中西部欠发达区域特色资源产业化模式研究
|
摘要
国内外学者对资源产业化模式的研究一直在探索之中,研究的领域和范围在不断的延伸和拓展。目前研究理论和实践告诉人们:国家所处的环境条件不同,对资源产业化模式的选择就不同;同一国家经济发展阶段不同,资源产业化模式表现的形式就不同;相同的历史阶段发展的要求和目的不同,资源产业化模式的内涵就不同。我国有自己的具体情况和环境条件,所处的发展阶段和发展要求存在较大的差异,经济社会发展和区域发展不平衡问题仍较突出,粗放型经济增长特征表现仍较明显,能源、资源和环境的瓶颈制约仍较严重。所以,在建设具有中国特色社会主义的过程中,欠发达地区的经济发展和崛起需要寻求适宜的道路,通过资源产业化,由资源变产业,这是欠发达地区在促进经济发展中所形成的共识,但采取什么样的产业化模式才能使资源变成生态型产业?这是关系到我国欠发达地区经济发展和区域协调发展的重大课题。
我国中西部欠发达地区因政策、体制、观念、技术和人才等原因,长期处于经济落后状态,又因历史上为维护生态和保护环境付出了巨大的努力而丧失了许多的发展机会,造成了今天仍然停留在为摆脱贫困而艰难挣扎的困境。在科学发展观的指导下,在新的历史背景下,欠发达地区如何实现经济发展和环境保护同步进行?已经付出的巨大的生态成本谁来支付?如何支付?支付的成本又怎样有助于经济发展?发达地区与欠发达地区如何协调发展?合作发展?本论文所研究的产业化生态模式就是为了解决以上问题的一种有意义的尝试,在构筑的生态模式中试图通过排污权交易来作为实现生态成本支付的手段,以此来促进欠发达地区的特色资源、产业化项目、生态成本支付的有机结合,最终实现经济发展和生态文明的双重目标。所以,本选题研究的主要内容是:应用产业生态学理论和方法,立足中观领域(省级区域),针对中西部欠发达地区,以特色资源为基础,以可持续发展为出发点,以排污权交易为手段,以项目企业为载体,以经济发展和生态文明为目标,着力构筑符合科学发展理念的中西部欠发达区域特色资源产业化生态模式,创建一条又好又快的发展之路,同时弥补国内在中观领域基于产业生态学视角关于特色资源产业化生态模式系统研究的不足。
在研究过程中,特色资源、产业化项目和生态成本支付三个要素在促进欠发达地区经济发展方面的作用和功能得到充分显现,尤其是生态成本支付要素,是构筑和运行中西部欠发达区域特色资源产业化生态模式的关键问题。本文通过排污权交易手段,来作为实现生态成本支付的有效途径,以此来解决欠发达地区在经济发展中所需的污染控制和污染治理的技术和资金来源问题。为此本文利用了生态足迹和生态承载力的理论和方法,并在此基础上进行了系列创新活动,产生了系列的创新成果。所创建的组合测度模型,经过实例分析和检验,在我国的初级发展阶段和具体国情环境下适用性较强,具有明显的可行性。
第一章是导论。基于以上问题研究的背景和意义,本文在导论部分对产业生态学理论、方法和产业化模式理论研究进行了文献综述,给出了论文研究的逻辑框架,及其需要研究的主要内容和本文的创新点。
第二章是关于中西部欠发达区域特色资源产业化生态模式的选择。阐明了特色资源产业化生态模式的优势所在,及其选择存在着客观必然性和可行性,符合可持续发展的必然要求。全面地对特色资源、特色资源产业化、特色资源产业化模式系列概念进行定义,并描述了它们的相关特征。并对特色资源的种类进行划分,对特色资源地理分布和经济功能分布进行了介绍。着重强调了特色资源的存在对中西部欠发达区域的经济发展具有特别重要的价值作用。同时说明了非生态模式存在的危害性,如污染环境、损害健康等,并举以实例。
第三章是关于中西部欠发达区域特色资源产业化生态模式框架构建。从经济发展、生态安全、区域公平三个原则出发,以特色资源、产业化项目、生态成本支付为构建要素,构筑了中西部欠发达区域特色资源产业化的生态模式为:“特色资源+产业化项目+生态成本支付”。对特色资源和产业化项目的选择条件以及生态成本支付的方式进行了分析,对生态模式运行机制和排污权交易体系进行了探讨,并认为产业化生态模式的建立,催生了产业生态共生网络的形成,具体表现为:形成了两条产业链、两种配套和两个集聚,即产品产业链和生态环保产业链、产业配套和生态环保配套、特色产业集聚和生态环保产业集聚。
第四章是关于生态模式运行的关键:生态成本支付。在对排污权的界定依据和准线进行确定的基础上,应用产业生态理论和方法创建了相对生态盈余测度模型、排污权测度模型、减排梯度势差模型和减排量测度模式,结合我国“十一五”减排计划,对欠发达地区进行排污权分配和对发达地区进行减排量分配,为发达地区与欠发达地区之间进行排污权交易创造市场条件。
第五章是关于生态模式实例分析:以青海省为例。从青海省的特色资源条件,到产业化项目存在的可能和途径,再到相对生态盈余的大小进行了客观的系统分析,采用创建的排污权测度模型对青海省的排污权进行了实地测度,结合发达地区的减排量,全面论述了青海省建立特色资源产业化生态模式的可能性。并通过在青海省产业化生态模式的实际构筑和运行过程,来论述中西部欠发达区域特色资源产业化生态模式在个体具体环境中的可行性和可操作性。
第六章是关于生态模式运行的建议与对策。在对模式运行的现实制约因素:区域、市场和制度因素进行分析的基础上,论述了产业化生态模式运行的有效实施条件,如制度条件、组织条件和市场条件。并对生态模式的正常运行提出了相关的对策建议:成立国家排污权交易领导小组和各级代理机构;加快立法步伐,提供法律保障;加大政策倾斜力度,建立减排梯度势差;通过排污权交易,建立国内清洁发展机制;强化监管监测手段,加大环保执法力度。
第七章是结论与展望。主要介绍本文的研究重要结论,并对论文的研究不足地方进行概括,并提出了相关研究可能的进一步的展望。
经过对中西部欠发达区域特色资源产业化生态模式的选择条件、构筑依据、框架内容、运行机制和关键要素的分析和探讨,并通过对青海省实例进行分析研究。结果说明:一是中西部欠发达区域特色资源产业化生态模式,在目前的国情下,较宜适用于以青海省为代表的中西部欠发达地区,并符合其经济社会发展现状和发展要求,同时与发达地区具备的扶持欠发达地区发展的条件和实力相适应;二是所创建的排污权测度等系列模型,设计合理,计算简便,可比性强,在具体的环境条件下具有可行性和可操作性;三是在生态模式构筑过程中,充分体现了国家对欠发达地区扶持政策和排污权交易制度建立的关键性和重要性;四是特色资源产业化生态模式的构筑和运行,对中西部欠发达地区的脱贫和经济腾飞具有不可估量的推动作用,并在全国范围内对污染治理和生态环境保护能产生积极的深远影响,在促进区域协调发展和贯彻落实科学发展观方面具有重大的实践意义。
由于中西部欠发达区域特色资源产业化生态模式的设计、形成和运行过程是对传统产业化模式全面的创新,是一条集经济发展和生态保护于一体的崭新的产业化途径。所以,难免存在一些不足和局限,如产业化生态模式的形成和运行对政府存在着依赖性;在排污权和减排目标的测度过程中数据难以完全准确无误;排污权交易制度和排污权交易市场体系建立中存在缺失障碍;特色资源产业化生态模式存在一定的局限性和不完整性,并在具体操作中易受主观意识的影响等。
产业生态学应用于中观领域研究的较少,应用于产业化模式研究的就更少,又以欠发达地区为研究对象的,是前人所较少涉及过的。在这个创新的过程中,不仅存在许多不足和局限,而且还存在许多进一步研究和拓展的空间。如排污权交易完全市场化问题、产业化生态模式进一步延伸问题等等。
总结全文,主要的创新有:第一、研究视角的创新。以产业生态学新的视角来研究产业化模式,并在研究方面,弥补了国内对中观领域(省区)关于产业化生态模式方面系统研究的不足。第二、产业化模式的创新。在对特色资源、特色资源产业化、特色资源产业化模式系列概念重新界定的基础上,创建了中西部欠发达区域特色资源产业化生态模式。第三、相对生态盈余测度、排污权配额测度和减排量测度等系列模型的创新。
The industrialization model has been to explore by domestic and foreign scholars and research in the field and scope of the extension and expansion continued. The theory and practice of the present study to tell people: the national conditions of the environment in which different patterns of resource industries on the different options; the same country at different stages of economic development, resource industries in the form of model performance on different; the same stage of development of the history and purpose of different patterns of resource industries on different connotations. China has its own specific circumstances and environmental conditions, stage of development and the requirements of the development there is a big difference in economic and social development and regional development imbalances still prominent features of extensive economic growth performance is still obvious, energy, resources and the environment is still a serious bottleneck. Therefore, in building socialism with Chinese characteristics, the less-developed areas of economic development and the rise of the need to seek appropriate roads, through the allocation of resources in industrial production, by the resources industry change, it is less-developed areas in promoting economic development by the formation of consensus, but what kind of industry so that resources can become a model eco-industry? This is related to the less-developed areas in China's economic development and coordinated development of major regional issues.
