产学研合作项目治理风险综合评价研究
|
摘要
近几年来,产学研合作项目作为增强我国自主创新能力、提升产业竞争力的重要实施载体,在发挥高科技在产业中的支撑作用、促进产业转型等方面具有举足轻重的作用。然而与创新型国家(美国、日本、芬兰等)相比,我国的创新能力还存在很大差距,尤其是在创新的绩效产出方面,我国更是落后于这些国家。另外,我国的高科技促进政策较多侧重于“专家”与“人才”的引进,较少关注对产学研合作项目过程的管控与监督,造成近几年来科研经费滥用、重要科研成果造假的事件频出。
产学研项目主要是产业界或企业界与高等院校双方/产业界或企业界与科研院所双方为了共同的目标和利益而形成的合作交流关系,而产业技术创新投入高、风险大、系统性和复杂性强,参与单位之间持续稳定的合作关系成为直接影响项目成败的重要因素。而当前国内外学者对产学研合作方面的研究集中在制度层面和要素层面,忽视了如何对产学研创新的载体—产学研合作项目进行有效治理方面的研究,这种缺陷导致制度层面的研究不能落地、要素层面的研究缺乏载体,这必然会影响国家技术创新体系的构建与产学研合作项目的成功执行。
项目治理的主要问题是对项目利益相关方风险的控制以及关系的维护,而产学研项目治理则是将高校、研究院、企业、政府等组织在为项目实施过程中采取的各类行为所带来的不确定因素作为研究对象,即将产学研合作项目治理风险的研究作为核心内容。因此对产学研合作项目治理风险的有效定义和界定、对风险的精确度量和评价不仅能保障项目参与方具有可靠、稳定的管理环境,还从管理机制上提升项目的运行可靠性和效率,使得项目管理者在面临治理风险时采取必要的防范措施,避免项目最终失败。
本文对产学研合作项目治理风险的评价研究主要分为以下四个部分：
第一部分主要是文献综述,本文在第二章首先对国内外关于项目治理角色、项目治理风险的文献进行了综述,提出了治理角色的概念和应承担的责任与任务；另外还对产学研合作项目要素/制度风险研究、关系风险研究、以及产学研项目治理平台及其风险研究进行了分析,并提出了本文将突破传统研究中以要素、制度等风险因素切入的思路,对治理风险进行重新分类。
第二部分主要分为两项内容,其一是运用实证研究方法探寻了对产学研合作项目创新绩效影响较大的治理活动,并通过运用因子分析方法将治理活动进行分类,进而得到了社会网络关系中的治理角色的分类。其二是以项目治理平台的建设作为切入视角,验证了产学研合作项目属性风险的分类以及指标。
第三部分构建了产学研合作项目双中心社会网络模型,并对其中的网络要素的内涵进行了界定。本文在第四章对双中心社会网络中的主要指标与管理内涵进行了阐述,并选取了代表产学研合作项目利益相关方关系风险的指标(限制度、有效网络规模等)。
第四部分为本文的第五、六、七章的内容。本文在第五章建立了基于网络层次模型的项目利益相关方治理风险综合评价模型,将关系风险和属性风险都纳入到网络中的元素组中,提出了不同利益相关方治理风险定量排序的求解方法；另外在第六章以深港产学研基地创业项目为例,对模型的过程进行了详细演示,并提出了相应的政策建议。最后本文提出了研究的结论、创新点和未来的展望。
通过研究,本文得到以下结论：
1.产学研合作项目治理风险可以从利益相关方角度划分为属性风险与关系风险。通过实证研究,本文将产学研合作项目治理角色归纳为规划角色、执行角色、资源维护角色和监督角色,同时验证了五类治理属性风险的重要性以及对创新绩效的影响作用,另外,对五类治理平台风险中的子指标的重要性进行了验证,结果表明二级子指标能较好的反映出产学研合作项目五个治理平台风险方面的情况,这为建立治理属性风险评价指标提供了依据。
2.双中心社会网络能有效的表达产学研合作项目中利益相关方之间的社会网络关系,并且通过对一系列指标的分析与比较,结构洞测度指标中的有效网络规模和限制度能对利益相关方在网络中的关系风险进行量化。在双中心社会网络中,利益相关方的有效规模和限制度能够体现其在网络中受到其他各方的限制程度、以及控制资源、信息渠道的能力,这可以对应其在网络中的关系风险；基于此,不同的利益相关方应该根据自身在网络中的位置,制定自身的应对策略来提升网络的运行效率。
3.通过建立基于ANP的产学研合作项目的治理风险模型,能够将属性风险与关系风险之间搭建逻辑关联,并能较好的量化出利益相关方面临的治理风险。案例演示的全过程也证明了该模型的可操作性。
由于产学研合作项目的治理风险评价问题是一个多维度评价,既包含属性风险,也包含关系风险；另外,由于利益相关方之间彼此之间并不独立,也就是评价元素组里的元素是彼此关联的,所以运用ANP方法可以使得关系风险得以体现。本文将属性风险与利益相关方都作为网络层次模型中的元素组,通过相关关系矩阵来获取属性风险与利益相关方之间的关联关系,通过双中心社会网络中的有效网络规模与限制度来定义利益相关方组内元素之间的关系,经过运算,可以得到利益相关方的治理风险大小的列表。通过将该模型应用到深港产学研基地的创业项目中去,可以得到属性风险的各个要素以及项目中各个利益相关方对目标的影响程度。
本文的研究创新主要体现在以下四个方面：
1.本文建立了具有普适性的产学研合作项目治理风险分类理论,从治理平台视角对属性风险进行了分类,并对属性风险与项目治理角色进行了验证。本研究克服了现有产学研合作项目风险研究特殊性的局限,而从利益相关方的视角出发将治理风险划分为属性风险与关系风险,这类划分方法比其他研究更具有普遍性,更利于运用统一的方法论对相关方的治理风险进行量化分析。
2.本文提出了项目治理平台的研究假设,并对产学研合作项目属性风险与项目治理角色进行了验证,这种发现对建立属性风险框架提供了统一化的新视角,其对项目治理角色的分类和验证也为建立相关方之间社会关系的过程奠定了理论基础。
3.本文将双中心社会网络理论引入到产学研合作项目的关系风险阐述中,并建立了产学研合作项目双中心社会网络模型,也对网络中的指标内涵与管理意义重新进行了界定。这种模型弥补了传统社会网络理论不足,更便于呈现产学研合作项目中利益相关方之间的网络态势和状态,更能鲜明的体现相关方之间的关系风险态势。
4.本文提出了基于治理统一框架的综合治理风险评价方法。通过建立产学研合作项目属性风险与关系风险的逻辑关联,本文放宽了以往以某一类风险评价为主要内容的理论体系,从属性与关系双重角度对相关方的治理风险进行了度量,为产学研合作项目利益相关方的治理风险综合评价提供了一种可行的方法。
本文从产学研合作项目的治理风险评价入手,试图以全新的角度阐述和表达属性风险与关系风险,并建立两者之间的联系,是一次新的尝试。但是由于研究手段的局限与产学研合作项目本身的复杂程度,仍有以下局限性：首先是仍未将结构风险中的网络风险考虑到评价体系中来。其次是根据项目规模、行业和资金来源的不同,产学研合作项目的利益相关方之间的社会关系会有一定的差异。在未来的研究中,应引入更多的社会网络类型,并进一步考虑网络关系的分类、各类关系间的独立性,以及关系的综合赋权方法。第三是在产学研合作项目社会网络的指标与度量方法的选取过程中,本研究仍缺乏从多个管理维度进行论证的过程；第四是随着产学研合作组织的发展形式日益多元化,治理风险评价也应该从基于单组织的项目治理风险评价转变成基于战略联盟下的多组织项目群治理风险评价,因此多个社会网络之间的影响和协同问题也是未来研究的主要方向。
In recent years, as an important implementation platform of enhancing China's capacity for independent innovation and promoting the competitiveness of the industry, the industry-university-institute cooperation projects have played a decisive role in supporting technology development in the industry and promoting the industry transformation. However compared with innovative countries (the United States, Japan, Finland, etc.), there is still the gap of the innovation ability of our country, and China is lagging behind in these countries especially in the innovation output performance. In addition, the high-tech promoting policy is more focused on the introduction of "experts" and "talent" rather than the whole lifecycle control and supervision of industry-university-institute cooperation projects, and it leads to a series of scandals such as important scientific research achievements fraud and abuse of government-invested funds.
The enterprises and research institutes establish cooperation relationship for the common goals and interests. For the process of industrial technology innovation needs much investments, is systematic, complexand of high risks, the highly steady cooperation relationship between participation organizations become important factors which can directly affect the success or failure of the project.Andonly from the perspective of system and factor research, the current domestic and foreign scholars in this area ignore the effective governance research of industry-university-institute cooperation projects, which leads to that the system research cannot be implemented in practice and the factor research lack the carrier. Thus this situation will inevitably affect national technology innovation system construction and the successful execution of cooperative projects.
The main problem of project governance is the risk control and relationship maintenance of the project stakeholders, and the industry-university-institute cooperation project governance focus on the uncertain factors of stakeholders'actions during the process of project implementation, which takes the governance risks as the core research content.Therefore the effective definition, accurate measurement and evaluation of industry-university-institute cooperation project governance risks can not only guarantee the reliable, stable management environment, but also improve running reliability and efficiency of the project, which help the project managers take necessary precautions to avoid the project failure in face of governance risks.
The paper is divided into4parts:
The first part mainly included the research introduction and literature review. First of all, this paperreviewed the literature about the project governance risk roles and risks in chapter2, put forward the concept of governance roles and their responsibilities and obligations. Also it analyzed the research on industry-university-institute cooperation project factor/system risks, the relationship risks and governance infrastructure risks, proposed the new perspective which broke through the traditional factor risks, and reclassified the governance risks according to the governance infrastructure.
The second part consisted of two contents, one wasto look for the governance activities which influencedthe innovation performance of industry-university-institute cooperation projects by using empirical research methods, classify these activities by factor analysis method, and then get the governance roles in the social network. Secondly, it verified the attribute risk classification indexes from the perspective of construction of project governance infrastructure.
The third part constructed the duo-centered social network model of industry-university-institute cooperation projects and defined the connotation of the network elements. The main indexes of duo-centered social network and their management connotation were expounded in Chapter4, and the representative indexes for stakeholders' relationship risks were selected (limited degree, effective network size etc.)
The fourth part included the Chapter5,6and7. The paper established comprehensive evaluation model of stakeholders' governance risks based on ANP, which put attribute and relationship risks into the network model and put forward the quantitative sequencing method for different stakeholders' governance risk.Moreover, the process of evaluation model was demonstrated in the case study and the corresponding policy suggestions were proposed. At last the paper put forward the conclusions, innovative points and the research prospect.
The conclusionsare as follows:
1. The governance risks in industry-university-institute cooperation projects can be divided into attribute and relationship risks from the perspective of stakeholders. Through empirical research, this article induced the industry-university-institute cooperation project governance roles for planning roles, implementing roles, resource maintenance role and supervision roles. At the same time it verified the importance of the five governance attribute risksand the result showed that secondary index can better reflect the five governance infrastructure risks which provided the basis for establishing governance risk attribute evaluation index.
2. Duo-centered social network can effectively express the social relationship between stakeholders in industry-university-institute cooperation projects, and through analysis and comparison of a series of indexes; the effective network scale and the limited degree index can quantify the relationship risks of stakeholders in the network. In the duo-centered social network, the two indexes can reflect the degree one stakeholder was limited by other ones, and the ability to control resources, information channels. Based on this situation, different stakeholders should formulate their own strategies to improve the operation efficiency of the network according to their own position in the network.
3. Through the establishment of industry-university-institute cooperation project governance risk model based on ANP, the paper can build logic connection between attribute and the relationship risks, and can better quantify the risks faced by stakeholders. Also the whole demonstration process of case analysis proved the operability of the model.
For the problem of governance risk evaluation is a multi-dimensional containing both attribute and relationship risks, and the stakeholders were not independent, which meant the evaluation elementswere associated with each other, the ANP method was suitable to demonstrate the relationship risks.
The research took the attribute risksand stakeholders as the element groups in ANP model, and the relationship between the attribute risks and stakeholders through can be achieved by the correlation relationship matrix, the relationship between the stakeholders can be defined through effective network scale and the limiteddegree.After calculation, the list of stakeholders' governance risk degree can be showed. By applying the model into the case, the risk influence degree of each stakeholder and each attribute risk to the objective can be achieved.
The research innovation points are listed in4aspects:
1. This paper established the governance risk classification theory of industry-university-institute cooperation projects with more generality, classified the attribute risks from the perspective of governance infrastructure, and verified the attribute risks and governance roles. This research overcame the limitations of existing project governance risk theory with particularity, and divided the risks into attributes and relationship risks from the perspective of stakeholders.This kind of classification method was more universal than other research, and made it more conducive to use unified methodology for the quantitative analysis of stakeholders' governance risks.
2. This paper puts forward the research hypotheses of project governanceinfrastructure, and the project attribute risks and governance roleswere verified. This conclusion provided a new and unified perspective of establishing attribute risk framework,and laid a theoretical foundation of establishing social relationship between stakeholders.
3. This paper applied duo-centered social network theory in the relationship risks research of cooperation projects, and established theduo-centered social network model, redefined the connotation andmanagement meaning of indexes.This model overcame the disadvantages of traditional social network theory, and was easier to express the network situation and status of stakeholders in the project and reflect the relationship risk situation between them.
4. The paper proposed the comprehensive risk evaluation method based on the unified governance framework. Through linking the attribute risks and relationship risks, the paper expanded the current theory which focused on only one kind of risk types and measured the integrated governance risks of the stakeholders, provided a feasible method in stakeholders' governance risk evaluation.
From the perspective of governance risk evaluation of industry-university-institute cooperation projects, the paper tried to express, quantify and integrate the attribute and relationship risks, and was a new attempt. However, due to the limitations of research means and the complexity of industry-university-institute cooperation projects, there are still several limitations. First of all, the research should take the whole network risks of structure risks into consideration in the evaluation system. Secondly, according to the differences of project scales, the industries and sources of investments, the social relationship between project stakeholders should be classified further. In the future, more social network types should be introduced and the network classification, the independence of stakeholders' relationships as well as the weighed method should be considered.
Thirdly during the process of selecting the social network indexes and evaluation methods, the research is still lack of perspectives from multiple management dimensions. Fourthly, as the development forms of industry-university-institutecooperation organizationsare increasingly diversified, the governance risk evaluation should be change from single project governance evaluation into portfolio evaluation from multiple organizations, so the problem of effects and coordination of multiple social networks will be the new direction of future research.
产学研项目主要是产业界或企业界与高等院校双方/产业界或企业界与科研院所双方为了共同的目标和利益而形成的合作交流关系,而产业技术创新投入高、风险大、系统性和复杂性强,参与单位之间持续稳定的合作关系成为直接影响项目成败的重要因素。而当前国内外学者对产学研合作方面的研究集中在制度层面和要素层面,忽视了如何对产学研创新的载体—产学研合作项目进行有效治理方面的研究,这种缺陷导致制度层面的研究不能落地、要素层面的研究缺乏载体,这必然会影响国家技术创新体系的构建与产学研合作项目的成功执行。
项目治理的主要问题是对项目利益相关方风险的控制以及关系的维护,而产学研项目治理则是将高校、研究院、企业、政府等组织在为项目实施过程中采取的各类行为所带来的不确定因素作为研究对象,即将产学研合作项目治理风险的研究作为核心内容。因此对产学研合作项目治理风险的有效定义和界定、对风险的精确度量和评价不仅能保障项目参与方具有可靠、稳定的管理环境,还从管理机制上提升项目的运行可靠性和效率,使得项目管理者在面临治理风险时采取必要的防范措施,避免项目最终失败。
本文对产学研合作项目治理风险的评价研究主要分为以下四个部分：
第一部分主要是文献综述,本文在第二章首先对国内外关于项目治理角色、项目治理风险的文献进行了综述,提出了治理角色的概念和应承担的责任与任务；另外还对产学研合作项目要素/制度风险研究、关系风险研究、以及产学研项目治理平台及其风险研究进行了分析,并提出了本文将突破传统研究中以要素、制度等风险因素切入的思路,对治理风险进行重新分类。
第二部分主要分为两项内容,其一是运用实证研究方法探寻了对产学研合作项目创新绩效影响较大的治理活动,并通过运用因子分析方法将治理活动进行分类,进而得到了社会网络关系中的治理角色的分类。其二是以项目治理平台的建设作为切入视角,验证了产学研合作项目属性风险的分类以及指标。
第三部分构建了产学研合作项目双中心社会网络模型,并对其中的网络要素的内涵进行了界定。本文在第四章对双中心社会网络中的主要指标与管理内涵进行了阐述,并选取了代表产学研合作项目利益相关方关系风险的指标(限制度、有效网络规模等)。
第四部分为本文的第五、六、七章的内容。本文在第五章建立了基于网络层次模型的项目利益相关方治理风险综合评价模型,将关系风险和属性风险都纳入到网络中的元素组中,提出了不同利益相关方治理风险定量排序的求解方法；另外在第六章以深港产学研基地创业项目为例,对模型的过程进行了详细演示,并提出了相应的政策建议。最后本文提出了研究的结论、创新点和未来的展望。
通过研究,本文得到以下结论：
1.产学研合作项目治理风险可以从利益相关方角度划分为属性风险与关系风险。通过实证研究,本文将产学研合作项目治理角色归纳为规划角色、执行角色、资源维护角色和监督角色,同时验证了五类治理属性风险的重要性以及对创新绩效的影响作用,另外,对五类治理平台风险中的子指标的重要性进行了验证,结果表明二级子指标能较好的反映出产学研合作项目五个治理平台风险方面的情况,这为建立治理属性风险评价指标提供了依据。
2.双中心社会网络能有效的表达产学研合作项目中利益相关方之间的社会网络关系,并且通过对一系列指标的分析与比较,结构洞测度指标中的有效网络规模和限制度能对利益相关方在网络中的关系风险进行量化。在双中心社会网络中,利益相关方的有效规模和限制度能够体现其在网络中受到其他各方的限制程度、以及控制资源、信息渠道的能力,这可以对应其在网络中的关系风险；基于此,不同的利益相关方应该根据自身在网络中的位置,制定自身的应对策略来提升网络的运行效率。
3.通过建立基于ANP的产学研合作项目的治理风险模型,能够将属性风险与关系风险之间搭建逻辑关联,并能较好的量化出利益相关方面临的治理风险。案例演示的全过程也证明了该模型的可操作性。
由于产学研合作项目的治理风险评价问题是一个多维度评价,既包含属性风险,也包含关系风险；另外,由于利益相关方之间彼此之间并不独立,也就是评价元素组里的元素是彼此关联的,所以运用ANP方法可以使得关系风险得以体现。本文将属性风险与利益相关方都作为网络层次模型中的元素组,通过相关关系矩阵来获取属性风险与利益相关方之间的关联关系,通过双中心社会网络中的有效网络规模与限制度来定义利益相关方组内元素之间的关系,经过运算,可以得到利益相关方的治理风险大小的列表。通过将该模型应用到深港产学研基地的创业项目中去,可以得到属性风险的各个要素以及项目中各个利益相关方对目标的影响程度。
本文的研究创新主要体现在以下四个方面：
1.本文建立了具有普适性的产学研合作项目治理风险分类理论,从治理平台视角对属性风险进行了分类,并对属性风险与项目治理角色进行了验证。本研究克服了现有产学研合作项目风险研究特殊性的局限,而从利益相关方的视角出发将治理风险划分为属性风险与关系风险,这类划分方法比其他研究更具有普遍性,更利于运用统一的方法论对相关方的治理风险进行量化分析。
2.本文提出了项目治理平台的研究假设,并对产学研合作项目属性风险与项目治理角色进行了验证,这种发现对建立属性风险框架提供了统一化的新视角,其对项目治理角色的分类和验证也为建立相关方之间社会关系的过程奠定了理论基础。
3.本文将双中心社会网络理论引入到产学研合作项目的关系风险阐述中,并建立了产学研合作项目双中心社会网络模型,也对网络中的指标内涵与管理意义重新进行了界定。这种模型弥补了传统社会网络理论不足,更便于呈现产学研合作项目中利益相关方之间的网络态势和状态,更能鲜明的体现相关方之间的关系风险态势。
4.本文提出了基于治理统一框架的综合治理风险评价方法。通过建立产学研合作项目属性风险与关系风险的逻辑关联,本文放宽了以往以某一类风险评价为主要内容的理论体系,从属性与关系双重角度对相关方的治理风险进行了度量,为产学研合作项目利益相关方的治理风险综合评价提供了一种可行的方法。
本文从产学研合作项目的治理风险评价入手,试图以全新的角度阐述和表达属性风险与关系风险,并建立两者之间的联系,是一次新的尝试。但是由于研究手段的局限与产学研合作项目本身的复杂程度,仍有以下局限性：首先是仍未将结构风险中的网络风险考虑到评价体系中来。其次是根据项目规模、行业和资金来源的不同,产学研合作项目的利益相关方之间的社会关系会有一定的差异。在未来的研究中,应引入更多的社会网络类型,并进一步考虑网络关系的分类、各类关系间的独立性,以及关系的综合赋权方法。第三是在产学研合作项目社会网络的指标与度量方法的选取过程中,本研究仍缺乏从多个管理维度进行论证的过程；第四是随着产学研合作组织的发展形式日益多元化,治理风险评价也应该从基于单组织的项目治理风险评价转变成基于战略联盟下的多组织项目群治理风险评价,因此多个社会网络之间的影响和协同问题也是未来研究的主要方向。
In recent years, as an important implementation platform of enhancing China's capacity for independent innovation and promoting the competitiveness of the industry, the industry-university-institute cooperation projects have played a decisive role in supporting technology development in the industry and promoting the industry transformation. However compared with innovative countries (the United States, Japan, Finland, etc.), there is still the gap of the innovation ability of our country, and China is lagging behind in these countries especially in the innovation output performance. In addition, the high-tech promoting policy is more focused on the introduction of "experts" and "talent" rather than the whole lifecycle control and supervision of industry-university-institute cooperation projects, and it leads to a series of scandals such as important scientific research achievements fraud and abuse of government-invested funds.
The enterprises and research institutes establish cooperation relationship for the common goals and interests. For the process of industrial technology innovation needs much investments, is systematic, complexand of high risks, the highly steady cooperation relationship between participation organizations become important factors which can directly affect the success or failure of the project.Andonly from the perspective of system and factor research, the current domestic and foreign scholars in this area ignore the effective governance research of industry-university-institute cooperation projects, which leads to that the system research cannot be implemented in practice and the factor research lack the carrier. Thus this situation will inevitably affect national technology innovation system construction and the successful execution of cooperative projects.
The main problem of project governance is the risk control and relationship maintenance of the project stakeholders, and the industry-university-institute cooperation project governance focus on the uncertain factors of stakeholders'actions during the process of project implementation, which takes the governance risks as the core research content.Therefore the effective definition, accurate measurement and evaluation of industry-university-institute cooperation project governance risks can not only guarantee the reliable, stable management environment, but also improve running reliability and efficiency of the project, which help the project managers take necessary precautions to avoid the project failure in face of governance risks.
The paper is divided into4parts:
The first part mainly included the research introduction and literature review. First of all, this paperreviewed the literature about the project governance risk roles and risks in chapter2, put forward the concept of governance roles and their responsibilities and obligations. Also it analyzed the research on industry-university-institute cooperation project factor/system risks, the relationship risks and governance infrastructure risks, proposed the new perspective which broke through the traditional factor risks, and reclassified the governance risks according to the governance infrastructure.
The second part consisted of two contents, one wasto look for the governance activities which influencedthe innovation performance of industry-university-institute cooperation projects by using empirical research methods, classify these activities by factor analysis method, and then get the governance roles in the social network. Secondly, it verified the attribute risk classification indexes from the perspective of construction of project governance infrastructure.
The third part constructed the duo-centered social network model of industry-university-institute cooperation projects and defined the connotation of the network elements. The main indexes of duo-centered social network and their management connotation were expounded in Chapter4, and the representative indexes for stakeholders' relationship risks were selected (limited degree, effective network size etc.)
The fourth part included the Chapter5,6and7. The paper established comprehensive evaluation model of stakeholders' governance risks based on ANP, which put attribute and relationship risks into the network model and put forward the quantitative sequencing method for different stakeholders' governance risk.Moreover, the process of evaluation model was demonstrated in the case study and the corresponding policy suggestions were proposed. At last the paper put forward the conclusions, innovative points and the research prospect.
The conclusionsare as follows:
1. The governance risks in industry-university-institute cooperation projects can be divided into attribute and relationship risks from the perspective of stakeholders. Through empirical research, this article induced the industry-university-institute cooperation project governance roles for planning roles, implementing roles, resource maintenance role and supervision roles. At the same time it verified the importance of the five governance attribute risksand the result showed that secondary index can better reflect the five governance infrastructure risks which provided the basis for establishing governance risk attribute evaluation index.
2. Duo-centered social network can effectively express the social relationship between stakeholders in industry-university-institute cooperation projects, and through analysis and comparison of a series of indexes; the effective network scale and the limited degree index can quantify the relationship risks of stakeholders in the network. In the duo-centered social network, the two indexes can reflect the degree one stakeholder was limited by other ones, and the ability to control resources, information channels. Based on this situation, different stakeholders should formulate their own strategies to improve the operation efficiency of the network according to their own position in the network.
3. Through the establishment of industry-university-institute cooperation project governance risk model based on ANP, the paper can build logic connection between attribute and the relationship risks, and can better quantify the risks faced by stakeholders. Also the whole demonstration process of case analysis proved the operability of the model.
For the problem of governance risk evaluation is a multi-dimensional containing both attribute and relationship risks, and the stakeholders were not independent, which meant the evaluation elementswere associated with each other, the ANP method was suitable to demonstrate the relationship risks.
The research took the attribute risksand stakeholders as the element groups in ANP model, and the relationship between the attribute risks and stakeholders through can be achieved by the correlation relationship matrix, the relationship between the stakeholders can be defined through effective network scale and the limiteddegree.After calculation, the list of stakeholders' governance risk degree can be showed. By applying the model into the case, the risk influence degree of each stakeholder and each attribute risk to the objective can be achieved.
The research innovation points are listed in4aspects:
1. This paper established the governance risk classification theory of industry-university-institute cooperation projects with more generality, classified the attribute risks from the perspective of governance infrastructure, and verified the attribute risks and governance roles. This research overcame the limitations of existing project governance risk theory with particularity, and divided the risks into attributes and relationship risks from the perspective of stakeholders.This kind of classification method was more universal than other research, and made it more conducive to use unified methodology for the quantitative analysis of stakeholders' governance risks.
2. This paper puts forward the research hypotheses of project governanceinfrastructure, and the project attribute risks and governance roleswere verified. This conclusion provided a new and unified perspective of establishing attribute risk framework,and laid a theoretical foundation of establishing social relationship between stakeholders.
3. This paper applied duo-centered social network theory in the relationship risks research of cooperation projects, and established theduo-centered social network model, redefined the connotation andmanagement meaning of indexes.This model overcame the disadvantages of traditional social network theory, and was easier to express the network situation and status of stakeholders in the project and reflect the relationship risk situation between them.
4. The paper proposed the comprehensive risk evaluation method based on the unified governance framework. Through linking the attribute risks and relationship risks, the paper expanded the current theory which focused on only one kind of risk types and measured the integrated governance risks of the stakeholders, provided a feasible method in stakeholders' governance risk evaluation.
From the perspective of governance risk evaluation of industry-university-institute cooperation projects, the paper tried to express, quantify and integrate the attribute and relationship risks, and was a new attempt. However, due to the limitations of research means and the complexity of industry-university-institute cooperation projects, there are still several limitations. First of all, the research should take the whole network risks of structure risks into consideration in the evaluation system. Secondly, according to the differences of project scales, the industries and sources of investments, the social relationship between project stakeholders should be classified further. In the future, more social network types should be introduced and the network classification, the independence of stakeholders' relationships as well as the weighed method should be considered.
Thirdly during the process of selecting the social network indexes and evaluation methods, the research is still lack of perspectives from multiple management dimensions. Fourthly, as the development forms of industry-university-institutecooperation organizationsare increasingly diversified, the governance risk evaluation should be change from single project governance evaluation into portfolio evaluation from multiple organizations, so the problem of effects and coordination of multiple social networks will be the new direction of future research.
引文
① 李健.中国特色产学研合作体系的形成与发展[N].光明日报,2011.12.18.
② 中华人民共和国科学技术进步法[S].1997.
③ 中华人民共和国国务院.国家中长期科学和技术发展规划纲要(2006-2020).http://www.gov.cn,2006.2.9.
④ 胡锦涛在中国共产党第十七次全国代表大会上的报告http://news.xinhuanet.com.2007,10.24.
① 国务院关于发挥科技支撑作用促进经济平稳较快发展的意见[s].国科发计(2009)379.
② 张志华,倪自银.产学研合作创新中人力资本产权制度分析[J].企业经济,2007(10)：23-25.
③ 唐婷.王志珍：我国科技成果真正实现产业化的不足5%[N].科技日报,2010,3.18.
④ Teece D. Profiting from technological innovation implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy [J]. Research Policy,1986(15):285-305.
⑤ 丁荣贵,邹祖烨等.政府投资科技项目治理中的关键问题及对策[J].中国软科学,,2012(1)：90-99.
⑥ 吴晓杰.教育观察：谁动了科研经费的奶酪[N].光明日报,,2011,9.7.
⑦ 丁荣贵,孙涛.政府投资产学研合作项目治理方式及其框架[J].中国软科学,2008(9)：101-111.
⑧ 陈劲.协同创新[M].浙江：浙江大学出版社.2012.
⑨ 杜鹃,et a1.产学研合作模式中存在的共性问题及其对策[J].科技进步与对策,2005,22(2)：123-125.
⑩ 董静,苟燕楠,吴晓薇.我国产学研合作创新中的知识产权障碍—基于企业视角的实证研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2008,29(7)：20-25.
11 肖玲诺,史建峰,孙玉忠,于涵.产学研知识创新联盟知识链运作的风险控制机制[J].中国科技论坛.2013(3)：115-120.
12 唐乐,段异兵.产学研合作的治理机制设计[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007(12)：45-48.
13 杨得前,严广乐,李红.产学研合作中的机会主义行为及其治理[J].科学学与科学技术管理.2006(9)：38-41.
14 张豪,丁云龙.产学研合作中技术与资本的结合过程探析[J].软科学,2012,26(10)：5-9.
① 丁荣贵,高航,张宁.项目治理相关概念辨析[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013(2)：132-142.
② 肖玲诺,史建峰,孙玉忠,于涵.产学研知识创新联盟知识链运作的风险控制机制[J].中国科技论坛,2013(3)：115-120.
③ 肖玲诺,史建峰,孙玉忠.基于BP神经网络的产学研知识创新联盟风险评价研究[J].中国软科学,2011(11)：173-179.
④ 杨利娟.产学研联盟风险预警指标体系及模糊综合评价方法[J].价值工程,2007(11)：130-133.
⑤ Yong S. Lee. Technology transfer'and the research university:a search for the boundaries of university-industry collaboration [J]. Research Policy,1996,25(6):843-863.
⑥ Johan Bruneel. Pablo D'Este, Ammon Salter. Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university-industry collaboration[J]. Research Policy.2010(39):858-868.
① 周媛,魏丹.基于产学研合作创新收益与风险的研究[J].科技管理研究,2012(5)：1-4.
② 鲍新中,王道平.产学研合作创新成本分摊和收益分配的博弈分析[J].研究与发展管理,2010(10)：75-81.
③ LIONEL NESTA, VINCENT MANGEMATIN. The dynamics of innovation networks [J]. Science Techonology Policy Research,2004(4):17-28.
④ 张家琛.产学研技术联盟伙伴利益分配风险补偿研究[J].统计与决策,2013(6)：168-170.
⑤ Donald S Siegel, David A Waldmanb. Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: improving the effectiveness of university-industry collaboration [J]. The Journal of High Technology Management Research,2003,14(01):111-133.
⑥ Maurin. Fixed-term Contracts and the Dynamics of Labor Demand [J].European Economic Review, 2001(45):533-552.
⑦ Funke. Michael. China's New Labor Contract Law:No Harm to Employment [J]. China Economic Review, 2009(20):558-572.
⑧ Susana. Indefinite Contract Duration:Evidence from Electronics Subcontracting [J]. International Review of Law and Economics,2010(30):145-159.
⑨ 盛永祥,田立新,马少辉.产学研协作中的研究人员报酬激励及风险研究[J].软科学,2012,26(1)：72-82.
⑩ 董静,苟燕楠,吴晓薇.我国产学研合作创新中的知识产权障碍—基于企业视角的实证研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2008,29(7)：20-25.
11 杜鹃,et al.产学研合作模式中存在的共性问题及其对策[J].科技进步与对策,,2005,22(2)：123-125.
12 Muhammad Fiaz. An empirical study of university-industry R&D collaboration in China:Implications for technology in society [J]. Technology in Society.2013,35(3):191-202.
13 Alessandro Muscio, Davide Quaglioneb, Michele Scarpinato.The effects of universities'proximity to industrial districts on university-industry collaboration [J]. China Economic Review,2012,23(3):639-650.
14 M.S. Liew, T.N. Tengku Shahdan.Enablers in Enhancing the Relevancy of University-industry Collaboration [J]. Social and Behavioral Sciences,2013(93):1889-1896.
① 冯峰,李徐伟,司尚奇.基于无标度网络的产学研合作网络功能及培育机制研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2009(9)：27-29.
② 王文婷,李南.产学研网络组织的边界治理模型[J].价值工程.2009.28(1)：103-105.
③ Jiancheng Guan, Qingjun Zhao. The impact of university-industry collaboration networks on innovation in nanobiopharmaceuticals [J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2013,80(7):1271-1286.
④ 孙亚男.基于社会网络结构演化的产学研合作项目治理风险研究[D].济南：山东大学学位论文.2011：35-50.
① 丁荣贵,高航,张宁.项目治理相关概念辨析[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版).2013(2)：132-142.
② 丁荣贵,高航,张宁.项目治理相关概念辨析[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013(2)：132-142.
① 丁荣贵,高航,张宁.项目治理相关概念辨析[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版).2013(2)：132-142.
① J. Rodney Turner. Anne Keegan. Mechanisms of governance in the project-based organization:Roles of the broker and steward [J]. European Management Journal,2001,19(3):254-267.
① Friedrich Steimann. On the representation of roles in object-oriented and conceptual modeling [J].Data&Knowledge Engineering,2000(35):83-100.
② 陈卫平.角色认知的概念与功能初探[J].会科学研究,1994,1(32)：153-155.
③ Marks S R, Macdermid S M. Multiple roles and the self:A theory of role balance [J]. Journal of Marriage and the Family,1996,58(2):417-432.
④ Belbin R. M.Management Teams:Why They Succeed Or Fail [M]. Oxford:Butterworth-Heinemann,2010.
① 陈贡.团队角色理论及其应用[J].人才资源开发,2006(11)：86-87.
② Belbin R M.Tearn roles at work [M].Oxford:Butterworth-Heinemann,2010.
③ 李朝波.国外团队角色理论相关研究述评[J].经济研究导刊,2011(31)：117-118.
④ Margerison C, Mccann D, Davies R. Focus on team appraisal [J]. Team Performance Management,1995, 1(4):13-18.
⑤ Hellriegel D, Jr. Slocum J W, Woodman R W. Organizational Behavior (Ninth Edition) (In Chinese) [M]. Shanghai:East China Normal University Press,2001.
⑥ 周明建,宝贡敏.组织中的社会交换：由直接到间接[J].心理学报,2005,37(4)：535-541.
⑦ RM Cyert, JG March. A behavioral theory of the firm [M]. Englewood Clififfs:NJ, PrenticHall,1963.
⑧ J. Rodney Turner. Towards a theory of project management:The nature of the project governance and project management [J]. European Management Journal,2006,24(2):93-95.
⑨ J. Rodney Turner, Anne Keegan. Mechanisms of governance in the project-based organization:Roles of the broker and steward [J]. European Management Journal,2001,19(3):254-267.
⑩ R. Green. The essential role of governance in project development [J]. Proceedings of the ICE-Municipal Engineer,2009,162(3):179-185.
① Gonzalo Lizarralde, Stella Tomiyoshi, etc.Understanding differences in construction project governance between developed and developing countries [J]. Construction Management and Economics,2013,31(7):711-730.
② Ralf Muller, Project governance [M].Burlington:Gower Publishing,2009.
③ Tuomas Ahola, Inkeri Ruuska,etc. What is project governance and what are its origins? [J]. International Journal of Project Management,2013,31(7):1016-1023.
④ Eric G. Too, Patrick Weaver. The management of project management:A conceptual framework for project governance [J]. International Journal of Project Management (2013),doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.07.006.
⑤ Witold J. Henisza.Raymond E. Levittb,W. Richard Scottc. Toward a unified theory of project governance: economic, sociological and psychological supports for relational contracting [J]. Engineering Project Organization Journal,2012(2):37-55.
⑥ 丁荣贵,高航,张宁.项目治理相关概念辨析[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013(2)：132-142.
⑦ 王彦伟,刘兴智,魏巍.项目治理的研究现状与评述[J].华东经济管理,2009(11)：138-144.
⑧ 丁荣贵.费振国.项目治理研究的迭代过程模型[J].东岳论从,2008(3)：67-74.
① Nuno Gil, Bruce S. Tether. Project risk management and design flexibility:Analysing a case and conditions of complementarity[J].Research policy,2012,40(3):415-428.
② Martinus P. Abednego. Stephen O. Ogunlana. Good project governance for proper risk allocation in public-private partnerships in Indonesia[J]. International journal of project management,2006,24(7):622-634.
① 刘荣坤,刘兴智等.政府投资项目治理风险评级方法研究[J].软科学,2011,02(25)：29-35.
② 王爱民.治理风险视角的复杂项目的危机成因及网格化治理研究[J].软科学,2013,2(27)：41-44.
③ Directing Change:A Guide to Governance of Project Management [EB/OL] www.apm.org.uk,2004.
① 丁荣贵,高航,张宁.项目治理相关概念辨析[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013(2)：132-142.
② 丁荣贵,高航,张宁.项目治理相关概念辨析[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013(2)：132-142.
③ 张宁,丁荣贵.基于项目治理统一框架的风险评价研究[J].科技进步与对策,2014,3 1(4)：84-88.
① 刘兴智.项目治理社会网络风险分析方法研究[D].济南：山东大学,2011：25-35.
② Yong S. Lee. Technology transfer'and the research university:a search for the boundaries of university-industry collaboration [J]. Research Policy.1996,25(06):843-863.
① Johan Bruneel, Pablo D'Este, Ammon Salter. Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university-industry collaboration[J]. Research Policy,2010,39(7):858-868.
② 肖玲诺,史建峰,孙玉忠,于涵.产学研知识创新联盟知识链运作的风险控制机制[J].中国科技论坛,2013(3)：115-120.
③ 肖玲诺,史建峰,孙玉忠.基于BP神经网络的产学研知识创新联盟风险评价研究[J].中国软科学,2011(11)：173-179.
④ 何郁冰.产学研协同创新的理论模式[J].科学学研究,2012.30(2)：165-174.
⑤ 谢园园,梅姝娥,仲伟俊.产学研合作行为及模式选择影响因素的实证研究.科学学与科学技术管理,2011,32(3)：35-43.
⑥ 杨利娟.产学研联盟风险预警指标体系及模糊综合评价方法[J].价值工程,2007(11)：130-133.
⑦ 鲍新中,王道平.产学研合作创新成本分摊和收益分配的博弈分析[J1.研究与发展管理,2010(10)：75-81.
⑧ LIONEL NESTA, VINCENT MANGEMATIN. The dynamics of innovation networks [J]. Science Techonology Policy Research,2004(4):17-28.
⑨ Donald S Siegel, David A Waldmanb. Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms:improving the effectiveness of university-industry collaboration [J]. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 2003,14(01):111-133.
⑩ 周媛,魏丹.基于产学研合作创新收益与风险的研究[J].科技管理研究,2012(5)：1-4.
11 张家琛.产学研技术联盟伙伴利益分配风险补偿研究[J].统计与决策,2013(6)：168-170.
① 张建新,孙树栋.高校技术转移条件与方式的创新研究[J].西北工业大学学报(社会科学版),2010,30(3)：64-67.
② 注：该类风险主要是指高校、研究机构与企业在追求利益的紧迫性和唯一性上具有显著差别。
③ 主要是指合作各方占有资源和信息不同带来的风险、诚信危机、对合作方理解的偏差带来的风险。
④ Maurin. Fixed-term Contracts and the Dynamics of Labor Demand [J].European Economic Review,2001(45):533-552.
⑤ Funke, Michael. China's New Labor Contract Law:No Harm to Employment [J]. China Economic Review, 2009(20):558-572.
⑥ Susana. Indefinite Contract Duration:Evidence from Electronics Subcontracting [J]. International Review of Law and Economics,2010(30):145-159.
⑦ Pek-Hooi Soh, Annapoornima M. Subramanian. When do firms benefit from university-industry R&D collaborations? The implications of firm R&D focus on scientific research and technological recombination [J]. Journal of Business Venture.2013(21):22-26.
⑧ Carolin Plewa.Nisha Korff. Claire Johnson, etc. The evolution of university-industry linkages-A framework [J].Journal of Engineering and Technology Management,2013,30(01):21-44.
⑨ 盛永祥,田立新,马少辉.产学研协作中的研究人员报酬激励及风险研究[J].软科学,2012,26(1)：72-82.
⑩ 王秀丽,侯理想,常静.产学研合作中的人力资本投资风险因素研究[J].科技进步与对策,2010.27(6)：139-142.
11 Muhammad Fiaz. An empirical study of university-industry R&D collaboration in China:Implications for technology in society [J]. Technology in Society,2013.35(3):191-202.
① Alessandro Muscio, Davide Quaglioneb, Michele Scarpinato.The effects of universities' proximity to industrial districts on university-industry collaboration [J]. China Economic Review,2012,23(3):639-650.
② M.S. Liew, T.N. Tengku Shahdan. Enablers in Enhancing the Relevancy of University-industry Collaboration [J]. Social and Behavioral Sciences,2013(93):1889-1896.
③ 杜鹃,et al.产学研合作模式中存在的共性问题及其对策[J].科技进步与对策,2005,22(2)：123-125.
④ 董静,苟燕楠,吴晓薇.我国产学研合作创新中的知识产权障碍—基于企业视角的实证研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2008,29(7)：20-25.
⑤ 陈劲.协同创新[M]杭州：浙江大学出版社,2012.
⑥ 陈劲,阳银娟.协同创新的理论基础与内涵[J].科学学研究,2012(2)：161-164.
① 丁荣贵,高航,张宁.项目治理相关概念辨析[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013(2)：132-142.
① 丁荣贵,高航张宁.项目治理相关概念辨析[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013,2：132-142.
② 丁荣贵,刘兴智等.政府投资科技项目治理的审计方式研究[J].中国软科学,2009,5：96-106.
③ 丁荣贵,邹祖烨等.政府投资科技项目治理中的关键问题及对策[J].中国软科学,2012,(1)：90-99.
① 丁荣贵,et al.基于社会网络分析的项目治理研究—以大型建设监理项目为例[J].中国软科学,2010(6)：132-140.
② 刘芳.项目利益相关方的动态治理关系研究[D].济南：山东大学学位论文,2010.
③ Jiancheng Guan, Qingjun Zhao.The impact of university-industry collaboration networks on innovation in nanobiopharmaceuticals [J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2013,80(7):1271-1286.
① Alice Lam. Knowledge Networks and Careers:Academic Scientists in Industry-University Links [J].Journal of management studies,2007,44(6):993-1016.
② 刘凤朝,马荣康,姜楠.基于“985高校”的产学研专利合作网络演化路径研究.中国软科学,2011(7)：178-192.
③ 黄胜杰,张毅.我国产学研合作的组织模式及其网络特性探析[J].高等工程教育研究,2002(6)：30-33.
④ 王文婷,李南.产学研网络组织的边界治理模型[J].价值工程,2009,28(1)：103-105.
⑤ 申俊喜.创新产学研合作视角下我国战略性新兴产业发展对策研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2012.33(2)：37-43.
⑥ 冯峰,李徐伟,司尚奇.基于无标度网络的产学研合作网络功能及培育机制研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2009(9)：27-29.
⑦ Alice Lam. Knowledge Networks and Careers:Academic Scientists in Industry-University Links[J].Journal of management studies,2007,44(6):993-1016.
① 孙亚男.基于社会网络结构演化的产学研合作项目治理风险研究[D].济南：山东大学学位论文.2011：35-50.
② Burt, R.S. Models of Network Structure [J]. Annual Review of Sociology,1980(6):79-141.
③ Wasserman, S. and Faust, K. Social Network Analysis:Methods and Applications (Structural Analysis in the Social Science) [M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1994.
④ 姚小涛,席酉民.社会网络理论及其在企业研究中的应用[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版).2003,23(3)：22-27.
⑤ 席酉民,唐方成.组织的立体多核网络模型研究[J].西安交通大学学报,2002,36(4)：430-435.
⑥ G. Walker,B.Kogut & W. Shan. Social Capital, Structural Holes and the Formation of an Industry Network [J].Organization Science,1997(8):109-125.
① N. Nohria. Information and Search in the Creation of New Business Ventures:The Case of the 128 Venture Group, in Networks and Organizations:Structure, Form, and Action (ed.N. Nohria and R. Eccles) [M].Boston, Massachusetts:Harvard Business School Press,1992.
② Aaltonen K, Jaakko K, Tuomas O. Stakeholder salience in global projects[J]. International Journal of Project Management,2008.26(5):509-516.
③ Masquefa B. Top management adoption of a locally driven performance measurement and evaluation system: A social network perspective[J].Management Accounting Research.2008,19(2):182-207.
④ 乐云,崇丹,曹冬平.基于社会网络分析方法的建设项目组织研究[J].建筑经济,2010(8)：34-38.
⑤ 刘兴智,王彦伟,魏巍.基于SNA的项目治理关系网络分析与相应策略研究[J].华东经济管理,,2011,25(6)：124-125.
⑥ Tore Opsahl. Filip Agneessens, John Skvoretz. Node centrality in weighted networks:Generalizing degree and shortest paths[J]. Social Networks,2010,32(3):245-251.
⑦ Cho E, Myers S A. Leskovec J. Friendship and mobility:user movement in location-based social networks[C] Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM. 2011:1082-1090.
⑧ Kumar R, Novak J, Tomkins A. Structure and evolution of online social networks [M]. New York:Springer, 2010.
⑨ Coromina, L.I. Ducentered networks [J]. Social Networks,2008(30):49-59.
① 丁荣贵,孙涛.政府投资产学研合作项目治理方式研究框架[J].中国软科学.2008(9)：101-111.
② 丁荣贵,费振国.项目治理研究的迭代过程模型[J].东岳论从,2008(3)：67-74.
③ 王彦伟,项目利益相关方的治理关系研究[D].济南：山东大学学位论文,2010：150-200.
④ 徐松伟,项目治理角色能力要素研究[D].济南：山东大学学位论文,2013：50-65.
① J. Rodney Turner. Towards a theory of project management:The nature of the project governance and project management [J]. European Management Journal,2006,24(2):93-95.
② J. Rodney Turner, Anne Keegan. Mechanisms of governance in the project-based organization:Roles of the broker and steward[J]. European Management Journal,2001,19(3):254-267.
③ R. Green.The essential role of governance in project development [J].Proceedings of the ICE-Municipal Engineer,2009,162(3):179-185.
① 陈劲.协同创新[M].浙江：浙江大学出版社.2012.
② 丁荣贵,高航,张宁.项目治理相关概念辨析[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013(2)：132-142.
③ Shuja.A.K, Krebs.J. IBM Rational Unified Process Reference and Certification Guide:Solution Designer [M]. New York:IBM Press,2008
④ 蓝海林,宋铁波,曾萍.情境理论化：基于中国企业战略管理实践的探讨[J].管理学报,2012,9(1)：12-17.
⑤ ROUSSEAU D M. FRIED Y. Location:Contextualizing Organizational Research [J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior,2001,22(1):1-13.
⑥ 潘旭伟,祝锡永,李娜.在情境中实现知识管理[J].图书情报工作,2011,55(4)：95-99.
⑦ 张志学.组织心理学研究的情境化及多层次理论[J].心理学报,2010(1)：10-21.
① 蓝海林.宋铁波,曾萍.情境理论化：基于中国企业战略管理实践的探讨[J].管理学报,2012,9(1)：12-16.
② Wenjuan T, Lei Z. Study on the success criteria of large-scale public sector development projects based on whole life cycle[C] Management Science and Industrial Engineering (MSIE),2011 International Conference on. IEEE,2011:135-139.
③ Burke R. Project management:planning and control techniques [M]. Chichester:John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 2013.
④ Project Management Institute. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide),Newtown Square:Gobal Standard,2009.
① Poject Management Institute. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide)[M].Newtown Square:Gobal Standard,2009.
① 技术过度开发是指在产品研发过程中为了追求技术上的理论优势,投入超出市场需求的过多的成本和精力,导致投资成本浪费的现象,例如09年国内手机生产厂商夏新3G标准TD-SCDMA的终端研发上的“过度投入”
② Project Management Institute. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) [M].Newtown Square:Gobal Standard,2009.
③ 张家琛.产学研技术联盟伙伴利益分配风险补偿研究[J].统计与决策,2013(6)：168-170.
④ Project Management Institute. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) [M].Newtown Square:Gobal Standard,2009.
⑤ 丁荣贵,费振国.项目治理研究的迭代过程模型[J].东岳论从,2008(3)：67-74.
① Project Management Institute. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) [M].Newtown Square:Gobal Standard,2009.
② E.Vesterveld. The Project Management Model:Linking success criteria and critical success factors [J].International Journal of Project Management.2003(21):411-418
③ Project Management Institute. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) [M].Newtown Square:Gobal Standard,2009.
④ 丁荣贵.项目管理：项目思维与管理关键(第二版)[M].北京：中国电力出版社,2013.
① 马家喜,仲伟俊.梅妹娥.企业技术联盟与一类“产学研”合作技术创新模式选择研究[J].管理学报,2008,5(6)：824-831.
② 张建新,孙树栋.产学研合作过程中的风险研究[J].经济纵横,,2010(6)：110-113.
③ 张建新,孙树栋.产学研合作过程中的风险研究[J].经济纵横,,2010(6)：110-113.
④ 谢园园,梅妹娥,仲伟俊.产学研合作行为及模式选择影响因素的实证研究.科学学与科学技术管理.2011,32(3)：35-43.
⑤ 丁荣贵,邹祖烨：刘兴智.政府投资科技项目治理中的关键问题及对策[J].中国软科学,2012(1)：90-95.
① 丁荣贵,高航,张宁.项目治理相关概念辨析[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013(2)：132-142.
② 杨宁.产品研发项目的动态资源配置研究[D].南京：南京航空航天大学,2007.
③ Besjkci U, Bilge U, Ulusoy G. Resource dedication problem in a multi-project environment [J].Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal,2013,25(2):206-229.
④ Yang S, Fu L. Critical chain and evidence reasoning applied to multi-project resource schedule in automobile R&D process [J]. International Journal of Project Management,2014,32(1):166-177.
① Browning T R, Yassine A A. Resource-constrained multi-project scheduling:Priority rule performance revisited[J]. International Journal of Production Economics,2010,126(2):212-228.
② Yaghootkar K, Gil N. The effects of schedule-driven project management in multi-project environments [J]. International Journal of Project Management,2012,30(1):127-140.
③ 寿涌毅.资源约束下多项目调度的迭代算法[J].浙江大学学报：工学版,2004,38(8)：1095-1099.
④ 方炜,欧立雄.多项目环境下新产品研发项目资源分配问题研究[J].管理工程学报,2006,19(10)：6-10.
⑤ Besikci U, Bilge U, Ulusoy G. Resource dedication problem in a multi-project environment [J].Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal,2013,25(2):206-229.
⑥ Yang S, Fu L. Critical chain and evidence reasoning applied to multi-project resource schedule in automobile R&D process [J]. International Journal of Project Management,2014.32(1):166-177.
⑦ 周祖军.王玉荣.多项目管理中资源配置问题解读,http：//www.mypm.net,2006,2.13.
⑧ Yaghootkar K. Gil N. The effects of schedule-driven project management in multi-project environments [J]. International Journal of Project Management,2012,30(1):127-140.
① 国际项目管理协会(美)著,许江林等译Project Management Institute. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (Fifth Edition)[M]北京：电子工业出版社,2013.
② 马家喜,仲伟俊,梅姝娥.企业技术联盟与一类“产学研”合作技术创新模式选择研究[J].管理学报,2008,5(6)：824-831.
③ 周祖军,王玉荣.多项目管理中资源配置问题解读,http://www.mypm.net,2006,2.13.
① Besikci U, Bilge U, Ulusoy G. Resource dedication problem in a multi-project environment [J].Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal,2013,25(2):206-229.
② 方炜,欧立雄.多项目环境下新产品研发项目资源分配问题研究[J].管理工程学报,2006,19(10)：6-10.
① Yaghootkar K, Gil N. The effects of schedule-driven project management in multi-project environments [J]. International Journal of Project Management,2012,30(1):127-140.
② Antonella Certa, Mario Enea, Giacomo Galante. Concetta Manuela La Fata. Multi-objective human resources allocation in R&D projects planning [J]. International Journal of Production Research,2009,47(1): 3503-3523.
③ Browning T R, Yassine A A. Resource-constrained multi-project scheduling:Priority rule performance revisited [J]. International Journal of Production Economics,2010,126(2):212-228.
④ Strehl A, Ghosh J. Cluster ensembles---a knowledge reuse framework for combining multiple partitions [J]. The Journal of Machine Learning Research,2003(3):583-617.
⑤ Markus M L. Toward a theory of knowledge reuse:Types of knowledge reuse situations and factors in reuse success [J]. Journal of management information systems,2001,18(1):57-94.
① Majchrzak A, Wagner C, Yates D. The impact of sharping on knowledge reuse for organizational improvement with Wikis [J].Mis Quarterly,2013,37(2):455-482.
② 丁荣贵,高航,张宁.项目治理相关概念辨析[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013(2)：132-142.
③ Davenport Th, Prusak L. Working knowledge:How Organizations Manage What They Know? [M]. Boston: Harvard Business School Press,2000.
④ 张少辉.葛新权.企业知识管理绩效的模糊评价模型与分析矩阵[J].管理学报2009,6(7)：879-891.
⑤ Quintas P, Lefrere P, Jones G. Knowledge management:a strategic agenda [J]. Long range planning.1997. 30(3):385-391.
⑥ QIIG K. Knowledge Management Fundation [M]. US:Schema Press.1993.
⑦ 李长玲.知识管理绩效的模糊评价[J].情报科学,2006,24(2)：185-188.
⑧ 邱若娟,梁工谦.企业知识管理绩效评价模型研究[J].情报杂志,2006(7)：43-45.
⑨ 郑丽景,司有和.企业知识管理水平评价指标体系研究[J].经济体制改革,2003(5)：162-165.
① 黄立军.企业知识管理综合评价的数学模型在[J].运筹与管理,2001,10(4)：143-145.
② 方永美,孙凌浩.我国企业知识管理评估的AHP模糊综合评价[J].华南农业大学学报：社会科学版,2005.4(3)：77-81.
③ 王君.樊治平.组织知识管理绩效的一种综合评价问题[J].管理工程学报,2004,18(2)：44-48.
④ 王秀红.组织知识管理绩效评价研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2006(3)：64-67.
⑤ Grant, R. M. Prospering in dynamically competitive environments:Organizational capabilities as knowledge integration[J].Organization Science,1996,7(4):375-387.
⑥ Szulanski, G. The process of knowledge transfer:A diachronic analysis of stickiness [J]. Organization Behavior Human Decision Processes.2000,82(1):9-27.
⑦ Ann, M., Lynne, P., Olivia, E. Knowledge Reuse for Innovation[J].Management science,2004(2):174-188.
⑧ 季月卿,郑程.基于SEM的工程设计知识重用的影响因素分析[J].工程建设与设计,2012,09：183-186.
⑨ 程志.知识系统的知识重用方法[J].计算机技术与发展.2006(7)：121-122..
⑩ 王彦忠,周红波,杨学英.建筑监理咨询企业知识复用水平评价研究[J].建筑经济,2007,10：84-86.
① 周荣辅,赵晓冬.知识重用系统评价体系研究[J].科技管理研究,2009,1：189-191.
① 郑丽景,司有和.企业知识管理水平评价指标体系研究[J].经济体制改革,2003(5)：162-165.
② 王君,樊治平.组织知识管理绩效的一种综合评价问题[J].管理工程学报,2004,18(2)：44-48.
③ 张少辉,葛新权.企业知识管理绩效的模糊评价模型与分析矩阵[J].管理学报,2009,6(7)：879-891.
① Majchrzak A, Wagner C, Yates D. The impact of sharping on knowledge reuse for organizational improvement with Wikis [J].Mis Quarterly,2013,37(2):455-482.
② 丁荣贵,高航,张宁.项目治理相关概念辨析[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版).2013(2)：132-142.
③ Cao Q, Hoffman J J. A case study approach for developing a project performance evaluation system [J]. International Journal of Project Management,2011,29(2):155-164.
④ Seijts,G. H.,Latham,G. P. Learning versus performance goals:When should each be used [J]. Academy of Management Executive,2005,19(1):124-131.
⑤ Tohumcu Z, Karasakal E. R&D project performance evaluation with multiple and interdependent criteria [J].Engineering Management,2010,57(4):620-633.
⑥ Xu Y, Yeh C H. A performance-based approach to project assignment and performance evaluation [J].International Journal of Project Management,2014.32(2):218-228.
⑦ Atkinson,A. A.,Waterhouse.J. H.,Wells,R. B. A stakeholder approach to strategic performance measurement[J]. Sloan Management Review,1997,38(3):25-37.
⑧ 原欣伟.王建仁,伊景冰.如何使绩效评价系统成为组织学习的推进器—基十112家企业的实证分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理.2009(2)：117-123.
① Toni.A. D.,Tonchia,S. Performance measurement systems models, characteristics and measures[J]. International Journal of Operations & Production Management,2001,21(1):46-63.
② 原欣伟,王建仁,伊景冰.如何使绩效评价系统成为组织学习的推进器—基于112家企业的实证分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2009(2)：117-123.
③ Toni.A. D.,Tonchia,S. Performance measurement systems models, characteristics and measures[Jl. International Journal of Operations & Production Management,2001,21(1):46-63.
④ Tohumcu Z, Karasakal E. R&D project performance evaluation with multiple and interdependent criteria [J].Engineering Management,2010,57(4):620-633.
⑤ Xu Y, Yeh C H. A performance-based approach to project assignment and performance evaluation [J].International Journal of Project Management,2014,32(2):218-228.
⑥ Atkinson,A. A..Waterhouse.J. H.,Wells,R. B. A stakeholder approach to strategic performance measurement[J]. Sloan Management Review,1997,38(3):25-37.
① 丁荣贵,高航,张宁.项目治理相关概念辨析[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013(2)：132-142.
② Zuo J, Zillante G. Project culture within construction projects:a literature review[C] 13th International Group for Lean Construction Conference:Proceedings. International Group on Lean Construction,2005.
③ Van Marrewijk A.Managing project culture:The case of Environ Megaproject [C].International Journal of project management,2007,25(3):290-299.
④ Ajmal M M, Koskinen K U. Knowledge transfer in project-based organizations:An organizational culture perspective [J]. Project Management Journal.2008,39(1):7-15.
① Cockburn A. Surviving object-oriented projects:a manager's guide [M]. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.,1998.
② Kraimer M L. Organizational goals and values:A socialization model [J]. Human Resource Management Review,1998,7(4):425-447.
③ Lawson B, Petersen K J. Cousins P D, et al. Knowledge sharing in interorganizational product development teams:the effect of formal and informal socialization mechanisms* [J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2009,26(2):156-172.
④ Kerzner H R. Project management:a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling [M]. New York:John Wiley&Sons Inc,2013.
① Ajmal M M, Koskinen K U. Knowledge transfer in project-based organizations:An organizational culture perspective[J]. Project Management Journal,2008,39(1):7-15.
② Kerzner H R. Project management:a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling [M]. New York:John Wiley&Sons Inc,2013.
① Kraimer M L. Organizational goals and values:A socialization model [J]. Human Resource Management Review,1998,7(4):425-447.
② Buckley P J. International integration and coordination in the global factory [J].Management International Review,2011,51(2):269-283.
③ Myant M, Drahokoupil J. International integration, varieties of capitalism and resilience to crisis in transition economies [J]. Europe-Asia Studies,2012,64(1):1-33.
① 侯杰泰,温忠麟.成子娟.结构方程模型及其应用[M].北京：教育科学出版社,2004.
② 陈晓萍,徐淑英,樊景立.组织与管理研究的实证方法[M].北京：北京大学出版社,2008
③ Steiger J H. Structure model evaluation and modification:An interval estimation approach [J]. Multivariate behavioral research.1990.25:173-180.
① Wasserman, S. and Faust, K. Social Network Analysis:Methods and Applications (Structural Analysis in the Social Science) [M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.1994.
② 丁荣贵,高航,张宁.项日治理相关概念辨析[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013(2)：132-142
① 乐云,崇丹,曹冬平.基于社会网络分析方法的建设项目组织研究[J].建筑经济.2010(8)：34-38
② 汪应洛.当代工程观与工程教育[J].中国工程科学,2008,10(3)：17-20.
③ 丁荣贵,刘芳,孙涛等.基于社会网络分析的项目治理研究一以大型建设监理项目为[J].中国软科学,2010(6)：132-140.
