75％氯氟吡氧乙酸·麦草畏配方及水分散粒剂的研制
摘要
不使用或很少使用有机溶剂,对环境友好的农药水基性制剂悬浮剂(suspension concentrate)、水分散粒剂(water dispersible granule)、水乳剂(emulation in water),成为国内外农药剂型的发展方向。本研究以空心莲子草作为防除靶标植物,对氯氟吡氧乙酸和麦草畏最优配比进行筛选,并对WDG剂型配方及加工技术进行研究,明确了氯氟吡氧乙酸和麦草畏复配的最佳比例,氯氟吡氧乙酸·麦草畏WDG的最佳配方；通过安全性测定,明确了氯氟吡氧乙酸·麦草畏WDG对小麦和直播水稻的安全使用技术；通过生物测定和田间试验,研究了延长控制空心莲子草的应用技术。结果如下：
氯氟吡氧乙酸和麦草畏复配防治空心莲子草具有明显的增效作用,通过等效线法得到氯氟吡氧乙酸与麦草畏在15.62：12.28=8：7时增效最明显,确定最优配方为氯氟吡氧乙酸·麦草畏75%,其它辅助成分25%。
通过试验得到符合WDG标准的优化配方。具体的配方如下：有效成分：75%；润湿剂：10%,分散剂：3%,崩解剂：2%,粘结剂：1%,载体补足。氯氟吡氧乙酸·麦草畏WDG为浅黄色圆柱状颗粒,粒度在1.0mm左右,原药有效含量为75±1%,pH值为6～8,水分≤1%,悬浮率≥90%,润湿时间≤60s,崩解时间≤3min。
75%氯氟吡氧乙酸.麦草畏WDG对空心莲子草的鲜重抑制,在剂量15g/667m2下,与20%氯氟吡氧乙酸EC40g/667m2和48%麦草畏AS20g/667m2在5%的显著水平上存在显著差异性；75%氯氟吡氧乙酸·麦草畏WDG在剂量15g/667m2下,对空心莲子草植株再生防效达到81.06%，20%氯氟吡氧乙酸EC40g/667m2的防效为47.79%,48%麦草畏AS20g/667m2的防效为-1.20%,三者之间均存在显著性差异；通过对空心莲子草的解剖结构分析,初步推断为：空心莲子草受药后茎表面出现不定根(或茎)的分化刺激茎节中细胞结构的变化可能阻碍药剂的传导扩散,是造成各类除草剂防效差的原因之一,防治空心莲子草要适当加大用药量。
生物安全性测定表明：75%氯氟吡氧乙酸·麦草畏WDG在小麦四叶一心期使用安全；在小麦二叶一心期、三叶一心期在推荐使用量25g/667m2以下安全,高于推荐使用量不安全,出现植株疯长畸形。75%氯氟吡氧乙酸·麦草畏WDG在所设剂量下水稻二叶一心期、三叶一心期、四叶一心期都安全。为了进一步明确75%氯氟吡氧乙酸·麦草畏WDG防治旱地空心莲子草的效果,本研究分别对旱地空心莲子草多发地点进行田间药效试验。结果表明：该药剂防除空心莲子草效果好,持效期较长,施药量30g／667m2的15d、45d防效分别为80.86%、93.94%。
Water-based pesticide formulations of SC、WDG、EW, which are friendly to environment and contain no or rarely organic solvents, have been regarded as a direction of pesticide development worldwidely. Alternanthera philoxeroides was used as a control target in this paper to screen the optium mixing ration of fluroxypyr and dicamba. Effects of fluroxypyr and dicamba mixtures and WDG formulations processing technology were also studied in this paper. The application technology of this formulation were determined by its safety and activity bioassay in green house and fields. The results are as follows:
The mixture of fluroxypyr and dicamba exhibited significant synergistic action on A. philoxeroides, which were observed at the mixture ratio of 15.62:12.28= 8:7 (fluroxypyr: dicamba) by the equivalent curve. And according to this results, the optimal formulation were determined as 75% of fluroxypyr·dicamba and 25% of other auxiliary components。
A optimized formula were obtained by experiments which agreed with the standard formula of WDG. The formula is listed as follows:active ingredient:75%; wetting agent: 10%, dispersing agent:3%, disintegrants:2%; stinck:1%; and the rest are filler complement. The fluroxypyr·dicamba WDG are white or light brown cylindrical particles, of which the particle size are about 1.0 mm, the effective content of TC are 75±1%, pH value ranged from 6 to 8, water content≤1%, suspension rate≥90%, the wetting time≤60s, disintegration time≤3min.
