基于企业家精神的动态能力生成机理研究
|
摘要
动态能力理论是在动荡复杂的竞争条件下,为解决企业持续发展问题而产生和发展起来的一个战略前沿。处于经济转型、技术变革、全球竞争、产业升级交错过程中的当代中国企业面临着更多的环境动态性、复杂性和不确定性,如何不断地开发和培育与环境变化相匹配的动态能力已成为未来中国企业面临的最大挑战。
现有研究主要集中于对动态能力概念内涵、形成机制、影响因素等的探讨,其中动态能力形成机制的研究是动态能力理论中最为核心的问题,对这一问题的解答是动态能力理论能否有效指导企业开发和提升动态能力的关键。现有这方面的研究成果大致可以分为两类。一是组织内部视角,主要观点包括：动态能力的形成是由企业所拥有的资产位势和历史发展路径所决定的;学习机制引导与塑造企业动态能力的形成与演化过程；知识形成的动态过程即为动态能力的形成与演变过程；动态能力形成过程即为企业形成技术轨道和技术范式的过程等。二是环境视角,主要是从“本地生产系统”的角度考察企业动态能力和环境影响因素的关系,源于一些学者从网络嵌入性视角考察企业动态能力的尝试。近年来,上述两种观点开始出现相互融合的趋势,如一些学者提出动态能力生成的自组织理论,把动态能力的形成视为一个与环境相适应的自组织过程。但是总体上看对动态能力的研究尚处于起始阶段,现有的分析框架还不够完善和成熟,因此不能较为全面地解释动态能力的本质和持续竞争优势的源泉。
动态能力是企业“整合、建立和重新配置内部与外部能力来适应快速变动环境的能力”,研究其生成机理应该体现这一内外结合的特征。企业家是企业创新的主体,他们介于市场与企业组织之间,是信息的集中者和决策的制定者,只有他们才能凭借其独特的地位和企业家精神,根据企业内部条件与外部环境的变化不断地筛选、组合、重组企业的资源和能力。但是现有对动态能力生成过程的研究中普遍存在企业家缺位现象,这一状况妨碍了人们对动态能力生成过程认识的深化。
系统动力学产生于上世纪50年代,本质上是一种从整体出发强调系统思考的研究模式和分析方法。本文认为缺少系统的研究视角是造成动态能力现有研究不足的主要原因,因此尝试引入这一分析视角,在一个系统思考的框架内深入探讨动态能力的生成机理,目的在于打开动态能力生成的“黑箱”,为破解企业能力演化中的两难困境,提高我国企业的国际竞争力、促进我国经济健康发展提供借鉴。
本文的主要研究内容包括以下几部分：
一是提出动态能力生成的分析框架。
动态能力理论是对核心能力理论的延伸和发展,它产生于动荡复杂的竞争条件下,以增强企业对环境变化的反应能力为目的,聚焦于核心刚性的克服,被认为是动态环境下企业持续竞争优势的来源。但是以往对动态能力的分析主要将其界定为一种持续的战略变革能力或改变惯例的惯例,虽然强调其动态性,但是却不具有直接可考查性,因而不能很好地解释其形成的过程,无法有效地指导企业的实践。组织即兴概念的引入使得我们可以用可考核的具体指标考查企业的组织即兴水平,并据此推断其动态能力,因此为动态能力生成的理论与实践研究提出了一个重要的研究思路。
本文首先从系统演进的视角提出一个由“企业家精神-组织即兴-动态能力”构成的动态能力生成的分析框架,从而从长期与短期相结合的角度解释了动态能力的生成过程。
二是分析动态能力生成的内在机理。
在上述分析框架的基础上,本文以快速战略调整能力和快速战略执行能力作为两个可考核的具体指标分析和评价企业的组织即兴水平,运用系统动力学分析方法,描述了动态能力生成的系统动力机制。
在本文提出的动态能力生成的理论框架中,动态能力的生成过程是由战略期间快速战略调整能力、运营期间快速战略执行能力两个增强环路构成的。增强环路有两种行为方式：要么是恶性循环,要么是良性循环。具体表现为恶性循环还是良性循环取决于环路的触发方式。系统思考发现：企业家精神是上述系统中系统要素的激活机制,也是系统结构中的“高杠杆解”。本文界定了个体、组织和社会三个不同层面的企业家精神,进而对三个层面企业家精神激活系统要素、催生动态能力的内在机理展开具体分析,使本文的理论框架建立在科学的逻辑基础之上。
三是分析动态能力生成的控制机理。
由于过程悖论的存在,研究动态能力的生成机理不仅需要考虑动力来源,还要研究控制机理。本研究从系统动力学的视角揭示了过程悖论产生的内在机理,为更深入认识过程悖论和动态能力的控制机理提供了一个新的分析视角,并在此基础上提出战略调整时点的识别机制,为破解过程悖和分析动态能力控制机理提出思路。
四是提出基于企业家精神培育的动态能力策略
本部分属于对策性研究,深入探讨了通过企业家精神培育促进动态能力生成的动态能力构建策略,为企业动态能力的开发和提升提供指导和借鉴。首先从系统协同的视角构建了企业家精神形成的分析框架,然后深入分析了个体层面企业家精神的来源、企业家精神的扩散机理和动态传承机制。
五是运用比较案例研究方法对本文提出的分析框架和理论模型进行实证检验。
本文通过对苹果公司、丰田汽车公司、联想集团、海尔集团和华为技术有限公司五个典型企业的案例考察,从实证研究的角度检验了本文提出的分析框架和理论模型,并且对本研究获得的重要结论做出总结,阐述理论贡献与实践价值之所在,分析本研究中存在的不足,提出有待今后进一步深入探索的研究方向。
本文的创新之处在于：
一是在一个系统思考的框架内分析了企业动态能力的生成与控制机理。
企业动态能力的生成过程是一个能力与环境不断匹配的过程,具有动态复杂系统的特征。本文将系统动力学方法运用于动态能力生成机制的研究,提出了一个由关系链条“企业家精神-组织即兴-动态能力”构成的企业动态能力生成的分析框架,并在此基础上深入分析了动态能力的生成和控制机理,以打开动态能力生成的“黑箱”,破解企业能力演化中的两难困境,丰富和推进了动态能力的理论研究进展。
二是将个体、组织和社会三个层面结合起来分析了企业动态能力的生成机理。
动态能力是“企业整合、建立、重新配置内外部能力来适应快速变动环境的能力”,只有将企业内外部因素结合起来才能全面认识动态能力的影响因素,深入理解动态能力的生成机理。然而现有对动态能力的研究缺少内外部结合的视角,导致对动态能力的生成缺少系统性认识。系统思考发现：企业家精神是动态能力生成过程中系统要素的激活机制。本文尝试以企业家精神为分析起点,将个体、组织和社会网络三个层面结合起来,系统地解析其激活系统要素、促进动态能力的生成的内在机理。
三是提出了基于企业家精神培育的动态能力策略。
本文从系统协同的视角构建了企业家精神形成的分析框架,然后深入分析了企业家精神的来源、扩散机理和动态传承机制,为企业动态能力培育和提升提出了一条可操作性路径。
Dynamic capabilities theory is a strategic management frontier, which was formed and developed to solve sustainable development of enterprises in turbulent and complicated competition condition. Contemporary Chinese enterprises, which are in changing technology, global competition, restructuring economy and upgrading industry, are faced with more environmental dynamics, complexity and uncertainty. So how to constantly develop and cultivate dynamic capabilities which can match with environment change has become the biggest challenge China's enterprises facing.
Currently research on dynamic capabilities mainly focused on discussion about its concept, mechanism and influencing factors. The formation mechanism of dynamic capabilities is the core in dynamic capabilities theory. How to answer this question is the key on whether dynamic capabilities theory can effectively guide enterprises to develop and improve their dynamic capabilities. The existing research results can be roughly divided into two groups. The first was called internal organization perspective. Its main ideas include:the formation of dynamic capabilities is determined by enterprises'property and development path; the formation and evolution of dynamic capabilities are guided and shaped by learning mechanism; the formation and evolution process of dynamic capabilities is the dynamic process of knowledge formation; the process of dynamic capabilities formation is the process in which enterprises formed their technology rail and technology model, etc. The second was called environment perspective, which mainly focused on the relations between enterprises dynamic capabilities and environmental impact factors from" the perspective of local production system". This viewpoint came from some scholars' attempt on researching enterprises'dynamic capabilities from network embedding perspective. In recent years, the above two ideas begun to appear integration trend. Such as, some scholars proposed self-organization theory on dynamic capabilities formation. That is, they regarded dynamic capabilities formation as a self-organizing process which can meet with environment. But on the whole, research on dynamic capabilities is still in the initial stage. The existing analysis frameworks are still not perfect and mature, so can't fully explain the nature of the dynamic capabilities and the source of sustainable competitive advantage.
Dynamic capabilities are "the capabilities which can integrate, establish and reconfigure internal and external capabilities to adapt to change of internal and external environment". To study the formation mechanism of it should reflect the features of combining inside and outside factors. Entrepreneurs are the main body of the enterprise innovation. Be situated between the market and enterprise organization, They are the concentration of information and decision makers. With its unique position and entrepreneurship, only they can constantly screen, combine, and reorganize enterprises resources and ability according to the internal and external conditions changes. But in the existing research on dynamic capability formation process, Entrepreneurs vacancy phenomenon exists generally. This situation hindered people to deepen understanding of the dynamic capability formation process.
Founded in the 1950s, System Dynamics is one kind of research pattern and analysis method starting from the whole and emphasizing on system thinking in essence. This paper argued that the lack of system research perspective was the main reason that led to the lack of research results. Introducing the analysis perspective, this paper tried to discusses dynamic capabilities formation mechanism in a system thinking framework. The purpose is to open the "black box" of dynamic capabilities formation, and put forward the beneficial reference for enterprises about how to break the dilemma in dynamic capabilities evolution, and how to enhance the international competitiveness of China's enterprise and promote economic health in China.
The main research contents include the following parts:
Partl:Put forward the analysis framework of dynamic capabilities formation.
Dynamic capabilities theory is the extension and development of core competence theory. It arises from the complex and volatile competition conditions in order to enhance the enterprise response to environmental change. Focusing on core rigidity to overcome, it is considered as the source of sustainable competitive advantage under dynamic environment. However, in previous research, dynamic capabilities were mainly seen as the capabilities which can constantly change strategy or the routines which can change operating routines. In this definition, although dynamic characteristics was emphasized, but because dynamic capabilities can't be directly evaluated, so the forming process could not be explained very well and enterprises' practice could not be effectively guided. The introduction of organization improvisation leads to that we can check organization improvisation level with specific assessment index and infer dynamic capabilities according to it. So it put forward a important thoughts for the theory and practice research of dynamic capabilities formation.
This paper put forward a dynamic capabilities formation framework from the system evolution perspective to deeply explain the formation process of dynamic capabilities from the perspective of combining short term and long term, which is made up of by the relationship chain " Entrepreneurship -Organization Improvisation-Dynamic Capabilities"
Part2:Analyze the inner mechanism of dynamic capabilities formation.
On the basis of the above analysis framework, taking quick strategic adjustment ability and rapid strategy implementation ability as two specific assessment indexes, this paper describes the system dynamic mechanism of dynamic capabilities formation by using system dynamics analysis method.
In the theoretical framework about dynamic capabilities formation put forward by this paper, the formation process of dynamic capabilities is made up of two enhancing loops: quick strategy adjustment ability during strategy period and rapid strategy implementation ability during operation period. Enhancing circuit performs two kinds of behavior:either a vicious cycle, or a benign circulation. The specific performance depends on how the loop was triggered. We found by system thinking:entrepreneurship is the activation mechanism of system elements in the process, and " high lever" in the system structure.This paper defined entrepreneurship in three different levels:the individual, the organization and the social level. Then concretely analyzed the inner mechanism on how three levels of entrepreneurship activate system elements and accelerate dynamic capabilities in order to make the theoretical framework put forward in this paper based on the science logic foundation.
Part3:Analyze the control mechanism of dynamic capabilities formation.
Due to the existence of process paradox, to research the formation mechanism of dynamic capabilities not only need to consider source of power, but also the control mechanism. From the perspective of system dynamics, this paper revealed the inner mechanism of process paradox, and provided a new perspective for more understanding of process paradox and control mechanism of dynamic capabilities. Further, we proposed the recognition mechanism of strategy adjustment in this foundation, and put forward ideas on how to solve process paradox and control dynamic capabilities.
Part4:Put forward dynamic ability strategy based on entrepreneurship cultivation.
This part belongs to the countermeasures study. We deeply discussed the dynamic capabilities construction strategy in order to provide guidance and reference about how to promote dynamic capabilities by fostering entrepreneurship. Firstly, we constructed the analysis framework about entrepreneurship formation from the perspective of system coordinate. Then we deeply analyzed the source of individual level entrepreneurship, the diffusion mechanism and dynamic inheritance mechanism of that.
Part5:We tested the analysis framework and theoretical model put forward by this paper using comparative case study method.
Finally, through case investigation for five typical enterprises, that is Apple, Toyota Motor Company, Lenovo Group, Haier Group and Huawei Technologies Co., we tested the analysis framework and theoretical model put forward in this paper from the perspective of positivism, made out a summary for the important conclusions of this research, expounded this theoretical contributions and practical value, analyzed the insufficiency in research and proposed the research direction in the future.
The innovation of this paper lies in:
1. Analyze the formation and control mechanism of dynamic capabilities in a systematic thinking framework.
As a process in which enterprises capabilities are constantly matching with the environment, the formation process of dynamic capabilities has characteristics of dynamic and complex system. Using system dynamics method, this paper put forward an analysis frame on dynamic capabilities formation mechanism, which is made up of by the relationship chain " Entrepreneurship - organization improvisation-dynamic capabilities ", and deeply analyzed the formation and control mechanism of dynamic capabilities in order to open "black box" of dynamic capabilities formation, crack the dilemma in enterprises dynamic capabilities development, and enrich and promote dynamic capabilities theory.
2. Analyze dynamic capabilities formation from three levels:The individual level, the organization level and the society level.
Dynamic capabilities are "the capabilities which can integrate, establish and reconfigure internal and external capabilities to adapt to change of internal and external environment". Only when the internal and external factors were combined together, can we have a comprehensive understanding on formation mechanism of dynamic capabilities. However, the existing research lacked the perspective of combining internal and external factors together. This is the reason why we still lacked systematic understanding on the formation path and formation mechanism of dynamic capabilities. We found by system thinking:entrepreneurship is the activation mechanism of system elements in the process of dynamic capabilities formation. So introducing the analysis perspective and taking entrepreneurship as the starting point of our analysis, this paper deeply discussed the internal mechanism on how entrepreneurship activated system elements and promoted dynamic capabilities formation from three levels:The individual level, the organization level and the society level.
3. Put forward dynamic capabilities strategy based on entrepreneurship cultivation.
Firstly, this paper constructed the analysis framework about the formation of entrepreneurship from the perspective of system coordinate. Then we deeply analyzed the source of individual level entrepreneurship, the diffusion mechanism and dynamic inheritance mechanism of it. Finally, we put forward an operability path to cultivate and promote enterprise dynamic capabilities.
现有研究主要集中于对动态能力概念内涵、形成机制、影响因素等的探讨,其中动态能力形成机制的研究是动态能力理论中最为核心的问题,对这一问题的解答是动态能力理论能否有效指导企业开发和提升动态能力的关键。现有这方面的研究成果大致可以分为两类。一是组织内部视角,主要观点包括：动态能力的形成是由企业所拥有的资产位势和历史发展路径所决定的;学习机制引导与塑造企业动态能力的形成与演化过程；知识形成的动态过程即为动态能力的形成与演变过程；动态能力形成过程即为企业形成技术轨道和技术范式的过程等。二是环境视角,主要是从“本地生产系统”的角度考察企业动态能力和环境影响因素的关系,源于一些学者从网络嵌入性视角考察企业动态能力的尝试。近年来,上述两种观点开始出现相互融合的趋势,如一些学者提出动态能力生成的自组织理论,把动态能力的形成视为一个与环境相适应的自组织过程。但是总体上看对动态能力的研究尚处于起始阶段,现有的分析框架还不够完善和成熟,因此不能较为全面地解释动态能力的本质和持续竞争优势的源泉。
动态能力是企业“整合、建立和重新配置内部与外部能力来适应快速变动环境的能力”,研究其生成机理应该体现这一内外结合的特征。企业家是企业创新的主体,他们介于市场与企业组织之间,是信息的集中者和决策的制定者,只有他们才能凭借其独特的地位和企业家精神,根据企业内部条件与外部环境的变化不断地筛选、组合、重组企业的资源和能力。但是现有对动态能力生成过程的研究中普遍存在企业家缺位现象,这一状况妨碍了人们对动态能力生成过程认识的深化。
系统动力学产生于上世纪50年代,本质上是一种从整体出发强调系统思考的研究模式和分析方法。本文认为缺少系统的研究视角是造成动态能力现有研究不足的主要原因,因此尝试引入这一分析视角,在一个系统思考的框架内深入探讨动态能力的生成机理,目的在于打开动态能力生成的“黑箱”,为破解企业能力演化中的两难困境,提高我国企业的国际竞争力、促进我国经济健康发展提供借鉴。
本文的主要研究内容包括以下几部分：
一是提出动态能力生成的分析框架。
动态能力理论是对核心能力理论的延伸和发展,它产生于动荡复杂的竞争条件下,以增强企业对环境变化的反应能力为目的,聚焦于核心刚性的克服,被认为是动态环境下企业持续竞争优势的来源。但是以往对动态能力的分析主要将其界定为一种持续的战略变革能力或改变惯例的惯例,虽然强调其动态性,但是却不具有直接可考查性,因而不能很好地解释其形成的过程,无法有效地指导企业的实践。组织即兴概念的引入使得我们可以用可考核的具体指标考查企业的组织即兴水平,并据此推断其动态能力,因此为动态能力生成的理论与实践研究提出了一个重要的研究思路。
本文首先从系统演进的视角提出一个由“企业家精神-组织即兴-动态能力”构成的动态能力生成的分析框架,从而从长期与短期相结合的角度解释了动态能力的生成过程。
二是分析动态能力生成的内在机理。
在上述分析框架的基础上,本文以快速战略调整能力和快速战略执行能力作为两个可考核的具体指标分析和评价企业的组织即兴水平,运用系统动力学分析方法,描述了动态能力生成的系统动力机制。
在本文提出的动态能力生成的理论框架中,动态能力的生成过程是由战略期间快速战略调整能力、运营期间快速战略执行能力两个增强环路构成的。增强环路有两种行为方式：要么是恶性循环,要么是良性循环。具体表现为恶性循环还是良性循环取决于环路的触发方式。系统思考发现：企业家精神是上述系统中系统要素的激活机制,也是系统结构中的“高杠杆解”。本文界定了个体、组织和社会三个不同层面的企业家精神,进而对三个层面企业家精神激活系统要素、催生动态能力的内在机理展开具体分析,使本文的理论框架建立在科学的逻辑基础之上。
三是分析动态能力生成的控制机理。
由于过程悖论的存在,研究动态能力的生成机理不仅需要考虑动力来源,还要研究控制机理。本研究从系统动力学的视角揭示了过程悖论产生的内在机理,为更深入认识过程悖论和动态能力的控制机理提供了一个新的分析视角,并在此基础上提出战略调整时点的识别机制,为破解过程悖和分析动态能力控制机理提出思路。
四是提出基于企业家精神培育的动态能力策略
本部分属于对策性研究,深入探讨了通过企业家精神培育促进动态能力生成的动态能力构建策略,为企业动态能力的开发和提升提供指导和借鉴。首先从系统协同的视角构建了企业家精神形成的分析框架,然后深入分析了个体层面企业家精神的来源、企业家精神的扩散机理和动态传承机制。
五是运用比较案例研究方法对本文提出的分析框架和理论模型进行实证检验。
本文通过对苹果公司、丰田汽车公司、联想集团、海尔集团和华为技术有限公司五个典型企业的案例考察,从实证研究的角度检验了本文提出的分析框架和理论模型,并且对本研究获得的重要结论做出总结,阐述理论贡献与实践价值之所在,分析本研究中存在的不足,提出有待今后进一步深入探索的研究方向。
本文的创新之处在于：
一是在一个系统思考的框架内分析了企业动态能力的生成与控制机理。
企业动态能力的生成过程是一个能力与环境不断匹配的过程,具有动态复杂系统的特征。本文将系统动力学方法运用于动态能力生成机制的研究,提出了一个由关系链条“企业家精神-组织即兴-动态能力”构成的企业动态能力生成的分析框架,并在此基础上深入分析了动态能力的生成和控制机理,以打开动态能力生成的“黑箱”,破解企业能力演化中的两难困境,丰富和推进了动态能力的理论研究进展。
二是将个体、组织和社会三个层面结合起来分析了企业动态能力的生成机理。
动态能力是“企业整合、建立、重新配置内外部能力来适应快速变动环境的能力”,只有将企业内外部因素结合起来才能全面认识动态能力的影响因素,深入理解动态能力的生成机理。然而现有对动态能力的研究缺少内外部结合的视角,导致对动态能力的生成缺少系统性认识。系统思考发现：企业家精神是动态能力生成过程中系统要素的激活机制。本文尝试以企业家精神为分析起点,将个体、组织和社会网络三个层面结合起来,系统地解析其激活系统要素、促进动态能力的生成的内在机理。
三是提出了基于企业家精神培育的动态能力策略。
本文从系统协同的视角构建了企业家精神形成的分析框架,然后深入分析了企业家精神的来源、扩散机理和动态传承机制,为企业动态能力培育和提升提出了一条可操作性路径。
Dynamic capabilities theory is a strategic management frontier, which was formed and developed to solve sustainable development of enterprises in turbulent and complicated competition condition. Contemporary Chinese enterprises, which are in changing technology, global competition, restructuring economy and upgrading industry, are faced with more environmental dynamics, complexity and uncertainty. So how to constantly develop and cultivate dynamic capabilities which can match with environment change has become the biggest challenge China's enterprises facing.
Currently research on dynamic capabilities mainly focused on discussion about its concept, mechanism and influencing factors. The formation mechanism of dynamic capabilities is the core in dynamic capabilities theory. How to answer this question is the key on whether dynamic capabilities theory can effectively guide enterprises to develop and improve their dynamic capabilities. The existing research results can be roughly divided into two groups. The first was called internal organization perspective. Its main ideas include:the formation of dynamic capabilities is determined by enterprises'property and development path; the formation and evolution of dynamic capabilities are guided and shaped by learning mechanism; the formation and evolution process of dynamic capabilities is the dynamic process of knowledge formation; the process of dynamic capabilities formation is the process in which enterprises formed their technology rail and technology model, etc. The second was called environment perspective, which mainly focused on the relations between enterprises dynamic capabilities and environmental impact factors from" the perspective of local production system". This viewpoint came from some scholars' attempt on researching enterprises'dynamic capabilities from network embedding perspective. In recent years, the above two ideas begun to appear integration trend. Such as, some scholars proposed self-organization theory on dynamic capabilities formation. That is, they regarded dynamic capabilities formation as a self-organizing process which can meet with environment. But on the whole, research on dynamic capabilities is still in the initial stage. The existing analysis frameworks are still not perfect and mature, so can't fully explain the nature of the dynamic capabilities and the source of sustainable competitive advantage.
Dynamic capabilities are "the capabilities which can integrate, establish and reconfigure internal and external capabilities to adapt to change of internal and external environment". To study the formation mechanism of it should reflect the features of combining inside and outside factors. Entrepreneurs are the main body of the enterprise innovation. Be situated between the market and enterprise organization, They are the concentration of information and decision makers. With its unique position and entrepreneurship, only they can constantly screen, combine, and reorganize enterprises resources and ability according to the internal and external conditions changes. But in the existing research on dynamic capability formation process, Entrepreneurs vacancy phenomenon exists generally. This situation hindered people to deepen understanding of the dynamic capability formation process.
Founded in the 1950s, System Dynamics is one kind of research pattern and analysis method starting from the whole and emphasizing on system thinking in essence. This paper argued that the lack of system research perspective was the main reason that led to the lack of research results. Introducing the analysis perspective, this paper tried to discusses dynamic capabilities formation mechanism in a system thinking framework. The purpose is to open the "black box" of dynamic capabilities formation, and put forward the beneficial reference for enterprises about how to break the dilemma in dynamic capabilities evolution, and how to enhance the international competitiveness of China's enterprise and promote economic health in China.
The main research contents include the following parts:
Partl:Put forward the analysis framework of dynamic capabilities formation.
Dynamic capabilities theory is the extension and development of core competence theory. It arises from the complex and volatile competition conditions in order to enhance the enterprise response to environmental change. Focusing on core rigidity to overcome, it is considered as the source of sustainable competitive advantage under dynamic environment. However, in previous research, dynamic capabilities were mainly seen as the capabilities which can constantly change strategy or the routines which can change operating routines. In this definition, although dynamic characteristics was emphasized, but because dynamic capabilities can't be directly evaluated, so the forming process could not be explained very well and enterprises' practice could not be effectively guided. The introduction of organization improvisation leads to that we can check organization improvisation level with specific assessment index and infer dynamic capabilities according to it. So it put forward a important thoughts for the theory and practice research of dynamic capabilities formation.
This paper put forward a dynamic capabilities formation framework from the system evolution perspective to deeply explain the formation process of dynamic capabilities from the perspective of combining short term and long term, which is made up of by the relationship chain " Entrepreneurship -Organization Improvisation-Dynamic Capabilities"
Part2:Analyze the inner mechanism of dynamic capabilities formation.
On the basis of the above analysis framework, taking quick strategic adjustment ability and rapid strategy implementation ability as two specific assessment indexes, this paper describes the system dynamic mechanism of dynamic capabilities formation by using system dynamics analysis method.
In the theoretical framework about dynamic capabilities formation put forward by this paper, the formation process of dynamic capabilities is made up of two enhancing loops: quick strategy adjustment ability during strategy period and rapid strategy implementation ability during operation period. Enhancing circuit performs two kinds of behavior:either a vicious cycle, or a benign circulation. The specific performance depends on how the loop was triggered. We found by system thinking:entrepreneurship is the activation mechanism of system elements in the process, and " high lever" in the system structure.This paper defined entrepreneurship in three different levels:the individual, the organization and the social level. Then concretely analyzed the inner mechanism on how three levels of entrepreneurship activate system elements and accelerate dynamic capabilities in order to make the theoretical framework put forward in this paper based on the science logic foundation.
Part3:Analyze the control mechanism of dynamic capabilities formation.
Due to the existence of process paradox, to research the formation mechanism of dynamic capabilities not only need to consider source of power, but also the control mechanism. From the perspective of system dynamics, this paper revealed the inner mechanism of process paradox, and provided a new perspective for more understanding of process paradox and control mechanism of dynamic capabilities. Further, we proposed the recognition mechanism of strategy adjustment in this foundation, and put forward ideas on how to solve process paradox and control dynamic capabilities.
Part4:Put forward dynamic ability strategy based on entrepreneurship cultivation.
This part belongs to the countermeasures study. We deeply discussed the dynamic capabilities construction strategy in order to provide guidance and reference about how to promote dynamic capabilities by fostering entrepreneurship. Firstly, we constructed the analysis framework about entrepreneurship formation from the perspective of system coordinate. Then we deeply analyzed the source of individual level entrepreneurship, the diffusion mechanism and dynamic inheritance mechanism of that.
Part5:We tested the analysis framework and theoretical model put forward by this paper using comparative case study method.
Finally, through case investigation for five typical enterprises, that is Apple, Toyota Motor Company, Lenovo Group, Haier Group and Huawei Technologies Co., we tested the analysis framework and theoretical model put forward in this paper from the perspective of positivism, made out a summary for the important conclusions of this research, expounded this theoretical contributions and practical value, analyzed the insufficiency in research and proposed the research direction in the future.
The innovation of this paper lies in:
1. Analyze the formation and control mechanism of dynamic capabilities in a systematic thinking framework.
As a process in which enterprises capabilities are constantly matching with the environment, the formation process of dynamic capabilities has characteristics of dynamic and complex system. Using system dynamics method, this paper put forward an analysis frame on dynamic capabilities formation mechanism, which is made up of by the relationship chain " Entrepreneurship - organization improvisation-dynamic capabilities ", and deeply analyzed the formation and control mechanism of dynamic capabilities in order to open "black box" of dynamic capabilities formation, crack the dilemma in enterprises dynamic capabilities development, and enrich and promote dynamic capabilities theory.
2. Analyze dynamic capabilities formation from three levels:The individual level, the organization level and the society level.
Dynamic capabilities are "the capabilities which can integrate, establish and reconfigure internal and external capabilities to adapt to change of internal and external environment". Only when the internal and external factors were combined together, can we have a comprehensive understanding on formation mechanism of dynamic capabilities. However, the existing research lacked the perspective of combining internal and external factors together. This is the reason why we still lacked systematic understanding on the formation path and formation mechanism of dynamic capabilities. We found by system thinking:entrepreneurship is the activation mechanism of system elements in the process of dynamic capabilities formation. So introducing the analysis perspective and taking entrepreneurship as the starting point of our analysis, this paper deeply discussed the internal mechanism on how entrepreneurship activated system elements and promoted dynamic capabilities formation from three levels:The individual level, the organization level and the society level.
3. Put forward dynamic capabilities strategy based on entrepreneurship cultivation.
Firstly, this paper constructed the analysis framework about the formation of entrepreneurship from the perspective of system coordinate. Then we deeply analyzed the source of individual level entrepreneurship, the diffusion mechanism and dynamic inheritance mechanism of it. Finally, we put forward an operability path to cultivate and promote enterprise dynamic capabilities.
引文
[1](英)安德鲁.坎贝尔,凯瑟琳.萨姆斯.卢克斯著,任通海,龙大伟译.战略协同[M].北京：机械工业出版社,2000.
[2](英)安德鲁.沃德,领袖的生命周期：使领袖与进化中的组织相适应[M].北京：经济管理出版社,2004.
[3]白景坤.基于组织惰性视角的组织理论演进路径研究[J].经济与管理,2007,(12)：32-36.
[4]边燕杰.找回强关系：中国的间接关系、网络桥梁和求职[J].国外社会学,1998,(2)：50-65.
[5]保罗·萨谬尔森,威廉·诺德豪斯(著),萧琛等(译).经济学(16版)[M].北京：华夏出版社,1999：28.
[6]彼得·德鲁克.创新与企业家精神[M].蔡文燕,译,北京：机械工业出版社,2009：106-135.
[7]曹红军,赵剑波和王以华,动态能力的维度：基于中国企业的实证研究[J].科学学研究,2009,(1)：36-44.
[8]陈晓东和陈传明.战略调整中的核心刚性探析.华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)[J],2005,(1)：94-100+125.
[9]陈传明.企业战略调整的路径依赖特征及其超越[J].管理世界,2002,(6)：94-101
[10]陈立新和张玉利.现有企业的突破性创新动能研究[J].现代管理科学,2008,(5)：38-40.
[11]陈国权.组织与环境的关系及组织学习[J].管理学报.2001,(5)：39-49.
[12]陈墀元.组织即兴、组织学习与组织惯例之内生性演化[D].国立云林科技大学管理研究所博士毕业论文.2006.
[13]储小平,家族企业传承之难：企业家精神[N],经理日报.2011-02-16(A02).
[14]崔瑜；焦豪,企业动态能力提升作用机制研究：基于学习理论的视角[J],软科学,2009(4)：30-35.
[15](美)丹尼斯·舍伍德(著),邱昭良,刘昕(译),系统思考[M],机械工业出版社,2007：3.
[16]丁任重.转型与发展中国市场经济进程分析[M],北京：中国经济出版社,2004：16.
[17]董俊武,黄江圳和陈震红.基于知识的动态能力演化模型研究[J].中国工业经济,2004(2)：117-127+156.
[18]董俊武,黄江圳和陈震红.动态能力演化的知识模型与一个中国企业的案例分析.管理世界,2004,(4)：117-127+156.
[19]多萝西.伦纳德.巴顿.知识与创新[M],北京：新华出版社,2000.
[20]窦军生,家族企业代际传承中企业家默会知识和关系网络的传承机理研究[D].浙江大学,2008.
[21]多萝西·伦纳德·巴顿,知识与创新[M],北京：新华出版社,2000.
[22]高波.文化、文化资本与企业家精神的区域差异[J].南京大学学报,2007,(5)：39-48.
[23]傅家骥和洪后其,企业家精神的培养与技术创新扩散[J].中外管理导报,1990,(2)：4-11.
[24]N·格里高利·曼昆(著).梁小民(译).经济学基础(2版)[M].北京：中国人民大学出版社,2005：310.
[25]贺小刚,李新春和方海鹰,动态能力的测量与功效：基于中国经验的实证研究.管理世界[J],2006,(3)：94-103+113+171.
[26]贺小刚,潘永永和连燕玲.核心能力理论的拓展：企业家能力与竞争绩效的关系研究[J].科研管理[J],2007,(4)：141-148.
[27]黄俊,王钊,白硕等,动态能力的测度：基于国内汽车行业的实证研究.管理评论,2010,(1)：76-81.
[28]贾良定和周三多,论企业家精神及其五项修炼[J].南京社会科学,2006,(9).39-35.
[29]江积海,知识传导、动态能力与后发企业成长研究.研究与发展管理,2006,(2)：22-27.
[30]蒋春燕和赵曙明,社会资本和公司企业家精神与绩效的关系：组织学习的中介作用[J],管理世界,2006,(10)：90-99+171-172.
[31]姜奇平,重新定义新经济[J],互联网周刊,2004,(2)：64-67.
[32]焦豪和魏江,企业动态能力度量与功效——本土模型的构建与实证研究.中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2008,(5)：83-87.
[33]李兴旺,动态能力理论的操作化研究：识别架构与形成机制[M],经济科学出版社,2006
[34]李笑男和潘安成.基于多维搜索的组织即兴模型研究[A].第五届(2010)中国管理 学年会——组织与战略分会场论文集.2010年：1-10.
[35]李新春等,企业家精神、企业家能力与企业成长——“企业家理论与企业成长国际研讨会”综述[J].经济研究,2002,(1)：89-92.
[36]李乾文,创业型战略的兴起及实施[J].商业研究,2006,(16)：137-139.
[37]李忠辉,企业知识资本管理模式初探[J].南开管理评论,2002,(4)：12-22.
[38]李正彪,一个综述：国外社会关系网络理论研究及其在国内企业研究中的运用[J].经济问题探索,2004,(11)：58-61.
[39]李维安和王辉,企业家创新精神培育：一个公司治理视角[J].南开经济研究,2003,(2)：56-59.
[40]林萍,动态能力的测量及作用：来自中国企业的经验数据[J].中南大学学报(社会科学版),2009,(4)：533-540.
[41]刘海建,陈松涛和陈传明,企业核心能力的刚性特征及其超越[J].中国工业经济,2003,(11)：47-54.
[42]刘海建,企业组织结构刚性与企业战略调整[D],南京大学博士毕业论文.2005：35.
[43]刘光岭,影响企业核心能力的因素及对策研究[D].西北大学博士学位论文,2004.
[44]刘漩华,基于核心能力的企业组织创新研究[D].鹭南大学博士学位论文,2003.
[45]柳传志,联想的失败与成功——联想如何穿越多元化到国际化的险滩[J],中国企业家,2007,(18)：52-56.
[46]罗伯特.K.殷(著),周海涛(译).案例研究设计与方法(第三版)[M].重庆大学出版社,2004：11,19,95,106.
[47]罗珉和刘永俊.企业动态能力理论架构与构成要素[M].中国工业经济,2009,(1)：75-86.
[48]马强和远德玉,技术行动的嵌入性与技术的产业化[J].自然辨证法研究,2004,(5)：71-74+93.
[49]米歇尔.A.赫特等,战略型企业家[M]经济管理出版社,2002.
[50]彭正龙和王海花,企业社会责任表现与员工满意度对组织即兴效能的影响[J].心理科学,2010,(1)：118-121.
[51]彭明朗.经济发展的源泉在于人力资本[J].读与写,1997,(3).58-59
[52]彭晶晶,晋商东掌制度述论.中州学刊[J],2009,(4)：180-182.
[53]蒲明,组织即兴、组织学习和组织记忆三者关系的研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007,(9)：154-157.
[54]青木昌彦：.比较制度分析[M].上海：上海远东出版社,2001.
[55]邱钊,黄俊,李传昭等,动态能力与企业竞争优势——基于东风汽车有限公司的质性研究.中国软科学,2008,(10)：134-140
[56]邱国栋和白景坤,价值生成分析：一个协同效应的理论框架[J],中国工业经济,2007,(06)：88-95.
[57]邱绍良.系统思考实践篇[M].北京：中国人民大学出版社,2009：234.
[58]芮明杰,屈路和胡金星,企业追求内部协同向外部协同转变的动因分析[J],上海管理科学,2005(03)：5-7.
[59](美)圣吉(著),张成林译.第五项修炼：学习型组织的艺术与实务[J],中信出版社,2009：61,63,73,81.
[60]时鹏程,许磊.论企业家精神的三个层次及其启示[J],外国经济与管理,2006,(2)：44-51.
[61]史漫飞,柯武刚.制度经济学——社会秩序与公共政策[M].韩朝华译,北京：商务印书馆,2003：35.
[62]斯蒂芬·P·罗宾斯.组织行为学(第七版).北京：中国人民大学出版社：423.
[63]陶然,彭正龙和许涛.组织认知的即兴现象与组织创新能力研究[J].图书情报工作.2009,(14)：59-62+79.
[64]陶厚永,王秀江和刘洪.组织即兴及其对企业应对危机的意义研究[J],外国经济与管理,2009,(9)：53-59.
[65][美]托马斯.福特.布朗(著).木子西(编译).社会资本理论综述[J].马克思主义与现实,2000：41-46.
[66]西蒙.现代决策理论的基石—有限理性论[M].北京：北京经济学院出版社,1989：45-62.
[67]王核成.中国企业国际竞争力的评价指标体系研究[J],科研管理,2001,(4).73-77.
[68]王翔.企业动态能力演化理论和实证研究[D],复旦大学博士毕业论文,2006.
[69]王毅.以核心能力为主导逻辑的战略管理.科研管理[J],2001(03)：13-19.
[70]王建安.技术创新与制度创新的匹配机制研究——一个理论框架和两个案例分析[J].科研管理.2001,(3)：79-85.
[71]魏江,陈志辉和张波.企业集群中企业家精神的外部经济性考察[J].科研管理,2004,(3)：20-25.
[72]吴东和裘颖.团队即兴能力与创新绩效的关系研究[J].科学管理研究,2010,(12)： 23-27.
[73]项保华和罗青军,基于主导逻辑与规则的战略循环模式,西北工业大学学报：社会科学版,2002,(4)：23-26.
[74]夏普·雷吉斯特·格里米斯(著),郭庆旺和应惟伟(译).社会问题经济学(第13版)[M].北京：中国人民大学出版社,2000：336.
[75]邢以群,企业家及其企业家精神.浙江大学学报(社会科学版),1994,(2)：67-74.
[76](美)熊彼特(著),李默(译)./经济发展理论[M].西安：陕西师范大学出版社.2007.
[77]许庆瑞,谢章澎和杨志蓉.企业技术与制度创新协同的动态分析[J].科研管理.2006,(4)：116-120+129.
[78]许和隆.冲突与互动：转型社会政治发展中的制度与文化[D].苏州大学博士学位论文,2006.
[79]94薛红志和张玉利.公司创业研究评述——国外创业研究新进展[J],外国经济与管理,2003(11).
[80]薛有志和王世龙.基于资源与能力的企业家精神机能体系研究[J].现代管理科学,2008,(9)：7-9.
[81]杨丽和孙国辉.战略执行影响因素研究[J].中央财经大学学报期.2009,(5)：48-53.
[82]叶卫华.人格特质理论的探讨与运用[J].江西社会科学,2004,(10)：200-202.
[83]殷华方,核心能力刚性的维度、机理与超越[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2006,(5)：56-61.
[84]余菁.案例研究与案例研究方法[J].经济管理.新管理.2004,(10)：24-29.
[85]韵江和姜晨.国外组织即兴研究述评[J].国外社会科学,2010,(5)：4-10.
[86]曾萍.知识创新、动态能力与组织绩效的关系研究[J].科学学研究,2009,(8)：1271-128.
[87]章威,基于知识的企业动态能力研究：嵌入性前因及创新绩效结果[D],2009,浙江大学.
[88]张小林和裘颖,即兴能力理论研究综述,科技进步与对策,2010,(23)：156-161.
[89]张文坤.组织即兴文献综述研究[J].时代经贸.2008(2)：139+141.
[90]张玉利.创业与企业家精神：管理者的思维模式和行为准则[J].南开学报,2004,(1)：12-15.
[91]张钢,基于技术转移的企业能力演化过程研究[J].科学学研究,2001,(3)：70-77.
[92]张娟.制度创新：当代中国政治发展的现实诉求与路径选择[M].湖南人民出版 社,2010.
[93]张佑林.江浙区域经济发展中的文化因素分析[D].华中科技大学博士毕业论文,2005：1.
[94]郑刚,颜宏亮,王斌.动态能力的构成维度及特征研究[J].科技进步与对策,2007,(3)：90-93.
[95]郑胜华和芮明杰.动态能力的研究述评及其启示[J].自然辨证法通讯,2009,(5)：56-64+70+111.
[96]郑素丽,章威和吴晓波.基于知识的动态能力：理论与实证[J].科学学研究.2010,(3)：405-411+466.
[97]邹国庆和徐庆仑.核心能力的构成维度及其特性[J].中国工业经济,2005,(5)：96-103.
[98]周会斌和刘冰.高新技术企业集群中企业家精神的扩散机理研究[J].企业活力2007,(5)：82-85.
[99]周其仁.新经济下的企业家精神.中国企业报[N],2000-07-06/(005).
[100]周立群和邓宏图.企业家理性、非理性与相对理性研究——兼论企业家精神[J].天津社会科学,2002,(1)：74-81.
[101]庄子银.企业家精神、持续技术创新和长期经济增长的微观机制[J].管理世界,2005,(12)：3244.
[102]Adner,R. & Helfat, C.E.2003,"Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.24, No.10, pp.1011-1025.
[103]Akgun, A.E.& Lynn, G.S.2002, "New product development team improvisation and speed-to-market:an extended model". European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol.5, No.3, pp.117-129.
[104]Aldrich,H.E. & Zimmer, C.1986, "Entrepreneurship through social networks",In: the art and science of entrepreneurship, ed. D.L. Sex-ton and R.W. Smilor. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing, pp.3-23.
[105]Amit, R.,& Schoemaker, P. J. H.1993, "Strategic assets and organisational rent", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.14, No.1, pp.33-46.
[106]Argyris, C. & Schon, D. A.1978, Organizational Learning:A Theory of Action Perspective Massachusetts:Addison-Wesley.
[107]Argyris C. & St. Schon D.A.1996, Organizational learning Ⅱ:Theory, method, and practice,Reading, MA:Addison Wesley.
[108]Arrow K.J.1962, Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for innovation, Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press, pp.609-626.
[109]Barney, J. B.2001,"Resource-based Theories of Competitive Advantage:a Ten-year Retrospective on the Resource-Based View", Journal of Management, Vol.27, No.6, pp.625-641.
[110]Barrett, F. J.1998, "Coda: Creativity and improvisation in organizations for organizational learning", Organization Science, Vol.9,No.5, pp.605-622.
[111]Bastien, D. T., & Hostager ,T. J.1992, " Cooperation as communicative accomplishment:A symbolic interaction analysis of an improvised jazz concert", Communication Studies, Vol.43,No.2,pp.92-104.
[112]Bertalanffy, L. von,1968, General System Theory:Foundations, Development, Applications,New York:George Braziller.
[113]Bettis, Richard A.& C. K. Prahalad 1995, " The Dominant Logic:Retrospective and Extension," Strategic Management Journal, Vol.16, No. 1,pp.5-14.
[114]Blyler, M. & Coff, R. W.2003, Dynamic capabilities, social capital, and rent appropriation: Ties that split pies, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.24, No.7,pp.677-686.
[115]Bourdieu, Pierre.1980, "Le capital social:notes provisoires", Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales,vol 31, No.1, pp.2-3.
[116]Bourdieu, Pierre.1985,"The social space and the genesis of groups", Theory and Society, Vol.14, No.6, pp.723-744.
[117]Calogherou, Y. A. Protogerou, Y. E. Spanos,&L. Papayanakis, "Industry vs. Firm-specific effects on Performance:Contrasting SMEs and Large-sized firms", European Management Journal, Vol.22, No.2,pp.231-243.
[118]Carlsson, S. A.,2003, "Knowledge managing and knowledge management systems in inter-organizational networks", Knowledge and Process Management, Vol.10, No. 3,pp.l94.
[119]Cangelosi, V.E.& Dill, W.R.1965,"Organizational Learning:Observations Towards a Theory", Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.10, No.2, pp.175-203.
[120]Cepeda, G. & Vera, D.2005,"Knowledge management and firm performance: Examining the mediating link of dynamic capabilities", Iberoamerican Academy of Management, Lisbon, Portugal.
[121]Chakravarthy, B. S. & Lorang, P.1991, "Managing the Strategy Process:A Framework for a Multibusiness Firm ",Preptice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
[122]Cohen, M.D., Burkhart R., Dos,i G. Egid,i M., Margengo, L., Warglien, M. & Winter, S.,1996,Routines and other recurring action patterns of organizations:contemporary research issues, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol.5, No.3,pp.653-698.
[123]Coleman, J.S.1988, " Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital", American Journal of Sociology, Vol.94,No.5,pp.95-121.
[124]Collis DJ.1994, "Research note:how valuable are organizational capabilities? Strategic Management Journal, Vol.15,No.2,pp.143-152.
[125]Covin J G, & Slevin D P.1989, "Strategic Management of Small Firms in Hostile and Benign Environments", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.10, No. l.pp.75-87.
[126]Crossan, M., Cunha, M. P., Vera, D., & Cunha, J.2005,"Time and organizational improvisation", Academy of Management Review, Vol.30, No. 1.pp.129-145.
[127]Crossan, M., & Sorrenti, M.1997, Making sense of improvisation. In J. P.Walsh and A S. Huff (Eds.),Advances in Strategic Management,14:155-180. Greenwich, CT:JAI Press.
[128]Cunha,M.P., Cunda J.V.da & Kamoche,K.,1999, " Organizational Improvisation: What, When, How and Why", International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol.30, No. 1.pp.299-341.
[129]Cunha, M., & Cunha, J.2002, " To plan and not to plan: Toward a synthesis between planning and learning", International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, Vol.5, No.3.pp.299-315.
[130]Cyert, R.,& March, J.G.1963,A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
[131]Daniel EM,&Wilson H N.2003, "The role of dynamic capabilities in e-business transformation", European Journal of Information Systems, Vol.12,No.4,pp.282-296.
[132]Davidsson, P.2003."The Domain of Entrepreneurship Reach:Some Suggestions", Advances in Entrepreneurship Firm Emergence and Growth, Vol.6.pp.315-372.
[133]David J. Teece.2007, "Explicating Dynamic Capabilities:The Nature and Micro-foundations of (Sustainable) Enterprise Performance", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.28, No.13. pp.1319-1350.
[134]Dorothy Leonard Barton.1992, "Core Capabilities and Rigidities:A Paradox in Managing New Product Development", Strategic Management Journal Vol.13, No.S1, pp. 111-125.
[135]Dosi, G.1982, "Technological paradigms and technological trajectories:a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change". Research Policy, Vol. 11,No.3,pp.147-162.
[136]Doving, E., & Gooderham, P.N.2008, "Dynamic capabilities as antecedents of the scope of related diversification: The case of small firm accountancy practices", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.29, No.8, pp.841-857
[137]Eisenhardt Kathleen M.1989, "Building Theories from Case Study Research", The Academy of Management Review, Vol.14, No.4,pp.532-550.
[138]Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. & Tabrizi, Benham N.1995, "Accelerating adaptive processes: product innovation in the global computer industry" Administrative Science Quarterly. Vol.40,No. 1,pp.84-110.
[139]Eisenhardt KM, & Martin JA.2000, "Dynamic capabilities:What are they? ", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.20, No.10,pp.1105-1121.
[140]Forrester J W.1991,"Greetings to the 1991 System Dynamics Conference in Bangkok", Supplemental Proceedings of the 1991 Inte. System Dynamics Conference, pp. 1-3.
[141]Gersick, CJG, & Hackman, JR.1990, "Habitual Routines in Task-performing Groups", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol.47,No.1,pp. 65-97.
[142]G. Gordon,1978, System Simulation, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
[143]Goto, Akira.1982, "Business Group in a Market Economy", European Economic Review, Vol.19, No.1, pp.53-70
[144]Godfrey, P. & Hill, C.1995, "The problem of unobservable in strategic management research", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.16, No.7,pp.519-533.
[145]Granovetter, M.1985, "Economic Action and Social Structure:The Problem of Embeddedness", American Journal of Sociology, Vol.91,No.3,pp.481-510.
[146]Grant, R.M.1996, "prospering in dynamically competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration", Organization Science, Vol.7,No. 4,pp.375-387.
[147]Guth,W.D., & Ginsberg, A.1990, "Guest Editor's Introduction: Corporate Entrepreneurship", Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 11,No.5,pp.5-16.
[148]Hagedoorn, J.2006, "Understanding the cross-level embeddedness of interfirm partnership formation", A cademy of Management Review, Vol.31,No.3.pp.670-680.
[149]Hannan,M. & Freeman,J.1977, "The population ecology of organizations",American Journal of Sociology, Vol.82,No.5.pp.929-964.
[150]Hannan, M. & Freeman, J.1989. Structural Inertia and Organizationl Change, American Sociological Review, Vol.49,No.2, pp.149-164.
[151]Hayek, F.A.von.1937, "Economics and Knowledge", Economica, Vol.4,No.13, pp.33-54.
[152]Helfat, C.,& Peteraf, M.2003, "The dynamic resource-based view:Capability lifecycles", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.24, No.10, pp.997-1010.
[153]Henderson Rebecca M. & Clark,Kim.B.1990, "Architectural Innovation:the Reconfiguration of Exiting Product Technologies and The Failure of Establised Firms",Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.35,No1,pp.9-30.
[154]Hodgkinson, G.P.1997, "Cognitive inertia in a turbulent market:the case of UK residential estate agents", Manage Study, Vol.34,No.6, pp.921-945.
[155]Hoskisson, R. E., Hitt, M.A. & Wan,W. P.1999, "Theory and Research in Strategic Management:Swings of a Pendulum", Journal of Management, Vol.25,No.3,pp 417-456.
[156]Iansiti,M, & Clark, K B.1994, "Integration and dynamic capability:Evidence from product development in automobiles and mainframe computers", Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol.3,No.3,pp.557-605.
[157]King,A.A.&Tucci,C.L.,2002, "Incumbent entry into new market niches:The role of experience and managerial choice in the creation of dynamic capabilities", Management Science, Vol.48,No.2, pp.171-186.
[158]Kirzner, Israel M.1973,Competition and Entrepreneurship, Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
[159]Kohli A. K. & Jaworski, B.J.1990, "Market orientation:the construct, research propositions and managerial implications", Journal of Marketing, Vol.54,No.2, pp.1-18.
[160]Leoncini, R., Montresor, S. & Vertova, G.2003, "Dynamic capabilities:evolving organizations in evolving (technological) systems", U of Bergamo Economics Working Paper No.4/2003.
[161]Leonard-Barton, D.1992, "Core Capability and Core Rigidity:A Paradox in Managing New Product Development", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.21.No.S1,pp. 111-125
[162]Levinthal, D.A.& Macrh, J.G.1993, "The myopia of learning", Strategic Management Journal,Vol.14,No.8,pp.95-112.
[163]Lumpkin G T, & Dess G G.1996, "Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking it to Performance", Academy of Management Journal, Vol.21.No.l. pp.135-172.
[164]Lynn,R.1991,The Secret of the Miracle Economy:Different National Attitudes to Competitiveness and Money, London:Crowley Esmonde Ltd,pp.112
[165]March, J. & Simon,1958, H.Oganizations, Newyork:Wiley.
[166]Masini, Zollo & Wassenhove.2004, "Understanding Exploration and Exploitation in Changing Operating Routines:The Influence of Industry and Organizational Traits", Working Paper, OTM 04-022.
[167]McEvily, S., Eisenhardt, K., & Prescott, J.2004, "The global acquisition, leverage and protection of technological competencies", Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 25,No.8-9,pp.713-722.
[168]Menguc B. and Auh S.2006, "Creating a firm-level dynamic capability through capitalizing on market orientation and innovativeness", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. Vol.34,No.1, pp.63-73.
[169]Miner, A., Bassoff, P. & Moorman, C.2001, "Organizational improvisation and learning:A field study". Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.46,No.2,pp.304-337.
[170]Miller D.1983, "The Correlates of Entrepreneurship in Three Types of Firms", Management Science, Vol.29,No.7, pp.770-791.
[171]Moorman,C, & Miner, A S.1998a, "Organizational improvisation and organizational memory", Academy of Management Review, Vol.23,No.42, pp.698-723.
[172]Moorman, C, & Miner. A S.1998b, "The convergence of planning and execution: Improvisation in new product development", Journal of Marketing, Vol.61,No.1, pp.1-20.
[173]Mosakowski,E., & McKelvey,B.1997, Predicting Rent Generation in Competence-based Competition, In Heene,A.and Sanchez, R.(ed.), Competence-Based Strategic Management,Chichester:John Wiley.
[174]Narver J.C. & Slater, S.F.1990, "The effect of a market orientation on business profitability", Journal of Marketing, Vol.54,No.4, pp.20-35.
[175]Nelson, R.R. & W inter, S.G.,1982, "An evolutionary theory of economic change", Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
[176]Pavlou A P, El Sawy O A.2006, "From IT leveraging competence to competitive advantage in turbulent environments:the case of new product development", Information Systems Research, Vol.17,No.3, pp.198-227.
[177]Polanyi K.1944,The great transformation, Boston:Beacon Press.
[178]Powell, W.W.1990, "Neither market nor hierarchy:Network forms of organization", Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol.12.pp.295-336.
[179]Prahalad C.K, & Bettis R.A.1986, "The Dominant Logic:A New Linkage between Diversity and Performance", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.7,No.6, pp.485-501.
[180]Priem, R. L. & Butler, J. E.2001, "Is the Resource-Based "View" a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? ",Academy of Management Review, Vol. 26,No. 1,pp.22-40.
[181]Prieto, I, Revilla, E.& Rodriguez, B.2008,"Building Dynamic capabilities in Product Development:The Role of Knowledge Management",IE Business School Working Paper WP08-1405-03-2008.
[182]Putnam R D.1993," The Prosperous community:Social Capital and Public Life", The American Prospect, Vol.4,No.13,pp.35-42.
[183]Rapoport,A.1986,General System Theory, Abacus Press.
[184]Rindova & Kotha,2001, ""Continuous "Morphing":Competing Through Dynamic Capabilities, Form, and Function, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.44, No. 6,pp.1263-1280.
[185]Ron Sanchez,& Aime Heene.2004, The New Strategic Management:Organization, Competition and Competence, New York:John Wiley and Sons.
[186]Rumelt, R. P.1984,Towards a Strategic Theory of the Firm, In R. B. Lamb, (ed.), Competitive Strategic Management, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N J.pp.556-570.
[187]Schreyogg, G.& Kliesch-Eberl, M.2007, "How dynamic can organizational capability be? Towards a dual-process model of capabilities dynamization", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.28,No.4,pp.15-24.
[188]Senge, P.1990,The Fifth Discipline:the Art and Practice of the Learning Organization, New York:Doubleday Currency.
[189]Sharma,P. & Chrisman,J.J.1999, "Toward a Reconciliation of the Definitional Issues in the Field of Corporate Entrepreneurship", Entrepreneur ship Theory and Practice, Vol.23,No.3,pp.11-27.
[190]Simon, H.A.1953, "Birth of an Organization:The Economic Cooperation Administration", Public Administrative Review, Vol.13,No.4,pp.227-236.
[191]Simonin,B.1999, "Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.20,No.7,pp.595-623.
[192]Stopford, J. M.1994, "Baden-Fuller,C. W. F. Creating Corporate Entrepreneurship", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.15,No.7,pp.521-536.
[193]Sull,D.N.1999, "Why good companies go bad", Harvard Business Review. Vol.77, No.4,pp.42-52.
[194]Tan, J.& Tan, D.2005, "Environment-strategy Co-evolution and Co-alignment:A Staged Model of Chinese SOEs under Transition", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.26,No.2,pp.141-157.
[195]Teece DJ.1998, "Capturing Value from Knowledge Assets:The New Economy, Markets For Know-How, and Intangible Assets", California Management Review, Vol.40, No.3, pp.55-79.
[196]Teece, D & Pisano, G.1994, " The dynamic capabilities of firms:an introduction",Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol.3, No.3. pp.537-556.
[197]Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A.1997, "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management ",Strategic Management Journal, Vol.18, No.7. pp.509-533.
[198]Teece, D.J.2007, "Explicating Dynamic Capabilities:the Nature and Microfoundations of (sustainable) Enterprise Performance", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.28, No.13, pp.1319-1350.
[199]Vera, D. & Crossan, M.2004, "Theatrical improvisation:Lessons for organizations" Organ. Stud, Vol.25, No.5. pp.727-749.
[200]Vera, D.& Crossan, M.2005, "Improvisation and innovative performance in teams", Organization Science, Vol.16, No.3. pp.203-224.
[201]Wang, C. L. & Ahmed, P. K.2007, "Dynamic Capabilities:A review and research agenda", International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol.9, No.1, pp.31-51.
[202]Weick, K. E.1993a, "The collapse of sense making in organization:The mann Gulch disaster", Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.38, No.4, pp.628-652.
[203]Weick, K. E.1993b, "Organizational redesign as improvisation", In G. P. Huber and W. H. Glick (eds.) Organizational Change and Redesign: New York:Oxford University Press,346-379,
[204]Weick, K. E.1998, "Improvisation as a mindset for organizational analysis", Organization Science, Vol.9, No.5, pp.543-555.
[205]Weiss, H.M., & Ilgen, D.R.1985, "Routinized Behavior in Organizations", Journal of Behavioral Economics, Vol.14, No.1, pp.57-67.
[206]Williamson, O.E.1985, "The Economic Institutions of Capitalism:Firms, Markets Relational Contracting", New York:Free Press.
[207]William J. Baumol.1990, "Entrepreneurship:Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive". The Journal of Political Economy, Vol.98,No.5,pp.893-921.
[208]Williamson, O.1999, "Strategy research:governance and competence perspectives",Strategic Management Journal, Vol.20, No.12.pp.1087-1108
[209]Wooten, L.P., & Crane, P.2004, "Generating dynamic capabilities through a humanistic work ideology", The American Behavioural Scientist, Vol.47,No.6, pp. 848-866.
[210]Zahra, S. A., Sapienza, H. J.&Davidsson, P.2006, Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities:A review, model and research agenda, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 43.No.4, pp.917-955.
[211]Zott, C.2003, Dynamic capabilities and the emergence of intra-industry differential firm performance:insights from a simulation study, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 24,No.2, pp.97-125.
[212]Zukin, S., and P. DiMaggio.1990, Structures of Capital:The Social Organization of the Economy. Eds. S. Zukin and P. DiMaggio. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
[2](英)安德鲁.沃德,领袖的生命周期：使领袖与进化中的组织相适应[M].北京：经济管理出版社,2004.
[3]白景坤.基于组织惰性视角的组织理论演进路径研究[J].经济与管理,2007,(12)：32-36.
[4]边燕杰.找回强关系：中国的间接关系、网络桥梁和求职[J].国外社会学,1998,(2)：50-65.
[5]保罗·萨谬尔森,威廉·诺德豪斯(著),萧琛等(译).经济学(16版)[M].北京：华夏出版社,1999：28.
[6]彼得·德鲁克.创新与企业家精神[M].蔡文燕,译,北京：机械工业出版社,2009：106-135.
[7]曹红军,赵剑波和王以华,动态能力的维度：基于中国企业的实证研究[J].科学学研究,2009,(1)：36-44.
[8]陈晓东和陈传明.战略调整中的核心刚性探析.华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)[J],2005,(1)：94-100+125.
[9]陈传明.企业战略调整的路径依赖特征及其超越[J].管理世界,2002,(6)：94-101
[10]陈立新和张玉利.现有企业的突破性创新动能研究[J].现代管理科学,2008,(5)：38-40.
[11]陈国权.组织与环境的关系及组织学习[J].管理学报.2001,(5)：39-49.
[12]陈墀元.组织即兴、组织学习与组织惯例之内生性演化[D].国立云林科技大学管理研究所博士毕业论文.2006.
[13]储小平,家族企业传承之难：企业家精神[N],经理日报.2011-02-16(A02).
[14]崔瑜；焦豪,企业动态能力提升作用机制研究：基于学习理论的视角[J],软科学,2009(4)：30-35.
[15](美)丹尼斯·舍伍德(著),邱昭良,刘昕(译),系统思考[M],机械工业出版社,2007：3.
[16]丁任重.转型与发展中国市场经济进程分析[M],北京：中国经济出版社,2004：16.
[17]董俊武,黄江圳和陈震红.基于知识的动态能力演化模型研究[J].中国工业经济,2004(2)：117-127+156.
[18]董俊武,黄江圳和陈震红.动态能力演化的知识模型与一个中国企业的案例分析.管理世界,2004,(4)：117-127+156.
[19]多萝西.伦纳德.巴顿.知识与创新[M],北京：新华出版社,2000.
[20]窦军生,家族企业代际传承中企业家默会知识和关系网络的传承机理研究[D].浙江大学,2008.
[21]多萝西·伦纳德·巴顿,知识与创新[M],北京：新华出版社,2000.
[22]高波.文化、文化资本与企业家精神的区域差异[J].南京大学学报,2007,(5)：39-48.
[23]傅家骥和洪后其,企业家精神的培养与技术创新扩散[J].中外管理导报,1990,(2)：4-11.
[24]N·格里高利·曼昆(著).梁小民(译).经济学基础(2版)[M].北京：中国人民大学出版社,2005：310.
[25]贺小刚,李新春和方海鹰,动态能力的测量与功效：基于中国经验的实证研究.管理世界[J],2006,(3)：94-103+113+171.
[26]贺小刚,潘永永和连燕玲.核心能力理论的拓展：企业家能力与竞争绩效的关系研究[J].科研管理[J],2007,(4)：141-148.
[27]黄俊,王钊,白硕等,动态能力的测度：基于国内汽车行业的实证研究.管理评论,2010,(1)：76-81.
[28]贾良定和周三多,论企业家精神及其五项修炼[J].南京社会科学,2006,(9).39-35.
[29]江积海,知识传导、动态能力与后发企业成长研究.研究与发展管理,2006,(2)：22-27.
[30]蒋春燕和赵曙明,社会资本和公司企业家精神与绩效的关系：组织学习的中介作用[J],管理世界,2006,(10)：90-99+171-172.
[31]姜奇平,重新定义新经济[J],互联网周刊,2004,(2)：64-67.
[32]焦豪和魏江,企业动态能力度量与功效——本土模型的构建与实证研究.中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2008,(5)：83-87.
[33]李兴旺,动态能力理论的操作化研究：识别架构与形成机制[M],经济科学出版社,2006
[34]李笑男和潘安成.基于多维搜索的组织即兴模型研究[A].第五届(2010)中国管理 学年会——组织与战略分会场论文集.2010年：1-10.
[35]李新春等,企业家精神、企业家能力与企业成长——“企业家理论与企业成长国际研讨会”综述[J].经济研究,2002,(1)：89-92.
[36]李乾文,创业型战略的兴起及实施[J].商业研究,2006,(16)：137-139.
[37]李忠辉,企业知识资本管理模式初探[J].南开管理评论,2002,(4)：12-22.
[38]李正彪,一个综述：国外社会关系网络理论研究及其在国内企业研究中的运用[J].经济问题探索,2004,(11)：58-61.
[39]李维安和王辉,企业家创新精神培育：一个公司治理视角[J].南开经济研究,2003,(2)：56-59.
[40]林萍,动态能力的测量及作用：来自中国企业的经验数据[J].中南大学学报(社会科学版),2009,(4)：533-540.
[41]刘海建,陈松涛和陈传明,企业核心能力的刚性特征及其超越[J].中国工业经济,2003,(11)：47-54.
[42]刘海建,企业组织结构刚性与企业战略调整[D],南京大学博士毕业论文.2005：35.
[43]刘光岭,影响企业核心能力的因素及对策研究[D].西北大学博士学位论文,2004.
[44]刘漩华,基于核心能力的企业组织创新研究[D].鹭南大学博士学位论文,2003.
[45]柳传志,联想的失败与成功——联想如何穿越多元化到国际化的险滩[J],中国企业家,2007,(18)：52-56.
[46]罗伯特.K.殷(著),周海涛(译).案例研究设计与方法(第三版)[M].重庆大学出版社,2004：11,19,95,106.
[47]罗珉和刘永俊.企业动态能力理论架构与构成要素[M].中国工业经济,2009,(1)：75-86.
[48]马强和远德玉,技术行动的嵌入性与技术的产业化[J].自然辨证法研究,2004,(5)：71-74+93.
[49]米歇尔.A.赫特等,战略型企业家[M]经济管理出版社,2002.
[50]彭正龙和王海花,企业社会责任表现与员工满意度对组织即兴效能的影响[J].心理科学,2010,(1)：118-121.
[51]彭明朗.经济发展的源泉在于人力资本[J].读与写,1997,(3).58-59
[52]彭晶晶,晋商东掌制度述论.中州学刊[J],2009,(4)：180-182.
[53]蒲明,组织即兴、组织学习和组织记忆三者关系的研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007,(9)：154-157.
[54]青木昌彦：.比较制度分析[M].上海：上海远东出版社,2001.
[55]邱钊,黄俊,李传昭等,动态能力与企业竞争优势——基于东风汽车有限公司的质性研究.中国软科学,2008,(10)：134-140
[56]邱国栋和白景坤,价值生成分析：一个协同效应的理论框架[J],中国工业经济,2007,(06)：88-95.
[57]邱绍良.系统思考实践篇[M].北京：中国人民大学出版社,2009：234.
[58]芮明杰,屈路和胡金星,企业追求内部协同向外部协同转变的动因分析[J],上海管理科学,2005(03)：5-7.
[59](美)圣吉(著),张成林译.第五项修炼：学习型组织的艺术与实务[J],中信出版社,2009：61,63,73,81.
[60]时鹏程,许磊.论企业家精神的三个层次及其启示[J],外国经济与管理,2006,(2)：44-51.
[61]史漫飞,柯武刚.制度经济学——社会秩序与公共政策[M].韩朝华译,北京：商务印书馆,2003：35.
[62]斯蒂芬·P·罗宾斯.组织行为学(第七版).北京：中国人民大学出版社：423.
[63]陶然,彭正龙和许涛.组织认知的即兴现象与组织创新能力研究[J].图书情报工作.2009,(14)：59-62+79.
[64]陶厚永,王秀江和刘洪.组织即兴及其对企业应对危机的意义研究[J],外国经济与管理,2009,(9)：53-59.
[65][美]托马斯.福特.布朗(著).木子西(编译).社会资本理论综述[J].马克思主义与现实,2000：41-46.
[66]西蒙.现代决策理论的基石—有限理性论[M].北京：北京经济学院出版社,1989：45-62.
[67]王核成.中国企业国际竞争力的评价指标体系研究[J],科研管理,2001,(4).73-77.
[68]王翔.企业动态能力演化理论和实证研究[D],复旦大学博士毕业论文,2006.
[69]王毅.以核心能力为主导逻辑的战略管理.科研管理[J],2001(03)：13-19.
[70]王建安.技术创新与制度创新的匹配机制研究——一个理论框架和两个案例分析[J].科研管理.2001,(3)：79-85.
[71]魏江,陈志辉和张波.企业集群中企业家精神的外部经济性考察[J].科研管理,2004,(3)：20-25.
[72]吴东和裘颖.团队即兴能力与创新绩效的关系研究[J].科学管理研究,2010,(12)： 23-27.
[73]项保华和罗青军,基于主导逻辑与规则的战略循环模式,西北工业大学学报：社会科学版,2002,(4)：23-26.
[74]夏普·雷吉斯特·格里米斯(著),郭庆旺和应惟伟(译).社会问题经济学(第13版)[M].北京：中国人民大学出版社,2000：336.
[75]邢以群,企业家及其企业家精神.浙江大学学报(社会科学版),1994,(2)：67-74.
[76](美)熊彼特(著),李默(译)./经济发展理论[M].西安：陕西师范大学出版社.2007.
[77]许庆瑞,谢章澎和杨志蓉.企业技术与制度创新协同的动态分析[J].科研管理.2006,(4)：116-120+129.
[78]许和隆.冲突与互动：转型社会政治发展中的制度与文化[D].苏州大学博士学位论文,2006.
[79]94薛红志和张玉利.公司创业研究评述——国外创业研究新进展[J],外国经济与管理,2003(11).
[80]薛有志和王世龙.基于资源与能力的企业家精神机能体系研究[J].现代管理科学,2008,(9)：7-9.
[81]杨丽和孙国辉.战略执行影响因素研究[J].中央财经大学学报期.2009,(5)：48-53.
[82]叶卫华.人格特质理论的探讨与运用[J].江西社会科学,2004,(10)：200-202.
[83]殷华方,核心能力刚性的维度、机理与超越[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2006,(5)：56-61.
[84]余菁.案例研究与案例研究方法[J].经济管理.新管理.2004,(10)：24-29.
[85]韵江和姜晨.国外组织即兴研究述评[J].国外社会科学,2010,(5)：4-10.
[86]曾萍.知识创新、动态能力与组织绩效的关系研究[J].科学学研究,2009,(8)：1271-128.
[87]章威,基于知识的企业动态能力研究：嵌入性前因及创新绩效结果[D],2009,浙江大学.
[88]张小林和裘颖,即兴能力理论研究综述,科技进步与对策,2010,(23)：156-161.
[89]张文坤.组织即兴文献综述研究[J].时代经贸.2008(2)：139+141.
[90]张玉利.创业与企业家精神：管理者的思维模式和行为准则[J].南开学报,2004,(1)：12-15.
[91]张钢,基于技术转移的企业能力演化过程研究[J].科学学研究,2001,(3)：70-77.
[92]张娟.制度创新：当代中国政治发展的现实诉求与路径选择[M].湖南人民出版 社,2010.
[93]张佑林.江浙区域经济发展中的文化因素分析[D].华中科技大学博士毕业论文,2005：1.
[94]郑刚,颜宏亮,王斌.动态能力的构成维度及特征研究[J].科技进步与对策,2007,(3)：90-93.
[95]郑胜华和芮明杰.动态能力的研究述评及其启示[J].自然辨证法通讯,2009,(5)：56-64+70+111.
[96]郑素丽,章威和吴晓波.基于知识的动态能力：理论与实证[J].科学学研究.2010,(3)：405-411+466.
[97]邹国庆和徐庆仑.核心能力的构成维度及其特性[J].中国工业经济,2005,(5)：96-103.
[98]周会斌和刘冰.高新技术企业集群中企业家精神的扩散机理研究[J].企业活力2007,(5)：82-85.
[99]周其仁.新经济下的企业家精神.中国企业报[N],2000-07-06/(005).
[100]周立群和邓宏图.企业家理性、非理性与相对理性研究——兼论企业家精神[J].天津社会科学,2002,(1)：74-81.
[101]庄子银.企业家精神、持续技术创新和长期经济增长的微观机制[J].管理世界,2005,(12)：3244.
[102]Adner,R. & Helfat, C.E.2003,"Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.24, No.10, pp.1011-1025.
[103]Akgun, A.E.& Lynn, G.S.2002, "New product development team improvisation and speed-to-market:an extended model". European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol.5, No.3, pp.117-129.
[104]Aldrich,H.E. & Zimmer, C.1986, "Entrepreneurship through social networks",In: the art and science of entrepreneurship, ed. D.L. Sex-ton and R.W. Smilor. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing, pp.3-23.
[105]Amit, R.,& Schoemaker, P. J. H.1993, "Strategic assets and organisational rent", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.14, No.1, pp.33-46.
[106]Argyris, C. & Schon, D. A.1978, Organizational Learning:A Theory of Action Perspective Massachusetts:Addison-Wesley.
[107]Argyris C. & St. Schon D.A.1996, Organizational learning Ⅱ:Theory, method, and practice,Reading, MA:Addison Wesley.
[108]Arrow K.J.1962, Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for innovation, Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press, pp.609-626.
[109]Barney, J. B.2001,"Resource-based Theories of Competitive Advantage:a Ten-year Retrospective on the Resource-Based View", Journal of Management, Vol.27, No.6, pp.625-641.
[110]Barrett, F. J.1998, "Coda: Creativity and improvisation in organizations for organizational learning", Organization Science, Vol.9,No.5, pp.605-622.
[111]Bastien, D. T., & Hostager ,T. J.1992, " Cooperation as communicative accomplishment:A symbolic interaction analysis of an improvised jazz concert", Communication Studies, Vol.43,No.2,pp.92-104.
[112]Bertalanffy, L. von,1968, General System Theory:Foundations, Development, Applications,New York:George Braziller.
[113]Bettis, Richard A.& C. K. Prahalad 1995, " The Dominant Logic:Retrospective and Extension," Strategic Management Journal, Vol.16, No. 1,pp.5-14.
[114]Blyler, M. & Coff, R. W.2003, Dynamic capabilities, social capital, and rent appropriation: Ties that split pies, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.24, No.7,pp.677-686.
[115]Bourdieu, Pierre.1980, "Le capital social:notes provisoires", Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales,vol 31, No.1, pp.2-3.
[116]Bourdieu, Pierre.1985,"The social space and the genesis of groups", Theory and Society, Vol.14, No.6, pp.723-744.
[117]Calogherou, Y. A. Protogerou, Y. E. Spanos,&L. Papayanakis, "Industry vs. Firm-specific effects on Performance:Contrasting SMEs and Large-sized firms", European Management Journal, Vol.22, No.2,pp.231-243.
[118]Carlsson, S. A.,2003, "Knowledge managing and knowledge management systems in inter-organizational networks", Knowledge and Process Management, Vol.10, No. 3,pp.l94.
[119]Cangelosi, V.E.& Dill, W.R.1965,"Organizational Learning:Observations Towards a Theory", Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.10, No.2, pp.175-203.
[120]Cepeda, G. & Vera, D.2005,"Knowledge management and firm performance: Examining the mediating link of dynamic capabilities", Iberoamerican Academy of Management, Lisbon, Portugal.
[121]Chakravarthy, B. S. & Lorang, P.1991, "Managing the Strategy Process:A Framework for a Multibusiness Firm ",Preptice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
[122]Cohen, M.D., Burkhart R., Dos,i G. Egid,i M., Margengo, L., Warglien, M. & Winter, S.,1996,Routines and other recurring action patterns of organizations:contemporary research issues, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol.5, No.3,pp.653-698.
[123]Coleman, J.S.1988, " Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital", American Journal of Sociology, Vol.94,No.5,pp.95-121.
[124]Collis DJ.1994, "Research note:how valuable are organizational capabilities? Strategic Management Journal, Vol.15,No.2,pp.143-152.
[125]Covin J G, & Slevin D P.1989, "Strategic Management of Small Firms in Hostile and Benign Environments", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.10, No. l.pp.75-87.
[126]Crossan, M., Cunha, M. P., Vera, D., & Cunha, J.2005,"Time and organizational improvisation", Academy of Management Review, Vol.30, No. 1.pp.129-145.
[127]Crossan, M., & Sorrenti, M.1997, Making sense of improvisation. In J. P.Walsh and A S. Huff (Eds.),Advances in Strategic Management,14:155-180. Greenwich, CT:JAI Press.
[128]Cunha,M.P., Cunda J.V.da & Kamoche,K.,1999, " Organizational Improvisation: What, When, How and Why", International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol.30, No. 1.pp.299-341.
[129]Cunha, M., & Cunha, J.2002, " To plan and not to plan: Toward a synthesis between planning and learning", International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, Vol.5, No.3.pp.299-315.
[130]Cyert, R.,& March, J.G.1963,A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
[131]Daniel EM,&Wilson H N.2003, "The role of dynamic capabilities in e-business transformation", European Journal of Information Systems, Vol.12,No.4,pp.282-296.
[132]Davidsson, P.2003."The Domain of Entrepreneurship Reach:Some Suggestions", Advances in Entrepreneurship Firm Emergence and Growth, Vol.6.pp.315-372.
[133]David J. Teece.2007, "Explicating Dynamic Capabilities:The Nature and Micro-foundations of (Sustainable) Enterprise Performance", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.28, No.13. pp.1319-1350.
[134]Dorothy Leonard Barton.1992, "Core Capabilities and Rigidities:A Paradox in Managing New Product Development", Strategic Management Journal Vol.13, No.S1, pp. 111-125.
[135]Dosi, G.1982, "Technological paradigms and technological trajectories:a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change". Research Policy, Vol. 11,No.3,pp.147-162.
[136]Doving, E., & Gooderham, P.N.2008, "Dynamic capabilities as antecedents of the scope of related diversification: The case of small firm accountancy practices", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.29, No.8, pp.841-857
[137]Eisenhardt Kathleen M.1989, "Building Theories from Case Study Research", The Academy of Management Review, Vol.14, No.4,pp.532-550.
[138]Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. & Tabrizi, Benham N.1995, "Accelerating adaptive processes: product innovation in the global computer industry" Administrative Science Quarterly. Vol.40,No. 1,pp.84-110.
[139]Eisenhardt KM, & Martin JA.2000, "Dynamic capabilities:What are they? ", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.20, No.10,pp.1105-1121.
[140]Forrester J W.1991,"Greetings to the 1991 System Dynamics Conference in Bangkok", Supplemental Proceedings of the 1991 Inte. System Dynamics Conference, pp. 1-3.
[141]Gersick, CJG, & Hackman, JR.1990, "Habitual Routines in Task-performing Groups", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol.47,No.1,pp. 65-97.
[142]G. Gordon,1978, System Simulation, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
[143]Goto, Akira.1982, "Business Group in a Market Economy", European Economic Review, Vol.19, No.1, pp.53-70
[144]Godfrey, P. & Hill, C.1995, "The problem of unobservable in strategic management research", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.16, No.7,pp.519-533.
[145]Granovetter, M.1985, "Economic Action and Social Structure:The Problem of Embeddedness", American Journal of Sociology, Vol.91,No.3,pp.481-510.
[146]Grant, R.M.1996, "prospering in dynamically competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration", Organization Science, Vol.7,No. 4,pp.375-387.
[147]Guth,W.D., & Ginsberg, A.1990, "Guest Editor's Introduction: Corporate Entrepreneurship", Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 11,No.5,pp.5-16.
[148]Hagedoorn, J.2006, "Understanding the cross-level embeddedness of interfirm partnership formation", A cademy of Management Review, Vol.31,No.3.pp.670-680.
[149]Hannan,M. & Freeman,J.1977, "The population ecology of organizations",American Journal of Sociology, Vol.82,No.5.pp.929-964.
[150]Hannan, M. & Freeman, J.1989. Structural Inertia and Organizationl Change, American Sociological Review, Vol.49,No.2, pp.149-164.
[151]Hayek, F.A.von.1937, "Economics and Knowledge", Economica, Vol.4,No.13, pp.33-54.
[152]Helfat, C.,& Peteraf, M.2003, "The dynamic resource-based view:Capability lifecycles", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.24, No.10, pp.997-1010.
[153]Henderson Rebecca M. & Clark,Kim.B.1990, "Architectural Innovation:the Reconfiguration of Exiting Product Technologies and The Failure of Establised Firms",Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.35,No1,pp.9-30.
[154]Hodgkinson, G.P.1997, "Cognitive inertia in a turbulent market:the case of UK residential estate agents", Manage Study, Vol.34,No.6, pp.921-945.
[155]Hoskisson, R. E., Hitt, M.A. & Wan,W. P.1999, "Theory and Research in Strategic Management:Swings of a Pendulum", Journal of Management, Vol.25,No.3,pp 417-456.
[156]Iansiti,M, & Clark, K B.1994, "Integration and dynamic capability:Evidence from product development in automobiles and mainframe computers", Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol.3,No.3,pp.557-605.
[157]King,A.A.&Tucci,C.L.,2002, "Incumbent entry into new market niches:The role of experience and managerial choice in the creation of dynamic capabilities", Management Science, Vol.48,No.2, pp.171-186.
[158]Kirzner, Israel M.1973,Competition and Entrepreneurship, Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
[159]Kohli A. K. & Jaworski, B.J.1990, "Market orientation:the construct, research propositions and managerial implications", Journal of Marketing, Vol.54,No.2, pp.1-18.
[160]Leoncini, R., Montresor, S. & Vertova, G.2003, "Dynamic capabilities:evolving organizations in evolving (technological) systems", U of Bergamo Economics Working Paper No.4/2003.
[161]Leonard-Barton, D.1992, "Core Capability and Core Rigidity:A Paradox in Managing New Product Development", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.21.No.S1,pp. 111-125
[162]Levinthal, D.A.& Macrh, J.G.1993, "The myopia of learning", Strategic Management Journal,Vol.14,No.8,pp.95-112.
[163]Lumpkin G T, & Dess G G.1996, "Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking it to Performance", Academy of Management Journal, Vol.21.No.l. pp.135-172.
[164]Lynn,R.1991,The Secret of the Miracle Economy:Different National Attitudes to Competitiveness and Money, London:Crowley Esmonde Ltd,pp.112
[165]March, J. & Simon,1958, H.Oganizations, Newyork:Wiley.
[166]Masini, Zollo & Wassenhove.2004, "Understanding Exploration and Exploitation in Changing Operating Routines:The Influence of Industry and Organizational Traits", Working Paper, OTM 04-022.
[167]McEvily, S., Eisenhardt, K., & Prescott, J.2004, "The global acquisition, leverage and protection of technological competencies", Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 25,No.8-9,pp.713-722.
[168]Menguc B. and Auh S.2006, "Creating a firm-level dynamic capability through capitalizing on market orientation and innovativeness", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. Vol.34,No.1, pp.63-73.
[169]Miner, A., Bassoff, P. & Moorman, C.2001, "Organizational improvisation and learning:A field study". Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.46,No.2,pp.304-337.
[170]Miller D.1983, "The Correlates of Entrepreneurship in Three Types of Firms", Management Science, Vol.29,No.7, pp.770-791.
[171]Moorman,C, & Miner, A S.1998a, "Organizational improvisation and organizational memory", Academy of Management Review, Vol.23,No.42, pp.698-723.
[172]Moorman, C, & Miner. A S.1998b, "The convergence of planning and execution: Improvisation in new product development", Journal of Marketing, Vol.61,No.1, pp.1-20.
[173]Mosakowski,E., & McKelvey,B.1997, Predicting Rent Generation in Competence-based Competition, In Heene,A.and Sanchez, R.(ed.), Competence-Based Strategic Management,Chichester:John Wiley.
[174]Narver J.C. & Slater, S.F.1990, "The effect of a market orientation on business profitability", Journal of Marketing, Vol.54,No.4, pp.20-35.
[175]Nelson, R.R. & W inter, S.G.,1982, "An evolutionary theory of economic change", Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
[176]Pavlou A P, El Sawy O A.2006, "From IT leveraging competence to competitive advantage in turbulent environments:the case of new product development", Information Systems Research, Vol.17,No.3, pp.198-227.
[177]Polanyi K.1944,The great transformation, Boston:Beacon Press.
[178]Powell, W.W.1990, "Neither market nor hierarchy:Network forms of organization", Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol.12.pp.295-336.
[179]Prahalad C.K, & Bettis R.A.1986, "The Dominant Logic:A New Linkage between Diversity and Performance", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.7,No.6, pp.485-501.
[180]Priem, R. L. & Butler, J. E.2001, "Is the Resource-Based "View" a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? ",Academy of Management Review, Vol. 26,No. 1,pp.22-40.
[181]Prieto, I, Revilla, E.& Rodriguez, B.2008,"Building Dynamic capabilities in Product Development:The Role of Knowledge Management",IE Business School Working Paper WP08-1405-03-2008.
[182]Putnam R D.1993," The Prosperous community:Social Capital and Public Life", The American Prospect, Vol.4,No.13,pp.35-42.
[183]Rapoport,A.1986,General System Theory, Abacus Press.
[184]Rindova & Kotha,2001, ""Continuous "Morphing":Competing Through Dynamic Capabilities, Form, and Function, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.44, No. 6,pp.1263-1280.
[185]Ron Sanchez,& Aime Heene.2004, The New Strategic Management:Organization, Competition and Competence, New York:John Wiley and Sons.
[186]Rumelt, R. P.1984,Towards a Strategic Theory of the Firm, In R. B. Lamb, (ed.), Competitive Strategic Management, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N J.pp.556-570.
[187]Schreyogg, G.& Kliesch-Eberl, M.2007, "How dynamic can organizational capability be? Towards a dual-process model of capabilities dynamization", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.28,No.4,pp.15-24.
[188]Senge, P.1990,The Fifth Discipline:the Art and Practice of the Learning Organization, New York:Doubleday Currency.
[189]Sharma,P. & Chrisman,J.J.1999, "Toward a Reconciliation of the Definitional Issues in the Field of Corporate Entrepreneurship", Entrepreneur ship Theory and Practice, Vol.23,No.3,pp.11-27.
[190]Simon, H.A.1953, "Birth of an Organization:The Economic Cooperation Administration", Public Administrative Review, Vol.13,No.4,pp.227-236.
[191]Simonin,B.1999, "Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.20,No.7,pp.595-623.
[192]Stopford, J. M.1994, "Baden-Fuller,C. W. F. Creating Corporate Entrepreneurship", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.15,No.7,pp.521-536.
[193]Sull,D.N.1999, "Why good companies go bad", Harvard Business Review. Vol.77, No.4,pp.42-52.
[194]Tan, J.& Tan, D.2005, "Environment-strategy Co-evolution and Co-alignment:A Staged Model of Chinese SOEs under Transition", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.26,No.2,pp.141-157.
[195]Teece DJ.1998, "Capturing Value from Knowledge Assets:The New Economy, Markets For Know-How, and Intangible Assets", California Management Review, Vol.40, No.3, pp.55-79.
[196]Teece, D & Pisano, G.1994, " The dynamic capabilities of firms:an introduction",Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol.3, No.3. pp.537-556.
[197]Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A.1997, "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management ",Strategic Management Journal, Vol.18, No.7. pp.509-533.
[198]Teece, D.J.2007, "Explicating Dynamic Capabilities:the Nature and Microfoundations of (sustainable) Enterprise Performance", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.28, No.13, pp.1319-1350.
[199]Vera, D. & Crossan, M.2004, "Theatrical improvisation:Lessons for organizations" Organ. Stud, Vol.25, No.5. pp.727-749.
[200]Vera, D.& Crossan, M.2005, "Improvisation and innovative performance in teams", Organization Science, Vol.16, No.3. pp.203-224.
[201]Wang, C. L. & Ahmed, P. K.2007, "Dynamic Capabilities:A review and research agenda", International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol.9, No.1, pp.31-51.
[202]Weick, K. E.1993a, "The collapse of sense making in organization:The mann Gulch disaster", Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.38, No.4, pp.628-652.
[203]Weick, K. E.1993b, "Organizational redesign as improvisation", In G. P. Huber and W. H. Glick (eds.) Organizational Change and Redesign: New York:Oxford University Press,346-379,
[204]Weick, K. E.1998, "Improvisation as a mindset for organizational analysis", Organization Science, Vol.9, No.5, pp.543-555.
[205]Weiss, H.M., & Ilgen, D.R.1985, "Routinized Behavior in Organizations", Journal of Behavioral Economics, Vol.14, No.1, pp.57-67.
[206]Williamson, O.E.1985, "The Economic Institutions of Capitalism:Firms, Markets Relational Contracting", New York:Free Press.
[207]William J. Baumol.1990, "Entrepreneurship:Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive". The Journal of Political Economy, Vol.98,No.5,pp.893-921.
[208]Williamson, O.1999, "Strategy research:governance and competence perspectives",Strategic Management Journal, Vol.20, No.12.pp.1087-1108
[209]Wooten, L.P., & Crane, P.2004, "Generating dynamic capabilities through a humanistic work ideology", The American Behavioural Scientist, Vol.47,No.6, pp. 848-866.
[210]Zahra, S. A., Sapienza, H. J.&Davidsson, P.2006, Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities:A review, model and research agenda, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 43.No.4, pp.917-955.
[211]Zott, C.2003, Dynamic capabilities and the emergence of intra-industry differential firm performance:insights from a simulation study, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 24,No.2, pp.97-125.
[212]Zukin, S., and P. DiMaggio.1990, Structures of Capital:The Social Organization of the Economy. Eds. S. Zukin and P. DiMaggio. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.