用户名: 密码: 验证码:
合成空间理论对“绝句”文本意义构建的认知解读
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本论文运用Fauconnier和Turner等人提出的合成空间理论从认知层面对"绝句"文本的意义构建进行分析,旨在说明概念合成是一种非常普遍的认知活动,具有极强的认知解释力。并且通过分析证明合成空间这一认知工具在文学层面进行认知操作的可能性和普遍性,同时也为"绝句"这种诗歌体裁提供一种独特的阐释视角。
     本论文选取唐代三位诗人的十首"绝句"为样本,从以下两个方面入手进行语篇分析,即,合成空间理论以跨空间映射(cross-space mapping)为中心的五大特征和以组织性框架投射(projection of organizing frame)为基础的四种概念整合网络(integration networks)。通过对样本分析可以看出,"绝句"文本的意义构建涉及五种映射类型和一种心理空间构建模式。五种跨空间映射类型分别是隐藏一个输入空间的映射(mapping with one hidden input),对照性映射(mapping in sharp contrast),隐喻式映射(metaphorical mapping),类推式映射(analogical mapping)和嵌入式映射(embedded mapping)。心理空间构建模式涉及母空间(base),观点空间(viewpoint)和焦点空间(focus),它对理解某一类"绝句"文本的意义构建有帮助。通过对四种概念整合网络在样本中分布的情况分析可以揭示"绝句"文本意义构建的认知过程。四种概念整合网络分别为简式网络(simplex networks),镜像网络(mirror networks),单域网络(single-scope networks)和双域网络(double-scope networks)。通过对样本分析还可以看出非语言信息(non-linguistic information)在合成空间理论中所起的关键性作用。
The purpose of this dissertation is to verify that conceptual blending (also called conceptual integration or blending), proposed by Fauconnier and Turner, is a general cognitive operation and serves a variety of cognitive purposes. By applying blending to meaning construction in Juejue text, this dissertation attempts to demonstrate the generalization of blending at literary level of cognitive operation, and offer an alternative perspective on interpretation of this pithy and expressive Chinese classic poem.
     With three poets and ten poems chosen as data for analysis,the application of blending theory is to be fulfilled in the light of central features which are centered around cross-space mapping, and integration networks whose classification is dominated by projection of the organizing frame. Based on the analysis, we can conclude that the meaning construction in Jueju text involves five kinds of mapping and one type of mental space construction. Cross-space mapping in Jueju text consists largely of mapping with one hidden input, mapping in sharp contrast, metaphorical mapping, analogical mapping and embedded mapping. One type of mental space construction concerning Base, Viewpoint, and Focus, helps to understand the meaning construction in some Jueju text. Moreover, the hidden cognitive process of meaning construction in Jueju text can be to some extent revealed by analyzing the distribution of the four integration networks, that is, simplex networks, mirror networks, single-scope networks, and double-scope networks. As the data analysis suggests, non-linguistic information plays a critical role in applying blending theory to meaning construction.
引文
Brown, G. & Yule, G. 1983. Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Coulson, S. 2001. Semantic Leaps: frame-shifting and conceptual blending in meaning construction. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Fauconnier, G. 1994. Mental Spaces. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Fauconnier, G. 1997. Mappings in Thought and Language. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Fauconnier, G. 2003. Conceptual Integration. 上海:《外国语》第2期。
    Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M. 1996. Blending As A Central Process of Grammar. In Adele Goldberg (Ed.), Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language. Standford: Center for the Study of Language and Information (CSLI) Publications. pp.113-129.
    Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M. 1998. Conceptual Integration Networks. Cognitive Science, 22 (2) (April-June), pp.133-187.
    Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M. 2002. The Way We Think. New York: Basic Books.
    Hiraga, M.K. 1998. Metaphor-Icon Link in Poetic Texts: A Cognitive Approach to Iconicity. Chiba City, Japan: The Journal of the University of the Air. 16. pp.95-123.
    Hiraga, M.K. 1999. Rough Sea and the Milky Way: 'Blending' in a Haiku Text. In Nehaniv, C.L.(Ed.), Computation for Metaphors, Analogy, and Agents. Belin;New York: Springer. pp.27-36.
    Johnson, M. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Lakoff, G. 1988. Cognitive Semantics. In U. Eco (Ed.), Meaning and Mental Representations. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. pp. 119-154.
    
    
    Robins, R.H. 1979. A Short History of Linguistics. New York: Longman Inc.
    Robins, R.H. 1989. General Linguistics: An Introductory Survey (Fourth Edition). New York: Longman Inc.
    Saeed, J.I. 1997. Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
    Turner, M. 1996. The Literary Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
    
    崔希亮,2002,认知语言学:研究范围和研究方法,北京:《语言教学与研究》第5期。
    胡壮麟、姜望琪,2002,语言学高级教程(英文),北京:北京大学出版社。
    黄 华,2001,试比较概念隐喻理论和概念整合理论,大连:《外语与外语教学》第6期。
    黄肃秋、陈 新, 1984, 唐人绝句选, 北京:中华书局出版。
    蒋 勇,2000,文学和日常话语中虚拟空间的认知能量,北京:《外语教学与研究》第4期。
    毛谷风,1988,唐人五绝选,西安:陕西人民出版社。
    屈兴国、罗仲鼎、周维德,1991,古典诗论集要,济南:齐鲁书社。
    束定芳,2000,现代语义学,上海:上海外语教育出版社。
    宋苏玲,2000,合成空间理论对语篇连贯解读的解释意义,大连:《外语与外语教学》第5期。
    王 斌,2001,交织与隐喻的比较研究,哈尔滨:《外语学刊》第1期。
    王 寅,2001,语义理论与语言教学,上海:上海外语教育出版社。
    王 寅,2002,认知语言学的哲学基础:体验哲学,北京:《外语教学与研究》第2期。
    汪少华,2000,隐喻推理机制的认知性透视,大连:《外语与外语教学》第10期。
    汪少华,2001,合成空间理论对隐喻的阐释力,上海:《外国语》第3期。
    汪少华,2002,概念合成与隐喻的实时意义建构,北京:《当代语言学》第2期。
    文 旭,1999,国外认知语言学研究综观,上海:《外国语》第1期。
    文 旭,2001,认知语言学:诠释与思考,上海:《外国语》第2期。
    文 旭,2002,认知语言学的研究目标、原则和方法,北京:《外语教学与研究》第2期。
    余渭深、董平荣,2003,合成空间与中国古典诗词意象,大连:《外语与
    
    外语教学》第3期。
    赵艳芳,2000,认知语言学概论,上海:上海外语教育出版社。
    郑守疆、王 颖,2002,虚拟情景的复合空间理据,哈尔滨:《外语学刊》第1期。
    朱永生、蒋 勇,2003,空间映射论与常规含意的推导,北京:《外语教学与研究》第1期。

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700