惠民凹陷孔店组油气成藏条件研究
|
摘要
惠民凹陷蕴藏着丰富的油气资源,但目前探明储量主要集中在沙三段及其以上层位中,深层的认识程度较低,为了维持油田的稳定发展,必须对深层加大研究力度,寻找有利的勘探目标区。本论文以惠民凹陷深层孔店组原型盆地研究为基础,选择典型的地震大剖面进行综合地质解释,突出孔店构造转型期对盆地演化的控制作用,同时研究盆地的沉积体系,明确物源方向,建立相应的沉积模式;利用现有地质分析化验资料对孔店组储层成岩阶段、储层性质进行分析;在基础石油地质研究基础上,开展成藏条件和成藏规律的研究,最终对孔店组有利目标区进行预测,从而达到开拓油气勘探新领域的目的。
论文运用层序地层学观点建立了深层孔店组～沙四段的地层格架,随后对凹陷内一、二级断层活动速率进行研究并对主干测线进行平衡剖面分析,研究认为控制孔店组沉积的断层为夏口断层、宁南断层和无南断层,虽然齐河断层是惠民凹陷南部的边界断层,但夏口断层才是惠民凹陷南部孔店组沉积的主控断层。孔店组充填体为一个从夏口断层上盘向北西方向逐渐减薄的楔形体,夏口断层与齐河断层之间为一个薄层沉积。孔店组的沉积中心主要位于夏口断层至滋镇南部一带及林樊家地区的北部。在地震相、钻井岩心、测井资料的分析基础上,认为惠民凹陷孔店组主要发育末端扇沉积,局部地区发育辫状三角洲沉积。由构造演化可知,宁南断层、无南断层虽然孔店组活动性较强,但随着向南延伸,断层面向南变缓呈坡坪状。孔店组时期在此平缓的地形上发育了末端扇沉积;夏口断层以南地形平缓,也发育大范围的末端扇沉积,在此沉积背景下,孔店组发育大面积粒度较细的砂岩体。在林樊家地区以南地区,孔店组初期地形相对较陡,发育面积较小的辫状三角洲沉积,随着盆地扩张,辫状三角洲面积逐步扩大。
论文利用普通薄片、铸体薄片、扫描电镜、阴极发光、X-射线衍射、电子探针等先进的岩矿分析测试技术,对孔店组储层岩石学特征、成岩作用和储层性质进行了研究。研究表明孔二段储层成岩演化程度高,属于中成岩B期,压实作用、胶结作用强烈,砂岩致密,局部见裂缝发育,颗粒以线—凹凸接触为主。原生孔隙因成岩作用大量消失,次生孔隙不发育,孔隙组合为少量的粒间、粒内溶孔,孔喉结构多为小孔微喉型,储层物性较差,多属IV类储集层。孔一段储层处于中成岩A期,压实作用、胶结作用强烈,颗粒以线接触为主。部分断裂发育或胶结相对较弱的地区溶蚀作用较强,孔隙组合为粒间、粒内、铸模孔为主,储层物性要好于孔二段储层,多属Ⅲ类储集层。另外发现孔店组不同的砂岩单元在成岩过程中对成岩作用的反应有所不同,可形成不同的成岩相,不同成岩相控制的砂岩单元按一定规律组合时可形成成岩圈闭。
论文根据孔店组的沉积特征结合相关的地化资料,认为孔二段的烃源岩已达高成熟阶段,而孔店组的砂岩储层处于中成岩A-B阶段,砂岩整体较致密且厚度大、分布范围广。孔二段生成的气运移到孔店组致密砂岩层中,形成致密砂岩气藏,研究认为孔店组致密砂岩气藏具有“深盆气藏”的特征。另外,在中央隆起带部位,临南洼陷沙三下、沙四上、孔二段三套烃源岩生成的油气可沿断裂向上运移到隆起带上的孔店组储层中成藏,因此位于中央隆起带的圈闭具有良好的成藏条件。论文在综合分析各种成藏条件的基础上,最终对孔店组进行了有利区预测,为下一步的油气勘探明确了方向。
There are abundant hydrocarbon resources in Huimin depression. The proven reserves mainly concentrate in the middle and shallow zone at present. Research degree is low in the deep zone. In order to maintain the stable development, it is necessary to seek the advantageous exploration target area in the deep zone. The paper takes the prototype basin research of Kongdian formation as the foundation in Huimin depression and analyzes the control action to evolvement of basin in the structure transition period. The deposition system is researched and depositional model is established. The diagenesis and the reservoir quality are researched based on the geologic analysis datum. The conditions for hydrocarbon accumulation are researched based on the petroleum geology analysis. The advantageous exploration target is found in Kongdian formation finally.
The paper establishes the framework of the deep zone in Huimin depression with the sequence stratigraphy viewpoint and analyzes the fault activity speed of the main fault in the depression. It is thought that the sediment of Kongdian formation is controlled by Xiakou fault, Ningnan fault and Wunan fault. The Xiakou fault is the master control fault in the south of Huimin depression. The lithosomic body of Kongdian formation is wedge-shaped body between Xiakou fault and the basin margin in the north of the Huimin depression. There is a thin layer deposition between Xiakou fault and Qihe fault. The depocenter of Kongdian formation is located the north of Xiakou fault and the north of Linfanjia area. There are terminal fan deposition and braided delta deposition in Huimin depression during the Kongdian formation period. The terminal fan deposition is the main sediment system in the basin. The braided delta system is located the south of Linfanjia area.
The lithological characteristics, characteristics of diagenesis and reservoir quality are researched based on the thin slice, the body of casting thin slice, scan the electron microscope, the cathode luminescence, the electron probe and so on. The reservoir of the second member of Kongdian formation is on the stage B period of the middle diagenetic stage. The compaction function and the cementation are intense in the sandstone. There is a little pore space and the pore throat structure is very bad in the sandstone. The quality of the reservoir is bad. The hierarchy of main reservoir of the second member of Kongdian formation is IV. The reservoir of the first member of Kongdian is on the stage A period of the middle diagenetic stage. The compaction function and the cementation are intense. The corrosion function is strong in the zone that there is lots of fault. The quality of the reservoir is better than the former. The hierarchy of main reservoir of the first member of Kongdian formation isⅢ. There is different response to different sandstone unit in Kongdian formation. Different diagenetic facies form in the different sandstone unit. The sandstone units controlled by different diagenetic facies form the diagenetic trap if they combine with certain rule.
The hydrocarbon source rocks of the second member of Kongdian formation is on the high mature stage based on the geochemical datum. The reservoir of Kongdian formation is compaction and the scale of reservoir is great. The gases from the second member of Kongdian formation migrate into the tight sand; form the compact sandstone gas pool. This kind of gas pool has the characteristic of deep basin gas. The hydrocarbon from Linnan sag can migrate into the reservoir of Kongdian formation in the central upheaval zone. The advantageous area is predicted based on kinds of conditions for hydrocarbon accumulation and a definitude direction is given to oil-gas exploration.
论文运用层序地层学观点建立了深层孔店组～沙四段的地层格架,随后对凹陷内一、二级断层活动速率进行研究并对主干测线进行平衡剖面分析,研究认为控制孔店组沉积的断层为夏口断层、宁南断层和无南断层,虽然齐河断层是惠民凹陷南部的边界断层,但夏口断层才是惠民凹陷南部孔店组沉积的主控断层。孔店组充填体为一个从夏口断层上盘向北西方向逐渐减薄的楔形体,夏口断层与齐河断层之间为一个薄层沉积。孔店组的沉积中心主要位于夏口断层至滋镇南部一带及林樊家地区的北部。在地震相、钻井岩心、测井资料的分析基础上,认为惠民凹陷孔店组主要发育末端扇沉积,局部地区发育辫状三角洲沉积。由构造演化可知,宁南断层、无南断层虽然孔店组活动性较强,但随着向南延伸,断层面向南变缓呈坡坪状。孔店组时期在此平缓的地形上发育了末端扇沉积;夏口断层以南地形平缓,也发育大范围的末端扇沉积,在此沉积背景下,孔店组发育大面积粒度较细的砂岩体。在林樊家地区以南地区,孔店组初期地形相对较陡,发育面积较小的辫状三角洲沉积,随着盆地扩张,辫状三角洲面积逐步扩大。
论文利用普通薄片、铸体薄片、扫描电镜、阴极发光、X-射线衍射、电子探针等先进的岩矿分析测试技术,对孔店组储层岩石学特征、成岩作用和储层性质进行了研究。研究表明孔二段储层成岩演化程度高,属于中成岩B期,压实作用、胶结作用强烈,砂岩致密,局部见裂缝发育,颗粒以线—凹凸接触为主。原生孔隙因成岩作用大量消失,次生孔隙不发育,孔隙组合为少量的粒间、粒内溶孔,孔喉结构多为小孔微喉型,储层物性较差,多属IV类储集层。孔一段储层处于中成岩A期,压实作用、胶结作用强烈,颗粒以线接触为主。部分断裂发育或胶结相对较弱的地区溶蚀作用较强,孔隙组合为粒间、粒内、铸模孔为主,储层物性要好于孔二段储层,多属Ⅲ类储集层。另外发现孔店组不同的砂岩单元在成岩过程中对成岩作用的反应有所不同,可形成不同的成岩相,不同成岩相控制的砂岩单元按一定规律组合时可形成成岩圈闭。
论文根据孔店组的沉积特征结合相关的地化资料,认为孔二段的烃源岩已达高成熟阶段,而孔店组的砂岩储层处于中成岩A-B阶段,砂岩整体较致密且厚度大、分布范围广。孔二段生成的气运移到孔店组致密砂岩层中,形成致密砂岩气藏,研究认为孔店组致密砂岩气藏具有“深盆气藏”的特征。另外,在中央隆起带部位,临南洼陷沙三下、沙四上、孔二段三套烃源岩生成的油气可沿断裂向上运移到隆起带上的孔店组储层中成藏,因此位于中央隆起带的圈闭具有良好的成藏条件。论文在综合分析各种成藏条件的基础上,最终对孔店组进行了有利区预测,为下一步的油气勘探明确了方向。
There are abundant hydrocarbon resources in Huimin depression. The proven reserves mainly concentrate in the middle and shallow zone at present. Research degree is low in the deep zone. In order to maintain the stable development, it is necessary to seek the advantageous exploration target area in the deep zone. The paper takes the prototype basin research of Kongdian formation as the foundation in Huimin depression and analyzes the control action to evolvement of basin in the structure transition period. The deposition system is researched and depositional model is established. The diagenesis and the reservoir quality are researched based on the geologic analysis datum. The conditions for hydrocarbon accumulation are researched based on the petroleum geology analysis. The advantageous exploration target is found in Kongdian formation finally.
The paper establishes the framework of the deep zone in Huimin depression with the sequence stratigraphy viewpoint and analyzes the fault activity speed of the main fault in the depression. It is thought that the sediment of Kongdian formation is controlled by Xiakou fault, Ningnan fault and Wunan fault. The Xiakou fault is the master control fault in the south of Huimin depression. The lithosomic body of Kongdian formation is wedge-shaped body between Xiakou fault and the basin margin in the north of the Huimin depression. There is a thin layer deposition between Xiakou fault and Qihe fault. The depocenter of Kongdian formation is located the north of Xiakou fault and the north of Linfanjia area. There are terminal fan deposition and braided delta deposition in Huimin depression during the Kongdian formation period. The terminal fan deposition is the main sediment system in the basin. The braided delta system is located the south of Linfanjia area.
The lithological characteristics, characteristics of diagenesis and reservoir quality are researched based on the thin slice, the body of casting thin slice, scan the electron microscope, the cathode luminescence, the electron probe and so on. The reservoir of the second member of Kongdian formation is on the stage B period of the middle diagenetic stage. The compaction function and the cementation are intense in the sandstone. There is a little pore space and the pore throat structure is very bad in the sandstone. The quality of the reservoir is bad. The hierarchy of main reservoir of the second member of Kongdian formation is IV. The reservoir of the first member of Kongdian is on the stage A period of the middle diagenetic stage. The compaction function and the cementation are intense. The corrosion function is strong in the zone that there is lots of fault. The quality of the reservoir is better than the former. The hierarchy of main reservoir of the first member of Kongdian formation isⅢ. There is different response to different sandstone unit in Kongdian formation. Different diagenetic facies form in the different sandstone unit. The sandstone units controlled by different diagenetic facies form the diagenetic trap if they combine with certain rule.
The hydrocarbon source rocks of the second member of Kongdian formation is on the high mature stage based on the geochemical datum. The reservoir of Kongdian formation is compaction and the scale of reservoir is great. The gases from the second member of Kongdian formation migrate into the tight sand; form the compact sandstone gas pool. This kind of gas pool has the characteristic of deep basin gas. The hydrocarbon from Linnan sag can migrate into the reservoir of Kongdian formation in the central upheaval zone. The advantageous area is predicted based on kinds of conditions for hydrocarbon accumulation and a definitude direction is given to oil-gas exploration.
引文
[1]Barker C and Takach N E. Prediction of natural gas composition in ultradeep sandstone reservoir. AAPG, 1992, 76(12)1859～1873
[2]Takach N E, Barker C and Kemp M K. Stability of natural gas in the deep subsurface: Thermodynamic calculation of equibrium composition. AAPG.1987, 71(3)322～333
[3]胡文海,陈冬晴.美国油气田分布规律和勘探经验.北京:石油工业出版社, 1995.
[4]冲津文雄.深层气资源的勘探与前景.伊培荣,译.天然气勘探与开发, 1996,19(4) : 72～75.
[5]牛嘉玉,王玉满,谯汉生.中国东部老油区深层油气勘探潜力分析.中国石油勘探,2004,9(1):33～40
[6]谯汉生,方朝亮,牛嘉玉,等.渤海湾盆地深层石油地质.北京:石油工业出版社,2003
[7]妥进才.深层油气研究现状及进展.地球科学进展,2002,17(4):565～570
[8]石昕,戴金星,赵文智.深层油气藏勘探前景分析.中国石油勘探,2005,10(1):1～10
[9]ΠоляковаИД.深层含油潜势.姜家生(译),天然气地球科学,2002,13(5～6):38～41
[10]孙永祥.俄罗斯境内深部油气藏的形成及分布特点.天然气地球科学, 1997,8(2) : 33～38.
[11]樊庆真,杨显成.济阳坳陷深层资源潜力和有利勘探方向.石油勘探与开发,1998,25(1):8～13
[12]何海清,王兆云,程玉.渤海湾盆地深层石油地质条件分析.沉积学报,1999,17(2):
[13]妥进才,王先彬,周世新.渤海湾盆地深层油气资源前景分析.天然气地球科学,1999,10(6):27～32
[14]周世新,王先彬,妥进才.深层油气地球化学研究新进展.天然气地球科学,1999,10(6):9～16
[15]段毅,王先彬.深层油气形成的若干问题探讨.天然气地球科学,1999,10(6):22～27
[16]杜小弟,姚超.深层油气勘探势在必行.海相油气地质,2001,6(1):1～5
[17]戴金星,戚厚发.天然气地质学概述.北京:石油工业出版社,1989
[18]任俞.超深油气藏物探方法的发展和改进.世界石油工业,1996,3(7):4～7.
[19]李春光.论渤海湾盆地深层油气勘探.海相油气地质,2005,10(2):17～22
[20]张之一.更新勘探观念,开拓深层油气新领域.石油与天然气地质,2005,26(2):193～197
[21]朱伟强,李卫忠,王成礼.济阳坳陷深层地震资料处理技术及应用.石油物探,2002,41 (2):161～169
[22]郝芳,邹华耀,倪建华.沉积盆地超压系统演化与深层油气成藏条件.地球科学,2002,27(5):610～615
[23]靳志霞,游小淼.综合地震技术在深层油气勘探中的应用.断块油气田,2003,10(5):47～52
[24]宫秀梅,曾溅辉,金之钧.渤南洼陷深层(沙四段)油气成藏模拟实验研究.西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2005,20(4):26～32
[25]宫秀梅,金之钧,曾溅辉.渤南洼陷深层油气成藏特征及主控因素.石油与天然气地质,2005,26(4):473～480
[26]张冬玉.深层油气藏的流体特征及成藏条件.油气地质与采收率,2006,13(5):47～52
[27]杨文采,于常青.深层油气地球物理勘探基础研究.地球物理学进展,2007,22(4):1238～1242
[28]蔡进功,谢忠怀,田芳.济阳坳陷深层砂岩成岩作用及孔隙演化.石油与天然气地质,2002,23(1):84～89
[29]杜淑艳,秦菲莉,董文峰.深层油气储层产能预测技术研究.石油天然气学报,2006,28(1):62～66
[30]李忠权,萧德铭,侯启军.松辽盆地深层古前陆盆地地层特征及其油气勘探意义.成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2004,31(6):582～586
[31]赵文智汪泽成张水昌.中国叠合盆地深层海相油气成藏条件与富集区带.科学通报,2007,52(增刊):9～19
[32]胜利油田,中国石油地质志,6卷,北京:石油工业出版社,1988
[33]宗国洪,肖焕钦,李常宝.济阳坳陷构造演化及其大地构造意义.高校地质学报,1999,5(3):275～283
[34]杨超,陈清华.济阳坳陷构造演化及其构造层的划分.油气地质与采收率,2005,12(2):9～14
[35]陈洁.济阳孔店转型期识别标志及盆地特征.地球物理学进展,2004,19(1):108～112
[36]陈洁.济阳孔店构造转型期沉积盆地的特征及勘探意义.地球物理学进展,2004,19(2):392～398
[37]李宏革,杜旭东.渤海湾地区中西部中生代构造特征及演化.石油大学学报(自然科学版),1999,23(3):1～5
[38]侯贵廷,蔡东升.渤海湾盆地中、新生代构造演化研究.北京大学学报(自然科学版),2001,37(6):845～851
[39]郑德顺,吴智平,李伟,等.济阳坳陷中、新生代盆地转型期断裂特征及其对盆地的控制作用.地质学报,2005,79(3):386～394
[40]宗国洪,施央申,王秉海,王捷.济阳盆地中生代构造特征与油气.地质评论,1998,44(3):289～294
[41]王颖,赵锡奎,高博禹.济阳坳陷构造演化特征.成都理工学院学报,2002,29(2):181～188
[42]赵俊兴,田景春,蔡进功.惠民凹陷南坡古中生代沉积体系特征及时空演化.沉积与特提斯地质,2002,22(1):46～53
[43]贾红义,于建国,王金铎.惠民凹陷东部区域性走滑断裂构造系统的发现和意义.大地构造与成矿学,2007,31(1):14～20
[44]郑德顺,吴智平,李凌,等.惠民凹陷中生代和新生代断层发育特征及其对沉积的控制作用.石油大学学报(自然科学版),2004,28(5):6～13
[45]王纪祥,陈发景,李趁义.山东惠民凹陷伸展构造及调节带特征.现代地质,2003,17(2): 203～209
[46]漆家福,张伟,陆克政,等.渤海湾新生代裂陷盆地的伸展构造模式及其动力学过程.石油石油地质,1995,17(4)
[47]姜在兴,操应长.砂体层序地层及沉积学研究-以山东惠民凹陷为例.地质出版社,2000.
[48]陈海红,张先平,叶加仁.济阳坳陷滋镇洼陷构造特征.海洋石油,2005,25(2):27～32
[49]Cross T A. High-resolution stratigraphic correlation from the perspective of base level cycles and accommodation. Proceedings of Northwestern European Sequence Stratigraphy Congress, 1994. 105～123.
[50]邓宏文,美国层序地层研究中的新学派-高分辨率层序地层学.石油与天然气地质, 1995,16(2):89～97.
[51]Cross T A., Lessenger M A., Sediment volume partitioning: Rationale for stratigraphic model evalution and high-resolution stratigraphic correlation. Norwegian Petroleums-Forening Conference Volume, 1996, 1～24.
[52]邓宏文,王洪亮,李熙喆，层序地层地层基准面的识别、对比技术及应用.石油与天然气地质,1996,17(3):177～184.
[53]邓宏文,王洪亮,祝永军,Timothy A. Cross.高分辨率层序的层序-原理及应用.北京:地质出版社,2002.
[54]郑容才,尹世民,彭军,基准面旋回结构与叠加样式的沉积动力学分析.沉积学报,2000,18(3):369～375.
[55]Cross T A.著,杜宁平译.据高分辨率层序地层学认识地层结构对比概念体积配分相分异和储层的间隔单元划分.国外油气勘探,1996,8(3):285～294
[56]陆基孟.地震勘探原理.东营:石油大学出版社,1993
[57]王建伟,赵勇生,田海芹.东营一惠民凹陷孔店组层序地层学研究.石油大学学报(自然科学版),2001,25(6):1～5
[58]王书宝,钟建华,陈志鹏.惠民凹陷新生代断裂活动特征研究.地质力学学报,2007,13(1):86～97
[59]刘冠德,夏斌,于俊峰.惠民凹陷南坡北北西向走滑断裂带的发育特征及成因分析.大地构造与成矿学,2007,33(2):168～173
[60]赵孟为.断层生长指数探讨.石油实验地质,1989,11(3):250～254
[61]陈刚,戴俊生,叶兴树,等.生长指数与断层落差的对比研究.西南石油大学学报.2007,29(3). 20～23
[62]赵勇,戴俊生.应用落差分析研究生长断层.石油勘探与开发,2003,30(3):13～15
[63]宋振宇,赵世广,周延明.断层落差断距的判定[黑龙江科技信息,2004,6:221～221
[64]马晓鸣,戴俊生.应用落差分析研究高邮凹陷南断阶主控断层.西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2007,22(4):31～34
[65]宋振宇,赵世广,周延明.断层落差断距的判定.黑龙江科技信息.2004(6):221～221
[66]袁宗辉.一种求断层落差的计算方法.湖南煤炭科技.1994,15(3):36～38
[67]李勤英,罗凤芝.断层活动速率研究方法及应用探讨.断块油气田,2000,7(2):15～17
[68]程有义.断层活动速率及其应用.陆相石油地质.1991(3):41～46
[69]牟中海.同生断层活动速率的研究.新疆石油地质.1991,12(3):212～217
[70]Ioannis D. Papanikolaou and Gerald P. Roberts .Geometry, kinematics and deformation rates along the active normal fault system in the southern Apennines: Implications for fault growth. Journal of Structural Geology, 2007,29(1): 166～188
[71]Liang Zhao ,Tianyu Zheng. Seismic structure of the Bohai Bay Basin, northern China: Implications for basin evolution.Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2005, 23(1-2):9～22
[72]Mason R.A. Structure of the Alice anticline, Papua New Guinea: serial balanced cross～sections and their restoration. Journal of Structural Geology, 1997, 19(5): 719～734
[73]Mouthereau F., Lacombe O., Deffontaines B. Deformation history of the southwestern Taiwan foreland thrust belt: insights from tectono～sedimentary analyses and balanced cross～sections . Tectonophysics, 2001, 33(1-2):293～318
[74]Dubey A. K., Misra R., Bhakuni S. S. Erratic shortening from balanced cross～sections of the western Himalayan foreland basin: causes and implications for basin evolution . Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2001,19(6):765～775
[75]王运所,刘亚洲,张孝义,等.平衡剖面的制作流程及其地质意义.长安大学学报,2003,25(1):28～32
[76]张世奇,纪友亮,高岭.平衡剖面分析技术在松辽盆地构造演化恢复中的应用.新疆地质,2003,21(4):489～490
[77]刘学锋,孟令奎.松辽盆地北部深层构造的平衡剖面研究.西安石油大学学报,2004,19(5):11～15
[78]梁慧社等.平衡部面技术及其在油气勘探中的应用.北京:地震出版社.2002
[79]裘怪南,薛叔浩,应凤祥.中国陆相油气储集层,北京:石油工业出版社,1997
[80]林壬子,张金亮.陆相储层沉积学进展.北京:石油工业出版社,1996, 97～127
[81]王良忱,张金亮编.沉积环境和沉积相.北京:石油工业出版社,1996
[82]刘宝珺主编.沉积岩石学.北京:地质出版社,1980
[83]赵瀓林,朱筱敏主编.沉积岩石学.北京:石油工业出版社,2001
[84]张金亮,常象春主编.石油地质学.北京:石油工业出版社,2004
[85]杨剑萍,操应长.惠民凹陷西部下第三系沙四段下部洪水一漫湖沉积特征.石油大学学报(自然科学版),2002,26(6):17～21
[86]沉积构造与环境解释编写组.沉积构造与环境解释.北京:科学出版社,1984
[87]尹兵祥,王尚旭,杨国权,等.渤海湾盆地东营-惠民凹陷古近系孔店组孔二段地震相与沉积相.古地理学报,2004,6(1):49～57
[88]陈建强.沉积学及岩相古地理.北京:地质出版社,2004
[89]赵澄林.油区岩相古地理.东营:石油大学出版社,2001
[90]Abdullatif O.M., Channel-fill and sheet-flood facies sequences in the ephemeral terminal River Gash, Kassala, Sudan. Sedimentary Geology, 1989, 63: 171-184
[91]Andrew J.Newell, Valentin P.T Verdokhlebov, Michael J. Benton., Interplay of tectonics and climate on a transverse fluvial system, Upper Permian, Southern Uralian Foreland Basin, Russia. Sedimentary Geology, 1999,127: 11~29
[92]Mukerji A.B.,Geomorphic patterns and processes in the terminal tract of inland streams in Sutlej-Yamuna plain.Journal of the Geological Society of India, 1975,16: 450~459
[93]Mukerji A.B. Terminal fans of inland streams in Sutlej-Yamuna Plain, India. Zeitschrift fur Geomorphologie, 1976,20: 190~204
[94]Sean B. Kelly, Henrik Olsen., Terminal fans—a review with reference to Devonian examples. Sedimentary Geology, 1993,85: 339~374
[95]Tooth S., Floodouts in Central Australia. In: (Eds. Miller, A. J. & Gupta, A.) Varieties of fluvial form John Wiley & Sons, 1999,219~247
[96]张金亮,戴朝强,张晓华.末端扇-一种新的沉积作用类型.地质论评,2007,53(2):170～179
[97]Tunbridge I.P., Facies model for a sandy ephemeral stream and clay playa complex; the Middle Devonian Trentishoe Formation of North Devon, UK. Sedimentology, 1984,31: 697-715
[98] Primmer T.J., Cade C.A., Evans J. Global patterns in sandstone diagenesis: their applicationto reservoir quality prediction for petroleum exploration. AAPG Menoir,1997, 69:61～77
[99] Surdam R C, Crossey L J. Predictive models for sandstone diagenesis. Org. Geochem,1991,17:243～253
[100] Scherer M Parameters influencing porosity in sandstone: A model for sandstone porosity prediction, AAPG,1987,71(5):485～491
[101]应凤祥,罗平,何东博,等.中国含油气盆地碎屑岩储集层成岩作用与成岩数值模拟.北京:石油工业出版社,2004
[102]郑浚茂,庞明.碎屑储集岩的成岩作用研究.武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1989
[103]孟元林,王志国,杨俊生,等.成岩过程综合模拟及其应用.石油实验室地质,2003,25(2):211～220
[104]孙永佳,李忠,李蕙生,等.中国东部含油气断陷盆地的成岩作用.北京:科学出版社,1996:46～85
[105]刘孟慧,赵瀓林主编.东濮凹陷下第三系砂体微相和成岩作用.东营:华东石油学院出版社,1988
[106]袁庆峰.碎屑岩储层动态评价技术.新疆石油地质,1992,13(1):57～65
[107] Houseknecht D W, Pittman E D. Origin, Diagenesis, and petrophysics of Clay Minerals in Sandstones.America: SEPM special publication 47, Society of Economic Paleontolgists and Mineralogists, 1992, 241～264
[108] Wilson, M.W., Pittman, E.D. Authigenic clays in sandstones: recognition and influence on reservoir properties and paleoenvironmental analysis. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 1977,47(1):3～31
[109]张金亮,刘宝珺,毛凤鸣,等.苏北盆地高邮凹陷北斜坡阜宁组成岩作用及储层特征.石油学报,2003,24(2):43～49
[110]张金亮,林辉,司学强.鄂尔多斯盆地王窑地区上三叠统长6油层成岩作用研究.中国海洋大学学报,2004,34(4):625～635
[111]杨晓宁,陈洪德,寿建峰,等.碎屑岩次生孔隙形成机制.大庆石油学院学报,2004,28(1): 4～6
[112]陈忠,罗蛰潭,沈明道,等.论砂岩次生孔隙的形成机制.成都理工学院学报,1996,23(增刊):35～41
[113] Meshriid, On the reactivity of carbonic and organic acides and generation of secondary porosity.SEPM Spec Pub,1986,38:123～128
[114] Surdam, R.C., S.W.Boese and L.J.Crossey. The Chemistry of Secondary Porosity, Clastic Diagenesis, AAPG Memoir 1984,37,127～150
[115] Salman K L, Bonnell R H L.Anomalously high porosity and permeability in deeply buriedsandstone reservoirs: Origin and predictability .AAPG Bulletin, 2002, 86(2): 301～328
[116]刘宝珺,张锦泉主编.沉积成岩作用.北京:科学出版社,1992
[117]中华人民共和国能源部.SY/T5477～92中华人民共和国石油天然气行业标准-碎屑岩成岩阶段划分规范.北京:石油工业出版社,1993:1～5
[118]张金亮,司学强,梁杰,等.陕甘宁盆地庆阳地区长8油层砂岩成岩作用及其对储层性质的影响.沉积学报,2004,22(2):225～233
[119]纪友亮,赵澄林.东濮凹陷地层流体的热循环对流与成岩圈闭的形成.石油实验地质, 1995,17(1)
[120]Bloch S, Helmold KP. Approaches to predicting reservoir quality in sandstones , AAPG.Bull,1995,79:97～ll5.
[121]Cant DJ. Diagenetic traps in Sandstones. AAPG.Bull,1986,70(2):l55-l60.
[122]李阳.惠民凹陷基山砂体成岩作用及对油气圈闭的影响.岩石学报,2006,22(8):2205-2212.
[123]罗蛰潭,王允诚编著.油气储集层的孔隙结构.北京:科学出版社,1986
[124]裘亦楠,薛叔浩.油气储层评价技术.北京:石油工业出版社,1994
[125] Alaa M, Salem S, Morad S, et al. Diagenesis and reservoir quality evolution of fluvial sandstones during progressive burial and uplift: Evidence from the Upper Jurassic Boipeba Member, Reconcavo Basin, Northeast Brazil. AAPG Bulletin, 2000, 84(7):1015～1040
[126]赵霞飞等著.陆相低渗透储层形成机制与区域评价.地质出版社,2002
[127] Wilkinson M, Darby D, Haszeldine R S, et al. Secondary porosity Generation During Deep Burial Associated with Overpressure Leak off: Fulmar Formation.UK Central Graben. AAPG Bulletin,1997,81(5):803～812
[128]寿建峰,朱国华.砂岩储层孔隙保存的定量预测研究.地质力学,1998, 33 (2):244～250
[129] Houseknecht, D.W. Assessing the relative importance of compaction processes and cementation to reduction of porosity in sandstones. Am. Assoc. Pet. Geol. Bull. 1987,71:633～642
[130] Lundegard, P.D. Sandstone porosity loss—a big picture view of the importance of compaction. Journal of Sedimentary Petroleum,1992,62:250～260
[131]党犇,赵虹等.台北凹陷侏罗系储层次生孔隙特征及形成机理.西北大学学报(自然科学版).2002,3(32):281～285
[132]张忠民,朱伟,赵澄林.辽河盆地下第三系深部碎屑岩储层次生孔隙演化模式及其分布.大庆石油学院学报,2002,26(3):12～14
[133] Crossey, L.J.,B.R. Frost and R.C.Surdam. Secondary Porosity in Laumontite. Bearing Sandstones,Clastic Diagenesis.AAPG Memoir,1984,37: 225～238
[134]黄福堂,冯子辉.松辽盆地中生界砂岩次生孔隙形成条件及预测.大庆石油地质与开发,1999, 18(1):1～4
[135]李丕龙.富油断陷盆地气环状分布与惠民凹陷勘探方向.石油实验地质,2001,23(2):146～148
[136]赵密福,刘泽容,等.惠民凹陷临南地区断层活动特征及控油作用.石油勘探与开发.2000,27 (6):9～11
[137]杜玉民.夏口断层对临南斜坡区油气分布及运移方向的影响.新疆石油地质,2005,26(5):525～528
[138]黄第藩,陆相有机质演化与成烃机理,北京:石油工业出版社,1984
[139]程克明,王铁冠,钟宁宁等,烃源岩地球化学,北京:石油工业出版社,1995
[140]胡见义,黄第藩,中国陆相石油地质理论基础,北京:石油工业出版社,1991
[141]傅家谟,秦匡宗,干酪根地球化学,广州:广东科技出版社,1995
[142]赵密福,刘泽溶.惠民凹陷临南地区断层活动特征及控油作用.石油勘探与开发,2000,27(6):9～11
[143]候青,赵健.惠民凹陷构造应力场与油气运聚模拟分析.油气地质与采收率,2006,13(1):62～65
[144]陈洁,张学才.渤海湾盆地构造圈闭类型与勘探方向——以济阳坳陷为例.地球物理学进展,2006,21(3):872～878
[145]刘国臣,徐寿根.惠民凹陷构造特征及圈闭类型研究.石油大学学报(自然科学版),1993,17(1):16～23
[146]赵澄林、张善文、袁静,等.胜利油区沉积储层与油气,北京:石油工业出版社,1999
[147]岳志鹏,曾俊,高志卫.惠民凹陷孔店组一沙四段“膏盐岩"层沉积机理.2006,33(5):591～595
[148]张金亮,常象春,深盆气地质理论及应用,地质出版社,2002
[2]Takach N E, Barker C and Kemp M K. Stability of natural gas in the deep subsurface: Thermodynamic calculation of equibrium composition. AAPG.1987, 71(3)322～333
[3]胡文海,陈冬晴.美国油气田分布规律和勘探经验.北京:石油工业出版社, 1995.
[4]冲津文雄.深层气资源的勘探与前景.伊培荣,译.天然气勘探与开发, 1996,19(4) : 72～75.
[5]牛嘉玉,王玉满,谯汉生.中国东部老油区深层油气勘探潜力分析.中国石油勘探,2004,9(1):33～40
[6]谯汉生,方朝亮,牛嘉玉,等.渤海湾盆地深层石油地质.北京:石油工业出版社,2003
[7]妥进才.深层油气研究现状及进展.地球科学进展,2002,17(4):565～570
[8]石昕,戴金星,赵文智.深层油气藏勘探前景分析.中国石油勘探,2005,10(1):1～10
[9]ΠоляковаИД.深层含油潜势.姜家生(译),天然气地球科学,2002,13(5～6):38～41
[10]孙永祥.俄罗斯境内深部油气藏的形成及分布特点.天然气地球科学, 1997,8(2) : 33～38.
[11]樊庆真,杨显成.济阳坳陷深层资源潜力和有利勘探方向.石油勘探与开发,1998,25(1):8～13
[12]何海清,王兆云,程玉.渤海湾盆地深层石油地质条件分析.沉积学报,1999,17(2):
[13]妥进才,王先彬,周世新.渤海湾盆地深层油气资源前景分析.天然气地球科学,1999,10(6):27～32
[14]周世新,王先彬,妥进才.深层油气地球化学研究新进展.天然气地球科学,1999,10(6):9～16
[15]段毅,王先彬.深层油气形成的若干问题探讨.天然气地球科学,1999,10(6):22～27
[16]杜小弟,姚超.深层油气勘探势在必行.海相油气地质,2001,6(1):1～5
[17]戴金星,戚厚发.天然气地质学概述.北京:石油工业出版社,1989
[18]任俞.超深油气藏物探方法的发展和改进.世界石油工业,1996,3(7):4～7.
[19]李春光.论渤海湾盆地深层油气勘探.海相油气地质,2005,10(2):17～22
[20]张之一.更新勘探观念,开拓深层油气新领域.石油与天然气地质,2005,26(2):193～197
[21]朱伟强,李卫忠,王成礼.济阳坳陷深层地震资料处理技术及应用.石油物探,2002,41 (2):161～169
[22]郝芳,邹华耀,倪建华.沉积盆地超压系统演化与深层油气成藏条件.地球科学,2002,27(5):610～615
[23]靳志霞,游小淼.综合地震技术在深层油气勘探中的应用.断块油气田,2003,10(5):47～52
[24]宫秀梅,曾溅辉,金之钧.渤南洼陷深层(沙四段)油气成藏模拟实验研究.西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2005,20(4):26～32
[25]宫秀梅,金之钧,曾溅辉.渤南洼陷深层油气成藏特征及主控因素.石油与天然气地质,2005,26(4):473～480
[26]张冬玉.深层油气藏的流体特征及成藏条件.油气地质与采收率,2006,13(5):47～52
[27]杨文采,于常青.深层油气地球物理勘探基础研究.地球物理学进展,2007,22(4):1238～1242
[28]蔡进功,谢忠怀,田芳.济阳坳陷深层砂岩成岩作用及孔隙演化.石油与天然气地质,2002,23(1):84～89
[29]杜淑艳,秦菲莉,董文峰.深层油气储层产能预测技术研究.石油天然气学报,2006,28(1):62～66
[30]李忠权,萧德铭,侯启军.松辽盆地深层古前陆盆地地层特征及其油气勘探意义.成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2004,31(6):582～586
[31]赵文智汪泽成张水昌.中国叠合盆地深层海相油气成藏条件与富集区带.科学通报,2007,52(增刊):9～19
[32]胜利油田,中国石油地质志,6卷,北京:石油工业出版社,1988
[33]宗国洪,肖焕钦,李常宝.济阳坳陷构造演化及其大地构造意义.高校地质学报,1999,5(3):275～283
[34]杨超,陈清华.济阳坳陷构造演化及其构造层的划分.油气地质与采收率,2005,12(2):9～14
[35]陈洁.济阳孔店转型期识别标志及盆地特征.地球物理学进展,2004,19(1):108～112
[36]陈洁.济阳孔店构造转型期沉积盆地的特征及勘探意义.地球物理学进展,2004,19(2):392～398
[37]李宏革,杜旭东.渤海湾地区中西部中生代构造特征及演化.石油大学学报(自然科学版),1999,23(3):1～5
[38]侯贵廷,蔡东升.渤海湾盆地中、新生代构造演化研究.北京大学学报(自然科学版),2001,37(6):845～851
[39]郑德顺,吴智平,李伟,等.济阳坳陷中、新生代盆地转型期断裂特征及其对盆地的控制作用.地质学报,2005,79(3):386～394
[40]宗国洪,施央申,王秉海,王捷.济阳盆地中生代构造特征与油气.地质评论,1998,44(3):289～294
[41]王颖,赵锡奎,高博禹.济阳坳陷构造演化特征.成都理工学院学报,2002,29(2):181～188
[42]赵俊兴,田景春,蔡进功.惠民凹陷南坡古中生代沉积体系特征及时空演化.沉积与特提斯地质,2002,22(1):46～53
[43]贾红义,于建国,王金铎.惠民凹陷东部区域性走滑断裂构造系统的发现和意义.大地构造与成矿学,2007,31(1):14～20
[44]郑德顺,吴智平,李凌,等.惠民凹陷中生代和新生代断层发育特征及其对沉积的控制作用.石油大学学报(自然科学版),2004,28(5):6～13
[45]王纪祥,陈发景,李趁义.山东惠民凹陷伸展构造及调节带特征.现代地质,2003,17(2): 203～209
[46]漆家福,张伟,陆克政,等.渤海湾新生代裂陷盆地的伸展构造模式及其动力学过程.石油石油地质,1995,17(4)
[47]姜在兴,操应长.砂体层序地层及沉积学研究-以山东惠民凹陷为例.地质出版社,2000.
[48]陈海红,张先平,叶加仁.济阳坳陷滋镇洼陷构造特征.海洋石油,2005,25(2):27～32
[49]Cross T A. High-resolution stratigraphic correlation from the perspective of base level cycles and accommodation. Proceedings of Northwestern European Sequence Stratigraphy Congress, 1994. 105～123.
[50]邓宏文,美国层序地层研究中的新学派-高分辨率层序地层学.石油与天然气地质, 1995,16(2):89～97.
[51]Cross T A., Lessenger M A., Sediment volume partitioning: Rationale for stratigraphic model evalution and high-resolution stratigraphic correlation. Norwegian Petroleums-Forening Conference Volume, 1996, 1～24.
[52]邓宏文,王洪亮,李熙喆，层序地层地层基准面的识别、对比技术及应用.石油与天然气地质,1996,17(3):177～184.
[53]邓宏文,王洪亮,祝永军,Timothy A. Cross.高分辨率层序的层序-原理及应用.北京:地质出版社,2002.
[54]郑容才,尹世民,彭军,基准面旋回结构与叠加样式的沉积动力学分析.沉积学报,2000,18(3):369～375.
[55]Cross T A.著,杜宁平译.据高分辨率层序地层学认识地层结构对比概念体积配分相分异和储层的间隔单元划分.国外油气勘探,1996,8(3):285～294
[56]陆基孟.地震勘探原理.东营:石油大学出版社,1993
[57]王建伟,赵勇生,田海芹.东营一惠民凹陷孔店组层序地层学研究.石油大学学报(自然科学版),2001,25(6):1～5
[58]王书宝,钟建华,陈志鹏.惠民凹陷新生代断裂活动特征研究.地质力学学报,2007,13(1):86～97
[59]刘冠德,夏斌,于俊峰.惠民凹陷南坡北北西向走滑断裂带的发育特征及成因分析.大地构造与成矿学,2007,33(2):168～173
[60]赵孟为.断层生长指数探讨.石油实验地质,1989,11(3):250～254
[61]陈刚,戴俊生,叶兴树,等.生长指数与断层落差的对比研究.西南石油大学学报.2007,29(3). 20～23
[62]赵勇,戴俊生.应用落差分析研究生长断层.石油勘探与开发,2003,30(3):13～15
[63]宋振宇,赵世广,周延明.断层落差断距的判定[黑龙江科技信息,2004,6:221～221
[64]马晓鸣,戴俊生.应用落差分析研究高邮凹陷南断阶主控断层.西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2007,22(4):31～34
[65]宋振宇,赵世广,周延明.断层落差断距的判定.黑龙江科技信息.2004(6):221～221
[66]袁宗辉.一种求断层落差的计算方法.湖南煤炭科技.1994,15(3):36～38
[67]李勤英,罗凤芝.断层活动速率研究方法及应用探讨.断块油气田,2000,7(2):15～17
[68]程有义.断层活动速率及其应用.陆相石油地质.1991(3):41～46
[69]牟中海.同生断层活动速率的研究.新疆石油地质.1991,12(3):212～217
[70]Ioannis D. Papanikolaou and Gerald P. Roberts .Geometry, kinematics and deformation rates along the active normal fault system in the southern Apennines: Implications for fault growth. Journal of Structural Geology, 2007,29(1): 166～188
[71]Liang Zhao ,Tianyu Zheng. Seismic structure of the Bohai Bay Basin, northern China: Implications for basin evolution.Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2005, 23(1-2):9～22
[72]Mason R.A. Structure of the Alice anticline, Papua New Guinea: serial balanced cross～sections and their restoration. Journal of Structural Geology, 1997, 19(5): 719～734
[73]Mouthereau F., Lacombe O., Deffontaines B. Deformation history of the southwestern Taiwan foreland thrust belt: insights from tectono～sedimentary analyses and balanced cross～sections . Tectonophysics, 2001, 33(1-2):293～318
[74]Dubey A. K., Misra R., Bhakuni S. S. Erratic shortening from balanced cross～sections of the western Himalayan foreland basin: causes and implications for basin evolution . Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2001,19(6):765～775
[75]王运所,刘亚洲,张孝义,等.平衡剖面的制作流程及其地质意义.长安大学学报,2003,25(1):28～32
[76]张世奇,纪友亮,高岭.平衡剖面分析技术在松辽盆地构造演化恢复中的应用.新疆地质,2003,21(4):489～490
[77]刘学锋,孟令奎.松辽盆地北部深层构造的平衡剖面研究.西安石油大学学报,2004,19(5):11～15
[78]梁慧社等.平衡部面技术及其在油气勘探中的应用.北京:地震出版社.2002
[79]裘怪南,薛叔浩,应凤祥.中国陆相油气储集层,北京:石油工业出版社,1997
[80]林壬子,张金亮.陆相储层沉积学进展.北京:石油工业出版社,1996, 97～127
[81]王良忱,张金亮编.沉积环境和沉积相.北京:石油工业出版社,1996
[82]刘宝珺主编.沉积岩石学.北京:地质出版社,1980
[83]赵瀓林,朱筱敏主编.沉积岩石学.北京:石油工业出版社,2001
[84]张金亮,常象春主编.石油地质学.北京:石油工业出版社,2004
[85]杨剑萍,操应长.惠民凹陷西部下第三系沙四段下部洪水一漫湖沉积特征.石油大学学报(自然科学版),2002,26(6):17～21
[86]沉积构造与环境解释编写组.沉积构造与环境解释.北京:科学出版社,1984
[87]尹兵祥,王尚旭,杨国权,等.渤海湾盆地东营-惠民凹陷古近系孔店组孔二段地震相与沉积相.古地理学报,2004,6(1):49～57
[88]陈建强.沉积学及岩相古地理.北京:地质出版社,2004
[89]赵澄林.油区岩相古地理.东营:石油大学出版社,2001
[90]Abdullatif O.M., Channel-fill and sheet-flood facies sequences in the ephemeral terminal River Gash, Kassala, Sudan. Sedimentary Geology, 1989, 63: 171-184
[91]Andrew J.Newell, Valentin P.T Verdokhlebov, Michael J. Benton., Interplay of tectonics and climate on a transverse fluvial system, Upper Permian, Southern Uralian Foreland Basin, Russia. Sedimentary Geology, 1999,127: 11~29
[92]Mukerji A.B.,Geomorphic patterns and processes in the terminal tract of inland streams in Sutlej-Yamuna plain.Journal of the Geological Society of India, 1975,16: 450~459
[93]Mukerji A.B. Terminal fans of inland streams in Sutlej-Yamuna Plain, India. Zeitschrift fur Geomorphologie, 1976,20: 190~204
[94]Sean B. Kelly, Henrik Olsen., Terminal fans—a review with reference to Devonian examples. Sedimentary Geology, 1993,85: 339~374
[95]Tooth S., Floodouts in Central Australia. In: (Eds. Miller, A. J. & Gupta, A.) Varieties of fluvial form John Wiley & Sons, 1999,219~247
[96]张金亮,戴朝强,张晓华.末端扇-一种新的沉积作用类型.地质论评,2007,53(2):170～179
[97]Tunbridge I.P., Facies model for a sandy ephemeral stream and clay playa complex; the Middle Devonian Trentishoe Formation of North Devon, UK. Sedimentology, 1984,31: 697-715
[98] Primmer T.J., Cade C.A., Evans J. Global patterns in sandstone diagenesis: their applicationto reservoir quality prediction for petroleum exploration. AAPG Menoir,1997, 69:61～77
[99] Surdam R C, Crossey L J. Predictive models for sandstone diagenesis. Org. Geochem,1991,17:243～253
[100] Scherer M Parameters influencing porosity in sandstone: A model for sandstone porosity prediction, AAPG,1987,71(5):485～491
[101]应凤祥,罗平,何东博,等.中国含油气盆地碎屑岩储集层成岩作用与成岩数值模拟.北京:石油工业出版社,2004
[102]郑浚茂,庞明.碎屑储集岩的成岩作用研究.武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1989
[103]孟元林,王志国,杨俊生,等.成岩过程综合模拟及其应用.石油实验室地质,2003,25(2):211～220
[104]孙永佳,李忠,李蕙生,等.中国东部含油气断陷盆地的成岩作用.北京:科学出版社,1996:46～85
[105]刘孟慧,赵瀓林主编.东濮凹陷下第三系砂体微相和成岩作用.东营:华东石油学院出版社,1988
[106]袁庆峰.碎屑岩储层动态评价技术.新疆石油地质,1992,13(1):57～65
[107] Houseknecht D W, Pittman E D. Origin, Diagenesis, and petrophysics of Clay Minerals in Sandstones.America: SEPM special publication 47, Society of Economic Paleontolgists and Mineralogists, 1992, 241～264
[108] Wilson, M.W., Pittman, E.D. Authigenic clays in sandstones: recognition and influence on reservoir properties and paleoenvironmental analysis. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 1977,47(1):3～31
[109]张金亮,刘宝珺,毛凤鸣,等.苏北盆地高邮凹陷北斜坡阜宁组成岩作用及储层特征.石油学报,2003,24(2):43～49
[110]张金亮,林辉,司学强.鄂尔多斯盆地王窑地区上三叠统长6油层成岩作用研究.中国海洋大学学报,2004,34(4):625～635
[111]杨晓宁,陈洪德,寿建峰,等.碎屑岩次生孔隙形成机制.大庆石油学院学报,2004,28(1): 4～6
[112]陈忠,罗蛰潭,沈明道,等.论砂岩次生孔隙的形成机制.成都理工学院学报,1996,23(增刊):35～41
[113] Meshriid, On the reactivity of carbonic and organic acides and generation of secondary porosity.SEPM Spec Pub,1986,38:123～128
[114] Surdam, R.C., S.W.Boese and L.J.Crossey. The Chemistry of Secondary Porosity, Clastic Diagenesis, AAPG Memoir 1984,37,127～150
[115] Salman K L, Bonnell R H L.Anomalously high porosity and permeability in deeply buriedsandstone reservoirs: Origin and predictability .AAPG Bulletin, 2002, 86(2): 301～328
[116]刘宝珺,张锦泉主编.沉积成岩作用.北京:科学出版社,1992
[117]中华人民共和国能源部.SY/T5477～92中华人民共和国石油天然气行业标准-碎屑岩成岩阶段划分规范.北京:石油工业出版社,1993:1～5
[118]张金亮,司学强,梁杰,等.陕甘宁盆地庆阳地区长8油层砂岩成岩作用及其对储层性质的影响.沉积学报,2004,22(2):225～233
[119]纪友亮,赵澄林.东濮凹陷地层流体的热循环对流与成岩圈闭的形成.石油实验地质, 1995,17(1)
[120]Bloch S, Helmold KP. Approaches to predicting reservoir quality in sandstones , AAPG.Bull,1995,79:97～ll5.
[121]Cant DJ. Diagenetic traps in Sandstones. AAPG.Bull,1986,70(2):l55-l60.
[122]李阳.惠民凹陷基山砂体成岩作用及对油气圈闭的影响.岩石学报,2006,22(8):2205-2212.
[123]罗蛰潭,王允诚编著.油气储集层的孔隙结构.北京:科学出版社,1986
[124]裘亦楠,薛叔浩.油气储层评价技术.北京:石油工业出版社,1994
[125] Alaa M, Salem S, Morad S, et al. Diagenesis and reservoir quality evolution of fluvial sandstones during progressive burial and uplift: Evidence from the Upper Jurassic Boipeba Member, Reconcavo Basin, Northeast Brazil. AAPG Bulletin, 2000, 84(7):1015～1040
[126]赵霞飞等著.陆相低渗透储层形成机制与区域评价.地质出版社,2002
[127] Wilkinson M, Darby D, Haszeldine R S, et al. Secondary porosity Generation During Deep Burial Associated with Overpressure Leak off: Fulmar Formation.UK Central Graben. AAPG Bulletin,1997,81(5):803～812
[128]寿建峰,朱国华.砂岩储层孔隙保存的定量预测研究.地质力学,1998, 33 (2):244～250
[129] Houseknecht, D.W. Assessing the relative importance of compaction processes and cementation to reduction of porosity in sandstones. Am. Assoc. Pet. Geol. Bull. 1987,71:633～642
[130] Lundegard, P.D. Sandstone porosity loss—a big picture view of the importance of compaction. Journal of Sedimentary Petroleum,1992,62:250～260
[131]党犇,赵虹等.台北凹陷侏罗系储层次生孔隙特征及形成机理.西北大学学报(自然科学版).2002,3(32):281～285
[132]张忠民,朱伟,赵澄林.辽河盆地下第三系深部碎屑岩储层次生孔隙演化模式及其分布.大庆石油学院学报,2002,26(3):12～14
[133] Crossey, L.J.,B.R. Frost and R.C.Surdam. Secondary Porosity in Laumontite. Bearing Sandstones,Clastic Diagenesis.AAPG Memoir,1984,37: 225～238
[134]黄福堂,冯子辉.松辽盆地中生界砂岩次生孔隙形成条件及预测.大庆石油地质与开发,1999, 18(1):1～4
[135]李丕龙.富油断陷盆地气环状分布与惠民凹陷勘探方向.石油实验地质,2001,23(2):146～148
[136]赵密福,刘泽容,等.惠民凹陷临南地区断层活动特征及控油作用.石油勘探与开发.2000,27 (6):9～11
[137]杜玉民.夏口断层对临南斜坡区油气分布及运移方向的影响.新疆石油地质,2005,26(5):525～528
[138]黄第藩,陆相有机质演化与成烃机理,北京:石油工业出版社,1984
[139]程克明,王铁冠,钟宁宁等,烃源岩地球化学,北京:石油工业出版社,1995
[140]胡见义,黄第藩,中国陆相石油地质理论基础,北京:石油工业出版社,1991
[141]傅家谟,秦匡宗,干酪根地球化学,广州:广东科技出版社,1995
[142]赵密福,刘泽溶.惠民凹陷临南地区断层活动特征及控油作用.石油勘探与开发,2000,27(6):9～11
[143]候青,赵健.惠民凹陷构造应力场与油气运聚模拟分析.油气地质与采收率,2006,13(1):62～65
[144]陈洁,张学才.渤海湾盆地构造圈闭类型与勘探方向——以济阳坳陷为例.地球物理学进展,2006,21(3):872～878
[145]刘国臣,徐寿根.惠民凹陷构造特征及圈闭类型研究.石油大学学报(自然科学版),1993,17(1):16～23
[146]赵澄林、张善文、袁静,等.胜利油区沉积储层与油气,北京:石油工业出版社,1999
[147]岳志鹏,曾俊,高志卫.惠民凹陷孔店组一沙四段“膏盐岩"层沉积机理.2006,33(5):591～595
[148]张金亮,常象春,深盆气地质理论及应用,地质出版社,2002
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |