull/ 20071219134115684.pdf.
[189]曾尊固等.三角洲国土开发——长江三角洲与莱茵河三角洲比较研究[M].南京：南京大学出版社,1991.
[190]张京祥,罗震东,何建颐.体制转型与中国城市空间重构[M].南京：东南大学出版社,2007.
[191]张京祥.城镇群体空间组合[M].南京：东南大学出版社,2000.
[192]张晓明.长江三角洲巨型城市区特征分析[J].地理学报,2006,61(10)：1025-1036.
[193]赵文丁.新型国际分工格局下中国制造业的比较优势[J].中国工业经济,2003,(8)：32-37.
[194]甄峰.信息时代的区域空间结构[M].北京：商务印书馆,2004.
[195]中国投入产出学会课题组.我国目前产业关联度分析[J].统计研究,2006,(11)：3-8.
[196]周一星,曹广忠.中国城市人口可比增长速度的空间差异(1949—1995)[J].经济地理,1998,18(1)：27-34.
[197]周一星.城市地理学[M]一北京：商务印书馆,1995.
[198]周振华.崛起中的全球城市——理论框架及中国模式研究[M].上海：上海人民出版社,2008.
[2]Arndt S W. Globalization and the open economy [J]. North American Journal of Economics and Finance,1997,8(1):71-79.
[3]Auty. Natural Resources, Capital Accumulation and the Resource Curse [J]. Ecological Economics,2006:1-10.
[4]Battern. Network cities:creative urban agglomerations for the 21st century [J]. Urban Studies, 1995,32(2):313-327.
[5]Beaverstock J V, Smith R G, Taylor P J. Globalization and world cities:some measurement methodologies [J]. Applied Geography,2000, (20):43-63.
[6]Bell M, Albu. Knowledge systems and technological dynamism in industrial clusters in developing countries [J]. World Development,1999,27 (9):1715-1734.
[7]Berry B J, Kim H M. Challenges to the mono-centric model [J]. Geographical Analysis,1993, 25:1-41.
[8]Brenner N. The urban question as a scale question:reflections on Henri Lefebvre, urban theory and the politics of scale [J]. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,2000, 24(2):361-378.
[9]Clark C. Urban population densities [J]. Journal of Royal Statistical Society,1951,114: 490-496.
[10]Castells M. The Information Age:Economy, Society and Culture. Vol.Ⅰ:The Rise of the Network Society [M]. Oxford:Blackwell,1996.
[11]Castells M. The Informational City [M]. Oxford:Blackwell,1989.
[12]Champion A. Urbanization, suburbanization, counter-urbanization and re-urbanization [A]. In: Paddison R, Lever W (eds.), Handbook of urban studies. Beverly Hills:Sage,2000.
[13]Cohen R. The New International Division of Labor, Multinational Corporations and urban hierarchy [A]. In:Dear M, Scott A J (eds.), Urbanization and urban planning in capitalist society. London:Methuen,1981.
[14]Corden, Neary. Booming Sector and De-industrialization in a Small Open Economy [J]. Economic Journal,1982,92:825-848.
[15]Coxhead Ian国际贸易和自然资源“诅咒”：中国的增长威胁到东南亚地区的发展子吗[J].经济学,2006,5(2)：609-634.
[16]Daniels P W. Producer services research in the United Kingdom [J]. Professional Geographer, 1995,47(1):82-87.
[17]Dematteis, Guiseppe. Globalisation and regional integration:the case of the Italian urban system [J]. GeoJournal,1997,43(4):331-338.
[18]Dewar M, Epstein D. Planning for "Mega-regions" in the United States [J]. Journal of Planning Literature,2007,22(2):108-124.
[19]Dicken P, Lloyd P E. Location in space:theoretical perspective in economic geography [M]. New York:Harper & Row,1990.
[20]Dicken P. Global Shift:Reshaping the Global Economic Map in the 21st Century [M]. London:Sage,2003.
