不同表面处理对纤维桩粘结性能和牙根抗折裂强度的影响
|
摘要
目的
通过薄片推出实验分析纤维桩粘接前不同的表面处理对纤维桩粘结强度的影响以及纤维桩在相同的表面处理下,不同深度根管内纤维桩粘结强度的大小,并在此基础上评价纤维桩粘固前的表面处理对牙根抗折裂强度的影响,从而为临床选择合适的表面处理方法提供理论依据。
方法
第一部分：不同的表面处理对纤维桩粘结强度的影响
根据纤维桩不同的表面处理分六组,即硅烷化组、喷砂组、过氧化氢酸蚀组、硅烷化+喷砂组、硅烷化+过氧化氢酸蚀组和未处理组(对照组)。将经过表面处理的纤维桩用树脂粘结材料粘结在离体牙根管内后,模拟口腔环境进行冷热循环和循环加载。将牙根沿与牙长轴垂直的方向切成厚度为1m的薄片,用薄片推出法分别测量并计算根管冠1／3,中1／3和根尖1／3的粘结强度的大小。光学显微镜观察试件破坏方式。
第二部分：不同表面处理对纤维桩核冠修复后牙根抗折裂强度的影响
将纤维桩分为喷砂组,过氧化氢酸蚀组和未处理组(对照组),在离体牙内粘结后并形成树脂核,金属全冠修复。模拟口腔环境进行冷热循环和循环加载。将试件在电子万能实验机上测试其抗折裂强度,加载头置于全冠颊尖颊斜面中央,加载方向与牙体长轴成30°(模拟下颌前磨牙受力方式),加载速度1mm／min,记录试件破环时的力值及破环形式。
结果
1.硅烷化组与未处理组的粘结强度无明显差异(P>0.05)
2.喷砂组、过氧化氢酸蚀组、硅烷化+喷砂组以及硅烷化+过氧化氢酸蚀组的粘结强度明显大于未处理组(P<0.05)
3.硅烷化+喷砂组和硅烷化+过氧化氢酸蚀组的粘结强度明显大于喷砂组和过氧化氢酸蚀组(P<0.05)
4.各组根上部粘结强度明显大于根下部(P<0.05)
5.喷砂组和过氧化氢酸蚀组的抗折裂强度明显大于未处理组(P<0.05)
结论
1.单独的硅烷化处理不能提高纤维桩与树脂粘接剂之间的粘结强度。喷砂和过氧化氢酸蚀处理均能提高纤维桩与树脂粘接剂之间的粘结强度和抗折裂强度,可作为纤维桩粘接前的表面处理方法,上述处理后再使用硅烷化处理可进一步提高纤维桩与树脂粘接剂之间的粘结强度。
2.桩道的深度会影响粘结强度的大小,根管上部至根尖部位粘结强度逐渐减小。
Objective
The purpose of this in-vitro study is to assess the effects of different surface treatments on bond strength of fiber posts to a resin cement through "thin-slice" push out test,compare the bond strength for different regions of the root and evaluate the effects of surface treatments on the fracture resistance of root,so that appropriate surface treatment methods can be used for clinical selection and providing a theoretical basis for improvement bond strength of fiber posts to a resin cement/core materials.
Method
(1)Effects of surface treatments on bond strength of fiber posts. The fiber posts were divided into six groups according to different surface treatment techniques, including silanization,sandblasting,etching with hydrogen peroxide, sandblasting and silanization, etching with hydrogen peroxide and silanization and no treatment performed.No treatment performed served as the control group. All fiber posts were luted with a composite resin luting agent in the canal roots.After cementation,the roots were subjected to simulated aging conditions consisting of mechanical loading cycles and thermal cycles. The roots were sectioned into slices with 1 mm thickness and a push-out test was performed on three different sections of each root to measure bond strengths. Test piece following testing was placed under optical microscope to observe the breakage method.
(2) Effects of surface treatment on the fracture resistance of teeth restored with fiber posts and core system. The fiber posts were divided into three groups according to different surface treatment techniques, including sandblasting,etching with hydrogen peroxide,and no treatment performed.No treatment performed served as the control group. All fiber posts were luted with a composite resin luting agent in the canal roots.The teeth were restored with composite resin cores and metal crowns. After cementation,the teeth were subjected to simulated aging conditions consisting of mechanical loading cycles and thermal cycles. All teeth were loaded in a mechanical testing machine with a compressive load(N) applied at 30 degree to the long axis of the specimen at acrosshead speed of lmm/min until fracture. The fracture load and fracture mode of each teeth were recorded.
Results
1. No significant difference in bond strength was determined between the silaned and no- treatment groups (P> 0.05).
2. Bond strength was significantly greater in the groups performed with surface treatments except the silaned compared with the control group (P< 0.05).
3. Bond strength was significantly greater in the sandblasting and silanization group and etching with hydrogen peroxide and silanization group compared with sandblasting group and etching with hydrogen peroxide group(P< 0.05).
4.The coronal third of the root resulted in statistically greater bond strengths than the medium third,whose bond strength was significantly greater than the apical third(P< 0.05).
5.The fracture resistance of sandblasting and hydrogen peroxide groups were higher than the the control group.
Conclusion
1. The use of a silane coupling agent only did not increase the bond strength between fiber posts and a resin cement, sandblasting and etching with hydrogen peroxide can increase the push-out bond strengths of fiber posts and improve the fracture resistance of teeth.
2.Bonding was more predictable at the coronal level of the root.