75% fluroxypyr'dicamba WDG could significantly inhibit the fresh weight of A. philoxeroides at the recommending dosage of 15g/667m2, compared with 20%Fluroxypyr EC (40g/667m2) and 48% Dicamba AS (20g/667m2). The controlling effect of 75% fluroxypyr·dicamba WDG(15g/667m2),20% Fluroxypyr EC (40g/667m2) and 48% dicamba AS (20g/667m2) on the re-growth of A. philoxeroides reached 81.06%,47.79% and-1.20%, respectively, in which significant difference were observed. It was deduced that the reason that cause low controlling effect on A. philoxeroides were that the cell construction change in stem nodes stimulated by the polarization of coronal roots on stems after herbicide application, based on which application dosage should be added to control A. philoxeroides.
Field trials showed that:75% fluroxypyr·dicamba WDG could be safely used in wheat four-leaf stage,Also it would be safe to wheat it was used in wheat two-leaf and three-leaf stage at a dose less than 25g/667m2, while it would cause injur to wheat when the dosage were higher than the recommending dose.75% fluroxypyr·dicamba WDG would be safe to rice plants when it was used in rice two-leaf, three-leaf and four-leaf stages. In order to confirm the controlling effect of 75% fluroxypyr·dicamba WDG on A. philoxeroides in dryland, field trails were conducted in areas where A. philoxeroides occurred frequently. The results showed that:this formulation could effectly control the occurrence of A. philoxeroides with a long residual effect, and the controlling effect of 15 and 45 days after treating at a dosage of 30g/667m2 were 80.86% and 93.94%, respectively.
氯氟吡氧乙酸和麦草畏复配防治空心莲子草具有明显的增效作用,通过等效线法得到氯氟吡氧乙酸与麦草畏在15.62：12.28=8：7时增效最明显,确定最优配方为氯氟吡氧乙酸·麦草畏75%,其它辅助成分25%。
通过试验得到符合WDG标准的优化配方。具体的配方如下：有效成分：75%；润湿剂：10%,分散剂：3%,崩解剂：2%,粘结剂：1%,载体补足。氯氟吡氧乙酸·麦草畏WDG为浅黄色圆柱状颗粒,粒度在1.0mm左右,原药有效含量为75±1%,pH值为6～8,水分≤1%,悬浮率≥90%,润湿时间≤60s,崩解时间≤3min。
75%氯氟吡氧乙酸.麦草畏WDG对空心莲子草的鲜重抑制,在剂量15g/667m2下,与20%氯氟吡氧乙酸EC40g/667m2和48%麦草畏AS20g/667m2在5%的显著水平上存在显著差异性；75%氯氟吡氧乙酸·麦草畏WDG在剂量15g/667m2下,对空心莲子草植株再生防效达到81.06%，20%氯氟吡氧乙酸EC40g/667m2的防效为47.79%,48%麦草畏AS20g/667m2的防效为-1.20%,三者之间均存在显著性差异；通过对空心莲子草的解剖结构分析,初步推断为：空心莲子草受药后茎表面出现不定根(或茎)的分化刺激茎节中细胞结构的变化可能阻碍药剂的传导扩散,是造成各类除草剂防效差的原因之一,防治空心莲子草要适当加大用药量。
生物安全性测定表明：75%氯氟吡氧乙酸·麦草畏WDG在小麦四叶一心期使用安全；在小麦二叶一心期、三叶一心期在推荐使用量25g/667m2以下安全,高于推荐使用量不安全,出现植株疯长畸形。75%氯氟吡氧乙酸·麦草畏WDG在所设剂量下水稻二叶一心期、三叶一心期、四叶一心期都安全。为了进一步明确75%氯氟吡氧乙酸·麦草畏WDG防治旱地空心莲子草的效果,本研究分别对旱地空心莲子草多发地点进行田间药效试验。结果表明：该药剂防除空心莲子草效果好,持效期较长,施药量30g／667m2的15d、45d防效分别为80.86%、93.94%。
Water-based pesticide formulations of SC、WDG、EW, which are friendly to environment and contain no or rarely organic solvents, have been regarded as a direction of pesticide development worldwidely. Alternanthera philoxeroides was used as a control target in this paper to screen the optium mixing ration of fluroxypyr and dicamba. Effects of fluroxypyr and dicamba mixtures and WDG formulations processing technology were also studied in this paper. The application technology of this formulation were determined by its safety and activity bioassay in green house and fields. The results are as follows:
The mixture of fluroxypyr and dicamba exhibited significant synergistic action on A. philoxeroides, which were observed at the mixture ratio of 15.62:12.28= 8:7 (fluroxypyr: dicamba) by the equivalent curve. And according to this results, the optimal formulation were determined as 75% of fluroxypyr·dicamba and 25% of other auxiliary components。
A optimized formula were obtained by experiments which agreed with the standard formula of WDG. The formula is listed as follows:active ingredient:75%; wetting agent: 10%, dispersing agent:3%, disintegrants:2%; stinck:1%; and the rest are filler complement. The fluroxypyr·dicamba WDG are white or light brown cylindrical particles, of which the particle size are about 1.0 mm, the effective content of TC are 75±1%, pH value ranged from 6 to 8, water content≤1%, suspension rate≥90%, the wetting time≤60s, disintegration time≤3min.
75% fluroxypyr'dicamba WDG could significantly inhibit the fresh weight of A. philoxeroides at the recommending dosage of 15g/667m2, compared with 20%Fluroxypyr EC (40g/667m2) and 48% Dicamba AS (20g/667m2). The controlling effect of 75% fluroxypyr·dicamba WDG(15g/667m2),20% Fluroxypyr EC (40g/667m2) and 48% dicamba AS (20g/667m2) on the re-growth of A. philoxeroides reached 81.06%,47.79% and-1.20%, respectively, in which significant difference were observed. It was deduced that the reason that cause low controlling effect on A. philoxeroides were that the cell construction change in stem nodes stimulated by the polarization of coronal roots on stems after herbicide application, based on which application dosage should be added to control A. philoxeroides.
Field trials showed that:75% fluroxypyr·dicamba WDG could be safely used in wheat four-leaf stage,Also it would be safe to wheat it was used in wheat two-leaf and three-leaf stage at a dose less than 25g/667m2, while it would cause injur to wheat when the dosage were higher than the recommending dose.75% fluroxypyr·dicamba WDG would be safe to rice plants when it was used in rice two-leaf, three-leaf and four-leaf stages. In order to confirm the controlling effect of 75% fluroxypyr·dicamba WDG on A. philoxeroides in dryland, field trails were conducted in areas where A. philoxeroides occurred frequently. The results showed that:this formulation could effectly control the occurrence of A. philoxeroides with a long residual effect, and the controlling effect of 15 and 45 days after treating at a dosage of 30g/667m2 were 80.86% and 93.94%, respectively.
引文
白慧东,蒋玉凤,曹丽蒙.几种分散片崩解剂的性能与应用现状[J].新疆医学.2007,37：162-164.
陈德胜,龚国斌,苏朝辉等.200g／L氯氟吡氧乙酸EC对玉米田一年生阔叶杂草药效及安全性试验[J].安徽农业科学.2007,35(35)：11494-11495.
蔡广成,胡学友,孙友武.70%麦草畏水分散粒剂防除小麦田杂草的药效试验[J].安徽农业科学,1999,283-284.
程敬丽,朱金文,魏方林等.机械能与界面张力在农药水乳剂制备中的作用机理研究[J].农药学学报,2004,6(2)：62-67.
陈克付,龚国斌,章昆仑等.35%苯磺隆·氯氟吡氧乙酸可湿性粉剂小麦田间药效及安全性试验[J].农药科学与管理.2006,25(10)34-36.
查友贵,徐汉虹,万树青.农药剂型智能化及其实现[J].农药.2002,41(11)：6～9.
陈立亚,于宝珠,赵慧芳.Zeta电位及其在药学分散体系研究中的应用[J].药物分析杂志.2006,26(2)：281-283
陈蔚林.农药新剂型和助剂的研究开发概况[J].安徽化工.2002,115(1)：4～6.
樊海安.2-4-D丁酯与麦草畏复配防除麦田杂草试验[J],安徽农业科学.2008,36(13)：5516-5517.
龚国斌,何普泉,陈德胜等.200g／L氯氟吡氧乙酸乳油防治小麦田一年生阔叶杂草田间药效试验[J],现代农药.2008.7(1).
