用户名: 密码: 验证码:
三峡工程对洞庭湖区湿地景观格局及生态健康的影响研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
洞庭湖位于长江中游荆江南岸,三峡工程是长江最大的水利枢纽工程。本文以洞庭湖区湿地为研究对象,运用景观生态学、遥感技术、管理科学、数学与计算机科学等多学科融合的方法与技术,研究三峡工程运行前后洞庭湖区湿地景观格局变化的特征,构建基于景观生态学的湿地生态系统健康评价指标体系,从时空角度进行洞庭湖区湿地生态系统健康评价。本研究的主要内容和结论有:
     (1)三峡工程运行前后洞庭湖区湿地景观格局变化
     根据研究区1987-2008年6期遥感影像数据资料,运用马尔科夫数学模型分析洞庭湖区湿地景观格局在三峡工程运行前(1987-1998年)、(1998-2003年)及运行后(2003-2008年)的时间动态变化特征。结果表明:区域整体景观破碎化程度逐渐增大,斑块数量增加,斑块密度不断增大,由1987年的0.61个.km-2增加为2008年的0.76个.km-2;斑块平均面积由1987年的163.28hm2缩减至2008年的162.26hm2。景观多样性指数由1987年的1.36增大2008年的1.91,均匀度指数逐渐变大,由1987年的0.68增大到2008年的0.87;形状指数由1987年的43.07增大到2008年的62.84。各景观类型水平变化各具特征,水体的形状指数1987-1993年由27.23降低为27.02,再增加到1998年的27.78,2003-2008年由31.72降到29;泥沙滩地1987—1998年斑块数量明显增加;2003—2008年斑块数量减少,最大斑块面积增大。苔草滩地和芦苇滩地景观破碎化程度在1987—1998年三峡工程建设期有所加大,1998—2004年有所减小,三峡工程运行后的2004—2008年又有所增大。防护林滩地1987—2008的破碎化程度由减小到增大到再增大;面积先后经历了增加、减少到再增加。形状指数先减小,后增大。耕地、林地的面积在三峡工程前后先增大后减小,平均斑块面积明显减小。建设用地斑块数量由1987年的3686块增加到2008年的5028块。
     (2)三峡工程运行前后洞庭湖区湿地生态系统健康时间变化分析
     利用单因子和多因子综合评价法对洞庭湖区湿地进行时间尺度的生态健康评价。结果表明:三峡工程建设前的1987—1998年洞庭湖湿地生态系统健康综合指数CEI为0.2806;建设中的1998—2003年CEI为0.2744;运行后的2003—2008年生态系统健康综合指数CEI为0.2806;依据本文的湿地生态系统健康分类级别,洞庭湖湿地生态系统的健康分级均为疾病(0.2~0.4),即生态系统活力较低,外界压力大,开始退化,但洞庭湖区湿地生态健康退化程度不大,退化速度有所减缓。
     (3)三峡工程运行后洞庭湖湿地生态系统健康空间差异分析
     运用层次分析法和模糊综合评判法,比较三峡工程运行五年后的2008年东洞庭湖区湿地、南洞庭湖区湿地、西洞庭湖区湿地生态健康状况,分析其空间上的差异。结果表明:东洞庭湖区湿地生态系统健康度为0.2515,西洞庭湖区湿地生态健康度为0.2478,南洞庭湖区湿地生态系统健康度为0.2208,东、西、南洞庭湖区湿地生态系统健康都属于第Ⅲ等级(0.2~0.4),2008年东洞庭湖区湿地生态系统健康状态最好,其次为西洞庭湖区湿地,南洞庭湖区湿地的生态健康状态略微差些。
     (4)三峡工程对洞庭湖区湿地景观格局及生态健康的影响
     三峡工程对洞庭湖区湿地景观格局的影响因主要表现为水沙、水文、泥沙淤积、湿地演替和土地利用等改变引起湿地景观格局相应的变化。三峡工程运行对洞庭湖区湿地生态系统健康状况的主要影响有:荆江三口断流时间延长,干扰了水生生物的传递环境;湿地生态环境功能脆弱,生物多样性呈减少趋势;丰水期洪涝灾害仍然频发,枯水期旱害连年;洞庭湖区水面缩小,水上航运功能退化。
Dongting Lake is located in the southern bank of the middle reach of Yangtze River, and Three Gorges Project(TGP) is the largest water conservancy project of Yangtze River. Based on the use of methods and technology of Landscape Ecology, Remote Sensing, Management Science, Mathematics and Computer Science, this paper aimed to compare the characteristics of landscape pattern changes of Dongting Lake Wetland before and after the operation of TGP, and tried to evaluate establish evaluation index system of the wetlands ecosystem health from the view of Landscape Ecology, furthermore, evaluated the health of Dongting Lake Wetland from the perspective of temporal and spatial variation. The content and major conclusions in this paper included:
     (1)The changes of landscape pattern in Dongting Lake wetland before and after the operation of TGP.
     Based on the six periods remote sensing data in the studied area (1987-2008), this paper analyzed the characteristic changes of landscape pattern of Dongting Lake Wetland by employing Markov, and the three main periods divided by before construction of TGP (1987-1998), under constructing of TGP (1998-2003), after operation of TGP (2003-2008). It turned out that degree of fragmentation of landscape increased significantly in research area, presented as the number of plaque had increased and the density of plaque had risen. During1987-2008, the number of plaque had increased from0.61to0.76per square kilometers, the average plaque area had decreased from163.28to162.26per hectare, landscape diversity index had increased from1.36to1.91, evenness index had increased from0.68to0.87, shape index had increased from43.07to62.84. The level change of each landscape type had its characteristics. The shape index of water had decreased from27.23to27.02since1987to1993, then risen to27.78in1998, and decreased from31.72to29since2003to2008. During1987-1998the plaque number of sediment had increased significantly, and decreased during2003-2008, and the largest plaque area had increased. The degree of landscape fragmentation of sedge bottomland and reed bottomland had increased from the year of1987to1998during the construction of TGP, decreased during1998-2004, and increased again during2004-2008after the operation of TGP. The degree of landscape fragmentation of shelter forest had experienced from decrease to increase to increase again, its area had experienced from increase to decrease to increase again, and its shape index had experienced from decrease to increase. The area of cultivated land and forest land had experienced from increase to decrease, and the average plaque area decreased significantly before and after the construction of TGP. In1987-2008, the number of construction land plaque had increased from3686to5028.
     (2) An analysis on the duration of Dongting Lake wetland ecosystem health before and after the operation of TGP.
     This study evaluated the ecosystem health condition of Dongting Lake Wetland on a temporal series by employing single-factor and multi-factor comprehensive evaluation methods. The result showed that the Composite Evaluation Index (CEI) of the ecosystem health condition of Dongting Lake Wetland during1987-1998(before the construction of TGP) was0.2806, and the CEI was0.2744during the construction period of1998-2003, and0.2806in the period of2003-2008(after the TGP was finished). Based on the classification of wetland ecosystem health condition cited in this paper, the health condition of Dongting Lake wetland ecosystem was all sickness (CEI:0.2-0.4), the ecosystem had low dynamism, suffered from great pressure, and leading to a degradation of the ecosystem. The degree of the degradation of Dongting Lake Wetland was not severe, and the speed of degradation was slowing down.
     (3) An analysis on the spacial variation of Dongting Lake Wetland ecosystem health after the operation of TGP.
     Analyzed the spacial variation by employing analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, this study compared the wetland ecosystem health condition among the East, South and West Dongting Lake after the operation of TGP in2008. The result showed:the wetland ecosystem health index of the East Dongting Lake was0.2515, the West Dongting Lake0.2478, and the South Dongting Lake0.2208. All of these three members indicated in heath condition Level III (0.2-0.4), and the ecosystem health condition of the East Dongting Lake wetland was the best, and the ecosystem health condition of the West Dongting Lake wetland was a little worse.
     (4) The influences of TGP on Dongting Lake wetland landscape pattern and ecological health.
     The influences of TGP on Dongting Lake wetland landscape pattern attribute to mainly sediment process, the succession of wetland hydrology, sediment deposition, and land use change. The main changes of Dongting lake wetland ecosystem health after the operation of TGP presented as: the cutoff time of three water entries of Jingjiang reach extended, the transfer environment of aquatic organisms interferenced, wetland ecological environment vulnerabled, biodiversity decreased, floods frequent in wet season increased, drought in dry season spreaded, water surface area of Dongting Lake decreased, aquatic shipping function degradated.
引文
[1]Abdullah S A, Nakagoshi N. Changes in landscape spatial pattern in the highly developing state of Selangor, peninsular Malaysia [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2005(5):1-13.
    [2]Annette Bar, Jorg Loffler. Ecological process indicators used for nature protection scenarios in agricultural landscapes of SW Norway [J]. Ecological Indicators,2007(7):396-411.
    [3]Aviron S, Burel F, Baudry J, et al. Carabid assemblages in agricultural landscapes:impacts of habitat features, landscape context at different spatial scales and farming intensity [J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment,2005,10(8):205-217.
    [4]Burel F, Baudry J. Habitat quality and connectivity in agricultural landscapes:The role of land use systems at various scales in time [J]. Ecological Indicators,2005(5):305-313.
    [5]Clarke K C, Hoppen S, Gaydos L. A self-modifying cellular automaton model of historical urbanization in the San Francisco Bay area [J]. Environ Plan,1997,24:247-261.
    [6]Collins P E F, Worsley P, Keith-Lucas D M, et al. FloodplCln environmental change during the Younger Dryas and Holocene in Northwest Europe:Insights from the lower Kennet Valley, south central England [J]. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology,2005:1-21.
    [7]DCIyuan Pan, Gerald Domon, Sylvie de Blois, et al. Temporal (1958-1993) and spatial patterns of land use changes in Haut-SCInt-Laurent (Quebec,Canada) and their elation to landscape physical attributes [J]. Landscape Ecology,1999,14:35-52.
    [8]Ernoult A, Tremauville Y, Cellier D, et al. Potential landscape drivers of biodiversity components in a flood plCIn:Past or present patterns [J]. Biological conservation,2006,12(7): 1-17.
    [9]Etter A, Alpine C M, Pullar D, et al. Modelling the conversion of Colombian lowland ecosystems since 1940:Drivers, patterns and rates [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2005,5:1-14.
    [10]Farina A. Principles and methods in landscape ecology [M]. London:Cambridge University Press,1998.
    [11]Forman R T T. Land mosCIcs, the ecology of landscapes and regions [M]. New York: Cambridge University Press,1995.
    [12]Forman R T T, Godron M G. Landscape Ecology [M]. New York:John Wiley & Sons,1986.
    [13]Gardner R H, Mime BT, Turner MG. et al. Neutral models for the analysis of broad-scale landscape patterns [J]. Landscape Ecology,1987,1(3):19-28.
    [14]Haase D, Walz U, Neubert M, et al. Changes to Central European landscapes- Analysing historical maps to approach current environmental issues, examples from Saxony,Central Germany [J]. Land Use Policy,2005:1-16.
    [15]Hoover K A. and Gordon Wolman M. Beyond the semivariogram:Patterns, scale, and hydrology in a semi-arid landscape [J]. Advances in Water Resources,2005,28:885-898.
    [16]Hulshoff R M. Landscape indices describing a Dutch landscape [J]. Landscape ecology,1995, 10(2):101-111.
    [17]IALE. Executive Commitee. IALE mission statement [J]. IALE Bulletin,1998,16(1):1.
    [18]Leonie Seabrook, Clive McAlpine, Rod Fensham. Cattle, crops and clearing:Regional drivers of landscape change in the Brigalow Belt, Queensland, Australia,1840--2004 [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2006(78):373-385.
    [19]Levins R, Awebuch T, Brinkmann U, et al. The emergence of new diseases [J]. American Scientist,1994,82:52-60.
    [20]Loehle C, Wigley T B, Rutzmoser S, et al. Managed forest landscape structure and avian species richness in the southeastern US [J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2005,21(4): 279-293.
    [21]Naveh Z, Lieberman A S. Landscape ecology:theory and application [M]. New York: Springer-Verlag,1994.
    [22]Nina Schneeberger, Matthias Burgi, Anna M. Hersperger, et al. Driving forces and rates of landscape change as a promising combination for landscape change esearch-An application on the northern fringe of the Swiss Alps [J]. Land Use Policy,2007(24):349-361.
    [23]O'Neill R V, Krummel J R, Gardner R V, et al. Indices of landscape pattern [J]. Landscape Ecology.1998,1(3):153-162.
    [24]Pickett S T A, Cadenasso M L. Landscape ecology:spatial heterogeneity in ecological systems [J]. Sciences.1995,26(9):331-334
    [25]Sousa J P, Bolger T, Gama M M, et al. Changes in Collembola richness and diversity along a gradient of land-use intensity:A pan European study [J]. Proceedings of the Xith International Colloqutum on Apter Ygota Roune, France,2004:1-10.
    [26]Turner M G. Landscape ecology:the effect of pattern on process [J]. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics,1989,20:171-197.
    [27]Turner M G, Gardner R H. Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology:The analysis and interpretation of Landscape Heterogeneity [M]. New York:Springer-Verlag,1991.
    [28]White R. Engelen G, Uljee I. The use of constrCIned cellular automata for High-resolution modeling of urban landuse dynamics [J]. Environ. Plan,1997(24):323-343.
    [29]Wiens J A, Milne B T. Scaling of'landscape'in landscape ecology, or, landscape ecology from a beetle's perspective [J]. Landscape Ecology,1989(3):87-96.
    [30]Zurlini G, Zaccarelli N, Petrosillo I. Indicating retrospective resilience of multi-scale patterns of real habitats in a landscape [J]. Ecological Indicators,2005(8):177-197.
    [31]曹宇,肖笃宁,赵弈等.近十年来我国景观生态学文献分析[J].应用生态学报,2001,12(3):474-477.
    [32]陈建军,张树文,郑冬梅.景观格局定量分析中的不确定性[J].干旱区研究,2005,22(1):63-67.
    [33]陈康娟,王学雷.人类活动影响下的四湖地区湿地景观格局分析[J].长江流域资源与环境,2002,11(3):219-223.
    [34]陈利顶,傅伯杰,徐建英.基于“源-汇”生态过程的景观格局识别方法-景观空间负荷对比指数[J].生态学报,2003,23(11):2406-2413.
    [35]陈文波,肖笃宁,李秀珍.景观指数分类、应用及构建研究[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(1):121-125.
    [36]丁圣彦,梁国付.近20年来河南沿黄湿地景观格局变化[J].地理学报,2004,59(5):653-661.
    [37]郭丽英,刘彦随,任志远.生态脆弱区土地利用格局变化及其驱动机制分析-以陕西榆林市为例[J].资源科学,2005,27(2):128-133.
    [38]傅伯杰.黄土区农业景观空间格局分析[J].生态学报,1995,15(2):113-120.
    [39]李娇编著.洞庭湖湿地生态系统价值评估[M].长沙:湖南师范大学出版社,2007,2.
    [40]景贵和.景观生态学的若干理论问题[J].地理科学,1989,8(1):6-12.
    [41]侯伟,张树文,张养贞,等.对三江平原挠力河流域50年代以来湿地退缩过程及驱动力分析[J].自然资源学报,2004,19(6):725-731.
    [42]胡志斌,何兴元,江晓波,等.岷江上游典型时期景观格局变化及驱动力初步分析[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(10):1797-1803.
    [43]李哈滨,Franklin J F.景观生态学:生态学领域里的新概念框架[J].生态学进展.1988,5(1):23-33.
    [44]李秀珍,布仁仓,常禹,等.景观格局指标对不同景观格局的反应[J].生态学报,2004,24(1):123-124.
    [45]李秀珍.从第十五届美国景观生态学年会看当前景观生态发展的热点和前沿[J].生态学报,2000,20(6):1113-1115.
    [46]邬建国.景观生态学:格局、过程、尺度与等级[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2000,78.
    [47]肖笃宁,苏文贵,贺红士.景观生态学的发展和应用[J].生态学杂志,1989,7(6):43-.48.
    [48]肖笃宁.景观生态学研究进展[M].长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,1999,15.
    [49]肖笃宁.景观生态学的理论、方法及应用[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1991,27.
    [50]肖笃宁,李晓文,王连平,等.辽东湾滨海湿地资源景观演变与可持续利用[J].资源科学,2001,23(2):31-36.
    [51]肖笃宁,李秀珍,常禹,等.景观生态学[M].北京:科学出版社,2003,56.
    [52]张明.区域土地利用结构及其驱动因子的统计分析[J].自然资源学报,1999,14(4):381-384.
    [53]张秋菊,傅伯杰,陈利顶.关于景观格局演变研究的几个问题[J].地理科学,2003,3:264-270.
    [54]赵羿,李月辉.实用景观生态学[M].北京:科学出版社,2001,21.
    [55]马克明,孔红梅,关文彬,等.生态系统健康评价:方法与方向[J].生态学报,2001,21(12):2106-2116.
    [56]崔保山.杨志峰.湿地生态系统健康研究进展[J].生态学杂志,2001,20(3):31-36.
    [57]卢金友,黄悦,宫平.三峡工程运用后长江中下游冲淤变化[J].人民长江,2006,37(9):55-58.
    [58]杨永兴.国际湿地科学研究的主要特点进展与展望[J].地理科学进展,2002,21(2):111-120.
    [59]陈利顶,傅伯杰.黄河三角洲地区人类活动对景观结构的影响分析[J].生态学报,1996,16(4):337-344.
    [60]刘桃菊,陈美球.鄱阳湖区湿地生态功能衰退分析及其恢复对策探讨[J].生态学杂志.2001.20(3):74-77.
    [61]王崇浩,韩其为.三峡水库建成后荆南三口洪道及洞庭湖淤积概算[J].水利水电技术,1997,28(11):16-19
    [62]崔保山,杨志峰.湿地生态系统健康的时空尺度特征[J].应用生态学报,2003,14(1):121-125.
    [63]Karr JR. Biological integrity:a long-neglected aspect of water resource management[J]. EcologicalApplications,1991,1(1):66-84.
    [64]Costanza R, Norton B G, Hashell B D. Ecosystem Health:new Goals forEnvironmentManagement[M]. Washington,D. C.:Is-land Press,1992:1-75.
    [65]Meyer JL. Stream health:incorporating the human dimension to advance stream ecology [J]. Journal of the North American BenthologicalSociety,1997,16(2):439-447.
    [66]Harvey J. The natural economy [J]. Nature,2001,413 (6855):463.
    [67]ClewellA, Aronson J, W interhalderK. The SER primeron eco-logical restoration[R]. Tucson: SER,2004.
    [68]王树功,周永章,黎夏,等.干扰对河口湿地生态系统的影响分析[J].中山大学学报(自然科学版),2005,44(1):107-111.
    [69]魏文彬.GIS技术支持下的河口湿地生态系统健康评价研究[D].上海:华东师范大学,2007,31-44.
    [70]白军红,王庆改.中国湿地生态威胁及其对策[J].水土保持研究,2003,10(4):247-249.
    [71]滑丽萍,华珞,李贵宝,等.基于全球环境变化的中国湿地问题及保护对策[J].首都师范大学学报(自然科学版),2005,26(3):102-108.
    [72]张娜.生态学中的尺度问题:内涵与分析方法[J].生态学报,2006,26(7):2340-2355.
    [73]邬建国.景观生态学——格局、过程、尺度与等级[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2000,52.
    [74]吕一河,傅伯杰.生态学中的尺度及尺度转移方法[J].生态学报,2001,21(12):2096-2105.
    [75]RapportD, Lee V. Ecosystem health:coming of age in profes-sional curriculum[J].EcoHealth, 2004(Supp):8-11.
    [76]Guntenspergen G R, Peterson SA, Leibowitz S G, et a.l Indi-cators ofwetland condition for the prairie pothole region of theU-nited States [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,2002,78(3):229-252.
    [77]BrownM T, VivasM B. Landscape development intensity index [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,2005,101(1):289-309.
    [78]ReissK C. FloridaWetlandCondition Index fordepressional for-ested wetlands [J]. Ecological Indicators,2006,6(2):337-352.
    [80]Xu F L, Lam K C, Zhao Z Y, et a.l Marine coastal ecosystemhealth assessment:a case study of the Tolo Harbour, HongKong, China [J]. EcologicalModelling,2004,173(4):355-370.
