松辽盆地北部断坳转化时期层序地层与沉积体系研究
|
摘要
松辽盆地经过60多年的勘探，先后在坳陷地层及断陷地层油气勘探都取得重大发现，但对断坳转化时期地层研究较少，该段地层最大厚度在800m以上，展示了一定的勘探潜力，是否能够成为今后的勘探接替层位，值得研究、探索。因此开展松辽盆地断坳转化时期登娄库组这一层系层序地层及沉积体系研究无疑是当前油气勘探急需解决的重要课题。以层序地层学、沉积学理论为指导，综合应用岩心、录井、测井、地震资料，通过研究层序界面的成因特征、识别标志、发育规模等，将断坳转化期地层划分为SQ1、SQ2、SQ3及SQ4四个三级层序；在联井对比地震追踪的基础上，建立了松辽盆地北部断坳转化时期层序地层格架；通过层序地层分析，SQ1主要以近源冲积扇体系粗碎屑沉积充填为主，具有断陷末期沉积特征，沉积范围小，被中央古隆起分割；SQ2主要沉积扇三角洲-辫状河三角洲过渡类型粗粒沉积体系，沉积范围扩大，不再受中央古隆起影响，沉积范围向北快速推进；SQ3以辫状河—湖泛三角洲体系沉积充填为主，沉积范围扩展不明显；SQ4充填了非典型的辫状河—湖泛三角洲体系，沉积范围向东西两侧扩展明显。总结了断坳转化时期‘垂向上断陷向坳陷转化，平面上层层超覆，沉积充填上由粗碎屑冲积扇向河流三角洲沉积转化’的层序地层模式。
在此基础上，运用物源形成过程－响应原理，从岩心实验室分析（重矿物、粒级等）及岩心沉积特征、测井相、地震反射及属性等方面，开展重矿物组合、砂砾/地比、砂砾厚、岩性或粒级或组分平面分布、古地貌、平面相序、地震反射与属性特征等综合分析，进行层序格架控制下的‘物源、沉积体系’综合识别。通过综合研究，SQ1层序识别8个近源环盆小物源，SQ2识别7个近物源体系，SQ3共识别6个由近源向远源的过渡型物源体系，SQ4识别7个远源物源体系，呈现向中部组合北部讷河物源、东部拜泉物源、东南绥化物源、西北部齐齐哈尔物源、西部英台物源逐步演化的特点；搞清了物源体系的方向、位置、特征、交汇类型及物源数量，进而解决无/稀探井条件下的断坳转化时期的冲积环境的‘物源、沉积体系’识别难题。，
以陆相盆地早期沉积理论模式为指导，以岩心为基础，识别了4大类9类相24种亚相及40多种微相的沉积体系，总结了其详尽特征，并结合沉积背景、古生态、古气候、地化特征等恢复古沉积环境、特别是水动力特征，通过岩电对应分析，建立测井微相模式，开展单井测井相识别，建立目的层段沉积相垂向序列；利用地震反射、属性进行地震相识别及相转化；通过上述岩心、测井及地震三相综合确定平面沉积相及组合，解决稀探井条件下的巨厚冲积地层的平面沉积相划分难题。
在沉积体系、相类型、特征、空间展布研究基础上，开展层序、沉积充填类型、样式、过程研究，建立了断坳转化时期的层序沉积‘近、多源冲积扇—扇三角洲粗粒沉积体系→中、多源冲积扇—辫状河—辫状河三角洲体系→远、主源冲积扇—辫状河—曲流河—湖泛三角洲体系’充填演化模式，并结合构造、气候、湖平面等方面，研究了沉积充填机制。在沉积充填演化模式指导下，研究烃源岩、盖层、储层所处的沉积充填演化阶段、位置及由此所决定的类型、规模、分布、特征等，并结合实际资料进行预测。
After about60years’ exploration, the Songliao basin has succeed in oil and gasexploration of the depression formation and fauted formation, but the study offault-depression transform formation has made less study. The maximum thicknessof formation is more than800m, which showing a certain exploration potential. It isworthy of study and exploration that whether can be future exploration succeedhorizon. It is no doubt that the sequence stratigraphy and sedimentary systemresearch of the Songliao Basin fault-depression transform the Denglouku strata is animportant and urgent subject. Based on sequence stratigraphy, sedimentologytheory，comprehensive applying core, logging, well logging, seismic data, by thestudy of genetic characteristics, identification and development scale of sequenceboundary，the stratigraphy of the period of fault-depression transform is divided intoSQ1, SQ2, SQ3and SQ4four third-order sequences. Based on joint well contrastand seismic trace, the sequence stratigraphic framework of northern Songliao basinof the period of fault-depression transform is established.Through the sequencestratigraphy analysis, SQ1is filled by coarse clastic sedimentary of proximal alluvialfan system; the sedimentary characteristics similar to the fault sedimentation; Thesedimentary range is small and separated by the central paleouplift. SQ2sedimentaryis mainly coarse-grained sedimentary of fan delta and braided delta transitional typesystem; the sedimentary range is expanded and not separated by the centralpaleouplift; the sedimentary range is northward advancing rapidly advancing. SQ3isfilled by braided river-delta depositional system; the sedimentary range is notobvious expansion.SQ4is filled by the atypical braided river-lacustrine deltasedimentary system; the sedimentary range expand significantly to bothsides.Sequence stratigraphic models of fault-depression transform period issummarized, which is ‘vertical fault to depression, plane layers overlap, depositionalfilling Transform from coarse clastic alluvial fan to the river delta’.
On the basis of this, using the principle of source formation process–response,the synthetic recognition of sedimentary source system is carried on under thecontrol of sequence stratigraphic framework. This work is according to corelaboratory testing (heavy mineral, grade, etc.), and the sedimentary characteristics of cores, logging facies, seismic reflection and properties, etc. comprehensive analysisof the combination of heavy mineral, gravel/than, graded gravel thickness, lithologyor the horizontal distribution of components, ancient landform, phase sequence,seismic reflection with attributive character is made. Through comprehensive study,SQ1sequence identified eight proximal ring basins, SQ2identified seven nearsource system, SQ3identified6from the proximal to the far source transitionalsource system, and SQ4identified seven far source provenance systems. It presentedthe gradually evolution characteristics of central combination, such like northlandNeHe provenance, eastern BaiQuan source, southeast of SuiHua source, northwestof qiqihar source, westward Yingtai source; the direction, location, characteristics,types and intersection of the source system is figured out. Further more, the problemof alluvial environment of the period of fault-depression transform sedimentarysource system identification under the conditions of non/thin exploratory well issolved.
Taking the early continental basins deposition theoretical model as a guide,4categories24kinds of subfacies and40kinds of sedimentary microfacies depositionsystem is identified based on core. Its detailed characteristics are summarized.Combining the depositional setting paleoecology，paleoclimate and geochemicalcharacteristics with ancient sedimentary environment and the hydrodynamiccharacteristics，the analysis of corresponding core to electrical measuring curve, thelogging sedimentary microfacies mode is established. After carrying out single-welllogging identification, the sedimentary vertical sequence of target layer is recognized.Using seismic reflection and the attributes, the seismic facies are identified andconverted to sedimentary facies. Using the core, logging and seismic, the flatsedimentary facies and combination are identified. The problems of planesedimentary facies division of thick alluvial formation under the conditions of diluteexploratory well are solved.
Based on the study of sedimentary system and the types, characteristics andspatial distribution of sedimentary facies, this paper carries out the study of sequence,sedimentary fill type, style and process. And then establishes sedimentary fillingevolution model of near and multi-source alluvial fan-coarse-grained sediments infan delta→medium and multi-source alluvial fan-braided river-braided riverdelta→far and main source of alluvial fan-braided river-meandering river-meandering river delta during the fault-depression Transform Period, at last gets thesedimentary filling mechanism combined with tectonics, climate and lake level etc.Under the guidance of sedimentary filling evolution model, this paper researches theevolution stage and area of hydrocarbon source rock, seal and reservoirs, the type, size, distribution, characterized determined by above all, then makes a predictioncombined with the actual data.
在此基础上，运用物源形成过程－响应原理，从岩心实验室分析（重矿物、粒级等）及岩心沉积特征、测井相、地震反射及属性等方面，开展重矿物组合、砂砾/地比、砂砾厚、岩性或粒级或组分平面分布、古地貌、平面相序、地震反射与属性特征等综合分析，进行层序格架控制下的‘物源、沉积体系’综合识别。通过综合研究，SQ1层序识别8个近源环盆小物源，SQ2识别7个近物源体系，SQ3共识别6个由近源向远源的过渡型物源体系，SQ4识别7个远源物源体系，呈现向中部组合北部讷河物源、东部拜泉物源、东南绥化物源、西北部齐齐哈尔物源、西部英台物源逐步演化的特点；搞清了物源体系的方向、位置、特征、交汇类型及物源数量，进而解决无/稀探井条件下的断坳转化时期的冲积环境的‘物源、沉积体系’识别难题。，
以陆相盆地早期沉积理论模式为指导，以岩心为基础，识别了4大类9类相24种亚相及40多种微相的沉积体系，总结了其详尽特征，并结合沉积背景、古生态、古气候、地化特征等恢复古沉积环境、特别是水动力特征，通过岩电对应分析，建立测井微相模式，开展单井测井相识别，建立目的层段沉积相垂向序列；利用地震反射、属性进行地震相识别及相转化；通过上述岩心、测井及地震三相综合确定平面沉积相及组合，解决稀探井条件下的巨厚冲积地层的平面沉积相划分难题。
在沉积体系、相类型、特征、空间展布研究基础上，开展层序、沉积充填类型、样式、过程研究，建立了断坳转化时期的层序沉积‘近、多源冲积扇—扇三角洲粗粒沉积体系→中、多源冲积扇—辫状河—辫状河三角洲体系→远、主源冲积扇—辫状河—曲流河—湖泛三角洲体系’充填演化模式，并结合构造、气候、湖平面等方面，研究了沉积充填机制。在沉积充填演化模式指导下，研究烃源岩、盖层、储层所处的沉积充填演化阶段、位置及由此所决定的类型、规模、分布、特征等，并结合实际资料进行预测。
After about60years’ exploration, the Songliao basin has succeed in oil and gasexploration of the depression formation and fauted formation, but the study offault-depression transform formation has made less study. The maximum thicknessof formation is more than800m, which showing a certain exploration potential. It isworthy of study and exploration that whether can be future exploration succeedhorizon. It is no doubt that the sequence stratigraphy and sedimentary systemresearch of the Songliao Basin fault-depression transform the Denglouku strata is animportant and urgent subject. Based on sequence stratigraphy, sedimentologytheory，comprehensive applying core, logging, well logging, seismic data, by thestudy of genetic characteristics, identification and development scale of sequenceboundary，the stratigraphy of the period of fault-depression transform is divided intoSQ1, SQ2, SQ3and SQ4four third-order sequences. Based on joint well contrastand seismic trace, the sequence stratigraphic framework of northern Songliao basinof the period of fault-depression transform is established.Through the sequencestratigraphy analysis, SQ1is filled by coarse clastic sedimentary of proximal alluvialfan system; the sedimentary characteristics similar to the fault sedimentation; Thesedimentary range is small and separated by the central paleouplift. SQ2sedimentaryis mainly coarse-grained sedimentary of fan delta and braided delta transitional typesystem; the sedimentary range is expanded and not separated by the centralpaleouplift; the sedimentary range is northward advancing rapidly advancing. SQ3isfilled by braided river-delta depositional system; the sedimentary range is notobvious expansion.SQ4is filled by the atypical braided river-lacustrine deltasedimentary system; the sedimentary range expand significantly to bothsides.Sequence stratigraphic models of fault-depression transform period issummarized, which is ‘vertical fault to depression, plane layers overlap, depositionalfilling Transform from coarse clastic alluvial fan to the river delta’.
On the basis of this, using the principle of source formation process–response,the synthetic recognition of sedimentary source system is carried on under thecontrol of sequence stratigraphic framework. This work is according to corelaboratory testing (heavy mineral, grade, etc.), and the sedimentary characteristics of cores, logging facies, seismic reflection and properties, etc. comprehensive analysisof the combination of heavy mineral, gravel/than, graded gravel thickness, lithologyor the horizontal distribution of components, ancient landform, phase sequence,seismic reflection with attributive character is made. Through comprehensive study,SQ1sequence identified eight proximal ring basins, SQ2identified seven nearsource system, SQ3identified6from the proximal to the far source transitionalsource system, and SQ4identified seven far source provenance systems. It presentedthe gradually evolution characteristics of central combination, such like northlandNeHe provenance, eastern BaiQuan source, southeast of SuiHua source, northwestof qiqihar source, westward Yingtai source; the direction, location, characteristics,types and intersection of the source system is figured out. Further more, the problemof alluvial environment of the period of fault-depression transform sedimentarysource system identification under the conditions of non/thin exploratory well issolved.
Taking the early continental basins deposition theoretical model as a guide,4categories24kinds of subfacies and40kinds of sedimentary microfacies depositionsystem is identified based on core. Its detailed characteristics are summarized.Combining the depositional setting paleoecology，paleoclimate and geochemicalcharacteristics with ancient sedimentary environment and the hydrodynamiccharacteristics，the analysis of corresponding core to electrical measuring curve, thelogging sedimentary microfacies mode is established. After carrying out single-welllogging identification, the sedimentary vertical sequence of target layer is recognized.Using seismic reflection and the attributes, the seismic facies are identified andconverted to sedimentary facies. Using the core, logging and seismic, the flatsedimentary facies and combination are identified. The problems of planesedimentary facies division of thick alluvial formation under the conditions of diluteexploratory well are solved.
Based on the study of sedimentary system and the types, characteristics andspatial distribution of sedimentary facies, this paper carries out the study of sequence,sedimentary fill type, style and process. And then establishes sedimentary fillingevolution model of near and multi-source alluvial fan-coarse-grained sediments infan delta→medium and multi-source alluvial fan-braided river-braided riverdelta→far and main source of alluvial fan-braided river-meandering river-meandering river delta during the fault-depression Transform Period, at last gets thesedimentary filling mechanism combined with tectonics, climate and lake level etc.Under the guidance of sedimentary filling evolution model, this paper researches theevolution stage and area of hydrocarbon source rock, seal and reservoirs, the type, size, distribution, characterized determined by above all, then makes a predictioncombined with the actual data.
引文
[1]冯增昭等.中国沉积学[M].北京：石油工业出版社,2000.
[2]纪友亮等.层序地层学原理及层序成因机制模式[M].北京：地质出版社,1998.
[3]冯志强,大庆探区勘探进展及下步勘探部署意见，大庆油田有限责任公司，2003,3.
[4]于兴河，碎屑岩系油气储层沉积学[M]，北京：石油工业出版社,2002,8.
[5]任延广,朱德丰,万传彪,等.松辽盆地北部深层地质特征与天然气勘探方向中国石油勘探,2004,4:12-18.
[6]李思田，论沉积盆地分析领域的追踪与创新[J].沉积学报，1992,10（3）：10-15
[7]冯有良，李思田，解习农.陆相断陷盆地层序形成动力学及层序地层模式[J].地学前缘，2000，7(3):19一132
[8]郭巍，刘招君，崔宝深.松辽盆地西部斜坡区坳陷期层序地层发育控制因素分析[J].长春地质学院学报，1997，27(3):327一332
[9]韩殿杰，孙新波.松辽盆地下白至统层序地层格架及油气勘探方向[J].石油与天然气地质，1995，16(4):354一389.
[10]黄清华，陈春瑞，王平在等.松辽盆地晚白圣世生物演化与古湖泊缺氧事件[J].微体古生物学报，1998，15(4):417一425.
[11]翟光明等.中国石油地质志(卷二上)[M].北京:石油工业出版社.1993:96一99.77
[12]Brown L.F and W.L.Fisher1977,AAPG Memoir26P213一248
[13]Miall，A.D.1985，EarthSci.Rev.，22，P.261一308
[14]Vail P.R.et al.，1990，The Stratigraphic Signatures of Tectonics，eustasy and Sedimentation-an overviewDepatent of Geology andGeophysics，Rice University HoustonTexas Version P90-917
[15] Shanley KW,McCabe P J,Hettinger R D.Tidal influence in Creta-ceousfluvial strata from Utah,USA:a key to sequencestratigraphicinterpretation. Sedimentology.1993
[16] Posamentier H W, Vail P R.Eustatic controls on clastic depositionII-sequence and systems track models. Sea-level Changes: An IntegratedApproach.1988
[17] Read J F.Controls on evolution of Cambrian-Ordovician passivemargin US Appalachians. Controls on Carbonate Platform and BasinDevelopment.1989
[18] Rio D, Silva I P,Capraro L.The geological time scaian stratigraphicrecord. Episodes.2003le and the Ital
[19] Sanders J E,Kumar N.Evidence of shoreface retreat andin–place‘drowning’during Holocene submergence of barriers, shelf offFire Island, New York. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America.1975
[20] Dean W F,Gardner J V.Milankovitch cycles in neogene deep-seasediment. Paleoceanograpy.1981
[21] Dodson.Timing and response of vegetation change to Millankovitchforcing in temperate Australia and New Zealand. Global and PlanetaryChange.1998
[22] Helsley C E,Steniner M B.Evidence for long intervals of normalpolarity during the Cretaceous period. Earth and Planet.1969
[23] Hilgen F J,Schwarzacher W,Strasser A.Concepts and definitions incyclostratigraphy(second report of the cyclostratigraphy working group).SEPM. Spec. Publ.81.2004
[24] Neuhuber S,Wagreich M,Wendler I,Sp?tl C.Turonian Oceanic Red Bedsin Eastern Alps: Concepts for palaeoceanographic changes in theMediterranean Tethys. Palaeogeography.2007
[25] Van Wagoner J C.Sequence stratigraphy and marine to nonmarine faciesarchitec-ture of foreland basin strata,Book cliffs,Utah,USA. In:VanWagoner J C,Bertram G T,eds,Sequence stratigraphy of foreland basindeposits:outcrop and subsurface exam-ples from the Cretaceous of NorthAmerica.1995
[26]解习农.松辽盆地层序地层格架和中浅层沉积体系研究，大庆油田勘探开发研究院科研报告，2007，11.