何普泉.200g／L氯氟吡氧乙酸乳油防治小麦田阔叶杂草田间药效试验[J].安徽农业科学.2007,,35(15)：4560-4563.
黄国洋.农药试验技术与评价方法[M].北京：中国农业出版社,2000：193-194.
贺红武,刘钊杰.国外农药开发的现状与发展趋势[J].湖北化工.1999,6：1～3.
黄国洋.农药试验技术与评价方法[M].北京：中国农业出版社,2000：193-194.
华乃震.增强活性和降低环境影响的农药剂型新进展[C],全国工业表面活性剂生产技术协作组和全国工业表面活性剂中心编.2002表面活性剂技术经济文集(9).大连：《精细与专用化学品》编辑部,2002：186-191.
华乃震.农药剂型研究进展(中)[J].农药.2008,47(3)：157-161.
华乃震.农药水分散粒剂的开发和进展[J].现代农药.2006,5(2)：32～37.
罗延红.一种新型农药水分散粒剂[D].陕西杨凌.西北农林科技大学,2005
华乃震.安全和环保型的农药水乳剂[J].现代农药,2003,2(5)：27-31.
黄傲良,李风敏,袁会珠.悬浮剂润湿分散剂选择方法研究[J].农药学学报,2001,9：66-70
黄金友.中国农药剂型及表面活性剂的发展趋势[J].精细化工中间体.2003,33：11-13
孔祥菊.氯氟吡氧乙酸防除空心莲子草试验观察[J].湖北植保,1998,(5)：32.
刘步林.农药剂型加工技术(第二版)[M],化学工业出版社,1998.
娄远来,邓渊钰等.我国空心莲子草的研究现状[J].江苏农业科学,2002,4：46-48.
李善林.麦草畏对早熟禾生长的影响[J].中国草地,2001,23(6)：73-74.
吕永来,刘荣权,梁卫红等.20%氯氟吡氧乙酸乳油防除玉米苗后阔叶杂草药效试验[M].内蒙古农业科技.2005(5：24-25.
刘亦学,汤天寿,刘焕禄等.46%苯磺隆·麦草畏可湿性粉剂防除小麦田阔叶杂草药效试验[J].安徽农业科学,2002,30(4)：575-576.
雷农田.克无踪+麦草畏防治田埂杂草[J],四川农业科技2002,4：21.
李怀明.松花江(哈尔滨段)冰封期制糖废水污染区的微生物监测、水质评价及其与鱼类越冬的关系[J].水产学杂志,1994,7(2)：38～41.
林冠伦.空心莲子草生物学及防治研究[J].江苏农学院学报,1990,2：58-62
凌世海.我国农药加工工业现状和发展建议[J].农药.1999,38(10)：19-24.
凌世海.农药剂型加工工业现状和发展趋势[J].安徽化工.2006,141(3)：3-9.
凌世海.农药助剂工业现状和发展建议[J].安徽化工.2001,113(5)：2-7.
娄远来,邓渊钰.我国空心莲子草的研究现状[J].江苏农业科学,2002,4：46—48.
李宏科,李丹.害虫天敌资源的保护与利用[J].世界农业2000,253(5)：36-38
刘峰,王会利,何茂华.利用正交试验设计优选氰·荞水SC配方[J].农药学学报,2003.1(5)：88-92
李丽芳,王开运.悬乳剂及其稳定性[[J].农药,2000,39(3)：14-16
李万梅,来虎钦,葛忠华.80%乙磷铝WDG崩解性和悬浮稳定性的研究[J].浙江工业大学学报,2006,34(1)：45-47
刘勤东.40%烯酞吗琳水分散粒剂的研制[J].农药,2007,46(10)：669—671
马超,刘峰.三角坐标图法在农药水分散粒剂配方研制中的应用[J].农药学学报,2006,8(4)：379-382.
农药电子手册(企业试用版).农业部农药检定所,2008.
潘立刚,陶岭梅.农药悬浮剂研究进展[J].植物保护.2005,31(2)：17～20.]
强胜,王庆亚,戴宝江.用空心莲子草评价草甘膦药效的新技术[J].上海农业学报,2003,19(2)：70～74.
沈国军,徐正浩等.空心莲子草的分布、危害与防除对策[J].2005,31(3)：14-18.
尚以顺,陈燕萍.水花生净防除空心莲子草的效果[J].中国草地,1997,(1)：76-79.
沈晋良.农药剂型加工[M].北京：中国农业出版社,2001,12.
谭万忠.空心莲子草对几种作物的损失测定[J].杂草学报,1994,8(1)：28～31
陶建新,姚国云,蔡忠等.使草合剂防除空心莲子草的效果[J].杂草科学.1993,3：19-20.
唐启义,冯明光.实用统计分析及其DPS数据处理系统[M].北京：科学出版社,2002：147
王焕民,张子明.新编农药手册[M].北京：农业出版社,1990.437-438.
吴寿法.氯氟吡氧乙酸防除空心莲子草试验[J].温州农业科技,2000,(3)：26～27.
温家钧,戴权.农药微乳剂简述[J].农药科学与管理,2003,24(6)：38—39
王以燕.农药剂型名称及代码[J].农药科学与管理,2004,25(6)：1-5
伍翔.40%三哇磷水乳剂的研制及物理稳定体系形成机理的研究[D].湖南长沙.湖南农业大学,2006
肖勇,陈建国.我国农药剂型加工工业的现状和发展建议[J].云南大学学报(自然科学版),2004,6(增刊)：194～198.
谢毅,郭凡.农药水分散粒剂的研究进展[J].农药科学与管理2005,26(12)：26～29.
徐正浩,王一平.外来植物的成灾机理及其防除对策[J].生态学杂志,2004,23(3)：124～127
谢毅,郭凡.农药水分散粒剂的研究进展[J].农药科学与管理2005,26(12)：26～29.
向梅梅,曾永二等.空心莲子草叶斑病菌代谢产物的除草活性[J].中国生物防治,2002,18(2)：87～89
向梅梅,曾永二等.莲子草假隔链格抱的寄主范围及对空心莲子草的控制作用[J].植物病理学报,2002,32(3)：285-287
尤庆伟,陈为民.14%苄嘧磺隆·麦草畏可湿性粉剂小麦田除草试验与研究[J].农药科学与管理2003,24(6)31～32.
中华人民共和国农业部农药检定所主编.农药登记公告汇编[M].北京：中国农业大学出版社,2004.
周家源,饶立平,薛俊等.25%氯氟吡氧乙酸乳油防除水稻移栽大田一年生阔叶杂草效果[J].湖北植保,2007,1：21-22.
周小刚,陈庆华,陈贵明等.氯氟吡氧乙酸·2甲4氯乳油防除移栽水稻田杂草的效果[J].杂草科学.2007,2：46～49.
张丽萍.国内外农药加工现状[J].山西农业科学.2000,28(1)：71～74.
郑铁军.农药新剂型的研究[J].黑龙江农业科学.2003,1：35～37.
张春华,王忠伟.农药微乳剂的优越性及其发展现状[J].农药科学与管理.2006,27(1)：35～38.
赵善欢.植物化学保护(第三版)[M].北京：中国农业出版社,2000,9：42～3
朱秀红,姚志龙,颜士洋等.氟草烟防除水花生试验初报[J].杂草科学.2005,2：57～58.
张金艳,王延锋.我国农药剂型加工工业的现状和发展建议[J].黑龙江农业科学.2001,(2)：39～41.
Bruce M. Mckay. Robert Koch and Richard M.Herbert.选择润湿助剂[A].第五届全国农药信息交流会会议文集,1994：84-87.)。
Barreto RW Torres ANT.1999. Nimbya alternantherae and cercospora alternantherae:two new records of fungal pathogens on Alternanthera philoxeroides (alligator weed) in Brazil[J]. Australasian
Plant Pathology,28(2):103107
Gangstad E O, Freeman T E. Aquatic Plant Control Program. Technical Report 8.Quatic Weed Control with Plant Pathogens[R]. Performer:Athens Coll Ala Dept of Biology. Sponsor:Office of the Chief of Engineers(Army),Washington D.C.61 Report:1974. APCP-TR-8.
Julien, M.H. and Chan, R.R. Biological control of alligator weed:unsuccessful attempts to control terrestrial growth using the flea beetle Disonycha argentiensis(Col:Chrysomelidate)[J]. Entomophaga,1992.37:215-221
Julien, M. H. Control of aquatic Alternathera philoxeroides in Australia; another success forAgasicles hygrophila[R]. In:Delfosse, E. S. (ed.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds,22-27 July 1980, Brisbane, Australia. CSIRO, Melbourne,1981, pp.583-588
Julien, M.H., Skarratt, B. and Maywald, G.F. Potential geographical distribution of alligator weed and its biologicalcontrol by Agasicles hygrophila[J]. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management 1995,33:55-60
Knowles DA. Chemistry and Technology of Agrochemical Formulations[M]. Kluwer Academic UK Publishers. The Netherlands,1998:41-43
Knowles DA. Trends in Pestcide Formulations [M]. UK London.2001:80-95.
Kirby A, Parr R, Tudor P, et al. Solid agrochemical compositionsin aqueous media dispersible [P]. W09918785,1999—4—22
Lionel S. Water Dispersible Granular Agricultural Compositions Made by Heat Extrusion:US,5474971 [P].1995-12-12.
Stefan H, Mirko,Matthias I. Analysis of the start-up process in continuos fluidized bed spray granulation balance modeling [J]. Chemical engineering science,2002,57 (20):4369-4390
Stefan H, Hans W H, Christian S. Influence of polymeric surfactants onpesticidal suspension concentrates:dispersing ability, milling efficiencyand stabilization power [J].Colloids and Surfaces, 2001,785—793
Sands,D.P.A., Kassulke, R.C., Harley, K.L.S.1982. Host specificity of Disonycha argentinensis(Coleoptera:Chrysomelidae), an agent for the biological control of alligatorweed, Alternanthera philoxeroldes in Australia[J]. Entomophaga,27:163-172
W.Van Valkenburg. Pesticide Formulations[M]. New York:Mekker Press,1973.
陈德胜,龚国斌,苏朝辉等.200g／L氯氟吡氧乙酸EC对玉米田一年生阔叶杂草药效及安全性试验[J].安徽农业科学.2007,35(35)：11494-11495.
蔡广成,胡学友,孙友武.70%麦草畏水分散粒剂防除小麦田杂草的药效试验[J].安徽农业科学,1999,283-284.
程敬丽,朱金文,魏方林等.机械能与界面张力在农药水乳剂制备中的作用机理研究[J].农药学学报,2004,6(2)：62-67.
陈克付,龚国斌,章昆仑等.35%苯磺隆·氯氟吡氧乙酸可湿性粉剂小麦田间药效及安全性试验[J].农药科学与管理.2006,25(10)34-36.
查友贵,徐汉虹,万树青.农药剂型智能化及其实现[J].农药.2002,41(11)：6～9.
陈立亚,于宝珠,赵慧芳.Zeta电位及其在药学分散体系研究中的应用[J].药物分析杂志.2006,26(2)：281-283
陈蔚林.农药新剂型和助剂的研究开发概况[J].安徽化工.2002,115(1)：4～6.
樊海安.2-4-D丁酯与麦草畏复配防除麦田杂草试验[J],安徽农业科学.2008,36(13)：5516-5517.
龚国斌,何普泉,陈德胜等.200g／L氯氟吡氧乙酸乳油防治小麦田一年生阔叶杂草田间药效试验[J],现代农药.2008.7(1).
何普泉.200g／L氯氟吡氧乙酸乳油防治小麦田阔叶杂草田间药效试验[J].安徽农业科学.2007,,35(15)：4560-4563.
黄国洋.农药试验技术与评价方法[M].北京：中国农业出版社,2000：193-194.
贺红武,刘钊杰.国外农药开发的现状与发展趋势[J].湖北化工.1999,6：1～3.
黄国洋.农药试验技术与评价方法[M].北京：中国农业出版社,2000：193-194.
华乃震.增强活性和降低环境影响的农药剂型新进展[C],全国工业表面活性剂生产技术协作组和全国工业表面活性剂中心编.2002表面活性剂技术经济文集(9).大连：《精细与专用化学品》编辑部,2002：186-191.
华乃震.农药剂型研究进展(中)[J].农药.2008,47(3)：157-161.
华乃震.农药水分散粒剂的开发和进展[J].现代农药.2006,5(2)：32～37.
罗延红.一种新型农药水分散粒剂[D].陕西杨凌.西北农林科技大学,2005
华乃震.安全和环保型的农药水乳剂[J].现代农药,2003,2(5)：27-31.
黄傲良,李风敏,袁会珠.悬浮剂润湿分散剂选择方法研究[J].农药学学报,2001,9：66-70
黄金友.中国农药剂型及表面活性剂的发展趋势[J].精细化工中间体.2003,33：11-13
孔祥菊.氯氟吡氧乙酸防除空心莲子草试验观察[J].湖北植保,1998,(5)：32.