[21]Dixit A K, Grossman G M. Trade and protection with multistage production [J]. The Review of Economic Studies,1982,49(4):583-594.
[22]Douglass M. Mega-urban regions and world city formation:globalization, the economic crisis and urban policy issues in Pacific Asia [J]. Urban Studies,2000,37(12):2315-2335.
[23]Doxiadis C A. Man's movement and his settlements [M]. Ekistrics,1970,29(1):173-175.
[24]Emrys J. Metropolis:The World's Great Cities [M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press,1990.
[25]Finger J M. Tariff provisions for offshore assembly and the exports of developing countries [J]. The Economic Journal,1975,85(338):365-371.
[1]Florida R. The rise of the mega-region [J]. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society,2008, (1):459-476.
[26]Frieldmann J. The world city hypothesis [J]. Development and Change,1986,17(1):69-83.
[27]Frisken F, Norris D F. Regionalism reconsidered [J]. Journal of Urban Affairs, 2002,23(5):467-478.
[28]Frobel F, Heinrichs J, Kreye O. The New International Division of Labor [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1980.
[29]Fujita M, Krugman P, Venables A J. The Spatial Economy:Cities, Regions and International Trade[M]. Cambridge:MIT Press,1999.
[30]Garreau J. Edge City:Life on the New Frontier [M].New York:Doubleday.1991.
[31]Garza G. Global economy, metropolitan dynamics and urban policies in Mexico [J]. Cities, 1999,16(3):149-170.
[32]Ginsburg N. Extended metropolitan region in Asia:a new spatial paradigm [A]. In:Ginsburg N,Koppel B, McGee T G (eds.), The Extended Metropolis:Settlement Transition in Asia. Honolulu:University of Hawaii,1991.
[33]Glaeser E. Do regional economies need regional coordination [A]. In:Goldfeld K S (eds.), The Economic Geography of Mega-regions. NJ:Princeton University,2007.
[34]Gottman N J. Megalopolis, or the urbanization of the Northeastern Seaboard [J]. Economic Geography,1957,33(3).
[35]Hall P. Global city-regions in the twenty-first century [A]. In Scott (ed.) Global City-Regions. New York:Oxford University Press,2001.
[36]Hall P. Planning the mega-city:a new eastern Asian urban form [A]. In:Brotchie J, Newton P, Hall P (eds.). East west perspective on 21st century urban development:sustainable eastern and western cities in the new millennium. Aldershot:Ashgate,1999.
[37]Hall P. The global city [J]. International Social Science Journal,1996,48(1):15-23.
[38]Hall P. The world cities,2nd edition [M]. London:Weidenfeld and Nicolson,1977.
[39]Hall P. World cities, mega-cities and global mega-city region [R]. GaWC Annual Lecture, 2004.
[40]Hare P. Institutional change and economic performance in the transitional economies [J]. UNECE Economic Survey of Europe in 2001,2001, (2):77-99.
[41]Harvey D. The Limits to Capital [M]. Oxford:Blackwell,1982.
[42]Hayter R. The Dynamics of Industrial Location [M]. Chichester:John Wiley & Sons,1997.
[43]Helleiner G K. Manufactured exports from less developed countries and multinational firms [J]. The Economic Journal,1973,83(329):21-47.
[44]Herod A. Notes on a spatialized labor politics:scale and the political geography of daul unionism in the US longshore industry [A]. In:R Lee, J Wills (eds.), Geographies of Economics. London:Arnold,1997.186-196.
[45]IMF. IMF survey [M]. Washington, DC.1996,1 July:214.
[46]Jarillo J C. On strategic networks [J]. Strategic Management Journal,1988,9(1):31-41.
[47]Jones R W, Kierzkowski H. The role of services in production and international trade:a theoretical framework [A]. In:Jones R W, Krueger A O (eds.), The Political Economy of International Trade:Essays in Honor of Robert E B. Basil Blackwell,1990.