[27]大庆油田石油地质志编写组．中国石油地质志卷二—大庆石油[M]．北京：石油工业出版社，1993，155~160．
[28]高有峰，松辽盆地上白垩统事件沉积与高分辨率层序地层[D].吉林大学2010
[29]聂逢君，松辽盆地构造演化与东吐莫地区层序地层及隐蔽圈闭研究[D].中国地震局地质研究所2004
[30]贾建亮，基于地球化学—地球物理的松辽盆地上白垩统油页岩识别与资源评价[D].吉林大学2012
[31]黄清华，松辽盆地晚白垩世地层及微体古生物群[D].中国地质科学院2007
[32]尹秀珍，松辽盆地中部晚白垩世早期古湖泊生产力研究[D].中国地质大学（北京）2008
[33]王立武，松辽盆地保乾三角洲层序地层学及含油气系统研究[D].中国科学院研究生院（广州地球化学研究所）2004
[34]关德师，松辽盆地下白垩统层序地层及沉积体系研究[D].中国科学院研究生院（广州地球化学研究所）2005
[35]宋鹰，松辽盆地裂后期构造反转及其动力学背景分析[D].中国地质大学2010
[36]王焯，松科一井南孔白垩纪中期介形类化石壳体稳定同位素及微量元素研究[D].中国地质大学（北京）2010
[37]杨春，松辽盆地深层不同类型天然气成因机理及其成藏贡献[D].浙江大学2009
[38]黄清华,张文婧,贾琼,党毅敏,王平,高宝明,谢磊.松辽盆地上、下白垩统界线划分[J].地学前缘.2009(06)
[39]魏魁生,叶淑芬,郭占谦,徐宏,任延广,王玉华,孙显义.松辽盆地白垩系非海相沉积层序模式[J].沉积学报.1996(04)
[40]刘招君,王东坡,刘立,刘万洙,王璞君,杜晓弟,杨光.松辽盆地白垩纪沉积特征[J].地质学报.1992(04)
[41]李桂俊,李国艳,胡耀东.松辽盆地深层地层及构造特征[J].吉林地质.2009(02)
[42]高瑞祺,赵传本,郑玉龙,宋之琛,黄嫔,王鑫甫.松辽盆地深层早白垩世孢粉组合研究[J].古生物学报.1994(06)
[43]叶德燎.松辽盆地东南隆起区下白垩统层序地层格架及油气成藏规律[J].地质科学.2005(02)
[44]刘招君,程日辉,易海永.层序地层学的概念、进展与争论[J].世界地质.1994(03)
[45] Van Wagoner J C.Sequence stratigraphy and marine to nonmarine faciesarchitec-ture of foreland basin strata,Book cliffs,Utah,USA. In:VanWagoner J C,Bertram G T,eds,Sequence stratigraphy of foreland basindeposits:outcrop and subsurface exam-ples from the Cretaceous of NorthAmerica.1995
[46]胡玉双,田芳,曹立岩.松辽盆地东部断陷群层序地层学研究[J].石油勘探与开发.1999(05)
[47]孙耀庭,张世奇,刘金华,魏垂高,孙杰.陆相可容空间变化及层序发育控制因素分析[J].油气地质与采收率.2005(01)
[48]蒙启安,王璞珺,杨宝俊,程日辉.松辽盆地断陷期超层序界面的地质属性刻画及其油气地质意义[J].地质论评.2005(01)
[49]胡玉双,张新,张天垚.徐家围子登娄库组层序地层特征及有利目标预测[J].科学技术与工程.2011(05)
[50]薛良清.层序地层学研究现状、方法与前景[J].石油勘探与开发,1995,22(5)：8-13.
[51]侯明才,陈洪德,田景春.层序地层学的研究进展[J].矿物岩石,2001,21(3)：128-134.
[52]顾家裕,范土芝.层序地层学回顾与展望[J].海相油气地质,2001,6(4)：15-25.
[53]孙雨.河流三角洲体系高分辨率层序地层及岩性类油藏成藏规律研究[D]东北石油大学，2010
[54]张新，徐家围子南部地区登娄库组层序地层学研究[D]，东北石油大学，2011
[55]杨莹彬，林甸—黑鱼泡地区登娄库至泉二段层序地层格架研究[D]，东北石油大学，2012
[56]孙冬来，徐家围子断陷北部登娄库组层序地层格架研究[D]，东北石油大学，2012
[57]刘敏，松辽盆地古龙地区登娄库组天然气成藏条件研究[D]，东北石油大学，2012
[58]鲁洪波,姜在兴.高分辨率层序地层学在资源序列评价中的应用[J].石油大学学报(自然科学版),1997,21(5)：9-12.
[59]桑树勋,秦勇,范炳恒,等.层序地层学在陆相盆地煤层气资源评价中的应用研究[J].煤炭学报,2002,27(2)：113-118.
[60]宋国奇,徐春华,樊庆真,等.应用层序地层学方法恢复加里东期古地貌——以济阳坳陷沾化地区为例[J].石油实验地质,2000,22(4):350-354.
[61]赵俊兴,陈洪德,向芳.高分辨率层序地层学方法在沉积前古地貌恢复中的应用[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2003,30(1):76-81.
[62]王家豪,王华,赵忠新,等.层序地层学应用于古地貌分析——以塔河油田为例[J].地球科学——中国地质大学学报,2003,28(4):425-430.
[63] Van Wagoner J C, Mitchum R M, Campion K M, et al. Siliciclasticsequence stratigraphy in well, cores and outcrops:concept forhigh-resolution correlation of time and facies.AAPG Methods inExploration Series,1990,(7):1~50.
[64] Graversen O. UpperTriassic-LowerCretaceous seismic sequencestratigraphy and basin tectonics at Bornholm, Denmark, Tornquist Zone,NW Europe[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology,2004,21(5):579-612.
[65]顾家裕,郭彬程,张兴阳.中国陆相盆地层序地层格架及模式[J].石油勘探与开发,2005,32(5):11-15.
[66]朱筱敏,董艳蕾,杨俊生,等.辽东湾地区古近系层序地层格架与沉积体系分布[J].中国科学(D辑),2008,38(S1):1-10.
[67] Houston, John. High-resolution sequence stratigraphy as a tool inhydrogeological exploration in the Atacam a Desert[J]. Quarterly Journalof Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology,2004,37(1):7-17.
[68]申银民,孙玉善,顾桥元,等.塔里木盆地哈得逊地区下石炭统薄层砂体沉积层序与砂体预测[J].石油勘探与开发,2005,32(2):43-45.
[69]郑荣才,周祺,王华,等.鄂尔多斯盆地长北气田山西组2段高分辨率层序构型与砂体预测[J].高校地质学报,2009,15(1):69-79.
[70]张尚锋,洪秀娥,郑荣才,等.应用高分辨率层序地层学对储层流动单元层次性进行分析——以泌阳凹陷双河油田为例[J].成都理工学院学报,2002,29(2):147-151.
[71]樊继宗,陈林媛,张素君,等.高分辨率层序地层学在划分流动单元中的应用[J].西南石油学院学报,2006,28(5):23-25.
[72]唐民安,孙宝玲.大牛地气田下石盒子组基准面旋回与储层流动单元的层次性[J].沉积学报,2007,25(1):39-46.
[73]许广明,徐怀大,孔祥言.高分辨率层序地层学在油藏数值模拟中的应用[J].石油与天然气地质,1999,20(2):115-119.
[74]顾家裕,张兴阳.陆相层序地层学进展与在油气勘探开发中的应用[J].石油与天然气地质,2004,25(5):484-490.
[75]尹太举,张昌民.依据高分辨率层序地层学进行剩余油分布预测[J].石油勘探与开发,2001,28(4):79-82.
[76]尹太举,张昌民,李中超,等.濮城油田沙三中层序格架内储层非均质性研究.石油学报,2003,25(5):74-78.
[77] Sloss L L, Sequence in the cratonic interior of North America,Geological Society of American Bulletin,1963,74:93-114.
[78] Wheeler.H.E..Stratigraphic units in time and space.Am J.Sci.,1959,257:692-706.
[79] Vail P R, Mitchum Jr R M, Todd J M, et al. Seismic stratigraphy andglobal changes of sea level. Seismic stratigraphy-Applications toHydrocarbon Exploration.AAPG.1977,26(2):199-206
[80] Brown L F, Fisher W L. Seismic stratigraphic interpretation ofdepositional systems：example from Brazil rift and pull-apart basins[A]，in：Payton C E，et al．Seismic stratigraphy applications to hydrocarbonexploration[M].AAPG,1977,26(2):213-248.
[81] Payton C E, ed. Seismic stratigraphy application to hydrocarbonexploration[J]. AAPG, Mem1977,26:1-516
[82] P.R.Vail.Seismic stratigraphy interpretation using sequencestratigraphy.Pertl:stratigraphy interpretation procedure [A].In: BallyA W，ed. Atlas of seismic Stratigraphy [C].AAPG，Studies in Geology，1987，27:l-10.
[83] W.E.Galloway. Genetic stratigraPhic sequence in basin analysisl:architecture and genesis of flooding surface bounded depositionalunits[J].AAPG，1989，73:125-142
[84] J.G.Johnson, G.Klapper and C.A.sandberg. Devonian ecstaticfluctuation in Eurameria[J]. Geologieal Soeitery of America Balletin,1985,96:567-587.
[85] Cross T A. High-resolution stratigraphic correlation from theperspective of base-level cycles and sediment accommodation. In:Proceedings of Northwestern Europian Sequence StratigraphyCongress,1994.105-123.
[86]王允诚.高分辨率层序地层学在油气勘探中的应用[M].油气储层评价.北京：石油工业出版社，1999,20-32.
[87]邓宏文.美国层序地层研究中的新学派—高分辨率层序地层学[J].石油与天然气地质，1995，16（2）：89-97.
[88]邓宏文，王洪亮，宁宁.沉积物体积分配原理—高分辨率层序地层学的理论基础[J].地学前缘，2000，7（4）：305-313.
[89]邓宏文，王红亮，祝永军.高分辨率层序地层学——原理及应用[M].地质出版社，2002，1-56.
[90]邓宏文，王洪亮，李小孟.高分辨率层序地层对比在河流相中的应用[J].石油与天然气地质，1997，18（2），90-114.
[91]邓宏文，王洪亮，李熙哲.层序地层地层基准面的识别、对比技术及应用[J].石油与天然气地质，1996，17（3）：177-184.
[92]郑荣才,文华国,梁西文.鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界高分辨率层序地层分析[J].矿物岩石2002，22(4)：66-74.
[93]孙致学,凌庆珍,邓虎成,等.高分辨率层序地层学在油田深度开发中的应用[J].石油学报,2008,29(2):239-245.
[94]徐安娜,郑红菊,董月霞,等.南堡凹陷东营组层序地层格架及沉积相预测[J].石油勘探与开发,2006,33(4):437-443.
[95]吴胜和，马晓芬，王仲林.温米油田开发阶段高分辨率层序地层学研究[J].石油学报，1999,20(5):33-38.
[96]尹太举，张昌民，李中超，等.濮城油田沙三中6-10砂组高分辨率层序地层研究[J].沉积学报，2003，21（4）：663-669.
[97]张明禄，郑荣才，达世攀，等.砂体等时对比的高分辨率层序分析技术[J].矿物岩石，2004，24(1)：113-120.
[98]邓宏文,王红亮,王居峰,等.层序地层构成与层序控砂、控藏的自相似特征——以三角洲-浊积扇体系为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2004,25(5):491-495.
[99]邓宏文,吴海波,王宁,等.河流相层序地层划分方法——以松辽盆地下白垩统扶余油层为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2007,28(5):621-627.
[100]郑荣才,柯光明,文华国,等.高分辨率层序分析在河流相砂体等时对比中的应用[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2004,31(6):641-647.
[101]柯光明,郑荣才,高红灿.胜坨油田一区沙河街组二段1-3砂组高分辨率层序地层学[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2004,31(2)：139-147.
[102]彭光明,盘昌林,郑荣才,等.高分辨率层序地层学在L35块砂体分析中的应用[J].矿物岩石,2005,25（1）：91-98.
[103]胡忠贵,郑荣才,周刚,等.阿尔及利亚韦德迈阿次盆地三叠系河流相沉积模式[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2009,36(3)：253-260.
[104]王璞珺,杜小弟,王骏,等.松辽盆地白垩系年代地层研究及地层划分对比[J].地质学报,1995,69(4):372-381.
[105]杨万里,李永康,高瑞琪.松辽盆地陆相石油的形成与演化[J].长春地质学院学报,1982,12(1):69-80.
[106]高瑞褀,蔡希源.松辽盆地油气田形成条件与分布规律[M].北京:石油工业出版社.1997,4-107.
[107]程学儒.松辽早期裂谷盆地特征及其含油气性[J].石油勘探与开发,1987,14(1)：1-9.
[108]马莉,刘德来.松辽盆地成因演化与软流圈对流模式[J].地质科学，1999，34(3)：365-374.
[109]刘和甫,梁慧社,李晓清,等.中国东部中新生代裂陷盆地与伸展山岭耦合机制[J].地学前缘,2000,7(4):477-486.
[110]杨祖序,龙新仁,成风池,等.松辽盆地的构造分带与油气田分布[J].石油学报,1983,4(2):1-8.
[111]张恺,罗志立,张清,等.中国大陆板块的演化与含油气盆地特点的探讨[J].石油勘探与开发，1981年，1:13-25.
[112]朱夏.中国东部板块内部盆地形成机制的初步探讨[J].石油实验地质，1979：1-9.
[113]李德生.中国东部含油气盆地的构造特征[J].石油勘探与开发，1982,,2：1-14.
[114]王东坡,王骏.沉积盆地形成的地球动力学机制及其分类[J].岩相古地理,1998,18(3):8-10.
[115]张功成,蔡希源,周章保,等.裂陷盆地分析原理和方法—以松辽盆地为例
[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1996,250-276.
[116]郭占谦,萧德铭,唐金生.深大断裂在油气藏形成中的作用[J].石油学报,1996,17（3）：27-32.
[117]郭占谦.火山活动与沉积盆地的形成和演化[J].地球科学——中国地质大学学报,1998,23（1）：59-64.
[118]周永胜,王绳祖.裂陷盆地成因研究现状综述与讨论[J].地球物理学进展,1999,14(3):29-37.
[119]王宝林.大庆油田南二、三区高台子油层砂体成因及储层物性参数研究
[D].大庆石油学院硕士学位论文，2005,3-11
[120]胡望水,吕炳全,张文军等.松辽盆地构造演化及成盆动力学探讨[J].地质科学,2005,40(1):16-31.
[121]黄汲清.中国地质构造基本特征的初步总结.地质学报,1960,40(2):1-37.
[122]陈发景,赵海玲,陈昭年,等.中国东部中、新生代伸展盆地构造特征及地球动力学背景.地球科学,1996,21(4):357-365.
[123]李四光.地壳构造与地壳运动[J].中国科学（A辑），1997,4,400-429.
[124]王鸿祯,刘本培,李思田.中国及邻区大地构造划分和构造发展阶段,见王鸿祯主编,中国及邻区构造古地理和生物古地理.中国地质大学出版社,1990,3-34.
[125]郑荣才,彭军,吴朝容.陆相盆地基准面旋回级次划分与研究意义[J].沉积学报,2001,19(2):249-255.
[2]纪友亮等.层序地层学原理及层序成因机制模式[M].北京：地质出版社,1998.
[3]冯志强,大庆探区勘探进展及下步勘探部署意见，大庆油田有限责任公司，2003,3.
[4]于兴河，碎屑岩系油气储层沉积学[M]，北京：石油工业出版社,2002,8.
[5]任延广,朱德丰,万传彪,等.松辽盆地北部深层地质特征与天然气勘探方向中国石油勘探,2004,4:12-18.
[6]李思田，论沉积盆地分析领域的追踪与创新[J].沉积学报，1992,10（3）：10-15
[7]冯有良，李思田，解习农.陆相断陷盆地层序形成动力学及层序地层模式[J].地学前缘，2000，7(3):19一132
[8]郭巍，刘招君，崔宝深.松辽盆地西部斜坡区坳陷期层序地层发育控制因素分析[J].长春地质学院学报，1997，27(3):327一332
[9]韩殿杰，孙新波.松辽盆地下白至统层序地层格架及油气勘探方向[J].石油与天然气地质，1995，16(4):354一389.
[10]黄清华，陈春瑞，王平在等.松辽盆地晚白圣世生物演化与古湖泊缺氧事件[J].微体古生物学报，1998，15(4):417一425.
[11]翟光明等.中国石油地质志(卷二上)[M].北京:石油工业出版社.1993:96一99.77
[12]Brown L.F and W.L.Fisher1977,AAPG Memoir26P213一248
[13]Miall，A.D.1985，EarthSci.Rev.，22，P.261一308
[14]Vail P.R.et al.，1990，The Stratigraphic Signatures of Tectonics，eustasy and Sedimentation-an overviewDepatent of Geology andGeophysics，Rice University HoustonTexas Version P90-917
[15] Shanley KW,McCabe P J,Hettinger R D.Tidal influence in Creta-ceousfluvial strata from Utah,USA:a key to sequencestratigraphicinterpretation. Sedimentology.1993
[16] Posamentier H W, Vail P R.Eustatic controls on clastic depositionII-sequence and systems track models. Sea-level Changes: An IntegratedApproach.1988
[17] Read J F.Controls on evolution of Cambrian-Ordovician passivemargin US Appalachians. Controls on Carbonate Platform and BasinDevelopment.1989
[18] Rio D, Silva I P,Capraro L.The geological time scaian stratigraphicrecord. Episodes.2003le and the Ital
[19] Sanders J E,Kumar N.Evidence of shoreface retreat andin–place‘drowning’during Holocene submergence of barriers, shelf offFire Island, New York. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America.1975
[20] Dean W F,Gardner J V.Milankovitch cycles in neogene deep-seasediment. Paleoceanograpy.1981
[21] Dodson.Timing and response of vegetation change to Millankovitchforcing in temperate Australia and New Zealand. Global and PlanetaryChange.1998
[22] Helsley C E,Steniner M B.Evidence for long intervals of normalpolarity during the Cretaceous period. Earth and Planet.1969
[23] Hilgen F J,Schwarzacher W,Strasser A.Concepts and definitions incyclostratigraphy(second report of the cyclostratigraphy working group).SEPM. Spec. Publ.81.2004
[24] Neuhuber S,Wagreich M,Wendler I,Sp?tl C.Turonian Oceanic Red Bedsin Eastern Alps: Concepts for palaeoceanographic changes in theMediterranean Tethys. Palaeogeography.2007
[25] Van Wagoner J C.Sequence stratigraphy and marine to nonmarine faciesarchitec-ture of foreland basin strata,Book cliffs,Utah,USA. In:VanWagoner J C,Bertram G T,eds,Sequence stratigraphy of foreland basindeposits:outcrop and subsurface exam-ples from the Cretaceous of NorthAmerica.1995
[26]解习农.松辽盆地层序地层格架和中浅层沉积体系研究，大庆油田勘探开发研究院科研报告，2007，11.
[27]大庆油田石油地质志编写组．中国石油地质志卷二—大庆石油[M]．北京：石油工业出版社，1993，155~160．
[28]高有峰，松辽盆地上白垩统事件沉积与高分辨率层序地层[D].吉林大学2010
[29]聂逢君，松辽盆地构造演化与东吐莫地区层序地层及隐蔽圈闭研究[D].中国地震局地质研究所2004
[30]贾建亮，基于地球化学—地球物理的松辽盆地上白垩统油页岩识别与资源评价[D].吉林大学2012
[31]黄清华，松辽盆地晚白垩世地层及微体古生物群[D].中国地质科学院2007
[32]尹秀珍，松辽盆地中部晚白垩世早期古湖泊生产力研究[D].中国地质大学（北京）2008
[33]王立武，松辽盆地保乾三角洲层序地层学及含油气系统研究[D].中国科学院研究生院（广州地球化学研究所）2004
[34]关德师，松辽盆地下白垩统层序地层及沉积体系研究[D].中国科学院研究生院（广州地球化学研究所）2005
[35]宋鹰，松辽盆地裂后期构造反转及其动力学背景分析[D].中国地质大学2010
[36]王焯，松科一井南孔白垩纪中期介形类化石壳体稳定同位素及微量元素研究[D].中国地质大学（北京）2010
[37]杨春，松辽盆地深层不同类型天然气成因机理及其成藏贡献[D].浙江大学2009
[38]黄清华,张文婧,贾琼,党毅敏,王平,高宝明,谢磊.松辽盆地上、下白垩统界线划分[J].地学前缘.2009(06)
[39]魏魁生,叶淑芬,郭占谦,徐宏,任延广,王玉华,孙显义.松辽盆地白垩系非海相沉积层序模式[J].沉积学报.1996(04)
[40]刘招君,王东坡,刘立,刘万洙,王璞君,杜晓弟,杨光.松辽盆地白垩纪沉积特征[J].地质学报.1992(04)
[41]李桂俊,李国艳,胡耀东.松辽盆地深层地层及构造特征[J].吉林地质.2009(02)
[42]高瑞祺,赵传本,郑玉龙,宋之琛,黄嫔,王鑫甫.松辽盆地深层早白垩世孢粉组合研究[J].古生物学报.1994(06)
[43]叶德燎.松辽盆地东南隆起区下白垩统层序地层格架及油气成藏规律[J].地质科学.2005(02)
[44]刘招君,程日辉,易海永.层序地层学的概念、进展与争论[J].世界地质.1994(03)
[45] Van Wagoner J C.Sequence stratigraphy and marine to nonmarine faciesarchitec-ture of foreland basin strata,Book cliffs,Utah,USA. In:VanWagoner J C,Bertram G T,eds,Sequence stratigraphy of foreland basindeposits:outcrop and subsurface exam-ples from the Cretaceous of NorthAmerica.1995
[46]胡玉双,田芳,曹立岩.松辽盆地东部断陷群层序地层学研究[J].石油勘探与开发.1999(05)
[47]孙耀庭,张世奇,刘金华,魏垂高,孙杰.陆相可容空间变化及层序发育控制因素分析[J].油气地质与采收率.2005(01)
[48]蒙启安,王璞珺,杨宝俊,程日辉.松辽盆地断陷期超层序界面的地质属性刻画及其油气地质意义[J].地质论评.2005(01)
[49]胡玉双,张新,张天垚.徐家围子登娄库组层序地层特征及有利目标预测[J].科学技术与工程.2011(05)
[50]薛良清.层序地层学研究现状、方法与前景[J].石油勘探与开发,1995,22(5)：8-13.
[51]侯明才,陈洪德,田景春.层序地层学的研究进展[J].矿物岩石,2001,21(3)：128-134.
[52]顾家裕,范土芝.层序地层学回顾与展望[J].海相油气地质,2001,6(4)：15-25.
[53]孙雨.河流三角洲体系高分辨率层序地层及岩性类油藏成藏规律研究[D]东北石油大学，2010
[54]张新，徐家围子南部地区登娄库组层序地层学研究[D]，东北石油大学，2011
[55]杨莹彬，林甸—黑鱼泡地区登娄库至泉二段层序地层格架研究[D]，东北石油大学，2012
[56]孙冬来，徐家围子断陷北部登娄库组层序地层格架研究[D]，东北石油大学，2012
[57]刘敏，松辽盆地古龙地区登娄库组天然气成藏条件研究[D]，东北石油大学，2012
[58]鲁洪波,姜在兴.高分辨率层序地层学在资源序列评价中的应用[J].石油大学学报(自然科学版),1997,21(5)：9-12.
[59]桑树勋,秦勇,范炳恒,等.层序地层学在陆相盆地煤层气资源评价中的应用研究[J].煤炭学报,2002,27(2)：113-118.
[60]宋国奇,徐春华,樊庆真,等.应用层序地层学方法恢复加里东期古地貌——以济阳坳陷沾化地区为例[J].石油实验地质,2000,22(4):350-354.
[61]赵俊兴,陈洪德,向芳.高分辨率层序地层学方法在沉积前古地貌恢复中的应用[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2003,30(1):76-81.
[62]王家豪,王华,赵忠新,等.层序地层学应用于古地貌分析——以塔河油田为例[J].地球科学——中国地质大学学报,2003,28(4):425-430.
[63] Van Wagoner J C, Mitchum R M, Campion K M, et al. Siliciclasticsequence stratigraphy in well, cores and outcrops:concept forhigh-resolution correlation of time and facies.AAPG Methods inExploration Series,1990,(7):1~50.
[64] Graversen O. UpperTriassic-LowerCretaceous seismic sequencestratigraphy and basin tectonics at Bornholm, Denmark, Tornquist Zone,NW Europe[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology,2004,21(5):579-612.
[65]顾家裕,郭彬程,张兴阳.中国陆相盆地层序地层格架及模式[J].石油勘探与开发,2005,32(5):11-15.
[66]朱筱敏,董艳蕾,杨俊生,等.辽东湾地区古近系层序地层格架与沉积体系分布[J].中国科学(D辑),2008,38(S1):1-10.
[67] Houston, John. High-resolution sequence stratigraphy as a tool inhydrogeological exploration in the Atacam a Desert[J]. Quarterly Journalof Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology,2004,37(1):7-17.
[68]申银民,孙玉善,顾桥元,等.塔里木盆地哈得逊地区下石炭统薄层砂体沉积层序与砂体预测[J].石油勘探与开发,2005,32(2):43-45.
[69]郑荣才,周祺,王华,等.鄂尔多斯盆地长北气田山西组2段高分辨率层序构型与砂体预测[J].高校地质学报,2009,15(1):69-79.
[70]张尚锋,洪秀娥,郑荣才,等.应用高分辨率层序地层学对储层流动单元层次性进行分析——以泌阳凹陷双河油田为例[J].成都理工学院学报,2002,29(2):147-151.
[71]樊继宗,陈林媛,张素君,等.高分辨率层序地层学在划分流动单元中的应用[J].西南石油学院学报,2006,28(5):23-25.
[72]唐民安,孙宝玲.大牛地气田下石盒子组基准面旋回与储层流动单元的层次性[J].沉积学报,2007,25(1):39-46.
[73]许广明,徐怀大,孔祥言.高分辨率层序地层学在油藏数值模拟中的应用[J].石油与天然气地质,1999,20(2):115-119.
[74]顾家裕,张兴阳.陆相层序地层学进展与在油气勘探开发中的应用[J].石油与天然气地质,2004,25(5):484-490.
[75]尹太举,张昌民.依据高分辨率层序地层学进行剩余油分布预测[J].石油勘探与开发,2001,28(4):79-82.
[76]尹太举,张昌民,李中超,等.濮城油田沙三中层序格架内储层非均质性研究.石油学报,2003,25(5):74-78.
[77] Sloss L L, Sequence in the cratonic interior of North America,Geological Society of American Bulletin,1963,74:93-114.
[78] Wheeler.H.E..Stratigraphic units in time and space.Am J.Sci.,1959,257:692-706.
[79] Vail P R, Mitchum Jr R M, Todd J M, et al. Seismic stratigraphy andglobal changes of sea level. Seismic stratigraphy-Applications toHydrocarbon Exploration.AAPG.1977,26(2):199-206
[80] Brown L F, Fisher W L. Seismic stratigraphic interpretation ofdepositional systems：example from Brazil rift and pull-apart basins[A]，in：Payton C E，et al．Seismic stratigraphy applications to hydrocarbonexploration[M].AAPG,1977,26(2):213-248.
[81] Payton C E, ed. Seismic stratigraphy application to hydrocarbonexploration[J]. AAPG, Mem1977,26:1-516
[82] P.R.Vail.Seismic stratigraphy interpretation using sequencestratigraphy.Pertl:stratigraphy interpretation procedure [A].In: BallyA W，ed. Atlas of seismic Stratigraphy [C].AAPG，Studies in Geology，1987，27:l-10.
[83] W.E.Galloway. Genetic stratigraPhic sequence in basin analysisl:architecture and genesis of flooding surface bounded depositionalunits[J].AAPG，1989，73:125-142
[84] J.G.Johnson, G.Klapper and C.A.sandberg. Devonian ecstaticfluctuation in Eurameria[J]. Geologieal Soeitery of America Balletin,1985,96:567-587.
[85] Cross T A. High-resolution stratigraphic correlation from theperspective of base-level cycles and sediment accommodation. In:Proceedings of Northwestern Europian Sequence StratigraphyCongress,1994.105-123.
[86]王允诚.高分辨率层序地层学在油气勘探中的应用[M].油气储层评价.北京：石油工业出版社，1999,20-32.
[87]邓宏文.美国层序地层研究中的新学派—高分辨率层序地层学[J].石油与天然气地质，1995，16（2）：89-97.
[88]邓宏文，王洪亮，宁宁.沉积物体积分配原理—高分辨率层序地层学的理论基础[J].地学前缘，2000，7（4）：305-313.
[89]邓宏文，王红亮，祝永军.高分辨率层序地层学——原理及应用[M].地质出版社，2002，1-56.
[90]邓宏文，王洪亮，李小孟.高分辨率层序地层对比在河流相中的应用[J].石油与天然气地质，1997，18（2），90-114.
[91]邓宏文，王洪亮，李熙哲.层序地层地层基准面的识别、对比技术及应用[J].石油与天然气地质，1996，17（3）：177-184.
[92]郑荣才,文华国,梁西文.鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界高分辨率层序地层分析[J].矿物岩石2002，22(4)：66-74.
[93]孙致学,凌庆珍,邓虎成,等.高分辨率层序地层学在油田深度开发中的应用[J].石油学报,2008,29(2):239-245.
[94]徐安娜,郑红菊,董月霞,等.南堡凹陷东营组层序地层格架及沉积相预测[J].石油勘探与开发,2006,33(4):437-443.
[95]吴胜和，马晓芬，王仲林.温米油田开发阶段高分辨率层序地层学研究[J].石油学报，1999,20(5):33-38.
[96]尹太举，张昌民，李中超，等.濮城油田沙三中6-10砂组高分辨率层序地层研究[J].沉积学报，2003，21（4）：663-669.
[97]张明禄，郑荣才，达世攀，等.砂体等时对比的高分辨率层序分析技术[J].矿物岩石，2004，24(1)：113-120.
[98]邓宏文,王红亮,王居峰,等.层序地层构成与层序控砂、控藏的自相似特征——以三角洲-浊积扇体系为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2004,25(5):491-495.
[99]邓宏文,吴海波,王宁,等.河流相层序地层划分方法——以松辽盆地下白垩统扶余油层为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2007,28(5):621-627.
[100]郑荣才,柯光明,文华国,等.高分辨率层序分析在河流相砂体等时对比中的应用[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2004,31(6):641-647.
[101]柯光明,郑荣才,高红灿.胜坨油田一区沙河街组二段1-3砂组高分辨率层序地层学[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2004,31(2)：139-147.
[102]彭光明,盘昌林,郑荣才,等.高分辨率层序地层学在L35块砂体分析中的应用[J].矿物岩石,2005,25（1）：91-98.
[103]胡忠贵,郑荣才,周刚,等.阿尔及利亚韦德迈阿次盆地三叠系河流相沉积模式[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2009,36(3)：253-260.
[104]王璞珺,杜小弟,王骏,等.松辽盆地白垩系年代地层研究及地层划分对比[J].地质学报,1995,69(4):372-381.
[105]杨万里,李永康,高瑞琪.松辽盆地陆相石油的形成与演化[J].长春地质学院学报,1982,12(1):69-80.
[106]高瑞褀,蔡希源.松辽盆地油气田形成条件与分布规律[M].北京:石油工业出版社.1997,4-107.
[107]程学儒.松辽早期裂谷盆地特征及其含油气性[J].石油勘探与开发,1987,14(1)：1-9.
[108]马莉,刘德来.松辽盆地成因演化与软流圈对流模式[J].地质科学，1999，34(3)：365-374.
[109]刘和甫,梁慧社,李晓清,等.中国东部中新生代裂陷盆地与伸展山岭耦合机制[J].地学前缘,2000,7(4):477-486.
[110]杨祖序,龙新仁,成风池,等.松辽盆地的构造分带与油气田分布[J].石油学报,1983,4(2):1-8.
[111]张恺,罗志立,张清,等.中国大陆板块的演化与含油气盆地特点的探讨[J].石油勘探与开发，1981年，1:13-25.
[112]朱夏.中国东部板块内部盆地形成机制的初步探讨[J].石油实验地质，1979：1-9.
[113]李德生.中国东部含油气盆地的构造特征[J].石油勘探与开发，1982,,2：1-14.
[114]王东坡,王骏.沉积盆地形成的地球动力学机制及其分类[J].岩相古地理,1998,18(3):8-10.
[115]张功成,蔡希源,周章保,等.裂陷盆地分析原理和方法—以松辽盆地为例
[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1996,250-276.
[116]郭占谦,萧德铭,唐金生.深大断裂在油气藏形成中的作用[J].石油学报,1996,17（3）：27-32.
[117]郭占谦.火山活动与沉积盆地的形成和演化[J].地球科学——中国地质大学学报,1998,23（1）：59-64.
[118]周永胜,王绳祖.裂陷盆地成因研究现状综述与讨论[J].地球物理学进展,1999,14(3):29-37.
[119]王宝林.大庆油田南二、三区高台子油层砂体成因及储层物性参数研究
[D].大庆石油学院硕士学位论文，2005,3-11
[120]胡望水,吕炳全,张文军等.松辽盆地构造演化及成盆动力学探讨[J].地质科学,2005,40(1):16-31.
[121]黄汲清.中国地质构造基本特征的初步总结.地质学报,1960,40(2):1-37.
[122]陈发景,赵海玲,陈昭年,等.中国东部中、新生代伸展盆地构造特征及地球动力学背景.地球科学,1996,21(4):357-365.
[123]李四光.地壳构造与地壳运动[J].中国科学（A辑），1997,4,400-429.
[124]王鸿祯,刘本培,李思田.中国及邻区大地构造划分和构造发展阶段,见王鸿祯主编,中国及邻区构造古地理和生物古地理.中国地质大学出版社,1990,3-34.
[125]郑荣才,彭军,吴朝容.陆相盆地基准面旋回级次划分与研究意义[J].沉积学报,2001,19(2):249-255.