用户名: 密码: 验证码:
影响颅内宽颈动脉瘤血管内治疗策略的相关因素研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
背景与目的:颅内宽颈动脉瘤仍是血管内治疗的难题之一,主要表现在技术处理困难和容易复发两个方面。目前虽然有多种方法可以采用,但许多因素会影响治疗策略的规划和治疗效果。本研究旨在分析、探讨可能影响颅内宽颈动脉瘤血管内治疗策略的相关因素,以期为提高宽颈动脉瘤的血管内治疗效果提供参考。
     方法:回顾分析2007年1月至2011年12月在我中心接受血管内治疗的颅内宽颈动脉瘤患者的相关资料,主要包括:(1)动脉瘤的形态学特点:如动脉瘤形状、大小、部位、瘤颈宽度、瘤体/颈比值、瘤体高/宽比、载瘤动脉直径等;(2)动脉瘤血管内治疗的情况:技术资料、栓塞结果、并发症、影像随访结果;(3)患者的临床状态:如动脉瘤是否破裂和临床转归等。连续变量的分布用均数和标准差(mean±SD)描述,离散变量用频率、百分比描述。采用单因素x2分析及多因素Logistic回归分析探讨可能影响栓塞结果的因素。
     结果:(1)共有210例患者(238个颅内宽颈动脉瘤)纳入本研究。其中,破裂动脉瘤154个(64.71%),未破裂动脉瘤84个(35.29%);前循环动脉瘤占200个(84.03%),后循环动脉瘤38个(15.97%);动脉瘤平均大小6.94±5.64mm(1.640mm),瘤颈平均4.11±2.47mm(1.0-20mm);平均瘤高/横径比值(H/D)1.31±0.46(0.45-5.40);分叉部动脉瘤88个(36.97%),侧壁动脉瘤150个(63.03%)。(2)238个动脉瘤中,1个因术中血栓形成放弃栓塞,技术成功率99.58%,充分栓塞率为81.01%。单纯弹簧圈栓塞55个(23.11%),球囊辅助弹簧圈栓塞71个(29.83%),支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞79个(33.19%),联合支架与球囊技术栓塞17个(7.14%),载瘤动脉单纯支架置入术(Sole Stenting)12个(5.04%),双微导管技术4个(1.68%)。(3)动脉瘤长/宽比≤1(OR=2.847,P=0.006)及瘤颈>4mm(OR=4.772,P=0.000)更倾向于应用支架辅助栓塞,破裂(OR=0.372,P=0.003)及位于分叉部的动脉瘤(OR=0.231,P=0.000)不倾向于应用支架辅助栓塞;瘤颈>4mmm多被选择应用球囊辅助栓塞(OR=3.662,P=0.003);破裂(OR=0.311,P=0.006)及体/颈比≥1.5的动脉瘤(OR=0.427,P=0.043)更倾向于单纯弹簧圈实施栓塞。(4)破裂动脉瘤的充分栓塞率高于未破裂动脉瘤(OR=2.918,P=0.002),长/宽比≤1的动脉瘤比>1的动脉瘤不容易被充分栓塞(OR=0.399,P=0.010)。(5)除10例院内死亡患者外,200例患者得到临床随访,平均随访时间24.60±16.28个月。7例患者随访期间死亡。134个动脉瘤接受了造影影像随访;良好转归率(包括治愈、好转或稳定)为87.31%,复发率12.69%。直径>15mm的动脉瘤栓塞后容易复发(OR=5.867,P=0.028)。
     结论:(1)选用适当的血管内治疗方法治疗颅内宽颈动脉瘤,可以取得满意的中短期疗效。(2)单纯弹簧圈、球囊或支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞是目前治疗颅内宽颈动脉瘤最基本的技术,且支架辅助技术呈上升趋势。(3)颈宽>4mm的动脉瘤多被采用球囊或支架辅助技术栓塞;破裂的或体/颈比≥1.5的动脉瘤,术者更倾向于选择球囊辅助或单纯弹簧圈栓塞;长/宽比≤1的动脉瘤更倾向于选择支架辅助栓塞;分叉部动脉瘤采用支架辅助栓塞率相对低。(4)破裂动脉瘤和长/宽比>1的动脉瘤充分栓塞率更高。(5)动脉瘤大小是影响动脉瘤栓塞后转归的主要因素,直径>15mm的动脉瘤栓塞后更易复发。
Background and Objectives:
     Intracranial wide-necked aneurysm is still one of the challenging issues in the field of interventional neuroradiology, largely due to the technical difficulties in their endovascular management and high recurrence rate after treatment. Although various approaches are available, a strategic selection of the proper one, as well as its efficacies, is affected by multiple factors. In this study, we aimed to retrospectively investigate and evaluate the factors affecting the endovascular treatment strategies of intracranial wide-necked aneurysms, with an intention to find some worthy information in improving the therapeutic efficacy of this type of disorders.
     Methods:
     Patients with wide-necked aneurysm(s) who received endovascular treatment in our centre between Jan,2007and Dec,2011were analyzed retrospectively with particular attention on the following aspects.
     1) Morphological characteristics:such as the aneurysm shape, size, location, neck size (N), dome-to-neck ratio (D/N), height-to-diameter transversa ratio (H/D) and the diameter of parent artery.
     2) Clinical and imaging records:including the patients'presentations, results of treatment, technique data, procedure related complications, and the clinical and imaging follow-up information. Data were statistically processed by either single-factor X2or multi-factor logistic regression analysis. Results are represented as frequency or ratio and mean±SD accordingly for un-continuous variants and continuous variants, respectively.
     Results:
     1)210patients with wide-necked aneurysms (in total of238aneurysms) were included in the study. Among all the aneurysms,154were ruptured and84un-ruptured, representing64.71%and35.92%, respectively.200(84.03%) occurred in anterior circulation and38(15.97%) in the posterior circulation;88(36.97%) are bifurcation aneurysms and150(63.03%) lateral ones. The aneurysms are6.94±5.64mm (1.6-40mm) in size, with their neck size at4.11±2.47mm (1.0-20mm) in average; Average H/D is1.31±0.46(0.45-5.40).
     2) Among all the238aneurysms,237(99.58%) were received successful endovascular treatment except that one fell into abeyance because of the thrombosis during procedure, and81.01%of the237aneurysms got adequate embolization. Specifically,55(23.11%) received standard coiling,71(29.83%) balloon-assisted and79(33.19%) stent-assisted coiling,17(7.14%) a combined technique with both stent and balloon assisting,12(5.04%) sole stenting and12(7.14%) double catheter technique.
     3) Aneurysms with H/D≤1(OR=2.847, P=0.006) and with N≥4mm (OR=4.772, P=0.000) were well suited for stent-assisted embolization, while ruptured (OR=0.372, P=0.003) and bifurcation aneurysms were not. Aneurysms with N≥4mm were preferable for balloon-assisted embolization (OR=3.662, P=0.003), too. Ruptured ones (OR=0.311,P=0.006) and those with D/N≥1.5(OR=0.427, P=0.043) were prone to be chosen for standard coiling.
     4) The rate of adequate embolization is higher in ruptured than in un-ruptured aneurysms (OR=2.918, P=0.002). The aneurysms with H/D≤1are much more difficult to get adequate embolization (OR=0.399, P=0.010).
     5) All200patients but10in-hospital death got follow-up of24.60±16.28months in average. Among them7died.134aneurysms underwent imaging follow-up, showing87.31%of satisfactory evolution (including improvement and no-change) and12.69%of worsening. Worsening tend to happen in those patients with aneurysms more than15mm in size (OR=5.867, P=0.028).
     Conclusions:
     1) Satisfactory short-or midterm quality of occlusion could be expected for those wide-necked aneurysms receiving appropriately selected endovascular treatment.
     2) Standard coiling, balloon-or stent-assisted embolizations are the mainstream methods for the endovascular treatment of intracranial wide-necked aneurysms, with the stent-assisted embolization getting a rising tendency.
     3) Aneurysms with neck size≥4mm are suited for balloon-or stent-assisted embolization. For ruptured aneurysm and those with D/N≥1.5, the operators favors balloon-assisted or standard coiling much more than stenting. Aneurysms with≤1are more appropriate for stent-assisted embolization, yet this do not include aneurysms located at the bifurcation.
     4) Ruptured aneurysms and those with H/D>1win a higher rate of adequate embolization.
     5) Aneurysm size was the primary factor affecting the evolution of the aneurysms after endovascular treatment, and diameter>15mm was the only independent risk factor for recurrence in this study.
引文
[1]Atkinson JL, Sundt TM Jr, Houser OW, et al. Angiographic frequency of anterior circulation intracranial aneurysms. J. Neurosurg 1989; 70:551-555.
    [2]Chason JL, Hindman WM. Berry aneurysms of the circle of Willis:results of a planned autopsy study. Neurology 1958; 8:41-44.
    [3]McCormick WF, Acosta-Rua GJ. The size of intracranial saccular aneurysms. An autopsy study. J. Neurosurg 1970; 33:422-427.
    [4]Phillips LHⅡ, Whisnant JP, O'Fallon WM, Sundt TM Jr. The unchanging pattern of subarachnoid hemorrhage in a community. Neurology 1980; 30:1034-1040.
    [5]Broderick JP, Brott TG, Duldner JE, et al. Initial and recurrent bleeding are the major causes of death following subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke 1994; 25:1342-1347.
    [6]Higashida RT, Halbach VV, Cahan LD, et al. Detachable balloon embolization therapy of posterior circulation intracranial aneurysms. J. Neurosurg 1989; 71:512-519.
    [7]Guglielmi G, Vinuela F, Dion J, Duckwiler G. Electrothrombosis of saccular aneurysms via endovascular approach. Part 2:preliminary clinical experience. J. Neurosurg.75:8-14(1991).
    [8]Guglielmi G, Vinuela F, Sepetka I, Macellari V. Electrothrombosis of saccular aneurysms via endovascular approach. Part 1:electrochemical basis, technique, and experimental results. J. Neurosurg.75,1-7 (1991).
    [9]Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I, et al. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping Versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms:A randomized trial. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Collaborative Group. Lancet,2002; 360:1267-1274.
    [10]Campi A, Ramzi N, Molyneux AJ, et al. Retreatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms in patients randomized by coiling or clipping in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Stroke 2007; 38:1538-1544.
    [11]Raymond J, Roy D. Safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment of acutely ruptured aneurysms. Neurosurgery 1997; 41:1235-1246.
    [12]王大明,凌锋,李萌,等.颅内动脉瘤囊内栓塞结果影像学判断标准的探讨.中华外科杂志2000;38(11):844-846(插图837)
    [13]Grunwald IQ, Kamran M, Corkill RA, et al. Simple measurement of aneurysm residual after treatment:the SMART scale for evaluation of intracranial aneurysms treated with flow diverters. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2012; 154(1):21-26.
    [14]Pierot L, Cognard C, Anxionnat R, Ricolfi F; for the CLARITY Investigators. Endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms:factors affecting midterm quality anatomic results:analysis in a prospective, multicenter series of patients (CLARITY). AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012; 33(8):1475-1480.
    [15]Luessenhop AJ, Velasquez AC. Observations on the tolerance of the intracranial arteries to catheterization. J. Neurosurg.21:85-91 (1964).
    [16]Piotin M, Blanc R, Spelle L, et al. Stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysm: clinical and angiographic results in 216 consecutive aneurysms. Stroke 2010; 41:110-115.
    [17]Pierot L. Flow diverter stents in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms:where are we? J Neuroradiol 2011; 38:40-46. Epub 2011 Jan 22
    [18]Debrun GM, Aletich VA, Kehril P, et al. Aneurysm geometry:an important criterion in selecting patients for Guglielmi detachable coiling. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 1998; 38 Suppl:1-20.
    [19]Zubilaga AF, Guglielmi G, Vimuela F, et al. Endovascular occlusion of intracranial aneurysms with electrically detachable coils:Correlation of aneurysm neck size and treatment results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994; 15:815-820.
    [20]Akio M. Natural history of unruptured cerebral aneurysms. Brain Nerve 2008; 60(11):1383-1389.
    [21]Castro MA, Putman CM, Cebral JR. Computational fluid dynamics modeling of intracranial aneurysms:Effects of parent artery segmentation on intracranial aneurismal hemaodynamics. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006; 27:1703-1709.
    [22]Rinkel GJE. Natural history, epidemiology and screening of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Rev. Neurol 2008; 164(10):781-786.
    [23]van Rooij WJ, Keeren GJ, Peluso JP, et al. Clinical and angiographic results of coiling of 196 very small (< or= 3 mm) intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30:835-839.
    [24]Brinjikji W, Lanzino G, Cloft HJ, et al. Endovascular treatment of very small (3 mm or smaller) intracranial aneurysms:report of a consecutive series and a meta-analysis. Stroke 2010; 41:116-121.
    [25]Ioannidis I, Lalloo S, Corkill R, et al. Endovascular treatment of very small intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2010; 112:551-556.
    [26]Nguyen TN, Raymond J, Guilbert F, et al. Association of endovascular therapy of very small ruptured aneurysms with higher rates of procedure-related rupture. J Neurosurg 2008; 108:1088-1092.
    [27]Murayama Y, Nien YL, Duckwiler G, et al. Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms:11 years'experience. J. Neurosurg 2003; 98:959-966.
    [28]王大明,刘加春,王利军,等.颈宽角——一个描述颅内动脉瘤瘤颈与载瘤动脉关系的概念.中华神经外科杂志2011;27(5):558-561.
    [29]Raymond J, Roy D, Weill A, et al. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms and the Trial on Endovascular Aneurysm Management (TEAM):The principles behind the protocol. J Vase Interv Neurol 2008; 1(1):21-25.
    [30]OrtizR, StefanskiM, Rosenwasser R, et al. Cigarette smoking as a risk factor for recurrence of aneurysms treated by endosaccular occlusion. J Neurosurg 2008; 108: 672-675.
    [31]Meyers PM, Schumacher HC, Higashida RT, et al. Reporting standards for endovascular repair of saccular intracranial cerebral aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010; 21(1):E12-24.
    [32]Wakhloo AK, Schellhammer F, de Vries J, et al. Self-expanding and balloon-expandable stents in the treatment of carotid aneurysms:an experimental study in a canine model. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994; 15:493-502.
    [33]Lieber BB, Stancampiano AP, Wakhloo AK. Alteration of hemodynamics in aneurysm models by stenting:influence of stent porosity. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 1997; 25:460-469.
    [34]Moret J, Pierot L, Boulin A, et al. "Remodelling" technique of the arterial wall in the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms (abstr). Neuroradiology 1994; 36 (suppl 1):S83.
    [35]Moret J, Cognard C, Weill A, et al. The "remodelling technique" in the treatment of wide neck intracranial aneiuysms:angiographic results and clinical follow-up in 56 cases. Interv Neuroradiol 1997; 3:21-35.
    [36]Pierot L, Rajpal G, Kadziolka K, et al. The place for remodeling technique and stenting in the endovascular management of intracranial aneurysms:a single-center analysis from 2008 to 2010. Neuroradiology,2012; 54(9):973-979.
    [37]Higashida RT, Smith W, Gress D, et al. Intravascular stent and endovascular coil placement for a ruptured fusiform aneurysm of the basilar artery:Case report and review of the literature. J Neurosurg 1997; 87:944-949.
    [38]Henkes H, Bose A, Felber S, et al. Endovascular coil occlusion of intracranial aneurysms assisted by a novel self-expandable nitinol microstent (Neuroform). Interv Neuroradiol 2002; 8:107-119.
    [39]Howington JU, Hanel RA, Harrigan MR, et al. The Neuroform stent, the first microcatheter-delivered stent for use in the intracranial circulation. Neurosurgery 2004; 54:2-5.
    [40]Yang PF, Huang QH, Zhao WY, et al. Safety and efficacy of stent placement for treatment of intracranial aneurysms:a systematic review. Chin Med J (Engl) 2012; 125(10):1817-1823.
    [41]Huang QH, Wu YF, Xu Y, et al. Vascular geometry change because of endovascular stent placement for anterior communicating artery aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011; 32:1721-1725.
    [42]Lawson MF, Newman WC, Chi YY, et al. stent associated flow remodeling causes further occlusion of incompletely coiled aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2011; 69(3): 598-604.
    [43]Chalouhi N, Campbell P, Makke Y, et al. Treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms with a telescoping stent technique. J Neurol Surg A 2012; DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1322589.
    [44]Pavlisa G, Ozretic D, Murselovic T, et al. Sole stenting of large and giant intracranial aneurysms with self-expanding intracranial stents—limits and complications. Acta Neurochir 2010; 152:763-769.
    [45]Bodily KD, Cloft HJ, Lanzino G, et al. Stent-Assisted Coiling in Acutely Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms:A Qualitative, Systematic Review of the Literature. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011; 32:1232-36.
    [46]Lopes D, Mangubat E, Keigher K, et al. Should we use stents in subarachnoid hemorrhage? J Neurosurg SCI 2011; 55:35-38.
    [47]Shapiro M, Babb J, Becske T, et al. Safety and Efficacy of Adjunctive Balloon Remodeling during Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms:A Literature Review. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol,2008; 29(10):1777-1781.
    [48]Pierot L, Spelle L, Leclerc C, et al. Endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms:comparison of safety of remodeling technique and standard treatment with coils. Radiology 2009; 251:846-55.
    [49]Brilstra EH, Rinkel GJ, van der Graaf Y, et al. Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by embolization with coils:A systematic review. Stroke 1999; 30:470-476.
    [50]Pierot L, Spelle, Vitry F, for the ATENA investigators. Immediate clinical outcome of patients harboring unruptured intracranial aneurysms treated by endovascular approach:results of the ATENA trial. Stroke,2008; 39:2497-504. Epub 2008 Jul 10.
    [51]Pierot L, Cognard C, Anxionnat R, et al, for the CLARITY group. Remodeling technique for endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms had a higher rate of adequate postoperative occlusion than did conventional coil embolization with comparable safety. Radiology.2011; 258:546-53.
    [52]Cho YD, Lee JY, Seo JH, Kang HS, et al. Early recurrent hemorrhage after coil embolization in ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Neuroradiology 2012; 54(7): 719-26.
    [53]Johnston SC, Dowd CF, Higashida RT, et al, for the CARAT investigators. Predictors of rehemorrhage after treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms:the Cerebral Aneurysm Rerupture After Treatment (CARAT) study. Stroke 2008; 39:120-125.
    [54]Jartti P, Isokangas JM, A Karttunen, et al. Early rebleeding after coiling of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Acta Radiol 2010; 9:1043-1049.
    [55]Raymond J, Guilbert F, Weill A, et al. Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke 2003; 34:1398-1403.
    [1]Atkinson JL, Sundt TM Jr, Houser OW, et al. Angiographic frequency of anterior circulation intracranial aneurysms. J. Neurosurg 1989; 70:551-555.
    [2]Chason JL, Hindman WM. Berry aneurysms of the circle of Willis:results of a planned autopsy study. Neurology 1958; 8:41-44.
    [3]McCormick WF, Acosta-Rua GJ. The size of intracranial saccular aneurysms. An autopsy study. J. Neurosurg 1970; 33:422-427.
    [4]Phillips LH II, Whisnant JP, O'Fallon WM, Sundt TM Jr. The unchanging pattern of subarachnoid hemorrhage in a community. Neurology 1980; 30:1034-1040.
    [5]Broderick JP, Brott TG, Duldner JE, et al. Initial and recurrent bleeding are the major causes of death following subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke 1994; 25:1342-1347.
    [6]Luessenhop AJ, Velasquez AC. Observations on the tolerance of the intracranial arteries to catheterization. J. Neurosurg 1964; 21:85-91.
    [7]Higashida RT, Halbach VV, Cahan LD, et al. Detachable balloon embolization therapy of posterior circulation intracranial aneurysms. J. Neurosurg 1989; 71:512-519.
    [8]Guglielmi G, Vinuela F, Dion J, et al. Electrothrombosis of saccular aneurysms via endovascular approach. Part 2:preliminary clinical experience. J. Neurosurg 1991; 75:8-14.
    [9]Guglielmi G, Vinuela F, Sepetka I, et al. Electrothrombosis of saccular aneurysms via endovascular approach. Part 1:electrochemical basis, technique, and experimental results. J. Neurosurg 1991; 75:1-7.
    [10]Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I, et al. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping Versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms:A randomized trial. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Collaborative Group. Lancet 2002; 360:1267-1274.
    [11]Murayama Y, Nien YL, Duckwiler G, et al. Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms:11 years'experience. J. Neurosurg 2003; 98:959-966.
    [12]Lin T, Fox AJ, Drake CG. Regrowth of aneurysm sacs from residual neck following aneurysm clipping. J. Neurosurg 1989; 70:556-560.
    [13]Feuerberg I, Lindquist C, Lindqvist M, et al. Natural history of postoperative aneurysm rests. J. Neurosurg 1987; 66:30-34.
    [14]Kole MK, Pelz DM, Kalapos P, et al. Endovascular coi embolization of intracranial aneurysms important factors related to rates and outcomes of incomplete occlusion. J. Neurosurg 2005; 102:607-615.
    [15]Tateshima S, Grinstead J, Sinha S, et al. Intra-aneurysmal flow visualization by using phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging:feasibility study based on a geometrically realistic in vitro aneurysm model. J. Neurosurg 2004; 100:1041-1048.
    [16]Lieber BB, Stancampiano AP, Wakhloo AK. Alteration of hemodynamics in aneurysm models by stenting:influence of stent porosity. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 1997; 25:460-469.
    [17]Parlea L, Fahrig R, Holdsworth DW, et al. An analysis of the geometry of saccular intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999; 20:1079-1089.
    [18]Darsaut T, Bouzeghrane F, Salazkin I, et al. The effects of stenting and endothelial denudation on aneurysm and branch occlusion in experimental aneurysm models. J Vase Surg,2007; 45:1228-1235.
    [19]Moret J, Pierot L, Boulin A, et al. "Remodelling" technique of the arterial wall in the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms (abstr). Neuroradiology 1994; 36(suppl 1):S83.
    [20]Moret J, Cognard C, Weill A, et al. The "remodelling technique" in the treatment of wide neck intracranial aneurysms:angiographic results and clinical follow-up in 56 cases. Interv Neuroradiol 1997; 3:21-35.
    [21]Pierot L, Cognard C, Spelle L, et al. Safety and efficacy of balloon remodeling technique during endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms:critical review of the literature. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012; 33:12-15.
    [22]Pukenas B, Albuquerque FC, Weigele JB, et al. Use of a new double-lumen balloon catheter for single-catheter balloon-assisted coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms:technical note. Neurosurgery,2011; 69[ONS Suppl 1]:ons8-13.
    [23]Shapiro M, Babb J, Becske T, et al. Safety and Efficacy of Adjunctive Balloon Remodeling during Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms:A Literature Review. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol,2008; 29(10):1777-1781.
    [24]Pierot L, Rajpal G, Kadziolka K, et al. The place for remodeling technique and stenting in the endovascular management of intracranial aneurysms:a single-center analysis from 2008 to 2010. Neuroradiology,2012; 54(9):973-979.
    [25]Pierot L, Spelle, Vitry F, for the ATENA investigators. Immediate clinical outcome of patients harboring unruptured intracranial aneurysms treated by endovascular approach:results of the ATENA trial. Stroke,2008; 39:2497-504. Epub 2008 Jul 10.
    [26]Pierot L, Cognard C, Anxionnat R, et al, for the CLARITY group. Remodeling technique for endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms had a higher rate of adequate postoperative occlusion than did conventional coil embolization with comparable safety. Radiology.2011; 258:546-53.
    [27]Pierot L, Spelle L, Leclerc C, et al. Endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms:comparison of safety of remodeling technique and standard treatment with coils. Radiology 2009; 251:846-55.
    [28]Cekirge HS, Yavuz K, Geyik S, et al. HyperForm balloon remodeling in the ndovascular treatment of anterior cerebral, middle cerebral, and anterior communicating artery aneurysms:clinical and angiographic follow-up results in 800 consecutive patients. J Neurosurg,2011; 14:944-953.
    [29]Sluzewski M, Von Rooij WJ, Beute GN, et al. Balloon-assisted coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms:incidence, complications, and angiography results. J Neurosurg,2006; 105(3):396-399.
    [30]Piotin M, Blanc R, Spelle L, et al. Stent-Assisted Coiling of Intracranial Aneurysms: Clinical and Angiographic Results in 216 Consecutive Aneurysms. Stroke.2010; 41: 110-115.
    [31]Szikora I, Guterman LR, Wells KM, et al. Combined use of stents and coils to treat experimental wide-necked carotid aneurysm:preliminary results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994; 15(6):1091-1102.
    [32]Turjman F, Massoud TF, Ji C, et al. Combined stent implantation and endovascular coil placement for treatment of experimental wide-necked aneurysms:a feasibility study in swine. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994; 15(6):1087-1090.
    [33]Massoud TF, Turjman F, Ji C, et al. Endovascular treatment of fusiform aneurysms with stents and coils:technical feasibility in a swine model. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1995; 16(10):1953-1963.
    [34]Higashida RT, Smith W, Gress D, et al. Intravascular stent and endovascular coil placement for a ruptured fusiform aneurysm of the basilar artery:Case report and review of the literature. J Neurosurg 1997; 87:944-949.
    [35]Anderson PG, Boerth NJ, Liu M, et al. Cyclic GMP-dependent protein kinase expression in coronary arterial smooth muscle in response to balloon catheter injury. Arterioscler Thromb Vase Biol 2000; 20:2192-2197.
    [36]Levy El, Hanel RA, Bendok BR, et al. Staged stent-assisted angioplasty for symptomatic intracranial vertebrobasilar artery stenosis. J Neurosurg; 97:1294-1301.
    [37]Tanaka H, Sukhova GK, Swanson SJ, et al. Sustained activation of vascular cells and leukocytes in the rabbit aorta after balloon injury. Circulation 1993; 88:1788-1803.
    [38]Wainwright CL, Miller AM, Wadsworth RM. Inflammation as a key event in the development of neointima following vascular balloon injury. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2001; 28:891-895.
    [39]Henkes H, Bose A, Felber S, et al. Endovascular coil occlusion of intracranial aneurysms assisted by a novel self-expandable nitinol microstent (Neuroform). Interv Neuroradiol 2002; 8:107-119.
    [40]Howington JU, Hanel RA, Harrigan MR, et al. The Neuroform stent, the first microcatheter-delivered stent for use in the intracranial circulation. Neurosurgery 2004; 54:2-5.
    [41]dos Santos Souza MP, Agid R, Willinsky RA, et al. Microstent-assisted coiling for wide-necked intracranial aneurysms. Can J Neurol Sci 2005; 32:71-81.
    [42]Liebman KM, Severson III MA. Techniques and devices in neuroendovascular procedures. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2009; 20:315-340.
    [43]Lucas CP, Piotin M, Spelle L, et al. Stent-jack technique in stent-assisted coiling of wide-neck aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2008; 62[ONS Suppl 2]:ONS414-ONS417.
    [44]Hong B, Patel NV, Gounis MJ, et al. Semi-jailing technique for coil embolization of complex, wide-necked intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2009; 65(6):1131-1139.
    [45]Biondi A, Janardhan V, Katz JM, et al. Neuroform stent-assisted coil embolization of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms:strategies in stent deployment and midterm follow-up. Neurosurgery 2007; 61(3):460-468.
    [46]Babiker MH, Gonzalez LF, Ryan J, et al. Influence of stent configuration on cerebral aneurysm fluid dynamics. Journal of Biomechanics 2012; 45:440-447.
    [47]Thorell WE, Chow MM, Woo HH, et al. Y-configured dual intracranial stent-assisted coil embolization for the treatment of wide-necked basilar tip aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2005; 56:1035-1040.
    [48]Jankowitz BT, Thomas A, Jovin T, et al. Y stenting using kissing stents for the treatment of bifurcation aneurysms. J Neurolntervent Surg 2011:doi:10.1136/ jnis.2010.004275.
    [49]Cho YD, Park SW, Lee JY, et al. Nonoverlapping Y-configuration stenting technique with dual closed-cell stents in wide-neck basilar tip aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2012; 70[ONS Suppl 2]:ONS244-ONS249.
    [50]Lazzaro MA, Zaidat OO. X-configuration intersecting Enterprise stents for vascular remodeling and assisted coil embolization of a wide neck anterior communicating artery aneurysm. J Neurolntervent Surg 2011; 3:348-351.
    [51]Saatci I, Geyik S, Yavuz K, et al. X-Configured stent-assisted coiling in the endovascular treatment of complex anterior communicating artery aneurysms:a novel reconstructive technique. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011; 32:E113-E117 (Published Online First:24 November 2010. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2111).
    [52]Zelenak K, Zelenakova J, DeRiggo J, et al. Flow changes after endovascular treatment of a wide-neck anterior communicating artery aneurysm by using X-configured kissing stents (cross-kissing stents) technique. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2011; 34:1308-1311.
    [53]Wakhloo AK, Schellhammer F, de Vries J, et al. Self-expanding and balloon-expandable stents in the treatment of carotid aneurysms:an experimental study in a canine model. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994; 15:493-502.
    [54]Kim YJ. Sole stenting technique for treatment of complex aneurysms. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2009; 46:545-51.
    [55]Zenteno MA, Santos-Franco JA, Freitas-Modenesi JM, et al. Use of the sole stenting technique for the management of aneurysms in the posterior circulation in a prospective series of 20 patients. J Neurosurg 2008; 108:1104-18.
    [56]Chalouhi N, Campbell P, Makke Y, et al. Treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms with a telescoping stent technique. J Neurol Surg A 2012; DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1322589.
    [57]Pavlisa G。 Ozretic D, Murselovic T, et al. Sole stenting of large and giant intracranial aneurysms with self-expanding intracranial stents—limits and complications. Acta Neurochir 2010; 152:763-769.
    [58]Yang PF, Huang QH, Zhao WY, et al. Safety and efficacy of stent placement for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review. Chinese Medical Journal 2012; 125(10):1817-1823.
    [59]Brilstra EH, Rinkel GJ, van der Graaf Y, et al. Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by embolization with coils:A systematic review. Stroke 1999; 30:470-476.
    [60]Shapiro M, Babb J, Becske T, et al. Safety and efficacy of adjunctive balloon remodeling during endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms:A literature review. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29:1777-1781.
    [61]Bodily KD, Cloft HJ, Lanzino G, et al. Stent-Assisted Coiling in Acutely Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms:A Qualitative, Systematic Review of the Literature. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011; 32:1232-36.
    [62]Lopes D, Mangubat E, Keigher K, et al. Should we use stents in subarachnoid hemorrhage? J Neurosurg SCI 2011; 55:35-38.
    [63]Fiorella D, Albuquerque FC, Woo H, et al. Neuroform in-stent stenosis:Incidence, natural history, and treatment strategies. Neurosurgery 2006; 59:34-42.
    [64]Zhu YQ, Li MH, Fang C, et al. Application of Willis covered stent in the treatment of aneurysm in the cisteraal segment of the internal carotid artery:a pilot comparative study with long-term follow-up results. J Endovasc Ther 2010; 17:55-65.
    [65]Kinugasa K, Mandai S, Terai Y, et al. Direct thrombosis of aneurysms with cellulose acetate polymer. Part Ⅱ:Preliminary clinical experience. J Neurosurg 77:501--507, 1992.
    [66]Kinugasa K, Mandai S, Tsuchida S, et al. Cellulose acetate polymer thrombosis for the emergency treatment of aneurysms:Angiographic findings, clinical experience, and histopathological study. Neurosurgery 34:694-701,1994.
    [67]Lubicz B, Piotin M, Mounayer C, et al. Selective endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with a liquid embolic:a single-center experience in 39 patients with 41 aneurysms. American Journal of Neuroradiology,2005; 26(4): 885-893.
    [68]Molyneux AJ, Cekirge S, Saatci I, et al. Cerebral aneurysm multicenter European Onyx (CAMEO) trial:results of a prospective observational study in 20 European centers. American Journal of Neuroradiology,2004; 25(1):39-51.
    [69]Cekirge HS, Saatci I, Ozturk MH, et al. Late angiographic and clinical follow-up results of 100 consecutive aneurysms treated with Onyx reconstruction:largest single-center experience. Neuroradiology,2006; 48(2):113-126.
    [70]Mawad ME, Cekirge S, Ciceri E, et al. Endovascular treatment of giant and large intracranial aneurysms by using a combination of stent placement and liquid polymer injection. Journal of Neurosurgery,2002; 96(3):474-482.
    [71]Piske RL, Kanashiro LH, Paschoal E, et al. Aguiar. Evaluation of onyx HD-500 embolic system in the treatment of 84 wide-neck intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery,2009; 64(5):E865-E875.
    [72]Simon SD, Eskioglu E, Reig A, et al. Endovascular treatment of side wall aneurysms using a liquid embolic agent:a US single-center prospective trial. Neurosurgery,2010; 67(3):855-860.
    [73]Weber W, Siekmann R, Kis B, et al. Treatment and follow-up of 22 unruptured wide-necked intracranial aneurysms of the internal carotid artery with Onyx HD 500. American Journal of Neuroradiology,2005; 26(8):1909-1915.
    [74]Dalyai RT, Randazzo C, Ghobrial G, et al. Redefining Onyx HD 500 in the Flow Diversion Era. International Journal of VascularMedicine,2012, Article ID 435490,9 pages doi:10.1155/2012/435490.
    [75]Cekirge HS, Saatci I, Geyik S, et al. Intrasaccular combination of metallic coils and Onyx liquid embolic agent for the endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms. J Neurosurg,2006; 105(11):706-712.
    [76]Murayama Y, Vinuela F, Tateshima S, et al. Endovascular treatment of experimental aneurysms by use of a combination of liquid embolic agents and protective devices. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol,2000; 21:1726-1735.
    [77]Takao H, Murayama Y, Yuki I, et al. Endovascular treatment of experimental aneurysms using a combination of thermoreversible gelation polymer and protection devices:feasibility study. Neurosurgery,2009; 65:601-609.
    [78]Fiorella D, Woo HH, Albuquerque FC, et al. Definitive reconstruction of circumferential, fusiform intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device. Neurosurgery 2008; 62(5):1115-1120.
    [79]Fiorella D, Kelly ME, Albuquerque FC, et al. Curative reconstruction of a giant midbasilar trunk aneurysm with the pipeline embolization device. Neurosurgery, 2009;64(2):212-217.
    [80]Nelson PK, Lylyk P, Szikora I, et al. The pipeline embolization device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial. American Journal of Neuroradiology AJNR 2011;32(1):34-40.
    [81]Summary of safety and effectiveness data, pipeline embolization device, Food and Drug Administration, Advisory Committee,2011; http://www.fda.gov/downloads/ AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/NeurologicalDevicesPanel/UCM 247165.pdf.
    [82]Byrne JV, Beltechi R, Yarnold JA, et al. Early experience in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms by endovascular flow diversion:a multicentre prospective study. PLoS One 2010; 5(9):1-8.
    [83]Armoiry X, Paysant M, Hartmann D, et al. Interest of Flow Diversion Prostheses in the Management of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms. International Journal of Vascular Medicine 2012; Article ID 654627,5 pages, doi:10.1155/2012/654627.
    [84]Kulcsar Z, Ernemann U, Wetzel SG, et al. High-profile flow diverter implantation in the basilar artery:efficacy in the treatment of aneurysms and the role of perforators. Stroke 2010; 41:1690-1696.
    [85]Fiorella D, Hsu D, Woo WH, et al. Very late thrombosis of a Pipeline Embolization Device construct:case report. Neurosurgery 2010; 67:ons313-314.
    [86]Kulcsar Z, Houdart E, Bonafe A, et al. Intra-aneurysmal thrombosis as a possible cause of delayed aneurysm rupture after flow diversion treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011; 32(1):20-25.
    [87]Cebral JR, Mut F, Raschi M, et al. Aneurysm rupture following treatment with flow-diverting stents:computational hemodynamics analysis of treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010; [E-pub ahead of print].
    [88]Turowski B, Macht S, Kulcsar Z, et al. Early fatal hemorrhage after endovascular cerebral aneurysm treatment with a flow diverter (Silk-Stent). Neuroradiology 2011; 53:37-41.
    [89]Lieber BB, Sadasivan C. Endoluminal scaffolds for vascular reconstruction and exclusion of aneurysms from the cerebral circulation. Stroke 2010; 41(10 suppl): S21-25.
    [90]Vallee JN, Pierot L, Bonafe A, et al. Endovascular treatment of intracranial wide-necked aneurysms using three-dimensional coils:predictors of immediate anatomic and clinical results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004; 25(2):298-306.
    [91]Veznedaroglu E, Koebbe C, Siddiqui A, et al. Initial experience with bioactive Cerecyte detachable coils:impact on reducing recurrence rate. Neurosurgery 2008; 62(4):799-805.
    [92]Fiorella D, Albuquerque FC, McDougall CG. Durability of aneurysm embolization with matrix detachable coils. Neurosurgery 2006; 58:51-59.
    [93]Murayama Y, Tateshima S, Gonzalez NR, et al. Matrix and bioabsorbable polymeric coils accelerate healing of intracranial aneurysms:long-term experimental study. Stroke 2003; 34:2031-2037.
    [94]Murayama Y, Vinuela F, Tateshima S, et al. Bioabsorbable polymeric material coils for embolization of intracranial aneurysms:a preliminary experimental study. J Neurosurg 2001; 94:454-63.
    [95]Raymond J, Guilbert F, and Roy D. Neck-bridge device for endovascular treatment of wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms:initial experience. Radiology 2001; 221: 318-326.
    [96]De Keukeleire K, Vanlangenhove P, Defreyne L. Evaluation of a neck-bridge device to assist endovascular treatmem of wide-neck aneurysms of the anerior circulation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29(1):73-78.
    [97]Ihn YK, Kim DI, Kim BS, et al. Utility of catheter-assisted Gugiielmi detachable coiling in the treatment of wide-necked aneurysms. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2006; 148: 1045-1052.
    [98]Gordhan A. Microcatheter neck bridging and incorporated branch vessel protection for coil embolization of a wide-neck ruptured aneurysm:technical case report. Neurosurgery 2011; 68(1 Suppl Operative):40-44.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700