用户名: 密码: 验证码:
城镇化背景下乡村景观格局演变与布局模式
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本文以景观生态学的“格局-过程-功能”为中心理论支撑,对乡村景观格局演变和布局模式进行系统研究。综合应用生命周期理论和生态位理论以及CA-Markov模型、多元线性回归方法和3S技术,分别探讨了乡村景观格局演变的模拟预测方法、乡村景观的稳定性分析以及乡村景观功能的定位与优化配置。基于上述研究,提出了以景观格局优化配置和调整为核心的乡村景观优化布局模式。论文以洞庭湖区金井镇为例,对该区域乡村景观格局演变进行模拟预测、景观稳定性分析以及景观功能定位与优化配置,完成了研究区域乡村景观格局优化布局方案。论文获得如下主要结论:
     (1)应用生命周期理论分析乡村景观格局的演变周期,并根据生长曲线设置演变周期曲线,与CA-Markov模型耦合建立了生命周期修正模型。并对研究区域进行实证研究:以2009年为基期年对生命周期修正模型进行精度验证,结果表明该模型更符合乡村景观格局的演变规律;然后预测了研究区域乡村景观格局达到稳定状态的时间以及2020年的景观格局,其结果表明:在城镇化的影响下聚落的面积将继续增长,茶园、农田和池塘的面积将有所下降,林地的面积略有增长。
     (2)通过多元线性回归方法研究各种乡村景观类型在不同影响因子作用下不变、新增和灭失的概率,进而对乡村景观的稳定性进行评价,划分了稳定、较稳定、较不稳定和不稳定4个等级。通过对研究区域的实证研究可以看出:不变概率的空间分布规律与新增概率的空间分布规律基本一致、与灭失概率的空间分布规律基本互逆,说明景观的变化概率可以反映出乡村景观的稳定性。
     (3)根据生态位理论评价乡村景观的农业生产功能、生态涵养功能和社会经济功能的生态位适宜度,进而对乡村的景观功能进行定位:生态保护、生态旅游、生态农业、农业生产、农业经济和经济主导。在粮食需求和人均建设用地指标的基础上对乡村景观功能的定位结果进行量化,即乡村景观的优化配置。然后,对研究区域13个村的乡村景观功能进行定位:3个生态保护型村、2个生态旅游型村、1个生态农业型村、2个农业生产型村和5个农业经济型村,然后对其乡村景观格局进行优化配置。
     (4)以新型城镇化为理论指导,提出了以乡村景观的预测格局为基础,以乡村景观的功能定位与优化配置为数量依据,以乡村景观稳定性的评价结果为空间参考的乡村景观优化布局模式,符合新型城镇化中“不以牺牲农业和粮食、生态和环境为代价”的中心思想。
There have been many problems in the process of rapid urbanization over the past decades in China, such as irrational urban planning, dramatic increase in environmental pressure and delayed development of the public services. In order to change this situation, an intensive, intelligent, green, low-carbon new-type urbanization method was proposed by the Chinese government.
     As well as agricultural modernization and new rural construction, new-type urbanization is the better way to promote the urban-rural integration development. The core approach of new-type urbanization is to promote development of economy and society by realizing integrated urban-rural infrastructure and equalization of public service without at the expense of agriculture and food, ecology and environment. Which kind layout of rural landscape pattern can achieve the goal of "production development, wealthy life, polite phenomenon, clean and tidy appearance and democratic management" is one of the key issues of rural landscape planning in the context of rapid urbanization.
     This work conducted a systematic study of the evolvement and layout of rural landscape pattern with the theoretical support of landscape ecology "pattern-process-function". The main research content of this work is followed by the simulation and prediction methods of rural landscape pattern evolution, the evaluation of rural landscape stability, the orientation of rural landscape function and the optimization of rural landscape configuration with the integrated application of life cycle theory, niche theory, CA-Markov model, multiple linear regression and3s technology. Based on the above researches, an optimized layout model of rural landscape was proposed with optimization and adjustment of landscape configuration as the core. Then, the approach is exemplified by a case study conducted in the Jinjing Town of Dongting Lake area, China. I simulated and predicted its rural landscape pattern evolution, evaluated its rural landscape stability, orientated its rural landscape function, optimized its rural landscape configuration, and proposed an optimized layout project of its rural landscape pattern. The conclusions of the work are listed as follows:
     (1) This paper analyzed the evolution of rural landscape patterns by means of life cycle theory, simulated the evolution cycle curve, and calculated its evolution period, then combining CA-Markov model, a complete prediction model based the rule of rural landscape change was built. Jinjing Town was taken as a case study to predict the times of5units of rural landscape pattern reaching steady state: after40-65years, after30-35years, after5-15years, after10-20years, and after20-45years. Compared with the remote hilly region, the landscape pattern in traffic developed plains reach steady state much earlier. Then, Jinjing Town was also taken as a case study to be predicted rural landscape changing in2020, the results showed that:in all landscape patterns, rural settlement landscape increased to1194.01hm2and paddy landscape greatly reduced to3090.24hm2, both were the largest change, also the prediction accuracy of quantitative and spatial via life cycle theory model were highly up to99.3%and96.4%respectively, obviously were more explicit than single CA-Markov model.
