用户名: 密码: 验证码:
桉树人工林地土壤理化性质及其群落的变化
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
伴随桉树人工林的不断迅速发展给社会带来良好经济效益的同时,由于不合理的经营措施也带来了一系列的生态问题。引发了学术界的争论并且愈演愈烈,争论的焦点主要是:(1)桉树人工林林下生物多样性问题;(2)桉树人工林的地力衰退问题。(3)桉树人工林化感作用。本文在研究地设置不同年龄尾巨桉林和柏树疏林(种植尾巨桉前的林地)实验样地,采用野外调查和室内分析相结合的方法对尾巨桉人工林取代柏树疏林后群落组成、土壤理化性质变化及化感作用进行研究,以阐明桉树人工林对林下植物多样性和地力的影响。
     对尾巨桉林取代柏树疏林后的土壤物理性质的研究结果表明:(1)士壤含水量在0~20cm土层中除1年生尾巨桉林与对照柏树林的差异达显著外,其余均不显著;在20~40cm土层中各林地差异均不显著,且各林地0~20cm土层土壤含水量大于20~40cm,差异达到极显著水平。(2)在0~20cm和20~40cm土层中土壤容重均表现为2年生桉林>柏树疏林>1年生桉林>0.5年生桉林,0.5年生桉林土壤容重与1年生、2年生尾巨桉和柏树疏林地间差异均达到极显著水平,而后三种林地之间土壤容重差异均不显著。0~20cm土壤容重小于20~40cm,且差异达到极显著水平。
     对尾巨桉林取代柏树疏林后的土壤化学性质的研究结果表明:(1)土壤的pH值在0~20cm和20~40cm土层中均呈明显的下降趋势,且0~20cm土壤pH小于20~40cm,两者间差异达到极显著水平。(2)土壤有机质、全N、全P含量在0~20cm和20~40cm中均呈现增加的趋势,且0~20cm土层有机质、全N、全P含量大于20~40cm土层,两土层间差异达到极显著水平。(3)碱解N、全K、有效K含量在0~20cm中的含量均大于20~40cm,两土层间差异达到极显著水平,且在两土层中均呈现先减少后增加的趋势。(4)0.5年桉林土壤有效P含量显著低于柏树疏林。随尾巨桉年龄增长,土壤中有效P含量有一定增加,但柏树疏林土壤有效P含量仍显著大于1年桉林和2年桉林,且0~20cm土壤有效P含量大于20~40cm土层,两土层间差异达到显著水平。
     对林下植物群落组成变化的研究结果表明:(1)由于人为干扰,炼山整地,导致尾巨桉林取代柏树疏林后灌木层的消亡。(2)林下草本层优势种的变化:柏树林下的草本层植物组成以积雪草、白茅和青蒿为主要草本植物群种,而在0.5年生尾巨尾巨桉林中则是以铁线草、雀椑、白茅为优势种;1年生尾巨桉林中以白茅、铁线草、小白酒草、竹叶草、半夏为优势种;而2年生尾巨桉林中则以蛇莓、竹叶草、半夏、酢浆草为优势种。(3)多样性指数和物种多样性分析结果显示,尾巨桉林取代柏树疏林后林下物种多样性有所降低。
     对尾巨桉的化感作用实验结果表明:(])在尾巨桉根浸提液处理下,对黄豆和四季豆的化感作用不明显,对黑麦草种子的发芽率、幼苗生长则表现为显著的抑制现象。(2)尾巨桉根际土壤浸提液对黑麦草、黄豆和四季豆的发芽率和幼苗生长均无明显影响。
     在野外条件下,尾巨桉林对黄豆、四季豆和黑麦草的发芽率均无显著影响。对黄豆的根长生长无明显的抑制作用,但2年生尾巨桉对四季豆和黑麦草的根长生长有显著的抑制作用。尾巨桉对黄豆和四季豆的茎长生长的抑制作用随树龄的增大而减弱,对黑麦草茎长生长的抑制作用则是随树龄的增大而加强。
     种植实验结果表明:(1)种植后桉林和柏林土壤水分有一定程度的减少,且种植在桉林下比种植在柏林下减少的程度要大。(2)桉林和柏林土壤pH值、全钾、全磷含量在种植前后无明显变化。(3)种植后桉林和柏林下土壤有机质含量均增加,且黑麦草增加量最大。(4)种植后能显著增加土壤的全氮和有效磷含量;增加量依次是黄豆>四季豆>黑麦草。
With the rapidly development of Eucalyptus plantation, a lot of economic benefit have been brought to the society. However, a great deal of ecological problems have been emerged because of irrationally management practices, Which caused more and more vehement dispute in the academe. The focus of the argument are:(1)The problem of biodiversity of the understory plants in eucalyptus plantation; (2)The problem of decline of soil fertility. (3) Allelopathic effects of Eucalyptus plantations. In this paper, three sort of plots were set, including Eucalyptus urophylla×E.Grandis plantation with different ages and Cupressus sempervirens open forest. The changes of community compositions and soil physical-chemical proprieties we researched through wild investigations and indoor analysis, in order to elucidate the influence of Eucalyptus plantation on understory species diversity, soil fertility and allelopathic effects.