通过薄片推出实验分析纤维桩粘接前不同的表面处理对纤维桩粘结强度的影响以及纤维桩在相同的表面处理下,不同深度根管内纤维桩粘结强度的大小,并在此基础上评价纤维桩粘固前的表面处理对牙根抗折裂强度的影响,从而为临床选择合适的表面处理方法提供理论依据。
方法
第一部分：不同的表面处理对纤维桩粘结强度的影响
根据纤维桩不同的表面处理分六组,即硅烷化组、喷砂组、过氧化氢酸蚀组、硅烷化+喷砂组、硅烷化+过氧化氢酸蚀组和未处理组(对照组)。将经过表面处理的纤维桩用树脂粘结材料粘结在离体牙根管内后,模拟口腔环境进行冷热循环和循环加载。将牙根沿与牙长轴垂直的方向切成厚度为1m的薄片,用薄片推出法分别测量并计算根管冠1／3,中1／3和根尖1／3的粘结强度的大小。光学显微镜观察试件破坏方式。
第二部分：不同表面处理对纤维桩核冠修复后牙根抗折裂强度的影响
将纤维桩分为喷砂组,过氧化氢酸蚀组和未处理组(对照组),在离体牙内粘结后并形成树脂核,金属全冠修复。模拟口腔环境进行冷热循环和循环加载。将试件在电子万能实验机上测试其抗折裂强度,加载头置于全冠颊尖颊斜面中央,加载方向与牙体长轴成30°(模拟下颌前磨牙受力方式),加载速度1mm／min,记录试件破环时的力值及破环形式。
结果
1.硅烷化组与未处理组的粘结强度无明显差异(P>0.05)
2.喷砂组、过氧化氢酸蚀组、硅烷化+喷砂组以及硅烷化+过氧化氢酸蚀组的粘结强度明显大于未处理组(P<0.05)
3.硅烷化+喷砂组和硅烷化+过氧化氢酸蚀组的粘结强度明显大于喷砂组和过氧化氢酸蚀组(P<0.05)
4.各组根上部粘结强度明显大于根下部(P<0.05)
5.喷砂组和过氧化氢酸蚀组的抗折裂强度明显大于未处理组(P<0.05)
结论
1.单独的硅烷化处理不能提高纤维桩与树脂粘接剂之间的粘结强度。喷砂和过氧化氢酸蚀处理均能提高纤维桩与树脂粘接剂之间的粘结强度和抗折裂强度,可作为纤维桩粘接前的表面处理方法,上述处理后再使用硅烷化处理可进一步提高纤维桩与树脂粘接剂之间的粘结强度。
2.桩道的深度会影响粘结强度的大小,根管上部至根尖部位粘结强度逐渐减小。
Objective
The purpose of this in-vitro study is to assess the effects of different surface treatments on bond strength of fiber posts to a resin cement through "thin-slice" push out test,compare the bond strength for different regions of the root and evaluate the effects of surface treatments on the fracture resistance of root,so that appropriate surface treatment methods can be used for clinical selection and providing a theoretical basis for improvement bond strength of fiber posts to a resin cement/core materials.
Method
(1)Effects of surface treatments on bond strength of fiber posts. The fiber posts were divided into six groups according to different surface treatment techniques, including silanization,sandblasting,etching with hydrogen peroxide, sandblasting and silanization, etching with hydrogen peroxide and silanization and no treatment performed.No treatment performed served as the control group. All fiber posts were luted with a composite resin luting agent in the canal roots.After cementation,the roots were subjected to simulated aging conditions consisting of mechanical loading cycles and thermal cycles. The roots were sectioned into slices with 1 mm thickness and a push-out test was performed on three different sections of each root to measure bond strengths. Test piece following testing was placed under optical microscope to observe the breakage method.
(2) Effects of surface treatment on the fracture resistance of teeth restored with fiber posts and core system. The fiber posts were divided into three groups according to different surface treatment techniques, including sandblasting,etching with hydrogen peroxide,and no treatment performed.No treatment performed served as the control group. All fiber posts were luted with a composite resin luting agent in the canal roots.The teeth were restored with composite resin cores and metal crowns. After cementation,the teeth were subjected to simulated aging conditions consisting of mechanical loading cycles and thermal cycles. All teeth were loaded in a mechanical testing machine with a compressive load(N) applied at 30 degree to the long axis of the specimen at acrosshead speed of lmm/min until fracture. The fracture load and fracture mode of each teeth were recorded.
Results
1. No significant difference in bond strength was determined between the silaned and no- treatment groups (P> 0.05).
2. Bond strength was significantly greater in the groups performed with surface treatments except the silaned compared with the control group (P< 0.05).
3. Bond strength was significantly greater in the sandblasting and silanization group and etching with hydrogen peroxide and silanization group compared with sandblasting group and etching with hydrogen peroxide group(P< 0.05).
4.The coronal third of the root resulted in statistically greater bond strengths than the medium third,whose bond strength was significantly greater than the apical third(P< 0.05).
5.The fracture resistance of sandblasting and hydrogen peroxide groups were higher than the the control group.
Conclusion
1. The use of a silane coupling agent only did not increase the bond strength between fiber posts and a resin cement, sandblasting and etching with hydrogen peroxide can increase the push-out bond strengths of fiber posts and improve the fracture resistance of teeth.
2.Bonding was more predictable at the coronal level of the root.
引文
[1]Schwartz RS, Robbins JW, et al. Post placement and restoration of endon-dontically treated teeth:A literature review. Endod,2004,30(5):289.
[2]Akgungor G, Akkayan B, et al. Influence of dentin bonding agents and polymerization modes on the bond strength between translucent fiber posts and three dentin regions within a post space. J Prosthet Dent,2006,95: 368-378.
[3]Naumann M, Blankenstein F,Dietrich T, et al. Survival of glass fibre reinforced composite post restorations after 2. years-an observational clinical study. J Dent,2005,33:305-312.
[4]Stockton LW, et al. Factors affecting retention of post systems:A literature review. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry,1999,81(4):380-385.
[5]Nergiz I, Schmage P, Ozcan M, et al. Effect of length and diamer of tapered posts on the retention. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation,2002,29(1): 28-24.
[6]Cohen BI, Pagnillo MK, Newman I, et al. Retention of three endondontic posts cemented with five dental cements. J Prosthet Dent,1998,79(5): 520-525.
[7]Ferrari M, Vichi A & Deutsch AS. Comparison of retentive properties of four post systems. J Prosthet Dent,1992,68(2):264-268.
[8]VichiA, GramdiniS, Davidson CL, et al.An SEM evaluation of several adhesive systems used for bonding fiber posts under clinical conditions. Dental Materials,2002,18:495-502.
[9]阙珍妮,张富强.纤维桩粘结强度的影响因素[J].口腔材料器械杂志,2007,16(3)：144-146
[10]Ferrari M, Vichi A, Garcia-Godoy F. A retrospective study of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts vs. cast posts and cores:a four year recall. Am J Dent,2000a,13:9B-13B.
[11]Ferrari M, Vichi A, Mannocci F, et al. Retrospective study of clinical behaviour of several types of fiber posts. Am J Dent,2000b,13:14B-19B.
[12]Malferrari S.Monaco C, Scotti R. Clinical evaluation of teeth restored with quartz fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. Internation Journal of Prosthodontics,2003,16(1):39-44.
[13]Boschian Pest L, Cavalli G, Bertani P, et al. Adhesive post endondontic restorations with fiber posts:Push-out tests and SEM observations. Dent Mater,2002,18 (8):596-602.
[14]Sadek FT, Monticelli F, Gorraci, et al. Bond strength performance of different resin composites used as core materials around fiber posts. Dent Mater,2007,1:95-99.
[15]Sahafi A, Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E, et al. Effect of surface treat-ment of prefabricated posts on bonding of resin cement. Oper Dent,2004, 29(1):60-68.
[16]Toksavul S, Toman M, Uyulgan B, etal. Effeet of luting agents and Reconstruction techniques on the fracture resistance of pre-fabricated post systems. J Oral Rehabil,2005,32(6):433-440.
