用户名: 密码: 验证码:
中国增值税扩围改革效应研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
自1954年法国成功引入增值税之后,增值税以独特的中性魅力迅速风靡全球,至今已被150多个国家和地区所引进。增值税在我国经历了一个不断发展和完善的过程,20年来一直是我国的主体税种。但由于历史原因,目前我国增值税征收范围仍然过窄,不能做到“一税贯通”,极大地影响其中性优势的发挥,逐步扩大征收范围一直是我国增值税的改革目标。随着我国经济结构的优化和实施结构性减税的需要,中央于2012年1月1日在上海开始了增值税扩围改革试点工作,将重复征税比较严重的交通运输业和部分现代服务业纳入增值税的征税范围。一年多来,试点工作进展顺利,取得了积极效果,大部分企业实现了减税效应,受到了众多企业的欢迎。
     在此基础上,中央决定2013年8月1日起在全国推行增值税扩围改革。本文主要探讨上海方案是否可以推广全国,以及上海方案推广到全国后需要解决的问题,并依据上海增值税扩围改革方案测算全国施行增值税扩围改革后对国家财政收入、行业税负、经济增长的影响,通过测算来反映增值税扩围改革是否有利于结构性减税目标的实现以及促进现代服务业的发展和我国产业结构的优化升级。为此,本文展开了如下研究:
     简要地回顾我国增值税试点、全面实施和转型过程,并对不同历史时期增值税的运行情况及存在的问题和改革内容做了剖析,同时参考增值税的先行国家“现代型增值税”的实践,论证了我国增值税扩围改革的必要性和可行性。
     根据经济学和税收学理论以及增值税、营业税制度设置,从理论上揭示了增值税和营业税在财政收入、企业税负以及对企业生产经营结构影响等方面的差异;分析了营业税与增值税并行对增值税的负面影响;探讨了增值税扩围改革对我国筹集财政资金、行业税负以及促进我国经济增长方面的影响。
     依据上海增值税扩围改革方案,运用投入产出法对上海方案推广全国后对行业税负和财政收入的影响进行测算。测算结果表明:一是扩围改革后各行业的税负变化有增有减,但以税负下降为主,其中工业税负的下降幅度主要集中在1%-2%之间,服务行业税负变化幅度主要集中在-3%-3%之间;二是扩围在整体上将导致财政收入减少,其中扩围行业财政收入减收约910亿元;三是整体财政效应和行业减税效应将对我国经济增长产生显著的正向影响。
     选取内地除西藏之外的30个省级行政区,时间跨度从2001年到2011年的数据,通过构建增值税、营业税与经济增长的关系模型,使用我国近11年税收和经济增长的面板数据研究了增值税和营业税以及增值税扩围对我国经济增长的影响。结果发现,增值税的影响程度从扩围前的16.51%增加至扩围后的44.11%,扩围前营业税和增值税共同对经济增长的影响只有33.67%,表明增值税扩围对我国的经济增长起到了显著的正向影响关系。
     根据上述研究结果和增值税扩围改革将面临的难点,总结了我国增值税扩围改革应遵循的原则,以及在实际操作中对财政收入分配、扩围行业选择、税率设计等方面提出了具体建议。
Since France has introduced value-added tax (VAT)1954, the VAT, which has been used by more than150countries and regions so and swept the globe with the charm of neutrality quickly. VAT, a major tax in China for the past20years, has experienced the process of continuous development and improvement. However, due to historical reasons, the taxation scope of China's VAT is so narrow that it greatly affects the play of its advantage. The objective of China's VAT reform has been gradually expanding the taxation scope of VAT. With the optimization of China's economic structure and needs of implementing structural tax cuts, the central government has decided that the country will start replacing its turnover tax with VAT in the transport sector and some service sectors in Shanghai starting from Jan1. More than a year, the reform pilot has gone smoothly and achieved positive results, and most of the businesses enjoys tax cuts and welcome the reform.
     Based on this, the central government decided to spread the reform to the whole country from Aug1. This paper mainly discusses whether the Shanghai program can be extended to the whole country, the problems to be solved after Shanghai program extend to the country, and the effect on fiscal revenue, industry tax burden, economic growth after the nationwide implementation of VAT expansion on the basis of Shanghai VAT reform program. The paper also analyses whether the reform is conducive to the goals of structural tax reduction and the promotion of the development of modern service industry and the optimization and upgrading of industrial structure in China. To this end, the paper launches a study as follows:
     A brief review of the pilot reform, the full implementation and transition process, the throughout analysis of the operation and the problems and reform content in different historical periods, and the demonstration of the necessity and feasibility of VAT expansion reform with reference to the practice of Modern type VAT in some countries.
     Theoretical reveal of the difference of VAT and business tax on fiscal revenue,corporate tax burden, as well as the structural impact on enterprise production and management on basis of economic and tax theory, as well as system settings of value-added tax and business tax; exploration of the impact on raising financial capital, industry tax burden as well as promoting economic growth after VAT expansion in China.
     Estimation of the nationwide impact on the industry tax burden and fiscal revenue based on the Shanghai VAT expansion reform program by the use of input-output method. It turns out that:Firstly, the industry tax burden varies, but mainly falls industrial tax burden decrease about1%-2%, the service tax burden changes between-3%-3%; Secondly, fiscal revenue will decrease, of which in pilot industry by about910billion yuan; Thirdly, overall financial effect and industry tax relief will have a significant positive impact on China's economic growth.
     Selection of30provincial-level administrative region except Tibet of Mainland China from2001to2011. By constructing the relational model of the value-added tax, business tax and economic growth, study of the impact of VAT and business tax and VAT expansion reform on China's economic growth by use of China's nearly11years of tax and economic growth panel data. It was found that the degree of the impact of the VAT increases from16.51%to44.11%, while the impact of VAT and business tax before pilot reform stands33.67%, indicating that the VAT expansion reform has played a significant positive role on China's economic growth.
     According to the results of the study and the difficulties faced by VAT expansion reform, the paper summarizes the principles of VAT expansion reform, and puts forward specific suggestion on the distribution of revenues selection of expansion industry, rate design and other aspects.
引文
[1]Acs.Z.J, Audretsch D, and Feldman M. Real Effects of Academic Research: Comment[J]. American Economic Review,1992,82:363-367
    [2]Acs.Z.J. and Audretsch, D. B. Innovation in Large and Small Firms:An Empirical Analysis[J]. American Economic Review,1988,78 (4):678-690.
    [3]Adams, J.D. Science, R&D, and Invention Potential Recharge:US Evidence [J]. American Economic Review,1993(Papers and Proceedings),83:458-462.
    [4]Alan Schenk and Oliver, Value Added Tax:a Comparative Approach, Cambirdge: Cambridge University Press,2006
    [5]Alchian and Demstez,H. Production, Information Costs,and Economic Organization[J]. American Economic Review,1972,62:777-795.
    [6]Ballard, Charles L, John Karl Scholz, and John B. Shoven.The value added tax:a general equilibrium look at its efficiency and incidence[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1987:445-474.
    [7]Besley, Harvey Rosen. Sales Tax and prices:an empirical analysis[J]. National Tar Journal.1999,52(2):157-178.
    [8]Bird and Gendron,VAT Revisited:A New Look at the Value Added Tax in Developing and Transitional Countres(USAID 2005),p87.
    [9]Bird and Gendron,VAT Revisited:A New Look at the Value Added Tax.2002
    [10]Carmichael, J. The effects of mission-oriented public R&D spending on private industry[J]. Journal of Finance 1981,36:617-627.
    [11]Cohen, Levinthal, D. Innovation and Learning:The Two Faces of R&D[J]. The Economic Journal,1989,99:569-596.
    [12]Comanor, W. and Scherer, F. M. Patent Statistics as a Measure of Technical Change[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1969,77(3):329-98.
    [13]Creedy, J. Measuring welfare changes and tax burdens. Ed ward Elgar. Publishing Limited,1998.
    [14]Creedy, John, Measuring Welfare Changes and Tax Burdens.Edward Elgar.Publishing Limited,1998.
    [15]Creedy, John,1999, Modeling Indirect Taxes and Tax Reform. Edward Elgar. Publishing Limited.
    [16]David, B.J. Universities and the Growth of Science in Germany and the United States[J]. Minerva,1968,7:1-35
    [17]Due, John F. Trends in State Sales Tax Audit Selec. tion Since 1960. National Tax Journal.1985.6.
    [18]Ebrill,Keen,Bodin and Summer,The Modern VAT,IMF,Washington DC,2001,p.94,95.
    [19]Edeli, Silvia, Forte. Francesco Joint income—tax and VAT—chain evasion. European Journal of Political Economy.1999.2
    [20]European Tax handbook, IBFD publications,2001
    [21]Fedeli, Silvia, Forte. Francesco Jointin come—tax and VAT—chain evasion. European Journalof Politicla Economy,1999.2.
    [22]Furman, Jeffrey L. & Porter, Michael E. & Stern, Scott. The Determinants of National Innovative Capacity[J].Research Policy,2002,31(6):899-933.
    [23]Freeman, C. Japan:A New National Innovation System?[C]. in G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. R. Nelson, G. Silverberg and L. Soete (eds.) Technology and Economy Theory, London: Pinter.1988.
    [24]Fuster, Imrohoroglu and Imrohoroglu, S. Altruism, incomplete markets, and tax reform[J]. Journal of Monetary Economics,2008,55:65-90.
    [25]Greenwood, Jovonovic. Financial Development, Growth, and the Distribution of Income[J]. The Journal of Political Economy,1990,98,5:1076-1107.
    [26]Griliches, Z. R&D and Productivity[M]. Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1998.
    [27]Hall, Grilichies, Z. AND Hausman, J. A. Patents and R & D:Is There a Lag?[J]. International Economic Review,1986,27(2):265-83.
    [28]Harryson. Japanese Technology and Innovation Management[M]. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited,1998.
    [29]Hayek. Economics and Knowledge [J]. Economica,1937,4:33-55.
    [30]Hooper and Karen A.smith A value—added Tax in The U.S.A:An Argument In Favor Business Horizons,1997
    [31]http://tax.tianhenet.com.cn/2012/1030/360456.shtml
    [32]http://www.ctax.org.cn/news/rdzt/ygzkw/zdxw/201211/t20121127_703866.html
    [33]Hu, Albert, G. Z. Ownership, Government R&D, Private R&D, and Productivity in Chinese Industry[J]. Journal of Comparative Economics,2001,29 (1):136-157.
    [34]JohnKay,MervynKing. The British Tax System. Jour—Economic Literature,1979.9.
    [35]Kaplanoglou, G. A Microsimulation Analysis of the distribution of the indirect tax burden among Greek households, in L. Mitton, H. Sutherland and M. Weeks (eds.), Microsimulation Modelling for Policy Analysis:Challenges and Innovations[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,2000.
    [36]Kay.Mervyn King. The British Tax System. Jourhal of Economic Literature,1979.9.
    [37]King, R.G., and Levine, R. Finance and Growth:Schumpeter Might Be Right[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics,1993,108:713-37.
    [38]Levine, R. Financial Development and Economic Growth:Views and Agenda [J]. Journal of Economic Literature,1997, (5):688-726.
    [39]Liam Ebrill, Michael Keen,Jean-paul Bodin and Victoria Summers,The modern VAT,International Monetary Fund,2001
    [40]Michael Keen and Jack Mintz,"The optimal theshold for a value-added tax",Journal of Public Economics 88,2004,p559-p576.
    [41]Nelson,R. Institutions Supporting Technical Advance in Industry [J]. American Economic Review,1986,76:186-189.
    [42]OECD,Taxing Powers of Stateandloeal government,OECDTax Polley Studies,1999
    [43]Powell, Brantley, P. Competitive Cooperation in Biotechnology:Learning Through Networks?[C]. In:N. Nohria, & R. G. Eccles (Ed.), Networks and Organizations:Structure, Form, and Action. Boston:Harvard University Press,1992:366-390.
    [44]Ramsey. Acontribution to the theory of taxation[J]. Economic Journal,1927,37:47-61.
    [45]Richard M Bird, Pierre-Pascal Gendron. The VAT in Developing and Transitional Countries [M]. New York:Cambridge University Press,2007
    [46]Rosenberg. Why do firms do basic research (with their own money)?[J]. Research Policy,1990,19:165-174.
    [47]Scherer, F. M. Corporate Inventive Output, Profits, and Growth[J]. The Journal of Political Economy, LⅩⅩⅢ,1965(a):290-297.
    [48]Seligman, E. R. A. Essays in Taxation[M].New York:Macmillan,1895.
    [49]Sijbren Cnossen, "VAT Treatment of Immorable Property",Tax Note International, Vol.10,1995.
    [50]Tait.Alan, Value—Added Tax:Administrative and Policy Issues. Washington.DC: International Monetary Fund.1991. October.
    [51]Tax Law in japan, kluwer law International,2001
    [52]Teresa Ter-Minassian. Inter-governmental Fiscal Relations in a Macroeconomic Perspective:An Overview[M].Washing-ton:International Monetary Fund,1997.
    [53]Thomas S. Adams. Fundamental Problems of Federal Income Taxation[J]. The Quarterly journal of economics.1921 (3)
    [54]Thomas Sewall Adams, National Tax Association. The taxation of business[].Atlanta: the National Tax Association, November 15,1917.
    [55]Tuan Minh Le,Value Added Tax:Mechanism,Dsign,and Policy Issues,Paper prepared for the World Bank course on practical issues of tax policy in developing countries,Washington D.C.,Apri128-May 1,2003.
    [56]Wiggins, Steven N. Product Quality Regulation and New Drug Introductions:Some New Evidence from the 1970s[J]. Review of Economics and Statistics,1981,63 (4): 615-619.
    [57]Womack, J. Jones and Roos, D. The Machine That Change the World[M]. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company,1990.
    [58]Yang, X. and Borland, J. A Microeconomic Mechanism for Economic Growth[J]. Journal of political Economy.1991,99:460-482.
    [59]Younger, Sahn, S. Haggblade, P. Dorosh. Tax incidence in Madagascar:an analysis using household data[J]. World Bank Economic Review,1999,13:303-331.
    [60]艾伦.泰特.增值税现实与问题研究[M].中国税务出版社,1992:68-72.
    [61]安徽财经大学课题组.私人部门税收负担与经济增长[J].公共经济评论,2008(10):72-76
    [62]蔡昌.对增值税扩围问题的探讨[J].税务研究,2010(5):44-45.
    [63]蔡昌.增值税扩围改革的路径选择[J].中国财政,2011(2):40-42.
    [64]蔡昌.增值税转型后的税负变化及其影响[J].税务研究,2009(5):55-57.
    [65]陈共.财政学[M].四川人民出版社,1994:78-89
    [66]陈必福.完善我国地方税体系研究[J].发展研究,2009,(12):67-71.
    [67]陈炳瑞,任学群.论增值税的效率原则[J].财贸经济,1995(7):47-50.
    [68]邓子基,习甜.对我国金融服务业改征增值税的探讨[J].涉外税务,2011(4):11-14.
    [69]邓子基.税收支出管理[M].中国经济出版社,1999:35-47.
    [70]樊静.中国税制新论[M].北京大学出版社,2004:46-57.
    [71]冯磊,张孟.增值税改革中的纳税筹划探索[J].商业会计.2011(5):48-49.
    [72]龚广虎.建立完整统一的增值税制势在必行[J].税务与经济,1996(1):5-6.
    [73]龚辉文.关于增值税、营业税合并问题的思考[J].税务研究,2010(5):41-43.
    [74]郭庆旺.税收与经济发展[M].中国财政经济出版社,1995:56-61
    [75]国家税务总局科研所.外国税制概览[M].中国税务出版社,2009:102-121.
    [76]国家税务总局注册税务司管理中心.税法[M].中国税务出版社.2010:78-93.
    [77]韩绍初.改革进程中的增值税[M].中国税务出版社,2010:67-83.
    [78]杭州市萧山区地方税务局课题组.优化地方税制结构的设想[J].涉外税务,2007(10):24-28.
    [79]胡怡建,朱为群.税收学教程[M].上海三联书店,1994:121-136.
    [80]胡怡建.推进服务业增值税改革促进经济结构调整优化[J].税务研究,2011(6):35-39.
    [81]胡怡建.我国增值税扩围改革面临八大挑战[J].涉外税务,2011(7):5-10.
    [82]胡春.增值税扩围对财政收入的影响—基于上海改革方案和投入产出表的分析[J].财经科学,2013(1):118-124.
    [83]胡春.增值税扩围改革对行业税负的影响研究—基于上海改革方案和投入产出表的分析[J].河北经贸大学学报,2013(2):40-44.
    [84]胡春,叶子荣.增值税“扩围”对我国经济增长的实证研究.[J].统计与决策,2013(7): 146-148.
    [85]贾康,施文泼.关于扩大增值税征收范围的思考[J].中国财政2010(19):39-41.
    [86]贾康.为何我国营业税要改征增值税[N].中国财经报,2011-11-22,第006版.
    [87]姜明耀.增值税征收范围与免税范围探讨[J].税务与经济,2011(5):84-87.
    [88]孔刘柳,谢乔昕.税种划分对地方财政收入稳定效应的实证研究[J].税务与经济,2010(5):98-103.
    [89]李嘉图.政治经济学及赋税原理[M].北京:商务印书馆,1962:231-246.
    [90]李建人.增值税的转型与转型中的增值税[J].财经问题研究.2010(2)
    [91]李秋蝉.增值税转型的效应分析及其意义[J].西南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2009(4):27-29.
    [92]李思泓,幺冬梅.论我国增值税范围的优化[J].行政论坛,2002(5):62-63.
    [93]李志远.我国税制结构优化探讨[J].税务研究,2006(9):39-41.
    [94]刘隆亨.中国财税法学[M].法律出版社,2004:217-223.
    [95]刘明,程莹,欧阳华生.扩大增值税征收范围的政策性见解[J].现代财经,2011(4):15-22.
    [96]刘怡,聂海峰.间接税负担对收入分配的影响分析[J].经济研究,2004(5):22-30.
    [97]刘佐,朱广俊.中国金融税制研究[J].中央财经大学学报,2004:1-6.
    [98]卢仁法.中国税收调控[M].中国税务出版社,1996:91-105.
    [99]吕炜.市场化进程与税制结构变动[J].世界经济,2004(11):72-79.
    [100]欧阳坤,许文.促进我国服务业发展的税收政策研究[J].税务研究,2009(4):9-14.
    [101]彭高旺,李里.我国税收负担:现状与优化[J].中央财经大学学报,2006(2):11-14.
    [102]彭浩东,黄惠平.关于我国增值税的问题研究及完善对策[J].审计与经济研究,2002(2):24-26.
    [103]平新乔,张海洋,梁爽,郝朝艳,毛亮.增值税与营业税的税负[J].经济社会体制比较,2010(3):6-12.
    [104]全国注册税务师执业资格考试教材编写组,税法一[M].中国税务出版社2013:127-136.
    [105]任小明.金融服务业增值税的三种课征模式及对我国的启发[J].涉外税务,2010(9):34-37.
    [106]上海财经大学公共政策研究中心.中国财政发展报告,上海财大出版社2006:78-83.
    [107]施文泼,贾康.增值税扩围改革与中央和地方财政体制调整[J].财贸经济,2010(11):46-51.
    [108]税收与税源问题研究课题组.区域税收转移调查[M].北京:中国税务出板社,2007:85-101.
    [109]斯蒂芬·R·刘易斯.寻求发展的税收:原则与应用[M],1998:76-85.
    [110]苏玲.增值税扩围改革预期问题及其应对[J].会计之友,2011(9):66-67.
    [111]孙冰凌.我国税制结构调整的初步研究[J].黑龙江对外经贸,2006(10):119-120.
    [112]孙刚.增值税扩围的方式选择——基于对行业和体制调整的影响性分析[J],地方财政研究,2011,(2):56-59.
    [113]孙玉栋.税收竞争、税收负担与经济发展的关系及政策选择[J].中央财经大学2010(3):1-6.
    [114]唐婧妮.中国、东盟增值税比较与改革[J].涉外税务,2010(3):47-51.
    [115]田秀英.增值税转型后存在的问题及对策建议[J].中国集体经济.2011(4):110-111.
    [116]汪冲,增值税扩围、单一税率改进与效率得益[J].税务与经济,2011,(3):81—87.
    [117]汪德华,杨之刚.增值税扩围—覆盖服务业的困难与建议[J].税务研究,2009(12):36-38.
    [118]汪昊.我国税收超额负担变化:原因与对策[J].财贸经济,2007(5):51-58.
    [119]王斌.我国税制结构现状及改革模式的选择分析[J].阜阳师范学院学报(社会科学版),2004(5):17-19.
    [120]王朝才,许军.从对经济效率影响的视角谈我国增值税改革方案的选择[J].财政研究,2012(7):28-33.
    [121]王定娟.我国税制结构优化的若干问题探析[D].华中科技大学硕士论文,2006:56-61.
    [122]王国清,马跷,程谦.财政学[M].高等教育出版社,2008:98-112.
    [123]王国清.税收经济学[M].西南财经大学出版社,2006:67-98.
    [124]王建平,张登炎.关于建筑安装、交通运输行业改征增值税的调查与思考[J].中央财经大学学报,1999(8):41-44.
    [125]王连清.中国新税制[M].河南人民出版社,2004:219-231.
    [126]王陆进.发展税收研究—我国经济发展中的税收理论与政策[M].中国财政经济出版社,1998:81-104.
    [127]王琦.流转税与经济增长长期关系的协整检验[J].税务研究,2006(8):26-28.
    [128]王小平,姚稼强.完善增值税小规模纳税人的征税规定和管理办法.税务研究[J],2002(10):66-68.
    [129]王新丽.经济增长与改革中的宏观税负与税制结构[D].山东大学博士论文,2002:61-76.
    [130]魏陆.服务业发展与我国货物和劳务税制改革[J].中南财经政法大学学报,2010(4):65-70.
    [131]魏陆.扩大增值税征收范围改革研究[J].经济问题探索,2011(7):139-143.
    [132]魏正武.对建筑安装、交通运输行业改征增值税的调查[J].涉外税务,1999(9):50-52.
    [133]吴彩霞.我国税制改革的思考——生产型增值税向消费型增值税转变[J].青年学刊,1997(4):31-33.
    [134]吴丹.浅谈增值税转型对企业的影响[J].现代商业.2010(2):247-248.
    [135]吴金光.保险业流转税制度的国际比较研究[J].税务与经济,2010(6):91-97.
    [136]吴霖,高晓莉.我国商业银行流转税税制改革探讨[J].经营管理,2011(2):54-58.
    [137]肖绪湖,汪应平.关于增值税扩围征收的理性思考[J].财贸经济,2011(7):24-28.
    [138]辛波.从有效政府的角度看我国对税收负担率的合理选择[J].管理世界,2005(12):24-35.
    [139]熊鹭.对我国税收与价格动态影响关系的实证分析[J].税务研究,2011(6):87-91.
    [140]徐孟洲.税法原理[M].中国人民出版社,2008:79-93.
    [141]许建国.税制改革的深层次问题[M].中国人民大学出版社,2001:156-172.
    [142]许善达.国家税收[M].中国税务出版社,1999:107-125.
    [143]鄢杰.从西方增值税的产生与发展谈我国增值税税制的进一步完善[J].四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2000(3):33-39.
    [144]杨默如.货物和劳务一体化课税原理及我国增值税的改革需求[J].涉外税务,2010(9):30-34.
    [145]杨默如.我国增值税征收范围改革的难题及其破解[J].华侨大学学报(哲学社会科 学版),2011(3):70-77.
    [146]杨全社.增值税和营业税的变化趋势及改革路径[J].涉外税务,2010(6):36-41.
    [147]杨志安.完善增值税转型改革的对策[J].税务研究,2010(9):36-38.
    [148]袁春明.论我国增值税征收范围的择定及其对经济的预期影响[J].税务与经济,2000(4): 21-25.
    [149]岳树民.中国税制优化的理论分析[M].中国人民大学出版社,2003:81-103.
    [150]叶子荣,郝晓薇.减税呼声中的增值税改革辨析[J].税务研究,2009(3):25-28.
    [151]叶子荣,辜昭.进一步完善增值税的思考[J].财经科学,1996(2):49-65.
    [152]叶子荣.增值税优越性再认识[J].四川财政,1998(4):4-5.
    [153]叶子荣.论税收分配的经济依据[J].经济学家,1998(5):68-74.
    [154]叶子荣,刘蓉.规范化:我国增值税进一步完善的目标[J].天府新论,1996(4):3-8.
    [155]张斌.营业税全面取消后的影响分析[J].财会研究,2011(2):31-33.
    [156]张斌.增值税扩围对地方经济的影响分析及对策研究[J].湖北社会科学,2011(6):74-77.
    [157]张赫城:最优税研究[D],东北财经大学博士论文,2007:78-84.
    [158]张伦俊.深化税制改革推进经济发展方式转型[J].南京审计学院学报,2011(2):6-17.
    [159]张培英,周磊.深化增值税改革方案的设计[J].学术交流,2003(2):101-103.
    [160]张任之.增值税转型的预期效应分析[D].江西财经大学博士论文,2009:78-84.
    [161]张五常.论新制度经济学[M].商务印书馆,2000:167-171.
    [162]张阳.中国税负归宿一般均衡研究[M].中国税务出版社,2000:260-271.
    [163]赵丽萍.关于增值税的扩围改革[J].财政研究,2010(6):34-36.
    [164]中国注册会计师协会.注册会计师考试全国统一教材:税法[M].中国财政经济出版社,2011:249-258.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700