    [81]Pantus F J, DennisonW C.Quantifying and evaluating ecosys-tem health:a case study fromMoreton Bay, Australia [J]. Envi-ronmentalManagement,2005,36(5):757-771.
    [82]Vugteveen P, Leuven R S EW, HuijbregtsM A J, et a.l Redefi-nition and elaboration ofriverecosystem health:perspective for riv-ermanagement [J]. Hydrobiologia,2006,565(1): 289-308.
    [83]蒋卫国.基于RS与GIS的湿地生态健康评价[D].南京师范大学,2003,78.
    [84]孔红梅,赵景柱,姬兰柱,等.生态系统健康评价方法初探[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(4):486-490.
    [85]罗跃初,周忠轩,孙轶.流域生态系统健康评价方法[J].生态学报,2003,23(8):1606-1614.
    [86]WangY K, Stevenson R J, SweetsP R, et a.l Developing and testing diatom indicators for wetlands in the Casco Bay water-shed, Maine, USA[J]. Hydrobiologia,2006,561(1):191-206.
    [87]MayerPM, Galatowitsch SM. Assessing ecosystem integrity of restored prairiewetlands from species production-diversity rela-tionships [J]. Hydrobiologia,2001,443(1):177-185.
    [88]Sharma R C, Rawat J S. Monitoring of aquatic macroinverte-brates as bioindicator forassessing the health ofwetlands:a case study in theCentralHimalayas, India [J].Ecological Indicators,2009,9(1):118-128.
    [89]Pergent-MartiniC, PergentG.Aremarine phanerogams a valua-ble tool in the evaluation ofmarine trace-metal contamination:example of the Mediterranean Sea? [J]. International Journal ofEnvironmental Pollution,2000,13(1-6),126-147.
    [90]Bhattacharya B, Sarkar S K, Das R. Seasonal variations and in-herent variability of selenium in marine biota of a tropicalwet-land ecosystem:implications for bioindicator species [J]. Eco-logical Indicators,2003,2(4):367-375.
    [91]MontefalconeM.Ecosystem health assessmentusing theMediter-ranean seagrassPosidonia oceanica:a review [J].Ecological In-dicators,2009,9(4):595-604.
    [92]Walker J, ReuterD J. Indicators ofCatchmentHealth:a technical perspective [M]. Melbourne: CSIRO publishing,1996.
    [93]张晓萍.杨勤科,李锐.流域“健康”诊断指标:一种生态环境评价的新方法[J].水土保持通报,1998,18(4):57-62.
    [94]Bertram P, Stadler-SaltN. Selection of indicators for great LakesBasin ecosystem Health: Version 4 [C]//State of the LakesEcosystem Conference, Chicago, USA, March,2000.
    [95]赵臻彦,徐福留,詹巍,等.湖泊生态系统健康定量评价方法[J].生态学报,2005,25(6):1466-1474.
    [96]俞小明,石纯,陈春来,等.河口滨海湿地评价指标体系研究[J].国土与自然资源研究,2006(2):42-44.
    [97]CROWE A.Millennium Wetland Event Program with Abstracts[M].Quebec,Canada:Elizabeth MacKay,2000:1-256.
    [98]吴晓琴.福建省河口湿地生态环境评价:以九龙江河口湿地为例[D].厦门:福建师范大学, 2005:1-50.
    [99]武海涛,吕宪国.中国湿地评价研究进展与展望[J].世界林业研究,2005,18(4):49-53.
    [100]李日志.鄱阳湖湿地生态系统的综合评价模型研究[J].江西农业学报,2004,16(2):25-32.
    [101]李建国.白洋淀湿地水环境安全评价研究[D].河北保定.河北农业大学.2005:1-46.
    [102]万洪秀,孙占东,王润.博斯腾湖湿地生态脆弱性评价研究[J].干旱区地理,2006,29(2):248-254.
    [103]杨一鹏,蒋卫国,何福红.基于PSR模型的松嫩平原西部湿地生态环境评价[J].生态环境,2004,13(4):597-600.
    [104]代勇,李景保,刘正.三峡水库运行后洞庭湖湿地生态系统服务功能价值评估[J].资源开发与市场.2011,27(12),1104-1106.
    [105]袁军,吕宪国.湿地水文功能评价的多级模糊模式识别模型[J].林业科学,2006,42(6):1-6.
    [106]任海,邬建国,彭少麟.生态系统健康的评估[J].热带地理,2000,20(4):310-316.
    [107]李文华,赵景柱.生态学研究回顾与展望[M].北京:气象出版社,2004:319-335.
    [108]蒋卫国.基于RS和GIS的湿地生态系统健康评价:以辽河三角洲盘锦市为例[D].江苏南京:南京师范大学,2003:1-62.
    [109]崔保山,杨志峰.吉林省典型湿地资源效益评价研究[J].资源科学,2001,23(5):55-61.
    [110]李波,苏岐芳,周晏敏,刘哲人.扎龙湿地的生态环境评价及防治对策[J].中国环境监测,2002,18(3):33-37.
    [111]何池全,崔保山,赵志春.吉林省典型湿地生态评价[J].应用生态学报,2001,12(5):754-756.
    [112]周林飞,谢立群,周林林,等.灰色聚类法在湿地水体富营养化评价中的应用[J].沈阳农业大学学报,2005,36(5):594-598.
    [113]张万军,阴三军,王六基等.河南省湿地生态环境评判模型研究[J].河南林业科技,2000,20(2):10-14.
    [114]林茂昌.基于RS和GIS的闽江河口湿地生态环境质量评价[D].福建厦门:福建师范大学,2005:1-57.
    [115]VADAS R G,GARCIA L A,LABADIE J W.A methodology for water quantity and quality assessment for wetland develop[J].Water Science Technology 1995,31(8):293-300.
    [116]崔丽娟.湿地价值评价研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2001,67.
    [117]许建民.黄河三角洲(东营市)湿地评价与可持续利用研究[D].北京:中国农业科学院,2001:1-190.
    [118]吴炳方,黄进良,沈良标.湿地的防洪功能分析评价:以东洞庭湖为例[J]地理研究,2000,19(2):189-193.
    [119]崔丽娟,张曼胤.扎龙湿地非使用价值评价研究[J].林业科学研究,2006,19(4):491-496.
    [120]陈增奇,陈飞星.李占玲,等.滨海湿地生态经济的综合评价模型[J].海洋学研究,2005,23(3):47-55.
    [121]申锐莉,鲍征宇。颜萍.美国湿地功能评价方法[J/OL].2005(8):1-8.
    [122]Cole C A.The assessment of herbaceous plant cover in wetlands as an indicator of function[J]. Ecological Indicators,2002,2(3):287-293.
    [123]Moctezuma-Malagon A, Gonzalez-EsquivelC E, De la Lanza-Espino G, et a.l A methodology for evaluating the sustain-ability of inland wetland systems [J].Aquaculture Internationa,2008,16(6):525-537.
    [124]Weinstein P. Human health Is harmed by ecosystem degrada-tion, but does intervention improve it? A research challengefrom the millennium ecosystem assessment [J]. EcoHealth,2005, 2(3):228-230.
    [125]申德轶,衷平.生态健康评价在湿地管理中的应用[J].湿地科学与管理,2008,4(3):30-33.
    [126]刘红玉.中国湿地资源特征、现状与生态安全[J].资源科学,2005,27(3):54-60.
    [127]郑建蕊,蒋卫国,周廷刚等.洞庭湖区湿地景观指数选取与格局分析[J].长江流域资源与环境2010,(19)3:305-609.
    [128]湖南省政协经济科技委员会.三峡工程与洞庭湖关系研究.[M].长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,2002,310-344.
    [129]张斌.湿地应对气候变化贡献大[N].湖南日报,2010-3-5.
    [130]万月华.洞庭湖湿地的生态环境及保护对策的研究[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2004:1-198.
    [131]李倩.三峡工程对洞庭湖生态环境的影响[D].长沙:湖南大学,2005:1-236.
    [132]曾敏学,张鸿.东洞庭湖成省级生态文明教育[N].岳阳晚报,2010-2-5.
    [133]聂芳容,弘征,王胜利.洞庭湖及其湿地保护对策[J].岳阳职业技术学院学报,2007,22(1):36-39.
    [134]翟金良,何岩,邓伟.向海国家级自然保护区湿地功能研究[J].水土保持通报,2002,22(3):5-9.
    [135]王克林.洞庭湖湿地景观结构与生态工程模式[J].生态学杂志.1998,17(6):28-32.
    [136]傅伯杰等.景观生态学原理及应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2001,10.
    [137]傅伯杰,吕一河,陈利顶,苏常红,姚雪玲,刘宇.国际景观生态学研究新进展[J].生态学报,2008,28(2):798-804.
    [138]麦少芝,徐颂军,潘颖君.PSR模型在湿地生态系统健康评价中的应用[J].热带地理,2005,25(4):317-381.
    [139]张秋菊,傅伯杰,陈利顶.关于景观格局演变研究的几个问题[J].地理科学,2003,23(3):264-270.
    [140]CNAPMANHP, H P, CHEETHAM J L. Monitoring and modeling saturation as a Proxy Indicator for in situ preservation in wetland:A GIS based approach [J].journal of Archaeological Science,2002,29(3):277-289.
    [141]邬建国.景观生态学:格局、过程、尺度与等级(第二版)[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2007.
    [142]曹宇,欧阳华,肖笃宁等.额济纳天然绿洲景观变化及其生态环境效应[M].地理研究,2005,24(1):130-139.
    [143]傅伯杰,陈利顶.景观多样性的类型及其生态意义[J].地理学报,1996,51(5):454-462.
    [144]彭建,王仰麟,张源等.土地利用分类对景观格局指数的影响[J].地理学报,2006,61(2):157-168.
    [145]余果.近60年洞庭湖水沙演变特征及其影响因素.湖南师范大学[D].2012,5.
    [146]何用,李义天,吴道喜等.水沙过程与河流健康[J].水利学报,2006,37(11):1354-1359.
    [147]李景保,张磊,帅红等.基于水过程变化下洞庭湖区的生态效应分析.热带地理,2012,32(1):16-22.
    [148]高桂芹.东平湖湿地生态系统健康评价研究.山东师范大学[D].2006,113-117.
    [149]林波.湿地生态系统健康评价方法及应用.中国林业科学研究院[D].2010,117.
    [150]胡国华.黄河泥沙对CODMn的实验研究[J]..人民黄河,2000,22(3):17-18.
    [151]尹辉,杨波,李景保,等.近60年洞庭湖泊形态与水沙过程的互动响应.地理研究,2012,31(3):471-483.
    [152]李景保,何林福,钟一苇.三峡水库运行对洞庭湖水文生态系统的影响.2012.11第二届中国湖泊论坛文集(水利篇):52-62.
    [153]李红怲,徐德平.洞庭湖“四大家鱼”资源变化特征及原因分析[J],内陆水产,2008,(6):33-36.
    [154]谢云辉.洞庭湖保护刻不容缓[J],大自然,2007,(5):62-66.
    [155]刘娜.洞庭湖区景观格局变化及其调蓄功能影响研究.[D].湖南农业大学,2011.1-20
    [156]马明国,曹宇,程国栋.干早区绿洲廊道景观研究——以金塔绿洲为例[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(12):1624-1628
    [157]石军南,徐永新,刘清华.洞庭湖湿地保护区景观格局变化及原因分析[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2010.
    [158]朱晓荣.基于RS、GIS技术的洞庭湖湿地景观变化研究.[D].北京林业大学,2008.
    [159]陈端吕,李季平,董明辉.环洞庭湖区森林景观研究的思考[J].生态经济,2007.
    [160]史小丽,秦伯强.长江中下游地区湖泊的演化及生态特性[J].宁波大学学报(理工版),2007,20(2):221-226.
    [161]杜刚,付必涛,凌峰.基于MODIS的洞庭湖芦苇湿地范围研究[J].计算机与数字工程,2005,1(33):32-34.
    [162]杜森尧,胡圣国.洞庭湖湖州资源演变及开发探讨[J].湖泊科学,1993,5(4):198-205.
    [163]施修瑞,夏薇,杨彬.洞庭湖冲淤变化分析(1956-1995)[J].湖泊科学,1999,11(3):199-201.
    [164]高俊峰,张深,姜加虎等.洞庭湖的冲淤变化和空间分布[J].地理学报,2000,56(3):269-277.
    [165]黄进良.洞庭湖湿地的面积变化与演替[J].地理研究,1999,18(3):297-304.
    [166]梁守真等.洞庭湖区湿地景观变化分析[J].中国生态农业学报,2007,15(6):171,174.
    [164]谢永宏,陈心胜等.三峡工程对洞庭湖湿地植被演替的影响[J].农业现代化研究,2008,29(6):684-687.
    [167]赵淑清,方精云,陈安平等.洞庭湖区近50年土地利用/覆盖的变化研究[J].长江流域资源与 环境,2002,11(6):536-542.
    [168]彭佩钦,蔡长安,赵青春等.洞庭湖区的湖坑农业、洪涝灾害与退田还湖[J].国土与自然资源研究,2004,1(2):65-69.
    [169]刘志强.洞庭湖区洪涝灾害及防洪减灾对策分析[D].武汉:武汉大学,2004:33-39.
    [170]李景保,邓铬金.洞庭湖滩地围垦及其对生态环境的影响[J].长江流域资源与环境,1993,2(4):340-346.
    [171]李矿明,李喜保,卢立等.洞庭湖湿地生态系统及其评价[J].中南林业调查规划,1999,18(3):43-47.
    [172]邓学建,米小其,牛艳东等.洞庭湖杨树林及原生湿地生态环境中鸟类的群落结构[J].农业现代化研究,2008,29(1):108-111.
    [173]Rapport DJ, Evolution of indicators of ecosystem health[J]. In:Daniel H, Mckenzie D,Hyatt E, et al. Ecological indicators[C]. Barking:Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd.,1992,121-134.
    [174]何池全,崔保山,赵志春.吉林省典型湿地生态评价[J].应用生态学报,2001,12(5):754-756.
    [175]蒋卫国,李京,李加洪,谢志仁,王文杰.辽河三角洲湿地生态系统健康评价[J].生态学报,2005,25(3):408-414.
    [176]蒋卫国,潘英姿,侯鹏,李雪,季维,郑建蕊.洞庭湖区湿地生态系统健康综合评价[J].地理研究,2009,28(6):1665-1672.
    [177]袁军,吕宪国.湿地功能评价研究进展[J].湿地科学,2004,2(2):153-160.
    [178]崔保山,杨志峰.湿地生态系统健康的时空尺度特征[J].应用生态学报,2003,14(1):121-125.
    [179]崔保山,杨志峰.湿地生态系统健康评价指标体系1.理论[J].生态学报,2002,22(7):1005-1011.
    [180]R.W.Dawson,Fuliu Xu, et al.An ecosystem health index methodology(EHIM) for lake ecosystem health assessment[J]. Ecological Modeling.Volume 88, Issues2-4,2005:327-329.
    [181]D.A.Albert,D.Mine. Plants as regional indicators of Great Lakes coastal wetland health [J]. Aquat.Eeosystem Health Manage.2004,(7):233-247.
    [182]美国环境保护局近海监测处.河口环境监测指标[M].北京:海洋出版社.1997:112-143.
    [183]蒋卫国,李京,李加洪,谢志仁,王文杰.辽河三角洲湿地生态系统健康评价[J].生态学 报,2005,25(3):408-414.
    [184]蒋卫国,潘英姿,侯鹏,李雪,季维,郑建蕊.洞庭湖区湿地生态系统健康综合评价[J].地理研究,2009,28(6):1665-1672.
    [185]刘永,郭怀成,戴永立,陆轶峰.湖泊生态系统健康评价方法研究[J].环境科学学报,2004,24(4):732-729.
    [186]殷会娟,冯耀龙.河流生态环境健康评价方法研究[J].中国农村水利水电.2006,(4):55-57.
    [187]袁军,吕宪国.湿地功能评价两级模糊模式识别模型的建立及应用[J].林业科学,2005,41(4):1-6.
    [188]崔保山,杨志峰.湿地学[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2006,26.
    [189]王根绪,钱鞠,程国栋.区域生态环境评价(REA)的方法与应用—以黑河流域为例[J].兰州大学学报(自然科学版),2001,37(2):131-139.
    [190]侯锐,刘恒,钟华平,耿雷华.基于P-S-R模型的水电工程生态效应评价指标体系构想[J].云南水力发电,2006,22(2):4-6
    [191]刘明华,董贵华.RS和GIS支持下的秦皇岛地区生态系统健康评价[J].地理研究,2006,25(5):930-938.
    [192]Myneni R. B, Ganapol B. D.,Asrar G. (1992). Remote sensing of vegetation canopy photosynthetic and stomatal conductance efficiencies [J].Remote Sensing of Environment, 42:217-238
    [193]Haxwall M.A., Myers Yong T,etal.A framework for an ecosystem integrity reportcard [J]. Bioscience,1999,49:543-556.
    [194]王莲芬,许树柏.层次分析法引论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1990:5-18.
    [195]徐建华.现代地理学中的数学方法(第二版)[M].高等教育出版社.2002:224.
    [196]李永建.拉鲁湿地生态环境质量评价的景观生态学方法研究[D].成都:四川大学,2002:56-62.
    [197]张富玲.基于3S技术湿地生态系统健康评价研究[D].西宁:青海师范大学硕士论文,2011.
    [198]刘晓丹.基于遥感图像的湿地生态系统健康评价——以大沽河河口湿地为例[D].青岛:中国海洋大学硕士论文,2006.
    [199]罗新正,朱坦,孙广有.松嫩平原大安古河口湿地的恢复与重建[J].生态学报,2003,23(2)244-250.
    [200]王丽学,李学森,窦孝鹏等.湿地保护的意义及我国湿地退化的原因与对策[J].中国水土保持,2003(7):8-9.
    [201]王薇.黄河三角洲湿地生态系统健康综合评价研究[D].2007,20-37.
    [202]王一涵.基于RS与GIS的洪河地区湿地生态健康定量评价[D].首都师范大学,2011,74-78.
    [203]周德民,宫辉力,胡金明,赵魁义.三江平原淡水湿地生态系统景观格局特征研究——以洪河湿地自然保护区为例[J].自然资源学报,2007,22(1):86-96.
    [204]聂芳容.三峡工程与洞庭湖[M].长沙:湖南人民出版社,2001.89
    [205]李海彬.三峡工程运行对洞庭湖湿地资源影响研究.[D].长沙:长沙理工大学,2008,10.
    [206]湖南省水利水电勘测设计研究院.湖南省洞庭湖区“平烷行洪、退田还湖、移民建镇”二至五年水利规划报告[R].长沙:湖南省水利水电勘测设计研究院,2000.110-138
    [207]周跃云.洞庭湖区旅游业发展的初步研究[J].湖南师范大学自然科学学报,2002,25(2):93-96.
    [208]庄大昌,欧维新,丁登山.洞庭湖湿地退田还湖的生态经济效益研究[J].自然资源学报,2003.12(5):535-542.
    [209]周宏春,王毅,于秀波等.长江中游退田还湖与可持续发展[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2002:10-15,20-36,132-135.
    [210]卜跃先,王文清,欧伏平等.洞庭湖区湿地生态环境及其保护对策.国土开发与整治,[J]2001,11(9):59-64.
    [211]方凯,李利强,田琪.洞庭湖水环境质量特征和发展趋势[J].内陆水产,2003,(4):26-28.
    [212]王克林,刘新平.长江中游平原湖区农业开发地域分工与农产品专业化生产[J].长江流域资源与环境,1994,3(4):342-348.
    [213]王克林.洞庭湖区湿地生态功能退化与避洪、耐涝高效农业建设[J].热带地理,1999,19(2):130-136.
    [214]庄大昌,丁登山,董明辉等.洞庭湖平原退田还湖区湿地生态功能建设初探[J].世界地理研究,2002,11(2):107-112.
    [215]李景保,朱翔,蔡炳华等.洞庭湖区湿地资源可持续利用途径研究[J].自然资源学报,2002,17(3):387-392.
    [216]谢炳庚,李晓青.湖南洞庭湖区湿地的利用和保护研究[J].国土与自然资源研究,1996,(2):25-31.
    [217]谢炳庚,董明辉,李晓青等.洞庭湖湿地自然保护区规划的基本问题[J].常德师范学院学报,2001,26(6):36-39.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700