利用嫁接技术研究不同年代大豆品种根系性状的演变
|
摘要
在作物遗传改良过程中,由于客观条件的限制,人们多对地上部分进行研究并对其主要表型性状进行选择。大豆地上部分的演变规律研究比较清楚,大量研究表明大豆的产量、植株干物质重、收获指数、叶面积随着年代的变化显著增加,荚粒数增多,平均株高下降,而对根系性状演变的研究较少。在已有的根系方法研究中,无法说明根系性状的演变是根系自身引起还是由地上部分引起。本试验以20世纪40年代以来生产上大面积种植的大豆品种为砧木,中黄39和自贡冬豆为接穗,建立并初步完善了根系贡献能力评价试验技术平台,为根系的研究提供了一种新的方法,并对不同年代大豆品种根系(即砧木)对产量的贡献能力及根系性状的演变进行评价。主要研究结果如下：
1.研究了不同年代大豆品种作为砧木时对接穗产量的影响。结果表明,盆栽试验和大田试验中不同年代大豆品种根系均可对接穗的生物产量(冠层鲜重、冠层干重、茎杆干重)产生显著影响,且冠层鲜重、冠层干重、茎杆干重随着年代的变化呈现下降的趋势,其中大田试验中冠层干重的试验结果达到显著水平,说明根系对接穗生物产量的贡献能力随着育种年代的推进逐渐下降。同时不同年代大豆品种作为砧木(根系)时对接穗经济产量及产量构成因素的影响达到显著水平,且荚数、有效荚、粒数与育成年代均呈负相关关系。以接穗生物产量和经济产量的大小为指标来评价根系对产量贡献能力的高低。对接穗籽粒产量与育成年代进行分析发现,接穗籽粒产量随着育种年代的变化呈现出下降的趋势,且接穗的经济系数随着育成年代的变化呈显著下降的趋势,说明根随着育种年代的推进根系对产量的贡献能力是逐渐下降的。
2.研究了不同年代大豆品种作为砧木时对接穗农艺性状的影响。结果表明：接穗为自贡冬豆时,盆栽试验和大田试验中不同年代大豆品种根系可对接穗的株高、节数、茎粗产生显著影响。相关分析表明,盆栽试验中株高、节数、茎粗均与育成年代负相关,仅节数差异达到显著水平r-0.27*；大田试验中株高、节数、茎粗与育成年代达到显著水平。接穗为中黄39时,接穗的株高、节数、分枝数均与育成年代的负相关。盆栽试验中分枝数与育成年代达到显著水平,大田试验中株高与育成年代之间达到显著水平。说明接穗生长发育过程中根系显著降低了株高。
3.研究了不同年代大豆品种作为砧木时对接穗籽粒化学品质的影响。结果表明：不同年代黄淮海地区大豆品种作为砧木(根系)时可以影响接穗籽粒蛋白质、脂肪的代谢积累过程。接穗籽粒蛋白质含量随着育种年代的变化呈现出显著的上升趋势,脂肪的含量择呈现出显著的下降趋势。同时接穗积累的蛋白质、脂肪重量随着年代的变化均呈现下降的趋势,这可能与根系的吸收能力随着年代变化逐渐下降有关。
4.研究了不同年代大豆品种作为砧木时对接穗生育期性状的影响。结果表明,不同年代大豆品种砧木(根系)可对接穗的生育期性状产生显著影响。相关分析表明无论大田试验还是盆栽试验接穗营养生长期(VE-R1)、全生育(VE-R7)与育成年代呈负相关,说明不同年代大豆品种做砧木时接穗的营养生长期(VE-R1)、全生育(VE-R7)的天数变短。生殖生长期(R1-R7)与育成年代正相关。早熟品种做砧木会促进接穗的发育及开花,说明砧木中存在开花促进物质。由于砧木只保留根系和子叶,子叶可能是大豆开花物质的来源。
5.研究了不同年代大豆品种根系性状的演变规律。结果表明,不同年代大豆品种作为砧木(接穗)时,根系干重随着育种年代的变化越来越重,自身嫁接处理也得到了相同的结果,说明随着育种年代的推进根系越来越发达,这是根系随年代变化逐渐发达的一个直接证据。根系干重与冠层干重、冠层鲜重、茎粗之间极显著相关。说明茎粗、冠层干重、冠层鲜重可作为判断根系是否发达的重要指标。
6.本研究创造了一个利用嫁接技术研究根系的方法,将根系作为一个“黑箱”进行整体研究,提高了根系研究的准确率。不仅丰富和优化了大豆的嫁接技术,也为更好地研究大豆根冠关系提供了技术支持和可能。
During the genetic improvement of soybean cultivars, we were used to pay attention to the agronomic trait,but not root. The results show that the yield increase was due to an increase in biomass,harvest index,leaf area,number of seed number per pod,but reduced in plant height.Root is closely related to the soybean development and yield formation. It will give some incorrect indication to evaluate the function of root by lack of high performance approach.It is difficult to separate the influence, which was caused by root or shoot,because the interaction between shoot and root. This study establishied a science platform which was used to evaluate the contribution of the root by using grafted method,which provided a new method for the root study and evaluate the contribution of soybean root and the root properties from different decades. The main results showed as follows:
1The effect of soybean root from different decades on the scion yield was studied by the pot trial and field trial. When ZGDD was used as scion,the soybean roots from different decades had significant impact on biomass of scion(shoot fresh weight、shoot dry weight、stem weight). Shoot fresh weight、shoot dry weight、stem weight decreased with year of release, shoot dry weight was in a significant negative correlation with year of release in field trial. The contribution ability of root to biomass reduced with year of release.As while as ZH39was used as scion,the soybean root from different decades has significant impact on yield components and yield. Correlation were performed based on yield components and year of release. The results showed that yield components and yield were in a significant negative correlation with year of release in field trial and pot trial. Seed weight per plant decreased with year of release. The contribution ability of root to yield reduced with year of release.
2The pot trial and field trial were carried out to research the effect of soybean cultivar root from different decades on the agronomic characters of scion. When ZGDD was used as scion,the soybean roots from different decades had significant impact on plant height、main stem node number、stem width of scion.Plant height、main stem node number、stem width were in a negative correlation with year of release in pot trial, only main stem node number was in a significant negative correlation with year of release. Plant height、main stem node number、stem width were in a significant negative correlation with year of release in field trial.As while as ZH39was used as scion, plant height main stem node number、branch number were in a negative correlation with year of release in pot trial, only branch number was in a significant negative correlation with year of release in pod trial,and plant height was in a significant negative correlation with year of release in field trial
3The field trial were carried out to research the effect of soybean cultivar from different decades on the protein content and oil content. The protein content of soybean from Yellow-Huai-Hai Rivers Valley decreased with year of release,while the oil content significantly increased. The soybean cultivar from different decades were acted stocks, the protein content of scion significantly increased with year of release,while oil content decreased.
4The effect of root on the maturity of scion was studied by the pot trial and the field trial. The results showed that the soybean roots have significant impact on days from VE to R1. Correlations were performed based on maturity traits and year of release. VE-R1and VE-R7were in a negative correlation with year of release. Days of VE-R7was became shorter.The soybean roots have significant impact on days from VE to Rl,plant height, main stem node number of the Middle-late-maturing scion. Regression analysis of VE-R1and year of release showed that soybean The days from VE toRl decreased with year of release. It showed that the floral stimuli maybe exsit in cotyledons.
5The evolution of root traits were studied by pot trial and the field trial. The results showed that the soybean cultivar from different decades have significant impact on tap root length, number of lateral root, root/shoot ratio, root dry weight. The root dry weight increased with year of release, when the soybean cultivar from different decades were used as stock(scion), the graft-self treatment showed the same result. Root dry weight has a significant positive effect on shoot fresh weight, shoot dry weight,Stem width.
6It invented a new method to research the root traits by using grafting technique.In this study, the root integer was studied as a "black box". This method improved on the root experiment. It could be used to research on the root-shoot relationship.
1.研究了不同年代大豆品种作为砧木时对接穗产量的影响。结果表明,盆栽试验和大田试验中不同年代大豆品种根系均可对接穗的生物产量(冠层鲜重、冠层干重、茎杆干重)产生显著影响,且冠层鲜重、冠层干重、茎杆干重随着年代的变化呈现下降的趋势,其中大田试验中冠层干重的试验结果达到显著水平,说明根系对接穗生物产量的贡献能力随着育种年代的推进逐渐下降。同时不同年代大豆品种作为砧木(根系)时对接穗经济产量及产量构成因素的影响达到显著水平,且荚数、有效荚、粒数与育成年代均呈负相关关系。以接穗生物产量和经济产量的大小为指标来评价根系对产量贡献能力的高低。对接穗籽粒产量与育成年代进行分析发现,接穗籽粒产量随着育种年代的变化呈现出下降的趋势,且接穗的经济系数随着育成年代的变化呈显著下降的趋势,说明根随着育种年代的推进根系对产量的贡献能力是逐渐下降的。
2.研究了不同年代大豆品种作为砧木时对接穗农艺性状的影响。结果表明：接穗为自贡冬豆时,盆栽试验和大田试验中不同年代大豆品种根系可对接穗的株高、节数、茎粗产生显著影响。相关分析表明,盆栽试验中株高、节数、茎粗均与育成年代负相关,仅节数差异达到显著水平r-0.27*；大田试验中株高、节数、茎粗与育成年代达到显著水平。接穗为中黄39时,接穗的株高、节数、分枝数均与育成年代的负相关。盆栽试验中分枝数与育成年代达到显著水平,大田试验中株高与育成年代之间达到显著水平。说明接穗生长发育过程中根系显著降低了株高。
3.研究了不同年代大豆品种作为砧木时对接穗籽粒化学品质的影响。结果表明：不同年代黄淮海地区大豆品种作为砧木(根系)时可以影响接穗籽粒蛋白质、脂肪的代谢积累过程。接穗籽粒蛋白质含量随着育种年代的变化呈现出显著的上升趋势,脂肪的含量择呈现出显著的下降趋势。同时接穗积累的蛋白质、脂肪重量随着年代的变化均呈现下降的趋势,这可能与根系的吸收能力随着年代变化逐渐下降有关。
4.研究了不同年代大豆品种作为砧木时对接穗生育期性状的影响。结果表明,不同年代大豆品种砧木(根系)可对接穗的生育期性状产生显著影响。相关分析表明无论大田试验还是盆栽试验接穗营养生长期(VE-R1)、全生育(VE-R7)与育成年代呈负相关,说明不同年代大豆品种做砧木时接穗的营养生长期(VE-R1)、全生育(VE-R7)的天数变短。生殖生长期(R1-R7)与育成年代正相关。早熟品种做砧木会促进接穗的发育及开花,说明砧木中存在开花促进物质。由于砧木只保留根系和子叶,子叶可能是大豆开花物质的来源。
5.研究了不同年代大豆品种根系性状的演变规律。结果表明,不同年代大豆品种作为砧木(接穗)时,根系干重随着育种年代的变化越来越重,自身嫁接处理也得到了相同的结果,说明随着育种年代的推进根系越来越发达,这是根系随年代变化逐渐发达的一个直接证据。根系干重与冠层干重、冠层鲜重、茎粗之间极显著相关。说明茎粗、冠层干重、冠层鲜重可作为判断根系是否发达的重要指标。
6.本研究创造了一个利用嫁接技术研究根系的方法,将根系作为一个“黑箱”进行整体研究,提高了根系研究的准确率。不仅丰富和优化了大豆的嫁接技术,也为更好地研究大豆根冠关系提供了技术支持和可能。
During the genetic improvement of soybean cultivars, we were used to pay attention to the agronomic trait,but not root. The results show that the yield increase was due to an increase in biomass,harvest index,leaf area,number of seed number per pod,but reduced in plant height.Root is closely related to the soybean development and yield formation. It will give some incorrect indication to evaluate the function of root by lack of high performance approach.It is difficult to separate the influence, which was caused by root or shoot,because the interaction between shoot and root. This study establishied a science platform which was used to evaluate the contribution of the root by using grafted method,which provided a new method for the root study and evaluate the contribution of soybean root and the root properties from different decades. The main results showed as follows:
1The effect of soybean root from different decades on the scion yield was studied by the pot trial and field trial. When ZGDD was used as scion,the soybean roots from different decades had significant impact on biomass of scion(shoot fresh weight、shoot dry weight、stem weight). Shoot fresh weight、shoot dry weight、stem weight decreased with year of release, shoot dry weight was in a significant negative correlation with year of release in field trial. The contribution ability of root to biomass reduced with year of release.As while as ZH39was used as scion,the soybean root from different decades has significant impact on yield components and yield. Correlation were performed based on yield components and year of release. The results showed that yield components and yield were in a significant negative correlation with year of release in field trial and pot trial. Seed weight per plant decreased with year of release. The contribution ability of root to yield reduced with year of release.
2The pot trial and field trial were carried out to research the effect of soybean cultivar root from different decades on the agronomic characters of scion. When ZGDD was used as scion,the soybean roots from different decades had significant impact on plant height、main stem node number、stem width of scion.Plant height、main stem node number、stem width were in a negative correlation with year of release in pot trial, only main stem node number was in a significant negative correlation with year of release. Plant height、main stem node number、stem width were in a significant negative correlation with year of release in field trial.As while as ZH39was used as scion, plant height main stem node number、branch number were in a negative correlation with year of release in pot trial, only branch number was in a significant negative correlation with year of release in pod trial,and plant height was in a significant negative correlation with year of release in field trial
3The field trial were carried out to research the effect of soybean cultivar from different decades on the protein content and oil content. The protein content of soybean from Yellow-Huai-Hai Rivers Valley decreased with year of release,while the oil content significantly increased. The soybean cultivar from different decades were acted stocks, the protein content of scion significantly increased with year of release,while oil content decreased.
4The effect of root on the maturity of scion was studied by the pot trial and the field trial. The results showed that the soybean roots have significant impact on days from VE to R1. Correlations were performed based on maturity traits and year of release. VE-R1and VE-R7were in a negative correlation with year of release. Days of VE-R7was became shorter.The soybean roots have significant impact on days from VE to Rl,plant height, main stem node number of the Middle-late-maturing scion. Regression analysis of VE-R1and year of release showed that soybean The days from VE toRl decreased with year of release. It showed that the floral stimuli maybe exsit in cotyledons.
5The evolution of root traits were studied by pot trial and the field trial. The results showed that the soybean cultivar from different decades have significant impact on tap root length, number of lateral root, root/shoot ratio, root dry weight. The root dry weight increased with year of release, when the soybean cultivar from different decades were used as stock(scion), the graft-self treatment showed the same result. Root dry weight has a significant positive effect on shoot fresh weight, shoot dry weight,Stem width.
6It invented a new method to research the root traits by using grafting technique.In this study, the root integer was studied as a "black box". This method improved on the root experiment. It could be used to research on the root-shoot relationship.
引文
[1]Hallmark W B, Barber S A. Root growth and morphology, nutrient uptake and nutrient status of early growth of soybeans as affected by soil P and K[J]. Agron J,1984,76:209-212
[2]Bienfait H F, vanden Briel W, Mesland-Mul N T. Free space iron pools in roots:generation and mobilization[J]. Plant Physiol,1985,78:596-600
[3]Somerville C, Briscoe J. Genetic engineering and water[J]. Sci.,2001,292:2217
[4]廖其兴.根系研究法评述[J].世界农业,1995,(7)：23-24
[5]Steudle E. Water transport across roots[J]. Plant Soil,1994,167:79-90
[6]王金陵.大豆根系的初步观察[J].农业学报,1955,6(3)：262-270
[7]王法宏.夏大豆根系生长规律的初步研究[J].莱阳农学院学报,1990,7(1)：24-27
[8]陈杨,李隆,张福锁.大豆和蚕豆苗期根系生长特征的比较[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(11)：2112-2116
[9]孙广玉,张荣华,黄忠文.大豆根系在土层中分布特点的研究[J].中国油料作物学报,2002,24(1)：45-47
[10]Mitchell R. L, Russell W J. Root development and rooting patterns of soybeans Glycine max (L.) Merrill evaluated under field conditions[J]. Agron J,1971,63:313-316
[11]孙广玉,何庸,张荣华,等.大豆根系生长和活性特点的研究[J].大豆科学,1996,15(4)：317-320
[12]田佩占.大豆品种根系的生态类型研究[J].作物学报,1984,10(3)：173-178
[13]王法宏,郑玉尧,王树安,等.大豆不同抗旱性品种根系性状的比较研究.Ⅰ形态特征及组织解剖结构[J].中国油料,1989,(1)：32-37
[14]Malamy J E. Intrinsic and environmental response pathways that regulate root system architecture[J]. Plant Cell Environ,2005,28:67-77
[15]Manavalan L P, Guttikonda S K, et al. Evaluation of diverse soybean germplasm for root growth and architecture[J]. Plant Soil,2010,330:503-514
[16]杨秀红,吴宗璞,张国栋.不同生育期大豆品种根系性状的比较研究[J].大豆科学,2002,21(2)：68-70
[17]杨秀红,吴宗璞,张国栋.无限结荚习性与亚有限结荚习性大豆品种根系性状的比较研究[J].大豆科学,2001,20(3)：231-332
[18]吕彩霞,郭建秋,王英,等.对大豆耐萎蔫材料PI471938根系和地上部的性状鉴定、遗传分析及QTL定位[J].作物学报,2010,36(9)：1476-1483
[19]杨秀红,吴宗璞,张国栋.对肥水条件反应不同的大豆品种根系性状的比较研究[J].中国油料作物学报,2001.23(3)：23-26
[20]金剑,王光华,刘晓冰,等.两个大豆品种在暗棕壤和黑土中的根系形态和根瘤性状[J].应用生态学报,2008,19(8)：1747-1753
[21]严小龙,廖红,戈振扬,等.植物根构型特性与磷吸收效率[J].植物学通报,1999,17(6)：511-519
[22]徐青萍,罗超云,廖红,等.大豆不同品种对磷胁迫反应的研究[J].大豆科学,2003,22(3)：108-114
[23]刘灵,廖红,王秀荣,等.不同根构型大豆对低磷的适应性变化及其与磷效率的关系[J].中国农业科学,2008,41(4)：1089-1099
[24]刘鹏,周国权,严小龙,等.低磷对大豆主根伸长生长的影响[J].植物生理学通讯,2008,44(4)：726-729
[25]Lide W, Liao H, Yan X L, et. al. Genetic variability for root hair traits as related to phosphorus status in soybean[J]. Plant Soil,2004,261:77-84
[26]Butter B R, Stone J A. Some effects of nitrate and light intensity on soybean root growth and development[J]. Plant Soil,1988,106,291-294
[27]曾秀成,王文明,罗敏娜,等.缺素培养对大豆营养生长和根系形态的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2010,16(4)：1032-1036
[28]王树起,韩晓增,乔云发,等.施氮对大豆根系形态和氮素吸收积累的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2009,17(6)：1069-1073
[29]乔云发,苗淑杰,韩晓增.氮素形态对大豆根系形态性状及释放H+的影响[J].大豆科学,2006,25(3)：265-269
[30]张含彬,任万军,杨文钰.氮肥处理下套作大豆根系建成与产量关系的研究[J].中国土壤与肥料,2007(2)：46-49
[31]张含彬,任万军,杨文钰,等.不同施氮量对套作大豆根系形态与生理特性的影响[J].作物学报,2007,33(1)：107-112
[32]Fernandez F G, Brouder S M, Volenec J, et al. Root and shoot growth, seed composition, and yield components of no-till rainfed soybean under variable potassium[J]. Plant Soil,2009, 322:125-138
[33]王敏,杨万明,杜维俊.苗期大豆根系及地上部性状与耐旱性的关系[J].大豆科学,2012.31(3)：399-405
[34]杨守萍,陈加敏,刘莹,等.大豆苗期耐旱性与根系性状的鉴定和分析[J].大豆科学,2005,24(3)：176-182
[35]刘莹,盖钧镒,吕慧能.大豆品种苗期根系性状的遗传变异及其与耐逆境胁迫的关系[J].大豆科学,2007,26(2)：127-133
[36]阮维斌,李晓鸣,王玉峰,等.分根法研究连作条件下大豆根系的生长[J].大豆科学,2001.20(3)：183-186
[37]Caba J M, Centeno M L, Fernandez B, et al. Inoculation and nitrate alter phytohormone levelsin soybean roots:differences between a supper nodulation mutant and the wild type[J]. Planta,2000, 211:98-104
[38]Balestrasse K B, Gallego S M, Benavides M P, et al. Polyamines and proline are affected by cadmium stress in nodules and roots of soybean plants[J], Plant Soil,2005,270:343-353
[39]马新明,王志强,王小纯,等.氮素形态对不同专用型小麦根系及氮素利用率影响的研究[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(4)：655-658
[40]Wang J W, Wang L J, Mao Y B, et al. Control of root cap formation by microRNA targeted auxin response factors in Arabidopsis[J]. Plant Cell,2005,17:2204-2216
[41]Casimiro I, Marchant A, Bhalerao R P, et al. Auxin transport promotes Arabidopsis lateral root initiation[J]. Plant Cell,2001,13:843-852
[42]Garcia A, Gonzalezm C. Morphological marker for the early selection of drought-tolerant rice varieties [J]. Cultivate Tropical,1997,18 (2):47-50
[43]魏道智,宁书菊,林文雄.小麦根系活力变化与叶片衰老的研究应用[J].生态学报,2004,15(9)：1565-1569
[44]王彦荣,华泽田,陈温福,等.粳稻根系与叶片早衰的关系及其对籽粒灌浆的影响[J].作物学报.2003.29(6)：892-898
[45]傅金民,董钻.大豆根系生长与产量的关系[J].大豆科学,1987,6(4)：261-279
[46]杨秀红,吴宗璞,张国栋.大豆品种根系性状与地上部性状的相关性研究[J].作物学报,2002：72-75
[47]金滢完,金光春.大豆根系的生理生化合成功能与花荚脱落关系的初步研究[J].吉林农业科学,1984(3)：43-48
[48]郑王尧,王法宏,王瑞舫,等.大豆不同抗旱性品种根系性状的比较研究,Ⅱ.生理功能[J].中国油料,1989(2)：6-9
[49]闫春娟,韩晓增,王守宇,等.水钾耦合对大豆干物质积累和产量的影响[J].大豆科学,2007,26(6)：862-867
[50]刘晓冰,王光华.根系研究的现状与展望[J].世界农业.2001(9)：4244
[51]Silberbush M., Barber S. A. Root growth, nutrient uptake and yield of soybean cultivars grown in the field[J]. Communications in soil science and plant analysis,1985,16 (1):119-127
[52]金剑,王光华,刘晓冰,等.东北黑土区高产大豆R5期根系分布特征[J].中国油料作物学报,2007,29(3)：266-271
[53]春亮,陈范骏,张福锁,等.不同氮效率玉米杂交种的根系生长、氮素吸收与产量形成[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2005,11(5)：615-619
[54]Mehetre S S, Shinde R B, Borle U M, et al. Correlation and path analysis studies of partitioning in root growth and yield characters in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) [J]. Crop Research Hisar, 1997,13(2):415-422
[55]梁泉,尹元萍,严小龙,等.不同磷水平下大豆根系性状的遗传特性分析[J].分子植物育种,2009,7(2)：321-329
[56]袁清华,年海,陈达刚,等.大豆根系性状和磷效率的遗传规律研究[J].大豆科学,2006, 25(2)：158-162
[57]金剑,刘晓冰,王光华,等.大豆生殖生长期根系形态性状与产量关系研究[J].大豆科学,2004,23(4)：253-257
[58]刘莹,盖钧镒,吕慧能.黄淮海地区大豆品种苗期根系性状的遗传变异及与耐逆境胁迫的关系[J].华北农学报.2008,23(1)：114-118
[59]Manavalan L P, Guttikonda S K, Tran L P, et al. Physiological and Molecular Approaches to Improve Drought resistance in soybean[J]. Plant cell Physiol,2009,50:1260-1276
[60]Hirasawa T, Tanaka K, Miyamoto D, et al. Effects of pre-flowering moisture deficits on dry matter production and ecophysiological characteristics in soybean plants under drought conditions during grain filling[J]. Jpn J Crop Sci,1994,63:21-730
[61]Roth U, Roepenack-Lahaye E V, Clemens S. Proteome changes in Arabidopsis thaliana roots upon exposure to Cd2+[J]. J Experi.Botany,2006,57, (15):4003-4013
[62]Danjon F, Reubens B. Assessing and analyzing 3D architecture of woody root systems, a review of methodsand applications in tree and soil stability, resource acquisition and allocation[J]. Plant Soil, 2008,303:1-34
[63]石庆华,黄英金,李木英,等.水稻根系性状与地上部的相关及根系性状的遗传研究[J].中国农业科学,1997,30(4)：61-67
[64]夏颖,姜存仓,王晓丽,等.嫁接对不同棉花基因型钾效率的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2012,20(1)：34-39
[65]李博,王春霞,张志勇,等.适用于低钾条件下棉花苗期根冠通讯研究的三种嫁接方法[J].作物学报,2009,35(2)：363-369
[66]陈小燕,王璐,王永泉,等.常规灌溉条件下嫁接和增施氮肥对温室黄瓜耗水量及水分利用效率的影响[J].应用生态学报,2008,19(12)：2656-2660
[67]姜飞,刘业霞,艾希珍,等.嫁接辣椒根际土壤微生物及酶活性与根腐病抗性的关系.中国农业科学.2010,43(16)：3367-3374
[68]周宝利,尹玉玲,李云鹏,等.嫁接茄根系分泌物与抗黄萎病的关系及其组分分析[J].生态学报,2010,30(11)：3073-3079
[69]张宇,刘世琦,张自坤,等.甜瓜中间砧对嫁接黄瓜生长和果实品质的影响[J].中国农业科学,2011,44(13)：2730-2737
[70]郑阳霞,唐海东,李焕秀,等.嫁接西瓜根、茎叶的化感效应及化感物质的鉴定[J].核农学报,2011,25(6)：1280-1285
[71]周俊国,扈惠灵.NaCl胁迫下不同砧木对嫁接黄瓜叶片氮素代谢的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2010,16(5)：1217-1223
[72]齐红岩,关小川,李岩,等.嫁接对薄皮甜瓜果皮和果肉中主要酯类、游离氨基酸及酯类合成相关酶活性的影响[J].中国农业科学,2010,43(9)：1895-1903
[73]吴凤芝,安美君.西瓜枯萎病抗性及其嫁接对根际土壤微生物数量及群落结构的影响[J].中 国农业科学,2011,44(22)：4636-4644
[74]郝俊杰,马奇祥,刘焕民,等.嫁接棉花对棉花黄萎病抗性、产量和纤维品质的影响[J].中国农业科学,2010,43(19)：3974-3980
[75]于贤昌,邢禹贤,马红,等.不同砧木与接穗对黄瓜嫁接苗抗冷性的影响[J].中国农业科学,1998,31(2)：41-47
[76]张衍鹏,于贤昌,张振贤,等.日光温室嫁接黄瓜的光合特性和保护酶活性[J].园艺学报,2004,31(1)：94-96
[77]Khah E M. Effect of grafting on growth, performance and yield of aubergine (Solanum melongena L.) in the field and greenhouse[J]. J Food, Agri. Environ,2005,3 (3&4):92-94
[78]陈贵林,乜兰春.蔬菜嫁接栽培实用技术[M].北京：金盾出版社,2005
[79]陈贵林,乜兰春,李建文,等.蔬菜嫁接育苗彩色图说[M].北京：中国农业出版社,1999
[80]贾贞,韩天富.嫁接技术在大豆生理和育种研究中的应用[J].大豆科学,2010,29(1)：136-143
[81]Borthwick H A. Parker M W. Pholoperiodic perception in Biloxi soybeans. Bot. Gaz. (Chicago), 1938,100:374-387
[82]Hamner K C. Interrelation of light and darkness in photoperiodic induction[J]. Botanical Gazette, 1940,101:658-687
[83]Shanmugasundaram S, Wang C C, Toung T S. Photoperiodic response of flowering in two-branched soybean plants[J]. Bot Gaz,1979,140 (4):4141-4147
[84]Tomasz Przepiorkowski, Steven K St Martin. The effect of grafting on the flowering of near-isogenic lines of soybean[J]. Crop Sci,2003.43(5):1760-1763
[85]Kiihl R A,. Hartwig E E, Kilen T C. Grafting as a tool in soybean breeding[J]. Crop Sci,1977, 17:181-182
[86]Cober E R, Curtis D F. Both p romoters and inhibitors affected flowering time in grafted Soybean flowering time isolines[J]. Crop Sci,2003,43(3):886-891
[87]贾贞,吴存祥,王妙,等.大豆嫁接体系中砧木或接穗保留叶片数对接穗生长发育的影响[J].作物学报,2011,37(4)：650-660
[88]Sun H, Jia Z, Cao D, et al. GmFT2a, a soybean homolog of FLOWERING LOCUST, is involved in flowering transition and maintenance[J]. PLoS ONE,2011,6:1-12
[89]Balatti P A. Pueppke S G. Cultivar-specific interactions of soybean with rhizobium fredii are regulated by the genotype of the root[J]. Plant Physiol,1990,94:1907-1909
[90]PantaloneV R, Rebetzke G J, Burton J W, et al. Soybean PI 416937 root system contributes to biomass accumulation in reciprocal grafts[J]. Agron J,1999,91:840-844
[91]Ookawa T, Nishiyama M, Ishihara K, et al. Analysis of the factorscausing differences in the leaf senescence pattern between two soybean cultivars, Enrei and Tachinagaha [J]. Plant Pro Sci,2001, 4(1):3-8
[92]Ookawa T, Tomita N, Hirasawa T. Interaction of scion and stock on leaf senescence of soybean p lants grafted atmidstem during ripening[J]. Plant Pro Sci,2005,8(1):32-37
[93]Chen H, Wang Y Q. Genetic variation in the grafting union of tomato and eggplant. American-Eurasian [J]. Agric. Environ. Sci.,20061(1):37-41
[94]Carver B F, Burton JW, Wilson R F. Graft transmissible influence on fatty acid composition of soybean seed[J]. Crop Sci.1987,27:53-56
[95]傅艳华,牛建光,王雪飞,等.大豆嫁接当代子粒脂肪含量变化规律研究简报[J].吉林农业大学学报.1991,16(增刊)：219-221
[96]孟继武,胡亚坤,郑荣儿.激光诱导优质高产大豆育种[J].激光生物学报,2001,10(3)：215-217
[97]Lambert L, Kilen T C. Insect resistance factor in soybean PI's 229358 and 227687[J]. Crop Sci, 1984,24:163-165
[98]Vuong T D, Hartman G L. Evaluation of soybean resistance to sclerotinia stem rot using reciprocal grafting [J]. Plant Dis,2003,87(2):154-158
[99]Bachman M S, Nickell C D. Use of reciprocal grafting to study brown stem rot resistance in soybean[J]. Phytopathology,1999,89(1):59-63
[100]韩天富,王金陵.大豆开花后光周期反应的研究[J].植物学报.1995,37(11)：863-869
[101]赵洪祥,徐克章,杨光宇.吉林省82年来育成大豆品种的产量和叶片部分生理特性变化及其相互关系[J].作物学报.2008,34(7)：1259-1265
[102]金剑,王光华,刘晓冰,等.1950-2006年间黑龙江省大豆品种农艺性状的演变[J].浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2008.34(3)：296-302
[103]郑洪兵,刘武仁,郑金玉,等.大豆在遗传改良过程中某些农艺性状演化的研究进展[J].吉林农业科学,2008,33(2)：13-16.
[104]王连铮,叶兴国,刘国强,等.黑龙江省及黄淮海地区大豆品种的遗传改进[J].中国油料作物学报,1998,20(4)：20-25
[105]熊冬金,赵团结,盖钧镒.中国大豆育成品种亲本分析[J].中国农业科学,2008,41(9)：2589-2598
[106]Battey N, Lyndon R. Reversion of flowering[J]. Bot Rev,1990,56:162-189
[107]韩天富,盖钧镒,王金陵,等.大豆开花逆转现象的发现[J].作物学报.1998,24：168-171
[108]Wu C, Ma Q, Yam K M, et al. In situ expression of the GmNMH7 gene is photoperiod dependent in a unique soybean(Glycine max [L] Merr.) flowering reversion system. Planta,2006, 223:725-735
[109]韩天富,王金陵.中国大豆不同生态类型开花至成熟期对光周期的反应[J].作物学报,1996,22(1)：20-26
[110]Kiyosawa S, Kiyosawa K. A study on varietal difference in flowering habits of soybean plants as followed by grafting experiments[J]. Plant Cell Physiol,1962,3:263-273
[111]Beaver J S, Nelson R L. Effect of grafting date and maturity of the stock on the flowering behavior of soybean scions[J]. SoybeanGenet Newsl,1981,8:37-40
[112]Sinclair T R, Hinson K. Soybean flowering in response to the long-juvenile trait[J]. Crop Sci, 1992,32:1242-1248
[113]吴存祥.大豆开花逆转现象的研究.2000.东北农业大学.硕士学位论文
[114]孙志强,田佩占,王继安.东北大豆品种生育期结构的初步分析[J].大豆科学,1990,9(3)：198-205
[115]叶兴国,王连铮,刘国强.黄淮海地区大豆品种遗传改进[J].大豆科学,1996,15(1)：1-10
[116]杨倩,张惠君,谢甫绨.不同来源大豆品种生育期结构与产量关系的研究[J].大豆科学,2008,27(6)：973-978
[117]李向华,常汝镇.中国春大豆品种主要性状相关及遗传潜力分析[J].大豆科学.1998.17(1)：23-30
[118]王振民,康波,邓劲华,等.吉林省不同年份主推大豆品种性状演变规律的初步分析[J].吉林农业大学学报,1993,15(4)：92-95
[119]赵颖君,徐克章,李大勇,等.吉林省大豆品种遗传改良过程中茎部性状的演变[J].中国油料作物学报,2008,30(4)：417-422
[120]叶兴国,王连铮,刘国强.黄淮海地区大豆品种遗传改进[J].大豆科学,1996,15(1)：1-10
[121]Voldeng H D, Cober E R, Hume D J R, et. al. Fifty-eight years of genetic improvement of short-season soybean cultivars in Canada[J]. Crop Sci,1997,37:428-431
[122]裴东红,田冰,谢甫绨,等.辽宁省杂交育成大豆品种主要农艺性状的遗传改进[J].大豆科学,1997,16(1)：1-5
[123]Bahrun A, Jensen C R, Asch F, et al. Drought-induced changes in xylem pH, ionic comosition, and ABA concentration act as early signals in field-grown maize[J]. J Experimental Botany,2002, 53:251-263
[124]戴俊英,鄂玉江,顾慰连.玉米根系的生长规律及其与产量关系的研究Ⅱ玉米根系与叶的相互作用及其与产量的关系[J].作物学报,1988,14(4)：310-314
[125]Liu F, Anderson M N, Jacobson S E, et al. Stomatal control and water use effi ciency of soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) during progressive soil drying[J]. Environ. Exp. Bot.2005,54:33-40
[126]陈晓远,高志红,罗远培,等.不同土壤水分冬小麦根冠关系及其对叶片水分利用效率的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2005,13(2)：134-137
[127]冯广龙,罗远培.土壤水分与冬小麦根、冠功能均衡关系的模拟研究[J].生态学报,1999,19(1)：96-103
[128]杨秀红,吴宗璞,张国栋.不同年代大豆品种根系性状演化的研究[J].中国农业科学,2001,34(3)：292295
[129]彰玉华,王金陵,孟庆喜.大豆单株蛋白质产量与蛋白质含量及产量因素的相关分析[J].中国油料,1987(4)：27-30
[130]孟祥勋.大豆不同杂交组合后代籽粒产量、蛋白质和脂肪含量间的相关分析[J].作物杂志.1991(4)：17-18
[131]薛恩玉,李文华,姜妍.黑龙江省大豆育成品种农艺性状演化趋势[J].大豆科学,2006, 25(4)：445-449
[132]邱丽娟,王金陵,孟庆喜.大豆种子发育过程中蛋白质和脂肪积累特点的研究[J].中国农业科学,1990,23(5)：28-32
[133]刘晓冰,王光华,金剑,等.大豆籽粒蛋白质与脂肪积累方式研究[J].生态农业研究.1999,7(4)：5-8
[134]周瑞莲,杨树德,赵哈林,等.发育早期变温对不同基因型大豆种子生长速率和蛋白质及脂肪含量的影响[J].中国农业科学,2008,41(11)：3580-3588
[135]Dornbos D L, Jr., Mullen R E. Soybean seed protein and oil contents and fatty acid composition adjustments by drought and temperature[J]. J Amer. Oil Chem. Soc.1992,69:228-231
[136]张海军,王英,张艳,等.东北地区大豆种质资源脂肪和蛋白质含量分析[J].大豆科学,2011,30(2)：215-219
[137]舒世珍,李福山,常汝镇.大豆主要性状演化的初步研究[J].作物学报,1986,12(4)：255-260
[138]朱贝贝,孙石,韩天富,等.中国不同地区野生大豆与栽培大豆生育期长度及结构性状的比较[J].大豆科学,2012,31(6)：894-899
[139]杨永华,盖钧镒,马育华.春夏秋播种季节条件下大豆生育期遗传的差异表现[J].中国农业科学,1994,27(3)：1-6
[140]张礼凤,徐冉,王彩洁.山东大豆品种主要农艺性状的演进[J].大豆科学,2005,23(4)：195-199
[141]孙怀亮,何军,李子惠.南阳栽培大豆生态类型及利用研究,Ⅱ南阳大豆品种更替中农艺性状演变和发展趋势[J].河南农业大学学报,1992,26(3)：273-278
[142]王占廷.河北省栽培大豆品种主要农艺性状演变的初步介析[J].大豆通报,1993,2(3)：29-30
[143]王连铮,王金陵.大豆遗传育种学[M].科学出版社.1992.北京：345
[144]Faluyi M A. Implications of selecting improved strains of soybeans for dry matter accumulation and grain yield[J]. Euphyriea,1990,50:197-201
[145]韩天富,王金陵,范彬彬,等.开花后光照长度对大豆农艺性状的影响[J].应用生态学报.1996,7(2)：169-173
[146]陈学珍,李欣,杨建宇,等.夏播大豆品种的生育期特性与农艺性状的关系分析[J].中国农学通报,2003,19(6)：64-68
[147]韩天富,盖钧镒,陈风云,等.生育期结构不同的大豆品种的光周期反应和农艺性状[J].作物学报.1998,24：550-557
[148]Khodarahmi M, Nabipour A, Zargari K. Genetic improvement of agronomic and quality traits of wheat cultivars introduced to temperate regions of Iran during 1942-2007[J]. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2010,5(9):947-954
[149]Sener O, Arslan M, Soysal Y, et al. Estimates of relative yield potential and genetic improvement of wheat cultivars in the Mediterranean region[J]. J Agric. Sci,2009,147,323-332
[150]费志宏,谢甫绨,朱洪德,等.黑龙江省早熟大豆品种主要农艺性状演变趋势[J].中国油料 作物学报,2006,28(1)：21-24
[151]王敏,杨万明,杜维俊.苗期大豆根系及地上部性状与耐旱性的关系[J].大豆科学.2012,31(3)：399-405
[152]Morrison M J, Voldeng H D, Cober E R. Agronomic Changes from 58 Years of Genetic Improvement of Short-Season Soybean Cultivars in Canada[J]. Agron. J.,2000,92:780-784
[153]Karmakar P G, Bhatnagar P S. Genetic improvement of soybean varieties released in India from 1969 to 1993[J]. Euphytica.1996,90:95-103
[154]James R W. Sixty years of improvement in publicly developed elite soybean lines[J]. Crop Sci, 2001,49:1711-1716
[155]Kumudini S, Hume D J, Chu G. Genetic improvement in short season soybeans:Ⅰ. Dry matter accumulation, partitioning, and leaf area duration [J]. Crop Sci,2001,41:391-398
[156]Brancourt-Hulmel M, Doussinault G, Lecomte C, et al. Genetic Improvement of Agronomic Traits of Winter Wheat Cultivars Released in France from 1946 to 1992[J]. Crop Sci,2003, 43:37-45
[157]Frederick J R. Seed yield and agronomic traits of old and modern soybean cultivars under irrigation and soil water-deficit [J]. Field Crop Research,1991,27:71-82
[158]Morrison M J, Voldeng H D, Cober E R. Physiological changes from 58 years of genetic improvement of shortseason soybean cultivars in Canada[J]. Agron J,1999,91:685-689
[159]马占峰,赵淑文,杨琪,等.生物产量-大豆高产育种的物质基础[J].东北农业大学学报,1995,26(2)：125-130
[160]郑洪兵,徐克章,赵洪祥.吉林省大豆品种遗传改良过程中主要农艺性状的变化[J].作物学报,2008,34(6)：1042-1050
[161]郑洪兵,徐克章,赵洪祥,等.吉林省不同年代大豆品种某些株型性状的演变[J].中国油料作物学报,2006,28(3)：276-281
[162]杨文钰,樊高琼,任万军,等.烯效唑干拌种对小麦根叶生理功能的影响[J].中国农业科学,2005,35(7)：1339-1345
[163]Ustun A, Allen F C, Burton C. English Genetic Progress in Soybean of the U. S. Midsouth[J]. Crop Sci,2001,41:993-998
[164]杜天庆,闫心柏,苗果园.不同微肥处理对大豆根系及地上部相关性的影响[J].山西农业大学学报,2006,26(2)：159-161
[165]金剑,刘晓冰,邱丽娟,等.绥农14系谱产量生理特性演化研究[J].大豆科学,2009,28(3)：426-435
[166]于小凤,李进前,田昊,等.影响粳稻品种吸氮能力的根系性状[J].中国农业科学,2011,44(21)：4358-4366
[167]雍太文,杨文钰,向达兵,等.不同种植模式对作物根系生长、产量及根际土壤微生物数量的影响[J].应用生态学报,2012,23(1)：125-132
[168]苗果园,高志强,张云亭,等.水肥对小麦根系整体影响及其与地上部相关的研究[J].作物 学报.2002,28(4)：445-450
[169]李鲁华,陈树宾,秦莉,等.不同土壤水分条件下春小麦品种根系功能效率的研究[J].中国农业科学,2002,35(7)：867-871
[170]汪强,樊小林,刘芳,等.断根和覆草旱作条件下水稻的产量效应[J].中国水稻科学,2004,18(5)：437-442
[171]石岩,位东斌,于振文.深耘断根对早地小麦花后根系衰老及产量的影响[J].应用与环境生物学报,2000,6(6)：516-519
[172]吴伟明,程式华.水稻根系育种的意义与前景[J].中国水稻科学,2005,19(2)：174-180
[173]马守臣,徐炳成,李凤民,等.根修剪对黄土早塬冬小麦根系分布、根系效率及产量形成的影响[J].生态学报,2008,28(12)：6172-6173
[174]王建康,李慧慧,张学才,等.中国作物分子设计育种[J].作物学报,2011,37(2)：191-201
[175]李卫东,张孟臣.黄淮海夏大豆及品种参数[M].北京,中国农业科学技术出版社,2006
[176]张正翼,龚万灼,杨文钰,等.套作模式下不同大豆品种(系)主要农艺性状与产量的关系[J].大豆科学,2007,26(5)：680-686
[177]慈敦伟,张礼凤,汪宝卿,等.大豆种质资源农艺性状和产量的年份间差异及其关系[J].植物遗传资源学报,2011,12(6)：872-880
[178]胡国玉,张丽亚,黄志平,等.黄淮夏大豆种质资源农艺性状的评价[J].大豆科学,2008,27(2)：215-222
[179]范冬梅,杨振,马占洲,等.多环境条件下大豆倒伏性相关形态性状的QTL分析[J].中国农业科学,2012,45(15)：3029-3039
[180]裴东红,田冰,谢甫绨,等.辽宁省杂交育成大豆品种主要农艺性状的遗传改进[J].大豆科学,1997,16(1)：1-5
[181]周瑞莲,杨树德,张萍,等.大豆杂交后代籽粒蛋白质和脂肪积累模式与亲本相异性分析[J].中国农业科学,2009,42(11)：4106-4114
[182]刘玉平,李志刚,李瑞平.不同密度与施氮水平对高油大豆产量及品质的影响[J].大豆科学,2011,30(1)：79-82
[183]闫春娟,韩晓增,宋书宏,等.水钾耦合对大豆产量及品质的影响[J].中国油料作物学报,2009,31(3)：359-364
[184]冯丽娟,朱洪德,于洪久.栽培措施对高油大豆产量及品质性状的影响[J].中国油料作物学报,2008,30(2)：206-211
[2]Bienfait H F, vanden Briel W, Mesland-Mul N T. Free space iron pools in roots:generation and mobilization[J]. Plant Physiol,1985,78:596-600
[3]Somerville C, Briscoe J. Genetic engineering and water[J]. Sci.,2001,292:2217
[4]廖其兴.根系研究法评述[J].世界农业,1995,(7)：23-24
[5]Steudle E. Water transport across roots[J]. Plant Soil,1994,167:79-90
[6]王金陵.大豆根系的初步观察[J].农业学报,1955,6(3)：262-270
[7]王法宏.夏大豆根系生长规律的初步研究[J].莱阳农学院学报,1990,7(1)：24-27
[8]陈杨,李隆,张福锁.大豆和蚕豆苗期根系生长特征的比较[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(11)：2112-2116
[9]孙广玉,张荣华,黄忠文.大豆根系在土层中分布特点的研究[J].中国油料作物学报,2002,24(1)：45-47
[10]Mitchell R. L, Russell W J. Root development and rooting patterns of soybeans Glycine max (L.) Merrill evaluated under field conditions[J]. Agron J,1971,63:313-316
[11]孙广玉,何庸,张荣华,等.大豆根系生长和活性特点的研究[J].大豆科学,1996,15(4)：317-320
[12]田佩占.大豆品种根系的生态类型研究[J].作物学报,1984,10(3)：173-178
[13]王法宏,郑玉尧,王树安,等.大豆不同抗旱性品种根系性状的比较研究.Ⅰ形态特征及组织解剖结构[J].中国油料,1989,(1)：32-37
[14]Malamy J E. Intrinsic and environmental response pathways that regulate root system architecture[J]. Plant Cell Environ,2005,28:67-77
[15]Manavalan L P, Guttikonda S K, et al. Evaluation of diverse soybean germplasm for root growth and architecture[J]. Plant Soil,2010,330:503-514
[16]杨秀红,吴宗璞,张国栋.不同生育期大豆品种根系性状的比较研究[J].大豆科学,2002,21(2)：68-70
[17]杨秀红,吴宗璞,张国栋.无限结荚习性与亚有限结荚习性大豆品种根系性状的比较研究[J].大豆科学,2001,20(3)：231-332
[18]吕彩霞,郭建秋,王英,等.对大豆耐萎蔫材料PI471938根系和地上部的性状鉴定、遗传分析及QTL定位[J].作物学报,2010,36(9)：1476-1483
[19]杨秀红,吴宗璞,张国栋.对肥水条件反应不同的大豆品种根系性状的比较研究[J].中国油料作物学报,2001.23(3)：23-26
[20]金剑,王光华,刘晓冰,等.两个大豆品种在暗棕壤和黑土中的根系形态和根瘤性状[J].应用生态学报,2008,19(8)：1747-1753
[21]严小龙,廖红,戈振扬,等.植物根构型特性与磷吸收效率[J].植物学通报,1999,17(6)：511-519
[22]徐青萍,罗超云,廖红,等.大豆不同品种对磷胁迫反应的研究[J].大豆科学,2003,22(3)：108-114
[23]刘灵,廖红,王秀荣,等.不同根构型大豆对低磷的适应性变化及其与磷效率的关系[J].中国农业科学,2008,41(4)：1089-1099
[24]刘鹏,周国权,严小龙,等.低磷对大豆主根伸长生长的影响[J].植物生理学通讯,2008,44(4)：726-729
[25]Lide W, Liao H, Yan X L, et. al. Genetic variability for root hair traits as related to phosphorus status in soybean[J]. Plant Soil,2004,261:77-84
[26]Butter B R, Stone J A. Some effects of nitrate and light intensity on soybean root growth and development[J]. Plant Soil,1988,106,291-294
[27]曾秀成,王文明,罗敏娜,等.缺素培养对大豆营养生长和根系形态的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2010,16(4)：1032-1036
[28]王树起,韩晓增,乔云发,等.施氮对大豆根系形态和氮素吸收积累的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2009,17(6)：1069-1073
[29]乔云发,苗淑杰,韩晓增.氮素形态对大豆根系形态性状及释放H+的影响[J].大豆科学,2006,25(3)：265-269
[30]张含彬,任万军,杨文钰.氮肥处理下套作大豆根系建成与产量关系的研究[J].中国土壤与肥料,2007(2)：46-49
[31]张含彬,任万军,杨文钰,等.不同施氮量对套作大豆根系形态与生理特性的影响[J].作物学报,2007,33(1)：107-112
[32]Fernandez F G, Brouder S M, Volenec J, et al. Root and shoot growth, seed composition, and yield components of no-till rainfed soybean under variable potassium[J]. Plant Soil,2009, 322:125-138
[33]王敏,杨万明,杜维俊.苗期大豆根系及地上部性状与耐旱性的关系[J].大豆科学,2012.31(3)：399-405
[34]杨守萍,陈加敏,刘莹,等.大豆苗期耐旱性与根系性状的鉴定和分析[J].大豆科学,2005,24(3)：176-182
[35]刘莹,盖钧镒,吕慧能.大豆品种苗期根系性状的遗传变异及其与耐逆境胁迫的关系[J].大豆科学,2007,26(2)：127-133
[36]阮维斌,李晓鸣,王玉峰,等.分根法研究连作条件下大豆根系的生长[J].大豆科学,2001.20(3)：183-186
[37]Caba J M, Centeno M L, Fernandez B, et al. Inoculation and nitrate alter phytohormone levelsin soybean roots:differences between a supper nodulation mutant and the wild type[J]. Planta,2000, 211:98-104
[38]Balestrasse K B, Gallego S M, Benavides M P, et al. Polyamines and proline are affected by cadmium stress in nodules and roots of soybean plants[J], Plant Soil,2005,270:343-353
[39]马新明,王志强,王小纯,等.氮素形态对不同专用型小麦根系及氮素利用率影响的研究[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(4)：655-658
[40]Wang J W, Wang L J, Mao Y B, et al. Control of root cap formation by microRNA targeted auxin response factors in Arabidopsis[J]. Plant Cell,2005,17:2204-2216
[41]Casimiro I, Marchant A, Bhalerao R P, et al. Auxin transport promotes Arabidopsis lateral root initiation[J]. Plant Cell,2001,13:843-852
[42]Garcia A, Gonzalezm C. Morphological marker for the early selection of drought-tolerant rice varieties [J]. Cultivate Tropical,1997,18 (2):47-50
[43]魏道智,宁书菊,林文雄.小麦根系活力变化与叶片衰老的研究应用[J].生态学报,2004,15(9)：1565-1569
[44]王彦荣,华泽田,陈温福,等.粳稻根系与叶片早衰的关系及其对籽粒灌浆的影响[J].作物学报.2003.29(6)：892-898
[45]傅金民,董钻.大豆根系生长与产量的关系[J].大豆科学,1987,6(4)：261-279
[46]杨秀红,吴宗璞,张国栋.大豆品种根系性状与地上部性状的相关性研究[J].作物学报,2002：72-75
[47]金滢完,金光春.大豆根系的生理生化合成功能与花荚脱落关系的初步研究[J].吉林农业科学,1984(3)：43-48
[48]郑王尧,王法宏,王瑞舫,等.大豆不同抗旱性品种根系性状的比较研究,Ⅱ.生理功能[J].中国油料,1989(2)：6-9
[49]闫春娟,韩晓增,王守宇,等.水钾耦合对大豆干物质积累和产量的影响[J].大豆科学,2007,26(6)：862-867
[50]刘晓冰,王光华.根系研究的现状与展望[J].世界农业.2001(9)：4244
[51]Silberbush M., Barber S. A. Root growth, nutrient uptake and yield of soybean cultivars grown in the field[J]. Communications in soil science and plant analysis,1985,16 (1):119-127
[52]金剑,王光华,刘晓冰,等.东北黑土区高产大豆R5期根系分布特征[J].中国油料作物学报,2007,29(3)：266-271
[53]春亮,陈范骏,张福锁,等.不同氮效率玉米杂交种的根系生长、氮素吸收与产量形成[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2005,11(5)：615-619
[54]Mehetre S S, Shinde R B, Borle U M, et al. Correlation and path analysis studies of partitioning in root growth and yield characters in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) [J]. Crop Research Hisar, 1997,13(2):415-422
[55]梁泉,尹元萍,严小龙,等.不同磷水平下大豆根系性状的遗传特性分析[J].分子植物育种,2009,7(2)：321-329
[56]袁清华,年海,陈达刚,等.大豆根系性状和磷效率的遗传规律研究[J].大豆科学,2006, 25(2)：158-162
[57]金剑,刘晓冰,王光华,等.大豆生殖生长期根系形态性状与产量关系研究[J].大豆科学,2004,23(4)：253-257
[58]刘莹,盖钧镒,吕慧能.黄淮海地区大豆品种苗期根系性状的遗传变异及与耐逆境胁迫的关系[J].华北农学报.2008,23(1)：114-118
[59]Manavalan L P, Guttikonda S K, Tran L P, et al. Physiological and Molecular Approaches to Improve Drought resistance in soybean[J]. Plant cell Physiol,2009,50:1260-1276
[60]Hirasawa T, Tanaka K, Miyamoto D, et al. Effects of pre-flowering moisture deficits on dry matter production and ecophysiological characteristics in soybean plants under drought conditions during grain filling[J]. Jpn J Crop Sci,1994,63:21-730
[61]Roth U, Roepenack-Lahaye E V, Clemens S. Proteome changes in Arabidopsis thaliana roots upon exposure to Cd2+[J]. J Experi.Botany,2006,57, (15):4003-4013
[62]Danjon F, Reubens B. Assessing and analyzing 3D architecture of woody root systems, a review of methodsand applications in tree and soil stability, resource acquisition and allocation[J]. Plant Soil, 2008,303:1-34
[63]石庆华,黄英金,李木英,等.水稻根系性状与地上部的相关及根系性状的遗传研究[J].中国农业科学,1997,30(4)：61-67
[64]夏颖,姜存仓,王晓丽,等.嫁接对不同棉花基因型钾效率的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2012,20(1)：34-39
[65]李博,王春霞,张志勇,等.适用于低钾条件下棉花苗期根冠通讯研究的三种嫁接方法[J].作物学报,2009,35(2)：363-369
[66]陈小燕,王璐,王永泉,等.常规灌溉条件下嫁接和增施氮肥对温室黄瓜耗水量及水分利用效率的影响[J].应用生态学报,2008,19(12)：2656-2660
[67]姜飞,刘业霞,艾希珍,等.嫁接辣椒根际土壤微生物及酶活性与根腐病抗性的关系.中国农业科学.2010,43(16)：3367-3374
[68]周宝利,尹玉玲,李云鹏,等.嫁接茄根系分泌物与抗黄萎病的关系及其组分分析[J].生态学报,2010,30(11)：3073-3079
[69]张宇,刘世琦,张自坤,等.甜瓜中间砧对嫁接黄瓜生长和果实品质的影响[J].中国农业科学,2011,44(13)：2730-2737
[70]郑阳霞,唐海东,李焕秀,等.嫁接西瓜根、茎叶的化感效应及化感物质的鉴定[J].核农学报,2011,25(6)：1280-1285
[71]周俊国,扈惠灵.NaCl胁迫下不同砧木对嫁接黄瓜叶片氮素代谢的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2010,16(5)：1217-1223
[72]齐红岩,关小川,李岩,等.嫁接对薄皮甜瓜果皮和果肉中主要酯类、游离氨基酸及酯类合成相关酶活性的影响[J].中国农业科学,2010,43(9)：1895-1903
[73]吴凤芝,安美君.西瓜枯萎病抗性及其嫁接对根际土壤微生物数量及群落结构的影响[J].中 国农业科学,2011,44(22)：4636-4644
[74]郝俊杰,马奇祥,刘焕民,等.嫁接棉花对棉花黄萎病抗性、产量和纤维品质的影响[J].中国农业科学,2010,43(19)：3974-3980
[75]于贤昌,邢禹贤,马红,等.不同砧木与接穗对黄瓜嫁接苗抗冷性的影响[J].中国农业科学,1998,31(2)：41-47
[76]张衍鹏,于贤昌,张振贤,等.日光温室嫁接黄瓜的光合特性和保护酶活性[J].园艺学报,2004,31(1)：94-96
[77]Khah E M. Effect of grafting on growth, performance and yield of aubergine (Solanum melongena L.) in the field and greenhouse[J]. J Food, Agri. Environ,2005,3 (3&4):92-94
[78]陈贵林,乜兰春.蔬菜嫁接栽培实用技术[M].北京：金盾出版社,2005
[79]陈贵林,乜兰春,李建文,等.蔬菜嫁接育苗彩色图说[M].北京：中国农业出版社,1999
[80]贾贞,韩天富.嫁接技术在大豆生理和育种研究中的应用[J].大豆科学,2010,29(1)：136-143
[81]Borthwick H A. Parker M W. Pholoperiodic perception in Biloxi soybeans. Bot. Gaz. (Chicago), 1938,100:374-387
[82]Hamner K C. Interrelation of light and darkness in photoperiodic induction[J]. Botanical Gazette, 1940,101:658-687
[83]Shanmugasundaram S, Wang C C, Toung T S. Photoperiodic response of flowering in two-branched soybean plants[J]. Bot Gaz,1979,140 (4):4141-4147
[84]Tomasz Przepiorkowski, Steven K St Martin. The effect of grafting on the flowering of near-isogenic lines of soybean[J]. Crop Sci,2003.43(5):1760-1763
[85]Kiihl R A,. Hartwig E E, Kilen T C. Grafting as a tool in soybean breeding[J]. Crop Sci,1977, 17:181-182
[86]Cober E R, Curtis D F. Both p romoters and inhibitors affected flowering time in grafted Soybean flowering time isolines[J]. Crop Sci,2003,43(3):886-891
[87]贾贞,吴存祥,王妙,等.大豆嫁接体系中砧木或接穗保留叶片数对接穗生长发育的影响[J].作物学报,2011,37(4)：650-660
[88]Sun H, Jia Z, Cao D, et al. GmFT2a, a soybean homolog of FLOWERING LOCUST, is involved in flowering transition and maintenance[J]. PLoS ONE,2011,6:1-12
[89]Balatti P A. Pueppke S G. Cultivar-specific interactions of soybean with rhizobium fredii are regulated by the genotype of the root[J]. Plant Physiol,1990,94:1907-1909
[90]PantaloneV R, Rebetzke G J, Burton J W, et al. Soybean PI 416937 root system contributes to biomass accumulation in reciprocal grafts[J]. Agron J,1999,91:840-844
[91]Ookawa T, Nishiyama M, Ishihara K, et al. Analysis of the factorscausing differences in the leaf senescence pattern between two soybean cultivars, Enrei and Tachinagaha [J]. Plant Pro Sci,2001, 4(1):3-8
[92]Ookawa T, Tomita N, Hirasawa T. Interaction of scion and stock on leaf senescence of soybean p lants grafted atmidstem during ripening[J]. Plant Pro Sci,2005,8(1):32-37
[93]Chen H, Wang Y Q. Genetic variation in the grafting union of tomato and eggplant. American-Eurasian [J]. Agric. Environ. Sci.,20061(1):37-41
[94]Carver B F, Burton JW, Wilson R F. Graft transmissible influence on fatty acid composition of soybean seed[J]. Crop Sci.1987,27:53-56
[95]傅艳华,牛建光,王雪飞,等.大豆嫁接当代子粒脂肪含量变化规律研究简报[J].吉林农业大学学报.1991,16(增刊)：219-221
[96]孟继武,胡亚坤,郑荣儿.激光诱导优质高产大豆育种[J].激光生物学报,2001,10(3)：215-217
[97]Lambert L, Kilen T C. Insect resistance factor in soybean PI's 229358 and 227687[J]. Crop Sci, 1984,24:163-165
[98]Vuong T D, Hartman G L. Evaluation of soybean resistance to sclerotinia stem rot using reciprocal grafting [J]. Plant Dis,2003,87(2):154-158
[99]Bachman M S, Nickell C D. Use of reciprocal grafting to study brown stem rot resistance in soybean[J]. Phytopathology,1999,89(1):59-63
[100]韩天富,王金陵.大豆开花后光周期反应的研究[J].植物学报.1995,37(11)：863-869
[101]赵洪祥,徐克章,杨光宇.吉林省82年来育成大豆品种的产量和叶片部分生理特性变化及其相互关系[J].作物学报.2008,34(7)：1259-1265
[102]金剑,王光华,刘晓冰,等.1950-2006年间黑龙江省大豆品种农艺性状的演变[J].浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2008.34(3)：296-302
[103]郑洪兵,刘武仁,郑金玉,等.大豆在遗传改良过程中某些农艺性状演化的研究进展[J].吉林农业科学,2008,33(2)：13-16.
[104]王连铮,叶兴国,刘国强,等.黑龙江省及黄淮海地区大豆品种的遗传改进[J].中国油料作物学报,1998,20(4)：20-25
[105]熊冬金,赵团结,盖钧镒.中国大豆育成品种亲本分析[J].中国农业科学,2008,41(9)：2589-2598
[106]Battey N, Lyndon R. Reversion of flowering[J]. Bot Rev,1990,56:162-189
[107]韩天富,盖钧镒,王金陵,等.大豆开花逆转现象的发现[J].作物学报.1998,24：168-171
[108]Wu C, Ma Q, Yam K M, et al. In situ expression of the GmNMH7 gene is photoperiod dependent in a unique soybean(Glycine max [L] Merr.) flowering reversion system. Planta,2006, 223:725-735
[109]韩天富,王金陵.中国大豆不同生态类型开花至成熟期对光周期的反应[J].作物学报,1996,22(1)：20-26
[110]Kiyosawa S, Kiyosawa K. A study on varietal difference in flowering habits of soybean plants as followed by grafting experiments[J]. Plant Cell Physiol,1962,3:263-273
[111]Beaver J S, Nelson R L. Effect of grafting date and maturity of the stock on the flowering behavior of soybean scions[J]. SoybeanGenet Newsl,1981,8:37-40
[112]Sinclair T R, Hinson K. Soybean flowering in response to the long-juvenile trait[J]. Crop Sci, 1992,32:1242-1248
[113]吴存祥.大豆开花逆转现象的研究.2000.东北农业大学.硕士学位论文
[114]孙志强,田佩占,王继安.东北大豆品种生育期结构的初步分析[J].大豆科学,1990,9(3)：198-205
[115]叶兴国,王连铮,刘国强.黄淮海地区大豆品种遗传改进[J].大豆科学,1996,15(1)：1-10
[116]杨倩,张惠君,谢甫绨.不同来源大豆品种生育期结构与产量关系的研究[J].大豆科学,2008,27(6)：973-978
[117]李向华,常汝镇.中国春大豆品种主要性状相关及遗传潜力分析[J].大豆科学.1998.17(1)：23-30
[118]王振民,康波,邓劲华,等.吉林省不同年份主推大豆品种性状演变规律的初步分析[J].吉林农业大学学报,1993,15(4)：92-95
[119]赵颖君,徐克章,李大勇,等.吉林省大豆品种遗传改良过程中茎部性状的演变[J].中国油料作物学报,2008,30(4)：417-422
[120]叶兴国,王连铮,刘国强.黄淮海地区大豆品种遗传改进[J].大豆科学,1996,15(1)：1-10
[121]Voldeng H D, Cober E R, Hume D J R, et. al. Fifty-eight years of genetic improvement of short-season soybean cultivars in Canada[J]. Crop Sci,1997,37:428-431
[122]裴东红,田冰,谢甫绨,等.辽宁省杂交育成大豆品种主要农艺性状的遗传改进[J].大豆科学,1997,16(1)：1-5
[123]Bahrun A, Jensen C R, Asch F, et al. Drought-induced changes in xylem pH, ionic comosition, and ABA concentration act as early signals in field-grown maize[J]. J Experimental Botany,2002, 53:251-263
[124]戴俊英,鄂玉江,顾慰连.玉米根系的生长规律及其与产量关系的研究Ⅱ玉米根系与叶的相互作用及其与产量的关系[J].作物学报,1988,14(4)：310-314
[125]Liu F, Anderson M N, Jacobson S E, et al. Stomatal control and water use effi ciency of soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) during progressive soil drying[J]. Environ. Exp. Bot.2005,54:33-40
[126]陈晓远,高志红,罗远培,等.不同土壤水分冬小麦根冠关系及其对叶片水分利用效率的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2005,13(2)：134-137
[127]冯广龙,罗远培.土壤水分与冬小麦根、冠功能均衡关系的模拟研究[J].生态学报,1999,19(1)：96-103
[128]杨秀红,吴宗璞,张国栋.不同年代大豆品种根系性状演化的研究[J].中国农业科学,2001,34(3)：292295
[129]彰玉华,王金陵,孟庆喜.大豆单株蛋白质产量与蛋白质含量及产量因素的相关分析[J].中国油料,1987(4)：27-30
[130]孟祥勋.大豆不同杂交组合后代籽粒产量、蛋白质和脂肪含量间的相关分析[J].作物杂志.1991(4)：17-18
[131]薛恩玉,李文华,姜妍.黑龙江省大豆育成品种农艺性状演化趋势[J].大豆科学,2006, 25(4)：445-449
[132]邱丽娟,王金陵,孟庆喜.大豆种子发育过程中蛋白质和脂肪积累特点的研究[J].中国农业科学,1990,23(5)：28-32
[133]刘晓冰,王光华,金剑,等.大豆籽粒蛋白质与脂肪积累方式研究[J].生态农业研究.1999,7(4)：5-8
[134]周瑞莲,杨树德,赵哈林,等.发育早期变温对不同基因型大豆种子生长速率和蛋白质及脂肪含量的影响[J].中国农业科学,2008,41(11)：3580-3588
[135]Dornbos D L, Jr., Mullen R E. Soybean seed protein and oil contents and fatty acid composition adjustments by drought and temperature[J]. J Amer. Oil Chem. Soc.1992,69:228-231
[136]张海军,王英,张艳,等.东北地区大豆种质资源脂肪和蛋白质含量分析[J].大豆科学,2011,30(2)：215-219
[137]舒世珍,李福山,常汝镇.大豆主要性状演化的初步研究[J].作物学报,1986,12(4)：255-260
[138]朱贝贝,孙石,韩天富,等.中国不同地区野生大豆与栽培大豆生育期长度及结构性状的比较[J].大豆科学,2012,31(6)：894-899
[139]杨永华,盖钧镒,马育华.春夏秋播种季节条件下大豆生育期遗传的差异表现[J].中国农业科学,1994,27(3)：1-6
[140]张礼凤,徐冉,王彩洁.山东大豆品种主要农艺性状的演进[J].大豆科学,2005,23(4)：195-199
[141]孙怀亮,何军,李子惠.南阳栽培大豆生态类型及利用研究,Ⅱ南阳大豆品种更替中农艺性状演变和发展趋势[J].河南农业大学学报,1992,26(3)：273-278
[142]王占廷.河北省栽培大豆品种主要农艺性状演变的初步介析[J].大豆通报,1993,2(3)：29-30
[143]王连铮,王金陵.大豆遗传育种学[M].科学出版社.1992.北京：345
[144]Faluyi M A. Implications of selecting improved strains of soybeans for dry matter accumulation and grain yield[J]. Euphyriea,1990,50:197-201
[145]韩天富,王金陵,范彬彬,等.开花后光照长度对大豆农艺性状的影响[J].应用生态学报.1996,7(2)：169-173
[146]陈学珍,李欣,杨建宇,等.夏播大豆品种的生育期特性与农艺性状的关系分析[J].中国农学通报,2003,19(6)：64-68
[147]韩天富,盖钧镒,陈风云,等.生育期结构不同的大豆品种的光周期反应和农艺性状[J].作物学报.1998,24：550-557
[148]Khodarahmi M, Nabipour A, Zargari K. Genetic improvement of agronomic and quality traits of wheat cultivars introduced to temperate regions of Iran during 1942-2007[J]. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2010,5(9):947-954
[149]Sener O, Arslan M, Soysal Y, et al. Estimates of relative yield potential and genetic improvement of wheat cultivars in the Mediterranean region[J]. J Agric. Sci,2009,147,323-332
[150]费志宏,谢甫绨,朱洪德,等.黑龙江省早熟大豆品种主要农艺性状演变趋势[J].中国油料 作物学报,2006,28(1)：21-24
[151]王敏,杨万明,杜维俊.苗期大豆根系及地上部性状与耐旱性的关系[J].大豆科学.2012,31(3)：399-405
[152]Morrison M J, Voldeng H D, Cober E R. Agronomic Changes from 58 Years of Genetic Improvement of Short-Season Soybean Cultivars in Canada[J]. Agron. J.,2000,92:780-784
[153]Karmakar P G, Bhatnagar P S. Genetic improvement of soybean varieties released in India from 1969 to 1993[J]. Euphytica.1996,90:95-103
[154]James R W. Sixty years of improvement in publicly developed elite soybean lines[J]. Crop Sci, 2001,49:1711-1716
[155]Kumudini S, Hume D J, Chu G. Genetic improvement in short season soybeans:Ⅰ. Dry matter accumulation, partitioning, and leaf area duration [J]. Crop Sci,2001,41:391-398
[156]Brancourt-Hulmel M, Doussinault G, Lecomte C, et al. Genetic Improvement of Agronomic Traits of Winter Wheat Cultivars Released in France from 1946 to 1992[J]. Crop Sci,2003, 43:37-45
[157]Frederick J R. Seed yield and agronomic traits of old and modern soybean cultivars under irrigation and soil water-deficit [J]. Field Crop Research,1991,27:71-82
[158]Morrison M J, Voldeng H D, Cober E R. Physiological changes from 58 years of genetic improvement of shortseason soybean cultivars in Canada[J]. Agron J,1999,91:685-689
[159]马占峰,赵淑文,杨琪,等.生物产量-大豆高产育种的物质基础[J].东北农业大学学报,1995,26(2)：125-130
[160]郑洪兵,徐克章,赵洪祥.吉林省大豆品种遗传改良过程中主要农艺性状的变化[J].作物学报,2008,34(6)：1042-1050
[161]郑洪兵,徐克章,赵洪祥,等.吉林省不同年代大豆品种某些株型性状的演变[J].中国油料作物学报,2006,28(3)：276-281
[162]杨文钰,樊高琼,任万军,等.烯效唑干拌种对小麦根叶生理功能的影响[J].中国农业科学,2005,35(7)：1339-1345
[163]Ustun A, Allen F C, Burton C. English Genetic Progress in Soybean of the U. S. Midsouth[J]. Crop Sci,2001,41:993-998
[164]杜天庆,闫心柏,苗果园.不同微肥处理对大豆根系及地上部相关性的影响[J].山西农业大学学报,2006,26(2)：159-161
[165]金剑,刘晓冰,邱丽娟,等.绥农14系谱产量生理特性演化研究[J].大豆科学,2009,28(3)：426-435
[166]于小凤,李进前,田昊,等.影响粳稻品种吸氮能力的根系性状[J].中国农业科学,2011,44(21)：4358-4366
[167]雍太文,杨文钰,向达兵,等.不同种植模式对作物根系生长、产量及根际土壤微生物数量的影响[J].应用生态学报,2012,23(1)：125-132
[168]苗果园,高志强,张云亭,等.水肥对小麦根系整体影响及其与地上部相关的研究[J].作物 学报.2002,28(4)：445-450
[169]李鲁华,陈树宾,秦莉,等.不同土壤水分条件下春小麦品种根系功能效率的研究[J].中国农业科学,2002,35(7)：867-871
[170]汪强,樊小林,刘芳,等.断根和覆草旱作条件下水稻的产量效应[J].中国水稻科学,2004,18(5)：437-442
[171]石岩,位东斌,于振文.深耘断根对早地小麦花后根系衰老及产量的影响[J].应用与环境生物学报,2000,6(6)：516-519
[172]吴伟明,程式华.水稻根系育种的意义与前景[J].中国水稻科学,2005,19(2)：174-180
[173]马守臣,徐炳成,李凤民,等.根修剪对黄土早塬冬小麦根系分布、根系效率及产量形成的影响[J].生态学报,2008,28(12)：6172-6173
[174]王建康,李慧慧,张学才,等.中国作物分子设计育种[J].作物学报,2011,37(2)：191-201
[175]李卫东,张孟臣.黄淮海夏大豆及品种参数[M].北京,中国农业科学技术出版社,2006
[176]张正翼,龚万灼,杨文钰,等.套作模式下不同大豆品种(系)主要农艺性状与产量的关系[J].大豆科学,2007,26(5)：680-686
[177]慈敦伟,张礼凤,汪宝卿,等.大豆种质资源农艺性状和产量的年份间差异及其关系[J].植物遗传资源学报,2011,12(6)：872-880
[178]胡国玉,张丽亚,黄志平,等.黄淮夏大豆种质资源农艺性状的评价[J].大豆科学,2008,27(2)：215-222
[179]范冬梅,杨振,马占洲,等.多环境条件下大豆倒伏性相关形态性状的QTL分析[J].中国农业科学,2012,45(15)：3029-3039
[180]裴东红,田冰,谢甫绨,等.辽宁省杂交育成大豆品种主要农艺性状的遗传改进[J].大豆科学,1997,16(1)：1-5
[181]周瑞莲,杨树德,张萍,等.大豆杂交后代籽粒蛋白质和脂肪积累模式与亲本相异性分析[J].中国农业科学,2009,42(11)：4106-4114
[182]刘玉平,李志刚,李瑞平.不同密度与施氮水平对高油大豆产量及品质的影响[J].大豆科学,2011,30(1)：79-82
[183]闫春娟,韩晓增,宋书宏,等.水钾耦合对大豆产量及品质的影响[J].中国油料作物学报,2009,31(3)：359-364
[184]冯丽娟,朱洪德,于洪久.栽培措施对高油大豆产量及品质性状的影响[J].中国油料作物学报,2008,30(2)：206-211
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |