用户名: 密码: 验证码:
多方参与下城市基础设施融资政府行为研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
城市基础设施是城市的立足之本,是城市经济发展、社会稳定的保证。进入21世纪以来,我国城市化水平以年均1%以上的速度向前推进,伴随着城市化进程的加快,我国对城市基础设施的需求将更加迫切。长期以来,政府一直是城市基础设施的主要提供者,但随着城市人口、经济增长引发的基础设施需求的迅速增长,政府有限的财政收入已不能满足城市基础设施建设巨额的资金需求,许多地方政府的城市基础设施建设投资力度大大超前于其财政增长的速度,使得财政不堪重负。在此背景下,我国借鉴国际经验,引入政府之外的投资者参与城市基础设施供给的融资模式,即多方参与下城市基础设施融资模式,并取得了很好的应用效果。在新的融资模式下,政府的角色及参与行为发生了较大的变化,政府如何明确自身的角色定位,认知自身的行为将直接影响到该模式的顺利实现,因此,研究多方参与下城市基础设施融资政府行为,以突破城市基础设施融资困境成为了一个具有重要意义的课题。
     本文立足我国国情,从政府参与城市基础设施融资的角色出发,探索多方参与下城市基础设施融资政府行为的机理、价值及实施途径,系统研究该模式下政府的项目参与人选择行为、承诺行为及监控行为,其研究目的在于为多方参与下城市基础设施融资政府行为的实施、控制、优化提供理论依据,推动城市基础设施的建设和发展。
     在梳理既有研究成果的基础上,本文基于政府参与城市基础设施融资的角色,站在政府视角对城市基础设施融资模式进行了分类,提出了多方参与下城市基础设施融资模式的理论框架,分析了该框架下政府行为的动因及约束,并依据特许经营合同签订的时点,指出了政府的三种基本行为,即项目参与人选择行为、承诺行为和监控行为。
     关于在特许经营合同签订前政府的项目参与人选择行为,本文对项目参与人选择过程进行了分析,并指出了项目参与人选择过程的特性及关键环节。针对招标代理机构比选环节,运用竞标理论设计了招标代理机构比选的最优支付合约,以降低招标委员会的支付成本;针对整个项目参与人选择过程中可能存在的双重串谋行为,应用博弈论建立了招标代理机构触发的串谋模型和招标负责人触发的串谋模型,并提出了相应的治理措施;针对项目参与人选择方法的问题,将粗糙集理论与灰色关联度理论相结合建立了参与人选择模型,并通过算例分析,验证了模型的有效性。
     关于在特许经营合同签订时政府的承诺行为,本文对政府作出的出资承诺、特许经营权授予承诺及投资收益保证承诺进行了研究,运用博弈论建立了政府在出资承诺时可能出现的因项目公司经理与政府授权部门项目负责人员之间的合谋而导致的国有资产流失模型,并提出了针对合谋行为的机制设计;分析了特许经营权授予承诺的一般形式,论证了多期特许经营权的授予可能,应用实物期权中的增长期权理论建立了多期特许经营权授予承诺的期权定价模型,并通过算例验证了模型的有效性;分析了政府浮动收益率保证承诺存在的问题,提出了嵌入激励行为的政府投资收益保证承诺模式,应用实物期权中的有效障碍期权理论建立了嵌入激励行为的政府投资收益保证承诺定价模型,并通过算例验证了模型的有效性。
     关于在特许经营合同签订后政府的监控行为,本文分析了多方参与下城市基础设施融资项目公司可能存在的违约行为,提出了政府委托中介机构进行监控的模式,并应用博弈论建立了其监控过程的中介机构违规上报模型及政府尽职检查模型;针对项目公司的违约行为,建立了政府监控指标体系,基于支持向量机(SVM)理论构建了监控模型,并通过监控模拟,验证了模型的精度;针对政府根据中介机构上报的监控报告所可能采取的激励措施,应用元胞自动机(CA)理论建立了基于监控结果的仿真模型,通过对演化结果分析,得出了各种激励方式下的演化特征。
     本文针对多方参与下城市基础设施融资政府行为进行了系统的研究,为多方参与下政府行为的实施、控制及优化提供了有效的工具,丰富了我国城市基础设施融资的理论与方法。
Urban infrastructure is not only the foundation of the city but also the guarantee of urban economic development and social stability. Since entering into the 21st century, China's urbanization has made forward with an average annual rate of more than 1%, the demand for urban infrastructure will be even more urgent. For a long time, the Government has been the main supplier of urban infrastructure. However, with the rapid growth of infrastructure needs involved by city population rising and economic growth, the limited revenue can not meet such a huge amount of fund to improve urban infrastructure. Many local governments’investment in urban infrastructure is more than the local fiscal financial growth, which made fiscal overwhelmed. At this background, by drawing on international experience, China applied a new financing mode which introduced the participants other than government to financing urban infrastructure, that is, urban infrastructure financing mode under multi-participant with good results. With the new financing mode, government's role and behavior had been changed a lot. .How to clearly define the role of government and recognize itself will directly affect the smooth realization of the mode. Therefore, in order to breakthrough the financing dilemma, it is important and significant topic to research government behavior in the process of urban infrastructure financing under multi-participant.
