母子公司网络横向联系及管理机制研究
|
摘要
论文以“母子公司网络横向联系及其管理机制研究”作为研究对象。在组织间网络理论、协同理论、企业资源观和组织学习理论的基础上,对(1)母子公司网络的组织特征;(2)母子公司网络的横向联系与组织绩效的关系;(3)横向联系的收益成本影响因素;(4)如何对母子公司网络横向联系进行有效管理等四个方面进行了探讨。并且通过调查问卷统计分析进行了实证研究和案例分析。
按照基础理论分析,实证研究,管理策略的思路,全文分成七章:
第一章是绪论。总结了过去相关领域的主要研究成果,提出论文研究对象,研究意义和目的,并阐述文章的主要研究思路和主要创新。
第二章是论文的理论基础。在本章中,在总结社会网络理论的基础上,从竞争环境和母子公司演化两个方面分析了母子公司网络化的动因。接下来,从母子公司网络的依存关系、协调机制等方面深入分析了母子公司网络的性质,指出:母子公司网络可以被视为一种特殊的具有科层结构和权力的组织间网络。
第三章和第四章是论文的核心内容部分。首先,在分析两种基础的母子公司横向联系收益机制基础上,系统分析母子公司网络内的各种形式的横向联系类型。接着,分析了横向联系与母子公司网络绩效的关系,以及与母子公司网络的竞争优势的关系,并提出了横向联系与母子公司网络绩效关系模型。然后,重点对横向联系涉及的成本类型和影响因素进行了分析,扩展和重新定义了母子公司网络交易成本的概念。认为从横向联系的成本和收益出发,母子公司应该重点关注的横向联系类型是战略性横向联系。在此基础上,从母子公司网络的自我发展和母子公司网络管理机制两个方面对横向联系的收益和成本进行了动态性分析,得出了母子公司网络横向联系影响因素动态模型。在这两章中,提出了论文的主要命题和假设。
第五章是论文的实证研究部分。主要从(1)母子公司网络化动因与母子公司组织特征的关系,(2)母子公司网络横向联系与经营绩效关系的实证分析,(3)横向联系影响因素等几个方面开展。并且,在统计实证研究基础上,进行了案例分析。
第六章主要是利用理论分析和实证研究的结果,对于如何管理母子公司网络的横向联系提出了具体的管理建议。对横向联系的系统管理机制包括母公司角色的重新定位,网络结构的优化,协调激励机制、网络社会资本的积累等方面。并且,采用重点案例分析的方法来定性地应用模型进行分析。
第七章是论文的结束部分。本章概括总结了论文的主要结论,指出了论文在理论分析,特别是在实证研究方法上的不足之处,并指出了今后研究的方向,最后针对我国母子公司管理现存的一些问题提出了一些看法和建议。
综观全文,笔者认为在以下方面对母子公司管理研究做了一定创新性工作:
1.系统地将组织间网络理论应用到对于母子公司性质的分析中。以往的研
The research object of the thesis is "Lateral Ties of Networked Parent-Subsidiary Company". Based on the Inter-organizational Network Theory, Resource-based View, Synergy Theory and Organizational Learning, The main content of the thesis include as follows: (1)the character of the networked parent-subsidiary company;(2)the relationship between the whole network's competitive advantage and lateral ties;(3)the revenue-cost mechanism of the lateral ties;(4)how to effectively "manage" the lateral ties. Also included is empirical study and case study.The thesis consists of seven chapters as follows:The first chapter is common introduction. We summarize the past research of the relevant fields and put forward the research object, research objective, the main structure of the thesis, and the breakthrough points.The second chapter is a fundamental part of theoretical reserech. First, based on the social network theory, and from the competitive environment and the parent-subsidiary company evolution, we point out the factors which drive the parent-subsidiary company networked. Furthermore, we give systematic study of the parent-subsidiary company network, form aspects such as interdependence, network structure, coordinating mechanism, etc. we propose that the networked parent-subsidiary company is a special type of inter-organizational network, with formal hierarchy structure and authority.The third and fourth chapters are the most important parts of the dissertation. We first identify two basic revenue types of later ties, and list and classify the concrete forms of later ties. We then study the source of networked parent-subsidiary company's competitive advantages, and find that its overall advantage more and more come from the later ties in the network. We also build a framework of networked parent-subsidiary company's competitive advantage. Furthermore, we try to find out important factors which influence the revenue and cost of the lateral ties. We propose that the parent-subsidiary company should put most emphasis on those lateral ties with important revenues and relatively low costs: that is called "strategic lateral ties". Here we enlarge and modify the concept of "transaction cost". Afterwards, we deeply analyze the dynamics of the revenue and cost of the lateral ties, from both the dynamics of the network and the management mechanism applied. We formulate the dynamic model of lateral ties, and put forward another important proposal: with the dynamic evolution of the network and the management mechanism, the lateral ties in the network will have more transaction value and face lower transaction cost, making lateral ties more valuable. And the main proposes are also forwarded in the two chapters.The fifth chapter is empirical study. We design questionnaire to testify the main proposals we make: (1) factor analysis of the drivers which make parent-subsidiary companys more networked; (2) the relation between lateral ties and the the subsidiary's performance and the overall performance of the whole network; (3) the relation between lateral ties and varies of influencing factors.
The sixth chapter is mainly on the practical management mechanism of lateral ties. Using the findings of theoretical and empirical study, we give some instrumental advices as follows: the repositioning of parent company (headquarter); the optimization of network structure, the flexible and effective coordination system and incentive system; cultivation of social capital in the network. Also we support our analysis with case study.The last chapter is summery of the final conclusion of the thesis and the shortcomings also are pointed. We also give the potential prospective direction of future work.Overall, personally, there are three main contributions to the research of management of the parent-subsidiary company.First, we incorporate the inter-organizational network theory into the study of the parent-subsidiary company. Although the large transnational corporation is regarded as a network in the former study, systematic analysis of the character
按照基础理论分析,实证研究,管理策略的思路,全文分成七章:
第一章是绪论。总结了过去相关领域的主要研究成果,提出论文研究对象,研究意义和目的,并阐述文章的主要研究思路和主要创新。
第二章是论文的理论基础。在本章中,在总结社会网络理论的基础上,从竞争环境和母子公司演化两个方面分析了母子公司网络化的动因。接下来,从母子公司网络的依存关系、协调机制等方面深入分析了母子公司网络的性质,指出:母子公司网络可以被视为一种特殊的具有科层结构和权力的组织间网络。
第三章和第四章是论文的核心内容部分。首先,在分析两种基础的母子公司横向联系收益机制基础上,系统分析母子公司网络内的各种形式的横向联系类型。接着,分析了横向联系与母子公司网络绩效的关系,以及与母子公司网络的竞争优势的关系,并提出了横向联系与母子公司网络绩效关系模型。然后,重点对横向联系涉及的成本类型和影响因素进行了分析,扩展和重新定义了母子公司网络交易成本的概念。认为从横向联系的成本和收益出发,母子公司应该重点关注的横向联系类型是战略性横向联系。在此基础上,从母子公司网络的自我发展和母子公司网络管理机制两个方面对横向联系的收益和成本进行了动态性分析,得出了母子公司网络横向联系影响因素动态模型。在这两章中,提出了论文的主要命题和假设。
第五章是论文的实证研究部分。主要从(1)母子公司网络化动因与母子公司组织特征的关系,(2)母子公司网络横向联系与经营绩效关系的实证分析,(3)横向联系影响因素等几个方面开展。并且,在统计实证研究基础上,进行了案例分析。
第六章主要是利用理论分析和实证研究的结果,对于如何管理母子公司网络的横向联系提出了具体的管理建议。对横向联系的系统管理机制包括母公司角色的重新定位,网络结构的优化,协调激励机制、网络社会资本的积累等方面。并且,采用重点案例分析的方法来定性地应用模型进行分析。
第七章是论文的结束部分。本章概括总结了论文的主要结论,指出了论文在理论分析,特别是在实证研究方法上的不足之处,并指出了今后研究的方向,最后针对我国母子公司管理现存的一些问题提出了一些看法和建议。
综观全文,笔者认为在以下方面对母子公司管理研究做了一定创新性工作:
1.系统地将组织间网络理论应用到对于母子公司性质的分析中。以往的研
The research object of the thesis is "Lateral Ties of Networked Parent-Subsidiary Company". Based on the Inter-organizational Network Theory, Resource-based View, Synergy Theory and Organizational Learning, The main content of the thesis include as follows: (1)the character of the networked parent-subsidiary company;(2)the relationship between the whole network's competitive advantage and lateral ties;(3)the revenue-cost mechanism of the lateral ties;(4)how to effectively "manage" the lateral ties. Also included is empirical study and case study.The thesis consists of seven chapters as follows:The first chapter is common introduction. We summarize the past research of the relevant fields and put forward the research object, research objective, the main structure of the thesis, and the breakthrough points.The second chapter is a fundamental part of theoretical reserech. First, based on the social network theory, and from the competitive environment and the parent-subsidiary company evolution, we point out the factors which drive the parent-subsidiary company networked. Furthermore, we give systematic study of the parent-subsidiary company network, form aspects such as interdependence, network structure, coordinating mechanism, etc. we propose that the networked parent-subsidiary company is a special type of inter-organizational network, with formal hierarchy structure and authority.The third and fourth chapters are the most important parts of the dissertation. We first identify two basic revenue types of later ties, and list and classify the concrete forms of later ties. We then study the source of networked parent-subsidiary company's competitive advantages, and find that its overall advantage more and more come from the later ties in the network. We also build a framework of networked parent-subsidiary company's competitive advantage. Furthermore, we try to find out important factors which influence the revenue and cost of the lateral ties. We propose that the parent-subsidiary company should put most emphasis on those lateral ties with important revenues and relatively low costs: that is called "strategic lateral ties". Here we enlarge and modify the concept of "transaction cost". Afterwards, we deeply analyze the dynamics of the revenue and cost of the lateral ties, from both the dynamics of the network and the management mechanism applied. We formulate the dynamic model of lateral ties, and put forward another important proposal: with the dynamic evolution of the network and the management mechanism, the lateral ties in the network will have more transaction value and face lower transaction cost, making lateral ties more valuable. And the main proposes are also forwarded in the two chapters.The fifth chapter is empirical study. We design questionnaire to testify the main proposals we make: (1) factor analysis of the drivers which make parent-subsidiary companys more networked; (2) the relation between lateral ties and the the subsidiary's performance and the overall performance of the whole network; (3) the relation between lateral ties and varies of influencing factors.
The sixth chapter is mainly on the practical management mechanism of lateral ties. Using the findings of theoretical and empirical study, we give some instrumental advices as follows: the repositioning of parent company (headquarter); the optimization of network structure, the flexible and effective coordination system and incentive system; cultivation of social capital in the network. Also we support our analysis with case study.The last chapter is summery of the final conclusion of the thesis and the shortcomings also are pointed. We also give the potential prospective direction of future work.Overall, personally, there are three main contributions to the research of management of the parent-subsidiary company.First, we incorporate the inter-organizational network theory into the study of the parent-subsidiary company. Although the large transnational corporation is regarded as a network in the former study, systematic analysis of the character
引文
1. Amit, R., P. J. H. Schoemaker(1993), "Strategic Assets and Organizational Rents", Strategic Management Journal, 14(1), 1993,pp. 33-46.
2. Anand B, Khanna T. (2000). Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliances. Strategic Management Journal, Special Issue 21(3): 295-315.
3. Anderson(2003), The Embeddedness of Selfish Routines: How Routines are Replicated in Business Networks, Industry and Innovation, Volumel0,No.2,159-177, June,2003.
4. Anderson ,Forsgren ,and Holm 1(2003) ,The Strategic Impact of External Network : Subsidiary Performance And Compentency Development In the Multinational Corporation[J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 2002 , 23 (1).
5. Ansoff(1965),Corporate Strategy, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1965.
6. Barney, J.B.(1986), Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck and business strategy, Management Science, 31, 1986,pp 1231-1241.
7. Barney, J. B.(1991), Firm Resource and Sustained Competitive Advantage, Journal of Management, 17, 1991, pp. 99-120.
8. Baum, Ingram (2001), Interorganizational Learning and Network Organization: toward a Behavioral Theory of the Interfirm, working paper.
9. Baum J, Calabrese T, Silverman B. (2000) . Don't go it alone: alliance composition and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal, Special Issue 21(3): 267-294.
10. Beckman C, Haunschild P(2002). Network learning: the effects of partners' heterogeneity of experience on corporate acquisitions. Administrative Science Quarterly 47: 92-124.
11. Berman, S. L., Down, J., & Hill, C. W. L. (2002). Tacit knowledge as a source of competitive advantage in the National Basketball Association. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 13-31.
12. Bian , Yanjie. (1997) ,"Bringing Strong Ties Back In : Indirect Ties , Network Bridges , and Job Searches in China. " A merican Sociological Review 62 (J une): 266 —285.
13. Beckman C, Haunschild P. (2002). Network learning: the effects of partners' heterogeneity of experience on corporate acquisitions. Administrative Science Quarterly 47: 92-124.
14. Biemans, W.G., (1996). Organizational networks: Towards a cross-fertilization between practice and theory, Journal of Business Research 35, pp. 29-39.
15. Biggart N, Guillen M. (1999). Developing difference: social organization and the rise of the auto industries of South Korea, Taiwan, Spain and Argentina. American Sociological Review 64: 722-747.
16. Black,J.A.and Kimberly B. Boal (1994) , Strategic Resources: Traits, Configurations and Paths to Sustainable Competitive Advantage, SMJ,Vol.15, ppl31-148, 1994.
17. Bettis, R. A., Performance Differences in Related and Unrelated Diversified Firms, Quarterly Journal of Economecs, 91,1992, pp. 241-262.
18. Bastos, P, Greve, H. (2003). Interorganizational learning and the location of manufacturing subsidiaries: is chain migration also a corporate behavior? Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 20, Baum JC, Sorenson O (eds). JAI Press: Greenwich, CT; 159-191.
19. Burton, M. D., Sorensen, J. B., & Beckman, C. M. (2002). Coming from good stock: Career histories and new venture formation. In M. Lounsbury & M. J. Ventrasca (Eds.), Research in
the sociology of organizations, vol. 19: 229-262. New York: Elsevier Science.
20. Cantwell, John and Piscitello , Lucia. The Location of Technological Activities of MNCs in European Regions : The Role Spillovers of and Local Competencies[J] . Journal of International Management, 2002 ,8(1).
21. Chatman J, Barsade S. (1995). Personality, organizational culture, and cooperation: evidence from a business simulation. Administrative Science Quarterly 40: 423-443.
22. Christmann, P. (2000). Effects of "best practices" of environmental management on cost advantage: The role of complementary assets. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 663-680.
23. Christmann, P., & Taylor, G.(2001). Globalization and the environment: Determinants of firm self-regulation in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 32: 438-458.
24. Collis, D.J., (1991). A resource-based analysis of global competition: the case of the bearings industry, Strategic Management Journal 12, pp. 49-68.
25. Daneels, E. (2002). The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strategic Management Journal, 23: 1095-1121.
26. Darr E, Kurtzberg T. (2000). An investigation of partner similarity dimensions on knowledge transfer. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 82: 28-44.
27. Dasgupta, S., Hettige, H., & Wheeler, D. (2000). What improves environmental performance? Evidence from Mexican industry. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 39: 39-66.
28. Das T, Teng B-S.( 2002). Alliance constellations: a social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Review 27: 445-456.
29. Dess, G. G., & Shaw, J. D. (2001). Voluntary turnover, social capital, and organizational performance. Academy of Management Review, 26: 446-456.
30. Goerzen A, Beamish P. (2003). Geographic scope and multinational enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal 24(13): 1289-1306.
31. Julian Birkinshaw, Neil Hood and Stefan Jonsson(1998),Building Firm-specific Advantages in Multinational Corporations: the Role of Subsidiary Initiative, Strategic Management Journal, Vol 19,221-241(1998).
32. Julian Birkinshaw(1998), Multinational subsidiary evolution: capability and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies, Academy of Management Review, Oct, 1998.
33. Julian Birkinshaw, Ulf Holm, Peter Thilenius, Niklas Arvidsson(2000), Consequences of perception gaps in the HQs-Subsidiary relationship, International Business Review9(2000)321-344.
34. Julian Birkinshaw(1997),Entrepreneurship in Multinational Corporations: The Characteristics of Subsidiary Initiatives, Strategic Management Journal, Vol 18:3,pp207-229(1997).
35. Julian Birkinshaw. Characteristics of Foreign Subsidiaries in Industry Clusters[J ] . Journal of International Business Studies ,2000, (3).
36. Julian Birkinshaw(1998), Corporate Entrepreneurship in Network Organizations: How Subsidiary Initiative Drives Internal Market Efficiency, European Management Journal Vol. 16,No.3,pp.355-364,1998.
37. Brockner, J. Davy, and C. Carter, Layoffs, self-esteem, and survivor guilt: motivational, affective, and attitudinal consequences," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36, 1985,pp.229-244.
38. Campa JM, Kedia S. (2002). Explaining the diversification discount. Journal of Finance 57: 1731-1762.
39. Capron(1998), Resources redeployment following horizontal acquisitions in Europe and North America 1988-1992, Strategic Management Journal, 1998
40. Chandler, Hambrick, Effective of executive departure on the performance of acquired firms, Strategic Management Journal, vol14, 1993
41. Chang, E., M. Susan Taylor(1999), Control in Multinational Corporations :the Case of Korean Manufacturing Subsidiaries, Journal of Management 1999,Vol.25,No.4, 541-565.
42. Chang S, Rosenzweig P. (2001). The choice of entry mode in sequential foreign direct investment. Strategic Management Journal 22(8): 747-776.
43. Chang SJ. (1996). An evolutionary perspective on diversification and corporate restructuring: entry, exit, and economic performance during 1981-89. Strategic Management Journal 17(8): 587-611.
44. Chattejee, Types of synergy and economic value:The impact of acquisitons on merging and rival firms,Strategic Management Journal,7,1986, pp119-139
45. Chatterjee, S. And B. Wernerfelt, The link between resources and type of diversification: theory and evidence", Strategic Management Journal, 12(1), 1991,pp. 33-48
46. Chung W, Alcacer J. (2002). Knowledge seeking and location choice of foreign direct investment in the United States. Management Science 48: 1534-1554.
47. Chung W, Song J. (2004). Sequential investment, firm motivation and agglomeration of Japanese electronics firms in the United States. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 13: 539-560.
48. Cohen, Levinthal, Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly,35,1990, ppl28-152
49. Coleman (1972), Socail capital in the creation of human capital, American Journal of Sociology, 94, pp95-120
50. Combs and David J.Ketchen, JR(1999), Explaining interfirm cooperation and performance toward a reconciliation of predictions from the resource-based view and organizational economics, Strategic Management Journal,20:pp867-888(1999).
51. Das, T.K. and Teng, B.S. (2000) A resource-based theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management 26(1), 31-61.
52. Dimitrios S. Kranias(2000), Cultural control: the case of Japanese multinational companies and their subsidiaries in the UK, Management Disicion 38/9(2000) pp638-648.
53. Dierickx, Cool, (1989),Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage, Management Science, 35, ppl47-160.
54. Dougherty D. (2001). Reimagining the differentiation and integration of work for sustained product innovation. Organization Science 12(5): 612-631.
55. Dyer, J. H. (1996). Specialised supplier networks as a source of competitive advantage. Evidence from the auto industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17,271-291.
56. Dyer(1997), Effective Interfirm collaboration: How firms minimize transaction costs and maximize transaction value, Strategic Management Journal vol.18:7,pp535-556.
57. Dyer and Kentaro Nobeoka(2000), Generating and Managing a High-Performance Knowledge-Sharing Network:The Toyota Case, Strategic Management Journal 21:pp 345-367(2000).
58. Eisenhardt, K.M.,( 1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review, Academy of
Management Review 14, pp. 57-74.
59. Eneroth, K. and Malm, A.T. (2000) Strategic identity: visions as catalysts for competence dynamics. In Advances in Applied Business Strategy, eds R. Sanchez and A. Heene A. JAI Press.
60. Farjoun M. (1998). The independent and joint effects of the skill and physical bases of relatedness in diversification. Strategic Management Journal 19(7): 611-630.
61. Franco, A. M., & Filson, D. (2000). Knowledge diffusion through employee mobility. Working paper, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
62. Furu,P., Drivers of competence development in different types of multinational R&D subsidiaries, Scandinavian Journal of Management 17 (2001) pp133-149.
63. Goerzen A, Beamish P. (2003). Geographic scope and multinational enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal 24(13): 1289-1306.
64. Ghoshal, Bartlett(1988), Creation, adoption , and diffusion of innovation by subsidiaries of multinational corporations, Journal of International Business Studies, 19, 1988, pp365-388.
65. Ghoshal, Bartlett(1990),The multinational corporation as an interorganizational network, Journal of International Business Studies, 19, 1990, pp365-388.
66. Goold M, Luchs K. (1993). Why diversify? Four decades of management thinking. Academy of Management Executive 7(3): 7-25.
67. Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78,1360-1380.
68. Granovetter , Mark. (1985) , "Economic Action and Social Structure : The Problem of Embeddedness." A merican Journal of Sociology 91 :481-510.
69. Grant (1996), Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue, 17,pp109-122.
70. Garud R, Kumaraswamy A, Langlois RN (eds). (2003). Managing in the Modular Age: Architectures, Networks, and Organizations. Blackwell: Maiden, MA.
71. Guillen M. (2002). Structural inertia, imitation, and foreign expansion: South Korean firms and business group in China, 1987-95. Academy of Management Journal 45: 509-525.
72. Gulati R. (1995). Social structure and alliance formation patterns: a longitudinal analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly 40: 619-652.
73. Gulati(1999), Network Location and Learning: the influence of network resources and firm capabilities on Alliance Formation, SMJ,20:pp397-420(1999).
74. Gulati, Nohria and Zaheer(2000), Strategic Networks, Strategic Management Journal 21:203-215(2000).
75. Gulati R, Nickerson J.(2004). Interorganizational-trust, governance choice, and exchange performance.Working paper, Northwestern University.
76. Gupta. Govindarajan(1991), Knowledge flows and the structure of control wihtin multinational corporation, Academy of Management Journal, 16(4), pp768-792.
77. Gupta, A., & Govindarajan, V. (1994). Organizing for knowledge flows within MNCs. International Business Review, 3 (4), 443-457.
78. Gupta, Govindarajan(2000), Knowledge flows within multinational corporations, Strategic Management Journal,21 :pp473-496(2000).
79. Hakansson, Havila, and Pedersen(1999), Learning in Networks, Industrial Marketing Management 28,pp443-452(1999).
80. Hall, R. (1992), The Strategic Analysis of Intangible Resources, Strategic Management
Journal, Vol. 13,135-144(1992).
81. Hamel, G (1991). Competition for competence and inter-partner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 83-103 Special issue.
82. Hansen,M.T.(1999),The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in the sharing knowledge across organization subunits, Administrative Science Quarterly; Mar 1999; 44, 1;pp82.
83. Harrison JS, Hitt MA, Hoskisson RE, Ireland RD. (2001). Resource complementarity in business combinations: extending the logic to organizational alliances. Journal of Management 27: 679-690.
84. Hatch, N. W., & Macher, J. T. (2002). Mitigating the tradeoff between time-to-market and manufacturing performance: Knowledge management in new technologies. Working paper, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah.
85. Hedlund(1994), A model of knowledge management and the N-form corporation , Strategic Model Journal, Summer Special Issue, 15, pp73-90.
86. Helfat, C. E., & Lieberman, M. B. (2002). The birth of capabilities: Market entry and the importance of pre-history. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11: 725-760.
87. Henisz W, Delios A. (2001). Uncertainty, imitation, and plant location: Japanese multinational corporations, 1990-1996. Administrative Science Quarterly 46: 443-475.
88. Hill CWL, Jones GR. (1998). Strategic Management Theory: An Integrated Approach (2nd edn). Houghton Mifflin: Boston, MA.
89. Higgins, M., & Gulati, R.(2003). Getting off to a good start: The effects of the upper echelon affiliations on underwriter prestige. Organization Science, 14: 244-263.
90. Hitt, M. A., Bierman, L., Shimizu, K., & Kochhar, R. (2001). Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms: A resource-based perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 13-28.
91. King, A. A., & Tucci, C. L. (2002). Incumbent entry into new market niches: The role of experience and managerial choice in the creation of dynamic capabilities. Management Science, 48: 171-186.
92. Holm,U., Johanson, J., and Thilenius(1995), Headquarters knowledge of subsidiary network contexts in the multinational corporation, International Studies of Management and Organization, 25(l-2)pp97-120, 1995.
93. Ingram P, Baum J. (1997). Chain affiliation and the failure of Manhattan hotels, 1898-1980. Administrative Science Quarterly 42: 68-102.
94. Inkpen AC, Dinur A. (1998). Knowledge management processes and international joint ventures. Organization Science 9(4): 454-468.
95. Inkpen AC. (2001). Strategic alliances. In Blackwell Handbookof Strategic Management, Hitt MA, Ireland RD,Harrison JS (eds). Blackwell: Maiden, MA; 409-432.
96. Ireland RD, Hitt MA, Vaidyanath D. (2002). Alliance management as a source of competitive advantage. Journal of Management 28(3): 413-446.
97. Jesen and Meckling(1976), Theory of the firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure", Journal of Financial Economics.
98. Jesen, M. C, R. Ruback(1985), The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence", Journal of Financial Economics, 11, pp5-50.
99. Jolly, D. (2000), Three generic resource-based strategies, Int. J. Technology Management, Vol.l9,Nos.7/8,2000.
100. Kale P, Dyer J, Singh H. (2002). Alliance capability, stock market response, and long-term alliance success: the role of the alliance function. Strategic Management Journal 23(8): 747_767.
101. King, A. A., & Lenox, M. J. (2000). Industry self-regulation without sanctions: The chemical industry's Responsible Care Program. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 698-716.
102. King, A. A., & Lenox, M. J. (2001). Lean and green? An empirical examination of the relationship between lean production and environmental performance.Production and Operations Management, 10(3): 244-256.
103. Kogut(2000), The Network as Knowledge:Generative Rules and the Emergence of Structure, Strategic Management Journal 21: pp405—425 (2000) .
104. Kogut, Zander(1995), Knowledge of the firm,combinative capabilities and the replication of technology, Organizationa Science, 3, pp383-397.
105. Kogut; Zander(1993), Knowledge of the Firm and the Evolutionary Theory of the Multinational Corporation, Journal of the International Business Studies, Volume24, Issue 4(4th Qtr.,1993),pp625-645.
106. Kogut, Zander(1995), Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities, Organizational Science, 6(1), pp76-92.
107. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1996). What do firms do? Coordination, identity and learning. Organization Science, 7, 502-518.
108. Koka B, Prescott J. (2002). Strategic alliances as social capital: a multidimensional view. Strategic Management Journal 23(9): 795-816.
109. Kostova,T. (1999),Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: a contextual perspective, Academy of Management Review, April, 1999.
110. Kotabe M, Martin X, Domoto H. (2003). Gaining from vertical partnerships: knowledge transfer, relationship duration and supplier performance improvement in the U.S. and Japanese automotive industries. Strategic Management Journal 24(4): 293-316.
111. Kumar, R., & Nti, K. O. (1998). Differential learning and interaction in alliance dynamics: a process and outcome discrepancy model. Organization Science, 9 (3), 356-367.
112. Lam(2000), Tacit Knowledge, Organizational Learning and Societal Institutions: An Integrated Framework, Organization Studies, 2000,21/3,pp 487-513.
113. Lane, P. J., & Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 461-478.
114. Laroche, M., Kirpalani, V. H., Pons, F., & Zhou, L. (2001). A model of advertising standardization in multinational companies. Journal of International Business Studies, 32: 249-266.
115. Larson A. (1992). Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: a study of the governance of exchange relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly 37: 76-105.
116. Leiponen, A. (2003). Core complementarities of the corporation: Organization of an innovating firm. Working paper, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
117. Lenox, M., & King, A. (2003). Absorptive capacity, information provision, and the diffusion of practices within firms. Working paper, New York University, New York.
118. Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development.Strategic Management Journal, 13 (Summer Special Issue): 111-125.
119. Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1987). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319-340.
120. Lorenzaoni , Lipparini(1999), The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: a longitudinal study, Strategic Management Journal 20: 317-338(1999).
121. Markides C, Williamson P. (1994). Related diversification, core competencies and corporate performance. Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue 15: 149-165.
122. Meyer MH, Lehnerd AP.( 1997). The Power of Product Platforms: Building Value and Cost Leadership. Free Press: New York.
123. Miles, R.E., Snow, C.C., (1995). The network firrm: A spherical structure built on a human investment philosophy, Organizational Dynamics 23, pp. 5-18.
124. Montgomery, D. G(1992),Diversification , ricardian rents, and tobin's Q,Rand Journal of Economics, 19(4), pp. 623-632
125. Montgomery, Wilson(1986), Mergers that last: a predictable pattern?, Strategic Management Journal, vol 7, pp91-96.
126. Karl J. Moore(2001), A strategy for subsidiaries: Centers of Excellence to Build Subsidiary Specific Advantages, Management International Review vol,41,2001/3,pp.275-290.
127. Nahapiet,Ghoshal(1998) , Social capital , intellectual capital and the organizational advantage, Academy of Management Review, 23(2), pp242-266.
128. Nelson, R., Winter S.(1982), An evolutionary theory of economic change, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
129. Nobel.R., Julian Birkinshaw(1998), Innovation in Multinational Corporations: Control and Communication Patterns in International R&D Operations, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 19,479-496(1998).
130. Nobeoka K, Cusumano MA. (1997). Multiproject strategy and sales growth: the benefits of rapid design transfer in new product development. Strategic Management Journal 18(3): 169-186.
131. Nonaka(1994), A dynamic theory of organizational knowldege creation, Organization Science, 5(1), pp 14-37.
132. Sharon O'Donnell(1999), Compensation Design as a Tool for Implementing Foreign Subsidiary Strategy, Management International Review vol.39,1999/2, pp.149-165.
133. Sharon Watson O'donnell(2000), Managing foreign subsidiaries:gents of headquarters, or an interdependent network? Strategic Management Journal 525-548(2000).