     (2) The unchanged probability, added probability and disappeared probability of each kind landscape under the effect of impact factors were analyzed by multiple linear regression by using SPSS software. Rural landscape stability was evaluated based on the3kinds of change probability of rural landscape, and the stability was divided into4grades:most stability, more stability, less instability and instability. The case study shows that:the spatial distribution regularities of unchanged probability is consistent with the spatial distribution regularities of added probability but reveal contrary property to the spatial distribution regularities of disappeared probability. It means the unchanged probability, added probability and disappeared probability of landscape reflect the rural landscape stability. The case study also shows:the stability of tea garden is mainly affected by soil type; elevation and slope play a key role to the stability of farmland and woodland; the stability of pond in acid purple soil region is much higher than it in the other area; The distance between business and services center had the greatest impact on the stability of settlement.
     (3) The niche-fitness of the agricultural production function, ecological conservation function and social economy function of rural landscape were evaluated according to niche theory. The function orientation of rural landscape was achieved based on the niche-fitness of the6kinds of function: ecological protection, ecological tourism, ecological agriculture, agricultural production, agricultural economy and economic dominant. The security area of farmland and the restricted area of settlement were calculated according to grain demand and per capita construction land index. Then, the results of function orientation of rural landscape were quantified to optimize the configuration of rural landscape. The results of the function orientation of rural landscape in Jinjing Town are3ecological protection villages,2ecological tourism villages,1ecological agriculture village,2agricultural production and5agricultural economy villages. Then the rural landscape configuration of each village was optimized according to its security area of farmland and restricted area of settlement
     (4) Under the instruction of new-type urbanization theory, an optimized layout model of rural landscape was proposed, which taken the prediction pattern of rural landscape as base map, taken the optimized configuration of rural landscape as quantitative reference, taken the evaluation results of rural landscape stability as spatial reference. On the basis of a feasible guarantee scheme, promoting the coordinated development of the sustainable utilization of the landscape resources and the coordinated development of rural landscape function should be in accordance with " without sacrificing agriculture and food, ecology and environment" in new-type urbanization theory.
引文
[1]傅伯杰,陈利顶,马克明等.景观生态学原理及应用.北京:科学出版社,2001.
    [2]邬建国.景观生态学——格局、过程、尺度与等级.北京:高等教育出版社,2000.
    [3]肖笃宁.景观生态学理论、方法及应用.北京:中国林业出版社,1991.
    [4]Turner M G. Spatial and temporal analysis of landscape patterns. Landscape Ecology,1990,4(1): 21-30.
    [5]李哈滨,王政权,王庆成.空间异质性定量研究理论与方法.应用生态学报,1998,9(6):651-657.
    [6]Forman R T T, Godron M. Landscape Ecology. New York:John Wiley and Sons,1986:25-30.
    [7]Southworth J, Munroeb D, Nagendra H. Land cover change and landscape fragmentation-comparing the utility of continuous and discrete analyses for a western Honduras region. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,2004, (101):48-56.
    [8]Dunn C P, et al. Methods for analyzing temporal changes in landscape pattern. In:Quantitative methods in landscape ecology. Editor, Turner MG, Gardner RH. Springer-verlag,1991:173-194.
    [9]Pan D, Domon G, de Blois S, et al. Temporal (1958-1993) and spatial patterns of land use changes in Haut-Saint-Laurent (Quebec, Canada) and their relation to landscape physical attributes. Landscape Ecology,1999,14:35-52.
    [10]Olsson E G A, Austrheim G, Grenne S N. Landscape change patterns in mountains, land use and environmental diversity, Mid-Norway 1960-1993. Landscape Ecology,2000,15(2):155-170.
    [11]Reid R S, Kruska R L, Muthui N, et al. Land-use and land-cover dynamics in response to changes in climatic, biological and socio-political forces:the case of southwestern Ethiopia Landscape Ecology,2000,15(4):339-355.
    [12]邬建国.景观生态学.北京:高等教育出版社,2007.
    [13]Wu J G, Richard H. Key issues and research priorities in landscape ecology:an idiosyncratic synthesis. Landscape Ecology.2002,17:355-365.
    [14]张明.榆林地区脆弱生态环境的景观格局与演变研究.地理研究,2000,19(1):30-36.
    [15]岳天祥,程彤,张红旗,等.景观动态及其驱动因素和效应分析——以江西省泰和县灌西乡千烟洲为例.自然资源,1997,(6):19-26.
    [16]肖笃宁,李晓文,王连平,等.辽东湾滨海湿地资源景观演与可持续利用.资源科学,2001,23(2):31-36.
    [17]Rao K S, Rekha P. Land use dynamics and landscape change pattern in a typical micro watershed in the mid elevation zone of central Himalaya, India. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment,2001, 86:113-123.
    [18]Sylvain Paquette, Ge'rald Domon. Trends in rural landscape development and sociodemographic recomposition in southern Quebec (Canada). Landscape and Urban Planning,2001:215-238.
    [19]Hietala-Koivu R. Agricultural landscape change:a case study in Ylane, southwest Finland. Landscape and Urban Planning,1999,46(1):103-108.
    [20]Hannes P. Landscape sensitivity changes in Estonia. Landscape and Urban Planning,1998,41(1): 163-169.
    [21]Kyriakidis P, Journel A G. Geostatistics models:a review. Mathematical Geology,1999,31(6): 615-684.
    [22]徐建华,岳文泽,谈文琦.城市景观格局尺度效应的空间统计规律——以上海中心城区为例.地理学报,2004,59(6):1058-1067.
    [23]杨雪姣,刘茂松,徐驰,等.城镇聚落斑块的异速增长与板块效应——以苏州、无锡、常州地区为例.生态学杂志,2009,28(12):2586-2592.
    [24]曾辉,江子瀛,孔宁宁,等.快速城市化景观格局的空间自相关特征分析——以深圳市龙华地区为例.北京大学学报(自然科学版),2000,36(6):824-831.
    [25]谈文琦,徐建华,岳文泽等.城市景观空间自相关与自相似的尺度特征研究.生态学杂志,2005,24(6):627-630.
    [26]郭晋平,阳含熙,张芸香.关帝山林区景观要素空间分布及其动态研究.生态学报,1999,19(4):468-473.
    [27]马燕飞,沙占江,牛志宁.环青海湖区沙漠化土地景观格局自相关分析.干旱区研究,2010,27(6):954-961.
    [28]Bailian L. Fractal geometry applications in description and analysis of patch patterns and patch dynamics. Ecological Modeling,2000,132:33-50.
    [29]祖元刚,马克明,张喜军.植被空间异质性的分形分析方法.生态学报,1997,17(3):333-337.
    [30]Hazrat M A, Lee T S, Yan K C. Modeling water balance components and irrigation efficiencies in relation to water requirements for double-cropping systems. Agricultural Water Management,2000, 46:167-182.
    [31]汪朝辉,谭德宝,王克林等.洞庭湖区景观镶嵌结构和分形特征研究.长江流域资源与环境,2006,15(5):579-583.
    [32]徐建华,艾南山,金炯等.西北干旱区景观要素镶嵌结构的分形研究——以黑河流域为例.干旱区研究,2001,18(1):35-39.
    [33]罗旭,马礼.北方农牧交错带景观格局分形特征分析——以河北省坝上沽源县为例.首都师范大学学报(自然科学版),2011,32(2):61-66.
    [34]林孝松,赵纯勇,郭跃等.渝西方山丘陵区小流域景观格局演变分析.水土保持通报,2007,27(2):91-94,98.
    [35]王水献,董新光,寇文.新疆焉耆盆地绿洲景观分形特征及驱动机制分析.水土保持研究,2007,14(6):256-259,263.
    [36]施仁杰.马尔科夫链基础及其应用.西安:西安电子科技大学出版社,1992.
    [37]陈卫平.贺兰山银川盆地景观格局分析与景观规划.北京林业大学,2008.
    [38]王学雷,吴宜进.马尔柯夫模型在四湖地区湿地景观变化研究中的应用.华中农业大学学报,2002,21(3):288-289.
    [39]Coppedge B, Engle D, Fuhlendorf S. Markov models of landcover dynamics in a southern Great Plains grassland region. Landscape Ecology,2007,22(9):1383-1393.
    [40]Muller M R, Middleton J. A Markov model of land-use change dynamics in the Niagara Region, Ontario, Canada. Landscape Ecology,1994,9:151-157.
    [41]宁龙梅,王学雷,胡望斌.利用马尔科夫过程模拟和预测武汉市湿地景观的动态演变,华中师范大学学报(自然科学版),2004,38(2):255-258.
    [42]付春雷,宋国利,鄂勇.马尔科夫模型下的乐清湾湿地景观变化分析,东北林业大学学报,2009,37(9):117-119.
    [43]徐丽,卞晓庆,刘琳等.马尔科夫模型在合肥市景观格局动态模拟及预测中的应用,安徽农业大学学报,2010,37(3):570-574.
    [44]吴晓旭,邹学勇,钱江.基于马尔科夫模型的乌审旗景观格局模拟与预测,干旱区资源与环境,2010,24(2):158-162.
    [45]刘黎明.乡村景观规划.北京:中国农业大学出版社,2003.
    [46]Crist P J, Kohiey T W, Oakleaf J. Assessing land-use impacts on biodiversity using an expert systems tool. Landscape Ecology,2000,15(1):47-62.
    [47]Farina A. Principles and methods in landscape ecology. London:Chapman and Hall,1998.
    [48]刘纪远,张增祥,庄大方,等.20世纪90年代中国土地利用变化时空特征及其成因分析.地理研究,2003,22(3):1-12.
    [49]Usher M B. Landscape sensitivity:from theory to practice. Catena,2001,42(2):375-383.
    [50]Jerzy Banski, Monika Wesolowska. Transformations in housing construction in rural areas of Poland's Lublin region—Influence on the spatial settlement structure and landscape aesthetics. Landscape and Urban Planning,2010,94(2):116-126.
    [51]Thrift N J, Kitchen R. International encyclopedia of human geography. Oxford:Elsevier,2009: 107-111.
    [52]Fu C B, Ye D Z. Recent progress on global change research in China. Advance in Earth Science, 1995,10(1):62.
    [53]Boserup E. The conditions of agricultural growth:The economics of agrarian change under population pressure. Chicago:Aldine Publishing Company,1965.
    [54]Mander U, Jongman R H G. Human impact on rural landscapes in central and northern Europe. Landscape and Urban Planning,1998:149-153.
    [55]Sevenant M, Antrop M. Settlement models, land use and visibility in rural landscapes:two case studies in Greece. Landscape and Urban Planning,2007,80(4):362-374.
    [56]许华,梁国付,丁圣彦.河南省黄泛区农业景观格局动态及驱动因素.生态与农村环境学报,2008,24(2):7-11.
    [57]Green G M, Sussman R W. Deforestation history of the eastern rain forests of Madagascar from satellite images. Science,1990,24:212-215.
    [58]Naveh Z, Lieberman A S. Landscape Ecology:Theory and Application. New York: Springer-Verlag,1984.
    [59]Alard D, Poudevigne I. Factors controlling plant diversity in a rural landscape:a functional approach. Landscape and Urban Planning,1999:29-39.
    [60]胡乔利,齐永青,胡引翠.京津冀地区土地利用/覆被与景观格局变化及驱动力分析,中国生态农业学报,2011,19(5):1182-1189.
    [61]Mottet A, Ladet S, CoqueN, et al. Agricultural land-use change and its drivers in mountain landscapes:A case study in the Pyrenees. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment,2006, 114(2/4):296-310.
    [62]Havbaker T J, Radeloff V C, Hammer R B, et al. Road density and landscape pattern in relation to housing density, land ownership, land cover, and soils. Landscape Ecology,2004,20(5):609-625.
    [63]Thorson J A. The effect of zoning an housing construction. Journal of Housing Economics,1997, 6(1):81-91.
    [64]Hammer R B, Stewart S I, Winkler R L, et al. Characterizing dynamic spatial and temporal residential density patterns from 1940-1990 across the North Central United States. Landscape Urban Plan,2004,69(2-3):183-199.
    [65]张秋菊,傅伯杰,陈利顶.关于景观格局演变研究的几个问题.地理科学,2003,23(3):265-270.
    [66]Yeha C T, Huangb S L. Investigating spatiotemporal patterns of landscape diversity in response to urbanization. Landscape and Urban Planning,2009:151-162.
    [67]Valbuenaa D, Verburga P H, Veldkampa A. Effects of farmers'decisions on the landscape structure of a Dutch rural region:An agent-based approach. Landscape and Urban Planning,2010:98-110.
    [68]张明.区域土地利用结构及其驱动因子的统计分析.自然资源学报,1999,14(4):381-384.
    [69]史培军,陈晋,潘耀忠.深圳市土地利用变化机制分析.地理学报,2000,55(2):151-160.
    [70]杨鹏,陆宏芳,陈飞鹏.1995至2004年广州土地利用格局变化与驱动分析.生态环境,2008,17(3):1262-1267.
    [71]Wang Q X, Otsubo K. Relationship between agricultural land use change and socioeconomic factors in North-East china in recent decades. In:Singh R B. Land Use and Cover Change. Science Publishers.Inc.2001
    [72]李颖,张养贞,张树文.三江平原沼泽湿地景观格局变化及其生态效应.地理科学,2002,22(6):677-682.
    [73]汪爱华,张树清,张柏.三江平原沼泽湿地景观空间格局变化.生态学报,2003,23(2):237-244.
    [74]李秀珍,布仁仓,常禹,等.景观格局指标对不同景观格局的反应.生态学报,2004,24(1):124-125.
    [75]林孟龙,曹宇,王鑫.基于景观指数的景观格局分析方法的局限性:以台湾宜兰利泽简湿地为例.应用生态学报,2008,19(1):125-143.
    [76]黄华,潘伟斌,郑相宇,等.小城镇实施土地利用规划的景观格局变化预测.安徽农业科学,2008,36(7):2840-2841,2961.
    [77]张茜.基于CA-Markov模型的杭州湾南岸湿地景观格局动态模拟与预测.[硕士学位论文].杭州:浙江大学,2013.
    [78]熊黑钢,徐长春.于田绿洲土地景观格局动态变化与预测.干旱区资源与环境,2008,22(6):56-62.
    [79]李晖,白杨,李国彦.集成灰色分析和元胞自动机用于景观动态模拟.生态学报,2009,29(11):6227-6238.
    [80]Sang L L, Zhang C, Yang J Y, et al. Simulation of land use spatial pattern of towns and villages based on CA-Markov model. Mathematical and Computer Modelling,2011,54:938-943.
    [81]范强,杨俊,吴楠,等.海岸旅游小镇景观格局演变与动态模拟——以大连市金石滩国家旅游度假区为例.地理科学.2013,33(12):1467-1475.
    [82]Ehrlich P R, Wheye D. "Nonadaptive" Hilltopping Behavior in Male Checkerspot Butterflies (Euphydryas editha). American Naturalist,1986,127(4):477-483.
    [83]刘茂松,张明娟.景观生态学:原理与方法.北京:化学工业出版社,2004.
    [84]王根绪,郭晓寅,程国栋.黄河源区景观格局与生态功能的动态变化.生态学报,2002,22(10):1587-1598.
    [85]Isabel O P, Miguel A C, Alejanddra E C, et al. Landscape evaluation:Comparison of evaluation methods in a region of Spain. Journal of Environment Management,2007,85(1):89-99.
    [86]Eckart L. Our shared landscape:design, planning and management of multifunctional landscapesJournal of Environment Management,2008,89(3):143-145.
    [87]Joly D, Brossard T, Cavailhes J, et, al. A quantitative approach to the visual evaluation of landscape. Annals of association of American geographers,2009,99(2):113-125.
    [88]谢花林.乡村景观功能评价.生态学报,2004,24(9):1988-1993.
    [89]李军,蔡运龙,后立胜.区域景观生态规划研究——长株潭案例.水土保持研究,2005,12(4):74-78.
    [90]张小飞,王仰麟,李正国.景观功能网络的等级与结构探讨.地理科学进展,2005,24(1):52-59.
    [91]Daniel T C, Boster R S. Measuring landscape esthetics. The scene beauty estimation method. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-167,66p. Rocky Mtn Forest and Range Exp Stn. Fort Collins, Colo 1976.
    [92]Arthur LM, Boster RS. Measuring scene beauty:A selected annotated bibliography. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-25. Rocky Mtn Forest and Range Exp Stn. Fort Collins, Colo 1976
    [93]陈鑫峰,沈国舫.森林游憩的几个重要概念辨析.世界林业研究,2000,13(1):69-76.
    [94]Litton R B. Visual vulnerability of Forest Landscapes. J For,1974(7):392-397.
    [95]Potter D R, Wagar J A. Techniques for inventorying manmade impact in roadway environments. USDA For. Serv. Res. Pap. PNW-121,12p. Pacific Northwest For. And Range Exp. Stn. Portland Ore,1971.
    [96]Hull R B, Buhyoff G J, Daniel T C. Measurement of scene beauty, the law of comparative judgment and scenic beauty estimation procedures. Forest Science,1984,30(4):1084-1096.
    [97]国庆喜,王天明.丰林自然保护区景观生态评价:量化与解释.应用生态学报,2005,(5):825-832.
    [98]徐慧,钱谊,彭补拙,等.鹞落坪国家级自然保护区生态评价研究.农业环境保护,2002,21(4):360-364.
    [99]Carey P D, S hort C, Morris C, et al. The multi-disciplinary evaluation of national agri-environment scheme. J Environ Man,2003,69(1):71-91.
    [100]Gulinck H, Mugica M. A framework for comparative landscape analysis and evaluation based on land cover data, with an application in the Madrid region (Spain).Landscape Urban Plan,2001, 55(4):257-270.
    [101]胡永宏,贺思辉.综合评价方法.北京:北京科学出版社,2000.
    [102]李明阳.森林生态评价的尺度和指标.中南林业调查规划,1997(3):52-54.
    [103]李世武,杨志发,王云鹏.高等级公路路侧景观对交通安全影响的综合评价方法.吉林大学学报(工学版),2007,37(4):777-781,
    [104]张秀丽,潘凤文,周卫峰,等.公路景观的模糊协调度评价方法.重庆交通大学学报:自然科学版,2009,28(4):736-741.
    [105]董长虹.神经网络与应用.北京:国防工业出版社,2005.
    [106]胡欣欣.龙栖山国家级自然保护区森林景观格局分析及其生态评价.福建农林大学,2009.
    [107]谢花林,刘黎明,龚丹.乡村景观美感效果评价指标体系及其模糊综合评判——以北京市海淀区温泉镇白家疃村为例.中国园林,2003(1):59-61.
    [108]刘滨谊,王云才.论中国乡村景观评价的理论基础与指标体系.中国园林,2002(5):76-79.
    [109]丁维,李正方,王长永.江苏省海门县农村生态环境评价方法.农村生态环境,1994,10(2):38-40.
    [110]肖笃宁,钟林生.景观分类与评价的生态原则.应用生态学报,1998,9(2):217-221.
    [111]谢花林,刘黎明,李蕾.乡村景观规划设计的相关问题探讨.中国园林,2003,19(3):39-41.
    [112]谢花林,刘黎明.乡村景观评价研究进展及其指标体系初探.生态学杂志,2003,22(6):97-101.
    [113]王云才,郭焕成,杨丽.北京市郊区传统村落价值评价及可持续利用模式探讨——以北京市门头沟区传统村落的调查研究为例.地理科学,2006,26(6):735-742.
    [114]张惠远,王仰麟.土地资源利用的景观生态优化方法.地学前缘,2000,7:112-120.
    [115]刘鸿雁.哈尔滨市景观格局变化及典型小流域水土保持分析.东北林业大学,2011.
    [116]贾丹.延庆风沙区景观生态风险评价及景观格局优化.北京林业大学,2009.
    [117]Forman RTT. Land Mosaics:the Ecology of Landscape and Region, Ambridge:Cambridge University Press,1995.
    [118]董明辉,赵建国.常德市土地利用结构优化研究.长江流域资源与环境.1997,6(1):24-28.
    [119]张贵祥,凌云,彦随.区域土地利用结构优化数学模型——以浙江省乐清市为例.山西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2000,14(3):90-94.
    [120]何书金,李秀彬,朱会义,等.黄河三角洲土地持续利用优化分析.地理科学进展2001,20(4):313-323.
    [121]耿红,王泽民.基于灰色线性规划的土地利用结构优化研究.武汉测绘科技大学学报,2000,25(2):167-171,182.
    [122]但承龙,雍新琴,厉伟.土地利用结构优化模型及决策方法——江苏启东市的实证分析.华南热带农业大学学报,2001,7(3):38-40,46.
    [123]左军.多目标决策分析.北京:中国大地出版社,1996.
    [124]王万茂,承龙.海门市土地利用结构优化研究.国土与自然资源研究,2003,1(1):44-46.
    [125]郭怀成,振兴,于涌.流域土地可持续利用规划方法及应用研究.地理研究,2003,22(6):671-679.
    [126]张洪江,王斌瑞.黄土梁状丘陵区土地利用结构及其生产潜力相关性的探讨.自然资源.1994,(2):8-13.
    [127]Luzio M D, Srinivasan R, Arnold J G. Integration of Watershed Tools and SWAT Model into BASINS. American Water Resources Association,2002,38(4):1127-1142.
    [128]Bettinger P. Challenges and opportunities for linking the modeling of forest vegetation dynamics with landscape planning models. Landscape and urban planning.2001,56(3):107.
    [129]Seppelt R. Regionalised optimum control problems for agroecosystem management. Ecological modeling,2000,131(2):121.
    [130]刘黎明.乡村景观规划的发展历史及其在我国的发展前景.农村生态环境,2001,17(1):52-55.
    [131]肖笃宁,高峻.农村景观规划与生态建设.农村生态环境,2001,17(4):48-51.
    [132]王云才.论都市郊区游憩景观规划与景观生态保护——以北京市郊区游憩景观规划为例.地理研究,2003,22(3):324-333.
    [133]宋志军,刘黎明.我国现代城郊农业区的功能演变及规划方法研究.中国农业大学学报,2010,15(6):120-126.
    [134]王德起,王霖琳,朱海坤,等.门头沟煤矿区生态修复功能及生态农业工程规划.农业工程学报,2007,23(11):138-141.
    [135]于东明.鲁中山区乡村景观演变研究——以山东省淄博市峨庄乡为例:[博士学位论文].泰安:山东农业大学,2011.
    [136]刘亚彬.粮食主产区综合食物安全风险评估方法研究——以洞庭湖区为例:[博士学位论文].北京:中国农业大学,2010.
    [137]金井镇政府.金井概况,[EB/OL]. http://jjz.csx.cn/zjjj/jjgk/201202/t20120223_97813.html.
    [138]梁发超.农业景观分类与应用研究:[博士学位论文].北京:中国农业大学,2012.
    [139]肖禾,王晓军,张晓彤,等.参与式方法支持下的河北王庄村乡村景观规划修编.中国土地科学,2013,27(8):87-92.
    [140]谢花林.乡村景观功能评价.生态学报,2004,24(9):1988-1993.
    [141]吴莉,侯西勇,徐新良,等.山东沿海地区土地利用和景观格局变化.农业工程学报,2013,29(5):207-216.
    [142]Meurk CD, Swaffield SR. A landscape ecological framework for indigenous regeneration in rural New Zealand-Aotearoa. Landscape and Urban Planning,2000,50:129-144.
    [143]Zhou ZZ. Landscape changes in a rural area in China. Landscape and Urban Planning,2000,47: 33-38.
    [144]Lokocz E, Ryan RL, Sadler AJ. Motivations for land protection and stewardship:Exploring place attachment and rural landscape character in Massachusetts, Landscape and Urban Planning,2011, 99:65-76.
    [145]Paquette S, Domon G. Trends in rural landscape development and sociodemographic recomposition in southern Quebec (Canada). Landscape and Urban Planning,2001,55:215-23.
    [146]Mander U, Jongman RHG. Human impact on rural landscapes in central and northern Europe. Landscape and Urban Planning,1998,41:149-153.
    [147]梁发超,刘黎明,曲衍波.乡村尺度农业景观分类方法及其在新农村建设规划中的应用.农业工程学报,2011,27(11):330-336.
    [148]Sang LL, Zhang C, Yang JY, et al. Simulation of land use spatial pattern of towns and villages based on CA-Markov model. Mathematical and Computer Modelling,2011,54:938-943.
    [149]Kamusoko C, Aniya M, Adi B, et al. Rural sustainability under threat in Zimbabwe-Simulation of future land use/cover changes in the Bindura district based on the Markov-cellular automata model. Applied Geography,2009,29:435-447.
    [150]龚文峰,袁力,范文义.基于CA-Markov的哈尔滨市土地利用变化及预测.农业工程学报,2012,28(14):216-222.
    [151]王友生,余新晓,贺康宁,等.基于CA-Markov模型的藉河流域土地利用变化动态模拟.农业工程学报,2011,27(12):330-336.
    [152]宋治清,王仰麟.城市景观格局动态及其规划的生态学探讨.地球科学进展,2005,20(8):840-848.
    [153]王行风,汪云甲,李永峰.基于生命周期理论的煤矿区土地利用演化模拟.地理研究,2009,,28(2):379-390.
    [154]Peng WW, Huang HZ, Li YF, et al. Life cycle reliability assessment of new products—A Bayesian model updating approach. Reliability Engineering and System Safety,2013,112: 109-119.
    [155]王寿兵,马小雪,陈雅敏,等.面向生命周期评价的土地利用生态影响评价方法.中国环境科学.2013,33(6):1141-1146.
    [156]王联兵,刘小鹏.宁夏沙湖旅游地生命周期分析与发展预测研究.干早区地理,2010,33(3):473-479.
    [157]Li GQ, Chen ZL. Dynamic industry evolution model on product life cycle. Energy Procedia,2011, 5:1611-1615.
    [158]Ramasesh R, Tirupati D, Vaitsos CA. Modeling process-switching decisions under product life cycle uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics,2010,126:236-246.
    [159]吴超,许建平,陈丽容.基于生命周期的软件缺陷预测技术.计算机工程与设计,2009,30(12):2956-2959.
    [160]沈永伟.基于Gompertz的气象水文装备维修器材消耗量分析与预测.装备环境工程,2011,8(2):97-99.
    [161]姜晨,张金春,王杰.利用龚帕兹曲线建立导弹研制费用——时间模型.系统工程与电子技术,2002,24(4):23-25.
    [162]徐亮,孟宪民,宿桂梅,等.应用动物生长曲线模型分析不同柞蚕品种幼虫的生长发育规律.蚕业科学,2013,39(3):0620-0623.
    [163]何其祥.产品生命周期的局部回归模型研究.统计与决策,2008,8:22-23.
    [164]Lopez-Carra D, Davisa J, Jankowska MM, et al. Space versus place in complex human-natural systems:Spatial and multi-level models of tropical land use and cover change (LUCC) in Guatemala. Ecological Modelling,2012,229:64-75.
    [165]Hasselmann F, Csaplovics E, Falconer I, et al. Technological driving forces of LUCC: Conceptualization, quantification, and the example of urban power distribution networks. Land Use Policy,2010,27:628-637.
    [166]李新通,朱鹤健.闽东南沿海地区农业景观变化及其驱动因素——以大南坂农场为例.资源科学,2000,22(1):35-39.
    [167]徐嘉兴,李钢,陈国良.基于logistic回归模型的矿区土地利用演变驱动力分析.农业工程学报,2012,28(20):247-255.
    [168]常春艳,赵庚星,王凌,等.黄河口生态脆弱区土地利用时空变化及驱动因素分析.农业工程学报,2012,28(24):226-234.
    [169]曾福兴.确定修正指数曲线模型参数的重要方法.情报学刊,1992,5(13):361-363,367.
    [170]张军,吕雄,姚贵平.修正指数曲线模型参数估计的一种新方法.内蒙古农业大学学报,2012,5-6(33):285-290.
    [171]李华,胡奇英.预测与决策.西安:西安电子科技大学出版社,2005.
    [172]彭建,王仰麟,刘松,等.海洋带土地持续利用景观生态评价.地理学报,2003,58(3):363-371
    [173]彭保发,陈端吕,李文军,等.土地利用景观格局的稳定性研究——以常德市为例.地理科学,2013,33(12):1484-1488.
    [174]肖化顺,付春风,张贵.流溪河国家森林公园森林景观稳定性评价.中南林业科技大学学报(自然科学版),2007,27(1):88-92.
    [175]谢高地,甄霖,杨丽,等.泾河流域景观稳定性与类型转换机制.应用生态学报,2005,16(9):1693-1698.
    [176]彭晓鹃,赵克飞.基于GIS的山地城镇空间拓展土地适宜性评价——以大埔县为例.热带地理,2013,33(4):480-488.
    [177]王虹力.基于GIS的县级土地适宜性评价系统研究——以吉林省九台市为例:[硕士学位论文].长春:吉林农业大学,2008.
    [178]宋吉涛,方创琳,宋敦江.中国城市群空间结构的稳定性分析.地理学报,2006,61(12):1311-1325.
    [179]丁陈建,汪吉林.神经网络法的采空区地基稳定性评价.采矿与安全工程学报,2009,26(2):208-211.
    [180]罗湘华,倪晋仁,罗华铭.论土地利用变化统计分析中的多重共线性问题.应用基础与工程科学学报,2001,9(4):297-306.
    [181]陈昱,陈银蓉,马文博.基于Logistic模型的水库移民安置区居民土地流转意愿分析——四川、湖南、湖北移民安置区的调查.资源科学,2011,33(6):178-1185.
    [182]和文超,师学义,邓青云,等.土地利用总体规划修编中粮食产量预测方法比较.农业工程学报,2011,27(12):348-352.
    [183]黎晓亚,马克明,傅伯杰,等.区域生态安全格局:设计原则与方法.生态学报,2004,5(24):1055-1062.
    [184]Ouyang Z, weisman J, wang R.ecological niche suitability model with an application in taojiang land use planning of environment science.1994,6(4):449-456.
    [185]Wenlong Li, Zizhen Li, Weide Li. Effect of the niche-fitness at different water supply and fertilization on yield of spring wheat in farmland of semi-arid areas. Agricultural Water Management,2004,67(1):1-13.
    [186]刘小平,黎夏,彭晓娟.“生态位”元胞自动机在土地可持续规划模型中的应用.生态学报,2007,27(6):2391-2402.
    [187]罗小龙,甄峰.生态位态势理论在城乡结合部应用的初步研究——以南京市为例.经济地理,2000,5(20):55-58,71.
    [188]井波,任建兰.生态位理论在土地利用结构优化中的应用:以济南市为例.山东师范大学学报:自然科学版,2006,21(4):79-81.
    [189]蒙莉娜,郑新奇,赵璐,等.基于生态位适宜度模型的土地利用功能分区.农业工程学报,2011,27(3):282-287.
    [190]俞艳,何建华.基于生态位适宜度的土地生态经济适宜性评价.农业工程学报,2008,24(1):124-128.
    [191]于婧,聂艳,周勇,等.生态位适宜度方法在基于GIS的农田多宜性评价中的应用.土壤通报,2006,43(2):190-196.
    [192]季翔,刘黎明,起晓星.区域农田粮食生产保障能力及其风险评价方法.农业工程学报,2014,30(7):219-226.
    [193]季翔,刘黎明.粮食生产水平的内涵解析及其预测方法.农业工程学报,2011,27(s2):331-335.
    [194]郇红艳,谭清美,朱平.城乡一体化进程中农田利用变化的驱动因素及区域比较.农业工程学报,2013,29(21):201-213.
    [195]赵志刚,梁栋栋,李霖.宁波市农田占补时空演变研究.华中师范大学学报(自然科学版),2012,3(46):368-372.
    [196]中国建筑设计研究院.GB50188~93.村镇规划标准.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1994-06-01.
    [197]中国建筑设计研究院.GB50188~2007.镇规划标准.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2007-03-01.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700