刘步林.农药剂型加工技术(第二版)[M],化学工业出版社,1998.
娄远来,邓渊钰等.我国空心莲子草的研究现状[J].江苏农业科学,2002,4：46-48.
李善林.麦草畏对早熟禾生长的影响[J].中国草地,2001,23(6)：73-74.
吕永来,刘荣权,梁卫红等.20%氯氟吡氧乙酸乳油防除玉米苗后阔叶杂草药效试验[M].内蒙古农业科技.2005(5：24-25.
刘亦学,汤天寿,刘焕禄等.46%苯磺隆·麦草畏可湿性粉剂防除小麦田阔叶杂草药效试验[J].安徽农业科学,2002,30(4)：575-576.
雷农田.克无踪+麦草畏防治田埂杂草[J],四川农业科技2002,4：21.
李怀明.松花江(哈尔滨段)冰封期制糖废水污染区的微生物监测、水质评价及其与鱼类越冬的关系[J].水产学杂志,1994,7(2)：38～41.
林冠伦.空心莲子草生物学及防治研究[J].江苏农学院学报,1990,2：58-62
凌世海.我国农药加工工业现状和发展建议[J].农药.1999,38(10)：19-24.
凌世海.农药剂型加工工业现状和发展趋势[J].安徽化工.2006,141(3)：3-9.
凌世海.农药助剂工业现状和发展建议[J].安徽化工.2001,113(5)：2-7.
娄远来,邓渊钰.我国空心莲子草的研究现状[J].江苏农业科学,2002,4：46—48.
李宏科,李丹.害虫天敌资源的保护与利用[J].世界农业2000,253(5)：36-38
刘峰,王会利,何茂华.利用正交试验设计优选氰·荞水SC配方[J].农药学学报,2003.1(5)：88-92
李丽芳,王开运.悬乳剂及其稳定性[[J].农药,2000,39(3)：14-16
李万梅,来虎钦,葛忠华.80%乙磷铝WDG崩解性和悬浮稳定性的研究[J].浙江工业大学学报,2006,34(1)：45-47
刘勤东.40%烯酞吗琳水分散粒剂的研制[J].农药,2007,46(10)：669—671
马超,刘峰.三角坐标图法在农药水分散粒剂配方研制中的应用[J].农药学学报,2006,8(4)：379-382.
农药电子手册(企业试用版).农业部农药检定所,2008.
潘立刚,陶岭梅.农药悬浮剂研究进展[J].植物保护.2005,31(2)：17～20.]
强胜,王庆亚,戴宝江.用空心莲子草评价草甘膦药效的新技术[J].上海农业学报,2003,19(2)：70～74.
沈国军,徐正浩等.空心莲子草的分布、危害与防除对策[J].2005,31(3)：14-18.
尚以顺,陈燕萍.水花生净防除空心莲子草的效果[J].中国草地,1997,(1)：76-79.
沈晋良.农药剂型加工[M].北京：中国农业出版社,2001,12.
谭万忠.空心莲子草对几种作物的损失测定[J].杂草学报,1994,8(1)：28～31
陶建新,姚国云,蔡忠等.使草合剂防除空心莲子草的效果[J].杂草科学.1993,3：19-20.
唐启义,冯明光.实用统计分析及其DPS数据处理系统[M].北京：科学出版社,2002：147
王焕民,张子明.新编农药手册[M].北京：农业出版社,1990.437-438.
吴寿法.氯氟吡氧乙酸防除空心莲子草试验[J].温州农业科技,2000,(3)：26～27.
温家钧,戴权.农药微乳剂简述[J].农药科学与管理,2003,24(6)：38—39
王以燕.农药剂型名称及代码[J].农药科学与管理,2004,25(6)：1-5
伍翔.40%三哇磷水乳剂的研制及物理稳定体系形成机理的研究[D].湖南长沙.湖南农业大学,2006
肖勇,陈建国.我国农药剂型加工工业的现状和发展建议[J].云南大学学报(自然科学版),2004,6(增刊)：194～198.
谢毅,郭凡.农药水分散粒剂的研究进展[J].农药科学与管理2005,26(12)：26～29.
徐正浩,王一平.外来植物的成灾机理及其防除对策[J].生态学杂志,2004,23(3)：124～127
谢毅,郭凡.农药水分散粒剂的研究进展[J].农药科学与管理2005,26(12)：26～29.
向梅梅,曾永二等.空心莲子草叶斑病菌代谢产物的除草活性[J].中国生物防治,2002,18(2)：87～89
向梅梅,曾永二等.莲子草假隔链格抱的寄主范围及对空心莲子草的控制作用[J].植物病理学报,2002,32(3)：285-287
尤庆伟,陈为民.14%苄嘧磺隆·麦草畏可湿性粉剂小麦田除草试验与研究[J].农药科学与管理2003,24(6)31～32.
中华人民共和国农业部农药检定所主编.农药登记公告汇编[M].北京：中国农业大学出版社,2004.
周家源,饶立平,薛俊等.25%氯氟吡氧乙酸乳油防除水稻移栽大田一年生阔叶杂草效果[J].湖北植保,2007,1：21-22.
周小刚,陈庆华,陈贵明等.氯氟吡氧乙酸·2甲4氯乳油防除移栽水稻田杂草的效果[J].杂草科学.2007,2：46～49.
张丽萍.国内外农药加工现状[J].山西农业科学.2000,28(1)：71～74.
郑铁军.农药新剂型的研究[J].黑龙江农业科学.2003,1：35～37.
张春华,王忠伟.农药微乳剂的优越性及其发展现状[J].农药科学与管理.2006,27(1)：35～38.
赵善欢.植物化学保护(第三版)[M].北京：中国农业出版社,2000,9：42～3
朱秀红,姚志龙,颜士洋等.氟草烟防除水花生试验初报[J].杂草科学.2005,2：57～58.
张金艳,王延锋.我国农药剂型加工工业的现状和发展建议[J].黑龙江农业科学.2001,(2)：39～41.
Bruce M. Mckay. Robert Koch and Richard M.Herbert.选择润湿助剂[A].第五届全国农药信息交流会会议文集,1994：84-87.)。
Barreto RW Torres ANT.1999. Nimbya alternantherae and cercospora alternantherae:two new records of fungal pathogens on Alternanthera philoxeroides (alligator weed) in Brazil[J]. Australasian
Plant Pathology,28(2):103107
Gangstad E O, Freeman T E. Aquatic Plant Control Program. Technical Report 8.Quatic Weed Control with Plant Pathogens[R]. Performer:Athens Coll Ala Dept of Biology. Sponsor:Office of the Chief of Engineers(Army),Washington D.C.61 Report:1974. APCP-TR-8.
Julien, M.H. and Chan, R.R. Biological control of alligator weed:unsuccessful attempts to control terrestrial growth using the flea beetle Disonycha argentiensis(Col:Chrysomelidate)[J]. Entomophaga,1992.37:215-221
Julien, M. H. Control of aquatic Alternathera philoxeroides in Australia; another success forAgasicles hygrophila[R]. In:Delfosse, E. S. (ed.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds,22-27 July 1980, Brisbane, Australia. CSIRO, Melbourne,1981, pp.583-588
Julien, M.H., Skarratt, B. and Maywald, G.F. Potential geographical distribution of alligator weed and its biologicalcontrol by Agasicles hygrophila[J]. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management 1995,33:55-60
Knowles DA. Chemistry and Technology of Agrochemical Formulations[M]. Kluwer Academic UK Publishers. The Netherlands,1998:41-43
Knowles DA. Trends in Pestcide Formulations [M]. UK London.2001:80-95.
Kirby A, Parr R, Tudor P, et al. Solid agrochemical compositionsin aqueous media dispersible [P]. W09918785,1999—4—22
Lionel S. Water Dispersible Granular Agricultural Compositions Made by Heat Extrusion:US,5474971 [P].1995-12-12.
Stefan H, Mirko,Matthias I. Analysis of the start-up process in continuos fluidized bed spray granulation balance modeling [J]. Chemical engineering science,2002,57 (20):4369-4390
Stefan H, Hans W H, Christian S. Influence of polymeric surfactants onpesticidal suspension concentrates:dispersing ability, milling efficiencyand stabilization power [J].Colloids and Surfaces, 2001,785—793
Sands,D.P.A., Kassulke, R.C., Harley, K.L.S.1982. Host specificity of Disonycha argentinensis(Coleoptera:Chrysomelidae), an agent for the biological control of alligatorweed, Alternanthera philoxeroldes in Australia[J]. Entomophaga,27:163-172
W.Van Valkenburg. Pesticide Formulations[M]. New York:Mekker Press,1973.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |