澳门路凼填海区湿地生物群落结构的动态变化及物种多样性研究
|
摘要
本论文首次对澳门路凼填海区3个湿地包括莲花大桥滩涂湿地、路凼湿地及路凼邻区湿地的生物群落进行较为系统的研究,分析了红树林群落、底栖动物群落、底表动物群落、水鸟群落的结构特征、生物多样性及其时空动态变化,为澳门自然生态环境的研究提供基础资料。主要研究结果如下:
1.红树林群落。2003年至2004年调查了莲花大桥滩涂红树林群落,并与1992年至1994年的路凼连贯公路滩涂红树林群落进行比较。莲花大桥滩涂红树林植物群落有6科6属6种,其中无瓣海桑Sonneratia apetala是外来入侵的物种。红树植物占莲花大桥滩涂红树林植物总数83.3%,半红树植物占总数16.7%。而以前路凼连贯公路滩涂红树林群落则有8科8属8种,其中红树植物及半红树植物各占总数50%。莲花大桥滩涂红树林植物种群的平均挤拥指数MCI最高是老鼠簕,约为462.40;而路凼连贯公路滩涂红树林群落的平均挤拥指数MCI最高是桐花树,约为311.86。路凼连贯公路滩涂红树林群落的生物多样性指数H′、Pielou均匀度指数及Simpson优势度指数远远大于莲花大桥滩涂红树林群落。相反,莲花大桥滩涂红树林群落的Margalef丰富度指数略大于路凼连贯公路滩涂红树林群落。
2.大型底栖动物群落。于2004年对莲花大桥滩涂和路凼湿地的大型底栖动物群落进行周年调查。结果在两地共发现大型底栖动物38种,分别隶属于4门5纲24科,其中澳门莲花大桥滩涂的大型底栖动物有4门5纲23科34种,占两个湿地总种数的89%;路凼湿地大型底栖动物有3门4纲15科21种,占两个湿地物种数的55%。
两个湿地大型底栖动物种数的季节变化表现为:莲花大桥滩涂春季19种、夏季20种、秋季20种、冬季12种,四季均出现的5种有:长尾虫Aspeudes sp.、光滑河篮蛤Potamocorbula laevis、光滑狭口螺Sternophyra gloabar、绷带腹螺Alvania ligata和日本拟背尾水虱Paraanthura japonica,长尾虫成为这里的优势种群;路凼湿地春季11种、夏季12种、秋季7种、冬季8种,四季均出现的3种包括:斜肋齿蜷Sermylariqueti、长尾虫Aspeudes sp.和瘤拟黑螺Melanoides tubercula,斜肋齿蜷成为这里的优势种群。莲花大桥滩涂大型底栖动物各季节的种数均高于路凼湿地,底栖动物的密度亦大于路凼湿地,而生物量则相反。两地相比,春秋莲花大桥底栖动物多样性指数较高,而冬夏路凼湿地的较高。
3.底表动物群落。本研究在莲花大桥滩涂采到的大型底表动物共有31科58种,包括:鱼类36种、软件动物3种、甲壳动物19种。物种数目最多的是小型鱼类。底表动物在春季出现24种,夏季30种,秋季37种,冬季31种。各季度出现频数F=1-4,其中仅在一季出现的有21种,两季出现的有18种,三季出现的有11种,四季均出现的有8种。样本个体数量以冬季最多,为1336尾,样本总重量亦以冬季最大约2385.6g。而春季数量最少,仅296尾,重1835.4g。
全年累计在高潮区采到938尾,计35种,中潮区共采到1547尾,计42种,低潮区共采到531尾,计40种。在四个季节中大型底表动物的优势种群均是脊尾白虾Palaemon carinicauda,其数量最高,占总数的52.02%,重量占总重量的35.38%。在四季中,大型底表动物的Shannon-Wiener多样性指数、均匀性指数(J)、丰富度指数(D)和优势度指数(Sp)的变化,除丰富度指数以夏季最高外,其余3个生物多样性指标均以春季最高。多样性指数和均匀性指数以冬季最低,而丰富度指数和优势度指数以秋季最低。
4.水鸟群落。2003年至2004年间对澳门路凼填海区三个湿地的水鸟进行调查,记录到三个湿地共有83种,隶属6目15科。其中莲花大桥滩涂48种、路凼湿地50种和路凼邻区湿地75种。水鸟地理区系以古北种最多,约有56种;其次是广布种,约有23种;东洋种只有4种。居留型以冬候鸟和过境鸟为主,其中莲花大桥滩涂冬候鸟19种,占三个湿地水鸟种类总数的22.89%,过境鸟17种占20.48%;路凼湿地冬候鸟18种,占水鸟种类总数的21.69%,过境鸟25种,占30.12%:路凼邻区湿地冬候鸟26种,占31.33%,过境鸟39种,占46.99%。生态类群主要是涉禽类及游禽类,这两种类群在3个湿地出现的种类数占三个湿地水鸟种类总数的比例分别为:莲花大桥滩涂涉禽39种,占三个湿地水鸟种类总数的46.99%,游禽9种,占10.84%;路凼湿地涉禽40种,占48.19%,游禽10种占12.05%;路凼邻区湿地涉禽63种,占75.90%,游禽12种,占14.46%。
2003年至2004年,以路凼邻区湿地的物种多样性指数、Margalef丰富度指数和Pielou均匀度指数最高,分别是2.77、7.10和0.64,而Simpson优势度指数以路凼湿地和莲花大桥滩涂较大,约为0.16。水鸟多样性的季度变化,以春季的生物多样性指数和Margalef丰富度指数最大,分别是3.11及7.50,出现于路凼邻区湿地。Pielou均匀度指数和Simpson优势度指数的最大值,发生于夏季及冬季,分别约为0.80和0.38,出现于路凼湿地。
The spatio-temporal variation of the structure of the mangrove community, macrobenthic community, epifaunal community and waterbird community in the Taipa-Coloane reclamation site, including the Lotus Flower Bridge mudflat, Taipa-Coloane wetland and the wetland near the Taipa-Coloane area, were studied in this paper. The results were indicated as following:
1 .A study on the mangrove plant in the mudflat of Lotus Flower Bridge was carried out from 2003 to 2004, and the result was compared to the investigation of mangrove community of Taipa-Coloane causeway mudflat from 1992 to 1994.
There are 6 families, 6 genera, 6 species in the Lotus Flower Bridge mudflat. The mangrove species and the semi-mangrove species were respectively account for 83.3% and 16.7% of the total studied plants in the Lotus Flower Bridge mudflat.
There are 8 families, 8 genera, 8 species in the mangrove community of Taipa-Coloane causeway mudflat and the mangrove species and the semi-mangrove species were respectively account for 50% of the total recorded plants in the Taipa-Coloane causeway mudflat.
The MCI of Acanthu ilicifolius, with the value of 462.3975, was the highest of the mangrove plants in the Lotus Flower Bridge mudflat, and that of Aegiceras comiculatum, with the value of 311.8578, was the highest in the Taipa-Coloane causeway mudflat. The Margalef's species richness of the mangrove community had no abvious difference between Lotus Flower Bridge mudflat and Taipa-Coloane causeway mudflat, but the Shannon-Wiener index, Pelou's evenness index and Simpson dominance index of mangrove community were low in the Lotus Flower Bridge mudflat.
2.These seasonal variations of macrofauna community structure were researched were examed on the mud flat of the Lotus flower bridge and the Taipa-Coloane of Macao in 2004. The results showed that 38 species of the macrofauna were identified in the mud flat of the Lotus flower bridge and the Taipa-Coloane of Macao, belonging to24 families, 5 classes, and 4 phyla.
We found a total of 34 species in the mud flat of the Lotus flower bridge of Macao, belonging to23 families, 5 classes, and 4 phyla. The macrofauna of the mud flat of the Lotus flower bridge constituted 89 % of all species of two mud flats. There were 21 species in the mud flat of the Taipa-Coloane of Macao, belonging to15 families,4 classes,and 3 phyla, and they constituted 55 % of all species of the two mud flat.
The number of the species of macrofauna of the Lotus flower bridge mudflat in the spring, summer, autumn and winter were respectively 19, 20, 20 and 12, respectively. The Aspeudes sp., Potamocorbula laevis , Sternophyra gloabar , Alvania ligata and Paraanthura japonica were discovered in the four seasons of the Lotus flower bridge mudflat. The number of the species of macrofauna of the Taipa-Coloane wetland in the spring, summer, autumn and winter were respectively 11, 12, 7 and 8. Sermyla riqueti , Aspeudes sp and Melanoides tubercula were discovered in every season of the mud flat of the Taipa-Coloane wetland. The results also indicated that the species number of the mud flat of the Lotus flower bridge was higher than that of the mud flat of the Taipa-Coloane in every season.
3.The seasonal investigation were performed in the intertidal flat of Lotus Flower Bridge in 2004. The results indicated that there recorded 58 species of epifauna on the mud flat, which belong to 31 families, including 3 species of molluscks, 19 species of crustacean and 36 species of fishes. The main species of epifauna were fish which are generally small species with slow activity. They are usually discovered in the coast of the South China Sea and became the natural food for the large size fishes and waterbirds.
Epifauna community had 24 species in spring, 30 species in summer, 37 species in autumn and 31 species in winter. The number of species occurring frequency in spring, summer, autumn, and winter were 21, 18, 11 and 8, respectively. The individual number and total fresh weight were the largest in winter, which were 1336 inds and 2385.6g, respectively, while the individual number and total fresh weight were small in the spring, with the values of 296 inds and 1835.4g, respectively. The individual number and species were discovered 938 inds and 35 species at high tidal flat, 1547 inds and 42 species at middle tidal flat, and 531 inds and 40 species at low tidal flat. The dominant species of benthos were Palaemon carinicauda in four seasons. The largest individual number and the heaviest fresh weight of the dominant species were 52.02% of the total individual number and 35.38% of the total fresh weight. Four species diversity indices (the Shannon-Wiener index, Pelou's evenness index, Margalef's species richness index and Simpon index)of the benthic community were various in the four seasons. Margalef's species richness index was the highest in the Summer, and the other values were the highest in the Spring. The values of Shannon-Wiener index and Pelou's evenness index were low in the Winter,and Margalef's species richness index and Simpon index were low in the Autumn.
4.The investigation on the waterbirds in the Taipa-Coloane reclamation site, which included the Lotus Flower Bridge, the Taipa-Coloane and the wetland near the Taipa-Coloane area were conducted in 2003 - 2004. The result revealed that there are 83 species of waterbirds in the reclamation site. 40 species of these birds can be found in the Lotus Flower Bridge wetland, 50 species can be found in the Taipa-Coloane wetland and 75 species can be found in the wetland near the Taipa-Coloane zone, and they respectively accounted for 57.83%, 60.24% and 90.36% of the total waterbirds recorded in Macao Taipa-Coloane reclamation site. In these 83 waterbirds species, 56 of which are Palaearctic birds, 23 are widespread birds and 4 are Oriental birds.
Both the winter birds and Passage migrant were dominant in the Taipa-Coloane reclamation site in Macao, among which 19 species of winter birds and 17 species of Passage migrant were found in the Lotus Flower Bridge wetland, respectively accounting for 22.89% and 20.48% of the total number of types of waterbirds recorded in the Taipa-Coloane reclamation site. 18 species of winter birds and 25 species of Passage migrant were in the Taipa-Coloane wetland, which account for 21.69% and 30.12% of the total number of waterbirds recorded in the Taipa-Coloane reclamation site. 26 species of winterbirds and 39 species of Passage migrant were found in the wetland near the Taipa-Coloane area, which account for 31.33% and 46.99% of the total number of waterbirds found in the Taipa-Coloane reclamation site.
In these waterbirds, 39 species of wader birds and 9 species of swim birds were in the Lotus Flower Bridge wetland, which account for 46.99% and 10.84% of the total number of waterbirds in Macao, respectively. 40 species of wader birds and 10 species of swim birds were in the Taipa-Coloane wetland, which account for 48.19% and 12.05% of the total number of waterbirds in Macao, respectively. 63 species of wader birds and 12 species of swimmer birds were recorded in the wetland near the Taipa-Coloane zone, which account for 75.90% and 14.47% of the total number of types of waterbirds recorded in Macao.
The Shannon-Weiner index, Margalef species richness index and Pielou equitability index of the wetland near the Taipa-Coloane area, with the values of 2.77, 7.10 and 0.64, respectively, were higher than other wetlands from 2003 to 2004. The Simpson dominance index of the Taipa-Coloane wetland and the Lotus Flower Bridge wetland, with the value of 0.16, was higher than that of the wetland near the Taipa-Coloane area in the same season. In the spring, the Shannon-Weiner and the Margalef species richness index of the wetland near the Taipa-Coloane area, with the values of 3.11 and 7.50, respectively, were higher than those of other wetlands. In the Summer and Winter, the Pielou equitability index and the Simpson dominance index of the Taipa-Coloane wetland, with the values of 0.80 and 0.38, respectively, were higher than those of other wetlands.
1.红树林群落。2003年至2004年调查了莲花大桥滩涂红树林群落,并与1992年至1994年的路凼连贯公路滩涂红树林群落进行比较。莲花大桥滩涂红树林植物群落有6科6属6种,其中无瓣海桑Sonneratia apetala是外来入侵的物种。红树植物占莲花大桥滩涂红树林植物总数83.3%,半红树植物占总数16.7%。而以前路凼连贯公路滩涂红树林群落则有8科8属8种,其中红树植物及半红树植物各占总数50%。莲花大桥滩涂红树林植物种群的平均挤拥指数MCI最高是老鼠簕,约为462.40;而路凼连贯公路滩涂红树林群落的平均挤拥指数MCI最高是桐花树,约为311.86。路凼连贯公路滩涂红树林群落的生物多样性指数H′、Pielou均匀度指数及Simpson优势度指数远远大于莲花大桥滩涂红树林群落。相反,莲花大桥滩涂红树林群落的Margalef丰富度指数略大于路凼连贯公路滩涂红树林群落。
2.大型底栖动物群落。于2004年对莲花大桥滩涂和路凼湿地的大型底栖动物群落进行周年调查。结果在两地共发现大型底栖动物38种,分别隶属于4门5纲24科,其中澳门莲花大桥滩涂的大型底栖动物有4门5纲23科34种,占两个湿地总种数的89%;路凼湿地大型底栖动物有3门4纲15科21种,占两个湿地物种数的55%。
两个湿地大型底栖动物种数的季节变化表现为:莲花大桥滩涂春季19种、夏季20种、秋季20种、冬季12种,四季均出现的5种有:长尾虫Aspeudes sp.、光滑河篮蛤Potamocorbula laevis、光滑狭口螺Sternophyra gloabar、绷带腹螺Alvania ligata和日本拟背尾水虱Paraanthura japonica,长尾虫成为这里的优势种群;路凼湿地春季11种、夏季12种、秋季7种、冬季8种,四季均出现的3种包括:斜肋齿蜷Sermylariqueti、长尾虫Aspeudes sp.和瘤拟黑螺Melanoides tubercula,斜肋齿蜷成为这里的优势种群。莲花大桥滩涂大型底栖动物各季节的种数均高于路凼湿地,底栖动物的密度亦大于路凼湿地,而生物量则相反。两地相比,春秋莲花大桥底栖动物多样性指数较高,而冬夏路凼湿地的较高。
3.底表动物群落。本研究在莲花大桥滩涂采到的大型底表动物共有31科58种,包括:鱼类36种、软件动物3种、甲壳动物19种。物种数目最多的是小型鱼类。底表动物在春季出现24种,夏季30种,秋季37种,冬季31种。各季度出现频数F=1-4,其中仅在一季出现的有21种,两季出现的有18种,三季出现的有11种,四季均出现的有8种。样本个体数量以冬季最多,为1336尾,样本总重量亦以冬季最大约2385.6g。而春季数量最少,仅296尾,重1835.4g。
全年累计在高潮区采到938尾,计35种,中潮区共采到1547尾,计42种,低潮区共采到531尾,计40种。在四个季节中大型底表动物的优势种群均是脊尾白虾Palaemon carinicauda,其数量最高,占总数的52.02%,重量占总重量的35.38%。在四季中,大型底表动物的Shannon-Wiener多样性指数、均匀性指数(J)、丰富度指数(D)和优势度指数(Sp)的变化,除丰富度指数以夏季最高外,其余3个生物多样性指标均以春季最高。多样性指数和均匀性指数以冬季最低,而丰富度指数和优势度指数以秋季最低。
4.水鸟群落。2003年至2004年间对澳门路凼填海区三个湿地的水鸟进行调查,记录到三个湿地共有83种,隶属6目15科。其中莲花大桥滩涂48种、路凼湿地50种和路凼邻区湿地75种。水鸟地理区系以古北种最多,约有56种;其次是广布种,约有23种;东洋种只有4种。居留型以冬候鸟和过境鸟为主,其中莲花大桥滩涂冬候鸟19种,占三个湿地水鸟种类总数的22.89%,过境鸟17种占20.48%;路凼湿地冬候鸟18种,占水鸟种类总数的21.69%,过境鸟25种,占30.12%:路凼邻区湿地冬候鸟26种,占31.33%,过境鸟39种,占46.99%。生态类群主要是涉禽类及游禽类,这两种类群在3个湿地出现的种类数占三个湿地水鸟种类总数的比例分别为:莲花大桥滩涂涉禽39种,占三个湿地水鸟种类总数的46.99%,游禽9种,占10.84%;路凼湿地涉禽40种,占48.19%,游禽10种占12.05%;路凼邻区湿地涉禽63种,占75.90%,游禽12种,占14.46%。
2003年至2004年,以路凼邻区湿地的物种多样性指数、Margalef丰富度指数和Pielou均匀度指数最高,分别是2.77、7.10和0.64,而Simpson优势度指数以路凼湿地和莲花大桥滩涂较大,约为0.16。水鸟多样性的季度变化,以春季的生物多样性指数和Margalef丰富度指数最大,分别是3.11及7.50,出现于路凼邻区湿地。Pielou均匀度指数和Simpson优势度指数的最大值,发生于夏季及冬季,分别约为0.80和0.38,出现于路凼湿地。
The spatio-temporal variation of the structure of the mangrove community, macrobenthic community, epifaunal community and waterbird community in the Taipa-Coloane reclamation site, including the Lotus Flower Bridge mudflat, Taipa-Coloane wetland and the wetland near the Taipa-Coloane area, were studied in this paper. The results were indicated as following:
1 .A study on the mangrove plant in the mudflat of Lotus Flower Bridge was carried out from 2003 to 2004, and the result was compared to the investigation of mangrove community of Taipa-Coloane causeway mudflat from 1992 to 1994.
There are 6 families, 6 genera, 6 species in the Lotus Flower Bridge mudflat. The mangrove species and the semi-mangrove species were respectively account for 83.3% and 16.7% of the total studied plants in the Lotus Flower Bridge mudflat.
There are 8 families, 8 genera, 8 species in the mangrove community of Taipa-Coloane causeway mudflat and the mangrove species and the semi-mangrove species were respectively account for 50% of the total recorded plants in the Taipa-Coloane causeway mudflat.
The MCI of Acanthu ilicifolius, with the value of 462.3975, was the highest of the mangrove plants in the Lotus Flower Bridge mudflat, and that of Aegiceras comiculatum, with the value of 311.8578, was the highest in the Taipa-Coloane causeway mudflat. The Margalef's species richness of the mangrove community had no abvious difference between Lotus Flower Bridge mudflat and Taipa-Coloane causeway mudflat, but the Shannon-Wiener index, Pelou's evenness index and Simpson dominance index of mangrove community were low in the Lotus Flower Bridge mudflat.
2.These seasonal variations of macrofauna community structure were researched were examed on the mud flat of the Lotus flower bridge and the Taipa-Coloane of Macao in 2004. The results showed that 38 species of the macrofauna were identified in the mud flat of the Lotus flower bridge and the Taipa-Coloane of Macao, belonging to24 families, 5 classes, and 4 phyla.
We found a total of 34 species in the mud flat of the Lotus flower bridge of Macao, belonging to23 families, 5 classes, and 4 phyla. The macrofauna of the mud flat of the Lotus flower bridge constituted 89 % of all species of two mud flats. There were 21 species in the mud flat of the Taipa-Coloane of Macao, belonging to15 families,4 classes,and 3 phyla, and they constituted 55 % of all species of the two mud flat.
The number of the species of macrofauna of the Lotus flower bridge mudflat in the spring, summer, autumn and winter were respectively 19, 20, 20 and 12, respectively. The Aspeudes sp., Potamocorbula laevis , Sternophyra gloabar , Alvania ligata and Paraanthura japonica were discovered in the four seasons of the Lotus flower bridge mudflat. The number of the species of macrofauna of the Taipa-Coloane wetland in the spring, summer, autumn and winter were respectively 11, 12, 7 and 8. Sermyla riqueti , Aspeudes sp and Melanoides tubercula were discovered in every season of the mud flat of the Taipa-Coloane wetland. The results also indicated that the species number of the mud flat of the Lotus flower bridge was higher than that of the mud flat of the Taipa-Coloane in every season.
3.The seasonal investigation were performed in the intertidal flat of Lotus Flower Bridge in 2004. The results indicated that there recorded 58 species of epifauna on the mud flat, which belong to 31 families, including 3 species of molluscks, 19 species of crustacean and 36 species of fishes. The main species of epifauna were fish which are generally small species with slow activity. They are usually discovered in the coast of the South China Sea and became the natural food for the large size fishes and waterbirds.
Epifauna community had 24 species in spring, 30 species in summer, 37 species in autumn and 31 species in winter. The number of species occurring frequency in spring, summer, autumn, and winter were 21, 18, 11 and 8, respectively. The individual number and total fresh weight were the largest in winter, which were 1336 inds and 2385.6g, respectively, while the individual number and total fresh weight were small in the spring, with the values of 296 inds and 1835.4g, respectively. The individual number and species were discovered 938 inds and 35 species at high tidal flat, 1547 inds and 42 species at middle tidal flat, and 531 inds and 40 species at low tidal flat. The dominant species of benthos were Palaemon carinicauda in four seasons. The largest individual number and the heaviest fresh weight of the dominant species were 52.02% of the total individual number and 35.38% of the total fresh weight. Four species diversity indices (the Shannon-Wiener index, Pelou's evenness index, Margalef's species richness index and Simpon index)of the benthic community were various in the four seasons. Margalef's species richness index was the highest in the Summer, and the other values were the highest in the Spring. The values of Shannon-Wiener index and Pelou's evenness index were low in the Winter,and Margalef's species richness index and Simpon index were low in the Autumn.
4.The investigation on the waterbirds in the Taipa-Coloane reclamation site, which included the Lotus Flower Bridge, the Taipa-Coloane and the wetland near the Taipa-Coloane area were conducted in 2003 - 2004. The result revealed that there are 83 species of waterbirds in the reclamation site. 40 species of these birds can be found in the Lotus Flower Bridge wetland, 50 species can be found in the Taipa-Coloane wetland and 75 species can be found in the wetland near the Taipa-Coloane zone, and they respectively accounted for 57.83%, 60.24% and 90.36% of the total waterbirds recorded in Macao Taipa-Coloane reclamation site. In these 83 waterbirds species, 56 of which are Palaearctic birds, 23 are widespread birds and 4 are Oriental birds.
Both the winter birds and Passage migrant were dominant in the Taipa-Coloane reclamation site in Macao, among which 19 species of winter birds and 17 species of Passage migrant were found in the Lotus Flower Bridge wetland, respectively accounting for 22.89% and 20.48% of the total number of types of waterbirds recorded in the Taipa-Coloane reclamation site. 18 species of winter birds and 25 species of Passage migrant were in the Taipa-Coloane wetland, which account for 21.69% and 30.12% of the total number of waterbirds recorded in the Taipa-Coloane reclamation site. 26 species of winterbirds and 39 species of Passage migrant were found in the wetland near the Taipa-Coloane area, which account for 31.33% and 46.99% of the total number of waterbirds found in the Taipa-Coloane reclamation site.
In these waterbirds, 39 species of wader birds and 9 species of swim birds were in the Lotus Flower Bridge wetland, which account for 46.99% and 10.84% of the total number of waterbirds in Macao, respectively. 40 species of wader birds and 10 species of swim birds were in the Taipa-Coloane wetland, which account for 48.19% and 12.05% of the total number of waterbirds in Macao, respectively. 63 species of wader birds and 12 species of swimmer birds were recorded in the wetland near the Taipa-Coloane zone, which account for 75.90% and 14.47% of the total number of types of waterbirds recorded in Macao.
The Shannon-Weiner index, Margalef species richness index and Pielou equitability index of the wetland near the Taipa-Coloane area, with the values of 2.77, 7.10 and 0.64, respectively, were higher than other wetlands from 2003 to 2004. The Simpson dominance index of the Taipa-Coloane wetland and the Lotus Flower Bridge wetland, with the value of 0.16, was higher than that of the wetland near the Taipa-Coloane area in the same season. In the spring, the Shannon-Weiner and the Margalef species richness index of the wetland near the Taipa-Coloane area, with the values of 3.11 and 7.50, respectively, were higher than those of other wetlands. In the Summer and Winter, the Pielou equitability index and the Simpson dominance index of the Taipa-Coloane wetland, with the values of 0.80 and 0.38, respectively, were higher than those of other wetlands.
引文
[1]Alongi D.M.,Christoffersen P.Benthic infaunna and organism-sediment relations in a shallow,tropical coastal area:influence of outwelled mangrove detritus and physical disturbance.Mar Ecol Prog Ser.1992,81(1-3):229-245.
[2]Andreev A.V.,Chan S.,Crosby M.J.et al.Threated Birds of Asia:The BirdLife International Red Data Book.Part A.The BirdLife International.2001,532-535.
[3]Asia Council,Bird Life International.Discovery of the breeding sites and migration routes of Black-faced Spoonbills PlataIea minor Proceedings of the 1990.International Black-faced spoonbills conservation workshop Taipei.1999.
[4]Baird D,Evans P R,Milne H,et al.University by shorebirds of benthic invertebrate production in intertidal areas.Oceanography and Marine Biology.Annual Review.1985,23:573-597.
[5]Barros L..Manual de identificacao das ayes de Macau.aves residentes e migradoras.Direccao dos Servicos de Turismo de Macau.1976,12-25.
[6]Bird Life International.Saving Asia's threatened birds.A guide for government and Civil Society.2003,181-186.
[7]Brian Morton and John Morton.The sea shore ecology of Hong Kong.Hong Kong University press.1983,138-146.
[8]Carey,G.J.and Young.L.The important to waterfowl of the Mai Po marches and Inner Deep Bay Ramsar Site.Hong Kong bird report.1997,141-149.
[9]Carey.G.J,Chalmers.M.L,Diskin.D.A.et al.Theavifauna of Hong Kong.2001,4-8.
[10]Chan.S,Crosby.M.J,Islam et al.Important bird areas in Asia key sites for conservation.BirLife Internation.2004,90-91.
[11]Chesney Me S.The benthic invertebrate community of the intertidal mudflat at the Mai Po Marshes Nature Reserve,with special reference to resources for migratory shorebirds.University of Hong Kong,1997.
[12]Chong Jong-Ryol,Pak U-il,RimChyu-Yon et al.The breeding biology of the Black-faced Spoonbill(Platalea minor).Wildbird society of Japan.2000,11-18.
[13]Chong Jong-Ryol.The Research of the breeding situation of Black-faced Spoonbill in North Korea International Symposium for the conservation of Black-faced Spoonbill in East Asia.Korean Federation for Environmental Movement.2004.
[14]Collar N.J.,AndreevA.V.,Chart.S.,et al.Athreatened birds of Asia.The BirdLife International red data book.A project of the BirdLife Asia Partnership.2001.
[15]Colwell M.A.and Taft O.W.Waterbird communities in managed weltlands of varying water depth.Colonial Waterbird.2000,23(1):45-55.
[16]Connell D.W.,Fung C.N.,Minh T.B.et al.Risk to breeding success of fish-eating Ardeids due to persistent organic contaminants in Hong Kong:evidence from organochlorine compounds in eggs.Water Research.2003,37:459-467.
[17]Crosby M.J..Saving Asia's threatened birds.Bird Life International.2003.
[18]Csaba Pigniczki and Zsolt Karcza.First results of Spoonbill colour-ringing project in Hungary(2003-2004).Eurostte Spoonbill network Newsletter.2006,(4):8-9.
[19]Dahmer Thomas D.,Yu Yat Yung and Mary L.Felley.Black-faced Spoonbill global population change from 1991-2005.International Symposium on Research and Conservation of Black-faced Spoonbill,Kong Hong,2006:16-18~(th).
[20]Dimalexis A.and Pyrovetsi M..Effect of water level fluctuations on wading bird foraging habit use at an irrigation reservoir,Lake Kerkini,Greece.Colonial Waterbirds.1997,20(2):244-252.
[21]Dugan P.Wetlands in Danger.London:Michael Beasley.Reed international books.1993.
[22]Earles S.Birds of the Maipo marshes,birds international.1990,2(3):11-21.
[23]EmstMayr and G.William Cottrell.Check-list of birds of the world VolumeI-X I.Cambridge:Massachusetts Museum of Comparative Zoology.2000.
[24]Fild G.D.Utilization of mangroves by birds on the Freetown Reninsula,Sierra Ieone.Ibis.1968,110:354-357.
[25]Frank D.Steinheimer,Emmett R.Easton and RichardW Lewthwaite.Rediscovery of John Crampton W.Kershaw's birds from Macau.including his record of Small Niltava Niltava macgrigoriae.Bull.B.O.C.2003,123(4):220-227.
[26]Gopal B.et al.Wetlands zoology meangement.Inter Sci.Puble.India.1983.
[27]Heath A G,Turner B J,Davis W P.Temperatureprerferences and tolerances of three figh species inhabiting hyperthermal ponds on mangrove islands.Hydrobiologia.1993,259:47-55.
[28]Lui Henry T.H..Birdwatchingin Wetlands HongKong Discoery.2001.
[29]Herklots,G.A.C.Hong Kongbirds.South China Morning Post.Hong Kong.1953.
[30]Hitoshi TOJO and Syuya NAKAMURA.Breeding density of exotic Red-billled Leiothix and native bird species on Mt.Tsukuba,central Japan.Ornithol Sci.2004,(3):23-32
[31]Hong Kong Bird Watching Society.Keeping Asia Spoonbills Airborne International Symposium on Research and Conservation of the Black-faced Spoonbil.Hong Kong.2006.
[32]Hong Kong Herbarium.Check list of Hong Kong plants.Agriculture,Fisheries and Conservation Department.The Government ofthe Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.2004,10-15.
[33]Isola,C.R.,Colwell M.A.,Taft O.W.et al.Interspecific difference in habitat use of shorebirds and waterfowl foraging in managed wetlands of Califormia's San Joaquin Valley.Waterbirds.2000,23(2):196-203.
[34]Kazantzidis,S.and Goutner V..Foraging ecology and conversation of feeding habitats of Little Egrets(Egretta garzetta)in the Axios River Delta,Macedonia,Greece.Colonial Waterbirds.1996,(1) 115-121
[35]Kershaw.J.C.Butterflies ofHong Kong(and South-east China).Kelly and Walsh.Hong Kong.1907,130-150.
[36]Kershaw.J.C.List ofthe birds ofthe QuangtungCoast.China.Ibis.1904,46:235-248.
[37]Kim Sooil,Do-Han Lee.Black-faced Spoonbill.Korea Doyosae publishing company.2001.
[38]Kuo Tung-Hui.Wintering ecology research in Taiwan.Taiwans Wild bird society of Tainan city.1999
[39]Kwok,K.Effect of water level fluctuation ofgei wais on distribution of waders in the Mai Po Marshes.Dissertation of department of appiled press,San Deigo.1993.
[40]Kwok.P.W.Time Activty Budget ofPerisesarma bidens and Parasearma affinis (Brachyura:Seasarminae) at the Mai Po Marshes Mangrove,Hong Kong.Hong Kong:Hong Kong University Press.1999,137-151.
[41]Lain Cheng Soh.On a collection ofsesarmine crabs(Decapoda,Brachyura, Grapsidae) from Hong Kong University of Hong Kong.1978.
[42]Lee S.Y.Litter Production and Turnover of the Mangrove Kandelia candel(L.)Druce in a Hong Kong Tidal Shrimp Pond.Coastal and Science.1989,29:75-87.
[43]Lee Shing-Yip,Leung Va.The Brachyuran Fauna of the Mai Po Marshes Nature Reserveand Deep Bay,Hong Kong.Hong Kong:Hong Kong University Press.1999,57-82.
[44]Lee Shing-Yip.The mangrove ecosystem of Deep Bay and the MaiPo Marshes,HongKong.Hong Kong:Hong Kong University Press.1999.
[45]Lefebver G.,Poulin B.,Bird communities in Panamanian black mangrove:Potential effects of physical and biotic factors.Journal of tropical ecology.1997,13:97-113.
[46]Lefebver G.,Poulin B.,Seasonal abundance of migrant birds and food resources in Panamanian mangrove forests.Wilson bulletin.1996,108(4):748-759.
[47]Lefebver G.,Temporal dynamics of mangrove bird com-munities in Venezuela with special reference to migrant war-blers.The Auk.1994,(2):405-415.
[48]Leung Chee Va.Population dynamics of Black-faced Spoonbill in Macao.International Syrnposium for the Conservation of Black-faced Spoonbill in East Asia.Korean Federation for Environmental Movement.2004.
[49]Leung Chee Va.Black-faced Spoonbill in Macao.International Symposium on Research and Conservation of Black-faced Spoonbill.Kong Hong.16-18th January 2006.
[50]Li David and Mundkur Taej.Numbers and distribution of waterbirds and wetlands in the Asia-Pacific region.Wetlands Internatioal.2002-2004.
[51]Liang Shichu,Fan Hangqing.Distribution pattern of plant populations of Rhizophora stylosa Community in Yingluo Bay of Guangxi.Journal of the Guangxi Academy of Sciences.1993,9(2):88-93.
[52]Lily K.,Tong Y..The microgastropods of HongKong.Mangroves University of Hong Kong.1986.
[53]Lioyd,J.W.et al.Wetland vulnerability in East Anglia:a possible conceptual framework and generalized approach.Journal of Environmental Management.1993.
[54]Liu Ruiyu,Zhong Zhenrui et al.Penaeoid Shrimps of the South China Sea.Beijing:China AgriculturalPublishing House.1986.
[55]Lui T.H.Henry.Birdwatching in Wetlands Hong Kong Discoery.2007.
[56]Marho Tucakovand Antun Zuljevic.How to protect colonies of Eurasian Spoonbill Platalea leucorodia on carpfish farms in Serbia? Eurostte Spoonbill network Newsletter.Eurostte Spoonbill network Newsletter 2006,4:10-14.
[57]Mclville D.S,Chesney Mc.S,Anderson C et al.Predicted impacts of the Shenzhen River regulation project on waterfowl in Deep Bay.Hong Kong Wetland.1997,86-92.
[58]Mikuska.T.,Mikuska.J.,Setina.M.and Kralj.J.Spoonbills inCroatia During 2005-Status,breeding distribution and importance of Kopacki Rit wetlands During post-breeding dispersaland fall migration Eurostte Spoonbill network Newsletter.2006,4:15-21.
[59]Mitsch W.J.and Gosselink J.G.Wetlands.3rd.New York:John Wiley & Sons.Inc.2000.
[60]Noske R.A.The ecology of mangrove forest birds in peninsular Malaysia.Ibis.1995,137(2):250-240.
[61]Odum E.P,Head R.J.Detritus based food web of an estuarine mangrove community.In:Cronin L E.Estuarine Research.New York-London:Academic Press.1975,1:256-286.
[62]Ong T.L,A,Sasekumar A.The tophic relationship of fishes in the shallow waters adjoining a mangrove shore.In:Soepadmo E et al.Proceedings of the Asian Symposium on MangroveEnvironment-Researc and Management.Kuala Lumpur.1984,453-469.
[63]Patrick Triplet,Ibrahima Diop,Vincent Schricke et alOrigin of the Spoonbills wintering in the Senegal Delta.Eurostte Spoonbill network Newsletter.2006,4:31-35.
[64]Pearson T H,RosenbergR.Macrobenthic succession inrelation to organic enrichment and pollution of the marine environment.Oceanography and Marine Biology:Annual Review.1978,(16):229-311.
[65]PeterJ.F.,Davie.A new species and new records of intertidal crabs(Crustacea;Brachyura) From Hong Kong.Hong Kong:Hong Kong University Press.1992
[66]Poulin B.,Lefebbre G.,Additional information on the use of Tartar Emetic in determining the diet of tropical birds.The Condor.1995.(4):897-902.
[67]Rhoads D.C,Young D.K.The influcnce of deposit-feeding organism on sediment stability and community trophic structure.Journal of MarineResearch.1970,28:150-178.
[68]Robert J.Craig and Kathleen G.Beal.Microhabitat partitioning among small passerinesin a pacific islandbird community Bird Conservation Research.2002,5(5):1-12.
[69]Robertson AI,Duke N C.Mangroves as nursery sites:comparisons of the abundance and species composition of fish and crustacean in mangroves and the other near shore habitats in tropical,Australia.Marine Biology.1987,96:193-205.
[70]Rollet,B.,Bibliography on mangrove research 1600-1975.Paris:UNESCO.1981,12-454.
[71]SasekumarA.,Ong T.L,ThongK.L.Predation of mangrove fauna by marine fishes In:Soepadmo E.et al.Proceedings of the Asian Symposium on Mangrove Envionment-Research and Management.Kuala Lumpur.1984,378-384.
[72]Shen S.P.Distribution of medium and microbenthos of shallow sea water inPearl River Estuary.In:Leading group of multidisciplinary investigation on the intertidal zone and shallow sea in Guangdong Provinced.Proceeding on multidisciplinary investigation on the intertidal zone and shallow sea in Pearl River Estuary(Ⅲ)(in Chinese).Guangzhou:Guangdong Science and Technology Press.1985,23-30.
[73]Shen S.P.Preliminary analysison the biomass and density of benthos in Pearl River Estuary.In:Leading group of multidisciplinary investigatuonon the intertidal zone and shallow sea in Guangdong Provinced.Proceeding on multidisciplinary investigation on the intertidal zone and shallow sea in Pearl River Estuary(Ⅲ)(in Chinese).Guangzhou:Guangdong Science and Technology Press.1985,30-37
[74]Sheng You Min.Development of studies on the community diversity.Agricultural University.Journal of Fujian.1998,27(4):432-439.
[75]Sodhi N.S,Choo J.P.S,Lee B.P.Y.Het al.Ecology of a mangrove forest bird community in Singapore.Raffles bulletin of zoology.1997,45(1):1-13.
[76]Swinhoe R.Notes on the ornithology of Hong Kong,Macao and Canton,made duringthe latter end of February,March,April and the beginning of May.Ibis 1861,23-57.
[77]Thayer G W,Colby D R.,Hettler W E Utilizzation of the red mangrove prop root habitar by fishes in south Florida.Marine Ecolog Progress Serials.1987, 35:25-38.
[78]The Hong Kong BirdWatching Society Limited.International Symposium on Research and Conservationofthe Black-faced Spoonbill.The Hong Kong Bird Watching Society Limited.2006.
[79]Theislands resources multidisciplinary investigation team of Guangdong Provinc.Leading group of multidisciplinary investigation on the intertidal zone and shallow sea in Guangdong Province.Report on islands resources multidisciplinary investigatuon in Pearl River Estuary(in Chinese).Guangzhou:Guangdong Science and Technology Press.1993,230-210.
[80]Tong K.Y.Lily The microgastropods of Hong Kong.Mangroves University of Hong Kong.1986.
[81]Vance DJ,Haywood MD E,Staples DJ.Use of a mangrove estuary as a area by postlarval and juvenile banana prawns,Penaeus merguiensis de Man.in Northern Australia.Estuary Constal Shelf Science.1990,31:689-701.
[82]Vanghan.R.E.and Jones.K.H..The birds of Hong Kong,Macao,and the West River or Si Kiang in South-East China,with special reference to their nidification and seasonal movements.Ibis.1913,55:17-76.
[83]Wang Bo-Sun,Liang Shi-Chu,Zhang Wei-Yin et al.Mangrove flora of the World.Acta BotanicaSinica.2003,45(6):644-653.
[84]YouMin Sheng.Development of studies on the community diversity.Journal of Fujian Agricultural University.Beijing China.1998,27(4):432-439.
[85]Young L,Melville D S.Conservation of the Deep Bay environment.In:Morton,ed.The marine biology ofthe South China Sea,edited by Morton.Hong Kong:HongKong University Press.1993,211-231.
[86]Young,L.The importance to ardeids of the Deep Bay fishpounds,Hong Kong.Biological Conversation 1998,84(3):293-300.
[87]Young,L.and Chan G..The significance of drained fish pounds for wintering waterbirds at the Mai Po Marshes,Hong Kong.Hong Kong:Hong Kong university.1997,139:694-698.
[88]Yu.Y.T.The International Black-facesd Spoonbill census.TheHong Kong Bird Watching Society Limited.2004,2005,2006.
[89]Zoltai S.C.An outline of wetland regions of Canada.In Ruboc C.D.A & Poleff P.Ceds.Sakatoon:Proceedings of a workshop on Canadian Wetlands.1979.
[90]Zsolt Vegvari,Laiszlo Fenyvesi,Istvan Kapocsi,et al.,Population dynamics of the Spoonbill in Hungary and its colony site selection in the Hortobagy National park 2006,4:1-7.
[91]安树青主编.湿地生态工程-湿地资源利用与保护的优化模式.北京:化学工业出版社.2003.
[92]鲍毅新,葛宝明,郑祥等.温州湾天河滩涂大型底栖动物群落分布与季节变化.动物学报.2006,52(1):45-52.
[93]蔡立哲,厉红梅,林鹏等.深圳河口潮间带泥滩多毛类的数量变化及环境影响.厦门大学学报(自然科学版).2001,40(3):741-750.
[94]蔡立哲,林鹏,刘俊杰.深圳河口泥滩3种大型多毛类的数量动态及其环境分析.海洋学报.2000,22(3):110-116.
[95]蔡立哲,林鹏,余书生等.深圳河口泥滩多毛类动物的生念研究.海洋环境科学.1998,17(1):41-47.
[96]常弘,陈仁先,粟娟等.广州新垦红树林湿地鸟类多样性与生境分析.四川动 物.2007,26(3):561-565.
[97]常家传,马金生,鲁长虎.鸟类学.哈尔滨:东北林业大学出版社.1992.
[98]陈吉余等.中国海岸发育过程和演变规律.上海:上海科技出版社.1989.
[99]陈梦,刘恩斌.生物多样性熵值测度指标的应用与分析.南京林业大学学报(自然科学版).2005,29(1):37-40.
[100]陈树培,梁志贤,邓义.中国南海海岸的红树林.广西植物.1988,8(3):215-224.
[101]陈水华,丁平,郑光美等.城市化对杭州市湿地水鸟群落的影响研究动物学研究.2000,4(22):279-288.
[102]陈水华,丁平,郑光美等.岛屿栖息鸟类群落的丰富度及其影响因数.生态学报.2002,22(2):142-149.
[103]陈宜瑜,吕宪国.湿地功能与湿地科学的研究方向.湿地科学.2003,1(1):7-11。
[104]陈友铃,唐兆,翁笑艳.闽江口湿地的鸟类研究.应用与环境生物学报.2001,7(3):271-276.
[105]大连水产学院主编.鱼类学.农业出版.1989.
[106]戴爱云,杨思谅,宋玉枝等.中国海洋蟹类.北京:海洋出版社。1986.
[107]戴爱云.中国动物志,节肢动物门,软甲纲.北京:科学出版社.1999.
[108]董存有.珠江口脊尾白虾(Palaemon carinicauda)的一些生物学观察.四川动物.1989.8(4):36-38.
[109]董聿茂,戴爱云,蒋燮治等.中国动物图谱,甲壳动物,第二册.北京:科学出版社.1982.
[110]范航清,何斌源,韦受庆.海岸红树林地沙丘移动对林内大型底栖动物的影响.生态学报.2000.20(5):722-727.
[111]范航清,韦受庆,何斌源等.英罗港红树林缘潮水中游泳动物的季节动态.广西科学.1998,5(1):45-50.
[112]范航清.海岸环保卫士-红树林.南宁:广西科学技术出版社.2000,87-108.
[113]高玮.中国东北地区鸟类及其生态学研究.北京:科学出版社.2006,1-142.
[114]关贯勋,邓巨燮.华南红树林潮滩带的鸟类.中山大学学报论丛(自然科学版).1990,9(2):66-73.
[115]广东省海岛资源综合调查大队、广东省海岸和海涂资源综合调查领导小组办公室.珠江口海岛资源综合调查报告.广州:广东科技出版社.1993,1-133.
[116]贵州农学院主编.生物统计附试验设计.北京:农业出版社.1979.
[117]国家水产总局南海水产研究所.南海诸岛海域鱼类志.北京:科学出版社.1979.
[118]韩博平,范航清.红树林植物的生态位特征及其研究意义.中国红树林研究与管理.1995.80-84.
[119]韩博平等.世界红树林植物分布区域间种类组成的相似性研究.植物学报.1995.37(8):624-629.
[120]何斌源,范航清.广西英罗港红树林区潮沟鱼类多样性季节动态研究生物多样性.2002,10(2):175-180.
[121]何斌源,范航清,莫竹承.广西英罗港红树林区潮沟游泳动物生态的研究.南海研究与开发.1998,3(4):27-32.
[122]何斌源等.广西两港湾红树林鱼类生态对比研究.海洋通报.1999,18(1):28-35.
[123]何斌源等.红树林潮沟游泳动物的季节动态研究.广西科学.2002,21(6):16-23.
[124]何景等.红树林的生态学.生态学通报.1957,(8):1-5.
[125]何勇田,熊光哲.试论湿地生态系统的特点.农业环境保护,1994,13(6):275-278。
[126]候宽昭,何椿年.中国红树林.广州:华南理工大学出版社.1997.1-4.
[127]胡善美等.我国华南沿海的红树林.地理知识.1960,(7):303.
[128]黄勃,张本,陆健健等.东寨港红树林区大型底栖动物生态与滩涂养殖容量的研究.海洋科学.2002,26(3):65-67.
[129]黄洪辉,林燕棠,李纯厚等.珠江口底栖动物生态学研究.生态学报.2002,22(4):603-608.
[130]黄宗国主编.海洋河口湿地生物多样性.北京:海洋出版社.2004,256-302.
[131]金岚主编.环境生态学.北京:高等教育出版社.199l
[132]兰竹虹,陈桂珠.南中国地区红树林的利用和保护.海洋环境科学.2007,26(4):355-359.
[133]兰竹虹等.南海地区红树林资源的利用现状及生态保育对策.生态坏境.2007,341-347.
[134]郎惠卿等.中国沼泽.济南:山东科技出版社.1983.
[135]李海生,陈桂珠,昝启杰.深圳湾红树林的保护及其恢复.城市环境与城市生态.2007,20(4):10-12.
[136]李金平,梁之华,杨廷宝.澳门鱼类的初步调查.广州:华南师范大学学报(自然科学版).2000:27-34.
[137]李金平,杨廷宝,梁之华等.澳门鱼类.澳门:海事博物馆、澳门科学技术协进会.1999.
[138]李丽芬,林建新,吴国恩等.香港淡水鱼图鉴.香港:香港郊野公园之友会.2004.
[139]李明顺,蓝崇钰,陈桂珠等.深圳福田红树林的群落学研究-多样性与种群格局.生态科学.1994,(1):82-86.
[140]李明顺.深圳福田红树林生态系统研究.中山大学博士论文.1992.
[141]李荣冠编着.中国海陆架及邻近海域大型底栖生物.北京:海洋出版社,2003:1～3.
[142]李云,郑德璋,陈焕雄等.无瓣海桑引种的初步研究.1997,487-493.
[143]厉红梅,李适宇,蔡立哲.深圳湾潮间带底栖动物群落与环境因子的关系研究.中山大学学报(自然科学版).2003,(5):93-97.
[144]梁海含,林小涛,梁华等.澳门路凼湿地的水质调查与评价.海洋科学.2006,30(3):21-25.
[145]梁华.澳门红树林植物组成及种群分布格局的研究.生态科学.1998,17(2):25-31.
[146]梁士楚,莫竹承,葛文标.广西曲湾红树林植物种群分布格局的研究.中国红树林研究与管理.1995,85-93.
[147]梁肇辉、李庆刚、黄嘉凤等.香港的经济甲壳类动物.香港:渔农自然护理署.2004.
[148]梁之华,林小涛,杨廷宝等.澳门珍稀鸟类-黑脸琵鹭.澳门:澳门科学技术协进会.2003.
[149]梁之华.白鹭林:沿岸鹭鸟繁殖地.澳门杂志.2002,28:5-13
[150]卢泽愚译.Pilou E.C.著.数学生态学引论.北京:科学出版社.1978.
[151]林来官,黄友儒.福建红树植物群落.福建师范学院学报.1962,(4):87-104.
[152]林鹏,胡继添.广西的红树林.广西植物.1983,3(2):95-102.
[153]林鹏,卢昌义.海南岛的红树林.厦门大学学报(自然科学版).1985,24(4):508-514.
[154]林鹏,韦信敏.福建亚热带红树生态学研究.植物生态学与地植物学丛刊,1981,5(3):177-186.
[155]林鹏等.中国东南部海岸红树林的类群及其分布.生态学报.1981,1(3):283-290.
[156]林鹏.中国红树林生态系统.北京:科学出版社.1997.
[157]林清贤.闽南沿海红树林区鸟类及其与大型底栖动物相关关系研究.厦门大学博士论文.厦门大学.2003
[158]林小涛,梁海含,梁华等.澳门路凼湿地芦苇氮磷含量的季节性变化.生态学杂志.2007,26(1):5-8.
[159]刘伯锋等.福建省沿海冬季水鸟资源现状及保护对策.福建林业科技.1998,25(1):73-76.
[160]刘灿然,马克平,吕廷华等.生物群落多样性的测度方法-Ⅵ:与多样性测度有关的统计问题.生物多样性.1998,6(3):229-239.
[161]刘厚田等.湿地生态环境.生态学杂志.1996,15(1):75-78.
[162]刘青松主编.湿地与湿地保护.北京:环境科学出版社.2003.
[163]刘瑞玉等.中国北部的经济虾类.北京:中国科学出版社.1955.
[164]刘棠瑞等.红树林,台大实验林丛刊.1956,第二号:1-25.
[165]刘兴土.我国的沼泽和利用.中国沼泽研究.北京:科学出版社.1988,30-37.
[166]刘月英,张文珍,王耀先等.中国经济动物志,淡水软体动物.北京:科学出版社.1979.
[167]鲁琳,吴启泉,吴宝铃.大亚湾大鹏澳软相潮间带多毛类的生态.大亚湾海洋生念文集.北京:海洋出版社.1989.93-105.
[168]吕宪国,黄锡畴.我国湿地研究进展.地理科学.1998,18(4):293-300。
[169]马克平等.生物群落多样性的测度方法-Ⅰα多样性的测度方法(上).生物多样性.1994,2(3):162-168.
[170]马克平,刘玉明.生物群落多样性的测度方法-Ⅰα多样性的测度方法(下)。生物多样性.1994,2(4):231-239.
[171]马应良主编.珠江口海岛资源综合调查报告.广州:广东科技出版社.1993,233-235.
[172]缪绅裕,廖文波,苏志尧.广东红树林研究概况及广东红树林的主要特征.广州:华南理工大学出版社.1997,73-84.
[173]缪绅裕等.世界红树林区系小资料.广西科学学报.1993,9(2):130-131.
[174]内海富士夫.原色日本海岸动物图鉴.东京:保育社.1956.
[175]聂湘平、蓝崇钰、栾天罡等.珠江广州段水体、沉积物及底栖生物中的多氯联苯.中国环境科学.2001,21(5):417-421.
[176]彭少麟,王伯荪.鼎湖山森林群落分析Ⅲ种群分布格局.热带亚热带森林生态系统研究.1984,(2):2.
[177]齐钟彦,马绣同,刘月英等.中国动物图谱,软体动物,第四册.北京:科学出版社.1985.
[178]齐钟彦,马绣同,楼子康等.中国动物图谱,软体动物,第二册.北京:科学出版社.1983.
[179]齐钟彦主编.中国动物图谱,软体动物,第三册.北京:科学出版社.1986.
[180]邵广昭,林沛立.溪池钓的鱼.渡假出版社有限公司.民国80年.
[181]邵庆春,韩顺正.三江平原沼泽芦苇种群高度和地上生物量季节动态初步研究.中国湿地研究.长春:吉林科学技术出版社.1995,134-139。
[182]寿振黄,许维枢.海南岛的鸟类-非雀形目.动物学报.1966,18(1):93-112.
[183]宋晓军,林鹏.福建红树林湿地鸟类区系研究.生态学杂志.2002,21(6):5-10.
[184]苏保林,王志石,程声通等.澳门邻近水域悬浮泥沙研究.澳门海洋资源及经济研讨会.2000.
[185]孙道元,陈木.小头虫作为有机质污染指示生物的调查研究.环境科学.1978,1:17-196.
[186]孙儒泳.动物生态学原理.北京:北京师范大学出版社.1986
[187]孙英兰,张越美.胶州湾三维变动边界的潮流数值模拟.海洋与湖沼.2001,32(4):355-360.
[188]唐承佳,陆健健.围塈堤内迁徙鹬群落的生态学特征.动物学杂志.2002,37(2):27-33.
[189]万冬梅,代玉梅.辽宁水鸟调查报告.辽宁林业科技.2002,(4):21-23。
[190]汪松,解焱.中国物种红色名录第一卷.北京:高等教育出版社.2004.
[191]王伯荪,张宏达,胡玉佳等.澳门地区的森林群落.生态科学.1988,(2):27-30.
[192]王伯荪,张炜银,昝启杰等.红树植物之诠释.中山大学学报(自然科学版).2003,42(3):42-46.
[193]王伯荪、廖宝文、王勇军等.深圳湾红树林生态系统及其持续发展.科学出版社.2002.67-82.
[194]王俊兰,祝炳昭.地球之肾-湿地生态系统.生物学教学.1999,24(5):26-28
[195]王丽荣,赵焕庭.中国河口湿地的一般特点.海洋通报.2000,19(5):47-54.
[196]王岐山,马鸣,高育仁编着.中国动物志鸟网-鹤形目、(行鸟)形目、鸥形目,第五卷.北京:科学出版社.2006.
[197]王晓玲,娄玉杰.吉林省西部游禽种类的调查研究.家畜生态学报.2006.27(6):46-49.
[198]王颖.红树林海岸.地理.1963,(3):110-112.
[199]王勇军,常弘,陈万成等.内伶仃岛猕猴种群动态研究.中山大学学报(自然科学版).1999,38(4):92-96.
[200]王勇军,林鹏,宋晓军.深圳福田红树林湿地水鸟的周年动态.厦门大学学报(自然科学版).1998,37(1):122-130.
[201]王子定等.红树林.中华林学丛刊.1982,第一号:1-86。
[202]魏美莉.黑脸琵鹭卫星追踪计划始木.生物多样性季刊.2000,1,92-104.
[203]吴诗宝,柯亚永,吴桂生等.雷州半岛湿地水鸟区系组成及生态分布的初步研究.动物学杂志.2002,37(2):58-62.
[204]香港特别行政区渔农自然护理署渔业管理科.香港海鱼.香港:香港特别行政区渔农自然护理署.2004
[205]刑铁牛,方保华,曲进社等.河南省典型湿地冬季水鸟资源调查初报.河南林业科技.1998,18(3):12-15.
[206]徐风山.中国动物志,软体动物门,双壳纲.北京:科学出版社.1999.
[207]徐恭昭,郑文莲,黄国材.大亚湾鱼类及生物学图志.合肥:安徽科学技术出版社.1994.
[208]徐君亮.澳门的海滩资源优势及其开发利用.澳门环境.2000,2(14):60-66.
[209]阎理钦,王金秀,赛道建等.威海湿地鸟类分和调查.动物学杂志.1998.33(6):5-8.
[210]尤平,任辉.底栖动物及其在水质评价和监测上的应用.淮北煤师院学报.2001,22(4):44-48.
[211]余日清,陈桂珠,蓝崇玉等.深圳福田红树林大型底栖动物的种类组成研究.中国红树林研究管理.北京:科学出版社.1995.130-135.
[212]袁兴中,何文珊.海洋沉积物中的动物多样性及其生态系统功能.地球科学进展.1999,(5):458-463.
[213]袁兴中,陆健健.长江口岛屿湿地的底栖动物资源研究.自然资源学报.2001,16(1):37-41.
[214]袁兴中,陆健健.围垦对长江口南岸底栖动物群落结构及多样性的影响.生态学报.2001,21(10):1642-1647.
[215]袁兴中,何文珊.海洋沉积物动物多样性及其生态系统功能.地球科学进展.1999,14(5):458-463.
[216]袁兴中,陆健健,刘红.长江口底栖动物功能群分布格局及其变化.生态学报.2002,22(12):2054-2062.
[217]尹毅,范航清.广西白骨壤群落的生物量研究.广西科学院学报.1993,9(2):19-24
[218]张孚允,杨若莉.中国鸟类迁徙研究.北京:中国林业出版社.1997.
[219]张宏达,陈桂珠,刘治平等.深圳福田红树林湿地生态系统研究.内部阅读.1996.
[220]张宏达,王伯荪,胡玉佳.香港地区的红树林.生态科学.1985,(2):1-8.
[221]张宏达,王伯荪等.香港植被(红树林部分).中山大学学报论丛(自然科学版).1989,8(2):91-97.
[222]张宏达,张超常,王伯荪.雷州半岛红树植物群落.中山大学学报(自然科学版).1957,(1):122-145.
[223]张宏达等.香港植被.中山大学学报论丛(自然科学).1989,(8):128-140.
[224]张权利等.海三棱草种群的物候与分布格局研究.植物生态学与地植物学学报.1992,16(1):43-51.
[225]张淑萍,张正旺,徐基良等.天津地区系组成及多样性分析.生物多样性.2002,10(3):280-285
[226]张淑萍.张正旺.水鸟迁徙的种间互利性分析.中央民族大学学报(自然科学版).2001,2(10):133-137.
[227]张雅芝,陈品健,陈灿忠等.福建省主要港湾潮下带底栖生物生态研究.1997,2(3):23-29.
[228]张永普,应雪萍,吴海龙等.北麂列岛岩相潮间带底栖生物群落的组成特征.海洋湖沼通报.2000,(4):26-32.
[229]赵焕庭.珠江河口演变.北京:海洋出版社.1990.1-357.
[230]赵羿.海岸带的景观生态特征及其管理.应用生态学报.1990,1(4):373-377.
[231]郑葆珊等.中国动物图谱(第二版).北京:科学出版社.1987.
[232]郑光美,王岐山.中国濒危动物红皮书,鸟类.北京:科学出版社.1998.
[233]郑光美主编.鸟类学.北京:北京师范大学出版社.1995.366-425.
[234]郑光美主编.世界鸟类分类与分布名录.北京:科学出版社.2002.
[235]郑作新.中国鸟类分布名录,第三版.北京:科学出版社.1976
[236]郑作新.脊椎动物分类学.北京:农业出版社.1982.113-173.
[237]中国科学院动物研究所、中国科学院海洋研究所、上海水产学院等主编.南海鱼类志(上、中、下).北京:科学出版社.1962.
[238]中国科学院华南植物园、澳门民政总署园林绿化部.澳门植物名录.中国科学院华南植物园、澳门民政总署园林绿化部出版.2004.
[239]中国科学院、中国动物志编辑委员会主编.中国动物志-鸟纲,第1至第10卷,1997.
[240]中国鸟类学会水鸟组.中国水鸟研究附录一中国水鸟名录.上海:华东师范大 学出版社.1994.
[241]中国鸟类学会水鸟组.中国水鸟研究.上海:华东师范大学出版社.1994.
[242]中国水产科学研究院、珠江水产研究所、上海水产大学等.海南岛淡水及河口鱼类志.广州:广东科技出版社.1986。
[243]中华人民共和国濒危物种进出口管理办公室主编.中国珍贵濒危动物.国家重点保护野生动物名录.1996.279-298.
[244]周放,房慧伶,张红星 山口红树林鸟类多样性初步研究.广西科学.2000,7(2):154-157.
[245]周放,房慧伶,张红星.北部湾北部沿海红树林的鸟类.中国动物科学研究.北京:中国林业出版社,1999.257-265.
[246]周放,房慧伶,张红星等.广西沿海红树林区的水鸟.广西农业生物科学.2002.21(3)145-150.
[247]朱曦,邹小平.中国鹭鸟.北京:中国林业出版社.2001.
[2]Andreev A.V.,Chan S.,Crosby M.J.et al.Threated Birds of Asia:The BirdLife International Red Data Book.Part A.The BirdLife International.2001,532-535.
[3]Asia Council,Bird Life International.Discovery of the breeding sites and migration routes of Black-faced Spoonbills PlataIea minor Proceedings of the 1990.International Black-faced spoonbills conservation workshop Taipei.1999.
[4]Baird D,Evans P R,Milne H,et al.University by shorebirds of benthic invertebrate production in intertidal areas.Oceanography and Marine Biology.Annual Review.1985,23:573-597.
[5]Barros L..Manual de identificacao das ayes de Macau.aves residentes e migradoras.Direccao dos Servicos de Turismo de Macau.1976,12-25.
[6]Bird Life International.Saving Asia's threatened birds.A guide for government and Civil Society.2003,181-186.
[7]Brian Morton and John Morton.The sea shore ecology of Hong Kong.Hong Kong University press.1983,138-146.
[8]Carey,G.J.and Young.L.The important to waterfowl of the Mai Po marches and Inner Deep Bay Ramsar Site.Hong Kong bird report.1997,141-149.
[9]Carey.G.J,Chalmers.M.L,Diskin.D.A.et al.Theavifauna of Hong Kong.2001,4-8.
[10]Chan.S,Crosby.M.J,Islam et al.Important bird areas in Asia key sites for conservation.BirLife Internation.2004,90-91.
[11]Chesney Me S.The benthic invertebrate community of the intertidal mudflat at the Mai Po Marshes Nature Reserve,with special reference to resources for migratory shorebirds.University of Hong Kong,1997.
[12]Chong Jong-Ryol,Pak U-il,RimChyu-Yon et al.The breeding biology of the Black-faced Spoonbill(Platalea minor).Wildbird society of Japan.2000,11-18.
[13]Chong Jong-Ryol.The Research of the breeding situation of Black-faced Spoonbill in North Korea International Symposium for the conservation of Black-faced Spoonbill in East Asia.Korean Federation for Environmental Movement.2004.
[14]Collar N.J.,AndreevA.V.,Chart.S.,et al.Athreatened birds of Asia.The BirdLife International red data book.A project of the BirdLife Asia Partnership.2001.
[15]Colwell M.A.and Taft O.W.Waterbird communities in managed weltlands of varying water depth.Colonial Waterbird.2000,23(1):45-55.
[16]Connell D.W.,Fung C.N.,Minh T.B.et al.Risk to breeding success of fish-eating Ardeids due to persistent organic contaminants in Hong Kong:evidence from organochlorine compounds in eggs.Water Research.2003,37:459-467.
[17]Crosby M.J..Saving Asia's threatened birds.Bird Life International.2003.
[18]Csaba Pigniczki and Zsolt Karcza.First results of Spoonbill colour-ringing project in Hungary(2003-2004).Eurostte Spoonbill network Newsletter.2006,(4):8-9.
[19]Dahmer Thomas D.,Yu Yat Yung and Mary L.Felley.Black-faced Spoonbill global population change from 1991-2005.International Symposium on Research and Conservation of Black-faced Spoonbill,Kong Hong,2006:16-18~(th).
[20]Dimalexis A.and Pyrovetsi M..Effect of water level fluctuations on wading bird foraging habit use at an irrigation reservoir,Lake Kerkini,Greece.Colonial Waterbirds.1997,20(2):244-252.
[21]Dugan P.Wetlands in Danger.London:Michael Beasley.Reed international books.1993.
[22]Earles S.Birds of the Maipo marshes,birds international.1990,2(3):11-21.
[23]EmstMayr and G.William Cottrell.Check-list of birds of the world VolumeI-X I.Cambridge:Massachusetts Museum of Comparative Zoology.2000.
[24]Fild G.D.Utilization of mangroves by birds on the Freetown Reninsula,Sierra Ieone.Ibis.1968,110:354-357.
[25]Frank D.Steinheimer,Emmett R.Easton and RichardW Lewthwaite.Rediscovery of John Crampton W.Kershaw's birds from Macau.including his record of Small Niltava Niltava macgrigoriae.Bull.B.O.C.2003,123(4):220-227.
[26]Gopal B.et al.Wetlands zoology meangement.Inter Sci.Puble.India.1983.
[27]Heath A G,Turner B J,Davis W P.Temperatureprerferences and tolerances of three figh species inhabiting hyperthermal ponds on mangrove islands.Hydrobiologia.1993,259:47-55.
[28]Lui Henry T.H..Birdwatchingin Wetlands HongKong Discoery.2001.
[29]Herklots,G.A.C.Hong Kongbirds.South China Morning Post.Hong Kong.1953.
[30]Hitoshi TOJO and Syuya NAKAMURA.Breeding density of exotic Red-billled Leiothix and native bird species on Mt.Tsukuba,central Japan.Ornithol Sci.2004,(3):23-32
[31]Hong Kong Bird Watching Society.Keeping Asia Spoonbills Airborne International Symposium on Research and Conservation of the Black-faced Spoonbil.Hong Kong.2006.
[32]Hong Kong Herbarium.Check list of Hong Kong plants.Agriculture,Fisheries and Conservation Department.The Government ofthe Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.2004,10-15.
[33]Isola,C.R.,Colwell M.A.,Taft O.W.et al.Interspecific difference in habitat use of shorebirds and waterfowl foraging in managed wetlands of Califormia's San Joaquin Valley.Waterbirds.2000,23(2):196-203.
[34]Kazantzidis,S.and Goutner V..Foraging ecology and conversation of feeding habitats of Little Egrets(Egretta garzetta)in the Axios River Delta,Macedonia,Greece.Colonial Waterbirds.1996,(1) 115-121
[35]Kershaw.J.C.Butterflies ofHong Kong(and South-east China).Kelly and Walsh.Hong Kong.1907,130-150.
[36]Kershaw.J.C.List ofthe birds ofthe QuangtungCoast.China.Ibis.1904,46:235-248.
[37]Kim Sooil,Do-Han Lee.Black-faced Spoonbill.Korea Doyosae publishing company.2001.
[38]Kuo Tung-Hui.Wintering ecology research in Taiwan.Taiwans Wild bird society of Tainan city.1999
[39]Kwok,K.Effect of water level fluctuation ofgei wais on distribution of waders in the Mai Po Marshes.Dissertation of department of appiled press,San Deigo.1993.
[40]Kwok.P.W.Time Activty Budget ofPerisesarma bidens and Parasearma affinis (Brachyura:Seasarminae) at the Mai Po Marshes Mangrove,Hong Kong.Hong Kong:Hong Kong University Press.1999,137-151.
[41]Lain Cheng Soh.On a collection ofsesarmine crabs(Decapoda,Brachyura, Grapsidae) from Hong Kong University of Hong Kong.1978.
[42]Lee S.Y.Litter Production and Turnover of the Mangrove Kandelia candel(L.)Druce in a Hong Kong Tidal Shrimp Pond.Coastal and Science.1989,29:75-87.
[43]Lee Shing-Yip,Leung Va.The Brachyuran Fauna of the Mai Po Marshes Nature Reserveand Deep Bay,Hong Kong.Hong Kong:Hong Kong University Press.1999,57-82.
[44]Lee Shing-Yip.The mangrove ecosystem of Deep Bay and the MaiPo Marshes,HongKong.Hong Kong:Hong Kong University Press.1999.
[45]Lefebver G.,Poulin B.,Bird communities in Panamanian black mangrove:Potential effects of physical and biotic factors.Journal of tropical ecology.1997,13:97-113.
[46]Lefebver G.,Poulin B.,Seasonal abundance of migrant birds and food resources in Panamanian mangrove forests.Wilson bulletin.1996,108(4):748-759.
[47]Lefebver G.,Temporal dynamics of mangrove bird com-munities in Venezuela with special reference to migrant war-blers.The Auk.1994,(2):405-415.
[48]Leung Chee Va.Population dynamics of Black-faced Spoonbill in Macao.International Syrnposium for the Conservation of Black-faced Spoonbill in East Asia.Korean Federation for Environmental Movement.2004.
[49]Leung Chee Va.Black-faced Spoonbill in Macao.International Symposium on Research and Conservation of Black-faced Spoonbill.Kong Hong.16-18th January 2006.
[50]Li David and Mundkur Taej.Numbers and distribution of waterbirds and wetlands in the Asia-Pacific region.Wetlands Internatioal.2002-2004.
[51]Liang Shichu,Fan Hangqing.Distribution pattern of plant populations of Rhizophora stylosa Community in Yingluo Bay of Guangxi.Journal of the Guangxi Academy of Sciences.1993,9(2):88-93.
[52]Lily K.,Tong Y..The microgastropods of HongKong.Mangroves University of Hong Kong.1986.
[53]Lioyd,J.W.et al.Wetland vulnerability in East Anglia:a possible conceptual framework and generalized approach.Journal of Environmental Management.1993.
[54]Liu Ruiyu,Zhong Zhenrui et al.Penaeoid Shrimps of the South China Sea.Beijing:China AgriculturalPublishing House.1986.
[55]Lui T.H.Henry.Birdwatching in Wetlands Hong Kong Discoery.2007.
[56]Marho Tucakovand Antun Zuljevic.How to protect colonies of Eurasian Spoonbill Platalea leucorodia on carpfish farms in Serbia? Eurostte Spoonbill network Newsletter.Eurostte Spoonbill network Newsletter 2006,4:10-14.
[57]Mclville D.S,Chesney Mc.S,Anderson C et al.Predicted impacts of the Shenzhen River regulation project on waterfowl in Deep Bay.Hong Kong Wetland.1997,86-92.
[58]Mikuska.T.,Mikuska.J.,Setina.M.and Kralj.J.Spoonbills inCroatia During 2005-Status,breeding distribution and importance of Kopacki Rit wetlands During post-breeding dispersaland fall migration Eurostte Spoonbill network Newsletter.2006,4:15-21.
[59]Mitsch W.J.and Gosselink J.G.Wetlands.3rd.New York:John Wiley & Sons.Inc.2000.
[60]Noske R.A.The ecology of mangrove forest birds in peninsular Malaysia.Ibis.1995,137(2):250-240.
[61]Odum E.P,Head R.J.Detritus based food web of an estuarine mangrove community.In:Cronin L E.Estuarine Research.New York-London:Academic Press.1975,1:256-286.
[62]Ong T.L,A,Sasekumar A.The tophic relationship of fishes in the shallow waters adjoining a mangrove shore.In:Soepadmo E et al.Proceedings of the Asian Symposium on MangroveEnvironment-Researc and Management.Kuala Lumpur.1984,453-469.
[63]Patrick Triplet,Ibrahima Diop,Vincent Schricke et alOrigin of the Spoonbills wintering in the Senegal Delta.Eurostte Spoonbill network Newsletter.2006,4:31-35.
[64]Pearson T H,RosenbergR.Macrobenthic succession inrelation to organic enrichment and pollution of the marine environment.Oceanography and Marine Biology:Annual Review.1978,(16):229-311.
[65]PeterJ.F.,Davie.A new species and new records of intertidal crabs(Crustacea;Brachyura) From Hong Kong.Hong Kong:Hong Kong University Press.1992
[66]Poulin B.,Lefebbre G.,Additional information on the use of Tartar Emetic in determining the diet of tropical birds.The Condor.1995.(4):897-902.
[67]Rhoads D.C,Young D.K.The influcnce of deposit-feeding organism on sediment stability and community trophic structure.Journal of MarineResearch.1970,28:150-178.
[68]Robert J.Craig and Kathleen G.Beal.Microhabitat partitioning among small passerinesin a pacific islandbird community Bird Conservation Research.2002,5(5):1-12.
[69]Robertson AI,Duke N C.Mangroves as nursery sites:comparisons of the abundance and species composition of fish and crustacean in mangroves and the other near shore habitats in tropical,Australia.Marine Biology.1987,96:193-205.
[70]Rollet,B.,Bibliography on mangrove research 1600-1975.Paris:UNESCO.1981,12-454.
[71]SasekumarA.,Ong T.L,ThongK.L.Predation of mangrove fauna by marine fishes In:Soepadmo E.et al.Proceedings of the Asian Symposium on Mangrove Envionment-Research and Management.Kuala Lumpur.1984,378-384.
[72]Shen S.P.Distribution of medium and microbenthos of shallow sea water inPearl River Estuary.In:Leading group of multidisciplinary investigation on the intertidal zone and shallow sea in Guangdong Provinced.Proceeding on multidisciplinary investigation on the intertidal zone and shallow sea in Pearl River Estuary(Ⅲ)(in Chinese).Guangzhou:Guangdong Science and Technology Press.1985,23-30.
[73]Shen S.P.Preliminary analysison the biomass and density of benthos in Pearl River Estuary.In:Leading group of multidisciplinary investigatuonon the intertidal zone and shallow sea in Guangdong Provinced.Proceeding on multidisciplinary investigation on the intertidal zone and shallow sea in Pearl River Estuary(Ⅲ)(in Chinese).Guangzhou:Guangdong Science and Technology Press.1985,30-37
[74]Sheng You Min.Development of studies on the community diversity.Agricultural University.Journal of Fujian.1998,27(4):432-439.
[75]Sodhi N.S,Choo J.P.S,Lee B.P.Y.Het al.Ecology of a mangrove forest bird community in Singapore.Raffles bulletin of zoology.1997,45(1):1-13.
[76]Swinhoe R.Notes on the ornithology of Hong Kong,Macao and Canton,made duringthe latter end of February,March,April and the beginning of May.Ibis 1861,23-57.
[77]Thayer G W,Colby D R.,Hettler W E Utilizzation of the red mangrove prop root habitar by fishes in south Florida.Marine Ecolog Progress Serials.1987, 35:25-38.
[78]The Hong Kong BirdWatching Society Limited.International Symposium on Research and Conservationofthe Black-faced Spoonbill.The Hong Kong Bird Watching Society Limited.2006.
[79]Theislands resources multidisciplinary investigation team of Guangdong Provinc.Leading group of multidisciplinary investigation on the intertidal zone and shallow sea in Guangdong Province.Report on islands resources multidisciplinary investigatuon in Pearl River Estuary(in Chinese).Guangzhou:Guangdong Science and Technology Press.1993,230-210.
[80]Tong K.Y.Lily The microgastropods of Hong Kong.Mangroves University of Hong Kong.1986.
[81]Vance DJ,Haywood MD E,Staples DJ.Use of a mangrove estuary as a area by postlarval and juvenile banana prawns,Penaeus merguiensis de Man.in Northern Australia.Estuary Constal Shelf Science.1990,31:689-701.
[82]Vanghan.R.E.and Jones.K.H..The birds of Hong Kong,Macao,and the West River or Si Kiang in South-East China,with special reference to their nidification and seasonal movements.Ibis.1913,55:17-76.
[83]Wang Bo-Sun,Liang Shi-Chu,Zhang Wei-Yin et al.Mangrove flora of the World.Acta BotanicaSinica.2003,45(6):644-653.
[84]YouMin Sheng.Development of studies on the community diversity.Journal of Fujian Agricultural University.Beijing China.1998,27(4):432-439.
[85]Young L,Melville D S.Conservation of the Deep Bay environment.In:Morton,ed.The marine biology ofthe South China Sea,edited by Morton.Hong Kong:HongKong University Press.1993,211-231.
[86]Young,L.The importance to ardeids of the Deep Bay fishpounds,Hong Kong.Biological Conversation 1998,84(3):293-300.
[87]Young,L.and Chan G..The significance of drained fish pounds for wintering waterbirds at the Mai Po Marshes,Hong Kong.Hong Kong:Hong Kong university.1997,139:694-698.
[88]Yu.Y.T.The International Black-facesd Spoonbill census.TheHong Kong Bird Watching Society Limited.2004,2005,2006.
[89]Zoltai S.C.An outline of wetland regions of Canada.In Ruboc C.D.A & Poleff P.Ceds.Sakatoon:Proceedings of a workshop on Canadian Wetlands.1979.
[90]Zsolt Vegvari,Laiszlo Fenyvesi,Istvan Kapocsi,et al.,Population dynamics of the Spoonbill in Hungary and its colony site selection in the Hortobagy National park 2006,4:1-7.
[91]安树青主编.湿地生态工程-湿地资源利用与保护的优化模式.北京:化学工业出版社.2003.
[92]鲍毅新,葛宝明,郑祥等.温州湾天河滩涂大型底栖动物群落分布与季节变化.动物学报.2006,52(1):45-52.
[93]蔡立哲,厉红梅,林鹏等.深圳河口潮间带泥滩多毛类的数量变化及环境影响.厦门大学学报(自然科学版).2001,40(3):741-750.
[94]蔡立哲,林鹏,刘俊杰.深圳河口泥滩3种大型多毛类的数量动态及其环境分析.海洋学报.2000,22(3):110-116.
[95]蔡立哲,林鹏,余书生等.深圳河口泥滩多毛类动物的生念研究.海洋环境科学.1998,17(1):41-47.
[96]常弘,陈仁先,粟娟等.广州新垦红树林湿地鸟类多样性与生境分析.四川动 物.2007,26(3):561-565.
[97]常家传,马金生,鲁长虎.鸟类学.哈尔滨:东北林业大学出版社.1992.
[98]陈吉余等.中国海岸发育过程和演变规律.上海:上海科技出版社.1989.
[99]陈梦,刘恩斌.生物多样性熵值测度指标的应用与分析.南京林业大学学报(自然科学版).2005,29(1):37-40.
[100]陈树培,梁志贤,邓义.中国南海海岸的红树林.广西植物.1988,8(3):215-224.
[101]陈水华,丁平,郑光美等.城市化对杭州市湿地水鸟群落的影响研究动物学研究.2000,4(22):279-288.
[102]陈水华,丁平,郑光美等.岛屿栖息鸟类群落的丰富度及其影响因数.生态学报.2002,22(2):142-149.
[103]陈宜瑜,吕宪国.湿地功能与湿地科学的研究方向.湿地科学.2003,1(1):7-11。
[104]陈友铃,唐兆,翁笑艳.闽江口湿地的鸟类研究.应用与环境生物学报.2001,7(3):271-276.
[105]大连水产学院主编.鱼类学.农业出版.1989.
[106]戴爱云,杨思谅,宋玉枝等.中国海洋蟹类.北京:海洋出版社。1986.
[107]戴爱云.中国动物志,节肢动物门,软甲纲.北京:科学出版社.1999.
[108]董存有.珠江口脊尾白虾(Palaemon carinicauda)的一些生物学观察.四川动物.1989.8(4):36-38.
[109]董聿茂,戴爱云,蒋燮治等.中国动物图谱,甲壳动物,第二册.北京:科学出版社.1982.
[110]范航清,何斌源,韦受庆.海岸红树林地沙丘移动对林内大型底栖动物的影响.生态学报.2000.20(5):722-727.
[111]范航清,韦受庆,何斌源等.英罗港红树林缘潮水中游泳动物的季节动态.广西科学.1998,5(1):45-50.
[112]范航清.海岸环保卫士-红树林.南宁:广西科学技术出版社.2000,87-108.
[113]高玮.中国东北地区鸟类及其生态学研究.北京:科学出版社.2006,1-142.
[114]关贯勋,邓巨燮.华南红树林潮滩带的鸟类.中山大学学报论丛(自然科学版).1990,9(2):66-73.
[115]广东省海岛资源综合调查大队、广东省海岸和海涂资源综合调查领导小组办公室.珠江口海岛资源综合调查报告.广州:广东科技出版社.1993,1-133.
[116]贵州农学院主编.生物统计附试验设计.北京:农业出版社.1979.
[117]国家水产总局南海水产研究所.南海诸岛海域鱼类志.北京:科学出版社.1979.
[118]韩博平,范航清.红树林植物的生态位特征及其研究意义.中国红树林研究与管理.1995.80-84.
[119]韩博平等.世界红树林植物分布区域间种类组成的相似性研究.植物学报.1995.37(8):624-629.
[120]何斌源,范航清.广西英罗港红树林区潮沟鱼类多样性季节动态研究生物多样性.2002,10(2):175-180.
[121]何斌源,范航清,莫竹承.广西英罗港红树林区潮沟游泳动物生态的研究.南海研究与开发.1998,3(4):27-32.
[122]何斌源等.广西两港湾红树林鱼类生态对比研究.海洋通报.1999,18(1):28-35.
[123]何斌源等.红树林潮沟游泳动物的季节动态研究.广西科学.2002,21(6):16-23.
[124]何景等.红树林的生态学.生态学通报.1957,(8):1-5.
[125]何勇田,熊光哲.试论湿地生态系统的特点.农业环境保护,1994,13(6):275-278。
[126]候宽昭,何椿年.中国红树林.广州:华南理工大学出版社.1997.1-4.
[127]胡善美等.我国华南沿海的红树林.地理知识.1960,(7):303.
[128]黄勃,张本,陆健健等.东寨港红树林区大型底栖动物生态与滩涂养殖容量的研究.海洋科学.2002,26(3):65-67.
[129]黄洪辉,林燕棠,李纯厚等.珠江口底栖动物生态学研究.生态学报.2002,22(4):603-608.
[130]黄宗国主编.海洋河口湿地生物多样性.北京:海洋出版社.2004,256-302.
[131]金岚主编.环境生态学.北京:高等教育出版社.199l
[132]兰竹虹,陈桂珠.南中国地区红树林的利用和保护.海洋环境科学.2007,26(4):355-359.
[133]兰竹虹等.南海地区红树林资源的利用现状及生态保育对策.生态坏境.2007,341-347.
[134]郎惠卿等.中国沼泽.济南:山东科技出版社.1983.
[135]李海生,陈桂珠,昝启杰.深圳湾红树林的保护及其恢复.城市环境与城市生态.2007,20(4):10-12.
[136]李金平,梁之华,杨廷宝.澳门鱼类的初步调查.广州:华南师范大学学报(自然科学版).2000:27-34.
[137]李金平,杨廷宝,梁之华等.澳门鱼类.澳门:海事博物馆、澳门科学技术协进会.1999.
[138]李丽芬,林建新,吴国恩等.香港淡水鱼图鉴.香港:香港郊野公园之友会.2004.
[139]李明顺,蓝崇钰,陈桂珠等.深圳福田红树林的群落学研究-多样性与种群格局.生态科学.1994,(1):82-86.
[140]李明顺.深圳福田红树林生态系统研究.中山大学博士论文.1992.
[141]李荣冠编着.中国海陆架及邻近海域大型底栖生物.北京:海洋出版社,2003:1～3.
[142]李云,郑德璋,陈焕雄等.无瓣海桑引种的初步研究.1997,487-493.
[143]厉红梅,李适宇,蔡立哲.深圳湾潮间带底栖动物群落与环境因子的关系研究.中山大学学报(自然科学版).2003,(5):93-97.
[144]梁海含,林小涛,梁华等.澳门路凼湿地的水质调查与评价.海洋科学.2006,30(3):21-25.
[145]梁华.澳门红树林植物组成及种群分布格局的研究.生态科学.1998,17(2):25-31.
[146]梁士楚,莫竹承,葛文标.广西曲湾红树林植物种群分布格局的研究.中国红树林研究与管理.1995,85-93.
[147]梁肇辉、李庆刚、黄嘉凤等.香港的经济甲壳类动物.香港:渔农自然护理署.2004.
[148]梁之华,林小涛,杨廷宝等.澳门珍稀鸟类-黑脸琵鹭.澳门:澳门科学技术协进会.2003.
[149]梁之华.白鹭林:沿岸鹭鸟繁殖地.澳门杂志.2002,28:5-13
[150]卢泽愚译.Pilou E.C.著.数学生态学引论.北京:科学出版社.1978.
[151]林来官,黄友儒.福建红树植物群落.福建师范学院学报.1962,(4):87-104.
[152]林鹏,胡继添.广西的红树林.广西植物.1983,3(2):95-102.
[153]林鹏,卢昌义.海南岛的红树林.厦门大学学报(自然科学版).1985,24(4):508-514.
[154]林鹏,韦信敏.福建亚热带红树生态学研究.植物生态学与地植物学丛刊,1981,5(3):177-186.
[155]林鹏等.中国东南部海岸红树林的类群及其分布.生态学报.1981,1(3):283-290.
[156]林鹏.中国红树林生态系统.北京:科学出版社.1997.
[157]林清贤.闽南沿海红树林区鸟类及其与大型底栖动物相关关系研究.厦门大学博士论文.厦门大学.2003
[158]林小涛,梁海含,梁华等.澳门路凼湿地芦苇氮磷含量的季节性变化.生态学杂志.2007,26(1):5-8.
[159]刘伯锋等.福建省沿海冬季水鸟资源现状及保护对策.福建林业科技.1998,25(1):73-76.
[160]刘灿然,马克平,吕廷华等.生物群落多样性的测度方法-Ⅵ:与多样性测度有关的统计问题.生物多样性.1998,6(3):229-239.
[161]刘厚田等.湿地生态环境.生态学杂志.1996,15(1):75-78.
[162]刘青松主编.湿地与湿地保护.北京:环境科学出版社.2003.
[163]刘瑞玉等.中国北部的经济虾类.北京:中国科学出版社.1955.
[164]刘棠瑞等.红树林,台大实验林丛刊.1956,第二号:1-25.
[165]刘兴土.我国的沼泽和利用.中国沼泽研究.北京:科学出版社.1988,30-37.
[166]刘月英,张文珍,王耀先等.中国经济动物志,淡水软体动物.北京:科学出版社.1979.
[167]鲁琳,吴启泉,吴宝铃.大亚湾大鹏澳软相潮间带多毛类的生态.大亚湾海洋生念文集.北京:海洋出版社.1989.93-105.
[168]吕宪国,黄锡畴.我国湿地研究进展.地理科学.1998,18(4):293-300。
[169]马克平等.生物群落多样性的测度方法-Ⅰα多样性的测度方法(上).生物多样性.1994,2(3):162-168.
[170]马克平,刘玉明.生物群落多样性的测度方法-Ⅰα多样性的测度方法(下)。生物多样性.1994,2(4):231-239.
[171]马应良主编.珠江口海岛资源综合调查报告.广州:广东科技出版社.1993,233-235.
[172]缪绅裕,廖文波,苏志尧.广东红树林研究概况及广东红树林的主要特征.广州:华南理工大学出版社.1997,73-84.
[173]缪绅裕等.世界红树林区系小资料.广西科学学报.1993,9(2):130-131.
[174]内海富士夫.原色日本海岸动物图鉴.东京:保育社.1956.
[175]聂湘平、蓝崇钰、栾天罡等.珠江广州段水体、沉积物及底栖生物中的多氯联苯.中国环境科学.2001,21(5):417-421.
[176]彭少麟,王伯荪.鼎湖山森林群落分析Ⅲ种群分布格局.热带亚热带森林生态系统研究.1984,(2):2.
[177]齐钟彦,马绣同,刘月英等.中国动物图谱,软体动物,第四册.北京:科学出版社.1985.
[178]齐钟彦,马绣同,楼子康等.中国动物图谱,软体动物,第二册.北京:科学出版社.1983.
[179]齐钟彦主编.中国动物图谱,软体动物,第三册.北京:科学出版社.1986.
[180]邵广昭,林沛立.溪池钓的鱼.渡假出版社有限公司.民国80年.
[181]邵庆春,韩顺正.三江平原沼泽芦苇种群高度和地上生物量季节动态初步研究.中国湿地研究.长春:吉林科学技术出版社.1995,134-139。
[182]寿振黄,许维枢.海南岛的鸟类-非雀形目.动物学报.1966,18(1):93-112.
[183]宋晓军,林鹏.福建红树林湿地鸟类区系研究.生态学杂志.2002,21(6):5-10.
[184]苏保林,王志石,程声通等.澳门邻近水域悬浮泥沙研究.澳门海洋资源及经济研讨会.2000.
[185]孙道元,陈木.小头虫作为有机质污染指示生物的调查研究.环境科学.1978,1:17-196.
[186]孙儒泳.动物生态学原理.北京:北京师范大学出版社.1986
[187]孙英兰,张越美.胶州湾三维变动边界的潮流数值模拟.海洋与湖沼.2001,32(4):355-360.
[188]唐承佳,陆健健.围塈堤内迁徙鹬群落的生态学特征.动物学杂志.2002,37(2):27-33.
[189]万冬梅,代玉梅.辽宁水鸟调查报告.辽宁林业科技.2002,(4):21-23。
[190]汪松,解焱.中国物种红色名录第一卷.北京:高等教育出版社.2004.
[191]王伯荪,张宏达,胡玉佳等.澳门地区的森林群落.生态科学.1988,(2):27-30.
[192]王伯荪,张炜银,昝启杰等.红树植物之诠释.中山大学学报(自然科学版).2003,42(3):42-46.
[193]王伯荪、廖宝文、王勇军等.深圳湾红树林生态系统及其持续发展.科学出版社.2002.67-82.
[194]王俊兰,祝炳昭.地球之肾-湿地生态系统.生物学教学.1999,24(5):26-28
[195]王丽荣,赵焕庭.中国河口湿地的一般特点.海洋通报.2000,19(5):47-54.
[196]王岐山,马鸣,高育仁编着.中国动物志鸟网-鹤形目、(行鸟)形目、鸥形目,第五卷.北京:科学出版社.2006.
[197]王晓玲,娄玉杰.吉林省西部游禽种类的调查研究.家畜生态学报.2006.27(6):46-49.
[198]王颖.红树林海岸.地理.1963,(3):110-112.
[199]王勇军,常弘,陈万成等.内伶仃岛猕猴种群动态研究.中山大学学报(自然科学版).1999,38(4):92-96.
[200]王勇军,林鹏,宋晓军.深圳福田红树林湿地水鸟的周年动态.厦门大学学报(自然科学版).1998,37(1):122-130.
[201]王子定等.红树林.中华林学丛刊.1982,第一号:1-86。
[202]魏美莉.黑脸琵鹭卫星追踪计划始木.生物多样性季刊.2000,1,92-104.
[203]吴诗宝,柯亚永,吴桂生等.雷州半岛湿地水鸟区系组成及生态分布的初步研究.动物学杂志.2002,37(2):58-62.
[204]香港特别行政区渔农自然护理署渔业管理科.香港海鱼.香港:香港特别行政区渔农自然护理署.2004
[205]刑铁牛,方保华,曲进社等.河南省典型湿地冬季水鸟资源调查初报.河南林业科技.1998,18(3):12-15.
[206]徐风山.中国动物志,软体动物门,双壳纲.北京:科学出版社.1999.
[207]徐恭昭,郑文莲,黄国材.大亚湾鱼类及生物学图志.合肥:安徽科学技术出版社.1994.
[208]徐君亮.澳门的海滩资源优势及其开发利用.澳门环境.2000,2(14):60-66.
[209]阎理钦,王金秀,赛道建等.威海湿地鸟类分和调查.动物学杂志.1998.33(6):5-8.
[210]尤平,任辉.底栖动物及其在水质评价和监测上的应用.淮北煤师院学报.2001,22(4):44-48.
[211]余日清,陈桂珠,蓝崇玉等.深圳福田红树林大型底栖动物的种类组成研究.中国红树林研究管理.北京:科学出版社.1995.130-135.
[212]袁兴中,何文珊.海洋沉积物中的动物多样性及其生态系统功能.地球科学进展.1999,(5):458-463.
[213]袁兴中,陆健健.长江口岛屿湿地的底栖动物资源研究.自然资源学报.2001,16(1):37-41.
[214]袁兴中,陆健健.围垦对长江口南岸底栖动物群落结构及多样性的影响.生态学报.2001,21(10):1642-1647.
[215]袁兴中,何文珊.海洋沉积物动物多样性及其生态系统功能.地球科学进展.1999,14(5):458-463.
[216]袁兴中,陆健健,刘红.长江口底栖动物功能群分布格局及其变化.生态学报.2002,22(12):2054-2062.
[217]尹毅,范航清.广西白骨壤群落的生物量研究.广西科学院学报.1993,9(2):19-24
[218]张孚允,杨若莉.中国鸟类迁徙研究.北京:中国林业出版社.1997.
[219]张宏达,陈桂珠,刘治平等.深圳福田红树林湿地生态系统研究.内部阅读.1996.
[220]张宏达,王伯荪,胡玉佳.香港地区的红树林.生态科学.1985,(2):1-8.
[221]张宏达,王伯荪等.香港植被(红树林部分).中山大学学报论丛(自然科学版).1989,8(2):91-97.
[222]张宏达,张超常,王伯荪.雷州半岛红树植物群落.中山大学学报(自然科学版).1957,(1):122-145.
[223]张宏达等.香港植被.中山大学学报论丛(自然科学).1989,(8):128-140.
[224]张权利等.海三棱草种群的物候与分布格局研究.植物生态学与地植物学学报.1992,16(1):43-51.
[225]张淑萍,张正旺,徐基良等.天津地区系组成及多样性分析.生物多样性.2002,10(3):280-285
[226]张淑萍.张正旺.水鸟迁徙的种间互利性分析.中央民族大学学报(自然科学版).2001,2(10):133-137.
[227]张雅芝,陈品健,陈灿忠等.福建省主要港湾潮下带底栖生物生态研究.1997,2(3):23-29.
[228]张永普,应雪萍,吴海龙等.北麂列岛岩相潮间带底栖生物群落的组成特征.海洋湖沼通报.2000,(4):26-32.
[229]赵焕庭.珠江河口演变.北京:海洋出版社.1990.1-357.
[230]赵羿.海岸带的景观生态特征及其管理.应用生态学报.1990,1(4):373-377.
[231]郑葆珊等.中国动物图谱(第二版).北京:科学出版社.1987.
[232]郑光美,王岐山.中国濒危动物红皮书,鸟类.北京:科学出版社.1998.
[233]郑光美主编.鸟类学.北京:北京师范大学出版社.1995.366-425.
[234]郑光美主编.世界鸟类分类与分布名录.北京:科学出版社.2002.
[235]郑作新.中国鸟类分布名录,第三版.北京:科学出版社.1976
[236]郑作新.脊椎动物分类学.北京:农业出版社.1982.113-173.
[237]中国科学院动物研究所、中国科学院海洋研究所、上海水产学院等主编.南海鱼类志(上、中、下).北京:科学出版社.1962.
[238]中国科学院华南植物园、澳门民政总署园林绿化部.澳门植物名录.中国科学院华南植物园、澳门民政总署园林绿化部出版.2004.
[239]中国科学院、中国动物志编辑委员会主编.中国动物志-鸟纲,第1至第10卷,1997.
[240]中国鸟类学会水鸟组.中国水鸟研究附录一中国水鸟名录.上海:华东师范大 学出版社.1994.
[241]中国鸟类学会水鸟组.中国水鸟研究.上海:华东师范大学出版社.1994.
[242]中国水产科学研究院、珠江水产研究所、上海水产大学等.海南岛淡水及河口鱼类志.广州:广东科技出版社.1986。
[243]中华人民共和国濒危物种进出口管理办公室主编.中国珍贵濒危动物.国家重点保护野生动物名录.1996.279-298.
[244]周放,房慧伶,张红星 山口红树林鸟类多样性初步研究.广西科学.2000,7(2):154-157.
[245]周放,房慧伶,张红星.北部湾北部沿海红树林的鸟类.中国动物科学研究.北京:中国林业出版社,1999.257-265.
[246]周放,房慧伶,张红星等.广西沿海红树林区的水鸟.广西农业生物科学.2002.21(3)145-150.
[247]朱曦,邹小平.中国鹭鸟.北京:中国林业出版社.2001.