134. Palich L, Cardinal L, Miller C. (2000). Curvilinearity in the diversification-performance linkage: an examination of over three decades of research. Strategic Management Journal 21(3): 155-174.
135. Paldam,Svendsen(2000), "An essay on social capital: looking for the fire behind the smoke", European Journal of Political Economy, Vol.16(2000),pp339-366.
136. Penrose, E. T. (1959),The theory of the growth of the firm, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
137. Pearce, David, A social network approach to organizational design-performance, Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review (pre-1986); Jul 1983,pp. 436.
138. Pennings J, Barkema H, Douma S. (1994). Organizational learning and diversification. Academy of Management Journal 37: 608-640.
139. Peteraf, M. A(1993),The cornerstone of competitive advantage: A resource-based view", Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), pp. 179-192.
140. Phillips, D. J. (2002). A genealogical approach to organizational life chances: The parent-progeny transfer among Silicon Valley law firms, 1946-1996, Administrative Science
Quarterly, 47: 474-506.
141. Podolny J. (2001). Networks as piles and prisms of the market. American Journal of Sociology 107: 33-60.
142. Poppo L, Zenger T. (2002). Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management Journal 23(8): 707-725.
143. Porter, M.E., (1991). Towards a Dynamic Theory of Strategy, Strategic Management Journal 12, pp. 95-117.
144. Powell(1990),Neither Market Nor Hierarchy: Network Form of Organization, Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol.12, pp295-336,1990.
145. Prahalad CK, Bettis RA. (1986). The dominant logic: a new linkage between diversity and performance. Strategic Management Journal 7(6): 485-501.
146. Prahalad C.K.,Gary Hamel(1992),The core competence of the corporation, Harvard Business Review, No.90311, march-April, 1992.
147. Rajan R, Servaes H. (2000). The cost of diversity: the diversification discount and inefficient investment. Journal of Finance 55(1): 35-78.
148. Rangan S. (2000). Search and deliberation in international exchange: microfoundations to some macro patterns. Journal of International Business Studies 31:205-222.
149. Robins JA, Wiersema MF. (1995) . A resource-based approach to the multibusiness firm: empirical analysis of portfolio interrelationships and corporate financial performance. Strategic Management Journal 16(4):277-299.
150. Rodan S, Galunic C. (2004). More than network structure: how knowledge heterogeneity influences managerial performance and innovativeness. Strategic Management Journal 25(6): 541-562.
151. Rowley T, Behrens D, Krackhardt D. (2000). Redundant governance structures: an analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strategic Management Journal, Special Issue 21(3): 369-386.
152. Rugman, Verbeke(2001), Subsidiary-specific advantages in multinational enterprises, Strategic Management Journal,22:pp237-250(2001).
153. Rumelt, R. P.(1982),Diversification strategy and profitability, Strategic Management Journal 3, pp359-369
154. Rumelt, R. P.(1987),Strategy, economic theory and entrepreneurship', in D. J. Teece(ed.) The Competitive Challenge, Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger Books.
155. Sanchez, R. and Heene A. (2000) Recent progress in developing theory for competence-based management. In Advances in Applied Business Strategy, eds R. Sanchez and A. Heene. JAI Press.
156. Shane, S.(2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11: 448-469.
157. Shane, S., & Stuart, T. (2002). Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups. Management Science, 48(1): 154-170.
158. Sharma, S. (2000). Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 681-697.
159. Schrader S. (1991). Informal technology transfer between firms: cooperation through information trading. Research Policy 20: 153-170.
160. Schulz M. (2001) . The uncertain relevance of newness: organizational learning and knowledge flows. Academy of Management Journal 44(4): 661-681.
161. Spender(1996),Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 17 (S2) ,pp45-62.
162. Stopford J, Wells L.( 1972). Managing the Multinational Enterprise. Basic Books: New York.
163. Szulanski (1996), Exploring internal stickness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), pp27-44.
164. Szulanski, G. (2000). The process of knowledge transfer: A diachronic analysis of stickiness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82: 9-27.
165. St John CHS, Harrison JS.(1999). Manufacturing-based relatedness, synergy, and coordination. StrategicManagement Journal 20(2): 129-145.
166. Schulz M. (2001). The uncertain relevance of newness organizational learning and knowledge flows.Academy of Management Journal 44(4): 661-681.
167. Silverman BS.(1999). Technological resources and the direction of corporate diversification: toward an integration of the resource-based view and transaction cost economics. Management Science 45(8): 1109-1124.
168. Shapiro, J., (1993). Optimizing the value chain. Interfaces 25 (2), 102-117.
169. Song J. (2002). Firm capabilities and technology ladders: sequential foreign direct investments of Japanese electronics firms in East Asia. Strategic Management Journal 21(3): 191-210.
170. Taggart,J., Hood(1999), Determinants of Autonomy in Multinational Corporation Subsidiaries , European Management Journal Vol17,No.2,pp.226-236,1999.
171. Tavakoli, Keith J. Perks(2001), The development of strategic control system for management of strategic change, Strategic Change 10:pp297-305(2001).
172. Teece (1977), Technology transfer by multinational firms: The resource cost of transferring technological know-how, The Economic Journal, 87, pp242-261
173. Teece, D. J. And G Risano(1994),The dynamic capabilities of firms: An Introduction", Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(3), pp. 537-556
174. David J.Teece, Gary Pisano and Amy Shuen(1997), Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management, Strategic Management Journal V61.18:7,pp509-533(1997).
175. Tichy,Tushman,Fombrun(1979), Social Network Analysis For Organizations, The Academy of Management Review, 1979,Vol.4,No.4,507-519.
176. Tsai(2000),Social capital, strategic relatedness and the formation of intraorganizational linkages, Strategic Management Journal, 21, pp925-939.
177. Tsai(2002), Social Structure of "Coopetition" within Multiunit Organizations: Coordination, Competition and Inter-organizational knowledge Sharing, Organization Science, Mar/Apr,2002; 13,2;pp179.
178. Ulf Andersson, Mats Forsgren(2000), In search of center of Excellence: Network Embeddedness and Subsidiary Roles in Multinational Corporations, Management International Review vol.40.2000/4,pp.329-350.
179. Uzzi B. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: the network effect. American Sociological Review 61: 674-699.
180. Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks. The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 35-67.
181. Von Hippel E, Katz R. (2002) . Shifting innovation to users via toolkits. Management Science 48(7): 821-833.
182. Walker, Kogut, Shan(1997), Social capital, Structural Holes and the Formation of an Industry Network, Organization Science, Volume 8, Issue 2(Mar.-Apr., 1997), pp109-125.
183. Watson W, Kumar K, Michaelsen L. (1993). Cultural diversity's impact on integration process and performance: comparing homogenous and diverse workgroups. Academy of Management Journal 36: 590-602.
184. Wernerfelt, B. (1984), A resource-based view of the firm', Strategic Management Journal 5, pp171-80.
185. Williamson, O. E.(1976), Transaction-cost economics: the governance of contractual relations", Journal of Law and Ecomomics, Oct pp.3-61.
186. Williamson O.(1991). Strategizing, economizing, and economic organization. Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue 12: 75-94.
187. Winter, S. G. (1987), Knowledge and competence as strategic assets', in D. J. Teece(ed.) The Competitive Challenge, Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger Books.
188. Yli-Renko, Autio and Harry J. Sapienza(2001), Social Capital, Knowledge Acquisition, and Knowledge Explotation in Young Technology-Based Firms, Strategic Management Journal, 22: 587-613(2001).
189. Zajac E. (1998). Commentary on 'Alliances and networks' by R. Gulati. Strategic Management Journal, Special Issue 19:319-321.
190. Zaheer, A., McEvily, B., & Perrone, V. (1998). Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organization Science, 9 (2), 141-159.
191. Zahra, S., & Dess, G. (2001). Entrepreneurship as a field of research: Encouraging dialogue and debate. Academy of Management Review, 26: 8-10.
192. Zahra, S. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hitt, M. A. (2000). International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 925-950.
193.[美]约翰·辛格,《设计最好的公司》,宇航出版社,科文(香港)出版有限公司,1999.
194.[美]麦克尔·波特,《竞争战略》,华夏出版社,西蒙舒斯特出版公司,1996.
195.[美]麦克尔·波特,《竞争优势》,华夏出版社,西蒙舒斯特出版公司,1996.
196.[丹麦]尼古莱.J.福斯,克里斯第安.克努森等编,李冬红译,《企业万能—面向企业能力理论》,东北财经大学出版社,1998年.
197.[英]安德鲁·坎贝尔,凯瑟琳·萨默斯·卢斯编,严勇,祝方译,《核心能力战略》,东北财经大学出版社,1999.
198.[美]肯尼思·普瑞斯,史蒂文·L·戈德曼,罗杰·N·内格尔著,武康平译,《以合作求竞争》,辽宁教育出版社,1998.
199.[美]乔尔·布利克,戴维·厄恩斯特编著,林燕等译,《协作型竞争——全球市场的战略联营与收购》,中国大百科全书出版社,1998.
200.[美]尼尔·瑞克曼等著,[台湾]苏怡仲译,《合作竞争大未来》,经济管理出版社,1998.
201.[美]哈默,普拉哈拉德著,王振西译.竞争大未来.北京:昆仑出版社,1998.
202.杜胜利、阎达五,《资本管理论—控股公司资本控制研究》,中国人民大学出版社,1999.
203.[美]小艾尔弗雷德.D.钱德勒著,《看得见的手——美国企业的管理革命》,商务印书馆,1994年.
204.[美]菲利普·科特勒.营销管理.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2001.
205.彼得.F.德鲁克(Peter F.Drucker)等著,杨开峰等译,《知识管理》,中国人民大学出版社,哈佛商学院出版社,1999.
206.[美]彼得·圣吉著,郭进隆译.第五项修炼——学习型组织的艺术与实务,上海三联书店,1998.
207.[美]科特,赫斯克特著,李晓涛,曾中译.企业文化与经营业绩.北京:华夏出版社,1997.
208.[美]克里斯托弗·A·巴特利特,[英]休曼特拉·戈歇尔著,赵曙明主译,《跨国管理》(第二版),东北财经大学出版社,2000.
209.孔茨,韦里克,《管理学》,经济科学出版社,1998.
210.约翰逊,斯科尔斯,《公司战略教程》,华夏出版社,1998.