     The results of the study on soil physical proprieties showed as follows:(1)at 0~20cm soil layer, Soil water content had no significant differences except which in Eucalyptus urophylla×E.Grandis plantation and Cupressus sempervirens open forest, at the 20~40cm soil layer Soil water content had not significant differences in the forests. And at 0~20cm layer, the soil water content was greater than 20~40cm, which reached a significant level. (2) at 0~20cm and 20~40cm soil layer, soil bulk density was showed as 2 years Eucalyptus plantation> the Cupressus sempervirens open forest> 1 year Eucalyptus plantation> 0.5 year of Eucalyptus plantation. Between 0.5 year old Eucalyptus plantation and 1 year old,2 years old Eucalyptus and Cupressus sempei-virens open forest, the soil bulk density had significant differences. The other three had no significant difference. The soil bulk density at 0~20cm was less than at 20~40cm, and reached a significant level.
     The results of the study on soil chemical proprieties showed as follows:(1) At 0~20cm and 20~40cm soil layer, the soil pH value showed a significant descent trend. and the soil pH at 0~20cm was less than at 20~40cm, which reached a significant level. (2) At 0~20cm and 20~40cm. soil organic matter, total N, P content showed an increasing trend. Soil organic matter, total N and total P content at 0~20cm was more than at 20~40cm soil layer, which achieved a significant level. (3) Available N, the total K, available K content at 0~20cm were greater than at 20~40cm, which achieved a significant level. (4) At 0~20cm and 20~40cm soil layer, Available P content showed a significant descent trend, and Available P content at 0~20cm was more than at 20~40cm, which reached a significant level.
     The results of study on community compositions showed as follow:(1) Since the Cupressus sempervirens open forest was replaced by the Eucalyptus urophylla×E.Grandis plantation, human interference and burning site preparation led to disappearence of the shrub layer. (2) The dominant species of herb layer changes:the composition of herb layer under the Cupressus sempervirens open forest are the Centella asiatica (L.) Urban, Imperata koenigii (Retz.) Beauv and Artemisia apiacea as the main species.0.5 year Eucalyptus plantation is based on Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers, Paspalum thunbergii Kunth ex Steud and Imperata koenigii (Retz.) Beauv as the dominant species.1 year Eucalyptus plantation was based on Imperata koenigii (Retz.) Beauv, Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers, Conyza Canadensis (L.) Crong, Oplismeums compositus (L.) Beauv, and Pinellia ternate (Thunb.) Breit as the dominant species, and 2 years old Eucalyptus plantation was based on Duchesnea indica (Andr.) Focke, Oplismeums compositus (L.) Beauv, Pinellia ternate (Thunb.) Breit and Oxalis coniculata L as the dominant species. (3) The results of study on diversity index and species richness showed that the species diversity ofunderstory had increased.
     The experimental results indicated that:(1) With the water extracts of roots of Eucalyptus urophyllaxE.Grandis, the allelopathic effect was not significant for Giycine max (L)Merrill and Phaseolus vulgaris L., but germination percentage, seedling growth of lolium multiflorum Lam. were inhibited significantly. (2)The rhizosphere soil leachate of Eucalyptus urophylla×E.Grandis grandis was not significantly inhibited the seed gemrination and seedling growth of Lolium multiflorum Lam., Giycine max (L)Merrill and Phaseolus vulgaris L.
     Under field conditions, the allelopathic effect of Eucalyptus urophylla×E.Grandis plantation did not have significant influences on the germination percentage of lolium multiflorum Lam., Giycine max (L)Merrill, Phaseolus vulgaris L. and Phaseolus vulgaris L., the same to root growth of Giycine max (L)Merrill. However,2 years Eucalyptus urophylla×E.Grandis had remarkably inhibited the stem growth of Phaseolus vulgaris L.and Lolium multiflorum Lam. when the root elongation of Giycine max (L)Merrill and Phaseolus vulgaris L.presented a downward trend as the inhibitory effects strengthening with increase of the age,except Lolium multiflorum Lam..
     The results of cultivation experiment shows that:(1)The soil water content of Eucalyptus plantation and Cupressus sempervirens open forest had decreased to some extent after planting. (2) The soil pH value, total K,P content were not obvious changed in all treatments at harvest compared to those before transplanting. (3)After transplanting, the soil organic matter content had increased, and the lolium multiflorum Lam. made the largest increase. (4)The total N and available P content had increased significantly after planting, the performance of increasing was Giycine max (L)Merrill>Phaseolus vulgaris L.>lolium multiflorum Lam
引文
[1]温远光.连栽桉树人工林植物物种多样性与生态系统功能关系的长期实验研究[D].四川大学博士学位论文.2006.
    [2]Cheng-Feng, Teng-chuan Yong. Bulletin of Taiwan Forestry Research Institute New series[J]. Results of adaptability test of twenty Eucalyptus species growth in Taiwan.1996,10 (3):283-292.
    [3]祁述雄等.中国桉树[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1995年.
    [4]Dye, P. J. Response of Eucalypt us (SA) grandis Trees to soil water deficits[J]. Tree physiology,16 (1-2):237-238.
    [5]Roden, Johns and Marilyn, C. The effect of elevated CO2 on growth and photosynthesis of two Eucalypt-us species exposed to high temperature and water deficiency[J]. Ball (us) plant phsiology,1996,111 (3):909-919.
    [6]Saeed, M. Asif and A. W. salir. Antimicrobial studies of the constituts of Pakistani Eucalypt us oils[J]. Journal of faculty of pharmacy of GaZi,1995,12 (2):129-140.
    [7]余雪标.桉树人工林长期生产力管理研究[M].北京:中国林业出版社.2000,59-61
    [8]蒋有绪.人工林地力衰退研究[M].北京:中国科技出版社.1992,11-14
    [9][澳]L.D.普瑞尔(曾龄英译).桉树生物学[M].云南:林业科学研究所出版,1995.
    [10][澳]W.E.希里斯(王豁然等译).桉树栽培与利用[M].北京:中国林业出版社.1990
    [11]Edgard Campinhos JR.Sustainable planatafions of high-yield Eucalyptus trees for production of fiber:the Aracruz case[J].New Forests.1999,17:129-143.
    [12]Turnbull, J. W., (Ed.). Eucalypts in Asia[G].Proceedings of an international conference held in zhanjiang, Guangdong. Peoples Republic of china.7-11 April 2003.ACIAR Proceedings No.111.
    [13]Turnbull. Eucalypt plantations [J]. New Forests,1999.17:37-52.
    [14]FAO.世界森林资源状况[M].联合国粮食及农业组织,罗马,2005.
    [15]王豁然.桉树人工林发展与景观生态和生物多样性——StoraEnso桉树人工林对广西南部地理景观影响的例证研究[J].广西林业科学,2006.35(4):192-194.
    [16]温远光,刘世荣,陈放,等.桉树工业人工林植物物种多样性及动态研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2005.27(4):17-22.
    [17]孙长忠,沈国舫,李吉跃等.我国主要树种人工林生产力现状及潜力的调查研究:桉树、落叶松及樟子松人工林生产力研究[J].林业科学研究,2001.14(6):657-667
    [18]李晓清.胡天宇.四川桉树基因收集及培育技术[J].四川林业科技.2004,25(1):26-30.
    [19]徐化成.人工林地力衰退研究[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社.1992:3-10.
    [20]叶镜中,邵锦峰.炼山对土壤理化性质的影响[J].南京林业大学学报.1990,14(1):1-7.
    [21]廖观荣,等.雷州半岛桉树人工林地力退化的现状和特征[J].土壤与环境2002,(1):25-28
    [22]徐大平,张宁南.桉树人工林:是非任由专家评说[J].造纸信息,2005,(7):3-4.
    [23]余雪标,杨国清,李尚昆,等.不同连载代次树树林土壤性质的变化[M].//余雪标.桉树人工林长期生产力管理研究.北京:中国林业出版社,1999.94-103.
    [24]郭国华.刚果12号桉林地土壤肥力监测初报[J].热带林业,1995.23(1):7-11.
    [25]赵庭香.桉树生态环境变化[J].广西林业,1988,(4):22
    [26]曾杰,翁启杰,郑海水.几种桉树生化感作用的生物测定[J].林业实用技术.2004(6):4-5.
    [27]徐大平,等.巨尾桉人工林地上部分净生产力及养分循环的研究[J].林业科学研究,1997.10(4):365-372.
    [28]杨再鸿.海南岛桉树人工林下植物多样性的比较研究[D].华南热带农业大学硕士学位论文.2001
    [29]Swinded-BF.etc. Species diversity in young douglas-fir plantation compared to old growth Forest[J]. Ecology and Management.1988.23:227-231
    [30]张文臣,张俊佩.人工林存在的问题与对策[J].防护林科技.2004.(3):45-46.
    [31]徐化成.人工林和天然林比较评价[J].世界林业研究.1991,(3):50-56.
    [32]熊朝耀.桉树林、云南松林及松栎混交林下植物群落调查与分析[J].林业调查规划,2006.31(3):28-33
    [33]陈茂乾,廖崇惠.小良热带人工林脊椎动物调查[J].热带亚热带森林生态系统研究,1984.2:202-212
    [34]温远光,等.广西沿海防护林生物多样性保育功能的研究[J].防护林科技.2001,(1):1-5.
    [35]陈少雄.桉树生态问题的来源与对策[J].热带林业,2005.3(4):26-30
    [36]温远光.桉树生态、社会问题与科学发展[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2008.54-55
    [37]曾杰,郑海水,翁启杰,等.桉树人工林中的他感作用研究综述[C].沈国舫,翟明普主编.混交林研究-全国混交林与树种关系学术讨论会论文集.北京:中国林业出版社,1997.285-289
    [38]黄卓烈,林韶湘,谭绍满,等.尾叶桉等植物叶提取液对几种植物插条生根和种子萌发的影响[J].林业科学研究,1997,10(5):546-550.
    [39]Ewers Bren T, Dan Binkly. Influence of adjacent stand an spatial pattern of carbon and nitrogen in Eucalyptus and Albizzia plantations. Canadian Journal of Forestry Research.1996,26(8):1501-1503.
    [40]李昆,陈玉德.元谋干热河谷人工林地的水分输入与土壤水分研究[J].林业科学研究.1995.8(6)651-657.
    [41]李绍文.生态生物化学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2001.45-69.
    [42]Florence R. Cultural problems of Eucalyptus as exotics [J]. Commonwealth Forestry Review [C].1986 (65): 141-163
    [43]曾任森.李蓬为.窿缘按和尾叶桉的化感作用研究[J].华南农业大学学报,1997(18):6-10.
    [44]曾杰,翁启杰,郑海水.几种桉树生化感作用的生物测定[J].林业实用技术.2004.(6):4-5.
    [45]杨冬生,杨汉英.引种桉树入川的生态学思考[J].四川林业科技,1990.12(2):56-60.
    [46]李晓清,胡天宇.四川桉树适生种及栽培技术[J].林业科技开发,2004.18(3):45-47.
    [47]何丙辉,徐霞,辜世贤.潼南县土地利用景观格局特征分析[J].2005.12(3):130-133
    [48]杨剑虹,王成林.代享林.土壤农化分析与环境检测[M].北京:中国大地出版社.2008.
    [49]龚珊珊,廖善刚.按树人工林与天然林土壤养分的对比研究[J].2009.36(3):1-4.
    [50]廖善刚,叶志君,汪炎明,等.桉树人工林与杉木林、毛竹林土壤理化性质对比研究2008,36(3):53-58.
    [51]谢宝东.方升佐.生物覆盖对山地杨树人工林土壤容重及稳定性影响[J].林业科技开发,2010.24(1):72-75.
    [52]郭俊誉,时忠杰,徐大平,等.天然次生林人工更新后对土壤物理性质及碳贮量的影响[J].生态环境,2008,17(6):2366-2369.
    [53]李东海,杨小波,邓运武,等.桉树人工林林下植被、地面覆盖物与土壤物理性质的关系[J].生态学杂志,2006,25(6):607-611.
    [54]中国科学院南京土壤研究所.土壤农化分析[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1978:365-366.
    [55]明安刚,温远光,朱宏光,等.连栽对桉树人工林土壤养分含量的影响[J].广西林业科学,209,38(1):26-30.
    [56]余雪标,白先权.不同连栽代数桉树人工林的养分循环[J].热带作物学报,1999,20(3):60-66.
    [57]盛炜彤.我国人工用材林发展中的生态问题及治理对策[J].世界林业研究,1995,(2):51-55.
    [58]袁颖红,樊后保,黄荣珍,等.连续年龄序列枝树人工林土壤微量元素含量及其影响因素[J].生态环境学报2009,18(1):268-273.
    [59]张如龙,秦晓燕,巴建文.张掖市北郊湿地土壤有机质与全氮、全磷的相关性分析[J].地下水,2010.32(4):28-31.
    [60]沈琼华.绍兴水网平原水稻土有机质和全氮含量研究[J].浙江农业科学,2010,(2):394-396.
    [61]郭玉红,郎南军,江期川,等.云南干热河谷区3种不同类型植被土壤的有效氮研究[J].贵州农业科学,2010,38(4):100-102.
    [62]韩凤朋,张兴昌,郑纪勇.黄河中游土壤有机质与氮磷相关性分析[J].人民黄河,2007,29(4):58-59.
    [63]Lueas Y, Luizao F J, Rouiller J, et al. The relationship between the biological activity of the rain forest and the mineral composition of the soils[J]. Science,1993,260:521-523.
    [64]万明利,洪莉,李贤伟,等.宽坝林区人工林群落植物物种多样性研究[J].四川林业科技.2007,27(3):15-18
    [65]彭少麟,陈章和.广东亚热带森林群落物种多样性[J].生态学,1983,(2):68-74.
    [66]朱锦懋,姜志林,郑群瑞,等.福建万木林自然保护区森林群落物种多样性[J].生态学杂志.1997.16(2):1-6.
    [67]马克平.生物群落多样性的测度方法Ⅰ:α多样性测度方法(下)[J].生物多样性.1994,2(4):231-239
    [68]陈秋波.桉树人工林生物多样性研究进展[J].热带作物学报,2001,23(4):82-90.
    [69]徐大平,张宁南.桉树人工林生态效应研究进展[J].广西林业科学,2006,35(4):179-188.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700