用户名: 密码: 验证码:
杀虫剂对龙眼角颊木虱田间种群毒理及对天敌瓢虫的安全性研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
不同地理种群的龙眼角颊木虱对杀虫剂敏感性存在明显差异,对同一种药剂,福州种群的敏感性高于仙游种群,这与两地种群的乙酰胆碱酯酶(ACHE)、羧酸酯酶(CarE)活力存在显著差异相关,但与谷胱甘肽S-转移酶(GSTs)活力差异无关或相关性较小。同一地理种群龙眼角颊木虱的不同虫态对药剂的敏感性有明显差异,对同一种药剂,龙眼角颊木虱若虫的敏感性随着虫龄的增加而降低,与不同龄期若虫之间的AChE、CarE、GSTs活力存在显著差异相关,成虫的AChE、CarE活力显著高于若虫,但GSTs活力低于若虫。
     同一种杀虫剂对龟纹瓢虫LC_(50)大于对四斑月瓢虫的LC_(50),对龟纹瓢虫与龙眼角颊木虱的毒力选择指数(天敌LC_(50)害虫LC_(50))大于四斑月瓢虫。以毒力选择指数进行安全性分析评价,吡虫啉、噻虫嗪、氟虫腈对天敌瓢虫的安全性最高,阿维菌素和高效氯氰菊酯次之,三氟氯氰菊酯、溴氰菊酯、氰戊菊酯、甲氰菊酯对天敌瓢虫的安全性较低,毒死蜱的安全性最低。在龙眼角颊木虱1、2龄若虫期进行化学防治对天敌瓢虫的选择性较高,可以更好地保护天敌瓢虫。
     龟纹瓢虫和四斑月瓢虫对龙眼角颊木虱的日捕食量都是随着猎物密度的增加而增加,捕食功反应均符合HollingⅡ型圆盘方程。在相同猎物和密度条件下,四斑月瓢虫对龙眼角颊木虱的日捕食量大于龟纹瓢虫,该2种天敌瓢虫对龙眼角颊木虱成虫在10头·瓶~(-1)、20头·瓶~(-1)猎物密度条件下的日捕食量差异不显著(p>0.05),其它处理,差异均达极显著水平(p<0.01)。2种天敌瓢虫对龙眼角颊木虱成虫的日捕食量小于若虫,对若虫的日捕食量都是随着虫龄的增加而减少。
     杀虫剂亚致死剂量降低龟纹瓢虫、四斑月瓢虫对猎物的捕食量,但不会影响捕食功能反应模型,只是模型参数发生变化,对猎物的瞬时攻击率a下降,处理时间T_h延长,寻找效应S降低.氟虫腈对龟纹瓢虫的捕食功能影响大于对四斑月瓢虫,其它几种杀虫剂对四斑月瓢虫的影响大于对龟纹瓢虫。
     从杀虫剂对天敌瓢虫和害虫的毒力、毒力选择指数及亚致死剂量对瓢虫捕食功能的影响等进行综合分析,吡虫啉、噻虫嗪、氟虫腈、阿维菌素、高效氯氰菊酯对2种天敌瓢虫的控害效能影响较小,安全性较高,三氟氯氰菊酯、溴氰菊酯、氰戊菊酯、甲氰菊酯、毒死蜱对天敌瓢虫控害效能影响较大,安全性低。
The studies on susceptibility of Cornegenapsylla sinica from different sites in Fujian province to insecticides were conducted.The results indicated that the Cornegenapsylla sinica in Fuzhou orchard performed more susceptible to insecticides than those in Xianyou county orchard.The different susceptibilities of C.sinica to insecticides between Fuzhou and Xianyou orchard correlated with the activities of acetylcholinesterase(AChE)and carboxylesterase(CarE),but there were not prominent correlation with the activity of glutathione-s-transferase(GSTs).In the same orchard,the different phase of C.sinica showed notable different susceptibility to a same insecticide. To a same insecticide,the susceptibility of nymph of C.sinica in the same orchard was descended as the instar increased.The discrepancy were mainly associated with the activities of ACHE,CarE,GSTs.Compared to the nymph of C.sinica,the activities of ACHE,CarE of adult performed more than that of nymph,but the activity of GSTs reversed.
     The toxicity and selective toxicity ratio of different insecticides to Propylaea japonica(Thunberg)and Chilomenes quadriplagiata Swartz were studied.It indicated that the LC_(50)of a same insecticide to P.japonica were more than that of C. quadriplagiata,and the selective toxicity ratio also did.Analysis on the toxicity and selective toxicity ratio of different insecticides to predatory ladybirds.The results showed that the imidacloprid,thiamethoxam and fipronil performed lower toxicity but higher selective toxicity ratio to predatory ladybirds,the insecticides of avermectin and alphacypermethrin taked the second place,but cyhalothrin,deltamethrin,fenvalerate, fenpropathrin and chlorpyrifos performed the higher toxicity but lower selective toxicity ratio.The chlorpyrifos performed the lowest selective toxicity ratio among all the experiment insecticides.Furthermore,the selective toxicity ratio of a same insecticide to 1-2~(nd)instar nymph of C.sinica and predatory ladybirds were higher than that of 3-4~(th) instar nymph and adult did.The toxicity test of insecticides to C.sinica and predatory ladybirds could instruct the pests control in Longan orchards.
     The functional response of P.japonica and C.quadriplagiata to C.sinica conformed to the model of HollingⅡ.In the same prey density of the same instar nymph or adult, the larger of predatory quantity,higher sudden attacking rate and lower handle time of C.quadriplagiata compared to the P.japonica were observed.Except on the prey density of 10 and 20 pests per bottle of adult of C.sinica,there were significant discrepancy(p<0.01)of predatory quantity between P.japonica and C.quadriplagiata. The predatory quantity sequence of ladybirds to different development phase of C.sinica were 1-2~(nd)instar nymph,3-4~(th)instar nymph and adult,respectively.
     Sublethal doses of insecticides could reduce the predatory quantity of ladybirds to C. sinica.The studies revealed that the functional response of ladybirds which pretreated with sublethal doses of insecticides were still conformed to the model of HollingⅡ,just only the parameters of model had atlered,the alteration showed that sudden attacking rate "a",handle time "T_h" and the searching efficiencies "S" were reduced.But different insecticides performed different effects on the fuctional response.Except fipronil,a same insecticide performed more severe effects on C.quadriplagiata than P.japonica.
     Integrated analysis on the effects of different insecticides on the predatory ladybirds from aspect of toxicity,selective toxicity ratio and the sublethal doses effected on the functional response.It showed that the insecticides of imidacloprid,thiamethoxam, fipronil,avermectinhad and alphacypermethrin performed more safety and less adverse effects on P.japonica and C.quadriplagiata,but the insecticides of cyhalothrin, deltamethrin,fenvalerate,fenpropathrin and chlorpyrifos performed the less safety and more severe adverse effects on the two kinds of predatory ladybirds.
引文
[1]白栋梁.龙眼角颊木虱发生规律调查研究[J].福建热作科技,1996,21(3):21-22.
    [2]蔡道基,江希流,蔡玉琪.化学农药对生态环境安全评价研究.农村生态环境,1986,(2):9-13.
    [3]陈欣,唐建军,王兆骞.农业活动对生物多样性的影响.生物多样性,1999,7(3):234-239.
    [4]陈元洪,黄玉清,胡启勇,等.龙眼角颊木虱的防治药剂筛选试验[J].福建果树,1998,4:16-17.
    [5]陈元洪,胡启勇,林党恩.龙眼、荔枝主要病虫害及综合防治对策[J].福建农业科技,1999,2:26.
    [6]陈元洪,胡奇勇,黄玉清,等.三角新小卷蛾生物学及防治研究[J].福建农业学报,1999,14(3):15-18.
    [7]陈志杰,张淑莲,张美荣,等.陕西玉米害螨发生与生态控制对策[J].植物保护学报,1999,26(1):7-12.
    [8]蔡道基.农药环境毒理学研究[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1999.
    [9]程燕,周军英,单正军,等.国内外农药生态风险评价的研究综述[J].农村生态环境,2005,21(3):62-66.
    [10]邓国荣,贤振华,李伟群,等.三角新小卷蛾生物学及防治[J].广西农学报,2002,(增刊):173-175.
    [11]邓国荣,杨皇红,陈德扬,等.龙眼荔枝病虫害防治图册[M].南宁:广西科学技术出版社:1998:1-4.
    [12]段金花,张润杰.六斑月瓢虫对菊小长管蚜的捕食作用[J].昆虫学报.2004,47(2):213-218.
    [13]杜相革,严毓骅.苹果园混合覆盖植物对害螨和东亚小花蝽影响[J].中国生物防治,1994,10(3):114-117.
    [14]丁岩钦.昆虫种群数学生态学原理及应用[M].北京:科学出版社.1980.256-262.
    [15]丁岩钦.论害虫种群的生态控制[J].生态学报,1993,13(2):99-106.
    [16]范永占,何明忠.龙眼角颊木虱生物学特性及防治研究初报[J].福建果树,1986,(1):23-24
    [17]傅和玉.农药的生态安全特性指标Q方程的研究[J].昆虫知识,2001,38(4):296-299.
    [18]郭莹.荔枝蝽卵平腹小蜂寄生效应的研究[J].武夷科学,2000,16:19-121.
    [19]顾中言,韩丽娟,黄祥麟,等.氰戊菊酯导致棉蚜种群暴涨的生态机制分析[J].江苏农业学报,1995,11(1):21-27.
    [20]盖英萍,冀宪领,刘玉升,等.异色瓢虫对中国梨木虱若虫的捕食作用[J].植物保护学报,2001,28(3):285-286.
    [21]郭玉杰,王念英.农药对天敌安全性的测定方法[J].中国生物防治,1995,11(4):174-177.
    [22]戈峰,丁岩钦.龟纹瓢虫对棉蚜的捕食行为[J].昆虫学报,1995,38(4):436-441.
    [23]高孝华,时爱菊,曲耀训,等.龟纹瓢虫捕食棉蚜功能反应与寻找效应的研究[J].山东农业大学学报(自然科学版),2001,32(4):457-460.
    [24]黄剑,吴文君.小菜蛾抗药性研究进展[J].贵州大学学报(自然科学版),2003,20(1):97-104.
    [25]胡奇勇,陈元洪,占志雄,等.龙眼角颊木虱发育起点温度和有效积温的研究[J].广西农业生物科学.1999,18(4):278-280.
    [26]黄明度,麦秀慧.荔枝蝽象卵寄生蜂-平腹小蜂的生物学及其应用的研究[J].昆虫学报, 1974,17[4):362-372.
    [27]黄建,黄邦侃,黄常青.荔枝、龙眼梢果蛀虫及主要种类记述[J].华东昆虫学报,1998,7(1):25-28.
    [28]黄玉清,张晓俊,魏辉,等.桃蛀螟及天敌的初步研究[J].江西农业大学学报,2000,22(4):523-525.
    [29]黄居昌,陈家骅,王良咸,等.几种杀虫剂对荔蝽平腹小蜂的影响[J].福建农学院学报,1992,21(3):294-298.
    [30]黄居昌,陈家骅,李金景,等.2种拟除虫菊酯对荔蝽平腹小蜂的毒力[J].福建农学院学报,1993,22(3):317-320.
    [31]海云.攀西地区龙眼主要害虫的发生规律及综防对策[J].中国南方果树,2003,32(5)39-40.
    [32]何明忠,钟秋珍.龙眼角颊木虱的形态发生与综合治理[J]福建果树,2002,19-20.
    [33]黄保宏,邹运鼎,毕守东,等.几种杀虫剂对梅园捕食瓢虫捕食功能的影响[J].南京农业大学学报,2007,30(4):66-70.
    [34]黄振,任顺祥,姚松林.淡色斧瓢虫对烟粉虱捕食作用[J].应用生态学报,2006,17(10):1928-1932.
    [35]孔建,王海燕,赵白鸽,等.苹果园主要害虫生态调控技术体系研究[J].生态学报,2001,21(5):789-794.
    [36]冷欣夫,唐振华,王荫长.杀虫药剂分子毒理学及昆虫抗药性[M].1996,北京:中国农业出版社.
    [37]冷欣夫,邱星辉.我国昆虫毒理学50年来的研究进展[J].昆虫知识,2000,37(1):24-28.
    [38]林仁魁,郑琼华,陈元洪.龙眼角颊木虱大发生原因及可持续治理对策[J].福建果树,2000(1):28-29.
    [39]李荣幸,钟义海,陈泽坦.几种化学药剂对三角新小卷蛾室内毒力测定[J].农药,2005,44(9):416-417.
    [40]李春光,关瑞峰,黄鹏,等.幼龄龙眼果园昆虫群落结构及其动态[J].福建农林大学学报(自然科学版),2006,35(6):582-587.
    [41]李增跃,黄邦侃.龙眼角颊木虱的初步研究[J].华东昆虫学报,1995,4(2):38-42.
    [42]卢芙萍,赵冬香,卢家兴,等.敌百虫对荔枝蝽几种代谢酶活性影响[J].华东昆虫学报,2007,16(2):119-122.
    [43]梁子宁,张永强.龙眼园节肢动物群落结构及其时空格局[J].生态学报,2007,27(4):1542-1549.
    [44]刘树生.天敌动物对害虫控制作用评估方法及其应用策略[J].中国生物防治,2004,20(1):1-7.
    [45]李梅,何凤琴,邱星辉.家蝇抗药性分子遗传机制[J].寄生虫与医学昆虫学报,2005,12(4):238-244.
    [46]李菁,韩召军.棉蚜对吡虫啉抗药性的初步研究[J].农药学学报2007,9(3):257-262
    [47]李美,孙作文,王金信,等.十一种杀虫剂的亚致死剂量对中华草蛉幼虫结茧的羽化和影响[J].昆虫天敌,2003,25(1):20-23.
    [48]陆庆光.持续农业的关键技术之一-IPM[J].世界农业,1997.2(214):45-46.
    [49]廖冬晴,刘耀成.广西龙眼主要害虫的发生规律及综防对策[J].广西热作科技,1996,2:20-25.
    [50]廖冬晴,袁夫永,刘耀成.荔蝽卵寄生蜂生态位的初步研究[J].广西植保,1999.12(1):1-3.
    [51]刘雨芳,古德祥.荔蝽卵平腹小蜂对寄主的搜索行为[J].中国生物防治,2000,16(1)1-4.
    [52]刘建峰,刘志诚,王春夏.大量繁殖平腹小蜂防荔枝蝽象研究[J].昆虫天敌,1995,17(4):177-178.
    [53]刘树生.害虫综合治理面临的机遇、挑战和对策[J]、植物保护,2000,26(4):35-38.
    [54]刘红,王慧,张兴卫.生态安全评价研究述评[J].生态学杂志,2006,25(1):74-78
    [55]慕立义.植物化学保护研究方法[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1991:154-155.
    [56]庞雄飞,梁广文.害虫种群系统的控制[M].广州:广东科技出版社,1995,5-14.
    [57]潘志萍,李敦松.昆虫抗药性监测与检测技术的研究进展[J].应用生态学报,2006,17(6):1539-1543.
    [58]邱立红,王成菊,邱星辉,等.基因组学与昆虫抗药性研究[J].昆虫知识,2004,41(5):392-396.
    [59]宋慧英,吴力游,陈国发,等.龟纹瓢虫生物学特性的研究[J].昆虫天敌,1988,10(1):22-33.
    [60]宋化稳,慕立义,王金信.13种杀虫剂对龟纹瓢虫及大草蛉毒力的研究[J].农药科学与管理,2001,22(6):17-18.
    [61]沈志成,胡萃,龚和.瓢虫人工饲料的研究进展[J].昆虫知识,1989,5:313-316.
    [62]沈慧敏,张新虎.二点叶螨对氧化乐果、甲氰菊酯、四螨嗪及螨嗪菊酯混剂抗药性[J].植物保护学报,2002,29(3):259-263.
    [63]孙俊萍.我国热带水果区域布局和发展研究[J].中国农业资源与区划,2007,28(3):21-24.
    [64]盛承发,苏建伟,宣维健,等.关于害虫生态防治若干概念讨论[J].生态学报,2002,22(4):597-602.
