用户名: 密码: 验证码:
量化宽松货币政策的理论、实践与效应研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
量化宽松货币政策是次贷危机后各国央行应对金融危机的非常规货币政策,本文对该政策的思想演进、理论框架、政策实践、政策效果、退出机制和对财政的影响进行系统的研究,下面为本文内容的概括和摘要。
     第一章从概念上明确了量化宽松货币政策定义,第二章对量化宽松货币政策思想演进作出了系统归纳,认为其起源于大萧条后宽松货币政策操作,危机后的快速复苏进程和货币学派观点均表明量化宽松宽松货币政策的有效性和可行性。日本2000-2006年间的零利率政策和量化宽松政策丰富和深化了量化宽松货币政策的思想理论体系,新情况下美联储等央行实施的量化宽松货币政策则偏向于通过资产负债表渠道维护金融市场稳定的政策目标,为量化宽松思想演进提供了新的思路和方向。此外,还提出了量化宽松货币政策的政策目的、中介目标、政策工具、传导机制,并细分了三类政策工具:基于基础货币的数量放松、预期管理和非常规公开市场操作;重点刻画了承诺效应、资产负债表扩张效应、资产组合效应的具体传导方式。第三章梳理了各国量化宽松货币政策实践。包括了日本2001-2006年和本次金融危机后的两次政策实践、美联储和欧元区的首次量化宽松实践的政策目标、政策工具、实施阶段等具体操作细节进行全面的梳理和总结。
     第四章和第五章分别对美联储量化宽松货币政策的金融稳定效应和经济刺激效应进行了系统的定量分析研究。第四章首先提出新的金融结构下影子银行体系对金融不稳定性的五大扩大机制,即抛售机制、恶性循环机制、蔓延机制、预期机制以及再融资机制。以上金融不稳定性扩大机制使得美联储在危机中创造了三大类创新性货币政策工具,对三类货币工具操作有效性进行检验发现TAF、PDCF以及AMLF等信贷类的货币政策工具有显著的有效性,而其他资产购买类的货币政策工具效果不佳。另外,检验表明同业拆借市场与商业票据市场之间的不稳定性能够相互蔓延,美联储通过创新多类货币政策工具同时在两类市场上进行操作具有相互支持作用。第五章则针对量化宽松货币政策应对经济衰退的有效性进行定性和定量分析。先从稳定金融市场、扩张货币供给、扩张总体需求三个方面给出了量化宽松货币政策应对经济衰退的机制,认为量化宽松可以通过稳定金融市场打通货币政策传导渠道扩张货币,进而通过信用扩张、通胀、贬值三大效应刺激总需求提升。然后对美联储量化宽松货币政策实施期间的货币供给扩张效应与由此带来的总需求扩张效应进行检验。结果表明美联储量化宽松货币政策应对本次经济衰退是有效的:第一,稳定了金融市场;第二,扩张了货币总供给;第三,通胀效应使货币供给扩张刺激了总需求。
     第六章第一部分研究了量化宽松货币政策的直接和间接财政效应。认为利用量化宽松的直接财政效应有必要性和可行性,经济衰退的特殊时期下的赤字货币化弥补方式不一定会造成通货膨胀。量化宽松的财政间接效应研究表明量化宽松主要是通过三类政策工具的第一类引导市场对未来低利率预期措施和第二类扩张央行资产负债表规模措施提高财政政策有效性,通过第三类改变央行持有资产结构措施对财政刺激实行了配合和担保。第二部分对量化宽松实施和退出对财政可持续影响作出说明。首先利用两个条件和一个框架衡量了财政可持续变化,认为量化宽松实施对其影响不大。然后分析了量化宽松货币政策退出对财政可持续的作用。积极财政政策支出、现有利息支出和国债收益率上升导致经济复苏时期美国财政融资需求仍然处于较高水平。在明确的赤字缺口下,量化宽松货币政策退出不仅将制约美联储购买国债数量和速度,而且将通过作用实际利率、产出和经济增长率以及上年财政赤字影响财政可持续性,对可持续性造成损害。
     第七章研究了量化宽松货币政策的退出效应,回顾了美国和日本几次退出实践,探讨了政策过早退出效应和过晚退出效应,提出退出时机选择是一个复杂的问题。过早退出量化宽松,不但复苏可能夭折甚至面临二次衰退以及扩张财政导致的国债价格上行和收益率下行风险增大;过迟退出,可能导致通货膨胀和资产价格泡沫。因此在综合衡量风险的情况下给出退出策略,包括具体策略、退出机制、退出时机。退出策略上主张采取有利于经济平稳复苏的“渐进式”退出策略,退出机制上采取自动收缩与主动收缩分步走的退出安排。
Quantitative easing monetary policy is an unconventional monetary policy which some central banks implement to react to the financial crisis.The article researches the ideological evolution, theory framework, practice, effectiveness,exit mechanism of the QEP and influence on fiscal sustainability.