[48]Knox Paul L, McCarthy Linda. Urbanization:An Introduction to Urban Geography [M]. Second Edition. New Jersey:Prentice Hall,2005.9-14.
[49]Kontuly T, Wiard S and Vogelsang R. Counter-urbanization in the Federal Republic of Germany [J]. Professional Geographer,1986,38(2):170-181.
[50]Krugman P. Growing world trade:causes and consequences [J]. Brooking Papers on Economic Activity,1995(1):327-362.
[51]Lang R E. Edgeless cities:exploring the elusive metropolis [M]. Washington:Washington brooking institution press,2003.
[52]Lefevre H. The production of space [M]. Oxford:Blackwell,1991.
[53]Lin G C S, Wei Y H D. China's restless urban landscapes 1:New Challenges for Theoretical Reconstruction [J]. Environment and Planning A,2002,34(9):1535-1544.
[54]Liu X H. Estimation of the spatial distribution of urban population using high spatial resolution satellite imagery [M]. Santa Barbara:University of California,2003.
[55]Logan J R. The New Chinese City [M]. Oxford:Blackwell,2002.
[56]Ma L J C. Urban transformation in China,1949-2000:a review and research agenda [J]. Environment and planning A,2002,34:1545-1569.
[57]Marcotullio P J. Asian urban sustainability in the era of globalization [J]. Habitat International,2001, (25):577-598.
[58]Massey D. Power-geometry and a progressive sense of place [M]. In:Bird J, et al (eds.). Mapping the Future:Local Cultures, Global Change. London:Routledge,1993.
[59]Mcgee, T G. The Emergence of Desakota Regions in Asia:Expanding a Hypothesis [A]. In: Ginsburg N,Koppel B, McGee T G (eds.), The Extended Metropolis:Settlement Transition in Asia. Honolulu:University of Hawaii,1991.
[60]Mercer J. North American cities:the micro-geography [A]. In:Boal F, Royle S (eds.), North America:a geographical mosaic. London:Arnold,1999.
[61]Naroll R S, Bertalanffy Lvon. The principle of allometry in biology and the social sciences [R]. General Systems Yearbook,1956,1:76-89.
[62]Newling B E. The spatial variation of urban population densities [J]. Geographical Review, 1969,59:242-252.
[63]Northam R M. Urban Geography [M]. New York:John Wiley & Sons,1975.
[64]Nucci A, Long L. Spatial and demographic dynamics of metropolitan and non-metropolitan territory in the United States [J]. International Journal of Population Geography,1996,1(2): 165-181.
[65]Pacione M. Urban Geography:a global perspective [M].2nd Edition. New York:Routledge, 2005.
[66]Peet R. Global capitalism:theories of societal development [M]. London:Routledge,1991.
[67]Porter M E. Comparative advantage:creating and sustaining superior performance [M]. The Free Press,1985.
[68]RPA. America 2050:towards a national strategy for prosperity, equity and sustainability [R]. New York:The Second Annual Policy Roundtable on Mega-Regional Development,2006.
[69]Sachs, Warner. The curse of natural resources [J]. European Economic Review,2001,45: 827-838.
[70]Sassen S. Mega-regions:benefits beyond sharing trains and parking lots [A].In:Goldfeld K S (eds.), The Economic Geography of Mega-regions. NJ:Princeton University,2007.
[71]Sassen S. The Global City:New York, London, Tokyo [M]. NJ:Princeton University Press, 1991.
[72]Schmitz H. Small shoemakers and Fordist giants:tale of a super-cluster [J]. World Development,1995,23(1):9-28.
[73]Scott A J, Agnew J, Soja E W, et al. Global city-region [A].In:Scott A J, et al. Global city-regions:trends, theory, policy. Oxford:Oxford University Press,2001.
[74]Scott A J. Regional motors of the global economy [J]. Futures,1996,28(5):391-411.
[75]Scott A J. Regions and the world economy:the coming shape of Global Product, competition, and political order [M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press,1998.
