用户名: 密码: 验证码:
广西姑婆山-花山花岗岩体侵位过程及构造解析
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
近年来,由于南岭花岗岩带的研究为揭示华南大地构造属性、演化及地球动力学背景提供了重要的岩石学与地球化学等方面的证据而倍受瞩目。但研究多集中在其东段和中段,对其西段、特别是在花岗岩侵位过程及相关构造研究方面尤显薄弱。本文在野外地质调查基础上,运用岩石有限应变测量、现代构造解析、岩石地球化学以及岩浆动力学等研究方法和手段,研究了位于南岭花岗岩带西段的广西姑婆山-花山花岗岩体的构造样式、变形特征、侵位过程及其与大地构造环境关系;分析了与该岩体侵位相关构造的运动学、几何学和动力学。取得了以下主要成果或认识:
     1.对姑婆山-花山花岗岩体的岩石谱系单位进行了重新厘定。将该岩体解体为26个侵入体,归并成牛庙和杨梅山2个独立侵入体,以及桂岭、里松、望高、新路、白水带和华美6个单元。在此基础上,建立了牛庙超单元、姑婆山超单元和银平超单元。这3个超单元是华南中生代构造—岩浆旋回中虽有间断但却关系密切的3次岩浆热事件的产物,并均具有渐进式的同源岩浆演化规律。
     2.岩浆动力学研究显示,姑婆山-花山花岗岩体形成于中深成环境,岩浆粘度较大、上升速度较慢、密度小于围岩;且总体上看,在岩浆侵位过程中从早期(超)单元到晚期(超)单元岩浆粘度由低到高,上升速度、密度、温度及压力由大到小。
     3.研究表明,姑婆山-花山花岗岩体的主体单元在塑性、半塑性状态下,甚至在次岩浆状态时就遭受(或产生)了一定的气球膨胀作用;同时也对其围岩产生了强力挤压和拖拽作用,具有主动侵位的特征。但岩体所具有的独特“拖尾”构造样式也表明,岩体的部分侵位空间还来自岩体边部区域断裂走滑剪切作用所“诱导”的空间,因此也具有被动侵位的特征。
     4.岩石有限应变测量和应变分析显示,姑婆山-花山花岗岩体及其热接触变质围岩主要为压扁型应变,应变程度弱—中等。但应变类型及应变程度的时空分布呈明显的非均一性。应变类型方面,早期的牛庙和杨梅山独立侵入体及里松、望高单元以压扁型应变为主,晚期的新路单元主要为拉长型应变;空间上,各单元(或独立侵入体)边部以压扁和平面型应变为主,中部主要为拉长型应变。应变程度方面,从早期单元到晚期单元应变程度递减;围岩内的应变程度向岩体接触
    
     面方向增强,且存在明显的应变梯度。上述应变特征表明,岩体及其
     热接触变质围岩的变形与岩浆脉动侵位密切相关,显示出主、被动侵
    位机制兼具,但以主动侵位为主的特征。
     5.岩体的冷却与隆升史研究表明,本区中生代地壳曾经历过3次
    快速隆升,它们分别发生在牛庙超单元(210.5 Ma一190 Ma)、姑婆
     山超单元(162.2 Ma一145.67 Ma)和银平超单元(129.1 Ma一121.2
    Ma)侵位期间,上升速率分别为0.69 mm/a、0.40 mH订a不口o.30m而a,
    比晚三叠世以来本区0.10 mm/a的地壳平均上升速率快约3一7倍。地
    壳的这种快速隆升—热折返,表明本区中生代存在强烈的壳一慢作
    用。
     6.研究表明,姑婆山一花山花岗岩体形成于印支运动后由碰撞挤
    压向板内裂解拉张转化的地球动力学背景。其中牛庙和姑婆山两超单
    元为后碰撞花岗岩,形成于晚三叠世扬子板块与华夏板块最终拼合的
    主碰撞期后由挤压体制向拉伸体制转变的后碰撞构造环境;而银平超
    单元则形成于伸展体制为主的板内环境。本区后碰撞期约经历了65
    m·y.。
     7.侵位机制的量化研究表明,在姑婆山一花山花岗岩体现有的空
    间里,主动膨胀作用为岩体拓展了23%一38%的空间;构造扩展约为
    岩体定位提供了21%的空间;剩下的41%一56%的空间是由岩浆侵
    吞作用获取的,故姑婆山一花山花岗岩体为复合侵位机制。从各单元
    看,牛庙和杨梅山独立侵入体以及桂岭单元为气球膨胀侵位机制;里
    松和望高单元以气球膨胀侵位机制为主,局部为岩墙扩展机制侵位;
    新路、白水带和华美单元则主要为岩墙扩展侵位机制。即从早至晚,
    随侵位深度由深至浅、构造环境由挤压向伸展转换,岩体侵位机制明
    显的表现出从主动向被动转化的趋势。
     8.岩体的生长方式研究表明,牛庙、杨梅山两独立侵入体为侧
    向式;桂岭、里松、望高和新路单元为中心式或偏心式;白水带、华
    美单元为中心多点式。虽然多数单元表现为极性生长,但除杨梅山独
    立侵入体侵位时岩浆通道可能出现的有限偏移外,在近90 m.y.的岩
    体缓慢生长过程中,姑婆山和花山花岗岩体始终都是通过各自深部相
    对稳定的主通道上侵。暗示在姑婆山一花山花岗岩体侵位的有限时、
    空间内,其所在的块体构造变动不大,为一相对稳定块体。
Attention has recently been paid to fruitful studies of Nanling granite belt that have provided important petrologic, geochemical, and other evidences for understanding the tectonic nature and evolution history and geodynamic setting of south China. The problem is, however, that these studies have only focused on the east and middle sections of the granite belt, and that few workers have made enough efforts on its west section, not even to say on the emplacement mechanisms and related structures of the plutons within the belt.
    This study thoroughly and systematically deals with the huge Gupuoshan-Huashan granite batholith located on the west section of Nanling granite belt and in Guangxi Province. The dissertation is based on intensive geologic mapping. Methods of finite strain measurement, modern structural analysis, petro-geochernistry, and magma dynamics have been employed. The structural style, deformational features, and emplacement process of Gupuoshan-Huashan batholith, and their relationships with tectonic environment are discussed, and the structural geometry, kinematics, and dynamics associated with granitic emplacement are analyzed. Conclusions are made as follows:
    1.Twenty-six individual intrusions have been identified within the Gupuoshan-Huanshan granitic batholith. They are classified into and named as Niumiao independent intrusion, Yangmeishan independent intrusion, and Guiling, Lisong, Wanggao, Xinlu, Baishuidai, and Huamei Units respectively. These granitic intrusions/units are grouped into three super-units: Niumiao Super-unit, Gupuoshan Super-unit, and Yinping Super-unit. Detailed study demonstrates that these three super-units are products of three periodic magmatic thermal events occurred during South China's Mesozoic tectonic-magmatic cycle, and that they were evolved sequentially from the same magma source.
    2. Study of magmatic dynamics of the Gupuoshan-Huashan pluton shows that the pluton crystallized within middle-deep crust with relatively high viscosity, slow ascend rate, and lower-than-its-country-rock density. The early sequences have lower viscosities and greater ascend rates, densities, temperature and pressure than late sequences.
    3. The major intrusive units were already subjected to
    
    
    compressional force produced by ballooning when the magmas were at plastic and half-plastic states, and even at half-molten state. The ballooning also exerted a strong compression and a shear force to country rocks, suggesting an active emplacement mechanism. The unique "tail" shape and deformation features of the pluton, however, imply that a regional strike-slip wench faulting would also contribute to the opening of the space for the magma emplacement, therefore suggesting a passive emplacement mechanism as well.
    4. Strain analyses from 155 finite strain measurement stations within the pluton and its aureole also demonstrate that the strain is mainly characterized by a flattening pattern, and that the strain types and strain intensities are heterogeneously distributed from time to time. The early sequences such as Niumiao and Yangmeishan intrusions and Lisong and Wanggao Units show mostly flattening strain patterns, whereas the late sequences such as Xinlu Unit stretching strain patterns. Spatially, the flattening and planar strain patterns exist along the margins of each unit and independent intrusion, whereas the stretching patterns appear in their central area. From early sequences (units) to late sequences (units), the average strain intensity decreases. A strain gradient exists from the aureole to the contact due to an increasing strain intensity measured from the aureole to the contact. The strain heterogeneity and strain patterns imply that periodic pulsating emplacement could account for the deformation of the pluton and its aureole country rocks, suggesting an active emplacement mechanism for the pluton.
    5. The cooling and exhumation history of the pluton is re-constructed. It is found that the Mesozoic crust of the region has experienced three fast exhumation events
引文
[1]陈好寿.关于南岭地区燕山期花岗岩浆活动的分期问题.地球化学,1978,(3):209~224
    [2]陈江峰,谢志,刘顺生,等.大别造山带冷却年龄的~(40)Ar/~(39)Ar和裂变径迹年龄测定.中国科学(B),1995,25(10):1086~1092
    [3]陈培荣,华仁民,章邦桐,等.南岭燕山早期后造山花岗岩类:岩石学制约和地球动力学背景,中国科学(D辑),2002,32(4):279~289
    [4]陈培荣,孔兴功,王银喜.赣南燕山早期双峰式火山—侵入杂岩的Rb-Sr同位素定年及意义.高校地质学报,1999,5(4):378~383
    [5]陈培荣,章邦桐,孔兴功,等.赣南寨背A型花岗岩的地球化学特征及其构造地质意义.岩石学报,1998,14(3):163~173
    [6]陈祥高,张忠奎.北京房山花岗闪长岩裂变径迹年龄测定和热历史的探讨.科学通报,1983,(6):357~359
    [7]陈毓川,毛景文.桂北地区矿床成矿系列和成矿历史演化轨迹.南宁:广西科学技术出版社,1995.1~127
    [8]程裕淇.中国区域地质概论.北京:地质出版社,1994.448~476
    [9]邓继新,刘瑞殉,史謌,等.广西圆石山花岗岩体构造与侵位机制初探.北京大学学报(自然科学板),2002,38(2):260~267
    [10]邓晋福,莫宣学,赵海玲,等.岩浆活动旋回与地球多层对流系统.地学前缘,1997,4(4):205~210
    [11]邓庆平.桂东北新路矿田与地洼期花岗岩有关的锡矿床成矿系列及白面山锡石硫化物矿床形成机理的初步研究:[硕士学位论文],长沙:中南矿冶学院,1984
    [12]地质矿产部《南岭项目》构造专题组.南岭区域构造特征及控岩控矿构造研究.北京:地质出版社,1988.1~88
    [13]董子成.广西新路锡矿田的稀土元素地球化学特征.桂林冶金地质学院学报,1991,11(3):277~286
    [14]鄂莫岚.广西乌羊山花岗岩体形成时的物理化学条件.地球化学,1978,(2):89~103
    [15]范春方,陈培荣.赣南坡头A型花岗岩的地质地球化学特征及其形成的构造环境.地球化学,2000,29(4):358~366
    [16]房立民,杨振升,李勤,等.变质岩区1:5万区域地质填图方法指南.武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1991.16~59
    
    
    [17]冯佐海,梁金城,康志强,等.广西平桂地区构造线定量分析.广西科学,2002,9(2):115~118
    [18]高秉璋,洪大卫,郑基俭,等.花岗岩类区1:5万区域地质填图方法指南.武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1991
    [19]高秉璋.关于花岗岩类岩石谱系划分中的若干问题.中国区域地质,1993,12(1):5~17
    [20]高山,金振民.折沉作用(delamination)及其壳—幔演化动力学意义.地质科技情报,1997,16(1):1~9
    [21]龚安,温淑英,韦玉山.姑婆山岩体西部花岗岩的成因类型及演化特征.桂林冶金地质学院学报,1985,5(1):21~30
    [22]广西壮族自治区地质局.桂林幅1:20万区域地质测量报告书.1969,23~40
    [23]广西壮族自治区地质局.贺县幅1:20万区域地质调查报告.1965a,39~68
    [24]广西壮族自治区地质局.荔浦幅1:20万地质图说明书.1965b,31~48
    [25]广西壮族自治区地质矿产局.广西壮族自治区区域地质志.北京:地质出版社,1985.429~732
    [26]广西壮族自治区地质矿产局.广西综合解释成果报告.南宁:广西壮族自治区地质矿产局,1997.39~103
    [27]广西壮族自治区地质矿产勘查开发局.广西壮族自治区数字地质图(1:50万).南宁:广西壮族自治区地质矿产局,2000
    [28]广西壮族自治区地质矿产勘查开发局.广西壮族自治区数字地质图说明书(1:50万).南宁:广西壮族自治区地质矿产局,1999,88~90
    [29]郭福祥.中国南方中新生代大地构造属性和南华造山带褶皱过程.地质学报,1998,72(1):22~33
    [30]郭令智,施央申,马瑞士.西太平洋中生代活动大陆边缘和岛弧的形成及演化.地质学报,1983,57(1):11~21
    [31]国际地科联(IUGS)火成分类学分委员会.国际火成岩分类图表,王碧香.北京:地质出版社,1990
    [32]洪大卫,郭文岐,李戈晶,等.福建沿海晶洞花岗岩的岩石学和成因演化.北京:北京科学技术出版社,1987
    [33]洪大卫,王式洗,韩宝福,等.碱性花岗岩的构造环境分类及其鉴别标志.中国科学(B辑),1995,25(4):418~426
    [34]洪大卫,谢锡林,张季生.试论杭州.诸广山-花山高~εNd值花岗岩带的
    
    地质意义.地质通报,2002,21(6):348~354
    [35]洪大卫.花岗岩研究的最新进展及发展趋势.地学前缘,1994,1(1~2):79~85
    [36]洪大卫.试论华南花岗岩岩套(岩石序列)的划分原则和研究方法.中国区域地质,1986,5(3):193~203
    [37]洪庆玉.地能学说在地质地球化学研究中的应用.成都:成都科技大学出版社,1992.49
    [38]胡霭琴.天山东段中天山隆起冷却史研究.地球化学,1982,(3):285~290
    [39]胡火炎.广西新路矿田白面山—六合坳锡多金属矿床成矿规律研究及隐伏矿床预测.广西:平桂矿务局,1989
    [40]湖南地质局.江永幅1:20万区域地质调查报告.1975,77~163
    [41]黄汲清,陈炳蔚.中国及临区特提斯海的演化.北京:地质出版社,1987.25~35
    [42]黄汲清.中国主要地质构造单位,1945.黄汲清著作选集(第三卷).北京:地质出版社,1992.11~97
    [43]黄茂新.花岗岩类长石相成分换算及其应用.地球化学,1984,(1):80~89
    [44]江西地质矿产局.中国南岭及其邻区地质构造图说明书(1:2000000).北京:地质出版社,1988.12~32
    [45]金跃群,袁奎荣,方清浩.广西花山花岗岩体的成因、演化及矿化.桂林冶金地质学院学报,1985a,5(4):295~306
    [46]金跃群.广西花山花岗岩体的成因、演化及矿化:[硕士学位论文],长沙:中南矿冶学院,1985b
    [47]金振民,高山.底侵作用(underplating)及壳—幔演化动力学意义.地质科技情报,1996,15(2):1~7
    [48]孔庆先.含锡钇矿花岗岩中钾长石化与成矿作用的关系.地质论评,1964,22(4):298~307
    [49]赖绍聪.岩浆作用的物理过程研究进展.地球科学进展,1994,14(2):153~157
    [50]李超,陈衍景.东秦岭—大别地区中生代岩石圈拆沉的岩石学证据.北京大学学报(自然科学板),2002,38(3):431~440
    [51]李武显,周新民.古太平洋岩石圈消减与中国东南部中生代火成岩成因——岩石圈消减与玄武岩相结合模式的补充证据.大地构造与成矿学,2001,25 (3):55~62
    
    
    [52]李武显,周新民.中国东部晚中生代俯冲带探讨.高校地质学报,1999,5(2):164~169
    [53]李献华.华南地壳增长和构造演化的年代学格架与同位素制约.矿物岩石地球化学通讯,1993,(3):111~115
    [54]梁金城,冯佐海.桂东南南渡—莲塘岩体的构造及侵位机制.桂林冶金地质学院学报,1994,14(3):222~232
    [55]廖庆康.广西大容山—十万大山地区花岗岩单元—超单元填图方法研究.中国区域地质,1992,11(2):183~191
    [56]刘宝珺,许效松,潘杏南,等.中国南方古大陆沉积地壳演化与成矿.北京:科学出版社,1993.9~46
    [57]刘新秒.后碰撞岩浆岩的大地构造球境及特征.前寒武纪研究进展,2000,23(2):121~127
    [58]吕其发,熊成云,刘国庆,等.花山—姑婆山—带构造特征及控岩控矿构造的研究.见:宜昌地质研究所,编.南岭地质矿产科研报告集(第二集).武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1989.80~132
    [59]吕贻峰.国外花岗岩构造的某些新进展.地质科技情报,1994,13(4):21~24
    [60]罗璋.广西博白—岑溪断裂带地质特征与构造演化.广西地质,1990,3(1):25~34
    [61]马昌前,杨坤光,唐仲华,等.花岗岩类岩浆动力学.武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1994
    [62]马昌前.北京周口店岩株侵位和成分分带的岩浆动力学机理.地质学报,1988,62(4):329~341
    [63]马昌前.硅酸盐熔体的粘度、密度及其计算方法.地质科技情报,1987,6(2):142~150
    [64]马昌前.结晶分异作用的岩浆力学条件.地球科学——中国地质大学学报,1989,14(1):245~251
    [65]马昌前.岩浆动力学与花岗岩研究.地球科学进展,1990,8(6):37~41
    [66]马昌前.岩浆活动中某些动力学参数的估算方法——流体动力学原理的应用.地质科技情报,1986,5(3):47~54
    [67]毛建仁.中国东南大陆中、新生代岩浆与壳幔演化动力学.火山地质与矿产,1994,15(2):1~12
    [68]南京大学地质系.华南不同时代花岗岩类及其与成矿关系.北京:科学出版社,1981
    
    
    [69] 欧阳成甫.广西姑婆山岩体侵位构造及侵位机制研究.大地构造与成矿学,2002a,26(3):331~334
    [70] 欧阳成甫,陈大克,钱建平,等.广西平桂地区构造地质特征及含矿岩系研究.南宁:广西科学技术出版社,2002b.61~101
    [71] 欧阳成甫,陈大克,钱建平.广西新路和水岩坝钨锡矿田的控矿构造.桂林冶金地质学院学报,1993,13(4):350~356
    [72] 裴荣富,洪大卫.碰撞造山与华南花岗岩及其成矿系列研究的新进展.矿床地质,1995,14(2):189~194
    [73] 浦路平.姑婆山花岗岩及其包体成因:[硕士学位论文],长沙:中南矿冶学院,1986
    [74] 邱家骧,林景仟.岩石化学.北京:地质出版社,1991.140~156
    [75] 邱家骧.岩浆岩岩石学.北京:地质出版社,1985.212
    [76] 任纪舜,朱宝贵,和政军,等.中国南部的构造格局和动力演化.北京:原子能出版社,1998.1~12
    [77] 任纪舜.论中国南部的大地构造.地质学报,1990,64(4):275~288
    [78] 沙连堃,袁奎荣.广西大宁花岗闪长岩体中暗色微粒包体的地球化学及形成模式.地球科学——中国地质大学学报,1991,16(4):377~386
    [79] 史明魁,熊成云,贾德福,等.湘桂粤赣地区有色金属隐伏矿床综合预测.北京:地质出版社,1993.1~33
    [80] 舒良树,周新民.中国东南部中生代构造作用.地质论评,2002,48(3):249~260
    [81] 宋慈安.珊瑚钨锡矿床.北京:北京工业大学出版社,2001.1~14
    [82] 宋子新,钱祥麟.花岗岩成因机制研究综述.地质科技情报,1996,15(3):19~47
    [83] 汤吉方,傅太安,龚家财.南岭地区有色金属矿床的构造控制特征及分布规律.见:宜昌地质研究所,编.南岭地质矿产科研报告集(第二集).武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1989.1~53
    [84] 汤经武,杨学敏.微型计算机在地质构造解析中的应用.武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1989.117~149
    [85] 涂绍雄,汪雄武.20世纪90年代国外花岗岩类研究的某些重大进展.岩石矿物学杂志,2002,21(2):107~118,130
    [86] 万天丰,Teyssier C,曾华霖,等.山东玲珑花岗质岩体侵位机制.中国科学(D辑),2000,30(4):337~340
    [87] 万天丰,朱鸿.华南晚元古代.三叠纪构造事件与应力场.现代地质,
    
    1990,4(2):65~74
    [88] 万天丰,朱鸿.中国大陆及邻区中生代—新生代大地构造与环境变迁.现代地质,2002,16(2):107-120
    [89] 王德滋,赵广涛,邱检生.中国东部晚中生代A型花岗岩的构造制约.高校地质学报,1995,1(2):13~21
    [90] 王德滋,周金城.我国花岗岩研究的回顾与展望.岩石学报,1999,15(2):61~69
    [91] 王德滋,周新民,徐夕生,等.微粒花岗岩包体的成因.桂林冶金地质学院学报,1992,12(3):235~241
    [92] 王光杰,藤吉文,张中杰.中国华南大陆及陆缘地带的大地构造基本格局.地球物理学进展,2000,15(3):25~44
    [93] 王鸿祯,杨森楠,李思田.中国东部及邻区中、新生代盆地发育及大陆边缘区的构造发展.地质学报,1983,57(3):213~223
    [94] 王人镜,马昌前.北京周口店侵入体特征及其侵位机制.地球科学——中国地质大学学报,1989,14(4):400~406
    [95] 王涛,王晓霞,李伍平.试论花岗质深成岩体的复合定位机制及定位空间问题.地质论评,1999a,45(2):142~150
    [96] 王涛,张国伟,王晓霞,等.花岗岩体生长方式及构造运动学、动力学意义.地质科学,1999b,34(3):326~335
    [97] 王韦玉.广西富贺钟地区姑婆山花岗岩的时代问题.地质论评,1965,23(5):431
    [98] 王玉梅,张小路.隐伏花岗岩体重磁异常标志.桂林冶金地质学院学报,1983,3(2):55~66
    [99] 王岳军,范蔚茗,郭峰.湘东南中生代花岗闪长岩锆石U-Pb法定年及其成因指示.中国科学(D辑),2001,31(9):745~751
    [100] 魏春景,张立飞,王式洸.安徽大别山东段中生代高钾花岗质岩石及其地质意义.中国科学(D辑),2000,30(4):355~363
    [101] 吴俊华,李铁华.湘赣边界北诸广山超单元组合特征及构造意义.中国区域地质,1999,18(3):264~270
    [102] 肖庆辉,邓晋福,马大铨,等.花岗岩研究思维与方法.北京:地质出版社,2002.12~52
    [103] 肖庆辉.当代造山带研究中值得重视的若干前沿问题.地学前缘,1995,2(1):43~50
    [104] 谢窦克,姜习华.华南地壳演化过程及其构造格架.成都理工学院学
    
    报,1998,25(2):153~161
    [105] 谢窦克,毛建仁,彭维霞,等.华南岩石与大陆动力学.地球物理学报,1997,40(增刊):153~163
    [106] 谢窦克,商玉强.东南大陆岩石圈板块地体构造.中国地质科学院南京地质矿产研究所所刊,1989,10(4):1~12
    [107] 徐夕生,周新民.花岗岩类中的岩石包体.南京大学学报(地球科学版),1998,10(1):233~241
    [108] 许靖华,孙枢,李继亮.是华南造山带而不是华南地台.中国科学(B辑),1987,(10):1107~1115
    [109] 许美辉.福建永定地区早侏罗世双峰式火山岩及其构造环境.福建地质,1992,(2):115~125
    [110] 许顺山,吴淦国,邓军.岩浆侵位机制研究综述.地质科技情报,1998,17(4):8~14
    [111] 杨崇辉,庄育勋,王新社,等.关于“侵入岩谱系单位填图方法”有关问题的讨论.地质论评,2001,47(5):483~486
    [112] 杨坤光,王强.花岗岩构造与侵位机制研究进展.地球科学进展,2002,17(4):546~550
    [113] 杨坤光,杨巍然.碰撞后造山过程及造山带巨量花岗岩的成因.地质科技情报,1997,16(4):16~22
    [114] 杨学明,张培善.Rb-Sr和Pb同位素在限定花岗质岩石源岩性质中的地学意义—以姑婆山花岗杂岩体为例.科学通报,1990,35(15):1174~1176
    [115] 殷保安.广西壮族自治区岩石地层.武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1997.265~270
    [116] 殷鸿福,吴顺宝,杜远生,等.华南是特提斯多岛洋体系的一部分.地球科学——中国地质大学学报,1999,24(1):1~11
    [117] 俞云文,周泰喜,陈江峰.浙江玄坛地早白垩世晚期双峰式火山岩特征及其成因.南京大学学报(地球科学),1993,5(4):420~429
    [118] 袁奎荣.姑婆山里松花岗岩体原始形态的恢复及其形成机制的探讨.桂林冶金地质学院学报,1981,1(1):1~13
    [119] 袁奎荣.湘桂粤部分地区隐伏花岗岩预测及深部找矿研究.桂林:桂林工学院,1992:10~14
    [120] 翟裕生,吕古贤.构造动力体制转换与成矿作用.地球学报,2002,23(2):97~102
    [121] 张德全,王雪英,孙桂英.关于广西姑婆山—里松岩体的定(侵)位
    
    年龄和冷凝历史的探讨.地质论评,1985,31(3):232~239
    [122] 张文佑.中国及临区海陆大地构造.北京:科学出版社,1986.22~44
    [123] 张玉泉,谢应雯.哀牢山—金沙江富碱侵入岩年代学和Nd,Sr同位素特征.中国科学(D辑),1997,27(4):289~293
    [124] 张志强.花岗岩定位机制研究进展综述.地球科学进展,1993,(2):15~20
    [125] 赵海玲,邓晋福,陈发景,等.中国东北地区中生代火山岩岩石学特征与盆地形成.现代地质,1998,12(1):56~61
    [126] 赵海玲.岩浆物理性质和液体动力学研究.地学前缘,1994,1(1-2):104~110
    [127] 赵振华,包志伟,张伯友.湘南中生代玄武岩类地球化学特征.中国科学(D辑),1998,28(增刊):7~14
    [128] 赵宗溥.“印支运动”五十周年回顾.地质科学,1986,21(1):7~15
    [129] 郑亚东,常志忠.岩石有限应变测量及韧性剪切带.北京:地质出版社,1985.89~102
    [130] 郑永飞,傅斌,龚冰.安徽黄梅尖岩体热历史及其与成矿关系:同位素证据.地质学报,1995,69(4):337~348
    [131] 郑永飞,魏春生,王峥嵘.大龙山岩体冷却史及其成矿关系的同位素研究.地质科学,1997,32(4):465~476
    [132] 中国科学院地质研究所.富钟贺矿物志.北京:科学出版社,1965
    [133] 中国科学院地质研究所地热室.矿山地热概论.北京:煤炭工业出版社,1981.23~38
    [134] 中国科学院贵阳地球化学研究所.华南花岗岩类的地球化学.北京:科学出版社,1979.40~80
    [135] 钟自云,骆靖中.大宁花岗闪长岩体的成因类型与地质特征.桂林冶金地质学院学报,1983,3(4):21~32
    [136] 周新民,李武显.中国东南部晚中生代火成岩成因:岩石圈消减和玄武岩底侵相结合的模式.自然科学进展,2000,10(3):240~247
    [137] 周绚若,王方正.岩石物理化学.郑州:河南科学技术出版社,1987.233~269
    [138] 朱鸿,万天丰.中国东部晚元古代—三叠纪古板块的运动学研究.地球科学——中国地质大学学报,1991,16(5):523~532
    [139] 朱金初,李向东,沈渭洲等.广西花山复式花岗岩体成因的锶、钕和氧同位素.地质学报,1989,63(3):225~235
    
    
    [140] 朱金初,李向东.广西花山花岗岩的岩石学和地球化学特征及成岩物质来源的探讨.岩石矿物学杂志,1988,7(1):28~38
    [141] Apperson K D. Stress field of the overriding plate at convergent margins and beneath active velcanic arcs. Science, 1991, 254:670~678
    [142] Barbarin B. A review of the relationship between granitoid types, their origins and their geodynamic environments. Lithos, 1998, 46:605~626
    [143] Batchelor R A, Bowden P. Petrogenetic interpretation of granitoid rock series using multicationic parameters. Chem. Geol., 1985, 48:43~45
    [144] Bateman P C, Chappell B W. Crystallization, fractionation, and solidification of the Tuolumne Intrusive Series, Yosemite National Park, California. Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull., 1979, 90(5): 465~482
    [145] Bateman P C, Dodge F C W. Variations of major chemical constituents across the Central Sierra Nevada Batholith. Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull., 1970, 81(2): 409~420
    [146] Bateman P C. A summary of critical relations in the central past of the Sierra Nevada Batholith California, U.S.A.. Geol. Sac. Amer. Mem., 1983, 159:241~254
    [147] Berger A R, Picther W S. The structure in granitoid rocks: A review on the granitic structure. In: Proceedings of the Geologist's Association, eds. 81 (Part 3), 1972. 421~461
    [148] Biot M A. Theory of folding of stratified viscoelastic media and its implication in tectonics and orogenesis, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 1961, 72:1595~1620
    [149] Bonin B, Azzouni-Sekkal A, Bussy F, et al. Alkali-calcic and alkaline post-orogenic (PO) granite magmatism: petrologic constraints and geodynamic settings. Lithos, 1998, 45:45~70
    [150] Bottinga Y, Weill D F, Richet P. Densities calculations for silicate liquids. I. Revised method for aluminosilicate compositions. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1982, 46:909~919
    [151] Bottinga Y, Weill D F. Densities of liquid silicate systems calculated from partial molar volumes of oxide components. Amer. J. Sci., 1970, 269:169~182
    [152] Bouchez J L, Delas C, Gleizes G, et al. Submagmatic microfractures in granites. Geology, 1992, 20:35-38
    [153] Bouchez J L, Diot H. Nested granites in question: Contrasted emplacement kinematics of independent magmas in the Zar pluton, Morocco. Geology, 1990, 18: 966~969
    
    
    [154] Brown M. The generation, segregation, ascent and emplacement of granite magma:the migmatite to crustally derived granite connection in thickened orogens. Earth Science Reviews, 1994, 36:83~100
    [155] Büsch W, Otto J. Endogenetic-inclusions in granites of the Black Forest. Germany. N. Jb. Miner. M., 1980, 6:269~282
    [156] Castro A, Fernandez C. Granite intrusion by extrnally induced growth and deformation of the magma reservoir, the example of the Plasenzuela pluton, Spain. J. Struct.Geol., 1998, 20:1219~1228
    [157] Castro A. On granitoid emplacement and related structures: A review. Geol. Rundsch.,1987, 76:101~124
    [158] Castro A. Structural pattern and ascent model in the Central Extremadura batholith, Hercynian belt, Spain. J. Struct.Geol., 1986, 6:633~645
    [159] Chappell B W, White A J R. Two contrasting granite types. Pacific Geol.,1974, 8:173~174
    [160] Charvet J, Lapierre H, Yu Y W. Geodynamic significance of the Mesozoic volcanism of southeastern China. Journal of Southeast Asian Earth Sciences, 1994, 9:387~396
    [161] Chung S L, Cheng H, Jahn B M, et al. Major and trace element, and Sr-Nd isotope constraints on the origin of Paleogene volcanism in South China prior to the South China Sea opening. Lithos, 1997, 40:203~220
    [162] Clemens J D, Mawer C K. Granitic magma transport by fracture propagation. Tectonophysics, 1992, 204:339~360
    [163] Cobbing E J, Mallick D I J. A new approach to mapping granites. Episodes,1983, 6(3): 10~14
    [164] Cobbing E J, Pitcher W S, Taylor W P. Segments and Superunits in the Coastal Batholth of Peru. J. Geol.. 1977, 85:625~631
    [165] Cobbing E J, Pitcher W S.The coastal batholith of central Peru. J. Geol. Soc. Lond., 1972, 128(5): 421~460
    [166] Courrioux G. Oblique diapirism: The Criffel granodiorite/granite zoned pluton (Southwest Scotland). J. Struct. Geol..1987, 9:313~330
    [167] Dallmeyer R D, VanBreeman O. Rb-Sr whole-rock and ~(40)Ar/~(39)Ar mineral ages of the Tagus and Hallowell quartz monzonite and Three Mile Pond granodiorite nodiorite plutons, Southcentral Maine: Their bearing on Post-Acadian cooling history. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol., 1981, 78:61~73
    
    
    [168] Dixon J M. Finite strain and progressive deformation in models of diapiric structures. Tectonophysics, 1975, 28: 89~124
    [169] Dlemos R S, Brown M, Strachan R A. The relationship between granite and shear zone: magma generation, ascent and emplacement within a transpressional orogen. J. Ceol. Soc. Lond., 1992, 149:487~490
    [170] Dodson M H, McClelland-Brown E. Isotopic and palaeomagnetic evidence for rates of cooling, uplift and erosion. In: The chronology of geological record. Geol. Soc. Mem. (London), 1985, 10:315~325
    [171] Dodson M H. Closure temperature in cooling geochronological and petrological systems. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol., 1973,40:259~274
    [172] Dodson M H. Theory of cooling age. In: Jager E, Hanziker J C, eds.Lectures in Isotope Geology, Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1979, 194~202
    [173] Dorais M J. Origin of mafic enclaves in the Dinkev Creek pluton, Central Sierra Nevadas Batholith, California. J. Petrol., 1990, 31 (4): 853~881
    [174] Dunnet D. A technique of finite strain analysis using elliptical particales.Tectonophysics, 1969, 7(2): 117~136
    [175] Eby G N. The A-type granitoids: A review of the occurrence and chemical characteristics and speculations on their petrogenesis. Lithos,1990, 26:115~134
    [176] England C,Houseman G A.Extension during continental convergence with application to the tibetan plateau.J. Geophys. Res, 1989, 94:17561~17579
    [177] Ferré E, Gleize G, Bouchez J L. Internal fabric and strike-slip emplacement of the Pan-African granite of Solli Hills. northen Nigeria. Tectonics, 1995, 14:1205~1219
    [178] Fowler T K Jr, Paterson S R, Crossland A, et al. Pluton emplacement mechanisms:a view from the roof. In: Brown M, Piccoli P M, eds.: The Origin of Granites and Related Rocks Third Hut-ton Symposium Abstracts, U. S. Geological Survey Circular, 1995, 1129, 57
    [179] Fowler T K Jr, Paterson S R.. Timing and magmatic fabric form structural relations around stoped blocks. J. Struct, Geol., 1997, 19: 209~224.
    [180] Frost T P, Mahood G A. Field, chemical, and physical constrains on mafic-felsic magmas interaction in the Lamarck Granodiorite, Sierra Nevada, California. Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull., 1987, 99:272~291
    [181] Furlong K P, Fountain D M. Continental crustal underplating: Thermal consideration and seismic-petrologic consequences. J. Geophys. Res., 1986, 91:
    
    8285~8294
    [182] Gilder S A, Gill J, Coe R S, et al. Isotopic and paleomagnetic constraints on the Mesozoic tectonic evolution of South China. J. Geophys. Res., 1996, 101: 16137~16154
    [183] Glazner A F. Plutonism, oblique subduction and continental growth: An example from the Mesozoic of California. Geology, 1991, 19:784~786
    [184] Guineberteau B, Bouchez J L, Vigneresse J L. The Mortagne granite Pluton (France) emplaced by pull-apart along a shear zone: Structural and gravimetric arguments and regional implications. Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull., 1987, 99:763~770
    [185] Harper C T. The geological interpretation of potassium-argon ages of metamorphic rocks from the Scottish Caledonides. Scott. J. Geol., 1967, 3:46~66
    [186] Harris N B W, Pearce J A, Tindle A G. Geochemical characteristics of collision-zones magmatism.In: Coward M P, Reos A C, eds. Collision Tectonics. Geol. Soc., Spec. Publ. 1986, 19, 67~81
    [187] Harrison T M, Armstrong R L,Naeser C W, et al. Geochronology and themal history of the Coast Plutonic Complex near Prince Ruport, British Columbia. Can. J. Earth Sci., 1979, 16:400~410
    [188] Hart S R. The petrology and isotopic-mineral age relations of a contact zone in the Front Range, Colorado. J.Geol., 1964, 72:493~525
    [189] Heizler M T, Lux D R, Decker E R. The age and cooling history of the Chain of Ponds and Big Island Pond plutons and the Spider Lake granite, West-central Maine and Quebec. Amer. J. Sci., 1988, 288:925~952
    [190] Hide D. The evolution of Western Pacific plate and its margin. Tectonophysics, 1977, 38:115~165
    [191] Holder M T. An emplacement mechanism for post-tectonic granites and its implications for their geochemical features.In: Atherton M P, Tarney J, eds. Origin of Granite Batholiths——Geochemical Criteria. Shiva Pub. Lted, U.K. 1979, 116~128
    [192] Hossack J R. Pebble deformation and thrusting in the Bygdin area (Southern Norway). Tectonophysies, 1968, 5:315~339
    [193] Huppert H E, Sparks R S J. Cooling and contamination of mafic and ultramafic magma during ascent through contiental crust. Earth planet. Sci. Lett., 1985, 72:371~386
    [194] Hutton D H W, Dempster T J, Brown P E. A new mechanism of granite emplacement:Intrusion in active extensional shear zones. Nature, 1990, 343:452~445
    
    
    [195] Hutton D H W. Granite sheeted complexes: Evidence for the dyking ascent mechanism: Tran. R. Soc. Edinb Earth Sci., 1992a, 377~382
    [196] Hutton D H W, Reavy R J. Strike-slip tectonics and granite petrogenesis.Tectonics, 1992b, 11: 960~967
    [197] Hutton D H W. A tectonic model for the emplacement of the Main Donegal granite. NW Ireland. J. Ceol. Soc. Lond., 1982, 139:615~631
    [198] Hutton D H W. Granite emplacement mechainisms and tectonic controls:Inferences from deformation studies.Tran. R. Soc. Edinb. Earth Sci., 1988a, 79: 245~255
    [199] Hutton D H W. Igneous emplacement in shear-zone termination: The biotite granite at Strontian, Scotland. Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull., 1988b, 100:1392~1399
    [200] International Subcommission on Stratigraphic Classification. Stratigraphic classification and nomenclature of igneous and metamorphic rock bodies. Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull., 1987, 99:440~442
    [201] Ishihara S. The magnetite-series and ilmenite-series rock. Mining Geol..1977, 27:293~305
    [202] Jaeger E. Rb/Sr systems in different degrees of metamorphism. Eclogae.Geol. Helv., 1970, 66:11~21
    [203] Jahn B M. Mesozoic thermal events in Southeast China. Nature, 1974, 248:480~483
    [204] Kay R W, Kay S M. Delamination and delamination magmatism. Tectonophysics, 1993, 219(1-3): 177~189
    [205] Kutty T S, Joy S. RFPHI——a program in turboc for the Rfl φ diagram method of two-dimensional strain analysis. Computers & Geosciences, 1994, 20(2): 247~263
    [206] Lagarde J L, Omar S A, Roddaz B. Structural characteristics of granitic plutons emplacemed during weak regional deformation: examples from late Carboniferous plutons, Morocco. J. Struct. Geol., 1990, 12(7): 805~821
    [207] Lapierre H, Jahn B M, Charvet J et al. Mesozoic felsic arc magmatism and continental olivine tholeiites in Zhejiang Province and their relationship with the tectonic activity in southeastern China. Tectonophysics, 1997, 274:321~338
    [208] Le Maitre R W. Weds R. Aclassification of igneous rock and glossary of terms. Blackwell Sci.Pub., 1989
    [209] Leat P T, Jackson S E, Thorpe R S, et al. Geochemistry of bimodal
    
    basalt-subalkaline/peralkaline rhyolite provinces within the Southern British Caledonides. J. Ceol. Soc. Lond., 1986, 143:259~273
    [210] Li X H. Cretaceous magmatism and lithospheric extension in Southeast China. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2000, 18:293~305
    [211] Liegeois J P. Some words on the post-collisional magrnatism. Lithos.1998a, 45: Xⅴ~Xⅶ.
    [212] Liegeois J P, Navez J, Hertogen J, et al. Contrasting origin of post-collisional high-K calc-alkaline and shoshonitic versus alkaline and peralkaline granitoids, The use of sliding normalization. Lithos, 1998b, 45:1~28
    [213] Liu Huaizhi, Zhong Ziyun, Yao Min. On the tectono-palaeogeography and Terrane evolution of SW China, Journal of Southeast Asian Earth Sciences, 1989, 3(1-4): 227~229
    [214] Loiselle M C, Wones D R. Characteristics and origin of anorogenic granites. Abstr. 92 nd. Geol. Soc. Amer. Meet.1979, 11:468
    [215] Martin H, Bonin B, Capdevila R, et al. The Kuiqi peralkaline granite complex (SE china): Petrology and geochemistry. J. Petrol., 1994, 35: 983~1015
    [216] McBirney A R, Murase T. Rheological properties of magmas. Ann. Rev.Earth Planet. Sci., 1984, 12:337-357
    [217] McNulty B A, Tong W, Tobisch O T. Assembly of a dike fed magma chamber: The Jackass Lakes pluton, central Sierra Nevada, California. Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull., 1996, 108:926~940
    [218] Nelson K D. Are crustal thickness variations in old mountain belts like the Appalachians a consequence of lithospheric delamination? Geology, 1992, 20:498~502
    [219] North American Commission on Stratigraphic Nomenclature. North American Stratigraphic Cole. Bull. Am. Ass. Petrolem Geologists, 1983, 67:841~875
    [220] Owens W H. Representation of finite strain state by three-axis planar diagram. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 1974, 85:307~310
    [221] Paterson S R, Fowler T K. Extensional pluton emplacement models: do they work for large plutonic complexes? Geology, 1993b, 21:781~784
    [222] Paterson S R, Fowler T K. Re-examing pluton emplacement proceses. J. Struct. Geol., 1993a, 15:191~206
    [223] Paterson S R, Vernon R H, Tobisch O T. A review of criteria for the identification of magmatic and tectonic foliations in granitoids. J. Struct. Geol., 1989, 11:349~363
    
    
    [224] Paterson S R, Vernon R H. Bursting the bubble of ballooning plutons: A return to nested diapirs emplaced by multiple proceses. Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull., 1995,107: 1356~1380
    [225] Pearce J A, Harris N B W, Tindle A G, et al. Trace element discrimination diagrams for the tectonic interpretation of granitic rocks. J .Petrol.,1984, 25(4):956~983
    [226] Pearce J A. Sources and settings of granitic rocks. Episodes, 1996, 19(4):120~125
    [227] Pei R F, Hong D W. The granites of south China and their metallogeny. Episodes, 1995, 18(1,2): 77~82
    [228] Petford N, Kerr R C, Lister J R. Dyke transport of granitoid magma. Geology, 1993, 21:845~848
    [229] Picher W S. Granites and yet more granites forty years on. Geol. Rund.,1987, 76:51~59
    [230] Pitcher W S.Granite type and tectonic environment. Mountain Building Processes. London: Academic Press. 1983, 19~40
    [231] Pitcher W S, Berger A R. The geology of Donegal: A study of granite emplacement and unroofing. Wiley Interscience, London. 1972
    [232] Pitcher W S. The nature, ascent and emplacement of granitic magmas. J. Ceol. Soc. Lond., 1979, 136:627~662
    [233] Piwiskii A J. Experimental studies of igneous rock series, central Sierra Nevada Batholith, California. J. Geol., 1968, 76:548
    [234] Pons J, Brun J P. Sur le caracter syntectonique de quelques plutons de la Sierra Morena Occidentale (Sud Ouest Espagne). Bol. Geol. Min. 1984, 95:26~32
    [235] Ramsay J G, Huber M I. The techniques of modern structural geology. Academic Press Inc.. London. 1983, 307
    [236] Ramsay J G. Emplacement kinematics of a granite diapir: the Chindamora batholith, Zimbabwe. J. Struct. Geol., 1989, 11:191~209
    [237] Ramsay J G. Emplacement mechanics of the Chidamora Batholith, Zimbabwe. J. Struct. Geol., 1981, 3:93~105
    [238] Ramsay J G. Folding and fracturing of rocks. McGraw-hill. New York, 1967
    [239] Ramsay J G. Shear zone geometry: a review. J. Struct. Geol.. 1980, 2:83~89
    [240] Read H H. The Granite controversy. Thomas Murby & Co. London, 1957
    [241] Roman B T, Puero M E L, Casas S A M. Granite emplacenent during contemporary shortening and normal faulting: Structural and magnetic study of the
    
    Veiga Massif (NW Spain). J. Struct. Geol., 1995, 12:1689~1706
    [242] Saleeby J B. The Cretaceous Sierra Nevada A trans-sitiching batholithic belt. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, 1991, 23:94
    [243] Schwerdtner S M. Local displacement of diapir contacts and its importance to pluton emplacement study. J. Struct. Geol..1995, 17:909~910
    [244] Shaw H R. Fracture mechanisms of magma transport from the mantle to the surface.In: Hargreaves R B, eds. Physics of Magmatic Process. New York: Princenton University Press, 1980, 201~264
    [245] Shaw H R. Rheology of basalt in the melting range. J. Petrol., 1969, 10:510~535
    [246] Shaw H R. Viscosity of magmatic silicate liquids: an empirical method of prediction. Amer. J. Sci., 1972,272:870~893
    [247] Sibsion R H. Fault rocks and fault mechanisms. J. Ceol. Soc. Lond., 1977, 133:191~213
    [248] Simancas J F, Zaldivar J G,Azor A. Three-dimensional shape and emplacement of the Cardenchosa deformed pluton (Variscan Orogen, southwestern Iberian Massif). J. Struct. Geol., 2000, 22:489~503
    [249] Sparks R S, Prinkerten H, Mackdonald R. The transport of xenoliths in magmas. Earth planet Sci.Lett., 1977, 35:234~238
    [250] Sparks R S J, Huppert H E, Turner J S. The fluid dynamics of evolving magma chambers. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., 1984, A310:511~534
    [251] Spera F J. Aspects of magma transport.In: Hargraves R B, eds. Physics of Magmatic Processes. New York: Princeton University Press, 1980. 585
    [252] Stormer J C. A practical two-feldspar geothermometer. Amer. Miner., 1975, 60:667~674
    [253] Streckeisen A L. To each plutonic rock its proper name. Earth Sci. Rev., 1976, 12:1~33
    [254] Suneson N, Lucchitta I. Origin of bimodal volcanism, southern Basin and Range province. West-central. Arizona. Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull., 1983, 94:1005~1019
    [255] Sylvester A G,Oertel G,Nelson C A, et al. Papoose Flat pluton: A granite blister in the Inyo Mountain, Californian. Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull., 1978, 89:1205~1219
    [256] Tikoff B, Teyssier C. Crustal-scale, an echelon "P-sheaf'tensional bridgesTA possible solution to the batholithic room problem. Geology, 1992, 20:927~930
    
    
    [257] Tobisch O T, Cruden A R. Fracture-controlled magma conduits in an obliguely convergent continental magmatic arc. Geology, 1995, 23:941~944
    [258] Turcotte D L. Geodynamics:Application of continuum physics to geological problems. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Inc., 1982. 450
    [259] Turner F J. Metamorphic petrology. Second edition. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981.78~93
    [260] Tuttle O F, Bowen N L. The origin of granite in light of experimental studies in the system NaAlSi_3O_8-KAl Si_3O_8-SiO_2-H_2O. Mem. Geol. Soc. Amer., 1958, 74
    [261] Vernon R H. K-feldspar megacrysts in granites-Phenocrysts not porphyroblasts. Earth Science Reviews, 1986, 23:1~63
    [262] Vernon R H., Paterson S R. The Ardara granite Ireland: Deflating an expand intrusion. Lithos. 1993, 31:17~31
    [263] Wagner G A, Reimer G M, Jaeger E. Cooling ages derived by apatite fission-track, mica Rb-Sr and K-Ar dating: the uplift and cooling history of the Central Alps. Mem. Inst, Geol.Univ. Padova, 1977, 30:1~27
    [264] Wang Qingchen, Cong Bolin. Tectonic implication of UHP rocks form the Dabie mountains. Science in China Series D, 1996, 39(3): 311~318
    [265] Wang T, Wang X, Li W. Evaluation of multiple emplacrment mechanisms: the Huichizi granite pluton, Qinling orogenic belt, central China. J. Struct. Geol., 2000, 22:505~518
    [266] Weinberg R F. Re-examining pluton emplacement process: Discussion. J.Struct. Geol., 1994,16(5): 743~746
    [267] Whitney J A, Stormer J C. The distribution of NaAlSiO_3O_8 between coexisting microcline and plagioclase and its effect on geothermometric calculations. J. Amer. Miner., 1977, 62:687~691
    [268] Yoshinobu A S, Okaya D A, Paterson S R, et al. Testing fault controlled magma emplacement mechanisms. In: Brown M, Piccoli P M, eds. The Origin of Granites and Related Rocks Third Hutton Symposium Abstract, U S Geological Survey Circular, 1995.1129, 166

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700