用户名: 密码: 验证码:
城市交通结构优化机理与方法研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
随着我国社会经济的发展,城市化与机动化水平都呈现快速增长的态势,加之人口基数庞大、自然系统供给能力相对不足的既有国情,城市交通的供需矛盾愈发尖锐,由此引发的一系列问题严重影响社会经济运行效率及居民生活质量的提高。由于居民基本出行需求的增长和自然系统供给能力的下降皆属主观调控难以奏效的范畴,而交通供给总量是之于交通流的相对值,因此改变居民出行方式结构就成为解决问题的有效方法。
     基于可持续发展理念及我国的实际国情,在获知城市主要交通方式技术经济属性的基础上,构建交通方式优劣性评价体系。运用层次分析法(AHP)计算各指标在综合评价体系中所占权重,并结合各项指标评价值得出交通方式的优先发展顺序,进而明确我国城市交通结构优化的目标。
     城市交通结构受生产力水平、交通需求特征等因素的影响,但从微观上看,其演化的动力来自于出行者基于个人效用最大化原则下对交通方式的选择行为,而利用非集计模型(disaggregate behavioral model)推导的结果说明交通方式带给出行者的期望效用是影响居民出行决策的核心因素,也是城市交通结构演化的根本动力。论文构建了交通方式竞争模型并指出,交通结构优化可从降低交通方式竞争强度及提高公共交通的竞争力入手。将上述研究加以综合,给出城市交通结构演化动力模型,从而为后续规划、政策、措施的制定提供总体思路,构建城市交通优化方法体系可从基于土地利用的城市交通结构优化与基于外部性的城市交通结构优化两方面入手。
     对土地利用与城市交通结构的关系进行深入研究发现,土地利用对某种交通结构的形成具有决定性影响;而交通结构也会反作用于土地利用,二者不是单纯地某一方决定另一方的静态关系,而是相互影响、彼此强化的动态发展过程。基于此,欲达到城市交通结构优化之目的,必须引入公共交通导向的土地利用模式(“TOD”模式),论文在阐述“TOD”基本理论及借鉴典型城市实施“TOD”先进经验的基础上,指出我国实施“TOD”模式应着手解决路网规划、交通管理体制、建设时序三方面问题。
     以外部性及产权的全新视角审视我国城市交通结构不合理的原因并提出相应的解决方案。外部性的产生从根本上说是由于产权界定不清引起的,而城市交通由于广泛涉猎共有产权资源或与之相关的经济活动,因此在市场机制作用下,资源配置或经济活动承载的收益或成本与理论值产生偏差,进而导致出行者基于个人效用最大的交通方式选择,却会造成社会整体福利的流失,外在表现为城市交通结构不合理。因此,消除城市交通外部性影响的过程亦即是交通结构优化的过程。论文指出,可建立全面的公共交通成本-收益评价体系以及利用产权的统一或分割消除外部效益溢出,以此解决公共交通投资建设力度不足、运营落后的问题;利用产权的限制解决出行者对资源的过度索取所造成的外部成本问题,具体又分为环境保护的产权限制和交通拥堵的产权限制,以此减少小汽车的使用范围,强行促成公交出行比例的上升;利用产权的分割将公共资源的部分权利引入市场交易的范畴,包括道路设施使用权、停车设施使用权、环境污染权、不可再生能源使用权等,以此增加小汽车使用者的实际经济成本,从而将其部分分流。
With the development of our country's economy, urbanlization and mechanization both have been rising quickly, adding the country's situlation that large population and environment's small supply capability, the contradiction between supply and demand of urban transportation becomes more and more serious,which leads to a series of problems constraining the efficiency of society's operation and the quality of denizen's life. As neither the increase of denizen's transportation demand nor the decrease of environment's supply capability is controlled by human, so changing the traffic structure becomes an effective method of solving problems.
     Based on the sustainable development idea and our country's practical situation, on the basis of realizing urban mainly traffic mode's attribute, The dissertation builds up the estimating system of traffic modes, makes us of the manner of AHP to calculate the proportion of target aims, and realizes the development gradation of kinds of traffic modes, at last shows the target of our country's urban traffic structure's optimization.
     Urban traffic structure is affected by productivity level, urban transportation demand and etc, but the motivity of development comes from the humans' activity of choosing traffic modes based on the travellers hoping make their values maximum, and the result of disaggregate behavioral model's derivation shows that the benefit traffic modes bring to travellers is the crucial factors affecting the travelling behavior, so it's the essential motivity for traffic structure's development. The dissertation builds up the model of traffic modes' competition and shows that to optimize traffic structure can operate from decreasing the competition intensity of traffic modes and increase the competition predominance of public traffic. At last the dissertation gives the motivity model of traffic structure's optimization, which can provide macro-frame.
     The dissertation makes deep research on the relationship between land utilization and urban traffic structure, and the result shows that land utilization has the crucial influence on traffic structure, and traffic structure has the counteractive to land utilization, the relation between two is not one decides another, but interactional and aggrandizement by one another. So, in order to achieve the target of traffic structure's optimization, we have to carry out the model of Transit-Oriented Development (TOD). The dissertation introduces the basical theory and advanced experience, shows that our country carrying out TOD should solve three fields of problems that road nets programming, traffic management system and building scheduling.
     The dissertation makes research on the reason to our country traffic structure's unbalance and solving project from the visual angle of externality and property right. As urban traffic deal with mutual property right resources and the correlative economical activity, so under the effect of market mechanism, the benefit and cost which resources collocating and economical activity bear are different from practical. The phenomena leads to the travelling behavior based on travellers' value maximum, which will decrease the social macro-welfare, and the appearance is urban traffic structure's unbalance.So, the process of eliminating the externality influnce is just the process of traffic structure's optimization. The dissertation shows that, we can use property right's unification or comminution to eliminate externality, which can solve the problems of lack of builiding financing and operation's draggling; use the property right's restrication to solve the problems of resources' excessive utilization, and the restrication includes environment pollution's right restrication and traffic congestion's right restrication; use the property right's comminution to make parts of public resources join in market, including the environment pollution right, road establishment utilization right and etc, throuh which we can increase the motor vehicle travellers' cost, and lead them to choose other traffic modes.
引文
[1]Downs A. The law of peak-hour express-way congestion[J]. Traffic Quarterly.1962,(16)3:392-409
    [2]曲大义,王炜,王殿海.城市土地利用与交通规划系统分析[J].城市规划汇刊,1999,(6):44-45
    [3]曲大义,王炜,王殿海,杨希锐.城市向郊区发展对中心区交通影响研究[J].城市规划,2001,(4):37-40
    [4]曲大义等.苏州市居民出行特征分析及交通发展对策研究[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2001,31(3):118-123
    [5]王炜.城市交通系统可持续发展规划框架研究[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2001,31(3):1-6
    [6]王炜.城市交通管理规划理论体系框架设计[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2003,33(3):335-339
    [7]陈学武,陈峻.南京市客运交通系统发展战略研究[J].公路交通科技,2000,17(4):70-72
    [8]袁虹.基于交通效率的合理城市土地利用形态研究[D].清华大学,2001
    [9]毛蒋兴.改革开放以来广州城市交通系统与土地利用互动关系[D].广州:中山大学,2002,5
    [10]阎小培,周素红,毛蒋兴.高密度开发城市的交通系统与土地利用[M].北京:科学出版社,2006
    [11]毛蒋兴,阎小培.城市交通干道对土地利用的廊道效应研究——以广州大道为例[J].地理与地理信息科学,2004,20(5):58-61
    [12]毛蒋兴,阎小培.高密度土地开发对交通系统的影响——以广州为例.规划师[J].2004,20(12):99-104
    [13]周素红,阎小培.城市交通与土地利用关系研究的进展[J].规划师,2005,(3):58-62
    [14]周素红,阎小培.广州城市空间结构域交通需求关系[J].地理学报,2005,(1):131-142
    [15]吴家正,尤建新.可持续发展导论[M].上海:同济大学出版社,1998
    [16]孙瑛,刘呈庆.可持续发展管理导论[M].北京:科学出版社,2003
    [17]曾珍香,顾培亮.可持续发展的系统分析与评价[M].北京:科学出版社,2000
    [18]王炜,陈学武,陆建.城市交通系统可持续发展理论体系研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2004
    [19]张生瑞.公路交通可持续发展系统分析与评价[D].西安:长安大学,2002,10
    [20]Gray Haq.面向可持续的运输规划:英国和荷兰的比较[M].1997
    [21]周伟,Joseph S. Szyliowicz.迈向可持续发展的未来——中国城市可持续交通发展战略政策研究[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2005,11
    [22]The World Bank. Development in Practice:Sustainable Transport-Priorities for Policy Reform[R].washington, D.C.:The World Bank
    [23]周伟,Joseph S. Szyliowicz.迈向可持续发展的未来:中国可持续交通发展战略与政策选择[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2005,11
    [24]世界银行.可持续发展的交通运输——改革开放之优先课题[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2002
    [25]陈学武.可持续发展的城市交通系统模式研究[D].南京:东南大学,2002,8
    [26]张军.城市交通可持续发展综合评价研究[D].成都:西南交通大学,2007,6
    [27]毛保华等.北京城市交通发展的历史思考[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2008,8(3):6-14
    [28]李翔晟.论城市交通的合理结构[J].中南林学院学报,2001,21(4):96-99
    [29]周干峙等.发展我国大城市交通的研究[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1997
    [30]李俊.人性化城市交通发展的理论与应用研究[D].武汉:武汉理工大学,2007,5
    [31]J.M.汤姆逊,著.城市布局与交通规划[M].倪文彦、陶吴馨,译.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1982
    [32]顾尚华.我国大城市客运交通结构的发展模式浅析[J].交通与运输,2005,(4):41-42
    [33]杨明,曲大义.城市土地利用与交通需求相关关系模型研究[J].公路交通科技,2002,(1):72-75
    [34]徐永健,阎小培.西方国家城市交通系统与土地利用关系研究[J].城市规划,1999,(11):38-42
    [35]毛蒋兴,阎晓培.国外城市交通与土地利用互动关系研究[J].城市交通,2004,28(7):64-70
    [36]毛蒋兴,阎小培.城市土地利用模式与城市交通模式关系研究[J].2002,18(7),69-72
    [37]Shih-Lung Shaw, Xiaohong Xin. Integrated land use and transportation interaction:a temporal GIS exploratory data analysis approach[J]. Journal of Transport Geography 11(2003)103-115
    [38]Bert van Wee. Land use and transport:research and policy challenges[J]. Journal of Transport Geography 10(2002):259-271
    [39]Pushkarev B, Zupan J. Public Transportation and Land Use Policy[M]. Indiana University Press,1977
    [40]Schimek P. Household motor vehicle ownership and use:how much does residential density matter?[J].Transportation Research Record,1996,1552:120-125
    [41]Schimek. Land-use, transit, and mode split in Boston and Toronto[J]. Presented at the Association of Collegiate School of planning and Association of European School of Planning Joint International Congress, Toronto, Canada,1996,7
    [42]Parsons Brinkerhoff, Quade and Douglas. Influence of land-use mix and neighborhood design on transit demand [J]. Prepared for Transit Cooperative Research Program, Transportation Research Board,1996
    [43]Parsons Brinkerhoff, Quade and Douglas. Transit and Urban form:mode of Access and Catchment areas of Rail Transit[J]. TCPR Project H-1. Prepared of Transit Cooperative Research Program, Transportation Research Board, March
    [44]Parsons Brinkerhoff, Quade and Douglas. Transit and Urban form[J]. TCRP Report 16, vol.1, Prepared for Transit Cooperative Research Program, Transportation Research Board
    [45]Messenger T, Ewing R. Transit-oriented development in the sunbelt[J]. Transportation Research Record,1996,1552:145-153
    [46]Ewing Reid, Padma Haliyur, G William Page. Getting around a Traditional city, a suburban planned unit development, and everything in between[J]. Transportation Research Record,1466:53-62
    [47]Kockelman K M. Travel behavior as a function of accessibility, land use mixing and land use balance: evidence from the San Francisco bay area[J]. Transportation Research Record.1997,1607:116-125
    [48]Newman Peter and Jefferey Kenworthy. Gasoline consumption and cities[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association.1989,55:24-37
    [49]Newman Peter and Jefferey Kenworthy. The land use transport connection, an overview[J]. Land Use policy,1996,Vol,13 NO.1
    [50]Newman Peter and Jefferey Kenworthy. Cities and Automobile dependence. Brookfield, Vt.:Gower Technical,1989
    [51]Cevero R. and Carolyn R. Travel choices in pedestrian versus automobile oriented neighborhoods[J]. Joural/Publisher:Institute of Urban and Regianal Development,1995,7:30
    [52]Cevero R. America's Suburban Centers:The Land-use Transportation Link. Unwin Hyman Inc
    [53]Cevero R. Mixed land-uses and commuting:evidence from the American housing survey[J]. Transportation Research A,1996,(5):361-377
    [54]周素红.高密度开发城市的内部交通需求与土地利用关系研究—以广州为例[D].广州:中山大学,2003,7
    [55]田锋.我国大城市客运交通结构发展模式研究[D].南京:东南大学,2002,6
    [56]徐寅初.关于确定城市交通方式结构的研究[J].城市规划汇刊,2003(1):13-16
    [57]陆建.城市交通系统可持续发展规划理论与方法[D].东南大学,2003
    [58]Bhat, Chandra R. Quasi-Random maximum simulated likelihood estimation of the mixed multinomial logit Model [J]. Transportation Research,2001,35
    [59]David J, Forkenbrock. Review of travel demand modeling[J]. National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board,2003,9
    [60]McCulloch, Robert E, Rossi P E. An exact likelihood analysis of the multinomial Probit Model[J]. Journal of Econometrics,1994,64:217-228
    [61]林震,杨浩.城市交通结构的优化模型分析[J].北京交通大学,2005,38(5):10-105
    [62]饭田恭敬.交通工程学[M].北京:人民交通出版社,1993
    [63]杨贵红,张肖虎.城镇贫困与社会救助[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2006
    [64]李俊.人性化城市交通发展的理论与应用研究[D].武汉:武汉理工大学,2007,5
    [65]陈学武.城市公交优先发展的对策研究[J].现在城市研究,2004(1):34-36
    [66]杨新苗.城市公交发展技术保障体系关键技术研究[D].南京:东南大学,2003,6
    [67]张卫华.城市公共交通优先通行技术及评价方法研究[D].南京:东南大学,2003,6
    [68]詹运州.城市客运交通政策研究及交通结构优化[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2000,6
    [69]Roland N. Mckean and Jacquelene M. Browing. Externalities from government and profit sectors[J]. Canadian Joural of Economics,1975,8(4)
    [70]上海市城市综合交通规划研究所.城市交通模型技术与应用[M].北京:同济大学出版社,2008,4
    [71]雪枯.广州城市空气污染调查:汽车尾气系主要源头[J].新民周刊,2009,14
    [72]阎小培,周素红,毛蒋兴.高密度开发城市的交通系统与土地利用[M].北京:科学出版社,2006,
    [73]http://www.191ou.com/forum-269-thread-11853951-1-1.html[EB/OL]
    [74]王炜,杨新苗等.城市公共交通系统规划方法与管理技术[M].北京:科学技术出版社,2002
    [75]陆化普,王建伟等.城市交通管理评价体系[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2003
    [76]http://baike.baidu.com/view/528562.htm[EB/OL]
    [77]国家计划委员会综合运输研究所.调整城市运输结构,发展轨道交通系统[M].北京:人民交通出版社,1998
    [78]王炜,徐吉谦.城市交通规划理论及其应用[M].南京:东南大学出版社,1998
    [79]王慧炯,李伯溪,李善同.可持续发展与交通运输[M].北京:中国铁道出版社
    [80]王炜等,城市交通管理规划指南[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2003
    [81]陆化普,黄海军.交通规划理论研究前沿[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2007
    [82]陆华普.交通规划理论与方法[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2006
    [83]Boyce D E, Balasubramaniam K, Tian X. Implications of marginal cost road pricing for urban travel choices and user benefits[R]. In Transportation and Network Analysis Current Trends, M.Gendreau and P. Marcotte, Dordrecht:Kluwer,2002,34-48
    [84]Florian M. A traffic equilibrium model of travel by car and public transit modes[J]. Transportation Science,2002,(11):166-179
    [85]百度百科.土地利用[EB/OL]. http://baike.baidu.com/view/247428.htm?fr=ala0_1_1,2010,3
    [86]GBJ137-90,城市用地分类与规划建设用地标准[S].北京:中国标准出版社,1996
    [87]郭寒英.基于出行者生理心理的城市客运交通出行行为研究[D].成都:西南交通大学,2007,9:27
    [88]崔红建,马天山.基于交通需求下的城市交通可持续发展策略研究[J].武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版
    [89]王炜等.城市交通系统可持续发展理论体系研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2004:196
    [90]Wright F L.1935. Broadacre City:A new community plan. Architectural Record,77:243-254
    [91]莫什·萨夫迪[美].后汽车时代的的城市.吴越译.北京:人民文学出版社,2001,12
    [92]马强.近年来北美关于"TOD"的研究进展[J].国外城市规划,2003,18(5):45-50
    [93]Peter Calthorpe. Transit-Oriented Development[M]. The Urban Ecologist, Fall,1993
    [94]http://baike.baidu.com/view/122503.htm[EB/OL]
    [95]杨忠振,李大洲.公交导向发展策略及其在中国城市的应用研究[J].城市交通,2004,2(2):15-19
    [96]陈燕萍.城市交通问题的治本之路[J].城市规划,2000,(24)3:72-75
    [97]程道平.现代城市规划[M].北京:科学出版社,2004
    [98]http://baike.baidu.com/view/79359.htm[EB/OL]
    [99]Ronald R. Braeutigam, Learning about Transport cost [M]. Brookings Instituation Press,1999
    [100]John Eatwell, Murray Milgate, Peter Newman. The New Palgrave:A Dictionary of Economics[M]. 北京:经济科学出版社,1996
    [101]Buchanan, J. M. n and Stubblebine[J]. W.E:Extemali ty, Economic 1962,Nov,29:371
    [102]加雷斯·D.迈尔斯著,匡小平译.公共经济学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2001:294-295
    [103]蓝楠.浅析市场和政府在解决环境外部性问题中的作用[J].中国环境法网,2002,12(24)
    [104]Sidgwick H. Principles of Political Economy[M]. London:Macmillan,1887
    [105]Marshall A. Principles of Welfare[M]. London:Macmillan,1890
    [106]Arthur Cecil Pigou. The Economics of welfare[M]. London:Macmillan and Co., Ltd,1920
    [107]William j.Baumol.郭家麟,郑孝齐译.福利经济及国家理论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1982
    [108]William j. Baumol, Wallace E. Oates. Theory of Environmental Policy[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1988
    [109]Pearce D. W, Warford J. J. World without End:Economics, Environment and Sustainable Development [M]. oxford:oxford University Press,1993
    [110]Douglass C. North, Robert P. Thomas. The Rise of the Western World[M]. Cambridge University Press,1973:2-3
    [111]Ronald H. Coase. The problem of Social Cost[J]. The Journal of Law and Economics.1960,3:1-44
    [112]Ronald H. Coase. The nature of the firm[J]. Economica,4,NO.3:386-405
    [113][美]Y巴泽尔.产权的经济分析[M].费方域,段毅才译.上海:上海人民出版社,1997,6
    [114]http://baike.baidu.com/view/111108.htm[EB/OL]
    [115]http://news.xinhuanet.com/video/2007-03/19/content_5866387.htm[EB/OL]
    [116]http://news.21 cn.com/guangdong/shenzhen/2008/08/17/5078817.shtml[EB/OL]
    [117]周伟,Joseph S. Szyliowicz.迈向可持续发展的未来——中国交通能源与环境政策研究[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2005
    [118]Litman, Transportation Cost and Benefit Analysis-Transportation Cost Implications[R]. Victoria Transport Policy Institue, www.vtpi.org
    [119]罗清玉等.城市交通拥挤外部成本衡量方法研究[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2007,7(5):9-13
    [120]崔智涛,霍娅敏.城市交通拥挤的外部成本分析[J].武汉理工大学学报(交通科学与工程版),2006,30(1):147-149
    [121]靳丽丽.城市交通外部成本分析及内部化定量方法[J].交通科技与经济,2007,(5):103-106
    [122]Walters A A. The theory and measurement of private and social cost of highway congestion[J].Econometrica,1961,29:676-699
    [123]Dafermos S C, Sparrow F T. Optimal resource allocation and toll patterns in user-optimized transportation network[J]. Journal of Transportation Economics and Policy,1971,5:198-200
    [124]Dafermos S C. Toll patterns for multiclass-user transportation networks[J]. Transportation Scienece,1973,7:211-223
    [125]Smith M J. The marginal cost taxation of a transportation network[J]. Transportation Research,1979,13B:237-242
    [126]Button K J. Road pricing, a special issue of Transportation Research,1986,20A
    [127]Button K J. Transport Economics(2nd ed)[M]. England:Edward Elgar,1993
    [128]Lesis N C. Road Pricing:Theory and Practice[M]. London:Thomas Telford,1993
    [129]Small K A. Congestion Pricing[M]. A special issue of Transportation,1992,19
    [130]Yang H, Huang H J. Principle of marginal-cost pricing:How does it work in a general network?[J]. Transportation Research,1998,32A:45-54
    [131]Wardreop J G. Some theoretical aspects of road traffic research[J]. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers,1952,Part Ⅱ,1:325-378
    [132]Ferrari P. Road pricing and network equilibrium[J]. Transportation Research,1995,29B,357-372
    [133]Yang H, Yagar S. Traffic assignment and traffic control in general freeway-arteriall corridor systems[J]. Transportation Rese arch,1994,28B:463-486
    [134]Evans A W. Road congestion pricing:When is it a good policy[J]. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy,1992,26:213-243
    [135]Bell M G H. Stochastic user equilibrium assignment in networks with queues[J]. Transportation Research,1994,29B,125-137
    [136]周伟,Joseph S. Szyliowicz.迈向可持续发展的未来——中国城市可持续交通发展战略政策研究[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2005
    [137]http://www.chinautc.com/information/newsshow.asp?newsid=262[EB/OL]
    [138]European Parliament resolution on the Commission Communication on an Action Plan to Improve Energy Efficiency in the European Community(COM(2000)247final)
    [139]http://www.ccei.org.cn/shownews.asp?id=53252[EB/OL]
    [140]http://baike.baidu.com/view/36890.htm[EB/OL]
    [141]http://blog.163.com/j msi/blog/static/4090112007115112128748/[EB/OL]

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700