学术机构知识库质量控制研究
|
摘要
随着开放获取理念的渐入人心,作为其三大分支之一的学术机构知识库在全世界范围内得到快速发展。学术机构知识库在质量审核方面摒弃了同行评议制度,导致其所收集知识成果的质量无法得到有效的保障,而学术机构知识库所收集知识成果的质量高低直接决定了其本身价值的大小,学术机构知识库质量控制是学术机构知识库赖以生存的保证。
本文分析了关于学术机构知识库的相关文献,对学术机构知识库的定义、特点、功能和研究现状进行了阐述。论文首先给出学术机构知识库知识对象的质量控制标准,主要从内容与格式质量、学术质量以及元数据质量三个方面进行标准的制定与衡量,然后根据学术机构知识库知识组织的特点,分过程的在知识成果提交前、知识成果提交时以及知识成果存储开放后三个阶段,进行相应的控制,同时构建了基于决策树理论的学术机构知识库质量控制决策树模型,最后,以郑州大学硕博士论文知识库为例,对学术机构知识库质量控制的过程和本文提出的一些观点进行了论证,以期对于我国学术机构知识库的可持续发展起到参考作用。
With the concept of open access had deeply rooted, Institutional Repository, one of the three brabches,have rapid development around the world.Because that the Institutional Repository abandoned the system of peer reviw in terms of quality audit,the contents that stored in IR can not be effectively protected.The value of IR was decided by the quality level of the contents that stored in institutional repositories, so it is the development assurance for IR to control the quality of IR. The IR will lose its survivability if there is no quality.
Based on the analysis of the literature on institutional repository, this paper describes the definition of institutional repository, features, functions, and analyze the situation of institutional repository status quo, as well as quality control of Institutional Repository, introducing the main part of this article-how to control the quality of the institutional repository. Firstly, this paper gives a quality control standards of the objects of the academic institutional repositories, composed by three parts:the quality of content and format, the quality of academic quality and the quality of metadata. Secondly, according to the characteristics of academic institutional repository resource collection, the academic institutional repository can take the corresponding control from three stages:before submitting resources、while submitting resources and after the resources stored and opened. At the same time, this paper builds a decision tree model of academic institutional repositories quality control based on the decision tree theory. Finally, combined with the Title of Thesis knowledge base of Zhengzhou University and the quality control of academic institutions in the process, the author analyzes an illustrative example, and hope that can play a reference role in sustainable development of our academic IR.
本文分析了关于学术机构知识库的相关文献,对学术机构知识库的定义、特点、功能和研究现状进行了阐述。论文首先给出学术机构知识库知识对象的质量控制标准,主要从内容与格式质量、学术质量以及元数据质量三个方面进行标准的制定与衡量,然后根据学术机构知识库知识组织的特点,分过程的在知识成果提交前、知识成果提交时以及知识成果存储开放后三个阶段,进行相应的控制,同时构建了基于决策树理论的学术机构知识库质量控制决策树模型,最后,以郑州大学硕博士论文知识库为例,对学术机构知识库质量控制的过程和本文提出的一些观点进行了论证,以期对于我国学术机构知识库的可持续发展起到参考作用。
With the concept of open access had deeply rooted, Institutional Repository, one of the three brabches,have rapid development around the world.Because that the Institutional Repository abandoned the system of peer reviw in terms of quality audit,the contents that stored in IR can not be effectively protected.The value of IR was decided by the quality level of the contents that stored in institutional repositories, so it is the development assurance for IR to control the quality of IR. The IR will lose its survivability if there is no quality.
Based on the analysis of the literature on institutional repository, this paper describes the definition of institutional repository, features, functions, and analyze the situation of institutional repository status quo, as well as quality control of Institutional Repository, introducing the main part of this article-how to control the quality of the institutional repository. Firstly, this paper gives a quality control standards of the objects of the academic institutional repositories, composed by three parts:the quality of content and format, the quality of academic quality and the quality of metadata. Secondly, according to the characteristics of academic institutional repository resource collection, the academic institutional repository can take the corresponding control from three stages:before submitting resources、while submitting resources and after the resources stored and opened. At the same time, this paper builds a decision tree model of academic institutional repositories quality control based on the decision tree theory. Finally, combined with the Title of Thesis knowledge base of Zhengzhou University and the quality control of academic institutions in the process, the author analyzes an illustrative example, and hope that can play a reference role in sustainable development of our academic IR.
引文
[3] Sally Rumsey. The purpose of institutional repositoriesin UK higher education:A repository manager's view[J].International Journal of Information Management.2006,3(26)
[4] Philip Hunter, Marilee Guy. Metadata for harvesting:the Open Archives Initiative, and how to find things on the WEB[J]. The Electronic Library,2004,22(2)
[5] Kat Hagedorn. OAIster:a "no dead ends" OAI service provider[J], Library Hi Tech,2003, 21(2)
[1] Martin Halbert. The Metascholar Initiative:American South. Org and Meta Archive[J]. Library Hi Tech,2003,21(2)
[2] Cathrine Harboe-Ree,Andrew Treloar. Connecting the Dots Downunder:Towards An Integrated Institutional Approach To Digital Content Management[J]. HEP Libraries WEBzine.2004,9(2)
[3] Raym Crow.The Case for Institutional Repositories:A SPARC Position Paper[EB]. http://www.arl.org/sparc/IR/ir.html
[4] Chris Awre. TheJISC's FAIR Programme:disclosing and sharing institutional assets[J].Learned Publishing,2004,17(2):151～156
[1]王东艳,郭淑艳.开放获取实现模式及其资源与服务[J],情报科学2007(1)：81～85
[2]王晶芬.试析Open Access对大学图书馆的影响[J]图书馆论坛.2006(3)：84～86
[3]任真.开放获取环境下的图书馆[J].大学图书馆学报,2005(5)：44[]47
[4]张晓林.机构知识库的政策、功能和支撑机制分析[J].图书情报工作,2008(1)：23—27.
[1]柯平,王颖洁.机构知识库—大学图书馆的新平台口].新世纪图书馆,2007(1)：5-8.
[2]黄凯文.高校图书馆构建机构仓储初探[J].图书馆工作与研究,2006(2)：51-54
[3]吴建中.图书馆VS机构库——图书馆战略发展的再思考[J].中国图书馆学报,2004(5)：5～8.
[4]李广建,黄永文,张丽.IR：现状、体系结构与发展趋势[J].情报学报,2006(02)236～240
[1]学术机构知识库构建模式研究[M].李大玲上海：上海交通大学出版社,2009：234～235
[1]乔冬梅.e印本文库建设与应用[D].武汉大学,2005：85～8
[1]张俊玲.机构知识库建设中存在的问题及对策[J].湖湘论坛,2007(3)：60～61
[1]王洪蕾,孟宪学,赵瑞雪,等.科研单位机构仓储的资源建设研究[J].情报杂志,2010,29(6)：316～318
[1]David Prosser. Information revolution:can institutional repositories and open access transform scholarlycommunications[EB].http://www.the-elso-gazette.org/magazines/issuel5/fea/tures/featur esl/pdf
[2]Belinda Weaver. Eprint archives-Reaching critical mass[J].Online Currents,2002,V01.17(9)
[3]John MaeColl, Pinfield. Climbing the Scholarly Publishing Mountainwith SHERPA[EB].2006. http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue33/sherpa/
[4]Darid C.Prosser.From Here to There:A Proposed Mechanism for Transforming Journals from Closed to Open Access[J]. Learned Publishing,2003,VoL16(3).
[5]Fletcher, Gordon. Averting the Crisis in Medical Publishing-Open Access Journals[EB].2008. http://www. Biomedcentral.com/html/info/about/FletcherHOITL.pdf
[6]San Francisco. Publishing Open-Access Journals:A Brief Overview from the Public Library of Science[DB/OL].2009, http://www.plos.org/downloads/oa_whitepaper.pdf
[7]Declan Butler. Los Alamos Loses Physics Archive as Preprint Pioneer Heads East[EB].2007. http://www.nature.com/ature/debates/e-access/Articles/ginsparg.html
[8]Joseph Y. Halpem. A Computing Research Repository[J/OL].D-Lib Magazine,1998(11). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november98/11halpem.html
[9]Raym Crow,SPARC Institutional Repository Checklist & Resource Guide. [M/OL]. http://www.arl.org/sparc/IR/IR_Guide.html
[10]Sally Rumsey. The purpose of institutional repositoriesin UK higher education:A repository manager's view[J].International Journal of Information Management.2006,3(26)
[11]Philip Hunter, Marilee Guy. Metadata for harvesting:the Open Archives Initiative, and how to find things on the WEB[J]. The Electronic Library,2004,22(2)
[12]Kat Hagedorn. OAIster:a "no dead ends" OAI service provider[J].Library Hi Tech,2003, 21(2)
[13]Martin Halbert. The Metascholar Initiative:American South. Org and Meta Archive[J]. Library Hi Tech,2003,21(2)
[14]Cathrine Harboe-Ree,Andrew Treloar. Connecting the Dots Downunder:Towards An Integrated Institutional Approach To Digital Content Management[J]. HEP Libraries WE Bzine. 2004,9(2)
[15]Raym Crow.The Case for Institutional Repositories:A SPARC Position Paper[EB]. http://www.arl.org/sparc/IR/ir.html
[16]Chris Awre. TheJISC's FAIR Programme:disclosing and sharing institutional assets[J]. Learned Publishing,2004,17(2):151～156
[17]William Nixon. DAEDALUS:Initial experiences with EPrints and DSpace at the University of Glasgow[DB/OL].http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue37/nixon/
[18]Susan Ashworth. The DAEDALUS Project[DB/OL]. https://DSpace.gla.ac.uk/handle/1905/149
[19]Susan Ashworth,Morag Mackie,William Nixon. The DAEDALUS project. Developing institutional repositories at Glasgow University:thestory so far[DB/OL]. http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/archive/00000408/
[20]Bill Hubbard.SHERPA and Institutional Repositories[DB/OL]. http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/archive/00000095/
[21]John MacColl, Pinfield. Climbing the Scholarly Publishing Mountain with SHERPA [EB]. http://www.Ariadne.ac.uk/issue33/sherpa/
[22]Jessie M N Hey.Targeting. Academic Research with Southampton's Institutional Repository[DB/OL]. http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue40/hey
[23]Christopher Gutteridge.GNU EPrints 2 Overview[EB].http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/6840/.
[24]MacKenzie Smith,Mary Barton,Mick Bass,etc. DSpace An Open Source Dynamic Digital Repository[J/OL].D-Lib Magazine,2003,9(1). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january03/smith/01 smith.html
[25]Richard D Jones. DSpace VS.ETD-db:Choosing software to manage electronic theses and dissertations[EB]. http://www.ariadne.an.uk/issue38/jones/
[26]王东艳,郭淑艳.开放获取实现模式及其资源与服务[J],情报科学2007(1)：81～85
[27]王晶芬.试析Open Access对大学图书馆的影响[J]图书馆论坛.2006(3)：84～86
[28]任真.开放获取环境下的图书馆[J].大学图书馆学报,2005(5)：44～47
[29]张晓林.机构知识库的政策、功能和支撑机制分析[J].图书情报工作,2008(1)：23—27.
[30]柯平,王颖洁.机构知识库—大学图书馆的新平台口].新世纪图书馆,2007(1)：5～8.
[31]黄凯文.高校图书馆构建机构仓储初探[J].图书馆工作与研究,2006(2)：51～54
[32]吴建中.图书馆VS机构库——图书馆战略发展的再思考[J].中国图书馆学报,2004(5)：5～8.
[33]李广建,黄永文,张丽.IR：现状、体系结构与发展趋势[J].情报学报,2006(02)：236-240
[34]学术机构知识库构建模式研究[M].李大玲.上海：上海交通大学出版社,2009：234～235
[35]乔冬梅.e印本文库建设与应用[D].武汉大学,2005：85～8
[36]张俊玲.机构知识库建设中存在的问题及对策[J].湖湘论坛,2007(3)：60～61
[37]http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/2007-11-17
[38]Raym Crow. Institutional Repository Checklist & Resource Guide[EB]. http://www.arl.org/sparc/bm-doc/IR_Guide_&_Checklist_vl.pdf
[39]DSpace MIT Libraries. Format Support[EB/OL]. http://libraries.mit.edu/dspace-mit/build/policies/format.html,2011-08-31
[40]王洪蕾,孟宪学,赵瑞雪,等.科研单位机构仓储的资源建设研究[J].情报杂志,2010,29(6)：316～318
[4] Philip Hunter, Marilee Guy. Metadata for harvesting:the Open Archives Initiative, and how to find things on the WEB[J]. The Electronic Library,2004,22(2)
[5] Kat Hagedorn. OAIster:a "no dead ends" OAI service provider[J], Library Hi Tech,2003, 21(2)
[1] Martin Halbert. The Metascholar Initiative:American South. Org and Meta Archive[J]. Library Hi Tech,2003,21(2)
[2] Cathrine Harboe-Ree,Andrew Treloar. Connecting the Dots Downunder:Towards An Integrated Institutional Approach To Digital Content Management[J]. HEP Libraries WEBzine.2004,9(2)
[3] Raym Crow.The Case for Institutional Repositories:A SPARC Position Paper[EB]. http://www.arl.org/sparc/IR/ir.html
[4] Chris Awre. TheJISC's FAIR Programme:disclosing and sharing institutional assets[J].Learned Publishing,2004,17(2):151～156
[1]王东艳,郭淑艳.开放获取实现模式及其资源与服务[J],情报科学2007(1)：81～85
[2]王晶芬.试析Open Access对大学图书馆的影响[J]图书馆论坛.2006(3)：84～86
[3]任真.开放获取环境下的图书馆[J].大学图书馆学报,2005(5)：44[]47
[4]张晓林.机构知识库的政策、功能和支撑机制分析[J].图书情报工作,2008(1)：23—27.
[1]柯平,王颖洁.机构知识库—大学图书馆的新平台口].新世纪图书馆,2007(1)：5-8.
[2]黄凯文.高校图书馆构建机构仓储初探[J].图书馆工作与研究,2006(2)：51-54
[3]吴建中.图书馆VS机构库——图书馆战略发展的再思考[J].中国图书馆学报,2004(5)：5～8.
[4]李广建,黄永文,张丽.IR：现状、体系结构与发展趋势[J].情报学报,2006(02)236～240
[1]学术机构知识库构建模式研究[M].李大玲上海：上海交通大学出版社,2009：234～235
[1]乔冬梅.e印本文库建设与应用[D].武汉大学,2005：85～8
[1]张俊玲.机构知识库建设中存在的问题及对策[J].湖湘论坛,2007(3)：60～61
[1]王洪蕾,孟宪学,赵瑞雪,等.科研单位机构仓储的资源建设研究[J].情报杂志,2010,29(6)：316～318
[1]David Prosser. Information revolution:can institutional repositories and open access transform scholarlycommunications[EB].http://www.the-elso-gazette.org/magazines/issuel5/fea/tures/featur esl/pdf
[2]Belinda Weaver. Eprint archives-Reaching critical mass[J].Online Currents,2002,V01.17(9)
[3]John MaeColl, Pinfield. Climbing the Scholarly Publishing Mountainwith SHERPA[EB].2006. http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue33/sherpa/
[4]Darid C.Prosser.From Here to There:A Proposed Mechanism for Transforming Journals from Closed to Open Access[J]. Learned Publishing,2003,VoL16(3).
[5]Fletcher, Gordon. Averting the Crisis in Medical Publishing-Open Access Journals[EB].2008. http://www. Biomedcentral.com/html/info/about/FletcherHOITL.pdf
[6]San Francisco. Publishing Open-Access Journals:A Brief Overview from the Public Library of Science[DB/OL].2009, http://www.plos.org/downloads/oa_whitepaper.pdf
[7]Declan Butler. Los Alamos Loses Physics Archive as Preprint Pioneer Heads East[EB].2007. http://www.nature.com/ature/debates/e-access/Articles/ginsparg.html
[8]Joseph Y. Halpem. A Computing Research Repository[J/OL].D-Lib Magazine,1998(11). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november98/11halpem.html
[9]Raym Crow,SPARC Institutional Repository Checklist & Resource Guide. [M/OL]. http://www.arl.org/sparc/IR/IR_Guide.html
[10]Sally Rumsey. The purpose of institutional repositoriesin UK higher education:A repository manager's view[J].International Journal of Information Management.2006,3(26)
[11]Philip Hunter, Marilee Guy. Metadata for harvesting:the Open Archives Initiative, and how to find things on the WEB[J]. The Electronic Library,2004,22(2)
[12]Kat Hagedorn. OAIster:a "no dead ends" OAI service provider[J].Library Hi Tech,2003, 21(2)
[13]Martin Halbert. The Metascholar Initiative:American South. Org and Meta Archive[J]. Library Hi Tech,2003,21(2)
[14]Cathrine Harboe-Ree,Andrew Treloar. Connecting the Dots Downunder:Towards An Integrated Institutional Approach To Digital Content Management[J]. HEP Libraries WE Bzine. 2004,9(2)
[15]Raym Crow.The Case for Institutional Repositories:A SPARC Position Paper[EB]. http://www.arl.org/sparc/IR/ir.html
[16]Chris Awre. TheJISC's FAIR Programme:disclosing and sharing institutional assets[J]. Learned Publishing,2004,17(2):151～156
[17]William Nixon. DAEDALUS:Initial experiences with EPrints and DSpace at the University of Glasgow[DB/OL].http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue37/nixon/
[18]Susan Ashworth. The DAEDALUS Project[DB/OL]. https://DSpace.gla.ac.uk/handle/1905/149
[19]Susan Ashworth,Morag Mackie,William Nixon. The DAEDALUS project. Developing institutional repositories at Glasgow University:thestory so far[DB/OL]. http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/archive/00000408/
[20]Bill Hubbard.SHERPA and Institutional Repositories[DB/OL]. http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/archive/00000095/
[21]John MacColl, Pinfield. Climbing the Scholarly Publishing Mountain with SHERPA [EB]. http://www.Ariadne.ac.uk/issue33/sherpa/
[22]Jessie M N Hey.Targeting. Academic Research with Southampton's Institutional Repository[DB/OL]. http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue40/hey
[23]Christopher Gutteridge.GNU EPrints 2 Overview[EB].http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/6840/.
[24]MacKenzie Smith,Mary Barton,Mick Bass,etc. DSpace An Open Source Dynamic Digital Repository[J/OL].D-Lib Magazine,2003,9(1). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january03/smith/01 smith.html
[25]Richard D Jones. DSpace VS.ETD-db:Choosing software to manage electronic theses and dissertations[EB]. http://www.ariadne.an.uk/issue38/jones/
[26]王东艳,郭淑艳.开放获取实现模式及其资源与服务[J],情报科学2007(1)：81～85
[27]王晶芬.试析Open Access对大学图书馆的影响[J]图书馆论坛.2006(3)：84～86
[28]任真.开放获取环境下的图书馆[J].大学图书馆学报,2005(5)：44～47
[29]张晓林.机构知识库的政策、功能和支撑机制分析[J].图书情报工作,2008(1)：23—27.
[30]柯平,王颖洁.机构知识库—大学图书馆的新平台口].新世纪图书馆,2007(1)：5～8.
[31]黄凯文.高校图书馆构建机构仓储初探[J].图书馆工作与研究,2006(2)：51～54
[32]吴建中.图书馆VS机构库——图书馆战略发展的再思考[J].中国图书馆学报,2004(5)：5～8.
[33]李广建,黄永文,张丽.IR：现状、体系结构与发展趋势[J].情报学报,2006(02)：236-240
[34]学术机构知识库构建模式研究[M].李大玲.上海：上海交通大学出版社,2009：234～235
[35]乔冬梅.e印本文库建设与应用[D].武汉大学,2005：85～8
[36]张俊玲.机构知识库建设中存在的问题及对策[J].湖湘论坛,2007(3)：60～61
[37]http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/2007-11-17
[38]Raym Crow. Institutional Repository Checklist & Resource Guide[EB]. http://www.arl.org/sparc/bm-doc/IR_Guide_&_Checklist_vl.pdf
[39]DSpace MIT Libraries. Format Support[EB/OL]. http://libraries.mit.edu/dspace-mit/build/policies/format.html,2011-08-31
[40]王洪蕾,孟宪学,赵瑞雪,等.科研单位机构仓储的资源建设研究[J].情报杂志,2010,29(6)：316～318