用户名: 密码: 验证码:
坳陷湖盆浊流、地震事件沉积研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
通过野外剖面观测、岩心描述,薄片鉴定和各种资料的综合分析,运用沉积学、石油地质学及地震地质学等理论对鄂尔多斯盆地南部上三叠统延长组长6-长8中的浊流和地震事件沉积进行了研究。
     本文对鄂尔多斯盆地南部上三叠统延长组长6-长8浊积岩的岩石类型,粒度特征,沉积构造特征进行了详细研究。研究表明长6-长8浊积岩的岩石类型为长石岩屑砂岩、岩屑长石砂岩和长石砂岩;浊积砂岩的矿物成熟度低,结构成熟度较低,杂基含量高。粒度分析表明为典型的浊流特征。沉积构造可见单一递变粒序、各种底层面构造、滑塌角砾和鲍马序列等、具有明显的韵律性和旋回性等。识别出薄层浊积岩、中层浊积岩、厚层浊积岩三种类型并描述其特征,主要为三角洲前缘滑塌浊积岩。在此基础上进行了亚相划分,详细描述了各亚相特征;确定了浊积岩分布在庆阳、合水、固城、安置农场、宁县及铜川地区。浊积岩的形成主要由外界的触发机制、充足的物源供给、古斜坡地形等因素控制。
     鄂尔多斯盆地南部中生界延长组长6—长8中发育与地震有关的震积岩。通过岩心观察和描述,对湖泊软沉积物的一些特殊构造进行了精细解释,识别出与古地震有关的软沉积物变形构造主要有微同沉积断裂、液化砂岩脉、振动液化卷曲变形构造、环状层理等。同时在塔17井中发现完整的震积岩垂向序列,据此建立了坳陷湖盆的震积岩垂向序列模式,序列自下而上分为下伏未震层、微断裂层、微褶皱层、碎块层及液化均一层,上覆未震层。定性讨论了震积岩特征与地震强度的关系及地震驱动与斜坡滑塌形成的变形构造之间的区别。
     该震积岩的发现为盆地构造演化提供了动力学解释,表明晚三叠世秦岭造山带南北向逆冲带的强烈活动,是本区延长组震积作用的直接诱发因素。同时该震积岩的发现,为盆地南部延长组长6—长8发育的大规模浊积岩的外界触发机制是由地震活动引起的提供了有力证据,还可以在更小的时间尺度内恢复盆地边界断裂的强烈活动性,对研究延长组时期的构造演化具有重要的科学意义。
Having surveyed the field sections, cores of wells, observed manymicrostructures and analysed various relevant documents, with the guide of the theoryof sedimentology, petroleum geology and seismogeology, the paper reacher the eventsof turbidity and earthquake in the Chang6-Chang8 of Yanchang Formation, UpperTriassic, Ordos Basin.
     Types of petrology, characteristics of granularity, sedimentary structures ofturbidite of Chang6-Chang8 of the Yanchang Formation are researched. The turbiditeof Chang6-Chang8 mainly composed of lithic feldspathic sandstone, feldspathiclithic sandstone and feldspathic sandstone. Which have low compositional maturity,textural maturity and high matrix. The results of grain-size analysis show that thegrain-size parameters, distribution, compositions are evidently turbidite sediment.Sedimentary features observed in the cores include unidirectional graded sequence,burthen structures, fluidization structures, breccia, rhythm and cyclic sequence andBouma sequence. There are three type of turbidite which are lamina turbidite, mediumthickness turbidite and thick turbidite, they are mostly slumped turbidite from deltafront.Base on those characteristics, sedimentary faces are identified, The characteristicof sedimentary sub-facies are described detailed. It is confirmed that the distributionof turbidite is located in Qingyang, Heshui, Gucheng, Anzhinongchang, Ningxian,Tongchuan region. Outside trigger mechanism, enough sources and slope landform arethe most important conditions to form turbidite.
     Seismites were identified by soft-sediment deformational structures. Manyearthquake-related Seismites were discovered in the Chang6-Chang8 of theYanchang Formation. Having surveyed the cores of wells, many typical deformationstructures were discovered, Such as syn-sedimentary micro factures, stone veins, vibrational liquefaction, deformation structure, earthquake breccia and load-casts andballs-and pillows types, cyclic bedding etc. They were formed in const rained horizonsbounded by undeformed strata, suggesting that they are syndepositional. Thecomplete vertical sequence of seismite of Ta 17 well, which include shattered rock bed,ladder-shaped faulted bed, vibrational liquefaction deformation structure bed,liquefied sandstone vein bed, rubble bed and homogenized bed. The association isdiscussed between the character of seismites with earthquake intensity.Deformational structure of earthquake genesis is different from slump genesis.
     The discovery of seismit can be used to interpret the tectonic evolvement of thebasin. In Late Triassic, with the Closeing of Qinling and the sea slot of SouthernQilian, The south-north thrust band occurrence Strong activity. It was the directinducing factors of the seimo-deposition in Yanchang Formation.and provided theevidence for the turbidite of Chang6-Chang8 of the Yanchang Formation,southwestern Ordos Basin, the outsider trigger mechanism of the turbidite isearthquake activity.
引文
[1] Bouma A H. Sedimentalogy Of solne flysh deposim[J].Agraphic approach tofades interpretation. 1962, 168~183.
    [2] Dorrik A V Stow. Mike Mayall. 2OOO. Deep water sedimentary systems:New modles for the 21 century[J].Marine and Petroleum Grology, 17(2): 125~135.
    [3] G. Shanmugam. The Bouma sequence and the turbidite mind set[J]. Earth Science Reviews. 1997, (42) :201—229.
    [4] O. Shanmugam. 50 years of the turbidite paradigm (1950s-1990s): deep~water processes and facies models—a critical perspective. Marine and Petroleum Geology[J].2000, 17: 285~342.
    [5] G. Shanmugam. Ten turbidite myths. Earth Science Reviews. 2002, 58: 311~341.
    [6] G. Shanmugam. Moiola R.J. Reinterpretation of depositional processes in a classicflys sequence (Pennsylvanian Jackfork Group), Ouachita Mountains arkansas and Oklahoma[J].AAPG, 1995, 79:672—695.
    [7] Hibsch.C,谢新生.厄瓜多尔基多地区全新世液化及松散沉积变形—湖相沉积中一种古地震历史的记录[J].地壳构造与地壳应力,1999,1(83):25~38.
    [8] Lowe D R. Sediment gravity flows, Ⅱ.Depositional models with special reference to the deposits of high-density turbidity currents[J].Sediment. Petrol. 1982, 52:279-297.
    [9] Middleton, O.V. Experiments on density and turbidity currents-Ⅲ, deposition of sediment[J].Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences. 1967, 4, 475-505.
    [10] Normark. W.R. Sublacustrine Fan Morpholgy in hake Superior[J]. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin. 1976, 60(7):912-931.
    [11] Obermeier S F, Jacobson R B, Smoot J P, et al. Earquake-induced liquefaction features in thecoastal setting of South Carolina and in the fluvial setting of the New Madrid seismic zone[J]. US Geological Survey Professional Paper 1504, 1990:1~44.
    [12] Obermeier S F, Pond E C. Issues in using liquefaction feaqures for paleoseismic analysis[J].Seismological Research letters. 1999, 70: 34~58.
    [13] Obermeier S F. Seismic liquefaction features: examples from paleoseismic investigations in the continental United States[J].Engineering Geology, 1998, 68(1): 16~34.
    [14] Obermeier S F. Use of liquefaction-induced features for paleoseismic analysis-An overview of how seismic liquefaction features can be distinguished from other features and how their regional distribution and properties of source sediment can be used to infer the location and strength of Holocene paleo-earthquakeds[J]. Engineering Geology, 1996, 44: 1~74.
    [15] Rodriguez—Pascua M A, Calvo J P, De Vicente G, et al. Soft2sediment deformation structures interpreted of the Prebetic Zone, SE Spain, and their potential use as indicators of earthquake magnitudes during the hateMiocene. Sedimentary Geology. 2000, 135 (124) : 117~135.
    [16] S.F. KhafizovandP. e. Syngaevsky. Turbidite, slump and debris flow deposits at the Kalchinskoe and Zimnee oildields West Siberian Basin[J], Journal of Petroleum Geology.2005, (28) 1:49~65.
    [17] SeilacherA. Fault-graded beds interpreted as seismites. Sedimentology, 1969, 13 (1/2): 155~159
    [18] Seilacher A. Sedimentary structures tentatively attributed to seismic events[J]. Mar Geot. 1984, 55(1): 1~12.
    [19] Stow, D.A.V., Bowen, A.J.A physical model for the transport and sorting of fine~grained sediment by turbidity currents[J].Sedimentology. 1980, 27: 31~46.
    [20] Walker R G. Deep water sandtone facies and ancient submarine fan: Modeis for exploration for stratigraphictraps[J].AAPG Bull. I978, 62(6):932~966.
    [21] Vincent Lignier, Christian Beck , Emmanuel Chapron. Geometrical and textural characteristics of earthquake-induced disturbances in quaternary alacio-lacustrine sediments (Argiles duTrieves', Alps, France). Eart&Planetary Sciences 1998.327, 645-652
    [22] 陈洪洲,高峰,吴雪娟,等.从历史记录看地震与火山喷发关系[J].地震学报.2004,26(4):448~453.
    [23] 陈全红,李文厚,郭艳琴等.鄂尔多斯盆地南部延长组浊积岩体系及油气勘探意义,地质学报,2006,80(5):656-663
    [24] 陈世悦,袁文芳,鄢继华.济阳坳陷早第二纪震积岩的发现及其意义[J].地质科学.2003,38(3):377~386.
    [25] 池原研,马建华.浊积层—海底沉积物中残留的古代大地震记录[J].海洋地质动态.2001,17(1):17~18.
    [26] 崔周旗,李文厚,吴健平,等.乌里雅斯太凹陷斜坡带湖底扇相砾岩体沉积特征与隐敲油藏勘探[J].沉积学报,2005,(01):21~28
    [27] 丁国瑜.占地震标忠问题.中国活动断裂[M].北京:地震出版社,1982.276~281.
    [28] 杜远生,韩欣.论震积作用和震积岩[J].地球科学进展.2000,15(4):389~394.
    [29] 杜远生,张传恒,韩欣,等.滇中中元占代昆阳群的地震事什沉积及其地质意义[J].中国科学D辑,2001,31(4):283—290.
    [30] 方爱民,李继亮,侯泉林.浊流及相关重力流沉积研究综述[J]地质论评.1998,(03):270~280.
    [31] 冯先岳,栾超群,李军,等.确定古地震标忠研究[J].中国地震.1987,3(2):64~68.
    [32] 冯先岳.地震振动液化形变的研究[J].内陆地震.1989,3(4):209~307.
    [33] 付金华,郭正权,邓秀芹.鄂尔多斯盆地西南地区上三叠统延长组沉积相及石油地质意义[J].古地理学报,2005,34~44.
    [34] 付文利,于艳琴,杨光,等.东营凹陷沙二段、沙四段震积岩研究.油气地质与采收率,2004.11(2):6~8.
    [35] 高振寰,宋惠珍,张镝亚,等.砂土液化形成的地质标忠[J].水文地质工程地质,1982,(03):19-21.
    [36] 高振中,吴智勇.深水异地沉积研究—同顺与展望[J]江汉石油学院学报,1995,(04):1~4.
    [37] 郭成贤.我国深水异地沉积研究二十年[J].占地理学报,2000,(01):1~10.
    [38] 郭建华,王方平,刘贵,等.湘西大庸上震旦统灯影组震裂角砾岩[J].石油实验地质, 1999,21(3):219~224.
    [39] 何起祥,刘招君,王东坡,等.湖泊相浊积岩的主要特征及其地质意义[J].沉积学报,1984,2(4):33-46.
    [40] 何自新等,鄂尔多斯盆地构造演化与油气,2003,北京:石油工业出版社。
    [41] 洪庆玉.沉积物重力流地质学[M].成都:成都科技大学出版社.1992,116~121.
    [42] 侯明才,田景春,陈洪德,等.尔营凹陷牛庄洼陷沙三中段浊积扇特征研究[J].成都理工学院学报,2002,(05):506~510.
    [43] 姜涛,解习农.细粒浊积体的油气地质意义[J]地质科技情报.2003,(02):51~55.
    [44] 姜在兴,赵徵林,刘孟慧.一种沿深水箕状谷纵向搬运的重力流沉积[J].石油实验地质,1988,(02).
    [45] 赖婉琦,顾家裕.渤海湾含油盆地中的浊积岩[J].沉积学报,1984,2(4):47~57.
    [46] 赖伟庆,张金亮.胡状集油田沙三3亚段浊积岩沉积特征[J].西安石油学院学报(自然科学版),1996,(02)22~30.
    [47] 李趁义.东营三角洲滑塌浊积岩形成机制与高频基准面旋回控砂模式研究:[D].北京:中国地质大学博士学位论文,2005:34~58.
    [48] 李继亮,陈吕明,高文学,等.我国几个地区浊积岩系的特征[J].地质科学,1978,(01):62~69
    [49] 李杰森,宋学良,孙应伦,等.云南抚仙湖现代浊流沉积物的磁化率测定及与地震相关性分析[J].地震学报.1999,21(1)):83~88.
    [50] 李文厚,邵磊,魏红红,等.西北地区湖相浊流沉积[J].西北大学学报(自然科学版),2001,31(1):57-62.
    [51] 李文厚,周立发,符俊辉,等.库车坳陷上三叠统的浊流沉积及石油地质意义[J].沉积学报,1997,(01):22~24.
    [52] 李小梅.渤南油田沙三段湖泊浊流沉积及其演化[J].新疆石油地质,2005,(01):68~70.
    [53] 李雁玲,李杰森.云南抚仙湖近千年地震事件记录[J].地球科学进展.2003,18(6):906-911.
    [54] 李祯,温显端,周慧堂,等.鄂尔多斯盆地东缘中生代延长组浊流沉积的发现与意义[J].现代地质,1995.9(1):99~107.
    [55] 梁定益,聂泽同,宋志敏,等.正在萌芽段的震积地层学[J].高校地质学报.1997,3(4):458~461.
    [56] 粱定益,聂泽同,宋志敏.再论震积岩及震积不整合——以川西、滇西为例[J].地球科学.1994,19(6)843~850.
    [57] 蔺连第,朗艳,金蕙,等.二连盆地鸟里斯太凹陷早自垩世湖底扇[J].石油勘探与开发,2005,32(3):27-32.
    [58] 蔺毓秀.松辽盆地北部姚家组水进二角洲沉积和嫩一段浊流沉积[J].沉积学报,1986,(02)101~110.
    [59] 刘宝珺,余光明.岩相古地理学教程[M].地质矿产部岩相古地理工作组.1990,21-22.
    [60] 刘宝珺.沉积岩石学[M].地质出版社.1981.
    [61] 刘池洋,赵红格,桂小军等.鄂尔多斯盆地演化-改造的时空坐标及其成藏(矿)响应.地质学报,2006,80(5):618~638.
    [62] 刘丽军,佟彦明,纪云龙,等.北部湾盆地福山凹陷流沙港组湖底扇沉积特征及发育背景[J].石油实验地质,2003,(02):110~115.
    [63] 刘孟慧,赵澂林.渤海湾地区下第三系湖底扇的沉积特征[J].石油大学学报(自然科学 版),1984,(()3)223~235.
    [64] 刘宪斌,万晓樵,林金逞等.陆相浊流沉积体系与油气[J]地球学报.2003,(01):61~66.
    [65] 刘颖,谢君裴.沙土振动液化[D].北京:地震出版社,1984.
    [66] 刘绍龙,华北地区大型三叠纪原始盆地的存在[J],地质学报,1986,60(2):128-138
    [67] 柳成忠,霍广君,张冬玲.辽河盆地西部凹陷冷家油田沙二段扇二角洲—湖底扇沉积模式[J].大庆石油学院学报,1999,(01):1~4.
    [68] 路慎强.济阳坳陷占近系碎屑岩地层中震积岩识别标忠研究[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版).2006,30(5):8-13.
    [69] 孟祥化,蔡国印等.下寒武统大林子组溶解蒸发岩系旋同层序及渗流构造成因[J].科学通报,2002,47(14):1113-1117.
    [70] 孟祥化,葛铭.中朝板块层序.事件.演化-天文周期的沉积响应和意义[M].科学出版社,2004:129-144.
    [71] 乔秀夫,高林忠.华北中新元古代及早中生代地震灾变事件及与Rodinia的关系.科学通报,1999,44(16):1753~1758
    [72] 乔秀大,李海兵,高林忠.华北地台震旦纪-早古生代的地震节律[J].地学前缘1997,4(3-4):155-160.
    [73] 乔秀大,宋天锐,高林与等.碳酸盐岩振动液化地震序列.地质学报,1994,68(1):16~32
    [74] 乔秀夫,宋天锐,李海兵,等.辽东半岛南部震旦系—下寒武统成因地层[J].北京:科学出版社.1995:57~72.
    [75] 乔秀大,宋天锐等.是地震液化泄水成因,不是“渗流管”构造.科学通报[J].2002,47(14):1118-1120
    [76] 冉波,王成善,朱利东,等.酒泉盆地早自垩世沉积相特征与构造样式浅析[J].大地构造与成矿学,2006,30(2):189-192.
    [77] 饶孟余,钟建华,郭泽清,等.济阳坳陷牛庄洼陷沙三段三角洲前缘浊积岩特征[J].高校地质学报.2004,10(4):624~633.
    [78] 饶孟余,钟建华,赵志根等.浊流沉积研究综述平和展望[J].煤田地质与勘探,2004,(06):1~5.
    [79] 任磊大.谈谈粘土矿物对石油地质研究的意义[J].石油试验地质,1981,3(1):34~51.
    [80] 宋天锐.北京十三陵前寒武纪碳酸盐岩地层中的一套可能的地震—海啸序列[J].科学通报.1988,33(8):609—611.
    [81] 孙枢,李继亮.我国浊流与其他重力流沉积研究进展概况和发展方向问题刍议[J].沉积学报.1984,(04):102~116.
    [82] 孙顺才,张立仁.云南抚仙湖现代浊流沉积特征的初步研究[J].科学通报.1981,(11):678~681.
    [83] 孙晓猛,梁定益,聂泽同.大陆边缘震积岩序列—以金沙江中段震积岩为例[J].现代地质.1995,9(3):271~278.
    [84] 田洪水,万中杰,王华林.鲁中寒武系馒头组震积岩的发现及初步研究[J].地质论评.2003,49(2):123—131.
    [85] 田洪水,张增奇.山东安丘地区郯庐断裂带占近纪冲积物震积岩序列.地质科学,2006,41(2):208~216.
    [86] 王尔康,欧阳钟辉,刘聪等.一种古地震岩石记录的发现[J].科学通报,1986,31(5): 365~368.
    [87] 王金铎,韩文功,王建国,等.东营凹陷沙三段浊积岩体系及其油气勘探意义[J].石油学报,2003,(06):24~29.
    [88] 王永栋,江德昕,谢小平.陕西秃尾河晚三叠世孢粉植物群及其环境意义[J].沉积学报.2003,21(3):434-440.
    [89] 魏乖高,张世奇,姜在兴,等.东营凹陷现河地区沙三段震积岩特征及其意义[J].沉积学报.2006,24(6):798-805.
    [90] 魏魁生.河南泌阳凹陷双河地区核桃园组第三段重力流沉积研究[J].西南石油学院学报,1989,(01):12~16.
    [91] 文应初.陕甘宁盆地晚三叠世的湖相重力流沉积及其含油性[J].两南石油学院学报,1983(2)1~17.
    [92] 吴崇筠,薛叔浩,杜永林,等.中国含油气盆地沉积学[J].北京:石油工业出版社,1992.65~88.
    [93] 吴贤涛,尹国勋.四川峨眉晚侏罗世湖泊沉积中震积岩的发现及其意义[J].沉积学报.1992,10(3):19~24.
    [94] 武振杰.滇中中元古代软沉积物变形构造及其地质意义[D].中国地质大学(北京)硕士学位论文,2006.
    [95] 许靖华.大地构造与沉积作用[M].地质出版社.1985,333-340.
    [96] 鄢继华,陈世悦,宋国奇,等.三角洲前缘滑塌浊积岩形成过程初探.沉积学报,2004,(04):573~578.