④ Chinowsky P, Diekmann J, Galotti V. Social network model of construction[J].Journal of Construction Engineering and Management,2008,134(10):804-812
⑤ Pryke S,Pearson S. Project governance:case studies on financial incentives[J].Building Research & Information,2006,34(6):534-545
⑥ Ellison G, Yildiz M.Social Network in Industrial Organization [M]. Cambridge. MA:Massachusetts Institute of Technology,2009
⑦ 刘芳.社会资本对产学研合作知识转移绩效影响的实证研究[J].研究与发展管理,2012,24(1)：103-110.
⑧ 崇丹,李永奎,乐云.城市基础设施建设项目群组织网络关系治理研究—一种网络组织的视角[J].软科学,2012,26(2)：13-19.
① 乐云,崇丹,曹冬平.基于社会网络分析方法的建设项目组织研究[J].建筑经济,2010(8)：34-38
② 李永奎,乐云,何清华等.基于SNA的复杂项目组织权力量化及实证[J].系统工程理论与实践,2012,32(2)：312-318.
③ 李永奎,乐云,卢昱杰.基于SNA的大型工程项目组织总控机制及实证[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2011,39(11)：1715-1719.
① Coromina, L.I. Ducentered networks [J].2008(30):49-59.
② 丁荣贵,张宁,李媛媛.产学研合作项目双中心社会网络研究[J].科研管理,2012,33(12)：86-93.
① 丁荣贵.张宁.李媛媛.产学研合作项目双中心社会网络研究[J].科研管理,2012,33(12)：86-93.
① 刘军.整体网络分析讲义[M].上海：世纪出版社,2009.
② 李永奎,乐云,卢昱杰.基于SNA的大型工程项目组织总控机制及实证[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2011,39(11)：1715-1719.
③ Meyer, J.W., & Rowan, B. Institutional organizations:formal structures as myth and ceremony [J]. American Journal of Sociology,1977(80):340-363
④ Rowley, T.J. Moving beyond dyadic ties:a network theory of stakeholder influences[J]. Academy of Management Review,1997.22 (4):887-910.
⑤ Oliver, C. Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Project Review,1991,16 (1):145-179.
① 刘军.整体网分析讲义[M],上海：人民出版社,2009.
① 李永奎,乐云,何清华等.基于SNA的复杂项目组织权力量化及实证[J].系统工程理论与实践.2012.32(2)：312-318.
② Gervase R B. Power and the empowered organization:The design of power in highly adaptive organizations [J]. The Organization Development Practitioner,1998(30):31-43.
③ Aaltonen, K. A network perspective on response strategies to stakeholder pressures in global projects[C].Recipes for success in project-based management, Project Management Association Finland,2008:29-59
① Burt, R.S. Structural holes:the social structure of competition [M]. Harvard University Press,Boston:1992.
② 指凝聚子群密度凝聚子群的密度((External-Internal Index),主要用来衡量一个大的网络中小团体现象是否十分严重,该值越向1靠近,意味着派系林立的程度越大；该值越接近-1,意味着派系林立的程度越小；该值越接近0,表明关系越趋向于随机分布,看不出派系林立的情形。
① Coleman, J.S. Social capital in the creation of human capital [J]. American journal of sociology,1988,94(1): 95-120.
② Burt, R.S. Structural holes:the social structure of competition [M]. Harvard University Press,Boston:1992.
① Burt, R.S. Structural holes:the social structure of competition[M]. Harvard University Press,Boston:1992.
② 罗家德.社会网络分析[M].北京：社会科学文献出版社,2005：68-72.
③ 庞科,陈京民.社会网络结构洞在网络参政领袖分析中的应用[J].武汉理工大学学报(信息与管理工程版),2011(1)：1-7.
① Coromina, L.I. Duo-centered networks [J].Social networks,2008,30:49-59.
① Fukuyama F.. Trust:The Social Virtues and Creation of Prosperity [M].New York:Free Press,1995.
② Ports, Alejandro. Social Capital:Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology [J]. Annual Reviews of Sociology,1998,24:1-24.
③ Ronald Breiger. Social Mobility and Social Structure [C].Cambridge University Press,1990:247-271.
④ 肖冬平,顾新.论社会资本对企业管理的负面影响及其应对措施[J].科技管理研究,2007,6：31-33.
⑤ 刘兴智.项目治理社会网络风险分析方法研究[D].济南：山东大学,2011.
① 丁荣贵,费振国.项目治理研究的迭代过程模型[J].东岳论从,2008,29(3)：67-74.
② Satty T L.Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback [M].Pittsburgh, PA:RWS Publication,1996.
① 邵强,林向义.基于ANP的国际石油工程项目风险评价研究[J].科技进步与决策,2010.27(11)：127-128.
① 许树柏.层次分析法原理[M].天津：天津大学出版社,1998.
① 丁荣贵.孙涛.政府投资产学研合作项目治理方式研究框架[J].中国软科学.2008,9：101-111.
① 郭九成.政府投资企业R&D项目治理研究[D].山东济南：山东大学.2008.
② ryke S, Pearson S. Project governance:case studies on financial incentives [J]. Building Research and Information,2006,34(6):534-545.
③ Scott J. Social network analysis [J].Sociology,1988,22(1):93-96.
④ Opsahl T, Panzarasa P. Clustering in weighted networks [J]. Social Networks,2009,31(2):155-163.
① 欧立雄,宋乐基.基于QFD的IT项目风险管理方法研究[J].科学技术与工程,2008(1)：287-290.
① 王莲芬.网络分析法(ANP)的理论与算法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2001.3：44-50.
① Saaty T L. Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback [M].Pittsburgh.PA:RWS Publication,1996.
② 由于前文中已经对治理属性风险进行了分类,因此本文主要以5类治理平台风险作为属性风险的要素。
① Burt, R.S. Structural holes:the social structure of competition [M].Havard University Press,1992.
① 丁荣贵,张宁,李媛媛.产学研合作项目双中心社会网络研究[J].科研管理,2012,33(12)：86-93.
② 张.大型工程项目利益相关方响应策略研究[D].济南：山东大学,2010.
① 张宁,丁荣贵,刘兴智.深圳市大学研究院项目治理平台建设与创新绩效关系研究[J].科技进步与对策,2013,30(22)：21-26.
① 丁荣贵,邹祖烨等.政府投资科技项目治理中的关键问题及对策[J].中国软科学,2012,1：90-99.
① 拉比尔S,巴塞.情境管理—全球新视角[M].北京：机械工业出版社,2000.
[1]. A. Aslan Sendogdu, Ahmet Diken. A Research on the Problems Encountered in the Collaboration between University and Industry Procedia [J]. Social and Behavioral Sciences,2013,99(3):966-975.
[2]. Aaltonen K, Jaakko K, Tuomas O. Stakeholder salience in global projects[J]. International Journal of Project Management,2008,26(5):509-516.
[3]. Abramo G, D'Angelo CA, Di Costa F. University-industry research collaboration. A model to assess university capability [J]. Higher Education 2011,62(2):163-81.
[4]. Ajmal M M, Koskinen K U. Knowledge transfer in project-based organizations:An organizational culture perspective [J]. Project Management Journal,2008,39(1): 7-15.
[5]. Alessandro Muscio, Davide Quaglioneb, Michele Scarpinato. The effects of universities' proximity to industrial districts on university-industry collaboration [J]. China Economic Review,2012,23(3):639-650.
[6]. Alice Lam. Knowledge Networks and Careers:Academic Scientists in Industry-University Links [J].Journal of management studies,2007,44(6):993-1016.
[7]. Ann, M., Lynne, P., Olivia, E. Knowledge Reuse for Innovation[J].Manag ement science,2004(2):174-188.
[8]. Antonella Certa, Mario Enea, Giacomo Galante, Concetta Manuela La Fata. Multi-objective human resources allocation in R&D projects planning [J]. Inte rnational Journal of Production Research,2009,47(1):3503-3523.
[9]. Atkinson,A. A.,Waterhouse,J. H.,Wells,R. B. A stakeholder approach to s trategic performance measurement [J]. Sloan Management Review,1997,38(3): 25-37.
[10]. Bakshy E, Rosenn I, Marlow C, et al. The role of social networks in inform ation diffusion[C] Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web. ACM,2012:519-528.
[11]. Becker W, Dietz J. R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms-evidence for the German manufacturing industry [J]. Research Policy,2004(33):209-230.
[12]. Belbin R M.Team roles at work [M].Oxford:Butterworth-Heinemann,2010.
[13]. Belbin R. M.Management Teams:Why They Succeed Or Fail [M]. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann,2010.
[14]. Besikci U, Bilge U, Ulusoy G. Resource dedication problem in a multi-project environment[J]. Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal,2013,25(2): 206-229.
[15]. Browning T R, Yassine A A. Resource-constrained multi-project scheduling: Priority rule performance revisited[J]. International Journal of Production Economics,2010,126(2):212-228.
[16]. Burke R. Project management:planning and control techniques [M]. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd,2013.
[17]. Burt, R.S. Models of Network Structure [J]. Annual Review of Sociology, 1980(6):79-141.
[18]. Cao Q, Hoffman J J. A case study approach for developing a project performance evaluation system [J]. International Journal of Project Management,2011,29(2): 155-164.
[19]. Carolin Plewa, Nisha Korff, Claire Johnson, etc. The evolution of university-industry linkages-A framework [J]. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management,2013,30(01):21-44.
[20]. Chinowsky P, Diekmann J, Galotti V. Social network model of construction [J].Journal of Construction Engineering and Management,2008,134(10):804-81 2.
[21]. Cho E, Myers S A, Leskovec J. Friendship and mobility:user movement in location-based social networks[C] Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD int ernational conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM,2011: 1082-1090.
[22]. Cockburn A. Surviving object-oriented projects:a manager's guide [M]. Addi son-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.,1998.
[23]. Coromina, L.I. Duo-centered networks [J]. Social Networks,2008(30):49-59.
[24]. RM Cyert, JG March. A behavioral theory of the firm [M]. Englewood Cliff s:NJ, PrenticHall,1963.
[25]. Davenport Th, Prusak L. Working knowledge:How Organizations Manage W hat They Know?[M]. Boston:Harvard Business School Press,2000.
[26]. Diana Nadine Boehm, Teresa Hogan. Science-to-Business collaborations:A science-to-business marketing perspective on scientific knowledge commercialization [J]. Industrial Marketing Management,2013,42(4):564-579.
[27]. Directing Change:A Guide to Governance of Project Management [EB/OL] www.apm.org.uk,2004.
[28]. Donald S Siegel, David A Waldmanb. Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms:improving the effectiveness of university-industry collaboration [J]. The Journal of High Technology Management Research,2003, 14(1):111-133.
[29]. E.Vesterveld. The Project Management Model:Linking success criteria and critical success factors [J]. International Journal of Project Management. 2003(21):411-418.
[30]. Ellison G, Yildiz M, Social Network in Industrial Organization[D]. Cambridg e, MA:Massachusetts Institute of Technology,2009.
[31]. Eric G. Too, Patrick Weaver. The management of project management:A co nceptual framework for project governance [J]. International Journal of Projec t Management(2013), doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.07.006.
[32]. Fiaz Muhammad, Naiding Yang. Exploring the barriers to R&D collaborations:a challenge for industry and faculty for sustainable U-I collaboration growth [J]. Science and Technology,2012,5(2):1-16.
[33]. Friedrich Steimann. On the representation of roles in object-oriented and conceptual modeling[J]. Data&Knowledge Engineering,2000(35):83-100.
[34], Fukuyama F. Trust:The Social Virtues and Creation of Prosperity [M].New York:Free Press,1995.
[35]. Funke, Michael. China's New Labor Contract Law:No Harm to Employment [J]. China Economic Review,2009(20):558-572.
[36]. G. Walker,B.Kogut & W. Shan. Social Capital, Structural Holes and the Formation of an Industry Network [J].Organization Science,1997(8):109-125.
[37]. Gervase R B. Power and the empowered organization:The design of power in highly adaptive organizations [J]. The Organization Development Practition er,1998(30):31-43.
[38]. Gonzalo Lizarralde, Stella Tomiyoshi, etc.Understanding differences in constru ction project governance between developed and developing countries [J]. Co nstruction Management and Economics,2013,31(7):711-730.
[39]. Grant, R. M. Prospering in dynamically competitive environments:Organizati onal capabilities as knowledge integration [J].Organization Science,1996,7 (4):375-387.
[40]. Hellriegel D, Jr. Slocum J W, Woodman R W. Organizational Behavior (Nint h Edition) (In Chinese). Shanghai:East China Normal University Press,200 1.
[41]. Hutchinson V, Quintas P. Do SMEs do knowledge management? Or simply manage what they know? [J].International Small Business Journal,2008,26 (2):131-154.
[42]. J. Rodney Turner. Towards a theory of project management:The nature of the project governance and project management [J]. European Management Journal, 2006,24(2):93-95.
[43]. J. Rodney Turner, Anne Keegan. Mechanisms of governance in the project-based organization:Roles of the broker and steward [J]. European Management Journal, 2001,19(3):254-267.
[44]. Jiancheng Guan, Qingjun Zhao. The impact of university-industry collaboration networks on innovation in nanobiopharmaceuticals [J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2013,80(7):1271-1286.
[45]. Johan Bruneel, Pablo D'Este, Ammon Salter. Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university-industry collaboration [J]. Research Policy,2010, 39(07):858-868.
[46]. Kazuyuki Motohashi. University-industry collaborations in Japan:The role of new technology-based firms in transforming the National Innovation System [J]. Research Policy,2005,34(05):583-594.
[47]. Kerzner H R. Project management:a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling [M]. New York:John Wiley&Sons Inc,2013.
[48]. Kolisch R. Serial and parallel resource-constrained project scheduling methods revisited:Theory and computation[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1996,90(2):320-333.
[49]. Kraimer M L. Organizational goals and values:A socialization model [J]. Human Resource Management Review,1998,7(4):425-447.
[50]. Kumar R, Novak J, Tomkins A. Structure and evolution of online social networks [M]. New York:Springer,2010.
[51]. Lawson B, Petersen K J, Cousins P D, et al. Knowledge sharing in inter--organizational product development teams:the effect of formal and informal socialization mechanisms [J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management,2009, 26(2):156-172.
[52]. Lee Wool gar. New institutional policies for university-industry links in Japan [J]. Research Policy,2007(36):1261-1274.
[53]. LIONEL NESTA, VINCENT MANGEMATIN. The dynamics of innovation networks [J]. Science Techonology Policy Research,2004(4):17-28.
[54]. M.S. Liew, T.N. Tengku Shahdan. Enablers in Enhancing the Relevancy of University-industry Collaboration [J]. Social and Behavioral Sciences,2013(93): 1889-1896.
[55]. Majchrzak A, Wagner C, Yates D. The impact of shaping on knowledge reuse for organizational improvement with Wikis [J]. MIS Quarterly,2013,37(2):455-482.
[56]. Margerison C, Mccann D, Davies R. Focus on team appraisal [J]. Team Performance Management,1995,1(4):13-18.
[57]. Marks S R, Macdermid S M. Multiple roles and the self:A theory of role balance[J]. Journal of Marriage and the Family,1996,58(2):417-432.
[58]. Markus M L. Toward a theory of knowledge reuse:Types of knowledge reuse situations and factors in reuse success [J]. Journal of management information systems,2001,18(1):57-94.
[59]. Martinus P. Abednego, Stephen O. Ogunlana. Good project governance for proper risk allocation in public-private partnerships in Indonesia [J]. International journal of project management,2006,24(7):622-634.
[60]. Masquefa B. Top management adoption of a locally driven performance measurement and evaluation system:A social network perspective [J].Management Accounting Research,2008,19(2):182-207.
[61]. Maurin. Fixed-term Contracts and the Dynamics of Labor Demand [J]. European Economic Review,2001(45):533-552.
[62]. Meyer, J.W.,& Rowan, B. Institutional organizations:formal structures as m yth and ceremony [J]. American Journal of Sociology,1977(80):340-363
[63]. Muhammad Fiaz. An empirical study of university-industry R&D collaboration in China:Implications for technology in society [J]. Technology in Society,2013, 35(3):191-202.
[64]. Myant M, Drahokoupil J. International integration, varieties of capitalism and resilience to crisis in transition economies [J]. Europe-Asia Studies,2012,64(1): 1-33.
[65]. N. Nohria. Information and Search in the Creation of New Business Ventures:The Case of the 128 Venture Group, in Networks and Organizations:Structure, Form, and Action (ed.N. Nohria and R. Eccles) [M].Boston, Massachusetts:Harvard Business School Press,1992.
[66]. Nuno Gil, Bruce S. Tether. Project risk management and design flexibility: Analysing a case and conditions of complementarity [J].Research policy,2012, 40(3):415-428.
[67]. Oliver, C. Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Project Review,1991,16(1):145-179.
[68]. Opsahl T, Panzarasa P. Clustering in weighted networks [J].Social Networks, 2009,31(2):155-163.
[69]. Opsahl T. Triadic closure in two-mode networks:Redefining the global and 1 ocal clustering coefficients [J]. Social Networks,2013,35(2):159-167.
[70]. Patrick Doreian, Frans Stokman.Evolution of social networks [M]. London:Ro utledge,2013.
[71]. Patterson J H. A comparison of exact approaches for solving the multiple co nstrained resources, project scheduling problem [J]. Management science,198 4,30(7):854-867.
[72]. Pek-Hooi Soh, Annapoornima M. Subramanian. When do firms benefit from university-industry R&D collaborations? The implications of firm R&D focus on scientific research and technological recombination [J]. Journal of Business Venture, 2013(21):22-26.
[73]. Ports, Alejandro. Social Capital:Its Origins and Applications in Modern Soci ology [J]. Annual Reviews of Sociology,1998(24):1-24.
[74]. Project Management Institute. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide)[M].Newtown Square:Global Standard,2009.
[75]. Pryke S, Pearson S. Project governance:case studies on financial incentives [J].Building Research & Information,2006,34(6):534-545.
[76]. Quintas P, Lefrere P, Jones G. Knowledge management:a strategic agenda[J]. Long range planning,1997,30(3):385-391.
[77]. R. Green. The essential role of governance in project development [J]. Proceedings of the ICE-Municipal Engineer,2009,162(3):179-185.
[78]. Ralf Muller, Project governance [M].Burlington:Gower Publishing,2009.
[79]. Ronald Breiger. Social Mobility and Social Structure[M].Kamblidge:Cambrid ge University Press,1990.
[80]. ROUSSEAU D M, FRIED Y. Location:Contextualizing Organizational Resea rch [J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior,2001,22(1):1-13.
[81]. Roth C,Cointet J P. Social and semantic evolution in knowledge networks [J]. Social Networks,2010,32(1):16-29.
[82]. Rowley, T.J. Moving beyond dyadic ties:a network theory of stakeholder inf luence [J]. Academy of Management Review,1997,22(4):887-910.
[83]. Saaty T L. Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback [M].Pittsburgh, PA:RWS Publication,1996.
[84]. Scott J. Social network analysis [J]. Sociology,1988,22(1):93-96.
[85]. Seijts,G. H,Latham,G. P. Learning versus performance goals:When should each be used [J].Academy of Management Executive,2005,19(1):124-131.
[86]. Shuja.A.K, Krebs.J. IBM Rational Unified Process Reference and Certification Guide:Solution Designer [M]. New York:IBM Press,2008
[87]. Steiger J H. Structure model evaluation and modification:An interval estimat ion approach [J]. Multivariate behavioral research,1990(25):173-180.
[88]. Storey J, Quintas P. Human resource management:A critical text [M]. Singa pore:Cengage Learning EMEA,2007.
[89]. Markus M L. Toward a theory of knowledge reuse:Types of knowledge reu se situations and factors in reuse success [J]. Journal of management informa tion systems,2001,18(1):57-94.
[90]. Susana. Indefinite Contract Duration:Evidence from Electronics Subcontracting [J]. International Review of Law and Economics,2010(30):145-159.
[91]. Szulanski, G.The process of knowledge transfer:A diachronic analysis of stic kiness[J].Organization Behavior Human Decision Processes,2000,82(1):9-27.
[92]. Takhteyev Y, Gruzd A, Wellman B. Geography of Twitter networks [J]. Soci al networks,2012,34(1):73-81.
[93]. Teece D. Profiting from technological innovation implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy[J]. Research Policy,1986(15):285-3 05.
[94]. Tohumcu Z, Karasakal E. R&D project performance evaluation with multiple and interdependent criteria [J].Engineering Management,2010,57(4):620-633.
[95]. Toni,A. D.,Tonchia,S. Performance measurement systems models, characteri sties and measures[J]. International Journal of Operations & Production Manage ment,2001,21(1):46-63.
[96]. Tore Opsahl, Filip Agneessens, John Skvoretz. Node centrality in weighted n etworks:Generalizing degree and shortest paths[J]. Social Networks,2010,32 (3):245-251.
[97]. Tuomas Ahola, Inkeri Ruuska,etc. What is project governance and what are i ts origins? [J]. International Journal of Project Management,2013,31(7):101 6-1023.
[98]. Van Marrewijk A.Managing project culture:The case of Environ Megaproject [J].International Journal of project management,2007,25(3):290-299.
[99]. Wasserman, S. and Faust, K. Social Network Analysis:Methods and Applications (Structural Analysis in the Social Science) [M], Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1994.
[100]. Wenjuan T, Lei Z. Study on the success criteria of large-scale public sector development projects based on whole life cycle[C] Management Science and Industrial Engineering (MSIE),2011 International Conference on. IEEE,2011: 135-139.
[101]. WIIG K. Knowledge Management Fundation [M]. US:Schema Press,1993.
[102]. Witold J. Henisza, Raymond E. Levittb,W. Richard Scottc. Toward a unified theory of project governance:economic, sociological and psychological supports for relational contracting [J]. Engineering Project Organization Journal, 2012(2):37-55.
[103]. Xu Y, Yeh C H. A performance-based approach to project assignment and performance evaluation [J].International Journal of Project Management,2014, 32(2):218-228.
[104]. Yaghootkar K, Gil N. The effects of schedule-driven project management in multi-project environments [J]. International Journal of Project Management,2012, 30(1):127-140.
[105]. Yang S, Fu L. Critical chain and evidence reasoning applied to multi-project resource schedule in automobile R&D process[J]. International Journal of Project Management,2014,32(1):166-177.
[106]. Yong S. Lee. Technology transfer'and the research university:a search for the boundaries of university-industry collaboration [J]. Research Policy,1996, 25(6):843-863.
[107]. Zuo J, Zillante G. Project culture within construction projects:a literature review[C] 13th International Group for Lean Construction Conference:Proceedings. International Group on Lean Construction,2005.
[108]. 鲍新中,王道平.产学研合作创新成本分摊和收益分配的博弈分析[J].研究与发展管理,2010(10)：75-81.
[109]. 陈贡.团队角色理论及其应用[J].人才资源开发,2006(11)：86-87.
[110]. 陈劲.协同创新[M].浙江：浙江大学出版社.2012.
[111]. 陈劲.协同创新与国家科研能力建设[J].科学学研究,2011,29(12)：2-3.
[112]. 陈劲,阳银娟.协同创新的理论基础与内涵[J].科学学研究,2012(2)：161-164.
[113]. 陈卫平.角色认知的概念与功能初探[J].社会科学研究,1994,1(32)：153-155.
[114]. 陈晓萍,徐淑英,樊景立.组织与管理研究的实证方法[M].北京：北京大学出版社,2008.
[115]. 程志.知识系统的知识重用方法[J].计算机技术与发展,2006(7)：121-122.
[116]. 崇丹,李永奎,乐云.城市基础设施建设项目群组织网络关系治理研究—种网络组织的视角[J].软科学,2012,26(2)：13-19.
[117]. 丁荣贵.项目管理：项目思维与管理关键(第二版)[M].北京：中国电力出版社,2013.
[118]. 丁荣贵,et al.基于社会网络分析的项目治理研究—以大型建设监理项目为例[J].中国软科学,2010(6)：132-140.
[119]. 丁荣贵,费振国.项目治理研究的迭代过程模型[J].东岳论丛,2008(3)：67-74.
[120]. 丁荣贵,高航,张宁.项目治理相关概念辨析[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013(2)：132-142.
[121]. 丁荣贵,刘兴智等.政府投资科技项目治理的审计方式研究[J].中国软科学,2009(5)：96-106.
[122]. 丁荣贵,孙涛.政府投资产学研合作项目治理方式及其框架[J].中国软科学,2008(9)：101-111.
[123]. 丁荣贵,张宁,李媛媛.产学研合作项目双中心社会网络研究[J].科研管理,2012,33(12)：86-93.
[124]. 丁荣贵,邹祖烨等.政府投资科技项目治理中的关键问题及对策[J].中国软科学,2012(1)：90-99.
[125]. 董静,苟燕楠,吴晓薇.我国产学研合作创新中的知识产权障碍—基于企业视角的实证研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2008,29(7)：20-25.
[126]. 杜鹃,et al.产学研合作模式中存在的共性问题及其对策[J].科技进步与对策,2005,22(2)：123-125.
[127]. 方炜,欧立雄.多项目环境下新产品研发项目资源分配问题研究[J].管理工程学报,2006,19(10)：6-10.
[128]. 方永美,孙凌浩.我国企业知识管理评估的AHP模糊综合评价[J].华南农业大学学报：社会科学版,2005,4(3)：77-81.
[129]. 冯峰,李徐伟,司尚奇.基于无标度网络的产学研合作网络功能及培育机制研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2009(9)：27-29.
[130]. 郭九成.政府投资企业R&D项目治理研究[D].山东济南：山东大学,2008.
[131]. 国际项目管理协会(美)著,许江林等译Project Management Institute. A G uide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (Fifth Edition) [M]北京：电子工业出版社,2013.
[132]. 国务院关于发挥科技支撑作用促进经济平稳较快发展的意见[S].国科发计(2009)379.
[133]. 何郁冰.产学研协同创新的理论模式[J].科学学研究,2012,30(2)：165-174.
[134]. 侯杰泰,温忠麟,成子娟.结构方程模型及其应用[M].北京：教育科学出版社,2004.
[135]. 胡锦涛在中国共产党第十七次全国代表大会上的报告,http://news.xinhuanet.com/,2007,10.24.
[136]. 黄立军.企业知识管理综合评价的数学模型在[J].运筹与管理,2001,10(4)：143-145.
[137]. 黄胜杰,张毅.我国产学研合作的组织模式及其网络特性探析[J].高等工程教育研究,2002(6)：30-33.
[138]. 季月卿,郑程.基于SEM的工程设计知识重用的影响因素分析[J].工程建设与设计,2012(9)：183-186.
[139]. 拉比尔S,巴塞.情境管理—全球新视角[M].北京：机械工业出版社,2000.
[140]. 蓝海林,宋铁波,曾萍.情境理论化：基于中国企业战略管理实践的探讨[J].管理学报,2012,9(1)：12-16.
[141]. 乐云,崇丹,曹冬平.基于社会网络分析方法的建设项目组织研究[J].建筑经济,2010(8)：34-38.
[142]. 李长玲.知识管理绩效的模糊评价[J].情报科学,2006,24(2)：185-188.
[143]. 李朝波.国外团队角色理论相关研究述评[J].经济研究导刊,2011(31)：117-118.
[144]. 李健.中国特色产学研合作体系的形成与发展[N].光明日报,2011,12.18.
[145]. 李永奎,乐云,何清华等.基于SNA的复杂项目组织权力量化及实证[J].系统工程理论与实践,2012,32(2)：312-318.
[146]. 李永奎,乐云,卢昱杰.基于SNA的大型工程项目组织总控机制及实证[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2011,39(11)：1715-1719.
[147]. 刘芳.社会资本对产学研合作知识转移绩效影响的实证研究[J].研究与发展管理,2012,24(1)：103-110.
[148]. 刘凤朝,马荣康,姜楠.基于“985高校”的产学研专利合作网络演化路径研究.中国软科学,2011(7)：178-192.
[149]. 刘军.整体网络分析讲义[M].上海：世纪出版社,2009.
[150]. 刘荣坤,刘兴智等.政府投资项目治理风险评级方法研究[J].软科学,2011,2(25)：29-35.
[151]. 刘兴智,王彦伟,魏巍.基于SNA的项目治理关系网络分析与相应策略研究[J].华东经济管理,2011,25(6)：124-125.
[152]. 刘兴智.项目治理社会网络风险分析方法研究[D].济南：山东大学,2011：25-35.
[153]. 罗家德.社会网络分析[M].北京：社会科学文献出版社,2005.
[154]. 马家喜,仲伟俊,梅姝娥.企业技术联盟与一类“产学研”合作技术创新模式选择研究[J].管理学报,2008,5(6)：824-831.
[155]. 欧立雄,宋乐基.基于QFD的IT项目风险管理方法研究[J].科学技术与工程,2008(1)：287-290.
[156]. 潘旭伟,祝锡永,李娜.在情境中实现知识管理[J].图书情报工作,2011,55(4)：95-99.
[157]. 庞科,陈京民.社会网络结构洞在网络参政领袖分析中的应用[J].武汉理工大学学报(信息与管理工程版),2011(1)：1-7.
[158]. 邱若娟,梁工谦.企业知识管理绩效评价模型研究[J].情报杂志,2006(7)：43-45.
[159.]. 申俊喜.创新产学研合作视角下我国战略性新兴产业发展对策研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2012,33(2)：37-43.
[160]. 盛永祥,田立新,马少辉.产学研协作中的研究人员报酬激励及风险研究[J].软科学,2012,26(1)：72-82.
[161]. 寿涌毅.资源约束下多项目调度的迭代算法[J].浙江大学学报：工学版,2004,38(8)：1095-1099.
[162]. 孙亚男.基于社会网络结构演化的产学研合作项目治理风险研究[D].济南：山东大学学位论文,2011：35-50.
[163]. 唐乐,段异兵.产学研合作的治理机制设计[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007(12)：45-48.
[164]. 唐婷,王志珍.我国科技成果真正实现产业化的不足5%[N].科技日报,2010,3.18.
[165]. 汪应洛.当代工程观与工程教育[J].中国工程科学,2008,10(3)：17-20.
[166]. 王爱民.治理风险视角的复杂项目的危机成因及网格化治理研究[J].软科学,2013,2(27)：41-44.
[167]. 王君,樊治平.组织知识管理绩效的一种综合评价问题[J].管理工程学报,2004,18(2)：44-48.
[168]. 王莲芬.网络分析法(ANP)的理论与算法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2001(3)：44-50.
[169]. 王文婷,李南.产学研网络组织的边界治理模型[J].价值工程,2009,28(1)：103-105.
[170]. 王秀红.组织知识管理绩效评价研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2006(3)：64-67.
[171]. 王秀丽,侯理想,常静.产学研合作中的人力资本投资风险因素研究[J].科技进步与对策,2010,27(6)：139-142.
[172]. 王彦伟,刘兴智,魏巍.项目治理的研究现状与评述[J].华东经济管理,2009(11)：138-144.
[173]. 王彦伟.项目利益相关方的治理关系研究[D].济南：山东大学学位论文,2010：150-200.
[174]. 王彦忠,周红波,杨学英.建筑监理咨询企业知识复用水平评价研究[J].建筑经济,2007(10)：84-86.
[175]. 吴晓杰.教育观察：谁动了科研经费的奶酪[N].光明日报,2011,9.7.
[176]. 席酉民,唐方成.组织的立体多核网络模型研究[J].西安交通大学学报,2002,36(4)：430-435.
[177]. 肖冬平,顾新.论社会资本对企业管理的负面影响及其应对措施[J].科技管理研究,2007(6)：31-33.
[178]. 肖玲诺,史建峰,孙玉忠,于涵.产学研知识创新联盟知识链运作的风险控制机制[J].中国科技论坛,2013(3)：115-120.
[179]. 肖玲诺,史建峰,孙玉忠.基于BP神经网络的产学研知识创新联盟风险评价研究[J].中国软科学,2011(11)：173-179.
[180]. 谢园园,梅姝娥,仲伟俊.产学研合作行为及模式选择影响因素的实证研究. 科学学与科学技术管理,2011,32(3)：35-43.
[181]. 徐静,et al.我国产学研合作动力机制研究.中国科技论坛,2012(7)：74-80.
[182]. 徐松伟.项目治理角色能力要素研究[D].济南：山东大学学位论文,2013：50-65.
[183]. 许树柏.层次分析法原理[M].天津：天津大学出版社,1998.
[184]. 杨得前,严广乐,李红.产学研合作中的机会主义行为及其治理[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2006(9)：38-41.
[185]. 杨利娟.产学研联盟风险预警指标体系及模糊综合评价方法[J].价值工程,2007(11)：130-133.
[186]. 杨宁.产品研发项目的动态资源配置研究[D].南京：南京航空航天大学,2007.
[187]. 姚小涛,席酉民.社会网络理论及其在企业研究中的应用[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2003,23(3)：22-27.
[188]. 原欣伟,王建仁,伊景冰.如何使绩效评价系统成为组织学习的推进器—基于112家企业的实证分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2009(2)：117-123.
[189]. 张豪,丁云龙.产学研合作中技术与资本的结合过程探析[J].软科学,2012,26(10)：5-9.
[190]. 张家琛.产学研技术联盟伙伴利益分配风险补偿研究[J].统计与决策,2013(6)：168-170.
[191]. 张建新,孙树栋.高校技术转移条件与方式的创新研究[J].西北工业大学学报(社会科学版),2010,30(3)：64-67.
[192]. 张少辉,葛新权.企业知识管理绩效的模糊评价模型与分析矩阵[J].管理学报,2009,6(7)：879-891.
[193]. 张宁,丁荣贵.基于项目治理统一框架的风险评价研究[J].科技进步与对策,2014,31(4)：84-88.
[194]. 张宁,丁荣贵,刘兴智.深圳市大学研究院项目治理平台建设与创新绩效关系研究[J].科技进步与对策,2013,30(22)：21-26.
[195]. 张志华,倪自银.产学研合作创新中人力资本产权制度分析[J].企业经济,2007(10)：23-25.
[196]. 张志学.组织心理学研究的情境化及多层次理论[J].心理学报,2010(1)：10-21.
[197]. 郑丽景,司有和.企业知识管理水平评价指标体系研究[J].经济体制改革,2003(5)：162-165.
[198]. 中华人民共和国国务院.国家中长期科技发展规划纲要(2006-2020),http://www.gov.cn,2006,2.9.
[199]. 中华人民共和国科学技术进步法[S].1997.
[200]. 周明建,宝贡敏.组织中的社会交换：由直接到间接[J].心理学报,2005,37(4)：535-541.
[201]. 周荣辅,赵晓冬.知识重用系统评价体系研究[J].科技管理研究,2009(1)：189-191.
[202]. 周媛,魏丹.基于产学研合作创新收益与风险的研究[J].科技管理研究,2012(5)：1-4.
[203]. 周祖军,王玉荣.多项目管理中资源配置问题解读,http://www.mypm.net,20 06,2.13.
② 中华人民共和国科学技术进步法[S].1997.
③ 中华人民共和国国务院.国家中长期科学和技术发展规划纲要(2006-2020).http://www.gov.cn,2006.2.9.
④ 胡锦涛在中国共产党第十七次全国代表大会上的报告http://news.xinhuanet.com.2007,10.24.
① 国务院关于发挥科技支撑作用促进经济平稳较快发展的意见[s].国科发计(2009)379.
② 张志华,倪自银.产学研合作创新中人力资本产权制度分析[J].企业经济,2007(10)：23-25.
③ 唐婷.王志珍：我国科技成果真正实现产业化的不足5%[N].科技日报,2010,3.18.
④ Teece D. Profiting from technological innovation implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy [J]. Research Policy,1986(15):285-305.
⑤ 丁荣贵,邹祖烨等.政府投资科技项目治理中的关键问题及对策[J].中国软科学,,2012(1)：90-99.
⑥ 吴晓杰.教育观察：谁动了科研经费的奶酪[N].光明日报,,2011,9.7.
⑦ 丁荣贵,孙涛.政府投资产学研合作项目治理方式及其框架[J].中国软科学,2008(9)：101-111.
⑧ 陈劲.协同创新[M].浙江：浙江大学出版社.2012.
⑨ 杜鹃,et a1.产学研合作模式中存在的共性问题及其对策[J].科技进步与对策,2005,22(2)：123-125.
⑩ 董静,苟燕楠,吴晓薇.我国产学研合作创新中的知识产权障碍—基于企业视角的实证研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2008,29(7)：20-25.
11 肖玲诺,史建峰,孙玉忠,于涵.产学研知识创新联盟知识链运作的风险控制机制[J].中国科技论坛.2013(3)：115-120.
12 唐乐,段异兵.产学研合作的治理机制设计[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007(12)：45-48.
13 杨得前,严广乐,李红.产学研合作中的机会主义行为及其治理[J].科学学与科学技术管理.2006(9)：38-41.
14 张豪,丁云龙.产学研合作中技术与资本的结合过程探析[J].软科学,2012,26(10)：5-9.
① 丁荣贵,高航,张宁.项目治理相关概念辨析[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013(2)：132-142.
② 肖玲诺,史建峰,孙玉忠,于涵.产学研知识创新联盟知识链运作的风险控制机制[J].中国科技论坛,2013(3)：115-120.
③ 肖玲诺,史建峰,孙玉忠.基于BP神经网络的产学研知识创新联盟风险评价研究[J].中国软科学,2011(11)：173-179.
④ 杨利娟.产学研联盟风险预警指标体系及模糊综合评价方法[J].价值工程,2007(11)：130-133.
⑤ Yong S. Lee. Technology transfer'and the research university:a search for the boundaries of university-industry collaboration [J]. Research Policy,1996,25(6):843-863.
⑥ Johan Bruneel. Pablo D'Este, Ammon Salter. Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university-industry collaboration[J]. Research Policy.2010(39):858-868.
① 周媛,魏丹.基于产学研合作创新收益与风险的研究[J].科技管理研究,2012(5)：1-4.
② 鲍新中,王道平.产学研合作创新成本分摊和收益分配的博弈分析[J].研究与发展管理,2010(10)：75-81.
③ LIONEL NESTA, VINCENT MANGEMATIN. The dynamics of innovation networks [J]. Science Techonology Policy Research,2004(4):17-28.
④ 张家琛.产学研技术联盟伙伴利益分配风险补偿研究[J].统计与决策,2013(6)：168-170.
⑤ Donald S Siegel, David A Waldmanb. Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: improving the effectiveness of university-industry collaboration [J]. The Journal of High Technology Management Research,2003,14(01):111-133.
⑥ Maurin. Fixed-term Contracts and the Dynamics of Labor Demand [J].European Economic Review, 2001(45):533-552.
⑦ Funke. Michael. China's New Labor Contract Law:No Harm to Employment [J]. China Economic Review, 2009(20):558-572.
⑧ Susana. Indefinite Contract Duration:Evidence from Electronics Subcontracting [J]. International Review of Law and Economics,2010(30):145-159.
⑨ 盛永祥,田立新,马少辉.产学研协作中的研究人员报酬激励及风险研究[J].软科学,2012,26(1)：72-82.
⑩ 董静,苟燕楠,吴晓薇.我国产学研合作创新中的知识产权障碍—基于企业视角的实证研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2008,29(7)：20-25.
11 杜鹃,et al.产学研合作模式中存在的共性问题及其对策[J].科技进步与对策,,2005,22(2)：123-125.
12 Muhammad Fiaz. An empirical study of university-industry R&D collaboration in China:Implications for technology in society [J]. Technology in Society.2013,35(3):191-202.
13 Alessandro Muscio, Davide Quaglioneb, Michele Scarpinato.The effects of universities'proximity to industrial districts on university-industry collaboration [J]. China Economic Review,2012,23(3):639-650.
14 M.S. Liew, T.N. Tengku Shahdan.Enablers in Enhancing the Relevancy of University-industry Collaboration [J]. Social and Behavioral Sciences,2013(93):1889-1896.
① 冯峰,李徐伟,司尚奇.基于无标度网络的产学研合作网络功能及培育机制研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2009(9)：27-29.
② 王文婷,李南.产学研网络组织的边界治理模型[J].价值工程.2009.28(1)：103-105.
③ Jiancheng Guan, Qingjun Zhao. The impact of university-industry collaboration networks on innovation in nanobiopharmaceuticals [J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2013,80(7):1271-1286.
④ 孙亚男.基于社会网络结构演化的产学研合作项目治理风险研究[D].济南：山东大学学位论文.2011：35-50.
① 丁荣贵,高航,张宁.项目治理相关概念辨析[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版).2013(2)：132-142.
② 丁荣贵,高航,张宁.项目治理相关概念辨析[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013(2)：132-142.
① 丁荣贵,高航,张宁.项目治理相关概念辨析[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版).2013(2)：132-142.
① J. Rodney Turner. Anne Keegan. Mechanisms of governance in the project-based organization:Roles of the broker and steward [J]. European Management Journal,2001,19(3):254-267.
① Friedrich Steimann. On the representation of roles in object-oriented and conceptual modeling [J].Data&Knowledge Engineering,2000(35):83-100.
② 陈卫平.角色认知的概念与功能初探[J].会科学研究,1994,1(32)：153-155.
③ Marks S R, Macdermid S M. Multiple roles and the self:A theory of role balance [J]. Journal of Marriage and the Family,1996,58(2):417-432.
④ Belbin R. M.Management Teams:Why They Succeed Or Fail [M]. Oxford:Butterworth-Heinemann,2010.
① 陈贡.团队角色理论及其应用[J].人才资源开发,2006(11)：86-87.
② Belbin R M.Tearn roles at work [M].Oxford:Butterworth-Heinemann,2010.
③ 李朝波.国外团队角色理论相关研究述评[J].经济研究导刊,2011(31)：117-118.
④ Margerison C, Mccann D, Davies R. Focus on team appraisal [J]. Team Performance Management,1995, 1(4):13-18.
⑤ Hellriegel D, Jr. Slocum J W, Woodman R W. Organizational Behavior (Ninth Edition) (In Chinese) [M]. Shanghai:East China Normal University Press,2001.
⑥ 周明建,宝贡敏.组织中的社会交换：由直接到间接[J].心理学报,2005,37(4)：535-541.
⑦ RM Cyert, JG March. A behavioral theory of the firm [M]. Englewood Clififfs:NJ, PrenticHall,1963.
⑧ J. Rodney Turner. Towards a theory of project management:The nature of the project governance and project management [J]. European Management Journal,2006,24(2):93-95.
⑨ J. Rodney Turner, Anne Keegan. Mechanisms of governance in the project-based organization:Roles of the broker and steward [J]. European Management Journal,2001,19(3):254-267.
⑩ R. Green. The essential role of governance in project development [J]. Proceedings of the ICE-Municipal Engineer,2009,162(3):179-185.
① Gonzalo Lizarralde, Stella Tomiyoshi, etc.Understanding differences in construction project governance between developed and developing countries [J]. Construction Management and Economics,2013,31(7):711-730.
② Ralf Muller, Project governance [M].Burlington:Gower Publishing,2009.
③ Tuomas Ahola, Inkeri Ruuska,etc. What is project governance and what are its origins? [J]. International Journal of Project Management,2013,31(7):1016-1023.
④ Eric G. Too, Patrick Weaver. The management of project management:A conceptual framework for project governance [J]. International Journal of Project Management (2013),doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.07.006.
⑤ Witold J. Henisza.Raymond E. Levittb,W. Richard Scottc. Toward a unified theory of project governance: economic, sociological and psychological supports for relational contracting [J]. Engineering Project Organization Journal,2012(2):37-55.
⑥ 丁荣贵,高航,张宁.项目治理相关概念辨析[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013(2)：132-142.
⑦ 王彦伟,刘兴智,魏巍.项目治理的研究现状与评述[J].华东经济管理,2009(11)：138-144.
⑧ 丁荣贵.费振国.项目治理研究的迭代过程模型[J].东岳论从,2008(3)：67-74.
① Nuno Gil, Bruce S. Tether. Project risk management and design flexibility:Analysing a case and conditions of complementarity[J].Research policy,2012,40(3):415-428.
② Martinus P. Abednego. Stephen O. Ogunlana. Good project governance for proper risk allocation in public-private partnerships in Indonesia[J]. International journal of project management,2006,24(7):622-634.
① 刘荣坤,刘兴智等.政府投资项目治理风险评级方法研究[J].软科学,2011,02(25)：29-35.
② 王爱民.治理风险视角的复杂项目的危机成因及网格化治理研究[J].软科学,2013,2(27)：41-44.
③ Directing Change:A Guide to Governance of Project Management [EB/OL] www.apm.org.uk,2004.
① 丁荣贵,高航,张宁.项目治理相关概念辨析[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013(2)：132-142.
② 丁荣贵,高航,张宁.项目治理相关概念辨析[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013(2)：132-142.
③ 张宁,丁荣贵.基于项目治理统一框架的风险评价研究[J].科技进步与对策,2014,3 1(4)：84-88.
① 刘兴智.项目治理社会网络风险分析方法研究[D].济南：山东大学,2011：25-35.
② Yong S. Lee. Technology transfer'and the research university:a search for the boundaries of university-industry collaboration [J]. Research Policy.1996,25(06):843-863.
① Johan Bruneel, Pablo D'Este, Ammon Salter. Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university-industry collaboration[J]. Research Policy,2010,39(7):858-868.
② 肖玲诺,史建峰,孙玉忠,于涵.产学研知识创新联盟知识链运作的风险控制机制[J].中国科技论坛,2013(3)：115-120.
③ 肖玲诺,史建峰,孙玉忠.基于BP神经网络的产学研知识创新联盟风险评价研究[J].中国软科学,2011(11)：173-179.
④ 何郁冰.产学研协同创新的理论模式[J].科学学研究,2012.30(2)：165-174.
⑤ 谢园园,梅姝娥,仲伟俊.产学研合作行为及模式选择影响因素的实证研究.科学学与科学技术管理,2011,32(3)：35-43.
⑥ 杨利娟.产学研联盟风险预警指标体系及模糊综合评价方法[J].价值工程,2007(11)：130-133.
⑦ 鲍新中,王道平.产学研合作创新成本分摊和收益分配的博弈分析[J1.研究与发展管理,2010(10)：75-81.
⑧ LIONEL NESTA, VINCENT MANGEMATIN. The dynamics of innovation networks [J]. Science Techonology Policy Research,2004(4):17-28.
⑨ Donald S Siegel, David A Waldmanb. Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms:improving the effectiveness of university-industry collaboration [J]. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 2003,14(01):111-133.
⑩ 周媛,魏丹.基于产学研合作创新收益与风险的研究[J].科技管理研究,2012(5)：1-4.
11 张家琛.产学研技术联盟伙伴利益分配风险补偿研究[J].统计与决策,2013(6)：168-170.
① 张建新,孙树栋.高校技术转移条件与方式的创新研究[J].西北工业大学学报(社会科学版),2010,30(3)：64-67.
② 注：该类风险主要是指高校、研究机构与企业在追求利益的紧迫性和唯一性上具有显著差别。
③ 主要是指合作各方占有资源和信息不同带来的风险、诚信危机、对合作方理解的偏差带来的风险。
④ Maurin. Fixed-term Contracts and the Dynamics of Labor Demand [J].European Economic Review,2001(45):533-552.
⑤ Funke, Michael. China's New Labor Contract Law:No Harm to Employment [J]. China Economic Review, 2009(20):558-572.
⑥ Susana. Indefinite Contract Duration:Evidence from Electronics Subcontracting [J]. International Review of Law and Economics,2010(30):145-159.
⑦ Pek-Hooi Soh, Annapoornima M. Subramanian. When do firms benefit from university-industry R&D collaborations? The implications of firm R&D focus on scientific research and technological recombination [J]. Journal of Business Venture.2013(21):22-26.
⑧ Carolin Plewa.Nisha Korff. Claire Johnson, etc. The evolution of university-industry linkages-A framework [J].Journal of Engineering and Technology Management,2013,30(01):21-44.
⑨ 盛永祥,田立新,马少辉.产学研协作中的研究人员报酬激励及风险研究[J].软科学,2012,26(1)：72-82.
⑩ 王秀丽,侯理想,常静.产学研合作中的人力资本投资风险因素研究[J].科技进步与对策,2010.27(6)：139-142.
11 Muhammad Fiaz. An empirical study of university-industry R&D collaboration in China:Implications for technology in society [J]. Technology in Society,2013.35(3):191-202.
① Alessandro Muscio, Davide Quaglioneb, Michele Scarpinato.The effects of universities' proximity to industrial districts on university-industry collaboration [J]. China Economic Review,2012,23(3):639-650.
② M.S. Liew, T.N. Tengku Shahdan. Enablers in Enhancing the Relevancy of University-industry Collaboration [J]. Social and Behavioral Sciences,2013(93):1889-1896.
③ 杜鹃,et al.产学研合作模式中存在的共性问题及其对策[J].科技进步与对策,2005,22(2)：123-125.
④ 董静,苟燕楠,吴晓薇.我国产学研合作创新中的知识产权障碍—基于企业视角的实证研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2008,29(7)：20-25.
⑤ 陈劲.协同创新[M]杭州：浙江大学出版社,2012.
⑥ 陈劲,阳银娟.协同创新的理论基础与内涵[J].科学学研究,2012(2)：161-164.
① 丁荣贵,高航,张宁.项目治理相关概念辨析[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013(2)：132-142.
① 丁荣贵,高航张宁.项目治理相关概念辨析[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013,2：132-142.
② 丁荣贵,刘兴智等.政府投资科技项目治理的审计方式研究[J].中国软科学,2009,5：96-106.
③ 丁荣贵,邹祖烨等.政府投资科技项目治理中的关键问题及对策[J].中国软科学,2012,(1)：90-99.
① 丁荣贵,et al.基于社会网络分析的项目治理研究—以大型建设监理项目为例[J].中国软科学,2010(6)：132-140.
② 刘芳.项目利益相关方的动态治理关系研究[D].济南：山东大学学位论文,2010.
③ Jiancheng Guan, Qingjun Zhao.The impact of university-industry collaboration networks on innovation in nanobiopharmaceuticals [J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2013,80(7):1271-1286.
① Alice Lam. Knowledge Networks and Careers:Academic Scientists in Industry-University Links [J].Journal of management studies,2007,44(6):993-1016.
② 刘凤朝,马荣康,姜楠.基于“985高校”的产学研专利合作网络演化路径研究.中国软科学,2011(7)：178-192.
③ 黄胜杰,张毅.我国产学研合作的组织模式及其网络特性探析[J].高等工程教育研究,2002(6)：30-33.
④ 王文婷,李南.产学研网络组织的边界治理模型[J].价值工程,2009,28(1)：103-105.
⑤ 申俊喜.创新产学研合作视角下我国战略性新兴产业发展对策研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2012.33(2)：37-43.
⑥ 冯峰,李徐伟,司尚奇.基于无标度网络的产学研合作网络功能及培育机制研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2009(9)：27-29.
⑦ Alice Lam. Knowledge Networks and Careers:Academic Scientists in Industry-University Links[J].Journal of management studies,2007,44(6):993-1016.
① 孙亚男.基于社会网络结构演化的产学研合作项目治理风险研究[D].济南：山东大学学位论文.2011：35-50.
② Burt, R.S. Models of Network Structure [J]. Annual Review of Sociology,1980(6):79-141.
③ Wasserman, S. and Faust, K. Social Network Analysis:Methods and Applications (Structural Analysis in the Social Science) [M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1994.
④ 姚小涛,席酉民.社会网络理论及其在企业研究中的应用[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版).2003,23(3)：22-27.
⑤ 席酉民,唐方成.组织的立体多核网络模型研究[J].西安交通大学学报,2002,36(4)：430-435.
⑥ G. Walker,B.Kogut & W. Shan. Social Capital, Structural Holes and the Formation of an Industry Network [J].Organization Science,1997(8):109-125.
① N. Nohria. Information and Search in the Creation of New Business Ventures:The Case of the 128 Venture Group, in Networks and Organizations:Structure, Form, and Action (ed.N. Nohria and R. Eccles) [M].Boston, Massachusetts:Harvard Business School Press,1992.
② Aaltonen K, Jaakko K, Tuomas O. Stakeholder salience in global projects[J]. International Journal of Project Management,2008.26(5):509-516.
③ Masquefa B. Top management adoption of a locally driven performance measurement and evaluation system: A social network perspective[J].Management Accounting Research.2008,19(2):182-207.
④ 乐云,崇丹,曹冬平.基于社会网络分析方法的建设项目组织研究[J].建筑经济,2010(8)：34-38.
⑤ 刘兴智,王彦伟,魏巍.基于SNA的项目治理关系网络分析与相应策略研究[J].华东经济管理,,2011,25(6)：124-125.
⑥ Tore Opsahl. Filip Agneessens, John Skvoretz. Node centrality in weighted networks:Generalizing degree and shortest paths[J]. Social Networks,2010,32(3):245-251.
⑦ Cho E, Myers S A. Leskovec J. Friendship and mobility:user movement in location-based social networks[C] Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM. 2011:1082-1090.
⑧ Kumar R, Novak J, Tomkins A. Structure and evolution of online social networks [M]. New York:Springer, 2010.
⑨ Coromina, L.I. Ducentered networks [J]. Social Networks,2008(30):49-59.
① 丁荣贵,孙涛.政府投资产学研合作项目治理方式研究框架[J].中国软科学.2008(9)：101-111.
② 丁荣贵,费振国.项目治理研究的迭代过程模型[J].东岳论从,2008(3)：67-74.
③ 王彦伟,项目利益相关方的治理关系研究[D].济南：山东大学学位论文,2010：150-200.
④ 徐松伟,项目治理角色能力要素研究[D].济南：山东大学学位论文,2013：50-65.
① J. Rodney Turner. Towards a theory of project management:The nature of the project governance and project management [J]. European Management Journal,2006,24(2):93-95.
② J. Rodney Turner, Anne Keegan. Mechanisms of governance in the project-based organization:Roles of the broker and steward[J]. European Management Journal,2001,19(3):254-267.
③ R. Green.The essential role of governance in project development [J].Proceedings of the ICE-Municipal Engineer,2009,162(3):179-185.
① 陈劲.协同创新[M].浙江：浙江大学出版社.2012.
② 丁荣贵,高航,张宁.项目治理相关概念辨析[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013(2)：132-142.
③ Shuja.A.K, Krebs.J. IBM Rational Unified Process Reference and Certification Guide:Solution Designer [M]. New York:IBM Press,2008
④ 蓝海林,宋铁波,曾萍.情境理论化：基于中国企业战略管理实践的探讨[J].管理学报,2012,9(1)：12-17.
⑤ ROUSSEAU D M. FRIED Y. Location:Contextualizing Organizational Research [J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior,2001,22(1):1-13.
⑥ 潘旭伟,祝锡永,李娜.在情境中实现知识管理[J].图书情报工作,2011,55(4)：95-99.
⑦ 张志学.组织心理学研究的情境化及多层次理论[J].心理学报,2010(1)：10-21.
① 蓝海林.宋铁波,曾萍.情境理论化：基于中国企业战略管理实践的探讨[J].管理学报,2012,9(1)：12-16.
② Wenjuan T, Lei Z. Study on the success criteria of large-scale public sector development projects based on whole life cycle[C] Management Science and Industrial Engineering (MSIE),2011 International Conference on. IEEE,2011:135-139.
③ Burke R. Project management:planning and control techniques [M]. Chichester:John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 2013.
④ Project Management Institute. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide),Newtown Square:Gobal Standard,2009.
① Poject Management Institute. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide)[M].Newtown Square:Gobal Standard,2009.
① 技术过度开发是指在产品研发过程中为了追求技术上的理论优势,投入超出市场需求的过多的成本和精力,导致投资成本浪费的现象,例如09年国内手机生产厂商夏新3G标准TD-SCDMA的终端研发上的“过度投入”
② Project Management Institute. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) [M].Newtown Square:Gobal Standard,2009.
③ 张家琛.产学研技术联盟伙伴利益分配风险补偿研究[J].统计与决策,2013(6)：168-170.
④ Project Management Institute. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) [M].Newtown Square:Gobal Standard,2009.
⑤ 丁荣贵,费振国.项目治理研究的迭代过程模型[J].东岳论从,2008(3)：67-74.
① Project Management Institute. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) [M].Newtown Square:Gobal Standard,2009.
② E.Vesterveld. The Project Management Model:Linking success criteria and critical success factors [J].International Journal of Project Management.2003(21):411-418
③ Project Management Institute. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) [M].Newtown Square:Gobal Standard,2009.
④ 丁荣贵.项目管理：项目思维与管理关键(第二版)[M].北京：中国电力出版社,2013.
① 马家喜,仲伟俊.梅妹娥.企业技术联盟与一类“产学研”合作技术创新模式选择研究[J].管理学报,2008,5(6)：824-831.
② 张建新,孙树栋.产学研合作过程中的风险研究[J].经济纵横,,2010(6)：110-113.
③ 张建新,孙树栋.产学研合作过程中的风险研究[J].经济纵横,,2010(6)：110-113.
④ 谢园园,梅妹娥,仲伟俊.产学研合作行为及模式选择影响因素的实证研究.科学学与科学技术管理.2011,32(3)：35-43.
⑤ 丁荣贵,邹祖烨：刘兴智.政府投资科技项目治理中的关键问题及对策[J].中国软科学,2012(1)：90-95.
① 丁荣贵,高航,张宁.项目治理相关概念辨析[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013(2)：132-142.
② 杨宁.产品研发项目的动态资源配置研究[D].南京：南京航空航天大学,2007.
③ Besjkci U, Bilge U, Ulusoy G. Resource dedication problem in a multi-project environment [J].Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal,2013,25(2):206-229.
④ Yang S, Fu L. Critical chain and evidence reasoning applied to multi-project resource schedule in automobile R&D process [J]. International Journal of Project Management,2014,32(1):166-177.
① Browning T R, Yassine A A. Resource-constrained multi-project scheduling:Priority rule performance revisited[J]. International Journal of Production Economics,2010,126(2):212-228.
② Yaghootkar K, Gil N. The effects of schedule-driven project management in multi-project environments [J]. International Journal of Project Management,2012,30(1):127-140.
③ 寿涌毅.资源约束下多项目调度的迭代算法[J].浙江大学学报：工学版,2004,38(8)：1095-1099.
④ 方炜,欧立雄.多项目环境下新产品研发项目资源分配问题研究[J].管理工程学报,2006,19(10)：6-10.
⑤ Besikci U, Bilge U, Ulusoy G. Resource dedication problem in a multi-project environment [J].Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal,2013,25(2):206-229.
⑥ Yang S, Fu L. Critical chain and evidence reasoning applied to multi-project resource schedule in automobile R&D process [J]. International Journal of Project Management,2014.32(1):166-177.
⑦ 周祖军.王玉荣.多项目管理中资源配置问题解读,http：//www.mypm.net,2006,2.13.
⑧ Yaghootkar K. Gil N. The effects of schedule-driven project management in multi-project environments [J]. International Journal of Project Management,2012,30(1):127-140.
① 国际项目管理协会(美)著,许江林等译Project Management Institute. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (Fifth Edition)[M]北京：电子工业出版社,2013.
② 马家喜,仲伟俊,梅姝娥.企业技术联盟与一类“产学研”合作技术创新模式选择研究[J].管理学报,2008,5(6)：824-831.
③ 周祖军,王玉荣.多项目管理中资源配置问题解读,http://www.mypm.net,2006,2.13.
① Besikci U, Bilge U, Ulusoy G. Resource dedication problem in a multi-project environment [J].Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal,2013,25(2):206-229.
② 方炜,欧立雄.多项目环境下新产品研发项目资源分配问题研究[J].管理工程学报,2006,19(10)：6-10.
① Yaghootkar K, Gil N. The effects of schedule-driven project management in multi-project environments [J]. International Journal of Project Management,2012,30(1):127-140.
② Antonella Certa, Mario Enea, Giacomo Galante. Concetta Manuela La Fata. Multi-objective human resources allocation in R&D projects planning [J]. International Journal of Production Research,2009,47(1): 3503-3523.
③ Browning T R, Yassine A A. Resource-constrained multi-project scheduling:Priority rule performance revisited [J]. International Journal of Production Economics,2010,126(2):212-228.
④ Strehl A, Ghosh J. Cluster ensembles---a knowledge reuse framework for combining multiple partitions [J]. The Journal of Machine Learning Research,2003(3):583-617.
⑤ Markus M L. Toward a theory of knowledge reuse:Types of knowledge reuse situations and factors in reuse success [J]. Journal of management information systems,2001,18(1):57-94.
① Majchrzak A, Wagner C, Yates D. The impact of sharping on knowledge reuse for organizational improvement with Wikis [J].Mis Quarterly,2013,37(2):455-482.
② 丁荣贵,高航,张宁.项目治理相关概念辨析[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013(2)：132-142.
③ Davenport Th, Prusak L. Working knowledge:How Organizations Manage What They Know? [M]. Boston: Harvard Business School Press,2000.
④ 张少辉.葛新权.企业知识管理绩效的模糊评价模型与分析矩阵[J].管理学报2009,6(7)：879-891.
⑤ Quintas P, Lefrere P, Jones G. Knowledge management:a strategic agenda [J]. Long range planning.1997. 30(3):385-391.
⑥ QIIG K. Knowledge Management Fundation [M]. US:Schema Press.1993.
⑦ 李长玲.知识管理绩效的模糊评价[J].情报科学,2006,24(2)：185-188.
⑧ 邱若娟,梁工谦.企业知识管理绩效评价模型研究[J].情报杂志,2006(7)：43-45.
⑨ 郑丽景,司有和.企业知识管理水平评价指标体系研究[J].经济体制改革,2003(5)：162-165.
① 黄立军.企业知识管理综合评价的数学模型在[J].运筹与管理,2001,10(4)：143-145.
② 方永美,孙凌浩.我国企业知识管理评估的AHP模糊综合评价[J].华南农业大学学报：社会科学版,2005.4(3)：77-81.
③ 王君.樊治平.组织知识管理绩效的一种综合评价问题[J].管理工程学报,2004,18(2)：44-48.
④ 王秀红.组织知识管理绩效评价研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2006(3)：64-67.
⑤ Grant, R. M. Prospering in dynamically competitive environments:Organizational capabilities as knowledge integration[J].Organization Science,1996,7(4):375-387.
⑥ Szulanski, G. The process of knowledge transfer:A diachronic analysis of stickiness [J]. Organization Behavior Human Decision Processes.2000,82(1):9-27.
⑦ Ann, M., Lynne, P., Olivia, E. Knowledge Reuse for Innovation[J].Management science,2004(2):174-188.
⑧ 季月卿,郑程.基于SEM的工程设计知识重用的影响因素分析[J].工程建设与设计,2012,09：183-186.
⑨ 程志.知识系统的知识重用方法[J].计算机技术与发展.2006(7)：121-122..
⑩ 王彦忠,周红波,杨学英.建筑监理咨询企业知识复用水平评价研究[J].建筑经济,2007,10：84-86.
① 周荣辅,赵晓冬.知识重用系统评价体系研究[J].科技管理研究,2009,1：189-191.
① 郑丽景,司有和.企业知识管理水平评价指标体系研究[J].经济体制改革,2003(5)：162-165.
② 王君,樊治平.组织知识管理绩效的一种综合评价问题[J].管理工程学报,2004,18(2)：44-48.
③ 张少辉,葛新权.企业知识管理绩效的模糊评价模型与分析矩阵[J].管理学报,2009,6(7)：879-891.
① Majchrzak A, Wagner C, Yates D. The impact of sharping on knowledge reuse for organizational improvement with Wikis [J].Mis Quarterly,2013,37(2):455-482.
② 丁荣贵,高航,张宁.项目治理相关概念辨析[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版).2013(2)：132-142.
③ Cao Q, Hoffman J J. A case study approach for developing a project performance evaluation system [J]. International Journal of Project Management,2011,29(2):155-164.
④ Seijts,G. H.,Latham,G. P. Learning versus performance goals:When should each be used [J]. Academy of Management Executive,2005,19(1):124-131.
⑤ Tohumcu Z, Karasakal E. R&D project performance evaluation with multiple and interdependent criteria [J].Engineering Management,2010,57(4):620-633.
⑥ Xu Y, Yeh C H. A performance-based approach to project assignment and performance evaluation [J].International Journal of Project Management,2014.32(2):218-228.
⑦ Atkinson,A. A.,Waterhouse.J. H.,Wells,R. B. A stakeholder approach to strategic performance measurement[J]. Sloan Management Review,1997,38(3):25-37.
⑧ 原欣伟.王建仁,伊景冰.如何使绩效评价系统成为组织学习的推进器—基十112家企业的实证分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理.2009(2)：117-123.
① Toni.A. D.,Tonchia,S. Performance measurement systems models, characteristics and measures[J]. International Journal of Operations & Production Management,2001,21(1):46-63.
② 原欣伟,王建仁,伊景冰.如何使绩效评价系统成为组织学习的推进器—基于112家企业的实证分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2009(2)：117-123.
③ Toni.A. D.,Tonchia,S. Performance measurement systems models, characteristics and measures[Jl. International Journal of Operations & Production Management,2001,21(1):46-63.
④ Tohumcu Z, Karasakal E. R&D project performance evaluation with multiple and interdependent criteria [J].Engineering Management,2010,57(4):620-633.
⑤ Xu Y, Yeh C H. A performance-based approach to project assignment and performance evaluation [J].International Journal of Project Management,2014,32(2):218-228.
⑥ Atkinson,A. A..Waterhouse.J. H.,Wells,R. B. A stakeholder approach to strategic performance measurement[J]. Sloan Management Review,1997,38(3):25-37.
① 丁荣贵,高航,张宁.项目治理相关概念辨析[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013(2)：132-142.
② Zuo J, Zillante G. Project culture within construction projects:a literature review[C] 13th International Group for Lean Construction Conference:Proceedings. International Group on Lean Construction,2005.
③ Van Marrewijk A.Managing project culture:The case of Environ Megaproject [C].International Journal of project management,2007,25(3):290-299.
④ Ajmal M M, Koskinen K U. Knowledge transfer in project-based organizations:An organizational culture perspective [J]. Project Management Journal.2008,39(1):7-15.
① Cockburn A. Surviving object-oriented projects:a manager's guide [M]. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.,1998.
② Kraimer M L. Organizational goals and values:A socialization model [J]. Human Resource Management Review,1998,7(4):425-447.
③ Lawson B, Petersen K J. Cousins P D, et al. Knowledge sharing in interorganizational product development teams:the effect of formal and informal socialization mechanisms* [J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2009,26(2):156-172.
④ Kerzner H R. Project management:a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling [M]. New York:John Wiley&Sons Inc,2013.
① Ajmal M M, Koskinen K U. Knowledge transfer in project-based organizations:An organizational culture perspective[J]. Project Management Journal,2008,39(1):7-15.
② Kerzner H R. Project management:a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling [M]. New York:John Wiley&Sons Inc,2013.
① Kraimer M L. Organizational goals and values:A socialization model [J]. Human Resource Management Review,1998,7(4):425-447.
② Buckley P J. International integration and coordination in the global factory [J].Management International Review,2011,51(2):269-283.
③ Myant M, Drahokoupil J. International integration, varieties of capitalism and resilience to crisis in transition economies [J]. Europe-Asia Studies,2012,64(1):1-33.
① 侯杰泰,温忠麟.成子娟.结构方程模型及其应用[M].北京：教育科学出版社,2004.
② 陈晓萍,徐淑英,樊景立.组织与管理研究的实证方法[M].北京：北京大学出版社,2008
③ Steiger J H. Structure model evaluation and modification:An interval estimation approach [J]. Multivariate behavioral research.1990.25:173-180.
① Wasserman, S. and Faust, K. Social Network Analysis:Methods and Applications (Structural Analysis in the Social Science) [M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.1994.
② 丁荣贵,高航,张宁.项日治理相关概念辨析[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013(2)：132-142
① 乐云,崇丹,曹冬平.基于社会网络分析方法的建设项目组织研究[J].建筑经济.2010(8)：34-38
② 汪应洛.当代工程观与工程教育[J].中国工程科学,2008,10(3)：17-20.
③ 丁荣贵,刘芳,孙涛等.基于社会网络分析的项目治理研究一以大型建设监理项目为[J].中国软科学,2010(6)：132-140.
④ Chinowsky P, Diekmann J, Galotti V. Social network model of construction[J].Journal of Construction Engineering and Management,2008,134(10):804-812
⑤ Pryke S,Pearson S. Project governance:case studies on financial incentives[J].Building Research & Information,2006,34(6):534-545
⑥ Ellison G, Yildiz M.Social Network in Industrial Organization [M]. Cambridge. MA:Massachusetts Institute of Technology,2009
⑦ 刘芳.社会资本对产学研合作知识转移绩效影响的实证研究[J].研究与发展管理,2012,24(1)：103-110.
⑧ 崇丹,李永奎,乐云.城市基础设施建设项目群组织网络关系治理研究—一种网络组织的视角[J].软科学,2012,26(2)：13-19.
① 乐云,崇丹,曹冬平.基于社会网络分析方法的建设项目组织研究[J].建筑经济,2010(8)：34-38
② 李永奎,乐云,何清华等.基于SNA的复杂项目组织权力量化及实证[J].系统工程理论与实践,2012,32(2)：312-318.
③ 李永奎,乐云,卢昱杰.基于SNA的大型工程项目组织总控机制及实证[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2011,39(11)：1715-1719.
① Coromina, L.I. Ducentered networks [J].2008(30):49-59.
② 丁荣贵,张宁,李媛媛.产学研合作项目双中心社会网络研究[J].科研管理,2012,33(12)：86-93.
① 丁荣贵.张宁.李媛媛.产学研合作项目双中心社会网络研究[J].科研管理,2012,33(12)：86-93.
① 刘军.整体网络分析讲义[M].上海：世纪出版社,2009.
② 李永奎,乐云,卢昱杰.基于SNA的大型工程项目组织总控机制及实证[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2011,39(11)：1715-1719.
③ Meyer, J.W., & Rowan, B. Institutional organizations:formal structures as myth and ceremony [J]. American Journal of Sociology,1977(80):340-363
④ Rowley, T.J. Moving beyond dyadic ties:a network theory of stakeholder influences[J]. Academy of Management Review,1997.22 (4):887-910.
⑤ Oliver, C. Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Project Review,1991,16 (1):145-179.
① 刘军.整体网分析讲义[M],上海：人民出版社,2009.
① 李永奎,乐云,何清华等.基于SNA的复杂项目组织权力量化及实证[J].系统工程理论与实践.2012.32(2)：312-318.
② Gervase R B. Power and the empowered organization:The design of power in highly adaptive organizations [J]. The Organization Development Practitioner,1998(30):31-43.
③ Aaltonen, K. A network perspective on response strategies to stakeholder pressures in global projects[C].Recipes for success in project-based management, Project Management Association Finland,2008:29-59
① Burt, R.S. Structural holes:the social structure of competition [M]. Harvard University Press,Boston:1992.
② 指凝聚子群密度凝聚子群的密度((External-Internal Index),主要用来衡量一个大的网络中小团体现象是否十分严重,该值越向1靠近,意味着派系林立的程度越大；该值越接近-1,意味着派系林立的程度越小；该值越接近0,表明关系越趋向于随机分布,看不出派系林立的情形。
① Coleman, J.S. Social capital in the creation of human capital [J]. American journal of sociology,1988,94(1): 95-120.
② Burt, R.S. Structural holes:the social structure of competition [M]. Harvard University Press,Boston:1992.
① Burt, R.S. Structural holes:the social structure of competition[M]. Harvard University Press,Boston:1992.
② 罗家德.社会网络分析[M].北京：社会科学文献出版社,2005：68-72.
③ 庞科,陈京民.社会网络结构洞在网络参政领袖分析中的应用[J].武汉理工大学学报(信息与管理工程版),2011(1)：1-7.
① Coromina, L.I. Duo-centered networks [J].Social networks,2008,30:49-59.
① Fukuyama F.. Trust:The Social Virtues and Creation of Prosperity [M].New York:Free Press,1995.
② Ports, Alejandro. Social Capital:Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology [J]. Annual Reviews of Sociology,1998,24:1-24.
③ Ronald Breiger. Social Mobility and Social Structure [C].Cambridge University Press,1990:247-271.
④ 肖冬平,顾新.论社会资本对企业管理的负面影响及其应对措施[J].科技管理研究,2007,6：31-33.
⑤ 刘兴智.项目治理社会网络风险分析方法研究[D].济南：山东大学,2011.
① 丁荣贵,费振国.项目治理研究的迭代过程模型[J].东岳论从,2008,29(3)：67-74.
② Satty T L.Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback [M].Pittsburgh, PA:RWS Publication,1996.
① 邵强,林向义.基于ANP的国际石油工程项目风险评价研究[J].科技进步与决策,2010.27(11)：127-128.
① 许树柏.层次分析法原理[M].天津：天津大学出版社,1998.
① 丁荣贵.孙涛.政府投资产学研合作项目治理方式研究框架[J].中国软科学.2008,9：101-111.
① 郭九成.政府投资企业R&D项目治理研究[D].山东济南：山东大学.2008.
② ryke S, Pearson S. Project governance:case studies on financial incentives [J]. Building Research and Information,2006,34(6):534-545.
③ Scott J. Social network analysis [J].Sociology,1988,22(1):93-96.
④ Opsahl T, Panzarasa P. Clustering in weighted networks [J]. Social Networks,2009,31(2):155-163.
① 欧立雄,宋乐基.基于QFD的IT项目风险管理方法研究[J].科学技术与工程,2008(1)：287-290.
① 王莲芬.网络分析法(ANP)的理论与算法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2001.3：44-50.
① Saaty T L. Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback [M].Pittsburgh.PA:RWS Publication,1996.
② 由于前文中已经对治理属性风险进行了分类,因此本文主要以5类治理平台风险作为属性风险的要素。
① Burt, R.S. Structural holes:the social structure of competition [M].Havard University Press,1992.
① 丁荣贵,张宁,李媛媛.产学研合作项目双中心社会网络研究[J].科研管理,2012,33(12)：86-93.
② 张.大型工程项目利益相关方响应策略研究[D].济南：山东大学,2010.
① 张宁,丁荣贵,刘兴智.深圳市大学研究院项目治理平台建设与创新绩效关系研究[J].科技进步与对策,2013,30(22)：21-26.
① 丁荣贵,邹祖烨等.政府投资科技项目治理中的关键问题及对策[J].中国软科学,2012,1：90-99.
① 拉比尔S,巴塞.情境管理—全球新视角[M].北京：机械工业出版社,2000.
[1]. A. Aslan Sendogdu, Ahmet Diken. A Research on the Problems Encountered in the Collaboration between University and Industry Procedia [J]. Social and Behavioral Sciences,2013,99(3):966-975.
[2]. Aaltonen K, Jaakko K, Tuomas O. Stakeholder salience in global projects[J]. International Journal of Project Management,2008,26(5):509-516.
[3]. Abramo G, D'Angelo CA, Di Costa F. University-industry research collaboration. A model to assess university capability [J]. Higher Education 2011,62(2):163-81.
[4]. Ajmal M M, Koskinen K U. Knowledge transfer in project-based organizations:An organizational culture perspective [J]. Project Management Journal,2008,39(1): 7-15.
[5]. Alessandro Muscio, Davide Quaglioneb, Michele Scarpinato. The effects of universities' proximity to industrial districts on university-industry collaboration [J]. China Economic Review,2012,23(3):639-650.
[6]. Alice Lam. Knowledge Networks and Careers:Academic Scientists in Industry-University Links [J].Journal of management studies,2007,44(6):993-1016.
[7]. Ann, M., Lynne, P., Olivia, E. Knowledge Reuse for Innovation[J].Manag ement science,2004(2):174-188.
[8]. Antonella Certa, Mario Enea, Giacomo Galante, Concetta Manuela La Fata. Multi-objective human resources allocation in R&D projects planning [J]. Inte rnational Journal of Production Research,2009,47(1):3503-3523.
[9]. Atkinson,A. A.,Waterhouse,J. H.,Wells,R. B. A stakeholder approach to s trategic performance measurement [J]. Sloan Management Review,1997,38(3): 25-37.
[10]. Bakshy E, Rosenn I, Marlow C, et al. The role of social networks in inform ation diffusion[C] Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web. ACM,2012:519-528.
[11]. Becker W, Dietz J. R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms-evidence for the German manufacturing industry [J]. Research Policy,2004(33):209-230.
[12]. Belbin R M.Team roles at work [M].Oxford:Butterworth-Heinemann,2010.
[13]. Belbin R. M.Management Teams:Why They Succeed Or Fail [M]. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann,2010.
[14]. Besikci U, Bilge U, Ulusoy G. Resource dedication problem in a multi-project environment[J]. Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal,2013,25(2): 206-229.
[15]. Browning T R, Yassine A A. Resource-constrained multi-project scheduling: Priority rule performance revisited[J]. International Journal of Production Economics,2010,126(2):212-228.
[16]. Burke R. Project management:planning and control techniques [M]. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd,2013.
[17]. Burt, R.S. Models of Network Structure [J]. Annual Review of Sociology, 1980(6):79-141.
[18]. Cao Q, Hoffman J J. A case study approach for developing a project performance evaluation system [J]. International Journal of Project Management,2011,29(2): 155-164.
[19]. Carolin Plewa, Nisha Korff, Claire Johnson, etc. The evolution of university-industry linkages-A framework [J]. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management,2013,30(01):21-44.
[20]. Chinowsky P, Diekmann J, Galotti V. Social network model of construction [J].Journal of Construction Engineering and Management,2008,134(10):804-81 2.
[21]. Cho E, Myers S A, Leskovec J. Friendship and mobility:user movement in location-based social networks[C] Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD int ernational conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM,2011: 1082-1090.
[22]. Cockburn A. Surviving object-oriented projects:a manager's guide [M]. Addi son-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.,1998.
[23]. Coromina, L.I. Duo-centered networks [J]. Social Networks,2008(30):49-59.
[24]. RM Cyert, JG March. A behavioral theory of the firm [M]. Englewood Cliff s:NJ, PrenticHall,1963.
[25]. Davenport Th, Prusak L. Working knowledge:How Organizations Manage W hat They Know?[M]. Boston:Harvard Business School Press,2000.
[26]. Diana Nadine Boehm, Teresa Hogan. Science-to-Business collaborations:A science-to-business marketing perspective on scientific knowledge commercialization [J]. Industrial Marketing Management,2013,42(4):564-579.
[27]. Directing Change:A Guide to Governance of Project Management [EB/OL] www.apm.org.uk,2004.
[28]. Donald S Siegel, David A Waldmanb. Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms:improving the effectiveness of university-industry collaboration [J]. The Journal of High Technology Management Research,2003, 14(1):111-133.
[29]. E.Vesterveld. The Project Management Model:Linking success criteria and critical success factors [J]. International Journal of Project Management. 2003(21):411-418.
[30]. Ellison G, Yildiz M, Social Network in Industrial Organization[D]. Cambridg e, MA:Massachusetts Institute of Technology,2009.
[31]. Eric G. Too, Patrick Weaver. The management of project management:A co nceptual framework for project governance [J]. International Journal of Projec t Management(2013), doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.07.006.
[32]. Fiaz Muhammad, Naiding Yang. Exploring the barriers to R&D collaborations:a challenge for industry and faculty for sustainable U-I collaboration growth [J]. Science and Technology,2012,5(2):1-16.
[33]. Friedrich Steimann. On the representation of roles in object-oriented and conceptual modeling[J]. Data&Knowledge Engineering,2000(35):83-100.
[34], Fukuyama F. Trust:The Social Virtues and Creation of Prosperity [M].New York:Free Press,1995.
[35]. Funke, Michael. China's New Labor Contract Law:No Harm to Employment [J]. China Economic Review,2009(20):558-572.
[36]. G. Walker,B.Kogut & W. Shan. Social Capital, Structural Holes and the Formation of an Industry Network [J].Organization Science,1997(8):109-125.
[37]. Gervase R B. Power and the empowered organization:The design of power in highly adaptive organizations [J]. The Organization Development Practition er,1998(30):31-43.
[38]. Gonzalo Lizarralde, Stella Tomiyoshi, etc.Understanding differences in constru ction project governance between developed and developing countries [J]. Co nstruction Management and Economics,2013,31(7):711-730.
[39]. Grant, R. M. Prospering in dynamically competitive environments:Organizati onal capabilities as knowledge integration [J].Organization Science,1996,7 (4):375-387.
[40]. Hellriegel D, Jr. Slocum J W, Woodman R W. Organizational Behavior (Nint h Edition) (In Chinese). Shanghai:East China Normal University Press,200 1.
[41]. Hutchinson V, Quintas P. Do SMEs do knowledge management? Or simply manage what they know? [J].International Small Business Journal,2008,26 (2):131-154.
[42]. J. Rodney Turner. Towards a theory of project management:The nature of the project governance and project management [J]. European Management Journal, 2006,24(2):93-95.
[43]. J. Rodney Turner, Anne Keegan. Mechanisms of governance in the project-based organization:Roles of the broker and steward [J]. European Management Journal, 2001,19(3):254-267.
[44]. Jiancheng Guan, Qingjun Zhao. The impact of university-industry collaboration networks on innovation in nanobiopharmaceuticals [J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2013,80(7):1271-1286.
[45]. Johan Bruneel, Pablo D'Este, Ammon Salter. Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university-industry collaboration [J]. Research Policy,2010, 39(07):858-868.
[46]. Kazuyuki Motohashi. University-industry collaborations in Japan:The role of new technology-based firms in transforming the National Innovation System [J]. Research Policy,2005,34(05):583-594.
[47]. Kerzner H R. Project management:a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling [M]. New York:John Wiley&Sons Inc,2013.
[48]. Kolisch R. Serial and parallel resource-constrained project scheduling methods revisited:Theory and computation[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1996,90(2):320-333.
[49]. Kraimer M L. Organizational goals and values:A socialization model [J]. Human Resource Management Review,1998,7(4):425-447.
[50]. Kumar R, Novak J, Tomkins A. Structure and evolution of online social networks [M]. New York:Springer,2010.
[51]. Lawson B, Petersen K J, Cousins P D, et al. Knowledge sharing in inter--organizational product development teams:the effect of formal and informal socialization mechanisms [J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management,2009, 26(2):156-172.
[52]. Lee Wool gar. New institutional policies for university-industry links in Japan [J]. Research Policy,2007(36):1261-1274.
[53]. LIONEL NESTA, VINCENT MANGEMATIN. The dynamics of innovation networks [J]. Science Techonology Policy Research,2004(4):17-28.
[54]. M.S. Liew, T.N. Tengku Shahdan. Enablers in Enhancing the Relevancy of University-industry Collaboration [J]. Social and Behavioral Sciences,2013(93): 1889-1896.
[55]. Majchrzak A, Wagner C, Yates D. The impact of shaping on knowledge reuse for organizational improvement with Wikis [J]. MIS Quarterly,2013,37(2):455-482.
[56]. Margerison C, Mccann D, Davies R. Focus on team appraisal [J]. Team Performance Management,1995,1(4):13-18.
[57]. Marks S R, Macdermid S M. Multiple roles and the self:A theory of role balance[J]. Journal of Marriage and the Family,1996,58(2):417-432.
[58]. Markus M L. Toward a theory of knowledge reuse:Types of knowledge reuse situations and factors in reuse success [J]. Journal of management information systems,2001,18(1):57-94.
[59]. Martinus P. Abednego, Stephen O. Ogunlana. Good project governance for proper risk allocation in public-private partnerships in Indonesia [J]. International journal of project management,2006,24(7):622-634.
[60]. Masquefa B. Top management adoption of a locally driven performance measurement and evaluation system:A social network perspective [J].Management Accounting Research,2008,19(2):182-207.
[61]. Maurin. Fixed-term Contracts and the Dynamics of Labor Demand [J]. European Economic Review,2001(45):533-552.
[62]. Meyer, J.W.,& Rowan, B. Institutional organizations:formal structures as m yth and ceremony [J]. American Journal of Sociology,1977(80):340-363
[63]. Muhammad Fiaz. An empirical study of university-industry R&D collaboration in China:Implications for technology in society [J]. Technology in Society,2013, 35(3):191-202.
[64]. Myant M, Drahokoupil J. International integration, varieties of capitalism and resilience to crisis in transition economies [J]. Europe-Asia Studies,2012,64(1): 1-33.
[65]. N. Nohria. Information and Search in the Creation of New Business Ventures:The Case of the 128 Venture Group, in Networks and Organizations:Structure, Form, and Action (ed.N. Nohria and R. Eccles) [M].Boston, Massachusetts:Harvard Business School Press,1992.
[66]. Nuno Gil, Bruce S. Tether. Project risk management and design flexibility: Analysing a case and conditions of complementarity [J].Research policy,2012, 40(3):415-428.
[67]. Oliver, C. Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Project Review,1991,16(1):145-179.
[68]. Opsahl T, Panzarasa P. Clustering in weighted networks [J].Social Networks, 2009,31(2):155-163.
[69]. Opsahl T. Triadic closure in two-mode networks:Redefining the global and 1 ocal clustering coefficients [J]. Social Networks,2013,35(2):159-167.
[70]. Patrick Doreian, Frans Stokman.Evolution of social networks [M]. London:Ro utledge,2013.
[71]. Patterson J H. A comparison of exact approaches for solving the multiple co nstrained resources, project scheduling problem [J]. Management science,198 4,30(7):854-867.
[72]. Pek-Hooi Soh, Annapoornima M. Subramanian. When do firms benefit from university-industry R&D collaborations? The implications of firm R&D focus on scientific research and technological recombination [J]. Journal of Business Venture, 2013(21):22-26.
[73]. Ports, Alejandro. Social Capital:Its Origins and Applications in Modern Soci ology [J]. Annual Reviews of Sociology,1998(24):1-24.
[74]. Project Management Institute. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide)[M].Newtown Square:Global Standard,2009.
[75]. Pryke S, Pearson S. Project governance:case studies on financial incentives [J].Building Research & Information,2006,34(6):534-545.
[76]. Quintas P, Lefrere P, Jones G. Knowledge management:a strategic agenda[J]. Long range planning,1997,30(3):385-391.
[77]. R. Green. The essential role of governance in project development [J]. Proceedings of the ICE-Municipal Engineer,2009,162(3):179-185.
[78]. Ralf Muller, Project governance [M].Burlington:Gower Publishing,2009.
[79]. Ronald Breiger. Social Mobility and Social Structure[M].Kamblidge:Cambrid ge University Press,1990.
[80]. ROUSSEAU D M, FRIED Y. Location:Contextualizing Organizational Resea rch [J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior,2001,22(1):1-13.
[81]. Roth C,Cointet J P. Social and semantic evolution in knowledge networks [J]. Social Networks,2010,32(1):16-29.
[82]. Rowley, T.J. Moving beyond dyadic ties:a network theory of stakeholder inf luence [J]. Academy of Management Review,1997,22(4):887-910.
[83]. Saaty T L. Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback [M].Pittsburgh, PA:RWS Publication,1996.
[84]. Scott J. Social network analysis [J]. Sociology,1988,22(1):93-96.
[85]. Seijts,G. H,Latham,G. P. Learning versus performance goals:When should each be used [J].Academy of Management Executive,2005,19(1):124-131.
[86]. Shuja.A.K, Krebs.J. IBM Rational Unified Process Reference and Certification Guide:Solution Designer [M]. New York:IBM Press,2008
[87]. Steiger J H. Structure model evaluation and modification:An interval estimat ion approach [J]. Multivariate behavioral research,1990(25):173-180.
[88]. Storey J, Quintas P. Human resource management:A critical text [M]. Singa pore:Cengage Learning EMEA,2007.
[89]. Markus M L. Toward a theory of knowledge reuse:Types of knowledge reu se situations and factors in reuse success [J]. Journal of management informa tion systems,2001,18(1):57-94.
[90]. Susana. Indefinite Contract Duration:Evidence from Electronics Subcontracting [J]. International Review of Law and Economics,2010(30):145-159.
[91]. Szulanski, G.The process of knowledge transfer:A diachronic analysis of stic kiness[J].Organization Behavior Human Decision Processes,2000,82(1):9-27.
[92]. Takhteyev Y, Gruzd A, Wellman B. Geography of Twitter networks [J]. Soci al networks,2012,34(1):73-81.
[93]. Teece D. Profiting from technological innovation implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy[J]. Research Policy,1986(15):285-3 05.
[94]. Tohumcu Z, Karasakal E. R&D project performance evaluation with multiple and interdependent criteria [J].Engineering Management,2010,57(4):620-633.
[95]. Toni,A. D.,Tonchia,S. Performance measurement systems models, characteri sties and measures[J]. International Journal of Operations & Production Manage ment,2001,21(1):46-63.
[96]. Tore Opsahl, Filip Agneessens, John Skvoretz. Node centrality in weighted n etworks:Generalizing degree and shortest paths[J]. Social Networks,2010,32 (3):245-251.
[97]. Tuomas Ahola, Inkeri Ruuska,etc. What is project governance and what are i ts origins? [J]. International Journal of Project Management,2013,31(7):101 6-1023.
[98]. Van Marrewijk A.Managing project culture:The case of Environ Megaproject [J].International Journal of project management,2007,25(3):290-299.
[99]. Wasserman, S. and Faust, K. Social Network Analysis:Methods and Applications (Structural Analysis in the Social Science) [M], Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1994.
[100]. Wenjuan T, Lei Z. Study on the success criteria of large-scale public sector development projects based on whole life cycle[C] Management Science and Industrial Engineering (MSIE),2011 International Conference on. IEEE,2011: 135-139.
[101]. WIIG K. Knowledge Management Fundation [M]. US:Schema Press,1993.
[102]. Witold J. Henisza, Raymond E. Levittb,W. Richard Scottc. Toward a unified theory of project governance:economic, sociological and psychological supports for relational contracting [J]. Engineering Project Organization Journal, 2012(2):37-55.
[103]. Xu Y, Yeh C H. A performance-based approach to project assignment and performance evaluation [J].International Journal of Project Management,2014, 32(2):218-228.
[104]. Yaghootkar K, Gil N. The effects of schedule-driven project management in multi-project environments [J]. International Journal of Project Management,2012, 30(1):127-140.
[105]. Yang S, Fu L. Critical chain and evidence reasoning applied to multi-project resource schedule in automobile R&D process[J]. International Journal of Project Management,2014,32(1):166-177.
[106]. Yong S. Lee. Technology transfer'and the research university:a search for the boundaries of university-industry collaboration [J]. Research Policy,1996, 25(6):843-863.
[107]. Zuo J, Zillante G. Project culture within construction projects:a literature review[C] 13th International Group for Lean Construction Conference:Proceedings. International Group on Lean Construction,2005.
[108]. 鲍新中,王道平.产学研合作创新成本分摊和收益分配的博弈分析[J].研究与发展管理,2010(10)：75-81.
[109]. 陈贡.团队角色理论及其应用[J].人才资源开发,2006(11)：86-87.
[110]. 陈劲.协同创新[M].浙江：浙江大学出版社.2012.
[111]. 陈劲.协同创新与国家科研能力建设[J].科学学研究,2011,29(12)：2-3.
[112]. 陈劲,阳银娟.协同创新的理论基础与内涵[J].科学学研究,2012(2)：161-164.
[113]. 陈卫平.角色认知的概念与功能初探[J].社会科学研究,1994,1(32)：153-155.
[114]. 陈晓萍,徐淑英,樊景立.组织与管理研究的实证方法[M].北京：北京大学出版社,2008.
[115]. 程志.知识系统的知识重用方法[J].计算机技术与发展,2006(7)：121-122.
[116]. 崇丹,李永奎,乐云.城市基础设施建设项目群组织网络关系治理研究—种网络组织的视角[J].软科学,2012,26(2)：13-19.
[117]. 丁荣贵.项目管理：项目思维与管理关键(第二版)[M].北京：中国电力出版社,2013.
[118]. 丁荣贵,et al.基于社会网络分析的项目治理研究—以大型建设监理项目为例[J].中国软科学,2010(6)：132-140.
[119]. 丁荣贵,费振国.项目治理研究的迭代过程模型[J].东岳论丛,2008(3)：67-74.
[120]. 丁荣贵,高航,张宁.项目治理相关概念辨析[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013(2)：132-142.
[121]. 丁荣贵,刘兴智等.政府投资科技项目治理的审计方式研究[J].中国软科学,2009(5)：96-106.
[122]. 丁荣贵,孙涛.政府投资产学研合作项目治理方式及其框架[J].中国软科学,2008(9)：101-111.
[123]. 丁荣贵,张宁,李媛媛.产学研合作项目双中心社会网络研究[J].科研管理,2012,33(12)：86-93.
[124]. 丁荣贵,邹祖烨等.政府投资科技项目治理中的关键问题及对策[J].中国软科学,2012(1)：90-99.
[125]. 董静,苟燕楠,吴晓薇.我国产学研合作创新中的知识产权障碍—基于企业视角的实证研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2008,29(7)：20-25.
[126]. 杜鹃,et al.产学研合作模式中存在的共性问题及其对策[J].科技进步与对策,2005,22(2)：123-125.
[127]. 方炜,欧立雄.多项目环境下新产品研发项目资源分配问题研究[J].管理工程学报,2006,19(10)：6-10.
[128]. 方永美,孙凌浩.我国企业知识管理评估的AHP模糊综合评价[J].华南农业大学学报：社会科学版,2005,4(3)：77-81.
[129]. 冯峰,李徐伟,司尚奇.基于无标度网络的产学研合作网络功能及培育机制研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2009(9)：27-29.
[130]. 郭九成.政府投资企业R&D项目治理研究[D].山东济南：山东大学,2008.
[131]. 国际项目管理协会(美)著,许江林等译Project Management Institute. A G uide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (Fifth Edition) [M]北京：电子工业出版社,2013.
[132]. 国务院关于发挥科技支撑作用促进经济平稳较快发展的意见[S].国科发计(2009)379.
[133]. 何郁冰.产学研协同创新的理论模式[J].科学学研究,2012,30(2)：165-174.
[134]. 侯杰泰,温忠麟,成子娟.结构方程模型及其应用[M].北京：教育科学出版社,2004.
[135]. 胡锦涛在中国共产党第十七次全国代表大会上的报告,http://news.xinhuanet.com/,2007,10.24.
[136]. 黄立军.企业知识管理综合评价的数学模型在[J].运筹与管理,2001,10(4)：143-145.
[137]. 黄胜杰,张毅.我国产学研合作的组织模式及其网络特性探析[J].高等工程教育研究,2002(6)：30-33.
[138]. 季月卿,郑程.基于SEM的工程设计知识重用的影响因素分析[J].工程建设与设计,2012(9)：183-186.
[139]. 拉比尔S,巴塞.情境管理—全球新视角[M].北京：机械工业出版社,2000.
[140]. 蓝海林,宋铁波,曾萍.情境理论化：基于中国企业战略管理实践的探讨[J].管理学报,2012,9(1)：12-16.
[141]. 乐云,崇丹,曹冬平.基于社会网络分析方法的建设项目组织研究[J].建筑经济,2010(8)：34-38.
[142]. 李长玲.知识管理绩效的模糊评价[J].情报科学,2006,24(2)：185-188.
[143]. 李朝波.国外团队角色理论相关研究述评[J].经济研究导刊,2011(31)：117-118.
[144]. 李健.中国特色产学研合作体系的形成与发展[N].光明日报,2011,12.18.
[145]. 李永奎,乐云,何清华等.基于SNA的复杂项目组织权力量化及实证[J].系统工程理论与实践,2012,32(2)：312-318.
[146]. 李永奎,乐云,卢昱杰.基于SNA的大型工程项目组织总控机制及实证[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2011,39(11)：1715-1719.
[147]. 刘芳.社会资本对产学研合作知识转移绩效影响的实证研究[J].研究与发展管理,2012,24(1)：103-110.
[148]. 刘凤朝,马荣康,姜楠.基于“985高校”的产学研专利合作网络演化路径研究.中国软科学,2011(7)：178-192.
[149]. 刘军.整体网络分析讲义[M].上海：世纪出版社,2009.
[150]. 刘荣坤,刘兴智等.政府投资项目治理风险评级方法研究[J].软科学,2011,2(25)：29-35.
[151]. 刘兴智,王彦伟,魏巍.基于SNA的项目治理关系网络分析与相应策略研究[J].华东经济管理,2011,25(6)：124-125.
[152]. 刘兴智.项目治理社会网络风险分析方法研究[D].济南：山东大学,2011：25-35.
[153]. 罗家德.社会网络分析[M].北京：社会科学文献出版社,2005.
[154]. 马家喜,仲伟俊,梅姝娥.企业技术联盟与一类“产学研”合作技术创新模式选择研究[J].管理学报,2008,5(6)：824-831.
[155]. 欧立雄,宋乐基.基于QFD的IT项目风险管理方法研究[J].科学技术与工程,2008(1)：287-290.
[156]. 潘旭伟,祝锡永,李娜.在情境中实现知识管理[J].图书情报工作,2011,55(4)：95-99.
[157]. 庞科,陈京民.社会网络结构洞在网络参政领袖分析中的应用[J].武汉理工大学学报(信息与管理工程版),2011(1)：1-7.
[158]. 邱若娟,梁工谦.企业知识管理绩效评价模型研究[J].情报杂志,2006(7)：43-45.
[159.]. 申俊喜.创新产学研合作视角下我国战略性新兴产业发展对策研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2012,33(2)：37-43.
[160]. 盛永祥,田立新,马少辉.产学研协作中的研究人员报酬激励及风险研究[J].软科学,2012,26(1)：72-82.
[161]. 寿涌毅.资源约束下多项目调度的迭代算法[J].浙江大学学报：工学版,2004,38(8)：1095-1099.
[162]. 孙亚男.基于社会网络结构演化的产学研合作项目治理风险研究[D].济南：山东大学学位论文,2011：35-50.
[163]. 唐乐,段异兵.产学研合作的治理机制设计[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007(12)：45-48.
[164]. 唐婷,王志珍.我国科技成果真正实现产业化的不足5%[N].科技日报,2010,3.18.
[165]. 汪应洛.当代工程观与工程教育[J].中国工程科学,2008,10(3)：17-20.
[166]. 王爱民.治理风险视角的复杂项目的危机成因及网格化治理研究[J].软科学,2013,2(27)：41-44.
[167]. 王君,樊治平.组织知识管理绩效的一种综合评价问题[J].管理工程学报,2004,18(2)：44-48.
[168]. 王莲芬.网络分析法(ANP)的理论与算法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2001(3)：44-50.
[169]. 王文婷,李南.产学研网络组织的边界治理模型[J].价值工程,2009,28(1)：103-105.
[170]. 王秀红.组织知识管理绩效评价研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2006(3)：64-67.
[171]. 王秀丽,侯理想,常静.产学研合作中的人力资本投资风险因素研究[J].科技进步与对策,2010,27(6)：139-142.
[172]. 王彦伟,刘兴智,魏巍.项目治理的研究现状与评述[J].华东经济管理,2009(11)：138-144.
[173]. 王彦伟.项目利益相关方的治理关系研究[D].济南：山东大学学位论文,2010：150-200.
[174]. 王彦忠,周红波,杨学英.建筑监理咨询企业知识复用水平评价研究[J].建筑经济,2007(10)：84-86.
[175]. 吴晓杰.教育观察：谁动了科研经费的奶酪[N].光明日报,2011,9.7.
[176]. 席酉民,唐方成.组织的立体多核网络模型研究[J].西安交通大学学报,2002,36(4)：430-435.
[177]. 肖冬平,顾新.论社会资本对企业管理的负面影响及其应对措施[J].科技管理研究,2007(6)：31-33.
[178]. 肖玲诺,史建峰,孙玉忠,于涵.产学研知识创新联盟知识链运作的风险控制机制[J].中国科技论坛,2013(3)：115-120.
[179]. 肖玲诺,史建峰,孙玉忠.基于BP神经网络的产学研知识创新联盟风险评价研究[J].中国软科学,2011(11)：173-179.
[180]. 谢园园,梅姝娥,仲伟俊.产学研合作行为及模式选择影响因素的实证研究. 科学学与科学技术管理,2011,32(3)：35-43.
[181]. 徐静,et al.我国产学研合作动力机制研究.中国科技论坛,2012(7)：74-80.
[182]. 徐松伟.项目治理角色能力要素研究[D].济南：山东大学学位论文,2013：50-65.
[183]. 许树柏.层次分析法原理[M].天津：天津大学出版社,1998.
[184]. 杨得前,严广乐,李红.产学研合作中的机会主义行为及其治理[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2006(9)：38-41.
[185]. 杨利娟.产学研联盟风险预警指标体系及模糊综合评价方法[J].价值工程,2007(11)：130-133.
[186]. 杨宁.产品研发项目的动态资源配置研究[D].南京：南京航空航天大学,2007.
[187]. 姚小涛,席酉民.社会网络理论及其在企业研究中的应用[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2003,23(3)：22-27.
[188]. 原欣伟,王建仁,伊景冰.如何使绩效评价系统成为组织学习的推进器—基于112家企业的实证分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2009(2)：117-123.
[189]. 张豪,丁云龙.产学研合作中技术与资本的结合过程探析[J].软科学,2012,26(10)：5-9.
[190]. 张家琛.产学研技术联盟伙伴利益分配风险补偿研究[J].统计与决策,2013(6)：168-170.
[191]. 张建新,孙树栋.高校技术转移条件与方式的创新研究[J].西北工业大学学报(社会科学版),2010,30(3)：64-67.
[192]. 张少辉,葛新权.企业知识管理绩效的模糊评价模型与分析矩阵[J].管理学报,2009,6(7)：879-891.
[193]. 张宁,丁荣贵.基于项目治理统一框架的风险评价研究[J].科技进步与对策,2014,31(4)：84-88.
[194]. 张宁,丁荣贵,刘兴智.深圳市大学研究院项目治理平台建设与创新绩效关系研究[J].科技进步与对策,2013,30(22)：21-26.
[195]. 张志华,倪自银.产学研合作创新中人力资本产权制度分析[J].企业经济,2007(10)：23-25.
[196]. 张志学.组织心理学研究的情境化及多层次理论[J].心理学报,2010(1)：10-21.
[197]. 郑丽景,司有和.企业知识管理水平评价指标体系研究[J].经济体制改革,2003(5)：162-165.
[198]. 中华人民共和国国务院.国家中长期科技发展规划纲要(2006-2020),http://www.gov.cn,2006,2.9.
[199]. 中华人民共和国科学技术进步法[S].1997.
[200]. 周明建,宝贡敏.组织中的社会交换：由直接到间接[J].心理学报,2005,37(4)：535-541.
[201]. 周荣辅,赵晓冬.知识重用系统评价体系研究[J].科技管理研究,2009(1)：189-191.
[202]. 周媛,魏丹.基于产学研合作创新收益与风险的研究[J].科技管理研究,2012(5)：1-4.
[203]. 周祖军,王玉荣.多项目管理中资源配置问题解读,http://www.mypm.net,20 06,2.13.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |