用户名: 密码: 验证码:
不同材料三单位后牙全瓷固定桥的生物力学分析
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
目的:应用螺旋CT扫描的原始DICOM数据,建立上颌后牙及固定桥的三维有限元模型,分析其载荷条件下的生物力学特性,并对三种不同材料的全瓷固定桥进行有限元分析。
     方法:①用螺旋CT对牙列完整、解剖结构正常的成人干颅进行断层扫描,将所得DICOM数据输入MIMICS软件,选择上颌第二前磨牙、第一磨牙和第二磨牙及相应颌骨组织进行三维图像重建。将信息导入三维有限元分析软件ANSYS中进行切割,建立后牙三单位固定桥的三维有限元模型。②在ANSYS软件中对固定桥模型进行加载,分析其各部位的位移及应力变化。③将固定桥的内冠材料分别设定为IPS e.max press、In-Ceram Alumina和氧化锆,利用ANSYS软件对其受载后的位移及应力分布进行分析。
     结果:①建立了上颌后牙三单位固定桥的三维有限元模型,模型包括上颌骨、牙齿、全瓷固定桥等结构,共包含67731个节点,344188个单元,具有良好的几何外形,可任意提取某一部分进行研究,具有可拓展性。②对固定桥进行加载后,其舌侧龈缘处位移最大;连接体区应力最大,且龈方的应力大于牙合方。③对三种材料的全瓷固定桥分别加载,氧化锆组的位移及应力小于其他两组,后两组间相差不大。
     结论:以应用螺旋CT扫描为基础,结合使用MIMICS和ANSYS软件建立较复杂的固定桥三维有限元模型,几何相似性较高,且过程更加简单快捷,便于应用和计算。
     全瓷固定桥受载后应力主要集中在连接体处,且龈方应力较大,提示该处是全瓷固定桥最脆弱的部位,应当加固。其次舌侧龈缘处的位移及应力较大,受力大于颊侧。
     比较IPS e.max press、In-Ceram Alumina和氧化锆三种常用的全瓷固定桥,氧化锆稍优于IPS e.max press和In-Ceram Alumina组,后二者之间差别不大。三种材料均可用于后牙固定桥的修复。
Objective: To construct the three-dimensiona finite elemet model of the maxillary postetior fixed partial denture (FPD) with the original DICOM data of spiral CT, investigate the biomechanics characters of the FPD by loading, and and carries on the finite element analysis to three different material's all-ceramic fixed partial denture.
     Methods:①A macerated human skull was scanned with spiral CT and the original DICOM data were imported into MIMICS software. The three-dimensional geometrical model containing the mandibular second premolar,mandibular first molar, mandibular second molar and the corresponding alveolar bone was constructed. The three-dimensional finite elemet model of the maxillary postetior fixed partial denture was constructed after slotting in three dimensional finite element analysis software ANSYS.②On the basis of the three-dimensional model of the first Part,we observed the load conditions on pontic of the maxillary FPD and analysed the stress distribution and displacement with a finite element program ANSYS.③Seting the core crown material of the fixed partial denture is IPS e.max press, In-Ceram Alumina and Zirconia, we analysed the stress distribution and displacement with a finite element program ANSYS.
     Results:①The establishment three-dimensional finite element model of maxillary postetior all-ceramic fixed partial denture, which was made up of 67331 nodes and 344188 units, included maxilla, teeth and all-ceramic fixed partial denture. Model and modeling had a good geometric similarity. So it had scalability and it could be splitted randomly or extracted a certain part for a separate study.②According to the FEA analysis after loading on the ponitic, the displacement in gingival margin of lingual surface was most significant , the stress occurred in connective area, and the gingival was more dignificant than occlusal.③Loading separately to three material's all-ceramic fixed partial denture, the displacement and the stress of Zirconia group's was smaller than other two groups, during the latter two groups differs not in a big way.
     Conclusion: The method to construct a complex fixed partial denture three-dimensional finite element model is improved by using the MIMCS and ANSYS software which based on the spiral CT. what’s more it was easy to apply and calculate.
     The connective aera was the frailest spot of all- FPD, must be reinforced.The displacement and stress in gingival margin of lingual side was significant than the buccal side.
     Compared the three kind material of commonly used all-creamic FPD, the Zirconia surpassed IPS e.max press and In-Ceram Alumina group, but the latter two groups had no significant difference. The material of IPS e.max press,In-Ceram Alumina and Zirconia could be used for the postetior fixed partial denture.
引文
[1]李国华,陈吉华.牙科全瓷材料3Y-TZP生物相容性初步评价[J].口腔医学研究, 2007,23(1)∶4~6.
    [2] Wataha JC. Principles of biocompatibility for dental practitioners[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2001, 86(2) :203~209.
    [3]刘梦桃,贾安琦.镍铬合金烤瓷修复体对局部牙龈组织损伤的机制[J].国外医学口腔医学分册, 2004,(1).
    [4] McLean J. The nature of dental ceramics and their clinincal use in The Science and Art of Dental Ceramics[M]. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co., Inc.; 1979
    [5]高文玲.全瓷固定桥的研究进展[J].国际口腔医学杂志, 2008, 35(4):471~473.
    [6] Farah JW, Craig RG. Finite element stress analysis of a restored axisym metric first molar. [J]. J Dent Res, 1974, 53(4):859~866.
    [7]徐君伍.口腔修复理论与临床[M].北京:人民卫生出版社, 1999: 18~19.
    [8]胡晓阳,邓旭亮,王威.不同切端设计类型瓷贴面的三维有限元应力分析[J].现代口腔医学杂志,2004,18(6):510~512.
    [9]翁维民,李玲,张富强,等.不同材料桩核冠系统修复上中切牙后的三维有限元分析[J].口腔材料器械杂志,2004,l3(2):79~82.
    [10]于海洋,杜传诗,巢永烈.三维有限元法分析瓷贴面厚度对三型瓷贴面复合体应力分布的影响[J].华西口腔医学杂志,1998,16(4):365~367.
    [11] Marc PD, Philipp K, Lothar B. Influence of the supporting structure on stress distribution in all-ceramic FPDs[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2010, 23(1): 63~68.
    [12] Anusavice KJ, Hojjatie B, Deehoff PH. Influence of metal thickness on stress distribution in metal-ceramic crowns[J]. J Dent Res. 1986, 65:1173~1178.
    [13] Farah JW, Craig RG, Meroueh KA. Finite element analysis of three-sand four-unit bridges[J]. J Oral Rehabil. 1989, 16:603~611.
    [14]朱成明.血管壁力学性能研究及其计算机仿真[D].上海:同济大学, 2008.
    [15]孙滢滢.上颌前牙桩核优化设计的三维有限元分析[D].西安:第四军医大学, 2006.
    [16]吕纯洁,董湘怀,潘卫红.有限元法在口腔科生物力学中的应用[J].桂林航天工业高等专科学校学报, 2004, 1:76~78.
    [17] Thresher RW. The stress analysis of human teeth. [J]. J Biomech, 1973, 6(5):443~449.
    [18] Dalstra M, Cattaneo PM, Melsen B. The finite element method: a tool to study orthodontic tooth movement. [J].J Dent Res ,2005,84(5):428~433.
    [19]赵云凤.口腔生物力学[M].北京:北京医科大学中国协和医科大学联合出版社, 1996: 2~5.
    [20]魏洪涛,张天夫,曾晨光等.牙颌三维有限元模型的生成方法的探讨[J].白求恩医科大学学报, 2000, (2): 150~153.
    [21]周学军,赵志河,赵美英等.包括下颌骨的颢下颌关节三维有限元模型的建立。实用口腔医学杂志, 2000, (1):17~20。
    [22]宋勇.精通ANSYS7.0有限元分析. [M].北京:清华大学出版社, 2003.
    [23]张美超.国内生物力学中有限元的应用研究进展[J].解剖科学进展杂志,2003, l: 53~56.
    [24]蒋孝煜.有限元法基础[M].北京:清华大学出版社,第2版,.1992:1~6.
    [25]刘涛,杨凤鹏.精通ANSYS[M].北京:清华大学出版社, 2002.1~3.
    [26] Fischer H, Webar M, Marx R, et al. Lifetime prediction of all- ceramic bridges by computational methods [J]. J Dent Res,2003,82(3): 238~242.
    [27]林映荷,满毅,宫苹,等.倾斜基牙固定桥修复前后应力分布的各向异性三维有限元分析[J].四川大学学报(医学版), 2006, 37(6):919~22.
    [28] Imanishi A;Nakamura T;Ohyama T;Nakamura T. 3-D Finite element analysis of all-ceramic posterior crowns [J]. J Oral Rehabil.2003,30(8):818~822.
    [29] Andréa B , Luiz C P, Andréia R.C. The in?uence of the loading mode on the stress distribution on the connector region of metal-ceramic and all-ceramic fixed partial denture [J]. Artif Organs. 2008,32(4):283~291.
    [30] Wolfart S, Eschbach S, Scherrer S, et al. Clinica1 outcome of three-unit lithium-disilicate glass- ceramic fixed dental prostheses: Up to 8 years results[J]. J Dent Mater, 2009, 25(9) :63~71.
    [31] Kamposiora P,Papavasiliou G,Bayne SC. Stress concentration in all-ceramie Posterior fixed partial dentures[J]. QuintesseneeInt. 1996, 27(10):701~6.
    [32] Oh WS, Anusavice KJ. Effect of connector design on the fracture resistance of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2002, 87(5): 536~542.
    [33] Studart AR, Filser F, Kocher P, Luthy H, Gauckler LJ. Cyclic fatigue in water of veneer framework composites for all-ceramic dental bridges[J]. J Dent Mater, 2007, 23(2):177~185.
    [34]吴艳玲.牙科全瓷材料的生物力学性能研究[D].上海:上海交通大学, 2009.
    [35] Larsson C, Holm L, L?gren N, et al. Fracture strength of four-unit Y-TZP FPD cores designed with varying connector diameter. An in-vitro study[J]. J Oral Rehabil, 2007 , 34(9):702~709.
    [36] Heinz Lüthya, Frank Filser, Olivier Loeffel, et al. Strength and reliability of four-unit all-ceramic posterior bridges[J]. Dent Mater ,2005, 21(10):930~937.
    [37] Tuntiprawon M, Wilson PR. The effect of cement thickness on the fracture strength of all-ceramic crowns [J].Aust Dent J, 1995, 40 (1):17~21.
    [38] Cehreii MC, K?kat A M, Akca K. CAD/CAM Zirconia vs. slip-cast glass-infiltrated Alumina/ Ziconia all-ceramic crowns:2-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial [J]. J Appl Oral Sci , 2009, 17(1): 49~55.
    [39]邱洪添. Vita In-Ceram Zirconia全瓷修复体临床效果评价[J].中国实用口腔科杂志,2010,7(3):410~412.
    [40] Wassermann A, Kaiser M, Snub JR, et al.Clinical long-term results of VITA In-Ceram Classic crowns and fixed partialdentures:A systematic literaturereview [J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2006,19(4):355~363.
    [41] Sailer I, Feher A, Filser F, et al. Five-year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2007, 20(4):151~156.
    [1] Fischer H, Webar M, Marx R, et al. Lifetime prediction of all- ceramic bridges by computational methods [J]. J Dent Res,2003,82(3): 238-242.
    [2] Wassermann A, Kaiser M, Snub JR, et al.Clinical long-term results of VITA In-Ceram Classic crowns and fixed partialdentures:A systematic literaturereview [J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2006,19(4):355-363.
    [3] Domhofer R, Araetzl GV, Koller M, et a1. Comparison of the static loading capacity of all-ceramic bridge frameworks in posterior teeth using three hard core materials[J]. Int J Comput Dent, 2007, 10(4): 315-328.
    [4] Cehreii MC, K?kat A M, Akca K. CAD/CAM Zirconia vs. slip-cast glass-infiltratedAlumina/ Ziconia all-ceramic crowns:2-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial [J]. J Appl Oral Sci , 2009, 17(1): 49-55.
    [5]邱洪添. Vita In-Ceram Zirconia全瓷修复体临床效果评价[J].中国实用口腔科杂志,2010,7(3):410-412.
    [6] Reich S, Wichmann M, Nkenke E, et a1. Clinical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial detures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems[J]. Eur J Oral Sci, 2005, l13(2): 174-179.
    [7]周国兴.四种全瓷材料的透光性研究[J].口腔材料器械杂志,2010, 19(4):183-186.
    [8]孟玉昆.全瓷冠桥修复材料的临床选择[J].国际口腔医学杂志,2010, 37(1):1-6.
    [9] Marquardt P, Strub JR. Survival rates of IPS empress 2 all-ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures:Results of a 5-year prospective clinical study[J].Quintessence Int, 2006,37(4):253-259.
    [10] Esquivel-Upshaw JF, Anusavice KJ, Young H, et a1.Clinical performance of lithia disilicate-based core ceramic for three-unit posterior FPDs[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2004, 17(4): 469-475.
    [11] Rosentritt M, Behr M, Gebhard R, et a1. Influence of stress simulation parameters on the fracture strength of all-ceramic fixed-partial dentures[J]. Dent Mater, 2006, 22(2):176-182.
    [12] Wolfart S, Eschbach S, Scherrer S, et al. Clinica1 outcome of three-unit lithium-disilicate glass- ceramic fixed dental prostheses: Up to 8 years results[J]. J Dent Mater, 2009, 25(9) :63-71.
    [13] Suttor D, Bunker k, Hoesheler S, et al. LAVA-the system for all-ceramic ZrO2 crowns and bridge frameworks[J]. Int J ComputDent, 2001, 4(3):195-206.
    [14] Sailer I, Fehe A, Filser F, et al. Five years clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures[J]. Int J prosthodont, 2007, 20(4):383-388.
    [15] Irena Sailer, Aurel Feher, Frank Filser, et al. Prospective clinical study of zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures: 3-year follow-up[J]. Quintessence Int, 2006, 37(9):685-693.
    [16] Sailer I, Feher A, Filser F, et al. Five-year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2007, 20(4):151-156.
    [17] Ortorp A, Kihl ML, Carlsson GE, et al. A 3-year retrospective and clinicalfollow-up study of zirconia crowns performed in a private practive, J Dent, 2009, 37(9):731-736.
    [18]赵云凤.现代固定修复学[M].北京:人民军医出版社, 2007, 233-244.
    [19] KamPosiora P, PaPavasiliou G, Bayne SC, et al.Stress concentration in all-ceramic Posterior fixed partial dentures[J].Quintessence Int,1996, 27(10):701-706.
    [20] Oh WS, Anusavice KJ. Effect of connector design on the fracture resistance of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2002, 87(5): 536-542.
    [21] Larsson C, Holm L, L?gren N, et al. Fracture strength of four-unit Y-TZP FPD cores designed with varying connector diameter. An in-vitro study[J]. J Oral Rehabil, 2007 , 34(9):702-709.
    [22] Heinz Lüthya, Frank Filser, Olivier Loeffel, et al. Strength and reliability of four-unit all-ceramic posterior bridges[J]. Dent Mater ,2005, 21(10):930-937.
    [23] Zdravko B, Deyar JHM, Per VVS. Fracture stremgth of three-unit fixed partial denture cores(Y-TZP) with different connector dimension and desion[J]. Swed Dent J, 2009, 33(3):149-159.
    [24]李小萌,高平,王永先.计算机辅助设计与制造固定桥连接体受力的三维有限元分析[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复, 2010, 14(9):1559-1562.
    [25] Marianthi M, Christos G, Vasilis G, et al. Effect of varying the vertical dimension of connectors of cantilever cross-arch fixed dental prostheses in patients with severely reduced osseous support: A three-dimensional finite element analysis[J]. J Prosthet Dent 2010,103(2):91-100.
    [26] Reich S, Wichmann M, Nkenke E, et al. Clinical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures,generated with three different CAD/CAM systems[J]. Eur J Oral Sci, 2005, 113(2):174-179.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700