     In this paper, based on the condition of our country, from the angle of government's participation in urban infrastructure financing, the mechanism, values and implementation ways of the government's financing behavior under multi-participant is studied and the government participants’selection commitment and monitoring behavior under the mode is analyzed systematically. The purpose of the study is to provide a theoretical basis for the conduction, control and optimization of government behavior in the prosess of urban infrastructure financing under multi-participant and to promote the construction and development of urban infrastructure.
     According to the existing research, this paper classifies the urban infrastructure financing mode from the view of government, and puts forward a theoretical framework of government behavior in the process of urban infrastructure financing under multi-participant, analyzes the motivation and restriction of government behavior under the framework, and pointed out three basic behaviors in accordance with the franchise contract time, which were project participants, selection behavior, commitment behavior and monitoring behavior.
     About the selection behavior of government project participants before signing franchise contract, the paper analyzes the selection process of project participants, and points out the characteristics of the selection process and the key section. to the tendering agent selection, the optimal contract of tendering agency is designed by using the auction theory to reduce the cost of the tender committee. to the dual conspiracy of project participants that may exist in entire selection process, game theory is applied to build dual conspiracy model triggered by tendering agency and tendering board, then corresponding countermeasures is promoted. With the issue of selection ways of project participants, the participant selection mode is built by combining the rough set theory and the gray relational grade theory, and calculating examples is analyzed to verifiy the model validity. On Government's commitment during the franchise contract being signed, this paper analyzes funding commitments made by the government, franchise commitment and investment income ensuring commitment, applying the game theory the possible loss of state-owned assets resulted from the conspiracy between project manager and project staff authorized by the Government departments is analyzed, and this paper proposed a mechanism to provent collusive behavior. the general form of commitment to the franchise is analyzed, the grant possibility of the multi-phase franchise is demonstrates. Applying growth option theory of real option, the option pricing model granted by multi-phase franchise is built and the validity of the model is verified by calculating example. this paper analyzes the problems of the government current floating rate of return, presents the government commitment to investment income model which is embedded in motivate behavior, applying effective barrier options theory of real options, the government commitment pricing model embedded in motivate behavior is built to ensuring investment-income, and the validity of the model by is verified calculating example.
     On the government monitoring behavior after signing franchise contract, this paper analyzes the possible breach among the project participants of multi-participant financing on urban infrastructure, proposes the mode of intermediaries monitor commissioned by the government, and applied game theory to build the irregularities report model and government check model to monitoring process. On noncompliance of project participants, this paper builds government monitoring indicator system based on support vector machine (SVM) theory, and verifies the accuracy of the model by monitoring simulation. For incentives probably carried by government according to intermediaries’monitoring report, it applies Cellular Automata (CA) theory to build simulation model based on the results of monitor. the features of the evolution under various incentives is found through the analysis of evolution results.
     The paper researches government behavior systematically in the prosess of urban infrastructure financing under multi-participant, offeres effective instruments to the implementation, controlg and optimization of government behavior of multi-participant, which will enrich the financing theory and method in China's urban infrastructure .
引文
1世界银行. 2006世界发展报告——公平与发展.清华大学出版社, 2006:3~15.
    2崔国清.中国城市基础设施融资模式研究.天津财经大学. 2009.1~2.
    3 1994年世界发展报告——为发展提供基础设施.中国财政经济出版社, 1994:5~17.
    4林森木,姜广新,沈志群.合理划分投资范围深化投资体制改革.投资研究. 1987(6): 21~25.
    5 William Easterly, Sergio Robelo. Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Monetary Economics, 1993, 32(3): 417~458.
    6 Sturm, Jan-Egbert Gerardj H.Kuper and Haan, Jakob de. Model Government Investment and Economic Growth on a Macro Level; A Review in S.Brakman; H.Van Ees, and S.K Kuipers, eds, Market Behaviour and Macroeconomic Model. Macmillan Press Lid, London, 1998: 359~406.
    7 Sanchex-Roblem, B. Infrastructure Investment and Growth: Some Empirical Evidence. Contemporary Economic Palicy, 1998(16): 98~108.
    8 Ward, Romp and Haan, Jakob de. Pubic Capital and Economic Growth: A Critical Survey. http://www.eib.org/attachments/efa/efa2005.
    9 Kjetil Bjorvatn. Urban Infrastructure and Industrialization. Journal of Urban Economics, 2000(48): 205~218.
    10倪鹏飞.中国城市竞争力聚类分析.中国工业经济. 2003(7): 23~31.
    11郭先登.关于提升城市基础设施建设水平的研究.东岳论丛. 2008, 29(1): 160~163.
    12王卉彤,李为人.北京城市基础设施建设投资与经济发展水平研究.北京社会科学, 2007(1): 20~24.
    13世界银行1998年发展报告——知识促进发展.中国财政经济出版社. 1998: 31~111.
    14 Ham v H, Koppenjan J. Building Public-private Partnerships: Assessing and Managing Risks in Port Development. Public Management Review. 2002, 4(1): 593~616.
    15 Tam A. Develo. Ping Toll Roads in China. Asia Engineer, l998 (26): 9~10.
    16张启智.城市公共基础设施投融资方式的选择与政府职能定位.内蒙古师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版). 2007, 36(2):104~107.
    17 Robert L K Tiong, Jahidul Almu. Financial Commitments of BOT Projects. International Journals of Project Management. 1997, 15(2):73~78.
    18 Lei Shi, Songping Xiong and Dashuang Dai. Ownership Structure and Contract Efficiency in BOT Projects. 2008:1~4.
    19 Robert L.K. Tiong. Risks and Guarantees in BOT Tender. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 1995,121(2):183~189.
    20张红丽,邹骥,王海芹. BOT项目融资与城市基础设施.环境与可持续发展. 2007(3): 7~9.
    21 Yeo, K.T and Tiong, R.L.K. Positive management of differences for risk reduction in BOT projects. International Journal of Project Management. 2000, 18(4): 257~265.
    22 Mohamed, M. Askar, Ahmed, A. Gab-Allah. Problems Facing Parties Involved in Build Operate and Transport Projects in Egypt. Journal of Management in Engineering. 2002, 18(4): 173~178.
    23 Tiong. R.L.K and Jahidul, A. Distinctive winning elements in BOT tender. Engineering Construction Architectural Management. 1997c, 4(2): 83~94.
    24 Lam, P.T.I.A. sectoral review of risks associated with major infrastructure projects. International Journal of Project Management. 1999, 17(2): 77~87.
    25 Song Jinbo, Han Shoudong and Wang Dongbo. A Decision Method of Concession Period for Build-Operate-Transfer Projects of Sewage Treatment. 2008 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing. Dalian. 2008:1~4.
    26 Gupta, J.P. and Sravat, A.K. Development and project financing of private power projects in developing countries: a case study of India. International Journal of Project Management. 1998, 16(2): 99~105.
    27 Li B. and Tiong, R.L.K. Risk management model for international construction joint ventures. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 1999, 125(5): 377~384.
    28 Faruqi, S. and Smith, N.J. Karachi light rail transit : a private finance proposal. Journal of Engineering. Construction and Architecture Management, 1997, 4(3): 233~246.
    29 Stark, R.M. Unbalanced highway contract tendering. Journal of Operational Research Quarterly. 1974, 25(3): 373~388.
    30 Tam C M. Build-operate-transfer model for infrastructure development in Asia: reasons successes and failures. International Journal of Project Management. 1999, 17(6): 329~377.
    31 Shen, L.Y. and Wu, Y.Z. Risk concession model for build operate transfer contract projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2005, 31(2): 31~35.
    32 Michael J. Garvin and Charles Y.J. Cheah. Valuation techniques for infrastructure investment decisions. Construction Management and Economics, 2003(22): 373~383.
    33 Wang Wenxiong, Li Qiming and Deng Xiaopeng. Critical Influential Factors for Pricing in Urban Transportation Infrastructure PPP Project. 2008 International Conference on Management Science & Engineering. Long Beach. 2008:1706~1712.
    34何寿奎,傅鸿源.基于另投资假设的公路基础设施BOT项目特许期决策探讨.中南公路工程. 2007, 32(2): 186~188.
    35刘伟. BOT模式在我国基础设施建设应用中存在的障碍及对策.职业圈. 2007(15): 163~165.
    36 Greg Goth. Army-Backed Flexible Display Effort:A Symbol of Public-Private Partnership. Journal of Pervasive Computing. 2006,5(3):4~6.
    37 Lehman G and Tregoning I. Public-Private Partnerships, Taxation and a Civil Society. Journal of Corporate Citizenship. 2004(15): 77~89.
    38王秀芹.公私伙伴关系模式在滨海新区基础设施建设中的应用.天津大学学报(社会科学版). 2007, 9(6): 484~487.
    39王灏. PPP的定义和分类研究.都市快轨交通. 2004, 17(5): 23~24.
    40邓连喜.公私合作模式在准经营性基础设施项目中的应用.城市轨道交通研究. 2007(11): 4~7.
    41任志涛.基础设施公私伙伴关系的激励机制.西安电子科技大学学报(社会科学版). 2007, 17(5): 28~32.
    42沈桂平.城市基础设施公私合作模式所有权归属的模型分析.城市轨道交通研究. 2007(4): 1~3.
    43奚秀岩.基础设施领域中公私伙伴关系的应用和发展.科技与管理. 2007(2): 11~13.
    44 Qi Yu, Li Huiming and Wang Junfeng. Promoting industrial symbiosis network Through public–private partnership: A case study of TEDA. 2009 International Conference Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering. Beijing. 2009:1~4.
    45 Yuan Jingfeng, Deng Xiaopeng, Li Qiming. Critical Risks Identification of Public Private Partnerships in China and the Analysis on Questionnaire Survey. Nanjing. 2008 Wireless Communications Networking and Mobile Computing. 2008:1~6.
    46 Li-Yin Shen and Rew Platten. Role of public private partnerships to manage risks in public sector projects in Hong Kong. International Journal of Project Management. 2006(24): 587~594.
    47 Sharon A.Jones and Robert J Houghtalen. Privatization of Municipal Services. Sustainability Issues of Production and Provision. Journal of Infrastructure Systems. 2004, 10(4):139~147.
    48柯永建,王守清,陈炳泉.基础设施PPP项目的风险分担.建筑经济. 2008(4): 31~36.
    49杨宇,穆尉鹏. PPP项目融资风险分担模型研究.建筑经济. 2008(2): 64~66.
    50万冬君等.基础设施PPP融资模式及其在小城镇的应用研究.土木工程学报. 2006, 39(6): 115~118.
    51 Xue qing Zhang. Critical Success Factors for Public-Private Partnerships in Infrastructure Development Engineering and Management. 2005, 131(1): 3~14.
    52 M.Sohail, S.Cavill and A.P.cotton. Sustainable Operation and Maintenance of Urban Infrastructure: Myth or Reality. Journal of Urban Planning and Development. 2005, 131(1): 39~49.
    53汤果,田一淋,雷妮. PPP融资模式的合作效率与稳定优化分析——一个简单框架.建筑经济. 2007(7): 43~45.
    54 Mustafa A. Public-Private Partnership: An Alternative Institutional Model for Implementing the Private Finance Initiative in the Provision of Transport Infrastructure. Journal of Project Finance. 1999, 5(2): 1~22.
    55何寿奎,傅鸿源.城市基础设施PPP建设模式挑战与对策.生产力研究. 2007(8): 65~67.
    56 Pradono. Towards Successful Conditions for PFI in Toll Road Projects: Indonesia Case. Proceedings of the Conference on Traffic and Transportation Studies, ICTTS, v4, Traffic and Transportation Studies-Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Traffic and Transportation Studies. 2004: 43~52.
    57 Zhang Shilian, Zheng Baijing. The Application Study of PFI Mode on the Construction of Low–rent Housing. 2007 International Conference on Management Science & Engineering. Harbin. 2007:2331~2336.
    58 Masamitsu Onishi, Lei Shi and Kiyoshi Kobayashi. The Impacts on Deposit and Subsidy Policy for Infrastructure PFI Projects. 2006 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Taipei.2006:5258~5263.
    59阎玮斌,王慧,罗福周. PFI和BOT融资模式的比较研究.建筑经济. 2008(5): 60~62.
    60陈柳钦.国际工程大型投资项目管理模式评述.规划与建设. 2005(10): 69~72.
    61 Kerzner, H. Project management: a systems approach to planning scheduling, and controlling (8ed). Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley. 2003:121~160.
    62张宏亮,李鹏. PFI项目特点对项目风险事件和脆弱性的影响.管理工程学报. 2007(1): 30~37.
    63金娜,杨乃定,高婧.基础设施项目区域投资PFI模式风险分析.软科学. 2007, 21(1): 10~14.
    64金永祥,谭轩. TOT项目运作.中国投资. 2002(5): 11~16.
    65张莹,杜建国.环保融资的现状分析及TOT模式探讨.现代管理科学. 2006(8): 101~102.
    66刘欣,王雪青,刘俊颖.经营性政府工程项目融资TOT模式研究.内蒙古农业大学学报(社会科学版). 2007(4): 119~121.
    67汉文. TOT融资.企业科技与发展. 2008(7): 30pp.
    68吴焕林.城市污水处理行业TOT模式的探讨.法制与社会, 2008(10): 343~344.
    69 Smith Vernon. Consistent Conjectures and Voluntary Contributions to Public Goods. Journal of Public Economics. 1985(27): 117.
    70 Montgomery M.R. and Bean R. Market Failure, Government Failure, and the Private Supply of Public Goods. Public Choice. 1999(3): 403~437.
    71 Raechelle M. Mechanisms for Financing International and National Public Goods. The World Economy. 2005, 28(8): 1095~1117.
    72 Felix S., Robert T.D. and Nick Hanley. A Note on the Measurement of Bias in Stated Willingness to Pay for Public Goods. Kyklos. 2005, 58(1): 145~152.
    73 Philippe D.D., Etienne B. and David M. An Incomplete Contract Perspective on Public Goods Provision. Journal of Economic Surveys. 2005, 19(2): 149~180.
    74亚当·斯密.国民财富的性质和原因的研究.商务出版社,北京. 1979: 11~40.
    75凯恩斯.就业、利息和货币通论.商务印书馆.北京. 1988:35~52.
    76 J. Smith, Thomas Telford. Privatized Infrastructure: the Role of Government. International Journal of Project Management. 2000(19): 137~138.
    77 Ravi Ramamurti. Can Governments Make Credible Promises Insights from Infrastructure Projects in Emerging Economies. Journal of International Management. 2003(9): 253~269.
    78 Juan V., Eduardo G. and Ana C. Efficiency and Program Contract Bargainingin Spanish Public Hospitals. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics. 2004, 75(4): 549~573.
    79王秀云.国外城市基础设施投融资体制改革对我国的启示.中国城市经济. 2007(2): 76~79.
    80朱会冲,张燎.基础设施项目投融资理论与实务.复旦大学出版社.上海. 2003:35~70.
    81毛腾飞.基础设施供给机制与投资模型.系统工程. 2006(5): 109~112.
    82 Mark B. and R A Rhodes P Weller. Comparative Governance: Prospects and Lessons. Public Administration. 2003, 81(1): 191~210.
    83李凤君.城市基础设施融资模式的探讨.湖北电力. 2007(2): 69~71.
    84 Christian von Hirschhausen , Thorsten Beckers and Andreas Brenck. Infrastructure Regulation and Investment for the Long-Term-An Introduction. Utilities Policy. 2004(12): 203~210.
    85 Maria Vagliasindi. The Role of Investment and Regulatory Reforms in the Development of Infrastructure Across Transition Economies. Utilities Policy. 2004(12): 303~314.
    86严荣.公共服务供给不足的政治经济分析.上海行政学院学报. 2007. 8(3): 37~41.
    87 Kirwan, R.M. Finance for Urban Public Infrastructure. Urban Studies. 1989(26):39~54.
    88 Antonio and Esacth. Decentralizing Infrastructure. World Bank Discussing Papers.1994:290
    89 E.S萨瓦斯.民营化与公私部门的伙伴关系.周志忍译.中国人民大学出版社,北京. 2002:25~41.
    90 Kevin S, T. Sandler. Collective Goods, Common Agency and thirdparty intervention. Bulletin of Economic Research. 2004, 56(1): 3307~3378.
    91 Claudia K. and Frans W. Conditional Cooperation and Voluntary Contributions to Pubic Goods. Scandinavian. Journal of Economics. 2000, 102(1): 23~39.
    92 Jeff Zitron. Public–private Partnership Projects: Towards a Model of Contractor Bidding Decision-making. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management. 2006, 12: 53-62.
    93张文春,王辉民.城市基础设施融资的国际经验与借鉴.国家行政学院学报. 2001(3): 79~83.
    94胡家勇.论基础设施领域改革.管理世界. 2003(4): 60~65.
    95 Boeuf P. Public-Private Partnerships for transport infrastructure projects. European Investment Bank. Paris. 2003:52~80.
    96 Guasch J L. Granting and renegotiating infrastructure concessions: doing it right. The World Bank. Washington, D.C. 2004:35~71.
    97 Wang Wenxiong, Li Qiming and Deng Xiaopeng. Selecting Optimal Private–Sector Partner in Infrastructure Projects under PPP Model. 2007 International Conference on Management Science & Engineering. Harbin. 2007:2264~2270.
    98 Yang Yao-dong, Guo Ya-jun and Yao Shuang. Analysis of the One-Level Sealed Bidding on Effectiveness under Different Bidding Variables. 2007 International Conference on Management Science & Engineering. Harbin. 2007:363~368.
    99於永和. BOT项目投标决策模型及其应用研究.湖南大学博士学位论文. 2006:19~40.
    100杜洪涛,黄立军.刍议城市基础设施向民间融资的趋势.西南金融. 2007(10): 36~38.
    101 George Akerlof. The Market for Lemons: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism.Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1970(84):488~500.
    102 Grimsey D and Lewis M K. Evaluating the Risks of Public Private Partnerships for Infrastructure Projects. International Journal of Project Management. 2002(20): 107~118.
    103 Ahwireng-Obeng F and Mokgohlwa J P. Entrepreneurial risk allocation in public-private infrastructure provision in South Africa. South African Journal of Business Management. 2002, 33(4): 29~39.
    104 Nisangul C. Private Participation in Infrastructure. A Risk Analysis of Long-term Contracts in PowerSector. Fairfax Virginia, U.S.A: George Mason University. 2002:51~65.
    105 Francesca C. Putting BOT on the road. Euro money. 1989(4): 88~91.
    106 Min C L. Contract Design of Private Infrastructure Concessions. Berkeley, U.S.A.: University of California. 2000:35~62.
    107 Ho S P. Real Options and Game Theoretic Valuation, Financing and Tendering for Investments on Build-Operate-Transfer Projects. Urbana-Champaign, U. S.A.: University of Illinois. 2001:105~117.
    108 Tam CM. Build-operate-transfer model for infrastructure developments in Asia Reasons for successes and failures. International Journal of Project Management. 1999, 17(6): 377~382.
    109 Kumaraswamy, M M and Zhang X Q. Governmental role in BOT-led infrastructure development. International Journal of Project Management. 2001, 19(4): 195~205.
    110 Gilberto M L and Ma C G S. Government Guarantees in Infrastructure Projects:A Second, Third Look at the Policy. Philippine Institute for Development Studies, 1997(11): 1~10.
    111周君.基础设施项目保险期权定价方法探讨.财会月刊. 2007(8): 35~37.
    112张国兴,郭菊娥,龚利.基础设施项目政府担保价值研究.统计与决策, 2007(20): 51~52.
    113孙艳,郭菊娥,高峰,张国兴.基础设施项目融资中政府担保的影响因素.统计与决策. 2007(20): 53~56.
    114 Mark A. Jamison, Lynne Holt and Sanford V. Berg. Measuring and Mitigating Regulatory Risk in Private Infrastructure Investment. The Electricity Journal. 2005(7): 36~45.
    115 Dequielt V. Martimort D. Delegated Monitoring Versus Arm’s Length Contracting. 2004(22): 951~981.
    116郑鸿.论政府在城市基础设施投融资中的多元化角色.科技创新导报. 2008(34): 215pp.
    117黄新华.政府管制、公共企业与特许经营权竞标——政府治理自然垄断问题的政策选择分析.东南学术. 2006(1):51~55.
    118柯永建,王守清,姚彩君.基础设施特许经营中的“新垄断”问题分析.商业研究. 2007(5): 17~19.
    119刘辉,李尧远.基础设施市场化中的政府角色定位研究——基于制度分析视角.学术交流. 2008(5): 72~75.
    120蔡建民.基于市场结构分析的我国基础设施政府监管构建探索.生产力研究. 2006(5): 132~134.
    121谈文昌.监管与服务——公用事业市场化中的政府定位.中国投资. 2007(1): 122~123.
    122王丽英,邱法宗.论城市基础设施市场化改革中政府监管的主要环节.中央财经大学学报. 2008(4): 5~10.
    123 Hansen, N. Unbalanced Growth and Regional Development. Western Econ. J. 1965(4): 23~26.
    124潘胜强.城市基础设施建设投融资管理及其绩效评价.湖南大学. 2007.22~39.
    125孙洁.城市基础设施的公私合作管理模式研究.同济大学. 2005.34~39.
    126万冬君.小城镇基础设施投融资政府行为研究.哈尔滨工业大学. 2006.21~22.
    127陈柳钦,孙建平.天津市公益性项目融资战略研究.中国工程咨询. 2004(1): 22~24.
    128吴殊.我国城市基础设施投资体制存在的问题及对策.商场现代化. 2007(1): 184~185.
    129柯永建,王守清,陈炳泉.基础设施PPP项目的风险分担.建筑经济. 2008(4): 32~35.
    130杜晓宇.公私伙伴关系(PPP)中的政府角色定位.财经界. 2008(3): 139~141.
    131黄仙,方璐.基于粗糙集和灰色关联度的电力公司评价方法.现代电力. 2009(2): 88~92.
    132杨明,曹明星.特许经营权:一项独立的财产权.华中科技大学学报(社会科学版). 2003(5): 83~87.
    133方晓成,李姚矿,龙丹.基于增长期权的并购目标企业价值评估.价值工程. 2008(5): 52~53.
    134杨春鹏.实物期权及其应用.复旦大学出版社, 2003: 29.
    135绳丽娜.论BOT特许协议中的政府保证.昆明冶金高等专科学校校报. 2004, 20(3): 83~85.
    136 Houskamp Melissa, Tnan. Private infrastructure: are the trends in low-income countries different. The World Bank-Private Sector. New York. 2000:41~52.
    137高峰,郭菊娥,龚利.基础设施项目政府担保的双障碍期权价值研究.管理工程学报. 2008(3): 19~23.
    138高峰,郭菊娥,王乐,张国兴.基于上升敲出期权的基础设施项目政府担保价值研究.软科学. 2007(8): 51~54.
    139周高平.基础设施项目投资风险预警阀值研究.公路. 2006(2): 100~105.
    140冯东梅.改进挣值法在施工项目集成管理中的应用.辽宁工程技术大学学报(社会科学版). 2008(5): 495~496.
    141 Nell Cristianini and John Shawe-Taylor.支持向量机导论.电子工业出版社.北京. 2004:35~43.
    142 Cowan R, Jonard N and Zimmermann J-B. Evolving Networks of Inventors. Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 2006, 16(1): 155~174.
    143来向红,王文平.基于元胞自动机的知识型组织中知识传播过程仿真研究.管理学报. 2006(5): 514~518.
    144 Latane B. Dynamic social impact, robust pre-dictations from simple theory. In: Hegselmann R, Mueller U, Troitzsch K G. Modeling and Simulation in the Social Science from a Philosophy of Science Point of View. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 1996: 287~310.
    145 Rogers E M. Diffusion of Innovations. 4th ed. The Free Press. New York. 1995:25~45.
    146张廷,宣慧玉,高宝俊.寡头垄断市场广告投放效果的元胞自动机仿真.系统工程学报. 2008, 6(3): 309~314.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700