211.坎贝尔,卢克斯编著,《战略协同》,机械工业出版社,2000.
212.哈默尔,普拉哈拉德编著,《战略柔性:变革中的管理》,机械工业出版社,2000.
213.R.科斯等,《财产权利与制度变迁》,上海三联书店,上海人民出版社,1995年.
214.安尼.布鲁金著,赵洁平译,《第三资源—智力资本及其管理》,东北财经大学出版社,1998.
215.徐金发著,《企业集团成因论》,同济大学出版社,1992.
216.赵景华,《跨国公司在华子公司战略研究》,经济管理出版社,2002.
217.陈手明.现代企业网络研究[M]上海:上海人民出版社,2002.
218.孙枫林编著,《管理统计学》,电子科技大学出版社,1995.
219.卢纹岱,朱一力等编著,《SPSS for Windows:从入门到精通》,电子工业出版社,1997.
220.边燕杰,丘海雄.企业的社会资本及其功效[J],中国社会科学,2000年第2期.
221.程家健,“新竞争”组织形态企业网络组织的几个问题[J],求实,2004.12.
222.李龙一,韦曙林.基于资本视角的核心能力理论模型[J],科技进步与对策,2003年10月号.
223.林旭东,专用性投资、持股安排与激励效率——企业集团内部所有权纽带的理论模型分析[J],中国工业经济,2004年3期.
224.兰春华,理顺母子公司关系的三种思路[J],企业改革与管理,2003年3期.
225.吕坚,孙林岩,范松林.网络组织类型及其管理机制适应性研究[J],管理科学学报,2005年4月,第八卷第五期.
226.国家经贸委企业研究中心课题组.我国企业集团管理体制的探讨[J].企业管理,1996,(6):43—45.
227.刘海建,陈松涛,陈传明,企业核心能力的刚性特征及其超越[J],中国工业经济,2003(11):47-54.
228.何静.网络组织模式及其发展趋势研究[J].商业研究,2003,(2).
229.黄津孚.资源、能力与核心竞争力[J].经济管理,2001(20):4-9.
230.郝红梅等,外商投资高新技术产业问题研究[J],国际经济合作,2000,(2).
231.苗青,王重鸣.企业家能力:理论、结构与实践[J].重庆大学学报社科版,2003(1):131-133.
232.姜万生,黎永前,冯文岚.基于Internet网的集成化供应链管理协同环境[J].信息与控制.2000,(4):320—324.
233.罗仲伟,罗美娟,网络组织对层级组织的替代[J],中国工业经济,2001年6月:23-30.
234.任志安.企业网络知识共享机制形成的进化博弈分析[J]1 合肥工业大学学报,2004,(5).
235.徐金发,刘翌.母子公司之间知识流动的决定因素研究[J],科研管理,第二十三卷,第二期,2002年3月.
236.谭新生.组织能力观与传统资源观的比较分析[J].外国经济与管理,2003(8):22-32.
237.彭新一,杨凯云.动态开发网络组织的创新特性研究[J].华南理工大学学报(社科版),2002,(9).
238.张文魁.大型企业集团管理体制研究:组织结构、管理控制与公司治理[J].改革,2003,(1)
239.葛晨,徐金发.母子公司的管理与控制模式[J].管理世界,1999年,6月.
240.许可,徐二明.企业资源学派与能力学派的回顾与比较[J].经济管理,2002(2):10-17.
241.张钢.基于技术转移的企业能力演化过程研究[J].科学学研究,2001(9):70-75.
242.彭正新,李传昭,李华.我国企业集团治理的若干问题探析[J],中国软科学,2003年,第3期.
243.赵富厚.跨国公司母子公司关系中自治权的确定性研究[J],南开管理评论,2004年第7卷,第5期,106—111页.
244.葛京,杨莉,李武.跨国企业集团管理[M],北京:机械工业出版社,2003.
245.许强,施放.从知识结构观点看母子公司关系[J],科技进步与对策,2003年5月.
246.徐金发,许强,顾惊雷.企业知识转移的情境分析模型[J].自然辩证法通讯,2003(2):51—56.
247.郭培民.基于资源观的母子公司关系管理,浙江大学博士论文,2001.
248.席酉民,赵增耀.企业集团治理[M]北京.机械工业出版社,2000.
249.谢洪明,蓝海林.战略网络中企业间关系的特征[J],中国流通经济,2003年3月.
250.许海,日本跨国公司在华直接投资的业绩及其影响因素[J],世界经济,2001年,(4).
251.应可福,薛恒新,企业集团管理中的协同效应研究[J],华东经济管理,2004年10月,第18卷第5期.
252.杨云,冯建民.企业集团管理组织的再造研究[J].企业经济,2000,(11):71—73.
253.杨瑞龙.企业间网络的效率边界:经济组织逻辑的重新审视[J] 中国工业经济,2003,(11)1.
254.刘翌,徐金发.母子公司知识流动:一个理论分析框架[J],科研管理,第23卷,第1期,2002年1月.
255.王生云,张宏伟.基于网络组织的企业核心能力研究[J].华东经济管理,2002,(10).
256.王耀忠.网络组织的结构及协调机制[J].系统工程理论方法应用,2002,(3).
257.肖条军,盛昭瀚,程书萍.组建横向型企业集团抉择的博弈分析[J].管理科学学报,2004年10月,第七卷第五期.
258.向晋乾,黄培清.横向型企业集团供应链结构及关系分析[J],管理现代化,2004年第5期:45—48页.
259.郑兴山,王莉.企业网络组织治理机制研究综述[J],学术月刊,2004.6
260.朱婧,周光芝.企业集团中母子公司的治理结构[J],经济论坛,2004,14.
261.王刚.论异质资本的生产功能.上海财经大学学报[J],2000(2):12-15.
2. Anand B, Khanna T. (2000). Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliances. Strategic Management Journal, Special Issue 21(3): 295-315.
3. Anderson(2003), The Embeddedness of Selfish Routines: How Routines are Replicated in Business Networks, Industry and Innovation, Volumel0,No.2,159-177, June,2003.
4. Anderson ,Forsgren ,and Holm 1(2003) ,The Strategic Impact of External Network : Subsidiary Performance And Compentency Development In the Multinational Corporation[J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 2002 , 23 (1).
5. Ansoff(1965),Corporate Strategy, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1965.
6. Barney, J.B.(1986), Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck and business strategy, Management Science, 31, 1986,pp 1231-1241.
7. Barney, J. B.(1991), Firm Resource and Sustained Competitive Advantage, Journal of Management, 17, 1991, pp. 99-120.
8. Baum, Ingram (2001), Interorganizational Learning and Network Organization: toward a Behavioral Theory of the Interfirm, working paper.
9. Baum J, Calabrese T, Silverman B. (2000) . Don't go it alone: alliance composition and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal, Special Issue 21(3): 267-294.
10. Beckman C, Haunschild P(2002). Network learning: the effects of partners' heterogeneity of experience on corporate acquisitions. Administrative Science Quarterly 47: 92-124.
11. Berman, S. L., Down, J., & Hill, C. W. L. (2002). Tacit knowledge as a source of competitive advantage in the National Basketball Association. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 13-31.
12. Bian , Yanjie. (1997) ,"Bringing Strong Ties Back In : Indirect Ties , Network Bridges , and Job Searches in China. " A merican Sociological Review 62 (J une): 266 —285.
13. Beckman C, Haunschild P. (2002). Network learning: the effects of partners' heterogeneity of experience on corporate acquisitions. Administrative Science Quarterly 47: 92-124.
14. Biemans, W.G., (1996). Organizational networks: Towards a cross-fertilization between practice and theory, Journal of Business Research 35, pp. 29-39.
15. Biggart N, Guillen M. (1999). Developing difference: social organization and the rise of the auto industries of South Korea, Taiwan, Spain and Argentina. American Sociological Review 64: 722-747.
16. Black,J.A.and Kimberly B. Boal (1994) , Strategic Resources: Traits, Configurations and Paths to Sustainable Competitive Advantage, SMJ,Vol.15, ppl31-148, 1994.
17. Bettis, R. A., Performance Differences in Related and Unrelated Diversified Firms, Quarterly Journal of Economecs, 91,1992, pp. 241-262.
18. Bastos, P, Greve, H. (2003). Interorganizational learning and the location of manufacturing subsidiaries: is chain migration also a corporate behavior? Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 20, Baum JC, Sorenson O (eds). JAI Press: Greenwich, CT; 159-191.
19. Burton, M. D., Sorensen, J. B., & Beckman, C. M. (2002). Coming from good stock: Career histories and new venture formation. In M. Lounsbury & M. J. Ventrasca (Eds.), Research in
the sociology of organizations, vol. 19: 229-262. New York: Elsevier Science.
20. Cantwell, John and Piscitello , Lucia. The Location of Technological Activities of MNCs in European Regions : The Role Spillovers of and Local Competencies[J] . Journal of International Management, 2002 ,8(1).
21. Chatman J, Barsade S. (1995). Personality, organizational culture, and cooperation: evidence from a business simulation. Administrative Science Quarterly 40: 423-443.
22. Christmann, P. (2000). Effects of "best practices" of environmental management on cost advantage: The role of complementary assets. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 663-680.
23. Christmann, P., & Taylor, G.(2001). Globalization and the environment: Determinants of firm self-regulation in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 32: 438-458.
24. Collis, D.J., (1991). A resource-based analysis of global competition: the case of the bearings industry, Strategic Management Journal 12, pp. 49-68.
25. Daneels, E. (2002). The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strategic Management Journal, 23: 1095-1121.
26. Darr E, Kurtzberg T. (2000). An investigation of partner similarity dimensions on knowledge transfer. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 82: 28-44.
27. Dasgupta, S., Hettige, H., & Wheeler, D. (2000). What improves environmental performance? Evidence from Mexican industry. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 39: 39-66.
28. Das T, Teng B-S.( 2002). Alliance constellations: a social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Review 27: 445-456.
29. Dess, G. G., & Shaw, J. D. (2001). Voluntary turnover, social capital, and organizational performance. Academy of Management Review, 26: 446-456.
30. Goerzen A, Beamish P. (2003). Geographic scope and multinational enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal 24(13): 1289-1306.
31. Julian Birkinshaw, Neil Hood and Stefan Jonsson(1998),Building Firm-specific Advantages in Multinational Corporations: the Role of Subsidiary Initiative, Strategic Management Journal, Vol 19,221-241(1998).
32. Julian Birkinshaw(1998), Multinational subsidiary evolution: capability and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies, Academy of Management Review, Oct, 1998.
33. Julian Birkinshaw, Ulf Holm, Peter Thilenius, Niklas Arvidsson(2000), Consequences of perception gaps in the HQs-Subsidiary relationship, International Business Review9(2000)321-344.
34. Julian Birkinshaw(1997),Entrepreneurship in Multinational Corporations: The Characteristics of Subsidiary Initiatives, Strategic Management Journal, Vol 18:3,pp207-229(1997).
35. Julian Birkinshaw. Characteristics of Foreign Subsidiaries in Industry Clusters[J ] . Journal of International Business Studies ,2000, (3).
36. Julian Birkinshaw(1998), Corporate Entrepreneurship in Network Organizations: How Subsidiary Initiative Drives Internal Market Efficiency, European Management Journal Vol. 16,No.3,pp.355-364,1998.
37. Brockner, J. Davy, and C. Carter, Layoffs, self-esteem, and survivor guilt: motivational, affective, and attitudinal consequences," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36, 1985,pp.229-244.
38. Campa JM, Kedia S. (2002). Explaining the diversification discount. Journal of Finance 57: 1731-1762.
39. Capron(1998), Resources redeployment following horizontal acquisitions in Europe and North America 1988-1992, Strategic Management Journal, 1998
40. Chandler, Hambrick, Effective of executive departure on the performance of acquired firms, Strategic Management Journal, vol14, 1993
41. Chang, E., M. Susan Taylor(1999), Control in Multinational Corporations :the Case of Korean Manufacturing Subsidiaries, Journal of Management 1999,Vol.25,No.4, 541-565.
42. Chang S, Rosenzweig P. (2001). The choice of entry mode in sequential foreign direct investment. Strategic Management Journal 22(8): 747-776.
43. Chang SJ. (1996). An evolutionary perspective on diversification and corporate restructuring: entry, exit, and economic performance during 1981-89. Strategic Management Journal 17(8): 587-611.
44. Chattejee, Types of synergy and economic value:The impact of acquisitons on merging and rival firms,Strategic Management Journal,7,1986, pp119-139
45. Chatterjee, S. And B. Wernerfelt, The link between resources and type of diversification: theory and evidence", Strategic Management Journal, 12(1), 1991,pp. 33-48
46. Chung W, Alcacer J. (2002). Knowledge seeking and location choice of foreign direct investment in the United States. Management Science 48: 1534-1554.
47. Chung W, Song J. (2004). Sequential investment, firm motivation and agglomeration of Japanese electronics firms in the United States. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 13: 539-560.
48. Cohen, Levinthal, Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly,35,1990, ppl28-152
49. Coleman (1972), Socail capital in the creation of human capital, American Journal of Sociology, 94, pp95-120
50. Combs and David J.Ketchen, JR(1999), Explaining interfirm cooperation and performance toward a reconciliation of predictions from the resource-based view and organizational economics, Strategic Management Journal,20:pp867-888(1999).
51. Das, T.K. and Teng, B.S. (2000) A resource-based theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management 26(1), 31-61.
52. Dimitrios S. Kranias(2000), Cultural control: the case of Japanese multinational companies and their subsidiaries in the UK, Management Disicion 38/9(2000) pp638-648.
53. Dierickx, Cool, (1989),Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage, Management Science, 35, ppl47-160.
54. Dougherty D. (2001). Reimagining the differentiation and integration of work for sustained product innovation. Organization Science 12(5): 612-631.
55. Dyer, J. H. (1996). Specialised supplier networks as a source of competitive advantage. Evidence from the auto industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17,271-291.
56. Dyer(1997), Effective Interfirm collaboration: How firms minimize transaction costs and maximize transaction value, Strategic Management Journal vol.18:7,pp535-556.
57. Dyer and Kentaro Nobeoka(2000), Generating and Managing a High-Performance Knowledge-Sharing Network:The Toyota Case, Strategic Management Journal 21:pp 345-367(2000).
58. Eisenhardt, K.M.,( 1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review, Academy of
Management Review 14, pp. 57-74.
59. Eneroth, K. and Malm, A.T. (2000) Strategic identity: visions as catalysts for competence dynamics. In Advances in Applied Business Strategy, eds R. Sanchez and A. Heene A. JAI Press.
60. Farjoun M. (1998). The independent and joint effects of the skill and physical bases of relatedness in diversification. Strategic Management Journal 19(7): 611-630.
61. Franco, A. M., & Filson, D. (2000). Knowledge diffusion through employee mobility. Working paper, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
62. Furu,P., Drivers of competence development in different types of multinational R&D subsidiaries, Scandinavian Journal of Management 17 (2001) pp133-149.
63. Goerzen A, Beamish P. (2003). Geographic scope and multinational enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal 24(13): 1289-1306.
64. Ghoshal, Bartlett(1988), Creation, adoption , and diffusion of innovation by subsidiaries of multinational corporations, Journal of International Business Studies, 19, 1988, pp365-388.
65. Ghoshal, Bartlett(1990),The multinational corporation as an interorganizational network, Journal of International Business Studies, 19, 1990, pp365-388.
66. Goold M, Luchs K. (1993). Why diversify? Four decades of management thinking. Academy of Management Executive 7(3): 7-25.
67. Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78,1360-1380.
68. Granovetter , Mark. (1985) , "Economic Action and Social Structure : The Problem of Embeddedness." A merican Journal of Sociology 91 :481-510.
69. Grant (1996), Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue, 17,pp109-122.
70. Garud R, Kumaraswamy A, Langlois RN (eds). (2003). Managing in the Modular Age: Architectures, Networks, and Organizations. Blackwell: Maiden, MA.
71. Guillen M. (2002). Structural inertia, imitation, and foreign expansion: South Korean firms and business group in China, 1987-95. Academy of Management Journal 45: 509-525.
72. Gulati R. (1995). Social structure and alliance formation patterns: a longitudinal analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly 40: 619-652.
73. Gulati(1999), Network Location and Learning: the influence of network resources and firm capabilities on Alliance Formation, SMJ,20:pp397-420(1999).
74. Gulati, Nohria and Zaheer(2000), Strategic Networks, Strategic Management Journal 21:203-215(2000).
75. Gulati R, Nickerson J.(2004). Interorganizational-trust, governance choice, and exchange performance.Working paper, Northwestern University.
76. Gupta. Govindarajan(1991), Knowledge flows and the structure of control wihtin multinational corporation, Academy of Management Journal, 16(4), pp768-792.
77. Gupta, A., & Govindarajan, V. (1994). Organizing for knowledge flows within MNCs. International Business Review, 3 (4), 443-457.
78. Gupta, Govindarajan(2000), Knowledge flows within multinational corporations, Strategic Management Journal,21 :pp473-496(2000).
79. Hakansson, Havila, and Pedersen(1999), Learning in Networks, Industrial Marketing Management 28,pp443-452(1999).
80. Hall, R. (1992), The Strategic Analysis of Intangible Resources, Strategic Management
Journal, Vol. 13,135-144(1992).
81. Hamel, G (1991). Competition for competence and inter-partner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 83-103 Special issue.
82. Hansen,M.T.(1999),The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in the sharing knowledge across organization subunits, Administrative Science Quarterly; Mar 1999; 44, 1;pp82.
83. Harrison JS, Hitt MA, Hoskisson RE, Ireland RD. (2001). Resource complementarity in business combinations: extending the logic to organizational alliances. Journal of Management 27: 679-690.
84. Hatch, N. W., & Macher, J. T. (2002). Mitigating the tradeoff between time-to-market and manufacturing performance: Knowledge management in new technologies. Working paper, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah.
85. Hedlund(1994), A model of knowledge management and the N-form corporation , Strategic Model Journal, Summer Special Issue, 15, pp73-90.
86. Helfat, C. E., & Lieberman, M. B. (2002). The birth of capabilities: Market entry and the importance of pre-history. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11: 725-760.
87. Henisz W, Delios A. (2001). Uncertainty, imitation, and plant location: Japanese multinational corporations, 1990-1996. Administrative Science Quarterly 46: 443-475.
88. Hill CWL, Jones GR. (1998). Strategic Management Theory: An Integrated Approach (2nd edn). Houghton Mifflin: Boston, MA.
89. Higgins, M., & Gulati, R.(2003). Getting off to a good start: The effects of the upper echelon affiliations on underwriter prestige. Organization Science, 14: 244-263.
90. Hitt, M. A., Bierman, L., Shimizu, K., & Kochhar, R. (2001). Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms: A resource-based perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 13-28.
91. King, A. A., & Tucci, C. L. (2002). Incumbent entry into new market niches: The role of experience and managerial choice in the creation of dynamic capabilities. Management Science, 48: 171-186.
92. Holm,U., Johanson, J., and Thilenius(1995), Headquarters knowledge of subsidiary network contexts in the multinational corporation, International Studies of Management and Organization, 25(l-2)pp97-120, 1995.
93. Ingram P, Baum J. (1997). Chain affiliation and the failure of Manhattan hotels, 1898-1980. Administrative Science Quarterly 42: 68-102.
94. Inkpen AC, Dinur A. (1998). Knowledge management processes and international joint ventures. Organization Science 9(4): 454-468.
95. Inkpen AC. (2001). Strategic alliances. In Blackwell Handbookof Strategic Management, Hitt MA, Ireland RD,Harrison JS (eds). Blackwell: Maiden, MA; 409-432.
96. Ireland RD, Hitt MA, Vaidyanath D. (2002). Alliance management as a source of competitive advantage. Journal of Management 28(3): 413-446.
97. Jesen and Meckling(1976), Theory of the firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure", Journal of Financial Economics.
98. Jesen, M. C, R. Ruback(1985), The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence", Journal of Financial Economics, 11, pp5-50.
99. Jolly, D. (2000), Three generic resource-based strategies, Int. J. Technology Management, Vol.l9,Nos.7/8,2000.
100. Kale P, Dyer J, Singh H. (2002). Alliance capability, stock market response, and long-term alliance success: the role of the alliance function. Strategic Management Journal 23(8): 747_767.
101. King, A. A., & Lenox, M. J. (2000). Industry self-regulation without sanctions: The chemical industry's Responsible Care Program. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 698-716.
102. King, A. A., & Lenox, M. J. (2001). Lean and green? An empirical examination of the relationship between lean production and environmental performance.Production and Operations Management, 10(3): 244-256.
103. Kogut(2000), The Network as Knowledge:Generative Rules and the Emergence of Structure, Strategic Management Journal 21: pp405—425 (2000) .
104. Kogut, Zander(1995), Knowledge of the firm,combinative capabilities and the replication of technology, Organizationa Science, 3, pp383-397.
105. Kogut; Zander(1993), Knowledge of the Firm and the Evolutionary Theory of the Multinational Corporation, Journal of the International Business Studies, Volume24, Issue 4(4th Qtr.,1993),pp625-645.
106. Kogut, Zander(1995), Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities, Organizational Science, 6(1), pp76-92.
107. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1996). What do firms do? Coordination, identity and learning. Organization Science, 7, 502-518.
108. Koka B, Prescott J. (2002). Strategic alliances as social capital: a multidimensional view. Strategic Management Journal 23(9): 795-816.
109. Kostova,T. (1999),Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: a contextual perspective, Academy of Management Review, April, 1999.
110. Kotabe M, Martin X, Domoto H. (2003). Gaining from vertical partnerships: knowledge transfer, relationship duration and supplier performance improvement in the U.S. and Japanese automotive industries. Strategic Management Journal 24(4): 293-316.
111. Kumar, R., & Nti, K. O. (1998). Differential learning and interaction in alliance dynamics: a process and outcome discrepancy model. Organization Science, 9 (3), 356-367.
112. Lam(2000), Tacit Knowledge, Organizational Learning and Societal Institutions: An Integrated Framework, Organization Studies, 2000,21/3,pp 487-513.
113. Lane, P. J., & Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 461-478.
114. Laroche, M., Kirpalani, V. H., Pons, F., & Zhou, L. (2001). A model of advertising standardization in multinational companies. Journal of International Business Studies, 32: 249-266.
115. Larson A. (1992). Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: a study of the governance of exchange relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly 37: 76-105.
116. Leiponen, A. (2003). Core complementarities of the corporation: Organization of an innovating firm. Working paper, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
117. Lenox, M., & King, A. (2003). Absorptive capacity, information provision, and the diffusion of practices within firms. Working paper, New York University, New York.
118. Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development.Strategic Management Journal, 13 (Summer Special Issue): 111-125.
119. Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1987). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319-340.
120. Lorenzaoni , Lipparini(1999), The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: a longitudinal study, Strategic Management Journal 20: 317-338(1999).
121. Markides C, Williamson P. (1994). Related diversification, core competencies and corporate performance. Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue 15: 149-165.
122. Meyer MH, Lehnerd AP.( 1997). The Power of Product Platforms: Building Value and Cost Leadership. Free Press: New York.
123. Miles, R.E., Snow, C.C., (1995). The network firrm: A spherical structure built on a human investment philosophy, Organizational Dynamics 23, pp. 5-18.
124. Montgomery, D. G(1992),Diversification , ricardian rents, and tobin's Q,Rand Journal of Economics, 19(4), pp. 623-632
125. Montgomery, Wilson(1986), Mergers that last: a predictable pattern?, Strategic Management Journal, vol 7, pp91-96.
126. Karl J. Moore(2001), A strategy for subsidiaries: Centers of Excellence to Build Subsidiary Specific Advantages, Management International Review vol,41,2001/3,pp.275-290.
127. Nahapiet,Ghoshal(1998) , Social capital , intellectual capital and the organizational advantage, Academy of Management Review, 23(2), pp242-266.
128. Nelson, R., Winter S.(1982), An evolutionary theory of economic change, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
129. Nobel.R., Julian Birkinshaw(1998), Innovation in Multinational Corporations: Control and Communication Patterns in International R&D Operations, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 19,479-496(1998).
130. Nobeoka K, Cusumano MA. (1997). Multiproject strategy and sales growth: the benefits of rapid design transfer in new product development. Strategic Management Journal 18(3): 169-186.
131. Nonaka(1994), A dynamic theory of organizational knowldege creation, Organization Science, 5(1), pp 14-37.
132. Sharon O'Donnell(1999), Compensation Design as a Tool for Implementing Foreign Subsidiary Strategy, Management International Review vol.39,1999/2, pp.149-165.
133. Sharon Watson O'donnell(2000), Managing foreign subsidiaries:gents of headquarters, or an interdependent network? Strategic Management Journal 525-548(2000).
134. Palich L, Cardinal L, Miller C. (2000). Curvilinearity in the diversification-performance linkage: an examination of over three decades of research. Strategic Management Journal 21(3): 155-174.
135. Paldam,Svendsen(2000), "An essay on social capital: looking for the fire behind the smoke", European Journal of Political Economy, Vol.16(2000),pp339-366.
136. Penrose, E. T. (1959),The theory of the growth of the firm, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
137. Pearce, David, A social network approach to organizational design-performance, Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review (pre-1986); Jul 1983,pp. 436.
138. Pennings J, Barkema H, Douma S. (1994). Organizational learning and diversification. Academy of Management Journal 37: 608-640.
139. Peteraf, M. A(1993),The cornerstone of competitive advantage: A resource-based view", Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), pp. 179-192.
140. Phillips, D. J. (2002). A genealogical approach to organizational life chances: The parent-progeny transfer among Silicon Valley law firms, 1946-1996, Administrative Science
Quarterly, 47: 474-506.
141. Podolny J. (2001). Networks as piles and prisms of the market. American Journal of Sociology 107: 33-60.
142. Poppo L, Zenger T. (2002). Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management Journal 23(8): 707-725.
143. Porter, M.E., (1991). Towards a Dynamic Theory of Strategy, Strategic Management Journal 12, pp. 95-117.
144. Powell(1990),Neither Market Nor Hierarchy: Network Form of Organization, Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol.12, pp295-336,1990.
145. Prahalad CK, Bettis RA. (1986). The dominant logic: a new linkage between diversity and performance. Strategic Management Journal 7(6): 485-501.
146. Prahalad C.K.,Gary Hamel(1992),The core competence of the corporation, Harvard Business Review, No.90311, march-April, 1992.
147. Rajan R, Servaes H. (2000). The cost of diversity: the diversification discount and inefficient investment. Journal of Finance 55(1): 35-78.
148. Rangan S. (2000). Search and deliberation in international exchange: microfoundations to some macro patterns. Journal of International Business Studies 31:205-222.
149. Robins JA, Wiersema MF. (1995) . A resource-based approach to the multibusiness firm: empirical analysis of portfolio interrelationships and corporate financial performance. Strategic Management Journal 16(4):277-299.
150. Rodan S, Galunic C. (2004). More than network structure: how knowledge heterogeneity influences managerial performance and innovativeness. Strategic Management Journal 25(6): 541-562.
151. Rowley T, Behrens D, Krackhardt D. (2000). Redundant governance structures: an analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strategic Management Journal, Special Issue 21(3): 369-386.
152. Rugman, Verbeke(2001), Subsidiary-specific advantages in multinational enterprises, Strategic Management Journal,22:pp237-250(2001).
153. Rumelt, R. P.(1982),Diversification strategy and profitability, Strategic Management Journal 3, pp359-369
154. Rumelt, R. P.(1987),Strategy, economic theory and entrepreneurship', in D. J. Teece(ed.) The Competitive Challenge, Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger Books.
155. Sanchez, R. and Heene A. (2000) Recent progress in developing theory for competence-based management. In Advances in Applied Business Strategy, eds R. Sanchez and A. Heene. JAI Press.
156. Shane, S.(2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11: 448-469.
157. Shane, S., & Stuart, T. (2002). Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups. Management Science, 48(1): 154-170.
158. Sharma, S. (2000). Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 681-697.
159. Schrader S. (1991). Informal technology transfer between firms: cooperation through information trading. Research Policy 20: 153-170.
160. Schulz M. (2001) . The uncertain relevance of newness: organizational learning and knowledge flows. Academy of Management Journal 44(4): 661-681.
161. Spender(1996),Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 17 (S2) ,pp45-62.
162. Stopford J, Wells L.( 1972). Managing the Multinational Enterprise. Basic Books: New York.
163. Szulanski (1996), Exploring internal stickness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), pp27-44.
164. Szulanski, G. (2000). The process of knowledge transfer: A diachronic analysis of stickiness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82: 9-27.
165. St John CHS, Harrison JS.(1999). Manufacturing-based relatedness, synergy, and coordination. StrategicManagement Journal 20(2): 129-145.
166. Schulz M. (2001). The uncertain relevance of newness organizational learning and knowledge flows.Academy of Management Journal 44(4): 661-681.
167. Silverman BS.(1999). Technological resources and the direction of corporate diversification: toward an integration of the resource-based view and transaction cost economics. Management Science 45(8): 1109-1124.
168. Shapiro, J., (1993). Optimizing the value chain. Interfaces 25 (2), 102-117.
169. Song J. (2002). Firm capabilities and technology ladders: sequential foreign direct investments of Japanese electronics firms in East Asia. Strategic Management Journal 21(3): 191-210.
170. Taggart,J., Hood(1999), Determinants of Autonomy in Multinational Corporation Subsidiaries , European Management Journal Vol17,No.2,pp.226-236,1999.
171. Tavakoli, Keith J. Perks(2001), The development of strategic control system for management of strategic change, Strategic Change 10:pp297-305(2001).
172. Teece (1977), Technology transfer by multinational firms: The resource cost of transferring technological know-how, The Economic Journal, 87, pp242-261
173. Teece, D. J. And G Risano(1994),The dynamic capabilities of firms: An Introduction", Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(3), pp. 537-556
174. David J.Teece, Gary Pisano and Amy Shuen(1997), Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management, Strategic Management Journal V61.18:7,pp509-533(1997).
175. Tichy,Tushman,Fombrun(1979), Social Network Analysis For Organizations, The Academy of Management Review, 1979,Vol.4,No.4,507-519.
176. Tsai(2000),Social capital, strategic relatedness and the formation of intraorganizational linkages, Strategic Management Journal, 21, pp925-939.
177. Tsai(2002), Social Structure of "Coopetition" within Multiunit Organizations: Coordination, Competition and Inter-organizational knowledge Sharing, Organization Science, Mar/Apr,2002; 13,2;pp179.
178. Ulf Andersson, Mats Forsgren(2000), In search of center of Excellence: Network Embeddedness and Subsidiary Roles in Multinational Corporations, Management International Review vol.40.2000/4,pp.329-350.
179. Uzzi B. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: the network effect. American Sociological Review 61: 674-699.
180. Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks. The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 35-67.
181. Von Hippel E, Katz R. (2002) . Shifting innovation to users via toolkits. Management Science 48(7): 821-833.
182. Walker, Kogut, Shan(1997), Social capital, Structural Holes and the Formation of an Industry Network, Organization Science, Volume 8, Issue 2(Mar.-Apr., 1997), pp109-125.
183. Watson W, Kumar K, Michaelsen L. (1993). Cultural diversity's impact on integration process and performance: comparing homogenous and diverse workgroups. Academy of Management Journal 36: 590-602.
184. Wernerfelt, B. (1984), A resource-based view of the firm', Strategic Management Journal 5, pp171-80.
185. Williamson, O. E.(1976), Transaction-cost economics: the governance of contractual relations", Journal of Law and Ecomomics, Oct pp.3-61.
186. Williamson O.(1991). Strategizing, economizing, and economic organization. Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue 12: 75-94.
187. Winter, S. G. (1987), Knowledge and competence as strategic assets', in D. J. Teece(ed.) The Competitive Challenge, Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger Books.
188. Yli-Renko, Autio and Harry J. Sapienza(2001), Social Capital, Knowledge Acquisition, and Knowledge Explotation in Young Technology-Based Firms, Strategic Management Journal, 22: 587-613(2001).
189. Zajac E. (1998). Commentary on 'Alliances and networks' by R. Gulati. Strategic Management Journal, Special Issue 19:319-321.
190. Zaheer, A., McEvily, B., & Perrone, V. (1998). Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organization Science, 9 (2), 141-159.
191. Zahra, S., & Dess, G. (2001). Entrepreneurship as a field of research: Encouraging dialogue and debate. Academy of Management Review, 26: 8-10.
192. Zahra, S. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hitt, M. A. (2000). International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 925-950.
193.[美]约翰·辛格,《设计最好的公司》,宇航出版社,科文(香港)出版有限公司,1999.
194.[美]麦克尔·波特,《竞争战略》,华夏出版社,西蒙舒斯特出版公司,1996.
195.[美]麦克尔·波特,《竞争优势》,华夏出版社,西蒙舒斯特出版公司,1996.
196.[丹麦]尼古莱.J.福斯,克里斯第安.克努森等编,李冬红译,《企业万能—面向企业能力理论》,东北财经大学出版社,1998年.
197.[英]安德鲁·坎贝尔,凯瑟琳·萨默斯·卢斯编,严勇,祝方译,《核心能力战略》,东北财经大学出版社,1999.
198.[美]肯尼思·普瑞斯,史蒂文·L·戈德曼,罗杰·N·内格尔著,武康平译,《以合作求竞争》,辽宁教育出版社,1998.
199.[美]乔尔·布利克,戴维·厄恩斯特编著,林燕等译,《协作型竞争——全球市场的战略联营与收购》,中国大百科全书出版社,1998.
200.[美]尼尔·瑞克曼等著,[台湾]苏怡仲译,《合作竞争大未来》,经济管理出版社,1998.
201.[美]哈默,普拉哈拉德著,王振西译.竞争大未来.北京:昆仑出版社,1998.
202.杜胜利、阎达五,《资本管理论—控股公司资本控制研究》,中国人民大学出版社,1999.
203.[美]小艾尔弗雷德.D.钱德勒著,《看得见的手——美国企业的管理革命》,商务印书馆,1994年.
204.[美]菲利普·科特勒.营销管理.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2001.
205.彼得.F.德鲁克(Peter F.Drucker)等著,杨开峰等译,《知识管理》,中国人民大学出版社,哈佛商学院出版社,1999.
206.[美]彼得·圣吉著,郭进隆译.第五项修炼——学习型组织的艺术与实务,上海三联书店,1998.
207.[美]科特,赫斯克特著,李晓涛,曾中译.企业文化与经营业绩.北京:华夏出版社,1997.
208.[美]克里斯托弗·A·巴特利特,[英]休曼特拉·戈歇尔著,赵曙明主译,《跨国管理》(第二版),东北财经大学出版社,2000.
209.孔茨,韦里克,《管理学》,经济科学出版社,1998.
210.约翰逊,斯科尔斯,《公司战略教程》,华夏出版社,1998.
211.坎贝尔,卢克斯编著,《战略协同》,机械工业出版社,2000.
212.哈默尔,普拉哈拉德编著,《战略柔性:变革中的管理》,机械工业出版社,2000.
213.R.科斯等,《财产权利与制度变迁》,上海三联书店,上海人民出版社,1995年.
214.安尼.布鲁金著,赵洁平译,《第三资源—智力资本及其管理》,东北财经大学出版社,1998.
215.徐金发著,《企业集团成因论》,同济大学出版社,1992.
216.赵景华,《跨国公司在华子公司战略研究》,经济管理出版社,2002.
217.陈手明.现代企业网络研究[M]上海:上海人民出版社,2002.
218.孙枫林编著,《管理统计学》,电子科技大学出版社,1995.
219.卢纹岱,朱一力等编著,《SPSS for Windows:从入门到精通》,电子工业出版社,1997.
220.边燕杰,丘海雄.企业的社会资本及其功效[J],中国社会科学,2000年第2期.
221.程家健,“新竞争”组织形态企业网络组织的几个问题[J],求实,2004.12.
222.李龙一,韦曙林.基于资本视角的核心能力理论模型[J],科技进步与对策,2003年10月号.
223.林旭东,专用性投资、持股安排与激励效率——企业集团内部所有权纽带的理论模型分析[J],中国工业经济,2004年3期.
224.兰春华,理顺母子公司关系的三种思路[J],企业改革与管理,2003年3期.
225.吕坚,孙林岩,范松林.网络组织类型及其管理机制适应性研究[J],管理科学学报,2005年4月,第八卷第五期.
226.国家经贸委企业研究中心课题组.我国企业集团管理体制的探讨[J].企业管理,1996,(6):43—45.
227.刘海建,陈松涛,陈传明,企业核心能力的刚性特征及其超越[J],中国工业经济,2003(11):47-54.
228.何静.网络组织模式及其发展趋势研究[J].商业研究,2003,(2).
229.黄津孚.资源、能力与核心竞争力[J].经济管理,2001(20):4-9.
230.郝红梅等,外商投资高新技术产业问题研究[J],国际经济合作,2000,(2).
231.苗青,王重鸣.企业家能力:理论、结构与实践[J].重庆大学学报社科版,2003(1):131-133.
232.姜万生,黎永前,冯文岚.基于Internet网的集成化供应链管理协同环境[J].信息与控制.2000,(4):320—324.
233.罗仲伟,罗美娟,网络组织对层级组织的替代[J],中国工业经济,2001年6月:23-30.
234.任志安.企业网络知识共享机制形成的进化博弈分析[J]1 合肥工业大学学报,2004,(5).
235.徐金发,刘翌.母子公司之间知识流动的决定因素研究[J],科研管理,第二十三卷,第二期,2002年3月.
236.谭新生.组织能力观与传统资源观的比较分析[J].外国经济与管理,2003(8):22-32.
237.彭新一,杨凯云.动态开发网络组织的创新特性研究[J].华南理工大学学报(社科版),2002,(9).
238.张文魁.大型企业集团管理体制研究:组织结构、管理控制与公司治理[J].改革,2003,(1)
239.葛晨,徐金发.母子公司的管理与控制模式[J].管理世界,1999年,6月.
240.许可,徐二明.企业资源学派与能力学派的回顾与比较[J].经济管理,2002(2):10-17.
241.张钢.基于技术转移的企业能力演化过程研究[J].科学学研究,2001(9):70-75.
242.彭正新,李传昭,李华.我国企业集团治理的若干问题探析[J],中国软科学,2003年,第3期.
243.赵富厚.跨国公司母子公司关系中自治权的确定性研究[J],南开管理评论,2004年第7卷,第5期,106—111页.
244.葛京,杨莉,李武.跨国企业集团管理[M],北京:机械工业出版社,2003.
245.许强,施放.从知识结构观点看母子公司关系[J],科技进步与对策,2003年5月.
246.徐金发,许强,顾惊雷.企业知识转移的情境分析模型[J].自然辩证法通讯,2003(2):51—56.
247.郭培民.基于资源观的母子公司关系管理,浙江大学博士论文,2001.
248.席酉民,赵增耀.企业集团治理[M]北京.机械工业出版社,2000.
249.谢洪明,蓝海林.战略网络中企业间关系的特征[J],中国流通经济,2003年3月.
250.许海,日本跨国公司在华直接投资的业绩及其影响因素[J],世界经济,2001年,(4).
251.应可福,薛恒新,企业集团管理中的协同效应研究[J],华东经济管理,2004年10月,第18卷第5期.
252.杨云,冯建民.企业集团管理组织的再造研究[J].企业经济,2000,(11):71—73.
253.杨瑞龙.企业间网络的效率边界:经济组织逻辑的重新审视[J] 中国工业经济,2003,(11)1.
254.刘翌,徐金发.母子公司知识流动:一个理论分析框架[J],科研管理,第23卷,第1期,2002年1月.
255.王生云,张宏伟.基于网络组织的企业核心能力研究[J].华东经济管理,2002,(10).
256.王耀忠.网络组织的结构及协调机制[J].系统工程理论方法应用,2002,(3).
257.肖条军,盛昭瀚,程书萍.组建横向型企业集团抉择的博弈分析[J].管理科学学报,2004年10月,第七卷第五期.
258.向晋乾,黄培清.横向型企业集团供应链结构及关系分析[J],管理现代化,2004年第5期:45—48页.
259.郑兴山,王莉.企业网络组织治理机制研究综述[J],学术月刊,2004.6
260.朱婧,周光芝.企业集团中母子公司的治理结构[J],经济论坛,2004,14.
261.王刚.论异质资本的生产功能.上海财经大学学报[J],2000(2):12-15.