用户名: 密码: 验证码:
新疆杏果实发育期及采后生理生化机理研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本文以新疆早熟杏品种巴都玉吕克和库买提,中熟品种大果胡安娜和轮台白杏,中晚熟品种佳娜丽和洪特克为材料,系统研究果实发育期及采后生理生化变化特性,为深入探究杏果实成熟衰老的生理生化机制提供一定的理论研究基础。主要研究结果如下:
     1、果实发育期:早熟品种为52d,中熟品种为70d,中晚熟品种为77d。果实发育期呈“快—慢—快”的生长趋势,第二速长期持续时间相对较长。至成熟期,果形指数由1.2左右降至1.1以下;硬度为0.23~0.28kg/cm2之间,晚熟品种略高于早熟品种;TSS、Vc、蛋白质及总糖含量增长,后期增幅较大,晚熟品种高于早熟品种;总酸含量下降50%左右,晚熟品种低于早熟品种;果实干鲜比增大,晚熟品种干物质含量明显高于早熟品种,差异显著(P<0.05)。
     2、果实发育期未出现呼吸跃变现象,细胞膜透性增大,早熟品种细胞膜透性最大,SOD、POD及CAT等细胞保护酶类活性至成熟期都有所升高,其中以SOD最为重要,细胞膜透性急剧增高时SOD活性急剧下降,SOD活性大小依次为:中晚熟品种>中熟品种>早熟品种。
     3、果实发育期,细胞壁含量下降;水溶性和离子型果胶含量上升,成熟时,巴都玉吕克水溶性果胶含量最高为13.26mg/g;共价结合果胶含量先上升后下降;纤维素和半纤维素含量下降,成熟期,纤维素下降至原含量的1/3左右;纤维素酶活性整体提高3倍;果胶酶升高,活性大小:早熟品种﹥中熟品种﹥中晚熟品种。
     4、果实发育期硬度与细胞壁和果胶(水溶性果胶和离子型果胶)含量呈显著正、负相关。
     5、果肉细胞体积可能是决定杏果实大小的主要因素之一。果实发育期,果肉细胞超显微结构变化:坐果期,中胶层电子密度高,呈明显的明-暗-明结构,细胞器完整,至成熟时,中胶层降解,叶绿体破裂,细胞壁松散。晚熟品种杏果实成熟过程中细胞器降解程度低,中胶层的降解幅度小于早熟品种,进一步从细胞结构角度解释其耐贮性较好。
     6、成熟期果实进行转录组分析,组装结果contigs序列与Nr/Nt库进行比对,可以推断杏果实与桃果实的蛋白基因相似度较高,主要体现在乙烯合成过程和软化相关酶类,与山杏的β-淀粉酶、蛋白激酶和脂氧合酶相似度较高,与金冠苹果的线粒体全基因组相似。预测与葡萄蛋白质的合成与代谢过程相关酶类似。与桃果实的果胶酶和梨果实的纤维素酶基因序列的相似度分别为97%和87%,认为果胶酶可能在杏果实成熟软化中起重要作用。
     7、果实采后软化程度较高,硬度可以作为衡量杏果实采后品质较为直观的的重要指标之一,晚熟品种硬度高于早熟品种,说明其耐贮性较好。贮期果实糖、酸、Vc和蛋白质等风味物质和营养物质消耗量较大,品质下降,应针对如何较好的保持杏果实贮期品质开展采后保鲜技术的研究。
     8、杏属于呼吸跃变型果实,是导致其不耐贮的主要原因,贮期呼吸峰值出现时间与细胞膜透性增大及有害物质含量迅速升高的时间吻合,相关保护酶类变化规律与有害物质含量变化规律相符,晚熟品种的有害物质积累量低于早熟品种,细胞膜稳定性高于早熟品种,进一步说明其耐贮性。
     9、果实贮期细胞壁含量下降,果胶酶和纤维素酶活性升高,促进了原果胶和纤维素的降解,纤维素、半纤维素和共价结合型果胶含量下降,细胞壁水溶性果胶和离子型果胶含量明显上升,最终导致果实的软化。早熟品种巴都玉吕克含细胞壁量最低,差异显著(p<0.05),是否可以将杏果实细胞壁含量做为耐贮性的评价指标之一,值得探讨。
     10、纤维素含量的下降速度和细胞膜透性的增大可能是杏果实硬度在贮期下降的主要影响因素。
     11、果实不耐贮主要原因可能是由于采后果实有呼吸峰值出现,该峰值出现后硬度及营养物质含量明显下降,细胞膜透性升高,细胞壁水解酶活性升高,细胞壁物质降解,果实品质迅速下降。晚熟品种耐贮性高于早熟品种。
Six Xinjiang apricot cultivars:early varieties (Baduyulvke and Kumaiti)、 medium varieties (Daguohuanna and Luntaixiaobaixi) and later medium varieties (Jianali and Hongdaike) were used as materials, physiological and biochemical characteristics changes in apricot fruit during maturation and postharvest stage were researched.These results provided the theoretical studies to the apricot fruits' ripening and aging physiological mechanisms. The results showed as follows:
     1.Development period:early maturing varieties was52d,middle maturing varieties was70d,late-maturing varieties was77d.The development period showed "fast-slow-fast" growth trend, the second duration was longer. To maturity, fruit shape index reduced from1.2to1.1;the firmness fell to0.23~0.28kg/cm2, late-maturing varieties was slightly higher than that of early maturing varieties; Soluble solids、Vc protein and total sugar content were growth, late-maturing varieties>early maturing varieties; The total acid content decreased50%, late-maturing varieties was less than early ones.Apricot fruit's fresh and dried ratio increased,dry matter content of late-maturing varieties was significantly higher than the early ones, significant differences (P<0.05).
     2. Apricot fruit has not breathing phenomenon during development period,membrane permeability increased, early maturing varieties was largest. Changes of SOD, POD and CAT activity was different, SOD is the most important, which had a sharp decline when cell membrane permeability had a sharp increased. SOD activity:late-maturing varieties> early maturing varieties.
     3. During fruit developmental, cell wall content decreased, soluble and ionic pectin content increased, to ripening period, baduyulvke contained the highest soluble pectin, was13.26mg/g; covalently bound pectin content increased first, to maturity showed downward trend; cellulose and hemicellulose showed downward trend, to ripening period, cellulose content decreased to1/3of the original; cellulase activity entirety rosed3times;pectinase activity:late-maturing varieties>medium maturing variety> early maturing varieties.
     4. Firmness with the content of the cell wall and pectin (soluble pectin and ionic pectin) showed a significant positive and negative correlation.
     5. The pulp cell volume is one of the main factors to determine the apricot fruit size. During development, pulp cell's ultra-microscopic structure changes:fruit set period, the middle lamella has high electron density, showed bright-dark-bright structure, organelles complete, to mature, the mesoglea obvious degradation, chloroplast rupture, cell wall loose. Pulp cells cell walls in late-maturing varieties showed lower degradation of organelles, the mesoglea degradation rate was less than early maturing varieties,further to explain its storability better from the cell structure angle.
     6. Transcriptome of analysis for mature apricot fruit,the assembly results contigs sequence compared with Nr/Nt,could be inferred apricot fruits protein gene was higher similarity with peach fruit,mainly in ethylene synthesis process and softening related enzymes,similarity with Prunus armeniaca's β-amylase、 protein kinase and lipoxygenase,similarity with complete mitochondrial genome of the Golden Delicious apple.Predicted similar to grape's protein synthesis and metabolic processes related enzymes. pectinase of peach fruit and cellulase gene sequence of pear fruit downloaded from NCBI,similarity were97%and87%,pectinase play an important role in the apricot fruit ripening and softening.
     7. The postharvest apricot fruit had higher degree of softening, firmness can be used as an important indicator to measure quality of postharvest apricot fruit, late-maturing varieties higher than early ones, showed better storability. Flavor and nutrients (sugar, acid, Vc and protein)content consumptioned larger during storage time, quality declined, post-harvest preservation technology research should focus on how to better maintain the quality of apricot fruit during storage
     8. Apricot was respiratory fruit, the main reason about its not storability, during storage, respiratory peak time,membrane permeability increased rapidly and the content of harmful substances incriesed time consistent, protective enzymes variation with the variation of the content of harmful substances in line, Accumulation of harmful substances of late-maturing varieties is less than early maturing varieties, the cell membrane stability higher than the early ones, further illustrate its storability.
     9. During postharvest storage,pectinase and cellulase activity increased,to promote the degradation of pectin and cellulose.Cellulose,hemicellulose,and covalent binding content decreased, water-soluble and ionic pectin content were increased, Baduyulvke had the lowest content of cell wal,significant difference (p <0.05),It's worth for exploring whether cell wall content as a storability evaluation index of apricot fruit.
     10. the rate of decline of the cellulose content and the increases of cell membrane permeability were the main factors which caused the decline of apricot fruits firmness during storage.
     11. The apricot fruit was not storability, mainly due to postharvest respiratory peak, after the peak appeared, the hardness and nutrient content decreased, cell membrane permeability increased, cell wall hydrolase activity increased, cell wall material degradation, The fruit quality rapid declined. The Storability of Late-maturing varieties were better than early varieties.
引文
[1]俞德俊.关于核果类植物分类的初步意见[J].中国果树,1959,5:35-38.
    [2]吕增仁.我国杏研究进展[J].河北果树.1996(1):1-5.
    [3]张钊,刘明彰,陈文椒,包颜芳,热衣曼牙生.新疆杏种质资源[J].果树科学,1985,3(1)1823.
    [4]Yu Zhu, Qi Zhi, L. Apricot Germplasm Resources inChina[J]. Acta Hort,2006,701:181-190.
    [5]Gu M. Apricot cultivars in china[J]. Acta Horticuturae,1988,209:63-67.
    [6]张强,李西萍.新疆杏树种质资源及开发利用前景[J].内蒙古农业科技,2005(4):38-40.
    [7]张君萍.对新疆若干杏品种果实主要营养成分的测定和分析评价[D].新疆:新疆农业大学,2006:16-17.
    [8]于希志,廖新宇,张加延.新疆杏的资源特点与开发利用前景—新疆杏资源考察报告[J].落叶果树,1998,(增刊):60-62.
    [9]新疆维吾尔自治区统计局.2012新疆统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2013:856.
    [10]张大海,吕昭智,胡天恩,唐章虎,何峰江.新疆杏产业发展现状及其相关资源配置评述[J]中国经济与管理科学,2009,(5):53-55.
    [11]罗新书,陈学森,郭延奎.杏品种孢粉学研究[J].园艺学报,1992,1(4):319-325.
    [12]曹建康,谈小芳,王敏,赵玉梅,姜微波.1-甲基环丙烯(1-MCP)真空渗透处理对货架期杏果实采后生理和品质的影响[J].食品工业科技.2008(4):254-257.
    [13]刘遵春,单长卷,包东娥.金太阳杏果实生长发育规律的研究[J].湖北农业科学,2006,45(5):625626.
    [14]陈美霞,陈学森,周杰,等.杏果实不同发育阶段的香味组分及其变化[J].中国农业科学,2005,38(6):1244-1249.
    [15]陈美霞,陈学森,慈志娟,等.杏果实糖酸组成及其不同发育阶段的变化[J].园艺学报,2006,33(4):805-808.
    [16]张加延,张钊.中国果树志:杏卷[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2003:17-17.
    [17]Femenia A, Sanchez ES, Simal S, Rossello C.Developmental and ripening-related effects on the cell wall of apricot (Prunus armeniaca) fruit [J]. Journal of the science of food and agriculture,1998,77(4):487-493.
    [18]BOURANIS DL,NIAVIS CA.Cell-Wall metabolism in growing and ripening stone fruits [J]. Plant and cell physioloyy,1992,33(7):999-1008.
    [19]Bureau S, Chahine H, Gouble B, Reich M, Albagnac G, Audergon JM.Fruit ripening of contrasted apricot varieties:Physical, physiological and biochemical changes[J]. Acta Horticulture2006(701):511-515.
    [20]Kovacs E, Meresz P, Kristof Z, Nemeth-Szerdahelyi E.Ripening and microstructure of apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.)[J].Acta Alimentaria,2008,37(1):27-39.
    [21]郝云,杨途熙,等.串枝红杏果实发育动态及品质的研究[J].北方园艺,2009(7):15-18.
    [22]王荣花,李嘉瑞.杏果实发育的形态解剖学研究[J].西北农业大学学报,2000,28(4):4550.
    [23]冯立娟,苑兆和.2个杏品种不同成熟期果实品质变化研究[J].中国农学通报,2010,26(16):206-210.
    [24]王静,张辉.不同成熟度赛买提杏货架期品质变化的研究[J].新疆农业科学,2010,47(6):1117-1121.
    [25]钱龙,崔宽波.乙烯脱除剂处理对杏果实常温贮藏品质的影响[J].保鲜与加工,2010(4):33-36.
    [26]刘路,张谦.臭氧对赛买提杏贮藏保鲜的影响[J].新疆农业科学,2010,47(4):756-760.
    [27]赵晓梅,张谦.不同贮藏条件下赛买提杏采后生理与贮藏效果的相关性研究[J].新疆农业科学,2009,46(5):1003-1007.
    [28]王伟,张有林.减压处理对采后杏果实软化的生理控制效应[J].西北植物学报,2008,28(1):131-135.
    [29]王荣花,李嘉瑞.杏果实生长发育生理学研究[J].西北农业学报,2000,9(3):76-78.
    [30]王毓宁,胡花丽.硝普钠处理对新疆库买提杏贮藏品质及抗氧化能力的影响[J].新疆农业科学,2010,47(11):2172-2176.
    [31]王静,张辉.热处理对库车小自杏贮藏品质的影响[J].新疆农业大学学报,2010,33(3):234-239.
    [32]张辉,逢焕明.C02熏蒸处理对采后杏果贮藏品质的影响[J].新疆农业大学学报,2009,32(1):56-59.
    [33]赵晓梅,张谦.新疆库买提杏果实采后品质劣变的调控技术研究初报[J].新疆农业科学,2009,46(1):82-86.
    [34]张婷,车凤斌.新疆主栽杏品种动态运输模拟试验[J].新疆农业科学,2010,47(8):14851491.
    [35]孙守文,刘凤兰.新疆杏果品质比较的研究[J].新疆农业大学学报,2011,34(3):226-229.
    [36]赵智慧,周俊义.果树果实内在品质形成及评价方法研究进展[J].河北农业大学学报,2002,25增刊:111-114.
    [37]曾骤.果树生理学[M].北京:北京农业大学出版社,1992.
    [38]徐晖,王飞,郝文红.甜樱桃果实发育及其营养成分的变化[1].果树科学,1992,9(4):228-230.
    [39]周睿,束怀瑞.高等植物中的山梨醇及其代谢[J].植物生理学通讯,1993,(5):384-386.
    [40]邓月娥,张传来,牛立元,等.桃果实发育过程中主要营养成分的动态变化及系统分析法研究[J].果实科学,1995,15(1):50.
    [41]李海燕,冯玉才,等.山葡萄果实成熟过程中呼吸强度和主要营养成分的变化规律[J].吉林农业大学学报,2001,23(1):46-49.
    [42]黄卫东,原永兵,彭宜本.温带果树结实生理[M].北京:北京农业大学出版社,1994.
    [43]马建军,张立彬.野生欧李生长期矿物营养元素含量的变化[J].园艺学报,2004,31(2):165-168.
    [44]江新能,吕仕洪,李纯,黄立拴.油梨果实的生长和内含物变化的观察[J].广西植物,1994,14(3):255-259.
    [45]赵树棠.李果实发育过程中糖、酸、Vc及矿质元素含量变化[J].河北农业大学,2003,14.
    [46]王圣梅,姜正旺,叶晓成,等.称猴桃果实氨基酸及其变化的研究[J].果树科学,1995,12(3):157.
    [47]顾曼如,束怀瑞,曲桂敏,等.红星苹果果实的矿质元素含量与品质关系[J].园艺学报,1992,19(4):302-304.
    [48]费学谦,王劲风,周立红,等.甘、涩柿果实主要化学成分的研究[J].林业科学研究,1994,7(1):1061-10.
    [49]曹琴,杜俊杰,刘和,等.野生欧李营养特性分析[J].中国野生植物资源,1999,18(1):34-35.
    [50]Suttle TC, Kende HE. Thyleneaction and of membrane in tegrity during petal seneseence in tradeseatia[J].Plant Physiol,1980,65:1067-1072.
    [51]卢春杉.GP在番茄果实成熟中的作用及二价金属离子与乙烯对GP活性的影响[J].植物学报,1990,32:337-342.
    [52]Blaekbourn HD, JegerMJ, John P. Inhibitin of degreening in the peel of bananas Ripened attropieal temperatures.11. Changes in plastid ultrastrueture and ehloro Phylipretein eomplexesae eompanying ripening in bananas and plantains [J]. Ann APPIBiZol.1990(117):147-161.
    [53]夏春森,王兰英.红星苹果在贮藏中果肉发绵生理过程的研究[J].园艺学报,1981,8(2):29-31
    [54]李雄彪.植物细胞壁酶的分子结构与生理功能[J].植物生理学通讯,1991,27(4):246-252.
    [55]茅林春,应铁进,张上隆.桃果实絮败与果胶质变化和细胞壁结构的关系[J].植物生理学报,1999,25(2):123-126.
    [56]Fiseher R.L, Bennett, A.B. Role of cell wall hydrolases in fruit ripening[J].Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol.Plant Mol.Biol,1991,42:675-703.
    [57]Hegde S, Maness NO. Sugar eom position of peetin and hemicellulose extracts Of peach fruit during softening over two harvest seasons[J].Amer. Soc. Hort. Sei,1996,121(6):1162-1167.
    [58]Huber DJ, O'Donoghue EM. Polyuronides in avoeado and tomato fruits exhibit markedly different patterns of moleeular weight down shifts during ripening[J].Plant Physiology,1993,102:473-480.
    [59]Cutillas-IturraldeA, Zarral, Lorenees EP. Metabolism of cell wall Polysac-charide from Persimmon fruit.Peetin solubilization occures in apparent absence of Polygalact Uronaseaetivity[J].Physiologia Plantarum,1993,89:369-375.
    [60]Pressey R, Hinton DM, Avants JK. Development of Polygalacturonase Activity and solubilization of Pectin in peaches during ripening[J].Food Sei,1971,36:1070-1073.
    [61]Bouranis D,LandNiavis,CA.Cell wall metabolism in growing and ripeningstonefruits[J].Plant Cell Physiology,1992,33(7):999-1008.
    [62]Gross KC, Watada AE, Kang MS, etal. Bioehemieal changes assoeiated with The ripening of hot pepper[J].Physiologia Plantarum,1986,66:31-36.
    [63]Tong CBS, Gross KC. Glyeosyl-linkage composition of tomato fruit cell wall hemieellulosie fractions during ripening[J].Physiologia Plantarum,1988,74:365-370.
    [64]Gross KC, Wallner S. Degradation of cell wall Ploysaceharides during Tomato fruit ripening[J].Plant Physiology,1979,63:117-120.
    [65]Pressey R, Hinton DM, Avants JK. Development of Polygalacturonase Activity and solubilization of pectin in Peaches during ripening[J].Food Sei,1971,36:1070-1073.
    [66]周培根,罗祖友,戚晓玉,吴邦良.桃成熟期间果实软化与果胶及有关酶的关系[J].南京农业大学学报,1991,14(2):33-37.
    [67]Barnes ME,Patehett BJ.Cell wall degrading enzymes and the softening of Seneseent strawberry fruit[J].Food Sci.,1976,41:1392-1395.
    [68]Gonzalez-Boseh C, Brummell DA, Bennett AB. Differential expression of two Endo-β-1,4-glucanase genes in periearp and loeules of wild-type and mutant tomato fruit[J].Plant Physiology,1996,111:1313-1319.
    [69]Awad M,Young RE.Postharvest variation in cellulase, Polygalaeturonase, and Pectinme thylesterase in avocado fruits in relation to respiration and ethylene production[J].Plant Physiology,1979,64:306-308.
    [70]Bonghi C, Ferrarese L, etal. Endo-β-1,4-glucanases are involved in peach fruit Growth and ripening, and regulated by ethylene[J].Physiologia Plantraum,1998,102:346-352.
    [71]Tucker GA, Robertson NG, GriersonD. Purification and changes in activities of Tomato peetinesterase isozymes[J]. Sci Food Agric,1982,33:396-400
    [72]薛炳业.肥城桃和草莓果实发育成熟软化生理机理研究[D].山东:山东农业大学,2002
    [73]陈昆松,徐昌杰,楼健,张上隆.脂氧合酶与称猴桃果实后熟软化的关系[J].植物生理学报,1999,25(2):138-1440.
    [74]Andrew PK, Li SL.Partial purification and characterization of β-D-Galactosidase from sweet cherry, a nonelimaeterie fruit [J]. Aghe.Foed Chem.1994,42:2177-2182.
    [75]Lidster PD, McRae KB, Dick AJ. Effeets of a vacuum infusion of apartially Purifiedβ-galactosidase inhibitor on apple quality[J]. Hortseienee.1985,20:80-82.
    [76]Huystee RB. Some molecular aspects of plant peroxidase biosyntheticstudies[J].Annual review of Plant Physiology,1987,38.
    [77]关军锋,管雪强,高华君等.成熟度和采后处理对草墓果实品质、超氧歧化酶活性和蛋白质含量的影响[J].果树科学,1997,1:2427.
    [78]胡小松,丁双阳.桃采后呼吸和乙烯释放规律及多效唑的影响[J].北京农业大学学报.1993,19:53-60.
    [79]Adams DO,Yang SF.Ethylene biosynthesis:Identificationof1-aminocyclop ropane-1-carboxylic acid as an intermediate in the conversion of methionine to ethylene[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA,1979,76:170-174.
    [80]张宪省,闫先喜.乙烯调控果实成熟研究的进展[J].山东农业大学学报,1994,25:487-490.
    [81]茅林春,张上隆.果胶酶与桃果实冷害的关系[J].植物生理学通讯,2000,36:266-271.
    [82]Echeverria E. Developmental transition from enzymatic to acid hydrolysis of sucrose in acid limes [J].Plant Physiology,1990,92:168-171.
    [83]张杏芝,李梅.不同温度处理对桃果品质及常温贮藏性的影响[J].湖北农业科学,1996,4:5456.
    [84]常军,张平,王莉.桃采后生理及贮藏研究进展[J].保鲜与加工,2003,6:89.
    [85]李敏,胡美姣,高兆银,杨凤珍.芒果采后及贮藏生理研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2005,21:400-404.
    [86]Grookes PR, Grierson D. Ultrastrueture of tomato fruit ripening and the roleOf polygalaeturonase isoenzymes in cell wall degradation [J]. Plnat Physiol,1983,72:1088-1093.
    [87]King GA, Hel、dson KG, Lill RE. Growth and anatomieal and ultrastrueture studies Of neetarine fruit cell development [J].BotGaz,1987,148:443-455.
    [88]张大鹏,李眠,王毅.葡萄果实发育过程中果肉细胞超微结构的观察[J].植物学报,1997,38:388-396.
    [89]陈安均,蒲彪,罗云波等.不同熟期桃果实超微结构及其相关代谢的研究[J].果树学报,2002,19(1):6769.
    [90]Tayler MA, Rabe E, Jaeobs G, Dood MC.Physiologieal and anatomieal changesAssoeiated with ripening in the inner and outermesoearp of cold stored song old Plums and the coneomitant of development internal disorders[J].HorSei,1993,68:911-918.
    [91]屈红霞,唐友林,谭兴杰.采后菠萝贮藏品质与果肉细胞超微结构的变化[J].果树学报,2001.18:164-167.
    [92]吴江明,张忠恒,于萍.苹果软化过程中质壁互作的生理和结构研究[J].园艺学报,1995.22:181-182.
    [93]杨兴德,庞向宁,邢红华.称猴桃衰老过程中GP、果胶质和细胞超微结构的变化[J].园艺学报,1993.20:341-345.
    [94]陆胜民,席屿芳.采后处理对梅果细胞超微结构的影响[J].食品科学,2001.22(6):62-63.
    [95]梁小娥,王三宝,赵迎丽.枣采后果肉软化的生理生化和细胞超微结构变化[J].园艺学报,1998,25:333-337.
    [96]冯晓元.桃果实在贮藏期发绵的机理和防治措施[J].北方果树,1998,4:35.
    [97]杨书珍,任小林,彭丽桃,饶景萍.6A3处理对采后油桃果实膜脂过氧化的影响[J].西北植物学报,2001,21:575-578.
    [98]杨剑平,韩涛,李丽萍,陈小宁.热处理对桃贮藏期膜脂过氧化作用的影响[J].园艺学报,1996,23:89-90.
    [99]林河通,陈莲,陈绍军,林娇芬,赵云峰.橄榄果实采后生物学研究进展[J].福建农林大学学报,2005,34:464-469.
    [100]徐晓静,张培正.桃、李果实耐贮性与呼吸、乙烯和脂质过氧化作用的关系[J].果树学报,1994,11:38-40.
    [101]Velculescu VE, Zhang L, Zhou W, et al. Characterization of the yeast transcriptome.Cell,1997,88:243-251.
    [102]Lander ES, Linton LM, Birren B, et al. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature,2001,409(6822):860-921.
    [103]谢金让(摘译).甜橙果实在发育成熟过程中转录组的变化分析[资讯,科技动态]中国果品新闻,2012,6(29):65
    [104]张琳.拟南芥种子发育过程转录组深度测序数据的分析[D].福建:福建农林大学硕士学位论文,2011,4.
    [105]唐琪.罗汉果转录组、表达谱的高通量测序及甜苷V生物合成关键酶的克隆[D].北京:北京协和医学院,2010,6.
    [106]杨楠,赵凯歌,陈龙清.蜡梅花转录组数据分析及次生代谢产物合成途径研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2012,2(34):104-106.
    [107]石文芳.基于RNA-sea测序的梅花转录组分析[D].北京:北京林业大学,2012,6.
    [108]Sultan M, Schulz M H, Richard H, Magen A, Klingenhoff A, ScherfM, Seifert M, Borodina T, Soldatov A, Parkhomchuk D, Schmidt D,O'Keeffe S, Haas S, Vingron M, Lehrach H, Yaspo M L. A globalview of gene activity and alternative splicing by deep sequencing ofthe human transcriptome. Science,2008,5891:956-960.
    [109]Wang E T, Sandberg R, Luo S, Khrebtukova Ⅰ, Zhang L, Mayr C, Kingsmore S F, Schroth G P, Burge C B. Alternative isoform regulation in human tissue transcriptomes. Nature,2008,7221:470-476.
    [110]Birzele F, Schaub J, Rust W, Clemens C, Baum P, Kaufmann H, WeithA, Schulz T W, Hildebrandt T. Into the unknown:Expression profilingwithout genome sequence information in CHO by next generation sequencing. Nucleic Acids Research,2010,38(12):3999-4010.
    [111]Pan Q, Shai O, Lee L J, Frey B J, Blencowe B J. Deep surveying of alternative splicing complexity in the human transcriptome by highthroughput sequencing. Nature Genetics,2008,40:1413-1415.
    [112]Nagalakshmi U, Wang Z, Waern K, Shou C, Raha D, Gerstein M, Snyder M. The transcriptional landscape of the yeast genome defined by RNA sequencing. Science,2008,320:1344-1349.
    [113]Li Y, Luo H M, Sun C, Song J Y, Sun Y Z, Wu Q, Wang N, Yao H, Steinmetz A, Chen S L. EST analysis reveals putative genes involved in glycyrrhizin biosynthesis. BMC Genomics,2010,11:268.
    [114]Severin A J, Woody J L, Bolon Y T, Joseph B, Diers B W, Farmer A D, Muehlbauer G J, Nelson R T, Grant D, Specht J E, Graham M A, Cannon S B, May G D, Vance C P, Shoemaker R C. RNA-Seq Atlas of Glycine max:A guide to the soybean transcriptome. BMC Plant Biology,2010,10:160.
    [115]Mortazavi A, Williams B A, McCue K, Schaeffer L, Wold B. Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq. Nature Methods,2008,5(7):621-628.
    [116]邵本华,罗广华,王爱国.几种检测超氧化物歧化酶活性反应的比较[J[.植物生理通讯,1983,(5):46-49.
    [117]朱广廉,钟海文,张爱琴。植物生理学实验[M].1990,北京大学出版社
    [118]茅林春.桃果实成熟和絮败的生理学研究[D].浙江:浙江大学,2000.
    [119]Fishman ML, Levaj B, GIllesPie D. Changes in the Physieo-hemieal Properties of peach fruit peetin during on-tree ripenin gand storage[J]. Amer.Soc.Hort.Sei,1993,118(3):343-349.
    [120]韩雅珊.食品化学实验指导[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社,1996,39-41.
    [121]大连轻工业学院.食品分析[M].北京:中国轻工业出版社,1994,205-206.
    [122]中国科学院上海植物生理研究所,上海市植物生理学会.《现代植物生理学实验指南》[M].上海:科学出版社,1999,258-259.
    [123]吴振先,苏美霞,陈维信,等.贮藏荔枝果皮多酚氧化酶及过氧化物酶与褐变的研究[J].华南农业大学学报,1998,19(1):12-15.
    [124]韩涛,李丽萍.果实和蔬菜中多酚氧化酶的作用[J].北京农学院学报.1998,13(2):115-124.
    [125]薛炳烨,束怀瑞.肥城桃两品系果实细胞壁成分和水解酶活性的比较[J].园艺学报,2004,31(4):499-501.
    [126]薛炳烨,毛志泉,束怀瑞.草莓果实发育成熟过程中糖苷酶和纤维素酶活性及细胞壁组成变化[J].植物生理与分子生物学学报,2006,32(3):363-368.
    [127]谢娟.红树莓果实生长发育规律及超显微结构研究[D].东北:东北农业大学硕士学位论文,2011,6.
    [128]韩明玉,田玉命,张慧梅,等.秦光油桃生长曲线和落果波相的观察[J].西北植物学报,1990(4):249-253.
    [129]杨恒,魏安智,杨途熙,等.日光温室栽培对杏花及果实生长发育的影响[J].西北植物学报,2003(11):1932-1936.
    [130]于希志,徐秋萍,金锡凤.杏果实发育的研究[J].果树科学,1990,7(4):227-230.
    [131]王荣花,李嘉瑞,陈理论.杏果实发育的形态解剖学研究[J].2000,28(4):45-50.
    [134]张建光,李俊奇.杏树授粉受精及胚胎发育观察[J].河北农业大学学报,1990,13(4):14-17.
    [135]马之胜.串枝红杏果实生长发育研究[J].北方园艺,1993,(1):24-26.
    [136]李明启.果实生理[M].北京:科学出版社,1989,30.
    [137]赵智慧.冬枣、临椅梨枣果实发育及品质的形成[D].河北:河北农业大学硕士学位(毕业)论文,2003,6.[138]刘立强.新疆若干杏品种开花结实生物学特性研究[D].新疆:新疆农业大学硕士学位论文,2005,6.
    [139]包东娥,单长卷,刘遵春.金太阳杏果实生长发育及各生长指标的相关性分析[J].安徽农业科学,2006,(34)19:4910-4911.
    [140]程杰山,沈火林,杨学妍,等.不同硬度辣椒品系果实组织结构观察与细胞壁物质含量测定
    [J].西北农业学报,2008,17(1):150-156.
    [141]汤飞云,张春红,胡淑英,吴文龙,李维林.不同品种黑莓果实发育过程中硬度变化规律的调查与分析[J].江西农业学报2012,24(10):9-11.
    [142]叶力勤.枸杞果实发育时期及特性观察[J].宁夏农林科技,2009,(2):18-20.
    [143]常美花,张素英,毕树广.温室条件下杏果实发育过程中糖、酸和Vc含量的变化[J].华北农学报,2007,22(3):68-70.
    [144]邓月娥,张传来,牛立元,等.桃果实发育过程中主要营养成分的动态变化及其系统分析方法研究 [J].果树科学,1998,15(1):48-52.
    [145]许建兰,马瑞娟,俞明亮,等.不同果肉颜色桃果实发育阶段糖、酸和叶绿素含量变化[J].江苏农业科学,2010,(4):131-133.
    [146]沈志军,马瑞娟,俞明亮,等.桃果实发育过程中主要糖及有机酸含量的变化分析[J].华北农学报,2007,22(6):130-135.
    [147]马之胜,王越辉,贾云云,等.桃果实果胶、可溶性糖、可滴定酸含量和果实大小与果实硬度关系的研究[J].江西农业学报,2008,20(10):45-46.
    [148]甘林,谢永红,吴正琴·嘉平大枣果实发育过程中糖、酸及维生素C含量的变化[J].园艺学报,2000,27(5):317-320.
    [149]中川昌.果树园艺原论[M].曾骧译.北京:农业出版社,1982:345-346.
    [150]牟君富,王绍美,朱庆刚,陈恒阳.刺梨果实发育中生理生化变化的初步研究[J].贵州农业科学,1984,(3)56-58.
    [151]陈昆松.称猴桃果实成熟过程中脂氧合酶的生理及分子特性研究[D].杭州:浙江农业大学,1998.
    [152]高敏,张继澎.1-甲基环丙烯对红富士苹果酶促褐变的影响[J].植物生理学通讯,2001,37(6):522-524.
    [153]闫师杰,寇晓虹,梁丽雅IAA、ABA和乙烯利对梨枣采后某些生理指标的影响[J].植物生理通讯,2004,40(3):323-325.
    [154]徐永杰.甜橙果实发育及贮藏过程中细胞膜稳定性研究[D].武汉:华中农业大学,1998.
    [155]武文州.活性氧代谢及相关酶对桃果实成熟软化的影响[D].扬州:扬州大学,1998.
    [156]黄明,彭世清.植物多酚氧化酶研究进展[J].广西师范大学学报(自然科学版),1998,16(2):65-70.
    [157]Alfred M M, Eitan H. Polyphenol oxidase in plants[J]. Phyto-chemistry,1979,18:193-215.
    [158]胡瑞波,田纪春.小麦多酚氧化酶研究进展[J].麦类作物学报,2004,24(1):81-85.
    [159]彭世清.植物多酚氧化酶的研究进展[J].热带农业科学,2000,6(3):61-63.
    [160]Vaughn K C, Lax A R. Polyphenol oxidase:thechloroplast enzyme with no established function[J]. Physiol Plant,1988,(72):659-665.
    [161]Mayer AM. Polyphenol oxidase in plants-recentprogress[J]. Phytochemistry,1987(26):11-20.
    [162]Piyada T P. Polyhpenol oxidase in tomato [J]. PlantPhysiol,1997(115):409-418.
    [163]Huber D J. The role of cell wall hydrolases in fruit softening[J]. Hor-tic Rev,1983,5:169-219.
    [164]Tong C B S, Gross K C. Glycosyl-linkage composition of tomato fruit hemicellulose fractions during ripening [J].1988, Physiologia Plan-tarum,74:365-370.
    [165]陆胜民,金勇丰,张耀洲.果实成熟过程中细胞壁组成的变化[J].植物生理学通讯,2001,37(3):246-249.
    [166]Redgwell R J, Macrae E, Hallett I. In vivo and in vitro cell walls during fruit ripening[J]. Planta,1997,203(2):162-173.
    [167]Roer J K C, Hadfield K A, Labavitch J M, et al. Temporal sequence of cell wall disassembly in rapidly ripening melon fruit [J]. Plant Physiol,1998,117(2):345-361.
    [168]Barnavon L, Thierry D, Nancy T, et al. Analysis of cell wall neutral sugar composition, β-galactosidase activity and related cDNA clone throughout the development of Vitis vinifera grape berries [J].Plant Physiol Biochem,2000,38(4):289-300.
    [169]庄军平,林焕章,陈维信.香蕉成熟过程中细胞壁结构的变化研究[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2006,14(3):218-221.
    [170]Brady C J, Mcglasson W B, Perason J A, et al. Interactions betweenthe amount and molecular forms of polygalacturonase, calcium,and firmness in tomato fruit[J]. J Amer Soc Hort Sci,1985,1(10):254-258.
    [171]Redgwell R J, Melton L D, Brasch D J. Cell wall dissolution in ripening kiwifruit[J]. Plant Physiol,1992,98:71-81.
    [172]Roee J K C, Hadfield K A, Labavitch J M, et al. Temporal sequenceof cell wall disassembly in rapidly ripening melon fruit [J]. PlantPhysiol,1998,117(2):345-361.
    [173]Carrington C M S, Greve C L, Labavitch J M. Cell wall metabolism in ripening fruit[J]. Plant Physiol,1993,103:429-434.
    [174]Redgwell R J, Macrae E, Hallett I. In vivo and in vitro swelling of cell walls during fruit ripening[J]. Plant,1997,203:162-173.
    [175]Croaks P R, Grierson D. Ultratrure of tomato fruit ripening and role of polygalacturonase in enzymes in cell wall de-gration[J]. Piant Physiol,1983,72:1088-1093.
    [176]Wachiraya I, Saichol K, Vandoom W G. Effect of temperature on softening and pectinesterase in durian fruit[J]. Postharvest Biology and Technology,2002,26:347-351.
    [177]Ketsa S, Daengkenit T. Firmness and activities of polygacturonase, pectinesterase, flgalactosidase and cellulase in ripening durian harvested at different stages of maturity[J].Scientia Horticulturae,1999,80:181-188.
    [178]Gross K C, Watada A E, Kang M S. Biochemical changes associated with the ripening of hot pepper[J]. Physiol Plant,1986,66:31-36.
    [179]Huber D J. Polyuronide degradation and hemicellulose modifications in ripening tomato fruit[J]. Amer Soc Hort Sci,1983,108:405-409.
    [180]Ahmed A E, Labavitch J M. Cell wall metabolism in ripening pear and cell wall changes in ripening Bartlett pears [J]. Plant Physiol,1980,65:1009-1013.
    [181]Gross K C, Wallner S J. Degradation of cell wall polysaccharides during tomato fruit ripening[J]. Plant Physiol,1979,63:117-120.
    [182]朱明月,沈文涛,周鹏.果实成熟软化机理研究进展[J].分子植物育种,2005,3(3):421-426.
    [183]Huber D J. The role of cell wall hydrolases in fruit softening [J]. Horticultural Reviews,1983,5:169-219.
    [184]饶景萍,任小林.果实成熟过程中组织超微结构的变化[J].西北植物学报,1997,17(1):128-134.
    [185]Takco Harada, Wakako Kurahashi, Masumi Yani, et al. Involvement of cell proliferation and cell enlargement in increasing the fruit size of Malus species[J].Scientia Horticulturae,2005,(105):447-456.
    [186]J. G. Cruz Castilloa, D. J. Woolleyb, G. S.Lawes. Kiwifruit size and CPPU response are influenced by the time of anthesis[J]. Scientia Horticuhurae,2002,(95):23-30.
    [187]陈安均,罗云波.不同熟期桃果实超微结构及相关代谢的研究[J].果树学报,2002,19(1):67-69.
    [188]梁小娥,王三宝.枣采后果肉软化的生化和细胞超微结构变化[J].园艺学报,1998,25(4):333-337.
    [189]王爱国,罗广华.植物的超氧物自由基与羟胺反应的定量关[J].植物生理学报,1983(1):77.
    [190]林植芳,李双顺,林桂珠,孙谷畴,郭俊彦.水稻叶片的衰老与超氧化物歧化酶及脂质过氧化作用的关系[J].植物学学报,1984,26:605-615.
    [191]茅林春,应铁进.桃果实絮败与果胶质变化和细胞壁结构的关系[J].植物生理学报,1999,25(2):121-126.
    [192]朴一龙,赵兰花,薛桂新.梨果实在贮藏过程中细胞壁成分的变化[J].果树学报,2006,23(6):880-883.
    [193]周拥军,郜海燕,张憨.冰温贮藏对柿果细胞壁物质代谢的影响[J].中国食品学报,2011,11(4):134-137.
    [194]张进献,李冬杰,张广华.不同钙处理对采后草莓果实细胞壁酶活性、果胶含量的影响[J].北方园艺,2006(2):24-26.
    [195]冯美,张宁,张宏宝.枸杞采后细胞壁组分及其降解酶活性的变化[J].干旱地区农业研究,2011,29(5):111-114.
    [196]林河通,赵云峰.龙眼果实采后果肉自溶过程中细胞壁组分及其降解酶活性的变化[J].植物生理与分子生物学学报,2007,33(2):137-145.
    [197]陆胜民,张耀洲.梅果采后软化与细胞壁组分及其降解酶活性的变化[J].中国农业科学,2003,36(5):595-598.
    [198]赵晓梅,张谦,徐麟,刘璐,何峰江.不同贮藏条件下赛买提杏采后生理与贮藏效果相关性研究[J].新疆农业科学,2009,4(5):1003-1007.
    [199]刘新社,刘三军.减压结合低温对杏李贮藏性状的影响[J].果树学报,2011,28(3):521-525.
    [200]刘峰娟,秦宗权,沈艾彬,冯作山,高洋洋,陈计峦.振动胁迫对杏果实品质的影响[J].食品科学,2011,32(10):266-268.
    [201]常君,张平,王丽.桃采后生理及贮藏研究进展[J].保鲜与加工,2003,19(6):8-10.
    [202]张加延,张钊.中国果树志:杏卷[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2003,17.
    [203]赵瑞平,白殿海.香白杏贮藏试验初探[J].北方园艺,2008(6):217-218.
    [204]王磊.无花果采后生理变化及其影响因素研究[D].河北:河北农业大学,2012,5.
    [205]任小林,李嘉瑞.杏果实成熟衰老过程中活性氧和几种生理指标的变化[J].植物生理学通讯,1991,27(1):34-36.
    [206]Rose J K C, Hadfield K A, Labavitch J M, et al. Temporal sequence of cell wall disassembly in rapidly ripening melon fruit [J]. Plant Physiol,1998,117(2):345-361.
    [207]Barnavon L, Thierry D, Nancy T, et al. Analysis of cell wall neutral sugar composition, β-galactosidase activity and related cDNA clone throughout the development of Vitis vinifera grape berries [J]. Plant Physiol Biochem,2000,38(4):289-300.
    [208]王琳,朴一龙,黄岳.耐贮性不同的梨贮藏中细胞壁成分变化比较[J].安徽农业大学学报,2010,37(2):244-248.
    [209]Saulnier L, Brillouet J M. Structural studies of pectic substances from the pulp of grape berries [J]. Carbohyd Res,1988,182:63-78.
    [210]Proctor A, Peng L C. Pectin transitions during blueberry fruit development and ripening [J]. Food Sci,1989,54:385-387.
    [211]Prasanna V, Yashoda H M, Prabha T N, et al. Pectic polysaccha-rides during ripening of mango (Mangifera indica L.)[J]. J Sci Food Agri,2003,83:1182-1186.
    [212]周培根.桃成熟期间果实软化与果胶及有关酶的关系[J].南京农业大学学报,1992,14(2):33-37.
    [213]Redgwell R J, MacRae E, Hallett Ⅰ. Invivo and invitro swelling of cell walls during fruit ripening[J]. Plant,1997,203:162-173.
    [214]Redgwell RJ, MacRae E, Hallett I, Fischer M, Perry J, HarkerR. In vivo and in vitro swelling of cell walls during fruit ripening [J]. Planta,1997,203(2):162-173.
    [215]颜季琼,张孝琪,龙程.高等植物细胞壁的结构和功能的分子生物学基础[M].见:余叔文,汤章城.植物生理与分子生物学(第二版):科学出版社,1998:93-112.
    [216]Murayama H, KatsumataT, Horiuchi O, et al. Relationship between fruit softening and cell wall polysaccharides in pears after different storage periods [J]. Postharvest Biol Technol,2002,26:15-21.
    [217]李春燕,张光伦,曾秀丽.细胞壁酶活性与甜橙果实质地的相关性研究[J].四川农业大学学报,2006,24(1):73-77.
    [218]Ali ZM, Armugam S, Lazan H. β-Galactosidase and its significance in ripening mango fruit[J]. Phytochemistry,1995,38(5):1109-1114.
    [219]陆胜民,席芳,张耀洲.梅果采后软化与细胞壁组分及其降解酶活性的变化[J].中国农业科学,2003,36(5):595-598.
    [220]P K Andrews, Li shulin. Cell wall hydrolytic enzyme activity during development of non climacteric sweet cherry (Prunus aviumL.) fruit[J].Journal of Horticultural Science,1995,70(4):561-567.
    [221]林河通,席屿芳,陈绍军.黄花梨果实采后软化生理基础[J].中国农业科学,2003,36(3):349-352.
    [222]Barrett D M, Gonzalez C. Activity of softening clizes during cherry maturation[J].J Food Sci,1994,59(3):574-577.
    [223]Abeles F B, Takeda F. Cellulase activity and ethylene in ripening strawberry and apple fruits [J]. Scientia Horticulturae,1990,42(2):269-275.
    [224]赵博,饶景萍.丙烯对柿果实采后细胞壁物质代谢和几种生理指标的影响[J].植物生理学通讯,2006,2(42):195-197.
    [225]Lacan D, Baeeou J C.Changes in lipidsand electroly teleakage during nootinetted Muskmelon ripening [J]. Amer.Soe. Hort. Sci,1996,121:554-558.
    [226]Lester G, Stein E. Plasmamembrance Physieo chemieal changes during maturation and postharvest storage of musklllelon fruit[J].AmeL Soe.Hort.Sei.,1993,118:223-227.
    [227]Ficher RL, Bennett AB. Roleof cell wall hydrolases in fruit ripening[J].Plant Physiol. PlantMol. Biol,1991,42:675-703.
    [228]李正国.果实成熟的基因调控[J].生物工程进展,2000,20(3):30-33.
    [229]阚娟,金昌海,汪志君,尤海芹.果实成熟软化机理分子生物学的研究进展[J].保鲜与加工2004,24(5):13-15.
    [230]Lashbrook CC, Gonzalez Boseh C, Bennert AB. Two divergentendo-β-1,4-glueanasegenes exhibit overlap pingex pression in ripening fujit and abseising flowers[J].Plant Cell,1994,6:1485-1493.
    [231]Tonutti P, Cass LG, Christoffersen RE.The expression of cellulasegene family Members during avocado fruit abscission and ripening [J]. Plant Cell Environment,1995,18:709-713.
    [232]Halpster MH, Lee KY, Dunsmuir P. Isolation and eharacterization of gene encoding endo-b-1,4-glueanase from pepper (Capsieum annuumL.)[J].Plant Moleeular Biology,1997,33:47-59.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700