用户名: 密码: 验证码:
竖井地基轴对称固结解析理论研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
排水固结法是一种经济有效的软土地基加固方法,获得了广泛的应用,在地基中设置竖井是加快固结的重要手段。经过几十年的发展,竖井地基固结理论研究已经取得了非常丰富的成果,但仍然有很多不完善的地方,与工程实际仍有一定的差距。为了进一步完善竖井地基固结理论,在前人研究成果基础上,本文对未打穿砂井地基,成层砂井地基,变荷载下的砂井地基,还有真空联合堆载预压竖井地基以及非线性砂井地基固结问题进行了一些有用的研究。主要具体工作和成果如下:
     (1)就单面排水和双面排水情况下,考虑了涂抹区土体水平渗透系数不变、呈线性变化和呈抛物线变化3种模式,并采用虚拟井法考虑了下卧层土体的三维渗流,给出了未打穿砂井地基固结解析解,编制了计算程序,分析了地基的固结性状。结果表明,考虑扰动区水平渗透系数呈抛物线变化时固结最快,呈线性变化时次之,不变时固结最慢;并且扰动范围越大,扰动区土体受扰动程度越大,砂井打入地基深度越大,不同模式对固结度的影响越大;
     (2)对成层砂井地基,就单面排水和双面排水情况下,考虑了涂抹区土体水平渗透系数3种模式,分别给出了解析解,编制了计算程序,分析了双层砂井地基的固结性状。结果表明,只有在各层土的压缩模量相同时,成层砂井地基按孔压定义的固结度才等于按变形定义的固结度,否则前者大于后者;当涂抹区水平渗透系数呈抛物线变化时地基固结最快,呈线性变化时次之,不变时最慢;增大任何一层土的压缩系数,均可加快整个地基中的孔压消散。
     (3)研究了随时间任意变化荷载作用下砂井地基固结问题。首先推导出考虑涂抹效应、井阻作用、土体内径竖向组合渗流、变荷载以及涂抹区水平渗透系数线性连续变化等因素的解析解。然后将上部荷载进行傅里叶变换转化为三角级数的形式,即将复杂荷载分解为很多简单的正余弦函数之和,通过简单荷载作用下响应的叠加得到原复杂荷载作用下的响应,由此得到了一种便于工程应用的简单方法。编制了计算程序,与传统解析解进行了对比,验证了该方法的合理性。分析了几种荷载模式下砂井地基的固结性状,包括多级线性加载、三角形循环荷载、矩形循环荷载等一般模式,并通过用多段直线段逼近曲线的方法,分析了抛物线形循环荷载作用下地基的固结特性。
     (4)通过引入土体孔隙比和有效应力以及孔隙比和渗透系数的对数关系,考虑了土体固结过程中压缩模量随孔隙比的减小而增大和渗透系数随孔隙比的减小而减小的特点,并考虑地基的径竖向组合渗流及水平渗透系数的3种模式,给出了一种竖井地基非线性固结解析解,并对竖井地基的非线性固结性状进行了分析。结果表明:考虑横竖向组合渗流比仅考虑径向渗流时固结快,井径比越小,水平渗透系数与竖向渗透系数之比越小,二者差距越大;考虑非线性时按应力和按变形定义的两种固结度不相等,并且按应力定义的固结度一般小于按变形定义的固结度;当压缩指数大于渗透指数时,不考虑土体的非线性得到的固结度比真实值大,当压缩指数小于渗透指数时,不考虑土体的非线性得到的固结度会比真实值小。
     (5)考虑真空度沿竖井的发展是一个深度的函数,同时考虑堆载所引起的附加应力既随时间变化也随深度变化,还考虑了地基的径竖向渗流以及扰动区土体水平渗透系数的3种变化模式,推导了真空联合堆载预压下竖井地基固结度的一个较普遍的解析解。并分析了在真空度沿竖井线性下降,堆载线性施加和附加应力沿深度梯形分布等情况下的地基固结性状。结果表明,在荷载瞬时施加时,无论是否采用真空预压,真空度或大或小,其沿深度的衰减速度或快或慢,固结度始终不变。而荷载逐渐施加时,采用真空联合堆载预压比只采用堆载预压固结要快,真空度越大,沿深度衰减越慢,固结越快。在地基井径比和水平渗透系数与竖向渗透系数之比较小时,地基的竖向渗流对地基的固结度有较大的影响。
Drainage preloading has been found a economical and efficient method for ground improvement and widely used. Vertical drains are usually used to accelerate the consolidation process of soft clay. After several years of development, great deals of findings have been made to the consolidation theory of vertical drains foundation, but still there are many imperfections, and there is still a gap with the actually engineering. In order to further improve the consolidation theory of vertical drains foundation, based on the results of previous research, some useful studies are made on the consolidation of partially penetrated vertical drains foundation, multi-layered vertical drains foundation, vertical drains foundation under general time-dependent loading, vertical drains foundation with the non-linear soil and vacuum preloading vertical drains foundation. The main specific work and achievements are as follows:
     1. The consolidation of soft soil with partially penetrated vertical drains under single-drainage condition and double-drainage condition was studied. Vertical and radial seepage of soils under sand drains was considered through setting suppositional sand drains. Meanwhile, in order to consider the fact that the larger the distance from sand drain is, the lighter the disturbance of construction is, the horizontal permeability of soils was expressed in unified way through introducing a function. Three types of variation patterns of the horizontal permeability of soil in the disturbed soil zone were considered, including the constant distribution pattern, the linear distribution pattern and the parabolic distribution pattern, and an analytical solution was obtained. Corresponding computer program was developed and several problems that should pay attention to during the process of programming were expatiated, then the consolidation behavior of partially penetrated sand drains foundation was investigated. The results show that consolidation is the fastest if the parabolic distribution pattern was considered, the consolidation is slower if the linear distribution pattern was considered, the slowest if the constant distribution was considered; and that the larger the disturbance zone is, the slower the consolidation is, the greater the disturbance is, the slower the consolidation is; the deeper the sand drains penetrated, the faster the consolidation is; the larger the permeability coefficient of sand drains is, the faster the consolidation is.
     2. The consolidation of multi-layered sand drains foundation under single-drainage condition and double-drainage condition was analyzed. Three types of variation patterns of the horizontal permeability of soil in the smear zone were considered, and an analytical solution was obtained. Corresponding computer program was developed and the consolidation behavior of double-layered sand drains foundation was investigated. The results show that the overall average degrees of consolidation of foundation in terms of pore pressure is equal to that in terms of strain only if compression modulus of every layer is equal to each other, otherwise the former is always larger than the later; the consolidation rate is at its maximum for the parabolic distribution pattern and is at its minimum for the constant distribution pattern whereas the one for the linear distribution pattern is in the middle. Increasing compression modulus of any layer could accelerate the dissipation of pore pressure.
     3. The consolidation behavior of soils with vertical drains subjected to a general time-dependent loading was studied in this paper. Firstly, an analytical solution was obtained accounting for the effects of soil smear, drain hydraulic resistance, coupled flows in the radial and vertical directions within the surrounding soil, time-dependent loading and the linear distribution of the horizontal permeability of soils in the disturbed soils zone. Then, the time-dependent loading was transferred to trigonometric series by the technique of Fourier Transform. By this method, the complex loading can be transformed into the sum of a series of sine and cosine function. Then the response of the complex loading was obtained by superimposing the responses of these relatively simple ones. A simple-to-use method was proposed according to this method. Consequently, a calculation computer program was developed and a comparison with a theoretical method is shown to assess the accuracy of the proposed method. Finally, the consolidation behavior of sand drains foundation under several conventional types of time-dependent loading was investigated, including multi-ramp loading, triangular cyclic loading and trapezium cyclic loading. Moreover, the consolidation behavior of sand drains foundation under parabolic cyclic loading was investigated by means of piecewise-linear approximation method.
     4. The characteristics of the nonlinear increase in the soil's compressive modulus and the non-linear decrease in the soil's permeability during consolidation are considered. Based on the non-linear characteristics of soil, an analytical solution for the consolidation of composite ground is developed. Then the non-linear consolidation behavior of vertical drains ground is analyzed and the results show that ADC in terms of stress is not equal to that in terms of deformation and furthermore the latter is always greater than the former. When the soil's compressive indices is less than the permeability indices, ignoring the soil's non-linearity will under-estimate the consolidation rate; however, when the soil's compressive indices is greater than the permeability indices, the reverse is true:ignoring the non-linearity will over-estimate the consolidation rate.
     5. A general analytical solution is obtained for the consolidation of vertical sand foundation under vacuum preloading considering simultaneously the variation of vacuum degree, the coupled variation of stress increment with depth and time together, both horizontal and vertical drainage, and the variation of horizontal permeability coefficient of soil. Furthermore, detailed solutions are obtained for excess pore water pressure and average degree of consolidation under the particular situation that the vacuum degree is linearly changed along the vertical drain depth, the stress increment is linearly changed along the column depth and the loading is applied in a single-stage way. Finally, the consolidation behavior of vertical drain foundation is analyzed. The results show that:If the loading is applied instantaneously, consolidation degrees of foundation have nothing to do with vacuum degree. If the loading is applied gradually, the larger the vacuum is, the faster the consolidation is, the slower the reducing of vacuum is, the faster the consolidation. Ignoring the vertical flow within the soil will under-estimate the consolidation rate. Furthermore, the less the radius ratio is, and the less the ratio of horizontal permeability to vertical permeability is, the greater the under-estimated value is.
引文
[1]Alamgir M, Miura N, Poorooshasb H B, and Madhav M R. Deformation analysis of soft ground reinforced by columnar inclusions. Computers and Geotechnics,1996,18(4):267-290.
    [2]Barron R.A. Consolidation of fine grained soil by drains wells. Transactions of ASCE,1948,113: 718-742.
    [3]Balaam N P, and Booker J R. Analysis of rigid rafts supported by granular piles. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics,1981,5:379-403.
    [4]Balaam N P, and Booker J R. Effect of stone column yield on settlement of rigid foundations in stabilized clay. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics,1985,9:331-351.
    [5]Basak P. Consolidation by sand drains in initial gradient soils. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division,1977,103(11):1327-1333.
    [6]Basak P, and Madhav R. Analytical solutions of sand drain problems. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division,1978,104(1):129-135.
    [7]Basu D, and Prezzi M. Effect of the smear and transition zones around PVD installed in a triangular pattern on the rate of soil consolidation. International Journal of Geomechanics,2007,7(1):34-43.
    [8]Bergado D T, Asakami H, Alfaro M C, and Balasubramaniam A S. Smear effects of vertical drains on soft Bangkok clay. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,1991,117(10):1509-1530.
    [9]Berry P L, and Wilkison W B. The radial consolidation of clay soils. Geotechnique,1969,19(2):253-284.
    [10]Boit M. General theory of three-dimensional consolidation. Journal of Applied Physics,1941, 12:155-164.
    [11]Carrillo N. Simple two and three dimensional cases in the theory of consolidation of soils. Journal of Mathematical Physics,1942,21(1):1-5.
    [12]Castro J, and Sagaseta C. Consolidation around stone columns. Influence of column deformation. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics,2009,33(7):851-877.
    [13]Chai J C, Cater J P, and Hayashi S. Ground deformation induced by vacuum consolidation. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,2005,131(12):1552-1561.
    [14]Chai J C, Miura N, Sakajo S, and Bergado D T. Behavior of vertical drain improved subsoil under embankment loading. Soils and Foundations,1995,35(4):49-61.
    [15]Chai J C, and Miura N. Investigation of factors affecting vertical drain behavior. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering.1999,125(3):216-226.
    [16]Chai J C, Shen S L, Miura N, and Bergado D T. Simple method of modeling PVD improved subsoil. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,2001,127(11):965-972.
    [17]Chai J C, Cater J P, and Hayashi S. Vacuum consolidation and its combination with embankment loading. Canadian Geotechnical Journal,2006,43:985-996.
    [18]Chu J, Yan S W, and Yang H. Soil improvement by the vacuum preloading method for an oil storage station. Geotechnique,2000,50(6):625-632.
    [19]Chu J, Goi M H, and Lim T T. Consolidation of cement-treated sewage sludge using vertical drains. Canadian Geotechnical Journal,2005,42:528-540.
    [20]Davis F H, and Raymond G P. A non-linear theory of consolidation. Geotechnique,1965,15(2):161-173.
    [21]Fang Z, and Yin J H. Physical modeling of consolidation of Hong Kong marine clay with prefabricated vertical drains. Canadian Geotechnical Journal,2006,43:638-652.
    [22]Hansbo S. Consolidation of fine-grained soils by prefabricated drains. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundations Engineering, Stockholm, Sweden,1981, vol.3, pp.677-682.
    [23]Hart E. G., Kindner R. L., Boyer W. C. Analysis for partially penetrating sand drains[J]. Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, ASCE,1958,84(SM4):1-15.
    [24]Hawlader B C, Imai G, and Muhunthan B. Numerical study of the factors affecting the consolidation of clay with vertical drains. Geotextiles and Geomembranes.2002,20 (4):213-239.
    [25]Hird C C, Pyrah I C, and Russell D. Finite element modeling of vertical drains beneath embankments on soft ground. Geotechnique,1992,42(3):499-511.
    [26]Hird C C, Pyrah I C, Russell D, and Cinicioglu F. Modeling the effect of vertical drains in two-dimensional finite element analyses of embankments on soft round. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1995,32:795-807.
    [27]Hird C C, and Moseley V J. Modeling study of seepage in smear zones around vertical drains in layered soil. Geotechnique,2000,50(1):89-97.
    [28]Hird C C, and Sangtian N. Model study of seepae in smear zones around vertical drains in layered soil: Further results. Geotechnique,2002,52(5):375-378.
    [29]Home M R. The consolidation of a stratified soil with vertical and horizontal drainage. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 1964,6:187-197.
    [30]Indraratna B, Balasubramaniam A S, and Ratnayake A M P. Performance of embankment stabilized with vertical drains on soft clay. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,1994,120(2):257-273.
    [31]Indraratna B, and Redana I W. Plane-strain modeling of smear effects associated with vertical drains. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,1997,123(5):474-478.
    [32]Indraratna B, and Redana I W. Labaoratory determination of smear zone due to vertical drain installation. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,1998,124(2):180-184.
    [33]Indraratna B, and Redana I W. Numerical modeling of vertical drains with smear and well resistance installed in soft clay. Canadian Geotechnical Journal,2000,37:133-145.
    [34]Indraratna B, Bamunawita C, and Khabbaz H. Numerical modeling of vacuum preloading and field applications. Canadian Geotechnical Journal,2004,41(6):1098-1110.
    [35]Indraratna B, Sathananthan I, Rujikiatkamjorn C, and Balasubramaniam A S. Aanlytical and numerical modeling of soft soil stabilized by PVD incorporating vacuum preloading. International Journal of Geomechanics,2005,5(2):114-124.
    [36]Kiellman, W. Consolidation of clayey soils by atmosphericpressure. In Proceedings of a Conference on Soil Stabilisation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Bsston,18-20 June 1952. MIT Press. PP. 258-263.
    [37]Indraratna B, Rujikiatkamjorn C, and Sathananthan I. Radial consolidation of clay using compressibility indices and varying horizontal permeability. Canadian Geotechnical Journal,2005,42:1330-1341.
    [38]Lekha K R, Krishnaswamy N R, and Basak P. Consolidation of clay by sand drain under time-dependent loading. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,1998,124(1):91-94.
    [39]Lekha K R, Krishnaswamy N R, and Basak P. Consolidation of clays for variable permeability and compressibiliry. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,2003,129(11):1001-1009.
    [40]Leo C.J. Equal strain consolidation by vertical drains. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,2004,130(3):316-327.
    [41]Lorenzo G A, and Bergado D T. New consolidation equation for soil-cement pile improved ground. Canadian Geotechnical Journal,2003,40:265-275.
    [42]Moser M A. The effectiveness of sand drains in soft soils. International Symposium on SOFT Clay, Bankok, Thailand,1977:261-270.
    [43]Nogami T, and Li M. Consolidation of clay with a system of vertical and horizontal drains. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering.2003,129(9):838-848.
    [44]Olson R E. Consolidation under time-dependent loading. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division ASCE 1977,103 (GT1):55-60.
    [45]Onoue A. Consolidation of multilayered anisotropic soils by vertical drains with well resistance. Soils and Foundations,1988a,28(3):75-90.
    [46]Onoue A. Consolidation by vertical drains taking well resistance and smear into consideration. Soils and Foundations,1988b,28(4):165-174.
    [47]Onoue A, Ting N H, Germaine J T, and Whitman R V. Permeability of disturbed zone around vertical drains. Proceedings of Geotechnical Engineering Congress, Boulder,1991, vol.2, pp.879-890.
    [48]Qian J H, Zhao W B, Cheung Y K, and Lee P K K. The theory and practice of vacuum preloading. Computers and Geotechnics,1992,13:103-118.
    [49]Rao X K, and Raju M V R. One-dimensional consolidation with three-dimensional flow for timw-dependent loading. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,1990,116(10):1576-1580.
    [50]Richart Jr. F E. A review of the theories for sand drains. Proc. ASCE,1957, Vol.83, No.Sm3:1-38.
    [51]Rujikiatkamjorn C, and Indraratna B. Analytical solutions and design curves for vacuum-assisted consolidation with both vertical and horizontal drainage. Canadian Geotechnical Journal,2007,44: 188-200.
    [52]Runesson K, Hansbo S, and Wiberg N E. The efficiency of partially penetrating vertical drains. Geotechnique,1985,35(4):511-516.
    [53]Saye S R. Assessment of soil disturbance by the installation of displacement sand drains and prefabricated vertical drains. In Soil behavior and soft ground construction. Edited by Germaine J.T., Sheahan T.C., and Whitman R.V. ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication 119, ASCE, Reston, Va. No.119, 2003, pp.325-362.
    [54]Seah T H, and Juirnarongrit T. Constant rate of strain consolidation with radial drainage. Geotechnical Testing Journal, ASTM,2003,26(4):1-12.
    [55]Seah T H, Tangthansup B, and Wongsatian P. Horizontal coefficient of consolidation of soft Bangkok clay. Geotechnical Testing Journal, ASTM,2004,27(5):1-11.
    [56]Sharma J S, and Xiao D. Characterization of a smear zone around vertical drains by large-sacle laboratory tests. Canadian Geotechnical Journal,2000,37(6):1265-1271.
    [57]Singh G, and Hattab T N. A laboratory study of efficiency of sand drains in relation to methods of installation and spacing. Geotechnique,1979,29(4):395-422.
    [58]Tang X W. A study for consolidation of ground with vertical drain system. Ph.D. thesis, Saga University, Japan,1998a.
    [59]Tang X W, and Onisuka K. Consolidation of ground with partially vertical drains. Geotechnical Engineering Journal,1998b,29(2):209-231.
    [60]Tang X W, and Onisuka K. Consolidation by vertical drains under time-dependent loading. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics,2000,24:739-751.
    [61]Tang X W, and Onisuka K. Consolidation of double-layered ground with vertical drains. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics,2001,25(14):1449-1465.
    [62]Tran T A, and Mitachi T. Equivalent plane strain modeling of vertical drains in soft ground under embankment combined with vacuum preloading. Computers and Geotechnics,2008,35(5):655-672.
    [63]Walker R, Indraratna B. Vertical drain consolidation with parabolic distribution of permeability in smear zone. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,2006,132(7):937-941.
    [64]Wang X S, and Jiao J J. Analysis of soil consolidation by vertical drains with double porosity model. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics,2004,28:1385-1400.
    [65]Xie K H, Lee P K K, and Cheung Y K. Consolidation of a two-layer system with ideal drains. In Proceeding of the 8th International Conference on Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA,1994, vol.1, pp.789-794.
    [66]Xie K H, Lu M M, Hu A F, and Chen G H. A general theoretical solution for the consolidation of a composite foundation, Computers and Geotechnics,2009,36 (1-2):24-30.
    [67]Xie K H, Lu M M, and Liu G B. Equal strain consolidation for stone-column reinforced foundation. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, DOI:10.1002/nag.790. (in Press, Available Online)
    [68]Xie K H, Gao P, and Xie X Y. Consolidation theory for soft clays reinforced by cement of granular columns. Proceedings Of 10th International Conference of the Association for Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics. America, Tucson,2001:1263-1268.
    [69]Yang Z H, and Jermic B. Study of soil layering effects on lateral loading behavior of piles. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,2005,131 (6):762-770.
    [70]Yoshikuni H, and Nakanodo H. Consolidation of soils by vertical drain wells with finite permeability. Soils and Foundations,1974,14(2):35-46.
    [71]Yoshikuni H. Design and control of construction in the vertical drain method. Gihoudou, Tokyo: Gihoudou,1979.
    [72]Zeng G X, and Xie K H. New development of the vertical drain theories. Proceeding of the 12th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 1989, vol.2, pp.1435-1438.
    [73]Zeng G X, Xie K H, and Zhu X R. Advances in the theories of consolidation by vertical drains. Proceedings of the International Conference on Structures and Foundation, Hangzhou,1994, pp.11-25.
    [74]Zhu G F, and Yin J H. Consolidation of soil under depth-dependent ramp load. Canadian Geotechnical Journal,1998,35(3):344-350.
    [75]Zhu G F, and Yin J H. Consolidation of double soil layers under depth-dependent ramp load. Geotechnique,1999,49(3):415-421.
    [76]Zhu G F, and Yin J H. Consolidation of soil with vertical and horizontal drainage. Geotechnique,2001a, 51(4):361-367.
    [77]Zhu G F, and Yin J H. Consolidation analysis of soil with vertical and horizontal drainage under ramp loading considering smear effects. Geotextiles and Geomembranes,2004 (22):63-74.
    [78]陈根媛.多层地基的一维固结计算方法与砂井地基计算的改进建议.水利水运科学研究.1984,2:18-29.
    [79]房营光.砂井地基固结的空间渗流和群井效应的解析分析.岩土工程学报,1996,18(2):30-36
    [80]龚晓南.土力学.北京,中国建筑工业出版社,2002.
    [81]龚晓南.高等土力学.北京,中国建筑工业出版社,1996.
    [82]龚晓南.地基处理新技术.西安,陕西科学技术出版社,1997.
    [83]郝玉龙,陈云敏,王军.深厚软土未打穿砂井超载预压地基孔隙水压力消散规律分析.中国公路学报,2004a,15(2):36-39.
    [84]刘加才,施建勇,赵维炳.真空堆载联合预压作用下路基固结分析.水运工程,2003,353(6):1-9.
    [85]刘加才,赵维炳,施建勇.真空预压作用下竖井地基孔压消散研究.中国公路学报,2004a,17(2):37-42.
    [86]刘加才,施建勇.用最小二乘法确定竖井地基平均固结度.长江科学院院报,2004b,21(4):28-31.
    [87]刘加才,施建勇.一种竖井地基竖墙化等效计算方法.岩土力学,2004c,25(11):1782-1785.
    [88]刘兴旺,谢康和,潘秋元,曾国熙.竖向排水井地基粘弹性固结解析理论.土木工程学报,1998,31(1):10-19.
    [89]卢萌盟,谢康和,张玉国,陈国红.考虑施工扰动和荷载效应的复合地基固结解.岩土工程学报,2008,30(4):549-554.
    [90]卢萌盟,谢康和,张玉国,胡安峰.考虑土体水平渗透系数变化的复合地基固结解.浙江大学学报:工学版,2008,42(11):1996-2001.
    [91]卢萌盟,谢康和,王坤,齐添.考虑桩体内径向渗流的复合地基固结解.固体力学学报,2009,30(2):155-161.
    [92]钱家欢,赵维炳.真空预压砂井地基固结分析的半解析方法.中国科学(A辑),1988,4:439-448.
    [93]施建勇,赵维炳,艾英钵,顾吉.砂井地基预压加固的粘弹塑性分析研究.岩土工程学报,1996-18(3):13-17.
    [94]王军,陈云敏.考虑土结构性影响的砂井地基固结度计算,中国公路学报,2001,14(2):22-26.
    [95]王瑞春,谢康和.变荷载下竖向排水井地基粘弹性固结沉降解析解.土木工程学报,2001,34(6):93-99.
    [96]王瑞春,童恺显,赖泉水.未打穿半透水下卧层的竖井地基固结解析研究.城市道桥与防洪,2003,1:31-35.
    [97]谢康和.砂井地基:固结理论、数值分析与优化设计.杭州:浙江大学博士论文,1987.
    [98]谢康和,曾国熙.等应变条件下的砂井地基固结解析理论.岩土工程学报,1989a,11(2):3-17.
    [99]谢康和.砂井地基的优化设计.土木工程学报,1989b,22(2):3-11.
    [100]谢康和.等应变条件下的双层理想井地基固结理论.浙江大学学报,1995,29(5):529-539.
    [101]谢康和,周开茂.未打穿竖向排水井地基固结理论.岩土工程学报,2006,28(6):679-684.39(7):829-835.
    [102]徐洋,谢康和,胡茂刚.考虑变形协调的刚性基础复合地基沉降计算.浙江大学学报:工学版,2003,37(5):551-555.
    [103]徐洋,谢康和,何丽波.三维复合模型及其在散体材料桩复合地基分析中的应用.岩石力学与工程学报,2004,23(20):3405-3412.
    [104]徐芝纶.弹性理论,北京:高等教育出版社,1990.
    [105]叶书麟,韩杰,叶观宝.地基处理与托换技术.北京,中国建筑工业出版社,1994:178-253.
    [106]张玉国.散体材料桩复合地基固结理论研究.杭州:浙江大学博士论文,2005.
    [107]赵维炳.砂井地基固结分析半解析方法的改进.岩土工程学报,1991,13(4):51-58.
    [108]周开茂,谢康和,应宏伟,来方勇.双面排水条件下未打穿竖井地基固结计算.浙江大学学报:工学版,2007,41(1):151-156.
    [109]朱建才.真空联合堆载预压加固软基机理及工艺研究.杭州:浙江大学博士论文,2004.
    [110]金小荣.真空联合堆载预压加固软基试验及理论研究.杭州:浙江大学博士论文,2007.
    [111]徐妍,吴芳,谢康和,林瑛.初始孔压非均布竖向排水井地基固结方程的解析解.水利学报,2008,
    [112]耿雪玉,蔡袁强,徐长节.复杂荷载作用下考虑下卧层三维渗流的未打穿竖井地基固结分析.岩土力学.2008,29(6):1521-1529.
    [113]谢洪涛,杨春和,陈晓平.竖井地基的粘弹一粘塑性固结及有限元解.岩土力学,2001,22(4):403-407.
    [114]王旭升,陈崇希.砂井地基固结的三维有限元模型及应用.岩土力学,2004,25(1):94-98.
    [115]耿雪玉,蔡袁强,徐长节.复杂荷载作用下考虑下卧层三维渗流的未打穿竖井地基固结分析.岩土力学.2008,29(6):1521-1529.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700