The west-central less-developed areas of China due to policies, institutions, ideas, technology and human resources and other reasons, long-term in a state of economic backwardness, because of the history of the maintenance of ecological and environmental protection have paid a great deal of effort and lost a lot of development opportunities, resulting in a today, still in the struggle to escape poverty and difficult situation. In new historical background under the guidance of the scientific development concept, the less-developed areas to achieve economic development and environmental protection simultaneously? Has been the tremendous ecological cost of who should pay? How to pay the cost of economic development help? Developed areas and less-developed areas to develop ways to co-ordinate? How to co-operation and development? This paper studied the ecological model of industrialization is to solve the above problems in a meaningful attempt to build the ecological model in trying to achieve the adoption of emissions trading as a means of payment of the ecological costs, in order to promote the organic combination of the less-developed areas characteristic resources, the project of industrialization and the ecological costs paid, and ultimately achieve the twin objectives of economic development and ecological civilization. Therefore, the main research topics are: the application of industrial ecology theory and methods, based on the field of meso (provincial regions), for the less-developed areas to create the ecological model of resource industries from the starting point for sustainable development. The emissions trading as a means and the project business as a carrier to economic development based on characteristic resources. To create a good road to the development of fast at the same time, to make up the lack of systematic research in the field of domestic industrialization ecological model based on the characteristic resources.
During the study process, the functions and role of the three elements of characteristic resources, industrial projects and ecological costs paid full show in promoting the economic development of less-developed areas, especially the element of ecological costs paid is the key issues of the building and operation of the ecological model of characteristic resources industry in the west-central less-developed areas. By means of emissions trading, as the realization of the ecological cost effective way to pay in order to solve the less-developed areas in economic development required for pollution control and pollution control technology and the source of funding. Make full use of the ecological footprint and ecological carrying capacity of the theories and methods, and on this basis a series of innovative activities carried out, resulting in a series of innovations. Measure created by the combination of models, through examples of analysis and testing, in the early stages of development of China's specific national conditions and the application of a strong environment, the feasibility of obvious.
The first chapter is the Introduction. Based on the above study the background and significance, the paper part of the Introduction to the theory of industrial ecology, methods and theoretical study of the industrialization model had a literature review, given the logic of the framework of research papers, and the need to study the main contents and in this article of innovation.
The second chapter on the west-central less-developed areas ecological model of characteristic resources industries choice. To clarify the characteristic resources where the advantages of the ecological model, and the choice of the existence of objective necessity and feasibility of compliance with an essential requirement for sustainable development. Features characteristic resources, the characteristic resources industrialization, the industrialization model of the definition of the concept series, and describe the characteristics of their related. Characteristics and the types of resources to be divided, on the characteristics of the geographical distribution of resources and the distribution of economic functions are introduced. Highlighted the existence of characteristic resources to the less-developed areas with the economic development of the value of the role of particular importance. At the same time shows the existence of non-ecological model of harm, such as pollution of the environment, damage to health, both by example.
The third chapter on the west-central less-developed areas industrialization ecological model of characteristic resources to build the framework. The three principles of the economic development, ecological security and regional fair, the three elements of the characteristic resources, industrial projects, the ecological costs paid , building a central feature of the less-developed areas of the ecological model as: " characteristic resources + industrial projects + ecological costs paid . " Characteristic resources and industrial projects selection criteria, as well as a way to pay the cost of ecological analysis, ecological model of operational mechanism and emissions trading system was discussed and that the industrialization of the establishment of the ecological model, the birth of the industrial symbiosis of ecological networks the formation of specific performance as follows: the formation of two industry chain, the two supporting and two aggregation, namely, the industrial chain products and eco-environmental protection industry chain, industry support and environmental protection facilities, characteristic industries clustering and ecological environment-protection industries clustering.
The fourth chapter on the key to eco-mode: ecological costs paid. Emission rights in the definition of quasi-line basis and determined on the basis of the application of industrial ecology theory and methods to create a relative measure of the ecological surplus model, measurement model of emission rights, emission reduction potential difference gradient model and measurement model of emission reductions, combined with China's "Eleventh Five-Year" plan to reduce emissions of less-developed areas and the allocation of emission rights for the developed areas of the allocation of emission reductions for developed areas and less-developed areas of emissions trading between the creation of market conditions.
Chapter V is a case study on the ecological model: A Case Study in Qinghai Province. From the characteristic resources in Qinghai Province, to the industrialization of the possibility of the existence of the project and means of ecological surplus relative to the size of an objective analysis, using the right measure to create the model of the sewage of the sewage on the right of Qinghai Province carried out a field measurement, combination of emission reductions in developed areas, the establishment of a comprehensive discussion of the characteristic resources industry in Qinghai Province of the possibility of ecological model. In Qinghai Province through the industrialization of the actual ecological model to build and run the process, to describe the west-central less-developed regional ecological model of resources industries in the specific environment of the individual feasibility and maneuverability.
Chapter VI is on the recommendation of eco-mode and countermeasures. Mode in the constraints of reality: the region, markets and an analysis of institutional factors on the basis of the discussion of eco-industrial mode of the effective implementation of conditions, such as institutional conditions, organizational conditions and market conditions. Ecological model and the normal operation of the countermeasures proposed by the relevant proposals: the establishment of the national leading group on emissions trading and agencies at all levels; to accelerate the pace of legislation to provide legal protection; intensify preferential policies and set up a gradient of emission reduction potential difference; through sewage trading, the establishment of domestic clean development mechanism; strengthen the supervision of the monitoring means, to increase environmental protection law enforcement.
Chapter VII presents conclusions and prospects. This article introduces the important conclusions of the study, and research papers for a general shortage of places, and made possible further research prospects.
After the west-central less-developed ecological model of resources industries of choice, and build the basis of the framework of the content, operation mechanism and a key element of the analysis and discussion and through analysis of examples of research in Qinghai Province. The results showed: first, the west-central less-developed areas ecological model of characteristic resource industries, in the current conditions, the fully applicable to west-central Qinghai Province, represented by the less-developed areas of economic and social development of the status quo and development requirements, as well as with the developed areas support with the development of less-developed areas suited to the conditions and strength; second is the creation of the right to measure, such as sewage series models, designed to calculate simple, comparable, and in specific environmental conditions is feasible and practical; The third is in the process of building eco-mode, fully reflecting the state policy to support less-developed areas and the establishment of an emissions trading system and the importance of the key; Fourth, the ecological model to build and run, the less-developed areas out of poverty and economic take-off with an immeasurable role in promoting and at the national level of pollution control and ecological environmental protection can have a positive and far-reaching impact in promoting coordinated regional development and implement the scientific concept of development has an important practical significance.
The less-developed ecological model of resources industries as a result of innovation of the design process of the formation and operation of traditional resources industries, is a set of economic development and ecological protection in one new way to industrialization. Therefore, there is inevitably a number of shortcomings and limitations, such as the ecological model of the formation and running there is a dependence on the government; in emission rights and emission reduction targets during the measurement data can not be completely accurate; emissions trading system and the emissions trading market system, lack and barriers that exist in the establishment; the ecological model of resources industries there are some limitations and not the integrity of the specific operation in the subjective sense of vulnerability and so on.
In this innovative process, not only the existence of many of the deficiencies and limitations, but also there are a lot of further research and development space. Full market such as the issue of emissions trading, industry and eco-mode extends further problems.
The full text summary of the main innovations are: First, the research perspective and the field of innovation. Industrial ecology in the perspective of the new model to study the industry and research, make up the concept of domestic areas (provinces) on the ecological models of the lack of systematic research. Secondly, the innovative concepts and models. The creation of the characteristic resources , characteristic resources industrialization, characteristic resources industrialization model of the concept series, the creation of ecological model of resources industries of the less-developed areas. Third, the relative measure of the ecological surplus, a quota of emission rights and emission reduction measure series model measure innovation.
我国中西部欠发达地区因政策、体制、观念、技术和人才等原因,长期处于经济落后状态,又因历史上为维护生态和保护环境付出了巨大的努力而丧失了许多的发展机会,造成了今天仍然停留在为摆脱贫困而艰难挣扎的困境。在科学发展观的指导下,在新的历史背景下,欠发达地区如何实现经济发展和环境保护同步进行?已经付出的巨大的生态成本谁来支付?如何支付?支付的成本又怎样有助于经济发展?发达地区与欠发达地区如何协调发展?合作发展?本论文所研究的产业化生态模式就是为了解决以上问题的一种有意义的尝试,在构筑的生态模式中试图通过排污权交易来作为实现生态成本支付的手段,以此来促进欠发达地区的特色资源、产业化项目、生态成本支付的有机结合,最终实现经济发展和生态文明的双重目标。所以,本选题研究的主要内容是:应用产业生态学理论和方法,立足中观领域(省级区域),针对中西部欠发达地区,以特色资源为基础,以可持续发展为出发点,以排污权交易为手段,以项目企业为载体,以经济发展和生态文明为目标,着力构筑符合科学发展理念的中西部欠发达区域特色资源产业化生态模式,创建一条又好又快的发展之路,同时弥补国内在中观领域基于产业生态学视角关于特色资源产业化生态模式系统研究的不足。
在研究过程中,特色资源、产业化项目和生态成本支付三个要素在促进欠发达地区经济发展方面的作用和功能得到充分显现,尤其是生态成本支付要素,是构筑和运行中西部欠发达区域特色资源产业化生态模式的关键问题。本文通过排污权交易手段,来作为实现生态成本支付的有效途径,以此来解决欠发达地区在经济发展中所需的污染控制和污染治理的技术和资金来源问题。为此本文利用了生态足迹和生态承载力的理论和方法,并在此基础上进行了系列创新活动,产生了系列的创新成果。所创建的组合测度模型,经过实例分析和检验,在我国的初级发展阶段和具体国情环境下适用性较强,具有明显的可行性。
第一章是导论。基于以上问题研究的背景和意义,本文在导论部分对产业生态学理论、方法和产业化模式理论研究进行了文献综述,给出了论文研究的逻辑框架,及其需要研究的主要内容和本文的创新点。
第二章是关于中西部欠发达区域特色资源产业化生态模式的选择。阐明了特色资源产业化生态模式的优势所在,及其选择存在着客观必然性和可行性,符合可持续发展的必然要求。全面地对特色资源、特色资源产业化、特色资源产业化模式系列概念进行定义,并描述了它们的相关特征。并对特色资源的种类进行划分,对特色资源地理分布和经济功能分布进行了介绍。着重强调了特色资源的存在对中西部欠发达区域的经济发展具有特别重要的价值作用。同时说明了非生态模式存在的危害性,如污染环境、损害健康等,并举以实例。
第三章是关于中西部欠发达区域特色资源产业化生态模式框架构建。从经济发展、生态安全、区域公平三个原则出发,以特色资源、产业化项目、生态成本支付为构建要素,构筑了中西部欠发达区域特色资源产业化的生态模式为:“特色资源+产业化项目+生态成本支付”。对特色资源和产业化项目的选择条件以及生态成本支付的方式进行了分析,对生态模式运行机制和排污权交易体系进行了探讨,并认为产业化生态模式的建立,催生了产业生态共生网络的形成,具体表现为:形成了两条产业链、两种配套和两个集聚,即产品产业链和生态环保产业链、产业配套和生态环保配套、特色产业集聚和生态环保产业集聚。
第四章是关于生态模式运行的关键:生态成本支付。在对排污权的界定依据和准线进行确定的基础上,应用产业生态理论和方法创建了相对生态盈余测度模型、排污权测度模型、减排梯度势差模型和减排量测度模式,结合我国“十一五”减排计划,对欠发达地区进行排污权分配和对发达地区进行减排量分配,为发达地区与欠发达地区之间进行排污权交易创造市场条件。
第五章是关于生态模式实例分析:以青海省为例。从青海省的特色资源条件,到产业化项目存在的可能和途径,再到相对生态盈余的大小进行了客观的系统分析,采用创建的排污权测度模型对青海省的排污权进行了实地测度,结合发达地区的减排量,全面论述了青海省建立特色资源产业化生态模式的可能性。并通过在青海省产业化生态模式的实际构筑和运行过程,来论述中西部欠发达区域特色资源产业化生态模式在个体具体环境中的可行性和可操作性。
第六章是关于生态模式运行的建议与对策。在对模式运行的现实制约因素:区域、市场和制度因素进行分析的基础上,论述了产业化生态模式运行的有效实施条件,如制度条件、组织条件和市场条件。并对生态模式的正常运行提出了相关的对策建议:成立国家排污权交易领导小组和各级代理机构;加快立法步伐,提供法律保障;加大政策倾斜力度,建立减排梯度势差;通过排污权交易,建立国内清洁发展机制;强化监管监测手段,加大环保执法力度。
第七章是结论与展望。主要介绍本文的研究重要结论,并对论文的研究不足地方进行概括,并提出了相关研究可能的进一步的展望。
经过对中西部欠发达区域特色资源产业化生态模式的选择条件、构筑依据、框架内容、运行机制和关键要素的分析和探讨,并通过对青海省实例进行分析研究。结果说明:一是中西部欠发达区域特色资源产业化生态模式,在目前的国情下,较宜适用于以青海省为代表的中西部欠发达地区,并符合其经济社会发展现状和发展要求,同时与发达地区具备的扶持欠发达地区发展的条件和实力相适应;二是所创建的排污权测度等系列模型,设计合理,计算简便,可比性强,在具体的环境条件下具有可行性和可操作性;三是在生态模式构筑过程中,充分体现了国家对欠发达地区扶持政策和排污权交易制度建立的关键性和重要性;四是特色资源产业化生态模式的构筑和运行,对中西部欠发达地区的脱贫和经济腾飞具有不可估量的推动作用,并在全国范围内对污染治理和生态环境保护能产生积极的深远影响,在促进区域协调发展和贯彻落实科学发展观方面具有重大的实践意义。
由于中西部欠发达区域特色资源产业化生态模式的设计、形成和运行过程是对传统产业化模式全面的创新,是一条集经济发展和生态保护于一体的崭新的产业化途径。所以,难免存在一些不足和局限,如产业化生态模式的形成和运行对政府存在着依赖性;在排污权和减排目标的测度过程中数据难以完全准确无误;排污权交易制度和排污权交易市场体系建立中存在缺失障碍;特色资源产业化生态模式存在一定的局限性和不完整性,并在具体操作中易受主观意识的影响等。
产业生态学应用于中观领域研究的较少,应用于产业化模式研究的就更少,又以欠发达地区为研究对象的,是前人所较少涉及过的。在这个创新的过程中,不仅存在许多不足和局限,而且还存在许多进一步研究和拓展的空间。如排污权交易完全市场化问题、产业化生态模式进一步延伸问题等等。
总结全文,主要的创新有:第一、研究视角的创新。以产业生态学新的视角来研究产业化模式,并在研究方面,弥补了国内对中观领域(省区)关于产业化生态模式方面系统研究的不足。第二、产业化模式的创新。在对特色资源、特色资源产业化、特色资源产业化模式系列概念重新界定的基础上,创建了中西部欠发达区域特色资源产业化生态模式。第三、相对生态盈余测度、排污权配额测度和减排量测度等系列模型的创新。
The industrialization model has been to explore by domestic and foreign scholars and research in the field and scope of the extension and expansion continued. The theory and practice of the present study to tell people: the national conditions of the environment in which different patterns of resource industries on the different options; the same country at different stages of economic development, resource industries in the form of model performance on different; the same stage of development of the history and purpose of different patterns of resource industries on different connotations. China has its own specific circumstances and environmental conditions, stage of development and the requirements of the development there is a big difference in economic and social development and regional development imbalances still prominent features of extensive economic growth performance is still obvious, energy, resources and the environment is still a serious bottleneck. Therefore, in building socialism with Chinese characteristics, the less-developed areas of economic development and the rise of the need to seek appropriate roads, through the allocation of resources in industrial production, by the resources industry change, it is less-developed areas in promoting economic development by the formation of consensus, but what kind of industry so that resources can become a model eco-industry? This is related to the less-developed areas in China's economic development and coordinated development of major regional issues.
The west-central less-developed areas of China due to policies, institutions, ideas, technology and human resources and other reasons, long-term in a state of economic backwardness, because of the history of the maintenance of ecological and environmental protection have paid a great deal of effort and lost a lot of development opportunities, resulting in a today, still in the struggle to escape poverty and difficult situation. In new historical background under the guidance of the scientific development concept, the less-developed areas to achieve economic development and environmental protection simultaneously? Has been the tremendous ecological cost of who should pay? How to pay the cost of economic development help? Developed areas and less-developed areas to develop ways to co-ordinate? How to co-operation and development? This paper studied the ecological model of industrialization is to solve the above problems in a meaningful attempt to build the ecological model in trying to achieve the adoption of emissions trading as a means of payment of the ecological costs, in order to promote the organic combination of the less-developed areas characteristic resources, the project of industrialization and the ecological costs paid, and ultimately achieve the twin objectives of economic development and ecological civilization. Therefore, the main research topics are: the application of industrial ecology theory and methods, based on the field of meso (provincial regions), for the less-developed areas to create the ecological model of resource industries from the starting point for sustainable development. The emissions trading as a means and the project business as a carrier to economic development based on characteristic resources. To create a good road to the development of fast at the same time, to make up the lack of systematic research in the field of domestic industrialization ecological model based on the characteristic resources.
During the study process, the functions and role of the three elements of characteristic resources, industrial projects and ecological costs paid full show in promoting the economic development of less-developed areas, especially the element of ecological costs paid is the key issues of the building and operation of the ecological model of characteristic resources industry in the west-central less-developed areas. By means of emissions trading, as the realization of the ecological cost effective way to pay in order to solve the less-developed areas in economic development required for pollution control and pollution control technology and the source of funding. Make full use of the ecological footprint and ecological carrying capacity of the theories and methods, and on this basis a series of innovative activities carried out, resulting in a series of innovations. Measure created by the combination of models, through examples of analysis and testing, in the early stages of development of China's specific national conditions and the application of a strong environment, the feasibility of obvious.
The first chapter is the Introduction. Based on the above study the background and significance, the paper part of the Introduction to the theory of industrial ecology, methods and theoretical study of the industrialization model had a literature review, given the logic of the framework of research papers, and the need to study the main contents and in this article of innovation.
The second chapter on the west-central less-developed areas ecological model of characteristic resources industries choice. To clarify the characteristic resources where the advantages of the ecological model, and the choice of the existence of objective necessity and feasibility of compliance with an essential requirement for sustainable development. Features characteristic resources, the characteristic resources industrialization, the industrialization model of the definition of the concept series, and describe the characteristics of their related. Characteristics and the types of resources to be divided, on the characteristics of the geographical distribution of resources and the distribution of economic functions are introduced. Highlighted the existence of characteristic resources to the less-developed areas with the economic development of the value of the role of particular importance. At the same time shows the existence of non-ecological model of harm, such as pollution of the environment, damage to health, both by example.
The third chapter on the west-central less-developed areas industrialization ecological model of characteristic resources to build the framework. The three principles of the economic development, ecological security and regional fair, the three elements of the characteristic resources, industrial projects, the ecological costs paid , building a central feature of the less-developed areas of the ecological model as: " characteristic resources + industrial projects + ecological costs paid . " Characteristic resources and industrial projects selection criteria, as well as a way to pay the cost of ecological analysis, ecological model of operational mechanism and emissions trading system was discussed and that the industrialization of the establishment of the ecological model, the birth of the industrial symbiosis of ecological networks the formation of specific performance as follows: the formation of two industry chain, the two supporting and two aggregation, namely, the industrial chain products and eco-environmental protection industry chain, industry support and environmental protection facilities, characteristic industries clustering and ecological environment-protection industries clustering.
The fourth chapter on the key to eco-mode: ecological costs paid. Emission rights in the definition of quasi-line basis and determined on the basis of the application of industrial ecology theory and methods to create a relative measure of the ecological surplus model, measurement model of emission rights, emission reduction potential difference gradient model and measurement model of emission reductions, combined with China's "Eleventh Five-Year" plan to reduce emissions of less-developed areas and the allocation of emission rights for the developed areas of the allocation of emission reductions for developed areas and less-developed areas of emissions trading between the creation of market conditions.
Chapter V is a case study on the ecological model: A Case Study in Qinghai Province. From the characteristic resources in Qinghai Province, to the industrialization of the possibility of the existence of the project and means of ecological surplus relative to the size of an objective analysis, using the right measure to create the model of the sewage of the sewage on the right of Qinghai Province carried out a field measurement, combination of emission reductions in developed areas, the establishment of a comprehensive discussion of the characteristic resources industry in Qinghai Province of the possibility of ecological model. In Qinghai Province through the industrialization of the actual ecological model to build and run the process, to describe the west-central less-developed regional ecological model of resources industries in the specific environment of the individual feasibility and maneuverability.
Chapter VI is on the recommendation of eco-mode and countermeasures. Mode in the constraints of reality: the region, markets and an analysis of institutional factors on the basis of the discussion of eco-industrial mode of the effective implementation of conditions, such as institutional conditions, organizational conditions and market conditions. Ecological model and the normal operation of the countermeasures proposed by the relevant proposals: the establishment of the national leading group on emissions trading and agencies at all levels; to accelerate the pace of legislation to provide legal protection; intensify preferential policies and set up a gradient of emission reduction potential difference; through sewage trading, the establishment of domestic clean development mechanism; strengthen the supervision of the monitoring means, to increase environmental protection law enforcement.
Chapter VII presents conclusions and prospects. This article introduces the important conclusions of the study, and research papers for a general shortage of places, and made possible further research prospects.
After the west-central less-developed ecological model of resources industries of choice, and build the basis of the framework of the content, operation mechanism and a key element of the analysis and discussion and through analysis of examples of research in Qinghai Province. The results showed: first, the west-central less-developed areas ecological model of characteristic resource industries, in the current conditions, the fully applicable to west-central Qinghai Province, represented by the less-developed areas of economic and social development of the status quo and development requirements, as well as with the developed areas support with the development of less-developed areas suited to the conditions and strength; second is the creation of the right to measure, such as sewage series models, designed to calculate simple, comparable, and in specific environmental conditions is feasible and practical; The third is in the process of building eco-mode, fully reflecting the state policy to support less-developed areas and the establishment of an emissions trading system and the importance of the key; Fourth, the ecological model to build and run, the less-developed areas out of poverty and economic take-off with an immeasurable role in promoting and at the national level of pollution control and ecological environmental protection can have a positive and far-reaching impact in promoting coordinated regional development and implement the scientific concept of development has an important practical significance.
The less-developed ecological model of resources industries as a result of innovation of the design process of the formation and operation of traditional resources industries, is a set of economic development and ecological protection in one new way to industrialization. Therefore, there is inevitably a number of shortcomings and limitations, such as the ecological model of the formation and running there is a dependence on the government; in emission rights and emission reduction targets during the measurement data can not be completely accurate; emissions trading system and the emissions trading market system, lack and barriers that exist in the establishment; the ecological model of resources industries there are some limitations and not the integrity of the specific operation in the subjective sense of vulnerability and so on.
In this innovative process, not only the existence of many of the deficiencies and limitations, but also there are a lot of further research and development space. Full market such as the issue of emissions trading, industry and eco-mode extends further problems.
The full text summary of the main innovations are: First, the research perspective and the field of innovation. Industrial ecology in the perspective of the new model to study the industry and research, make up the concept of domestic areas (provinces) on the ecological models of the lack of systematic research. Secondly, the innovative concepts and models. The creation of the characteristic resources , characteristic resources industrialization, characteristic resources industrialization model of the concept series, the creation of ecological model of resources industries of the less-developed areas. Third, the relative measure of the ecological surplus, a quota of emission rights and emission reduction measure series model measure innovation.
引文
[1]邓伟根,王贵明.产业生态学导论[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2006(第一版).
[2]马世骏,王如松.社会-经济-自然复合生态系统[J].生态学报,1984,4(1):1-9.
[3]杨建新,王如松.产业生态学的回顾与展望[J].应用生态学报,1998,9(5):555-561.
[4]威廉·麦克唐纳.《从摇篮到摇篮》[M].上海:同济大学出版社,2005.
[5]王薇薇,李仕良.产业生态学文献综述[J].引进与咨询,2006,(4).
[6]T.E.Graedel,B.R.Allenby.《产业生态学》第二版[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2004.
[7]蔡伟民,黄高宝.产业生态学研究进展[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2007,(4):131-138.
[8]陆宏芳,任海,王昌伟等.产业生态学研究方法[J].中山大学学报(自然科学版),2005,(44)增刊2:233-239.
[9]杨开忠,杨咏,陈洁.生态足迹分析理论与方法[J].地球科学进展,2000,15(6):630-635.
[10]刘红丽,黄朝禧.湖北省耕地生态足迹动态分析[J].资源与产业,2007,9(3):72-76.
[11]王倩,邹欣庆.生态示范区内生态工业建设模式探讨[J].工业经济,2000(12).
[12]薛德升,闫小培,张成智.生态工业园:理论基础、发展阶段与竞争优势[J].城市规划,2006,30(8).
[13]袁增伟,毕军.产业生态学最新研究进展及趋势展望[J].生态学报,2006,26(8):2709-2715.
[14]陶伦康,鄢本风.当代西方学者的循环经济思想述评[J].现代经济探讨,2007(7).
[15]曲格平.循环经济与环境保护[N].光明日报,2001,11,20.
[16]胡振鹏,汪勤峰.循环经济的理论基础是生态经济学[J].中国井冈山干部学院学报,2006,2(3).
[17]冯之俊.树立科学发展观,促进循环经济发展[J].上海大学学报(社科版),2004(5).
[18]郑志国.建立中国特色的循环经济体系[N].经济参考报,2005,7,25.
[19]张思峰.循环经济发展阶段与政府循环经济政策[J].西京论坛,2004(4).
[20]杜国胜.发展循环经济与政府职能转变[N].中华工商时报,2005,7,05.
[21]钟远平.循环经济研究进展[J].科研管理,2007,8(1).
[22]张岳恒,饶本勇.美国农业产业化经营的主要模式与经验[J].南方农村,1999,(6):49-51.
[23]王浩.美国农业产业化模式的借鉴[J].经济纵横,1999,(3):54-56.
[24]李鹰.国外教育产业化的几种动作模式及其启示[J].山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版).2006,51(3):141-144.
[25]盛军锋,苏启林.国际花卉产业化典型经营模式比较研究[J].林业经济,2003,(3):58-61.
[26]黄理芳.国外激光产业化模式及政策研究[J].激光与红外,1993,(2):13-15.
[27]邹帆,江华.日本农业产业化经营模式及对我国的借鉴[J].农业技术经济,2000,(4):62-64.
[28]张岳恒,黄化勇.法国农业产业化经营的主要模式与经验[J].南方农村,2000,(1):51-52.
[29]马海发.荷兰农业产业化经营的基本模式及主要经验[J].云南农业,2002,(11):29.
[30]张岳恒,陈虎城.以色列农业产业化经营的主要模式与经验[J].南方农村,2000,(3):42-44.
[31]房红.发达国家农业产业化基本模式及对我国的启示[J].哈尔滨商业大学学报(社会科学版),2006,90(5):108-110.
[32]孙丽军,杜晓堂.主导产业与专业协会的结合:我国农业产业化经营模式的选择[J].生产力研究,2003,(3):23-25.
[33]王杰,徐凯涛,才玉石.我国农业产业化经营模式探讨[J]..学术交流,2001,95(2):73-76.
[34]揭筱纹,里昕.产业链联盟视角下的农业产业化经营模式研究[J].软科学,2007,21(1):55-58.
[35]许明国.因地制宜推广各具特色的产业化模式[J].云南科技管理,1996,(6):38-39.
[36]曾力.龙头企业带动型农业产业化经营方式的分析[J].决策参考,2006,(2):14-15.
[37]牛宝俊,李大胜,熊启泉.“三温一古”养鸡产业化经营模式的实证分析[J].农业经济问题,2000,(1):17-22.
[38]吴华.蚕桑产业化经营创出“富安模式”[N].中国绿色时报,2003,9,26.
[39]周善.“广州模式”的威力[N].中国食品报,2001,11,29.
[40]王薇.福清联合模式催生枇杷大产业[N].中国食品报,2007,1,23.
[41]姚永亮.“川仁模式”:产业化步子迈得实[N].四川经济日报,2006,4,10.
[42]陈张书.“青竹模式”引领农民快速致富[N].湖南经济日报,2006,10,19.
[43]王天敏.股份制的制度性风险及防范[J].陕西农业科学,2003,(2):54-61.
[44]倪杰,范亦刚.“公司+学校+农户”产业化模式的探索与思考[J].中国农业教育,2003,(6):41-43.
[45]魏琴芳,李克乾.定西市花卉产业化经营模式研究[J].甘肃农业,2005,(4):36-37.
[46]杨德军,胡仕林,敖玉平等.重庆地区天然香料产业化运作模式探讨[J].西南园艺,2005,(33)增刊:27-29.
[47]冯世勇.农业产业化经营模式及其利益联结机制分析[J].山东省农业管理干部学院学报,2005,2(6):42-43.
[48]何东.广西农业产业化宜推行的四种利益联结模式[J].广西社会科学,2005,(5):105-107.
[49]李丽纯.基于经济利益圆周模型的农业产业化模式研究[J].湖南行政学院学报,2005,(5):41-48.
[50]孙雅静.农业产业化发展模式研究[J].理论学刊,2006,(12):38-40.
[51]马晓河,陈凡,唐仁键等.“双加模式”:发展农业产业化的新思路[J].调研世界,1996,(2):20-24.
[52]杨光明.论用“三加模式”加快子长县薯类产业化进程[J].马铃薯杂志,1998,12(2):120-124.
[53]袁放建,杨静.“公司+银行+担保+农户+培训”农业经营模式探索[J].安徽农学通报,2006,12(11):19-20.
[54]刘晓刚,蔡聪.农业产业化发展的新模式:公司托管--对高峰村农业产业模式的分析与思考[J].农业技术经济,1999,(2):48-51.
[55]朱红红,徐邓耀.农业产业化发展模式:殊途同归的选择[J].中国农村信用合作,2005,(7):20-22.
[56]庄海军,苗建军.扩充农业产业化的四种新模式[J].现代经济探讨,2005,(6):42-44.
[57]邓兰兰.异地农业理论与模式初探[J].南方农村,2006,(6):39-42.
[58]姜励卿.淅江跨区域农业产业化经营模式研究[J].财经论丛,2006,(5):19-23.
[59]孙文军,赵昌文.“庄园经济”一种农业产业化发展的新模式[J].农村经济,1999,(3):11-13.
[60]冯光德.公司+园区+农户--安全畜产品产业化模式[J].农村养殖技术, 2007,(3):4-5.
[61]段延泽,白玉劳,郭军良.“公司+专家+农户”模式养出好大“牛”[N].中国畜牧报,2002,8,11.
[62]张振武,张玉玺,吕永利等.藏酷牛二年育成出栏产业化模式[J].中国牛业科学,2006,(32)增刊:45-48.
[63]苟佳鸿.肉羊产业化建设势在必行[J].中国牧业通迅,2002,(9):58-59.
[64]吴桂林.高科技养羊与产业化经营模式[R].中国羊业高峰会暨中国畜牧业协会羊业分会成立大会会刊,2003,20-24.
[65]鲍旺虎,谭晶荣.对农业产业化进程中“赊养”经营模式的探讨[J].中国农村经济,2005,(3):33-37.
[66]杨晓光,樊杰.我国深海资源产业化模式及对策研究[J].矿业研究与开发,2004,24(1):1-4.
[67]王淼,权锡鉴.我国海洋渔业产业化的发展模式研究[J].工业技术经济,2002,(6):12-13.
[68]戴锦,张晓燕.论中国生态农业经营模式[J].求索,2004,(5):26-27.
[69]张壬午.生态农业产业化浅析[J].生态农业研究,2000,8(2):93-96.
[70]胡定寰.试论“超市+农产品加工企业+农户”新模式[J].农村经济问题,2006,(1):36-39.
[71]范新翔.猪—沼—菜生态模式的推广应用[J].安徽农学通报,2005,11(4):129.
[72]薛彦棠.山西省晋中市五配套生态果园模式[J].中国果树,2006,(4):62.
[73]李胜,路明.农业产业化企业循环经济模式研究——以河南天冠企业集团为例[J].中国农业大学学报,2004,9(5):79-83.
[74]郝志芹.浅谈山区发展生态农业产业化的途径与对策[J].中国农技推广,2006,(22)增刊:180-181.
[75]张明林,傅春,陈华等.我国绿色食品产业化经营模式初探[J].江西农业大学学报(社会科学版),2004,3(4):70-72.
[76]汤梓军.资源+资本:四川旅游产业化运作模式初探[J].西南民族学院·哲学社会科学版,2002,(23):328-330.
[77]李小斌,杨桂红.云南省旅游商品产业化发展模式研究[J].云南财贸学院学报(社会科学版),2006,21(1):64-66.
[78]鄢杰.西部民族地区民居接待产业化发展的问题、制约因素及模式选择[J].探索,2003,(6):120-122.
[79]林勇、张宗益、杨先斌.欠发达地区类型界定及其指标体系应用分析[J].重庆大 学学报(自然科学版),2007,(30)12.
[80]李嘉瑶.高校办学定位选择及特色追求[J].北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版),2001(3).
[81]李宝卿:中西部地区发展的难点和思路[J].前进,1997(4).
[82]樊勇.对“特色经济”中特色的理解[J].理论与现代化,2004,(1):64-67.
[83]蔡忠兵.“图书馆产业”与“图书馆产业化”的概念辨析[J].现代情报,2005,(8):20-22.
[84]关柯,李忠富.住宅产业化概念释义[J].建筑管理现代化,1998,(4):19-21.
[85]张文方,马玉华.农业产业化:概念·实质·意义[J].南方农村,1996,(6):56-57.
[86]王家骥,姚小红.黑河流域生态承载力估测[J].环境科学研究,2000,(2).
[87]http://www.sina.com.cn 2004年04月21日04:45河南报业网-大河报
[88]2004年6月21日《新闻通稿57号》
[89]《2002年淮河流域水资源公报》
[90]国家环保总局挂牌督办九大环境违法案件,2005-5-10 14:12:20靖江市环境信息中心
[91]李武,从GDP看我国区域经济发展水平,中国国情国力。
[92]习得,污染治理与排污权交易,人民日报,2006,11,10。
[93]大卫·李嘉图,《政治经济学及赋税原理》.
[94]曲格平.环境与资源法律读本[M].解放军出版社,2002年3月版第324页.
[95][日]大塚直.环境政策的新手法[J].法学教室,2002年1月第256号第98页.
[96]陈志宣.法国二氧化碳排放权交易市场开张[N].经济日报,2005年6月29日第007版.
[97]卢福财,周鹏.企业间网络是合作创新的有效组织形式[J].当代财经,2006,(9),.262.
[98]杜轶,张勇.山西省2001年生态足迹计算与分析[J].山西水土保持科技,2007,12(4).
[99]张志强,徐中民等.中国西部12省(区市)的生态足迹[J].地理学报,2001,56(5).
[100]鲁丰先.中国省级区域生态占用的计算与分析[D].硕士学位论文,河南大学,2003.
[101]龚永泉.江苏南通:建厂先买排污权[N].人民日报,2005,5,9.
[102]罗丽.美国排污权交易制度及其对我国的启示[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2004,(6)1.
[103]戴伟娣.清洁发展机制简介[J].生物质化学工程,2006,40(1).
[104]司言武,李珺.我国排污费改税的现实思考与理论构想[J].统计与决策, 2007,24.
[105]R.U.Ayres,A. V. Kneese. Production, consumption and externalities.Washington D.C.:Resources for the Future. 1969.
[106]R.U. Ayres,J.H. Ausubel,H.E.Sladovich,editors.Technology and environment. Washington D.C.:National Academy Press, 1989,pp.23-49.
[107]C.Watanabe.Industrial-ecology: introduction of ecology into industrial policy, Tokyo:Ministry of International Trade and Industry(MITI).1972.
[108]Kumar,C.,Patel,N.Industrial Ecology,Proc.National Acad.Sci.USA, 1992,89 (798-799).
[109]Hardin,B.C.Industrial Ecology:An Environmental Agenda for Industry.Arthur D.Little,Inc.,New York, 1991,1-3.
[110]Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers(IEEE),White Paper on Sustainable Development and Industrial Ecology[M],1995.
[111]Wackernagel M,Ree W E. Our Ecological Footprint:Reducing Human Impact on the Earth[M]. Gabriola Island. B.C. Canada:New Society Publishers, 1996.
[112]P.Khanna.Carrying-capacity as a basis for sustainable clevelopment.A case study of National Capital Region in India,Progress in Planning. 1999(52),pp. 101-163.
[113]W.Ashworth.The economy of nature.Boston,MA:Houghton Mifflin Company, 1995, pp.89-93.
[114]R.A.Frosch,N.E.Galloponlos.Strategies for manufacturing.Scientific American , 1989,261(3),.pp.94-102
[115]V.Niutanen and J.Korhonen.Industrial ecology flows of agriculture and food industry-utilising by.-products and wastes.The International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology,2003,Vol.l0,pp.l33-147.
[116]H.Daly.Toward some operational principles of sustainable development.Ecological Economics, 1990,Vol.2,pp. 1 -6.
[117]K.Mayumi,M.Giampietro et al.Georgescu-Roegen/Daly VS.Solow/Stiglitz Revisited. Ecological Economics,1998,Vol.27,No.2,pp.115-118.
[118]I.Ring.Evolutionany strategies in environmental policy.Ecol Econ, 1997, 23(3): 237-250.
