用户名: 密码: 验证码:
伊洛河流域农村经济空间分异与可持续发展研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
流域经济是建立在流域自然地理环境基础上的区域经济,具有整体性和关联性、区段性和差异性、层次性和结构性、开放性和耗散性等特征。它的独特性和重要性使其在社会经济发展中始终占据着突出地位。可持续发展是人类社会一种全新的发展模式,已经得到广泛认同和赞誉,以流域为基本单元的可持续发展研究日益受到重视。
     本研究从流域经济空间分异和可持续发展的视角出发,分县市和乡镇两个层次,分析伊洛河流域农村经济空间分异特征及其变化,进而寻求经济空间分异的主要影响因素,并在此基础上,确立流域实施农村经济可持续发展的原则和战略重点。
     在县市层次上,重工业城市洛阳市和煤炭城市义马市,第二产业尤其是农村工业特别发达的偃师市和巩义市,处于流域经济发展的领先位置,经济发展水平明显超过其他各县。流域中上游的洛南县、卢氏县、洛宁县、栾川县、嵩县和宜阳县,都处在比较落后的位置,并且同流域下游地区有较大的差距。而渑池县、新安县、孟津县、伊川县,基本上处于前两类之间,但更接近于中上游的落后地区。这样就形成了下游明显高于中上游、涧河流域高于伊河流域和洛河流域的经济发展水平格局。
     在乡镇层次上,流域中上游绝大部分乡镇的农民人均纯收入较低,而下游洛阳市区、偃师市和巩义市的大部分乡镇则较高,基本符合流域县市级经济空间格局。处在县城周围、河谷平原,矿产资源优势明显的乡镇,其农民收入比距县城较远、地形复杂、交通不便的乡镇明显要高。除了下游较为集中的高收入乡镇,整个流域大部分乡镇、尤其是中上游乡镇的农民人均纯收入落后于河南省平均水平。从1995-2000年经济空间特征变化看,出现了一种值得注意的“富者更富、贫者更贫”的态势,巩义市和洛南县、嵩县中部是典型代表。而渑池县和新安县比较特别,大部分乡镇基础薄弱但收入增长很快。
    
     伊洛河流域经济的空间特征与其地貌、自然资源、交通设施和农村工业的发
    展具有很强的空间祸合性。影响流域县市级经济空间分异的因素对乡镇经济空间
    分异起着控制性作用,在局部范围内某一种或几种因素起主导作用。而其他因素,
    诸如与中心城市(在县内为县城)的距离等,也有一定的影响。
     根据伊洛河流域农村经济的空间分异特征、影响因素和流域经济可持续发展
    理论,本研究提出了实施农村经济可持续发展的经济发展优先、富县与富民相结
    合、各区段协调发展、经济发展与生态环境保护相协调、加强流域内外交流与联
    系等基本原则,并确立了农业空间结构优化、网络结构优化、自然资源开发与农
    村工业发展、人力资源开发、生态旅游开发等战略重点。
The economy of a river basin, based on its geographic environment, is a special kind of regional economy with the characteristics of entirety and relation, regionality and diversity, gradation and network, opening and dissipation etc. Because of the particularity and importance, it has special outstanding status in the development of society and economy all along. Sustainable development is a new brand development model, which has been recognized and honored broadly. The studies of sustainable development which regard river basin as a basic unit have been paid more and more attention to.
    On the basis of the view of the spatial difference and sustainable development of river basin economy, the article studies the spatial difference and changes of the rural economy of Yiluo River basin from two kinds of levels, including counties and cities, villages and towns. Further, the article analyzes the main factors that affect the economic spatial difference on each level. And on the former studies, the article establishes some principles and strategic emphases of the river basin rural economy sustainable development.
    On the level of counties and cities, the heavy-industry city Luoyang City, the coal city Yima City, Yanshi City and Gongyi City whose secondary industry especially rural industry are very advanced and much developed than other counties. The upper and middle reach counties, including Luonan county, Lushi county, Luoning county, Luanchuan county, Songxian county and Yiyang county, drop behind and have a relative big gap with the lower reach counties. While Mianchi county, Xin'an county, Mengjin county and Yichuan county are between the former two types on the whole, which approach much the upper and middle counties. The pattern of economic development
    
    
    
    levels is very obvious, the level of lower reach areas is much higher than the upper and middle reach areas, and Jian River basin is higher than Yi River basin and Luo River basin.
    On the level of villages and towns, the economic spatial pattern accords with the counties and cities' in the main. The per capita net income of rural residents of most upper and middle reach villages and towns are low, while most lower reach villages and towns are relative higher, especially some in Luoyang city, Yanshi city and Gongyi city. The level of those which locates at the surroundings of county seat, or valleys and plains, or those which have obvious advantages of mineral resources, is apparently higher than those which have farther distance with county seat, complex terrain, and inconvenient traffics.
    Except some lower reach areas with high income, the income level of most villages and towns especially in the upper and middle reach of the river basin is lower than the average level of Henan province. The changes of economic spatial characteristics from 1995 to 2000 appear an attractive situation: the rich becoming richer and the poor becoming poorer. It is very typical in the Gongyi city, Luonan county and the center of Songxian county. While Mianchi county and Xin'an county are special, most of villages and towns' economic base are weak, but the increments of per capita net income of rural residents are very quickly.
    The economic spatial characteristic of Yiluo River basin couples well with physiognomy, natural resources and transportation facilities. The factors which affect the economic spatial difference of counties and cities control the villages and towns' economic spatial characteristics. One or several factors play dominant roles at partial place. While other factors, such as the distance with central city(county seat is the central city of a county), also have some effects to a certainty.
    On the basis of rural economic spatial difference characteristics and factors of Yiluo River basin, and the theory of river basin economic sustainable development, the
    
    
    article put forward some basic principles and strategic emphases of rural economic sustainable development. The principles include economic development first, the combination of making the co
引文
[1] 郭培章,宋群.中外流域综合治理开发案例分析[M].北京:中国计划出版社,2001.
    [2] 姜付仁.以流域为单元的可持续发展研究——以海河流域为例[D].中国水利水电科学研究院博士论文,2001年.
    [3] 陈南岳.长江流域可持续发展研究[J].中国软科学,2001,(2):112-115.
    [4] 王慧敏,徐立中.流域系统可持续发展分析[J].水科学进展,2000,11(2):165-172.
    [5] 郑度.关于地理学的区域性和地域分异研究[J].地理研究,1998,17(1):4-8.
    [6] 陈东景,马安青,徐中民.干旱区流域经济分析的初步研究[J].人文地理,2002,17(5):81-84.
    [7] 陈湘满.论流域开发管理中的区域利益协调[J].经济地理,2002,22(5):525-529.
    [8] 钱乐祥,许叔明,秦奋.流域经济空间分析与西部发展战略[J].地理科学进展,2000,19(3):266-272.
    [9] 邓宏兵.长江流域空间经济系统的特征研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2000,9(3):277-282.
    [10] 邓宏兵.长江流域空间经济系统形成的要素分析[J].生态经济,2000,(8):22-24.
    [11] 邓宏兵.试析长江流域空间经济系统运行机制及其演变规律[J].社会科学研究,2000,(4):33-36.
    [12] Komaragiri Srinivasa Raju, C.R.S. Pillai. Multicriterion decision making in river basin planning and development[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1999,112: 249-257.
    [13] A. Botes, J. Henderson, T. Nakale, K. Nantanga, K. Schachtschneider, M. Seely. Ephemeral rivers and their development: testing an approach to basin management committees on the Kuiseb River, Namibia[J]. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth,2003, 28:853-858.
    [14] R.M.Miloradov, P. Marjanovic, Z.Cukic. Water resources assessment as the basic tool for sustainable and environmentally sound river basin management [J]. Wat. Sci. Tech. 1995,32(5-6):45-53.
    [15] R. J. H. M. van der Veeren, C. M. Lorenz. Integrated economic-ecological analysis and evaiuation of management strategies on nutrient abatement in the Rhine basin[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2002, 66:361-376.
    
    
    [16] Christopher J. Barrow river basin development planning and management: a critical review [J]. World Development, 1998, 26(1): 171-186.
    [17] T. Botterweg, D. W. Rodda. Danube river basin: progress with the environmental programme[J]. Wat. Sci. Tech. 1999,40(10):1-8.
    [18] 李文华,金陵,徐勇,等.流域开发与管理——美国田纳西河流域与中国乌江流域对比研究[M].贵阳:贵州人民出版社,1989.
    [19] 何大明,冯彦,Hsiang-te,等.TVA与澜沧江流域的综合开发与管理研究[J].云南地理环境研究,1994,6(2):45-60.
    [20] 陈湘满.美国田纳西流域开发及其对我国流域经济发展的启示[J].世界地理研究,2000,9(2):87-92.
    [21] 张文合.流域开发论[M].北京:水利电力出版社,1994.
    [22] 吕拉昌.流域开发——广东可持续发展的地域战略[J].热带地理,1999,19(3):264-267.
    [23] 周运清,熊瑛.流域问题的本质与长江流域的适度开发[J].长江流域资源与环境,2001,10(1):28-33.
    [24] 伍新木,李雪松.流域开发的外部性及其内部化[J].长江流域资源与环境,2002,11(1):21-26.
    [25] 陈湘满.论流域区域行政区的关系及其优化[J].人文地理,2001,16(4):67-70.
    [26] 陈湘满.我国流域开发管理的目标模式与体制创新[J].湘潭大学社会科学学报,2003,27(1):101-104.
    [27] 陈湘满.中国流域开发治理的管理与调控研究[D].华东师范大学博士论文,2001.
    [28] 林道辉.流域可持续发展理论初探[J].浙江大学学报(理学版),2001,28(2):211-215.
    [29] Bengt-Owe Jansson, Carl-Einar Stalvant. The Baltic Basin Case Study----towards a sustainable Baltic Europe[J]. Continental Shelf Research,2001,21: 1999-2019.
    [30] Emmanuel Adilson S. Serrao, Daniel Nepstad, Robert Walker. Upland agricultural and forestry development in the Amazon: sustainability, criticality and resilience[J]. Ecological Economics,1996, 18:3-13.
    [31] 马兰,张曦,李雪松.论流域经济可持续发展[J].云南环境科学,2003,22(增刊):42-45.
    [32] 傅尔林,陈鸿宇,曾建生.论流域可持续发展中的效率与公平关系[J].生态经
    
    济,2001,(3):15-17.
    [33] 张道军,朱麦云,张昭,等.流域生态环境可持续发展论[M].郑州:黄河水利出版社,2001.
    [34] 陈利顶,傅伯杰.长江流域可持续发展的基础与资源环境适应性评价[J].环境科学,1999,(2),92-94.
    [35] 伍新木.中国入世与长江流域可持续发展[J].长江流域资源与环境,2002,11(4):297-299.
    [36] 刘健.长江流域可持续发展的环境支持系统研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,1999,8(2):117-120.
    [37] 王合生.长江流域持续发展的态势、问题及对策研究[J].地理科学,1999,19(5):392-399.
    [38] 黄润.淮河流域可持续发展的主要问题和综合调控[J].国土与自然资源研究,2000,(1):23-25.
    [39] 王远飞,张超.淮河流域减灾脱贫可持续发展战略研究[J].经济地理,2000,20(3):30-34.
    [40] 潘树荣等.自然地理学(第二版)[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1985年.
    [41] 牛文元.持续发展导论[M].北京:科学出版社,1994.
    [42] 李小建主编.经济地理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1999年.
    [43] 赵媛.区域发展理论与当代经济地理学的发展[J].人文地理,1998,13(3):30-34.
    [44] 徐梅.当代西方区域经济理论评析[J].经济评论,2002,(3):74-77.
    [45] 孙海鸣,刘乃全.区域经济理论的历史回顾及其在20世纪中叶的发展[J].外国经济与管理,2000,22(8):2-6.
    [46] 刘伟.经济发展与结构转换[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1992.
    [47] 吕安民,李成名,林宗壑,等.中国省级人口增长率及其空间关联分析[J].地理学报,2002,57(2):143-150.
    [48] Goodchild et al. Spatially Integrated Social Science. International Regional Science Review, 2000,23(2): 139-159.
    [49] 曾辉,江子瀛,孔宁宁,等.快速城市化景观格局的空间自相关特征分析—以深圳市龙华地区为例[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2000,36(6):824-831.
    [50] 梁艳平,钟耳顺,朱建军.城市人口分布的空间相关性分析[J].工程勘察,2003,(4):48-50.
    [51] 梁艳平,钟耳顺,朱建军.我国省级人均GDP增量变化的空间特征分析[J].中南大学学报(社会科学版),2003,9(6):155-159.
    
    
    [52] 刘德钦,刘宇,薛新玉.中国人口分布及空间相关分析[J].遥感信息,2002,(6):2-6.
    [53] 朱传耿,顾朝林,马荣华,等.中国流动人口的影响要素与空间分布[J].地理学报,2001,56(5):549-560.
    [54] 陈修颖,顾朝林.农业发展新阶段的市域农业结构问题与调整——以衡阳市为例[J].经济地理,2002,22(4):30-434.
    [55] 靳建忠.伊河在哭泣[N].人民日报,2003年2月20日第十四版.
    [56] 王小鲁.农村工业化对经济增长的贡献[J].改革,1995,(5):97-106.
    [57] 刘慧.论农村工业化与区域发展[J].农业现代化研究,2003,24(1):2-5.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700