海拉尔盆地复杂油水层地化录井综合评价研究
|
摘要
海拉尔盆地是中国油气勘探重点区域之一,该盆地为断陷沉积,成藏条件及油水分布都极为复杂,油水层评价难度大。本论文以近年来实际应用效果突出的地化录井为核心,通过改进、完善已有的地化录井技术和重新建立新的地化录井评价技术方法,目的是为石油勘探提供先进有效的适合该区复杂油水层评价的新技术,满足生产需求。
本论文在地化评价基础研究和资料定量化处理基础上,建立了以地化为核心,综合应用气测、荧光图像和测井资料的综合评价新技术,并将其成功地应用于油田勘探实践,取得了以下主要研究成果和创新性。
(1)系统开展了地化色谱与储层油水响应实验及响应机理研究。研究表明,在海拉尔盆地,测井电阻率受多种因素影响,与含油性相关性较差,论证了地化参数的有效性,从理论上阐述了地化录井是海拉尔盆地最有效的解释技术。
(2)创建了录井资料定量化处理技术。应用数学和计算机技术,建立了地化色谱量化表征和自动化处理技术;将热解、轻烃、饱和烃和气测等资料作为一个整体,应用神经网络技术,建立了地化分析烃类损失恢复校正技术。在资料处理技术研究上取得了较大突破,为定量评价奠定了基础。
(3)丰富了解释技术手段。建立了饱和烃、轻烃参数图版,实现了地化色谱精细解释,同时,还加大了气测和荧光图像资料应用力度,完善了录井单项评价技术,在理论上和技术方法上都取得了较大的突破。
(4)发展了复杂油水层综合评价技术。优选了储层流体和产能评价的关键参数,完善了综合评价图版,形成了储层产液性质判别的核心技术;基于单井静态的石油地质储量与储层产能的内在联系,设计了应用测井录井参数评估油层产能的计算模型,发展了海拉尔盆地油层定量评价方法,实现了从定性判断向定量评价的技术跨越,形成了录井行业的替代技术。
几年来,本论文所建立的复杂油水层地化录井综合评价技术在海拉尔盆地共应用了73口井,解释判准率达到了95.0%,为海拉尔盆地增加上亿吨的探明储量做出了重大贡献。录井资料定量化处理技术不仅较大地提高了复杂油水层精细处理解释评价技术水平,而且充分挖掘了录井资料潜力,带动了录井行业核心技术的进步。储层产能预测技术为今后的定量评价技术的研究提供了可供借鉴的方法,为储量评价参数的获取拓宽了新的研究思路,具有十分现实的意义。
Hailaer basin is one of the key regions of petroleum exploration in China. It is a faulted-depressed basin with complex reservoir forming conditions and oil-water distribution. And it is hard to evaluate oil-water layers in the basin. This paper took prominent geochemical logging effectively used practically in recent years as the core, through improving the existing geochemical logging technologies and reestablishing new geochemical logging evaluation technologies, for the purpose of providing advanced and efficient new technologies suitable for complex oil- water layer evaluation in petroleum exploration to meet production requirements.
On the basis of basic geochemical evaluation studies and quantitative processing of data, new comprehensive evaluation technologies were established in this paper, which took geochemistry as the core and applied gas logging, fluorescence images and logging data comprehensively. And the technologies were applied in petroleum exploration practice successfully. This paper has obtained some achievements and innovations as follows.
(1) Researches on response experiment of geochemical chromatography and oil-water in reservoir and response mechanism were carried out systematically. The results show that logging resistivity is affected by many factors and has poor correlation with oiliness. This paper demonstrated the effectiveness of geochemical parameters and theoretically expounded that geochemical logging was the most effective interpretation technology in Hailaer basin.
(2) Quantitative processing technology of well logging data was created. Quantitative characterization of geochemical chromatography and automatic processing technology were established by use of mathematics and computer technology. Taking pyrolysis, light hydrocarbon, saturated hydrocarbon and gas logging as a whole, we set up hydrocarbon loss geochemical analysis and recovery-correction technology with neural network.
(3) Interpretation technical means were enriched. This paper established parameter chart of saturated hydrocarbon and light hydrocarbon and realized fine interpretation of geochemical chromatography. At the same time, this paper also increased the application of fluorescence images and gas logging data, improved individual evaluation technology of well logging, and made a larger breakthrough theoretically and technically.
(4) Comprehensive evaluation technology of complex oil-water layers was developed. This paper optimized key parameters of reservoir fluid and productivity evaluation, improved comprehensive evaluation chart and formed core technology of discrimination of reservoir produced fluid property. On the basis of internal relations between static petroleum geological reserves of single well and reservoir productivity, we designed calculation model for the evaluation of oil layer productivity by use of logging data, developed quantitative evaluation method of oil layers in Hailaer basin, realized technological leapfrogging from quantitative judgment to quantitative evaluation, and formed alternative technology in logging industry.
In recent years, this new technology has been applied in 73 wells in Hailaer basin, whose interpretation accuracy reached 95.0%, and made a significant contribution in the increasing of over a hundred million tons of proved reserves in Hailaer basin. Quantitative processing technology of well logging data established in this paper not only greatly improved the level of fine processing and interpretation evaluation skill of complex oil-water layers, but also fully tapped the potential of logging data and led the progress of core technology in logging industry. Reservoir productivity forecast technology with a very practical significance which established in this paper provided reference approach for future research on quantitative evaluation technology and broadened new research ideas for obtaining reservoir evaluation parameters.
本论文在地化评价基础研究和资料定量化处理基础上,建立了以地化为核心,综合应用气测、荧光图像和测井资料的综合评价新技术,并将其成功地应用于油田勘探实践,取得了以下主要研究成果和创新性。
(1)系统开展了地化色谱与储层油水响应实验及响应机理研究。研究表明,在海拉尔盆地,测井电阻率受多种因素影响,与含油性相关性较差,论证了地化参数的有效性,从理论上阐述了地化录井是海拉尔盆地最有效的解释技术。
(2)创建了录井资料定量化处理技术。应用数学和计算机技术,建立了地化色谱量化表征和自动化处理技术;将热解、轻烃、饱和烃和气测等资料作为一个整体,应用神经网络技术,建立了地化分析烃类损失恢复校正技术。在资料处理技术研究上取得了较大突破,为定量评价奠定了基础。
(3)丰富了解释技术手段。建立了饱和烃、轻烃参数图版,实现了地化色谱精细解释,同时,还加大了气测和荧光图像资料应用力度,完善了录井单项评价技术,在理论上和技术方法上都取得了较大的突破。
(4)发展了复杂油水层综合评价技术。优选了储层流体和产能评价的关键参数,完善了综合评价图版,形成了储层产液性质判别的核心技术;基于单井静态的石油地质储量与储层产能的内在联系,设计了应用测井录井参数评估油层产能的计算模型,发展了海拉尔盆地油层定量评价方法,实现了从定性判断向定量评价的技术跨越,形成了录井行业的替代技术。
几年来,本论文所建立的复杂油水层地化录井综合评价技术在海拉尔盆地共应用了73口井,解释判准率达到了95.0%,为海拉尔盆地增加上亿吨的探明储量做出了重大贡献。录井资料定量化处理技术不仅较大地提高了复杂油水层精细处理解释评价技术水平,而且充分挖掘了录井资料潜力,带动了录井行业核心技术的进步。储层产能预测技术为今后的定量评价技术的研究提供了可供借鉴的方法,为储量评价参数的获取拓宽了新的研究思路,具有十分现实的意义。
Hailaer basin is one of the key regions of petroleum exploration in China. It is a faulted-depressed basin with complex reservoir forming conditions and oil-water distribution. And it is hard to evaluate oil-water layers in the basin. This paper took prominent geochemical logging effectively used practically in recent years as the core, through improving the existing geochemical logging technologies and reestablishing new geochemical logging evaluation technologies, for the purpose of providing advanced and efficient new technologies suitable for complex oil- water layer evaluation in petroleum exploration to meet production requirements.
On the basis of basic geochemical evaluation studies and quantitative processing of data, new comprehensive evaluation technologies were established in this paper, which took geochemistry as the core and applied gas logging, fluorescence images and logging data comprehensively. And the technologies were applied in petroleum exploration practice successfully. This paper has obtained some achievements and innovations as follows.
(1) Researches on response experiment of geochemical chromatography and oil-water in reservoir and response mechanism were carried out systematically. The results show that logging resistivity is affected by many factors and has poor correlation with oiliness. This paper demonstrated the effectiveness of geochemical parameters and theoretically expounded that geochemical logging was the most effective interpretation technology in Hailaer basin.
(2) Quantitative processing technology of well logging data was created. Quantitative characterization of geochemical chromatography and automatic processing technology were established by use of mathematics and computer technology. Taking pyrolysis, light hydrocarbon, saturated hydrocarbon and gas logging as a whole, we set up hydrocarbon loss geochemical analysis and recovery-correction technology with neural network.
(3) Interpretation technical means were enriched. This paper established parameter chart of saturated hydrocarbon and light hydrocarbon and realized fine interpretation of geochemical chromatography. At the same time, this paper also increased the application of fluorescence images and gas logging data, improved individual evaluation technology of well logging, and made a larger breakthrough theoretically and technically.
(4) Comprehensive evaluation technology of complex oil-water layers was developed. This paper optimized key parameters of reservoir fluid and productivity evaluation, improved comprehensive evaluation chart and formed core technology of discrimination of reservoir produced fluid property. On the basis of internal relations between static petroleum geological reserves of single well and reservoir productivity, we designed calculation model for the evaluation of oil layer productivity by use of logging data, developed quantitative evaluation method of oil layers in Hailaer basin, realized technological leapfrogging from quantitative judgment to quantitative evaluation, and formed alternative technology in logging industry.
In recent years, this new technology has been applied in 73 wells in Hailaer basin, whose interpretation accuracy reached 95.0%, and made a significant contribution in the increasing of over a hundred million tons of proved reserves in Hailaer basin. Quantitative processing technology of well logging data established in this paper not only greatly improved the level of fine processing and interpretation evaluation skill of complex oil-water layers, but also fully tapped the potential of logging data and led the progress of core technology in logging industry. Reservoir productivity forecast technology with a very practical significance which established in this paper provided reference approach for future research on quantitative evaluation technology and broadened new research ideas for obtaining reservoir evaluation parameters.
引文
[1]王玉华,张吉光,张海军.海拉尔盆地贝尔断陷布达特群变质岩储层特征及勘探方法[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2007,26(2):23～29.
[2]王鹏,金卫东,高会军等,声、电成像测井资料裂缝识别技术及其应用[J].测井技术,2000,24(增):487～490.
[3]康保东.海拉尔盆地布达特群裂缝型储集层含油气识别方法[J].录井技术,2004,15(1):64～65.
[4]赵晨颖,耿长喜,左铁秋等.气相色谱分析资料评价水淹层方法研究[J].录井工程,2005,16(1):21～24.
[5]陈本才,王忠德.储集岩热解地化录井影响因素及对策探讨[J].西部探矿工程,2004,(11):91～93.
[6]郎东升,岳兴举等.油气水层定量评价录井新技术[M].石油工业出版社,2004,1～56
[7]邬立言,丁莲花,李斌等.油气储集岩热解快速定性定量评价[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2000,1～190.
[8]迟元林.大庆录井技术在油气勘探开发中的作用及其发展方向[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2005,24(增):1～3.
[9]郎东升,金成志,郭冀义,等.储层流体的热解及气相色谱评价技术[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1999,1～211.
[10]王振平,王子文.轻烃地球化学场与油气勘探[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1997,37～99.
[11]李友川,蒋基平,席小应等.地球化学方法应用于油层水层预测初探[J].中国海上油气(地质),1998,12(3):193～199.
[12]欧阳健,曾文冲.测井地层分析与油气评价[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1981,11～67.
[13]雍世和,洪有密编.测井资料综合解释与数字处理[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1989,1～85.
[14]曹阳,黄宝华,王德福等,海拉尔盆地油气水层的测井评价模型[J].大庆石油学院学报,1999,23(增):37～40.
[15]朱彬,文政,刘传平等,用多矿物双水模型评价海拉尔盆地泥质砂岩储层[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2002,21(6):58～60.
[16]闫伟林,葛百成,鲁红等.海拉尔盆地贝尔凹陷布达特群储层次生孔隙度确定方法[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2005,24(1):100～102.
[17]耿长喜,刘丽萍,夏峥寒等,录井解释评价技术面临的困难与挑战[J].录井工程,2006,17(1):18～20.
[18]郭瞬铃等.荧光显微镜技术[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1994,13～95.
[19] J.M.丘比特,W.A.英格兰编.王铁冠,张枝焕译.油藏地球化学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1997,22～75.
[20]陈玉斌.海拉尔油水层解释评价[R].大庆钻探录井一公司,2004,1～45.
[21]陈玉斌.裂缝性储层油气水层录井综合识别评价方法研究[R].大庆钻探录井一公司,2007,1～55.
[22]陈俊男,何太洪,郑雷清等.地化录井结合测井技术评价油气层方法[J].录井工程, 2006,17(1):1～4.
[23]李斌,郑明德.地化录井技术在油气勘探应用中的探讨[J].录井技术, 2000,11(2):6～13.
[24]刘方,马德华,吕彬. YQZF-Ⅱ型油气组分评价仪应用效果研究[J].录井工程,2004,15(4):23～25.
[25]大庆油田石油地质志编写组.中国石油地质志(卷二,下)-大庆油田[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1993:627～733.
[26]冯志强,任延广,张晓东等.海拉尔盆地油气分布规律及下步勘探方向[J].中国石油勘探,2004,(4):19～22.
[27]张长俊,龙永文.海拉尔盆地沉积相特征与油气分布[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1995, 166～167.
[28]陈守田,刘招君,崔凤林等.海拉尔盆地含油气系统[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2002,32(2):151～154.
[29]王青海,陈守田,唐建人.海拉尔盆地油气勘探开发前景[J].中国石油勘探,2002,7(3):16～19.
[30] Zorin Y A. Geodynamics of the western part of the Mongolia-Okhotsk collisional belt, Trans-Baikal region (Russia) and Mongolia[J]. Tectonophysics 306:33～56.
[31]张怡侠,孙运生,张兴洲,杨宝俊.满洲里-绥芬河地学断面[M].北京:地质出版社,1998,17～83.
[32]程学儒等.海拉尔盆地石油地质分析[R].大庆油田责任有限公司勘探开发研究院,1990,12～68.
[33]陈均亮等.海拉尔构造演化与油气聚集研究[R].大庆油田责任有限公司勘探开发研究院,2000,1～85.
[34]罗志力等.海拉尔盆地构造特征及发展史研究[R].大庆油田责任有限公司勘探开发研究院,1990,12～45.
[35] DAVIS G A,WANG Cong,ZHENG Yadong,et al.The enigmatic Yinshan fold-and-thrust belt of northern China:New views on its intraplate contractional styles [J]. Geology, 1998,26 (1): 43～46.
[36] MENG Qingren.What drove late Mesozoic extension of the northern China-Mongoliatract[J]. Tectonophysics,2003,369(3-4):155～174.
[37]郑亚东,Davis G A,王琮,等.燕山中生代主要构造事件与板块构造背景问题[J].地质学报,2000,74(4):289～295.
[38]张晓东,刘光鼎,王家林.海拉尔盆地的构造特征及其演化[J].石油实验地质,1994,16(2):119～127.
[39]张吉光.海拉尔盆地不整合的形成及其油气地质意义[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2002,5:8～10.