     Chapter 1 defines the quantitative easing monetary policy and chapter 2 hackles the idealogical evolution of QEP. We think the idea of QEP started from the Fed's monetary operation after the great depression.It was becoming deepen along with Japan's bank zero interest rate monetary policy and QEP from 2000 to 2006.Since subprime crisis, Fed's QEP based on the balance sheet channel open a new way for the idealogy.We advance an academic framework for QEP,which consisting of policy aim,medi-objection,policy tools and transmission mechanism and classify policy tools to quantitative easing toos based on money base,expectation management tools and non open-market operation. Then we describe commitment effect,balance-sheet expanding effect and balance-sheet composition effect.Chapter 3 summarizes Japan's QEP during 2001-2006 & QEP responding to world-wide financial crisis,and the first QEP attempts of Fed & ECB.
     Chapter 4 &5 examine the effectiveness of QEP to financial crisis and economic depression quantificationally and respectively. We set forth 5 financial instability enlargers of shadow banking system in chapter 4. In allusion to 5 enlargers above, Fed design innovative monetary policy tools accordingly to keep monetary policy effective and corresponding.Then we verify the effectiveness of 3 types of monetary policy tools and conclude TAF,PDCF,AMLF are significant when assets purchase programs are not.In addition,we find instability could expand between the inter-bank funds market and commercial paper market,so the innovative monetary policy tools in these two markets could support reciprocally.In chapter 5,we initially describe the mechanism why QEP could be effective to economic depression.It is because that QEP could keep financial market stable to get credit transmission channel through by credit expand,inflation and depreciation.Then we verify the money creation effect during the Fed’s QEP and demand expand effect consequently. The result indicates that the QEP is effective to depression.
     In the first part of chapter 6,we study the direct and indirect mechanism how QEP effects fiscal policy and We find it is necessary and feasible to use QEP to finance fiscal policy,and we think the first and second type policy tools could strengthen validity of fiscal policy, meanwhile the third type tools could cooperate and guarantee fisical stimulation.. In the second part of chapter 6, we check QEP practice and exiting effects to fiscal sustainability of the government. The review to2010-2020 fiscal sustainability of the United States indicates that most of years are not according with No-Ponzi-Game term and Domar term. Contrarily,most of years are according with sustainable framework term.It means maybe we should use framework,not the No-ponzi-Game or Domar term to scale the fiscal sustainability. About exiting effect,we find fisical outlay,interest cost and public debt yield increasing induce fiscal financing scale is enormous. Under the explicit deficit,the QEP exit will not only restrict the speed and quality debt purchase,but also damage fiscal sustainability by affecting the real rate,output and GDP growth rate.
     Chapter 7 summarizes QEP exit effect, which consisiting of exit practice in USA and Japan, potential exit risk and exit choice of the right moment.If we exit too early,public debt price climbs up and yield decline,even economy may come back to depression.If we exit too late,inflation and asset bubble may happen.We tend to adopt“step-by-step”exit strategy to keep economy recovery steadily. Concretely, the exit mechanism could be separate into automatic and active reduction mechanism.
引文
'Richard Werner、Keizai Kyoshitsu、Keiki kaifuku, ryoteiki kinyu kanwa kara, Nikkei,2 September 1995
    2Ben S. Bernanke& Vincent R. Reinhart. Conducting Monetary Policy at Very Low Short-Term Interest Rates.Lecture at the International Center for Monetary and Banking Studies,Geneva,2004-01-14
    3张晶,定量宽松还是信贷宽松:基于伯南克货币救助政策创新的思考,国际金融研究,2009.11
    4Andres,Javier:Lo'pez-Salido,J.David andNelson.Edward.“Tobin's Imperfect AssetSubstitution in Optimizing General Equilib-rium.” Unpublished manuscript presented atthe JMCB/Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago James Tobin Symposium,14-15 November 2003.
    5 Nelson White, A Reinterpretation of the Banking Crisis of 1930, The Journal of Economic History,1984,44: 119-138, Cambridge University Press
    8Ueda, Kazuo, 1999, Remarks presented at FRB-Boston Conference. "Monetary Policy in a Low-Inflation Environment", Woodstock VT, October 20.
    9M:货币供应量,r:利率水平,I:投资支出,Y:总收入,Ps:股票价格,Lα:可贷资金,Yt:临时收入
    10Minutes of the Monetary Policy Meeting on March 19,2001, Bank of Japan.
