用户名: 密码: 验证码:
基于振动测试的杆系钢结构损伤识别研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
随着社会的进步和经济的快速发展,土木工程结构的形式和功能日趋复杂,其安全越来越受到人们的重视。结构健康监测系统越来越多的安装到大跨桥梁、大型空间结构等大型土木工程结构中,但作为健康监测系统核心技术的损伤识别仍未从根本上得到解决,严重制约了结构健康监测系统的应用和发展。
     基于振动测试的结构损伤识别得到了广泛的研究和发展,人们提出了很多方法,这些方法在数值仿真分析及实验室试验中均取得了良好的识别效果。但由于实际的土木工程结构体积巨大,形式复杂,观测手段的限制等原因,通常难以获得这些传统的损伤识别方法所要求的测试信息及测试精度,因此,在已提出的结构损伤识别方法中能够成功应用到土木工程结构的损伤识别和健康监测中的例子尚不多见。结构损伤识别要在土木工程中走向实用还有很多问题需要解决,其中最主要的问题是需要解决测试信息不完备和测量噪声干扰条件下的参数识别及损伤识别问题。基于这样的背景,本文分别以杆系钢结构的轴向刚度和侧向刚度损伤识别为研究对象,提出了两种不同的损伤识别方法,即基于遗传算法的智能算法和基于改进残余力向量的解析算法,并在一些测试条件相同的benchmark结构算例中比较了它们的识别效果。本文主要研究工作分为六章:
     第一章是绪论。阐述了本论文的选题背景和目前结构损伤识别研究现状,并对本文的主要研究内容做了介绍。
     第二章提出基于频响函数和遗传算法的结构损伤识别方法。遗传算法是计算智能的一个重要组成部分,与常规的数学方法相比,它具有高度的自适应性、鲁棒性和并行性,因而对于包含非确定性和噪声的信息也有一定的处理能力,是一种典型的全局优化方法。如果结构输入(激励)已知,频响函数的测试简单且精度好,所包含的结构信息丰富。用测试频响函数及相应的计算频响函数构造遗传算法目标函数进行结构损伤识别,能够在考虑较高噪声水平情况下将结构的损伤识别出来。
     第三章在前人研究基础上提出基于残余力向量的杆系结构损伤直接识别法,克服了由残余力向量法一般只能得到结构损伤位置而无法识别其程度的缺点。该方法用刚度联系矩阵将损伤后结构刚度矩阵的变化矩阵展开,得到一个新的残余力向量方程,求解即可得到各单元刚度参数改变量的解析解,仅需一阶模态参数经一步计算就能够同时识别损伤的位置和损伤的程度。
     第四章研究了输出测量信息不足时结构的损伤识别问题。在基于残余力向量的结构损伤直接识别法中,当输出信息测量不足时无法得到完备的模态振型,完备的模态振型只能通过模态扩阶得到,而由扩阶模态进行结构损伤识别的效果与损伤处的测试信息完备程度有关。在基于遗传算法的结构损伤识别法中,提出直接由不完备的测试频响函数构造遗传算法的目标函数进行结构的损伤识别,在benchmark结构的算例中,识别效果良好。
     第五章研究了输入未知时结构的损伤识别问题。在噪声干扰下结构的模态参数识别误差较大,由此导致了依赖模态参数进行识别的残余力向量法的识别误差也较大,只有在很低水平的噪声条件下识别出来的结果才是可靠的。在基于遗传算法的结构损伤识别法中,在输入未知时无法获得结构的实测频响函数,如果输入的频谱平坦,近似为有限带宽的白噪声(比如脉动风),其功率谱为一常数,则结构的原点频响函数和自功率谱具有相似的形状。提出直接由测试的结构自功率谱和计算的原点频响函数来构造遗传算法的目标函数,进行结构的损伤识别,在benchmark结构算例中,获得了很好的识别效果。最后还讨论了在输入未知且输出测量信息不足时,仅以部分实测自功率谱和相应的计算频响函数构造遗传算法的目标函数,进行结构的损失识别,在算例中也能够获得很好的识别效果。
     第六章总结了本文的主要研究内容,指出尚需要进一步研究解决的问题并对将来的研究工作做了展望。
With the quickly development of the societies and economy, the shape and function of the civil engineering structures become more and more complication, and the security of them is pained more attention to. More and more structural health monitoring(simplified in SHM) system are installed on the long-span bridge、large-scale space civil engineering, however, the key technique of the SHM system—damage identification has never been ultimately resolve, and it restricts the application and developing of SHM seriously.