[40]叶得泉,张莹.海拉尔盆地介形类化石的发现及其地层意义[J].微体古生物学报. 1989,6(1):17～30.
[41]叶得泉,赵传本,万传彪.海拉尔盆地地层划分对比[A].见:大庆油田勘探开发研究论文集[C].北京:石油工业出版社,1995,84～95.
[42]蒙启安,万传彪,乔秀云等.内蒙古海拉尔盆地大磨拐河组孢粉组合[J].地层学杂志,2003,27(3):173～184.
[43]王始波,等.海拉尔盆地贝尔断陷储层特征与油气聚集研究[R].大庆油田责任有限公司勘探开发研究院,1997,1～75.
[44]王培荣,姚焕新,陈奇,等.伊敏湖底褐煤油提物中有机氧化物的组成特征[J].江汉石油学院学报, 1995,17(2):33～38.
[45]霍秋立等.海拉尔盆地贝尔凹陷油源及油气运移研究[J].吉林大学学报:地球科学版,2006:36(3):377～383.
[46]秦建中等.海拉尔盆地烃源岩评价[R].大庆油田责任有限公司勘探开发研究院,2002,19～85.
[47]高胜利,杨金侠,王映辉.海拉尔盆地乌尔逊凹陷大下段泥岩盖层的封闭性[J].陕西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2004,32(1):102～106.
[48] Baskin R,Huang J. Predicting gas. oil and water intervals in Niger Delta reservoirs using gas chromatography[J]. AAPG. 1995,79(3):337～350.
[49]武杰,曹磊,李英明,等.快速气相色谱法分析石油饱和烃[J].色谱,2004,22(5):479~481.
[50]肖廷荣等.气相色谱在石油分析中的应用[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1984:5~23.
[51]李孝国,张晓彤,桂建舟,等.多维气相色谱在线分析轻烃芳构化产物的研究[J].石油化工高等学校学报,2004,17(2):6~8.
[52]王新玲,张继,林秋野,等.轻烃分析技术对东濮凹陷原油性质的评价方法研究[J].内蒙古石油化工,2008,9:147~149.
[53]李玉桓,夏亮.轻烃分析技术在勘探上的应用[J].录井工程,2005,16(1):5~8.
[54]李玉桓,刘勤,郭双亭.轻烃分析方法及参数应用[J].河南石油,2004,18(1):56~57.
[55]朱扬明,梅博文,潘志清.储岩热解技术在石油勘探中的应用[J].石油勘探与开发,1995,22(4):92~95.
[56]隋淑玲,林承焰,侯连华.含油饱和度的地化热解评价方法[J].石油实验地质,2004,26(1):80~83.
[57]郎东升,郭树生.热解分析方法在松辽盆地北部储层评价中的应用[J].石油学验地质,1996,18(4):441~447.
[58]郭树生,郎东升.热解分析与相关资料结合评价储层[J].录井技术,1995,6(1):17~19.
[59]岳兴举,耿长喜,左铁秋,等.水驱油实验研究地化热解参数的水洗响应特征[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2005,24(增刊):109~110.
[60]陈世明,王振斌,刘丽萍.气相色谱资料在肇源地区扶余油层定量解释中的应用[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2006,25(4):7~8.
[61]马友生,刘文利,刘新等.应用热解气相色谱含水指数评价储集层流体性质初探[J].录井技术,2004,15(1):6~9.
[62] Palmer S E. Effect of water washing on C15+ hydrocarbon fraction of crude oils from northwest Palawan,Philippines[J].AAPG Bull,1984,68:137～149.
[63] Kuo Lung-chuan. An experimental study of crude oil alteration in reservoir rocks by water washing[J]. Org Geochem, 1994,21:465～479.
[64] Lafargue E, Barker C. Effect of water washing on crude oil composition[J].AAPG Bull, 1988,72:263～276.
[65] Lafargue E, Thiez P L. Effect of water washing on light end compositional heterogeneity[J]. Org Geochem, 1996,24:1141～1150.
[66]李玉恒,曹革新,杨济学.水驱油物模试验及原油在水驱过程中组分变化的分析研究[J].天津:录井技术,2000,11(3):42～48.
[67]陆健.最小二乘法及其应用[J].中国西部科技,2007,(7):19~21.
[68]金凯德.数值分析[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2005, 31～125.
[69]蔺云.概率分布的广义函数表示[J].高师理科学刊,2008,28(4):15~18.
[70]邓东皋,尹小玲.数学分析简明教程(上册)[M].北京:高等教育出版社, 2000, 12～87.
[71]欧阳光中,姚允龙,周渊.数学分析(上册)[M].上海:复旦大学出版社, 2002, 19～115.
[72]边均伯,张茂根.极限的新概念[M].北京:宇航出版社,1988, 21～105.
[73]王新玲.轻烃分析技术在油气层评价中的应用研究[J].断块油气田,2008,15(2):30~33.
[74]曾统一,靳斌.色谱仪反控系统的研究与设计[J].中国仪器仪表, 2008, 03:21~25.
[75]邱红.轻烃组分自动定性方法研究[J].油气田地面工程,2008,27(7):13~14.
[76]王培荣,朱俊章,方孝林.一种新的原油轻烃分类法——塔里木盆地原油分类及其地化特征[J].石油学报,1998,19(1):24~28.
[77] Thompson K F M. Classification and thermal history of petroleum based on light hydrocarbons[J].Geochim.Cosmochem.ASTA,1983,47:303~316.
[78] Mango F D.The origin of light hydrocarbons in petroleum:A Kinetic test of thesteady-state catalytic hypothesis[J].Geochim Cosmochim.ACTA,1990,54:1315~1323.
[79] Mango F D.The origin of light cycloalkanes in petroleum[J]. Geochem.Cosmochim ACTA, 1990,54:23~27.
[80]朱扬明,张春明. Mango轻烃参数在塔里木原油分类中的应用[J].地球化学,1999,28(1):26~33.
[81]胡国艺,李剑;李谨等.判识天然气成因的轻烃指标探讨[J].中国科学D辑:地球科学,2007,37(Z2):111~117.
[82] Thompson K F M. Light hydrocarbons in subsurface sediments[J]. Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 1979, 43:657~672.
[83] Mango F D. The origin of light cycloalkanes in petroleum[J]. Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 1990, 54: 23~27.
[84] Mango F D. The origin of light hydrocarbons in petroleum: Ring preference in the closure of carbocyclic rings[J]. Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 1994, 58(2):895~901.
[85]蒋启贵,张志荣,宋晓莹.轻烃指纹分析及其应用[J].地质科技情报,2005,24(1):61~64.
[86]孙燕,杨胜强,王彬,等.用灰关联分析和神经网络方法预测煤与瓦斯突出[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2008,4(3):14~17.
[87]胡守仁,沈清.神经网络应用技术)[M].长沙:国防科技大学出版社,1993, 19～185.
[88]解可新,韩立兴,林友联.最优化方法[M].天津:天津大学出版社,1997,1～321.
[89]周继成.人工神经网络的原理及应用[M].北京:科学出版社, 1999, 21～95.
[90]王旭,王宏..人工神经元网络原理与应用[M].沈阳:东北大学出版社, 2000, 17～112.
[91]韩力群.人工神经网络理论、设计及应用[M].北京:化工工业出版社, 2002, 13～87.
[92]刘志宏,柳行军,李传顺等.海拉尔盆地各二级构造单元关系及断面图编制方法研究[R].大庆油田勘探开发研究院,2004, 1～75.
[93]王延志,赵忠晶,牛林等.海拉尔盆地贝尔湖坳陷乌尔逊凹陷乌东斜坡构造带乌27井录井解释报告[R].大庆油田有限责任公司勘探分公司,2005, 1～45.
[94]史飞.海拉尔盆地贝尔湖坳陷—乌尔逊凹陷乌东斜坡构造带乌32井录井解释报告[R].大庆油田有限责任公司海拉尔石油勘探开发指挥部,2007, 17～85.
[95]程建军.乌112-88井录井解释报告[R].大庆油田有限责任公司海拉尔石油勘探开发指挥部,2007, 1～35.
[96]马光强.海拉尔盆地贝尔湖坳陷乌尔逊凹陷乌东斜坡构造带乌51井录井解释报告[R].大庆油田有限责任公司海拉尔石油勘探开发指挥部,2007, 1～45.
[97]赵忠晶,牛林,张福来.海拉尔盆地贝尔湖坳陷乌尔逊凹陷巴彦塔拉构造带巴X2井录井解释报告[R].大庆油田有限责任公司勘探分公司,2005, 1～29.
[98]孟玲华.海拉尔盆地乌55井试油地质总结[R].大庆油田有限责任公司试油试采分公司,2007, 1～35.
[99]庞雄奇,宫广胜,李素梅.海拉尔盆地乌尔逊、贝尔凹陷油气成藏体系定量评价[R].大庆油田勘探开发研究院,2004, 21～95.
[100]宋兴德.海拉尔盆地贝尔凹陷海参5井完井地质总结报告[R].大庆石油管理局地质录井公司,1987, 1～25.
[101]丁铃,郭权.海拉尔盆地希3井试油地质总结[R].大庆油田有限责任公司试油试采分公司,2005, 1～19.
[102]陶玉彬.海拉尔盆地贝尔湖坳陷贝尔凹陷傲里华东构造带希斜1井录井解释报告[R].大庆油田有限责任公司海拉尔石油勘探开发指挥部,2007, 1～25.
[103]李庆文.希4井试油地质总结[R].大庆油田有限责任公司试油试采分公司,2006, 1～28.
[104]牛林,赵忠晶,张福来.海拉尔盆地贝尔湖坳陷霍多莫尔构造带霍12井录井解释报告[R].大庆油田有限责任公司勘探分公司,2005, 1～25.
[105]丁铃,陆敬阳.海拉尔盆地霍12井试油地质总结[R].大庆油田有限责任公司试油试采分公司,2006, 1～21.
[106]牛林.海拉尔盆地贝尔湖坳陷贝尔凹陷贝西斜坡带贝39井录井解释报告[R].大庆油田海拉尔石油勘探开发指挥部,2007, 1～19.
[107]冉法海,牛林.海拉尔盆地贝尔湖坳陷贝尔凹陷霍多莫尔构造带霍9井录井解释报告[R].大庆油田海拉尔石油勘探开发指挥部,2007, 1～25.
[108]冉法海,牛林.海拉尔盆地贝尔湖坳陷贝尔凹陷呼和诺仁构造贝41井录井解释报告[R].大庆油田海拉尔石油勘探开发指挥部,2007, 1～26.
[2]王鹏,金卫东,高会军等,声、电成像测井资料裂缝识别技术及其应用[J].测井技术,2000,24(增):487～490.
[3]康保东.海拉尔盆地布达特群裂缝型储集层含油气识别方法[J].录井技术,2004,15(1):64～65.
[4]赵晨颖,耿长喜,左铁秋等.气相色谱分析资料评价水淹层方法研究[J].录井工程,2005,16(1):21～24.
[5]陈本才,王忠德.储集岩热解地化录井影响因素及对策探讨[J].西部探矿工程,2004,(11):91～93.
[6]郎东升,岳兴举等.油气水层定量评价录井新技术[M].石油工业出版社,2004,1～56
[7]邬立言,丁莲花,李斌等.油气储集岩热解快速定性定量评价[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2000,1～190.
[8]迟元林.大庆录井技术在油气勘探开发中的作用及其发展方向[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2005,24(增):1～3.
[9]郎东升,金成志,郭冀义,等.储层流体的热解及气相色谱评价技术[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1999,1～211.
[10]王振平,王子文.轻烃地球化学场与油气勘探[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1997,37～99.
[11]李友川,蒋基平,席小应等.地球化学方法应用于油层水层预测初探[J].中国海上油气(地质),1998,12(3):193～199.
[12]欧阳健,曾文冲.测井地层分析与油气评价[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1981,11～67.
[13]雍世和,洪有密编.测井资料综合解释与数字处理[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1989,1～85.
[14]曹阳,黄宝华,王德福等,海拉尔盆地油气水层的测井评价模型[J].大庆石油学院学报,1999,23(增):37～40.
[15]朱彬,文政,刘传平等,用多矿物双水模型评价海拉尔盆地泥质砂岩储层[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2002,21(6):58～60.
[16]闫伟林,葛百成,鲁红等.海拉尔盆地贝尔凹陷布达特群储层次生孔隙度确定方法[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2005,24(1):100～102.
[17]耿长喜,刘丽萍,夏峥寒等,录井解释评价技术面临的困难与挑战[J].录井工程,2006,17(1):18～20.
[18]郭瞬铃等.荧光显微镜技术[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1994,13～95.
[19] J.M.丘比特,W.A.英格兰编.王铁冠,张枝焕译.油藏地球化学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1997,22～75.
[20]陈玉斌.海拉尔油水层解释评价[R].大庆钻探录井一公司,2004,1～45.
[21]陈玉斌.裂缝性储层油气水层录井综合识别评价方法研究[R].大庆钻探录井一公司,2007,1～55.
[22]陈俊男,何太洪,郑雷清等.地化录井结合测井技术评价油气层方法[J].录井工程, 2006,17(1):1～4.
[23]李斌,郑明德.地化录井技术在油气勘探应用中的探讨[J].录井技术, 2000,11(2):6～13.
[24]刘方,马德华,吕彬. YQZF-Ⅱ型油气组分评价仪应用效果研究[J].录井工程,2004,15(4):23～25.
[25]大庆油田石油地质志编写组.中国石油地质志(卷二,下)-大庆油田[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1993:627～733.
[26]冯志强,任延广,张晓东等.海拉尔盆地油气分布规律及下步勘探方向[J].中国石油勘探,2004,(4):19～22.
[27]张长俊,龙永文.海拉尔盆地沉积相特征与油气分布[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1995, 166～167.
[28]陈守田,刘招君,崔凤林等.海拉尔盆地含油气系统[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2002,32(2):151～154.
[29]王青海,陈守田,唐建人.海拉尔盆地油气勘探开发前景[J].中国石油勘探,2002,7(3):16～19.
[30] Zorin Y A. Geodynamics of the western part of the Mongolia-Okhotsk collisional belt, Trans-Baikal region (Russia) and Mongolia[J]. Tectonophysics 306:33～56.
[31]张怡侠,孙运生,张兴洲,杨宝俊.满洲里-绥芬河地学断面[M].北京:地质出版社,1998,17～83.
[32]程学儒等.海拉尔盆地石油地质分析[R].大庆油田责任有限公司勘探开发研究院,1990,12～68.
[33]陈均亮等.海拉尔构造演化与油气聚集研究[R].大庆油田责任有限公司勘探开发研究院,2000,1～85.
[34]罗志力等.海拉尔盆地构造特征及发展史研究[R].大庆油田责任有限公司勘探开发研究院,1990,12～45.
[35] DAVIS G A,WANG Cong,ZHENG Yadong,et al.The enigmatic Yinshan fold-and-thrust belt of northern China:New views on its intraplate contractional styles [J]. Geology, 1998,26 (1): 43～46.
[36] MENG Qingren.What drove late Mesozoic extension of the northern China-Mongoliatract[J]. Tectonophysics,2003,369(3-4):155～174.
[37]郑亚东,Davis G A,王琮,等.燕山中生代主要构造事件与板块构造背景问题[J].地质学报,2000,74(4):289～295.
[38]张晓东,刘光鼎,王家林.海拉尔盆地的构造特征及其演化[J].石油实验地质,1994,16(2):119～127.
[39]张吉光.海拉尔盆地不整合的形成及其油气地质意义[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2002,5:8～10.
[40]叶得泉,张莹.海拉尔盆地介形类化石的发现及其地层意义[J].微体古生物学报. 1989,6(1):17～30.
[41]叶得泉,赵传本,万传彪.海拉尔盆地地层划分对比[A].见:大庆油田勘探开发研究论文集[C].北京:石油工业出版社,1995,84～95.
[42]蒙启安,万传彪,乔秀云等.内蒙古海拉尔盆地大磨拐河组孢粉组合[J].地层学杂志,2003,27(3):173～184.
[43]王始波,等.海拉尔盆地贝尔断陷储层特征与油气聚集研究[R].大庆油田责任有限公司勘探开发研究院,1997,1～75.
[44]王培荣,姚焕新,陈奇,等.伊敏湖底褐煤油提物中有机氧化物的组成特征[J].江汉石油学院学报, 1995,17(2):33～38.
[45]霍秋立等.海拉尔盆地贝尔凹陷油源及油气运移研究[J].吉林大学学报:地球科学版,2006:36(3):377～383.
[46]秦建中等.海拉尔盆地烃源岩评价[R].大庆油田责任有限公司勘探开发研究院,2002,19～85.
[47]高胜利,杨金侠,王映辉.海拉尔盆地乌尔逊凹陷大下段泥岩盖层的封闭性[J].陕西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2004,32(1):102～106.
[48] Baskin R,Huang J. Predicting gas. oil and water intervals in Niger Delta reservoirs using gas chromatography[J]. AAPG. 1995,79(3):337～350.
[49]武杰,曹磊,李英明,等.快速气相色谱法分析石油饱和烃[J].色谱,2004,22(5):479~481.
[50]肖廷荣等.气相色谱在石油分析中的应用[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1984:5~23.
[51]李孝国,张晓彤,桂建舟,等.多维气相色谱在线分析轻烃芳构化产物的研究[J].石油化工高等学校学报,2004,17(2):6~8.
[52]王新玲,张继,林秋野,等.轻烃分析技术对东濮凹陷原油性质的评价方法研究[J].内蒙古石油化工,2008,9:147~149.
[53]李玉桓,夏亮.轻烃分析技术在勘探上的应用[J].录井工程,2005,16(1):5~8.
[54]李玉桓,刘勤,郭双亭.轻烃分析方法及参数应用[J].河南石油,2004,18(1):56~57.
[55]朱扬明,梅博文,潘志清.储岩热解技术在石油勘探中的应用[J].石油勘探与开发,1995,22(4):92~95.
[56]隋淑玲,林承焰,侯连华.含油饱和度的地化热解评价方法[J].石油实验地质,2004,26(1):80~83.
[57]郎东升,郭树生.热解分析方法在松辽盆地北部储层评价中的应用[J].石油学验地质,1996,18(4):441~447.
[58]郭树生,郎东升.热解分析与相关资料结合评价储层[J].录井技术,1995,6(1):17~19.
[59]岳兴举,耿长喜,左铁秋,等.水驱油实验研究地化热解参数的水洗响应特征[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2005,24(增刊):109~110.
[60]陈世明,王振斌,刘丽萍.气相色谱资料在肇源地区扶余油层定量解释中的应用[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2006,25(4):7~8.
[61]马友生,刘文利,刘新等.应用热解气相色谱含水指数评价储集层流体性质初探[J].录井技术,2004,15(1):6~9.
[62] Palmer S E. Effect of water washing on C15+ hydrocarbon fraction of crude oils from northwest Palawan,Philippines[J].AAPG Bull,1984,68:137～149.
[63] Kuo Lung-chuan. An experimental study of crude oil alteration in reservoir rocks by water washing[J]. Org Geochem, 1994,21:465～479.
[64] Lafargue E, Barker C. Effect of water washing on crude oil composition[J].AAPG Bull, 1988,72:263～276.
[65] Lafargue E, Thiez P L. Effect of water washing on light end compositional heterogeneity[J]. Org Geochem, 1996,24:1141～1150.
[66]李玉恒,曹革新,杨济学.水驱油物模试验及原油在水驱过程中组分变化的分析研究[J].天津:录井技术,2000,11(3):42～48.
[67]陆健.最小二乘法及其应用[J].中国西部科技,2007,(7):19~21.
[68]金凯德.数值分析[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2005, 31～125.
[69]蔺云.概率分布的广义函数表示[J].高师理科学刊,2008,28(4):15~18.
[70]邓东皋,尹小玲.数学分析简明教程(上册)[M].北京:高等教育出版社, 2000, 12～87.
[71]欧阳光中,姚允龙,周渊.数学分析(上册)[M].上海:复旦大学出版社, 2002, 19～115.
[72]边均伯,张茂根.极限的新概念[M].北京:宇航出版社,1988, 21～105.
[73]王新玲.轻烃分析技术在油气层评价中的应用研究[J].断块油气田,2008,15(2):30~33.
[74]曾统一,靳斌.色谱仪反控系统的研究与设计[J].中国仪器仪表, 2008, 03:21~25.
[75]邱红.轻烃组分自动定性方法研究[J].油气田地面工程,2008,27(7):13~14.
[76]王培荣,朱俊章,方孝林.一种新的原油轻烃分类法——塔里木盆地原油分类及其地化特征[J].石油学报,1998,19(1):24~28.
[77] Thompson K F M. Classification and thermal history of petroleum based on light hydrocarbons[J].Geochim.Cosmochem.ASTA,1983,47:303~316.
[78] Mango F D.The origin of light hydrocarbons in petroleum:A Kinetic test of thesteady-state catalytic hypothesis[J].Geochim Cosmochim.ACTA,1990,54:1315~1323.
[79] Mango F D.The origin of light cycloalkanes in petroleum[J]. Geochem.Cosmochim ACTA, 1990,54:23~27.
[80]朱扬明,张春明. Mango轻烃参数在塔里木原油分类中的应用[J].地球化学,1999,28(1):26~33.
[81]胡国艺,李剑;李谨等.判识天然气成因的轻烃指标探讨[J].中国科学D辑:地球科学,2007,37(Z2):111~117.
[82] Thompson K F M. Light hydrocarbons in subsurface sediments[J]. Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 1979, 43:657~672.
[83] Mango F D. The origin of light cycloalkanes in petroleum[J]. Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 1990, 54: 23~27.
[84] Mango F D. The origin of light hydrocarbons in petroleum: Ring preference in the closure of carbocyclic rings[J]. Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 1994, 58(2):895~901.
[85]蒋启贵,张志荣,宋晓莹.轻烃指纹分析及其应用[J].地质科技情报,2005,24(1):61~64.
[86]孙燕,杨胜强,王彬,等.用灰关联分析和神经网络方法预测煤与瓦斯突出[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2008,4(3):14~17.
[87]胡守仁,沈清.神经网络应用技术)[M].长沙:国防科技大学出版社,1993, 19～185.
[88]解可新,韩立兴,林友联.最优化方法[M].天津:天津大学出版社,1997,1～321.
[89]周继成.人工神经网络的原理及应用[M].北京:科学出版社, 1999, 21～95.
[90]王旭,王宏..人工神经元网络原理与应用[M].沈阳:东北大学出版社, 2000, 17～112.
[91]韩力群.人工神经网络理论、设计及应用[M].北京:化工工业出版社, 2002, 13～87.
[92]刘志宏,柳行军,李传顺等.海拉尔盆地各二级构造单元关系及断面图编制方法研究[R].大庆油田勘探开发研究院,2004, 1～75.
[93]王延志,赵忠晶,牛林等.海拉尔盆地贝尔湖坳陷乌尔逊凹陷乌东斜坡构造带乌27井录井解释报告[R].大庆油田有限责任公司勘探分公司,2005, 1～45.
[94]史飞.海拉尔盆地贝尔湖坳陷—乌尔逊凹陷乌东斜坡构造带乌32井录井解释报告[R].大庆油田有限责任公司海拉尔石油勘探开发指挥部,2007, 17～85.
[95]程建军.乌112-88井录井解释报告[R].大庆油田有限责任公司海拉尔石油勘探开发指挥部,2007, 1～35.
[96]马光强.海拉尔盆地贝尔湖坳陷乌尔逊凹陷乌东斜坡构造带乌51井录井解释报告[R].大庆油田有限责任公司海拉尔石油勘探开发指挥部,2007, 1～45.
[97]赵忠晶,牛林,张福来.海拉尔盆地贝尔湖坳陷乌尔逊凹陷巴彦塔拉构造带巴X2井录井解释报告[R].大庆油田有限责任公司勘探分公司,2005, 1～29.
[98]孟玲华.海拉尔盆地乌55井试油地质总结[R].大庆油田有限责任公司试油试采分公司,2007, 1～35.
[99]庞雄奇,宫广胜,李素梅.海拉尔盆地乌尔逊、贝尔凹陷油气成藏体系定量评价[R].大庆油田勘探开发研究院,2004, 21～95.
[100]宋兴德.海拉尔盆地贝尔凹陷海参5井完井地质总结报告[R].大庆石油管理局地质录井公司,1987, 1～25.
[101]丁铃,郭权.海拉尔盆地希3井试油地质总结[R].大庆油田有限责任公司试油试采分公司,2005, 1～19.
[102]陶玉彬.海拉尔盆地贝尔湖坳陷贝尔凹陷傲里华东构造带希斜1井录井解释报告[R].大庆油田有限责任公司海拉尔石油勘探开发指挥部,2007, 1～25.
[103]李庆文.希4井试油地质总结[R].大庆油田有限责任公司试油试采分公司,2006, 1～28.
[104]牛林,赵忠晶,张福来.海拉尔盆地贝尔湖坳陷霍多莫尔构造带霍12井录井解释报告[R].大庆油田有限责任公司勘探分公司,2005, 1～25.
[105]丁铃,陆敬阳.海拉尔盆地霍12井试油地质总结[R].大庆油田有限责任公司试油试采分公司,2006, 1～21.
[106]牛林.海拉尔盆地贝尔湖坳陷贝尔凹陷贝西斜坡带贝39井录井解释报告[R].大庆油田海拉尔石油勘探开发指挥部,2007, 1～19.
[107]冉法海,牛林.海拉尔盆地贝尔湖坳陷贝尔凹陷霍多莫尔构造带霍9井录井解释报告[R].大庆油田海拉尔石油勘探开发指挥部,2007, 1～25.
[108]冉法海,牛林.海拉尔盆地贝尔湖坳陷贝尔凹陷呼和诺仁构造贝41井录井解释报告[R].大庆油田海拉尔石油勘探开发指挥部,2007, 1～26.