用户名: 密码: 验证码:
基于PMU的电力系统动态状态估计研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
现代电力调度系统要求能够迅速、准确而全面地掌握电力系统的实时运行状态,做出及时有效的控制决策,从而保证运行的安全性和经济性。电力系统状态估计利用实时量测和伪量测数据估计出全网的母线电压幅值和角度,排除随机干扰引起的错误信息,从而估计和预报系统的实时运行状态,实现对系统当前运行状态的安全监控,在现代电力系统中发挥着重要的作用。传统的静态状态估计只能进行当前状态的估计,动态状态估计则可以提前估计下一时刻的状态。90年代以来,基于GPS技术的PMU装置的出现,为状态估计提供了新的发展契机。
     本文针对基于PMU的电力系统动态状态估计问题,主要做了以下几方面工作:
     (1)介绍了状态估计的研究意义、概念及研究现状。包括传统的静态状态估计算法、动态状态估计算法以及近几年计及PMU量测的状态估计算法的发展情况。重点介绍了动态状态估计的基本方法——扩展Kalman滤波法及相关改进算法,并指出算法各自的优缺点。
     (2)详细介绍了PMU的技术原理,构成WAMS系统的方式及引入状态估计时的相关问题。针对当前PMU量测和SCADA系统长期共存的情况,重点介绍了基于二者混合量测的动态状态估计算法。
     (3)提出一种基于混合量测的静动态结合的估计算法。该算法针对SCADA量测数据运用基本加权最小二乘法进行静态估计,动态估计时只选用PMU量测的节点电压相量与静态估计结果进行线性估计。传统的静态估计方法实用可靠,估计结果精度高有保障,动态估计时运用线性估计方法,速度快,保证了估计效率。IEEE-14节点系统仿真验证了算法的有效性和优越性。针对PMU的配置个数和位置对估计精度的影响做了仿真分析,结论表明:配置有PMU节点的估计精度偏高;临近配置甚至构成环路的配置方式可以提升整体估计精度;配置在邻接支路较多的节点,可以有效提升整体估计精度。
     (4)为了进一步提升估计时间和精度,提出基于快速分解的混合估计算法。该方法运用快速分解状态估计算法做静态估计以节省估计时间,动态估计时将PMU支路电流相量量测转换为节点电压相量量测参与估计,以达到增加量测冗余、提高估计精度的目的。IEEE-14节点系统仿真结果表明,该改进算法有效改善了滤波和预测的精度。同时给出了配置不同数目PMU时滤波误差的数值试验结果。
Modern power system requests to monitor the real-time state to make effective control decisions, in order to keep its safety. Power system state estimation can calculate the bus voltage amplitude and phase from system measurements, so as to estimate and forecast the state, which plays an important role in modern power system. The traditional static state estimation can only give the current state, while dynamic state estimation can provide the state of next step. Since the 1990s, the emergence of PMU based on the GPS technology provides a new opportunity and method for state estimation.
     Aimed to the dynamic state estimation of power system based on PMU, the paper did some research work mainly on the below aspects:
     (1)The concept of state estimation, why to study the state estimation and how the research is going on were firstly introduced. The traditional static state estimation algorithms, dynamic state estimation algorithms and algorithms considering the PMU measurements were covered. The basic dynamic state estimation algorithm and some improved algorithms were given an emphasis and their merits and defects were pointed out after careful analysis and comparison.
     (2)PMU provides a new way for state estimation. Its technical theory, the way to form WAMS system and some relevant problems were detailed in the paper. Because the SCADA system and PMU measurements will exist together for a long time, some algorithms based on data fusion of these two measurements were introduced in detail.