[119]J.Korhonen,J.P.Snakin.Analysing the evolution of industrial ecosystemsxoncepts and application.Ecological Economics.2005.170(52):169-186.
[120]P.H.Templet.Energy,diversity and development in economic systems;an empirical analysis.Ecological Economics, 1999. Vol.30,pp.223-233.
[121]N.Roome.Conceptualising and studying the contribution of networks in environmental mana-gement and sustainable development.Businese Strategy and the Environment,2001 ,Vol. 10,No.2, pp.69-76.
[122]Shi H,Yuichi M,Yang J X.lndustrial ecology in china .Journal of Industrial Ecology,2003,6(3-4):7-10.
[123]T.E.Graedel,B.R.Allenby.Industrial Ecology.Prentice Hall Press,New York, 1995, 108-109.
[124]Grant W,Pedersen E.K,Marin S.L.Ecological Modelling:Systems analysis and simulaLion A.Jorgenson S.E,Muller F.Handbook of ecosystem theories and management C.New York:CRC Press LLC,2000,103-113.
[125] Wagner J.E,Luzadis V.A,Floyd D.W.A role for economic analysis in the ecosystem Management debate[J].Landscape and Urban Planning,1998,40:151-157.
[126]Grayr.Accounting for the environment:green accounting M.Princeton(NJ):Markns Weiner Publishing, 1994.
[127]Macve R.Accounting for environmental cost A.Richards D.The industrial green Game:implications for environmental design and maintenance C.Washington(DC): National Academy Press, 1997,185-199.
[128]White A.L,Becker M,Savage D.Environmentally smart accounting:using total cost Assessment to advance pollution prevention[J].Pollution Prevention Review,1993, Summer:247-259.
[129]Lavel B,Maclean H.L,Hendrickson C.T,et al.Life-cycle analysis of alternative antomobile fuel/propulsion technologies[J].Environmental Science&Technology,2000, 34(17):3598-3605.
[130]Ayres R.U,Axtell R.Foresight as a survival characteristic:when(if ever) doesThe long view pay?[J]Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 1996,51:209-235.
[131]Brown M.T,Herendeen R.A.Embodied energy analysis and emergy analysis:a comparative view[J].Ecological Economics, 1996,19:219-235.
[132]Jogensen S.E,Nielsen S.N,Mejer H.Emergy,environ,exergy and ecological modeling[J].Ecological Modelling, 1995,77(2-3):99-109.
[133]B Jork H,Rasmuson A.A method for life cycle assessment environmental optimization of a dynamic process exemplified by an analysis of an energy system with aSuper heated steam dryer integrated in a local district heat and power plant[J].Chemical Engineering Journal.2002.87:381-394.
[134]Mozes E,Cornelissen R.L,Hirs G.Get al.Exergy analysis of the conventionalTextile washing process[J].Energy Conversion and Management,1998,39(16-18):1835-1843.
[135]Ayres R.U,Ayres L.W,Martina S.K.Exergy,waste accounting,and life-cycle analysis[J].Energy,1998,23(5):355-363.
[136]Marque S.J,Nielsen S.N,Pardal M.A,Jor Gensen S.E.Impact of entrophication and River management within a framework of ecosystem theories[J].Ecological Modelling,2003,166:147-168.
[137]Dincer I.Themodynamics,exergy and environmental impact[J]. Energy Sources,2000,22:723-732.
[138]Tester J.W,Model M.Thermodynamics and its applications.Upper Saddle River,NJ:Prentice Hall,1999.
[139] Wackernagel M,Onistol L,Bello P,et al.Ecological footprint of Nations: How much nature do they use? How much nature do they have?[R].Commissioned by the Earth Council for the Rio 5 Forum.Toronto:International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives, 1997.
[140]Odum H.T.Environmental Accounting:Emergy and Decision Making M.New York: John Wiley&Sons,1996,57-58,85-86.
[141]Graedel T.E,Allenby B.R.Industrial ecology (Second Edition).Pearson Education Inc.Prentice Hall,2003.
[142]Suren Erkman.Industrial ecology.FPH Press, 1998,10-15.
[143] 世界商业可持续发展委员会,Changing Course[J]．WBCSD出版,1992．
[144]Evert Nienwlan,Geart Warringa,Corjan Brink,Walter Vermenlen.Supply Curves for Eco-efficient Environmental Improvements Using Different Weighting Methods[J].Journal of Industrial Ecology,2005,No.4,PP.85-96.
[145]Sangwon Suh,Kun Mo Lee,Sang Sun Ha.Eco-efficiency for Pollution Prevention in Small to Medium-sized Enterprises A Case from South Korea[J]. Journal of Industrial Ecology,2005,No.4,pp.223-240.
[146]Yri Seppald,Matti Melanen,Hmo Maenpiia,Sirkka Koskela,Sirkka Koskela.How can the Eco-Efficiency of a Region be Measured and Monitored?[J].Journal of Industrial Ecology,2005,No.4,pp.117-130.
[147]Reinout Heijungs,Arjan de Koning,Sangwon Suh.Toward an information Tool for Integrated Product Policy[J]. Journal of Industrial Ecology,2005,No.3,pp.l47-158.
[148]Jutta Geldermann,Otto Rentz.Multi-criteria Analysis for Technique Assessment[J]. Journal of Industrial Ecology,2005,No.3,pp.l27-143.
[149]Jesper Munksgaard,Mette Wier,Manfred Lenzen.Using Input-Output Analysis to Measure the Environmental Pressure of Consumption at Different Spetial levels[J]. Journal of Industrial Ecology,2005,No.1/2,pp.169-185.
[150]Koji Takase, Yasushi Koudo,Ayu Washizu.An Analysis of Sustainable Consumption by the Waste Input-Output Model[J]. Journal of Industrial Ecology,2005,No.1/2,pp.201-219.
[151]Uif Sonesson,Hakan Jonsson,Berit Mattsson.Post-Consumption Sewage Treatment in Environmental Systems Analysis of Foods[J]. Journal of Industrial Ecology,2004,No.3,pp.51 -64.
[152]Cote E.P,Hall J.Industrial parks as ecosystems[J] .Journal of cleaner Production, 1995,3(1 -2):41 -46.
[153]Thermoshare.Integrated eco-industrial park with cogeneration,energy cascading and recycling,a report prepared for environment Canada,Industry Canada and Natural Resources Cana-da.Ottawa,1997.
[154]Ernest A.L.Eco-Industrial park Handbook.Accessed at June 10,2004. Http ://www. indigodev.com.
[155]Carolyn Eve Nobel.A model for industrial water resue:a geographic information systems(GIS) Approach to industrial ecology.The University of Texas, Austin, 1998. http://www.usc.edu/sppd/rese-arch/NCEID.
[156]Research Triangle Institute.Eco-industrial park:a case study and analysis of economic,environ-mental,technical and regulatery issues,final report for the U.S.Environmental Protection Agency.Research Triangle Park(RC),1994.
[157]Audra J and Potts C.Choctaw eco-industrial park:an ecological approach to industrial land-use Planning and design.Landscape and Urban Planning, 1998,42(2-4): 239-257.
[158]Wackernagel M,Onistol L,Bello P,et al. national natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept[J].Ecological Economics,1999,29(3):375-390.
[2]马世骏,王如松.社会-经济-自然复合生态系统[J].生态学报,1984,4(1):1-9.
[3]杨建新,王如松.产业生态学的回顾与展望[J].应用生态学报,1998,9(5):555-561.
[4]威廉·麦克唐纳.《从摇篮到摇篮》[M].上海:同济大学出版社,2005.
[5]王薇薇,李仕良.产业生态学文献综述[J].引进与咨询,2006,(4).
[6]T.E.Graedel,B.R.Allenby.《产业生态学》第二版[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2004.
[7]蔡伟民,黄高宝.产业生态学研究进展[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2007,(4):131-138.
[8]陆宏芳,任海,王昌伟等.产业生态学研究方法[J].中山大学学报(自然科学版),2005,(44)增刊2:233-239.
[9]杨开忠,杨咏,陈洁.生态足迹分析理论与方法[J].地球科学进展,2000,15(6):630-635.
[10]刘红丽,黄朝禧.湖北省耕地生态足迹动态分析[J].资源与产业,2007,9(3):72-76.
[11]王倩,邹欣庆.生态示范区内生态工业建设模式探讨[J].工业经济,2000(12).
[12]薛德升,闫小培,张成智.生态工业园:理论基础、发展阶段与竞争优势[J].城市规划,2006,30(8).
[13]袁增伟,毕军.产业生态学最新研究进展及趋势展望[J].生态学报,2006,26(8):2709-2715.
[14]陶伦康,鄢本风.当代西方学者的循环经济思想述评[J].现代经济探讨,2007(7).
[15]曲格平.循环经济与环境保护[N].光明日报,2001,11,20.
[16]胡振鹏,汪勤峰.循环经济的理论基础是生态经济学[J].中国井冈山干部学院学报,2006,2(3).
[17]冯之俊.树立科学发展观,促进循环经济发展[J].上海大学学报(社科版),2004(5).
[18]郑志国.建立中国特色的循环经济体系[N].经济参考报,2005,7,25.
[19]张思峰.循环经济发展阶段与政府循环经济政策[J].西京论坛,2004(4).
[20]杜国胜.发展循环经济与政府职能转变[N].中华工商时报,2005,7,05.
[21]钟远平.循环经济研究进展[J].科研管理,2007,8(1).
[22]张岳恒,饶本勇.美国农业产业化经营的主要模式与经验[J].南方农村,1999,(6):49-51.
[23]王浩.美国农业产业化模式的借鉴[J].经济纵横,1999,(3):54-56.
[24]李鹰.国外教育产业化的几种动作模式及其启示[J].山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版).2006,51(3):141-144.
[25]盛军锋,苏启林.国际花卉产业化典型经营模式比较研究[J].林业经济,2003,(3):58-61.
[26]黄理芳.国外激光产业化模式及政策研究[J].激光与红外,1993,(2):13-15.
[27]邹帆,江华.日本农业产业化经营模式及对我国的借鉴[J].农业技术经济,2000,(4):62-64.
[28]张岳恒,黄化勇.法国农业产业化经营的主要模式与经验[J].南方农村,2000,(1):51-52.
[29]马海发.荷兰农业产业化经营的基本模式及主要经验[J].云南农业,2002,(11):29.
[30]张岳恒,陈虎城.以色列农业产业化经营的主要模式与经验[J].南方农村,2000,(3):42-44.
[31]房红.发达国家农业产业化基本模式及对我国的启示[J].哈尔滨商业大学学报(社会科学版),2006,90(5):108-110.
[32]孙丽军,杜晓堂.主导产业与专业协会的结合:我国农业产业化经营模式的选择[J].生产力研究,2003,(3):23-25.
[33]王杰,徐凯涛,才玉石.我国农业产业化经营模式探讨[J]..学术交流,2001,95(2):73-76.
[34]揭筱纹,里昕.产业链联盟视角下的农业产业化经营模式研究[J].软科学,2007,21(1):55-58.
[35]许明国.因地制宜推广各具特色的产业化模式[J].云南科技管理,1996,(6):38-39.
[36]曾力.龙头企业带动型农业产业化经营方式的分析[J].决策参考,2006,(2):14-15.
[37]牛宝俊,李大胜,熊启泉.“三温一古”养鸡产业化经营模式的实证分析[J].农业经济问题,2000,(1):17-22.
[38]吴华.蚕桑产业化经营创出“富安模式”[N].中国绿色时报,2003,9,26.
[39]周善.“广州模式”的威力[N].中国食品报,2001,11,29.
[40]王薇.福清联合模式催生枇杷大产业[N].中国食品报,2007,1,23.
[41]姚永亮.“川仁模式”:产业化步子迈得实[N].四川经济日报,2006,4,10.
[42]陈张书.“青竹模式”引领农民快速致富[N].湖南经济日报,2006,10,19.
[43]王天敏.股份制的制度性风险及防范[J].陕西农业科学,2003,(2):54-61.
[44]倪杰,范亦刚.“公司+学校+农户”产业化模式的探索与思考[J].中国农业教育,2003,(6):41-43.
[45]魏琴芳,李克乾.定西市花卉产业化经营模式研究[J].甘肃农业,2005,(4):36-37.
[46]杨德军,胡仕林,敖玉平等.重庆地区天然香料产业化运作模式探讨[J].西南园艺,2005,(33)增刊:27-29.
[47]冯世勇.农业产业化经营模式及其利益联结机制分析[J].山东省农业管理干部学院学报,2005,2(6):42-43.
[48]何东.广西农业产业化宜推行的四种利益联结模式[J].广西社会科学,2005,(5):105-107.
[49]李丽纯.基于经济利益圆周模型的农业产业化模式研究[J].湖南行政学院学报,2005,(5):41-48.
[50]孙雅静.农业产业化发展模式研究[J].理论学刊,2006,(12):38-40.
[51]马晓河,陈凡,唐仁键等.“双加模式”:发展农业产业化的新思路[J].调研世界,1996,(2):20-24.
[52]杨光明.论用“三加模式”加快子长县薯类产业化进程[J].马铃薯杂志,1998,12(2):120-124.
[53]袁放建,杨静.“公司+银行+担保+农户+培训”农业经营模式探索[J].安徽农学通报,2006,12(11):19-20.
[54]刘晓刚,蔡聪.农业产业化发展的新模式:公司托管--对高峰村农业产业模式的分析与思考[J].农业技术经济,1999,(2):48-51.
[55]朱红红,徐邓耀.农业产业化发展模式:殊途同归的选择[J].中国农村信用合作,2005,(7):20-22.
[56]庄海军,苗建军.扩充农业产业化的四种新模式[J].现代经济探讨,2005,(6):42-44.
[57]邓兰兰.异地农业理论与模式初探[J].南方农村,2006,(6):39-42.
[58]姜励卿.淅江跨区域农业产业化经营模式研究[J].财经论丛,2006,(5):19-23.
[59]孙文军,赵昌文.“庄园经济”一种农业产业化发展的新模式[J].农村经济,1999,(3):11-13.
[60]冯光德.公司+园区+农户--安全畜产品产业化模式[J].农村养殖技术, 2007,(3):4-5.
[61]段延泽,白玉劳,郭军良.“公司+专家+农户”模式养出好大“牛”[N].中国畜牧报,2002,8,11.
[62]张振武,张玉玺,吕永利等.藏酷牛二年育成出栏产业化模式[J].中国牛业科学,2006,(32)增刊:45-48.
[63]苟佳鸿.肉羊产业化建设势在必行[J].中国牧业通迅,2002,(9):58-59.
[64]吴桂林.高科技养羊与产业化经营模式[R].中国羊业高峰会暨中国畜牧业协会羊业分会成立大会会刊,2003,20-24.
[65]鲍旺虎,谭晶荣.对农业产业化进程中“赊养”经营模式的探讨[J].中国农村经济,2005,(3):33-37.
[66]杨晓光,樊杰.我国深海资源产业化模式及对策研究[J].矿业研究与开发,2004,24(1):1-4.
[67]王淼,权锡鉴.我国海洋渔业产业化的发展模式研究[J].工业技术经济,2002,(6):12-13.
[68]戴锦,张晓燕.论中国生态农业经营模式[J].求索,2004,(5):26-27.
[69]张壬午.生态农业产业化浅析[J].生态农业研究,2000,8(2):93-96.
[70]胡定寰.试论“超市+农产品加工企业+农户”新模式[J].农村经济问题,2006,(1):36-39.
[71]范新翔.猪—沼—菜生态模式的推广应用[J].安徽农学通报,2005,11(4):129.
[72]薛彦棠.山西省晋中市五配套生态果园模式[J].中国果树,2006,(4):62.
[73]李胜,路明.农业产业化企业循环经济模式研究——以河南天冠企业集团为例[J].中国农业大学学报,2004,9(5):79-83.
[74]郝志芹.浅谈山区发展生态农业产业化的途径与对策[J].中国农技推广,2006,(22)增刊:180-181.
[75]张明林,傅春,陈华等.我国绿色食品产业化经营模式初探[J].江西农业大学学报(社会科学版),2004,3(4):70-72.
[76]汤梓军.资源+资本:四川旅游产业化运作模式初探[J].西南民族学院·哲学社会科学版,2002,(23):328-330.
[77]李小斌,杨桂红.云南省旅游商品产业化发展模式研究[J].云南财贸学院学报(社会科学版),2006,21(1):64-66.
[78]鄢杰.西部民族地区民居接待产业化发展的问题、制约因素及模式选择[J].探索,2003,(6):120-122.
[79]林勇、张宗益、杨先斌.欠发达地区类型界定及其指标体系应用分析[J].重庆大 学学报(自然科学版),2007,(30)12.
[80]李嘉瑶.高校办学定位选择及特色追求[J].北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版),2001(3).
[81]李宝卿:中西部地区发展的难点和思路[J].前进,1997(4).
[82]樊勇.对“特色经济”中特色的理解[J].理论与现代化,2004,(1):64-67.
[83]蔡忠兵.“图书馆产业”与“图书馆产业化”的概念辨析[J].现代情报,2005,(8):20-22.
[84]关柯,李忠富.住宅产业化概念释义[J].建筑管理现代化,1998,(4):19-21.
[85]张文方,马玉华.农业产业化:概念·实质·意义[J].南方农村,1996,(6):56-57.
[86]王家骥,姚小红.黑河流域生态承载力估测[J].环境科学研究,2000,(2).
[87]http://www.sina.com.cn 2004年04月21日04:45河南报业网-大河报
[88]2004年6月21日《新闻通稿57号》
[89]《2002年淮河流域水资源公报》
[90]国家环保总局挂牌督办九大环境违法案件,2005-5-10 14:12:20靖江市环境信息中心
[91]李武,从GDP看我国区域经济发展水平,中国国情国力。
[92]习得,污染治理与排污权交易,人民日报,2006,11,10。
[93]大卫·李嘉图,《政治经济学及赋税原理》.
[94]曲格平.环境与资源法律读本[M].解放军出版社,2002年3月版第324页.
[95][日]大塚直.环境政策的新手法[J].法学教室,2002年1月第256号第98页.
[96]陈志宣.法国二氧化碳排放权交易市场开张[N].经济日报,2005年6月29日第007版.
[97]卢福财,周鹏.企业间网络是合作创新的有效组织形式[J].当代财经,2006,(9),.262.
[98]杜轶,张勇.山西省2001年生态足迹计算与分析[J].山西水土保持科技,2007,12(4).
[99]张志强,徐中民等.中国西部12省(区市)的生态足迹[J].地理学报,2001,56(5).
[100]鲁丰先.中国省级区域生态占用的计算与分析[D].硕士学位论文,河南大学,2003.
[101]龚永泉.江苏南通:建厂先买排污权[N].人民日报,2005,5,9.
[102]罗丽.美国排污权交易制度及其对我国的启示[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2004,(6)1.
[103]戴伟娣.清洁发展机制简介[J].生物质化学工程,2006,40(1).
[104]司言武,李珺.我国排污费改税的现实思考与理论构想[J].统计与决策, 2007,24.
[105]R.U.Ayres,A. V. Kneese. Production, consumption and externalities.Washington D.C.:Resources for the Future. 1969.
[106]R.U. Ayres,J.H. Ausubel,H.E.Sladovich,editors.Technology and environment. Washington D.C.:National Academy Press, 1989,pp.23-49.
[107]C.Watanabe.Industrial-ecology: introduction of ecology into industrial policy, Tokyo:Ministry of International Trade and Industry(MITI).1972.
[108]Kumar,C.,Patel,N.Industrial Ecology,Proc.National Acad.Sci.USA, 1992,89 (798-799).
[109]Hardin,B.C.Industrial Ecology:An Environmental Agenda for Industry.Arthur D.Little,Inc.,New York, 1991,1-3.
[110]Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers(IEEE),White Paper on Sustainable Development and Industrial Ecology[M],1995.
[111]Wackernagel M,Ree W E. Our Ecological Footprint:Reducing Human Impact on the Earth[M]. Gabriola Island. B.C. Canada:New Society Publishers, 1996.
[112]P.Khanna.Carrying-capacity as a basis for sustainable clevelopment.A case study of National Capital Region in India,Progress in Planning. 1999(52),pp. 101-163.
[113]W.Ashworth.The economy of nature.Boston,MA:Houghton Mifflin Company, 1995, pp.89-93.
[114]R.A.Frosch,N.E.Galloponlos.Strategies for manufacturing.Scientific American , 1989,261(3),.pp.94-102
[115]V.Niutanen and J.Korhonen.Industrial ecology flows of agriculture and food industry-utilising by.-products and wastes.The International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology,2003,Vol.l0,pp.l33-147.
[116]H.Daly.Toward some operational principles of sustainable development.Ecological Economics, 1990,Vol.2,pp. 1 -6.
[117]K.Mayumi,M.Giampietro et al.Georgescu-Roegen/Daly VS.Solow/Stiglitz Revisited. Ecological Economics,1998,Vol.27,No.2,pp.115-118.
[118]I.Ring.Evolutionany strategies in environmental policy.Ecol Econ, 1997, 23(3): 237-250.
[119]J.Korhonen,J.P.Snakin.Analysing the evolution of industrial ecosystemsxoncepts and application.Ecological Economics.2005.170(52):169-186.
[120]P.H.Templet.Energy,diversity and development in economic systems;an empirical analysis.Ecological Economics, 1999. Vol.30,pp.223-233.
[121]N.Roome.Conceptualising and studying the contribution of networks in environmental mana-gement and sustainable development.Businese Strategy and the Environment,2001 ,Vol. 10,No.2, pp.69-76.
[122]Shi H,Yuichi M,Yang J X.lndustrial ecology in china .Journal of Industrial Ecology,2003,6(3-4):7-10.
[123]T.E.Graedel,B.R.Allenby.Industrial Ecology.Prentice Hall Press,New York, 1995, 108-109.
[124]Grant W,Pedersen E.K,Marin S.L.Ecological Modelling:Systems analysis and simulaLion A.Jorgenson S.E,Muller F.Handbook of ecosystem theories and management C.New York:CRC Press LLC,2000,103-113.
[125] Wagner J.E,Luzadis V.A,Floyd D.W.A role for economic analysis in the ecosystem Management debate[J].Landscape and Urban Planning,1998,40:151-157.
[126]Grayr.Accounting for the environment:green accounting M.Princeton(NJ):Markns Weiner Publishing, 1994.
[127]Macve R.Accounting for environmental cost A.Richards D.The industrial green Game:implications for environmental design and maintenance C.Washington(DC): National Academy Press, 1997,185-199.
[128]White A.L,Becker M,Savage D.Environmentally smart accounting:using total cost Assessment to advance pollution prevention[J].Pollution Prevention Review,1993, Summer:247-259.
[129]Lavel B,Maclean H.L,Hendrickson C.T,et al.Life-cycle analysis of alternative antomobile fuel/propulsion technologies[J].Environmental Science&Technology,2000, 34(17):3598-3605.
[130]Ayres R.U,Axtell R.Foresight as a survival characteristic:when(if ever) doesThe long view pay?[J]Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 1996,51:209-235.
[131]Brown M.T,Herendeen R.A.Embodied energy analysis and emergy analysis:a comparative view[J].Ecological Economics, 1996,19:219-235.
[132]Jogensen S.E,Nielsen S.N,Mejer H.Emergy,environ,exergy and ecological modeling[J].Ecological Modelling, 1995,77(2-3):99-109.
[133]B Jork H,Rasmuson A.A method for life cycle assessment environmental optimization of a dynamic process exemplified by an analysis of an energy system with aSuper heated steam dryer integrated in a local district heat and power plant[J].Chemical Engineering Journal.2002.87:381-394.
[134]Mozes E,Cornelissen R.L,Hirs G.Get al.Exergy analysis of the conventionalTextile washing process[J].Energy Conversion and Management,1998,39(16-18):1835-1843.
[135]Ayres R.U,Ayres L.W,Martina S.K.Exergy,waste accounting,and life-cycle analysis[J].Energy,1998,23(5):355-363.
[136]Marque S.J,Nielsen S.N,Pardal M.A,Jor Gensen S.E.Impact of entrophication and River management within a framework of ecosystem theories[J].Ecological Modelling,2003,166:147-168.
[137]Dincer I.Themodynamics,exergy and environmental impact[J]. Energy Sources,2000,22:723-732.
[138]Tester J.W,Model M.Thermodynamics and its applications.Upper Saddle River,NJ:Prentice Hall,1999.
[139] Wackernagel M,Onistol L,Bello P,et al.Ecological footprint of Nations: How much nature do they use? How much nature do they have?[R].Commissioned by the Earth Council for the Rio 5 Forum.Toronto:International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives, 1997.
[140]Odum H.T.Environmental Accounting:Emergy and Decision Making M.New York: John Wiley&Sons,1996,57-58,85-86.
[141]Graedel T.E,Allenby B.R.Industrial ecology (Second Edition).Pearson Education Inc.Prentice Hall,2003.
[142]Suren Erkman.Industrial ecology.FPH Press, 1998,10-15.
[143] 世界商业可持续发展委员会,Changing Course[J]．WBCSD出版,1992．
[144]Evert Nienwlan,Geart Warringa,Corjan Brink,Walter Vermenlen.Supply Curves for Eco-efficient Environmental Improvements Using Different Weighting Methods[J].Journal of Industrial Ecology,2005,No.4,PP.85-96.
[145]Sangwon Suh,Kun Mo Lee,Sang Sun Ha.Eco-efficiency for Pollution Prevention in Small to Medium-sized Enterprises A Case from South Korea[J]. Journal of Industrial Ecology,2005,No.4,pp.223-240.
[146]Yri Seppald,Matti Melanen,Hmo Maenpiia,Sirkka Koskela,Sirkka Koskela.How can the Eco-Efficiency of a Region be Measured and Monitored?[J].Journal of Industrial Ecology,2005,No.4,pp.117-130.
[147]Reinout Heijungs,Arjan de Koning,Sangwon Suh.Toward an information Tool for Integrated Product Policy[J]. Journal of Industrial Ecology,2005,No.3,pp.l47-158.
[148]Jutta Geldermann,Otto Rentz.Multi-criteria Analysis for Technique Assessment[J]. Journal of Industrial Ecology,2005,No.3,pp.l27-143.
[149]Jesper Munksgaard,Mette Wier,Manfred Lenzen.Using Input-Output Analysis to Measure the Environmental Pressure of Consumption at Different Spetial levels[J]. Journal of Industrial Ecology,2005,No.1/2,pp.169-185.
[150]Koji Takase, Yasushi Koudo,Ayu Washizu.An Analysis of Sustainable Consumption by the Waste Input-Output Model[J]. Journal of Industrial Ecology,2005,No.1/2,pp.201-219.
[151]Uif Sonesson,Hakan Jonsson,Berit Mattsson.Post-Consumption Sewage Treatment in Environmental Systems Analysis of Foods[J]. Journal of Industrial Ecology,2004,No.3,pp.51 -64.
[152]Cote E.P,Hall J.Industrial parks as ecosystems[J] .Journal of cleaner Production, 1995,3(1 -2):41 -46.
[153]Thermoshare.Integrated eco-industrial park with cogeneration,energy cascading and recycling,a report prepared for environment Canada,Industry Canada and Natural Resources Cana-da.Ottawa,1997.
[154]Ernest A.L.Eco-Industrial park Handbook.Accessed at June 10,2004. Http ://www. indigodev.com.
[155]Carolyn Eve Nobel.A model for industrial water resue:a geographic information systems(GIS) Approach to industrial ecology.The University of Texas, Austin, 1998. http://www.usc.edu/sppd/rese-arch/NCEID.
[156]Research Triangle Institute.Eco-industrial park:a case study and analysis of economic,environ-mental,technical and regulatery issues,final report for the U.S.Environmental Protection Agency.Research Triangle Park(RC),1994.
[157]Audra J and Potts C.Choctaw eco-industrial park:an ecological approach to industrial land-use Planning and design.Landscape and Urban Planning, 1998,42(2-4): 239-257.
[158]Wackernagel M,Onistol L,Bello P,et al. national natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept[J].Ecological Economics,1999,29(3):375-390.