    11Ben S. Bernanke.FRB speech: The Crisis and the Policy Response[Z].At the Stamp Lecture, London School of Economics. London. England,2009-01-13
    12MB:基础货币,Pa:非现金资产价格,r实际:实际短期利率,Ep:物价预期,I:投资,Y:产出,C:消费
    132001年2月从0.5%下调至0.25%,2001年9月从0.25%下调至0.1%。
    14曾红,定量宽松货币政策理论与实践的研究,浙江大学硕士论文,2010-06-01
    l5BOJ,Policy Planning Office,“The Role of the Money Stock in Conducting Monetary Policy,”Bank of Japan Quarterly Bulletin,2003,11(2), pp.151-202
    16沈建光,直升机撒钱:日本的经验和启示,财经网,2009年4月7日
    17本部分多处引用作者已发表的文章。王维安、徐滢,次贷危机中美联储非常规货币政策应对、影响和效果,国际金融研究,2011-01-12
    19 ECB, Monthly Bulletin, October 2010
    21本部分多处引用作者已发表的文章。王维安、徐滢,次贷危机中美联储非常规货币政策应对、影响和效果,国际金融研究,2011-01-12
    22在其他政策工具有效性检验的模型中也均会遇到随机干扰项序列相关问题,在后续模型中均采用广义差分法进行估计,根据需要引入1阶自回归或1阶与2阶自回归。故以上说明后文不再赘述。
    23在本章其他效应有效性检验的模型中也均会遇到随机干扰项序列相关问题,在后续模型中均采用广义差分法进行估计,根据需要引入1阶自回归或1阶与2阶自回归。故以上说明后文不再赘述。
    24伯南克成为美联储主席前,在2002年一次研究解决通缩的策略讨论会上,曾提到“开直升机从空中撒钱”,这是米尔顿·弗里德曼的经典名言。
    25王琳,从财政赤字弥补浅议中央银行独立性,财金贸易,1994.9
    26包括国内和国外的个人、企业和金融机构。
    27中金公司,美国经济:不要期待再通胀很快到来,2009.4
    28 http://www.bea.gov/index.htm,Gross Domestic Product (GDP),Current-dollar and "real" GDP
    29FRB, Expired Policy Tools,http://www.federalreserve..gov/monetarypolicy/expiredtools.htm
    30Richard C.Koo,大衰退:如何在金融危机中幸存和发展,2009
    3iFDIC,2009 Annual Report, Recoveries and Losses by the Deposit Insurance Fund on Disbursements for the Protection of Depositors,1934-2009, Bank and Thrift Failures
    32 http://www.fdic.gov/about/strategic/report/2009annualreport/AR09final.pdf
    33 2008年11月25日,美联储和美国财政部宣布拨款2000亿美元创立“定期资产支持证券贷款工具”,该工具可接受住房抵押贷款支持债券和汽车贷款、信用卡贷款、学生贷款和小企业贷款支持债券。投资者可以从美联储获得贷款,并用贷款购买一系列由消费和小企业贷款支持的证券。
    34Public-Private Investment Program Fact Sheet, httpy/www.treas.gov/press/releases/reports/ppip_fact_sheet.pdf
    35 FEDERAL RESERVE statistical release H.4.1, Factors Affecting Reserve Balances of Depository Institutions and Condition Statement of Federal Reserve Banks,1. Factors Affecting Reserve Balances of Depository Institutions
    36原先承诺从TARP或金融稳定计划(FSP, Financial Stability Plan)动用的300亿美元仅实现191.6亿美元ProPublica, Bailout Guide, http://bailout.propublica.org/programs/8-public-private-investment-program
    37FRB, H4.1 Release July 3,2008
    38 2008年11月25日和2009年3月2日分两次宣布SSFI计划。
    39 http:/www.propublica.org/article/how-bie-is-aigs-bailout-reallv-707
    40 http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/categories/32215
    41实际利率由名义利率减去CPI年增长率推算,名义利率取一年期国债利率。实际经济增长率来源于BEA公布数据。实际国债增长率由名义国债增长率减去CPI年增长率推算。
    42名义经济增长率g1,g2分别来自表6.3、表6.4中CBO和OMB对经济增长率预测,名义国债增长率来ρ1,ρ2分别来自表6.3、表6.4中CBO和OMB对公众持有国债增长率计算,由于CBO和OMB只预测了公众持有国债(Debt Held by the Public),而未预测总国债余额(Gross Federal Debt),因此用公众持有国债增长率代替国债增长率。
    43除基础设施改造计划还未被国会通过,其他均进入实施阶段
    45加*为笔者预测数据,(CBO)表示该行数据由CBO预测。
    46此处购买的国债包括Bills、notes and bonds, nominal、notes and bonds, inflation indexed、inflation compensation 以及 Federal agency debt securities。
    472009年3月18日美国公债局公布的Total Public Debt Outstanding为110342.25亿美元,2010年11月4日为137234.39亿美元,新增国债余额26892.14亿美元。
    48Ben Bernanke, The Fed's Exit Strategy, The Wall Street Journal,2009.07.21
    491年期利率标注在左侧坐标轴,10年期利率标注在右侧坐标轴。
    50耿群,日本结束量化宽松货币政策的影响分析,国际金融研究,2006.5
    51外国投资者持有国债数据来自United States Department of Treasury, Treasury International Capital System (TICS), Securities (b), special data series;
    公众持有国债数据来自美国财政部公债局,http://www.treasurydirect.gov/
    521年期利率标注在左侧坐标轴,10年期利率标注在右侧坐标轴。
    53采用自FOMC开始公布市场操作以来的(1989年12月后)的182次FOMC会议利息决议数据。
    [1]Allan G.B. Fisher.Does an Increase in Volume of Production Call For a Corresponding Increase in Volume of Money[J].The American economic review.1935.6.Vol xxv,No.2;