     (3)Based on the study above, a new algorithm which combines the merits of the static and dynamic state estimation algorithm was brought up. The algorithm uses WLS algorithm on the SCADA measurements first, then mix the result with node voltage from PMU measurements as mixed measurements data to do further dynamic estimation. The traditional WLS algorithm provides reliable results and the linear dynamic algorithm has a quick performance. Simulations on an IEEE 14 test system showed that the new algorithm is effective and superior. Simulations and analysis were carried out to study the effects of PMU deployment to the estimation accuracy, results show that those lines with PMU have higher accuracy; near deployment improves all lines’accuracy; deployment on the node with more branches improves all lines’accuracy.
     (4)An improved algorithm was brought up to reduce estimation time and error. The fast decoupled method was applied in the process of static estimation. Then the results, together with the voltage phasor measured by PMU, and some relevant voltage phasor transformed from branch current measured by PMU, formed the measured data for the linear dynamic state estimation. Simulations on an IEEE 14 bus test system demonstrated that the method has a better validity in filtering and forecasting the voltage phasor. Numerical experiments results were given to show the effects of different amount of PMU to estimation accuracy.
引文
[1]兰华,李积捷.电力系统状态估计算法的研究现状和展望[J].继电器,2007, 35(10):78-82.
    [2]于尔铿.电力系统状态估计[M].北京:水利电力出版社,1985.
    [3]王珍意.电力系统状态估计[D].华中科技大学,2005.
    [4] F.C. Schweppe. Static State Estimation in Electric Power Systems [J]. IEEE, 1974: 972-982.
    [5]汪隆臻.基于PMU的状态估计研究[D],华北电力大学(北京),2008.
    [6] Horisberger H P, Richard J C, Rossier C. A Fast Decoupled Static State Estimation for Electric Power System [J]. IEEE Trans. on Power Apparatus and Systems, 1976, 95(1): 208-215.
    [7] Dopazo J F, Klitin O A. State Calculation of Power System from Line Flow Measurements [J]. IEEE Trans. on Power Systems, 1970, 89(7):1698-1708.
    [8] Dopazo J F, Klitin O A. Implementation of AEP Real-time Monitoring Systems [J]. IEEE Trans. on Power Apparatus and Systems, 1976, 95(5): 1618-1629.
    [9] Lu C N, Teng J H, Liu W HE. Distribution System State Estimation [J]. IEEE Trans. on Power Systems, 1995, 10(1):229-236.
    [10]孙宏斌,张伯明,相年德.基于支路功率的配电状态估计方法[J].电力系统自动化, 1998, 22(8):2-17.
    [11]李响,刘玲群,等.抗差最小二乘状态估计[J].继电器,2003,31(7):50-53.
    [12] Debs A and Larson R. A Dynamic Estimator for Tracking the State of a Power system, IEEE Trans. on PAS, 1970, PAS-89(7):1670-1678.
    [13] Masiello R D and Schweppe F C. A Tracking Static State Estimator, IEEE Trans. on PAS, 1971, PAS-90(8):1025-1033.
    [14] Nishiya K et al. Dynamic State Estimation for Electric Power System-Introduction of a Trand Factor and Detection of Innovation Processes, Electrical Engineering in Japan, 1976,96(5).
    [15] Leite da Silva A M et al. State Forecasting in Electric Power System. IEEE Proc., 1982, 130(5):237-244.
    [16]张伯明,王世缨,相年德.电力系统实时运行的状态估计和预报[J]. 1991, 11(增刊):68-74.
    [17] Mandal J K. Sinha A K. Roy L. Incorporating Nonlinearities of Measurement Function in Power System Dynamic State Estimation. 1995(03).
    [18] Lin Jeu-min, Huang Shyh-jier. Application of Sliding Surface-Enhanced Fuzzy Control for Dynamic State Estimation of a Power System. IEEE Trans. on Power Systems, 2003, 18(2): 570-577.
    [19] Kuang-Rong Shih, Shyh-Jier Huang. Application of a Robust Algorithm for Dynamic State Estimation of a Power System. IEEE Trans. On Power System, 2002, 17(1): 141-147.
    [20] Sinha, A.K. and Mandal, J.K., Dynamic State Estimation Using ANN based Bus Load Prediction. IEEE Trans. On Power Systems, 1999,14(4), 1219-1225.
    [21]靳希,吴文辉,吴世敏等.基于PMU的广域测量技术及其应用[J].电网与清洁能源,2010,26(10):10-13.
    [22]丁剑,白晓民,王文平,等.电力系统中基于PMU同步数据的应用研究综述[J].继电器, 2006, 34(6): 78-84.
    [23]刘晓,唐云龙,胡新,郑霓虹.PMU在电力系统运行与控制中的应用[J].电工技术, 2005(2): 3-5.
    [24] Phadke A G. State Estimation with Phasor Measurements [J]. IEEE Trans. on Power Systems, 1986, 1(1): 233-240.
    [25]李强,周京阳,于尔铿,等.基于相量量测的电力系统线性状态估计[J].电力系统自动化,2005,29(18):18-24.
    [26]卫志农,李阳林,郑玉平.基于混合量测的电力系统线性动态状态估计算法[J].电力系统自动化,2007,31(6):39-43.
    [27]李强,周京阳,于尔铿,等.基于混合量测的电力系统状态估计混合算法[J].电力系统自动化,2005,29(19):31-35.
    [28]薛辉,贾清泉,王宁,等.基于PMU量测数据和SCADA数据融合的电力系统状态估计方法[J].电网技术,2008,32(14): 44-49.
    [29]丁军策,蔡泽祥,王克英.基于广域测量系统的混合量测状态估计算法[J].中国电机工程学报,2006,26(2):58-63.
    [30]程浩忠,袁青山,汪一华,等.基于等效电流量测变换的电力系统状态估计方法[J].电力系统自动化,2000,24(14):25-29.
    [31]刘辉乐,刘天琪,黄志华.基于Kalman滤波原理的电力系统动态状态估计的研究综述[J].继电器, 2004, 32(20):62-66.
    [32]刘辉乐.基于PMU的分布式动态状态估计的研究[D].四川大学.2005.
    [33]贺觅知.基于卡尔曼滤波的电力系统动态状态估计算法研究[D].西南交通大学,2006.
    [34]贾宏杰,吕英辉,曾沅,等.PMU在电力系统中的优化配置方法[J].电力科学与技术学报, 2010,25(1):54-59.
    [35]杨道驰,李威.相角测量及其在电力系统中的应用[J].广西轻工业, 2008, 12:58-59.
    [36]李强.基于PMU量测的电力系统状态估计研究[D].中国电力科学研究院, 2007.
    [37] PHADKE A G. Synchronized phase measurements in power system [J]. IEEE Computer Application in Power System, 1993, 6(2):42-47.
    [38] Sotojic D R. Spectral monitoring of power system dynamic performances [J]. IEEE Trans. on Power systems, 1993, 8(2):445-451.
    [39] Wilson R E, Sterlina P S. Verification of measured transmission system phase angles [J]. IEEE Trans. on Power Delivery, 1996, 11(4): 1743-1747.
    [40]苗世洪,王少荣,刘沛,等.基于GPS的电网状态监测系统的设计与实现[J].电力系统自动化, 2000, 24(12):52-54.
    [41]卢志刚,郝玉山,康庆平,等.电力系统实时相角监控系统结构研究[J].电网技术, 1998, 22(5):18-20.
    [42]闵勇,丁仁杰,任勇,等.电力系统全网同步监测系统[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),1997,37(7):86-88.
    [43]鞠平,郑世宇,徐群,等.广域测量系统研究综述[J].电力自动化设备, 2004, 24(7): 37-40.
    [44]王宗义,郭志忠.PMU配置不完全可观测系统状态计算[J].继电器,2005, 33(8):10-12.
    [45]孙国强.基于相量测量的电力系统状态估计研究[D].河海大学, 2005.
    [46]纳少华,马彩虹.电力系统同步相量测量装置(PMU)应用及分析[J].中国科技信息,2011, (5):116-119.
    [47]卞晓猛.基于相量量测单元的电力系统状态估计性能改进研究[D].浙江大学,2008.
    [48]虞芹婕.同步相量测量技术及其在状态估计中的应用研究[D].西南交通大学, 2007.
    [49]王英涛.基于WAMS的电力系统动态监测及分析研究[D].中国电力科学研究院,2006.
    [50]严登俊,鞠平,袁洪.网络通信模式下电网相量的广域测量与实时传输系统[J].电网技术,2004,28(4):15-18.
    [51]郑相华,米增强,赵洪山,等.基于PMU的状态估计的研究[J].继电器, 2004, 32(17): 16-19.
    [52]沙智明,郝育黔,郝玉山,等.电力系统PMU安装地点选择优化算法的研究[J]. 2005, 33(7):31-36.
    [53]乔晓艳,乔琨,孟鑫,等.电力系统PMU优化配置问题研究[J].电网与清洁能源, 2010, 26(10):26-30.
    [54]刘杰.基于改进自适应遗传算法的系统可观测PMU最优配置[J].广东电力, 2008, 21(12):13-17.
    [55]王雪杰,齐磊,黄德福,等.基于广域测量系统的状态估计和PMU配置[J].吉林电力, 2010, 38(4):17-19.
    [56]李虹,李卫国.基于提高系统可观测性和状态估计精度的PMU配置[J].华北电力大学学报, 2011, 38(1):31-34.
    [57]郭佩英,郝红艳,邓颖等.考虑测量冗余度最大的电力系统PMU最优配置[J].东北电力大学学报,2010,30(2):31-35.
    [58]程涛,黄彦全,申铁.遗传算法在PMU优化配置中的应用[J].电力系统及其自动化学报, 2009, 21(1):48-51.
    [59]李新振,滕欢.自适应遗传-禁忌搜索混合算法在PMU最优配置中的应用[J].四川电力技术, 2009,32(3):56-60.
    [60]罗毅,赵冬梅.电力系统PMU最优配置数字规划算法[J].电力系统自动化, 2006, 30(9):20-24.
    [61]周琦.基于PMU优化的电力系统状态估计算法的研究[D].华北电力大学(保定), 2008.
    [62]吕英辉.基于可观性的电力系统PMU优化配置研究[D].天津大学, 2008.
    [63]张玲.电力系统PMU优化配置研究[D].兰州理工大学,2008.
    [64]毛安家,郭志忠.与SCADA互补的WAMS中PMU的配置及数据处理方法[J].电网技术, 2005, 29(8): 71-74.
    [65]赵红嘎,薛禹胜,高翔,等.量测量的时延差对状态估计的影响及其对策[J].电力系统自动化, 2004,28(21):12-16.
    [66] J S Thorp, A G Phadke and K J Karimi. Real Time Voltage phasor Measurements for Static State Estimation. IEEE Transactions on PAS, 1985, 104(11):3098-3106.
    [67]王勇.基于相角测量技术的状态估计研究[D].河海大学,2001.
    [68]刘怡.GPS功角量测在电力系统状态估计中的应用[D].华北电力大学,2002.
    [69]王克英,穆刚,陈学允.计及PMU的状态估计精度分析及配置研究[J].中国电机工程学报,2001,21(8):29-33.
    [70]李阳林.基于WAMS/SCADA混合量测的电力系统动态状态估计算法研究[D].河海大学,2007.
    [71]陈娟,吉培荣,卢丰.指数平滑法及其在负荷预测中的应用[J].三峡大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 32(3): 37-41.
    [72]赵红嘎,薛禹胜,汪德星,等.计及PMU支路电流相量的状态估计模型[J].电力系统自动化,2004,28(17):37-40.
    [73] Huang Shyh Jier, Shih Kuang Rong. Dynamic-state-estimation scheme including nonlinear measurement-function considerations [J]. IEEE Proceedings of Generation, Transmission and Distribution, 2002, 149(2): 673-678.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700