     The structures damage identification based on vibration test was researched and developed widely, lots of methods were presented in past several decades, most of these methods can get a good results in the numerical analysis or in the experiment in laboratory. However, because the volume of the civil engineering is very huge, and the shapes are more complicated, observation means are restrict, and so on, the prerequisite test information of these methods are generally hard to get completely, the successful examples of damage identification and SHM of civil engineering structures are rare. The damage identification of civil engineering structures go to practical, there are a lot of problems need to be solved, most important of all, is to solve the parameter identification and damage identification in incomplete of the test information and the disturbing of test noise. In such background, two different methods of structures damage identification on steel member structures were presented in this dissertation, they are intelligent method based on genetic algorithm(simplified in GA) and analysis method based on residual force vector separately. In some examples of benchmark structure with the same test condition, the identification results were compared. This dissertation includes six chapters as follows:
     In the first chapter, the background of this dissertation are introduced firstly, Secondly, the structures damage identification based on vibration test is surveyed. Finally, the major research work of this dissertation is produced.
     In the second chapter, the structures damage identification methods based on FRF and GA is presented. GA is an important part of computation intelligence, compare with other mathematical methods, it has the characteristic of adaptive itself, robustness, and parallelism, so it can process the information with the uncertainty and noise, it is a typical global optimization method. if the input of structures is know, the testing of frequency response function(simplified in FRF) is simple and the precision is high, and it contains abundance information. The test FRF and the corresponding calculated FRF are used to construct the target function of GA, the damage of structures can be identified well in difference level noise in the examples.
     In the third chapter, based on the work of previers, a direct damage identification method of structures based on residual force vector is presented. Compare with the traditional method of residual force vector, the weakness that it can only identify the location of damage but not extent in generally directly is overcome. The stiffness matrix perturbation of the damaged structure is expanded by the stiffness connectivity matrix at first, then a new equation of residual force vector is got, it can be solve directly, so the analytical solutions of the stiffness parameter perturbation of elements are got. This method can identify the location and extent of structures damage at the same time only need one calculation step, and need only the first mode parameters of the damaged structures.
     In the fourth chapter, the damage identification of structures with insufficient output information is researched. In the direct damage identification method of structures based on residual force vector, when the output information is insufficient, the completed mode shapes can not be got, so the completed mode shapes can be got only by mode extend, the damage identification results based on extend mode shape depend on the complete degree of the test information of damage location. In the damage identification of structures base on GA, when the output information is insufficient, the insufficient test FRF is used to construct the target function of GA is presented, and GA is used to identify the structures damage. In the example of benchmark structure, the identify results is well.
     In the fifth chapter, the damage identification of structures with unknown input(excitation) information is researched. When the input is unknown, the errors of identification mode parameters are larger than known input in considering of test noise, and it lead to larger errors of damage identification results, in the example, the identification results is reliable only in considering a very low level noise. In the structures damage identification base on GA, when the input is unknown, the test FRF can not be got, if the spectrum of input is flat, and approximately to the white noise(such as fluctuating wind), it's the power spectrum is a constant, so the origin FRF of structures are similar to the power spectrum in form. So the target function of GA constructed by testing power spectrum and corresponding calculating FRF is presented, and used to identify the structures damage. In the example of benchmark structure, a good identification results is got. At last, the case considering with the unknown input and output incomplete is researched, only parts of test power spectrum and corresponding calculating FRF are used to construct the target function of GA, in the example of benchmark structure, the good identification results are got too.
     The last chapter summarizes conclusions in this dissertation, pointes out the present problems in the damage identification of structures, and narrates the prospect for the research work of future in this field.
引文
[1]欧进萍.重大工程结构损伤累积、健康监测与安全评定[A].见:学科发展战略研究报告(2006年-2010年)土木工程卷[C].北京:科学出版社,2006
    [2]刘效尧,蔡键,刘晖.桥梁损伤诊断[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2002
    [3]段香英,王乐,李华.桥梁评估方法研究[J].交通标准化,2004,10:24-28
    [4]G.W.Housner,L.A.Bergman,T.K.Caughey.Structural control:past,present,and future[J].Journal of Engineering Mechanics,ASCE,1997,123(9):897-971
    US]E.Y.Andersen.Structural monitoring of the Great Belt East Bridge[C].In:Jon Krokeborg,ed.Proceedings of the Third Symposium on Strait Crossing.Rotterdam:Balkema,1994,54-62
    [6]V.D.Muria,R.Gomez,C.King.Dynamic structural properties of cable stayed Tampico Bridge[J].Journal of Structural Engineering,1991,117(11):3396-3416
    [7]F.Myroll,E.Dibiagio.Instrumentation for monitoring the Skarnsunder Cable-stayed Bridge[C].In:Jon Krokeborg,ed.Proceedings of the Third Symposium on Strait Crossing.Rotterdam:Balkema,1994,207-215
    [8]秦权.桥梁结构的健康监测[J].中国公路学报,2000,13(2):37-42
    [9]肖纯.工程结构远程健康监测系统的集成与数据处理研究:[博士学位论文].武汉:武汉理工大学,2006
    [10]李宏男,李东升.土木工程结构安全性评估、健康监测及诊断述评[J].地震工程与工程振动.2002,22(3):82-90
    [11]H.Sohn,C.R.Fairer,F.M.Hemez,A Review of Structural Health Monitoring Literature:1996-2001[R].LANL Report LA- 13976-MS,2003
    [12]S.W.Doebling,C.R.Farrar,M.B.Prime.Damage Identification and Health Monitoring of Structural and Mechanical Systems From Changes in Their Vibration Characteristics:A Literature Review[R].LANA Report LA-13070-MS,1996
    [13]马宏伟,杨桂通.结构损伤探测的基本方法和研究进展[J].力学进展,1999,29(4):513-527.
    [14]韩大建,王文东.基于振动的结构损伤识别方法的近期研究进展[J].华南理工大学学报(自然科学版),2003,31(1):91-96
    [15]宗周红,任伟新,阮毅.土木工程结构损伤诊断研究进展[J].土木工程学报,2003,36(51:105-110
    [16]P.Cawley,R.D.Adams.The location of defects in structures from measurements of natural frequencies[J].Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design,19 79,14(2):49-57
    [17]F.Ismail,A.Ibrahim,Identification of fatiguec racks from vibration testing[J].Journal of Sound and Vibration,1990,140:305-317
    [18]G.Hearn,R.B.Testa.Modal analysis for damage detection in structures [J].Journal of Structural Engineering.1991,117(10):3042-3063
    [19]J.E.T.Penny,D.A.Wilson.Damage location in structuers using vibration data[C].Proceedings of the 11th International Modal Analysis Conference,1993,861-867
    [20]A.Messina,E.J.Williams.Structural damage detection by a sensitivity and statistical-based method[J].Journal of Sound and Vibration,1998,216(5):791-808
    [21]N.Stubbs,B.roome,R.Osegueda.Nondestructive construction error detection in largespace structuers[J].AIAA Jounral,1990,28(1):146-152
    [22]N.Stubbs,R.Osegueda.Global non-destructive damage evaluation in solids[J].The International of Analytical and Experimental Modal Analysis,1990,5(2):67-79
    [23]N.Stubbs,R.Osegueda.Global non-destructive damage evaluation in solids-experimental verification[J].The International of Analytical and Experimental Modal Analysis,1990,5(2):81-97
    [24]C.Bails,L.Castellani,G.Coppotelli.Generalization of non-destructive detection and localization in a eronautical structures[C].Proceedings of the 13th International Modal Analysis Confeernce,1995,428-431
    [25]O.S.Salawu.Detection of structural damage through changes in frequency:a review[J].Engineering Structures,1997,19(9):718-723
    [26]M.M.F.Yuen.A numerical study of the eigenparameters of a damaged cantilever[J].Journal of sound and vibration,1985,103:301-310
    [27]RX.Mayes.Error localization using mode shapes-an application to a two-link robot arm[C].Proceedings of the 10th International Modal Analysis Confeernce,1992,886-891
    [28]R.J.AUemang,D.L.Brown.A corerction coefficient for modal vector analysis[C].Proceedings of the 1th International Modal Analysis Confeernce,1982,110-116
    [29]W.M.West.Illustration of the use of modal assurance criterion to detect structural changes in an orbiter test specimenfC].Proceedings of Air Force on Aircraft Structural Integrity,1984:1-6
    [30]C.H.J.Fox.The location of defects in structures:a comparison of the use of a natural frequency and mode shape data[C].Proceedings of the 10th International Modal Analysis Conference,1992:522-528
    [31]N.A.J.Lieven,D.L.J.Ewins.Spatial correlation of modal shapes,the coordinate modal assurance criterion(COMAC)fC].Proceedings of the 4th International Modal Analysis Confeernce,1986,1 -5
    [32]A.K.Pandy,M.Biswas.Damage detection from changes in curvature mode shapes[J].Journal of sound and vibration,1991,145(2):321-332
    [33]J.Chance,G.R.Tomlinson.Simplified approach to the numerical and experimental modeling of the dynamics of a cracked beam[C].Proceedings of the 12th International Modal Analysis Confeernce,1994,778-785
    [34]B.S.Wang,X.B.Liang.Comparative study of damage indices in application to a long-span suspension bridge[C].Advances in Structural Dynamics,2000,1085-1092
    [35]袁向荣.梁的破损对频率振型及振型曲率的影响[J].振动、测试与诊断,1994,2:40-44
    [36]郭国会.桥梁结构动力损伤诊断方法研究:[博士学位论文].长沙:湖南大学土木工程学院,2001
    [37]J.C.Chen,J.A.Garba.On-orbit damage assessment for large space structures[J].AIAA Journal,1988,26(9):1098-1126
    [38]T.W.Lim.Structural damage deteciton using modal test data[J].AIAA Journal,1991,29(12):2271-2275
    [39]N.Stubbs,J.T.Kim,K.Topole.An efficient and robust algorithm for damage localization in offshore platforms[C].Proceedings of the 10th ASCE Structure Congress,ASCE,1992,543-546
    [40]L.R.Barroso,R.Rodriguez.Damage Detection Utilizing the Damage Index Method to a Benchmark Structure[J].Journal of Engineering Mechanics,2004,130(2):142-151
    [41]Z.Y.Shi,S.S.Law,L.M.Zhang.Structural damage localization from modal strain energy change[J].Journal of Sound and Vibration,1998,218(5):825-844
    [42]Z.Y.Shi,S.S.Law,L.M.Zhang.Structural damage detection from modal strain energy change[J].Journalof Engineering Mechanics,2000,126(12):1216-1223
    [43]S.S.Law,Z.Y.Shi,L.M.Zhang.Improved Damage Quantification from Elemental Modal Strain Energy Change[J].Journal of Engineering Mechanics,2002,128(5):521-529
    [44]H.J.Li,H.Z.Yang,S.L.J.Hu.Modal Strain Energy Decomposition Method for Damage Localization in 3D Frame Structures[J].Journal of Engineering Mechanics,2006,132(9):941-951
    [45]刘晖,瞿伟廉,袁润章.基于模态应变能耗散率理论的结构损伤识别方法[J].振动与冲击,2003,23(2):118-122.
    [46]A.Berman,W.G.Flarmelly.Theory of incomplete models of dynamic structures[J].AIAA Journal,1971,9:1481-1487
    [47]T.Toksoy,A.E.Aktan.Bridge condition assessment by modal flexibility[J].Experimental Mechanics,1994,34:271-278
    [48]A.K.Pandey,M.Biswas.Damage detection in structures using changes in flexibiilty[J].Jounral of Sound and Vibraiton,1994,169(1):3-17
    [49]A.K.Pandey,M.Biswas.Experimental verification of flexibilty difference method for locating damage in structures[J].Journal of Sound and Vibraiton,1995,184(2):311-328
    [50]R.L.Mayes.An experimental algorithm for detecting damage applied to the 1-40 Bridge over the Rio Gande[C].Proceedings of the 13th International Modal Analysis Conference,1995,219-225
    [51]綦宝晖,邬瑞锋,蔡贤辉.一种桁架结构损伤识别的柔度阵法[J].计算力学学报.2001,18(1):42-47
    [52]李国强,郝坤超,陆烨.弯剪型悬臂结构损伤识别的柔度法[J].地震工程与工程振动.1999,19(1):31-36
    [53]赵媛,陆秋海.简支梁桥多位置损伤的检测方法[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版).2002,42(4):434-438
    [54]唐小兵,沈成武,陈定方.结构损伤识别的柔度曲率法[J].武汉理工大学学报.200123(8):18-20
    [55]冯新.土木工程中结构识别方法的研究:[博士学位论文].大连:大连理工大学,2002
    [56]董聪.现代结构系统可靠性理论及其应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2001
    [57]董聪,丁辉.结构损伤识别和定位的基本原理与办法[J].中国铁道科学,1999,20(3):89-94
    [58]C.R.Farrar,D.A.Jauragui.Comparative study of damage identification algorithms applied to a bridge:Ⅰ.Experiment[J].Smart Materials and Structures,1998,7(5):704-719
    [59]C.R.Farrar,D.A.Jauragui.Comparative study of damage identification algorithms applied to a bridge:Ⅱ.Numerical study[J].Smart Materials and Structures,1998,7(5):720-731
    [60]F.N.Catbas,A.E.Aktan.Condition and Damage Assessment:Issues and Some Promising Indices[J].Journal of Structural Engineering,2002,128(8),1026-1036
    [61]Z.Sun.Wavelet Packet Based Structural Health Monitoring and Damage Assessment[D].HongKong:HongKong University of Science and Technology,2003
    [62]张德文,魏阜旋.模型修正与破损诊断[M].北京:科学出版社,1999
    [63]D.C.Zimmerman,M.Kaouk.Structural Damage Detection Using a Minimum Rank Update Theory[J].Jounral of Vibration and Acoustics,1994,116,222-232
    [64]M.Kaouk,D.C.Zimmerman.Structural Damage Assessment Using a Generalized Minimum Rank Perturbation Theory[J].AIAA Journal,1994,32(4):836-842
    [65]D.C.Zimmerman,S.W.Smith,H.M.Kim.An Experimental Study of Structural Health Monitoring Using Incomplete Measurements[J].Jounral of Vibration and Acoustics,1996,118(4):543-550
    [66]S.W.Doebling.Minimum-rank optimal update of elemental stifness parameters for structural damage identification[J].AIAA Journal,1996,34(12):2615-2621
    [67]A.Messina,E.J.Williams,T.Contursi.Structural damage detection by a sensitivity and statistica-based method[J].Journal of Sound and Vibration,1998,216(5):791-808
    [68]Z.Y.Shi,S.S.Law,L.M.Zhang.Damage localization by directly using incomplete mode shapes[J].Jounral of Engineering Mechanics,2000,126(6):656-660
    [69]H.F.Lam,J.M.Ko,C.W.Wong.Localization of damaged structural connections based on Experimental modal and sensitivity analysis[J].Jounral of Sound and Vibration,1998,210(1):91-115
    [70]A.Cherki,B.Lallemand,Y.Tison.Improvement of analytical model using uncertain test data[J].AIAA Journal,1999,37(4):489-495
    [71]D.C.Zimmerman,M.Kaouk.Eigenstructuer Assignment Aproach for Structural Damage Detection[J].AIAA Journal,1992,30(7),1848-1855
    [72]R.Q.Cobb,B.S.Liebst.Structural damage identification using assigned partial eigens tructure[J].AIAA Jounral,1997,35(1):152-158
    [73]H.M.Kim,T.J.Bartkowicz.A two-step structural damage detection approach with limited instrumentation[J].Jounral of Vibration and Acoustics,1997,119(2):258-264
    [74]S.S.Law,Z.Y.Shi,L.M.Zhang.Structural damage detection from incomplete and noisy modal test data[J].Journal of Engineering Mechanics,1998,124(11):1280-1288
    [75]H.Sohn,K.H.Law.Damage diagnosis using experimental Ritz vectors[J].Journal of Engineering Mechanics,2001,127(11):1184-1193
    [76]H.Sohn.Extraction of Ritz vectors from vibration test data[J].Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing,2001,15(1):213-226
    [77]陈素文,李国强.人工神经网络在结构损伤识别中的应用[J].振动、测试与诊断,2001,21(2):141-150
    [78]X.Wu,J.Ghabousisi,J.H.Garret.Use of neural networks in prediction of structural damage[J].Computers & Structures,1992,42(4):649-659
    [79]S.V.Barai,P.C.Pandey.Vibration signature analysis using artificial neural networks[J].Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering,1995,9(4):259-265
    [80]S.F.Masri,M.Nakamura,A.G.Chassiakos.Neural network approach to detection of changes in structural parameters[J].Jounral of Engineering Mechanics,1996,122(4):350-360
    [81]S.F.Masri,A.W.Smyth,A.G.Chassiakos.Appilcaiton of neural net works for detection of changes in nonlinear system[J].Jounral of Engmeering Mechanics,2000,126(7):666-676
    [82]H.M.Chen,G.Z.Qi,J.C.S.Yang.Neural network for structural dynamic model identification[J].Journal of Engineering Mechanics,1995,121(12):1377-1381
    [83]陆秋海,李德葆,张维.利用模态试验参数识别结构损伤的神经网络法[J].工程力学,1999,16(1):35-42
    [84]王柏生,丁皓江,倪一清.模型参数误筹对用神经网络进行结构损伤识别的影响[J].土木工程学报,2000,33(1):50-55
    [85]王柏生,倪一清,高赞明.用概率性神经网络进行结构损伤位置识别[J].振动工程学报,2001,14(1):60-64
    [86]姜绍飞,刘明,倪一清.大跨悬索桥损伤定位的自适应概率神经网络研究[J].土木工程学报,2003,36(8):74-78
    [87]瞿伟廉,陈伟,李秋胜.基于神经网络技术的复杂框架结构节点损伤的两步诊断法[J].土木工程学报,2003,36(5):37-45
    [88]C.Mares,C.Surace.An application of genetic algorithms to identify damage in elastic structuers[J].Jounral of sound and vibration,1996,195(2):195-215
    [89]易伟建,刘霞.基于遗传算法的结构损伤诊断研究[J].工程力学,2001,18(2):64-71
    [90]D.Y.Chiang,W.Y.lai.Structural damage detection using the simulated evoluiton method[J].AIAA Jounral,1999,37(10):1331-1333
    [91]H.Chou,J.Ghaboussi.Geneitc algorithm in structural damage deteciton[J].Computers and Structures,2001,(79):1335-1353
    [92]B.Titurus,M.I.Friswell,L.Starek.Damage deteciton using generic elements:Part Ⅰ.Model updating[J].Computers and Structures,2003,(81):2273-2286
    [93]B.Titurus,M.I.Friswell,L.Starek.Damage detection using genetic elements:Part Ⅱ.Damage deteciton[J].Computers and Structures,2003,(81):2287-2299
    [94]R.Perera,R.Torres.Structural Damage Detection via Modal Data with Geneitc Algorithms[J].Journal of Structural Engineering,2006,132(9):1491-1501
    [95]郭惠勇,张陵,蒋建.基于遗传算法的二阶段结构损伤探测方法[J].西安交通大学学报,2005,39(5):485-489
    [96]邹大力,屈福政.基于修正模态的混合遗传算法结构损伤识别[J].大连理工大学学报,2005,45(3):362-365
    [97]袁颖.桥梁结构损伤识别相关问题的研究:[博士学位论文].大连:大连理工大学,2005
    [98]H.Kim,H.Melhem.Damage detection of structures by wavelet analysis[J].Engineering Structures,2004,(26):347-362
    [99]A.Al-khalidy,M.Noori,Z.Hou.Health monitoring systems of linears tructures using wavelet analysis[C].Proceedings of the 1th IWSHM.1997,164-175
    [100]A.Al-khalidy,M.Noori,Z.Hou.A study of health monitoring systems of linear structures using wavelet analysis[J].ASME PVP,1997,347:49-58
    [101]A.V.Ovanesova,L.E.Suarez.Applications of wavelet transforms to damage detection in frame structures[J].Engineering Structures,2004,(26):39-49
    [102]A.Hera,Z.Hou.Application of wavelet approach for ASCE Structural Health Monitoring benchmark studies[J].Journal of Engineering Mechanics,2004,130(1):96-104
    [103]Z.Sun,C.C.Chang.Structural damage assessment based on wavelet packet transform[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering,2002,128(10):1354-1361
    [104]J.G.Han,W.X.Ren,Z.S.Sun.Wavelet packet based damage identification of beams tructures[J].Intenrational Jounralof Solids and Structures,2005,(42):6610-6627
    [105]J.C.Hong,Y.Y.Kim,H.C.Lee.Damage detection using the Lipschitz exponent estimated by the wavelet transform:application to vibration modes of a beam[J].Intenrational Jounral of Solids and Structures,2002,(39):1803-1816
    [106]任宜春,马石城,林琳.移动荷载作用下梁裂缝识别的小波方法研究[J].振动与冲击,2004,23(2):82-85
    [107]孙增寿,韩建刚,任伟新.基于小波分析的结构损伤检测研究进展[J].地震工程与工程振动,2005,25(2):93-99
    [108]N.E.Huang,Z.Shen,S.R.Long.The empirical mode decomposition and Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis[J].Proc R Soc Lond,1998,A454,903-995
    [109]J.N.Yang,Y.Lei,S.Pan,N.E.H uang.System identification of linears tructures based on Hilbert Huang spectral analysis.Part 1:Normal modes[J].Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics,2003,32:1443-1467
    [110]J.N.Yang,Y.Lei,S.Pan,N.E.Huang.System identification of linears tructures based on Hilbert Huang spectral analysis.Part 2:Complex modes[J].Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics,2003,32:1533-1554
    [111]陈隽,徐幼麟.HHT方法在结构模态参数识别中的应用[J].振动工程学报,2003,16(3):383-388
    [112]陈隽,徐幼麟,李杰.Hilbert-Huang变换在密频结构阻尼识别中的应用[J].地震工程与工程振动,2003,23(4):34-42
    [113]J.Chen,Y.L.Xu.Identification of modal damping ratios of structures with closely spaced modal frequencies:HHT method[J].Structural Engineering and Mechanics,2002,14(4):417-434
    [114]何旭辉,余志武,陈政清.基于EMD和随机减量技术的大型桥梁模态参数识别[J].铁道科学与工程学报,2007,4(4):6-10
    [115]Y.L.Xu,S.W.Chen,R.C.Z hang.Modal identification of Di-Wang building under typhoon York using the Hilbert-Huang Transform Method[J].The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings,2003,12:21-47
    [116]黄天立.结构系统和损伤识别的若干方法研究:[博士学位论文].上海:同济大学,2007
    [117]L.科恩著,白居宪译.时-频分析,理论与应用[M].西安:西安交通大学出版社,1998
    [118]S.A.Neild,P.D.McFadden,M.S.Williams.A review of time-frequency methods for structural vibration analysis[J].Engineering Structures,2003,25(6):713-728
    [119]周明,孙树栋.遗传算法原理及应用[M].北京:国防工业出版社,1999
    [120]J.H.Chou,J.Ghaboussi.Genetic algorithm in structural damage detection[J].Computers and Structures,2001,79(14):1335-1353
    [121]R.Perera,R.Torres.Structural Damage Detection via Modal Data with Geneitc Algorithms[J].Journal of Structural Engineering,2006,132(9):1491-1501
    [122]程远胜,区达光,谭国焕.基于分级遗传算法的结构损伤识别方法[J].华中科技大学学报,2002,30(2):73-75
    [123]邹万杰,瞿伟廉.基于频响函数和遗传算法的结构损伤识别研究[J].振动与冲击,2008,27(12):28-30
    [124]J.H.Holland.Adaption in Nature and Artificial Systems[M].MIT Press,1992
    [125]K.A.De Jong.An Analysis of the Behavior of a Class of Enetic Adaptive Systems[D].Ph.D Dissertation,University of Michigan,No,76-9381,1975
    [126]Z.Michalewicz.Genetic algorithms + data structures = evolution programs[M].Berlin-New York:Springer-Verlag,1996
    [127]曹树谦,张文德,萧龙翔.振动结构模态分析--理论、实验与应用[M].天津大学出版社,2001
    [128]李国强,李杰.工程结构动力检测理论与应用[M].科学出版社,2002
    [129]张令弥,姚迎宪.频率响应函数估计的进展[J].机械强度,1989,11(1):15-17
    [130]傅志方.振动模态分析与参数辨识[M].北京:机械工业出版社,1990
    [131]周传荣,赵淳生.机械振动参数识别及其应用[M].北京:科学出版社,1989
    [132]徐张明,沈荣瀛,华宏星.基于频响函数相关性的灵敏度分析的有限元模型修正[J].机械强度,2003,25(1):5-8
    [133]温华兵,王国治.基于频响函数相关系数灵敏度的浮筏舱段有限元模型修正[J].江苏科技大学学报,2005,19(6):75-78
    [134]E.A.Johnson,H.F.Lam,L.S.Katafygiotis.Phase Ⅰ IASC-ASCE Structural Health Monitoring Benchmark Problem Using Simulated Data[J].Jounal Engineering Mechanics,2004,130(1):3-15
    [135]J.M.Caicedo,S.J.Dyke,E.A.Johnson.Natural Excitation Technique and Eigensystem Realization Algorithm for Phase Ⅰ of the IASC-ASCE Benchmark Problem:Simulated Data[J].Jounal Engineering Mechanics.2004,130(1):49-60
    [136]K.V.Yuen,S.K.Au,J.L.Beck.Two-Stage Structural Health Monitoring Approach for Phase Ⅰ Benchmark Studies[J].Journal of Engineering Mechanics.2004,130(1):16-33
    [137]S.W,Doebling,C.R.Farrar,M.B.Prime.A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods[J],The Shock and Vibration Digest,1998;30(2):91-105
    [138]D.C.Zimmerman,M.Kaouk.Structural damage detection in beam structures using a subspace rotation algorithm[J].AIAA Journal,1992,34(12):2341-2350
    [139]K.Kahl,J.S.Sirkis.Damage detection in beam structures using subspace rotation algorithm with strain data[J].AIAA Journal,1996,34(12):2609-2614
    [140]周先雁,沈浦生.用振动参数识别技术对混凝土框架结构进行破损评估[J].土木工程学报,1998,31(2):39-45
    [141]周先雁.用动力法对混凝土平面框架结构进行损伤诊断[J].湖南城市学院学报,2003,24(3):1-3
    [142]王中要,郭秀文.用残余力向量进行连续梁损伤诊断[J].昆明理工大学学报,2000,25(5):64-67
    [143]张向东,王志华,马宏伟.基于残余力向量法的悬臂梁损伤识别研究[J].太原理工大学学报,2003,34(5):529-531.
    [144]黄东梅,瞿伟廉.高耸塔架结构节点损伤的指标分析与反分析两步诊断法[J].华中科技大学学报(城市科学版),2003,20(2):61-64
    [145]刘济科,杨秋伟.基于残余力向量的结构损伤识别两步法[J].中山大学学报,2004,43(4):1-4
    [146]ZOU Wanjie,QU Weilian.A Direct Damaged Identification Method of Frame Structures Based on Residual Force Vector[J].Key Engineering Materials,2008,(385-387):313-316
    [147]邹万杰,瞿伟廉.基于残余力向量的桁架结构损伤直接识别法[J].广西工学院学报,2009,20(1):32-36
    [148]沈永欢,梁在中,许履瑚,蔡蓓蓓.实用数学手册[M].科学出版社,2001
    [149]A.Berman,F.S.Wei,K.V.Rao.Improvement of Analytical Dynamic Models Using Modal Test Data[C],Proceedings of the 21th SDM Conference,AIAA 80-0800,1980
    [150]A.Berman,E.J.Nagy.Improved of a Large Analytical Model Using Test Data[J],AIAA Journal,1983,21(8)
    [151]王超,李立,陈绍汀.结构振动有限元模型的精细修改方法[J].西安交通大学学报,1990,24(5):129-136
    [152]曾庆华.结构动力修改技术若干问题研究:[博士学位论文],南京:南京航空航天大学,1989
    [153]D.C.Kammer.Test-analysis model development using an exact modal reduction[J].The international journal of Analytical and experimental Modal Analysis,1987,(10):174-179
    [154]刘晖,瞿伟廉,袁润章.一种适用于结构损伤识别的模态扩阶法[J].武汉理工大学学报,2004,26(8):48-51
    [155]汪晓虹,周传荣,徐庆华.结构分析模型的修正与振型扩充技术[J].东南大学学报,2000,30(2):143-147
    [156]袁旭东.基于不完备信息土木程结构损伤识别方法研究:[博士学位论文].大连:大连理工大学,2005
    [157]J.S.Bendat,A.G.Piersol.Engineering applications of correlation and spectral analysis[M]. 2nd edition.New York:John Wiley & Sons,1993
    [158]S.R.Ibrahim.Eficient Random Decrement Computation for Identification of Ambient Response[C].Proceedings of the 19th IMAC,2001,1:6
    [159]V.O.Peter,D.M.Bart.Subspace identification for linear systems:theory,implementation and applications[M].Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic Publishers,1996
    [160]B.Peeters,G.D.Roeck.Reference-based stochastic subspace identification for output-only modal analysis[J].Mechanical Systems and Signal Porcessing,1999,13(6):855-878
    [161]G.H.James,T.G.Carne,J.P.Lauffer.The natural excitation technique(NEXT) for modal parameter extraction from operating structures[J].International Journal of Analytical and Experimental Modal Analysis,1995,10(4):260-277
    [162]R.Brincker,L.Zhang,P.Andersen.Modal Identification from Ambient Responses Using Frequency Domain Decomposition[C].Proceedings of the 18th IMAC,2000:625-630
    [163]任伟新.环境振动系统识别办法的比较分析[J].福州大学学报,29(6):80-86

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700