    [2]Andres,Javier,Lo'pez-Salido,J.David,Nelson,Edward.Tobin's Imperfect Asset Substitution in Optimizing General Equilib-rium[R]. Unpublished manuscript presented atthe JMCB/Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago James Tobin Symposium,2003.11.pp.13-15;
    [3]Auerbach,A.J.,&Obstfeld. The Case for Open-Market Purchases in a Liquidity Trap[J].The American Economic Review,2005,Vol.95, No.1:110-137;
    [4]Alan S. Blinder,Michael Ehrmann,Marcel Fratzscher,Jakob De Haan,David-Jan Jansen.Central Bank Communication and Monetary Policy:A Survey of Theory and Evidence[R]. NBER Working Paper No.13932,April 2008;
    [5]A.H. Meltzer, The Demand for Money:The Evidence from the Time Series[J]. J.P.E, LXXI,1963.6,pp 219-46;
    [6]AH. Meltzer. Monetary, Credit and (Other) Transmission Processes:A Monetarist Perspective [J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives,1995,Vol.9, No.4:49-72;
    [7]AH. Meltzer. Rejoinder to Comments Made by Professors McKinnon and Meltzer[J]. Monetary and Economic Studies,1999,Vol.17,No.3.Institute for Monetary and Economic Studies, Bank of Japan:192-197;
    [8]AH. Meltzer. Monetary Transmission at Low Inflation:Some Clues from Japan in the 1990s[J].Monetary and Economic Studies,2001,Vol.19,No.S-1.Institute for Monetary and Economic Studies, Bank of Japan: 13-34;
    [9]Bank of Japan. New Procedures for Money Market Operations and Monetary Easing[Z].2001-03-18;
    [10]Bank of Japan. Minutes of the Monetary Policy Meeting[Z].2001-03-19;
    [11]Bank of Japan. Policy Planning Office. How Should the Recent Increase in Japan's Monetary Base Be Understood?[Z]. Bank of Japan Quarterly Bulletin,2002,10(4):139-172;
    [12]Bank of Japan. Policy Planning Office. The Role of the Money Stock in Conducting Monetary Policy[Z]. Bank of Japan Quarterly Bulletin, 2003,11 (2):151-202;
    [13]Baudchon Helene,Tools for an Exit S trategy[Z].Consensus Economics, Credit Agricole,Paris, October 1,2009. http://www.consensuseconomics.comi
    [14]Ben S. Bernanke,Alan S. Blinder Credit.Money,and Aggregate Demand[J].The American Econnomic Review, Vol.78,No.2.Papers and Proceedings of the One-Hundredth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association.(May,1988),pp.435-439;
    [15]Ben S. Bernanke. The gold standard, deflation, and financial crisis in the Great Depression an international comparison[R].NBER working paper 3488,1999-10;
    [16]Ben S.Bernanke. Japanese Monetary Policy:A Case of Self-Induced Paralysis[EB/OL].1999.Essays on the Great Depression[C]. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press,2000:149-166;
    [17]Ben S. Bernanke. Essays on the Great Depression[C]. Princeton, N. J.:Princeton University Press,2000;
    [18]Ben S. Bernanke. Deflation:Making Sure "It" Doesn't Happen Here[Z].Remarks by Governor Ben S. Bernanke Before the National Economists Club, Washington, D.C..2002-11-21;
    [19]Ben S. Bernanke& Vincent R. Reinhart. Conducting Monetary Policy at Very Low Short-Term Interest Rates[DB/OL].Lecture at the International Center for Monetary and Banking Studies,Geneva,2004-01-14;
    [20]Ben S.Bernanke.Money, Gold, and the Great Depression[EB/OL].At the H. Parker Willis Lecture in Economic Policy, Washington and Lee University, Lexington, Virginia,2004-03-02;
    [21]Ben S. Bernanke.FRB speech: The Crisis and the Policy Response[Z].At the Stamp Lecture, London School of Economics, London, England,2009-01-13;
    [22]Ben S. Bernanke. The Fed's Exit Strategy[Z]. The Wall Street Journal,2009-07-21;
    [23]Ben S. Bernanke. Federal Reserve's exit strategy[Z]. Before the Committee on Financial Services, U.S. House of Representatives, Washington, D.C,2010-02-10;
    [24]Barry Eichengreen& Jeffrey Sachs. Exchange Rates and Economic Recovery in the 1930s[J]. Journal of Economic History,1985-12,45(4):925-946;
    [25]Barry Eichengreen. The Cambridge Economic History of Modern Britain Volume 2:Economic Maturity,1860-1939 [M].Chapter 12:The British economy between the wars.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2004:314-344;
    [26]Baba,N.,M.Nakashima,Y.Shigemi&K.Ueda. The Bank of Japan's Monetary Policy and Bank Risk Premiums in the Money Market[J]. International Journal of Central Banking,2006, Vol.2, No.1:105-135;
    [27]Baba,N.,Nishioka,S.,Oda,N.,Shirakawa,M.,Ueda,K.&Ugai,H. Japan's Deflation, Problems in the Financial System and Monetary Policy[J].Monetary and Economic Studies,2005,Vol.23,No.1.Institute for Monetary and Economic Studies,Bank of Japan:47-111;(presented at Understanding Low Inflation and Deflation: A Conference Organized by the Bank for International Settlements on 18-19 June 2004)
    [28]Clouse,J.,D.Henderson,A. Orphanides,D.H.Small& P.A.Tinsley. Monetary Policy When the Nominal Short-Term Interest Rate is Zero [J].Topics in Macroeconomics,2003,Vol.3, No.1, article 12;
    [29]Christina D. Romer. What Ended the Great Depression?[J].The Journal of Economic History,1992(12),Vol.52, No.4.:757-784;
    [30]Christina D. Romer. Great Depression[EB/OL].Forthcoming in the Encyclop?dia Britannica.2003-12-20;
    [31]Clouse J.,D.Henderson,A.Orphanides,D.H.Small,P.A.Tinsley.Monetary Policy When the Nominal Short-Term Interest Rate is Zero [J]. Topics in Macroeconomics.2003,Vol.3, No.1, article 12;
    [32]Cecchetti Stephen G..Crisis and Responses:the Federal Reserve and the Financial Crisis of 2007-2008[R].NBER working paper 2008,No.14134;
    [33]Crawford Allan, Cesaire A. Meh, Yaz Terajim a. PriceLevel Uncertainty, PriceLevel Targeting,and Nom inal Debt Contracts[J]. Bank of Canada Review,2009,pp.33-43;
    [34]D. Laidler, Some Evidence on the Demand for Money[R]. J.P.E., LXXVI,1966.2,pp 55-58;
    [35]D. Laidler, The Rate of Interest and the Demand for Money-Some Empirical Evidence[J]. The Journal of Political Economy, Vol.74, No.6 (Dec.,1966), pp. 543-555;
    [36]Dodge, D. A.&J. Bennett. Reflections on the conduct of monetary and financial stability policy[EB/OL]. Canadian Economics Association.2010,0008-8045/10/ 29-40;
    [37]Eggertsson,G.&M.Woodford. The Zero Bound on Interest Rates and Optimal Monetary Policy[J].Brookings Papers on Economic Activity,1,2003:139-211;
    [38]Ennis,H.M.&Keister.Understanding Monetary Policy Implementation[J].Economic Quarterly,2008,Vol.94, No.3, summer;
    [39]Ennis, H. M., and T. Keister. Understanding Monetary Policy Implementation[Z]. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Economic Quarterly 94,2008,no.3;
    [40]Fujiwara,Ⅰ..Evaluating Monetary Policy When Nominal Interest Rates are Almost Zero [J]. Journal of the Japanese and International Economy,2006,forthcoming;
    [41]Fujiki,H., K.Okina& S.Shiratsuka. Monetary Policy under Zero Interest Rate: Viewpoints of Central Bank Economists.Monetary and Economic Studies,2001,Vol.19,No.1. Institute for Monetary and Economic Studies, Bank of Japan:89-130;
    [42]Frank Nathaniel,Hesse Heiko.The Effectiveness of Central Bank Interventions During the First Phase of the Subprime Crisis[R].IMF working paper 2009,No.206;
    [43]Goodfriend,M..Overcoming the Zero Bound on Interest Rate Policy[J].Journal of Money,Credit and Banking,2000,Vol.32, No.4, Part 2:1007-1035;
    [44]Goodfriend,M..Interest on Reserves and Monetary Policy[R].FRBNY Economic Policy Review,2002.5,Vol.8, No.1;
    [45]Harada,Y.&S.Okamoto.Ginko Kashidashi,Money,Sonota no Shikin Choutatsu Shudan no Yuisei[R](Comparison among Bank Loans, Money Supply, and Other Fund Procurement Methods). In Hamada, K., Y. Harada, and Economic and Social Research Institute, Cabinet Office, ed.,Choki Fukyo no Riron to Jissho, Toyo Keizai Shimposha,2004:101-123 (in Japanese);
    [46]Glenn D.Rudebusch.The Fed's Exit Strategy for Monetary Policy[Z].FRBSF Economic Letter,2010-6-14;
    [47]H.Fujiki &S.Shiratsuka. Policy Duration Effects under the Zero Interest Rate Policy in 1999-2000:Evidence from Japan's Money Market Data[J]. Monetary and Economic Studies,2001,Vol.20,No.l,Institute for Monetary and Economic Studies, Bank of Japan:1-32;
    [48]In Francis,Cui Jin.The impact of a new term auction facility on LIBOR-OIS spreads and volatility transmission between money and mortgage markets[R].Monash University woring paper 2008;
    [49]John Maynard Keynes. The General Theory of Employment,Interest and Money(1936)[M].北京:世界图书出版社,2010.5;
    [50]JR.Hicks.Mr. Keynes and the "Classics":A Suggested Interpretation[J]. Econometrica,1937.4,Vol.5, No.2:147-159;
    [51]Jurgen van Hagen. Monetary Policy on the Way out of Crisis[Z].Bruegel Policy Contribu tion. ISSUE 2009.9.15;
    [52]K. Brunner&A.H. Meltzer, Preced-ing Velocity:Implications for Theory and Policy[R]. J. Finance.ⅩⅤⅢ.1963.5, pp319-54;
    [53]Krugman,R.P..It's baaack:Japan's slump and the return of the liquidity trap[J]. Brookings Pap.Econ.,1998,Act.2:137-205;
    [54]Krugman,R.P. Thinking About the Liquidity Trap [J]. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies,2000,14:221-237;
    [55]Kimura,T.,H.Kobayashi,J.Muranaga&H.Ugai.The Effect of the Increase in the Monetary Base on Japan's Economy at Zero Interest Rates:An Empirical Analysis[R]. In Monetary Policy in a Changing Environment,Bank for International Settlements Conference Series,2003,No.19:276-312;
    [56]Kimura,T.&D.Small.Quantitative Monetary Easing and Risk in Financial Asset Markets[J].The B.E. Journals in Macroeconomics,2006,Vol.6, Issue 1;
    [57]King,M..No Money,No Inflation:The Role of Money in the Economy[Z].Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin,2002, Summer:162-177;
    [58]Kamada,K.&T.Sugo. Evaluating the Japanese Monetary Policy under the Non-Negativity Constraint on Nominal Short-Term Interests Rates[J].Bank of Japan Working Paper Series, forthcoming,2006;
    [59]Keister,T.,A.Martin&J.McAndrews.Divorcing Money from Monetary Policy[R]. FRBNY Economic Policy Review,2008.9, Vol.14, No.2;
    [60]Kuttner,K.N.,Comments on "Price Stability and Japanese Monetary Policy"[J].Monetary and Economic Studies,2004,Vol.22,No.3,Institute for Monetary and Economic Studies, Bank of Japan:37-46;
    [61]Krishnamurthy Arvind. Amplification Merchanisms in Liquidity Crises[R].NBER working paper 2009,No.15040;
    [62]Milton Friedman.The Optimum Quatity of Money.The Optimum Quatity of Money and Other Essays[M].Chicago:Aldine Books,2005;
    [63]M.SHIRAKAWA.One Year Under'Quantitative Easing'[R].Institure for Monetary and Economic Studies,Bank of Japan,2002,Discussion Paper No. 2002-E-3;
    [64]Minegishi, M. and B. Cournede.Monetary Policy Responses to the Crisis and Exit Strategies[R].OECD Economics Department Working Papers,2010, No.753, OECD Publishing;
    [65]McCallum,B.T..Theoretical Analysis Regarding a Zero Lower Bound on Nominal Interest Rates[J] Journal of Money, Credit and Banking,2000, Vol.32, No.4, Part 2:870-904;
    [66]Marumo,K.,T.Nakayama,S.Nishioka&T.Yoshida.Extracting Market Expectations on the Duration of the Zero Interest Rate Policy from Japan's Bond Prices[J]. Financial Markets Department Working Paper Series,2003,03-E-2;
    [67]Nelson,C.R.,&A.F.Siegel.Parsimonious Modeling of Yield Curves[J].Journal of Business,1987, Vol.60, No.4:473-489;
    [68]Miyao,R..Liquidity Traps and the Stability of Money Demand:Is Japan Really Trapped at the Zero Bound?[R].RIEB Discussion Paper,No.172,Kobe University,2002;
    [69]McAndrews James,Sarkar Asani,Wang Zhenyu.The Effect of the Term Action Facility on the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate [R].Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports 2008,No.335;
    [70]Mishkin Frederic S..Monetary Policy Flexibility,Risk Management,and Financial Disruptions[EB/OL].speech delivered at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York,New York,January 11,2008;
    [71]Mishkin Frederic S.The Federal Reserve's Tools for Responding to Financial Disruptions [Z]. Board of the Federal Reserve System,2008-02-15;
    [72]Mishkin Frederic S..Is Monetary Policy Effective during Financial Crises?[R].NBER working paper 2009,No.l4678;
    [73]Okina&S.Shiratsuka.Policy Commitment and Expectation Formation: Japan's Experience under Zero Interest Rates[J].North American Journal of Economics and Finance,2004,Vol.15, No.1:75-100;
    [74]Posen, A. S..Finding the right tool for dealing with asset price booms[Z].Speech to the MPR Monetary Policy and Markets.2009;
    [75]Reifschneider,D.&J.C.,Williams.Three Lessons for Monetary Policy in a Low Inflation Era[J]. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking,2000,Vol.32,No.4,Part 2:936-966;
    [76]Sadahiro,A.Toyo.Keizai Shimpousha[EB/OL].Sengo Nihon no Macro Keizai Bunseki, Chapter 9(in Japanese),2005;
    [77]Suzuki,A.&S.Kobayashi.Ryouteki Kanwa Seisaku no Hyouka to Korekara no Kin'yu Seisaku[R](The Effects of Quantitative Easing Policy and the Next Monetary Policy). Souken Chousa,2005, No.4, UFJ Institute Ltd(in Japanese);
    [78]Shinpo,S..Defure wo Motarashita nowa Kouzou Youin ka, Kin'yu Seisaku ka[R].In R.Komiya and Japan Center for Economic Research,ed.,Kin'yu Seisaku Rongi no Souten-Nichigin Hihan to Sono Hanron (Main Issues of Monetary Policy Debates),2002, Nihon Keizai Shinbunsha:81-120 (in Japanese);
    [79]Sugihara,S.,T.Mihira,T.Takahashi&M.Takeda.Kin'yu Seisaku no Hakyu Keiro to Seisaku Shudan[R] (Monetary Policy in Japan-Instruments, Transmission Mechanisms, and Effects).Economic Analysis Series,No.162, Economic and Social Research Institute, Cabinet Office:115-435 (in Japanese);
    [80]Suzuki,A.&S.Kobayashi.Ryouteki Kanwa Seisaku no Hyouka to Korekara no Kin'yu Seisaku[J] (The Effects of Quantitative Easing Policy and the Next Monetary Policy). Souken Chousa,2005,No.4, UFJ Institute Ltd (in Japanese);
    [81]Stephen G. Cecchetti. Prices During the Great Depression:Was the Deflation of 1930-1932 Really Unanticipated?[J]The American Economic Review.Vol.82.No. 1 (Mar.,1992).pp.141-156;
    [82]Stroebel Johannes C.,Taylor John B..Estimated Impact of the Fed's Mortgage-Backed Securities Purchase Program[R].NBER working paper 2009,No.15626;
    [83]Tobin James, The Interest-Elasticity of Transactions Demand for Cash[J].Review of Economics and Statistics,1956,38(3), pp.241-247;
    [84]Takeda,Y.,Y.Komaki&K.Yajima.Toyo Keizai Shimpousha[EB/OL].Kitai Keisei no Ishitusei to Macro Keizai Seisaku:Keizai Shutai wa Dokomade Gouriteki ka,Chapter 8(in Japanese),2005;
    [85]Taylor John B.,Williams John C..A Black Swan in the Money Market[R].NBER working paper 2008,No.13943;
    [86]Todd Keister,Antoine Martin James McAndrews.Divorcing Money from Monetary Policy[J].Economic Policy Review,Vol.14, No.2,2008.9;
    [87]Taylor John B..The Financial Crisis and the Policy Responses:an Empirical Analysis of What Went Wrong[R].NBER working paper 2009,No.14631;
    [88]Ueda,Kazuo.Remarks presented at FRB-Boston Conference:Monetary Policy in a Low-Inflation Environment[EB/OL]. Woodstock VT,1999-10-20;
    [89]Ugai,H..Effects of the Quantitative Easing Policy:A Survey of Empirical Analyses[R].Bank of Japan Working Paper Series,No.06-E-10,2006-07;
    [90]Vasco Cu, Michael Woodford.The central-bank balance sheet as an instrument of monetary policy[J]. Journal of Monetary Economics.2010.9;
    [91]Wu Tao.On the Effectiveness of the Federal Reserve's New Liquidity Facilities[R].Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Working Paper 2008,No.2008-08;
    [92]Willem Buiter.Quantitative easing and qualitative easing:a terminological and taxonomic proposal[Z]. Financial Times, Willem Buiter's Maverecon homepage,2008-12-09;
    [94]陈作章.日本货币政策问题研究[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2005:183-188;
    [95]陈雨露,汪昌云.金融学文献通论(宏观金融卷)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006;
    [96]杜军.对日银“定量宽松货币政策”的思考[J].当代经济管理,2007(6),Vol29,No.3:95-98;
    [97]耿群.日本结束量化宽松货币政策的影响分析[J].国际金融研究,2006(5):4-7;
    [98]辜朝明.大衰退[M].北京:东方出版社,2008;
    [99]刘瑞.日本走出萧条过程中的货币政策:近年来的零利率政策与数量宽松政策分析[J].日本学刊,2007(1):42-54;
    [100]刘奥琳,周洪礼,孙淼玲,肖红.美联储实施数量型放松‘中性’化[R].中国国际金融有限公司,宏观经济简评,2009-06-26;
    [101]李众敏.美国政府危机应对措施:内容、效果与前景[R].中国社会科学院世界经济与政治研究所,PolicyBrief, No.09009,2009-06;
    [102]李众敏.美国有毒资产处理计划的前景分析[R].中国社会科学院世界经济与政治研究所,PolicyBrief, No.09019,2009-09-30;
    [103]李众敏.美国数量宽松货币政策的前景分析[J].国际经济评论,2009(9.10):1-9:
    [104]米什金.货币金融学(第四版)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005:415-452:
    [105]米尔顿·弗里德曼.美国货币史(1867-1960)[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2009;
    [106]裴桂芬.日本数量宽松型货币政策及其效果分析[J].日本研究2008(2):26-30;
    [107]彭兴韵.金融危机管理中的货币政策操作[J].金融研究,2009年第4期;
    [108]潘成夫.量化宽松货币政策理论、实践与影响[J].上海金融,2009(7):37-40;
    [109]潘敏、缪海斌.非常规货币政策退出的时机与策略[J].经济学动态,2010年第6期;
    [110]彭芸.金融危机背景下非常规性货币政策的实施与退出[J].经济问题,2010年第12期;
    [111]孙立坚,林文彬.从“零利率”政策到“负利率”结果—透析日本金融体系的微观传导机制[J].国际金融研究,2003(9):36-43;
    [112]王洛林,孙新,张季风等.日本经济与中日经贸关系发展报告(2008)[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2008:222-234;
    [113]王汉锋,高挺,梁耀文,郦彬.数量型放松货币政策的前景—来自大萧条时代的启示[R].中国国际金融有限公司,投资策略,2009-03-23;
    [114]王维安,徐滢.次贷危机中美联储非常规货币政策应对、影响和效果[J].国际金融研究,2011年第1期;
    [115]向松祚,邵智宾.伯南克的货币理论和政策哲学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2008;
    [116]小林庆一郎,李琳(译).量化宽松政策与通货紧缩:日本的艰难抉择[J].中国金融,2004(17):58-59;
    [117]易纲.零利率和数量宽松货币政策是否有效?[EB/OL].http://www.cf40.org.cn/html/CF40guandian/xingmingB/200902/27-1220.html 2009-02-28;
    [118]姚斌.美国量化宽松货币政策的影响及我国的对策[J].中国金融,2009(7):33-36:
    [119]闫瑞明.量化宽松货币政策:美联储的次优选择[J].西部金融,
    2009(7):30-32;
    [120]朱庆,冯娟娟.美国量化宽松货币政策的退出策略研究[J].金融纵横,2009(9):26-29;
    [121]钟华,沈楠.零利率时代伯南克手中的牌—非常规货币政策探讨及日本的
    经验[R].长江证券海外市场观察,2008-12-21;
    [122]中国人民银行.2009年一季度货币政策执行报告[R].2009-05-06;
    [123]郑联盛.影子银行体系:发展、内涵与未来[R].中国社会科学院世界经济 与政治研究所研究报告,2009,No.09035;
    [124]钟伟.美联储定量宽松货币政策制造“廉价美元”[EB/OL].http://www.cf40.org.cn/html/CF40guandian/xingming91/200903/28-1297.html, 2009-04-04;
    [125]张晶.定量宽松还是信贷宽松:基于伯南克货币救助政策创新的思考[J].国际金融研究,2009(11):35-38;
    [126]钟华.美联储政策退出路线图[R].长江证券2010年投资策略报告之四,2009-12-01;
    [127]张翃.看不懂的美联储资产负债表[Z].财经,2008-12-04.
    [128]张翠微.从公开市场操作的发展变化分析主要国家央行非常规货币政策的退出机制.金融研究,2010年第1期

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700