用户名: 密码: 验证码:
经济增长中地理要素作用的空间计量经济分析
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
经济增长问题一直是研究的热点,本文基于经济增长的三个事实:经济分异、经济收敛、产业专业化和聚集现象,分析了三大地理要素对这些事实的作用。
     第一章为引论,基于人地关系理论、比较优势、新经济增长理论,在Krugman(1993)提出的两大自然基础之上,提出了影响经济增长的三大地理要素,其中自然地理环境为第一地理要素,共包括海拔、坡度、地形起伏度、人生气候指数、水资源适宜度、农业生产潜力;交通和区位为第二地理要素,分别用交通便利性和经济区位来表示;人力资本和研发水平为经济发展的第三地理要素,分别用受教育年限和专利水平来表示。
     第二章分析了三大地理要素的时空分布及变化,通过建模,在Arcgis 9.0支持下获取各地级单元的地理要素值,分析了三大地理要素在时空的变化。
     第三章为经济增长的地理差异事实,经济增长指标包括经济增长速度、经济增长规模、经济结构和经济效率等,分析了这些指标的时空变化,并通过Gini系数和Wolfson指数、核密度函数分布曲线分析了区域经济的不平衡和极化现象。
     第四章为经济发展中地理要素的作用,本文认为三大地理要素是经济发展的三次诱因,自然地理环境对经济发展起了最基本的发展作用,交通便利性和经济区位的作用促使了地理环境对经济影响的改变,新增长理论的人力资本和研发水平是经济发生的内生的动力,是经济发展的第三次诱因。
     基于地级单元截面数据分析经济发展同各地理要素的关系,发现影响经济发展的要素并非单一的,而是多样的。在不同尺度上地理要素对经济发展的作用不同,其中在七大区域尺度上发现三次地理要素的作用与经济发展的关系表现为:
     (ⅰ)在经济相对落后的西北区和西南区,地理环境相对恶劣,对人类活动一直有较强的限制作用,交通、经济区位和人力资本的作用改善了对人有限制作用。
     (ⅱ)经济相对较发达的东北区、京津冀鲁、东部沿海区、南部沿海区,发现良好自然地理环境为农业生产提供了优势条件,引导经济产生第一次分异,随着交通、经济区位和人力资本的提高,自然环境的作用在减小但仍然存在,经济的发展更依赖于受第三平和第二地理要素,人地关系进入了人对地的充分利用阶段。
     第五章为区域经济收敛性与地理要素分析,将研究时间划分不同的时段,分析各区域经济的收敛机制及地理要素对经济收敛的影响,并计算了经济增长的稳态值。结果发现:
     (ⅰ)在1994~2004年间除西南区域外其它区域都不存在σ收敛,全国尺度上也不存在σ收敛,但选取研究不同的时间段σ收敛也有所变化。
     (ⅱ)在七大区域尺度上,对比考虑空间作用前后的经济收敛回归模型,发现1994~2004西北区和西南区的收敛性有所增强,地理间的相互作用使得区域之间的差异变化速度减小,东部沿海区、京津冀鲁区和中部区的经济发散性都增强,即地理间相互作用加大了区域间经济的差异变化速度。
     (ⅲ)为探讨地理要素对经济收敛的作用机制,在1999~2004年区域尺度上分析地理要素对经济增长速度的影响,发现七大区域中,第一地理要素中的第一主因子对经济增长作用都为正值,即经济增长发生在地形地貌条件较好的区域,第二主因子对经济增长作用在经济发达的区域像京津冀鲁区、东部沿海区和南部沿海区表现为正值,即优越的自然环境也可为经济增长提供良好的基础。
     交通便利性对经济增长起了明显的促进作用。受教育年限对发达地区的经济增长出现负作用,研发水平在东部地区作用最强。
     第六章为产业专业化、聚集同地理要素的作用。全国尺度上分析了影响三次产业区位熵的地理要素,发现第一产业区位熵仅与农业生产潜力有正相关作用。第二产业区位熵与第二、三地理要素对有正相关关系。第三产业的区位熵与第一第二地理要素有显著正相关关系。选取主要的制造业部门分析地理要素的作用,发现影响烟草加工聚集和纺织业聚集受第一地理要素影响最大;电子通讯业是高技术密集型产业,与交通、区位以及研发水平和固定资产等因子关系密切,主要是受第三地理要素引导的加工业。最后分析矿产产业这种特殊的资源型产业的产业聚集情况,并以资源强度系数代表了矿业相对丰富程度,发现矿业资源丰富度是促使产业聚集的重要因素,交通、水资源对其影响也很大。
     第七章为本文的总结与讨论,对全文的研究进行归纳,并指出了研究中的不足和进一步研究方向。
Economic growth has been a hot issue. Based on the economic growth of three facts: economic diversity, economic convergence, and industry specialization and agglomeration, the paper analyzes the effect of three major geographic factors on these facts.
    The first chapter is the overviews about these facts and theories of human-land relationship, comparative advantages, and the new theory of economic growth. Based on the two nature theory of Krugman(1993), the paper proposes three geographic factors of the economic growth: the first geographic factor refers to natural environment, including elevation, slope, undulating topography, human climate index, water resource index, and potential agricultural production; the second geographic factor is traffic and location, which are represented by transport facilitation and economic position respectively; the third geography factors is human capital and R&D level , respectively represented by education years and the level of the patent number.
    Chapter II is about by means of acquiring the values of geographic factors of various regions through modeling.
    Chapter III develops analysis of the temporal and spatial changes of economic growth. Economic indicators include economic growth rate, economic structure, economic scale and economic efficiency. The paper analyzes regional economic inequality and polarization by calculating the Gini coefficient, Wolfson index and kernel density curve.
    Chapter IV presents effects of the three major geographic factors on economic diversity , and concludes that the three geographic factors serve as three inducements of economic development, during which the first geographic factor is basal and elementary, the convenient transportation and economic location can promote the geographic environment and bring the second change of the economic development, new economic growth theory indicates the role of human capital and R&D level, whose function is as endogenous impetus in the process of economic development.
    Based on the cross section data, the paper analyzes the relationship between the geographic factor and economic development, and indicates that the factor influencing the economic development is not single but diverse. On different geographic scale the impacts of geographic factors are different.
    In seven regions we found three geographic factors having the good relationship between economic developments.
    (i) In the Northwest and the Southwest, Central District, the relatively poor region, geographic environment can restrict human activity, but the second geographic factors, transportation and economic position can improve the role of first geographic factors, on the whole the people have a limiting effect.
    (ii) In the relatively economic region, such as Beijing-Tianjin - Hebei-Shandong region, and the eastern coastal areas, the southern coastal areas, we found a good natural environment for agricultural production can provided favorable conditions, and guide the economic development, although with the traffic and human capital development, the effect of the natural environment is reduced ,which still exist, economic development mainly dependent on the second and third geographic factors.
    In Chapter V which mainly discussed the convergence of regional economy and the analysis of geographic factors, we partitioned the different period, analyzing convergence principle of different economy and the impact of geographic factors on economy convergence, and calculating the steady-state value of economic growth. We can achieve the following results:
    (i) From 1994 to 2000, there is no σ convergence phenomenon except in southwest region, neither the whole country. However, in different studying period we will get the different σ convergence result.
    (ii) Comparing the economy convergence regression models considering or not considering the spatial effect, we have recognized that from 1994 to 2004 convergence rate of the northwest and southwest region among Seven regions speed up, and Eastern coastal region, Beijing-Tianjin - Hebei-Shandong region and the central region economy showing the divergence of economy with increasing tendency, namely the mutual geographic effect can increase the disparity among different regions.
    (iii) In order to explore the function principle of the geography factor on economic convergence, on regional scale from 1999 to 2004, we analyze the impact of geographic factors on the rate of economic growth, finding that in the seven regions, the impact of the first main factor of the first geographic factor on economic growth is positive, namely economic growth in such regions that have the good condition about landform will be better. The impact of the second main factor on economic growth in developed regions like the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei-Shandong region, the Eastern coastal region and Southern coastal region is positive, that is superior in terms of the natural environment can provide a good foundation for economic growth..
    Convenient transportation plays an obviously positive role on economic growth. Fixed number of year of Education plays an obviously negative role on economic growth in the developed regions. The impact of Research and Development on the eastern region is strongest.
    Chapter VI shows situations of industry specialization and agglomeration and the effects of three geographic factors, on the national scale, the first industrial location entropy is positively relevant only to potential agricultural productivity; the second industrial entropy is closely connective with the second and three geographic factors. Third industrial entropy is connective with the first and second geographic factors significantly. To a major manufacturing sector, we
    analyze the role of geographic factors, finding that the agglomeration of tobacco processing and textile gathered are affected by the first geographic factors, Electronic communications industry is a high-technology-intensive industries, mainly affected by the third geographic factors. Finally, we use resource intensity coefficient representing the mining relative abundance, and the result shows mineral resources abundance is the important factors of spurring industrial specialization, in addition to transportation, water resource.
    Chapter VII concludes the whole content, pointing out the deficiencies of the study and further research directions.
引文
1 Amiti, 1998. New trade theories and industrial location in the EU: a survey of evidence, Oxf Rev Econ Policy. 14: 45-53.
    2 Anselin L., 1988. Spatial econometrics: methods and models, Dordrecht, Kluwer academic Publishers
    3 Archibugi D., 1992. Patenting as an indicator of technological innovation a review, Science of Public Policy. 19(6): 357-368.
    4 Athreye S., 2001. Agglomeration and growth: a study of the Cambridge high tech cluster, Building high-tech silicon valley and beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge university Press, 20O4
    5 Bai C., Du Y., Tao Z., 2004. Local protectionism and regional specialization: evidence from China's industries, Journal of International Economics. 63: 397-417.
    6 Bao S. M., Chang G. S., Sachs J. D., Woo W. H., 2002. Geographic factors and China's regional development under market reforms, 1978-1998, China Economic Review. 13: 89-111.
    7 Barro R., Sala-l-Martin Ⅹ., 1995. Economic growth, McGraw-Hill, London.
    8 Barro R. J., Sail-Ⅰ-Martin, 1991. Convergence across state and regions brooking, papers on economic activity. 1: 107-158.
    9 Barro R. J., Sali-Ⅰ-Martin, 1992. Convergence of political economy, Journal of political economy. 100(2): 223-251.
    10 Barro R., Lee J. W., 1993. International comparison of educational attainment, Journal of Monetary Economics. 32(3), 363-394.
    11 Batisse C., 2002. Dynamic externalities and local growth: a panel data analysis applied to chinese provinces, Chinese Economic Review. 13: 231-251.
    12 Baumol W. J., Wolfee E. N., 1988. Productivity growth, convergence and welfare reply, American Economic Review. 79: 1155-1159.
    13 Benenson I., Sofer M..,, Schnell I., 1998. Analysis of economic networks-geographic. information systems as a visualization tool, Applied Geography. 18(2): 117-135.
    14 Bernard A. B., Jones C. I., 1996. Comparing applies to oranges: productivity convergence and measurement across industries and countries, American Economic Review. 86: 16-38.
    15 Blach W. R., 2001. An unpopular Essay on Transportation, Journal of Transport Geography. (9): 1-11.
    16 Black D., Henderson J. V., 1999. A theory of urban growth, Journal of Political Economy. 107(2): 252-284.
    17 Bloom D., Sachs J., 1998. Geography, demography and economic growth in Africa, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. 2: 207-295.
    18 Bresthchger L., 1999. Growth theory and sustainable development, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited Glensanda House. UK.
    19 Bratton M., Alderfer P., Bowser G, Temba J., 1999. The effects of civic education on political culture: evidence from Zambia, World Development. 27 (5): 807-824.
    20 Brun J. F., Combes J. L., Renard M. E, 2002. Are the spillover effects between coastal and non-coastal regions in China, China Economic Review. 13: 161-169.
    21 Carlino G, Mills, 1992. Are US regional incomes converging, Journal of Monetary Economics. 32: 597-616.
    22 Catherine Beaudry, Peter Swann, 2001. Growth in industrial clusters: a bird's eye view of the United Kingdom, S1EPR Discussion Paper. No.2001: 00-38.
    23 Chatterji J. M., Dewhurst J. H. L., 1996. Convergence clubs and relative economic performance in Great Britain, regional studies. 30: 31-40.
    24 Chatterji M., 1992. Convergence clubs and endogenous growth, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 8: 57-69.
    25 Chen J., Fleisher B., 1996. Regional income inequality and economic growth in China, Journal of Comparative Economics. 221:41-164.
    26 Chen S., Wang Y., 2001. China's growth and poverty reduction: recent trends between 1990 and 1999, The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. No.2651.
    27 Cheng W., Sachs J., Yang X.,2000. An inframarginal analysis of the Ricardian model, Review of International Economics. 8: 208-220.
    28 Clapp J. M., Rodriguez M., Thrall G, 1997. How GIS can put urban economic analysis on the map, Journal of Housing Economics. (6): 368-386.
    29 Clarke K. C, 1995. Analytical and computer cartography, 2nd edition, Englewood Cliffs, N.J, Prentice-Hall.
    30 Coulomble S., 2000. New evidence of convergence across Canadian provinces: the role of urbanization, Regional Studies. 34(8): 713-125.
    31 Crosby Alfred W., 1986. Ecological imperialism: the biological expansion of Europe, 900-1900, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    32 de Freitas C, 1979. Human climates of Northern China, Atmospheric Environment. 13: 71-77.
    33 Demurger S., 2001. March, infrastructure development and economic growth: an explanation for regional disparities in China? Journal of Comparative Economics. 29 (1): 95-117.
    34 Demurger S, Sachs, J.D., Woo W.T., et al, 2001. Geography, economic policy, and regional development in China, NBER Woring Paper Series 8897,1-59
    35 Desmet K., 2000. A perfect foresight model of regional development and skill specialization, Regional Sci. & Urban Econ.. 30: 221-242.
    36 Dennison F., 1974. Accounting for the United States economic growth 1929-1969, Washington, D.C. Inst
    37 Diamond Jared, 1997. Guns, germs and steel: the fates of human societies, New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
    38 Dixit A., Stiglitz J., 1977. Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity, American Economic Review. 67: 297-308.
    39 Dueker K. J., 1979. Land resource information systems: a review of fifteen years' experience, Geo-processing. 1(2): 105-128.
    40 Dull L. J., 2004. Democracy and discipline in Ghanaian education, International Journal of Educational Development. 24(3): 303-314.
    41 Ekins P., Simon S., Deutsch L., Folke C, deGroot R., 2003. A framework for the practical application of the concept of critical natural capital and strong Sustainability, Ecological Economics. 44: 165-185.
    42 Ellison Glenn, Glaser Edward L., 1997. Geographic concentration in U.S. manufacturing industries: a dartboard approach, Journal of Political Economy. 105(5): 889-927.
    43 Ellison Glenn, Glaser Edward L., 1999. The geographic concentration of industry: does natural advantage explain agglomeration, The American Economic Review. 89(2): 311-316.
    44 Esteban J. M., Gradin C, Ray D., 1999. Extension of a measure of polarization, with an application to the income distribution of five OECD countries, International Conferences on Panel Data (Berlin), 10th series. D3-1.
    45 Esteban J. M., Ray D., 1994. On the measurement of polarization, Econometrica. 62(4): 819-851.
    46 Fan C. C, Scott A. J., 2004. Industrial agglomeration and development: a survey of spatial economic issues in East Asia and a statistical analysis of Chinese regions, Journal of Development Economics. 73: 329-347.
    47 Fleisher.B., Chen J., 1997. The coast and non-coast gap, productivity, and regional economic policy in China, Journal of Comparative Economics. 25(2): 220-236.
    48 Friedman E., 1987. Maoism and the liberation of the poor, World Politics. 39 (3): 408-428.
    49 Fujita M., Hu D. P., 2001. Regional disparity in China 1985-1994: the effects of globalization and liberalization, the Annals of Regional Science. 35: 3-37.
    50 Fujita M., Thisse J. F., 1996. Economics of agglomeration, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies. 10(4): 339-378.
    51 Fung M. K., Chow W. W., 2002. Measuring the intensity of knowledge flow with patent statistics, Economic Letters. 74: 353-358.
    52 Funke M., Strulik, 1999. Regional growth in west Germany: convergence or divergence, Economic Modeling. 16: 489-502.
    53 Gallup J. L, Sachs J. D., Mellinger A., 1999. Geography and economic development. International Regional Science Review. 22: 179-232.
    54 Gallup J. L., Sachs, J. D., Mellinger A. D., 1999. Geography and economic development. International Regional Science Review. 22(2): 179-232.
    55 Garett, Schneider, 2006. Intelligence, human capital, and economic growth: A Bayesian averaging of classical estimates approach, Journal of Economic Growth. 11: 71-93.
    56 Giles Atkinson, Kirk Hamilton, 2003. Savings, growth and the resource curse hypothesis, World Development. 31(11): 1793-1807.
    57 Goodchild M. F., 1992. Geographic information science, International Journal Geographic Information System. 6: 31-45.
    58 Goodchild M. F., Parks B. O., Steyaert L. T., 1993. Environmental modeling with GIS, New York: Oxford University Press. 142-146.
    59 Goodfriend M., McDermott J., 1995. Early development, the American Economic Review. 85: 116-133.
    60 Greunz L.,2003. Geographically and technologically mediated knowledge spillovers between European,
    61 Grupp H., Schmoob, 1999. Patents in the age of globalization new legal procedures, new analytical methods, new economic interpretation, Research Policy. 28(4): 377-396.
    62 Haggett P., Cliff A. D., 1977. Locational models, London: Edward Arnold Ltd. 37-69.
    63 Hall, Robert, Jones Charles, 1999. Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others, the Quarterly Journal of Economics. Feb: 83-115.
    64 Hecksche, EliFe,1919; The effect of foreign trade on the distribution of income , Ekonomisk Tidiskrift,21(2): 1-32
    65 Henderson J. V., Zmarak S., Venables A. J., 2001. Geography and development, NBER, Working Paper.
    66 Henley A., 2005. On regional growth convergence in Great Britain, Journal of Regional Studies. 39(9): 1245-1260.
    67 Henry G O., Stephen Redding, Anthony J. V., 2001. The economic geography of trade, production and income: a survey of empirics, NBER, Working Paper.
    68 Hinterberger H., Luks F., Schmidt Black F., 1997. Material flow vs. 'natural capital' what make an economy sustainable? Ecological Economics. (23): 1-14.
    69 Holmers T., Stevens J., 2002. Geographic concentration and establishment scale, the review of economics and spastics. 84: 682-690.
    70 Holmers T., Stevens J., 2002. Geographic concentration and establishment scale, the Review of Economics and Spastics. 84: 682-690.
    71 Islam N., 1995. Growth empirics: a panel data approach, Quarterly Journal of Economics. 110: 1127-1170.
    72 Jian T., Sachs J. D., Warner A. M., 1996. Trends in regional inequality in China, China Economic Review. 7(1): 1-21.
    73 Jimenez L., Landgrebe D. A., Projection pursuit in high dimensional data reduction: initial conditions, feature selection and the assumption of normality, Vancouver: IEEE International Conference.
    74 Jones E. L., 1981. The European miracle: Environments, economies, and geopolitics in the history of Europe and Asia, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    75 Kangasharju A., 1998. Convergence in Finland: regional differences in the speed of convergence, Applied Economics. 30: 679-687.
    76 Keeble D., Oford J. , Walker S., 1986. Peripheral regions in 8 communities of twelve member states, Luxemburg: Commission of the European Community.
    77 Kim S., 1995, 1999. Region, resource and economics geography: Sources of U.S. regional comparative advantage, 1880-1987, Regional Science and Urban Economics. (29): 213-232.
    78 Kim T J., Knap, G, 2001. The spatial dispersion of economic activities and development trends in China: 1952-1985, the Annals of Regional Science. (35): 39 -57.
    79 Kolasa J., Pickett S. T. A., 1991. Ecological heterogeneity, New York: Springer-Verlag New York, New York, USA.
    80 Krugman P., 1991. Increasing returns and economic geography, Journal of Political Economy. 99: 483-499.
    81 Krugman P., 1993a. First nature, second nature and metropolitan location. Journal of Regional Science. 33: 129-144.
    82 Krugman P., 1993b. On the number and location of cities, European Economic review. 37: 293-293.
    83 Landes, David, 1998. The wealth and poverty of nations: why some are so rich and some so poor, New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
    84 Lardy N. R., 1978. Economic growth and income distribution in the People's Republic of China, New York: Cambridge University Press. 10-120.
    85 Lardy N. R., 1980. Regional growth and income distribution in China, In: R F Denberger (Ed), China's Development Experience in Comparative Perspective, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 153-190.
    86 Leamer E. E. et al, 1999. Does natural resource abundance increase Latin American income inequality, Journal of Development Economics. 59: 3-54.
    87 Leontief, W, 1953, Demestic production and foreign trade: the American capital position re-examined, Proceedings of the American Philosophical society,97:57
    88 Lucas R. E., 1988. On the mechanisms of economic development, Journal of Monetary Economics. 22: 1-42.
    89 Mackay R., 2003. Twenty-five years of regional development. Regional studies. 3: 303-317.
    90 Malmbeg A., Maskell P., 2002. The elusive concept of localization economies: towards a knowledge-based theory of spatial clustering, Environment Planning. 34: 429-449.
    91 Marshell A., 1890. Principles of economics, an introductory volume, Macmillan, London.
    92 Martin R., Sunley P., 2003. Deconstructing clusters: chaotic concept or policy panacea?. Journal of Economic Geography. (3): 5 -35.
    93 Martin R., Sunley P., 1998. Slow convergence? The new endogenous growth theory and regional development, Economic Geography. 74: 201-227.
    94 Masters W. A., McMillan M. S., 2001. Climate and scale in the economic growth, Journal of Economic Growth. 167-186.
    95 Mccormick, 1999. Africa enterprise cluster and industrialization, theory and reality, World Development. 27(9): 1531-1551.
    96 O' Donoghue D., Gleave B., 2004. A note on methods for measuring industrial agglomeration, Regional Studies. 38(4): 419-427.
    97 Ohlin, B G, 1933, Interregional and interregional trade, Cambridge M A: Havard University Press
    98 Paelinck J, Klaassen L. 1979. Spatial Econometrics. Farnborough: Saxon House,
    99 Pearce D. W., Turner R. K.., 1990. Economics of natural resources and the environment, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press: 51-53.
    100 Persson Joakim, 1997. Convergence across the Swedish counties, European economic variable, Journal of Econometric. 80: 335-385.
    101 Peter M. Y, 1997. Human domination of earth's ecosystems, Science. 277: 494-499.
    102 Porter M. E., 1998. Competitive advantage, agglomeration economies and regional policy, International Regional Science Review. 19(112): 85-90.
    103 Poter M. E., 1990. The competitive advantage of nations, Washington: Harvard Business Review.
    104 Raiser M.,1998. Subsidizing inequality: economic reforms, fiscal transfers and convergence across Chinese provinces, Journal of Development Studies. 34(3): 1-26.
    105 Redding S., Venables V. A., 2001. Economic geography and international inequality, Mimeo, LSE, 2000.
    106 Restuccia, Diego, Yang, Dennis Tao, Zhu Xiaodong, 2004. Agricultural and aggregate productivity: a quantitative cross-country analysis, Working Paper, Department of Economics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
    107 Rey S. J., Montouri B. D., 1999. US regional income convergence: a spatial econometric perspective, Regional Studies. 33: 143-156.
    108 Rey S. J., Montour B. D., 1999. US regional income convergence: a spatial economic perspective, Regional Studies. 33(2): 1421-1441.
    109 Ricardo D, 1817, The principle of political economy and taxation, London, Gaernsey press.
    110 Riskin C., 1978. China's political economy: the quest for development since 1949, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 12-98.
    111 Roberts M., 2004. The growth performance of the GB countries: some new empirical evidence for 1977-1993, Regional Studies. 38: 143-165.
    112 Romer, Paul, 1986. Increasing returns and long-rnn growth., Journal of Political Economy. 94(5): 1002-37.
    113 Rosenthal, Strange, 2001. Determinate of agglomeration, Journal of Urban Economics. 50: 191-229.
    114 Sachs J. D., Andrew M. Warner, 1997. Natural resource abundance and economic growth, Harvard University, Cambridge MA November. 1-50.
    115 Sala-i-Martin, 1996, The classical approach to convergence analysis, the Economic Journal, 106: 1019~1036
    116 Sala-i-Martin, X. Doppelhofer, G. &Miller R. 2004. Determinants of long-run growth: a Bayesian averaging of classical estimates (BACE) approach, American Economic Review. 94(4): 813-835.
    117 Schmidt A., 2002. Statistical measurement of income polarization, a cross-national comparison, International Conferences on Panel Data (Berlin), 10th series. D3-1.
    118 Shubhasre Seshanna, Ssephane Decornez, 2003. Income polarization and inequality across countries: an empirical study, Journal of Policy Modeling. 25: 335-358.
    119 Simon Kuznets, 1971. Economic growth of nations, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 76-79.
    120 Siriopurlos C., Asteriou D., 1998. Testing for convergence across the Greek regions, Regional Studies. 32: 537-546.
    121 Smith, Adam, 1776, An inquiry into nature and national wealth of nation, reprint, edited by E Carman of Chicago, University of Chicago Press,
    122 Srivastava K., Patel Ⅰ., 2006. Community mobilization, gender equality, and resource mobilization in adult education, International Journal of Educational Development 26. 2006(2): 153-65.
    123 Ten Brink, BJE. Biodiversity indicators for the OECD environmental outlook and strategy. RIVM Rapport 402001014. Globo Report Series25, 2000: 34-52.
    124 Terrasi M., 1999. Convergence and divergence across Italian region, the Annals of Regional Science. 33(4): 491-510.
    125 Thomas C., Shelling, 1956. An essay on bargaining, the American Economic Review. 6
    126 Tsionas E. G., 2000. Regional growth and convergence: evidence from the unite states, regional studies. 34(3): 231-238.
    127 Tsui K. Y., 1991. China's regional inequality, 1952-1985, Journal of Comparative Economics. 15(1): 1-21.
    128 Tsui K. Y., 1993. Decomposition of China's regional inequalities, Journal of Comparative Economics. (17): 600-627.
    129 Tsui K, Wang Y, 1998, Polarization Ordering and New Classes of Polarization Indices, Memo: the Chinese University of Hong Kong.
    130 Venables A., 2000. Cities and trade: external trade and internal geography in developing economies, NBER, Working Paper. 15-30.
    131 Venables A., 1996. Equilibrium locations of vertically linked industries, International Economic Review. 37: 341-359.
    132 Victor P. A., 1991. Indicators of sustainable development: some lessons from capital theory, Ecological Economics. 4: 191-213.
    133 Watson L T, Lohani V. K., Kiler, D. F., et al, 2002. Intergrated computing environments for watershed management, Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 16(4):: 259-268
    134 Weeks M., Yao J., 2003. Provincial conditional income 1953-1997: a panel data approach, Econometric Reviews, Convergence in China. 22(1): 59-77.
    135 Wen M., 2004. Relocation and agglomeration of Chinese industry, Journal of Development Economics. 7: 329-347.
    136 Wolfson M. C., 1994. When inequalities diverge? American Economic Review Papers and Proceeding. 84: 353-358.
    137 Wolfson M. C., 1997. Divergent inequalities: theory and empirical results, Review of Income and Wealth. 43(4): 401-421.
    138 Wu Y. R., 1999. Income disparity and convergence in China's regional economics, University of Western Australia Discussion Paper. 9915.
    139 Xu L. X., Zou H. F., 2000. Explaining the changes of income distribution in China, China Economic Review. (11): 149-170.
    140 Ying L. G., 2000. Measuring the spillover effects: some Chinese evidence, Regional Science. 79: 75-89.
    141 Ying L. G., 2003. Understanding China's recent growth experience: a spatial econometric perspective, the Annals of Regional Science. (37): 613-628.
    142 Zhang Z. Y., Liu A. Y., Yao S. J., 2001. Convergence of China's regional incomes 1952-1997, China Economic Review. 12: 243-258.
    1 陈述彭,鲁学军,周成虎,2000,地理信息系统导论,北京:科学出版社,1-2
    2 Demurger等,2002,地理位置与优惠政策对中国地区经济发展的相关贡献,经济研究,(9):14-23.
    3 冷疏影,1992,地理信息系统支持下的中国农业生产潜力研究,自然资源报,7(1):71-79
    4 Hoove A.M.,王翼龙,1990,区域经济导论,商务印书馆
    5 艾彬,徐建华,岳文泽等,2004,湖南省城市空间关联研究,地域研究与开发,6:48-52
    6 安裕伦,1994,喀斯特人地关系地域系统的结构与功能自议——以贵州民族地区为例,中国岩溶,13(2):153-160
    7 毕家顺,2001,紫外线辐射对人体的影响及其预报,云南环境科学,12:46-48
    8 毕硕本,王桥,徐秀华,2003,地理信息系统软件工程的原理与方法,北京:科学出版社
    9 蔡昉,都阳,2000年,中国地区经济增长的趋同与差异,经济研究,(10):30-37
    10 蔡运龙,1995,可持续发展——人地系统研究的新思路,应用生态学报,15(3):329-333
    11 陈安平,李国平,2004,中国地区经济增长的收敛性:时间序列的经验研究,数量经济技术经济研究,31-35
    12 陈才,2001,区域经济地理,北京:科学出版社,2001,92-101
    13 陈林生,李刚,2004,资源禀赋、比较优势与区域经济增长,245(5):63-66
    14 陈述彭,何建邦,承继成,1997,地理信息系统的基础研究——地球信息科学,地球信息,(3):11-20
    15 陈秀山,徐瑛,2004,中国区域差距影响因素的实证研究,中国社会科学,5:117-129
    16 戴霄晔,王铮,刘涛,2006,我国高原健康环境评估,山地学报,24(3):312-319
    17 党安荣,阎守,吴宏歧等,2000,基于GIS的中国生产潜力研究,生态学报,20(6):910-915
    18 邓先瑞,1995,气候资源概论,华中师范大学,1995,143-153
    19 杜世宏,秦其明,王桥,2006,空间关系及其应用,地学前缘,13(3):69-80
    20 樊杰,孙威,傅小锋,2005,我国矿业城市持续发展的问题、成因与策略,自然资源学报,20(1):68-77
    21 樊杰,1993,我国煤矿城市产业结构转换问题研究.地理学报,48(3):566-573
    22 范剑勇,2004,市场一体化、地区专业化与产业集聚趋势——兼谈对地区差距的影响,中国社会科学,6:39-51
    23 范剑勇,朱国林,2002,中国地区差距演变及其结构分解,管理世界,(7):37-44
    24 范九力,白暴力,2004,基础设施投资与中国经济增长的地区差异研究,人文地理,19(2):35-39
    25 方曙,张勐,高利丹,2006,我国省(市)自治区专利产出及其之间关系的实证研究,科研管理,27(2):40-43
    26 方创琳,中国人地关系研究的新进展与展望,地理学报,2004,59增刊,21-32
    27 高飞,2002,关于产业聚集的地理学思考,经济地理,20(2):134-136
    28 高平,李国胜,2005,自然地域系统格局对中国区域发展的时空分异的影响分析,中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所硕士论文
    29 葛昭攀,王铮,2003,多区域体系经济增长分析集成计算环境原型研究与应用,华东师范大学,硕士毕业论文
    30 管卫华,林振山,2004,改革开放以来江苏省区域空间结构变化,地理研究,23(04):541-550
    31 郭枝峰,傅硕龄,1992,我国农业生产潜力的研究进展,地理研究,11(4):105-115
    32 韩延玲,高志刚,2002,新疆地、州区域经济差异分析与评价.干旱区地理,25(1):50-55
    33 贺灿飞,谢秀珍,2006,中国制造业地理集中与省区专业化,地理学宝,161(2):212-222
    34 胡鞍钢,1999,知识与发展:中国新的追赶策略:写于建国50周年,管理世界,(6):7~24
    35 胡鞍钢,2000,我国知识发展的地区差距分析:特点、成因及对策,管理世界,(3):5-17
    36 胡永平,张宗益,2004,中国地区经济增长差距的成因分析,当代财经,238(9):80-83
    37 金煜,陈钊,陆铭,2006,中国的地区工业集聚:经济地理、新经济地理与经济政策,经济研究,(4):79-89
    38 李二玲,覃成林,2002,中国南北区域经济差异研究,地理学与国土研究,2002,18(4):76-78
    39 李后强,1998,人地协同论:持续发展模型构建的基础,中国人口、资源与环境,8(3):48-53
    40 李辉,2006,宁夏产业结构及其区位优势变化(1978-2003),西北民族研究,51(4):77-87
    41 李秋斌,2006,区域经济差异的实证研究与R/S分析,东南学术,1:42-50
    42 李小建,乔家君,2001,20世纪90年代中国县际经济差异的空间分析,地理学报,56(2):136-145
    43 李旭东,张善余,2007,贵州喀斯特高原人口分布的自然环境因素——主要影响因素研究,干旱区研究,24(1):20-26
    44 李子奈,叶阿忠,2000,高等计量经济学,清华大学出版社
    45 梁琦,2003,中国工业的区位基尼系数——兼论外商直接投资对制造业集聚的影响,统计研究,(09):21-25
    46 林毅夫,蔡昉,李周,1998,中国经济转型时期的地区差距分析,经济研究,(6):3-10
    47 林毅夫,刘明兴,2003,中国的经济增长收敛与收入分配,世界经济,(8):3-14
    48 林毅夫,刘培林,2003,经济发展战略对劳均资本积累和技术进步的影响——基于中国经验的实证研究,中国社会科学,(4):18-32
    49 林毅大,刘培林,2003,中国的经济发展战略与地区收入差距,经济研究,(3):19-25
    50 刘建平,王克林,黄怀槐,2006,产业结构与经济增长关系的实证分析,统计与决策,1:70-72
    51 刘清春,王铮,许世远,2007,中国城市旅游人生气候舒适性研究,资源科学,291):133-142
    52 刘扬,王铮,2003,基于Web的区域经济增长分析PSE模式与应用系统,华东师范大学博士毕业论文
    53 刘勇,2005,中国新三大地带宏观区域格局的划分,地理学报,60(3):361-370
    54 陆铭,陈钊,2005,区域经济差异的两种要素、两种力量,云南大学学报(社会版),27-38
    55 吕安民,李成名,林宗坚,2002,人口统计数据的空间分布化,武汉大学学报信息科学版,27(3):301-305
    56 吕拉吕,1998,人地关系操作范式探讨,人文地理.6:14-17
    57 罗姗,叶宗文,2005,省域中心与边缘地区的经济发展差异,重庆科技学院学报(社会科学版),1:70-72
    58 罗勇,曹丽莉,2005,中国制造业集聚程度变动趋势实证研究,经济研究.2005,(8):106-115
    59 马国霞,甘国辉,2006,区域经济增长时空分异模拟研究,中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所博士论文
    60 毛汉英,余丹林,2001,环渤海地区区域承载力研究,地理学报,66(3):363-371
    61 欧向军,2004,江苏省区域经济极化及其动力机制定量分析,地理学报,59(09):791-799
    62 钱枫林,2005,比较优势、资源禀赋、社会经济发展与劳动就业——实证分析与理论探讨,学海,3:129-135
    63 乔家君,李小建,2004,中国中部农区村域人地关系系统定量研究,河南大学博士毕业论文
    64 沈百福,2003,地方教育投资研究,北京:北京师范大学出版社
    65 沈坤荣,耿强,2001,外国直接投资、技术外溢与内生经济增长,中国社会科学,5:82-93
    66 沈坤荣,马俊,2002,中国经济增长的“俱乐部收敛”特征及其成因研究,经济研究,1:33-39
    67 舒元,谢识予,孔爱国等,1999,现代经济增长模型,上海:复旦大学出版社,7
    68 孙久文,邓慧慧,2006,京津冀区域趋同的实证分析,地理与地理信息科学,22(5):60-63
    69 腾丽,王铮,2005,GIS环境下的区域溢山研究,华东师范大学硕士博士毕业论文
    70 涂红,2006,贸易开放、制度变迁与经济增长——基于不同国家规模和发展水平的比较分析,南开学报:哲学社会科学版(3):45-53
    71 汪应宏,郭达志,张海荣等,2006,我国煤炭资源势的空间分布及其应用,自然资源学报,21(2):225-230
    72 王启仿,叶一广,2003,区域经济差异及其影响因素分析,南京农业大学博士论文,
    73 王铮,葛昭攀,2002,中国区域经济发展的多重均衡态与转变前兆,中国社会科学,4:31-38
    74 王铮,毛可晶,刘筱等,2005,高技术产业聚集区形成的区位因子分析,60(4):567-576
    75 王铮,邓悦,葛昭攀等,2002,理论经济地理学,北京:科学出版社.
    76 王铮,张不远,刘啸雷等,1995,中国生态环境过渡的一个重要地带,生态学报,15(3):319-326
    77 王志刚,2004,质疑中国经济增长的条件收敛性,管理世界,(3):25-30
    78 魏后凯,1997,中国地区经济增长及其收敛性,中国工业经济,3:31-37
    79 魏后凯,2002,外商直接投资对中国区域经济增长的影响,经济研究,4:19-26
    80 吴兵,王铮,2004,中国各省区人力资本测算研究,科研管理,25(4):60-65
    81 吴传钧,1991,论地理学的研究核心人地关系地域系统,经济地理,11(3):1-5
    82 吴传钧,1999,我国20世纪地理学发展回顾及新世纪展望:庆祝中国地理学会创立90周年,地理学报,54(5):657-663
    83 吴玉鸣,徐建华,2004,GIS支持下中国区域经济增长与收入差异研究,华东师范大学博士毕业论文
    84 夏海斌,2006,面向艰苦边远性分析的地理信息系统——设计、模型利算法,华东师范大学硕士毕业论文
    85 谢书玲,王铮,2006,结合GIS的新经济产业地里计算模型研究及应用,华东师范大学硕士毕业论文
    86 徐建华,鲁凤,苏芳林等,2005,中国区域经济擦和时空尺度分析,地理研究,24(1):57-61
    87 徐康宁,冯春虎,2003,中国制造业地区性集中程度的实证研究,东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版,5(01):37-42
    88 徐康宁,王剑,2006,自然资源丰裕程度与经济发展水平关系的实证研究,经济研究,453(1):78-90
    89 徐现祥,李郇,2004,中国城市经济增长的趋同分析,经济研究,(5):40-48
    90 闫仲勇,杨华,王丽红,2006,中国农村区域经济增长的收敛性研究,中国农业大学学报,11(1):105-108
    91 颜鹏飞,王兵,2004,技术效率、技术进步与生产率增长:基于DEA的实证分析,经济研究,(12):55-65
    92 杨洁,2002,近几年我国东、中、西部地区发展差距的变动情况及趋势判断,经济研究参考,(70):2~6
    93 杨开忠,1994,中国区域经济变动研究,经济研究,(12):28-33
    94 杨青山2002,对人地关系地域系统协凋发展的概念性认识.经济地理,22(3):289-292
    95 杨伟民,1992,地区间收入差距变动的实证分析,经济研究,(1):70-74
    96 杨晓光,樊杰,赵燕霞,2002,20世纪90年代中国区域经济增长的要素分析,地理学报,57(6);701-708
    97 杨云彦,1994,中国人口迁移与发展的长期战略,武汉:武汉出版社,274-295
    98 叶阿忠,2003,非参数计量经济学,南开大学出版社
    99 尹希国,陈刚,2006,我国金融发展与地区经济收敛,当代经济科学,27(5):18-25
    100 应龙根,宁越敏,2004,空间数据:性质、影响和分析方法,地理科学进展,20(1):49~57
    101 俞勇军,陆玉麒,2005,交通投资与经济发展的关系及其区域效应评价方法研究,人文地理,20(1):27-31
    102 张守一,葛新权,王斌,1997,非参数回归及其应用,数量经济技术经济研究,(10):60-65
    103 赵明华,韩荣青,2004,地理学人地关系与人地系统研究现状评述,地域研究与开发,23(5):6~10
    104 赵跃龙,刘燕华,1996,中国脆弱生态环境分布及其与贫困的关系,人文地理,11(2):61-68
    105 郑度,2002,21世纪人地关系研究前瞻,地理研究,21(1):9-13
    106 周卫峰,汪同三,2005,中国区域经济增长收敛性研究,中国社会科学院研究生院博士学位论文
    107 周兆年,2003,低氧与健康研究,中国基础科学.5:20-25
    108 朱洪革,蒋敏元,2006,国外自然资本研究,外国经济与管理,28(2):1-6
    109 朱孔来、刘善凤,2001,山东省东西部地区差距衡量指标体系及测算分析,地理学与国土研究,2000,16(3):87-91
    110 朱鹏飞,2004,中国经济增长地区差异的收敛性分析,南京工业大学硕士毕业论文
    111 朱英明,2002,长江三角洲地区外商投资企业空间集群与地区增长,中国工业经济,(1):66-72

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700