    [65]苏丽,戈峰,刘向辉.化学防治对不同类型棉田害虫和捕食性天敌群落多样性影响[J].昆虫学报,2002,45(6):777-784.
    [66]唐振华.我国昆虫抗药性研究的现状及展望[J].昆虫知识,2000,37(2):97-103.
    [67]谭仕东,韦金道,兰如新.广西南宁地区龙眼害虫群落结构及其动态研究[J].热带作物学报,1997,18(1):84-91.
    [68]王维专,陈伟平,卢叔勤,等.广州、深圳地区小菜蛾对定虫隆和Bt的抗性监测[J].植物保护学报,1993,20(3):273-276.
    [69]吴珍泉,陈星文,徐祖进,等.龙眼主要害虫卵的新天敌-中华微刺盲蝽[J].福建农业大学学报,1999,28(3):382-383.
    [70]吴梅香,汤玉清.荔枝卵跳小蜂生物学特性的初步研究[J].福建农业大学学报,2000,29(4):482-485.
    [71]吴孔明,刘芹轩.杀虫剂诱使棉蚜再猖獗的研究[J].生态学报,1992,12(4):341-347.
    [72]王小艺,沈佐锐.四种杀虫剂对桃蚜和异色瓢虫的选择毒性及害虫生物防治与化学防治的协调性评价[J].农药学学报,2002,4(1):34-37.
    [73]王洪亮,王丙丽,李朝伟.害虫综合治理研究进展[J].2006,河南科技学院学报,2006,34(3):40-42.
    [74]万方浩,叶正楚,郭建英,等.我国生物防治研究进展及展望[J].昆虫知识,2000,37(2):65-74.
    [75]王小艺,沈佐锐.亚致死剂量杀虫剂对异色瓢虫繁殖力的影响[J].应用生态学报,2003,14 (8):1354-1358.
    [76]王巧兰,夏敬华.农业害虫抗药性及治理[J].植物保护,2004,30(6):15-18.
    [77]王小艺,沈佐锐.亚致死剂量杀虫剂对异色瓢虫捕食作用的影响[J].生态学报,2002,22(12):2278-2283.
    [78]邢嘉琪,李丽英.荔枝蝽象卵寄生蜂-平腹小蜂体外培育研究[J].昆虫学报,1990,33(2):166-173.
    [79]谢钦铭,梁广文,曾玲.几种常用农药对荔枝蝽卵跳小蜂毒性[J].江西科学,2006,24(3):235-237.
    [80]谢钦铭,梁广文,曾玲.菊酯类杀虫剂对二种荔枝蝽卵寄生蜂的毒力的测定[C].走向21世纪的中国昆虫学(中国昆虫学会2000年学术年会论文集),中国科学技术出版社,2000:398-400.
    [81]谢钦铭,梁广文,曾玲.几种生物农药对平腹小蜂的毒性[J].昆虫天敌,2001,23(2):90-92.
    [82]许雄,张敏玲.敌百虫对荔枝蝽平腹小蜂不同发育期毒力测定[J].昆虫天敌,1988,10(3):151-154.
    [83]徐金汉,陈美珍,林授楷,等.龙眼幼果期荔枝蝽的防治指标[J].热带作物学报,2006,27(1):88-91.
    [84]杨朗.龙眼新发生的二种害虫生物学特性及防治技术研究[C].2001,广西大学硕士学位论文.
    [85]杨朗,邓国荣,陈恩海.龙眼长跗萤叶甲成虫田间消长规律及防治[J].植物保护,2003,29(6):17-19.
    [86]尤民生,刘雨芳,侯有明.农田生物多样性与害虫综合治理[J].生态学报,2004,24(1):116-122.
    [87]杨秀清,高希武,郑炳宗.烟粉虱与温室白粉虱羧酸酯酶、谷胱甘肽转移酶和乙酰胆碱酯酶性质比较研究[J].农药学学报,2001,3(4):38-43.
    [88]杨朗,贤振华,邓国荣.几种农药对龙眼长跗萤叶甲毒力测定[J].广西农学报,2002:176-178.
    [89]杨集昆,李法圣.为害龙眼的角颊木虱新属、新种(同翅目:木虱科)[J].武夷科学,1982,2:124-127.
    [90]姚洪渭,叶恭银,程家安.同翅目害虫抗药性研究进展[J].浙江农业学报 2002,14(2):63-70.
    [91]钟少雄.龙眼角颊木虱发生规律与防治的研究[J].华东昆虫学报,1999,8(1):41-46.
    [92]周忠实,邓国荣.龙眼和荔枝卷叶蛾类种群动态及群落结构[J].昆虫知识,2006,43(3):311-315.
    [93]占志雄,邱良妙,林仁魁,等.套种羽叶决明龙眼园节肢动物群落结构与稳定性研究[J].福建农业学报,2005,20(3):149-153.
    [94]周忠实,叶一强,罗淑萍.龙眼、荔枝三角新小卷蛾对敌百虫敏感性测定[J].植物保护,2004,30(1):58-60.
    [95]占志雄,郑琼华,陈元洪,等.龙眼园两种细蛾的研究[J].武夷科学,2003,19:40-44.
    [96]赵景玮.荔枝蝽卵平腹小蜂对寄主的功能反应研究-对经典Ho lling功能反应原理的改良[J].福建农业大学学报,1995,24(1):23-27.
    [97]赵怀玲,赵景玮.不同温度条件下三种常用有机磷杀虫剂对荔枝蝽卵平腹小蜂的毒效试验及毒性比较[J].武夷科学,1999,15:151-155.
    [98]张敏玲,许雄,韩诗畴.用体外培养法测定敌百虫对荔蝽平腹小蜂毒力测定[J].昆虫天敌,1989,11(1):10-11.
    [99]赵怀玲,赵景玮,郭莹.不同温度条件下甲胺磷对荔枝蝽卵平腹小蜂毒效实验[J].福建农业大学学报,1999,28(4):457-460.
    [100]张宝棣.果树病虫害原色图谱[M].广州:广东科技出版社.2001.
    [101]占志雄,陈福如,翁启勇,等.龙眼荔枝病虫害诊断与防治原色图谱[M].北京:金盾出版社.2004.
    [102]赵白鸽,严毓骅,段建军.从苹果园植被多样化看叶螨天敌群落自然控制的生态效应[J].昆虫天敌,1993,15(1):22-27.
    [103]张英键,仓惠.常用农药对棉田捕食性天敌的毒力测定[J].江苏农业科学.1989,(9):22-24.
    [104]张宗炳.杀虫药剂的毒力测定[M].北京:科学出版社,1988
    [105]杨建华.龟纹瓢虫的初步观察[J].昆虫知识,1983,20(5):215-217
    [106]杨崇珍,王兴林,张兴.几种农药对瓢虫的安全性评价[J].农药科学与管理,1998,4:24-26.
    [107]朱三荣,高峰,刘向辉,等.龟纹瓢虫在棉株上对棉蚜的搜索与捕食行为[J].应用生态学报,2006,17(2):261-264.
    [108]朱福兴,王金信,刘峰,等.瓢虫对杀虫剂的敏感性研究[J].昆虫学报,1998,41(4):359-365.
    [109]朱福兴,王金信,刘峰,等.常用杀虫剂对苹果黄蚜、龟纹瓢虫的毒力及其选择性测定[J].植物保护学报,1998,25(1):93-94.
    [110]赵修复.害虫生物防治(第三版)[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1999.
    [111]邹运鼎.几种瓢虫的生活史及人工饲养[J].生物学通报,2000,35(6):10-12.
    [112]周忠实,邓国荣.广西三角新小卷蛾等龙眼卷叶蛾的综合治理[J].果树学报2006,23(2):304-306.
    [113]Bugg R L,Waddington C.Using cover crops to manage arthropods pests of orchards:a review[J].Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment,1994,50(1):11-28.
    [114]Bradford M M.A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of migrogran quantitives of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding.Annual.Biochem,1976,72:248-254.
    [115]Biddinger D J,Hull LA.Sublethal effects of selectived insecticides on growth and reproduction of a laboratory susceptible strain of tufted apple bud moth(Lepidoptea:Tortricidae).J Econ Ent,1999,92(2):314-324.
    [116]Bartlett,B.R.Outbreaks of two-spotted spider mites and cotton aphids following pesticide treatment I.Pest stimulation vs.national enemy destruction as the cause of outbreaks,J.Econ,Entomol.1968,61(1):297-303.
    [117]ChenZ H,HanZ J,Li FL,et al.Development declining of resistance indiamondback moth,Plotellaxylostella L.resistant strains selected by dimehypo and cartap[J].Entomol Sinica,1995,2(4):345-352.
    [118]Crofr B A & Brown A B.Response of arthropod natural enemies to insecticides.Ann.Rev.Entomol.,1975,20:285-336.
    [119]Denholm I,Devine G J,Williamson M S.Insecticide resistance on the move.Science,2002,297(5590):2222-2223.
    [120]Finny D.J.Probit Analysis.London:Cambridge University Press,1971.333.
    [121]Hassell M P.A population model for the interaction between Cyzenis albicans and Operophtera brumata at Wytham Berkshire[J].J Anim.Ecol.38:567-576.
    [122] Hassell M P,V arley G C. N ew induction population model fo r insect parasites and its bearing on bio logical control[J ]. Nature, 1969,223: 1113-1137.
    [123] Heinrichs E. A. Resurgence of Nilaparvata lugens (Stal) population as influenced by method and timing of insecticides applications in Lowland rice environ. Entomol, 1982,11(1):78-84.
    [124] Holling G S. Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. Can Entomol, 1959,91:385-398.
    [125] Hemingway Janet, Ranson Hilary.Insecticide resistance in insect vectors of human disease-Annual Review of Entomology. 2000,45:371-391.
    [126] Kogan M. Integrated pest management:historical perspecrives and contemporary developments[J]. Annual Review of Emomology, 1998, 43: 243-270.
    [127] Luck R F. Chemical insect control-a troubled strategy.Bioscience, 1977, 27:606-611.
    [128] Lee CY, Yap HH , Chong NL.1998. Sublethal effects of deltamethrin and propoxur on longevity and reproduction of German cockroaches , Blattella germanica. Ent Ex p A ppl, 1998,89 (2): 137-145.
    
    [129] Melander A. L. Can insects become resistance to spray[J]. i.Econ.Entomol. 1914,7:167.
    [130] Nakamuta K. Switchover in searching behavior of ladybeetle Coccinella septempumctata L. (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) cause by prey consumption. Appl Ent Zool, 1982, 17 :501-506.
    [131] Pimentel D, Culliney T W, Buttler I W, et al. Low—input sustainable agriculture using ecological management practices[J]. Asric Ecosystems Environ, 1989, 27(1-4): 3-24.
    [132] Pimentel D, Acquay H,Biltonen M, et al. Environmental and economic costs of pesticide use[J]. Bio Science, 1992,42(10): 750-760.
    
    [133] Solomn M E. The natural control of animal populations. J Anim Ecol, 1949,18: 1-35.
    [134] Tabashnik B E & Crofr B A.Managing pesticides resistance in ceop-arthropod complexes: interactions between biological and operational factors. Environmental Entomology, 1982, 11: 1137-1144.
    [135] Yu S. J., Nguyen. N.. Detection and biochemical characterization of insecticide resistance in the diamondback moth. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology. 1992, 44: 74-81.
    
    [136] Yu S. J., Hsu E. L. Induction of detoxification enzymes in phytophagous insects:roles of insecticide synergists, larval age and species. Arch.Insect Biochem.Physiol.. 1993,24(1):21-23.
    
    [137] Zhao J. Z., Hild A L., Collins H . L.,et al.. Development and Characterization of Diamondback Moth Resistance to Transgenic Broccoli Expressing High Levels of Cry1C .Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2000, 66(9): 3784-3789.
    [138] Zhao J. Z, Li Y. X.. Collins H L et al. Monitoring and characterization of Diamondback moth(Lepidoptera:Plutellidae)resistance to spinosad. J. Econ.Entomol. 2002,95 (2):430-436.
    [139] Zhang Z B.Effects of agricultural chemicals on farmland Ecosystem(1).Journal of Ecology, 1988, 7 (3): 25-29.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700