    [97] 鄢继华,陈世悦,宋国奇,等..三角洲前缘滑塌浊积岩形成过程初探[J].沉积学报.2004,22(4):573~578.
    [98] 严进荣,陈尔,郭勤涛,等.洼陷中浊积岩沉积特征及油气富集规律研究[J].沉积与特提斯地质,2002,(03):19~24.
    [99] 阎火.辽河裂谷西部凹陷下第三系沙河街组三段浊积岩相及其分布[J].石油勘探与开发,1984,3:23-30.
    [100] 杨景春.史前地震及其鉴别标志的几个问题[M].史前地震与第四纪地质文集.陕西科学出版社,1982.
    [101] 杨有运,印支期秦岭造山活动对鄂尔多斯盆地延长组沉积的影响[J],煤田地质与勘探,2004,32(5):7-9
    [102] 尹太举,张吕民,李中超.东营凹陷滑塌浊积岩沉积特征及油气藏勘探技术[J].石油与天然气地质,2006,27(1):94-98.
    [103] 袁静,陈鑫,田洪水.济阳坳陷古近纪软沉积变形层中的环状层理及成因,沉积学报[J],2006,24(5):666-671
    [104] 袁静.山东惠民凹陷古近纪震积岩特征及其地质意义,沉积学报,2004,22(1):41-46
    [105] 袁静。中国震积作用和震积岩研究进展,石油大学学报(自然科学版),2005,29(1):144-149
    [106] 张传恒,刘典波,张传林,等.新疆博格达地区旱二叠世软沉积物变形构造:弧后碰撞前陆盆地地震记录[J],地学前缘.2006,13(4):255-266.
    [107] 张春生,刘忠保,施冬等.三角洲分流河道及河口坝形成过程的物理模拟[J]地学前缘,2000,(03):168~176.
    [108] 张春生,刘忠保,施冬等.涌流型浊流形成及发展的实验模拟[J]沉积学报,2002,(01):112~119.
    [109] 张国伟,张本仁,袁学诚,等.秦岭造山带与大陆动力学.北京:科学出版社,2001. 706~724.
    [110] 张琴,朱筱敏,张建军等.酒西盆地青南凹陷柳沟庄—窟窿山地区下自垩统震积岩的发现及意义,地质学报,2003,77(2):158~162
    [111] 张喜林,朱筱敏,钟大康,等.苏北盆地高邮凹陷占近系戴南组沉积相及其对隐蔽油气藏的控制[J].古地理学报,2005,7(2):208-218.
    [112] 张勇.惠民凹陷西部早第三纪沙河街组浊积扇及砂岩体沉积特征研究[J].地球学报,2001,(01)43~48:.
    [113] 赵澄林,刘孟慧.湖底扇相模式及其在油气预测中的应用[J].华东石油学院学报,1984.(4):1~10.
    [114] 赵澄林.沉积学原理[M].北京:石油工?业出版社,2001.
    [115] 赵密福,信荃麟,刘泽容.惠民凹陷临南洼陷滑塌浊积岩的分布规律及其控制因素[J].石油实验地质,2001,(03):21~24.
    [116] 赵卫卫,查明,杨剑萍.中国震积岩研究综述.地层学杂志,2006.30(2):172~176
    [117] 赵重远等.华北克拉通沉积盆地形成与油气赋存,1990,西安:西北大学出版社,1~63
    [118] 中国石油学会石油地质委员会.国外浊积岩和扇三角洲研究[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1986.
    [119] 中国石油勘探开发研究院西北分院,鄂尔多斯分院.鄂尔多斯盆地中生代盆地演化及勘探潜力分析(科研报告),2005.
    [120] 朱海之,陈建英,陈国顺,等.山西临汾古湖沉积中的史前地震遗迹[J].防灾减火工程学报.1982,2:15~20
    [121] 朱海之,朱淑莲,王立功,等.宁夏中宁发现古地震剖面[J].地震地质,1979,(04):12~21.
    [122] 朱筱敏,信荃麟,刘泽容.陆相断陷湖盆中滑塌浊积扇的识别[J],科学通报.1991,36(7):535~538.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700