[17]Wiskott HWA, NiehollsJI, Belser UC. Stress fatigue:Basic Principles and Prosthodontic implications. Int J Prosthodont,1995,8(2):105-116.
[18]F Monticelli, R Osorio, FT Sadek, et al. Surface Treatments for improve-ing bond strength to prefabricated fiber posts:A Literature Review. Operative Dentistry,2008,33(3):346-355.
[19]Goracci C, Raffaelli 0, Monticelli F, et al. The adhesion between prefabricates FRC post and composite resin cores:microtensile bond strength with and without post silanization. Dent Mater,2005,21:437-444.
[20]Aksornmuang J, Foxton RM, Nakajima M, et al. Microtensile bond strength of a dual-cure resin core material to glass and quartz fibre posts. J Dent,2004,32(6):443-450.
[21]Monticelli F, Toledano M, Tay FR, et al. Post-surface conditioning improves interfacial adhesion in post-core restorations. Dent Mater,2006, 22:602-609.
[22]Bitter K, Meyer-Luckel H, Priehn K, et al. Bond strengths of resin cements to fiber-reinforced composite posts. American journal of dentistry,2006,19 (3):138-142.
[23]Perdigao J, Gomes G & Lee IK, et al. The effect of silane on the bond strengths of fiber posts. Dental Materials,2006,22(8):752-758.
[24]Sarac YS, Sarac D, Kulunk T, et al. The effect of chemical surface treatments of different denture base resins on the shear bond strength of denture repair. J Prosthet Dent,2005,94:259-266.
[25]张志闻,苏剑生.纤维桩的表面处理[J].国际口腔医学杂志,2007,34(5)：384-386.
[26]Ozcan M, Vallittu PK. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cements to ceramics [J]. Dental Materials.2004, 19(8):725-731
[27]Frankenberger R. Repair strength of etched VS silica-coated Metal-ceramic and all-ceramic restoration. Oper Dent,2000,25:209-215.
[28]Omura I. Adhesive and mechanical properties of a new dental adhesive. J Prosthet Dent,1982.
[29]Carlos Jose Soares, Fernanda Ribeiro Santana, Janaina Carla Prerira, at al. Influence of airborne-particle abradion on mechanical properties and bond strength of carbon/epoxy and glass/BIS-GAM fiber-reinforced resin posts. J Prosthet Dent,2008,99:444-445.
[30]Monticelli F, Toledano M, Tay FR, et al.A simple etching technique for improving the retention of fiber posts to resin composites. Journal of Endodontics,2006,32(1):44-47.
[31]Vona M, Goracci C, Monticelli F, et al. The adhesion between fibre posts and composite resin cores:the evaluationg of microtensile bond strength following various surface chemical treatments to posts. International Endodontic Journal,2006,39(1):31-39.
[32]Carrigan PJ, Morse DR, Furst ML, et al. A scanning electron micro-scopic evaluation of human dentinal tubules according to age and location. J Endod,1984,10:359-363.
[33]Vichi A, Grandini S, Davidson CL, et al. An SEM evaluation of several adhesive systems used for bonding fiber posts under clinical conditions. Dent Mater,2002,18:495-502.
[34]Chapell RP, Cobb CM, Spencer P, et al. Dentin tubule anastomosis:A potential factor in dentinal adhesive bonding?J Prosthet Dent 1994; 72:183-188.
[35]Bouillaguet S, Troesch S, Wataha JC, et al. Microtensile bond strength between adhesive cements and root canal dentin. Dent Mater,2003,19:199-205.
[36]Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 1987,66:1636-1639.
[37]Alster D, FeilzerAJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Polymerization contraction stress injthin resin composite layers as a function of layer thickness. Dent Mater,1997,13:146-150.
[38]Sorensen JA, Ahn SG, Berge HX, etal. Aeademy of dental materials, proeeedings of conference on scientific criteria for selecting materials and techniques in clinical dentistry.2001,15:567-584.
[39]Azer55, DrunllnondJL, CamPbellSD, etal. lnflueneeofeorebuilduPmateri onthefatiguestrengthofanall-eeramieerown. J Prosthet Dent,2008,6(6): 624-631.
[40]Wiskott HWA, NiehollsJI, Belser UC. Stress fatigue:Basic Principles and Prosthodontic implications. Int J Prosthodont,1995,8(2):105-116.
[41]郭良微,孙宏晨,徐经威,等.热循环对二种粘结剂的树脂-牙本质界面粘结强度的影响[J].吉林大学学报(医学版),2006,32(2)：306-312.
[42]Nikaido T, Kunzenlmann KH, et al. Evaluation of thermal cycling and mechanical loading on bonding strength of a selfetching pprimer system to dentin. Dental materials,2002,18:269-276.
[43]TilkM, LommelT, GersteinH. A study of mandibular and maxillary root widths to determine dowel size. J Endodont,1979,5(3):79-82.
[44]Tsubota M. Stress analysis of Post-reconstructed teeth with dead space at the apex of the Post. Nippon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi,1989, 33(3):609-620
[45]LuZhi-Yue, Zhangyu-Xing. Effects of Post-core design and ferrule on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors. J Prosthet Dent,2003,89(4):368-373.
[46]Giachetti L, Scaminaci Russo D, Bertini F, et al. Translucent fiber post cementation using a light-curing adhesive/composite system:SEM analysis and pull-out test. J Dent,2004,32:629-634.
[47]Balbosh A, Kern M. Effect of surface treatment on retention of glass-fiber endodontic posts. J Prosthet Dent,2006,95:218-223.
[48]Ngoh EC, Pashley DH, Loushine RJ, et al. Effects of eugenol on resin bond strengths to root canal dentin. J Endod,2001,27:411-414.
[49]Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, et al. Relationship between surface area for adhesion andtensile bond strength-evaluation of a microtensile bond test.Dental Materials,1994,10:236-240.
[50]Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, Sano H, et al.The microtensile bond test:a review. J Adhes Dent,1999,1:299-309.
[51]Goracci C, Grandini S, BossuM, et al. Laboratory assessment of the retentive potential of adhesive posts:a review. J Dent,2007,35(11): 827-835.
[52]Goracci C, Tavares AU, Fabianelli A, et al. The adhesion between fiber posts and root canal walls comparison between microtensile and push-out bond strength measurements. European J Oral Sci,2004,112:353-361.
[53]Goracci C, Sadek FT, Fabianelli A, et al. Evaluation of the adhesion of fiber posts to intraradicular dentin. Oper Dent,2005,30:627-635.
[54]Heydecke G, Butz F, Hussein A, et al. Fracture strength after dynamic loading of endodontically treated teeth restore with different post-and-core systems. J Prosthet Dent,2002,87(4):438-445.
[55]Duret B, Reynaud M, Duret F. New concept of corona radicular recon-struction:the composit post.Chir Dent Fr,1990,540:131-141.
[56]Newman MP, Yaman P, Dennison J, et al. Fracture resistance of endod-ontically treated teeth restored with composite posts. J Prosthet Dent, 2003,89(4):360-367.
[57]Raygot CG, Chai J, Jameson DL. Fracture resistance and primary failure mode of endodontically treated teeth restored with a carbon fiber-reinforced resin post system in vitro. Int J Prosthodont,2001,14(2): 141-145.
[58]Sidoli GE, King PA, Setchell DJ. An in vitro evaluation of a carbon fiber-based post and core system.J Prosthet Dent,1997,78(1):5-9.
[59]Martinez Insua A, da Silva L, Rilo B, et al. Comparison of the fracture resistances of pulpless teeth restored with a cast post or carbon-fiber post with a composite core.J Prosthet Dent,1998,80(5):527-532.
[60]LibmanWJ, Niehollsjl. Load fatigue of teeth restored with cast posts and cores and complete crowns. Int J Prosthodont.1995:8(2):155-161.
[61]Qualtrough AJ, Chandler Np, Purton DG. A comParison of the retention of tooth-colored Posts. Quintessence Ini.2003; 34(3):199-201.
[62]Sahafi A, Peutzfeld A, Asmussen E, Gotfredsen K. Effect of surface treatment of prefabricated posts on bonding of resin cement. Oper Dent, 2004,29:60-68.
[63]Balbosh A, Kern M. Effect of surface treatment on retention of glass-fiber endodontic posts. J Prosthet Dent,2006,95:218-223.
[64]Mazzitelli C, Ferrari M, Toledano M, et al. Surface roughness analysis of fiber post conditioning processes.J Dent Res,2000,87(2):186-190
[65]Carlos Jose Soares, Fernanda Ribeiro Santana, Janaina Carla Prerira. at al. Influence of airborne-particle abradion on mechanical properties and bond strength of carbon/epoxy and glass/BIS-GAM fiber-reinforced resin posts. J Prosthet Dent,2008,99:444-445.
[66]Sahafi A, Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E, Gotfredsen K. Retention and failure morphology of prefabricated posts. Int J Prosthodont,2004,17(3):307-312.
[67]Schmitter M, Huy C, Ohlmann B, et al. J Endod,2006,32(4):328-330.
[68]Valandro LF, Ozcan M, de Melo RM, et al. Int J Prosthodont.2006, 19(1):74-76.
[69]Sahafi Peutzfeldt A, Ravnhoh G'et al. Clin Oral Inve-stig,2005, 9(2):84-90.
[70]Sahaft Peutzfeldt Asmussen E, et al. Int J Prosthodont。2004.17(3): 307-312.
[71]Elisabeth J, Stricker, Till N, et al. Influence of different posts and cores on marginal adaptation, fracture resistance, and fracture mode of composite resin crowns on human and mandibular premolars [J]. J Dent,2006, 34(5):326-335.
[72]Ebru,Safak, Duygu, et al. Effect of different surface treatments on the push-out bond strength of fiber post to root canal dentin[J]. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology,2009, 108 (2):e74-e80.
[1]Sadek FT, Monticelli F, Gorraci,et al. Bond strength performance of different resin com-posites used as core materials around fiber posts. Dent Mater,2007,1:95-99.
[2]陈治清.口腔材料学(第三版).北京：人民卫生出版社,2005.65-66.
[3]F Monticelli,R Osorio, FT Sadek, et al. Surface Treatments for improving bond strength to prefabricated fiber posts:A Literature Review. Operative Dentistry,2008,33(3):346～355.
[4]Goracci C, Raffaelli 0, Monticelli F, et al.The adhesion between prefabricates FRC post and composite resin cores:microtensile bond strength with and without post silanization. Dent Mater,2005,21:437-444.
[5]AKsornmuang J, Nakajima M, Foxton RM, et al.Microtensile bond strength of a dual cure resin core material to glass and quartz fibre posts. Journal of Dentistry,2004,32(6):443-450.
[6]Monticelli F, Toledano M, Tay FR, et al. Post-surface conditioning improves interfacial adhesion in post-core restorations. Dent Mater,2006, 22:602-609.
[7]Bitter K, Meyer-Luckel H, Priehn K, et al. Bond strengths of resin cements to fiber-reinforced composite posts. American journal of dentistry,2006,19(3):138-142.
[8]Perdigao J, Gomes G & Lee IK, et al. The effect of silane on the bond strengths of fiber posts. Dental Materials,2006,22(8):752-758.
[9]Daniels MW, Francis LF, et al. Silane adsorption behaviour micro-structure, and properties of doxypropyl trimethoxy silane modified colloidal silica coatings. J Colloid Interface Sci,1998,20(5):191-200.
[10]Hooshmand T, van Noort R, Keshvad A. Bond durability of the resin-bonded and silane treated ceramic surface.Dent Mater,2002,18:179-188.
[11]Graf RT, Koenig JL, Ishida H. The influence of interfacial structure on the f lexural strength of glass reinforced polyester. J Adhesion,1983,16: 97-114.
[12]Sato K, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Effect of three-liquid bonding agents on bond strength to a machine-milled ceramic material. J Oral Rehabil 1999,26:570-574.
[13]Blum FD, Meesiri W, Kang H, et al. Hydrolysis, Adsorption and Dynamics of Silane Coupling Agents on Silica Surfaces.J Adhesion Sci Tech.1991, 5:479-496.
[14]Plueddemann EP. Silanols and Siloxanes as Coupling Agents and Primers.39th Annual Conference, Reinforced Plastics/Composite. The Society of Plastics Industry,1984.
[15]Barghi N, Berry T & Chung K. Effects of timing and heat treatment of silanated porcelain on the bond strength. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 2000,27(5):407-412.
[16]Kato JF, Soderholm KJ, Longmate J et al. Effects of treatment and storage conditiongs on ceramic/composite bond strength.J Dent Res.1995,74:381-387.
[18]Monticelli F, Toledano M, Osoria R et al. Effect of temperature on the silane coupling agents when bonding core resin to quartz fibre posts. Dental Materials,2006,22(11):1024-1028.
[19]Hooshmand T, Van Noorl R & Keshvad A. Bond durability of the resin-bonded and silane treated ceramic surface. Dental Materials,2002,18(2): 179-188.
[20]Aksornmuang J, Nakajima M, Foxton RM & Tagami J. Regional bond strengths of a dual cure resin core material to translucent fiber posts. American journal of Dentistry,2006,19(1):51-55.
[21]Ferrari M, Goracci C, Sadek FT,et al. An investigation of the interfacial strengths of methacrylate resin-based glass fiber post-core buildups. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry,2006,8(4):239-245.
[22]Radovic I, Monticelli F, Goracci C, et al. The effect of sandblasting on adhesion of a dual-cured resin composite to methacrylic fiber posts: microtensile bond strength and SEM evaluation. Journal of Dentistry,2007, 35(6):496-502.
[23]Balbosh A & Kern M. Effect of surface treatment on retention of glass-fiber endodontic posts. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry,2006, 95(3):218-223.
[24]Hashimoto M, DE Munck J, Ito S, et al. In vitro effect of nanoleakage on resin-dentin bond strengths analyzed by microtensile bond test, SEM/EDX and TEM. Biomaterials,2004,25(25):5565-5574.
[25]Quintas AF, Bottino MA, Neisser MP et al. An SEM evaluation of carbon-fiber post and core resin interface before and after an in vitro test. Pesqui Odintol Brads,2001,15(4):64-69.
[26]Frankenberger R. Repair strength of etched VS silica—coated metal-ceramic and all- ceramic restoration. Oper Dent,2000,25:209-215.
[27]Omura I. Adhesive and mechanical properties of a new dental adhesive.J Prosthet Dent,1982.
[28]Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A & Sahaf i A. Bonding of resin cements to post materials Influence of surface energy characteristics. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry,2005,7(3):231-234.
[29]Carlos Jose Soares, Fernanda Ribeiro Santana, Janaina Car la Prerira, at al. Influence of airborne-particle abradion on mechanical properties and bond strength of carbon/epoxy and glass/BIS-GAM fiber-reinforced resin posts. J Prosthet Dent,2008,99:444-445.
[30]Ivana Radovic, Francesca Monticelli, Federica Papacchini et al. Acclerated aging of adhesive-mediated fiber post-resin composite bonds:A modeling approach. J of Dent.2007,35:683-689.
[31]Monticelli F, Toledano M, Tay FR, et al. A simple etching technique for improving the retention of fiber posts to resin composites. Journal of Endodontics,2006,32(1):44-47.
[32]张志闻,苏剑生.纤维桩的表面处理.国际口腔医学杂志,2007,34(5)：384-386.
[33]DE munck J, Vargas M, Van Landuyt K, et al. Bonding of an auto adhesive luting material to enamel and dentin. Dental Materials,2004,20(10): 963-971.
[34]D'Arcangelo C, D'Amario M, Prosperi GD, et al. Effect of surface treatments on tensile bond strength and on morphology of quartz-fiber posts.Journal of Endodontics,2007,33(3):264-267.
[35]Sahafi A, Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E et al.Bond strength of resin cement to surface-treated posts of titanium alloy, glass fiber, and zirconia, and to dentin. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry,2003,5(2): 153-162.
[36]Sahafi A, Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E et al. Retention and failure morphology of prefabricated posts. Int J of Prosthodontics,2004,17(3): 307-312.
[37]Volandro LF, Yoshiga S, DE Melo RM, et al. Microtensile bond strength between a quartz fiber post and a resin cement:Effect of post surface conditioning. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry,2006,8(2):105-111.
[38]Vona M, Goracci C, Monticelli F, et al.The adhesion between fibre posts and composite resin cores:the evaluationg of microtensile bond strength following various surface chemical treatments to posts. International Endodontic Journal,2006,39(1):31-39.
[39]Bronson SH, Hansen AR, Nielsen HZ et al.A comparative study of the immunogold labeling on h2O2-treated and heated epoxy sections. Micron, 2001,32(2):147-151.
[40]Holm R, Farrants GW, Nesland JM, Sobrinho-Simoes M, et al. Ultra-structural and electron immuno-histochemical features of medullary thyroid carcinoma. Virchows Archive A:Pathological Anatomy and Histology,1989, A4(14):375-384.
[41]Enerstrom S & Kniola B.Resin embedding for quantitative immuno-electron microscopy:A comparative computerized image analysis. Biotechnic & Histochemistry,1995,70(3):135-146.
[42]Baskin DG, Erlandsen SL & Parsin JA. Influence of hydrogen peroxide or alcoholic sodium hydroxide on the immunocytochemical detection of growth hormone and prolactin after osmium fixation. Journal of Histo-chemistry and Cytochemistry,1979,27(9):1290-1292.
[43]Murat Yenisey, Safak Kulunk. Effects of chemical surface treatments of quartz and glass fiber posts on the retention of a composite resin.J Prosthet Dent,2008,99:38-45.
[44]Nagai E, Otani K, Satoh Y, et al. Repair of denture base resin using woven metal and glass fiber:effect of methylene chloride pretreatment. J prosthet Dent,2001;85:496-500.
[45]Cheleux. Surface treatment on quartz fiber post Influence on adhesion and flexural properties. Am J Dent,2007,20(6):375-379.
[47]Mann D, Fessmann J, Kampschulute G & Hopkins M. Adherent metalliza-tion of plastic composites. Surface and Coatings Technology,1991,49(11): 168-17,3.
[48]Kirmann J, Roizard X, Pagetti J & Halut J. Effect of alkaline permanganate etching of epoxy on the peel adhesion of electrolessly plated copper on a fibre reinforced epoxy composite. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology,1998,12(4):383-398.
[49]Thorm CE & Walsh MK. The mechanism of permanganate desmearing. Printed Circuits Boards & Fabrication,1991,25:30-32.
[50]Sahfi A, Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E et al. Effect of surface treatment of prefabricated posts on bonding of resin cement. Operative Dentistry.2004,29(1):60-68.
[51]Sehmitter M, Huy C, Ohlmann B, et al. Fracture resistance of upper and lower incisors restored with glass fiber reinforced posts. J Endod, 2006,32 (4):328-330.
[2]Akgungor G, Akkayan B, et al. Influence of dentin bonding agents and polymerization modes on the bond strength between translucent fiber posts and three dentin regions within a post space. J Prosthet Dent,2006,95: 368-378.
[3]Naumann M, Blankenstein F,Dietrich T, et al. Survival of glass fibre reinforced composite post restorations after 2. years-an observational clinical study. J Dent,2005,33:305-312.
[4]Stockton LW, et al. Factors affecting retention of post systems:A literature review. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry,1999,81(4):380-385.
[5]Nergiz I, Schmage P, Ozcan M, et al. Effect of length and diamer of tapered posts on the retention. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation,2002,29(1): 28-24.
[6]Cohen BI, Pagnillo MK, Newman I, et al. Retention of three endondontic posts cemented with five dental cements. J Prosthet Dent,1998,79(5): 520-525.
[7]Ferrari M, Vichi A & Deutsch AS. Comparison of retentive properties of four post systems. J Prosthet Dent,1992,68(2):264-268.
[8]VichiA, GramdiniS, Davidson CL, et al.An SEM evaluation of several adhesive systems used for bonding fiber posts under clinical conditions. Dental Materials,2002,18:495-502.
[9]阙珍妮,张富强.纤维桩粘结强度的影响因素[J].口腔材料器械杂志,2007,16(3)：144-146
[10]Ferrari M, Vichi A, Garcia-Godoy F. A retrospective study of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts vs. cast posts and cores:a four year recall. Am J Dent,2000a,13:9B-13B.
[11]Ferrari M, Vichi A, Mannocci F, et al. Retrospective study of clinical behaviour of several types of fiber posts. Am J Dent,2000b,13:14B-19B.
[12]Malferrari S.Monaco C, Scotti R. Clinical evaluation of teeth restored with quartz fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. Internation Journal of Prosthodontics,2003,16(1):39-44.
[13]Boschian Pest L, Cavalli G, Bertani P, et al. Adhesive post endondontic restorations with fiber posts:Push-out tests and SEM observations. Dent Mater,2002,18 (8):596-602.
[14]Sadek FT, Monticelli F, Gorraci, et al. Bond strength performance of different resin composites used as core materials around fiber posts. Dent Mater,2007,1:95-99.
[15]Sahafi A, Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E, et al. Effect of surface treat-ment of prefabricated posts on bonding of resin cement. Oper Dent,2004, 29(1):60-68.
[16]Toksavul S, Toman M, Uyulgan B, etal. Effeet of luting agents and Reconstruction techniques on the fracture resistance of pre-fabricated post systems. J Oral Rehabil,2005,32(6):433-440.
[17]Wiskott HWA, NiehollsJI, Belser UC. Stress fatigue:Basic Principles and Prosthodontic implications. Int J Prosthodont,1995,8(2):105-116.
[18]F Monticelli, R Osorio, FT Sadek, et al. Surface Treatments for improve-ing bond strength to prefabricated fiber posts:A Literature Review. Operative Dentistry,2008,33(3):346-355.
[19]Goracci C, Raffaelli 0, Monticelli F, et al. The adhesion between prefabricates FRC post and composite resin cores:microtensile bond strength with and without post silanization. Dent Mater,2005,21:437-444.
[20]Aksornmuang J, Foxton RM, Nakajima M, et al. Microtensile bond strength of a dual-cure resin core material to glass and quartz fibre posts. J Dent,2004,32(6):443-450.
[21]Monticelli F, Toledano M, Tay FR, et al. Post-surface conditioning improves interfacial adhesion in post-core restorations. Dent Mater,2006, 22:602-609.
[22]Bitter K, Meyer-Luckel H, Priehn K, et al. Bond strengths of resin cements to fiber-reinforced composite posts. American journal of dentistry,2006,19 (3):138-142.
[23]Perdigao J, Gomes G & Lee IK, et al. The effect of silane on the bond strengths of fiber posts. Dental Materials,2006,22(8):752-758.
[24]Sarac YS, Sarac D, Kulunk T, et al. The effect of chemical surface treatments of different denture base resins on the shear bond strength of denture repair. J Prosthet Dent,2005,94:259-266.
[25]张志闻,苏剑生.纤维桩的表面处理[J].国际口腔医学杂志,2007,34(5)：384-386.
[26]Ozcan M, Vallittu PK. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cements to ceramics [J]. Dental Materials.2004, 19(8):725-731
[27]Frankenberger R. Repair strength of etched VS silica-coated Metal-ceramic and all-ceramic restoration. Oper Dent,2000,25:209-215.
[28]Omura I. Adhesive and mechanical properties of a new dental adhesive. J Prosthet Dent,1982.
[29]Carlos Jose Soares, Fernanda Ribeiro Santana, Janaina Carla Prerira, at al. Influence of airborne-particle abradion on mechanical properties and bond strength of carbon/epoxy and glass/BIS-GAM fiber-reinforced resin posts. J Prosthet Dent,2008,99:444-445.
[30]Monticelli F, Toledano M, Tay FR, et al.A simple etching technique for improving the retention of fiber posts to resin composites. Journal of Endodontics,2006,32(1):44-47.
[31]Vona M, Goracci C, Monticelli F, et al. The adhesion between fibre posts and composite resin cores:the evaluationg of microtensile bond strength following various surface chemical treatments to posts. International Endodontic Journal,2006,39(1):31-39.
[32]Carrigan PJ, Morse DR, Furst ML, et al. A scanning electron micro-scopic evaluation of human dentinal tubules according to age and location. J Endod,1984,10:359-363.
[33]Vichi A, Grandini S, Davidson CL, et al. An SEM evaluation of several adhesive systems used for bonding fiber posts under clinical conditions. Dent Mater,2002,18:495-502.
[34]Chapell RP, Cobb CM, Spencer P, et al. Dentin tubule anastomosis:A potential factor in dentinal adhesive bonding?J Prosthet Dent 1994; 72:183-188.
[35]Bouillaguet S, Troesch S, Wataha JC, et al. Microtensile bond strength between adhesive cements and root canal dentin. Dent Mater,2003,19:199-205.
[36]Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 1987,66:1636-1639.
[37]Alster D, FeilzerAJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Polymerization contraction stress injthin resin composite layers as a function of layer thickness. Dent Mater,1997,13:146-150.
[38]Sorensen JA, Ahn SG, Berge HX, etal. Aeademy of dental materials, proeeedings of conference on scientific criteria for selecting materials and techniques in clinical dentistry.2001,15:567-584.
[39]Azer55, DrunllnondJL, CamPbellSD, etal. lnflueneeofeorebuilduPmateri onthefatiguestrengthofanall-eeramieerown. J Prosthet Dent,2008,6(6): 624-631.
[40]Wiskott HWA, NiehollsJI, Belser UC. Stress fatigue:Basic Principles and Prosthodontic implications. Int J Prosthodont,1995,8(2):105-116.
[41]郭良微,孙宏晨,徐经威,等.热循环对二种粘结剂的树脂-牙本质界面粘结强度的影响[J].吉林大学学报(医学版),2006,32(2)：306-312.
[42]Nikaido T, Kunzenlmann KH, et al. Evaluation of thermal cycling and mechanical loading on bonding strength of a selfetching pprimer system to dentin. Dental materials,2002,18:269-276.
[43]TilkM, LommelT, GersteinH. A study of mandibular and maxillary root widths to determine dowel size. J Endodont,1979,5(3):79-82.
[44]Tsubota M. Stress analysis of Post-reconstructed teeth with dead space at the apex of the Post. Nippon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi,1989, 33(3):609-620
[45]LuZhi-Yue, Zhangyu-Xing. Effects of Post-core design and ferrule on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors. J Prosthet Dent,2003,89(4):368-373.
[46]Giachetti L, Scaminaci Russo D, Bertini F, et al. Translucent fiber post cementation using a light-curing adhesive/composite system:SEM analysis and pull-out test. J Dent,2004,32:629-634.
[47]Balbosh A, Kern M. Effect of surface treatment on retention of glass-fiber endodontic posts. J Prosthet Dent,2006,95:218-223.
[48]Ngoh EC, Pashley DH, Loushine RJ, et al. Effects of eugenol on resin bond strengths to root canal dentin. J Endod,2001,27:411-414.
[49]Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, et al. Relationship between surface area for adhesion andtensile bond strength-evaluation of a microtensile bond test.Dental Materials,1994,10:236-240.
[50]Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, Sano H, et al.The microtensile bond test:a review. J Adhes Dent,1999,1:299-309.
[51]Goracci C, Grandini S, BossuM, et al. Laboratory assessment of the retentive potential of adhesive posts:a review. J Dent,2007,35(11): 827-835.
[52]Goracci C, Tavares AU, Fabianelli A, et al. The adhesion between fiber posts and root canal walls comparison between microtensile and push-out bond strength measurements. European J Oral Sci,2004,112:353-361.
[53]Goracci C, Sadek FT, Fabianelli A, et al. Evaluation of the adhesion of fiber posts to intraradicular dentin. Oper Dent,2005,30:627-635.
[54]Heydecke G, Butz F, Hussein A, et al. Fracture strength after dynamic loading of endodontically treated teeth restore with different post-and-core systems. J Prosthet Dent,2002,87(4):438-445.
[55]Duret B, Reynaud M, Duret F. New concept of corona radicular recon-struction:the composit post.Chir Dent Fr,1990,540:131-141.
[56]Newman MP, Yaman P, Dennison J, et al. Fracture resistance of endod-ontically treated teeth restored with composite posts. J Prosthet Dent, 2003,89(4):360-367.
[57]Raygot CG, Chai J, Jameson DL. Fracture resistance and primary failure mode of endodontically treated teeth restored with a carbon fiber-reinforced resin post system in vitro. Int J Prosthodont,2001,14(2): 141-145.
[58]Sidoli GE, King PA, Setchell DJ. An in vitro evaluation of a carbon fiber-based post and core system.J Prosthet Dent,1997,78(1):5-9.
[59]Martinez Insua A, da Silva L, Rilo B, et al. Comparison of the fracture resistances of pulpless teeth restored with a cast post or carbon-fiber post with a composite core.J Prosthet Dent,1998,80(5):527-532.
[60]LibmanWJ, Niehollsjl. Load fatigue of teeth restored with cast posts and cores and complete crowns. Int J Prosthodont.1995:8(2):155-161.
[61]Qualtrough AJ, Chandler Np, Purton DG. A comParison of the retention of tooth-colored Posts. Quintessence Ini.2003; 34(3):199-201.
[62]Sahafi A, Peutzfeld A, Asmussen E, Gotfredsen K. Effect of surface treatment of prefabricated posts on bonding of resin cement. Oper Dent, 2004,29:60-68.
[63]Balbosh A, Kern M. Effect of surface treatment on retention of glass-fiber endodontic posts. J Prosthet Dent,2006,95:218-223.
[64]Mazzitelli C, Ferrari M, Toledano M, et al. Surface roughness analysis of fiber post conditioning processes.J Dent Res,2000,87(2):186-190
[65]Carlos Jose Soares, Fernanda Ribeiro Santana, Janaina Carla Prerira. at al. Influence of airborne-particle abradion on mechanical properties and bond strength of carbon/epoxy and glass/BIS-GAM fiber-reinforced resin posts. J Prosthet Dent,2008,99:444-445.
[66]Sahafi A, Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E, Gotfredsen K. Retention and failure morphology of prefabricated posts. Int J Prosthodont,2004,17(3):307-312.
[67]Schmitter M, Huy C, Ohlmann B, et al. J Endod,2006,32(4):328-330.
[68]Valandro LF, Ozcan M, de Melo RM, et al. Int J Prosthodont.2006, 19(1):74-76.
[69]Sahafi Peutzfeldt A, Ravnhoh G'et al. Clin Oral Inve-stig,2005, 9(2):84-90.
[70]Sahaft Peutzfeldt Asmussen E, et al. Int J Prosthodont。2004.17(3): 307-312.
[71]Elisabeth J, Stricker, Till N, et al. Influence of different posts and cores on marginal adaptation, fracture resistance, and fracture mode of composite resin crowns on human and mandibular premolars [J]. J Dent,2006, 34(5):326-335.
[72]Ebru,Safak, Duygu, et al. Effect of different surface treatments on the push-out bond strength of fiber post to root canal dentin[J]. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology,2009, 108 (2):e74-e80.
[1]Sadek FT, Monticelli F, Gorraci,et al. Bond strength performance of different resin com-posites used as core materials around fiber posts. Dent Mater,2007,1:95-99.
[2]陈治清.口腔材料学(第三版).北京：人民卫生出版社,2005.65-66.
[3]F Monticelli,R Osorio, FT Sadek, et al. Surface Treatments for improving bond strength to prefabricated fiber posts:A Literature Review. Operative Dentistry,2008,33(3):346～355.
[4]Goracci C, Raffaelli 0, Monticelli F, et al.The adhesion between prefabricates FRC post and composite resin cores:microtensile bond strength with and without post silanization. Dent Mater,2005,21:437-444.
[5]AKsornmuang J, Nakajima M, Foxton RM, et al.Microtensile bond strength of a dual cure resin core material to glass and quartz fibre posts. Journal of Dentistry,2004,32(6):443-450.
[6]Monticelli F, Toledano M, Tay FR, et al. Post-surface conditioning improves interfacial adhesion in post-core restorations. Dent Mater,2006, 22:602-609.
[7]Bitter K, Meyer-Luckel H, Priehn K, et al. Bond strengths of resin cements to fiber-reinforced composite posts. American journal of dentistry,2006,19(3):138-142.
[8]Perdigao J, Gomes G & Lee IK, et al. The effect of silane on the bond strengths of fiber posts. Dental Materials,2006,22(8):752-758.
[9]Daniels MW, Francis LF, et al. Silane adsorption behaviour micro-structure, and properties of doxypropyl trimethoxy silane modified colloidal silica coatings. J Colloid Interface Sci,1998,20(5):191-200.
[10]Hooshmand T, van Noort R, Keshvad A. Bond durability of the resin-bonded and silane treated ceramic surface.Dent Mater,2002,18:179-188.
[11]Graf RT, Koenig JL, Ishida H. The influence of interfacial structure on the f lexural strength of glass reinforced polyester. J Adhesion,1983,16: 97-114.
[12]Sato K, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Effect of three-liquid bonding agents on bond strength to a machine-milled ceramic material. J Oral Rehabil 1999,26:570-574.
[13]Blum FD, Meesiri W, Kang H, et al. Hydrolysis, Adsorption and Dynamics of Silane Coupling Agents on Silica Surfaces.J Adhesion Sci Tech.1991, 5:479-496.
[14]Plueddemann EP. Silanols and Siloxanes as Coupling Agents and Primers.39th Annual Conference, Reinforced Plastics/Composite. The Society of Plastics Industry,1984.
[15]Barghi N, Berry T & Chung K. Effects of timing and heat treatment of silanated porcelain on the bond strength. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 2000,27(5):407-412.
[16]Kato JF, Soderholm KJ, Longmate J et al. Effects of treatment and storage conditiongs on ceramic/composite bond strength.J Dent Res.1995,74:381-387.
[18]Monticelli F, Toledano M, Osoria R et al. Effect of temperature on the silane coupling agents when bonding core resin to quartz fibre posts. Dental Materials,2006,22(11):1024-1028.
[19]Hooshmand T, Van Noorl R & Keshvad A. Bond durability of the resin-bonded and silane treated ceramic surface. Dental Materials,2002,18(2): 179-188.
[20]Aksornmuang J, Nakajima M, Foxton RM & Tagami J. Regional bond strengths of a dual cure resin core material to translucent fiber posts. American journal of Dentistry,2006,19(1):51-55.
[21]Ferrari M, Goracci C, Sadek FT,et al. An investigation of the interfacial strengths of methacrylate resin-based glass fiber post-core buildups. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry,2006,8(4):239-245.
[22]Radovic I, Monticelli F, Goracci C, et al. The effect of sandblasting on adhesion of a dual-cured resin composite to methacrylic fiber posts: microtensile bond strength and SEM evaluation. Journal of Dentistry,2007, 35(6):496-502.
[23]Balbosh A & Kern M. Effect of surface treatment on retention of glass-fiber endodontic posts. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry,2006, 95(3):218-223.
[24]Hashimoto M, DE Munck J, Ito S, et al. In vitro effect of nanoleakage on resin-dentin bond strengths analyzed by microtensile bond test, SEM/EDX and TEM. Biomaterials,2004,25(25):5565-5574.
[25]Quintas AF, Bottino MA, Neisser MP et al. An SEM evaluation of carbon-fiber post and core resin interface before and after an in vitro test. Pesqui Odintol Brads,2001,15(4):64-69.
[26]Frankenberger R. Repair strength of etched VS silica—coated metal-ceramic and all- ceramic restoration. Oper Dent,2000,25:209-215.
[27]Omura I. Adhesive and mechanical properties of a new dental adhesive.J Prosthet Dent,1982.
[28]Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A & Sahaf i A. Bonding of resin cements to post materials Influence of surface energy characteristics. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry,2005,7(3):231-234.
[29]Carlos Jose Soares, Fernanda Ribeiro Santana, Janaina Car la Prerira, at al. Influence of airborne-particle abradion on mechanical properties and bond strength of carbon/epoxy and glass/BIS-GAM fiber-reinforced resin posts. J Prosthet Dent,2008,99:444-445.
[30]Ivana Radovic, Francesca Monticelli, Federica Papacchini et al. Acclerated aging of adhesive-mediated fiber post-resin composite bonds:A modeling approach. J of Dent.2007,35:683-689.
[31]Monticelli F, Toledano M, Tay FR, et al. A simple etching technique for improving the retention of fiber posts to resin composites. Journal of Endodontics,2006,32(1):44-47.
[32]张志闻,苏剑生.纤维桩的表面处理.国际口腔医学杂志,2007,34(5)：384-386.
[33]DE munck J, Vargas M, Van Landuyt K, et al. Bonding of an auto adhesive luting material to enamel and dentin. Dental Materials,2004,20(10): 963-971.
[34]D'Arcangelo C, D'Amario M, Prosperi GD, et al. Effect of surface treatments on tensile bond strength and on morphology of quartz-fiber posts.Journal of Endodontics,2007,33(3):264-267.
[35]Sahafi A, Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E et al.Bond strength of resin cement to surface-treated posts of titanium alloy, glass fiber, and zirconia, and to dentin. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry,2003,5(2): 153-162.
[36]Sahafi A, Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E et al. Retention and failure morphology of prefabricated posts. Int J of Prosthodontics,2004,17(3): 307-312.
[37]Volandro LF, Yoshiga S, DE Melo RM, et al. Microtensile bond strength between a quartz fiber post and a resin cement:Effect of post surface conditioning. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry,2006,8(2):105-111.
[38]Vona M, Goracci C, Monticelli F, et al.The adhesion between fibre posts and composite resin cores:the evaluationg of microtensile bond strength following various surface chemical treatments to posts. International Endodontic Journal,2006,39(1):31-39.
[39]Bronson SH, Hansen AR, Nielsen HZ et al.A comparative study of the immunogold labeling on h2O2-treated and heated epoxy sections. Micron, 2001,32(2):147-151.
[40]Holm R, Farrants GW, Nesland JM, Sobrinho-Simoes M, et al. Ultra-structural and electron immuno-histochemical features of medullary thyroid carcinoma. Virchows Archive A:Pathological Anatomy and Histology,1989, A4(14):375-384.
[41]Enerstrom S & Kniola B.Resin embedding for quantitative immuno-electron microscopy:A comparative computerized image analysis. Biotechnic & Histochemistry,1995,70(3):135-146.
[42]Baskin DG, Erlandsen SL & Parsin JA. Influence of hydrogen peroxide or alcoholic sodium hydroxide on the immunocytochemical detection of growth hormone and prolactin after osmium fixation. Journal of Histo-chemistry and Cytochemistry,1979,27(9):1290-1292.
[43]Murat Yenisey, Safak Kulunk. Effects of chemical surface treatments of quartz and glass fiber posts on the retention of a composite resin.J Prosthet Dent,2008,99:38-45.
[44]Nagai E, Otani K, Satoh Y, et al. Repair of denture base resin using woven metal and glass fiber:effect of methylene chloride pretreatment. J prosthet Dent,2001;85:496-500.
[45]Cheleux. Surface treatment on quartz fiber post Influence on adhesion and flexural properties. Am J Dent,2007,20(6):375-379.
[47]Mann D, Fessmann J, Kampschulute G & Hopkins M. Adherent metalliza-tion of plastic composites. Surface and Coatings Technology,1991,49(11): 168-17,3.
[48]Kirmann J, Roizard X, Pagetti J & Halut J. Effect of alkaline permanganate etching of epoxy on the peel adhesion of electrolessly plated copper on a fibre reinforced epoxy composite. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology,1998,12(4):383-398.
[49]Thorm CE & Walsh MK. The mechanism of permanganate desmearing. Printed Circuits Boards & Fabrication,1991,25:30-32.
[50]Sahfi A, Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E et al. Effect of surface treatment of prefabricated posts on bonding of resin cement. Operative Dentistry.2004,29(1):60-68.
[51]Sehmitter M, Huy C, Ohlmann B, et al. Fracture resistance of upper and lower incisors restored with glass fiber reinforced posts. J Endod, 2006,32 (4):328-330.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |