佳木斯隆起与周缘盆地耦合关系研究
|
摘要
本文通过对佳木斯隆起周缘盆地的地层学、沉积学、构造地质学、物源特征等方面进行综合研究,提出佳木斯隆起区及周缘盆地早白垩世为一原型盆地,佳木斯隆起区尚未隆起。早白垩世东山组沉积以后,由于依泽奈崎板块以北北西向,高速率(23.5 cm /a)向欧亚板块俯冲,在近NS向的持续挤压作用下佳木斯隆起快速隆升,早白垩世的原型盆地遭到破坏,形成现今佳木斯周缘盆地的雏形,周缘盆地的南部边界一般表现为由南向北的逆冲断裂,太古代麻山群或元古代花岗片麻岩逆冲到早白垩世的地层之上,逆冲的最高层位为早白垩世东山组,而北部边界表现为正常接触。
此外,本文利用独居石Th-U-Pb化学法(CHIME)和黑云母、钾长石40Ar-39Ar法等测年方法对佳木斯隆起的隆升史进行了研究,表明泥盆纪到二叠纪,佳木斯隆起区没有或微弱隆升,处于晚古生代盆地演化阶段,二叠纪末期,华北板块与西伯利亚板块沿西拉木伦河-长春-延吉一带发生了最终的碰撞拼合作用,在南北向挤压应力场的作用下佳木斯隆起快速隆升;早三叠世末到侏罗纪,佳木斯隆起区总体上还是处于隆升剥蚀阶段,仅在北部有少量侏罗纪沉积。早白垩世,佳木斯隆起区及周缘盆地处于一种大陆边缘近海环境,为中生代盆地演化阶段;早白垩世末,佳木斯隆起快速隆升;晚白垩世猴石沟组沉积时期,佳木斯隆起为其周缘盆地提供物源。
Jiamusi-Uplift composed of Hunan-Uplift and Mishan-Uplift is a northern part of Jiamusi massif. The basins around Jiamusi-Uplift are Sanjiang basin, Boli basin, Jixi basin and Hulin basin. The sedimentary basins have been researched in the area of structural geology, sedimentary facies, magmatism and tectonics. But most of these studies were focused on the single basin, partial area, certain sedimentary series and some single issues. The research about tectonic evolution of the whole area is weak from the view of Basin-Range coupling. This paper discusses structural characteristics of the Jiamusi-Uplift and its coupling relationship with the surrounding basins by the studies of structural geology,stratigraphy, sedimentology, and provenance analysis. And the uplifting history of the Jiamusi-Uplift has been discussed by Monazite Th-U-Pb chemical dating technique (CHIME), 40Ar-39Ar dating of biotite and feldspar. Finally the uplifting kinetic background of the Jiamusi-Uplift has been discussed.
The Early Cretaceous strata developed in the basins around Jiamusi-Uplift are named as Jixi Group (including Didao Formation, Chengzihe Formation and Muleng Formation) and Longzhaogou Group (including Peide Formation, Qihulin Formation, Yunshan Formation and Zhushan Formation). The Late Cretaceous sequence mainly consists of Houshigou Formation and Hailang Formation. The studies of bio-stratigraphy, lithological stratigraphy and isotopic geochronology suggest that Jixi Group and Longzhaogou Group were developed at same time but in different sedimentary facies. Within the two groups, the Didao Formation is correlated with Peide Formation. The Chengzihe Formation is correlated with Qihulin and Yunshan Formation. And Muleng Formation is correspond with Zhushan Formation. The Houshigou Formation and Hailang Formation were developed in all basins, and can be correlated each other by fossils and age dating. All the evidences suggest that the basins around the Jiamusi-Uplift had the same tectonic setting in the Early Cretaceous period.
There occurred two mainly compression events revealed by the research of the Jia-Yi Fault and the Dun-Mi Fault along the western and eastern borders of the Jiamusi-Uplift. The two events happened in the late Early-Cretaceous and the late Late-Cretaceous respectively. A series of thrust faults with E-W strike were developed along the borders between Jiamusi-Uplift and the surrounding basins. Mashan Group (Ar) or Granite gneiss (Pt) were thrusted over the Early Cretaceous Dongshan Formation. The southern boundaries of the surrounding basins are thrust faults directing to the north, but the northern boundaries are normal without fault. On the measurements of the geological boundaries and the Mashan Group distribution on both sides of the Dun-Mi Fault, the 130-150 km left-lateral strike-slip offset of the Dun-Mi Fault has been estimated. The present distance between the Jixi Group in the Jixi basin and in the Hulin basin is 135 km, which is consistent with the offset of the Dun-Mi Fault. The reconstruction of the Jixi and Hulin basins suggests that the southern part of the Hulin basin and Jixi basin originally was a large connected basin in the Early Cretaceous, which were displaced by Dun-Mi Fault in the late Early-Cretaceous.
Based on field investigation and the studies, the sandstone provenance, grave provenance, Palaeocurrent, and lithofacies palaeogeography have been studied, which suggest that the Jiamusi-Uplift area and the surrounding basins originally was a large proto-basin as a whole in Early Cretaceous and the Jiamusi-Uplift was not a uplift. The provenance was mainly in the XiaoHingan Mountain-Zhangguangcai Mountain. The Jiamusi-Uplift began to be uplifted in late Early-Cretaceous and raised to a certain height in the early Late-Cretaceous, finally provided sediments for its surrounding basins in the Late Cretaceous. Meanwhile, the Early Cretaceous proto-basin was destroyed and separated into several isolated basins.
Based on the cooling and uplifting rates of the Jiamusi-Uplift calculated by the age dating of Monazite Th-U-Pb chemical method (CHIME) and Biotite and Feldspar 40Ar-39Ar method, and the other new geological data, it is deduced that the Jiamusi-Uplift was very slowly / not uplifted from Devonian to Permian. But Jiamusi-Uplift was quickly uplifted during 260 Ma-240 Ma with a cooling rate of 8-9℃/ Ma and uplifting rate of 330-370m/Ma.
Based on the synthetic studies, it is concluded that the Jiamusi-Uplift area was in the evolutional stage of the late Paleozoic basin, and developed Late Paleozoic sequences. Because of the collision between North China Plate and Siberia Plate along the Xar Moron River-Changchun-Yanji suture zone at the end of Permian, the Jiamusi-Uplift area was rapidly uplifted. From the Triassic to Jurassic, Jiamusi-Uplift area was also uplifted, but there are a little Jurassic sedimentary in the north of Jiamusi-Uplift area . In the Early Cretaceous Jiamusi-Uplift area and the surrounding basins were in the Mesozoic basin developing stage in a continental margin tectonic setting close to the sea. After the Early Cretaceous Dongshan Formation period the Jiamusi-Uplift was rapidly uplifted by the N-S compression caused by the high-speed (23.5 cm/a) oblique subduction of the Izanagi Plate to the NNW. The proto-basin in the Early Cretaceous was destroyed and separated into several small basins around the Jiamusi-Uplift. In Late Cretaceous Houshigou Formation period the Jiamusi-Uplift was becoming the provenance of the peripheral basins.
此外,本文利用独居石Th-U-Pb化学法(CHIME)和黑云母、钾长石40Ar-39Ar法等测年方法对佳木斯隆起的隆升史进行了研究,表明泥盆纪到二叠纪,佳木斯隆起区没有或微弱隆升,处于晚古生代盆地演化阶段,二叠纪末期,华北板块与西伯利亚板块沿西拉木伦河-长春-延吉一带发生了最终的碰撞拼合作用,在南北向挤压应力场的作用下佳木斯隆起快速隆升;早三叠世末到侏罗纪,佳木斯隆起区总体上还是处于隆升剥蚀阶段,仅在北部有少量侏罗纪沉积。早白垩世,佳木斯隆起区及周缘盆地处于一种大陆边缘近海环境,为中生代盆地演化阶段;早白垩世末,佳木斯隆起快速隆升;晚白垩世猴石沟组沉积时期,佳木斯隆起为其周缘盆地提供物源。
Jiamusi-Uplift composed of Hunan-Uplift and Mishan-Uplift is a northern part of Jiamusi massif. The basins around Jiamusi-Uplift are Sanjiang basin, Boli basin, Jixi basin and Hulin basin. The sedimentary basins have been researched in the area of structural geology, sedimentary facies, magmatism and tectonics. But most of these studies were focused on the single basin, partial area, certain sedimentary series and some single issues. The research about tectonic evolution of the whole area is weak from the view of Basin-Range coupling. This paper discusses structural characteristics of the Jiamusi-Uplift and its coupling relationship with the surrounding basins by the studies of structural geology,stratigraphy, sedimentology, and provenance analysis. And the uplifting history of the Jiamusi-Uplift has been discussed by Monazite Th-U-Pb chemical dating technique (CHIME), 40Ar-39Ar dating of biotite and feldspar. Finally the uplifting kinetic background of the Jiamusi-Uplift has been discussed.
The Early Cretaceous strata developed in the basins around Jiamusi-Uplift are named as Jixi Group (including Didao Formation, Chengzihe Formation and Muleng Formation) and Longzhaogou Group (including Peide Formation, Qihulin Formation, Yunshan Formation and Zhushan Formation). The Late Cretaceous sequence mainly consists of Houshigou Formation and Hailang Formation. The studies of bio-stratigraphy, lithological stratigraphy and isotopic geochronology suggest that Jixi Group and Longzhaogou Group were developed at same time but in different sedimentary facies. Within the two groups, the Didao Formation is correlated with Peide Formation. The Chengzihe Formation is correlated with Qihulin and Yunshan Formation. And Muleng Formation is correspond with Zhushan Formation. The Houshigou Formation and Hailang Formation were developed in all basins, and can be correlated each other by fossils and age dating. All the evidences suggest that the basins around the Jiamusi-Uplift had the same tectonic setting in the Early Cretaceous period.
There occurred two mainly compression events revealed by the research of the Jia-Yi Fault and the Dun-Mi Fault along the western and eastern borders of the Jiamusi-Uplift. The two events happened in the late Early-Cretaceous and the late Late-Cretaceous respectively. A series of thrust faults with E-W strike were developed along the borders between Jiamusi-Uplift and the surrounding basins. Mashan Group (Ar) or Granite gneiss (Pt) were thrusted over the Early Cretaceous Dongshan Formation. The southern boundaries of the surrounding basins are thrust faults directing to the north, but the northern boundaries are normal without fault. On the measurements of the geological boundaries and the Mashan Group distribution on both sides of the Dun-Mi Fault, the 130-150 km left-lateral strike-slip offset of the Dun-Mi Fault has been estimated. The present distance between the Jixi Group in the Jixi basin and in the Hulin basin is 135 km, which is consistent with the offset of the Dun-Mi Fault. The reconstruction of the Jixi and Hulin basins suggests that the southern part of the Hulin basin and Jixi basin originally was a large connected basin in the Early Cretaceous, which were displaced by Dun-Mi Fault in the late Early-Cretaceous.
Based on field investigation and the studies, the sandstone provenance, grave provenance, Palaeocurrent, and lithofacies palaeogeography have been studied, which suggest that the Jiamusi-Uplift area and the surrounding basins originally was a large proto-basin as a whole in Early Cretaceous and the Jiamusi-Uplift was not a uplift. The provenance was mainly in the XiaoHingan Mountain-Zhangguangcai Mountain. The Jiamusi-Uplift began to be uplifted in late Early-Cretaceous and raised to a certain height in the early Late-Cretaceous, finally provided sediments for its surrounding basins in the Late Cretaceous. Meanwhile, the Early Cretaceous proto-basin was destroyed and separated into several isolated basins.
Based on the cooling and uplifting rates of the Jiamusi-Uplift calculated by the age dating of Monazite Th-U-Pb chemical method (CHIME) and Biotite and Feldspar 40Ar-39Ar method, and the other new geological data, it is deduced that the Jiamusi-Uplift was very slowly / not uplifted from Devonian to Permian. But Jiamusi-Uplift was quickly uplifted during 260 Ma-240 Ma with a cooling rate of 8-9℃/ Ma and uplifting rate of 330-370m/Ma.
Based on the synthetic studies, it is concluded that the Jiamusi-Uplift area was in the evolutional stage of the late Paleozoic basin, and developed Late Paleozoic sequences. Because of the collision between North China Plate and Siberia Plate along the Xar Moron River-Changchun-Yanji suture zone at the end of Permian, the Jiamusi-Uplift area was rapidly uplifted. From the Triassic to Jurassic, Jiamusi-Uplift area was also uplifted, but there are a little Jurassic sedimentary in the north of Jiamusi-Uplift area . In the Early Cretaceous Jiamusi-Uplift area and the surrounding basins were in the Mesozoic basin developing stage in a continental margin tectonic setting close to the sea. After the Early Cretaceous Dongshan Formation period the Jiamusi-Uplift was rapidly uplifted by the N-S compression caused by the high-speed (23.5 cm/a) oblique subduction of the Izanagi Plate to the NNW. The proto-basin in the Early Cretaceous was destroyed and separated into several small basins around the Jiamusi-Uplift. In Late Cretaceous Houshigou Formation period the Jiamusi-Uplift was becoming the provenance of the peripheral basins.
引文
1. Cocherie A.,Be Mezeme E.,Legendre O.,et al. Electron-microprobe dating as a tool for determing the closure of Th-U-Pb system in migmatitie monazites[J].American Mineralogist,2005,90:607-618.
2. Dorsett-Bain H L,Wilde S A,Liu J L. A Pan-African granulite facies event in northeastern China: SHRIMP U-Pb zircon dating of the Mashan group at Liumao, Heilongjiang Province. 30th International Geological Conference[C]. Beijing,1996.
3. Dickinson W R,Suczek C A. Plate tectonics and sandstone compositions[J].AAPG Bull 1979:63(12): 2164-2182.
4. Dickinson W R, Beard L S, Brakenridge G R, et al. Provenance of North American Phanerozoic sandstones in relation to tectonic setting[J].Bull Geo-Soc America, 1983,94: 222-235.
5. Dickinson W R. Interpreting provenance relations from detrital modes of sandstones[J]. In: Zuffa G G, editor. Provenance of Arenites.Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company,1985:331-361.
6. Davis D,Suppe J,Dahlen F A. Mechanics of folds and thrust belts and accretionary wedges[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research,1983,88(B2):1153-1172.
7. Dallmeyer R D. 40Ar/39Ar ages of biotite and hornblende from a progressively remetamor- phosed basement terrane:their bearing on interpretation of release spectra[J]. Geochimicaet Cosmochimica Acta,1975,39(12):1655-1669.
8. Dodson M H. Closure temperature in cooling geochronological and petrological systens[J].Contrib Mineral Petrol,1973,40:250-274.
9. Dodson M H. McClelland-Brown E. Isotopic and palaeomagnetic evidence for rates of cooling uplift and crosion[C].In:The Chronology of Geological Record (ed. N.J. Snelling). Geol. Soc. Mem. (London),1985,10:315-325.
10.Futakami M,Matsukawa M,Chen Piji,et al. Barremian ammonite from the Longzhaogou Group in eastern Heilongjiang, northeast China[J].The Journal of the Geological Societh of Japan, 1995,101(1):79-85.
11.Gu Zhiwei. Evolutionary trends in non-marine Cretaceous bivalves of northeast China[A]. JOHNSTON P A,HAGGART J W. Bivalves:An Eon of Evotion-Paleobiological Studies Honoring Norman D.Newell[M].Calgary:University of Calgary Press,1999:367-276.
12.Harrison T M,Armstrong B L,Naeser C W. Geochronology and thermal history of the coast plutonic complex near Prince Rupert,British Columbia[J].Earth Sci.,1979,16:400-410.
13.Harrison T M, Ducan I, M cdougall I. Diffusion of Ar in biotite-Temperature, pressure and compositional effects[J].Geochim Cosmochim Acta,1985,49:2461-2468.
14.Harker B R, Wang Q. 40Ar/39Ar geochronology of ultrahigh-pressure metamorphism in Central China[J].Tectonics,1995,14(4):994-1006.
15.Kojima S.Mesozoic terrane accretion in northeast China, Sikhote Alin and Japan regions[J]. Paleogeog Paleoclim Paleoecol, 1989,69:213-232.
16.Kellys R A, Wang Yigang, Zheng lin. Arevised Cretaceous age for ammonites originallyindentified as Middle Jurassic,from eastern Heilongjiang,China[J].Acta Palaeontologica Sinaca,1994,33(4):509-517.
17. Liu Shaofeng, Liu Benpei. Comparative study on the juxtaposition events of Jurassic terranes in the Northern circum-Pack belt in Lithospheric Plate Tectonics and Dynamics[M]. Geological Publishing House,1995.
18. Maruyama S,Seno T. Orogeny and relative platemotions:Example of the Japanese Islands[J]. Tectonophysics,1986,127(3-4):305-329.
19. McDougall I,Harrison T M.Geochronology and Thermochronology by the 40Ar/39Ar method[M]. New York:Oxford University Press,1998.
20. Natalin, B. A. History and modes of Mesozoic accretion in southeastern Russia[J]. Island Arc,1993,2: 15-34.
21. Sha Jingeng,Fursich F T. Bivalve faunas of eastern Heilongjiang,northeastern China[J]. Beringeria, 1993,12:3-93.
22. Sun Ge, David L. Dilcher, Early angiosperms from the Lower Cretaceous of Jixi, eastern Heilongjiang, China[J].Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, 2002,121:91-112.
23. Sun Ge, Guo Shuangxing,Zheng Shaolin, et al. First Discovery of the Earliest Angiospermous Megafossils in the World[J].Science in China Ser. B, 1993,36(2):249-256.
24. Suzuki K, Adachi M. Precambrian provenance and silurivan metamorphism of the Tsubonosaxa paragneissin the South Kitakani Terrene,northeast Japan [J].J Geochem,1991a,25:357-376.
25. Suzuki K, Adachi M. The Chemical Th-U-Total Pb Isochron Ages of Zircon and Monazite from the Gray Granite of the Hida Terrene , Japan [J].J Earth Sci Nagoya Univ,1991b,38:11-37.
26. Suzuki K, Adachi M, Kajizuka I. Electron Microprobe Observations of Diffusion in Metamorphosed Detrital Monazites[J]. Earth Planet Sci Lett,1994,128:391-405.
27. Wu Fuyuan, Jahn Borming, Wilde Simon, et al.Phanerozoic crustal growth:U-Pb and Sr-Nd isotopic evidence from the granites in northeatern China[J]. Tectonophysics,2000,328:89- 113.
28. Wu F Y,Sun D Y, Li H M, Jahn B M, et al. A-type granites in northeastern China: Age and geochemical constraints on their petrogenesis[J].Chemical Geology,2002,187:143-173.
29. Wilde S A , Zhang X Z , Wu F Y. Extension of a newly identified 500 Ma etamorphic terrain in northeast China:further U-Pb SHRIMP dating of the Mashan omplex,Heilongjiang Province, China[J].Tectonophysics,2000,328:115-130.
30. Wilde S A, Wu Fuyuan, Zhang Xingzhou. Late Pan-African magmatism in northeastern China: SHRIMP U-Pb zircon evidence from granitoids in the Jiamusi massif[J].Precambrian Research, 2003, 122: 311-327.
31. Williams M,Jercinovic M,Terry M. Age Mapping and Dating of Monazite on the Electron Microprobe:Decon-voluting Multistage Tectonic Histories[J].Geology,1999,27:1023-1026.
32. Yue Qiao, Zhang Weishi, Shu Wendong. Cenozoic deformation history of the Tancheng- Lujiang Fault Zone,north China,and dynamic implications[J]. The Island Arc,2003,12:281-293.
33.白瑾,黄学光,王惠初,等.中国前寒武纪地壳演化(第二版)[M].北京:地质出版社,1996:18-76.
34.曹成润,刘正宏,王东坡.黑龙江省东部虎林盆地断块构造特征及其运动学规律[J].长春科技大学学报,2001,31(4):340-344.
35.曹成润,郑庆道.黑龙江东部残留盆地群构造演化特征及其油气勘探意义[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2003,33(2):167-172.
36.曹熹,党增欣,张兴洲等.佳木斯复合地体[M].吉林:吉林科学技术出版社,1992:1-15.陈守田,唐建人.汤原断陷下第三系层序地层学探讨[J].长春科技大学学报,2000,30(4):362-365.
37.陈丕基.中国陆相侏罗、白垩系划分对比述评[J].地层学杂志,2000,24(2):116-119.程裕淇.中国区域地质概论[M].北京:地质出版社,1994:9-71.
38.迟效国,葛文春,许文良,等.东北地区火山岩与油气关系研究[R].长春:吉林大学,2007.
39.大庆油田勘探开发研究院.黑龙江省东部煤油气资源远景评价研究[R].大庆:大庆油田勘探开发研究院,1990.
40.董申宝.中国蓝片岩带的一般特征及分布[J].地质学报,1989,(3):273-284.
41.窦立荣,宋建国,王瑜.郯庐断裂带北段形成的年代学证据及其意义[J].地质论评,1996,42(6):508-512.
42.何承全,黄冠军.黑龙江绥滨地区中侏罗世晚期绥滨组沟鞭藻类的发现[J].微体古生物学报,1997:14(1):21-40.
43.何承全,万传彪,杨明杰.黑龙江省东部虎林盆地欧特里夫-巴列姆期沟鞭藻类[J].古生物学报,1999,38(2):183-202.
44.何承全,孙学坤.黑龙江省东部鸡西盆地城子河组下部早白垩世欧特里夫晚期海相沟鞭藻类[J].古生物学报,2000, 39(1):46-62.
45.何承全,祝幼华.黑龙江省东北部绥滨地区东荣组最上部的沟鞭藻组合-兼论该地区侏罗-白垩系界线[J].古生物学报,2003,42(3):328-345.
46.黄汲清,姜春发.从多旋回构造运动观点初步探讨地壳发展规律[J].地质学报,1962,42 (2):105-152.
47.黄汲清,任纪舜,姜春发,等.中国大地构造及其演化[M].北京:科学出版社,1980:1-124.
48.黑龙江省地质矿产局.黑龙江省区域地质志[M].北京:地质出版社,1993:8-43.
49.何玉平.黑龙江省东部早白垩世沉积特征与原型盆地恢复[D].吉林大学,2006.
50.何丽娟,胡圣标,杨文采,等.中国大陆科学钻探主孔动态地温测量[J].地球物理学报,2006,49(3):745-752
51.姜宝玉,冯金宝.鸡西群城子河组时代的进一步探讨[J].地层学杂志,2001,25(3):217-221.
52.荆惠林.东北晚中生代聚煤盆地与成矿规律[J].中国煤田地质,1995,7(1):1-5.
53.吉林省地质矿产局.吉林省区域地质志[M].地质出版社,1988:213-270.
54.贾东,何永明,施央申,等.山东地体构造及其拼贴运动学研究[M].南京:南京大学出版社,1993:45-60.
55.李春昱.中国板块构造的轮廓[J].中国地质科学院院报, 1980:2(1):11-22.
56.李春昱,王荃,刘雪亚,等.亚洲大地构造及其演化[J].中国地质科学院院报,1984,(10):3-11
57.李锦轶.中国东北及邻区若干地质构造问题的新认识[J].地质论评,1998, 44(4):339-347.
58.李锦铁,牛宝贵,宋彪,等.长白山北段地壳的形成与演化[M].北京:地质出版社,1999.
59.李锦轶,和政军,莫申国,等.大兴安岭北部绣峰组下部砾岩的形成时代及其大地构造竞义[J].地质通报,2004,23(21):120-129.
60.李廷栋.对青藏高原地质构造主要特点的再认识[A].见:佚名.青藏高原岩石圈结构构造和形成演化[C].北京:地质出版社,1996:160-163.
61.刘招君,孙晓猛,和钟华,等.,刘永江.中、新生代盆地群成因类型及成盆规律[R].长春:吉林大学,2006.
62.李德威.大陆动力学的哲学探索[J].大自然探索,1997,l6(2):107-110.
63.李忠权,罗启后,吴征,等.大庆探区外围盆地含油气性评价与优选[R].成都:成都理工大学,2003.
64.李俊建,沈保丰,李双保,等.辽北—吉南前寒武纪大陆壳的地质特征和演化[J].中国区域地质,1998,17(1):30-39.
65.李思田.联合古陆演化周期中超大型含煤及含油气盆地的形成[J].地学前缘,1997,4(3-4):299-304.
66.李俊建,沈保丰,李双保,等.辽北-吉南前寒武纪大陆壳的地质特征和演化[J].中国区域地质,1998,17(1):30-39.
67.刘少峰,张国伟.盆山关系研究的基本思路、内容和方法[J].地学前缘,2005,12 (3):101-111.
68.刘和甫,梁慧社,李晓清,等.中国东部中新生代裂陷盆地与伸展山岭耦合机制[J].地学前缘,2000,7(4):477-486.
69.刘和甫.盆地-山岭耦合体系与地球动力学机制[J].地球科学,2001,26(6):581-596.
70.刘树文,舒桂明,潘元明,等.电子探针独居石定年法及五台群的变质时代[J].高校地质学报,2004,10(3):356-363.
71.刘国兴.区域地球物理场与中新生带盆地结构特征[R].长春:吉林大学,2006.
72.罗群,白新华.汤原断陷断裂构造特征及其对油气成藏的控制作用[J].长春科技大学学报,1999,29(3):247-251.
73.毛德宝,沈保丰,李俊建,等.辽北清原地区太古宙地质演化及其对成矿的控制作用[J].前寒武纪研究进展,1997,20(3):1-10.
74.彭玉鲸,纪春华,辛玉莲.中俄朝毗邻地区古吉黑造山带岩石及年代纪录[J].地质与资源,2002:11 (2):65 -75.
75.潘华璋,朱祥根.黑龙江省东部早白垩世的一些海相和半咸水相腹足类[J].古生物学报,2004,43(3):338-348.
76.蒲荣干,吴洪章.黑龙江东部中生代地层的孢子花粉.中国地质科学院南京古生物研究所丛刊,1980,(1):383-443.
77.任纪舜,姜春发,张正坤,等.中国大地构造及其演化[M].科学出版社,1980.
78.任纪舜,王作勋,陈廷愚,等.从全球看中国大地构造-中国及邻区大地构造图简要说明[M].北京:地质出版社,1999:1-50.
79.任凤和,杨晓平,李仰春,等.黑龙江省东部鸡西群地层时代划分及地质意义[J].中国地质,2005:32(1):48-54.
80.邵济安,唐克东,王成源,等.那丹哈达地体的构造特征及演化[J].中国科学,1991,21(7):744-751.
81.邵济安,王成源,唐克东.乌苏里地区构造新探索[J].地质论评,1992,38(1):33-38.
82.邵济安,唐克东.中国东北地体与东北亚大陆边缘演化[M].北京:地质出版社,1995.
83.沙金庚.黑龙江省东部Aucellina(双壳类)的发现[J].地层学杂志,1990,14(3):226-230.
84.沙金庚.对黑龙江东部龙爪沟群和鸡西群时代的不同认识[J].地质学报,1991,(4):376-383.
85.沙金庚.黑龙江东部的Buchia和Aucellina层[J].地层学杂志,1992,16(1):41-48.
86.沙金庚.一个值得注意的修订-评“中国黑龙江省东部早白垩世双壳类”[J].古生物学报, 1999,38(3):403-406.
87.沙金庚.黑龙江东部早白垩世生物地层学研究的主要进展[J].地学前缘,2000,9(39):
95-101.
88.沙金庚.黑龙江东部早白垩世生物地层学研究的主要进展[J].地学前缘,2002,9(39):95-101.
89.孙德有,吴福元,林强,等.张广才岭燕山早期白石山岩体成因与壳幔相互作用[J].岩石学报,2001,17(2):227-235.
90.孙德有,吴福元,张艳斌,等.西拉木伦河-长春-延吉板块缝合带的最后闭合时间-来自吉林大玉山花岗岩体的证据[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2004,34(2):174-181.
91.孙德有,吴福元,高山,等.吉林中部晚三叠世和早侏罗世两期铝质A型花岗岩的厘定及对吉黑东部构造格局的制约[J].地学前缘,2005,12(2):263-275.
92.水谷伸治朗,邵济安,张庆龙.那丹哈达地体与东亚大陆边缘中生代构造关系[J].地质学报, 1989,63(3):204-216.
93.宋彪,李锦轶,牛宝贵,等,黑龙江省东部麻山群黑云斜长片麻岩中锆石的年龄及其地质意义[J].地球学报,1997,18(3):306-312
94.孙革,郭双兴,郑少林,等.世界最早的被子植物化石群的首次发现[J].中国科学B辑,1992,(5): 543-548.
95.孙革,曹正尧.白垩纪植物群-中国地质时期的植物群[M].广州:广东科技出版社,1995:310-341.
96.孙革,郑少林,姜剑红,等.黑龙江鸡西含煤盆地早白垩世生物地层研究新进展田[J].煤田地质与勘探,1999,27(6):1-3.
97.孙革,郑少林.中国东北中生代地层划分对比之新见[J].地层学杂志,2000,24(1):6-64.
98.尚玉珂.黑龙江省鸡西城子河组被子植物化石层的孢粉研究[J].微体古生物学报,1997,14(2):162-174
99.单秀兰,陈春雷.依-舒地堑汤原断陷自然伽马能谱与岩性及矿物成分的关系[J].大庆石油学院学报,1997,21(3):76-79.
100.沈保丰,毛德宝,李俊建.中国绿岩带金矿床的时空分布[J].华北地质矿产杂志,1996,11(3):368-374.
101.沈保丰,李俊建,毛德宝.华北地台绿岩带地质特征类型和演化[J].前寒武纪研究进展,1997,20(1):2-11.
102.孙晓猛,龙胜祥,张梅生,等.佳木斯-伊通断裂带大型逆冲构造带的发现及形成时代[J].石油与天然气地质,2006,27(5):637-643.
103.孙晓猛,刘永江.黑龙江东部构造学与年代[R].长春:吉林大学,2007.
104.田东江,周建波,郑常青,等.完达山造山带蛇绿岩混杂岩中变质基性岩的地球化学特征及其地质意义[J].世界地质,2006,26(3):64-70.
105.童亨茂,纪洪勇,宋立忠,等.伊通地堑构造样式及其油气分布规律[J].西安石油学院学报(自然科学版),2002,17(5):9-14.
106.唐克东,王莹,何国琦,等.中国东北及邻区大陆边缘构造[J].地质学报, 1995, 69 (1):16-30.
107.唐振海,张亚金,赵玉珍.三江盆地绥滨坳陷石油地质特征[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2005,24(3):31-34.
108.王成文,金巍,张兴洲,等.东北及邻区晚古生代大地构造属性新认识[J].地层学杂志,2008,32(2):119-136.
109.王成文,刘立,孙耀武,等.东北地区晚古生代海相地层分布、沉积环境恢复与烃源岩研究[R].长春:吉林大学,2007.
110.王成文,李宁.古生代地层古生物与区域构造演化[R].长春:吉林大学,2006.
111.王东坡,薛林福,刘立,等.中国东北中生代盆地形成的地球动力学机制[J].长春地质学院学报(增刊),1997,27:1-7.
112.王桂梁,邵震杰,彭向峰,等.中国东部中新生代含煤盆地的构造反转[J].煤炭学报,1997,22(6):561-565.
113.王小凤,李中坚,陈柏林.郯庐断裂带[M].北京:地质出版社,2000.
114.王桂梁,刘桂建,邹海.华北地台北缘中生代盆-山的耦合转移及其动力学分析[J].煤田地质与勘探,1999,27(6):14-17.
115.王杰,和钟铧,刘招君,等.鸡西盆地白垩纪碎屑岩地球化学特征及其对物源的制约[J].世界地质,2006,25(4):341-348.
116.吴福元,张兴洲,张世红.现代大地构造学进展概论[J].世界地质,1994,13(1):1-11.
117.吴福元,Wilde S A,孙德有.佳木斯地块片麻状花岗岩的锆石离子探针U-Pb年龄[J].岩石学报,2001,17(3):443-452.
118.吴福元,杨进辉,柳小明.辽东半岛中生代花岗质岩浆作用的年代学格架[J].高校地质学报,2005,11(3):305-317.
119.万传彪,闫凤兰,尹楠.黑龙江集贤地区早白垩世沟鞭藻类和其他藻类[J].微体古生物学报,1995,12(1):51-52.
120.万传彪,乔秀云,杨建国,等.黑龙江省鸡西盆地早白垩世孢粉组合.中国含煤气盆地孢粉学论文集[C].北京:石油工业出版社,2000:81-89.
121.万天丰,朱鸿.郯庐断裂带的最大左旋走滑断距及其形成时期[J].高校地质学报,1996,2(1):14-27.
122. Wildes S A,吴福元,张兴洲.中国东北麻山杂岩晚泛非期变质的锆石SHRIMP年龄证据及全球大陆再造意义[J].地球化学,2001,30(1):35-50.
123.许效松,徐强.盆山转换和当代盆地分析中的新问题[J].岩相古地理,1996,16(2):24-33.
124.许浚远.依舒地堑新生代构造演化[J].地球科学,1997,22(4):406-410.
125.许效松.盆山转换与造盆、造山过程分析[J].岩相古地理,1998,18(6):1-10.
126.谢鸣谦.拼贴板块构造及其驱动机理-中国东部及相邻区的大地构造演化[J].北京:科学出版社,2000.
127.许志琴.郯庐断裂系概述.构造地质丛论(3)[M].北京:地质出版社,1984:39-46.
128.徐嘉炜.郯城-庐江平移断裂系统.构造地质论丛(3)[M].北京:地质出版社,1984:18-32.
129.徐嘉炜,马国峰.郯庐断裂带研究的十年回顾[J].地质论评,1992,38(4):316-324.
130.杨小菊.黑龙江鸡西早白垩世穆棱组真蕨类植物新种[J].古生物学报,2002,41(2):259-265.
131.杨小菊,何承全,黎文本,等.鸡西盆地早白垄世穆棱组海相沟鞭藻的发现及其古环境意义[J].科学通报,2003,48(14):1553-1556
132.杨丙中,王东坡,李西建.松辽盆地东部地区逆冲推覆构造与油气勘探趋势[J].长春地质学院学报, 1989,19(4):361-369
133.杨建国,刘俊来,吴河勇,等.黑龙江东部汤原断陷构造特征及其演化[J].大庆石油学院学报,2007,31(1):19-30.
134.杨金中,邱海峻,孙加鹏,等.跃进山岩系及其构造意义[J].长春科技大学学报,1998,28(4):380-385.
135.杨晓平,李仰春,柳震,等.黑龙江东部鸡西盆地构造层序划分与盆地动力学演化[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2005,35(5):616-621.
136.余和中,李玉文,韩守华,等.松辽盆地古生代构造演化[J].大地构造与成矿学, 2001,25 (4):389-396
137.姚大全.密-抚断裂带西南段中生代早中期变位与变形的研究[M].辽宁地质学报,1988,(1):8-12.
138.张贻侠,孙运生,张兴洲,等.中国满洲里—绥芬河地学断面1∶1000000说明书[M].北京:地质出版社,1998:1-53.
139.张兴洲.黑龙江岩系-古佳木斯地块加里东缝合带的证据[J].长春地质学院学报,1992,22(增刊):94-101.
140.张兴洲,金巍,张梅生,等.大庆探区外围中、新生代断陷盆地群演化与油气远景[R].长春:吉林大学,2007.
141.张原庆,钱样麟,盆山耦合概念及机制[J].中国地质,2001,28(3):47.
142.张梅生,彭向东,孙晓猛.中国东北区古生代构造古地理格局[J].辽宁地质,1998,2:91-96.
143.张梅生,彭向东.东北地区中、新生代区域地层格架研究[R].吉林大学,2005.
144.张艳斌,吴福元,李惠民,等.吉林黄泥岭花岗岩体的单颗粒锆石U-Pb年龄[J].岩石学报,2002,18:475-481.
145.张世红,张传恒,李红生.黑龙江省东部裴德组砾石中放射虫的发现及其意义[J].地层学杂志,1999,23(3):201-205
146.张庆龙,水谷伸治朗.从板块构造到地体[J].江苏地质,2004,28(1):1-6.
147.张德民,林大杨.我国煤盆地区域构造特征与煤层气开发潜力[J].中国煤田地质,1998,10(增刊):37-40.
148.张岳桥,赵越,董树文,等.中国东部及邻区早白垩世裂陷盆地构造演化阶段[J].地学前缘,2004,11(3):123-133.
149.张清波.黑龙江省东部鸡西盆地滴道组孢粉组合.地层古生物论文集[M].北京:地质出版社,1986,15:107-148.
150.张宏.敦-密断裂带平移问题讨论.中国地质科学院沈阳地质矿产研究所集刊[M].北京:地质出版社,1993,(2):35-43.
151.赵春荆,彭玉鲸、党增欣,等.吉黑东部构造格架及地壳演化[M]沈阳:辽宁大学出版社,1996:104-148.
152.赵春荆,朱群、李之彤.佳木斯地块基底地质构造[J].中国地质,1997,(5-6):1-118.
153.赵海玲,邓晋福,陈发景,等.黑龙江完达山地区中侏罗世火山岩特征及其形成构造背景[J].地球科学,1996,21(4): 428-432
154.郑少林,梁子华.城子河组的新材料及其地层意义[J].地层学杂志,1995,19(1):1-19
155.郑少林,张武,朱洪森,等.关于龙爪沟群地层单位名称问题的讨论[J].地层学杂志,2005,29(1):84-91
156.朱光,王道轩,刘国正,等.郯庐断裂带的伸展活动及其动力学背景[J].地质科学,2001,36(3):269-278.
157.朱光,宋传中,牛漫兰,等.郯庐断裂带的岩石圈结构及其成因分析[J].高校地质学报,2002,8(3):248-256.
158.朱光,刘国正,牛漫兰,等.郯庐断裂带的平移运动与成因[J].地质通报,2003,22(3):200-207.
159.朱光,王道轩,刘国正,等.郯庐断裂带的演化及其对西太平洋板块的响应[J].地质科学,2004,39(1):36-49.
160.朱光,牛漫兰,刘国正,等.郯庐断裂带肥东段走滑运动的40Ar/39Ar法定年[J].地质学报,2005,79(3):303-316.
161.周剑雄,杨明明.微区痕量分析及其应用[J].国外床地质,1996a,2:77-107.
162.周剑雄,陈克樵.锆石Th-U-Pb等时年龄的电子探针测定方法的研究简介[J].国外矿床地质,1996b,2:120-122.
163.周永胜,王东坡,杨丙中,等.伊舒地堑的构造-沉积演化及其聚油条件[J].岩相古地理,1993,13(5):1-15.
2. Dorsett-Bain H L,Wilde S A,Liu J L. A Pan-African granulite facies event in northeastern China: SHRIMP U-Pb zircon dating of the Mashan group at Liumao, Heilongjiang Province. 30th International Geological Conference[C]. Beijing,1996.
3. Dickinson W R,Suczek C A. Plate tectonics and sandstone compositions[J].AAPG Bull 1979:63(12): 2164-2182.
4. Dickinson W R, Beard L S, Brakenridge G R, et al. Provenance of North American Phanerozoic sandstones in relation to tectonic setting[J].Bull Geo-Soc America, 1983,94: 222-235.
5. Dickinson W R. Interpreting provenance relations from detrital modes of sandstones[J]. In: Zuffa G G, editor. Provenance of Arenites.Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company,1985:331-361.
6. Davis D,Suppe J,Dahlen F A. Mechanics of folds and thrust belts and accretionary wedges[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research,1983,88(B2):1153-1172.
7. Dallmeyer R D. 40Ar/39Ar ages of biotite and hornblende from a progressively remetamor- phosed basement terrane:their bearing on interpretation of release spectra[J]. Geochimicaet Cosmochimica Acta,1975,39(12):1655-1669.
8. Dodson M H. Closure temperature in cooling geochronological and petrological systens[J].Contrib Mineral Petrol,1973,40:250-274.
9. Dodson M H. McClelland-Brown E. Isotopic and palaeomagnetic evidence for rates of cooling uplift and crosion[C].In:The Chronology of Geological Record (ed. N.J. Snelling). Geol. Soc. Mem. (London),1985,10:315-325.
10.Futakami M,Matsukawa M,Chen Piji,et al. Barremian ammonite from the Longzhaogou Group in eastern Heilongjiang, northeast China[J].The Journal of the Geological Societh of Japan, 1995,101(1):79-85.
11.Gu Zhiwei. Evolutionary trends in non-marine Cretaceous bivalves of northeast China[A]. JOHNSTON P A,HAGGART J W. Bivalves:An Eon of Evotion-Paleobiological Studies Honoring Norman D.Newell[M].Calgary:University of Calgary Press,1999:367-276.
12.Harrison T M,Armstrong B L,Naeser C W. Geochronology and thermal history of the coast plutonic complex near Prince Rupert,British Columbia[J].Earth Sci.,1979,16:400-410.
13.Harrison T M, Ducan I, M cdougall I. Diffusion of Ar in biotite-Temperature, pressure and compositional effects[J].Geochim Cosmochim Acta,1985,49:2461-2468.
14.Harker B R, Wang Q. 40Ar/39Ar geochronology of ultrahigh-pressure metamorphism in Central China[J].Tectonics,1995,14(4):994-1006.
15.Kojima S.Mesozoic terrane accretion in northeast China, Sikhote Alin and Japan regions[J]. Paleogeog Paleoclim Paleoecol, 1989,69:213-232.
16.Kellys R A, Wang Yigang, Zheng lin. Arevised Cretaceous age for ammonites originallyindentified as Middle Jurassic,from eastern Heilongjiang,China[J].Acta Palaeontologica Sinaca,1994,33(4):509-517.
17. Liu Shaofeng, Liu Benpei. Comparative study on the juxtaposition events of Jurassic terranes in the Northern circum-Pack belt in Lithospheric Plate Tectonics and Dynamics[M]. Geological Publishing House,1995.
18. Maruyama S,Seno T. Orogeny and relative platemotions:Example of the Japanese Islands[J]. Tectonophysics,1986,127(3-4):305-329.
19. McDougall I,Harrison T M.Geochronology and Thermochronology by the 40Ar/39Ar method[M]. New York:Oxford University Press,1998.
20. Natalin, B. A. History and modes of Mesozoic accretion in southeastern Russia[J]. Island Arc,1993,2: 15-34.
21. Sha Jingeng,Fursich F T. Bivalve faunas of eastern Heilongjiang,northeastern China[J]. Beringeria, 1993,12:3-93.
22. Sun Ge, David L. Dilcher, Early angiosperms from the Lower Cretaceous of Jixi, eastern Heilongjiang, China[J].Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, 2002,121:91-112.
23. Sun Ge, Guo Shuangxing,Zheng Shaolin, et al. First Discovery of the Earliest Angiospermous Megafossils in the World[J].Science in China Ser. B, 1993,36(2):249-256.
24. Suzuki K, Adachi M. Precambrian provenance and silurivan metamorphism of the Tsubonosaxa paragneissin the South Kitakani Terrene,northeast Japan [J].J Geochem,1991a,25:357-376.
25. Suzuki K, Adachi M. The Chemical Th-U-Total Pb Isochron Ages of Zircon and Monazite from the Gray Granite of the Hida Terrene , Japan [J].J Earth Sci Nagoya Univ,1991b,38:11-37.
26. Suzuki K, Adachi M, Kajizuka I. Electron Microprobe Observations of Diffusion in Metamorphosed Detrital Monazites[J]. Earth Planet Sci Lett,1994,128:391-405.
27. Wu Fuyuan, Jahn Borming, Wilde Simon, et al.Phanerozoic crustal growth:U-Pb and Sr-Nd isotopic evidence from the granites in northeatern China[J]. Tectonophysics,2000,328:89- 113.
28. Wu F Y,Sun D Y, Li H M, Jahn B M, et al. A-type granites in northeastern China: Age and geochemical constraints on their petrogenesis[J].Chemical Geology,2002,187:143-173.
29. Wilde S A , Zhang X Z , Wu F Y. Extension of a newly identified 500 Ma etamorphic terrain in northeast China:further U-Pb SHRIMP dating of the Mashan omplex,Heilongjiang Province, China[J].Tectonophysics,2000,328:115-130.
30. Wilde S A, Wu Fuyuan, Zhang Xingzhou. Late Pan-African magmatism in northeastern China: SHRIMP U-Pb zircon evidence from granitoids in the Jiamusi massif[J].Precambrian Research, 2003, 122: 311-327.
31. Williams M,Jercinovic M,Terry M. Age Mapping and Dating of Monazite on the Electron Microprobe:Decon-voluting Multistage Tectonic Histories[J].Geology,1999,27:1023-1026.
32. Yue Qiao, Zhang Weishi, Shu Wendong. Cenozoic deformation history of the Tancheng- Lujiang Fault Zone,north China,and dynamic implications[J]. The Island Arc,2003,12:281-293.
33.白瑾,黄学光,王惠初,等.中国前寒武纪地壳演化(第二版)[M].北京:地质出版社,1996:18-76.
34.曹成润,刘正宏,王东坡.黑龙江省东部虎林盆地断块构造特征及其运动学规律[J].长春科技大学学报,2001,31(4):340-344.
35.曹成润,郑庆道.黑龙江东部残留盆地群构造演化特征及其油气勘探意义[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2003,33(2):167-172.
36.曹熹,党增欣,张兴洲等.佳木斯复合地体[M].吉林:吉林科学技术出版社,1992:1-15.陈守田,唐建人.汤原断陷下第三系层序地层学探讨[J].长春科技大学学报,2000,30(4):362-365.
37.陈丕基.中国陆相侏罗、白垩系划分对比述评[J].地层学杂志,2000,24(2):116-119.程裕淇.中国区域地质概论[M].北京:地质出版社,1994:9-71.
38.迟效国,葛文春,许文良,等.东北地区火山岩与油气关系研究[R].长春:吉林大学,2007.
39.大庆油田勘探开发研究院.黑龙江省东部煤油气资源远景评价研究[R].大庆:大庆油田勘探开发研究院,1990.
40.董申宝.中国蓝片岩带的一般特征及分布[J].地质学报,1989,(3):273-284.
41.窦立荣,宋建国,王瑜.郯庐断裂带北段形成的年代学证据及其意义[J].地质论评,1996,42(6):508-512.
42.何承全,黄冠军.黑龙江绥滨地区中侏罗世晚期绥滨组沟鞭藻类的发现[J].微体古生物学报,1997:14(1):21-40.
43.何承全,万传彪,杨明杰.黑龙江省东部虎林盆地欧特里夫-巴列姆期沟鞭藻类[J].古生物学报,1999,38(2):183-202.
44.何承全,孙学坤.黑龙江省东部鸡西盆地城子河组下部早白垩世欧特里夫晚期海相沟鞭藻类[J].古生物学报,2000, 39(1):46-62.
45.何承全,祝幼华.黑龙江省东北部绥滨地区东荣组最上部的沟鞭藻组合-兼论该地区侏罗-白垩系界线[J].古生物学报,2003,42(3):328-345.
46.黄汲清,姜春发.从多旋回构造运动观点初步探讨地壳发展规律[J].地质学报,1962,42 (2):105-152.
47.黄汲清,任纪舜,姜春发,等.中国大地构造及其演化[M].北京:科学出版社,1980:1-124.
48.黑龙江省地质矿产局.黑龙江省区域地质志[M].北京:地质出版社,1993:8-43.
49.何玉平.黑龙江省东部早白垩世沉积特征与原型盆地恢复[D].吉林大学,2006.
50.何丽娟,胡圣标,杨文采,等.中国大陆科学钻探主孔动态地温测量[J].地球物理学报,2006,49(3):745-752
51.姜宝玉,冯金宝.鸡西群城子河组时代的进一步探讨[J].地层学杂志,2001,25(3):217-221.
52.荆惠林.东北晚中生代聚煤盆地与成矿规律[J].中国煤田地质,1995,7(1):1-5.
53.吉林省地质矿产局.吉林省区域地质志[M].地质出版社,1988:213-270.
54.贾东,何永明,施央申,等.山东地体构造及其拼贴运动学研究[M].南京:南京大学出版社,1993:45-60.
55.李春昱.中国板块构造的轮廓[J].中国地质科学院院报, 1980:2(1):11-22.
56.李春昱,王荃,刘雪亚,等.亚洲大地构造及其演化[J].中国地质科学院院报,1984,(10):3-11
57.李锦轶.中国东北及邻区若干地质构造问题的新认识[J].地质论评,1998, 44(4):339-347.
58.李锦铁,牛宝贵,宋彪,等.长白山北段地壳的形成与演化[M].北京:地质出版社,1999.
59.李锦轶,和政军,莫申国,等.大兴安岭北部绣峰组下部砾岩的形成时代及其大地构造竞义[J].地质通报,2004,23(21):120-129.
60.李廷栋.对青藏高原地质构造主要特点的再认识[A].见:佚名.青藏高原岩石圈结构构造和形成演化[C].北京:地质出版社,1996:160-163.
61.刘招君,孙晓猛,和钟华,等.,刘永江.中、新生代盆地群成因类型及成盆规律[R].长春:吉林大学,2006.
62.李德威.大陆动力学的哲学探索[J].大自然探索,1997,l6(2):107-110.
63.李忠权,罗启后,吴征,等.大庆探区外围盆地含油气性评价与优选[R].成都:成都理工大学,2003.
64.李俊建,沈保丰,李双保,等.辽北—吉南前寒武纪大陆壳的地质特征和演化[J].中国区域地质,1998,17(1):30-39.
65.李思田.联合古陆演化周期中超大型含煤及含油气盆地的形成[J].地学前缘,1997,4(3-4):299-304.
66.李俊建,沈保丰,李双保,等.辽北-吉南前寒武纪大陆壳的地质特征和演化[J].中国区域地质,1998,17(1):30-39.
67.刘少峰,张国伟.盆山关系研究的基本思路、内容和方法[J].地学前缘,2005,12 (3):101-111.
68.刘和甫,梁慧社,李晓清,等.中国东部中新生代裂陷盆地与伸展山岭耦合机制[J].地学前缘,2000,7(4):477-486.
69.刘和甫.盆地-山岭耦合体系与地球动力学机制[J].地球科学,2001,26(6):581-596.
70.刘树文,舒桂明,潘元明,等.电子探针独居石定年法及五台群的变质时代[J].高校地质学报,2004,10(3):356-363.
71.刘国兴.区域地球物理场与中新生带盆地结构特征[R].长春:吉林大学,2006.
72.罗群,白新华.汤原断陷断裂构造特征及其对油气成藏的控制作用[J].长春科技大学学报,1999,29(3):247-251.
73.毛德宝,沈保丰,李俊建,等.辽北清原地区太古宙地质演化及其对成矿的控制作用[J].前寒武纪研究进展,1997,20(3):1-10.
74.彭玉鲸,纪春华,辛玉莲.中俄朝毗邻地区古吉黑造山带岩石及年代纪录[J].地质与资源,2002:11 (2):65 -75.
75.潘华璋,朱祥根.黑龙江省东部早白垩世的一些海相和半咸水相腹足类[J].古生物学报,2004,43(3):338-348.
76.蒲荣干,吴洪章.黑龙江东部中生代地层的孢子花粉.中国地质科学院南京古生物研究所丛刊,1980,(1):383-443.
77.任纪舜,姜春发,张正坤,等.中国大地构造及其演化[M].科学出版社,1980.
78.任纪舜,王作勋,陈廷愚,等.从全球看中国大地构造-中国及邻区大地构造图简要说明[M].北京:地质出版社,1999:1-50.
79.任凤和,杨晓平,李仰春,等.黑龙江省东部鸡西群地层时代划分及地质意义[J].中国地质,2005:32(1):48-54.
80.邵济安,唐克东,王成源,等.那丹哈达地体的构造特征及演化[J].中国科学,1991,21(7):744-751.
81.邵济安,王成源,唐克东.乌苏里地区构造新探索[J].地质论评,1992,38(1):33-38.
82.邵济安,唐克东.中国东北地体与东北亚大陆边缘演化[M].北京:地质出版社,1995.
83.沙金庚.黑龙江省东部Aucellina(双壳类)的发现[J].地层学杂志,1990,14(3):226-230.
84.沙金庚.对黑龙江东部龙爪沟群和鸡西群时代的不同认识[J].地质学报,1991,(4):376-383.
85.沙金庚.黑龙江东部的Buchia和Aucellina层[J].地层学杂志,1992,16(1):41-48.
86.沙金庚.一个值得注意的修订-评“中国黑龙江省东部早白垩世双壳类”[J].古生物学报, 1999,38(3):403-406.
87.沙金庚.黑龙江东部早白垩世生物地层学研究的主要进展[J].地学前缘,2000,9(39):
95-101.
88.沙金庚.黑龙江东部早白垩世生物地层学研究的主要进展[J].地学前缘,2002,9(39):95-101.
89.孙德有,吴福元,林强,等.张广才岭燕山早期白石山岩体成因与壳幔相互作用[J].岩石学报,2001,17(2):227-235.
90.孙德有,吴福元,张艳斌,等.西拉木伦河-长春-延吉板块缝合带的最后闭合时间-来自吉林大玉山花岗岩体的证据[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2004,34(2):174-181.
91.孙德有,吴福元,高山,等.吉林中部晚三叠世和早侏罗世两期铝质A型花岗岩的厘定及对吉黑东部构造格局的制约[J].地学前缘,2005,12(2):263-275.
92.水谷伸治朗,邵济安,张庆龙.那丹哈达地体与东亚大陆边缘中生代构造关系[J].地质学报, 1989,63(3):204-216.
93.宋彪,李锦轶,牛宝贵,等,黑龙江省东部麻山群黑云斜长片麻岩中锆石的年龄及其地质意义[J].地球学报,1997,18(3):306-312
94.孙革,郭双兴,郑少林,等.世界最早的被子植物化石群的首次发现[J].中国科学B辑,1992,(5): 543-548.
95.孙革,曹正尧.白垩纪植物群-中国地质时期的植物群[M].广州:广东科技出版社,1995:310-341.
96.孙革,郑少林,姜剑红,等.黑龙江鸡西含煤盆地早白垩世生物地层研究新进展田[J].煤田地质与勘探,1999,27(6):1-3.
97.孙革,郑少林.中国东北中生代地层划分对比之新见[J].地层学杂志,2000,24(1):6-64.
98.尚玉珂.黑龙江省鸡西城子河组被子植物化石层的孢粉研究[J].微体古生物学报,1997,14(2):162-174
99.单秀兰,陈春雷.依-舒地堑汤原断陷自然伽马能谱与岩性及矿物成分的关系[J].大庆石油学院学报,1997,21(3):76-79.
100.沈保丰,毛德宝,李俊建.中国绿岩带金矿床的时空分布[J].华北地质矿产杂志,1996,11(3):368-374.
101.沈保丰,李俊建,毛德宝.华北地台绿岩带地质特征类型和演化[J].前寒武纪研究进展,1997,20(1):2-11.
102.孙晓猛,龙胜祥,张梅生,等.佳木斯-伊通断裂带大型逆冲构造带的发现及形成时代[J].石油与天然气地质,2006,27(5):637-643.
103.孙晓猛,刘永江.黑龙江东部构造学与年代[R].长春:吉林大学,2007.
104.田东江,周建波,郑常青,等.完达山造山带蛇绿岩混杂岩中变质基性岩的地球化学特征及其地质意义[J].世界地质,2006,26(3):64-70.
105.童亨茂,纪洪勇,宋立忠,等.伊通地堑构造样式及其油气分布规律[J].西安石油学院学报(自然科学版),2002,17(5):9-14.
106.唐克东,王莹,何国琦,等.中国东北及邻区大陆边缘构造[J].地质学报, 1995, 69 (1):16-30.
107.唐振海,张亚金,赵玉珍.三江盆地绥滨坳陷石油地质特征[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2005,24(3):31-34.
108.王成文,金巍,张兴洲,等.东北及邻区晚古生代大地构造属性新认识[J].地层学杂志,2008,32(2):119-136.
109.王成文,刘立,孙耀武,等.东北地区晚古生代海相地层分布、沉积环境恢复与烃源岩研究[R].长春:吉林大学,2007.
110.王成文,李宁.古生代地层古生物与区域构造演化[R].长春:吉林大学,2006.
111.王东坡,薛林福,刘立,等.中国东北中生代盆地形成的地球动力学机制[J].长春地质学院学报(增刊),1997,27:1-7.
112.王桂梁,邵震杰,彭向峰,等.中国东部中新生代含煤盆地的构造反转[J].煤炭学报,1997,22(6):561-565.
113.王小凤,李中坚,陈柏林.郯庐断裂带[M].北京:地质出版社,2000.
114.王桂梁,刘桂建,邹海.华北地台北缘中生代盆-山的耦合转移及其动力学分析[J].煤田地质与勘探,1999,27(6):14-17.
115.王杰,和钟铧,刘招君,等.鸡西盆地白垩纪碎屑岩地球化学特征及其对物源的制约[J].世界地质,2006,25(4):341-348.
116.吴福元,张兴洲,张世红.现代大地构造学进展概论[J].世界地质,1994,13(1):1-11.
117.吴福元,Wilde S A,孙德有.佳木斯地块片麻状花岗岩的锆石离子探针U-Pb年龄[J].岩石学报,2001,17(3):443-452.
118.吴福元,杨进辉,柳小明.辽东半岛中生代花岗质岩浆作用的年代学格架[J].高校地质学报,2005,11(3):305-317.
119.万传彪,闫凤兰,尹楠.黑龙江集贤地区早白垩世沟鞭藻类和其他藻类[J].微体古生物学报,1995,12(1):51-52.
120.万传彪,乔秀云,杨建国,等.黑龙江省鸡西盆地早白垩世孢粉组合.中国含煤气盆地孢粉学论文集[C].北京:石油工业出版社,2000:81-89.
121.万天丰,朱鸿.郯庐断裂带的最大左旋走滑断距及其形成时期[J].高校地质学报,1996,2(1):14-27.
122. Wildes S A,吴福元,张兴洲.中国东北麻山杂岩晚泛非期变质的锆石SHRIMP年龄证据及全球大陆再造意义[J].地球化学,2001,30(1):35-50.
123.许效松,徐强.盆山转换和当代盆地分析中的新问题[J].岩相古地理,1996,16(2):24-33.
124.许浚远.依舒地堑新生代构造演化[J].地球科学,1997,22(4):406-410.
125.许效松.盆山转换与造盆、造山过程分析[J].岩相古地理,1998,18(6):1-10.
126.谢鸣谦.拼贴板块构造及其驱动机理-中国东部及相邻区的大地构造演化[J].北京:科学出版社,2000.
127.许志琴.郯庐断裂系概述.构造地质丛论(3)[M].北京:地质出版社,1984:39-46.
128.徐嘉炜.郯城-庐江平移断裂系统.构造地质论丛(3)[M].北京:地质出版社,1984:18-32.
129.徐嘉炜,马国峰.郯庐断裂带研究的十年回顾[J].地质论评,1992,38(4):316-324.
130.杨小菊.黑龙江鸡西早白垩世穆棱组真蕨类植物新种[J].古生物学报,2002,41(2):259-265.
131.杨小菊,何承全,黎文本,等.鸡西盆地早白垄世穆棱组海相沟鞭藻的发现及其古环境意义[J].科学通报,2003,48(14):1553-1556
132.杨丙中,王东坡,李西建.松辽盆地东部地区逆冲推覆构造与油气勘探趋势[J].长春地质学院学报, 1989,19(4):361-369
133.杨建国,刘俊来,吴河勇,等.黑龙江东部汤原断陷构造特征及其演化[J].大庆石油学院学报,2007,31(1):19-30.
134.杨金中,邱海峻,孙加鹏,等.跃进山岩系及其构造意义[J].长春科技大学学报,1998,28(4):380-385.
135.杨晓平,李仰春,柳震,等.黑龙江东部鸡西盆地构造层序划分与盆地动力学演化[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2005,35(5):616-621.
136.余和中,李玉文,韩守华,等.松辽盆地古生代构造演化[J].大地构造与成矿学, 2001,25 (4):389-396
137.姚大全.密-抚断裂带西南段中生代早中期变位与变形的研究[M].辽宁地质学报,1988,(1):8-12.
138.张贻侠,孙运生,张兴洲,等.中国满洲里—绥芬河地学断面1∶1000000说明书[M].北京:地质出版社,1998:1-53.
139.张兴洲.黑龙江岩系-古佳木斯地块加里东缝合带的证据[J].长春地质学院学报,1992,22(增刊):94-101.
140.张兴洲,金巍,张梅生,等.大庆探区外围中、新生代断陷盆地群演化与油气远景[R].长春:吉林大学,2007.
141.张原庆,钱样麟,盆山耦合概念及机制[J].中国地质,2001,28(3):47.
142.张梅生,彭向东,孙晓猛.中国东北区古生代构造古地理格局[J].辽宁地质,1998,2:91-96.
143.张梅生,彭向东.东北地区中、新生代区域地层格架研究[R].吉林大学,2005.
144.张艳斌,吴福元,李惠民,等.吉林黄泥岭花岗岩体的单颗粒锆石U-Pb年龄[J].岩石学报,2002,18:475-481.
145.张世红,张传恒,李红生.黑龙江省东部裴德组砾石中放射虫的发现及其意义[J].地层学杂志,1999,23(3):201-205
146.张庆龙,水谷伸治朗.从板块构造到地体[J].江苏地质,2004,28(1):1-6.
147.张德民,林大杨.我国煤盆地区域构造特征与煤层气开发潜力[J].中国煤田地质,1998,10(增刊):37-40.
148.张岳桥,赵越,董树文,等.中国东部及邻区早白垩世裂陷盆地构造演化阶段[J].地学前缘,2004,11(3):123-133.
149.张清波.黑龙江省东部鸡西盆地滴道组孢粉组合.地层古生物论文集[M].北京:地质出版社,1986,15:107-148.
150.张宏.敦-密断裂带平移问题讨论.中国地质科学院沈阳地质矿产研究所集刊[M].北京:地质出版社,1993,(2):35-43.
151.赵春荆,彭玉鲸、党增欣,等.吉黑东部构造格架及地壳演化[M]沈阳:辽宁大学出版社,1996:104-148.
152.赵春荆,朱群、李之彤.佳木斯地块基底地质构造[J].中国地质,1997,(5-6):1-118.
153.赵海玲,邓晋福,陈发景,等.黑龙江完达山地区中侏罗世火山岩特征及其形成构造背景[J].地球科学,1996,21(4): 428-432
154.郑少林,梁子华.城子河组的新材料及其地层意义[J].地层学杂志,1995,19(1):1-19
155.郑少林,张武,朱洪森,等.关于龙爪沟群地层单位名称问题的讨论[J].地层学杂志,2005,29(1):84-91
156.朱光,王道轩,刘国正,等.郯庐断裂带的伸展活动及其动力学背景[J].地质科学,2001,36(3):269-278.
157.朱光,宋传中,牛漫兰,等.郯庐断裂带的岩石圈结构及其成因分析[J].高校地质学报,2002,8(3):248-256.
158.朱光,刘国正,牛漫兰,等.郯庐断裂带的平移运动与成因[J].地质通报,2003,22(3):200-207.
159.朱光,王道轩,刘国正,等.郯庐断裂带的演化及其对西太平洋板块的响应[J].地质科学,2004,39(1):36-49.
160.朱光,牛漫兰,刘国正,等.郯庐断裂带肥东段走滑运动的40Ar/39Ar法定年[J].地质学报,2005,79(3):303-316.
161.周剑雄,杨明明.微区痕量分析及其应用[J].国外床地质,1996a,2:77-107.
162.周剑雄,陈克樵.锆石Th-U-Pb等时年龄的电子探针测定方法的研究简介[J].国外矿床地质,1996b,2:120-122.
163.周永胜,王东坡,杨丙中,等.伊舒地堑的构造-沉积演化及其聚油条件[J].岩相古地理,1993,13(5):1-15.