企业创新团队知识学习机理与模式研究
|
摘要
在21世纪的经济发展态势下,知识已经成为企业形成核心竞争力、确立核心地位的重要资源,以知识获取、转化、吸收、应用为核心的知识学习则是企业知识产出的始点、是企业知识绩效形成的重要基础,基于此本文以知识量集聚、知识学习能力强的创新团队为切入点,运用组织行为学、生态学、信息经济学、计量经济学、数理统计学、复杂性理论、系统论等理论与方法,展开企业创新团队知识学习进行理论阐述与实证研究,旨在探索企业创新团队知识学习的学习机理与可行模式,得出企业创新团队知识学习绩效提升的规律与对策。
(1)本文以全球知识经济发展趋势、我国企业知识学习情境为基础,提出企业创新团队知识学习研究的目的与意义,通过企业创新团队知识学习相关研究现在分析,给出了本文研究的内容、方法与技术路线,初步形成本文研究的逻辑框架与理论基础。根据企业创新团队界定及其特征、使命与功能分析,提出创新团队“建立阶段、动荡磨合阶段、培养规范阶段、稳定运行阶段和均衡结束”的五阶段形成模式,给定以知识的转化、吸收、存储、固化为要点的企业创新团队知识学习概念,探讨企业创新团队知识学习复杂性高、外显性弱、不确定性强的内容特征,总结了企业创新团队知识学习主动性、螺旋上升、路径依赖、动态整合、正外部性的过程特点,从而形成了本文研究的内容重心与边界。
(2)明确企业环境的不确定性、企业能力的有限性、市场需求的多变性和创新行动的复杂性是企业创新团队知识学习的一般动因以及探讨其综合影响过程。基于个体行为对企业创新团队知识学习的相关性分析,提炼出社会知觉、价值观、态度、挫折、激励的个体行为因子,深入分析了知识学习过程的个体行为基础要素的变化及其动态影响；提出以“群体物理构成、群体规则、团队目标”为核心的企业创新团队知识学习的群体行为要素构成图,综合个体行为、群体行为以及社会与趋同反馈,阐述企业创新团队知识学习群体行为产生机理。从文化生态的概念及内涵、文化生态的生态学特性、文化生态的建设及保护和良好的文化生态等视角剖析企业创新团队知识学习的文化生态原理,给出了创新团队知识学习的产生与演变的生态学解释；通过企业创新团队知识学习的自组织特性分析,透析了企业创新团队协同进化、随机涨落、循环相变、遗忘斗争的自组织原理；综合各影响要素对企业创新团队知识学习的系统反馈影响,构建企业创新团队知识学习的系统动力学模型,揭示个体行为、群体行为与创新团队知识学习的动态交互作用过程。
(3)描述知识获取、知识转化、知识应用和创新、知识评估、知识转移的创新团队知识学习的过程范式,细化每个环节的具体内容。构建大师主导、产学合作、跨团队三种典型的知识学习模式,指出大师主导模式的隐性知识学习优势、产学合作模式的优势互补特征、跨团队模式的知识学习规模优势。以团队高效为目标,定义“清晰的目标、相关技能、相互信任、一致的承诺、良好的沟通、谈判技能、有效的领导、内部支持和外部支持”为比较因子,得出大师主导型模式选择的有效的领导、内部支持因子倾向,产学合作模式选择的相关技能和外部支持因子倾向,跨团队模式选择的良好沟通和谈判技能倾向。
(4)强调创新团队知识学习绩效主要影响于知识转移和创造环节的绩效,应综合考虑创新团队为整体所创造的规模绩效、创新团队内成员个体绩效。提炼出包括创新团队知识获取、知识共享、知识吸收、知识应用和知识创造五个绩效维度,在此基础上构建了企业创新团队知识学习绩效指标体系及评价模型,并从团队知识角色、学习化团队设立、知识共享与转化平台构建、管理体系建立、团队氛围及组织文化的培养等方面,对企业创新团队知识学习绩效提升途径展开研究。
(5)基于理论回顾与文献研究提出企业创新团队知识学习SEM模型分析的基本假设,提炼出团队学习氛围(FW)、团队学习激励(JL)、团队学习效果(XG)、团队协作绩效(JX)等潜变量,通过验证性因子分析得出团队学习氛围对团队学习效果以及协作绩效具有正向影响、团队学习激励对团队协作绩效具有正向影响但对团队学习效果不具有正向影响、团队协作绩效对团队学习效果具有正向影响等主要结论。通过群体案例分析后,描述企业创新团队知识学习现有的主要模式与绩效水平,并给出了若干指导性建议与对策。
In the twenty-first Century under the situation of economic development, knowledge has become the core competitiveness of enterprises and establishing core status of important resources, to knowledge acquisition,conversion,absorption and application as the core of knowledge is the enterprise knowledge production starting point which is the basis of forming the enterprise knowledge performance.Based on this knowledge, to assemble knowledge learning ability innovation team, as the breakthrough point using the organization behavior, ecology, information economics, econometrics, mathematical statistics, complexity theory, system theory and other theories and methods, expand enterprise innovation team knowledge learning theory and empirical research, to explore the innovation of enterprise knowledge learning mechanism and the feasible mode, reach the enterprise innovation team learning performance promotion law and countermeasures.
(1) The global development trend of intellectual economy, our country enterprise knowledge learning as the basis, put forward an enterprise to innovate knowledge study and research purposes and significance, through the enterprise innovation team knowledge learning research now analysis, this paper studies the content, method and technical route, the initial formation of the logical framework an d theoretical basis. According to the definition and characteristics of enterprise innovation team, mission and function analysis, put forward innovation team" establishment stage, turbulent running-in stage, training the specification phase, stable operation phase and equilibrium end" five stage formation model, given to the transformation of knowledge, absorption, storage, curing of enterprise innovation team knowledge learning concept, Discussion on enterprise innovation team knowledge learning of high complexity, explicit weak, strong uncertainty of contextual features, summarizes the enterprise innovation team knowledge learning initiative, spiral, path dependence, dynamic integration, positive externality process characteristics, thus forming the research contents of this paper focus and boundary.
(2) Clear enterprise environmental uncertainty, the enterprise ability is limited, the market demand variability and innovation action complexity is enterprise innovation team knowledge learning motivation and its influence on general integrated process. Based on individual behavior to the enterprise innovation team learning of the correlation analysis, to extract the social perception, values, attitudes, frustration, incentive individual behavior factor, In depth analysis of the learning process of the behavior of the individual elements based on change and its dynamic effect; put forward with " group physical constitution, rules of groups, group goal" as the core enterprise innovation team knowledge learning elements of group behavior, individual behavior, group behavior, social and convergence of feedback, elaborated the enterprise innovation team knowledge learning groups behavior mechanism. From the concept of cultural ecology and cultural ecology connotation, ecological characteristics, cultural and ecological construction and protection and good cultural ecology perspective analysis of enterprise innovation team knowledge learning culture ecological principle, gives the innovation team knowledge creation and evolution of ecological explanations; through the enterprise innovation team learning self organization characteristics of, dialysis of enterprise innovation team cooperative evolution, random fluctuations, circulating phase-change, forgotten struggle principle of self organization; The influence factors on enterprise innovation team knowledge learning system feedback effect, construction of enterprise innovation team knowledge learning system dynamics model, reveal individual behavior, group behavior and innovative team learning dynamic interaction process.
(3) Description of knowledge acquisition,knowledge transformation, knowledge application and innovation, knowledge assessment, knowledge transfer innovation team knowledge learning process, detailing every link of the specific content. Master of building leading, industry-university cooperation, interdisciplinary team of three kinds of typical knowledge learning mode, points out that the master of dominant mode of tacit knowledge learning advantage, industry-university cooperation pattern of complementary characteristics, cross team pattern knowledge learning advantages of scale. With the team and efficient as the goal, the definition of " clear objectives, skills, mutual trust, the same commitment, good communication, negotiation skills, effective leadership, internal support and an outer support "for the factor, the master dominant mode selection of effective leadership, internal support factor tendency, produce learn cooperative mode selection the relevant skills and external support factor tendency, cross team mode selection and good communication and negotiation skill tendency.
(4) Emphasizing innovation team performance in knowledge learning effects of knowledge transfer and creation link performance, should be integrated into the innovation team as a whole to creat scale performance, innovation team member individual performance. Extracted from the creative team of knowledge acquisition, knowledge sharing, knowledge, knowledge application and knowledge to create a five performance dimension, On the basis of constructing the innovative team learning performance index system and evaluation model, and from the team role of knowledge, learning team establishment, knowledge sharing and transformation platform construction, management system, team atmosphere and tissue culture and so on, to the enterprise innovation team learning performance promotion way research.
(5) Based on the theoretical review and literature research puts forward enterprise innovation team knowledge learning SEM model analysis of the basic assumptions, refines the team learning environment (FW), team learning, team learning effect (JL)(XG), team performance (JX), latent variable, Through confirmatory factor analysis team learning climate on team learning and collaborative performance has a positive effect on team cooperation learning motivation, team performance has positive impact on team learning effect but has no positive effect on team learning, team performance has positive effect and main conclusions effect. Through group, case analysis description of enterprise innovation team knowledge existing main mode and performance levels, and gives some suggestions and countermeasures.
(1)本文以全球知识经济发展趋势、我国企业知识学习情境为基础,提出企业创新团队知识学习研究的目的与意义,通过企业创新团队知识学习相关研究现在分析,给出了本文研究的内容、方法与技术路线,初步形成本文研究的逻辑框架与理论基础。根据企业创新团队界定及其特征、使命与功能分析,提出创新团队“建立阶段、动荡磨合阶段、培养规范阶段、稳定运行阶段和均衡结束”的五阶段形成模式,给定以知识的转化、吸收、存储、固化为要点的企业创新团队知识学习概念,探讨企业创新团队知识学习复杂性高、外显性弱、不确定性强的内容特征,总结了企业创新团队知识学习主动性、螺旋上升、路径依赖、动态整合、正外部性的过程特点,从而形成了本文研究的内容重心与边界。
(2)明确企业环境的不确定性、企业能力的有限性、市场需求的多变性和创新行动的复杂性是企业创新团队知识学习的一般动因以及探讨其综合影响过程。基于个体行为对企业创新团队知识学习的相关性分析,提炼出社会知觉、价值观、态度、挫折、激励的个体行为因子,深入分析了知识学习过程的个体行为基础要素的变化及其动态影响；提出以“群体物理构成、群体规则、团队目标”为核心的企业创新团队知识学习的群体行为要素构成图,综合个体行为、群体行为以及社会与趋同反馈,阐述企业创新团队知识学习群体行为产生机理。从文化生态的概念及内涵、文化生态的生态学特性、文化生态的建设及保护和良好的文化生态等视角剖析企业创新团队知识学习的文化生态原理,给出了创新团队知识学习的产生与演变的生态学解释；通过企业创新团队知识学习的自组织特性分析,透析了企业创新团队协同进化、随机涨落、循环相变、遗忘斗争的自组织原理；综合各影响要素对企业创新团队知识学习的系统反馈影响,构建企业创新团队知识学习的系统动力学模型,揭示个体行为、群体行为与创新团队知识学习的动态交互作用过程。
(3)描述知识获取、知识转化、知识应用和创新、知识评估、知识转移的创新团队知识学习的过程范式,细化每个环节的具体内容。构建大师主导、产学合作、跨团队三种典型的知识学习模式,指出大师主导模式的隐性知识学习优势、产学合作模式的优势互补特征、跨团队模式的知识学习规模优势。以团队高效为目标,定义“清晰的目标、相关技能、相互信任、一致的承诺、良好的沟通、谈判技能、有效的领导、内部支持和外部支持”为比较因子,得出大师主导型模式选择的有效的领导、内部支持因子倾向,产学合作模式选择的相关技能和外部支持因子倾向,跨团队模式选择的良好沟通和谈判技能倾向。
(4)强调创新团队知识学习绩效主要影响于知识转移和创造环节的绩效,应综合考虑创新团队为整体所创造的规模绩效、创新团队内成员个体绩效。提炼出包括创新团队知识获取、知识共享、知识吸收、知识应用和知识创造五个绩效维度,在此基础上构建了企业创新团队知识学习绩效指标体系及评价模型,并从团队知识角色、学习化团队设立、知识共享与转化平台构建、管理体系建立、团队氛围及组织文化的培养等方面,对企业创新团队知识学习绩效提升途径展开研究。
(5)基于理论回顾与文献研究提出企业创新团队知识学习SEM模型分析的基本假设,提炼出团队学习氛围(FW)、团队学习激励(JL)、团队学习效果(XG)、团队协作绩效(JX)等潜变量,通过验证性因子分析得出团队学习氛围对团队学习效果以及协作绩效具有正向影响、团队学习激励对团队协作绩效具有正向影响但对团队学习效果不具有正向影响、团队协作绩效对团队学习效果具有正向影响等主要结论。通过群体案例分析后,描述企业创新团队知识学习现有的主要模式与绩效水平,并给出了若干指导性建议与对策。
In the twenty-first Century under the situation of economic development, knowledge has become the core competitiveness of enterprises and establishing core status of important resources, to knowledge acquisition,conversion,absorption and application as the core of knowledge is the enterprise knowledge production starting point which is the basis of forming the enterprise knowledge performance.Based on this knowledge, to assemble knowledge learning ability innovation team, as the breakthrough point using the organization behavior, ecology, information economics, econometrics, mathematical statistics, complexity theory, system theory and other theories and methods, expand enterprise innovation team knowledge learning theory and empirical research, to explore the innovation of enterprise knowledge learning mechanism and the feasible mode, reach the enterprise innovation team learning performance promotion law and countermeasures.
(1) The global development trend of intellectual economy, our country enterprise knowledge learning as the basis, put forward an enterprise to innovate knowledge study and research purposes and significance, through the enterprise innovation team knowledge learning research now analysis, this paper studies the content, method and technical route, the initial formation of the logical framework an d theoretical basis. According to the definition and characteristics of enterprise innovation team, mission and function analysis, put forward innovation team" establishment stage, turbulent running-in stage, training the specification phase, stable operation phase and equilibrium end" five stage formation model, given to the transformation of knowledge, absorption, storage, curing of enterprise innovation team knowledge learning concept, Discussion on enterprise innovation team knowledge learning of high complexity, explicit weak, strong uncertainty of contextual features, summarizes the enterprise innovation team knowledge learning initiative, spiral, path dependence, dynamic integration, positive externality process characteristics, thus forming the research contents of this paper focus and boundary.
(2) Clear enterprise environmental uncertainty, the enterprise ability is limited, the market demand variability and innovation action complexity is enterprise innovation team knowledge learning motivation and its influence on general integrated process. Based on individual behavior to the enterprise innovation team learning of the correlation analysis, to extract the social perception, values, attitudes, frustration, incentive individual behavior factor, In depth analysis of the learning process of the behavior of the individual elements based on change and its dynamic effect; put forward with " group physical constitution, rules of groups, group goal" as the core enterprise innovation team knowledge learning elements of group behavior, individual behavior, group behavior, social and convergence of feedback, elaborated the enterprise innovation team knowledge learning groups behavior mechanism. From the concept of cultural ecology and cultural ecology connotation, ecological characteristics, cultural and ecological construction and protection and good cultural ecology perspective analysis of enterprise innovation team knowledge learning culture ecological principle, gives the innovation team knowledge creation and evolution of ecological explanations; through the enterprise innovation team learning self organization characteristics of, dialysis of enterprise innovation team cooperative evolution, random fluctuations, circulating phase-change, forgotten struggle principle of self organization; The influence factors on enterprise innovation team knowledge learning system feedback effect, construction of enterprise innovation team knowledge learning system dynamics model, reveal individual behavior, group behavior and innovative team learning dynamic interaction process.
(3) Description of knowledge acquisition,knowledge transformation, knowledge application and innovation, knowledge assessment, knowledge transfer innovation team knowledge learning process, detailing every link of the specific content. Master of building leading, industry-university cooperation, interdisciplinary team of three kinds of typical knowledge learning mode, points out that the master of dominant mode of tacit knowledge learning advantage, industry-university cooperation pattern of complementary characteristics, cross team pattern knowledge learning advantages of scale. With the team and efficient as the goal, the definition of " clear objectives, skills, mutual trust, the same commitment, good communication, negotiation skills, effective leadership, internal support and an outer support "for the factor, the master dominant mode selection of effective leadership, internal support factor tendency, produce learn cooperative mode selection the relevant skills and external support factor tendency, cross team mode selection and good communication and negotiation skill tendency.
(4) Emphasizing innovation team performance in knowledge learning effects of knowledge transfer and creation link performance, should be integrated into the innovation team as a whole to creat scale performance, innovation team member individual performance. Extracted from the creative team of knowledge acquisition, knowledge sharing, knowledge, knowledge application and knowledge to create a five performance dimension, On the basis of constructing the innovative team learning performance index system and evaluation model, and from the team role of knowledge, learning team establishment, knowledge sharing and transformation platform construction, management system, team atmosphere and tissue culture and so on, to the enterprise innovation team learning performance promotion way research.
(5) Based on the theoretical review and literature research puts forward enterprise innovation team knowledge learning SEM model analysis of the basic assumptions, refines the team learning environment (FW), team learning, team learning effect (JL)(XG), team performance (JX), latent variable, Through confirmatory factor analysis team learning climate on team learning and collaborative performance has a positive effect on team cooperation learning motivation, team performance has positive impact on team learning effect but has no positive effect on team learning, team performance has positive effect and main conclusions effect. Through group, case analysis description of enterprise innovation team knowledge existing main mode and performance levels, and gives some suggestions and countermeasures.
引文
[1]Nonaka I, Takeuchi H. The knowledge creating Company[M].Oxford:Oxford University press, 1995.
[2]Nonaka Lkujiro. The Knowledge-creating company[J].Harvard Business Review,1991,69 (6):96-104.
[3]McCampbell A S. Knowledge Management:The New Challenge for the 21st
Century[J].Journal of Knowledge Management,1999,3 (3):172-179.
[4]Bjorn Johnson, Bengt-Aake Lundvall. Why all this Fuss about Codified and Tacit Knowledge? [J]. Industrial and Corporate Change,2002, (11):546-551
[5]维娜·艾莉.知识的进化[M].珠海：珠海出版社,1998.
[6]高湘萍.隐性知识的获得及其显性化的心理途径[J].全球教育展望,2003,(8)：76-81.
[7]陈志斌.基于隐性知识层面的企业理论之问题研究[J].生产力研究,2002,(6)：278-279.
[8]Collins H. Structure of knowledge [J].Social Research,1993, (60):95-116.
[9]Blackler F. Knowledge, knowledge work, and organizations:an overview and interpretation [J].Organization Studies,1995, (16):121-146.
[10]Roy Lubit.The Keys to Sustainable Competitive Advantage:Tacit Knowledge and Knowledge Management [J].Organizational Dynamics,2001,29 (3):164-178.
[11]王方华.知识管理论[M].山西经济出版社,1999.
[12]夏德,程国平.隐性知识的产生、识别与传播[J].华东经济管理,2003,17(12)：91-94.
[13]冷晓彦.企业隐性知识管理国内外研究述评[J].情报科学.2006,24(6)：944-948
[14]Chris Argyris.Organization Learning:A Theory of Action Perspective[M].Addison-Wesley,1978.
[15]崔浩,张道武,陈晓剑.组织知识创新机制扩展研究[J].科学学研究.2005,23(1)：130-133.
[16]Nonaka I.,Byosiere P.,Borucki,C.,and Konno,N. Organizational Knowledge[M]. Strategic Management Research Center,1994.
[17]C. W. Holsapple, M. Singh. The knowledge chain model:activities for competitiveness[J]. Expert Systems with Applications,2001, (20):77-98.
[18]王忠.企业知识创新的整合模式[J].武汉科技大学学报：社会科学版.2002,(4)4：20-23.
[19]沈桂平,任红波.高新技术企业知识创新机理研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理.2004,10(25)：45-48.
[20]Gunnar Hedlund. A Model of Knowledge Management and the N-Form Corporation [J]. Strategic Management Journal,1994, (15):73-90.
[21]Coleman D Groupware:Collaboration and Knowledge Sharing[A].Knowledge Management Handbook[M]:Florida CRC Press LLC,1999.
[22]Pelton C. Share the Knowledge[J].Information week,1999, (737):188-194.
[23]Maryam Alavi, Dorothy E. Leidner. Review:Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems:Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues [J]. MIS Quarterly,2001,1 (25),2001:36-107.
[24]匡跃平.知识经济时代跨国公司的科学技术管理[J].科研管理,2000,21(2)：27-34.
[25]郭斌.企业创新过程中的知识管理[J].研究与发展管理,2001,13(5)：7-12.
[26]温新民.创新中的知识管理与技术管理---硅谷创新体系实践中的经验和启示[J].科学学研究.2005,23(1)：283-287.
[27]Teece,D.J.,Pisano,G.,Shuen,A. Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management, Strategic Management Journal,1997, (18):509-533.
[28]Michael H. Zack. Knowledge and Strategy[M].Butterworth-Heinemann,1999.
[29]谢洪明,刘常勇,李晓彤.知识管理战略方法及其绩效研究[J].管理世界,2002,(10)：85-92.
[30]Robert S. Kaplan,David P. Norton.The balanced scorecard is more than just a new measurement system[J].Harvard Bussiness Review,1996,74 (3):432-439.
[31]Leif Edvinsson.El Captial Intelectual[M].Grupo Editorial Norma,1998.
[32]Karl-Erik Sveiby.The new organizational wealth:managing&measuring knowledge-based assets[M].BerrettKoehler,1997.
[33]Annie Brooking.Intellectual Capital:Core Asset for the Third Millennium[M].Ediciones Paidos Iberica,1997.
[34]罗戎,孙文钦,刘凌.对企业知识管理系统效能的量化评估体系[M].北京大学校长基金论文集,2003.
[35]Kratzer J. Managing Creative Team Performance in Virtual Environments[J]. Journal of Technovation,2006, (26):345-349.
[36]杨晨,顾晓丹.创新团队内涵探析[J].科技管理研究,2008,(6)：394-396.
[37]许小东.R&D团队建设与管理的思考[J].科学管理研究,2001,19(1)：50-58.
[38]戚振江,王端旭.研发团队效能管理[J].科研管理,2003,(2)：56-61.
[39][美]卡尔·弗拉保罗.知识管理[M].北京,华夏出版社,2004.
[40]李华伟,董小英,左美云.知识管理的理论与实践[M].北京：华艺出版社,2000.
[41]尼克·海伊斯.协作致胜-成功的团队管理[M].东北财经大学出版社,1998.
[42]赵春明.团队管理-基于团队的组织构造[M].上海人民出版社,2002.
[43]查尔斯·萨维奇.第五代管理[M].珠海出版社,1998.
[44]芮明杰,李鑫,任红波.高技术企业知识创新模式研究——对野中郁次郎知识创造模型的修正与扩展[J].外国经济与管理.2004,26(5)：8-12.
[45]Albino V, Garavelli A.C, Schiuma G. Knowledge transfer and inter-firm relationships in industrial districts:the role of the leader firm[J]. Technovation Journal,1998,19 (1):53-63.
[46]Kaj U.Koskinen, Hannu Vanharanta. The role of tacit knowledge in innovation processes of small technology compares[J].Production Economics,2002, (80):57-64.
[47]刘冀生,吴金希.论基于知识的企业核心竞争力与企业知识链管理[J].清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2002,17(1)：68-72.
[48]储节旺.国内外知识管理研究领域、主要成就及未来趋势[J].情报资料工作,2006,(5)：36-39.
[49]付立宏,崔波.近年来我国知识管理研究综述[J].郑州经济管理干部学院学报,2004,19(2)：3-9.
[50]T.H. Davenport, L. Prusak. How Organizations Manage What They Know [J]. Harvard Business School Press,1998, (12):1-24.
[51]Smalley B T,Scannell E. Making Knowledge Mean Business[J].Info World,1999,21 (8):69-70.
[52]周玉泉,李垣,谢恩.Current Research Trends on Knowledge Management[J]成组技术与生产现代化,2003,20(3)：78-82.
[53]王开明.团队生产与团队协调：企业知识理论与主流企业理论的比较,综合与发展[J].经济评论,2002,(6)：106-110.
[54]J.S. Brown, P. Duguid. Organizational Learning and Communities of Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation [J]. Organization Science,1991, (2):40-57.
[55]季香清.创新团队的知识转移与管理策略研究[D].山东大学,2008.
[56]范丽群,石锦涛等.国外组织气氛研究综述[J].华东经济管理,2006,(6)：58-62.
[57]Druskat,V.U, Wolff,S.B.Building the emotional intelligence of groups[J].Harvard business review.2001,79 (3):81-89.
[58]Huber G.P. Organizational Learning:The Contributing Process and the Literatures [J].Organization science,1991,2 (1):88-115.
[59]宫辉,徐渝.高校BBS信息传递与控制研究[J].山东社会科学,2006(7)：113-116.
[60]高宏卿,王新法.团队学习层次模型研究[J].软件导刊,2009,(1)：7-8.
[61]吴志明,武欣.MBA学生团队学习效果及影响因素研究[J].2006,3(1)：55-99.
[62]Edmondson A C. Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1999,44 (2) 350-383.
[63]李伶俐,李娇丽.高校行政管理队伍团队学习的必要性和途径探究[J].教育理论研究,2010,(6)：213-214.
[64]Celia Zarrag,Jaime Bonache. Assessing the team environment for knowledge sharing:an empirical analysis [J].The international journal of human resource management.2003.14 (7):1227-1245.
[65]Mcgrath J E,Hollingshead A B.Groups Interacting with Technology[M].Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage Publications,1994.
[66]Tsui A.S.,Pearce J.L.Porter L.W., Hite J.P.Choice of employee-organization relationship: influence of external and internal organizational factors[J]. Research in personnel and human resource management.1995 (13):117-151.
[67]Dension D.R, Hart S.L., Kahn J.A. From chimneys to cross-functional teams:developing and validing a diagnostic model [J]. Academy of management journal.1996, (39):1005-1023.
[68]Levit, March. Organizational learning[J].Annual review of Sociology,1988, (14):319-340.
[69]郝晓倜.知识管理视野下企业创新团队建设[J].科技情报开发与经济,2008,18(33)：156-157.
[70]张小晖.企业创新团队知识学习的跨团队知识共享和转移机制[J].2011,(29)：35-37.
[71]徐玲,潘和平.对学习型组织创建中团队学习的新思考[J].安徽农业大学学报,2005,14(4)：34-36.
[72]McLure WM,Faraj S.Why should Ishare ? examining social capital and knowledge[J].Management Information Systems Quarterly,2005,29 (1):35-57.
[73]张小晖.企业创新团队知识学习的动因分析[J].当代经济,2011,(8)：149-150.
[74]Lee Dong-Joo Lee,Ahn Jae-Hyeon.Reward systems for intraorganizational knowledge sharing[J].European Journal of Operation Research,2007, (180):938-956.
[75]戴黎燕.知识经济背景下企业研发团队的知识获取[J].企业导报,2011(13)：206-206.
[76]Jing Wang, Kholekile Gwebu,Murali Shanker.An application of agent-based simulation to knowledge sharing[J].Decision Support System,2009, (46):532-541.
[77]刘希宋,张长涛,战歌.企业产品开发团队学习模型研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2002,(1)：59-61.
[78]Drucker,Harris.A Theory of Wage Dynamics[J].Review of Economic Studies,2003, (49):315-333.
[79]孙彬.团队及团队创新研究进展综述[J].社会心理科学,2010,25(9)：47-51
[80]Schwarz R M.Groud rules for groups[J].Trainning and Development,1999,48 (8):45-51.
[81]Yang Heng-Li, Tang Jih-Hsin.Team Structure and Team Performance in IS Development:A Social Network Perspective[J].Information&Management,2004,41 (3):335-349.
[82]于立宏,郁义鸿.知识团队自我激励有效性研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2005,(2)：105-111.
[83]Maxine Robertson,Jacky Swan.Control—What Control?Culture and Ambiguity Within a Konwledge Incentive Firm[J].Journal of Management Studies,2003,4 (40).831-858. [84]Gary S,Lynn.Measuring team performance[J].Research&Technology Management,2000, (3):457-462.
[85]赵嵩正,肖伟.虚拟团队关键成功因素模型构建与实证研究[J].管理工程学报,2006,(3)：89-93.
[86]蒋日富,霍国庆.科技团队知识创新绩效影响要素研究——基于我国国立科研机构的调查分析[J].科学学研究,2007,25(2)：364-372.
[87]陈士俊,邱玉敏.高校科技创新团队的绩效管理影响因素与策略分析[J].科技管理研究,2011,(6)：101-104.
[88]陈云娟.知识型员工激励模式新探[J].经营与管理,2004,(3)：67-69.
[89]梁棵,罗彪,王志强.基于战略的全绩效管理实施模型[J].科研管理,2003,(5)：89-93.
[90]Edmondson A C.The Local and Variedgated Nature of Learning in Organizations:a Group level Perspective[J].Organization Science,2002,13 (2):128-146.
[91]Gibson C,Vemeulen F V.A Healthy Divide Subgroup as a Stimulus for Team Learning Behavior[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,2003,48 (2):202-239.
[92]李志宏,赖文娣.创新气氛对高校科研团队知识创新绩效的影响研究[J].高等教育研究,2010,27(3)：18-22.
[93]陈国权,赵慧群,蒋璐.团队心理安全、团队学习能力与团队绩效关系的实证研究[J].科学学研究,2008,26(6)：1283-1292.
[94]Wong S S.Distal and Local Group Learning:Performance Trade offs and Tensions[J].Organization Science,2004,15 (6):645-656.
[95]曾萍,蓝海林.组织学习、知识创新与动态能力：机制和路径[J].中国软科学,2009,(5)：38-41.
[96]毛良斌.团队学习行为特征的内容分析研究[J].经济论坛,2009,(21)：134-136
[97]Anderson N R, West M A. Measuring Climate for Work Group Innovation:development and Validation of the Team Climate I nventory[J].Journal of Organizational Behavior,1999 (19):235-258.
[98]周晓.风险投资项目团队气氛与团队绩效关系的实证研究[J].华南农业大学学报：社会科学版,2007,(10)：112-115.
[99]吴价宝,刘洪.基于组织学习的企业自主创新能力形成机理研究[J].现代管理科学,2009,(4)：20-22.
[100]汪欢欢.知识学习对自主创新能力形成的作用机理[J].中国新技术新产品,2008,(8)：168-171.
[101]章娇娜.浅谈我国的科技创新团队建设[J].湖南涉外经济学院学报,2006,6(4)：47-49.
[102]张体勤,常宏建.高校学术创新团队绩效影响因素研究[J].山东经济,2010,(1)：52-59.
[103]Pilar de Luis C,Sanchez A M,Perez M P.Team empowerment an empirical stude in Spanish univeraity R&D teams[J].International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management,2005,5 (1):69-75.
[104]Argote I,Insko C A,Yovetich N.Group learning curves:the effects of turn over and task complexity on group performance[J].Journal of Applied Social Psychology,1995,25 (3):512-529.
[105]乔恩·R·卡曾巴赫.团队的智慧-创建绩优组织[M].经济科学出版社,1999
[106]迈克尔·J·马奎特.《创建学习型组织5要素》[M].机械工业出版社,2003.
[107]王江,金占明.隐含经验类知识：企业持续竞争优势的源泉[J].南开管理评论,2004,(5)：91-95.
[108]Linda Argote, Bill McEvily, Ray Reagans. Managing Knowledge in Organizations:An Integrative Framework and Review of Emerging Themes [J]. Management Science,2003,49 (5):571-582.
[109]Spender J.C. Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm [J]. Strategic Management Journal.,1996,17 (4):45-62.
[110]叶建亮.知识溢出与企业集群[J].经济科学,2001,(3)：67-71
[112]叶庆祥,徐海洁.基于知识溢出的集群企业创新机理研究[J].浙江社会科学,2006,(1)：57-60
[113]迈克尔·波特.竞争论[M].中信出版社,2003.
[114]魏江.产业集群-创新系统与技术学习[M].科学出版社,2003.
[115]罗彪,梁梁.组织学习理论与实施模型[J].研究与发展管理,2003,(8)：33-35.
[116]项后军.外资企业的迁移及其植根性问题研究[J].浙江社会科学,2004,(5)：98-100.
[117]杨飞.嵌入性集群中外资企业扎根失效机理分析[J].改革,2004,(4)：123-125.
[118]仇保兴.小企业集群研究[M].上海：复旦大学出版社,1999.
[119]朱嘉红,邬爱其.基于焦点企业成长的集群演进机理与模仿失败[J].外国经济与管理,2004,(2)：45-47.
[120]姜卉,邹积峰,盛峰.技术创新型企业的构建模式研究[J].价值工程,2007,26(1)：213-216.
[121]夏新平,焦锦淼.基于学习型组织构建的企业组织学习6系统模型研究[J].企业活力,2005,(3)：81-84.
[122]薛求知,阎海峰.跨国公司全球学习---新角度审视跨国公司[J].南开管理评论,2001,4(2)：72-77.
[123]候宇辉.企业创新人才的知识地图构建研究[J].经济师,2005,(4)：55-61.
[124]伍忠贤.知识管理的策略与实务[M].中国纺织出版社,2003.
[125]张燕敏.论知识管理体系及知识库[J].数量经济技术,2002,(4)：47-52.
[126]张和生.知识经济学[M].沈阳：辽宁人民出版社,1992.
[127]许庆瑞.研究：发展与技术创新管理[M].高等教育出版社,2000.
[128]切尔·波兰尼.个人知识—迈向后批评哲学[M].贵州：贵州人民出版社,2000.
[129]德鲁克等.知识管理[M].北京：中国人民大学出版社,1999.
[130]R·J·斯膝伯格.成功智力[M].上海：华东师范大学出版社,1999.
[131]Lane PJ, Lubatkin M., Relative Absorptive Capacity and Inter-organizational Learning[J]. Strategic Management Journal,1998,19 (11):461-477.
[132]M. Hosein Fallah. Knowledge Spillover and Innovation in Technological Clusters[M]. Fallah -Ibrahim,2004.
[133]Mowery,D.C.,Rosenberg,N.P. Technology and the Pursuit of Economic Growth[M]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,1989.
[134]L. Edvinsson, M. Malone.Intellectual Capital[M].New York:HarperBusiness,1997.
[135]Piergiovanni R. and Santarelli,E.Patents and the geographic localization of R&D Spillover in French manufacturing[J]. Regional Studies,2001,35 (8):697-702.
[136]T.H. Davenport, S. Jarvenpaa, M.C. Beers. Improving Knowledge Work Processes [J].Sloan Management Review,1996, (37):53-65.
[137]Morten T. Hansen. Knowledge Networks:Explaining Effective Knowledge Sharing in Multiunit Companies[J].Organization Science,2002,13 (3):232-248.
[138]Romer,P. Endogenous technological change[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1998, (98):71-102.
[139]Maryam Alavi, Amrit Tiwana. Knowledge Integration in Virtual Teams:The Potential Role of KMS[J] Journal of the American Society for Information Science,2006,53 (12):1029-1037.
[140]Smith,P.J.,Do Knowledge Spillovers Contribute to U.S. State Output and Growth?[J]. Journal of Urban Economics,1999,4 (5):331-53.
[141]B. Rubenstein-Montano, J. Liebowitz, J. Buchwalter. A Systems Thinking Framework for Knowledge Management [J].Decision Support Systems,2001,31 (1):5-16.
[142]Minsoo Shin, Tony Holden, Ruth A. Schmidt. From Knowledge Theory to Management Practice:Towards an Integrated Approach [J].Information Processing & Management,2001,37 (2):335-355.
[143]Wallsten,S.J., An Empirical Test of Geographic Knowledge Spillovers Using Geographic Information Systems and Firm-level Data[J]. Regional Science and Urban Economics,2001, (31):571-99.
[144]Gerhard Fischer, Jonathan Ostwald. Knowledge Management:Problems, Promises,Realities,and Challenges[J].IEEE Intelligent Systems,2001,16 (1):60-72.
[145]OECD.Knowledge-based Economy[M].Economy Dairly Press,1998.
[146]Grant R M. Towa, d a knowledge-based theory of the firm[J].Strategic Management Journal,1996, (17):109-122.
[147]Jaffe,A.B. Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D:Evidence from firms'patents, profits, and Market value[J].American Economic Review,1986,76 (5):984-1001.
[148]Helfat C.E. Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation:the case of R&D[J]. Strategic Management Journal,1997,18 (5):339-360.
[149]Davenport T H. Ten principles of knowledge management and four case studies [J].Knowledge and Process Management,1997,4 (3):451-456.
[150]Ikujiro Nonaka, Ryoko Toyama,Noboru Konno.SECI, Ba and Leadership:a Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation[J].Long Range Planning,2000, (33):290-294.
[151]Grossman,G., Helpman,E. Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, MIT Press[M].Cambridge,1992.
[152]Teece D. Technology transfer by corporation multinational:the resource cost of transferring technological knowhow[J].Economic Journal,1977,87 (1):242-261.
[153]Davenport T H, Laurence P. Working Knowledge:How Organization Manage What They Know[M].Boston (Mass):Harvard Business School Press,1998.
[154]Szulanski G. Exploring internal stickiness:impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm[J].Strategic Management Journal,1996,17 (2):27-43.
[155]Allee V. The Knowledge Evolution[M].Butterworth-Heinemann,1997.
[156]Nickols F. The Knowledge in Knowledge Management (KM),Knowledge Management Yearbook[M]London:Heinemann,2000.
[157]Kelly M.,Hageman A. Marshallian externalities in innovation[J]. Journal of Economic Growth,1999,4 (1):78-83.
[158]Kolb D,et al. Organization Psychology:An Experiential Approach[M].Prentice Hall,1979.
[159]Derek Binney.The Knowledge Management Spectrum-Understanding the KM Landscape [J].Journal of Knowledge Management,2001,5, (1):33-42.
[160]C.K. Prahalad,G. Hamel.The Core Competence of the Corporation[J].Harvard Business Review,1990,68 (3):45-51.
[161]C.K. Prahalad.The Role of Core Competeneies in the Corporation[J].Research Technology Management,1993,36 (6):81-86.
[162]C.W. Holsapple, K.D. Joshi. An Investigation of Factors that Influence the Management of Knowledge in Organizations [J].The Journal of Strategic Information Systems,2000,9, (2):235-261.
[163]Dorothy Leonard-Barton. Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities:A paradox in Managing New Product Development [J].Strategic Management Journal,1992, (13):321-330.
[164]Helleloid D and Simonin B. Organizational Learning and a Firm's Core Competence [A],in G. Hamel and A. Heene,eds., Competence-Based Competition[C], New York John Wiley & Sons Ltd.,1994.
[165]Jules Goddard. The Architecture of Core Competence[J].Business Strategy Review,1997,8 (1):67-72.
[166]Kathleen R. Conner and C.K. Prahalad. A Resource-based Theory of the Firm:Knowledge Versus Opportunism[J].Organization Science,1996,7(5):39-47.
[167]Matteo Bonifacio, Paolo Bouquet, Paolo Traverso. Enabling Distributed Knowledge Management: Managerial and Technological Implications[J].Upgrade,2002,3 (1):24-31.
[168]Audretsch D.,Feldman,M. Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation and production[J].American Economic Review,1996,86 (3):92-99.
[169]Beal,B,Gimeno,J. Geographic Agglomeration, Knowledge Spillovers and Competitive Evolution[J].Isead Working paper,2001, (26):178-183.
[170]Brezis,E.S., Krugman,P.Technology and the Life-cycle of Cities[M].Nber Working,1993.
[171]Capello R.Spatial Transfer of Knowledge in High Technology Milieux:Learning Versus Collective L earning Processes[J].Regional Studies,1999,33 (4):353-354.
[172]汤超颖,周寄中,刘腾.企业隐性技术知识吸收模型研究[J].科研管理,2004,(4)：60-65.
[173]张成考,聂茂林,吴价宝,纪延光.虚拟团队的知识创新与互动性研究[J].软科学,2004,(5)：32-37.
[173]张生太,李涛,段兴民.组织内部隐性知识传播模型研究[J].科研管理,2004,(4)：39-43.
[174]赵涛,曾金平.企业隐性知识流动态扩展模型分析[J].科学学研究,2005,(4)：319-324.
[175]施琴芬,崔志明,粱凯.隐性知识转移的特征与模式分析[J].自然辩证法研究,2004,(2)：78-83.
[176]朱方伟,王永强,唐丽艳.技术转移中隐性知识转化的研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2004,(11)：59-64.
[2]Nonaka Lkujiro. The Knowledge-creating company[J].Harvard Business Review,1991,69 (6):96-104.
[3]McCampbell A S. Knowledge Management:The New Challenge for the 21st
Century[J].Journal of Knowledge Management,1999,3 (3):172-179.
[4]Bjorn Johnson, Bengt-Aake Lundvall. Why all this Fuss about Codified and Tacit Knowledge? [J]. Industrial and Corporate Change,2002, (11):546-551
[5]维娜·艾莉.知识的进化[M].珠海：珠海出版社,1998.
[6]高湘萍.隐性知识的获得及其显性化的心理途径[J].全球教育展望,2003,(8)：76-81.
[7]陈志斌.基于隐性知识层面的企业理论之问题研究[J].生产力研究,2002,(6)：278-279.
[8]Collins H. Structure of knowledge [J].Social Research,1993, (60):95-116.
[9]Blackler F. Knowledge, knowledge work, and organizations:an overview and interpretation [J].Organization Studies,1995, (16):121-146.
[10]Roy Lubit.The Keys to Sustainable Competitive Advantage:Tacit Knowledge and Knowledge Management [J].Organizational Dynamics,2001,29 (3):164-178.
[11]王方华.知识管理论[M].山西经济出版社,1999.
[12]夏德,程国平.隐性知识的产生、识别与传播[J].华东经济管理,2003,17(12)：91-94.
[13]冷晓彦.企业隐性知识管理国内外研究述评[J].情报科学.2006,24(6)：944-948
[14]Chris Argyris.Organization Learning:A Theory of Action Perspective[M].Addison-Wesley,1978.
[15]崔浩,张道武,陈晓剑.组织知识创新机制扩展研究[J].科学学研究.2005,23(1)：130-133.
[16]Nonaka I.,Byosiere P.,Borucki,C.,and Konno,N. Organizational Knowledge[M]. Strategic Management Research Center,1994.
[17]C. W. Holsapple, M. Singh. The knowledge chain model:activities for competitiveness[J]. Expert Systems with Applications,2001, (20):77-98.
[18]王忠.企业知识创新的整合模式[J].武汉科技大学学报：社会科学版.2002,(4)4：20-23.
[19]沈桂平,任红波.高新技术企业知识创新机理研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理.2004,10(25)：45-48.
[20]Gunnar Hedlund. A Model of Knowledge Management and the N-Form Corporation [J]. Strategic Management Journal,1994, (15):73-90.
[21]Coleman D Groupware:Collaboration and Knowledge Sharing[A].Knowledge Management Handbook[M]:Florida CRC Press LLC,1999.
[22]Pelton C. Share the Knowledge[J].Information week,1999, (737):188-194.
[23]Maryam Alavi, Dorothy E. Leidner. Review:Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems:Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues [J]. MIS Quarterly,2001,1 (25),2001:36-107.
[24]匡跃平.知识经济时代跨国公司的科学技术管理[J].科研管理,2000,21(2)：27-34.
[25]郭斌.企业创新过程中的知识管理[J].研究与发展管理,2001,13(5)：7-12.
[26]温新民.创新中的知识管理与技术管理---硅谷创新体系实践中的经验和启示[J].科学学研究.2005,23(1)：283-287.
[27]Teece,D.J.,Pisano,G.,Shuen,A. Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management, Strategic Management Journal,1997, (18):509-533.
[28]Michael H. Zack. Knowledge and Strategy[M].Butterworth-Heinemann,1999.
[29]谢洪明,刘常勇,李晓彤.知识管理战略方法及其绩效研究[J].管理世界,2002,(10)：85-92.
[30]Robert S. Kaplan,David P. Norton.The balanced scorecard is more than just a new measurement system[J].Harvard Bussiness Review,1996,74 (3):432-439.
[31]Leif Edvinsson.El Captial Intelectual[M].Grupo Editorial Norma,1998.
[32]Karl-Erik Sveiby.The new organizational wealth:managing&measuring knowledge-based assets[M].BerrettKoehler,1997.
[33]Annie Brooking.Intellectual Capital:Core Asset for the Third Millennium[M].Ediciones Paidos Iberica,1997.
[34]罗戎,孙文钦,刘凌.对企业知识管理系统效能的量化评估体系[M].北京大学校长基金论文集,2003.
[35]Kratzer J. Managing Creative Team Performance in Virtual Environments[J]. Journal of Technovation,2006, (26):345-349.
[36]杨晨,顾晓丹.创新团队内涵探析[J].科技管理研究,2008,(6)：394-396.
[37]许小东.R&D团队建设与管理的思考[J].科学管理研究,2001,19(1)：50-58.
[38]戚振江,王端旭.研发团队效能管理[J].科研管理,2003,(2)：56-61.
[39][美]卡尔·弗拉保罗.知识管理[M].北京,华夏出版社,2004.
[40]李华伟,董小英,左美云.知识管理的理论与实践[M].北京：华艺出版社,2000.
[41]尼克·海伊斯.协作致胜-成功的团队管理[M].东北财经大学出版社,1998.
[42]赵春明.团队管理-基于团队的组织构造[M].上海人民出版社,2002.
[43]查尔斯·萨维奇.第五代管理[M].珠海出版社,1998.
[44]芮明杰,李鑫,任红波.高技术企业知识创新模式研究——对野中郁次郎知识创造模型的修正与扩展[J].外国经济与管理.2004,26(5)：8-12.
[45]Albino V, Garavelli A.C, Schiuma G. Knowledge transfer and inter-firm relationships in industrial districts:the role of the leader firm[J]. Technovation Journal,1998,19 (1):53-63.
[46]Kaj U.Koskinen, Hannu Vanharanta. The role of tacit knowledge in innovation processes of small technology compares[J].Production Economics,2002, (80):57-64.
[47]刘冀生,吴金希.论基于知识的企业核心竞争力与企业知识链管理[J].清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2002,17(1)：68-72.
[48]储节旺.国内外知识管理研究领域、主要成就及未来趋势[J].情报资料工作,2006,(5)：36-39.
[49]付立宏,崔波.近年来我国知识管理研究综述[J].郑州经济管理干部学院学报,2004,19(2)：3-9.
[50]T.H. Davenport, L. Prusak. How Organizations Manage What They Know [J]. Harvard Business School Press,1998, (12):1-24.
[51]Smalley B T,Scannell E. Making Knowledge Mean Business[J].Info World,1999,21 (8):69-70.
[52]周玉泉,李垣,谢恩.Current Research Trends on Knowledge Management[J]成组技术与生产现代化,2003,20(3)：78-82.
[53]王开明.团队生产与团队协调：企业知识理论与主流企业理论的比较,综合与发展[J].经济评论,2002,(6)：106-110.
[54]J.S. Brown, P. Duguid. Organizational Learning and Communities of Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation [J]. Organization Science,1991, (2):40-57.
[55]季香清.创新团队的知识转移与管理策略研究[D].山东大学,2008.
[56]范丽群,石锦涛等.国外组织气氛研究综述[J].华东经济管理,2006,(6)：58-62.
[57]Druskat,V.U, Wolff,S.B.Building the emotional intelligence of groups[J].Harvard business review.2001,79 (3):81-89.
[58]Huber G.P. Organizational Learning:The Contributing Process and the Literatures [J].Organization science,1991,2 (1):88-115.
[59]宫辉,徐渝.高校BBS信息传递与控制研究[J].山东社会科学,2006(7)：113-116.
[60]高宏卿,王新法.团队学习层次模型研究[J].软件导刊,2009,(1)：7-8.
[61]吴志明,武欣.MBA学生团队学习效果及影响因素研究[J].2006,3(1)：55-99.
[62]Edmondson A C. Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1999,44 (2) 350-383.
[63]李伶俐,李娇丽.高校行政管理队伍团队学习的必要性和途径探究[J].教育理论研究,2010,(6)：213-214.
[64]Celia Zarrag,Jaime Bonache. Assessing the team environment for knowledge sharing:an empirical analysis [J].The international journal of human resource management.2003.14 (7):1227-1245.
[65]Mcgrath J E,Hollingshead A B.Groups Interacting with Technology[M].Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage Publications,1994.
[66]Tsui A.S.,Pearce J.L.Porter L.W., Hite J.P.Choice of employee-organization relationship: influence of external and internal organizational factors[J]. Research in personnel and human resource management.1995 (13):117-151.
[67]Dension D.R, Hart S.L., Kahn J.A. From chimneys to cross-functional teams:developing and validing a diagnostic model [J]. Academy of management journal.1996, (39):1005-1023.
[68]Levit, March. Organizational learning[J].Annual review of Sociology,1988, (14):319-340.
[69]郝晓倜.知识管理视野下企业创新团队建设[J].科技情报开发与经济,2008,18(33)：156-157.
[70]张小晖.企业创新团队知识学习的跨团队知识共享和转移机制[J].2011,(29)：35-37.
[71]徐玲,潘和平.对学习型组织创建中团队学习的新思考[J].安徽农业大学学报,2005,14(4)：34-36.
[72]McLure WM,Faraj S.Why should Ishare ? examining social capital and knowledge[J].Management Information Systems Quarterly,2005,29 (1):35-57.
[73]张小晖.企业创新团队知识学习的动因分析[J].当代经济,2011,(8)：149-150.
[74]Lee Dong-Joo Lee,Ahn Jae-Hyeon.Reward systems for intraorganizational knowledge sharing[J].European Journal of Operation Research,2007, (180):938-956.
[75]戴黎燕.知识经济背景下企业研发团队的知识获取[J].企业导报,2011(13)：206-206.
[76]Jing Wang, Kholekile Gwebu,Murali Shanker.An application of agent-based simulation to knowledge sharing[J].Decision Support System,2009, (46):532-541.
[77]刘希宋,张长涛,战歌.企业产品开发团队学习模型研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2002,(1)：59-61.
[78]Drucker,Harris.A Theory of Wage Dynamics[J].Review of Economic Studies,2003, (49):315-333.
[79]孙彬.团队及团队创新研究进展综述[J].社会心理科学,2010,25(9)：47-51
[80]Schwarz R M.Groud rules for groups[J].Trainning and Development,1999,48 (8):45-51.
[81]Yang Heng-Li, Tang Jih-Hsin.Team Structure and Team Performance in IS Development:A Social Network Perspective[J].Information&Management,2004,41 (3):335-349.
[82]于立宏,郁义鸿.知识团队自我激励有效性研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2005,(2)：105-111.
[83]Maxine Robertson,Jacky Swan.Control—What Control?Culture and Ambiguity Within a Konwledge Incentive Firm[J].Journal of Management Studies,2003,4 (40).831-858. [84]Gary S,Lynn.Measuring team performance[J].Research&Technology Management,2000, (3):457-462.
[85]赵嵩正,肖伟.虚拟团队关键成功因素模型构建与实证研究[J].管理工程学报,2006,(3)：89-93.
[86]蒋日富,霍国庆.科技团队知识创新绩效影响要素研究——基于我国国立科研机构的调查分析[J].科学学研究,2007,25(2)：364-372.
[87]陈士俊,邱玉敏.高校科技创新团队的绩效管理影响因素与策略分析[J].科技管理研究,2011,(6)：101-104.
[88]陈云娟.知识型员工激励模式新探[J].经营与管理,2004,(3)：67-69.
[89]梁棵,罗彪,王志强.基于战略的全绩效管理实施模型[J].科研管理,2003,(5)：89-93.
[90]Edmondson A C.The Local and Variedgated Nature of Learning in Organizations:a Group level Perspective[J].Organization Science,2002,13 (2):128-146.
[91]Gibson C,Vemeulen F V.A Healthy Divide Subgroup as a Stimulus for Team Learning Behavior[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,2003,48 (2):202-239.
[92]李志宏,赖文娣.创新气氛对高校科研团队知识创新绩效的影响研究[J].高等教育研究,2010,27(3)：18-22.
[93]陈国权,赵慧群,蒋璐.团队心理安全、团队学习能力与团队绩效关系的实证研究[J].科学学研究,2008,26(6)：1283-1292.
[94]Wong S S.Distal and Local Group Learning:Performance Trade offs and Tensions[J].Organization Science,2004,15 (6):645-656.
[95]曾萍,蓝海林.组织学习、知识创新与动态能力：机制和路径[J].中国软科学,2009,(5)：38-41.
[96]毛良斌.团队学习行为特征的内容分析研究[J].经济论坛,2009,(21)：134-136
[97]Anderson N R, West M A. Measuring Climate for Work Group Innovation:development and Validation of the Team Climate I nventory[J].Journal of Organizational Behavior,1999 (19):235-258.
[98]周晓.风险投资项目团队气氛与团队绩效关系的实证研究[J].华南农业大学学报：社会科学版,2007,(10)：112-115.
[99]吴价宝,刘洪.基于组织学习的企业自主创新能力形成机理研究[J].现代管理科学,2009,(4)：20-22.
[100]汪欢欢.知识学习对自主创新能力形成的作用机理[J].中国新技术新产品,2008,(8)：168-171.
[101]章娇娜.浅谈我国的科技创新团队建设[J].湖南涉外经济学院学报,2006,6(4)：47-49.
[102]张体勤,常宏建.高校学术创新团队绩效影响因素研究[J].山东经济,2010,(1)：52-59.
[103]Pilar de Luis C,Sanchez A M,Perez M P.Team empowerment an empirical stude in Spanish univeraity R&D teams[J].International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management,2005,5 (1):69-75.
[104]Argote I,Insko C A,Yovetich N.Group learning curves:the effects of turn over and task complexity on group performance[J].Journal of Applied Social Psychology,1995,25 (3):512-529.
[105]乔恩·R·卡曾巴赫.团队的智慧-创建绩优组织[M].经济科学出版社,1999
[106]迈克尔·J·马奎特.《创建学习型组织5要素》[M].机械工业出版社,2003.
[107]王江,金占明.隐含经验类知识：企业持续竞争优势的源泉[J].南开管理评论,2004,(5)：91-95.
[108]Linda Argote, Bill McEvily, Ray Reagans. Managing Knowledge in Organizations:An Integrative Framework and Review of Emerging Themes [J]. Management Science,2003,49 (5):571-582.
[109]Spender J.C. Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm [J]. Strategic Management Journal.,1996,17 (4):45-62.
[110]叶建亮.知识溢出与企业集群[J].经济科学,2001,(3)：67-71
[112]叶庆祥,徐海洁.基于知识溢出的集群企业创新机理研究[J].浙江社会科学,2006,(1)：57-60
[113]迈克尔·波特.竞争论[M].中信出版社,2003.
[114]魏江.产业集群-创新系统与技术学习[M].科学出版社,2003.
[115]罗彪,梁梁.组织学习理论与实施模型[J].研究与发展管理,2003,(8)：33-35.
[116]项后军.外资企业的迁移及其植根性问题研究[J].浙江社会科学,2004,(5)：98-100.
[117]杨飞.嵌入性集群中外资企业扎根失效机理分析[J].改革,2004,(4)：123-125.
[118]仇保兴.小企业集群研究[M].上海：复旦大学出版社,1999.
[119]朱嘉红,邬爱其.基于焦点企业成长的集群演进机理与模仿失败[J].外国经济与管理,2004,(2)：45-47.
[120]姜卉,邹积峰,盛峰.技术创新型企业的构建模式研究[J].价值工程,2007,26(1)：213-216.
[121]夏新平,焦锦淼.基于学习型组织构建的企业组织学习6系统模型研究[J].企业活力,2005,(3)：81-84.
[122]薛求知,阎海峰.跨国公司全球学习---新角度审视跨国公司[J].南开管理评论,2001,4(2)：72-77.
[123]候宇辉.企业创新人才的知识地图构建研究[J].经济师,2005,(4)：55-61.
[124]伍忠贤.知识管理的策略与实务[M].中国纺织出版社,2003.
[125]张燕敏.论知识管理体系及知识库[J].数量经济技术,2002,(4)：47-52.
[126]张和生.知识经济学[M].沈阳：辽宁人民出版社,1992.
[127]许庆瑞.研究：发展与技术创新管理[M].高等教育出版社,2000.
[128]切尔·波兰尼.个人知识—迈向后批评哲学[M].贵州：贵州人民出版社,2000.
[129]德鲁克等.知识管理[M].北京：中国人民大学出版社,1999.
[130]R·J·斯膝伯格.成功智力[M].上海：华东师范大学出版社,1999.
[131]Lane PJ, Lubatkin M., Relative Absorptive Capacity and Inter-organizational Learning[J]. Strategic Management Journal,1998,19 (11):461-477.
[132]M. Hosein Fallah. Knowledge Spillover and Innovation in Technological Clusters[M]. Fallah -Ibrahim,2004.
[133]Mowery,D.C.,Rosenberg,N.P. Technology and the Pursuit of Economic Growth[M]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,1989.
[134]L. Edvinsson, M. Malone.Intellectual Capital[M].New York:HarperBusiness,1997.
[135]Piergiovanni R. and Santarelli,E.Patents and the geographic localization of R&D Spillover in French manufacturing[J]. Regional Studies,2001,35 (8):697-702.
[136]T.H. Davenport, S. Jarvenpaa, M.C. Beers. Improving Knowledge Work Processes [J].Sloan Management Review,1996, (37):53-65.
[137]Morten T. Hansen. Knowledge Networks:Explaining Effective Knowledge Sharing in Multiunit Companies[J].Organization Science,2002,13 (3):232-248.
[138]Romer,P. Endogenous technological change[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1998, (98):71-102.
[139]Maryam Alavi, Amrit Tiwana. Knowledge Integration in Virtual Teams:The Potential Role of KMS[J] Journal of the American Society for Information Science,2006,53 (12):1029-1037.
[140]Smith,P.J.,Do Knowledge Spillovers Contribute to U.S. State Output and Growth?[J]. Journal of Urban Economics,1999,4 (5):331-53.
[141]B. Rubenstein-Montano, J. Liebowitz, J. Buchwalter. A Systems Thinking Framework for Knowledge Management [J].Decision Support Systems,2001,31 (1):5-16.
[142]Minsoo Shin, Tony Holden, Ruth A. Schmidt. From Knowledge Theory to Management Practice:Towards an Integrated Approach [J].Information Processing & Management,2001,37 (2):335-355.
[143]Wallsten,S.J., An Empirical Test of Geographic Knowledge Spillovers Using Geographic Information Systems and Firm-level Data[J]. Regional Science and Urban Economics,2001, (31):571-99.
[144]Gerhard Fischer, Jonathan Ostwald. Knowledge Management:Problems, Promises,Realities,and Challenges[J].IEEE Intelligent Systems,2001,16 (1):60-72.
[145]OECD.Knowledge-based Economy[M].Economy Dairly Press,1998.
[146]Grant R M. Towa, d a knowledge-based theory of the firm[J].Strategic Management Journal,1996, (17):109-122.
[147]Jaffe,A.B. Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D:Evidence from firms'patents, profits, and Market value[J].American Economic Review,1986,76 (5):984-1001.
[148]Helfat C.E. Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation:the case of R&D[J]. Strategic Management Journal,1997,18 (5):339-360.
[149]Davenport T H. Ten principles of knowledge management and four case studies [J].Knowledge and Process Management,1997,4 (3):451-456.
[150]Ikujiro Nonaka, Ryoko Toyama,Noboru Konno.SECI, Ba and Leadership:a Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation[J].Long Range Planning,2000, (33):290-294.
[151]Grossman,G., Helpman,E. Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, MIT Press[M].Cambridge,1992.
[152]Teece D. Technology transfer by corporation multinational:the resource cost of transferring technological knowhow[J].Economic Journal,1977,87 (1):242-261.
[153]Davenport T H, Laurence P. Working Knowledge:How Organization Manage What They Know[M].Boston (Mass):Harvard Business School Press,1998.
[154]Szulanski G. Exploring internal stickiness:impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm[J].Strategic Management Journal,1996,17 (2):27-43.
[155]Allee V. The Knowledge Evolution[M].Butterworth-Heinemann,1997.
[156]Nickols F. The Knowledge in Knowledge Management (KM),Knowledge Management Yearbook[M]London:Heinemann,2000.
[157]Kelly M.,Hageman A. Marshallian externalities in innovation[J]. Journal of Economic Growth,1999,4 (1):78-83.
[158]Kolb D,et al. Organization Psychology:An Experiential Approach[M].Prentice Hall,1979.
[159]Derek Binney.The Knowledge Management Spectrum-Understanding the KM Landscape [J].Journal of Knowledge Management,2001,5, (1):33-42.
[160]C.K. Prahalad,G. Hamel.The Core Competence of the Corporation[J].Harvard Business Review,1990,68 (3):45-51.
[161]C.K. Prahalad.The Role of Core Competeneies in the Corporation[J].Research Technology Management,1993,36 (6):81-86.
[162]C.W. Holsapple, K.D. Joshi. An Investigation of Factors that Influence the Management of Knowledge in Organizations [J].The Journal of Strategic Information Systems,2000,9, (2):235-261.
[163]Dorothy Leonard-Barton. Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities:A paradox in Managing New Product Development [J].Strategic Management Journal,1992, (13):321-330.
[164]Helleloid D and Simonin B. Organizational Learning and a Firm's Core Competence [A],in G. Hamel and A. Heene,eds., Competence-Based Competition[C], New York John Wiley & Sons Ltd.,1994.
[165]Jules Goddard. The Architecture of Core Competence[J].Business Strategy Review,1997,8 (1):67-72.
[166]Kathleen R. Conner and C.K. Prahalad. A Resource-based Theory of the Firm:Knowledge Versus Opportunism[J].Organization Science,1996,7(5):39-47.
[167]Matteo Bonifacio, Paolo Bouquet, Paolo Traverso. Enabling Distributed Knowledge Management: Managerial and Technological Implications[J].Upgrade,2002,3 (1):24-31.
[168]Audretsch D.,Feldman,M. Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation and production[J].American Economic Review,1996,86 (3):92-99.
[169]Beal,B,Gimeno,J. Geographic Agglomeration, Knowledge Spillovers and Competitive Evolution[J].Isead Working paper,2001, (26):178-183.
[170]Brezis,E.S., Krugman,P.Technology and the Life-cycle of Cities[M].Nber Working,1993.
[171]Capello R.Spatial Transfer of Knowledge in High Technology Milieux:Learning Versus Collective L earning Processes[J].Regional Studies,1999,33 (4):353-354.
[172]汤超颖,周寄中,刘腾.企业隐性技术知识吸收模型研究[J].科研管理,2004,(4)：60-65.
[173]张成考,聂茂林,吴价宝,纪延光.虚拟团队的知识创新与互动性研究[J].软科学,2004,(5)：32-37.
[173]张生太,李涛,段兴民.组织内部隐性知识传播模型研究[J].科研管理,2004,(4)：39-43.
[174]赵涛,曾金平.企业隐性知识流动态扩展模型分析[J].科学学研究,2005,(4)：319-324.
[175]施琴芬,崔志明,粱凯.隐性知识转移的特征与模式分析[J].自然辩证法研究,2004,(2)：78-83.
[176]朱方伟,王永强,唐丽艳.技术转移中隐性知识转化的研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2004,(11)：59-64.