[76]Sherrantt G G. A model for general urban growth [A]. In:Churchman C W, Verhulst M (eds.), Management Sciences, Model and Techniques:Proceedings of the Sixth International Meeting of Institute of Management Sciences. Elmsford, N.Y:Pergamon Press,1960.
[77]Smeed R J. The traffic problem in towns [R]. Manchester Statistical Society Papers, Manchester:Norbury Lockwood,1961.
[78]Smith D A, Timberlake M. Conceptualizing and mapping the structure of the world system's city system [J]. Urban Studies,1995,32(2):287-302.
[79]Stewart J Q, Warntz W. Physics of population distribution [J]. Journal of Regional Science, 1958,1:99-123.
[80]Storper M. Globalization, localization and trade [A]. In:Clark G, Feldman M, Gertler M (Eds), A Handbook Of Economic Geography, Oxford:Oxford University Press:146-165.
[81]Storper M. The Regional World:Territorial Development in a Global Economy [M]. New York:Guilford,1997.
[82]Sturgeon T J. Modular production networks:a new American model of industrial organization [J]. Industrial and Corporate Change,2002,11(3):451-496.
[83]Swyngedoiuw E. Excluding the other:the production of scale and scaled politics [A]. In:R Lee, J Wills(eds.), Geographies of Economics. London:Arnold,1997.167-176.
[84]Tanner J C. Factors affecting the amount travel [R]. Road Research Technical Paper No.51, HMSO (Department of Scientific and Industrial Research). London,1961.
[85]Taylor P J, Hierarchical tendencies amongst world cities:a global research proposal [J]. Cities, 1997,14(6):323-332.
[86]Thrift N, Amin A. Globalization, socio-economics, territoriality [A].In:R Lee, J Wills (eds.), Geographies of Economics. London:Arnold,1997.147-157.
[87]Todorovich P. Introduction [A]. In:Goldfeld K S (eds.), The Economic Geography of Mega-regions. NJ:Princeton University,2007.
[88]UNCTAD. Informational encounter on international governance:trade in a globalization world economy [M] Jakarta, Indonesia.1991, June.pp 19-20.
[89]UNCTAD. Trade and development report [R]. United Nations, New York and Geneva,2002.
[90]United Nations. World urbanization prospects:the 1994 revision [M]. New York:United Nations,1995.
[91]Ward S V (eds.). Planning and Urban Change [M].Sage Publications,2004.
[92]Wei Y H D. Regional development in China [M]. New York:Routledge,2000.
[93]Wu F L. China's recent urban development in the process of land and housing marketisation and economic globalization [J]. Habitat International,2001, (25):273-289.
[94]Wu F. Commentary:Transitional cities [J]. Environment and Planning A,2003,35: 1331-1338.
[95]Yi K M. Can vertical specialization explain the growth of world trade [J]. Journal of Political Economy,2003,111(1):52-102.
[96]Yue T X, Wang Y A, Liu J Y, et al. Surface modeling of human population distribution in China [J]. Ecological Modeling,2005,181:461-478.
[97]Zou D. The open door policy and urban development in China [J]. Habitat International,1996, 20(4):525-529.
[98][英]A.J.约翰斯顿(主编).柴彦威等译.人文地理学词典[M].北京：商务印书馆,2004.
[99]阿兰·鲁格曼.全球化的终结[M].北京：中央编译出版社,2000.1-9.
[100]蔡来兴等.国际经济中心城市的崛起[M].上海：上海人民出版社,1995.
[101]陈波翀,郝寿义,杨兴宪.中国城市化快速发展的动力机制[J].地理学报,2004,59(6)：1068-1075.
[102]陈波翀,郝寿义.自然资源对中国城市化水平的影响研究[J].自然资源学报,2005,20(3)：394-399.
[103]陈才.区域经济地理学[M].北京：科学出版社,2001.
[104]崔功豪,魏清泉,陈宗兴.区域分析与规划[M].北京：高等教育出版社,1999：10-14.
[105]崔功豪.长江三角洲城市发展的新趋势[J].城市规划,2006,30,增刊：41-43.
[106]崔功豪等.城市地理学[M].南京：江苏教育出版社,1992.
[107]邓悦,王铮.上海的边缘城市[J].人文地理,2001,16(5)：34-39.
[108]杜国明,张树文.基于遥感的城乡人口分布模拟[J].遥感学报,2007,11(2)：252-256.
[109]方创琳,刘海燕.快速城市化进程中的区域剥夺行为与调控路径[J].地理学报,2007,62(8)：849-860.
[110]方创琳等.中国城市群结构体系的组成与空间分异格局[J].地理学报,2005,60(5)：827-840.
[111]冯健,周一星.近20年来北京都市区人口增长与分布[J].地理学报,2003,58(6)：903-916.
[112]冯健.杭州市人口密度空间分布及其演化的模型研究[J].地理研究,2002,21(5)：635-646.
[113]高云虹,曾菊新.西部地区城市化进程及其动力机制[J].经济地理,2006,26(6)：965-968.
[114]辜胜阻.非农化与城镇化研究[M].杭州：浙江人民出版社,1991.
[115]顾朝林,庞海峰.中国城市集聚区的演化过程[J].城市问题,2007,(9)：2-6.
[116]顾朝林,石爱华,王恩儒.“新经济地理学”与“地理经济学”——兼论西方经济学与地理学融合的新趋向[J].地理科学,2002,22(2)：30-36.
[117]顾朝林,袁家冬,杜国庆.全球化与日本城市化的新动向[J].国际城市规划,2007,22,(1)：14.
[118]顾朝林.城市化的国际研究[J].城市规划,2003,29(6)：19-24.
[119]顾朝林.大都市伸展区：全球化时代中国大都市地区发展新特征[J].规划师,2002,36(2)：16-21.
[120]顾朝林.经济全球化与中国城市发展[M].北京：商务印书馆,1999.
[121]顾朝林.中国城市发展的新趋势[J].城市规划,2004,30(3)：26-31.
[122]顾朝林等.长江三角洲城市群发展展望[J].地理科学,2007,27(1)：1-8.
[123]顾朝林等.经济全球化与中国城市发展[M].北京：商务印书馆,1999.
[124]何深静,刘玉亭.中国城市贫困问题的国际研究新进展[J].国际城市规划,2008,23(4)：7-11.
[125]洪银兴.从比较优势到竞争优势——兼论国际贸易的比较利益理论的缺陷[J].经济研究,1997,(6)：20-26.
[126]洪银兴.经济转型和转型经济理论[J].学术月刊,2004,(6)：92-102.
[127]胡序威,周一星,顾朝林.中国沿海城镇密集地区空间集聚与扩散研究[M].北京：科学出版社,2000.
[128]胡序威.经济全球化与中国城市化[J].城市规划学刊,2007,(4)：53-55.
[129]黄亚平.城市空间理论与空间分析[M].南京：东南大学出版社,2002.
[130]简博秀.全球化观点的中国都市与区域研究[J].地理学报,2004,59(增刊)：93-100.
[131]金东海,秦文利.论城市化发展的自然资源基础[J].人文地理,2004,19(4)：64-67.
[132]景普秋,张复明.资源型地区工业化与城市化的偏差与整合[J].人文地理,2005,20(6)：38-41.
[133]景普秋.中国工业化与城镇化互动发展研究[M].北京：经济科学出版社,2003.
[134]敬东,谢杰雄.交易成本理论对城市及区域规划的影响——评艾伦-斯科特的“新工业区位论”[J].现代城市研究,1999,(3)：33-36.
[135]黎云,李郇.我国城市用地规模的影响因素分析[J].城市规划,2006,30(10)：14-18.
[136]李诚固,郑文升,李培祥.中国城市化的区域经济支撑模型分析[J].地理科学,2004,24(1)：1-6.
[137]李加林,许继琴,李伟芳等.长江三角洲地区城市用地增长的时空特征分析[J].地理学报,2007,62(4)：437-447.
[138]李若建.我国城市人口空间特征变化分析[J].人口研究,1991,(5)：34-37.
[139]李小建.公司地理论[M]一北京：科学出版社,1999.
[140]李小建.经济地理学[M].北京：高等教育出版社,1999：197.
[141]里斯本小组.竞争的极限：经济全球化与人类未来[M].北京：中央编译出版社,2000.50-51.
[142]梁志坚.交易成本理论在城市与区域研究中的应用[J].城市问题,1994,(6)：7-9.
[143]林毅夫,刘培林.自身能力和国企改革[R].北京大学中国经济研究中心讨论稿系列,2001,2001005.
[144]刘春生.全球生产网络的构建与中国的战略选择[M].北京：中国人民大学出版社,2008.
[145]刘纪远,王新生,庄大方等.凸壳原理用于城市用地空间扩展类型识别[J].地理学报,2003,59(6)：885-892.
[146]刘耀彬,李仁东.转型时期中国城市化水平变动及动力分析[J].长江流域资源与环境,2003,12(1)：8-12.
[147]卢锋.产品内分工[J].经济学(季刊),2004,2004,4(1)：55-82.
[148]吕安民,李成名,林宗坚等.基于遥感影像的城市人口密度模型[J].地理学报,2004,59(6)：158-164.
[149]吕拉昌,魏也华,林初升.中国城市地理研究的若干问题：海外学者的观点[J].人文地理,2006,(2)：67-71.
[150]孟庆民,李国平,杨开忠.新国际分工的动态：概念与机制[J].中国软科学,2000,(9)：112-116.
[151]孟庆民,李国平.新国际劳动分工研究动态[J].世界地理研究,2000,(2)：31-37.
[152]宁越敏,刘涛.上海CBD的发展及趋势展望[J].现代城市研究,2006,(2)：67-72.
[153]宁越敏.从劳动分工到城市形态——评艾伦-斯科特的区位论(二)[J].城市问题,1995,(3)：14-16.
[154]宁越敏.从劳动分工到城市形态——评艾伦-斯科特的区位论(一)[J].城市问题,1995,(2)：18-21.
[155]宁越敏.上海大都市区空间结构的重构[J].城市规划,2006,30(增刊)：44-45.
[156]宁越敏.新的国际劳动分工、世界城市和我国中心城市的发展[J].城市问题,1991,(3)：2-7.
[157]庞海峰,樊烨,丁睿.中国城市人口增长过程及差异研究[J].地理与地理信息科学,2006,22(2)：69-72.
[158]乔继明,宁越敏.试论西方国家劳动空间分工理论的发展[J].世界地理研究,1992,1(1)：38-44.
[159]上海市城市规划设计院,嘉定县建设局规划室.上海的“科学城”——_嘉定城总体规划[J].城市规划,1985,(2)：57-60.
[160]盛洪.分工与交易——一个一般理论及其对中国非专业化问题的应用分析[M].上海：上海三联书店,1992.
[161]田文.产品内贸易的定义、计量及比较分析[J].财贸经济,2005,(5)：77-79.
[162]田永中,陈述彭,岳天祥等.基于土地利用的中国人口密度模拟[J].地理学报,2004,59(2)：283-292.
[163]王缉慈,童昕.地方竞争优势的源泉——论全球化背景下的地方产业群[J].战略与管理,2002,(49)：28—-36.
[164]王闰平,陈凯.资源富集地区经济贫困的成因与对策研究[J].资源科学,2006,7：158-165.
[165]韦亚平.大都市区化的空间分工机制[J].城市发展研究,2003,13(4)：1-6.
[166]魏后凯.大都市区新型产业分工与冲突管理[J].中国工业经济,2007,(2)：28-34.
[167]吴敬琏.当代中国经济改革[M].上海：上海远东出版社,2003.
[168]吴晓,马红杰.“边缘城市”的形成和形态初探[J].华中建筑,2000,(4)：85-86.
[169]吴志强Global region:an alternative strategy for Canton[R]广州都市区发展国际研讨会论文集,2002.
[170]夏丽萍,刘惟华.建设以科研和高科技产业为主体的科技城——嘉定新城总体规划简介(上)[J].上海建设科技,2000,(2)：18-20.
[171]徐康宁,王剑.自然资源丰裕程度与经济发展水平关系的研究[J].经济研究,2006,(1)：78-89.
[172]徐康宁.国际生产网络与新国际分工[J].国际经济评论,2007,(6)：38-41.
[173]徐永健,许学强,阎小培.中国典型都市连绵区形成机制初探——以珠江三角洲和长江三角洲为例[J].人文地理,2000,15(2)：19-23.
[174]许学强,周春山.论珠江三角洲大都会区的形成[J].城市问题,1993,(3)：3-6.
[175]许学强,周一星,宁越敏.城市地理学[M].北京：高等教育出版社,1997.
[176]闫小培,林彰平.20世纪90年代中国城市发展空间差异变动分析[J].地理学报,2004,59(3)：437-445.
[177]闫小培,周素红.信息技术对城市职能的影响——兼论信息化下广州城市职能转变与城 市发展政策应对[J].城市规划,2003,27(8)：15-18.
[178]阎小培,郭建国,胡宇冰.穗港澳都市连绵区的形成机制研究[J].地理研究,1997,16(2)：31-38.
[179]杨青山,李红英,梅林.改革开放以来东北区城市化与产业结构变动关系研究[J].地理科学,2004,24(3)：314-319.
[180]杨小唤,江东,王乃斌等.人口统计数据空间化的处理方法[J].地理学报,2002,57(7)：70-75.
[181]杨小凯,张永生.新兴古典经济学和超边际分析[M].北京：中国人民大学出版社,2000.
[182]姚士谋等.中国城市群(第二版)[M].合肥：中国科学技术大学出版社,2001.
[183]叶嘉安,徐江,易虹.中国城市化的第四波[J].城市规划,2006,30(增刊)：13-18.
[184]叶舜赞.大城市和国际城市集聚和扩散机制的探讨[J].城市问题,1994,(4)：6-10.
[185]于尔根·弗里德里希斯.全球化：概念与基本设想[N].联邦德国议会周报副刊：政治与现代史,1997.33-34期合刊.
[186]俞卫平编译.全球化时代的资本主义[M].北京：中央编译山版社,1999.66-89.
[187]虞孝感,吴楚材.长江三角洲地区国土与区域规划研究[M].北京：科学出版社,1993.
[188]曾刚.上海汽车产业集群建设初探www.sass.org.cn/eWebEditor/UploadFile/OOn/ull/ 20071219134115684.pdf.
[189]曾尊固等.三角洲国土开发——长江三角洲与莱茵河三角洲比较研究[M].南京：南京大学出版社,1991.
[190]张京祥,罗震东,何建颐.体制转型与中国城市空间重构[M].南京：东南大学出版社,2007.
[191]张京祥.城镇群体空间组合[M].南京：东南大学出版社,2000.
[192]张晓明.长江三角洲巨型城市区特征分析[J].地理学报,2006,61(10)：1025-1036.
[193]赵文丁.新型国际分工格局下中国制造业的比较优势[J].中国工业经济,2003,(8)：32-37.
[194]甄峰.信息时代的区域空间结构[M].北京：商务印书馆,2004.
[195]中国投入产出学会课题组.我国目前产业关联度分析[J].统计研究,2006,(11)：3-8.
[196]周一星,曹广忠.中国城市人口可比增长速度的空间差异(1949—1995)[J].经济地理,1998,18(1)：27-34.
[197]周一星.城市地理学[M]一北京：商务印书馆,1995.
[198]周振华.崛起中的全球城市——理论框架及中国模式研究[M].上海：上海人民出版社,2008.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |