用户名: 密码: 验证码:
中国房价波动的收入分配效应研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
改革开放以来,中国经济实现了持续高速增长,城镇居民收入水平有明显提高。由于区域之间经济发展的不平衡,利益分配机制的不健全以及收入分配调节机制的相对滞后,造成城乡居民之间和城镇居民内部之间的收入差距都在日益扩大。而上世纪九十年代末我国实施住房市场化、货币化改革后,随着城镇化进程的加快,国内房地产市场价格整体上呈持续上扬之势,其中部分大中城市房价波动更为明显,使得高收入居民和家庭更容易获取房价上涨滋生的资产性收益。
     统计数据显示,近十余年来,国内整体性房价上涨趋势与城镇居民收入差距逐步拉大几乎同步发生。究其原因,一方面,不同收入阶层居民家庭在购房的支付能力上存在较大鸿沟,相比高收入阶层,房价上涨使得低收入阶层所承担的购房负担过重;另一方面,房价上涨又引起房地产财富存量迅速增加,对不同阶层的家庭总财富状况会产生不同的影响,进一步导致财富在居民或家庭之间分配不均。社会财富的单向转移并向高收入家庭愈加集中的趋势,更将拉大城镇居民中高收入家庭与低收入家庭之间的收入差距。
     本文将住房价格波动引起居民之间收入分配状况发生变化的现象定义为房价波动的收入分配效应。这一效应的存在将房价与居民收入分配状况紧密联系起来,凸显出住房的民生属性。由此,房价波动不单是市场自身问题,它也可以看做是现有经济增长模式和收入分配方式等体制性障碍通过房价的一种综合体现。同时,“十二五”规划中将中国经济的发展重心由主要追求效率转向更加注重公平,由主要关注财富增长转向更加注重财富分配等政策方向,也为本文的研究提供了重要的现实依据。由此,探讨中国房价波动收入分配效应的表现、传导机制以及主要渠道,对促进房价合理变动,抑制住房投资投机性需求,支持自住型需求,优化收入分配机制,实现住房和社会公平等方面都具有重要的理论和现实意义。
     研究发现,无论从中国宏观数据、区域省际数据还是家庭微观调研数据都证实了住房价格波动会引起家庭财产性收入和家庭总财富的变化,从而改变居民之间的收入分配状况,具有收入分配效应。具体来说,中国房价波动与收入分配状况长期内具有一定的互动关系,短期内两者之间的非均衡状态将会以固定的调整力度逐渐向长期的均衡状态趋近。同时,房价波动的收入分配效应又具有明显的区域差异性,就当前影响效果来说,东部地区和西部地区为正效应,而中部地区为负效应。对于家庭或居民来说,除住房情况可产生收入分配效应外,家庭特征如家庭总收入、家庭的储蓄率以及家庭人口年龄结构也都表现出一定的收入分配效应。此外,居民个体特征如个人的户籍情况、年龄大小以及工作状况也会明显影响到居民之间的收入分配状况。
     本文的学术创新与贡献主要体现在:第一,选题的新颖性与现实性,本文较创新性地将当前广受关注的房价与收入分配两大问题纳入到统一的理论框架之下展开深入分析。第二,现有文献对房价波动收入分配效应相关选题的研究还较为缺乏,本文则对这一选题进行了系统性研究并提出了相应对策。第三,对房价波动收入分配效应的传导机制进行归纳,提出房价波动可通过宏观、中观、微观三种渠道影响居民的收入分配状况并对其逐一进行了实证检验。第四,运用了多维度的实证分析,尤其是分析中运用了微观调查数据(CGSS),在分析房价波动收入分配效应的基础上同时研究了家庭特征和个体特征方面的差异可能对居民之间收入分配状况产生的影响。此外,笔者在研究中还依据各省相关统计年鉴数据,逐一推算出1995-2010年中国27省份的城镇基尼系数值,这对相关选题的后续研究也会有一定的借鉴意义。
     最后,在内容安排上,本文首先阐述了研究的背景和意义,目标、内容和方法,以及思路和创新等(第一章),并就相关研究的大量文献进行了系统性回顾与梳理(第二章);其次,从理论角度对房价波动的收入分配效应进行了论述,建立反映房价与家庭收入关联性的世代交叠模型,并指出房价波动可通过宏观渠道、区域渠道以及微观家庭与个体渠道等影响居民之间的收入分配状况(第三章)。接着,分别引入相关数据对上述房价波动收入分配效应的三种传导渠道逐一进行实证检验,如运用中国1986-2010年的时间序列数据,建立VAR模型从宏观层面检验我国房价波动与城镇居民收入分配之间的互动效应(第四章);运用中国省际面板数据,通过建立动态面板数据模型,比较分析中国东、中、西部和全国房价波动对收入分配的影响及其区域差异(第五章);采用中国综合社会调查微观数据(CGSS2006),对房价波动收入分配效应的微观传导渠道进行验证(第六章)。最后,基于以上对房价波动的收入分配效应的理论阐述及多维度实证检验结果,提出了相应的对策建议(第七章)。
China has achieved sustained rapid economic growth since the economic reform and opening-up starting from1978and the level of income for urban residents has improved significantly since then. The income gap between urban and rural residents or among urban residents has continued to widen because of the unbalanced economic development in different regions, the imperfect mechanism of benefits distribution, and lagging behind in adjustment mechanism of income distribution. China implemented a national wide urban housing reform program in the late of1990s. After then, the urban real estate prices continually climb up to the most recent, obviously in some of core cities in China, for example, Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou and among others. The sky-high property prices cause that residents or families in high-income groups are in advantage to receive capital gain from their housing prices increasing.
     Evidence shows that the income gap of urban residents is gradually widened as almost synchronous with domestic integrity housing prices rising trend in the past decade. On the one hand, residents in the different income groups have a variety purchasing power of homes. The low-income residents are under a higher pressure in housing purchase than high-income families. On the other hand, the increasing value of property impacts the wealthy distribution among residents in different income groups, which makes unbalanced wealthy distribution in China society even worse than before. There is a rapid growth trend which the social wealthy is concentrated to the rich families one-way recently. Therefore, the gap between the high-and the low-income families was getting bigger and bigger.
     The income distributional effect of housing price fluctuation is defined as the phenomenon that income distribution among the residents caused by the housing prices fluctuation in the current research. The existence of this effect is closely linked to housing prices and income distribution situation, and also highlights the livelihood issues of the housing. As a result, fluctuation in house prices is not only the problem of market itself, but also can has been seen as the comprehensive reflection of existing institutional barriers in the model of economic growth and income distribution methods. At the meantime, China12th Five-year economic development program will turn the target from pursuit of efficiency to a fair distribution of social wealthy among residents, which provides significant policy and practical foundations for the current research. Thus, to explore the performance, transmission mechanism and the main channel of the income distribution effects of housing price fluctuation in China have important theoretical and practical significance, such as promoting reasonable housing prices changes, inhibition of investment and speculative housing demand, supporting user demand, and optimizing the mechanism of income distribution, housing and social fairness.
     The current study finds that housing prices fluctuation can cause property income and total household wealth change from macro data, the regional inter-provincial data, and family micro survey data, thus it changes the income distribution among the residents. The relationship between the fluctuation of housing prices and distribution of social wealthy is interactive in the long term, but the non-equilibrium relationship in the short term will be gradually near to the long-term equilibrium as a fixed rate. Moreover, the income distribution effects of house prices changes show obvious difference among three areas:two variables move in the same deriction in the western region and eastern region, but opposite deriction in the central region. Household characteristics, for example total household income, household saving rate and household population age structure, are also demonstrated a certain income distribution effects overlooking the income distribution effect of housing prices.In addition, the individual characteristics, such as the individual household registration, age and working conditions, are significantly impacting the income distribution among residents.
     The current research contributes to the literatures in the following aspects. First, the research integrates two major popular issues, the price and income distribution, into a unified theoretical framework and presents an in-depth analysis. Second, existing literatures on income distributional effects of housing prices fluctuations are scarce, but this paper performs a systematic study on the topics and puts forward some corresponding countermeasures based on the deep study. Third, we empirically prove that changes in the housing prices impact income distribution through the macro-, regional-, and micro-channel. We systematically summarize the conduction mechanism of the income distribution effects of house prices changes in China. Finally, we employ the multi-dimensional empirical analysis, i.e. micro survey data (CGSS), to study income distribution effects of prices changes. At the meantime, we also test differences in household characteristics and individual characteristics may change the income distribution situation among the residents. As an important aside, it should be noted that we calculate urban Gini coefficient of27provinces in1995-2010according to China's Statistical Yearbook (1996-2011) in the current study. We would like to shed a light for the coming research in future.
     This research is organized as follows. Chapter one is an introductive chapter, which will introduce the research background and the research importance. Moreover, both research objectives and research design are also included in this chapter. Chapter two systematically reviews literatures in the field. Chapter three is a methodology chapter. It theoretically discusses the income distributional effects of price changes, and then establishes an overlapping generation model to reflect the correlation of house prices and household income. The model is aim to point out that price changes in the property market can affect income distribution among the residents from the macro-channels, regional channels, and micro channels. Chapter four conducts an empirical analysis of the income distribution effects of the three transmission channels by using the annual time series data through the VAR model to test the mutual effect between China's house prices and income distribution urban residents from a macro-level. Chapter five analyzes comparatively the income distribution effects of house prices changes in central, eastern and western regions of China according to inter-provincial panel data through the establishment of a dynamic panel data model. Chapter six tests microscopic conduction channels on the income distributional effects of housing price employing General Social Survey (CGSS2006) micro-data. The last chapter is a conclusive chapter, which proposes the countermeasures and policy comments.
引文
[1]Abraham J. M., Hendershott P. H.1996, Bubbles in metropolitan housing. markets[J]. Journal of Housing Research, vol.7(2), pp.191-207.
    [2]Alesina A., Perotti R.1996, Income distribution, political instability and investment[J]. European Economic Review, vol.81 (5), pp.1170-1189.
    [3]Allen F., Gale D.2000, Optimal currency crises[J]. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, vol.53 (1), pp.177-230.
    [4]Ando A., Modigliani F.1963, The 'Life Cycle' Hypothesis of savings: aggregate implications and tests[J]. The American Economic Review, vol.53, pp.55-84.
    [5]Arrondel L., B. Lefebvre.2001, Behavior of household portfolios in france: the role of housing[J]. Review of Income and Wealth, vol.47 (4), pp.489-514.
    [6]Arrondel L., B. Lefebvre.2001, Consumption and investment motives in housing wealth accumulation:a french study[J]. Journal of Urban Economics, vol.50, pp.112-137.
    [7]Attanasio O., Blow L., Hamilton R., Leicester A.2009, Booms and busts: consumption, house prices and expectations [J]. Economica, vol.76 (301), pp.20-50.
    [8]Barro R. J.2000, Inequality and growth in a panel of countries [J]. Journal of Economic Growth, vol.5, pp.5-32.
    [9]Becker G. S., Chiswick B. R.1966, Education and the distribution of earaings[J]. The American Economic Review, vol.56, pp.358-369.
    [10]Benjamin D., Chinloy P., Donald G. 2004, Real estate versus financial wealth in consumption[J]. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, vol.3, pp.341-354.
    [11]Bertola G., Disney R., Grant C.2006, The Economics of Consumer Credit[M]. MIT Press.
    [12]Buchnan M.1991, Economics in the post-cocialist century[J]. Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol.101 (404), pp.15-21.
    [13]C. Goodhart, B. Hofmann.2008, House prices, money, credit and the macroeconomy[C]. Working Paper, European Central Bank.
    [14]C. L. Lee.2009, Housing price volatility and its determinants[J]. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, vol.2 (3), pp.293-308.
    [15]Campbell J. Y., Cocco J. F.2007, How do house prices affect consumption? Evidence from micro data[J]. Journal of Monetary Economics, vol.54, pp.591-621.
    [16]Cerny A., D. K. Miles, L. Schmidt.2010, The impact of changing demographics and pensions on the demand for housing and financial assets[J]. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, vol.9 (3), pp.393-420.
    [17]Chetty R, Szeidl A.2007, Consumption commitments and risk preferences[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.122(2), pp.831-877.
    [18]Chetty R, Szeidl A.2010, The effect of housing on portfolio choice[C].NBER Working Papers 15998, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    [19]Chiu, Rebecca L. H.2007, Planning, land and affordable housing in Hong Kong[J]. Housing Studies, vol.22 (1), pp.63-81.
    [20]Chua B. H.2000, Public housing residents as clients of the state[J]. Housing Studies, vol.15, pp.46-60.
    [21]Curran C., Schrag J.2000, Does it matter whom an agent serves? Evidence from recent changes in real estate agency law[J]. Journal of Law and Economics, vol.43, pp.265-284.
    [22]Datt, G. and M.Ravallion, (1998), "Why Have Some Indian States Done Better Than Others at Reducing Rural Poverty?" Economica, vol.65 (257), pp.17-38.
    [23]Debelle G.2004, Macroeconomic implications of rising household debt[C]. BIS Working Paper, No.153.
    [24]Denise D., Wheaton C.1996, The Economics of real estate markets [M].Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
    [25]Devlin J.2005, A detailed study of financial exclusion in the UK[J]. Journal of Consumer Policy, vol.28, pp.75-108.
    [26]Di Pasquale D., Wheaton W. C.1992, The market for real estate assets and space:a conceptual framework, AREUEA, vol.20 (1), pp.181-197.
    [27]Ebrahim M. S., H. Sikandar,2010, Financial development and asset valuation: The special case of real estate[J]. Journal of Banking & Finance, vol.34, pp.150-162.
    [28]Edelstein R.H., Lum S. K.2004, House prices, wealth effects, and the Singapore macroeconomy[J]. Journal of Housing Economics, vol.13 (4), pp.342-367.
    [29]Eiler W., Zumpano L., Baryla E.1999, Buyer search intensity and the role of the residential real estate broker[J]. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, vol.18 (3), pp.351-368.
    [30]Eriksen D., Rosenthal S.2007, Crowd out, stigma and the effect of place-based subsidized rental housing[C]. University of Syracuse, Working Paper.
    [31]Feinberg, Daniel.1964, Consumer economics[M]. New York:Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    [32]Frank M.W.2005, Income inequality and economic growth in the U. S.:a panel copintegration approach[C]. Working Paper, Sam Houston State University.
    [33]Gan J.2010, Housing wealth and consumption growth:evidence from a large panel of households[J]. Review of Financial Studies, vol.23, pp.2229-2267.
    [34]Gatzlaff D., Tirtiroglu D.1995, Real estate market efficiency:issues and evidence [J]. Journal of Real Estate Literature, vol.3 (2), pp.157-189.
    [35]Glaeser E.2003, The misallocation of housing under rent control[J].The American Economic Review, vol.93, pp.1027-1046.
    [36]Grossanan S, Laroque G.1990, Asset pricing and optimal portfolio choice in the pricing of illiquid durable consumption goods[J]. Econometrica, vol.58(1), pp.25-51.
    [37]Hayakawa K., Hirayama Y.1991, The impact of the minkatsu policy on Japanese housing and land use, society and space[J]. Environment and Planning [J]. vol.9 (2), pp.151-64.
    [38]Hendershott P. H., Hu S. C.1983, The allocation of capital between residential and non-residential uses:taxes, inflations and credit markets constraints[J]. Journal of Finance, ⅩⅩⅩⅧ,3, pp.795-812.
    [39]Henderson V. J., Ioannides, M. Y.1983, A model of housing tenure choice[J]. The American Economic Review, vol.73(1), pp.98-113.
    [40]Hyeon Park.2010, OLG based asset pricing with housing[C]. Working Paper. University of Pittsburgh.
    [41]Iacoviello M., Minetti R.2003, The credit channel of monetary policy: evidence from the housing market [C]. Working paper, Boston College.
    [42]Ioannides, M. Y., Rosenthal S. S.1994, Estimating the consumption and investment demands for housing and their effect on housing tenure status [J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol.76(1), pp.127-141.
    [43]J. Mincer.1958, Investment in human capital and personal income distribution source[J]. Journal of Political Economy, vol.66(4), pp.281-302.
    [44]J. R. Knight, William E.H., A. M.Balihuta,2004, Housing prices and maturing real estate markets:evidence from uganda[J].The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, vol.28 (1), pp.5-18.
    [45]J. Tracy, H. Schneider, S. Chan,1999, Are stocks overtaking real estate in household portfolios[J]. Current Issues in Economics and Finance, vol.5(5), pp.1-6
    [46]J. V. Henderson, Y. Ioannides.1983, A model of housing tenure choice[J]. The American Economic Review, vol.73, pp.98-113.
    [47]Jerome D., William J., Sonya A.1995, Racially exclusive real estate advertising:public policy implications for fair housing practices[J]. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, vol.14 (2), pp.225-244.
    [48]John D., Catherine T.2011, America's rental housing:meeting challenges, building on opportunities [C]. Working Paper, Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University.
    [49]Kaldor N.1956, Alternative theories of distribution[J]. Review of Economic Studies, vol.23, pp.83-100.
    [50]Kim, K.-H., Suh, S.H.1991, An analysis of optimality of housing investment in Korea[J]. Journal of Urban Economics, vol.5(1),pp.91-103.
    [51]Kim, K.-H., Suh, S.H.1993, Speculation and price bubble in the Korean and Japanese real estate markets[J]. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, vol.6 (1),pp.73-88.
    [52]Koo, Hyeng-Keun.1995, Consumption and portfolio selection with labor income:evaluation of human capital[C]. Working Paper, Washington University.
    [53]Kydland F, Prescott E.1977, Rules rather than discretion:the inconsistency of optimal plans [J].The Journal of Political Economy, vol.85 (3), pp.473-492.
    [54]Lau M, Li M.2006, Commercial housing affordability in Beijing, 1992-2002[J]. Habitat International, vol.30 (3), pp.614-627.
    [55]Lee N.J., Neo P.H., Ong, S.E.2002, Impact of changes in housing finance on 'homebuyers' decision:a case study of Singapore[C]. Working Paper, Department of Real Estate, National University of Singapore.
    [56]LeRoy S. F., Porter R. D.1981, The present-value relation:tests based on implied variance bounds[J]. Econometrica, vol.49 (3), pp.555-574.
    [57]Liu Zuyun, Hu Rong.2010, Urban housing stratification:an analysis based on CGSS2006 data[J]. Chinese Journal of Sociology, vol.32 (1), ppl65-192.
    [58]M. Flavin, T. Yamashita,2002, Owner-occupied housing and the composition of the household portfolio[J].The American Economic Review, vol.92(1), pp.345-362.
    [59]M. Friedman,1957, Introduction to "a theory of the consumption function"[C]. NBER Chapters, in:A Theory of the Consumption Function, NBER, Inc.
    [60]Malpezzi S.1990, Urban housing and financial markets:some international comparisons [J].Urban Study, vol.27 (6), pp.971-1022.
    [61]Malpezzi S., Wachter S.2002, The welfare economics of land use planning [J] Journal of Urban Economics, vol.52, pp.242-269.
    [62]Meltzer A.1995, Monetary, credit and (other) transmission processes:a monetarist perspective[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol.9 (4), pp.49-72.
    [63]Modigliani F., Brumberg R.1954, Utility analysis and the consumption function:an interpretation of cross-section data[M]. In Post-Keynesian Economics, ed. Kenneth K. Kurihara, New Brunswick, NJ:Rutgers University Press, pp.388-436.
    [64]Muellbauer J, Murphy A.1997, Booms and busts in the UK housing market[J]. The Economic Journal, vol.107,445, pp.1701-1727.
    [65]Negro M., Otrok C.2007,99 luftballons:monetary policy and the house price boom across U.S. states[J]. Journal of Monetary Economics, vol.54 (7), pp.1962-1985.
    [66]Olsen E.1969, a competitive theory of the housing market[J]. The American Economic Review, vol.59 (4), pp.612-622.
    [67]O. G. Ling.1990, Town councils in Singapore:self determination for public housing estates[C]. The Institute of Policy Studies (IPS occasional paper no. 4), Singapore:Times Academic Press.
    [68]Ortalo-Magne F., Rady S.2006, Housing market dynamics:on the contribution of income shocks and credit constraints [J]. Review of Economic Studies, vol.73, pp.459-485.
    [69]P. A. Diamond,1965, National debt in a neoclassical growth model[J]. The American Economic Review, vol.55(5), pp.1126-1150.
    [70]P. C. Kelley,1953, Consumer Economics [M]. Homewood,Ill. RD Irwin, Inc.
    [71]Phang, S.,2004, House prices and aggregate consumption:do they move together? Evidence from Singapore[J]. Journal of Housing Economics, vol.13, pp.101-119.
    [72]Q Gan, R. J. Hill,2008, A new perspective on the relationship between house prices and income[C].Working Paper, Draft:16 June, The University of New South Wales.
    [73]R. Lawrence,1990, Public collective and private space:a study of urban housing in Switzerland[C]. In S. Kent, S. (ed.) Domestic architecture and the use of space:An interdisciplinary cross-cultural study, New York, Cambridge University Press, pp.73-91.
    [74]R. Perotti,1994, Income distribution and investment[J]. European Economic Review, vol.38(3-4), pp.827-835.
    [75]Raymond Y. C., J Raftery,1999, Urban economics and housing reform in Asia[J]. Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, vol.11 (2), pp.78-81.
    [76]Richard J. H., S. M. Wachter,1998. Real estate cycles and banking crises:an international perspective[C].Working Papers, Wharton School Samuel Zell and Robert Lurie Real Estate Center, University of Pennsylvania.
    [77]S Dine.2006, Monitoring the monitors:the corporate governance in Japanese banks and their real estate lending in the 1980s[J]. Journal of Business, vol.79 (6), pp.3057-3082.
    [78]S. Kuznets,1955, Economic growth and income inequality[J]. The American Economic Review, Vol.45(1), pp.1-28.
    [79]S. Malpezzi, S. M. Wachter,2002, The role of speculation in real estate cycles [C]. Working Papers, Wharton School Samuel Zell and Robert Lurie Real Estate Center, University of Pennsylvania.
    [80]Saito A., Thornley A.2003, Shifts in Tokyo's world city status and the urban planning response[J].Urban Studies,vol.40 (4), pp.665-685.
    [81]Schuc F. Monetary policy, housing and heterogeneous regional markets[J]. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, vol.35, pp.557-589.
    [82]Shiller, Robert J.1981, Do stock prices move too much to be justified by subsequent changes in dividends? [J]. The American Economic Review, vol.71 (3), pp.421-436.
    [83]Stephens M., Burns N., Mackay, L.2003, The limits of housing reform:british social rented housing in a european context[J]. Urban Studies, vol.40 (4), pp.767-789.
    [84]Tai C. L.1988, Housing policy and high-rise living:a study of Singapore's public housing[M]. Singapore:Chopmen Publishers, pp.76-77.
    [85]Tracy J, Schneider H, Chan S.1999, Are stocks overtaking real estate in household portfolios[J]. Current Issues in Economics and Finance, vol.5 (5), pp.1-6.
    [86]Tuluca S. A., F. C. Myer, J. R. Webb.2000, Dynamics of private and public real estate markets [J]. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, vol.21 (3):279-296.
    [87]Turner M.2007, Current rental housing market challenges and the need for a new federal policy response[C]. Working Paper, the Urban Institute.
    [88]V. N. Shaw,1997, Urban housing reform in China[J]. Habitat International, vol.21 (2), pp.199-212.
    [89]Webb R., Rubens J.1987, How much in real estate? A surprising answer[J]. Journal of Portfolio Management, vol.13, pp.10-14.
    [90]Wu F.2000, The Asian crisis and its implications for urban development in emerging markets under globalization[J].Urban Geography, vol.21 (7), pp.568-585.
    [91]Yinger J.1981, A search model of real estate broker behavior[J].The American Economic Review, vol.71(4),pp.591-605.
    [92]Y. Zhou.2006, Heterogeneity and Dynamics in China's Emerging Housing Market. Habitat International, vol.30 (2), pp.277-304.
    [93]阿瑟·刘易斯.二元经济论[M].北京:北京经济学院出版社,1989.
    [94]包宗华.中国房改的经验及深化的建议[J].上海房地,2010,(5):7-10.
    [95]曹振良,傅十和.房地产泡沫及其防范[J].中国房地产,2000,(2):7-11.
    [96]陈伯庚,顾志敏,陆开和.城镇住房制度改革的理论与实践[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2003.
    [97]陈伯庚.中国特色住房消费模式探索[J].住宅产业,2007,(6):58-59.
    [98]陈灿煌.房价上涨与城市居民收入差距的关系[J].统计与决策,2007,(22): 87-89.
    [99]陈红霞,宋戈.关于城乡土地市场协调发展问题研究[J].经济纵横,2008,(2):20-22.
    [100]陈杰.制度经济学视角下的中国住房制度变迁分析[J].社会科学辑刊,2010, (6): 104-108.
    [101]陈捷.房地产税收对房价的影响之分析[J].价格月刊,2010,(4):19-21.
    [102]程红梅.超额需求:对上海房价波动的探讨[J].世界经济情况,2010,(2):77-81.
    [103]崔光灿.流动性影响资产价格与消费价格的传导机制[J].财经科学,2009,(11):16-23.
    [104]崔裴,严乐乐.住房租买选择机制缺失对中国房地产市场运行的影响 [J].华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2010,(1):108-113.
    [105]大卫·李嘉图,政治经济学及赋税原理[M].北京:商务印书馆,1976.
    [106]邓桑,杨朝军.股价房价波动与经济周期关系[J].上海交通大学学报,2008,(11):1797-1801.
    [107]董藩,陈辉玲.住房保障模式经济效应考查——基于住房过滤模型的思考[J].河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2010,(2):1-7.
    [108]杜雪君,吴次芳,黄忠华.我国房地产税与房价关系的实证研究[J].技术经济,2008,(9):54-59.
    [109]段忠东,曾令华,黄泽先.房地产价格波动与银行信贷增长的实证研究[J].金融论坛,2007(2):40-45.
    [110]范方志,李海海.房地产价格波动、通货膨胀与收入分配差距[J].青海社会科学,2010,(3),74-78.
    [111]范言慧,段军山.外商直接投资与中国居民的收入分配[J].财经科学,2003,(2):102-106.
    [112]丰雷,苗田,蒋妍.中国土地供应管制对住宅价格波动的影响[J].经济理论与经济管理,2011,(2):33-40.
    [113]冯长春.中低收入家庭住房解决途径研究[J].建筑经济,2009,(5):11-15.
    [114]冯仕政.中国社会转型期的阶级认同与社会稳定——基于中国综合调查的实证研究[J].黑龙江社会科学,2011,(3):127-133.
    [115]冯涛,王宗道,赵会玉.资产价格波动的财富效应与居民消费行为[J].经济社会体制比较,2010,(4):73-81.
    [116]冯涛,王宗道.住房制度渐进改革、房地产价格波动与居民财产性收入分配[J].财政研究,2010,(7):18-23.
    [117]冯云.城乡教育发展差距与居民收入差距关系研究[J].当代经济管理,2011,(10):13-18.
    [118]付文林.住房消费、收入分配与中国的消费需求不足[J].经济学家,2010, (2): 55-60.
    [119]傅十和.发展和规范我国住房二级市场[J].管理世界,2000,(2):46-57.
    [120]傅晓燕.国外房地产政策与制度建设的经验借鉴[J].江苏现代计量,2009,(2):42-44.
    [121]高波,洪涛.中国住宅市场羊群行为研究——基于1999-2005动态面板 模型的实证分析[J].管理世界,2008,(2):90-96.
    [122]高波,毛丰付.房价与地价关系的实证检验:1999-2002[J].产业经济研究(双月刊)[J].2003,(3):19-24.
    [123]高波.房价波动、住房保障与消费扩张[J].理论月刊,2010,(7):5-9.
    [124]高春亮,周晓艳.34个城市的住宅财富效应:基于panel data的实证研究[J].南开经济研究,2007,(1):36-44.
    [125]高书生,刘晶.收入分配的效应分析[J].经济理论与经济管理,1998,(3):66-70.
    [126]歌德伯戈,钦洛伊.城市土地经济学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1990.
    [127]顾云昌.谈住房制度改革[EB/OL]http://www.people.com.cn/GB/32306/ 143124/147550/11713302.html.
    [128]管晓明,李云娥.行业垄断的收入分配效应——对城镇垄断部门的实证分析[J].中央财经大学学报,2007,(3):66-70.
    [129]郭伟伟. “居者有其屋”——独具特色的新加坡住房保障制度及启示[J].当代世界与社会主义,2008,(6):162-167.
    [130]何丽芬,吴卫星,徐芊.中国居民家庭债务:规模、结构及其影响因素[C].工作论文,2011-10-27.
    [131]宏观经济研究院投资所住房保障课题组.我国城镇住房保障制度主要问题和建议[J].宏观经济管理,2009,(2):33-36.
    [132]洪涛.房地产价格波动与消费增长——基于中国数据的实证分析及理论解释[J].南京社会科学,2006,(5):54-58.
    [133]黄凌灵,刘志新.考虑住房因素的中国居民资产配置问题研究[J].北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版),2009,(1):1-5.
    [134]黄书会.我国房地产市场结构分析[J].合作经济与科技,2009,(19):21-22.
    [135]黄小虎.我国城镇住房制度改革思路的演变[J].红旗文稿,2010,(1):32-33.
    [136]季朗超.非均衡的房地产市场[M].北京:经济管理出版社,2005.
    [137]贾康,刘军民.中国住房制度改革问题研究——经济社会转轨中“居者有其屋”的求解[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2007.
    [138]贾生华,戚文举.国外“房价收入比”研究:起源、测量与应用[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2010,(2):16-20.
    [139]姜付秀,余晖.我国行政性垄断的危害——市场势力效应和收入分配效应的实证研究[J].中国工业经济,2007,(10):71-78.
    [140]孔煜.房价波动、银行信贷与经济增长[J].财经理论与实践,2009,(5):12-16.
    [141]况伟大.预期、投机与中国城市房价波动[J].经济研究,2010,(9):67-78.
    [142]赖华东,蔡靖方.城市住房保障政策效果及其选择——基于住宅过滤模型的思考[J].经济评论,2007,(3):136-140.
    [143]李斌.分化的住房政策:一项对住房改革的评估性研究[M].社会科学文献出版社,2009.
    [144]李春吉,孟晓宏.中国房地产市场结构和价格影响因素的实证分析[J].产业经济研究,2005,(6):48-56.
    [145]李德智,李启明.我国房价与城镇家庭贫富差距的长期均衡与短期波动:1987-2008[J].经济问题探索,2010,(11):100-105.
    [146]李宏瑾,蔡键.公平目标、社会福利与经济适用房建设——一个关于经济适用房的理论模型[J].南方金融,2009,(1):9-14.
    [147]李健飞.经济转轨时期中国房地产融资风险防范:理论与实证[M].北京:中国金融出版社,2006.
    [148]李培.房屋租赁的替代效应与福利评价[J].南方经济,2009,(2):3-12.
    [149]李实,魏众,丁赛.中国居民财产分布不均等及其原因的经验分析[J].经济研究,2005,(6):4-15.
    [150]李实.城镇内部差距拉大:当前中国收入分配差距新动向[J].中国社会科学报,2011,第175期7版.
    [151]李受华,成思危,等.城镇居民住房购买力研究[J].管理科学学报,2006,(10): 8-17.
    [152]李涛,王志芳,王海港,谭松涛.中国城市居民的金融受排斥状况研究[J].经济研究,2010,(7):15-30.
    [153]李涛,熊志飞.中国城市二手房市场“高价柠檬“悖论[J].南京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2005,(8):45-50.
    [154]李晓飞.户籍与当代中国社会差别——基于中国综合社会调查 (CGSS2006)数据的定量研究[J].华中科技大学学报(社会科学版),2010,(3):85-91.
    [155]李嫣.我国城镇居民住房制度:历史变迁及改进对策[J].中州学刊,2007,(3): 134-136.
    [156]李玉杰,王庆石.我国房地产业对国民经济其他产业带动作用研究[J].山东财政学院学报,2011,(1):87-91.
    [157]梁云芳,高铁梅,贺书军.房地产市场与国民经济协调发展的实证分析[J].中国社会科学,2006,(3):74-84.
    [158]梁云芳,高铁梅.我国商品住宅销售价格波动成因的实证分析[J].管理世界,2006,(8):76-82.
    [159]梁云芳,高铁梅.中国房地产价格波动区域差异的实证分析[J].经济研究,2007,(8):133-142.
    [160]林坚,冯长春.美国的住房政策[J].国外城市规划,1998,(2):6-10.
    [161]刘旦.中国城镇住宅价格与消费关系的实证研究[J].上海财经大学学报,2008,(1):80-87.
    [162]刘芳,郭颖.我国房地产市场供求的非均衡分析——基于1987-2005年数据的实证研究[J].上海电机学院学报,2007,(2):142-146.
    [163]刘凤良,吕志华,人力资本对收入分配影响研究进展[J].经济学动态,2008,(6):89-95.
    [164]刘桂芝,刘振华.经济增长与收入分配相关性研究重点转移带来的政策启示[J].经济经纬,2004,(2):12-15.
    [165]刘红.地方政府土地市场行为的经济学分析[J].改革与战略,2009,(1):15-17.
    [166]刘洪玉,黄英,刘琳.二手房市场中购房者对房地产经纪服务的选择行为研究[J].中国房地产,2005,(5):14-16.
    [167]刘洪玉.中国住房市场的现状和未来发展[J].建筑经济,2007,(7):8-12.
    [168]刘敏楼.金融发展的收入分配效应——基于中国地区截面数据的分析[J].上海金融,2006,(1):8-11.
    [169]刘楹.家庭金融资产配置行为研究[M].北京:社会科学文献出版,2007.
    [170]马丽娟.我国房地产价格波动的区域差异的实证分析[J].生产力研究,2011,(8):74-76.
    [171]倪鹏飞.建立多层次的中国住房公共政策体系[J].财贸经济,2008,(1):17-26.
    [172]潘爱民.公平与效率视角下住宅消费保障制度研究[J].经济与管理,2008,(5):5-8.
    [173]庞元.加快建立促进房地产平稳健康发展的长效机制[J].上海房地,2010,(11):4-6.
    [174]裴小革.论收入分配理论的历史演变和劳动价值论的实践价值[J].当代经济科学,2003,(1):6-11.
    [175]彭竞.高等教育回报率与工资的性别差异[J].人口与经济,2011,(4):51-57.
    [176]钱瑛瑛.中国住房保障政策研究——经济适用房与廉租住房[J].中国房地产,2003,(8):57-60.
    [177]邱崇明,李辉文.房价波动、银行不稳定和货币政策[J].财贸经济,2011,(3): 116-122.
    [178]权衡.收入分配与经济增长的相关性:现代分析框架及其争论[J].社会科学,2004,(6):15-21.
    [179]权衡.转型时期中国经济增长的收入分配效应及其机理分析[J].上海经济研究,2002,(2):42-50.
    [180]邵红.房价与宏观调控政策博弈[J].重庆行政,2006.(2):88-89.
    [181]沈悦,刘洪玉.住宅价格与经济基本面:1995-2002年中国14城市的实证研究[J].经济研究,2004,(6):78-86.
    [182]石弘.商品房价格与城镇居民收入差距的实证分析[J].中国物价,2007,(11):43-46.
    [183]史晨昱.戴蒙德模型融合宏观经济与微观行为[N].上海证券报,2007-04-02(B8).
    [184]史代敏,宋艳.居民家庭金融资产选择的实证研究[J].统计研究,2005,(10): 43-49.
    [185]史永东,陈日清.信息不对称、羊群行为与房地产市场中的居民破产[J].财经问题研究,2006,(12):39-46.
    [186]宋勃,刘建江.房价与地价关系的理论分析与中国经验的实证检验:1998-2007[J].中央财经大学学报,2009,(9):60-66.
    [187]宋勃.房地产市场财富效应的理论分析和中国经验的实证检验:1998-2006[J].经济科学,2007,(5):41-53.
    [188]宋博通.从公共住房到租金优惠券—美国低收入阶层住房政策演化解析[J].城市规划汇刊,2002,(4):65-68.
    [189]苏志雄.浅谈保障性住房建设对房地产市场的影响[J].住房保障,2009,(3):44-46.
    [190]汤浩,刘旦.房地产价格与城镇居民收入差距的经验分析[J].西安财经学院学报,2007,(6):52-56.
    [191]屠佳华,张洁.什么推动了房价的上涨:来自上海房地产市场的证据[J].世界经济,2005,(5):28-37.
    [192]汪浩瀚.跨期选择、制度转型与居民消费行为的不确定性[J].当代财经,2006,(5):12-15.
    [193]汪同三,蔡跃洲.改革开放以来收入分配对资本积累及投资结构的影响[J].中国社会科学,2006,(1):4-14.
    [194]王聪,张海云.中美家庭金融资产选择行为的差异及其原因分析[J].国际金融研究,2010,(6):55-61.
    [195]王辉龙,王先柱.住房保障、房地产市场秩序与民生改善[J].中共南京市委党校学报,2010,(1):31-42.
    [196]王辉龙.房价波动、家庭财富配置与居民生活水平——来自长江、珠江三角洲地区的经验证据[J].南方经济,2009,(12):3-14.
    [197]王家庭,张换兆.利率变动对中国房地产市场影响的实证分析[J].中央财经大学学报,2006,(1):54-59.
    [198]邬丽萍,周建军.房价波动对消费支出影响的实证分析[J].财经理论与实践,2009,(1):109-112.
    [199]吴德进,李国柱,等.房地产泡沫——理论、预警与治理[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2007.
    [200]吴卫星,齐天翔.流动性、生命周期与投资组合相异性——中国投资者行为调查实证研究[J].经济研究,2007,(2):97-110.
    [201]吴卫星,钱锦晔.住房投资与家庭金融资产选择:基于中国居民家庭调查的实证分析[A].中国金融国际年会投稿论文[C],2010.
    [202]武建东.解决住房问题,先把城乡统起来[J].中国土地,2007,(7):32-33.
    [203]武康平,皮舜,鲁桂华.中国房地产市场与金融市场共生性的一般均衡分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2004,(10):24-32.
    [204]向志容,颜蕾.城镇居民收入差距扩大:根源与对策[J].西部金融,2010,(4):74-75.
    [205]谢百三,陈小明,我国房地产市场宏观调控的效果及其未来的政策取向[J],当代财经,2006,(10):87-90.
    [206]谢经荣,朱勇.地产泡沫与金融危机[M].北京:经济管理出版社.2002.
    [207]谢勇.中国城镇居民储蓄率的影响因素研究[J].浙江社会科学,2011,(4): 25-156.
    [208]谢勇.中国居民储蓄的分布特征——微观数据及其宏观含义[J].经济与管理研究,2010,(10):5-11.
    [209]薛宇峰.中国农村收入分配差距的现状和空间分布特征[J].财经研究,2005,(5):133-144.
    [210]严金海,丰雷,包晓辉.北京住房价格波动研究[J].财贸经济,2009,(5):117-123.
    [211]杨帆,李宏谨,李勇.泡沫经济理论与中国房地产市场[J].管理世界,2005,(6):64-75.
    [212]杨绍媛,徐晓波.我国房地产税对房价的影响及改革探索[J].经济体制改革,2007,(2):136-139.
    [213]姚玲珍.中国公共住房政策模式研究[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,2003.
    [214]姚先国,黄炜华.地价与房价的关系[J].中国土地,2001,(9):33-35.
    [215]野口悠纪雄(日).泡沫经济学[M].曾寅初译.上海:三联书店出版社,2005.
    [216]易君健,易行健.房价上涨与生育率的长期下降:基于香港的实证研究[J].经济学(季刊),2008,(3):961-982.
    [217]易宪容.论中国住房公共政策的基本原则与框架[J].经济社会体制比较,2009,(6):100-107.
    [218]易宪容.信用扩张的合理界限与房价波动研究[J].财贸经济,2009,(8):5-14.
    [219]尹向飞,陈柳钦.城镇居民收入差距、财富差距、收入增长与房价关系 的因果检验:1992-2006[J].河北经贸大学学报,2008,(11):16-21.
    [220]余壮雄,林建浩.谁推高了房价?开发商、置业者还是地方政府[J].经济学家,2010,(5):30-38.
    [221]袁志刚,樊潇彦.房地产市场理性泡沫分析[J].经济研究,2003,(3):34-43.
    [222]臧日宏.经济学[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社,2002.
    [223]曾国安,郭晶晶.论中国城镇住房保障体系改革和发展的基本思路与目标构架[J].江汉论坛,2011,(2):15-20.
    [224]张建华.一种简便易用的基尼系数计算方法[J].山西农业大学学报(社会科学版),2007,(3):275.
    [225]张涛,龚六堂,卜永祥.资产回报、住房按揭贷款与房地产均衡价格[J].金融研究,2006,(2):1-11.
    [226]张向达.劳动、资本对收入分配的影响分析[J].财经问题研究,1996,(2):17-23.
    [227]张永岳,陈伯庚,孙斌艺.房地产经济学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2006.
    [228]张永岳,陈伯庚,等.房地产经济学(第二版)[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2011.
    [229]张永岳,张传勇,谢晖,我国房地产宏观调控政策效果评估初探——基于公共政策评估的视角[J].上海经济研究,2010,(12):73-81.
    [230]张永岳,周建成.社会利益分配关系与房地产业的健康发展[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2010.
    [231]张永岳.当前流动性扩张下资产价格波动的成因、影响及其应对[A].中国经济60年道路、模式与发展:上海市社会科学界第七届学术年会文集(2009年度)经济、管理学科卷.上海:上海人民出版社,2009.413-418.
    [232]张永岳.房地产二、三级市场联动的实质与突破口[J].中国房地产,2000,(6):1-2.
    [233]张原.行政垄断的收入分配效应理论及中国的经验研究[D].浙江:浙江大学博士学位论文,2009.
    [234]赵海成.我国货币汇率与房地产关系跟踪研究[J].东岳丛论,2004,(6):59-63.
    [235]赵楠.世代交叠模型及其应用[J].经济学动态,2004,(4):60-63.
    [236]钟甫宁,褚小明.房产累进税和住房供求关系的实证研究[J].财贸经济,2008,(6):83-87.
    [237]周京奎.房地产价格波动与投机行为——对中国14城市的实证研究[J].当代经济科学,2005,(7):19-24.
    [238]朱亚鹏.住房制度改革政策创新与住房公平[M].广东:中山大学出版社,2007.
    [239]邹红,黄慧丽.居民家庭资产与消费的变动关系:基于1999-2009年城镇季度数据的实证检验[J].中央财经大学学报,2010,(10):81-86.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700